ML20236K351

Forwards Supplemental Motion for Reconsideration Including Addidavit of Memorandum to Aslab for Filing in Compliance w/10CFR2.771

ML20236K351
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	07/09/1971
From:	Eissler F SCENIC SHORELINE PRESERVATION CONFERENCE, INC.
To:	US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML20236J368	List: IA-87-214, Discusses ACRS 92nd Meeting on 671207-09.ACRS Completed Review of PG&E Application for Const of Nuclear Unit at Diablo Canyon Site.Facility Can Be Constructed W/O Risk to Public Health & Safety ML20236J366 ML20236J587 ML20236J622 ML20236J671 ML20236J804 ML20236J841 ML20236J985 ML20236K008 ML20236K057 ML20236K327 ML20236K351 ML20236K384 ML20236K422 ML20236K563 ML20236L228 ML20236L279 ML20236L316 ML20236L364 ML20236L420 ML20236L474 ML20236L565 ML20236L647 ML20236L689 ML20236L706 ML20236L724 ML20236L756 ML20236L787 ML20236L806 ML20236L866 ML20236L901 ML20236L922 ML20236L931 ML20236L986 ML20236M007 ML20236M024 ML20236M065 ML20236M681 ML20236M725 ML20236M744 ML20236M771 ML20236M777 ML20236N015 ML20236N032 ML20236N085 ML20236N115 ML20236N139 ML20236N193 ML20236N208 ML20236N255 ... further results
References
FOIA-87-214 NUDOCS 8708070088
Download: ML20236K351 (2)

Text

.,

~

l4 F:titC J'luisi:LIrn: M.SKrtVATION CONICRT.11#.. IllC.,

4623 More Moce Drivo i

Sr,mta Brabara, california 93110 July 9, 1971-(805) 96+-2492 l

..o-,

)

Sect :ts+.?

b U, '.i. I t,omN Energy Cow.aist;1on j

Washin(ton J.C., 20345 j

no; Docket no. 50-323 Pa::$ fic C-ae e.nd Electric Cor.1phny.

j (Diablo Canyon Unit 2) 1

.]j Dear Sirt

.h.clerad f or filing n e the origi2:a1 and 20 c:Lfcemed ce;>ies of i

" Supplemental Motion for Recq;osideration inclutng Affadavit and' Memorandun 1;o the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board '

. by Scenic Eboreline Preservation Conferer.ce, Inc.,in compliance,'

l with 10 CPR 2.771.

j 1

Orighnlly to be sent in summary by Western Urion (on strike) l to port,or.3..icted on the certLficats of cervice, the documents are l

being forwn.ded by airr. nil sp>cial delivery..

l Kindly f.eknowledga receipt of this ir.aterisl iv. the encioned copy of thi:. letter and retur.2 it to me in the enciozed starmsed em i'.cy.

Cordir.0.ly your s l

r.g y

I h&f5f $44 Frederick Eistler President

/ ?gC

'D e

l A [' ' '..

CJ f

j

,.'f..

l - l}

h 3

?*' ^

% Leg e

,.\\

4 t

i g.

=. Agguter.

.,i,,p.,-

a w

sl'l l'

sp l'

B700070008 870729 j

j.

{DR y& 4 E00 b 21

s.W e W l'8"pf.-

e i

j and Atmospheric Adlainistration confirm the validity of this. factor.

It is cur con riction that the Bocrd has no choice but' to deny the-licence at, thiu time pending review of this new evidence. The company, the cl.i'.rchelders, and the ratepsyere would cuffer enor: nous j

i expenso if con? deration of th'is redesign data here pcstponed until the operatirg Ticense stage when errors of construction were. find in j

concrete. 'Jhe courts he.ve ruled (Power Et, actor Develop:nent Company v.

IUEW (3f US396, 1961) that no consideration should be given to the fact that a plant ic a'.re ady constructed, in the face of new datei such' as we submit, even though millions have been expended for this -

constructiora 4

Within five days of submission of this motion Scenic Shoreline shall j

be prepared to forward a scheiule stating what our direct testimony j

willcover/exsetlywhatspecificandlimitedsubjectareasweplanto

)

J focus upon und within ten days we would be ready to ps.rticipate 1.n l

\\

a heraring lfmited to this seiscic design issue. This request does i

not supecet e other motiona that have been filed by Scenic Shoreline..

n Respectfully wbmitted, i.ffh$

0881 i

Frederick Eissler Gov-4o'ofe+t"~

\\

4 J

i

, 9, !9 71 k

l l

l.

e-

-