IR 05000206/1986005
| ML13323B110 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 02/27/1986 |
| From: | Phelan P, Wagner W, Thomas Young NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML13323B109 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-206-86-05, 50-206-86-5, 50-361-86-06, 50-361-86-6, 50-362-86-06, 50-362-86-6, NUDOCS 8603180299 | |
| Download: ML13323B110 (8) | |
Text
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION V
Report No /86-05, 50-361/86-06 and 50-362/86-06 Docket No, 50-361arid,'50-362 License No DPR-13, NPF-10 and NPF-15 Licensee,: Southern California Edison Company P 0. Box>800-2244. Walnut, Grove Averiu Rosemead'California '9177,6 Facility Name:. San Onofre Units 1-,
2 and 3 Inspection at:
San Onofre, San Cemente, California Inspection conid d:
February-14, 1986 Inspectors:
t P. H. Phelan, Reactor Inspector Date Signed w'B. Wagner/ Reactor Insp o
Da e S3-gned Approved By:
T. Young, Jr., C ef, En ie ring Section Date Signed Summary:
Inspection on February 10-14, 1986 (Report Nos. 50-206/86-05, 50-361/86-06.and 50-362/86-06)
Areas Inspected: Routine unannounced inspection by regional based inspectors of activities associated with Audits, Records, Fire Protection, and licensee action on inspector identified item NRC Inspection Procedures 39701B, 40702, 64704, 92701 and 30703 were covered during this inspection. The inspection involved 70 inspector-hours by two NRC inspector Results:
No violations or deviations were identifie PDR ADOCK 05000206
DETAILS Persons Contacted Southern California Edison Company
- D. Schone, Site QA Manager
- K. Slagle, Manager, Material and Administration
- R. Tye, Supervisor, Fire Protection
- W. Robinson, QA Engineer
- C. Kergis, Lead Compliance Engineer
- G. Gibson, Supervisor, Compliance
- D. Barreres, Supervisor, Emergency Preparedness
- R. Richter., Engineer, Emergency Preparedness
- S. Hunn, Supervisor of CDM Site Operations
- J. Grosshardt, QA Engineer
- S. Foglio, Station Enginee *F. Briggs, Station Technician J. Kahrs, CDM Center Supervisor L. Baugher, CDM Coordinator R. Retana, Codes QA Engineer
.T. Sturteuant,.Senior Captain, Fire Protection Services D. Peacor, Manager, Emergency Preparedness D. Ensminger, Engineer, Emergency Preparedness T. Dack, QA Engineer
- Denotes those individuals attending exit meeting of February 14, 198.
Licensee Action on Previously Identified Items (Closed) Unresolved Item No. 50-361/84-34-01 "Disposition of Weld Indication" The inspector reviewed the licensee's.evaluation.and disposition of a weld indication identified in an inconcel transition field weld 10-505-06 (ISI Weld No. 02-14-002). The evaluation, performed in accordance with the rules of Article IWB-3500 of ASME Section XI, determined the discontinuity indication to be acceptable for continued servic Threason given for detection of this indication, which was not previously identified,.was that current technique utilized improvement in the "state -of-the-art" ability to detect, characterize and size discontinuitie The licensee plans on monitoring this indication for the next three -fuel cycles to determine if any increase in size occur This Item is close (Closed) Inspectfi6n Open Item 50-206/84-16-09 "Fire Protection Design/Document Review'
The inspector reviewed the revisions to the licensee's procedures to process proposed facility hane packages and for handling design
change packages for SONGS 1, 2 and 3. The procedural changes appear adequate to assure that a qualified fire protection engineer reviews plant modification This change will assure that any modifications which affects a unit's fire protection program are included in the design change reviews and will be properly documented. The inspector reviewed a cross section of Proposed Facility Changes to assure that the revised procedures were being properly implemente This item is close (Closed) Inspection Open Item 50-206/85-11-02 "Functional Test of Fire Dampers" NFPA Code 90 recommends that dampers be checked annually by removing
.the link and ensuring the dampers close against air flo Previously, the plant procedures and Technical Specifications stated that the functional test of the fire dampers was a visual inspectio Procedures SO1-X111-57, February 10, 1986, and SO 23-X111-57, February.13, 1986, 18 Month Fire Rated Assembly Inspection, have both been revised.to incorporate removing the fusible link when.performing the functional test. During the inspection'of the.dampers this will be done to at least 10% of the listed dampers in Units'.2 and 3, and 100% of the dampers listed in Unit This item is close (Closed). Inspdction Open Item 50-361/84-22-01 "Fire Protection Design/Document Review Refer to 2.b of this repor This item is close (Closed) Inspection Open Item 50-361/85-11-02 "Functional Test of Fire Dampers" Refer to 2.c of this repor This item is close (Closed) Inspection Open Item 50-362/84-22-01 "Fire Protection Design/Document Review" Refer to 2.b of this repor This item is close (Closed) Inspection Open Item 50-362/85-10-02 "Functional Test of Fire Dampers" Refer to 2.c of this repor This item is close '3
Fire Protection Documents Reviewed a. 'Fire Hazard Analysis SO 123-XIII-12, Control of Ignition Sources,, March 13, 1985 SO 123-XIIt'-13, Weekly Inspection for the Control of Combustibles and Transient Fire Loads-, January-14, 1986
' SO 123-XIII-52, Monthly Portable Fire Extinguisher Inspection SO 123-XIII-54, Monthly Fire Hose Station Inspection,. December 30,.
1985 SO 123-GAD-3, Site Housekeeping and Cleanliness Control, October 10, 1985 SO 123-XVI-2.0, Storage of Gas Cylinders Fire Department Training The fire brigade is.made up of an independent fire department dedicated to fire fighting, as well as,.other site emergencies such as hazardous chemicals and medical aid. 'Their training is divided up into thfee phases; classroom instruction, practice sessions and periodic refresher training on shift. Each month, all members receive training in at least twenty different subjects ranging from fire fighting to first aid. The training records were reviewed to verify that all members were present for, and received,.monthly training.: The inspector witnessed an unannounced fire drill which required *a full turn out of the shift member All members seemed well versed in their responsibilities and dutie No violations or 'deviations were' identifie.
Fire Protection Inspections/Surveillances The inspector observed instances where fire extinguishers were allowed to remain in the plants after being identified"as unsatisfactory,- in some cases, for periods of up to.four month The inspector was informed that these discrepancies hadbeen previously identified. The root cause of the.problem being a lack of administrative controls to 'hold individuals responsible for replacing the extinguishers. A change was made-to incorporate explicit.data 6n.the extinguisher exchange.sheets including type,"size, identification number and by whom it was installed. "A comparison of the monthly extinguishers surveillance sheets will show if any -extinguisher was mistakenly left in the plants. A cross.'check of'the extinguisher exchange sheet indicates the responsible party. The revisions to the program 'have.been in place since the first of this yea The implementation and program effectiveness will be evaluated during a later inspection.,
All other areas of the. fire protecion inspection and surveillance program appeared adequat No violations dr deviations were identifie. Plant Tour.- Fire Protection The inspector conducted an in-depth tour of all three units with the following.result Combustible Materials Unit 1 was in the middle of an outage; a large portion of the plant had some type of construction or modification activity. The amount of transient combustibles was high. The-weekly fire surveillance identified thbse combustibles that were unauthorized or posed a hazard. immediate action was taken in 'these cases. No unauthorized combustibles..were identified in Units 2& Hot Work The inspector,observed numerous areas in Unit 1 where "hot work" was in progress. 'In each pase a valid hot work permit was authorized and posted..A fire wafth was posted, all nearby communications and suppressfon -systems were inplace and functiona Housekeeping
-
w Combustible waste aterial and.rubbish were removed from the work areas as,rapidly sprac icable. Appropriate trash containers were provkded for oily rags and other combustible material. The, housekeeping in Units 2&3 were adequat d ir' Protection Systems Fire hoses, extinguishers, suppression devices and other-equipment irfside the units were examined.- The extinguishers were properly sealed and labeled,.hoserstations were in good order, and all other equipment appeared to be well maintaine No violations-or deviations were identifie.
Audit Program The inspector reviewed the licensee's corporate quality assurance program relating to audits of Units-1, 2 and 3 activities to assure that the audit program was in conformance with regulatory. requirements, commitments inthe application, and industry standards. The Topical Quality Assurance Manual (TQAM) sets' forth the policies and.general requirements for establishing and implementing the licensee's quality assurance.program. The scope of the audit program is defined in TQA chapter 1E "Audits"; the audit program -defined in this document is consistent with Section 6 of the Technical.Specifications and Section 17 of the FSAR. Other quality assurance procedures applicable to the audits program are contained.in the Quality Assurance Organization Reference Procedures Manual (QAP).
