|
|---|
Category:SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT--LICENSING & RELATED ISSUES
MONTHYEARML20198K8331998-12-21021 December 1998
Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 12 to License R-88
ML20155C5421998-10-28028 October 1998
Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 11 to License R-88
ML20134F1421996-10-30030 October 1996
Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 10 to License R-88
1998-12-21
[Table view]
Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20217N7471999-10-18018 October 1999
Ro:On 990923,overpower Operation.Caused by Malfunction in Percent Power Channel.Channel Repaired & Returned to Service on 991007
ML20198K8331998-12-21021 December 1998
Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 12 to License R-88
ML20155C5421998-10-28028 October 1998
Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 11 to License R-88
ML20211H9651997-10-0101 October 1997
Annual Operating Rept for Kansas State Univ Triga Mark II Nuclear Reactor Facility for Period 961001-970930
ML20134F1421996-10-30030 October 1996
Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 10 to License R-88
ML20078A2291995-01-12012 January 1995
Changes in Facility,Procedures & Tests & Experiments for Period 931001-940930,per 10CFR50.59(b)
ML20059D0341993-10-26026 October 1993
Changes in Facility,Procedures & Tests & Experiements for Period 921001-930930,per 10CFR50.59(b)
ML20118D1711992-10-0202 October 1992
Annual Rept for Kansas State Univ Triga Mk II Nuclear Facility for Oct 1991 Through Sept 1992
ML20085D5311991-10-0404 October 1991
Annual Operating Rept for Kansas State Univ Triga Mark II Nuclear Reactor Facility for Oct 1990 to Sept 1991
ML20058B8101990-10-0909 October 1990
Submits Annual Rept for Oct 1989 - Sept 1990.Procedure 21 Re Alpha Particle Assay of Reactor Liquids Revised
ML19325C7861989-10-0909 October 1989
Operating Rept for Oct 1988 - Sept 1989
ML20236B8831989-03-0202 March 1989
Ro:On 890301,as Second to Two Std Control Rods Being Withdrawn,Other Two Rods Automatically Scrammed.Caused by Frayed Wires on Rod Drive Mechanism Resulting in Short Circuit.Electromagnetic Assembly May Be Replaced
ML20205L2581988-10-25025 October 1988
Submits Changes to Facility & Procedures for Oct 1987 to Sept 1988
ML20235Y5371987-10-16016 October 1987
Annual Operating Rept for Oct 1986 - Sept 1987
ML20213G9331986-10-30030 October 1986
Ro:On 861028,while Performing Routine Monthly Surveillance Tests,Alarm Condition in Circuit Activated Visual Annunciation at Police Dept Indicator Panel But Failed to Activate Audible Annunciation.Caused by Dirty Contacts
ML20211B3351986-10-0606 October 1986
Annual Operating Rept Fo Triga Mark II Nuclear Reactor Facility for Oct 1985 - Sept 1986
ML20133H4771985-10-0707 October 1985
Annual Rept of Changes in Facility,Procedures & Experiments, Oct 1984 - Sept 1985
ML20129E7121985-05-23023 May 1985
Ro:On 850522,reactor Operated W/O Continuous Air Monitor Operating.Caused by Monitor Being Manually Switched Off Before Reactor Startup.Breaker Reset
ML20093K1161984-10-0303 October 1984
Annual Operating Rept,Oct 1983 - Sept 1984
ML20085J3761983-10-0707 October 1983
Annual Operating Rept for Oct 1982 - Sept 1983
ML20069H0741982-10-11011 October 1982
Submits List of Facility Procedure Changes,Tests & Experiments for Oct 1981-Sept 1982,per 10CFR50.59(b)
1999-10-18
[Table view] |
Text
. .-
1 1,,
p* n?u i i g t UNITED STATES l
s j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g , WASHINGTON, D.C. 20666-0001
'% *****l '
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION SUPPORTING AMENDMENT NO.11 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. R-88 KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY DOCKET NO. 50-188
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By letter dated August 13,1998, Kansas State University (the licensee) requested that l their security plan be deleted from their license since they have special nuclear material of low strategic significance at the facility.
2.0 EVALUATION l
The license possession limits for spedal nuclear material (SNM) fall within the limits define '
as SNM of Low Strategic Significance (SNMLSS). Since a physical security plan is not required for facilities that possess SNMLSS, the staff finds that deletion of the physical security plan is acceptable. A physical security plan is required for SNMLSS only if the quantity of materialis 10 Leams or more (see 10 CFR 73.67(c)). However the licensee's possession limits are well below this threshold.
The licensee is aware that security requirements for SNM that they possess must be provided in accordance with 10 CFR 73.67(f).
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION
This amendment involves changes in the category of recordkeeping, reporting, and administrative procedures and requirements. Accordingly, this amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(10). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of this amendment.
4.0 CONCLUSION
The staff has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, and (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations and the issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or the health and safety of the public.
Principal Contributor: Theodore S. Michaels Date: October 28, 1998 9811020264 981028 i
PDR ADOCK 05000188 P PDR ,