ML20237K606
| ML20237K606 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 07/31/1987 |
| From: | DETROIT EDISON CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20237K591 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8708270230 | |
| Download: ML20237K606 (717) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:-- - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ . .___ - . _ . _ _ U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Docket No. 50-341 License flo. NPF43 Fermi 2 Detailec Control Room Design Review Supplement 1 July 1987 r
.' -9,.p-ai- _
I, _'g
- c. w - _.. . ~ ~Mmi,5 gw, .
m cjk Ys ? L.-n;
~
P ~qs-^c; nkf=4 f '%t}ch s pg w g;:l " p hQi-= m - e$${~$$QW? S *** 5
~W", x,pn g2.f' bN$$:
,,4 ar - _'
f Q, & ^ l W_ w.
. L y +
J )] y, ,~ v g w 1L,,.aff.y,c;,t"'.. cy J => R ,,a\4dMN41 . utv
.=w. s, sw ~. .
n.ewe e~ -a .,Jf~ >i ~%~ ,.m<<
$A% M.% v t j l Vl , I u, l h e : g: -..
R A me P /a # T i! Sip@e -12 @? 7 s e$ $ p
. u-ww ,~ .
~
Cf? /l 4 . / G @ ,v \ . l
~~ % y%s y \
l A47 3-e f> g/ ! Detroit l Edison 1 1 8708270230 970819 PDR ADOCK 05000341 P. PDR i
i l DETROIT EDISON COMPANY Fermi 2 Detail Control Room Design Review Report Supplement 1 July 31, 1987
TABLE OF CONTENTS i Section Page {-
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1-1 l 1 1.1 General Comments 1-1 1.2 DCRDR Purpose and Requirements 1-2 1.3 Plant Description 1-3 , 1.4 Plant Features Covered by the DCRDR 1-4 1.5 Previous Human Factors Work in the ' Control Room 1-4 Glossory of Terms and Acronyms 1-8 2.0 PLANNING PHASE 2-1 e 2.1 Planning Phase Objectives 2-1
-2.2 DCRDR Management and Staffing 2-1 2.3 Data Management . 2-6 2.4 Equipment and Work Space 2-9 2.5 Planning Phase Documentation 2-9 3.0 REVIEW PHASE 3-1 3.1 Review Phase Processes 3-1
[ 3.2 Operating Experience Review 3-1 3.3 Control Room Survey 3-5 3.4 Function Review and Task Analysis 3-6 3.5 . Validation of Control Room Functions 3-18 4.0 ASSESSMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION PHASE 4-1 l 1 4.1 Assessment and Implementation Activities- 4-1 j 4.2 Analyze and Categorize HEDs 4-1 4.3 Assessment of Cumulative Effects 4-3 4.4 Recommend and Evaluate HED Resolutions 4-4 4.5 Documented Schedule and Resolution Implementation 4-5 4.6 Evaluation of Design Improvements 4-5 i l l _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ -
1 5.0 ONGOING PROGRAM 5-1 6.0- PROGRAM INTEGRATION 6 -l '~. 6.1 . General' Comments 6-1 6.2- DCRDR Integration'with'Other ERC Programs 6-1 7.0 REVIEW FINDINGS 7-1 Appendix 1 - References Appendix 2 - Resumes Appendix'3 - Link Analysis Appendix 4 - HEDs. l. l l l l i 4 1 I \ l l l 11 L 4
FERMI 2 DETAILED CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW REPORT Supplement l'
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 General Comments Detroit Edison has an established history of applying human factors engineering principles to the design of control rooms. Design and review activities that have been undertaken for the Fermi 2 Control Room have included: o Application of human factors in original design with review of control panel layout by a multidiscipline Control Room Task Force. o Construction of a full scale control room mockup. o Participation in the BWR Owners Group (BWROG) control room design review program and completion of a control room survey by the BWROG. o NRC Human Factors Engineering Branch review of the Fermi 2 control room with subsequent Detroit Edison Company's assessment and implementation of improvements. o Installation of a full scale plant referenced simulator at the Fermi 2 site. The current program as discussed in this report addresses-the requirements of NUREG-0737. The program included human factor surveys of the control room panels, assessments of findings from operating interviews, task analysis of Plant Specific Technical Guidelines, Validation of Control Room functions, Licensee Event Report reviews for Fermi and two other plants and remaining open Category 3 items from a previous Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) survey. 1-1 s
l l 1.2 DCRDR Purpose and Requirements 1.2.1 Program Purpose The DCRDR identified and provided suggested improvements in the control room that offer high probability for improving plant safety by strengthening the man-machine interface. Emphasis was placed on improving both Emergency Response Capability (ERC) ,. and other areas of operations. The task analysis of the Plant Specific Technical Guidelines (PSTGs) is directed at ERC while operator interviews, surveys and licensee event review (LER) address all areas of the man-machine interface. 1.2.2 Regulator Requirements and Guidance To accomplish the above purpose, Detroit Edison Company has designed the DCRDR to fulfill the requirements of NUREG-0737 Supplement 1-(Section 5), in accordance with the guidance of the applicable portions of NUREG-0700 and NUREG-0800. These requirements for the Fermi 2 DCRDR are:
- a. The establishment of a qualified multidisciplinary review team and a review j pro ram incorporating accepted human eng neering principles.
- b. The use of system functions review and task analysis to identify contro) room operator tasks, information and control requirements during emergency operations.
- c. A comparison of the display and control requirements with a control room inventory to identify missing or unsuitable displays and controls.
- d. A dynamic performance evaluation that j determined whether the physical and organizational design for operations was 1-2 i
1 I
I ade@ ate ~to support an effective integrated performance of the functions of the control room crew.
~
- e. A control room survey to identify deviations,
- from accepted human factors' principles.
.This survey.will include, among other things, an assessment of the control room is layout,:the usefulness.of audible and visual-the information recording and alarm recallsystems,ity capabil and.the control ~ room environment.
- f. Assessment of Human Engineering Discrepancies (HEDs)'. ,,
- g. Selection of design. improvements that will correct these discrepancies.
- h. A verification that each selected design improvement provides the necessary.
correction and could be-introduced into the control' room without creating.other HEDs due
'unreviewed safety to increased questions or risks, situations in which a temporary reduction in safety could occur.
Improvements introduced will be coordinated with changes resulting from other improvement programs such as Safety Parameter Display System (SPDS)g Emergency-Response Capability (ERC) training, Post Accident Monitoring.(PAM) instrumentation and upgraded Emergency Operating Procedures (EOPs). 1.3 Plant Description 1.3.1 Plant Site and Description Fermi 2 is located on the Western shore of Lake Erie, at Lagoona Beach, Monroe' County, Michigan. The Fermi 2 Nuclear Steam Supply System (NSSS) is a General Electric Boiling Water Reactor /4 (BWR/4) with a Mark I containment. Significant dates for Fermi 2 are listed below: 1-3 *
..-_.c- - _ . _ . . _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ . - - . - _ _ - - _ - - _ - -
t l l-P l l Milestone Date Application for Construction Permit April 1969-Construction Permit (CPPR-87)-Issued Sept 1972 Operating License Granted (Low Power) March 1985-Operating._ License Granted-(Full' Power) July 1985 1.4 Plant Features-Covered by the DCRDR 1.4.1 Main Control Room The central focus of the DCRDR was the main-control room shown in Figures 1-1,1-2 and 1-3. 1.4.2 Remote Shutdown Panel Also included in the DCRDR were the displays and 4 controls required to bring the plant.to hot shutdown should the main control room become uninhabitable. -This item is listed below: o Panel H21-P100, Division I Remote Shutdown l Panel ? 1.5- Previous Human Factors Work in the Control Room l 1.5.1 Fermi 2 Control Room Task Force The Detroit Edison management has been aware of the problems that man-machine interface can-pose :' in modern plants. Therefore as early.as 1965, a task force approach was used to design the Control Room of the Trenton Channel Fossil Unit 9A. This approach was later followed on the other Detroit Edison fossil units such as St. Clair 7 and Monroe Units 1,2,3 and 4. 1-4 1
I s . t The advantages of this' concept encouraged ~ , management to continue the task force approach-and a1 Fermi 12 Control-Room. Task Force was created.in'the earlier stages of the' Fermi'2 design.. The task force incluaed members with' the.following expertise: o operators with experience in Nuclear Plant operations. o Control Systems and Instrumentation Engineers. ct Engineering Specialists. j l" o- -Research Psychologist. o
-Control Board Designers.
Following.that effort, an initial: control room-l design review was conducted by an-independent l group of the BWR Owners Group.(BifROG), using review guidelines developed by the BWR Owner's Group and approved by the NRC staff.- The results of this review were transmitted to the NRC in early 1981. Subsequently, the control room was-surveyed by NRC personnel. Any commitments resulting thereof were part of the-Fermi 2 Safety Evaluation Report, NUREG-0798. 1.5.2 Control Room Console Human Factors Review l I The operators' console was designed using human-engineering principles. As a first step, the operational functions assigned to this station were defined. These were reviewed with the functions allocated to other areas such as Alarm Records Desk and Communications Center. The functional requirements-included items such as communications needs, visibility.of main panels, . computer access (both plant and SPDS , limited work space to prepare logs, review ma)terials and .l 4 site evacuation alarms. A human engineering criterion was then detailed which included features such as anthropometry, vision, work I space, CRT adjustment, maintenance - removal of components'and sit / stand operation. 1-5 1 t
M l a1 ,
' Drawings-and a full scale mock-up were then l developed. Operational personnel, engineering l and human factors psychologists.were-a part of theLdevelopmentLand review process. The console 3 was constructed only after final. review by.the console Task Group.
1.5.3 Transition from' Previous Work to the DCRDR
' Safety Evaluation Appendix report for D of NUREG-0798,ified Fermi'2, ident HEDs from the NRC review of the control room. -These HEDs were subsequently reviewed with NRC personnel from' the Human Factors branch on November 4, 1933.
All HEDs'were construction completed with the exception-of color coding of meter scales and Category 3 items which were to be addressed in
'the. Detailed Control Room. Design Review, which is being undertaken now and is the subject of this report. Details of above were conveyed to NRC on July 25, 1984(Reference 1).
As described earlier the original Fermi-2 Control Room was des 1gned using a task force approach employing personnel with background in Industrial Psychology, various engineering disciplines, plant personnel including operators, maintenance.and instrument and control-(I&C) personnel. An outcome of this task force was a set of standards in the form of drawings which have been used for modifications to the control boards. Though the original panels were left with approximately twenty-five percent room for expansion, system changes and additional requirements have taxed the available panel space which led to some compromises. An i example of an additional requirement'is the new symptom based emargency procedures which could not be anticipated at the time of earlier design. 1-6 i 1
With this DRCDR, Detroit Edison is conducting another review of the control room using NUREG-0700,and the PSTGs,-re-evaluating all panels to encompass the modifications previously completed. This goes beyond the original commitment which was to do the Control Room Design Review using only a supplement of the BWR Owners Group program to complement the original detailed review done in 1981. The BWROG l Supplement incorporated the~ differences between the standards. prevailing in 1981 and the later issued NRC documents such as NUREG-0737 Supplement 1 and NUREG-0700. An outcome of the present review will be control room modification guidelines which will strengthen the already existing control room . design standards. These will assure, for any 1 future modifications a continuity of the excellent features in the existing Fermi 2 l Control Room. l l l 1-7 l l ' 1 l
~ ~ ,,<, ;) ]
g. L l Glossary of Terms and Acronyms
- 1. . General Remarks a
A: number of terms.and acronyms were used that apply.to l
-the~DCRDR.. Since there are differences in the usage of 1 these terms the definitions shown below applied to all lFermi 2 DCRDR activities. Applicable-acronyms are also
' listed.
- 2. Terms a .- Control Room - The term " Control Room" refers to all plant. features covered by the DCRDR as outlined'in Section 1.0, Subsection 1.4. The.tarm " main control room" was used to denote the control room.as shown in Figure 1-1 and did not include the Remote Shutdown Panel. .
- b. Control Room Enhancements - surface modifications that are cosmetic and do not involve major physical changes, for example, demarcation, labeling changes and painting.
- c. Control Room Survey - A static verification of the control room performed by comparing the existing control room instrumentation and layout with selected checking human engineering the control design room match to criteria,icali.e.,
the phys capabilities and limitations of the human operator.
- d. Detailed Control Room Design Review (DCRDR) - The Control Room Design Review described in this report, consistent with guidance of NUREG-0737 (Item I.D.1) and NUREG-0737 Supplement 1 (Section 5).
- e. DCRDR Review Team - A multidiscipline group of individuals responsible for directing and/or conducting the DCRDR of a specific control room.
4 1-8 4
r- - _
- f. Emergency Operating Procedures (EOPs) - Plant procedures directing operator actions necessary to mitigate the consequences of accidents. The EOPs were developed using the Plant Specific Technical Guidelines (PSTGs) and the EOP Writers Guide per NUREG-0899.
- g. Emergency Procedures Guidelines (EPGs) - The technical guidelines developed by the BWR Owners Group (BWROG), which provided sound engineering basis for use in developing BWR PSTGs and EOPs.
- h. Final Summary Report - Report of the results of the DCRDR as described by NUREG-0737 Supplement 1 (Section 5.2.b) in Detroit Edison's DCRDR Report, Supplements 1 and 2.
- i. Function / Functional Analysis - The examination of system goals to determine the functions the system requires. Also, examination of the required functions with respect to available manpower, technology and other resources to determine how the functions may be allocated and executed. In the DCRDR, primarily the identification of established functions and examination of how they were allocated and executed.
- j. Function Allocation - The distribution of functions among the human and automated constituents of a system.
- k. Function (Subfunction) - A kind of activity (or a static role) performed by one or more system constituents (people, mechanisms, structures) to contribute to a larger activity or goal state.
- 1. Guidance - A given condition that is subject to modification or change when adequate, documented justification is provided.
1-9
- e. ,.
9 . 9
- m. Human' Engineering - The science of optimizing the performance of human beings, especially in industry. ,
the science of the desi , Also, morefor equipment narrowlyient effic use by human beings.gn of
- n. Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) - A departure ,
from some bench mark of system design suitability [ for the roles and capabilities of the human operator.
- o. Operator - Any NRC-licensed individual in a nuclear power facility who manipulated a control or directed ~
another to manipulate a control. s [,
- p. Operating Experience Review - One of the activities of a DCRDR. The operating experience review screens plant operating documents and operator experience to discover human engineering shortcomings that have caused, or could have caused, actual operating problems in the past.
- g. Plant Specific Technical Guidelines (PSTGs? - The plant specific technical requirements developed from the BWROG EPGs, along with any other plant specific requirements determined necessary for mitigating the consequences of an accident. The PSTGs provided the technical basis for the EOPs.
- r. Requirement - A given condition that is not subject to modification or change.
- s. Safety Parameter Display Systems (SPDS) - An aid to the control room operating crew for use in monitoring the status of peak parameters. The SPDS also is capable of displaying the EOP curves.
- t. System Punctions Analysis - The determination of system functions required to meet system goals.
1-10 , k i
\
k
=
y
l l u. System Function Description - A brief description of the system function as determined by the design basis of the plant. The complete system description is contained in the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) .
- v. System (Subsystem) - An organization of interdependent constituents that worked together in a patterned manner to accomplish some purpose.
W. System (s) Analysis - Examination of a complex organization and its constituents to define their relationships and the means by which their actions and interactions were regulated to achieve goal states.
- x. Task Analysis - The systematic process of identifying and examining operator tasks in order to identify conditions, instrumentation and controls associated with the performance of a task. In the DCRDR context, task analysis is used to determine the individual tasks that must be completed to allow successful emergency operation. In addition, this activity can verify and validate the match of information available in the control room to the information requirements of the emergency operating tasks.
- y. Task (Subtask) - A specific action, performed by a single system constituent,ishment of a function. person or equipment, contributed to the accompl In that the DCRDR, only tasks allocated to people, in particular to control room operators, were addressed in detail.
1-11
M~ l
- z. Validation - The process of determining whether the physical and organizational design for operations was adequate to support effective integrated performance of the functions of the control room operating crew. In the DCRDR context, validation implies a dynamic performance evaluation.
aa. Verification - The process of determining whether instrumentation, controls and other equipment met t l the specific requirements of tha task performed by l operators. In the DCRDR context, verification impljes a static check of instrumentation and controls against information and control I requirements specified in the Task Analysis. , u
*\
9 1-12
g (
- 3. Acronym List -
ATWS - Anticipated Transient Without Scram BWR - Boiling Water Reactor BWROG - BWR Owners Group CR - Control Room CRT - Cathode Ray Tube (Display) DBMS - Database Management System DCRDR - Detailed Control Room Design Review S EOP -- Emergency Operating Procedure EPG - Emergency Procedures Guideline ERC - Emergency Response Capabiliity ERIS - Emergency Response Information System UFSAR - Updated Final Safety Analysis Report HED - Human Engineering Discrepancy HF - Human Factors HFC - Human Factors Consultant I&C - Instrumentation and Controls LER - Licensee Event Report NRC - Nuclear Regulatory Commission NTOL - Near Term Operating License PAM - Post-Accident Monitoring PGP - Procedures Generation Package PSTG - Plant Specific Technical Guideline R3 - Regulatory Guide NSS - Nuclear Shift Supervisor SPDS - Safety Parameter Display System V&V - Verification and Validation 9 1-13 - x
3 ORCULATWO WATER g MFPT CONTROLS ! a f RHR SERVICE WATER 0 f PIREPVWPS - % PIEoWATER HEATING & f HEATER DRAINS i OENERAL SERV 8CE WATER l \ g i S g CONDENSATE SYSTEM & 8 l AUXILIARY SOILER /yy,g CONDENSATE STDRAQE l g # STAfsON AIR / PRIMARY CONT AeNedENT t, , 4 l [ asONTTORfNG
*, e / CONTAINGRENT ATMOSPHERE tums T*
oEMEygS 807 CON Rb" ENTER HVAC p u = ^c' a auaac avAc 0,8 E . ,ARATOR = =ATER J ^ 80s C "'"'.U/Ro ,,Ae
=,'u",",^y4,
- 808 6 '
FIGURE 1.3 l 804 N, mRT.o
..,**. PRIMARY CONTAINMENT
. ao"naac FIGURE 1.2 CONTAWMENT ATheOSPMERE
+ 817 CONTROL SLC STANDSV GAS TREATMENT RHR VENTILATION C%D MYDRAULICS
=UmON MONnO .No _
EtACTOR PROTECTION REACTOR CONTROL 603 +- 814 CEACTOR RECIRCULATION -------- PEEowATER & vtSSEt LEVEL CONTROL 815
+ POLISHWG
- 816 DEMINERALtZERS OPERATOR'S CONSOLE ALARM FIRE PROTECTION &
flECORD
"',*", DESK naciATeON 300Nff0fWNG
,,,,- FIGURE 1.3 aHR 602 -
809 CORE SPRAY wWCLEAR eOLER 601 " HPCI DIESEL GENERATOR DRYWELL SUMP PUMFN 4140 AND 400v NSTRISUTION RwCU 810 RSCCW / RNR j 811 ,
,/ CORE SPRAY j \s
, RCic e
/ EECW l g g \
/ ADS 8 134sxV l 'g a
MAM STEAM RSOLAtlON l l 3RgAggR I DIESEL GENERATOR
- g
/ LEAN o(TECTiON . CONTROL , diso Awo Asov o'STmiSuriON
# l i *
. i MAIN CONTROL ROOM PANEL ARRANGEMENT Tigure 1_1
~
I l
.a% . ~ *i ~ w,,. < ,
h k i$ . l.Ml[M
* ~4m. wo 7,; ,
~
j .
'9~'g" w .i[NN
~
' y~M)I.T ,p g o,, g
,,,;x;rg w
. yyh.m ya,,.g,= , ,,n,, w~ -
_ . s._, e m .,.
.. a. aa. _
I f. 4 K
~
K ^ m..-y . -. _,u-.... _ __ . , _ . . . ~ , h . gg a
. . .r . . - i 5'
- ,y ,
1 , .. .e en I. \ a en y ..e ,.
. .=
I'
' ~'
R
' ~
i : ..l , - .h .a: <.s
,. ,j ..N.jd : ;-rip f.
' ..'... k. _w 4t..
,yd* P -T ' -Y e*
f s .i s '#
.M a ' .
.m f'r)?)w,%.c ).W**4.., e 4
- l {:$,y';2; &p>, ., h '
&, yA ;,.oy- T , ; , mu, .
c.4a g g(.. , .m.p , r.n ,. . , . . - n : y 9.m .w r ..< . .
- p& --' t 4 g -g'" .n..:.
34 p,t
, li , - . . -
_s -. ks~n FIGURE 1-2 MAIN CONITOL DOCM Panels H11-P601, 602, 603, 804, 805 (Left to Right)
O
, T.
f[')^
'" v, ,P
.l , ,. E d4 U p, Ll -! ' ' ' . a, Of (jj H ,. ' I 'l l -
.I i s
B $pUSM93hMW
,, n us; e.. .
%%"GF 2"*. "!"*:een 5'i' y';!.!.;;;. ~~ l;l,f; '
Sam,
.1 '
";v
! Nj
,,,-**, g
. r 5 ~bk, ,)). , b QL)L) c.v.w.Y!.A.*.h ..
V.=.a . g.] .., 4. > .ur.As, I,00 , ,, ,,
~ s e 1- , p
[ #f e e PIGJim 1-3 MM N CCNI*IOL IKXN Tt)p lef t to Pigtit : Pancin illl-P606, et07, 608, ti] 7 I'O t t C [Of t t. : G iant P ano l .c 'i] ] -P 9 } f. 904, El fl All
1 2.0 PLANNING PHASE 2.1 Planning Phase Objectives The main objectives of the Planning Phase were to completely identify activities and schedule sequences of events by the responsible organization and to i develop a Program Plan for submittal to the NRC. 2.2 DCRDR Management and Staffing i 2.2.1 DCRDR Team Structure
- s. Team Management Detroit Edison Company's management recognize the importance of the DCRDR and the other
!?UREG-0737 Supplement 1 programs. Detroit Edison Company is dedicated to providing the management involvement necessary to provide a complete, multidisciplined control room review.
However, the day-to-day conduct of the review (including the use of additional support for the DCRDR Team as needed) was the responsibility of the DCRDR Team Leader. The DCRDR Team Leader provided the program management oversight to ensure the accomplishment of the project objectives and to meet the regulatory requirements of the review. The DCRDR Team Leader was responsible for planning, scheduling, coordinating and integrating all DCRDR activities.
- b. Team Members The DCRDR Team consisted of a core group of specialists in Human Factors engineering, plant operations, nuclear system engineering and Instrumentation and Controls (I&C) engineering.
This core group included personnel who were knowledgeable in licensing, training, program management and other NUREG-0737 Supplement 1 programs such as SPDS and upgrade of Emergency Operating Procedures (EOPs). 2-1
- c. DCRDR Teams Two DCRDR teams are described below and reflect a change in programmatic support to General Physics (GP) from General Electric (GE).
Detroit Edison Company modified the scope of the DCRDR to complete a control room survey per the guidelines of NUREG-0700 rather than the BWROG supplemental checklist. This survey activity coupled with other program support needs and contractor schedule commitments resulted in contractor support. The DCRDR team described in the DCRDR Report submitted to the NRC on November 30, 1986 was supported by GE and completed the Task Analysis Review portion of the program. The present team is supported by - GP and has or will complete DCRDR activities for the survey and operating experience reviews. 2.2.2 Present DCRDR Team Member Qualifications and Duties: The qualifications of the DCRDR Team members. comply with the NUREG-0E00 criteria. The team members' resumes are provided in Appendix 2. Briefly, the team members include:
- a. J. R. Green - DCRDR Team Leader. Mr. Green is the Supervisor, Systems Engineering in Nuclear Engineering and has been involved with both Fermi specific and industry (BWROG and INPO) responses to NUREG-0737 requirements for the l control room and SPDS. He is responsible for l
program management to ensure accomplishment of ' the project objectives and to meet the regulatory requirements of the review. This includes planning, scheduling and integrating the DCRDR activities.
- b. Dr. L. R. Schroeder - DCRDR Team Member for Human Factors engineering. Dr. Schroeder is a Human Factors Engineer with over thirteen years experience in academics and industry. He provided Human Factors engineering support to the team and provided input for HED resolution.
2-2 A
+ ,
\
- c. R. C. Anderson - DCRDR Team Member for Systems Engineering. Mr. Anderson hac been involved with System Engineering related projects at Fermi 2 since 1973. He has had extensive .
involvement in the design and installation of both safety and balance of plant systems. He provided systems engineering input for HED resolution.
- d. R. N. Haupt - DCRDR Team Member as the Instrument and Controls (I&C) engineer. Mr.
Haupt is the Lead I&C Engineer for Projects and Plant Engineering in the Nuclear Engineering Department. He has worked on the Fermi 2 ' project since August 1976 in the I&C group. Mr. > Haupt was a certified Shift Technical Advisor for Fermi 2. He provided engineering input for HED Resolution.
- e. J. P. Flint - DCRDR Team Member - Senior Reactor Operator. Mr. Flint is a Nuclear Assistant Shift Supervisor, temporarily assigned to the Operations Support Group as the Operations Training Coordinator. He has held an SRO License for over three years. He was also extensively involved in the Fermi 2 start-up ~ g~
effort. Mr. Flint was also involved in the validation of control room functions as +a/- discussed in Section 3.0 of this report. He I provided the DCRDR liason with the Operations Department and provided input for HED resolution.
- f. M. B. Laird - DCRDR Team Member for Operations / Engineering support. Assigned to Nuclear Engineering staff, Ms. Laird has six years nuclear operator experience including over two years as a Licensed Reactor Operator at the Brunswick Steam Electric Plant. She provided operations input for HED resolution.
e s 2-3 1-
- g. T. J. Murphy - DCRDR Team Member for engineering support. Assigned to the Nuclear .
Plant Engineering staff, Mr. Murphy has over. ' fourteen years of experience designing control panels for nuclear power plants. He served as an Engineering Assistant for input and summary , . of HED data.
- h. C. F. Kupiec - Engineering DCRDR Team Member ,
, for operations support. Mr. Kupiec held a Senior Reactor Operator License at the Zion Nuclear Station. He has nineteen years of . . operations, training and job task analysis ' ' ( experience in the commercial nuclear power industry. He provided operations engineering ~, input for HED resolution. m - 2.2.3 Previous DCRDR Team Member Qualifications and Duties The qualifications of the DCRDR Team members met the NUREG-0800 criteria. The team members' i' - - resumes are provided in Appendix 2. Briefly, the team members included:
- a. G. Sharma - DCRDR Team Leader. Provided overall direction and support for the DCRDR '
Team. He was part of the original BWROG . Team reviewing other nuclear facilities. He was also part of IEEE-566 Group developing control room standards. As part of IEEE, he visited other facilities such as European nuclear stations and NASA to assess the application of Human Factors in industry. He is providing full time support to the current DCRDR Team.
- b. Dr. F. McIntyre - Human Factors Specialist.
Dr. McIntyre has over thirty years experience in Human Factors engineering. He provided Human Factors engineering support - - input to the DCRDR Team. 2-4 e
- c. J. Seminara - Human Factors Specialist.
Mr. Seminara has over thirty years experience in Human Factors engineering. He provided Human Factors engineering support input to the DCRDR team.
- d. L. DeLucia - Operations Support Engineer.
Mr. DeLucia has worked as a Nuclear Assistant Shift Supervisor. He holds a Senior Reactor Operatiors License at Fermi
- 2. He provided Operations input to the DCRDR Team.
- e. J. Hanlon - System Engineer. Provided Human Factors Engineering support. Mr. Hanlon has over twenty-five years of nuclear plant operations experience.
2.2.4 DCRDR Team Support
- a. General Physics - Human Factors Support.
General Physics provided additional Human Factors engineering support required for the DCRDR as directed by the DCRDR Team Leader.
- b. General Electric Company - Human Factors support. General Electric provided additional Human Factors enginee' ring support required for the DCRDR as directed by the DCRDR Team Leader.
- c. Detroit Edison Company - DCRDR Team support.
This additional support came from personnel in Licensing, Training, Administration, Scheduling, Operations and Engineering. 2-5
l' i 2.2.5 DCRDR Team Orientation l
- a. Human Factors Orientation for Detroit Edison Company The DCRDR Team received two. days training detailing the applicable requirements of i NUREG-0737 Supplement 1, the guidance of NUREG-0700 and NUREG-0800 and the basics of human engineering principles as applied to nuclear power plants.
2.3 Data Management A large number of documents we.re referenced and produced during the DCRDR. Therefore, an efficient and systematic method for controlling these documents was established. The DCRDR Team Leader was responsible for documentation control and a comprehensive documentation file is maintained for use by the DCRDR Team. 2.3.1 Documentation Requirements The methodology described in this section was used to meet the following documentation I requirements:
- a. Provide a record of all documents produced by the DCRDR Team as project output.
- b. Allow an audit path to be generated through the project documentation.
- c. Develop project files in a manner that allows future access to help determine the effects of control room changes proposed in i the future.
l 2-6 1
(
/
\
2.3.2 Input Data The following documents were identified as I reference material used during the review process: o Licensee Bvent Reports (LERs) o Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), Chapter 15, " Accident Analysis" _, o Fermi 2 Plant Technical Specifications o Training Department Systems Lesson Guides . o Piping and Instrumentation Drawings - - - - o Functional Operating Sketches o Master Instrument List (MIL) o Control Room Floor Plan o Panel Layout Drawings o Panel Photographs o Emergency Procedure Guideline's (EPGs) prepared by the Boiling Water Reactor Owners Group (BWROG) o Fermi 2 Emergency Operating Procedures (EOPs) o Alarm Response Procedures o System Operating Procedures o SPDS Parameter List , o Regulatory Guide 1.97 Data o Schematic Diagrams ( 6 e 2-7 - I 8
s
,3 ,
4 2.3.3 Output Data Throughout the DCRDR, documents were processed to record data, document analyses and record findings. Whenever possible and appropriate, , standard forms were developed and used in conjunction with the database system. The following list represents the types of documents that resulted from the DCRDR: . ,3 o Program Plan o operator Questionnaires
\
o Panel Checklists (from the Control Room Survey) , o Task Analysis Worksheets o Videotapes of Validations o Human Engineering Discrepancy Forms o DCRDR Final Summary Report (Supplement 1 and 2) 2.3.4 Database Management System 1 The focus of the Computerized Database Management System (DBMS) was an IBM AT computer. The DBMS software was based on the dBASE III i system by Ashton-Tate, as modified by General , Physics for DCRDR projects. The DBMS allowed ' selective sorts and lists of data collected i throughout the DCRDR. The following data was ' l input into the DBMS files: l l o HEDs from Task Analysis and verification and . validation activities. o HEDs and other findings from the review of Fermi 2 operating expertence. 2-8
}
o HEDs and other results of the Control Room survey. m l o The results of the Assessment and Implementation activities, documented on HED forms. o All other HEDs or findings not specified above. The input data files allowed rapid, convenient management and tracking of the review findings - and results. The HED file provided a printout of the HED form that was used in the Final Summary Report and other documentation. The - - DBMS will be used to track and document closure of each HED. __ _ 2.4 Equipment and Work Space Detroit Edison Company made arrangements for work . space to be provided for the DCRDR Team in the Fermi 2 Technical Assistance Center (TAC). GP provided all the equipment required to conduct the Control Room - survey and videotaping of Validation scenarios. 2.5 Planning Phase Documentation . 2.5.1 NRC Program Plan The Program Plan submitted to the NRC in August of 1984 (Reference 2) was based on BWR Owners Group plans and intended to use the Supplement of BWR Owners Group Plan to cover the survey requirements of NUREG-0700. The . . intention of using only the supplement was , based on the fact that the Fermi 2 Control Room had already been surveyed by the BWR Owners Group and later by the NRC for NTOL _ , plants. Differences between newly issued NRC guidelines (0700,0737, etc) and the original ' control room review by the NRC and BWROG was provided in the BWROG Supplement. 2-9 S'
cn a q As the-details.given el'sewhere in-this report-1 reflect,.a much more detailed' review of'the~ ]
. controliroomjis-being conducted to comply with )
NUREG-0737 Supplement requirements._ The.. L 4 control ~ room survey is-being done using the comprehensive NUREG-0700 criteria ^and i checklists rather.than BWROG Supplement.only. . j The LER' review used not only Fermi-2 LERs but: j also the LERs from two other'similar BWRs. The operator interviews were a' larger sampling (eighteen personnel rather than the original committed twelve operators). In the area of
- task analysis, NUREG-0737 Supplement ~1 required identification of the missing instrumentation by comparing the required instruments from the' existing inventory.- The verification was completed and supplemented by observations of the dynamic performance of-crews during the EOP Validation. Also a.linkL analysis was conducted by, videotaping the operator movements. In short, a thorough DCRDR is being. conducted which in some areas
. goes beyond.the NUREG-0737 Supplement 1
- requirements. Details of the Program Plan appear throughout this report.
4 1 i i 1 2-10 l j a
3.0 REVIEW PHASE 3.1 Review' Phase Processes The major processes' discussed in NUREG-0700 were:used to-establish and apply bench marks for identifying i HEDs'for both completeness and human engineering suitability: o Operating. experience review o control room survey o Function review and task analysis o; ' control room walk-through inventory. 1 o Validation-of control room functions The: activities involved in'each of these processes are-discussed below. L 3.2 Operating Experience Review 3.2.1 Purpose The' Operating Experience Review identified-factors or conditions that could cause and/or have previously' caused human performance problems and could be alleviated by improved human' engineering. This review provided information'on potential problem areas by . completing operator interviews and reviewing LERs for Fermi 2'and-two similar plants. 3.2.2 Methodology There are two major items in the Operating i Experience Review, a Historical Documentation Review of LERs and Operator Interviews. The methodologies for both tasks are described below. 3-1 l a+u e
t I-3.2.3 Licensee Event Report Review
- a. Purpose The Licensee. Event: Report XIER): review.
identified factors.or condj.tions that could cause and/or have previously caused i human performance problems which'could be alleviated by. improved human engineering. This review provided information on potential problem areas by studying -i j documented occurrences of human engineering related problems that have u ' occurred at Fermi 2 and two similar plants.
- b. Methodology There were two major steps in the LER:
Review: (1) a review of LERs from Fermi-2 l and (2) a review of significant LERs from two other plants similar in design to Fermi 2. .The methodologies for both tasks , are described below. ! (1) Licensee Event Reports (LERs), from-Fermi 2 were reviewed by a human factors engineer and an operations specialist to. identify deficiencies known to have previously contributed i to operator errors. This review 1 consisted of the following approach: j (a) Obtain documentation l [ (b) Examine LER documentation and establish whether the incident l reported constituted a human ! factors control room problem. l A human factors control room problem is defined as one in which: o The equipment referenced in the LER is located in the main control room or remote shutdown panel; 3-2 l i ( -m____-___-_-__ _ _ . -
o The procedure referenced is used
.within the main control' room or remote shutdown panel; o A personnel error occurred using main control room or remote shutdown panel components.
(c) An. Human Engineering Discrep-ancy (HED) form was used to summarize and document control room human factors problems identified from the historical reports. The form provided information concerning the event itself, an indication of what actions have been taken to resolve the problem and additional human factors recommendations, (2) Based on the short operating history j of Fermi 2, significant LERs were reviewed from Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Station and James A. FitzPatrick j Nuclear Power Plant. Both of these plants are similar in vintage and configuration to Fermi 2 and were subjected to the review process described above. The accumulated operating history from Edwin I. Hatch and James A. FitzPatrick provided the data necessary for a more comprehensive input into the Farmi 2 DCRDR. An example of an HED identified during the LER review is ' shown in Figures 3-1 and 3-2.
- l. 3-3 J l
_ _________________a
.c >
j 13.2.4 Operator-Interviews?
.a. . Purpose The. purpose of the operator Interviews'wa's-to obtain direct operator: input to. aid in identifying. potential or actual deficiencies in the control room layout or!
design or in operating-procedures that-resulted in confusion (mental activities),1 difficulty (manual activities), or distraction (the environment).
- b. : Methodology The steps-for. conducting operator interviews were as follows:
o- Seventeen Licensed Operators and a Training. Instructor.were asked to complete
.the operator written interview questionnaire.
o Questionnaire responses were assimilated and an oral interview format was; developed based on responses. o oral interviews were conducted with each. operator:-who completed the questionnaires discussed above. o Data was reviewed to ascertain whether the concerns encountered were HEDs. o HEDs from operator interviews were documented on an HED form and entered into the DBMS for use during HED assessment. Examples of the HEDs and corrective action taken resulting from the operator Interviews are shown in Figures 3-3, 3-4, 3-5 and 3-6. 3-4
l 3.3 control Room Survey Purpose 3.3.1 The purpose of the Control Room Survey is to identify characteristics of I&C equipment, control room layout and environmental conditions that do not conform to precepts of - good human engineering practice regardless of the particular system or specif1c tasks I requirements. This survey is accomplished by j conducting a systematic comparison of existing control room design features with documented human engineering guidelines. Deviation from I the design guidelines are identified as HEDs. The ultimate objective is to identify potential enhancements and modifications of the operator-control room interface that would L f reduce the potential for human error, l 3.3.2 Methodology l ! The control room survey is being conducted in j two stages. During January 1981, a curvey l team of the BWR Owners Group Control ac,om Improvement Committee performed a review of , the Fermi 2 Control Room using the BWR Owners Group Checklist. Findings were reported to the NRC on April 13, 1981 (Reference 3). j To supplement the original survey, a second ! survey will be conducted in the Fermi 2 ! Control Room and remote shutdown panel in July { based on NUREG-0700, Section VI. The survey ! team will include members of the DCRDR team, a j human factors specialist and an operations i
~
specialist. , The checklists will be completed for each {' panel in the control room and the remote shutdown panel. Some checklist items will be addressed on a control room-wide basis such as items that fall into categories of communications, control room layout and environmental factors. l 3-5 i l l _____________w
r l ( i l Compliance with the guidelines will be noted by checking the "yes" column of the guidelines. In instances of noncompliance a i "no" will be checked and specific information ' concerning.the discrepancy will be noted in the " comments" field. HEDs from the control j room survey will then be documented on an HED I form and input into the DCRDR computer - database system. 3.3.3 1981 Category 3 Findings The 1981 NRC Survey Findings were prioritized as 1, 2 and 3. Priority 1 and 2 Findings were construction completed prior to fuel load.
' Priority 3 items and color coding of meters (henceforth referred to as Category 3 Findings) are being evaluated as part of this DCh0R.
'k Most of these category 3 Findings have been !
evaluated and dispositioned. Examples of these are shown in Figures 3-7, 3-8, 3-9 and 3-10. The remaining Category 3 items could only be evaluated as part of the NUREG-0700 Survey of the Fermi 2 Panels. The evaluation on these will be done as part of the survey item evaluations and submitted with our October report. 3.4 Function Review and Task Analysis The Task Analysis was performed using the Fermi 2 Plant Specific Technical Guidelines (PSTGs). The PSTGs'were developed from the generic Functional Emergency Procedure Guidelines, Rev. 4-AC. Development of the PSTGs and Writer's Guide was discussed in the Procedure Generation Package which was submitted to the NRC on July 31, 1986 (Reference 4). 3-6
.i j i
' There were three major steps required in performing the Task Analysis for Fermi 2.- .The first step was the !
task identification, where:the guidelines were broken down.into operator actions.- The second step was to establish the requirements-in which specific instrument and control requirements were identified for each, task. The third step involved.the control room walk.through/ inventory,in which the actual control room design was compared to the-information and control requirements. .This step provides for a verification-of the availability and suitability of required! instrumentation in the Fermi 2 control: room. 3.4.1 Task. Identification i The first step in performing the Task Analysis was.to identify each' operator task required by the PSTGs. The PSTGs consist primarily of functions which the' operator must accomplish.by performing several. elementary' tasks. For example, the PSTG step may read." start the RHR' system'in the fuel pool cooling mode". This is a'" function" which would consist of several L " tasks" such as opening and closing appropriate l 1 valves, starting pumps and verifying proper. l . operation. A numbering system was used to identify each l_ function and task in the PSTGs as follows: a.N.n where; a = a letter code to identify the guide-lines in which the function or step appears. The letter codes shall be as follows: CA - Cautions Section of Guideline RP = RPV Control Guideline PC = Primary Containment Control Guideline SC = Secondary Containment Control Guideline 3-7
L. w I.! RR = Radioactivity Release Control' l Guideline
.C1'= Contingency #1 C2 = Contingency #2
#3 C3 = Contingency C4 = Contingency #4 C5 = Contingency'#5 C6 = Contingency #6 N = A sequentially assigned function number starting with Number 1 for the first function identified in a given guide-line.
n = A task' number sequentially assigned, starting with Number 1 for the'first task identified in a given function. For functions, n shall be 0 (zero). For example, PC.10.3 is the third task identified under the tenth function of the Primary Containment Control Guideline; C5.18.0 is-the eighteenth function of Contingency #5.- Functions were identified directly from the PSTG text. The first step in the task identification process identified and numbered functions in the PSTGs. For each function, the required operator ; tasks are written down and numbered. A task analysis data sheet was completed for each function and each task. During the task identification process, the following sections of , the data sheet were completed:
- a. EPG Locator: Where the function or task ;
was located within the EPG (PSTG) (guideline, step and , page number).
- b. Function / Task ID: Function or task identifi-cation number.
3-8
- c. Cross
Reference:
Indicate duplicate tasks. If the task or function duplicates a previous task, the function or task iden-tification number of the duplicate task was entered. This reduced redundancy.in analyzing identical-tasks many times over.
d. Description:
Describe the function or task performed by the operator.
- e. Operator Action Type: This field was completed only for tasks, not func-tions. The operator actions were classified l into one (or possibly more) l of the following types.
- 1. Information: The operator must.obtain information.
- 2. Control: The operator must manipulate a control
- 3. Calculation / Decision:
The operator must I manipulate previously l gathered data (prior to i
-taking one of several alternative actions).
- 4. Communication: The operator must obtain information from outside the main control room or transfer information to a location outside the con-trol room.
- 5. Procedural: The operator follows procedure instruc-tions. ;
I 3-9 j 1 __-_____ _ - ___ D
i i l l l Task identification was complete when the EPG i Locator, Function / Task ID, Cross Reference, ! Description and Operator Action Type fields were j filled out on the task analysis data sheet for each task in the PSTG's. The next major step was to identify instrument and control requirements ! for each task. ; 3.4.2 Establishment of Requirements Information control and other requirements were determined for each task. The requirements were documented in the column labeled " REQUIRED" on the task analysis data sheets. The requirements for functions were established by the subordinate tasks for each function. Requirements were established only for tasks. Separate sections were provided on each data sheet for Information, control, Calculation / Decision and Communication operator action types. A task identified as a Procedural type action required no control panel interaction and, therefore, did not entail any control room requirements. There was not a section provided for Procedural operator action types for this reason. A "Special Requirements" section was provided on , the data sheet for requirements not ! specifically listed under one of the other four sections. Based on the operator action type designated during the task identification phase, the corresponding requirements section was completed. Information Requirements The various required characteristics for information gathering activities were described in this section. A check mark was entered in the requirements column for one or more of the following information types as appropriate: 3-10 L_-__-____-_____-
.i
- a. Numerica1'Value: A specific numerical'
-value for the parameter is needed.(i.e.', a reading). ~
- b. Logic Value/
Judgement: A true or false value for a specified condition is required. Specifically,
'the valueLof a parameter falls within a specified range'of possible values.
- c. Alert: The value of a parameter" requires the operator's immediate attention,Leven though he may not be' monitoring.the parameter,
- d. . Trend: A parameter's recent rate or direction of change-was. required.
4
- e. Record: A written record of a i parameter's value, trend or history was required.
- f. Status: An. indication of the- '
L operational state of a device or system was l required (e.g., ON, OFF, ) 1 TRIPPED, etc.). 3-11
y c n
-3
- -v
't r
*, +, ,,
Based'on the infornition type characteristics,s ari ,q . ,". appropriate compondnt was specified for displaying' the. required.'information (e.g., meter, recorder,'- annunciator, indicator light, etc.). The-specification of: component type was made strictly, upon the' basis.ofjthenrequired.information type: N Characteristics and knowledge'of other uses for-the' displayed-information.- );
. /-
Component type was7nSt sec2ified' based upon what was'known to exist in the Control Room. cRequired instrument location'was specified only ifL y the--information'was used in conjunction with , another instrument or control'. .In such. cases, the. task identification number of the task specifying the other control'or instrument was: entered in the location field. 'For example,Lif Task RC.5.3 requiredLinformation which was used in conjunction with a control action addressed by, Task RC.S.1, then RC.5.1 was enteredsin the I;egpired location q field of data sheet'RC.5.3. 4
' Specific data was entered in the. required column for the following characteristics:
~, %:
- a. Variable / Parameter: Determined directly 4, from the inak descrip- .3 a#'
, tions written in the *a DSTG2 Examples are:
4' Absciute Reactor _ Pressure, RHR A Pump . Flow Rate. , 4
- b. Process Units: Specified as indicated in the, PSTG. Any incon-'
sistoney.will be iden- - tified as a Human Engineering Discrepancy. Examples are: PSIA,,GPM, etc. 3-12 i - u -. ,. __ .
'si j y
')_
m a 4; h "4 ty.
- c. Rango:- Tlie narrowest range to e x e c u t'e t h e P S T G i n s t r u c -
tion.
- d. Resolution: The accuracy to which the operator must be able to o read the parameter value.
s ~
- e. Set Point: Setpoint for alert infor-mation as required by the
'c PSTG.
- f. Qualitative: A check mark in the re-quired column was entered if any of the following qualitative charac-teristics were applicable.
- 1. Attention getting signal y, if alert information type was checked.
$ 3
, +
- s. 2. Text / Trend Legible if
'T - readable text on 1 indicators, window tiles,
, , etc. was needed. This
\
included the need for legible traces on recorders. m.
- 3. Indicator State Distinguishable indicating the need for clearly distinguishable states for t
indicators such as lights (LIT / UNLIT, color coded, etc.). ) l l l l 3-13 I l t
+
t -
s' V . a f I i:
- When-trend type information was re p ired
~
additional, requirements were specified'since trend- .j implies that two~(2) parameters apply; the parameter.cf~ interest (such as reactor water
. level); and- time.- Speci.fically, consideration was t given to establishing.re pirements.for process j units, range and resolution for both the; parameter >
'of interest and time.
Calculation / Decision Requirements Requirements for calculation / decision type operator actions were normally minimal. Three elements were routinely considered: '1) procedures,.2) tools, and 3) worksheets. Control Requirements Control type is the first characteristic to consider. A check mark was entered in the required column for one of the following control types as appropriate:
- a. Discrete: A controlled parameter was only set to one of a discrete number of values or conditions (e.g., ON/
OFF, AUTO / MANUAL, etc.). y' b. Auto Continuous: The automatic, continuous control of a parameter was necessary. This charac-teristic type implied the need for variable control dictated by feedback of a varying controlled para-meter, and the operator could not be expected to continuously monitor the control. 3-14 1
- - - _ - _ - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - _ - - - , _ _ l
o
- c. Manual-Continuous: The manual, continuous control of.a parameter l was necessary. This {
characteristic type implied'the need for variable control dic-tated by. feedback of a non-varyiny controlled parameter.. Specifically, the operator could ad-just the control to obtain the desired
-parameter value and'no further control was needed.
, Based on the control type. requirements, an i appropriate component type was specified for controlling the parameter (e.g., 3 position l . switch, automatic controller, etc.). As was the l case for instrumer.ts, component type specifications were based strictly upon the basis of required control type characteristics and knowledge of other uses for the control. Component type was not specified based upon what was known to exist in the control room. The required location field was completed in the same manner described for instrument requirements. Specific data was entered in the required column for the following characteristics:
- a. Variable / Parameter /
Equipment: Specified the parameter or equipment controlled (e.g., ESW pump inlet valve position, feed-water flow rate, etc.). This determined directly from the task description. 3-15
- b. Process Units: Specified process units for the controlled variable.
- c. Range: Specified the minimum range over which the parameter must be controllable.
- d. Resolution: Specified the accuracy to which the parameter must be controlled as indicated by the PSTG, if applicable.
Communications Communications re@irements were specified whenever information was transferred into or out of the main control room. Communications requirements included specification of the source and destination locations for the communication and whether two-way communication was necessary. Human Factors Review ' The task analysis sheets were prepared by Human Factors experts and engineering personnel. These were initially completed by engineering personnel familiar with control room design reviews and human factors issues relative to nuclear power plant control rooms. The completed sheets were then comprehensively reviewed by the Human Factors personnel for the task identification and requirements phases of task analysis. 3-16
3.4.3 Control Room Walk-Through Inventory During the third and final task analysis phase, the actual control room configuration was measured against the requirements established in the second phase of the task analysis. During this phase, the " inventory" column of the data sheet was completed and human engineering discrepancies (HEDs) were identified and documented on the data sheets. The DCRDR team conducted the control room walk-through in the Fermi 2 simulator. With the assistance of Fermi 2 operators, each data sheet was first reviewed for accuracy in describing the operator's actions. For each data sheet that specified the requirements, corresponding entries were made in the inventory column. In the inventory column, space was provided to enter equipment identification numbers for instruments, controls or other components. The inventory column was completed for the equipment identified by the equipment identification number. For specific numerical data entered in the required column (such as process units, range, resolution, etc.), the corresponding numbers were entered in the inventory column for the actual instrument or control. For resolution, the smallest resolution the operator could reasonable read from the device, but in no case less than one-half (1/2) the increment between the finest tick marks on a scale was entered. For other than quantitative requirements, a check mark was placed in the inventory column to indicate that the installed equipment complied with the requirement. Any discrepancy between the " REQUIRED" and
" INVENTORY" columns required notation in the
" NOTE" and/or "HED" columns. In general, any discrepancy was indicated by a check mark in the HED column. Exceptions to this rule 3-17
)
I a
'\
were unanimously agreed.upon~by the review- { team. For example, a recorder may be just as j 3 . acceptable as a meter for a given application.- ;j If further elaboration on any item would I clarify a decision'made during the data . I collection process,.the number was entered in Lthe." NOTE", column and comments were provided' j at the bottom of the' data sheet. j 3.5 Validation of Control Room' Functions 3.5.1 Purpose l-
.The purpose-of the Validation of Control Room Punctions was to determine whether the.
functions alJocated to.the' control room
' operating crew could'be accomplished effectively within: .'(1) the structure of the-Fermi 2 specific EOPs.and- 2) the control room as it exis(ts.the7.design of additionally, this step provided an opportunity to identify HEDs that do not become evidentnin the static processes of the DCRDR, for example, in the control room survey.
3.5.2 Methodology The DCRDR validation was performed in conjunction with the validation of Fermi 2 Emergency Operating Procedures required by NUREG-0737, Supplement 1. Control room personnel performed actual control functions in the Fermi 2 simulato-J in response to twenty-four planned' scenarios. During the scenario runs, a human factors observer noted any man-machine interface concerns related to'the crew's performance. Table 3-1 lists-guidelines used by observers in identifying human factors issues. Following each real-time run, a debriefing session was held with operators to discuss potential human factors problems associated with control room instrumentation. 3-18 _j
All scenario runs were videotaped for later reference and analysis.
'A link analysis which traced the movement
. patterns of the. operating: crew in the control room was subsequently performed on a representative sample of nine of the scenarios.- The videotapes were analyzed.to.
show the sequencing, location and paths of the operators as they performed the nine scenarios. This link analysis, provided as Appendix 3, was performed-to further assess whether the control-room layout hinders operator movement while performing the events. 3.5.3 Results. Although operators moved throughout the entire control room area, the link' analysis exhibited relatively few repetitions of the traversal of long paths. It appears that high frequency links were most often associated with adjacent-
' panels'or neighboring areas of the control !
room. In summary, a review of the link analysis indicated that.there were no. significant problems attributed to control room layout which hindered operating crew movement or control access while performing the scenarios. l Any dynamic performance problems that were uncovered during the validation process as a results of observations or subsequent analysis were documented on HED Forms for review and disposition during assessment. l 3-19 i
4
,E F i
~
Table' 3-1
/ Issues To Be Addressed During Validation and Supported by Walk Throughs
,i 1
1; Are'all required displays'and controls reachable and readable?'
- 2. .Does placement of the controls and related displayscrapire one person to read the display while another manipulates the control?
4
. 3. :Does the arrangement of the control room tend' to cause members offthe crew.to get into each other's p' way?
4 ,. .Can the tasks listed in the scenario be accomplished by the number of people on shift?
- 5. Is there~ confusion as to whom is in charge during emergency operations?
- 6. Is any one operator overburdened?-
- 7. Is there sufficient coordination between control room and support personnel?
1
- 8. Are the spatial relationships of work stations / panels appropriate for'the demands of the tasks?
l 9. Are any controls susceptible to accidental activation?
FIGURE 3-1 HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 1004 SOURCE: LER REVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: C5100,C7100 COMP / INSERT NO: C51-R603C LEGEND: RBM A APRM E 3B211 BACKUP MANUAL SCRAM TRIP B KEYWORD: COMMUNICATION / RECORDER DESCRIPTION: MISCOMMUNICATION/ IMPROPER PIACEMENT OF EQUIP. OBSERVATION: LER 85-010: Multiple reactor scrams, isolations and actuations occurred duo to operator miscommunication and improper placement of control room instrumentation. PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED, MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: ' Training has been instituted to facilitate proper communications under'the title of " Operational Voice communications, module #06 35 01 01. A restraining device has been installed on the recorder door to' prevent door travel all the way to the left. A PDC will be prepared to document the existence of the lanyard. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
-Prepare PDC as specified in Recommended Correction above.
STATUS: CI4SURE: l l l- _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - _ s
1
.==_...
,4,
- r. .. ~= . .......
. . . m a n n, . .. -.
gg , l (,
. (.~rz-9 ediE l' lp% ;) ,
32 lI . lk. h' . ' - ig - 1 : - l , . osgen c 1 , I I. a' * - L. =E -~ s et u . - asum ..= L.l al I l
, - . .=
q .t I . l
- S- :. . . j -
/ ep
; egg h $ __
q s .. . , , . I g- . , n - (%.
~
, 1
% anm].ll+{ g
.,. I.
FIGlitE 3-2 int) 1004: IMpirx'MR I'I/CIM12(P W IYJJIIM271' When the above recorcier 's door was orerKrl it ru n h+ d O'Ja l n9 t t I'C DOCKup MaflUOl C= r ar' Tr l p D r au c i nJj lt tO initiate. A lanyard ha- ter n installed at t h> lower p>rtion c,e that f ul l omn ing ir preventH .
FIGURE 3-3 HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 776 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: 0 'PAGE l' PANEL: H11-P809 SYSTEM: R3001
. COMP / INSERT'NO:l9A23 12GEND: EDG 11 GOVERNOR CONTROL 9A24 EDG 11 VOLTAGE CONTROL 9A41 EDG 12 GOVERNOR CONTROL
.9A42 EDG 12 VOLTAGE CONTROL PANEL:-H11-P810 . SYSTEM: R3001 COMP / INSERT NO: 10A8 LEGEND: EDG 13 GOVERNOR' CONTROL 10A9 EDG 13 VOLTAGE CONTROL 10A21 EDG 14 GOVERNOR CONTROL 10A22 EDG 14 VOLTAGE CONTROL PANEL:~H11-P811 SYSTEM:'R3001 COMP / INSERT'NO: 11A50 . LEGEND: CTG 11 POWER BLOCK CONTROL-VOLTAGE 11A64 CTG 11 POWER BLOCK CONTROL-GOVERNOR 11A74 CTG 11 UNIT CONTROL - UNIT 1 VOLTAGE 11A75 CTG 11 UNIT CONTROL - UNIT 2 VOLTAGE l 11A76 CTG 11 UNIT CONTROL - UNIT 3 VOLTAGE 11A77 CTG 11 UNIT CONTROL - UNIT 4 VOLTAGE 11A78 CTG 11 UNIT CONTROL - UNIT 1 GOVERNOR 11A79 CTG 11 UNIT CONTROL - UNIT 2' GOVERNOR 11A80 CTG 11 UNIT CONTROL - UNIT 3 GOVERNOR 11A81 CTG 11 UNIT CONTROL - UNIT 4 GOVERNOR KEYWORD: SHAPE CODING (6.4.2.2)
DESCRIPTION: SAME SHAPE HANDLES ON DIFFERENT CTL SWITCHES 1
. OBSERVATION:
The pistol grip switches used for Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG)
. Voltage control and Governor Control are identical in size and shape.
This could be a source of error, particularly as these Generators are i used only under extreme stress. The knobs are close together and can I easily be confused. The same configuration is used for the field panels. j __________-_______-__ ____-______-___________-_______-______--_ j PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A.. Recommended Correction: Issue a PDC to add a unique handle shape for each Governor control - at control board and . local panel. (Refer to Drawing No. 6M-2290, Sheet 3) STATUS: PDC 7593 will be issued CLOSURE: l l
l l
',l. t sB E' g,, l.,,, O O 4 E ', ';, #
'. b I ' '-t'i4 0 ,
p FIGURE 3-4 IIED 776: SAME SIIAPE IWOLES ON DIFFERIWP CONTROL SWI'ICIIES l The pistol grip handles on the Energency D!esel Generator ! 14 Governor and Voltage Control switches sNun above ( could be a source of error. IIED 776 reconcords that i there te an unicpe hardle shape for these switches. 1
FIGUm! 3-5 HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 781 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P805 BACK PANEL SYSTEM: N3000 COMP / INSERT NO: 805C540 LEGEND: UNITIZED ACTUATORS / JACKING OIL PUMPS KEYWORD: PANEL LAYOUT AND DESIGN DESCRIPTION: UNITIZED ACTUATOR CMC SWITCH PLACEMENT OBSERVATION: CONTROL PANEL LAYOUT - Operators were positive about the layout of the l control room, when compared to other control rooms in the industry. j Thsy generally liked the groupings of controls. However, there are j controls behind the main panels which require operator attention. l Unitized Actuator Controls: This is required for some operations and 1 Opsrator needs to go behind main panel to use the control. { PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: ' A. Recommended Correction: None. Equipment deficiencies causing the need for actuator controls on the H11-P804 have been corrected. Additionally, the controls are , only useful below 25% power. j l B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed l CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/25/87 l i l l {
i .
^
- ,f .
j
== ; ; I ; . u. I
[>e{j J., ;l .>. . . . . i .. .... .ou . . , , u. . ae,g __ . _ . . __._ ..
. ; r- ..,.
.jf .
. . .. [gf
-- ' ' . . l 4 . y ,f,. 4ff,
- ; .it " }.l-
.;. ; ; . . .g :. .. . :. .- :. .b. % :. . . . f; u .u n . ] jo, .
- u. -
. 1; ' . re e4eszee
.: a rm;/e r a .m e .
u,- .
- , c ,
\.
..,.,. ,, . j
., : ' ,. ..3 . 4 , .4 ' ;.
~
; .-( ; . ,
;. . u. i.
( '. -l
..,, f# .,... . , , .
. 3, me , me u me. == ==
, y ,, J '- f'A-w, Y-
*>' *^ "
P' ' i ,, . ., ~ f ;. ., .. b --
; - -- l
, [/J f , .
[ . - d'. - .'
. man msm,l mez ,n e m nasj'
., ensup * - raam
,e - ., .
1
'a .
ss 58 .-
- e- /
FIGUIE 3-6 IIFD 781: UNITIZED /CIUNIOR OC fMI'ICH PIACINFNP
'Ihe Unitized Actuator OC Switches are properly located behind the main panel. The above photograph presents a typical grouping of controls using demarcation.
i
FIGURE 3-7 HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 'HED No.: 761 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P808 SYSTEM: N/A KEYWORD: ANTHROPOMETRIC (6.1.2.2) DESCRIPTION: PIACEMENT OF RECORDERS OUTSIDE STANDARDS OBSERVATION: On the "C" surface of Panel H11-P808, all recorders are too high for cney maintenance by a 5th percentile person. The most extreme case.is t suppression chamber bulk water temperature. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTION. PIAN: A. Recommended Correction: No correction. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix,(For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/19/87 l l
., l I
l l l 1
-._._____________J
i -r : p=j r hijigiggl8WQg n-
;-yp- @r p ~S s l (,. l C {,
e 4 , , a
% .y .,..
p pg 7 i n g y y :
.e gf .
l t; , - "*p7
. ,t .4; r . ,
m y
,' >. 1 q(ia
. .... ';_. m y~ 1E*""
m'
- - 1 m
9l' - n [ es"
+
;. .s _
. i
.l f.aggy , / a m ,, , [ y,,,e__.,.54
;v'"** . . ma an. 'I A me seV " W 3 %d Tr"A"4 - _g r; ,- T[ g
; drr" . mm ( s e"" " -! . - - -1 I"+
e " "* ** "*
!- .o- """*w
, Pjam es ,. ,
b'
~
f~mj g ,'? as 8",",", . ] (. ' g.gp
" a g; .......
3;;;;;n li. r sm a
-gj pW '
E[!I asem g ' y[g&g&3,,a m, - -
.f,sf A f & & $ N "4 gp, [/ A;if m -
, ._.c ;
,E $ 7. " .
q' ~ . 1 y , ^ Qu ':
$NS
. g!id ti l
l FIGUTE 3-8 i IllD 761: PIACIMWP OF IUEDIOERS OlfISIDE S'INOAIDS Above on the right, the arrow is pointing to the forner location of the Suppression Chanber Bulk Water Temperature Recorder on illl-P808. This recorder's location outside the anthroponetric standards given in ! I tUREG 0700 caused it to be relocated to Illl-P601, as shown on the left.
FIGUllE 3-9 HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 ) l HED NO.: 766 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV No.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P809- SYSTEM: H3000 R3000 COMP / INSERT NO: 9D35 LEGEND:.DIV I EDG 11 AUTO START 9D59 ^DIV I EDG 12. AUTO START i 1 PANEL: H11-P810 SYSTEM: H3000 R3000 COMP / INSERT NO: 10D11 LEGEND: DIV II EDG 14 AUTO START 10D35 DIV II EDG 13 AUTO START KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.3.3)
--_-__.-____--------_---_--_----_-__---_..-_-_--------______.-__--____---- l DESCRIPTION: POOR GROUPING OBSERVATION:
On Panels 809 and 810, auto-start annunciators are in same groupings as i tha trouble alarms. ! PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: The correction required by this HED is also to include the annunciator concern of HED 941. Relocate individual windows to improve " grouping." This HED to address a " generic" concern. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Defer to NUREG 0700 Survey CLOSURE: l M uMm
)
r s DIVISION II ELECTRICAL Hil-P810 8hWe***. y . s. .
^
8 .. h; I.: ,A .. . . .l u 4
/. ,,14., ; . .
ll g
~"
; 2 (
g I
..[
-.bnes*wame :.~ . s n
;lNv f!>. i ,;; .--
3yn
'yff.lwh" ; ?T15,a,q~ ::.e,w %7r Q .__
I s e . 4 . , ! N
~
)' l, '
-u . . ._ ..
FIGJIr8 3-10 IIFD 766: POOR A?MitCINIDR WItiXM G00PItG 1 1 The above annunciator window grouping has trips and abnormal conditions mixed together without grouping and uses inconsistent color coding. ITED 766 reconmends that the windows be relocated to inprove the " grouping" and to include any follow-up actions resulting from the IUREX3 0700 survey.
)
4.0 ASSESSMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION PHASE . 4.1 Assessment and Implementation Activities NOTE: The HED Assessment process discussed j below was used in assessing the HEDs identified during the Operating Experience Review and Task Analysis portion of the DC40R. The same basic assessment process will be used to assess the HEDs that are identified by the Control Room Survey. Although past tense is useC in this section, the assessment portion for the Control Room Survey is not yet complete. The DCRDR Team prioritized and assessed HEDs and recommended corrective actions for their resolution in an interactive process. The threc major activities in this Assessment and Implemention process were: o Analyzed and prioritized HEDs o Recommended and evaluated HED resolutions o Documented and scheduled resolution implementation 4.2 Analyze and Categorire HED The priority of an HED was assessed on the basis of the potential for operating crew error and its potential impact on safety. This assessment was accomplished by analyzing and evaluating the problems that could arise from the identified HEDs. Each HED was assigned to a cognizant individual who performed a pre-assessment of the issue prior to the actual DCRDR Team HED assessment. In the pre-assessment phase, the team member would provide an assessment based on the individual's judgement. When necessary, potential technical implications would be discussed with other team members or affected groups such as operations or Engineering. 4-1 ,
- l. 47
.l
- l a
To clarify any'HED,Lcurrent-photographs were available for' study.L Visits were made to the simulator or.the- ! control-room if additional clarification was required. j The details were then discussed with the DCRDR team- 1 who did the' actual assessment such asLto-the safety ] significance andgerror: potential. The DCRDR Team then- ; agreed..upon.the necessary corrections'to be made. '!
~The DCNDR Team assessed.the1HEDs: identified during the previous phases of'the'DCRDR:in a manner similar.to' 1 the guidance given11n NUREG-0800. The'two primary . ]
criteria for-assessing HEDs are:. l(1) whether or.not? { the'HED has'resulted in.a documented error or provides-the potential-for operator error and (2) what; impact the HED.has on plant safety. . Each of-the criteria is
-discussed below.
HEDs.thatmay.[ affect' operating lcreWperformance'were st@jected- to a. series of criteria similar to' that in - NUREG-0800, Section 18.1. These' questions.are provided'in Table 4-1. Other performance shaping factors such as training, operator experience, procedure adequacy'and situational requirements were considered.- The response to this line of-questioning aided the! reviewers in assessing theLimpact of those HEDs on operating crew performance and plant safety. If an HED was a result of a documented error at Fermi '
- 2,1for example, in an IJHL or in an operator interview, c then the HED was automatically assessed as having an effect'on operator performance. HEDs,not associated T with documented errors were systematically assessed to V determine their impact on operating crew performance.
Information gathered during the survey of operating personnel ~was considered regarding problems that resulted in, or provided the potential for, operator error. The safety consequences of the HED were reviewed by the DCRDR Team for impact on both emergency and normal 4-2
i l 1 l
. operations. Considerations included the operhtions of safety systems, use of equipment required by the Emergency Procedures, ability of operator to detect a problem, critical time response, etc.
Based on the assessment of HEDs safety consequences I and the likelihood of human error, each HED was i i assigned a priority. The priorities are defined below: Priority I - High Safety Consequences and Documented and/or High Potential for Error.
, Priority II- High Safety Consequences and Low Potential for Error Priority III - Low Safety Consequences and Documented and/or High Potential for Error l i
l Priority IV - Low Safety Consequences and Low I Potential for Error This prioritization aided the team in further assessing the importance of HEDs and provided a means of scheduling HEDs for corrective action. Figure 4-1 provides the HED prioritization matrix used to assist in the prioritization process. 4.3 Assessment of Cumulative Effects The potential cumulative or interactive effects of HEDs were examined by the DCRDR team during assessment meetings. The HEDs were separated on a panel / problem
, area basis to determine the extent to which these groupings cumulatively increase the potential for error on these panels.
h 4-3
1 If for a given' panel, numerous HEDs'were'similar in-
-either, operations of the system, checklist' area,.or in-human: performance' modality.(e.g., all visual and.
L r auditory modality), the HEDs were considered to have a
. potential interactive'effect and.the priority assignment was made more conservative.
~
i t l 4.4 Recommend and Evaluate HED Resolutions l 9 s .. Recommended correction plans were' developed.to bring the HEDs into agreement with acceptable human'factorsi
. guidelines ~or to limit their effects.. The' specific
- resolutions' chosen were enhancements, modifications, new or revised procedures and training or any.
combination ofEthe above. . Resolutions requiring no
- correction'or already. corrected were made.and-
' documented with closure'of the HED. Consideration was given'to the effectiveness of the-improvement,and.to
- assurance.that.no'new deviations from human. factors criteria resultedLfrom the improvements. References used included NUREG-0700, EPRI NP-2411, and other Human Engineering guidelines. The following factors' were used in the assignment of the recommended corrections.
o Priority rating i o Degree of deviation from human factors criteria o Extent of correction: Enhancement vs. modification o operator performance / retraining o Fotential for creating new errors
. o Integration with other control room improvement programs: SPDS, R.G. 1.97, EOPS, etc.
Sufficient detail regarding the recommended correction i plan was developed by the DCRDR team to provide i adequate guidelines for its subsequent implementation j action. j 4-4 i
4.5 . Documented Schedule and Resolution Implementation. An implementation schedule was assigned to each HED corrective action according.to the classification.of the HEDst The corrective action' assignments to be used are'as follows: Schedule:for. HEDs Implementation Priority I Prompt, no later than first refueling
~
Priority II First Refueling Priority III First Refueling Priority IV Optional (. Any' practical constraints on scheduling of modifications were considered separately from the determination of the HEDs significance and priority. Any change in schedule of implementation and the reasons for the change will be documented. 14 . 6 Evaluation of Design Improvements The modified control room instrumentation and control
-design will be evaluated to assure that the selected design improvements, both individually and collectively, adequately correct their respective discrepancies and do not create other safety problems.
The evaluations will be accomplished by performing the following: l 4.6.1 Comparison of the modified control room design. with the control room human factors design ) conventions document. 4-5
4.6.2 Comparison of the modified control room design with the instrumentation and controls requirements identified during the control room survey and task analysis. l I 4.6.3 Control room changes resulting from HEDs will be reviewed for conformance with Fermi 2 control room modification guidlines as part of the design configuration control process. The configuration control process will be discussed in Section 5.0 of this report. This i includes items such as, schedule, design detail, design verification, work package development and safety evaluation. l
\
a. 4-6
]
1 l I I I Error Potential i Documented and/or Low Potential
, High Potential Error Error E
$ c cr 8 l II
[ O O E B m o lll jy FIGURE 4-1 HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY PRIORITIZATION MATRIX , i u___________._
5.0 ONGOING PROGRAM This section will be provided in supplement 2 of the DCRDR Report. l 5-1
l 6.O PROGRAM INTEGRATION 6.1 General Comments The DCRDR process was one part of an overall program to improve Fermi 2 Emergency Response Capabilities (ERC) . Detroit Edison's Integrated Implementation Plan (Reference 5) provided a program that responded to.the $ 3r requirements of Nureg-0737 Supplement 1. It addressed the integration and scheduling of the following 4" activities: the SPDS, the DCRDR, the upgrade of EOPs, Regulatory Guide 1.97 and Emergency Response Facility (ERF) improvement. , 6.2 DCRDR Integration With Other ERC Programs - The interrelationships of the DCRDR with other NUREG-0737 Supplement 1 activities are discussed below: 6.2.1 Safety Parameter Display System (SPDS) The Fermi 2 SPDS is an input to the integration of elements for Control Room Emergency Response Capability. Its design, based'on the Graphic Display System (GDS), was developed through participation in the activities of the BWR Owners Group Control Room Improvement Committee. The BWROG programs included the specification of critical safety functions, generation and operator review of the dynamic GDS and a simulator evaluation of the GDS on the Perry simulator. The Fermi 2 SPDS includes information and displays that are plant specific. The SPDS displays are shown in Figure 6-1. The operator-computer interface has been designed to provide easily accessed and readily understood displays. Based upon its review of the system, the NRC confirmed that the Detroit Edison Company did commit to a Human Factors Program in the design of the SPDS (Docket No. 50-341). 6-1
y,- h 6.2.2 Emergency Operating Procedures Program l The Fermi 2 Plant Specific Technical Guidelines (PSTGs) were developed From Rev. 4-AC of the BWROG generic EPGs. They represent the basis for the development of the Fermi 2 EOPs. The PSTGs, the Writers Guide for EOPs, the EOP Verification and Validation Program, and the EOP Training Program were submitted to the NRC as part of the Fermi 2 Procedures Generation Package (PGP) on July 31, 1986 (Reference 4). As discussed in Section 3.0, the Fermi 2 PSTG also formed the basis for the DCRDR to identify operator functions and tasks and to establish information and control requirements for these tasks. Detroit Edison also integrated aspects of the EOP validation program with the DCRDR validation effort (see Section 3.0). Man-machine control room design issues were noted by a Human Factors engineer during the EOP validation sessions in the simulator. These problems were written as HEDs and forwarded to the Assessment Team. A link analysis was also performed on nine of the twenty-four EOP validation scenarios to support the DCRDR validation process. 6.2.3 Program for Implementation of Regulatory Guide 1.97 Post-accident monitoring instrumentation was included as part of the design concept of Ferni
- 2. Detroit Edison Company has delineated the manner in which the Fermi 2 plant complies with Revision 2 in a Regulatory Guide subm Compliance Report 1.97,itted in September 1985.
For each of the post-accident parameters, the report provides a description of both the regulatory guide requirements and the Fermi 2 6-2
r E+ method of complying with the requirement. In
- t. "L some cases, human factors data and findings from
% the control room have been used to assess the impact of providing a particular information/ display on operator performance s Ce.g. additional color coding).only minor
anstru, mentation changes'have been required to achieve compliance with the intent of Regulatory Guide 1.97.
f 6.2.4 Emergency Response Facilities With the exception of the Emergency Response Information System (ERIS), the Emergency Response Facilities (TSC, OSC, and EOF) were fully functional when the Fermi 2 Integration Plan was submitted in 1983 (Reference 5). Descriptions of these facilities are documented in the UFSAR, Chapter 7. 6.2.5 HED Assessment Integration The resolution of HEDs may necessitate changes to the EOPs, the SPDS, Emergency Response Facilities, or Operator Training. For example, micsing or inappropriately located information identified during the DCRDR might be displayed on the SPDS. The total integration process will ensure that the results of the DCRDR will be incorporated into Fermi 2 training as applicable. In this manner, implemented changes involving physical modifications or procedural alterations will be brought to the operator's attention. 6-3
4 .g ..
~**=s re ym
.T .,4 I r ,
g . .. , , p *MMM , 4 2'-
' ^ '
.1 . ._ ._.. i.s M i k a d &d? ? %.
g. e ;
.g l
-----r- .
~~
3 t
. t e f, . {
.: 1. *:'
. , , , r3 i. . .
- 6
, .-i
--+ , 4-s r,$ a an a ti. $ ' ' )
.. ,. i . .
',9i *. .
/
. . . . . . ..... .. e .
2.. . e.
, .!;m9a +w . . .
. . . . . . .. p . . _ _ . _.
d gp # Y l -t V** *MM guesias.. . . . . . . . -= .
' M .
O FIGUIE 6-1 SPDS DISI4AY IN 'ITIE COtfl'IOL IOCH
W P l l . a 1 l > 7.0 . REVIEW FINDINGS' The Fermi 2 ' DCRDR Human Engineering Discrepancy (HED) Lfindings-that have been' documented are provided in this section. Additional HEDs from.the Control Room Survey will be presented in Supplement 2 of the DCRDR Report. The HED forms provide the' complete record o! findings which wereLcompiled.throughout the-Fermi-2 DCRDR project. .The HEDs are uniquely identified with a number for reference purposes; however, they are logically organized and summarized in the following tables: o Table 7-1 Closed HEDs requiring no further action. , o Table 7-2 Open HEDs requiring closure action. The~HEDS referenced in Tables 7-1 and 7-2 are' presented inLmore detail in Appendix 4. It should be noted that the open HEDs presented in this section and Appendix 4 are subject to change. An HED is a living document subject:to change based on continued review and analyses of the Fermi 2 Control Room and other associated HEDs. An HED is not considered final until it has been closed. 7-1
Pege No. 1 07/29/87 7~I HED STATUS - CLOSED HED #0. DESCRIPfl0N KEYWORD STATUS 459 No ELAPSED TIME METER / STOPWATCH UNCONTROLLED INDICATOR, ELAPSED TIME Closed 460 NO ELAPSED TIME METER INDICtTOR, ELAPSED TIME Closed 461 REVIEW KEYLOCK ON SUCTION VALVE SWITCH, KEYLOCK Closed 463 SUMP REC. DUTSIDE AT CONTROL AREA REC, LOCATION Closed 469 REVISE E00 CAUTION TO 'UCLUDE 25# TRIP STPT. PROCEDURE Closed
- 47) RAD RELEASE NO ACTION REQUIRED INDICATION Closed 472 DON'T HAVE IND TB HVAC RAD REL (XREF 490) INDICATION Closed 475 R8 TEMP IND NEAR VARIABLE LEGS RPV LVL INDICATION, LOC Closed 546 HVAC DIFF TEMP INSTMT NONE INDICATOR, LOCATION Closed 552 HVAC EXHAUST RAD INSTMT
- NONE INDICATOR, RANGE Closed 553 SUMP LEVEL INSTMT - NONE REC, LOCATION Closed Closed '
562 CONTROL SWITCH LOCATION SWITCH, LOCATION 597 RPV LEVEL TREND ANNUM NONE NO ANNUNCIATOR Closed 598 RPV PRESSURL & LEVEL TREND ANNUN NONE NO ANNUNCIATOR Closed 599 RPV PRESSURE & LEVEL TREND ANNUN NONE NO ANNUNCIATOR Closed ,
~~~ '
600 NO ALM FOR OPERATOR TO KNOW RPV AT 114.7 PSIG NO ANNUNCIATOR Closed 601 No ALM FOR OPERATOR TO KNOW RPV PWR > 3% NO ANNUNCIATOR Closed ! 602 NO ALM FOR OPERATOR TO KNOW PWR INCREASING NO ANNUNCIATOR Closed 603 NO ALM FOR OPERATOR MODE SW IN "$HUTDOWN" NO ANNUNCIATOR Closed 605 NO ALM FOR OPERATOR WHEN RX IS "NOT SHUTDOWN" NO ANNUNCIATOR Closed 606 NO ALM FOR OPERATOR WHEN RX IS "$HUTDOWN" NO ANNUNCIATOR Closed 608 NO ALM FOR OPERATOR WHEN SCRAM IS RESET NO ANNUNCIATOR Closed .", 623 RECORDER LEGIBILITT SCALE, REC Closed 631 RECORDER SHADOWING RECORDER Cloi6ed 646 RHR CROSS-TIE FLOW INDICAfl0N METER STATION Closed 651 SJAE VALVE INDICATION INDICATING LIGHT Closed 654 RPV COOLDOWN RATE RECORDER Closed 655 NO INDICATION OF RHR SDC INTERLOCK CLEARING INDICATING LIGHT Closed 656 FULL CORE DISP',AT INDICATION, CRD Closed 659 CRDH LOCAL MANUAL VALVE VALVE, INDICATION Closed 661 SDV LEVEL INDICATION NONE Closed l 662 CRDH LOCAL MANUAL VALVE NONE Closed 663 SDV VENT & DRAIN VLAVES STATUS INDICATION INDICATING LIGHT Closed 664 CRD INDIVIDUAL SWITCH PANEL LOCATION CRD Closed 679 LABELING LABEL Closed j 709 RECORDER SCALE BANDING RECORDER Closed 711 INDICATOR SCALE BANDING INDICATOR Closed 712 RECORDER SCALE BANDING RECORDER Closed 713 INDICATOR SCALE BANDING INDICATOR Closed 714 INDICATOR SCALE BANDING INDICATOR Closed 735 RECORDER SCALE BANDING RECORDER Closed 737 REC 00ER SCALE BANDING RECORDER Closed , 740 RECORDER SCALE BANDING RECORDER Closed 741 RECORDER SCALE BANDING RECORDER Closed 742 RECORDER SCALE BANDING RECORDER Closed I 743 INDICATOR SCALE BANDING INDICATOR Closed 744 INDICATOR SCALE BANDING INDICATOR Closed 747 INDIVIDUAL TRAINING NEEDS ARE NOT BEING MET TRAINING Closed 748 TRAINING MAY NOT COVER ALL IMPORTANT NEEDS TRAINING, SIMULATOR Closed 750 SIMULATOR DYNAMICS DO NOT MATCH PLANT TRAINING, SIMULATOR Closed 751 OPERATORS DO NOT RLCEIVE TEAM TRAINING TRAINING Closed
pew No. 2 07/29/87 TABLE 7-1 HED STATUS - CLOSED HED NO. DESCRIPTION KEYWORD STATUS 753 TRAINING PROGRAM UPDATING REQUIRED TRAINING Closed 754 PLACEMENT (F INDICATORS OUTSIDE STANDARDS ANTHROP 0 METRIC (6.1.2.2) Closed 755 PLACEMENT 8/,RECORDERn 0UTSIDE STANDARDS ANTHROP 0 METRIC (6.1.2.5) Closed 756 CHAIRS DO NOT HAVE ADJUSTABLE SEAT HEIGHT CHAIRS (6.1.2.5) Closed 758 POOR CONTRAST - IrJICATOR LIGHTS / BACKGROUND ILLUMINATION (6.1.5.3) Closed 760 SHADOWS ON THE LA8CLS VISIBILITY (SEE HED 945) Closed 761 PLACEMENT OF RECORDERS OUTSIDE STANDARDS ANTHROP 0 METRIC (6.1.2.2) Closed 762 WINDOWS AT WRONG LOCATIONS ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.3.1) Closed 764 No CUE FOR CLEARED ALARMS ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.1.5) Closed 767 MULTIPLE INPUTS ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.1.2) Closed 768 GENERAL ALARM ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.1.2) Closed 769 "CAUSE AND EFFECT OPERATOR" TRAINING TRAINING Closed 770 PROBLEM ANALYSIS / EVENT DIAGNOSIS TRAllLNG Closed 772 HYDROGEN CONCENTRATION INSTRUMENT RESOLUTION SETPOINT Closed l l 770 ACCESS PROBLEMS CONTROL ROOM i tELAY ROOH Closed 779 MAIN OIL LUBRICATION INDICATOR PLACEMENT PANEL LAYOUT (SEE HED 783) Closed 781 UNIT! ZED ACTUATOR CMC SWITCH PLACEMENT PANEL LAYOUT AND DESIGN Closed 782 FW HEATER VENT CONTROL PLACEMENT PANEL LAYOUT AND DESIGN Closed 785 HEATER SEP SEAL TANK MANUAL CONTROL BACK PANL PANEL LAYOUT AND DESIGN Closed 787 SAMPLING ISOLATION VALVES PANEL LAYOUT AND DESIGN Closed 788 REAC BLDG SUMP PUMP CONTROLS PANEL LAYCUT AND DESIGN Closed 789 DRYWELL SUMPS LEVEL INDICATION PANEL LAYOUT AND DESIGN Closed 792 NO STATION AIR PRESSURE INDICATION IkiTRUMENTATION & HARDWARE Closed 793 CONDENSER PUMP CMC RUN LIGHT STAYS ON CONTROLS (SEE HED 794) Closed 796 TOO MANY HI COM MESSAGES VOICE COMM (SEE HED 795) Closed 797 HI COM SPEAKERS DROWN OUT RADIO MESSAGES VOICE COMM (SEE HED 795) Closed 798 POOR QUALITY HI COM & RADIO SPEAKERS VOICE COMM (SEE HED 795) Closed 800 ADDITIONAL TELEPNONES REQUIRED VOICE COMM (SEE HED 795) Closed 801 HI-COM HANDSET CORDS ARE 100 SHORT Vo!CE COMM (SEE HED 795) Closed 802 CONTROL ROOM SPEAKER PROBLEM VOICE COMM (SEE HED 795) Closed 803 NEED SPEAKERS IN BACK OF PANELS VOICE COMM (SEE HED 795) Closed 804 SITE EVACUATION ALARM PROBLEM VOICE COMM (6.2.1.6) Closed 806 PANEL SURFACE LIGHTING PROBLEM ILLUMINAfl0N (SEE HED 811) Closed 807 LIGHTING USED AS SUPPLEMENTAL HEATING ENVIRONMENT (SEE HED 805) Closed 809 MIXED CONTROL OF LIGHT BANKS ILLUMINATION (SEE HID 811) Closed 81D COMMUNICAfl0NS CONSOLE LIGHilWG PROBLEM ILLUMINATION (SEE HED Bil) Closed 812 NOISE IN THE CONTROL ROOM ENVIRON (6.1.5.5)(HED 795) Closed 814/ STAMP 1NG OF CONTROL ROOM CHART RECORDERS GRAPHIC RECORDER (6.5.4.1) Closed 816 OPERATOR FEELS POORLY INFORMED ON ACTIVITIES COMMUNICATION Closed 817 PLANT EQUIPMENT STATUS
SUMMARY
TEMPORARY LABELS (6.6.5.1) Closed 818 TV MONITORING OF CONTROL ROOM ILLUMINATION (6.1.5.3) Closed 819 CHAIRS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH NUREG 0700 CHAIRS (SEE HED 756) Closed 820 PLASTIC FLOOR PAD PROSLEM FURN!TURE & EQUIP (6.1.1.3) Closed 821 INSUFFICIENT WORKSPACE AT OPERATOR'S CONSOLE WORK STATION (6.1.2.7) Closed 822 PROCEDURE CART IS BIG AND BULKY WORK STATION (6.1.2.6) Closed 823 NEED FILE FOR EXTRA COPIES OF PROCEDURES DOCUMF4i STORAGE (6.1.1.4) Closed 824 REPLACE BULKY BOOKS WITH HANGING FILES DOCUMENT STORAGE (6.1.1.4) Closed 825 NEED ADDITIONAL PLANT DRAWINGS ON FILE DONMENT STORAGE (6.1.1.4) Closed 826 ALARM RESPONSE PROCEDURE STORAGE NOT ADEQUATE DOCUMENT STORAGE (6.1.1.4) Closed B28 DIFFERENT VINTAGE COMPUTER SYSTEMS TRAINING (SEE MED 752) Closed 829 INADEQUATE TRAINING TIME ON COMPUTERS TRAINING (SEE HED 752) Closed I
Pigs No. 3 TABLE 7-1 07/29/87 HED STATUS CLOSED
- KEYWORD STATUS HED CD. DESCRIPil0N TRAINING (SEE HED 752) Closed 830 LACK OF TRAINING ON COMPUTERS TRAINING (SEE HED 752) Closed 831 LACK OF HELP PROGRAMS ON COMPUTERS ENVIRONMENT Closed 836 OPERATOR UNIFORMS EMERGENCY SITUATIONS Closed 837 ISOLATION VALVES IN BREATHING AIR SYSTEM LABELS (SEE HED 945) Closed 839 LABELING CONCERNS ALARM MESSAGES (6.7.3.2) Closed 843 ALARMS NOT PRINTED BY ALARM PRINTER ALARM MESSAGES (6.7.3.2) Closed 844 PRINTED MESSAGES DON'T ADD INFORMATION ALARM MESSAGES (6.7.3.2) Closed 845 ALARM SUMMARIES CANNOT BE CALLED UP ALARM MESSAGES (6.7.3.2) Closed 846 ALARM PRINTER COLORS DON'T MATCH WINDOW COLOR ALARM MESSAGES (6.7.3.2) Closed 847 TOO MANY STATUS POINTS ARE RECORDED ALARM MESSAGES (6.7.3.2) Closed 848 SOER MESSAGE SHOULD MATCH ANNUNCIATOR WINDOW ANNUNCIATOR (SEE HED 763) Closed 849 FIRST GUT ANNUNCIATION CONTROLS (6.4.4.2) Closed 851 REACTOR MODE SWITCH DIFFICULT TO OPERATE PANEL LAYOUT (6.8.1.1) Closed 852 HARD TO SEE CRD DISCH INDICATOR ON H11 P805 CONTROL DISPLAY (6.9.3.2) Closed 856 DIFFICULT MANUEVER FOR MSIV-LCS SURVEILLANCE VISUAL DISPLAYS (SEE HED 857) Closed 858 GEMAC CONTROLLER CONCERN VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.3.1) Closed 859 NO LANP TEST FOR FULL CORE DISPLAY PANEL LAYOUT (6.8.1.1) Closed 860 . ADDITIONAL MEGAWATT METER VISUAL DISPLAYS (SEE HED 857) Closed 861 DUPLEX GAGES IN CONTROL ROOM VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.3.1) Closed 863 HAYS REPUBLIC METER ALARM BACKLIGHT!NG VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.3) Closed 864 " REACTOR WASTE FLOW METER" READABILITY POOR PANEL LAYOUT (6.8.1.1) ' Closed 870 MAIN STM LINE RADIATION MON! TOR REC PLACEMENT PANEL LAYOUT (6.8.1.1) Closed 871 0FF GAS RADIATION MONITOR PLACEMENT VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.1) Closed 872 LEVEL INDICATION UNAVAILABLE IN CONTROL ROOM PANEL LAYOUT (6.8.1.1) Closed 8 73 DRYWELL EQUIP DRAIN SUMP LEVEL NOT AVAIL &BLE CONTROLS (SEE HED 455) Closed 874 UNNECESSARY CONTROLS / DISPLAYS IN CONTRCL ROOM PANEL LAYOUT (6.8.1.1) Closed 875 DIESEL CEN FAN CONTROLS NOT NEEDED IN CTL RM CONTROLS (SEE HED 455) Closed 876 HEATER EMERGENCY DRAINS CONTROLS NOT NCEDED PANEL LAYOUT (6.8.1.1) Closed 877 REMOVE AUX BOILER CONTROLS FROM CONTROL ROOM DISPLAY Closed 878 EMERGENCY STATUS SYSTEM UNNECESSARY PANEL LAYOUT (6.8.1.1) Closed 880 DRYWELL SYSTEM FLOW RECORDER UNNECESSARY ANNUNCIATOR Closed 882 TOO MANY ALARMS IN AT ANY ONE TIME ANNUNCIATOR Closed E33 NUISANCE ALARMS ANNUNCIATOR Closed 884 SPURIOUS ALARMS ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.1.2) Closed 885 TOO MANY Hl/LO ALARMS WITH NO ADDITIONAL INFO ANNUNCIATOR Closed 886 ALARM DOES NOT PROVIDE ENOUGH INFORMATION ANNUNCIATOR Closed 887 DISTRACTING ALARM ANNUNCIATOR Closed 890 HYDRAULIC CONTROL TROUBLE ALARM UNCLEAR ANNUNCIATOR Closed 891 ALARM DEFEAT MATRIX NOT CLEAR ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.1.2) Closed 899 ALARM SETPOINTS CANNOT BE CHANGED IN CTL RM ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.1.2) Closed 900 EXCESS FLOW CHECK VALVE ANNUNCIATOR NEEDED ANNUNCIATOR (SEE HED 972) Closed 901 CONFUSION OVER WHAT CONSTITUTES AN ALARM ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.4.1) Closed 902 ANNUNCIATOR ACKNOWLEDGE BUTTON LOCATIONS ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.4.1) Closed 903 ANNUNCIATOR LAMP TEST ANNUNCIATOR (SEE HED 764) Closed 904 NO CUE FOR CLEARED ALARMS ANNUNCIATOR (SEE HED 766) Closed l 906 AREA RADIATION MONITOR ANNUNCIATOR PROBLEM 90f, DOCUMENT STORAGE (6.1.1.4) Closed
.. TABS IN PROCEDURE BOOKS SHOULD HAVE NAMES PROCEDURE Closed 909 PROCEDURES OVERLY COMPLICATED DOCUMENTATION Closed 910 DESIGNATE WHICH EQUIPMEN! IS OPERATED BY WHOM PROCEDURE Closed 911 PROCEDURES 700 RIGID TEMPORARY LABELS (6.6.5.1) Closed 912 ANNUNCIATOR ALARM WINDOW OUT OF SERVICE - _ _ - _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ ___ ___ _ __
) J ' -
r
>Pege No. 4L TABLE 7-1 07/29/87-HED STATUS - CLOSED HED No. DESCRIPTION KEYWORD STATUS a
913 ALARM VS ALERT . ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.1.4) ' Closed
'914' COWERS 70 PREVENT DIRT INTO PANELS CONTROLS (6.4.1.1). Closed 916 INAPPROPRIATE SCALE - VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.2) Closed .
918 . INAPPROPRIATE SCALE: VISUAL DISPLAis (6.5.1.2) Closed ] 920 INAPPROPRIATE SCALE VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.2) Closed- j 923- - CONFLICT BETWEN DISPLAY & PROCEDURE VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.2) Closed: . VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.2)- Closed 924 INAPPROPRIATE SCALE 925 INAPPROPRIATE SCALE VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.2) Closed
' 926 ' INAPPROPRIATE SCALE VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.2). Closed ,
930 COLOR CODING l$ INCONSISTENT. USE OF MIMICS (6.6.6.4) Closed' 931 TURBINE SHAFT V!BRATION RECORDER PLACEMENT PANEL LAYOUT (6.8.1.1) Closed 932 RECIRC PUMPS CONTROLS ARE MIRRORED. MIRROR !MAGING (6.8.3.3) Closed 934 LOCATION OF N & S AIR COMPRESSOR CONTROLS PANEL LAYOUT (SEE MED 791) Closed 935 CRT CONTROLS DIFFICULT To LOCATE DEMARCATION (6.6.6.2) Closed 937. SCRAM RESET VERIFICATION GENERAL LAYOUT (6.1.1.1) Closed . 938 ALARM WINDOW NOT DIRECTLY ABOVE CONTROLS ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.3.1) Closed 939 ECCS SUCTION LEAK DETECTION SYSTEM NOT CLEAR LABEL CONTENT (6.6.3.1) Closed 941 ANNUNCIATOR VS CONTROLS FOR BUS 72J & BUS 72K CONTROL DISPLAY (6.9.2.3). Closed 942 RECORDER DISPLAY FOR CHLORINATION / SERV WATER CONTROL DISPLAY (6.9.2.2) Closed-943- IRM RECORDER & RANGE S W CH PATTERN CONTROL DISPLAY (6.9.2.2) Closed: 944 EXHAUST SUPPLY FAN SELECTOR SWITCHES LAYOUT ARRANGEMENT (6.8.2.1) Closed 946 WHITE ON BLACK LABELS READABILITY (6.6.4.1) Closed 947 GROUP DEMARCATION OF RHR DEMARCATION (6.6.6.2). Closed 948 - ' INCONSISTENT USE OF ABBREV!ATIONS ON LABELS LABEL CONTENT (SEE HED 945) Closed 949 CONFUSING FEEDWATER HEATER LABELS DEMARCATION (6.6.6.2) Closed 950 VALVE SYMBOL INCONSISTENCY ON CONDENSER MIMIC SYMBOLS (6.6.3.4) Closed 951 BE2ELS (MOUNTING BARRIERS) NOT CONSISTENT VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.3.3) Closed 952 EDG HVAC CONTROL GROUPING HIERARCHICAL (6.6.1.2) Closed 953 INADEQUATE CONTRAST BETWEEN LEGEND / BACKGROUND : CONTROLS (6.4.3.3) Closed 954 LABEL NOT SUFFICIENTLY DESCRIPTIVE' LABEL CONTENT (6.6.3.2) Closed 955 CO2 SYSTEM LABELS NOT CLEAR LABEL CONTENT (6.6.3.2) Closed j 956 INADEQUATE LABELING ON H11 P816 HIERARCHICAL (6.6.1.2) Closed 957 POOR ATTACHMENT DF DEMARCATION LINES DEMARCATION (6.6.6.2) Closed j
.958 DEMARCATION NEEDED TO SEPARATE CONTROL MATRIX DEMARCATION (6.6.6.2) Closed
'960 COLOR CODING INCONS! STENT USE OF MINICS (6.6.6 4) Closed 962 MINIC FLOW INDISTINCT USE OF MIMICS (6.6.6.4) Closed 968 DIFFICULT TO IDENTIFY EDP INSTRUMENTS ENHANCING IDENT (6.8.1.3) Closed 973 COLOR CODING FOR TECH SPEC ALARMS ANNUNCIATOR (SEE HED 972) Closed 1 974 INCONSISTENT COLOR CODING ANNUNCIATOR (SEE HED 972) Closed .]
976 P00R COLOR CONTRAST MIMIC (SEE HED 455) Closed j 977 MIMIC LINES MISSING MIMIC (SEE MED 455) Closed 979 NEED TO ASSOCIATE RFP CONTROLS AND DISPLAYS DEMARCATION (SEE HED 940) Closed j 980 MIMIC LINES MIS $1NG USE OF MIMICS (6.6.6.4) Closed 981 MIMICS NEED TO SHOW FLOW DIRECTIONS USE OF MINICS (6.6.6.4) Closed I 982 DEMARCATION NEEDED FOR EDG CONTROLS DEMARCATION (6.6.6.2) Closed 984 NUMERIC KEYBOARD ARRANGEMENT DATA ENTRY KEYBOARD (6.7.1.4) Closed 986 CRT SCREEN VISIBILITY PROBLEM STAND UP CONSOLE (6.1.2.2) Closed 989 GRAPHIC RECORDER READABILITY PROBLEM VISUAL DISPLAYS (SEE HED 987) Closed 990 INSTRUMENT SCALE COLOR CODING 18 LACKING VISUAL DISPLAYS (SEE HED 775) Closed 991 USEABILITY OF DISPLAYED VALUES ON CONTROLLERS VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.2) Closed 992 INSTRUMENT ALARM Po!NTS INDICATION IS LACKING VISUAL DISPLAYS (SEE HED 775) Closed
Page Ms. 5 TABLE 7-1 07/29/87 NED STATUS - CLOSED HED NO. ' DESCRIPTION KEYWORD STATUS 993 CONTROLS HAVE To BE HELD FOR EXTENDED PERIODS CONTROLS (6.4.1.1) Closed j 994 CONTROLS HAVE TO BE HELD FOR EXTENDED PERIODS CONTROLS (6.4.1.1) Closed 995 CONTROLS NAVE 70 BE HELD FOR EXTENDED PERIODS CONTROLS (6.4.1.1) Closed i 1001 CONTROL ROOM MISCOMMUNICAT!DN COIWUNICATION Closed 1002 PROCEDURE NON-COMPLIANCE / TECH SPEC VIOLATION PROCEDURE Closed 1003 TECH SPEC MISINTERPRETATION COMMUNICATION Closed 1005 SPUR!auS ACTUATIONS PROCEDURE Closed 1006 PERSONNEL ERROR FROM INCORRECT REV 0F PROCED PROCEDUNE Closed i 1007 TECH SPEC MISINTERPRETATION COMMUNICATION Closed 1008 RBCCW MISALIGNMENT CAUICS EECW ACTUATION PROCEDURE Closed 1009 SPURIOUS ACTUATIDs OF CCHVAC EMERGENCY RECIRC ACTUATION Closed 1014 TECH SPEC MISINTERPRETATION PROCEDURE Closed 1016 TECH SPEC VIOLATION FOR RWCU ISOLATION VALVES PROCEDURE Closed 1017 MISSED SURVE!LLANCE/ TECH SPEC VIOLATION. PROCEDURE Closed 1018 DELETED PROCEDURAL STEP + PROCEDURE Closed 1019 SYSTEM MISALIGNMENT / TECH SPEC VIOLATION COMMUNICATION / PROCEDURE Closed 1020 FAIL TO FOLLOW PROCEDURE / TECH SPEC VIOLATION PROCEDURE Closed 1022 > PERSONNEL ERROR ACTUATION Closed 1023 PERSONNEL ERROR ACTUATION Closed 1024 PERSONNEL ERROR CAUSES RWCU ISOLATION ACTUATION Closed 1025 PERSONNEL ERROR / TECH SPEC VIOLATION COMMUNICATION Closed 1026 PROCEDURAL INADEQUACY / TECH SPEC VIOLATION PROCEDURE Clossd 1027 ACTUATION Closed 1028 PERSONNEL ERROR CAUSES SDC & RWCU ISOLATION PERSONNEL ERROR ( ACTUATION Closed 1029 OPERATOR ERROR CAUSES EECW ACTUATION PROCEDURE Closed 1030 PERSONNEL ERROR RESULTS IN EDG AUTO START ACTUATION Closed 1031 PROCEDURAL INADEQUACY CAUSED EDG AUTO START ACTUATION Closed 1032 PERSONNEL ERROR LEADS 70 AUTO ISOLATION ACTUATION Closed 1033 PERSONNEL ERROR LIFTING LEADS CAUSES ISOLAT ACTUATION Closed j 1034 TEST REQUIREMENT DELETION / TECH SPEC VIOLATION PROCEDURE Closed l 1035 PERSONNEL ERROR CAUSES AUTO ACTUATION ACTUAfl0N Closed 1036 INADEQUATE PROCEDURES / TECH SPEC VIOLATION PROCEDURE Closed 4 i 1037 PROCEDURE SCHEDULE NOT REVISED PROCEDURE Closed 1036 PERSONNEL CAUSED ISOLAT!DN OF RWCU ACTUATION Closed 1039 Closed TECH SPEC REQUIREMENTS NEGELCTED PROCEDURE l 1040 PERSONNEL ERROR RESULTS IN CC HVAC & SGTS ACT ACTUATION Closed 1041 PERSONNEL ERROR CAUSES ISOLATION ACTUATION C bsed 1042 PERSONNEL ERROR CAUSIS REACTOR SCRAM COMMUNICATION Closed ] ' 1043 INCORRECT INSTRUMENT REF/ TECH SPEC VIOLATION PROCEDURE Closed 1044 INADEQUATE REVIEW / TECH SPEC VIOLATION PROCEDURE Closed 1045 TECH SPEC MISINTERPRETATION PROCEDURE Closed 1047 WORK SCOPE MISINTERPRETAfl0N CAUSES ISOLATION COMMUNICATION Closed 1048 SURVEILLANCE EXCEEDS ALLOWABLE TIME INTERVAL PROCEDURE Closed 1049 PERSONNEL ERROR CAUSES ACTUATION ACTUATION Closed : Closed 1050 HPCI GOV BRG FAILS DUE TD LACK OF LUBRICATION EQUIPMENT FAILURE 1052 INADEQUATE PROCEDURE LEADS TO REACTOR SCRAM PROCEDURE Closed 1053 TORUS LEVEL LIMIT EXCEEDED PROCEDURE Closed 9054 COOLDOWN RATE EXCEEDS TECH SPEC LIMIT VIOLATION Closed 1055 TocVS LEVEL OUT OF SPEC VIOLATION Closed 1056 HIGH DRYWELL PRESSURE VIOLATION Closed 1057 RODS WITHDRAWN PAST PROPER POSITION VIOLATION Closed l
Page No. 6 TABLE 7-1 07/29/_7
. HED STATUS - CLOSED i
KEYWORD STATUS HED NO. DESCRIPTION 1059 BOTH LOOPS OF CORE SPRAY INOPERABLE PROCEDURE Closed 1060 SPURIOUS ISOLATION CAUSED BT BUMP ISOLATION Closed 1061 OXYCEN CONCENTRATION EXCEEDS TECN SPEC LIMIT VIOLATION (SEE HED 1058) Closed 1062 ISOLATION VALVE OPENED IN VIOLATION OF A LCO VIOLAfl0N Closed 1064 IMPROPER VALVE LINE UP/ TECH SPEC VIOLATION VIOLATION Closed 1065 PERSONNEL ERROR ACTUATION Closed 106A EQUIP STATUS DID NOT AGREE WITH DOCUMENTATION PROCEDURE Closed
' 1C HEATUP RATE EXCEEDS TECH SPEC LIMIT V10LAfl0N Closed 1068 FAIL TO PERF SURVEILLANCE / TECH SPEC VIOLATION VIOLATION Closed 1069 RADIO FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE ACTUATION ,
Closed 1070 CC HVAC AND SGT ACTUATION ACTUATION Clostd 1071 HPCI & RCIC SIMULTANEOUSLY INOPERABLE VIOLATION Closed 1080 NO ANNUNCIATOR ACKNOWLEDGE AT PtNEL ANNUNCIATOR / COMMUNICATION Closed 1081 METER SCALE DIFFICULT TO READ INDICATOR Closed 1084 SHIFT SUPERVISOR LEFT WORKSTATION STAFFING Closed 1085 INADEQUATE VISIBILITY OF RECORDER RECORDER Closed 1086 RAD MONITOR SCALES NOT ACCURATE RECORDER Closed 1087 CONTRAST OF INDICATING LIGHTS POOR ILLUMINAfl0N (SEE HED 811) Closed a
l J PaBe No. 1 TABLE 7-2 07/29/87-HED STATUS OPEN HED N0. DESCRIPTION KEYWORD J 450 FLOW METERS HAVE Loa SCALE VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.5) 451 DIFFERING SETPO!NTS FOR VESSEL H2O LEVEL L1 PROCEDURE ; 452 ADS PESET NEEDS BOTH PB'S USED SIMULTANEOUSLY NEED FOR LABELING (6.6.1.1) 453 FLOWMETER POINTER IS TOO FAR FROM INDEX LINES COLOR CODING (6.5.1.6) 454 ADS VALVES NOT CLEARLY DISTINGUISHED DEMARCATION (6.6.6.2) 455 H11-P805 CLUTTERED PANEL LAYOUT (6.8.1.2) t 456 N0 KEYLOCK FOR INTERLOCK DEFEAT L8 JUMPER SWITCH, KEYLOCK 457 METER SCALE / POINTER (N21 R802) POINTER, IND. j 458 N0 KEYLOCK FOR INTERLOCK DEFEAT L8 JUMPER SWITCH, KEYLOCK 462 NO PRIMARY CONTAINMENT WATER LEVEL INDICATOR INDICATOR, NONE 1 464 SUMP REC MIN LEVEL 6", ROOM FLR NOT 0 PROCEDURE ) 465 NO KEfLOCK FOR INTERLOCK DEFEAT HI D/W PRESS JUMPER SWITCH, KEYLOCK
-466 NO KEYLOCK FOR INTERLOCK DEFEAT L0 LEVEL JUMPER SWITCH, KEYLOCK 467 D/W TEMP REC (T47 R803A&B) RANGE NOT ADEQUATE RECORDER 468 BANDING ASAP (PRESENT BANDING INCORRECT) INDICATOR ;
470 RAD RELEASE 10X TECH SPEC ALARM INDICATION l 473 No KEYLOCK FOR DEFEAT TB HVAC HI RAD TRIP JUMPER SWITCH, KEYLOCK 476 D/W TEMP REC (T50-R800) RANGE NOT ADEQUATE RECORDER 477 DW-TOR TMP REC (T50RB00A&B) TOR H2O TMP REC RECORDER 479 PUT RECORDER # DN NAMEPLATE GENERIC-- MARKER PLATES j 480 TEMP ALM 1D66 SETPT &/or PSTG RWCU PMP RM 1066, SETPOINT 481 TEMP ALM 1D66 SETPT &/or PSTG RWCU PMP RM 1066, SETPOINT 482 TEMP ALM 1D66 SETPT &/or PSTG RWCU HX RM 1D66, SETPolNT l 483 CH TEMP ALM 1D66 SETPT 1.PR PSTG PH SEP RM 1D66, SETPOINT { 484 CHNG TEMP ALM 1D66 SETPT &/or PSTG NW CORN RM 1D66, SETPOINT 485 CHNG TEMP ALM 1D66 SETPT &/or PSTG SW CORN RM 1D66, SETPOINT 486 CHNG TEMP ALM 1D66 SETPT 1/or PSTG (HPCI CAD) 1D66, SETPolNT , 487 CHNG TMP ALM 1D66 SET &/or PSTG (NE CORN RCIC iD66, SETPolNT 488 CHNG TEMP ALM 1D66 SETPT &/or PSTG STEAM SPLY 1D66, SETPOINT 489 CHNG SETPT 1/or PSTG (RECIRC MG AREA) ANNUNCIATOR ; 490. RB HVAC EXH RAD LVL 50 ndEM/HR VS 120/135 CPM ANNUNCIATOR ; 491 FUEL POOL HVAC ALM 5 WEM/HR VS 50 nREM/HR ANNUNCIATOR l 492 AREA RADIATION ANNUNCIATOR 498 RB SUBBSMT WATER LEVEL NE & SE CORNER RM ANNUNCIATOR ! 500 RB SUBBSMT WATER LVL NW & SW CORNER RM ANNUNCIATOR 502 2ND CONT HVAC RAD 6 d EM/HR VS 120/135 CPM ANNUNCIATOR 503 RB HVAC RAD IND MREM /HR VS CPM ANNUNCIATOR 504 2ND CONT HVAC RAD IND piREM/HR VS CPM ANNUNCIATOR 505 NO REFLASH ANNUNCIATOR 506 D/W AVERAGE TEMP INDICATOR 508 WR TORUS WTR LVL INDICATION-!NSUFF RANGE RECORDER, INSUFFICIENT RANGE 509 PRIMARY CONTNT WTR LEVEL IND - NONE INDICATOR, NONE 510 ROOM TEMP INDICATION NONE IN CR-SE CS. PUMP RM INDICATOR, LOCATION 511 AREA TEMP >210 F, INDICAfl0N NONE IN CR INDICATOR, LOCATION i 512 ROOM TEMP INDICATION NONE IN CR (N RHR HX Rm) INDICATOR, LOCATION l 513 ROOM TEMP INDICATION NONE IN CR ($ RHR Hx Rm) INDICATOR, LOCATION 514 ROOM TEMP !NDICATION NONE IN CR (TIP AREA) INDICATOR 516 ROOM TEMP INDICATION-NONE IN CR (RB 5th Ftr) INDICATOR, NONE 521 HPCI ROOM WATER LEVEL INSTMT NONE ANNUNCIATOR, NONE 522 AREA TEMP INDICATION NONE (NW EECW AREA TEMP) ANNUNCIATOR, INDICATOR 526 ROOM TEMP IND NONE IN CR (TIP AREA) INDICATOR
l l l
- 7f TABLE 7-2 HED STATUS - OPEN HED NO. DESCRIPTION KEYWORD 528 ROOM TEMP IND*NONE IN CR (RB 5th FLOOR) INDICATOR, NONE 530 AREA RAD INSTMT - NONE INSTRUMENTATION j 537 AREA TEMP IND - NONE IN CR (A RWCU PLMP ROOM) INDICATOR, LOCATION !
538 AREA TEMP IND - NONE IN CR (B RWCU PUMP ROOM) INDICATOR, LOCATION 539 AREA TEMP IND NONE IN CR (RWCU HX ROOM) INDICATOR, LOCATION 540 AREA TEMP IND WONE IN CR (PHASE SEP ROOM)' INDICATOR, LOCATION 1 541 AREA TEMP IND - NONE IN CR (NW CORNER ROOM) INDICATOR, LOCATION 542 AREA TEMP !ND - NONE IN CR (SW CORNER ROOM) INDICATOR, LOCATION 543 AREA TEMP IND - NONE IN CR (HPC1/CRD ROOM) INDICATOR, LOCATION 544 AREA TEMP IND
- NONE IN CR (SE CORN /RCIC) INDICATOR, LOCATION i 545 AREA TEMP IND NONE IN CR (STEAM TUNNEL) INDICATOR, LOCATION 551 NO CR INDICATION OF RB HVAC RAD LEVELS INDICATOR, LOCATION i 581 PROVIDE BULK TORUS WATER TEMP ANNUNCIATOR 582 RAD RELEASE RATE > T. SPEC LIMIT ANNUN
- NONE ANNUNCIATOR, INDICATION j 586 AREA TEMP ANNUN-SETPolNT CHANGE SETPOINT, ANNUN & PRPCEDURE
]
587 ROOM TEMP ANNUN - NONE IN CR (N RHR Hx RM) . ANNUNCIATOR SETPOINT j 588 ROOM TEMP ANNUN NONE IN CR (S RHR Mx ROOM) ANNUNCIATOR SETPOINT
'589 ROOM TEMP ANNUN - NONE IN CR (TIP AREA) No ANNUNCIATOR 4 590 ROOM TEMP INDICATION NONE IN CR (H2 RECOMB) NO ANNUNCIATOR 591 ROOM TEMP ANNUN - NONE IN CR (RB 5th FLOOR) No ANNUNCIATOR I 604 NO ALM FOR SUPP'N POOL LOAD LIMIT (SPLL) NO ANNUNCIATOR 607 NO ALM WHEN SLC TANK IS EMPTY NO ANNUNCIATOR 609 TEMPORARY MAGNETIC DECALS IN CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS l 610 COMM BETWEEN CR & RR IS POOR COMMUNICATION SYSTEM i 611 TEMP NEAR LVL INSTMT RUN NOT AVAILABLE SOP l 612 N2 INERTING VALVE - MANUAL LOCAL VALVE 613 DEFEAT INTERLOCK JUMPER SWITCH, KEYLOCK 614 SCALE MARKINGS LEGIBILITY SCALE, IND 615 PRIMARY CONTAINMENT AVERAGE TEMP ANNUNCIATOR ANNUNCIATOR 616 DRYWELL H2/02 RECORDER PROCEDURE 617 TEMPORARY DECALS SCALE, REC 618 AREA RM TEMP ANNUN REFLASHABILITY ANNUNCIATOR, REFLASH 619 T47 R803 A&B DIFFICULT TO READ. NO POINT SEL. RECORMD 621 T50-R804A & B DOOR MUST BE OPENED TO READ ANURDER, SCALE 622 T50-R806A & D PRI CONT OXYCEN/ HYDR U W CO G. RECORDER, SCALE 625 RECORDER SCALE SCALE, REC 626 RECORDER SCALE & PRINT CUTS RECORDER 628 RECORDER SCALE & PAPER RECORDER, ECALE 629 RECORDER SCALE & SHADOWING SCALE, REC.