The following QAP procedures were reviewed by the inspector:
PNer Td l Revision Effective Number Tt le, Number Date N18.04 Quality Assurance Organization Audits
02-03-86
-
Scheduling, Planning, Performance, Documeitation and Follow-up N18.05 Qualification of Quality Assurance
01-21-85 Organization Auditors N18.07 Participation of Technical Personnel
05-06-85 from other Departments on Audit Teams N18.11 Independent Audits
- 2 06-19-85 N18.13 Technical Specification Audits b the Quality Assurance Organization By review of the.above quality assurance program procedures the inspector verified that responsibilities were assigned in writing for the overall management of the audit program including: Determining the adequacy of'the qualifications of audit personne Determining the need for special training of audit personnel and/or inclusion of special expertis *c. Determining the independence of audit personne Ensuring correptive actions taken for deficiencies identified during audit Determining when reaudits are require Issuance of audit reports to managemen Periodic review of the audit program to determine its status and adequac ' Preparation of long-range audit plan The audit program also requires the audited organization to respond to audit findings.within 30 day Distribution-requirements for audit reports and corrective action responses have been defined in the QAP's. Checklists are used in the performance of all audits, however the checklist for Technical Specificatons includes provisions for verification that Technical
'Specification changes have been translated into appropriate procedure No violations or deviations were identifie.
Records Progtam The inspt reviewed the licensee's quality assurance program relating to the control of records 10 -assur% that a records program~has been estabished andimplemented in 'conformance with regulatory requirements, commitments, inthe.FSAR, and industry standard This involved a review of the types'qfrecords rquired to-be maintained, record storage controls, records retention 'and verification that responsibilities for these areas-have been assigned. TQAM Chapter 1-D "Document Management" contains the corporatepolicy and requirements for the records program responsibilities for these activitie Records to be Maintained The requirements and provisions to maintain the types of records identified in Section 6.10 of the Technical Specifications, Section 17.2.17 of the FSAR, and ANSI N45.2.9 are contained in Department Procedure CDM 26-8-14 "Receipt, Control and Retrieval of Records at SONGS 1, 2 & 3", Revision 9 of August 18, 198 Records Storage Record storage controls are provided in Department Procedure CDM 26-8-1 "Storage of Original Records/Documents at CDM SONGS",
Revision 7 of December.21,-198 The inspector reviewed this storage procedure to assure that provisions were established which, as a minimum, accomplished the following:
(1) *Describes the records storage facilit (2) Designates a supervisor in charge of the storage facilit f(3)
Describes the filing system use (4) A method for verifying that the records received are in agreement with the transmittal document and that the records are legibl (5) Rules for.governing access to files and maintaining accountability of records removed from the storage facilit Provisions for.correcting or filing supplemental information and disposing of superceded records is-contained in.procedure CDM 26-8-45 "Corrections/Additions to Records in CDM Files", Revision 5 of December 3, 198 The required review and approval for these activities is also specified. The' CDM supervisor has been assigned the responsibility for assuring that the record storage controls be properly implemente Record Retention The inspector interviewed the CDM Supervisor regarding retention period controls. Provisions have been established and responsibilities assigned to assure that record retention
requirements identified in Section 6.10 of the Technical Specifications are being met. This includes retention periods of records not covered by the FSAR or Technical Specification Implementation The inspector selected.records for Unit 1, 2 and 3 from the same cateogry in order to assure that records maintenance for all units is in accordance with the administrative controls identified in The following type of records were selected:
inservice inspection (ISI), startup test records, QA audit reports, personnel.training, control.operators-log books, receiving inspection, maintenance activities,"and reportable occurrences (LER's). These records were selected to assure that the records were listed on an index; that the index, which is a computerized data base with on-line search capability called STAIRS (Storage and Information Retrieval System),
identifies record retention times, storage locations and location with storage area; records are readily retrievable and properly stored." The Unit 1 ISI records were not available to the inspector during'this inspection. There.appeared to be some confusion concerning whether or not the.ISI records were submitted to CDM, and if..so, whether theoriginating organization can provide the necessary information to CDM to retrieve the record The location and maintenance of ISI records for Unit 1 will be reviewed during a later inspection (Unresolved Item No. 50-206/86-05-01).
The inspector conducted a tour of the records storage area and found the environmental conditions, such as temperature and humidity, and the fire prevention suppression systems to be as described in the Technical Specifications and-ANSI N45. No violations or deviations were identifie.
Exit Meetin The inspectors met with licensee management representatives denoted in paragraph 1 on February 14, 198 The scope of the inspection and the inspector's findings as noted in this report were discussed.