ML20054K229

Notice of Violation from Insp on 820322-26 & 29-31

ML20054K229
Person / Time
Site:	Browns Ferry
Issue date:	04/29/1982
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20054K225	List: IR 05000259/1982010 ML20054K224 ML20054K227 ML20054K228 ML20054K229
References
50-259-82-10, 50-260-82-10, 50-296-82-10, NUDOCS 8207010317
Download: ML20054K229 (2)

Text

f APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Tennessee Valley Authority Docket Nos. 50-259, 50-260 & 50-296 Browns Ferry 1, 2 and 3 License Nos. DPR-33, DPR-52 & OPR-68 As a result of the inspection conducted on March 22-26 and 29-31,1982, and in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, 47 FR 9987 (March 9,1982), the following violations were identified.

A. 10 CFR 50, Appendix B Criterion XVI and the accepted QA Program Section 17.2.16 require that measures be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality are promptly corrected.

Contrary to the above, measures have not been established to assure that conditions adverse to quality are promptly corrected in that nonconforming conditions placed in the Correction Report.(CAR) system from 1978 through 1931 have not been resolved. Examples include the following CARS: 78-43-0T, 79-41-0T, 81-35-0T, 81-66-0T, 81-74-0T and 81-83-0T. These examples are representative of the problem and are not intended to be all-inclusive.

This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I).

B. 10 CFR 50, Appendix B Criterion V and the accepted QA Program Section 17.2.5 require that activities affecting quality be accomplished in accordance with documented procedures. Implementing procedure QAAS-QAP-3.1, Quality Audit Program, Revision 8, and ANSI N45.2-12, Draft 3, Revision 4, committed to by the accepted QA Program require the audited organization to provide the date when corrective action will be completed.

Contrary to the above, in three out of six audits reviewed by the inspector, the audited organization's response did not provide the expected completion date for each proposed correction action nor did the auditing organization request a supplemental response to provide this missing information. The

, deficient responses involved the following audits: OPQAA-BF-81TS-02,

Findings A1, A2, A6; OPQAA-BF-81TS-05, Finding A2; and OPQAA-CH-8100-05, Finding A15, A16.

This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I).

C. 10 CFR 50, Appendix B Criterion II and the accepted QA Program Section 17.2.2 require that the accepted QA Program be carried out throughout plant life in accordance with written procedures. Section 17.2.10 of the program requires that material receiving inspectors be assigned to the Supervisor, Plant Quality Assurance Staff. This requirement is addressed in the N-0QAM, Part III, Section 2.2 revised March 31, 1981.

t 8207010317 820623 PDR ADOCK 05000259

O PDR

- _ - - _ . . --. - . - _ . - . - - . - .-- --- . ~ , -

. e .

Tennessee Valley Authority 2 Docket Nos. 50-259, 50-260 & 50-296 Browns Ferry 1, 2 and 3 License Nos. OPR-33, DPR-52 & DPR-68 Contrary to the above, Section 17.2.10 of the accepted QA Program and Section 2.2, Part III of the N-00AM are not being carried out in that the implementing site procedure, Standard Practice BF 16.4 revised February 12, 1982, assigns the receipt inspection responsibility to the Power Stores supervisors.

This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement I ).

D. Technical Specification 6.B.6 requires that copies of PORC meeting minutes be sent to the Director of Nuclear Power.

Contrary to the above, as of March 23, 1982, copies of PORC meeting minutes were not being sent to the Director of Nuclear Power.

This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement I).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are hereby required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including: (1) admission or denial of the alleged viola-tions; (2) the reasons for the violations if admitted; (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.

Date: APR 2 91982 l

r i

I i

i