ML20236L724

Motion for Reopening of Hearing to Place Data in Record & Provide Opportunity for cross-examination of Witnesses on Subjs Raised in Documents

ML20236L724
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	10/16/1970
From:	Eissler F SCENIC SHORELINE PRESERVATION CONFERENCE, INC.
To:	US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML20236J368	List: IA-87-214, Discusses ACRS 92nd Meeting on 671207-09.ACRS Completed Review of PG&E Application for Const of Nuclear Unit at Diablo Canyon Site.Facility Can Be Constructed W/O Risk to Public Health & Safety ML20236J366 ML20236J587 ML20236J622 ML20236J671 ML20236J804 ML20236J841 ML20236J985 ML20236K008 ML20236K057 ML20236K327 ML20236K351 ML20236K384 ML20236K422 ML20236K563 ML20236L228 ML20236L279 ML20236L316 ML20236L364 ML20236L420 ML20236L474 ML20236L565 ML20236L647 ML20236L689 ML20236L706 ML20236L724 ML20236L756 ML20236L787 ML20236L806 ML20236L866 ML20236L901 ML20236L922 ML20236L931 ML20236L986 ML20236M007 ML20236M024 ML20236M065 ML20236M681 ML20236M725 ML20236M744 ML20236M771 ML20236M777 ML20236N015 ML20236N032 ML20236N085 ML20236N115 ML20236N139 ML20236N193 ML20236N208 ML20236N255 ... further results
References
FOIA-87-214 NUDOCS 8708100338
Download: ML20236L724 (3)

Text

--

, i UNITED STATES OF AMERICA --

ATOMIC ENF.RGY COMMISSION 1

In the Matter of ) i

)

PACIPIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY ) Docket No. 50-32, j

)

(Diablo Canyon Unit 2) )

l l

MOTION FOR REOPENING O? HEAT 1ING TO PLACS DATA IN THE RECORD OF l THE DIABLO P30CEEDINGS (1) In "AEC Regulatory Staff Reply to ' Supplemental Statement by Ralph Vrana Concernin6 Testimony of the August 7,1970 Hearing i Before the AEC Board in San Luis Obispo, California 8 and 'neply to the September 4,1970 Statement of Mr. Philip Crane, of PG&E  ;

by Ralph Vrana,'" Staff Counsel asserts that " Conference's 'Supplemen-tal statement,' ' Exhibits' and ' Reply' are clearly in the nature of proffered testimony which should not be included as part of the  !

evidentiary record in this proceeding since the evidentiary record has been closed. If construed as a motion to reopen the record, the AEC regulatory staff (staff) believes that the motion should be 4 denied since the Conference had an adequate opportunity at the l

\

reopened hearing to present its case on the matters in issue."

(2) Conference participated in the reopened hearing under protest I on grounds partly that adequate opportunity was not afforded for preparation of Jts testimony. In view of comments by staff above and the necescity of a compete record as the basis for a wise decision affecting the public health, safety, and welfare, Conference )

applies in this motion for a reopened hearing to place these documents in the record and provide the opportunity for cross-examination of l

witnesses on the subjects raised in these documents. .

l

~

This action is proposed only if a reopened hearing is legally ^'

i i

necessary to place this and subsequent material (See 3 below) on record so that the data are available for review by the Board.

8708100338 070729 PDR FOIA CONNOR87-214 PDR

.2-(3) Also to be covered by this motion are any drrca in Sc:nic Shoreline's submission of September 16 1970 encloced 1:it'. i^ i s motion.

(4) Dr. Jahns has mentioned in his i;estitiony and Pacific repeats (Supplemental Proposed Findings of fact and Conclusions of Law l Submitted by Pacific Gas and Electric Company, September 4,1970, p.6) that " detailed reconnaissance of the entire area was made."

The term " detailed reconnaissance" seems self-contradictory. In j any case, Scenic Shoreline has already requested these studies  ;

I and maps and would like nou to repeat this reque.st, These maps should be publicly available as a basis of cross-examination at a reopened hearing. We requst that your Board require Pacific to l 1

produce these documents.

(5) Scert Shoreline wishes it to be understood that the request .

for a reopened hearing on this restr'cted

. subject area above should not be interpreted as a waiver of our standing request for a full i hearing on the various issues we listed at the lose Board hearing, We wish to reinstate our request for a hearing on those issues as well.

~

D MuAr -

}rederick Eissler

~ cot President Scenic Shoreline Preservation Conference, Inc.

Dated at Santa Barbara, California this 16 day of October, 1970

'"**"*-r- =**w-

• e

.y - ra. w d.. .w..

me!$!K$$$m$$y8y@

if@

.A ngg D.M npa$m=

. m..,. ~..

=

~!i m

z w agn e h enn b%a<&)t$@ g cf p. +y j h ,?( W d h. N, $ .

a,,

w- O s [ w!

g q.~/ 8 ,.

s. . .. s jg 7

, s ,,

Y . bY k% ')

l

_e _

6 .

[w 9$ $,.e$ # m$n%s Q #gs ,c$e% ,1 idM hw u.e .# .

.l

-l .

g'.% v wp&sdMffc

,c y p J.  :.. 3k  :!

bv ii . .r# lU M il' l'.{&.+)f db \ eif $ b% k hk>6 .

Th W

!l Mn I.

h ..'$?

- 9 a. '. ,

Y W l A 1-?L -a m cw% ndk

? ' '

h 7 a% fin

i i  :/Ii d

%a @M(V@[s' .: ,,. t ~y;'.^=7- , _YQ p.ls W!j .D *m a,

~'

• i .

,l i f

.m{.4(%s

. p ,

~ ,. s y y .p, '

't

. /

. s 5

bsi . g ey#R'@;W$$u[~si; i  :

'A. ..w k ki??M s .;

' %u.~ )em f6 e? n, m:fs y!' . - &,u%

o .

~/hky .a .

3 e. -

f a .

[$$g, .ar.;s g/.,,[p ._.jf.kyh,,

,e. f 1 g

~. 3 I'NgM 'kph Qk- Y : (jf Q l ., .

f. .

w, . =., w. ..

m - , .

L &t s

)g - -- -

h.n;\9 kW' ;'. }l g g.

' ' o *

?J .

n 1 l.,

{ [g. . . .f .",gfyI.. . k . k ,

p~ ',;;

-}f

+ .  ; 4. . ')\

J

~h. -' }[. 52 s vh y

,~u csg -

Q 9

) -a n,), w , hy a

.. m 4

e

'i -

$.s ~  ?  ;

.. w .* *c. .. y.g. o.

1

• . , .l.,,,

.e

~*

l

• - ,," ...; " (A. ,j,.,.y .a...r.:...,*

g '

, r.

- .<,n',. . s' ,

h

.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _