Similar Documents at Fermi |
---|
Category:GENERAL EXTERNAL TECHNICAL REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20153B7921998-08-31031 August 1998 Rev 0 to Fermi 1 Sar ML20197A9921997-12-15015 December 1997 Rev 0 to Efp,Unit 1 Fermi 1 Sar ML20148A3191997-05-0202 May 1997 SE Summary Rept for Fermi 2, Rev 1 ML20137N1261997-03-25025 March 1997 Rev 0 to Leak-Before-Break Evaluation for Three Locations on Recirculation Sys at Fermi 2 ML20133A2311996-12-19019 December 1996 Ferm 2 CR Simulator Four Yr Rept ML20129A3511996-03-15015 March 1996 Rev 0 to Cchvac Duct & Duct Support Qualification ML20134J6241996-03-13013 March 1996 Rev 0 to Tmr 96-0003, Safety Evaluation ML20083A7591995-05-0808 May 1995 Safety Evaluation Summary Rept, Rev 7 NRC-94-0093, Main Turbine-Generator Vibration Monitoring & Balancing During Start-Up After RF041994-10-0707 October 1994 Main Turbine-Generator Vibration Monitoring & Balancing During Start-Up After RF04 ML20076J6211994-10-0606 October 1994 Safety Evaluation of Rev a to Edp 26726 ML20076J5831994-08-31031 August 1994 Turbine Failure Post-Event Earthquake Passive Instrumentation Data Evaluation ML20076J6081994-08-27027 August 1994 Root Cause Analyses of Fermi 2 Main Turbine Generator Event, Executive Summary ML20076J5891994-08-0808 August 1994 Structural Walkdown Final Rept ML20093N4781994-03-0303 March 1994 Gamma Spectroscopy Analysis Rept ML20093N4901994-03-0303 March 1994 Gamma Spectroscopy Analysis Rept ML20064L9841994-02-0404 February 1994 Turbine Failure,Post-Event Earthquake Instrumentation Data Evaluation ML20126J1141992-12-30030 December 1992 Nuclear Training Simulator Certification ML20099B9921992-07-10010 July 1992 Rev 0 to Updated NUREG-0619 Feedwater Nozzle Fatigue Crack Growth Analysis,Fermi Nuclear Power Plant Unit 2 ML20086P2551991-12-31031 December 1991 Nuclear Training Simulator Certification NRC-91-0039, Safety Evaluation Summary Rept 19901991-03-18018 March 1991 Safety Evaluation Summary Rept 1990 NRC-90-0041, Safety Evaluation Re as-built Notices1989-12-31031 December 1989 Safety Evaluation Re as-built Notices NRC-90-0104, Rev 1 to Decommissioning Cost Study of Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant Unit 11989-11-0808 November 1989 Rev 1 to Decommissioning Cost Study of Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant Unit 1 ML19354D4801989-10-20020 October 1989 Rev 1 to Safety Evaluation. ML19324B7551989-09-30030 September 1989 Radioiodine & Particle Transmission Through Sampling Lines for Standby Gas Treatment Sys Effluents at Fermi 2, Final Rept ML20248E7021989-09-30030 September 1989 Control Sys Common Power Source Failure Analysis Evaluation Rept for Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant Unit 2 ML20247H8991989-08-31031 August 1989 Control Sys Common Sensor Line Failure Analysis Evaluation Rept for Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant Unit 2 ML20245B3851989-06-13013 June 1989 ATWS Alternate Rod Insertion & Recirculation Pump Trip Response to NRC Rule 10CFR50.62 ML20235J4271987-09-30030 September 1987 Supplemental Environ Info Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit 1 ML20235G3041987-09-29029 September 1987 Partially Withheld, Preliminary Investigation of Enrico Fermi II Nuclear Power Plant ML20237K6061987-07-31031 July 1987 Suppl 1 to Dcrdr ML20236C8291987-06-29029 June 1987 Preimplementation Audit Rept for Dcrdr for Fermi-2 ML20234C9821987-05-21021 May 1987 Insp Followup of Failure of South Reactor Feed Pump Turbine,Fermi Unit 2 Nuclear Power Plant, Technical Review Rept ML20236C8601987-05-11011 May 1987 Post-Implementation Audit Rept for Fermi-2,SPDS ML20204F1701987-01-31031 January 1987 Maint,Mod & Outage Mgt Monthly Rept. Maint/Mods for Period Ending 870222, Manpower Tracking - Labor Distribution & Period Ending 870125, Hours by Craft Rept, Also Encl ML20209B8231987-01-30030 January 1987 Rev a to Heavy Loads Handling Review,Control of Heavy Loads Over or in Close Proximity to Irradiated Fuel or Critical Safety Sys Components ML20214Q4521986-11-30030 November 1986 Dcrdr Summary Rept,Fermi 2 ML20211D3961986-10-0303 October 1986 Preliminary Rept on Main Steam Bypass Piping Fatigue Analysis & Life Expectancy ML20211D4211986-10-0303 October 1986 Preliminary Steam Bypass Line Structural Evaluation ML20214J8391986-08-31031 August 1986 Final Rept on Metallurgical Investigation of Various Defects on Surfaces of Diesel Engine Aluminum-Tin Bearings ML20209E7591986-07-0202 July 1986 Response to Independent Overview Committee ML20213A5901986-06-30030 June 1986 Investigation of Surface Scoring of Main Bearings:Fairbanks Morse 38TD8-1/8 Diesels at Fermi II Power Plant ML20209E7791986-06-26026 June 1986 Program to Evaluate & Resolve Engineering Issues ML20141M9441986-01-30030 January 1986 Evaluation of Detroit Edison Mgt at Fermi 2 ML20237J4711985-08-31031 August 1985 Rev 1 to Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant Unit 2 Primary Containment Negative Pressure Analysis ML20128B7251985-06-30030 June 1985 Rev 4 to Evaluation of Containment Coatings A10089, Investigation of Engine Bearing Distress in Fairbanks-Morse Emergency Diesel Generators at Fermi-II Power Plant, Phase 1:Insp & Preliminary Conclusions1985-02-28028 February 1985 Investigation of Engine Bearing Distress in Fairbanks-Morse Emergency Diesel Generators at Fermi-II Power Plant, Phase 1:Insp & Preliminary Conclusions ML20115F3901985-02-28028 February 1985 Transfix Sys Description. W/Four Proprietary Drawings 8911-M-2000,2001,2006 & 9402-M-2100 Re Transfix Sys P&Id. Drawings Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790) ML20115F4381985-02-28028 February 1985 Comparison of NUS Process Svcs Corp Mobile Radwaste Processing Sys W/Guidelines of Us NRC Reg Guide 1.143 ML20106G1011985-01-31031 January 1985 Evaluation of Fire Doors 3-20 & 3-13 at Fermi 2 ML20117D5201985-01-31031 January 1985 Rev 0 to Mark I Wetwell to Drywell Differential Pressure Load & Vacuum Breaker Response for Fermi Atomic Power Plant Unit 2 1998-08-31
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20217N4381999-10-25025 October 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 17 to License DPR-9 ML20217P3551999-10-22022 October 1999 LER 99-S01-00:on 990922,loaded 9mm Handgun Was Discovered on Truck Cargo Area of Vehicle Inside Protected Area.Caused by Inadequate Vehicle Search.Guidance in Procedures & Security Training to Address Multiple Vehicle Searches Was Provided NRC-99-0095, Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Fermi 2.With1999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Fermi 2.With NRC-99-0067, Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Fermi 2.With1999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Fermi 2.With NRC-99-0065, Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Fermi 2.With1999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Fermi 2.With NRC-99-0088, Detroit Edison Co Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant,Unit 1 Annual Rept for Period 980701-990630. with1999-06-30030 June 1999 Detroit Edison Co Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant,Unit 1 Annual Rept for Period 980701-990630. with NRC-99-0064, Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Fermi 2.With1999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Fermi 2.With NRC-99-0062, Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Fermi 2.With1999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Fermi 2.With ML20206J9301999-05-10010 May 1999 SER Concluding That Util Adequately Addressed Actions Requested in GL 95-07, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Powered-Operated Gate Valves ML20206G5081999-05-0505 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Approving Request for Relief PR-8,Rev 2 on Basis That Licensee Committed to Meet All Related Requirements of ASME OM-6 Std & PR-12 on Basis That Proposed Alternative Will Provide Acceptable Level of Safety NRC-99-0022, Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Fermi 2.With1999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Fermi 2.With ML20205Q7141999-04-15015 April 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 16 to License DPR-9 ML20205P9721999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1999 for Fermi 2 ML20204E0371999-03-17017 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Request for NRC Approval of Alternative Rv Weld Exam,Per Provisions of 10CFR50.55a(a)(3)(i) & 10CFR50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(A)(5) for Plant,Unit 2 for 40-month Period ML20204D0361999-02-28028 February 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1999 for Fermi 2 ML20198S3341999-01-0606 January 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 15 to License DPR-9 NRC-99-0005, Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1998 for Fermi 2.With1998-12-31031 December 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1998 for Fermi 2.With ML20207B7491998-12-31031 December 1998 1998 Annual Operating Rept for Fermi 2 ML20205Q9621998-12-31031 December 1998 Revised Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1998 for Fermi 2 NRC-99-0021, 1998 Annual Financial Rept for Detroit Edison Co. with1998-12-31031 December 1998 1998 Annual Financial Rept for Detroit Edison Co. with NRC-98-0153, Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1998 for Fermi 2.With1998-11-30030 November 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1998 for Fermi 2.With NRC-98-0160, Monthly Operating Rept for Oct 1998 for Fermi 2.With1998-10-31031 October 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Oct 1998 for Fermi 2.With ML20154R2331998-10-21021 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 13 to License DPR-9 ML20154L1031998-10-14014 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Response to NRC Bulletin 95-002, Unexpected Clogging of Residual Heat Removal Pump Strainer While Operating in Suppression Pool Cooling Mode NRC-98-0139, Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1998 for Fermi,Unit 2.With1998-09-30030 September 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1998 for Fermi,Unit 2.With ML20154H8161998-09-30030 September 1998 Rev 0 to COLR Cycle 7 for Fermi 2 ML20153B8811998-09-18018 September 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Request for Relief from Certain Requirements of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Section Xi,For Plant,Unit 2 ML20151X0651998-09-11011 September 1998 Safety Evaluation Re Inservice Testing Program Relief Request VR-63 for Plant NRC-98-0111, Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1998 for Fermi 2.With1998-08-31031 August 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1998 for Fermi 2.With ML20153B7921998-08-31031 August 1998 Rev 0 to Fermi 1 Sar ML20237E1171998-08-25025 August 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Relief Requests for First 10-yr Interval Inservice Insp Nondestructive Exam Program ML20236X8611998-08-0505 August 1998 SER Related to Revised Feedwater Nozzle Analysis to Facility Operating License NPF-43,Enrico Fermi Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2 NRC-98-0109, Monthly Operating Rept for July 1998 for Fermi 21998-07-31031 July 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1998 for Fermi 2 ML20236K3261998-07-0101 July 1998 SER Accepting Licensee Response Related to Revised Feedwater Nozzle Analysis to License NPF-43 for Enrico Fermi Nuclear Power Plant,Unit 2 NRC-98-0097, Monthly Operating Rept for June 1998 for Fermi,Unit 21998-06-30030 June 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1998 for Fermi,Unit 2 NRC-98-0127, Annual Rept for Period 970701-9806301998-06-30030 June 1998 Annual Rept for Period 970701-980630 NRC-98-0079, Monthly Operating Rept for May 1998 for Fermi 21998-05-31031 May 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1998 for Fermi 2 NRC-98-0076, Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1998 for Fermi 21998-04-30030 April 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1998 for Fermi 2 NRC-98-0072, Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1998 for Fermi 21998-03-31031 March 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1998 for Fermi 2 NRC-98-0050, Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1998 for Fermi 21998-02-28028 February 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1998 for Fermi 2 NRC-98-0019, Monthly Operating Rept for Jan 1998 for Fermi 21998-01-31031 January 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Jan 1998 for Fermi 2 ML20198L4241998-01-0808 January 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Proposed Rev 2 to Relief Request VR-51 Under Fermi 2 Pump & Valve Inservice Testing Program Per 10CFR50.55a(f)(6)(i) for First 10-yr Interval NRC-98-0015, Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1997 for Fermi 21997-12-31031 December 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1997 for Fermi 2 ML20217N3821997-12-31031 December 1997 Annual Operating Rept for 970101-1231 NRC-98-0053, 1997 Annual Financial Rept for Detroit Edison Company1997-12-31031 December 1997 1997 Annual Financial Rept for Detroit Edison Company ML20205Q9601997-12-31031 December 1997 Revised Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1997 for Fermi 2 NRC-97-0141, Deficiency Rept Re Malfunction of EDG Number 11 Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR) Printed Circuit Board Rev B,Due to Failure of Operational Amplifier U8 Chip.Avr Board Rev B Was Sent Offsite to Independent Engineering Facility1997-12-23023 December 1997 Deficiency Rept Re Malfunction of EDG Number 11 Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR) Printed Circuit Board Rev B,Due to Failure of Operational Amplifier U8 Chip.Avr Board Rev B Was Sent Offsite to Independent Engineering Facility ML20197A9921997-12-15015 December 1997 Rev 0 to Efp,Unit 1 Fermi 1 Sar NRC-97-0131, Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1997 for Fermi 21997-11-30030 November 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1997 for Fermi 2 ML20248H1151997-10-31031 October 1997 Rev 1 to Colr,Cycle 6 for Fermi 2 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
- -
PROFESSIONAL LOWS CONTROL, INC.
EVALUATION OF FIRE DETECTION PLACEMENT AT FERMI 2 DETROIT EDIS0N C0.
Date Submitted: January 31, 1985 Prepared by: Robert J. 0'Laughlin, P.E., CSP Senior Fire Protection Engineer Professional Loss Control, Inc.
8502140230 850204 PDR ADOCK 05000341 F PDR -
P. O. Dox 446
- Oak Ridge. Tennessec 37831 e (615) 482-3541
O O TABLE OF CONTENTS Subject Page 1.0 Introduction.............................................. 1 2.0 Control Room Complex...................................... 1 2 .1 F i r e A r e a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2.2 Fire Hazards.......................................... 1 2.3 Safe Shut Down Equipment.............................. 2 2.4 Fire Protection....................................... 2 2.5 Conclusion............................................ 2 3.0 Torus Area................................................ 3 3 .1 F i re A r e a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3 . 2 F i r e H a z a rd s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3.3 Fire Protection....................................... 3 3.4 Safe Shut Down Equipment.............................. 3 3.5 Conclusion............................................ 4 ;
4.0 Refueling Floor - 5th Floor of the Reactor Building....... 4 4.1 Fire Area ............................................ 4 4 . 2 F i r e H a z a rd s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 4.3 Safe Shut Down Equipment.............................. 5 4.4 Fire Protection....................................... 5 4.5 Conclusion............................................ 5
a
.. 1.0 Introduction This report reviews the fire detectors placement in three specific nuclear safety related areas:
Control Room Complex Torus, f geactor Mr ef the E '?ieri Building Refueling Floor - 5th floor The following sections will evaluate the need for fire detection in these three areas with specific emphasis on:
The fire area Fire hazards Safety related equipment Fire protection 2.0 Control Room Complex 2.1 Fire Area The control room is separated froin the reactor building and tur-bine building by 3. hour fire resistance wall and floor / ceiling assemblies. The control room has a drop ceiling approximately 22 ft above the floor. The main ceiling is approximately 32 ft above this floor. The stairwell in the northeast corner of the room is enclosed by two hour fire resistive construction.
The ventilation air is supplied by the control center HVAC sys-tem. Supply and return ducts are provided with fire dampers at the three hour barriers.
The exterior finish material within the control room has a maxi-mum flame spread of 25, smoke developed of 50 and fuel contribu-tion of 50. The control room contains no carpet.
2.2 Fire Hazards Combustibles in this area consist of electrical cable insulation, paper and plastics. The combustible loading within the room is less than 10 lb/ft2. No flammable or combustible liquids are used in this area except very small quantities permitted by procedures.
1
O O The amount of combustible material above the drop ceiling is
. negligible. The combustible loading is less than 1 lb/ft . 2 2.3 Safe Shutdown Equipment The control room contains the control and instruments necessary for safe shutdown.
2.4 Fire Protection The control room is manned all of the time. The computer room (a peripheral room) is protected by an automated Halon 1301 fi re suppression system. This system protects the computer room and the computer room underfloor area. A manual hose station is lo-cated just outside the south wall of the control room. Portable fire extinguishers (Halon and CO2 ) are located within the control room.
Ionization smoke detectors are located inside each of the control board panels. Smoke detectors are provided above the drop ceil-ing but do not conform to the spacing requirements of NFPA 72E (beam pocket criteria).
The kitchen room is provided with a spot thermal detector.
2.5 Conclusion The fire detection capability within the control room complex is adequate to detect incipient smoldering and flaming mode fires.
This is based upon:
The control room is manned all of the time.
The control room panels are provided with smoke detectors.
The amount of combustibles above the drop ceiling is negligible (<1 lb/ft )2 Therefore, placing additional detectors above the drop ceiling to conform with the spacing requirements in NFPA 72E will not sig-
.nificantly enhance the fire protection for the control room.
2
O O 3.0 Torus
. 3.1 Fire Area The torus area is an octagonally shape room in the reactor build-ing which extends from Elev. 540'-0" up to Elev. 583'-6". The room contains piping, cabling and the suppression pool (torus) .
The walls and floor are constructed of reinforced concrete. The ceiling assembly is constructed of reinforced concrete over steel beams.
The ventilation in the torus area is provided by conditioned air from the four basement corner rooms. The exhaust air is ducted to the main exhaust system.
3.2 Fire Hazards The combustible material in this area consists of electrical cable insulation. The total combustible loading for the torus area is 19,000 BTU /ft 2. No in-situ flammable or combustible liquids are located in the torus area.
EPRI tests have demonstrated that electrical shorts will not pro-pagate a fire in this type of insulation material. The EPR/Hy-palon jacketed cable has a high degree of fire retardance.
3.3 Safe Shutdown Equipment The torus area contains Division I and 11 shutdown cables. The torus room conforms to the requirements of Appendix R except for filed deviations.
3.4 Fire Protection The torus area has an automatic sprinkler system that protects the entire area. This system will protect any exposed structure steel from thermal degradation during any fire condition. The water flow alarm for the sprinkler system transmits signals to the control room upon actuation.
3
--~v
O O Fire detection in the torus area consists of 8 ionization smoke
. . detectors which are located adjacent to the exhaust duct grills.
These detectors do not conform to the spacing requirements of NFPA 72E (beam pocket criteria).
3.5 Conclusion The fire protection in the torus area is adequate to protect the safe shutdown capability of this area. The automatic sprinkler system will protect at least one of the functionally redundant systems which is needed for safe shutdown.
Additional fire detectors will not enhance to a sufficient degree the fire protection provided by the current configuration based upon:
Light combustible load (19,000 BTU /ft2)
Complete automatic sprinkler protection High ceiling height (approximately 43 ft - will not detect a smoldering fire due to the lack of a thermal plume).
Spatial separation of functionally redundant equipment.
EPR/Hypalon cable insulation.
No in-situ flammable or combustible liquids in the area.
4.0 Refueling Floor - 5th Floor of Reactor Building 4.1 Fire Area The refueling floor (El. 684'-6") of the reactor building is en-closed by outside walls on the north, south and west sides; the east wall separates the reactor building from the auxiliary
-building. The east wall is constructed of reinforced concrete up to Elev. 701' and provides a three hour fire resistance barrier between this area and the auxiliary building.
The roof consists of steel frame and built-up roof deck conform-ing to Factory Mutual Class 1 roof construction. The ceiling height is approximately 51 ft. The total volume of the room is 911,000 ft 3, 4
O O The refueling floor contains the fuel storage pool, the dryer /
separator pool, and the decontamination area.
l The HVAC system supplies air directly thorough ducts to the floor area. Air is exhausted from these areas through ducts to the reactor / auxiliary building ventilation system.
4.2 Fire Hazards The types of combustibles on the refueling floor primarily con-sists of lubricating oil for the gear box in the fuel handling crane. The estimated total heat of combustion is 12,000,000 BTU with a combustible loading of 600 BTU /ft2 ,
Transit combustibles will be in the area during refueling peri-ods.
4.3 Safe Shutdown Equipment The refueling floor contains n_o,osafe shutdown equipment.
4.4 Fire Protection Fire suppression equipment consists of four (4) manual hose sta-tions and portable fire extinguishers (dry chemical and water types).
Ionization smoke detectors (8) are located at ceiling level but l
do not conform to the spacing rgquirements of NFPA 72E (beam pocket criteria).
4.5 Conclusion The fire protection provided on the refueling floor is capable of preventing the spread of fire from the refueling floor to areas containing safe shutdown equipment.
5 i
- - - __ , _.r. . . , , - -
O Additional detectors will not enhance the fire protection to a significant degree based upon:
A low combustible loading (<1 lb/ft2)
No in-situ flammable liquids in the area A high ceiling height (51 ft) - smoldering fires will not be detected at this height. A significant thermal fire plume would have to be developed in a fire to cause the fire by-products to rise to the detectors on the ceiling.
r Fi1e Ref: FR-11-005-06 '
6 w
O O-O e 4
f 2
F i
15 h
DEVIATION REQUEST FOR FIRE DETECTOR REPLACEMENT
- i. _
4 FOR 1
REACTOR BUILDING BASEMENT CORNER ROOMS
~~
PERFORMED.BY DETROIT EDISON I
i i
s a
f r
4 I
1
r O O 1.0 Basement Corner Rooms 1.1 Fire Zones The basement Corner Rooms consist of four unconnected triangular shaped rooms, one of which is located in each corner of the Reactor Building.
Each room is comprised of two floors, one at elevation 540', the other at elevation 562'. An open stairwell in each room connects each floor.
Walls and floors are reinforced concrete with unprotected openings. Specifically this evaluation is for the 562' elevations.
1.2 Fire Hazards At the 562' elevation, combustibles consist of electrical cable insulation. Each room has 2 or 3 trays which run along the wall separating the Corner Room from the Torus Room. The trays are lightly: loaded (less than 50% visual) and are located approximately 15 ft. off the floor. Each room has instrument racks located in it. No other fixed combustibles are present.
1.3 Safe Shutdown Equipment
- ' Each room contains only one functionally redundant division of Appendix R shutdown equipment and cables.-
1.4- Fire Protection Fire detection is provided at each level. The basement level (562' elevation) detector does-not meet the spacing requirements of NFPA 72E when-evaluated against the beam pocket criteria con-tained within this standard.. Additionally, the-detector is' located on the beam approximately 24
' inches from the ceiling.
l l
Manual hose stations and portable fire extin-guishers are available in the zones.
L
- 1.5 conclusion i
The' fire protection in the Corner Rooms is 3
adequate to protect the safe shutdown capability 1
aof these areas.' Placement of additional fire detectors does not enhance to a significant degree the fire protection provided by the current-j configuration based upon:
f .
0 0 Light Combustible Loading EPR/Hypalon Cable Insulation Physical Separation of Functionally Redundant Equipment ..
No Insitu Flammable or Combustible Liquids at the 562' elevation In-addition, statification of smoke is a distinct possibility due to the small fire loading. If a small delay of fire detection is postulated, the safe shutdown capability of the plant will not be jeopardized.
f' 4
d r
l j .:
Attachment C 6 0 t
i 3
4 I
i a
}
r I
5 1
+
I I
I.
I
- e 4
4 1
k b
1 1
~n-,e , - . =- . - ,- , . . ,._, , , .,.--- - ,.,. , ,._,,.,n - - , .--,-..-,,,n- - _..-., . --