ML18158A225

From kanterella
Revision as of 00:45, 18 June 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

(OEDO-15-00479) Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - 2.206 Petition Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Current Licensing Basis for Flooding - 60-Day Status Report (CAC No. MF6460; EPID L-2015-CRS-0002)
ML18158A225
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 06/07/2018
From: Booma Venkataraman
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Lochbaum D
Entergy Nuclear Operations
Ventkataraman V, DORL/LPLI-I, 415-2934
References
CAC MF6460, EPID L-2015-CRS-0002, OEDO-15-00479
Download: ML18158A225 (1)


Text

From:Venkataraman, BoomaTo:Dave LochbaumCc:Danna, James; Buckberg, Perry

Subject:

2.206 Petition Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station's Current Licensing Basis for Flooding Day StatusReport (OEDO-15-00479) (CAC NO. MF6460; EPID L-2015-CRS-0002)Date:Thursday, June 07, 2018 10:50:00 AMMr. Lochbaum: In accordance with Management Directive 8.11, "Review Process for 10 CFR 2.206Petitions," I am writing to provide you a status update on your petition submitted inaccordance with 10 CFR 2.206, dated June 24, 2015, regarding the current licensing basison flooding for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (Pilgrim). This e-mail provides a statussince my last update to you on April 9, 2018. In the June 8, 2017, update, I informed you that the issue of reevaluated flooding hazardsraised in your petition is currently being considered by the Commission as part of SECY-16-0142, the mitigation of beyond-design-basis event (MBDBE) draft final rule dated December15, 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16301A005). Furthermore, given the deferral in theclosure of the Pilgrim flood assessments associated with the March 12, 2012, request forinformation and the Commission consideration of the issues raised in your petition as part ofthe MBDBE draft final rule, the petition review board (PRB) determined that theCommission's decision on the MBDBE draft final rule would likely disposition your petition. As such, once the Commission provides direction on this rule, the staff intends to issue aproposed director's decision reflecting the Commission's decision. The NRC staff is awaitingthe Commission's direction on the rule. Sincerely, BoomaBooma Venkataraman, P.E.Acting Branch Chief, NRR/DORL/LPL2-2Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationBooma.Venkataraman@nrc.gov301.415.2934