ML20209E779

Program to Evaluate & Resolve Engineering Issues

ML20209E779
Person / Time
Site:	Fermi
Issue date:	06/26/1986
From:	DETROIT EDISON CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20209E709	List: IR 05000341/1985040 IR 05000701/2010015 ML20209E702 ML20209E725 ML20209E744 ML20209E759 ML20209E779 ML20209E832
References
NUDOCS 8609110353
Download: ML20209E779 (23)

Text

.. - _

' N' ka y g-A

~ ~

/l c.,

'Atta hc ment 8

. +- .. ss

'ti

-t 4 er. ,

.~

.:3

\

L PROGRAM TO EVALUATE AND RESOLVE E!!G:!:EER:!;G ISSUES -

' DETROIT EDIS0!:

s FERP.I.2'P7 DER PLANT

'( .

a

)

i

! s b

i PRESENTATION: GLEN El. LYN i NUCLEAR RELULATORY COMMISSION REGION III JUNE 26,'1986 8609110353 860827 i PDR COMMS NRCC CORRESPONDENCE PDR

AGEf!DA e I!!TRODUCTIO!;

. o- SEISMIC REVIEW OF DESIG;! MODIFICATI0 :S i

i e E!!VIR0!.?E::TAL QUALIFICATI0!!S REVIE'c OF DESIG:

MODIFICATIO!! -

e DESIG:: REVERIFICATIO!J OF E!JGI!!EERI!!3 CHA: GE DOCUME::TS e UPDATE OF DESIG;! CALCULATIO:!S e SMALL BORE DESIG!: RE-REVIEU e' E!SE DED PLATE OVERSTRESS ISSUE

.e- !JELS0!! STUD EMEEDDED PLATE ISSUE e PROJECT MA!!AGEME::T ORGA!!IZATIO! (?!0) TASXS a

e THIRD PARTY (SIEET) EVALUATIO!! 0F E! 3:!:EERING e CLOSURE I

a

.,, . . - - - . - , . - . . ,:.-_ - , - -- - . , - , , . , , , - - , , . - , , , - - - - . . . . - - . . . - . . ~ . ~ - , , - - - - .

o..

SEISF'C RrVIEU ISSUE ISliUI e IDEt:TIFIED DESIGN CHA!!GE PAPER LACKIt!G SE!SMIC REVIEW e DER !!0-85-680 ISSUED e SAFETEAM C0!!CER" a

e t UCLEA?. QUALI1Y ASSURA:JCE fit:DIt?G SCOPE e SCREE'!D ALL l'UCLEAR E!1GINEER:NG SEIS"IC DESIGN CHA!GE DOCUMENTS e TOTAL IDE!!TIrIED: 1995 DESIG" CHA? IGE DOCU"E!!TS -

SINCE A'JGUST 1984 i

~

133 REQU:RD ADD:T:C :AL REVIE5 PESULTS s

e 133 REU..T.D A :D ACCEPTO e D00'J"E . TAT:0.*: CO.'-:PLETE VIA SE:S":0 QUAL:F:CATIO:: RECORD F;?:'S e I:C HA?7.- ARE II: PACT e PROCOURE REVISO TC REQUIEE DES:G! VER:F: CAT *0!' EY QUALIFID PERS0!'!!EL e  ! . D - . -em

..  ;-, , .e. e.. ., .-

, -4...r -.

.. .. .. ,. ,,. T s O r . ,-..s-..-. . , e .r. r ..s .p-.r o. Sv..-

n .. .n CC' Cit'S *0*:

e ISSUE ADORESSD e ASSESS' E::T A!!D CLOSURE C0!)CURRO BY t'RC RDIC!' III REDORT 85-052 i

i

- --..-,,-,.- - - _ , _ - -y . -, - .- - .-, -m . - -. -m--

EQUIPMENT OUALIFICATIO!; (EO) ISSUE ISSUE o IDE!!TIFIED ISSUE BASED ON SEIS!:IC REVIE~.-! CO !CER!!

o  !!UCLEAR QUALITY ASSURA!JCE FI!! DING SCOPE o S".:.r.r'..'",

.. " .e..t.' u".. a' '.L ./ 4 .W.w s ' r 'ac

~ ~ r.t. "1. n.... ".". u.n' ". . .J~ r Dw~w.'.' .-.4 A"JA '..'.<T 21 SAFETY RELATED SYSTEMS THAT CO:. TAI!! EO EOU~?ME!!T -

e TOTAL IDE!!TLr!ED: 273 DES ~G:: CHA!!GE DOCUMENTS R ES'JLTS e ALL CHA!DE DOCUME::TS REV~EWED HAD SEE:: PRODERLY ADDRESSED FO . EQUIPME.':T QUA',IFICA'l *D : .

CC'::LUS Oc e ISS'JE ADDRESSED e a.e e re S .r. 1 A.1,

. ..s C _r n.e 2 n. .e.

. r C D L- .J .:. r. 'D

. .m.v... . . o. .r.c. . r.. .- u. .T .v.-

RE?D?.T 55-D52 A

DESIG!1 RE-VERIFICATIO!!

ISSUE.

o RE-VERIFICATI0!! 0F Q/A I E!JGI!!EERI!1G DESIG.': PACKAGES (DP)

A!;D ASSOCIATED CHA!!GE PAPER SCOPE PHASE I:

e fiUCLEAR E!!GI!!EERI!!G GE!!ERATO DESIG! DOCU!!E!:TS (DER !'0-E5-712) e DESIG!; CHA!!GE DOCUME!;TS 5 77 a se .o. P0e. . )

o P.*.n_* _ I.-. r i r*'e_

. 4. . r_n e.. _.s .. rn..

- - .s- ( Ta.Cv.

. E'.'s .>.'e r.e. .r.".

GE!!ERATD DES *G ! CHA!:GE DOCT!E!!TS s DES ~G:: CHA!;GE DOCU:!E!:TS 490 RESULTS e ALL CHA!:GE PAPER REVIE'dEC A!!D CD'!PLETD e TH?EE (3) !!O!! C0!!FOR!<A!!!ES HAV~!13 HARD'..'ARE IMPACT (F'JSES

.. e ..

".i.m_ n...e e.

e CCRRETIVE ACT:0!! !!! PROCESS C0"CL"S*0"S e RE-VER:FICAT:0! OF E!;G:!IEERI!!G DES!G!! PACKAGES & CHA!JGE PA?EF. CC'!?LETED e CO?$ECTIVE ACTIO!! !!! PROCESS k':LL SE C0!'PLETE BY RESTART e ISS'JE CLOSED h'ITH !!F.C REGIO.'! III DURI!!G M0! sis OF MAY/JU!!E

4 UPDATE OF DESIG!! CALCULATIO?!S ISSUE e C/A I CALCULATIO!!S IDE!!TIFIED THAT HAVE !!OT BEE!! UPDATED TO REFLECT DESIG!! DOCUME!!TS A!!D AS-3UILT CO.TIGURATIO!! 0F THE PLA!!T SCOPE o SCREE!ED C/A I CALCULATIO!!S REQUIRI!!G UPDATI!!G:

e  !!ECHA!!ICAL LARGE BORE PIPE 455 -

S"ALL BORE PIPE 1034 SYSTE'S 106 EQUIP"E!!T A!!CHOR BOLT 39 e ELECTRICAL /I"STFL'?!E!:TATIO!! 62 FUSES, THER"AL OVERL0A0 SHORT CIRCUIT, VOLTAGE OROP ETC.

e CIVIL h1 TOTAL 1737 i

.I l

l

_ - _ _ _ _ . . _ _ . . . o _ .. . . _ - _ . _ _ ,_ ... . . - - - - . . _ _ _ - - - , _ . - - - - - - - - ---- J

RESULTS

.e l'ECHA?IICAL LARGE BORE ASSESSMENT & UPDATE COMPLETE e 2 DEVIATIO.'i EVE!!T REPORTS -(DER) ISSUED DER ?!P-86-232 RD'0 VAL OF I!! SUI.ATIO! O!! T-4S !!!TROGE:!

SUPPLY DER !!P-86-233 ADDITIO!!AL SUPPORT T CORE SPRAY TEST C0!;NECTIO!

e CORRIT VE ACTIO!! II: PROCE.',S - COMPLETE SE ORE RESTART e S"A*.L BORE ASSESS E:T A::D UPDATE C0"PLETE e fl0 HARDh'ARE !!! PACT - ITE." CLOSED At:D ACCEPTED EY t:RC I! SPECTOR e  !!C.' OPE:l ITE" 0:: UTILIZATIOf T DESIG:: MA':UAL 3.rYO!D APPROVED /DOCU"E.TED DESIG!! CRITERIA e  !'ECHA!:: CAL SYSTE".S: ASSESS:E!:T A!:D UPDATE C0"PLETE EXCEPT FCF 3 CALCULAT:C::S ::: PROCESS OF UPDATII:G

- e. 3 OEVIATIO: E"E!!T RE? ORTS (DER ) were hsued e DER ::P-96-23S ESSE!:TIAL COOLER SETPD:!:TS e DER ;;P-36-0254 REACTOR 2* DO. HEAT LOAD CALCULATIO!

e DER ::F-S6-C255 E!:ERGE:10Y EQU:P!E::T C00LI: 3

r. e. .e. .w....

r.r. 4 . . c e CORRETIVE ACT:0 : I!! PROCESS - TO SE C0"PLETE SEFORE RE-START e  !!O ADDITIO::AL HARD'.'ARE IMPACTS n.

1 t:

I o ELECTRICAL /INSTRUMEhTATION a CONTROLS: ASSESSMENT &

i UPDATE COMPLETED ~

t e 2 DEVIATION EVEf!T REPORTS ISSUED.

i' NP-86-0224 - LOW VOLTAGE DEGRADED GRID RELAY SETPOINT T

.NP-86-0218 - U!OERSIZED CASLES 1

e CORRECTIVE ACTIO :S IN PROCESS AND L'ILL DE COMPLETE BEFORE RESTART e f;0 ADDITIONAL HARD'.-lARE IMPACTS o C .- u. .. .,

i-

, o UPDATING & ASSESSEEllT C0"PLETE EXCE?T FOR 22 I!;TERACTIC:: CALCULATIO :S e FRO .7 E!D ASSESS"E"I C0!!PLETE t

e DOCUME!.TATIO:: TO SE COMPLETE BEFORE RESTART e

N3 HARDWARE It' PACT I

h CO'!CLUSIO!!S e 1737 D:SC:PL:::E CALCULAT:0 :S HAVE BEE!: REi':E!!O A*:D 3

UPDATED AS NECESSARY TO REFLECT DESIO : D0;""E::TS A::D THE l PLA!:T AS-SU:LT CO:0:TIO'S

.e 7 DEV:ATIO:: EVE!:T REPORTS UERE '!RITTE:: AS A RESULT Or THE REVIEW a UPDATE.

? e CORREETIVE ACTIONS /MODIFICATIO :S ARE I!! PRTESS A:.7 U:LL

!~ SE COMPLETED BY RESTART e PROCEDURES HAVE BEE" I!!?LEME:!TED TO ASSURE CALCULAT:0NS ARE UPDAT D/C0"PLETED AT THE TIME OF PLA:T "03:FICAT:0:S.

c I

i "l

t 1

SMALL BORE PIPE DESIG!! RE-REVID! ,

ISSUE e DEVIAT:0! S FR0! THE APPROVED DES:G!! MA'!UAL RULES FOR SMALL BORE PIPE A!iD P:PE SUPPORT DESIG::S DfD 1101 HAVE SUPPORT !:G DOCUME!JTATIO! TO JUSTIFY USAGE.

SCOPE e REVID? ALL SMALL BORE DESIG!! CALCUMT:0!!S THAT UTILIZE THE DES:G!: MA!!UAL METHODOLOGY e 70S CALCULATIO!!S REQUIRED REVID?

'4ET40DOLOGY e CALCUMTIO!!S WERE REV:DlED, US:!:0 A CHECI: L:ST, TO DETEP.'C! E DEVIATIO!!S FR0" THE DESIG!! "A!!UAL PESULTS e 703 CALCULATIO!:S WERE REVIDlED A!!D DEV!ATIO! S JUST7IO A!:D 300UME!!TED e 15 CALCULATIO!;S ARE I!! DIS 0!: REV:D? 1 APPR0"AL CYCLE o !JO HARD'. ARE IMPACTS C0"CLUSIO!!S e S"ALL BORE DES:G!! CALCULATIO! S UPDATED TO REFLECT THE DESIG!! DOCUME!:TS A!:D THE PLA!!T AS-BUILT C0!D:T:0!!S

EMBEDDED PLATE ISSUE ISSU.E e DURI!1G DESIGt! CLOSURE IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT A flUMBER OF EMBEDDED SUPPORT PLATES WERE POTE!!TIALLY OVERLOADED BASED 0:1 THE C0!!SERVATIVE E!iVELOPI!!G LOAD CALCULATIO!!S PERFORMED.

SCOPE e ISSUED A !!O!!-C0! FORMA'!CE Oil EMBEDDED PLATES - POTE'TIAL OVERSTRESS.

o DEFI!!D ACTUAL LOADS SY PLATE.

e AS BUILT VERIFICATI0!? 0F LOCATIO!! 0F ATTACHME!!T O!! -

E!'3DDED PLATE e EVALUATIO!! 0F PLATE e DOCU"E::TATIO!:

FESULTS e ALL PLATES QUALIFID e  !!O HARDi.'ARE MODIFICATI0!!S REQ'JIRED e DESIG! CALCULATIO!!S PREPARED, VERIFIED AC APPROVED. DCs AUDITED BY !!RC TECH!!! CAL STArF. ALL PASS D.

C0!!CLUS:0! S e DESIG!! TASK C0"?LETD e TASK REVIDED A!!D CLOSD BY !!RC REDIO!; III AS OF THIS I!!SPECTIO!!.

!!n 90'l STUD /EMBEI)DED PI. ATE ISSUE ISSUE e- FAILURE OF EMBEDDED PLATE SUPPORTING THE N0!! O 52" MAIN STEAM MANIFOLD IN THE TURBI!:E HOUSE. THIS FAILURE INDICATED THAT THE NELSON STUD WELDS WERE DEFECTIVE.

S_C_QEE.

e FAILURE OF THE EMSEDDED PLATE IDE!:TIFIED O!! A N0! -CC"FORl!A!!CE e IMMEDIATE FIX IMPLEME!TD e VISUAL. INSPECTION OF SIMILAR PLATES e ENGINEERING BESEARCH EXAMI??ATIO!! IDE!TIFIED POROSITY AND SLAG INCLUSIONS !!! THE STUD WELDS e ENGI!!EERING IDENTIFIED 251 ! 0!! O I PLATES INSTALLED II: -

SAFETY RELATED BUILDII:GS. WAL':D E!S CONFIRMED THAT I49 PLATES 'ERE I:0T LOADED.

e THE !'ELS0!! STUD / PLATE WELDS WERE EVALUATED e TH:S PLA!! CALLED FOR A COMEI!!ATIO!! 0F ULTRAS 0!CC TESTS OF 59 PLATES W:TH 20 PLATES UNDEcGO:!!G A DIRECT LOAD TEST e HA"GERS W:TH THE LARGEST UT REFLECT!O"S A':D LARGEST LO;':

I!!TERACTIONS WERE TESTED TO EOU: VALENT 0.S.E. LEVELS.

RESULTS e ALL 59 PLATES PASSD THE TESTS.

e ACCE?TA"CE OF THE BALANCE OF PLATES.

CD'!CLUSIO"S e ISSUE REVIEt2' A!!D ADDRESSD e  !!O HARDUARE FIXES e TASK REVIDED A!D CLOSD SY NRC RELION III AS OF THIS I!!SPECTIO!!.

PROJECT MAf!AGEMENT ORGA!?IZATIO!! (PMO) TASES ISSUE e CURRENT STAT 1JS OF P.M.0 TASKS IDEtiTIFIED Ifi WHITE BOOK AS OF APRIL 1985.

SCOPE e TOTAL OF 53 TASKS - 44 SAFETY RELATED.

12 E!!VIR0!NE!TAL OJALIFICATIO!: TASKS (fl0V. 30,1985) 3 COM!!!TMENT TASKS (2 NRC 1 MICH) (1985 A!!D 1986) 5 TASKS AS REQUESTED BY NUCLEAR OPERATIO!!S 12 PROCESSI!JG DOCU!!ENTS OR ONGOING TASKS 14 SEIS!!IC QUALIFICATI0", DES:GN OR VERIFICATI0!: TASKS 7 CALCULATION RECONCILIATIO:: TASKS THESE TASKS WERE REV!E'JED A!!D PRIORITIZD FOR C0"PLET:0!

RESULTS e 45' 0F THE ORIG:f;AL TASKS ARE CLOSED A!!D UPDATED TO REFLECT THE AS SU:LT PLA!iT 3 ARE O!! GOING CHANGE PAPER INCORPORATIO!!

1 :S COMPLETI0!? 0F RAD'JASTE SYSTE!!S 2 ARE COMMIT"E"T TAS:CS - C0"TRG. R03: DESIG!! REV:SIO!:

A!!D THE S'<?P OWNERS GROUP SETPOINT CALCULATIC"5

2. ARE A'? ONGO:!!G E!:VIR0!ME!:TAL QUALIFICATIO!! TAS::S

1. A !U"3ER OF THESE TASKS W:LL BE O!:GO:::3 BASED O!!

C0!!TINUING !!0D!FICATIO! S OF THE PLA!!T A"D itAINTE"A!!CE Or REQUIRED FILES, LIST AND MANUALS.

CO'!SLUSIO"S e ALL P.!!.0. TASKS HAVE BEE!! REVIE'.!D A!.'D ADDRESSED e ALL RESTART TASKS TO BE C0!!PLETD PRIOR TO RESTART e Et:V:R0!!".E!!TAL QUALIF: CATION PR:LRAM COMPLETED e O!:GO!!JG lt0DIFICATION TASKS PERFORMED F'OR SCHDULE AND

!!UCLEAR ENGI! LEERING REVISED DESIG!! VERIFICATION PR03 RAM

3 STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING EVALUATION PURPOSE:

4 0 TO DETERMINE WHETHER FERMI-2 DESIGN DOCUMENTS ARE COMPLETE AND CURRENT.

PURPOSE ACCOMPLISHED BY:

0 AUDITS OF REVERIFICATION OF EDPS AND ASSOCIATED CHANGE PAPER. (S & W SUPPORTED DECO QA),

1 O EVALUATION OF CORE SPRAY SYSTEM TO DETERMINE IF REQUIRED DESIGN DOCUMENTS EXIST AND ARE CURRENT.

i l t, l l

l i

2 CORE SPRAY EVALUAT10N COMBINED DISCIPLINE MATRIX STRUCT. PWR. FtFC. IaC EMD. N.T.

L I h ll ll t l l

DESIGN CRITERIA l

SPECIFICATIONS N N I I

l CALCULATIONS l

CONT. INTERFACE N N I l

VENDOR INTERFACE N N I

, I SElsMIC Review N I I

N N N N I STRESS RFPORTs I

l DESIGN DRAWINGS l

l SAR COMMITMENTS l

CODE REQUIREMENTS N N I (REG, I l

REGutATOR REo. GU10E)

I N

N N N N I TFCHNICAl SPEC.

I N I EO REQUIREMENTS I

l l I l l l DESIGN CHANGES SINCE _7/84l

! l NOTE:

0 LICENSING - LIMITED TO REVIEW OF LICENSING COMMITMENTS ASSOCI ATED WITH CORE SPRAY.

l O PLANT SERVICES (OP3) - LIMITED TO EVALUATION OF CORE SPRAY j SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS.

e

..,-n.--- - , - . . _ - - . - - - . . . - -. , . _ - . - - - - _.-... - -. ,..-.. ,-.., a-.., n...-- _._,m, , - , - . . . , . - , , , , - . -

. 3 l

l RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS O ENGINEERING AND DESIGN ACTIVITIES OF FERMI 2 WERE CONDUCTED IN A CONVENTIONAL MANNER.

O CRITERIA AND DESIGN REQUIREMENTS WERE APPROPRIATELY ADDRESSED FOR THE ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES REVIEWED.

O THE CONCERNS OF DESIGN STATUS MAY NOT HAVE BEEN RAISED, IF

~

DECISIONS TO DEFER UPDATING OF CERTAIN CALCULATIONS HAD BEEN DOCUMENTED.

4 0 POTENTIAL FINDINGS AND EVALUATOR CONCERNS (ll) IDENTIFIED ,

DURING THE REVIEW OF CORE SPRAY SYSTEM DESIGN DOCUMENTS WERE RESOLVED.

O MOST ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES IDENTIFIED OPEN NON-CONFORMANCE REPORTS WHICH COULD IMPACT THE CALCULATION UPDATE ACTIVITY.

O MOST ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES IDENTIFIED CALCULATIONS REQUIRING UPDATING.

O DESIGN CHANGES TO THE CORE SPRAY SYSTEM, INITIATED SINCE JULY, 1984, WERE IMPLEMENTED.

I

. L RECORENDATIONS

1. RESOLVE OUTSTANDING SAFETY-RELATED NON-CONFORMANCE REPORTS, WHICH COULD IMPACT CALCULATION UPDATE PROGRAM.

2.

ESTABLISH A METHOD FOR RESPONSIBLE ENGINEERS TO RECEIVE FEEDBACK FROM DECISION PROCESSES RESULTING IN DEFERRAL / CHANGES TO THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS.

3.

DEVELOP PROCEDURES / PROGRAM TO PROPERLY EVALUATE CONCERNS PRIOR TO DECLARING SYSTEM INOPERABLE.

4.

CONSIDER A POLICY THAT PLACES A TIME LIMIT ON COMPLETION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR AUDIT FINDINGS. ALSO, INCLUDE DESIGN PRODUCT IN AUDIT SCOPE.

3 COMPLETE CALCULATION UPDATING FOR ALL SAFETY-RELATED SYSTE 3 -,

. 5-NRC INSPECTION STONE a WEBSTER (WEEK OF 6/2/86)

PURPOSE:

o ADEQUACY OF SCOPE o IMPLEMENTATION o CONSISTENCY ,

o JUSTlFICATION OF CONCLUSIONS RESULT:

o DEFICIENCIES IN RIGOR OF APPLYING & PURSUING CHECKLISTS.

O DEFICIENCIES IN DOCUMENTATION OF BASES FOR SOME i CONCLUSIONS.

ACTIONS / STATUS:

o S a W To CORRECT lDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES (COMPLETE BY 6/30/86).

o NRC INSPECTION / DECO FOLLOW-UP (7/l-2/86),

o S a W To INCORPORATE RESULTS OF ACTION TAKEN IN A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT. (COMPLETE BY 7/l4/86),

i 4

SfET REC 0ktEWATION 1 ITEF/ISS!f O_0SE OJTST#0lt0 SWETY REATED tCRs 40 ERs TF@T C01D IWACT CALQ1ATimS PRIOR TO CDPLETION &

CALCllAT10N LPCATE PREPR/,.

ClostRE BASIS CECKLIST E\ELCPED #0 IfRSBMD TO IDEtiTIFY ITBS 1 FAT C01D IfPACT CALOtATION LPfATF FRTPM, A LIST & APR lCAaf FERS 03.PilfD.

NO ADDITIO@L G ITBS ffEDED.

4 4

- - - - , - , . - . , , , , . . - . . , . , - - - - ---,--.--------.n a.7-,, , - , . , - . --,_. , , - , ,,. . -

9 SEET RECCMENRTION 2 ITEWIR9 F ESTABLISH A EMD FOR ESPWSIBlf EMIEERS TO RECEIE FEHBoCX FR@ TCISim FRnrFRTS ESLLTim IN DEFERPA1 OWES TO TEIR REUMBIATIWS. -

O m RE BASIS

- PR00RE 12.000.52, TVIATim #O QJetcTIW ACTIm itFu<ilm, WILL RECUlE NJ0. EAR EMIEERim TO PARTICIPATE AS A hDBER T CuFMLIIVE ACTIm REVl&l B0oRD (CNE) IN DE EVI&! #O EVALLATim 7 TVIATION EET REFu<is (ERs).

l l

I

~

l SEET RECCMEP0ATION 3 ITEWIR9 F TWLCP FROPAM TO FRCPER.Y EVA. LATE 00 KERNS FRim TO TQAlm SYSTBS IMHP#LE.

a rA E BASIS

- 12.000.52, TVIATION #0 al+fciIW ETim REPORTim, TO FRNIT ftiltx DIECTim Fm ETEWINim OEPABILITY.

l

i l

SEET RECOtEMMTION 4 ITEWIR9 F UNSICER A RLICY MT RAES A TIE CF 03RETl0N 01 CGRECTIE ETICN Fm ADIT Fit 0ltES, a m RE BASIS M RILEAR CFEPATIGS IHRCMMNT RA Ita.lES AS A FHlf/ARY EASLRE MT ADIT Fit 0ltG REFu<TS WILL BE Q.0 SED WilHIN SIX MA%,

(DLITY ASRF#E FROG @M REQJIREMN 18 (OVR) IS IN FHOTSS T BEltG REVISED TO ENRRE TIKLY CDRETION 7 ADIT FitolNGS, 1

O l

SEET REC 09ENDATl0N 5 ITEWISSE

CDRETE CA.01ATim LP[MTIN3 FOR ALL SVETY-Rfl.ATED SESS. -

I a m RE BASIS ESSEhTIA1Y CDRETE o REVIEMD #0 WRIFIED o FINol EDIS m APFR W A.

I l

l

l l

l l

l I

.-. . - - - - - -. - - - , . _ , - - - . , , , - - , , - - - - . , _ , , - ,_,, ,, - _ - n _ _ _ -_ ,- _ ,,., __~,-,-n,-n,,-. .- , ,-, ,

SL W ARY f

CONCERNS EXTENSIVE ENGINEERING REVIEW e SEISMIC e EQUIPENT QUALIFICATION e REVERIFICATION OF QA1 DESIGN CHANGES e Ef0EDDED PLATES e DESIGN CALCULATIONS ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT S&W STATUS:

BASELINE DOCUENTAT10N e CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND UPDATED TO REFLECT THE PLANT AS-BUILT CONDITION s DESIGN CHANGE DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN REVERIFIED VAINTENANCE OF DOCUMENTAT10N e PROCEDURES STRENGTHENED e VERIFICATION TRAINING i

PLANT RESTART

I

% r,..c.a, , Attachm nt 9 vo bn.oc-s Nww ows .on ,

D *roit . . - ,

.diSOn 53rl65* fl ~~pera O

May 1, 1986 VP-86-0052 Mr. James G. Keppler Regional Administrator Region III U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Dear Mr. Keppler -

References (1) Fermi 2 NRC Docket No. 50-341 NRC License No. NPF-43 (2) NRC Inspection Report 50-341/85047 dated February 11, 1986

Subject:

Detroit Edison Nuc1 car Security Improvement Plan As previously discussed with members of your staff, attached is the Nuc1 car Security Irnprovement Plan (NSIP) . This plan augments the specific corrective actions being taken in response to the violations noted in Reference 2 and provides a broad approach to improving the long-term effectiveness of security at Fermi 2.

The scope of this plan is not limited to the Nuclear Security Organizations it involves all of Nuclear Operations and represents Detroit Edison's commitment to a successful security program at Fermi 2. The details of the NSIP are dynamic and will be reviewed and changed with notification of the NRC, as the needs and accomplishments in the area of security evolve.

The major elements of this plan are intended to be completed by December 31, 1986. Documentation mentioned in this plan will be maintained for the duration of the plan and for one year following its completion for inspection by your staf f.

T) / n . .

0 hf f J$

MAY 5 1986

Mr. James G. Keppler May 1, 1986-VP-86-0052 Page 2 We trust this plan satisfactorily addresses your concerns regarding security performance at Fermi 2. Please contact Mr.

Joseph Conen, (313) 586-5083 if you have any questions on this matter.

Sincerely, i

Tfc .I -

cc J. R. Creed M. D. Lynch W. G. Rogers USNRC Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555

i i

Mr. James G. Keppler May 1, 1986 VP-86-0052 Page 3 bcc: F. E. Agosti J. H. Flynn L. W. Hastings J. D. Leman R. S. Lenart L. Martin S. H. Noetzel G. R. Overbeck J. L. Piana T. Randazzo G. M. Trahey l A. E. Wegele .-

R. L. Woolley Approval Control NRC Follow-up Book /NRC File

Region III Chron File Secretary's Office (2412 WCB)

)

4 4

I

. _ _ _ _ _ . . ~ . - . _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ __ _ .._ _ . _ _ -_. _ _ -_.-_._ _. - _ -_ _ -._ ___ _ _-_

NUCLEAR SECURITl IMPROVDETT PLAN Innediate and Long 'Ibrm Inprovements

'Ib Be Cttpleted before 12/31/86 (DAL As Implement a manag-set systen to Mr t surveillannan required by cannitaunts.

CBJECTIVES:

1. Inplement process for verifying door chs:ks utilizing security ccrputer.

a. A Shift Lieutenant randcoly selects one shift per Through week and verifies door check utilizing security NSIP ccuputer data. Otmpletion

b. Ibclear Security Chief independently ensures door 'Ihrough -

checks are performed on each shift by selecting NSIP cme sarple per rnanth and verifying the door checks Cttpletion utilizing the security ccuputer data.

c. Conduct a surveillance of this effort during the May review of the Physical Barriers - Vital Areas. July Octcber

d. Follcw up as required to resolve surveillance 'Ihrough findings. NSIP Ccmpletion

2. Assure all Physical Security Plan requirenents for reports and operability tests are met.

a. List all required reports and operability tests. Cceplete

b. Penitor ccrpletion of requiral reports and opera- Through bility tests. (?tnthly) LEIP Ctrpletion

c. Conduct a surveillance of this offort during the May review of the Security Plan and Irplanenting Pro- July cedures. Octcber

d. Follcw up as requircd to resolve surveillance Through findings. LEIP Ccrpletion

3. Provide officers with current and ccuplete fixed post checklists.

a. Shift Lieutenant monitors every shift for ccupli- 'Ihrough ance. NSIP Ccmpletion

l l

NSIP - 1986 May 1, 1986 Page 2 l

b. thclear Security Q11ef independently ensures by 'Ihrough corducting a randcm quarterly check. NSIP Chtpletion

c. Conduct a surveillance of this effort during the May review of the Security Plan and Inplementing Pro- July cedures. Octcber

d. Follow up as required to resolve surveillance 'Ihrough findings. NSIP Cttpletion

4. Cboduct internal surveillance review on all 22 applicable -

NRC Inspection Procedure Modules by:

a. Formally training 10 lbclear persconel in Ccmplete surveillance techniques through the use of a certified generic quality assurance training course conducted for Detroit Edison by Bechtel Power Corporation.

b. Expand the scope of the Physical Security Plan Ccrplete audit by organizaticns not ccritrolled by tbclear PSP Rev 9 Security managernent to match 10CFR and Detroit Edison cm mitments.

c. (bnduct the annual audit of Nuclear Security by an Ccrplete outside organization (tOA).

d. U grade Nuclear Security surveillance activities April by including itens frcm prior surveillances, ,

audits and inspections.

e. Chaplete first round of surveillance on all June modules.

f. Verify the effectiveness of the corrective actions 'Ihrough being taken in other NSIP objectives. IGIP Ccrnpletion

5. Clarify procedural ccrmitznents and maintenance require-ments,

a. Subnit Physical Security Plan changes for more Ccmplete effective operation. PSP Rev 9

b. Verify the Physical Security Plan changes are in- April cw r

.u..ted into procedures.

c. (bnduct a surveillance of this effort during the my review of the Sa:urity Plan and Irplanenting Pro- July cedures. Octcber

NSIP - 1986 May 1, 1986 Page 3 N

d. Follow up as requirsi to recolve curveillance '1hrough findings. E'IP Ompletion

-6. Correct the process for authorizing tertporary access to zones not perinanently accessed, including sinplifying the record keeping.

a. Take i! mediate corrective action to ensure that CXITplete all terporary zcoes are properly authorized.

b. Sinplify the record keeping and review te:porary 'Ihrough

, zone deviations in existence on every shift, to NSIP ensure that all are authorized. Ctmpletion

c. Cbnduct a surveillance of this effort during the May review of Access Control - Personnel. July Octcber

d. Follow up as required to resolve surveillance 'Ihrough findings. NSIP Ompletion

7. Ensure that all access authorization background inforrra-tion files centain all requirsi docunents.

a. (baduct a 100% review of the files to ensure April required docunentation is contained in each,

b. Cbnduct a surveillance of this effort during the May review of Access Control - Personnel. July Octcber

c. Follow up as required to resolve surveillance 'Ihrough findings. 1GIF Ompletion

8. Qansolidate access authorization zone groups by orgard-zaticnal unit and job title to limit access on a generic basis to those having a jcb need to access a zone.

a. Cbnduct a 100% review of the authorized zones for Ccrplete all keycard holders and inplanent corrective action for required access in the plant.

b. Otrduct a surveillance of this effort during the May review of Access Control - Persormel. July Octcber

c. Follow up as required to resolve surveillance 'Ihrough firdings. NSIP Capletion

NSIP - 1986 May 1,1986 Page 4

9. Cbnduct a 100% review of the vehicles permanently authcr rized inside the Protected Area.

a. Inventory all vehicles inside the Proteted Area and Ctmplete ccmpare the actual vehicles with the authorizing re-cords, and take corrective action so that every vehicle is properly authorized. .

b. Conduct a surveillance of this effort during the May review of Access Control - Vehicles. July Octcber

c. Follow up as required to resolve surveillance 'Ihrough -

findings. NSIP Ctmpletion

10. Ensure Security Officers have met all SPT&Q Plan criteria.

a. Shift Lieutenant conducts weekly qualification re- 'Ihrough view of all shif t personnel to ensure that all offi- NSIP cers' training is current. Ocupletion

b. Nuclear Security Chief conducts a monthly review 'Ihrough to ensure shift personnel meet SPT&Q Plan criteria. NSIP Otmpletion

c. Conduct a surveillance of this effort during the May review of Personnel T&Q - General. August November

d. Follcw up as required to resolve surveillance 'Ihrough findings. NSIP Otmpletion

11. Upgrade Nuclear Security work instruction for Conduct April of Internal Ocupliance Evaluation (NS2008).

i NSIP - 1986 May 1, 1986 Page 5 GPL B: Cbrrect adverse treds.

CEk7ECTIVES:

1. Reduce personnel errors resulting frczn inpwr use of keycards and doors to less than 10 per month, without changing the definition.

a. Assign two officers during peak periods at each Ccrrplete portal to minimize potential for keycards leaving the Protectal Area. -

b. Monitor personnel errors weekly for inproper use Chrplete of doors and keycards until the cbjective is net,

c. Monthly ccrmunication to senior Fermi 2 Management 'Ihrough perscrinel on number of personnel errors resulting NSIP frcra inproper use of doors and keycards. Carpletion

d. Monitor (quarterly) corrective action taken on NCRs 'Ihrough and review results with senior Fermi 2 Managenent. NSIP Ccrrpletion

e. Include information on Security corrective actions 'Ihrough in two weekly Plant Newsletters (Moderator) per NSIP month. Ccr:pletion

f. Regularly include information on Security corrective 'Ihrough action cbjectives in the daily Plant Status Report. NSIP Carpletion

g. Cbnduct a surveillance of this effort during the May review of Management Effectiveness. Septeter Deceter

h. Follow up as required to resolve surveillance 'Ihrough findings. NSIP Ccrrpletion

2. Issue a discipline clarification policy for Security Carplete rules (NCD 38) frun the Vice President - Nuclear Operations.

3. mnagement meetings with Bargaining thit Officers to 'Ihrough erghasize ccrrpliance with Security rules. NSIP Ctrapletion

4 NSIP - 1986 N y 1, 1986 Page 6

4. I@ rove maintenance of x-ray, metal and explosive detection equignent to achieve an in-service rate of 50% or rnore on each type of equirrent in each portal.

a. I@ rove rnonitoring and tracking systen. Camlete

b. Initiate comensatory measures in a timely manner. 'Ihrough ,

NSIP Otmpletion

c. Cbnduct a surveillance of this effort during the May review of Testing and W intenance. July -

Octci>er

d. Follow up as required to resolve surveillance 'Ihrough findings. NSIP Ompletion

5. Inprove maintenance of equirrent requiring ccrapensatory measures.

a. Inprove monitoring and tracking systen. Omplete

b. Record causes for equipment out of service that 'It@

require ccupensatory measures in excess of 5 days. NSIP Otmpletion

c. mintain Security equignent so that less than three 'Ihrough unplanned ccrpensatory measures will be in effect IEIP for equipnent out of service due to maintenance at Ccmpletion least 90% of the time,

d. Institute corrective actions through senior Fermi 2 'Ihrough Managenent when equignent maintenance fails to meet NSIP 5.b and 5.c. Ocupletion

e. Security Staff Member will attend the P!b21 Work 'Ihrough Group acceptance meeting to ensure Security 1EIP maintenance PN-21s are being worked. Senior Ocmpletion Fermi 2 mnagenent will discuss ccupensatory measures requiring maintenance when appropriate priorities need e@hasis,

f. Carxiuct a surveillance of this effort during the my review of 'Ibsting and Wintenance. July Octcber

g. Security Staff Manber will attend PCD meeting 'Ihrough to address Security concerns and work requiring FEIP ccmpensatory measures. Ccrpletion

e 4

4 NSIP - 1986 hy 1,1986 Page 7

h. Follow up as required to resolve surveillance 'ntrough findings. NSIP Ctmpletion

6. Security Syste modificaticms (EDPs) for identified im-provments for security doors, alarm stations, HVAC systens, and outside grounding will be catpleted.

a. Security Staff MEEber will attend meetings 'Ihrough to ensure the Security EDPs are apsusiately NSIP addressed and progress to PN-21s and are worked Otrpletion to ccepletion.

b. (bnduct a surveillance of this effort during the May review of Testing and N intenance. July Octcber

c. Follow up as required to resolve surveillance 'Ihrough findings. NSIP Otmpletion

7. Security System preventive maintenance will be inproved as an elernent in the Plant Preventive Maintenance Program.

a. All security systen equignent requiring April preventive maintenance will be identified.

b. Preventive mintenance instructions will be May written on all security systen equipnent requiring preventive maintenance,

c. Preventive N intenance scheduling intervals June will be established.

d. Monitoring of preventive

d. 2nitoring of preventive maintenance carpletal. July

e. Conduct a surveillance of this effort during the my review of 'Ibsting and Nintenance. July Octcber

f. Follow up as required to resolve surveillance 'Ihrough findings.- NSIP Otmpletion

8. Warehouse B will be excluded fran the Protected Area to August reduce ccupensatory measures requiral.

9. Otmpensatory Measure procedures for microwave equignent the ntmber of Security personnel hours to acccmplish.

3 1

1 i

4 NSIP - 1986 May 1, 1986 l

Page 8

a. Eclear Security Chief will monitor ccmpliance 'Ihrough monthly. IEIP Otmpletion

b. Conduct a surveillance of this effort during the May review of Otmpensatory Measures. August Nover:ber

c. Follow up as required to resolve surveillance 'Ihrough findings. NSIP 0:mpletion

10. Coordinate senior Fermi 2 Management and Nuclear Security efforts.

a. Nuclear Production Superintendent - Maintenance and Otmplete Modification issued memo erphasizing high priority for Security equipnent maintenance,

b. Director - m elear Security conducts monthly review 'Ihrough meetings with Plant snager, General Director - NSIP mclear Engineering, General Director - Nuclear Ctmpletion Operations Services, to establish Security Systen EDP priorities and monitor work conpletions.

c. Cbnduct a surveillance of this effort during the my review of management effectiveness. Septeaber Decernber

d. Folicw up as required to resolve sunreillarce 'Ihrough findings. NSIP ,

Otmpletion

11. Re-write General Diploye Training (Fermi 2 Orientation A)

Security module, for both initial and requalification training to apphasize Security respcnsibility and disci-plinary consequences to all personnel.

a. Ensure the upgraded training is inplanented. April

b. Conduct randcm sanpling of personnel ccr:pleting Through upgraded training to verify effectiveness. NSIP 0:mpletion

4 NSIP - 1986 May 1,1986 Page 9 GGM, C: Clarify security respesibilities.

CEJECTIVES:

1. Incorporate IE Bulletin 85-79 on Security Notification when Barriers are Removed, into Main-tenance procedures.

a. Revise procedures and discuss changes with Omplete N intenance Personnel.

. b. Conduct a surveillance of this effort during the May ,

review of Testing and N intenance. July Octcber

c. Follow up as required to resolve surveillance 'Ihrough findings. NSIP Ctmpletion

2. Clarify Nuclear Security organizational responsibilities to parallel ANS 3.3.

a. Suhnit Physical Security Plan, Rev 9, to the NRC Omplete Region III.

b. Review all Nuclear Security Corporate jcb June descriptions and're-write to appropriately reflect current respcrisibilities.

c. Conduct a surveillance of this effort during the May review of management effectiveness. Septe-ber Decaker

d. Follow up as required to resolve surveillance 'Ihrough findings. NSIP Ompletion

3. Inplement lines of comunication between the Director -

Nuclear Security, and Nuclear Security personnel to ensure concerns are brought to managenent attention.

a. 'Ihe Director - Nuclear Security normally attends 'Ihrough weekly Uniformed section supervisors' meetings. NSIP Ompletion

b. Conduct business / dinner meetings with all Security Ccmplete Personnel to siphasize ccmpliance with regulatory requirements.

c. Hold ccrbined DEOo/ security contractor shift 'Ihrough briefings. NSIP Cmpletion

4 e 1 NSIP - 1986 May 1, 1986 Page 10

d. Director - Nuclear Security at least monthly /per 'Ihrough shift attentis Security officer shift briefing to NSIP ertphasize meeting regulatocy security requirements. Ocrtpletion

4. Revise !bclear Operations Programs covering Security responsibilities ard functions and access authorization.

a. (btain senior Fermi 2 Management approval and April ccmnunicate Sa:urity responsibilities and functions based on the Physical Security Plan organizational definiticns and the FSAR Gapter 13.7 to all Fermi 2 personnel.

5. Upgrade, sinplify, clarify, work instructions for the April Nuclear Security Chief and Shift Lieutenant to more precisely direct their efforts in the cuerall coverage of thair responsibilities.

6. Review IE Bulletin 85-97, Miterial False Statenents, with all Security Personnel.

a. Ensure Security personnel presently working have a Ccr.plete clear understanding of IE 85-97.

b. Include IE 85-97 in the Security Personnel annual June requalification program.

c. Include IE 85-97 in the initial Security Personnel August training.

d. Conduct a surveillance of this effort during the May review of Personnel T&Q - General. August Novater

e. Follow up as required to resolve surveillance 'Ihrough findings. NSIP Ccrtpletion

7. Cbnduct an internal ccr.pliance evaluation of Ibclear Security managenent effectiveness covering the ele-ments of the NRC Inspection mcdule IP 81020.

a. An evaluation including all supervisory July and staff perscnnel, (A-Grade and M-Grade) and will be made by the General Director - Nuclear Operations Services.

8. Conduct Safeguards Contingency Plan drills and exercises,

a. Each Shift Lieutenant conducts and docunents results 'Ihrough of monthly drills and exercises on all shifts NSIP for various event scenarios. Otr:pletion

6 NSIP - 1986 May 1, 1986 Page 11

b. Security Staff Menbers conduct (quarterly) '1hrough and docunent results of monthly drills and NSIP exercises on all shifts for various event Otmpletion scenarios.

c. (brduct a surveillance of this effort during the May review of Safeguards Contingency Plan. August Novatber

d. Follow up as required to resolve surveillance 'Ihrough findings. NSIP Otmpletion b

)

NSIP - 1986 May 1, 1986 Page 12 ElAL D: Ingrove nedersh=M= cf Security plans and implementing

g. . bres, CBJECTIVES:

1. Revise and clarify Security Plan Inplementing Procedures and Nuclear Security Plan Work Instructions and Post Instructions to clearly inplanent mysical Security Plan and Safeguards Contingency Plan ccmnitments.

a. Assign each current revision of an existing Cm plete -l procedure to one of the five Shift Lieutenants for review, to ensure clarity and consistency with Plan ccmnitments.

b. Determine requiral changes and inplement approved trough procedures to assist in the operation of Ibclear NSIP Security, at the rate of 5 per month. Ocmpletion

2. D: ploy a consultant to review and upgrade the clarity of Decenber the Physical Security Plan, Safeguards (bntingency Plan, and Se:urity Personnel T & Q Plan.

