ML101470089

From kanterella
Revision as of 18:06, 22 August 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Limerick, Units 1 and 2, Request for Additional Information Regarding Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Power Uprate
ML101470089
Person / Time
Site: Limerick  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 06/03/2010
From: Bamford P J
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Pardee C
Exelon Nuclear
Bamford, Peter J., NRR/DORL 415-2833
References
TAC ME3589, TAC ME3590
Download: ML101470089 (4)


Text

I'EG UNITED STATES 01' NUCLEAR REGULATORY

!:J .L ... WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001

<[ 0 .... ;c <Jl 't";; June 3, 2010 ****-l<Mr. Charles President and Chief Nuclear Exelon 4300 Winfield Warrenville, IL LIMERICK GENERATING STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 -

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY RECAPTURE POWER UPRATE (TAC NOS.

ME3589 AND ME3590)

Dear Mr. Pardee:

By letter dated March 25, 2010 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML 100850380), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) proposing to revise the operating license and technical specifications for Limerick Generating Station (LGS), Units 1 and 2. This LAR proposes to implement an increase of approximately 1.65% in rated thermal power from the current licensed thermal power limit of 3458 megawatts thermal. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has been reviewing the response and has determined that additional information is needed to complete its review. The specific questions are found in the enclosed request for additional information (RAI). The questions were sent via electronic transmission on May 13, 2010, to Mr. Kevin Borton, of your staff. The draft questions were sent to ensure that the questions were understandable, the regulatory basis for the questions was clear, and to determine if the information was previously docketed.

The draft questions were discussed in a teleconference with your staff on May 26, 2010, and several minor wording changes were made to make portions of the RAI more understandable. It was agreed that a response to this RAI would be submitted by June 30, 2010. Please contact me at 301-415-2833, if you have any questions.

Sincerely, Peter Bamford, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 1-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353 As cc w/encl:

Distribution via Listserv UNITED NUCLEAR REGULATORY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION LIMERICK GENERATING STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY RECAPTURE POWER UPRATE REQUEST DOCKET NOS. 50-352 AND 50-353 By letter dated March 25, 2010 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML 100850380), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) proposing to revise the operating license and technical specifications for Limerick Generating Station (LGS), Units 1 and 2. This LAR proposes to implement an increase of approximately 1.65% in rated thermal power from the current licensed thermal power limit of 3458 megawatts thermal. The increase would be based on the improved flow measurement accuracy which would be achieved through the utilization of ultrasonic feedwater flow meters. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has been reviewing the submittal and has determined that additional information is needed to complete its review. Attached to the March 25, 2010, letter was a report by General Electric (GE)-Hitachi Nuclear Energy, NEDC-33484P, titled "Safety Analysis Report for Limerick Generating Station Units 1 and 2 Thermal Power Optimization," Revision 0, dated March 2010. A non-proprietary version of this report (NEDO-33484, same title) is available at ADAMS Accession No. ML 100850403. Section 3.4, "Flow Induced Vibration," of NEDC-33484P and NEDO-33484, notes, in part, that main steam (MS) and feedwater (FW) piping will experience about a 4%

increase in vibration levels due to increased flow velocities for Thermal Power Optimization (TPO) uprate conditions, and asserts that: "...the MS and FW lines vibration will remain within acceptable limits during TPO." The reports do not document the implementation of a vibration surveillance program during TPO to confirm this assertion. In the application dated March 25, 2010, Exelon states that the effects of the uprate request have been evaluated using an approach developed by GE-Hitachi and documented in 32938P-A, "Licensing Topical Report I Generic Guidelines and Evaluations for General Electric Boiling Water Reactor Thermal Power Optimization," Revision 2, May 2003. A non-proprietary version of this report (NEDO-32938, same title) is available at ADAMS Accession No. ML023170607.

Appendix K, "Methods and Assumptions for Piping Evaluation of TPO Uprate," of NEDC-32938P-A and NEDO-32938 notes, in part, that: "[f]or plants whose licensing basis

-2includes the results of main steam line and/or FW line vibration measurements taken during startup testing, the effects of power uprate on vibratory displacements will also be included." Further, the NRC staff notes that Table 3.9-7, "Non-NSSS

[nuclear steam supply system] Piping Systems Power Ascension Testing," of the LGS Updated Final Safety Analysis Report documents both dynamic transient and steady-state vibration tests for the MS and FW piping systems during plant startup. Please indicate how the assessment of the effects of power uprate on the vibratory displacements of the MS and FW lines has been performed and if the predicted vibratory displacements will be validated after the new TPO full power level is reached. If validation after startup is not planned, please discuss why it is not needed.

RAI2 Section 3.5.2, "Balance-of-Plant Piping Evaluation," of NEDC-33484P and NEDO-33484 notes, in part, that "[f]or the MS system piping outside containment, the turbine stop valve (TSV) closure transient was reviewed against conditions that bound operations under TPO." Please indicate how the TSV closure transient has been reviewed for the TPO, and if this review considered the results of any testing of the TSV closure transient conducted during ortqtnal plant startup. Section 6.7, of NEDC-33484P and NEDO-33484, "Fire Protection," states that "...There is no change in the physical plant configuration and the potential for minor changes to combustible loading as result of TPO uprate... " The staff requests the licensee to summarize any changes to the combustible loading, however minor, and discuss the impact of these changes on the plant's compliance with the fire protection program licensing basis, Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 50 (10 CFR 50.48), or applicable portions of 10 CFR 50, Appendix R. RAI4 Section 6.7, of NEDC-33484P and NEDO-33484, "Fire Protection," states that "...the fire shutdown analysis includes consideration of equipment needed to achieve and maintain hot shutdown, fire barriers, operator manual actions, personnel resources, and repair activities credited to achieve and maintain cold shutdown ... " The staff requests the licensee to verify that (1) the measurement uncertainty recapture (MUR) power uprate will not require any new operator actions; (2) any effects from additional heat in the plant environment from the increased power will not prevent required post fire operator manual actions, as identified in the LGS, Units 1 and 2, fire protection program, from being performed at and within their designated time; and (3) procedures and resources necessary for systems required to achieve and maintain shutdown will not change and are adequate for the MUR power uprate. Some plants credit aspects of their fire protection system for other than fire protection activities (e. g., utilizing the fire water pumps and water supply as backup cooling or inventory for primary reactor systems). If LGS, Units 1 and 2, credit the fire protection system in this way, the MUR power uprate LAR should identify the specific situations and discuss to what extent, if any, the MUR power uprate affects these "non-fire-protection" aspects of the plant fire protection system. If LGS, Units 1 and 2, do not take such credit, the staff requests that the licensee verify this as well.

June 3,2010 Mr. Charles Pardee President and Chief Nuclear Officer Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555 LIMERICK GENERATING STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 -

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY RECAPTURE POWER UPRATE (TAC NOS.

ME3589 AND ME3590)

Dear Mr. Pardee:

By letter dated March 25, 2010 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML 100850380), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) proposing to revise the operating license and technical specifications for Limerick Generating Station (LGS), Units 1 and 2. This LAR proposes to implement an increase of approximately 1.65% in rated thermal power from the current licensed thermal power limit of 3458 megawatts thermal. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has been reviewing the response and has determined that additional information is needed to complete its review. The specific questions are found in the enclosed request for additional information (RAI). The questions were sent via electronic transmission on May 13, 2010, to Mr. Kevin Borton, of your staff. The draft questions were sent to ensure that the questions were understandable, the regulatory basis for the questions was clear, and to determine if the information was previously docketed.

The draft questions were discussed in a teleconference with your staff on May 26, 2010, and several minor wording changes were made to make portions of the RAI more understandable. It was agreed that a response to this RAI would be submitted by June 30, 2010.

Please contact me at 301-415-2833, if you have any questions.

Sincerely, /raJ Peter Bamford, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 1-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/encl:

Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLIC RidsOgcRp Resource LPLI-2 RtF RidsAcrsAcnw_MailCTR Resource RidsNrrDssEmcb Resource AduBouchet, NRR RidsRgn1 MailCenter Resource RidsNrrDorlDpr Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl1-2 Resouce RidsNrrPMLimerick Resource RidsNrrLAABaxter Resource Nlqbal, NRR RidsNrrDraAfpb Resource ADAMS Accession Number' ML101470089

  • concurrence via memo OFFICE LPLI-2tPM LPLI-2/LA EMCB/BC AFPB/BC LPL1-2/BC NAME PBamford ABaxter MKhanna* AKlein* HChernoff (w/comment)

DATE 5127/10 6/1110 04/16/2010 05/12/10 613/10 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY