ML20211D760

From kanterella
Revision as of 16:05, 1 December 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rept Per ASLB Order on Harassment Allegations Re Secret Witness.Witness Unable to Obtain Ofc of Investigation Rept on Secret Witness Allegations.Served on 860609
ML20211D760
Person / Time
Site: Harris Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/06/1986
From: Eddleman W
EDDLEMAN, W.
To:
References
CON-#286-520 82-468-01-OL, 82-468-1-OL, OL, NUDOCS 8606130144
Download: ML20211D760 (1)


Text

bb JV D

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA June 6, 1986 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (served June W es! .. ,,

' '/'

BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD Glenn O. Bright ^'"*'

Dr. Janes H. Carpenter

'qp; ;

James L. Kelley, Chairman In the Matter of

) Docket- 50 400 OL CAROLINA POWER AND LIGHT CO. et al. )

(Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, )

Unit 1) ) ASLBP Ho. 82-h68-01

) OL

Dear Judges Kelley,

Bright and Caroenter:

Pursuant to the Board's Order on Harassment allegations I have contacted Mr. Guild concerning the secret witness. Mr.

Guild informs me that to his knowledge to date (May 31) the witness had been unable to obtain a copy of die OI renort on the secret witness' allegations. B ased on the witness ' exnerience and dealings with OI, the witness evidently does not believe that the NRC will give fair consideration "o the witness' allegations. Also, unless the witness has a cony of the OI repo=t to review, daere would be no way to get the witness' cons ent to use the report under protective order or otherwise, since the witness wants to review the reuort before giving such clearance. Evidentli OI has been usinc O

,$g a wrong address for the witness and there have been substantial 004

$8 delays in contacts for that and possibly odner reasons. ,

$3 Thus Intervenors are unable to pursue this ma tter now. Cat Mk 4q/ ' kui '

I must add that the 30ard 's conclusion that becaus e no gworkers eo 38 cane forward, harassment and intimidation doe s not exist, is no nove n<

5 logically valid as to Har=is than the concl usion tha t if intf aidation SE mAC exists, it is highly effective (so far). My co ntac t wi th plant work,ers who do not wish to be identified indicates the latter. ~)y.'//62byf gellsEdd1'e$dN SY50 3