3. Enhance Uniform section understanding of overall organiza-tional responsibilities by jcb enrichment assigments to the Staff section.

a. Conduct interviews with assigned personnel to Through identify strengths and weaknesses of this personnel NSIP develognental program, hese interviews could Ocupletion result in future changes in assignment periods to more effectively develop personnel.

4. Review of QA audit and NRC Inspection Reports with h rough Security supervision and staff by the Dira: tor - NSIP Nuclear Security, as they are received. Wis review Ccrpletion will contribute to lessons learnal and minimize the potential for repeating the findings and cbservations.

5. Reduce the ntmber of Security reportable events Decenber 10CFR 70.71(c) for Security personnel errors to at least 50% below that of 1985.

All ccmpletion dates are the last day of the nonth indicated.

l 5/1/86

ha - n' r .no

~,0. li T U G g NIY' ' b"g

~~'

Attachment 10 MAY 2 01986 Docket No. 50-341 License No. NPF-33 EA 86-66 The Detroit Edison Company ATTN: Frank E. Agosti Vice President Nuclear Operations 6400 North Dixie Highway Newport, MI 48166 Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND PROPOSED IMPOSITION OF CIVIL PENALTIES

[NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-341/85047(DRSS)]

This refers to the special safeguards inspection conducted during the period November 12 through December 27, 1985 at the Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit 2, Newport, Michigan. The results of the inspection were discussed on January 17, 1986 during an enforcement conference between Mr. C. W. Heidel and others of the Detroit Edison staff and Mr. A. B. Davis and others of the NRC Region III staff.

The violations identified during this inspection resulted from the failure of your management control system to assure adherence to the provisions of your Commission approved physical security plan and related documents. The number of problems iaentified reflect unacceptable levels of management performance and programmatic weaknesses in several key areas of the security program.

While some of the violations may not be considered significant when viewed individually, the numoer of such violations makes it imperative that you increase your efforts for sufficient management involvement to assure activities are performed in accordance with established procedures and practices.

CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED I

& v / -O e-gh< m ,y v- -

\(( ,

Enclosure contains SAFEGUARDS INFORMATIO Upon Separation This a-OA-"OlA>To ^V Pass Is Decontrolled on _u sn s so ti OmUM

~

a Ud

'] N-n A "3 Y f ( "A i ll A " ^ L s -

~ vn  ;.0 u n \ Jo I 1 UTYM U T The Detroit Edison Company 2 MAY 2 01986

(

The NRC is particularly concerned with violation No. 13 which relates to falsification of records by a. member of the security guard force. The NRC views falsification of records which are required to be kept to be a serious concern. Such records are required to be kept to enable a licensee to adequately control the safety of its licensed activities. With regard to this particular instance, the NRC understands appropriate disciplinary action has been taken. Nonetheless, close licensee attention is needed to assure no recurrence of this problem.

To emphasize the importance the NRC places on effective management of the security program as well as the importance of personnel maintaining accurate and complete records required by the security plan, I have been authorized, after consultation with the Director, Office of Inspection and Enforcement, to issue the enclosed Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalties in the amount of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000) for the violations described -

in the enclosed Notice. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1985), the violations described in the enclosed Notice have beer. classified as a Severity Level III problem. The base value of a civil penalty for a Severity Level III problem or violation is 550,000. The NRC Enforcement Policy allows for reduction of a civil penalty under certain circumstances. Consideration was given to reducing the civil penalty by fifty percent because of your extensive corrective actions which included: (1) increased aucit commitments; (2) trend analysis commitments pertaining to access control viciations, maintenance support, and security reportable events; (3) an increased security surveillance program; (4) a detailed 100'. audit of all authorizec access records; (5) accelerated activity on Engineering Design Projects pertaining to security systems; and (6) proposed long term corrective actions to address adverse trends, organizational responsibilities, and review and revision of security plans.

. However, because of the pervasive nature of the violations and due to the multiple examples of violations in the area of access control, mitigation of the civil penalty is considered inappropriate.

You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response. You should place all Safeguards Information as defined in 10 CFR 73.21 only in enclosures, so that your letter may be placed in the Public Docurent Room.

In your response, you should dacument the specific actions taken and any additional actions you plan to prevent recurrence. After reviewing your response to this Notice, including your proposed corrective actions, the NRC will determine whether further NRC enforcement actior is necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements, inclosure Contains

$AFEGUARDS INFORM Upon Separation This Page 'Is Decontrolled

~

J u 'N 3 W U M D [A *"* L n su i s unyn

..-..a* --. ,. _ __

j' 5A-diUA U5 PU u_3_.,g,A ur The Detroit Edison Company 3 MAY 2 01986 I .

The responses directed by this letter and the enclosed Notice are not subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.

Sincerely,

[IU2I Fi

. c :.. t- ro.,.i.:cd g p<.

James G. Keppler Regional Administrator

Enclosures:

1. Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition -

of Civil Penalties

2. Inspection Report No. 50-341/85047(DRSS)

(UNCLASSIFIED SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION) cc w/ enclosures:

L. P. Bregni, Licensing Engineer

( P. A. Marquardt, Corporate Legal Department cc w/o enclosures:

See Attached Distribution

\O kiC o

W WY (

IE:E$v ELb . RII . I

\

I-Prob'nson JLieb an JKepp(PA.

ler ES:D xelrad S/c/86 5/ /86 leer J or 5/p/86 5/g5/86 g/86 g86 l

l RIII RIIT RII RII '

Qd, M Enclosure contains Stapleton/rr H,ind gg g'$ Da'vis f,4eppler SAFEGUARDS INFORMATil 4 gp h [f// ((/y Upon Separation This Page is pecontrolled

~8AFTrJA1JS F0UK OX

r

' i I,

l' The Detroit Edison Company MAY 2 01986 4

Distribution w/o enclosures:

PDR LPDR SECY CA ACRS JTaylor, IE RVollmer, IE JKeppler, RIII*

JAxelrad, IE PRobinson, IE" JLieberman, ELD Enforcement Coordinators -

RI, RII, RIII, RIV, RV FIngram, PA LCobb, IE VMiller, NMSS RBurnett, NMSS IE File IE/ES NMSS/SGPL NRR/DL/SSPB DCS Licensing Fee Management Branch Resident Inspector, RIII Ronald Callen, Michigan Public Service Commission Harry H. Voigt, Esq.

Nuclear Facilities and Environmental Monitoring Section Monroe County Office of Civil Preparedness w/ Safeguards Information Enclosure contains SAFEGUARDS INFORMATI Upon separation This i

Page is Decontrolled