630 RECORDER SCALE AND SHADOWING LIGHTING SURVEY 632 CS & RHR FLOW PATH LABELING DEMARCATION 633 INDICATOR SCALE & PolNTER SCALE, IND. 634 RHR FLOW RATE REC. MULTIPLIER & SHADOWING SCALE, RECORDER 635 RHR LCX)P FLOW METERS SCALE, IND. 637 HPCI FLOW RATE METER SCALE, POINTER SCALE IND 638 EDG VOLTMETER SCALE, IND. 639 CMC SPRING-RETURN TO CENTER SWITCH SWITCH, CMC 640 RECORDER SCALE MULTIPLIER (FW) SCALE 641 INTERLOCK BY PASS SWITCH JUMPER SWITCH, KEYLOCK 642 SWITCH MARKING SWITCH, ENGRAVING 643 GEMAC LABEllWG GEMAC, "C"/"0" PB8s
Page No. 3 TMLE 7- 2 07/29/87 HED STATUS OPEN HED N0. DESCRIPTION KEYWORD 644 NO KEYLOCK DEFEAT HI TORUS WTR LVL XFER LOGIC JUMPER SWITCH, KEYLOCK 645 TORUS WATER AVERAGE TEMPERATURE RECORDER 647 AREA RAD MON RECORDER RECORDER 648. KEYLOCK SWITCH SWITCH, KEYLOCK 649 NO SWITCH TO BYPASS MSIV LO RPV LVL ISOLATION JUMPER SWITCH, KEYLOCK 652 LOCAL MANUAL VALVE POSITION INDICATION VALVE, LOCKED 657' ADS /SLC INTERLOCK . SWITCH, INTERLOCK, KEYLOCK 658 DISABLE RPS (PULL FUSE) LABEL 666 LABLEING LABEL 667 LABELING LABEL 668 LABELING LABEL 669 LABELING LABEL 670 LADELING LABEL 671 LABELING LABEL 672 LABELING LABEL 673 LABELING LABEL 674 LABELING LABEL
. 675 LABELING LABEL 676 LABELING LABEL 677 LABELING LABEL 678 LABELING LABEL 680 LABELING LABEL 681 LABELING LABEL ,
682 LABELING LABEL 683 LABELING LABEL' 684 LABELING LABEL l 685 LABELING LABEL ! 686 LABELING LABEL 687 LABELING LABEL 688 LABELING LABEL 689 LABELING LABEL 690 LABELING LABEL 691 LABELING LABEL 692 LABELING LABEL 693 LASELING LABEL 694 LABELING LABEL 695 LABELING LABEL 696 LABELING LABEL l 697 LABELING LABEL 698 LABELING LABEL 699 LABELING LABEL 700 RECORDER SCALE BANDING RECORDER 701 RECORDER SCALE BANDING RECORDER 702 RECORDER SCALE BANDING RECORDER 703 RECORDER SCALE BANDING RECORDER l 704 RECORDER SCALE BANDING RECORDER 705 RECORDER SCALE BANDING RECORDER > 706 INDICATOR SCALE BANDING INDICATOR 707 RECORDER SCALE BANDING RECORDER 708 RECORDER SCALE BANDING RECORDER 711 RECORDER SCALE BANDING RECORDER l
l 1 1 Page No. 4 TABLE 7-2 07/29/87
,NED STATUS - OPEN l
HED Wo. DESCRIPTION KEYWORD 1.. 715 INDICATOR SCALE BANDING INDICATOR i i 716 IN0lCATOR SCALE BANDING INDICATOR 717 RECORDER SCALE BANDlWG RECORDER l 718 !NDICATOR SCALE BANDING INDICATOR I RECORDER SCALE BANDING RECORDER 719 720 INDICATOR SCALE BANDING INDICATOR I 721 RECORDER SCALE SANDING RECORDER 722 RECORDER SCALE BANDING RECONDER 723 RECORDER SCALE BANDING RECORDER RECORDER SCALE BANDING RECORDER-724 725 INDICATOR SCALE BANDING INDICATOR RECORDER 726 RECORDER SCALE BANDING 727 INDICATOR SCALE BANDING INDICATOR 728 RECORDER SCALE BANDING RECORDER 1 729 INDICATOR SCALE BANDING INDICATOR 730 INDICATOR SCALE BANDING INDICATOR 731 INDICATOR SCALE BANDING INDICATOR 732 INDICATOR SCALE BANDING INDICATOR 733 INDICATOR SCALE BANDING INDICATOR 734 INDICATOR SCALE BANDING INDICATOR 736 INDICATOR SCALE BANDING INDICATOR RECORDER 738 RECORDER SCALE BANDING 739 INDICATOR SCALE BANDING INDICATOR 745 NEED A CONTROLLED SET OF KEYS IN CONTROL ROOM KEYS, PROCEDURE - 746 DECO. STANDARD 61721 2960 1 METER 749 POWER PRODUCTION / DISTRIBUTION TRAINING NEEDED TRAINING 752 OPERATORS NOT TRAINED ON SEVERAL COMPUTERS TRAINING 757 INSUFFICIENT LIGHTING ILLUMINATION (6.1.5.3) 759 REFLECTIONS ON CRT SCREENS ILLUMINATION (6.1.5.3) 763 NO "FIRST OUT" ALARM FEATURE ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.1.3) 765 WINDOW LOCATED ON WRONG PANEL ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.3.1) 766 POOR GROUPING ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.3.3) 771 INCONSISTENT COLOR CODED CONTROLS & DISPLAYS COLOR CODING (6.5.1.6) f VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.3.1) 773 BLINKING LIGHTS CAUSE OPERATOR DISTRACTION 774 METERS ARE COLOR CODED INC M ECTLY ZONE MARKING (6.5.2.3) ( 775 INCOMPLETE COLOR CODING OF SCALES COLOR CODING (6.5.1.6) 776 SAME SHAPE HANDLES ON DIFFERENT CTL SWITCHES SHAPE CODING (6.4.2.2) 777 ACCESS PkOBLEMS CONTROL ROOM (6.1.1.7) 780 TURBINE AUXILIARY RECORDER PLACEMENT PANEL LAYOUT AND DESIGN 783 TURBINE LUBE DIL PRESS RECORDER PLACEMENT PANEL LAYOUT (SEE HED 780) 784 CT 2B INFO NOT AVAILABLE IN AT CONTROLS AREA PANEL LAYOUT AND DESIGN 786 STEAM SEPARATOR SEAL WATER TANK CONTROLS PANEL LAYOUT AND DESIGN 790 G41 F032 POSITION INDICATOR NOT IN CONTROL RM PANEL LAYOUT AND DESIGN 791 LOCATION OF N & S AIR COMPRESSOR CONTROLS PANEL LAYOUT (6.8.1.1) 794 CMC CONTROL SWITCH RUN LIGHT STAYS ON CONTROL DISPLAY (6.9.3.2) 795 HI COM & RADIO SPEAKERS DO NOT COVER CTL RM VolCE COMM (6.2.1.6) l 799 TOO MANY TELEPHONE MESSAGES Vo!CE COMMUNICATION 805 CONTROL ROOM TEMPERATURE CONTROL PROBLEM ENVIRONMENT (6.1.5.1) 808 SOME LIGHT CONTROLS ARE NOT IN CONTROL ROOM ILLUMINATION (SEE MED 811) 811 CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING ILLUMINATION (6.1.5.3) 813 QUESTIONABLE DATA LOGGING DOCUMENTATION I
Page No. 5 TABLE 7-2 07/29/87 HED STATUS - OPEN HED No. ' DESCRIPTION KEYWORD 815 POOR FUNCTIONAL OPERAT!NG SKETCH QUALITY DOCUMENTATION 827 AUTO-DIAL TELEPHONE V0lCE COMMUNICATION 832. LOGGING DATA BY MAND SURVE!LLANCE l 833 COMPUTERS NOT AVAILABLE To OPERATORS TRAINING j 834 GAS EFF UNITS DIFFER FROM TECH SPEC UNITS COMPUTERS 835 A USABLE POWER SUPPLY LOAD LIST IS REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION 838 ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT 840 MIMIC IS NOT ACCURATE AND CAUSES CONFUSION PANEL LAYOUT (6.8.1.1) 841 ISQLATION VALVES MINIC DISPLAY PROBLEMS PANEL 8.AYOUT (6.8.1.1) 842 MIMICS SOMETIMES LACK INFORMATION USE OF MIMICS (6.6.6.4) 850 DIFFICULT TO OPERATE SWITCHES CONTROLS (6.4.1.1) 853 IRM SCALE SWITCH DIRECTl0N UNCONVENT!0NAL CONTROLS (6.4.2.1) 854 POOR LAYOUT FOR OFF GAS SYSTEM PANEL LAYOUT (6.8.1.2) 855 FEEDWATER & RECIRCULAT!DN CONTROLS 700 CLOSE PANEL LAYOUT (6.8.1.3) 857 GEMAC CONTROLLER CONCERN VISUAL DISP (6.5.1.1&6.5.1.2) 862 INCONSISTENT LABELING OF RESET PUSHBUTTONS LABEL CONTENT (6.6.3.3) 865 BAILEY RECORDERS NOT RELIABLE RECORDER 866 RWCU RECORDER MAINTENANCE CAUSES FALSE ALARMS GRAPHIC RECORDERS (6.5.4.1) 867 ALIGNMENT OF RECORDER POINTER & PEN POSITION GRAPHIC RECORDERS (6.5.4.1) 868 RECORDERS LOCKING DEVICE FOR SERVICING RECORDER 86 9 CT-2B INFO NOT AVAILABLE IN AT CONTROLS AREA PANEL LAYOUT AND DESIGN , 8 79 ECCS SUCT!DN LEAK DETECTION SYSTEM NOT USED VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.1) 001 HPCI VIBRATION METER VISUAL DISPLAY 888 MISLABELED ANNUNCIATOR 889 5D111 IS MISLABELED ANNUNCIATOR 892 ALARM NOISE TOO HIGH DURING MULTIPLE ALARMS ANNUNCIATOR 893 3D44 HAS NO REFLASH CAPABILITY ANNUNCIATOR 894 ALARM WINDOW SHOULD HAVE REFLASH CAPABILITY ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.1.2) 8 95 3044 HAS NO REFLASH CAPABILITY ANNUNCIATOR, DUPLICATE 896 ALARM WINDOW SHOULD HAVE REFLASH CAPABILITY ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.1.2) ; 897 ANNUNCIATOR, 3D10, NO REFLASH ANNUNCIATOR, REFLASH 898 ALARM WINDOW SHOULD HAVE REFLASH CAPABILITY ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.1.2) , 905 ALARM SETPOINT HAS TOO NARROW 0F A BAND WIDTH ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.1.2) 907 SIMPLIFY TITLES PROCEDURE 915 KEYLOCK SWITCHES ARE NOT CONSISTENT CONTROLS (6.4.4.3) 917 INAPPROPRIATE SCALE VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.2) 919 INAPPROPRIATE SCALE VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.2) 921 INAPPROPRIATE SCALE v!SUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.2) 922 INAPPROPRIATE SCALE VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.2) 927 AMBIGUOUS SCALE VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.4) 928 UNCONVENTIONAL GRADUAT!DNS SCALE MARKING (6.5.1.5) 929 SCALE SCALE MARK!NG (6.5.1.5) 933 480V BUS VOLTMETER LOCATIONS PANEL LAYOUT (6.8.2.3) 936 FUEL TANK DUMP VALVES ARRANGEMENT PANEL LAYOUT (6.8.2.2) 940 CONTROLS / INDICATORS - RELATIONSHIP IS UNCLEAR CONTROL DISPLAY (6.9.1.1) 945 LABELING PROBLEMS LABEL CONTENT (6.6.3.1) ) 959 MIMIC USES SAME COLOR FOR DIFFERENT FUNCT!DNS USE OF MIMICS (6.6.6.4) 961 INCONSISTENT USE OF MlHIC LINE WIDTHS USE OF MIMCS (6.6.6.4) 963 CLARIFY START AND END POINTS OF MIMIC LINES USE OF MIMICS (6.6.6.4) 964 INORDlWANT AMOUNT OF TIME TO OPERATE SWITCH SWITCH, PUSHBUTTON 965 HYDROGEN CONCENTRAT!DN SETPolNT IS TOO HIGH ANNUNCIATOR
l i Page No. 6. TABLE 7-2 07/29/87 l HED STATUS - OPEN ! HED NO. DESCRIPTION KEYWORD I 966 INCOMPLETE LABELS FOR RECORDERS T50-R806A&B LABEL (6.6.3.1)
%7 TORUS PRESSURE WR & NR REQ'D INST RESOLUTION 1 M9 THIRD MS!V CONTROLS HAVE INADEQUATE LA8ELS LABEL (6.6.1.1) 970 IDENTIFY SENSOR ELEVAtl0N FOR FLOODING REQMT LABEL CONTENT (6.6.3.1) 971 VENTING PRIMARY CONTAINMENT MANUALLY VALVE OPERATION l
972 PRIORITIZATION COLOR CODING ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.1.4) 975 COMPONENTS ARE NOT ALWAYS TIED TO MIMIC LINES USE OF MIMICS (6.6.6.4) . 978 INITIATION & TERMINAfl0N PolNTS INCONSISTENT USE OF MIMICS (6.6.6.4) j 983 FLOW DIRECTION NEEDED MIMIC j 985 NO COLOR CODING STANDARD FOR CRT DISPLAYS CRT DISPLAYS (6.7.2.7) i 987 RECORDERS ARE DIFFICULT TO READ VISUAL DISPLAY (6.5.4.2) 988 GRAPHIC RECORDERS REFLECTIVE GLARE PROBLEM VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.4.1) 999 HAYS REPUBLIC DISPLAYS HAVE FAULTY READINGS VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.1) i 1000 ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES DISPLAY NOT USED VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.2) h 1004 MISCOMMUNICATION/1MPROPER PLACEMENT OF EQUIP. COMMUNICATION / RECORDER ] 1010 FAIL TO PERF SURVEILLANCE / TECH SPEC VIOLATION COMMUNICATION I 1011 RWCU ISOLATION DURING FUSE RE INSTALLATION ACTUATION 1012 EECW AUTO INITIATION DURING RBCCW REALIGNMENT PROCEDURE 1013 MANUAL SCRAM REQ'D BY CRD PUMP TRIP PROCEDURE i 1015 LOW LEVEL SCRAM FROM OPERATOR ERROR ANNUNCIATOR 1021 AUTO ISOLATION DUE TO HIGH DIFFERENTIAL FLOW ISOLATION 1046 HPCI AND RCIC SIMULTANEOUSLY INOPERABLE ~ PROCEDURE 105* LOW LEVEL SCRAM ON SDC START UP ACTUATION 1058 OXYGEN CONCENTRATION EXCEEDS TECH SPEC LIMIT VIOLATION 1063 LACK OF TORUS LEVEL IND/ ANNUNCIATOR IN CTL RM ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.3.4) 1082 . GROUP ISOLATION SIGNAL INDICATICW VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.1) l 1083 LABELS NOT CONSISTENT LABEL CONTENT (6.6.3.3) I 1088 CONTROLS HAVE TO BE HELD FOR EXTENDED PERIODS CONTROLS (6.4.1.1) i, 1 {
APPENDIX 1 REFERENCES
t r 2 = ,_.+ s . . , _ _ _.~ . _ . - . . . . . . . . . . .
..v.m . . . ..__.m- .
1 i i REFERENCES
]
Reference:
1
)
, Letter from W..Jens, Detroit Edison to J. Youngblood,.NRC;
Subject:
. Control Room Design Review Open Item Status; Ltr.
j s No.;EF2-69,137, dated July 25, 1984. l t Reference 2 Letter from'W. Jens', Detroit Edison to J. Youngblood, NRC;
Subject:
Control Room Design Review (CRDR) Program Plan; L ' Ltr. No. EF2-72747; Dated August-.-16, 1984.- i Reference 3 i Letter from H; Tauber,, Detroit Edison to H.-Denton, NRC; l
Subject:
. Human Factors Design Review of the Enrico Fermi 2' -j Control Room;'Ltr. No. EF2-52,884; dated April 13, 1981~.
. Reference 4 ..
Letter-from F. Agosti, Detroit Edison to Adensam, NRC; Sub ect: Submittal of Procedures Generation Package and .
- Mod fled License Amendment Request; Ltr. No. VP-86-0093; l dated July'31, 1986.
I
- Reference 5 Letter from H. Tauber, Detroit Edison to J. Youngblood, NRC;
Subject:
Response to Supplement 1 of NUREG-0737, ) '
" Requirements for Emergency Response Capability (Generic Letter 82-83)"; dated December 17, 1982; Ltr. No. EF2-62,262; dated April 15, 1983. ]
]
J 1 1 j _-______________-___-_A
y - .-- - . , - - - - - - - - - , - - , - - - - - - _ - - - , - , . - - -, , - - . - - - APPENDIX 2 RESUMES 4
NAME: John R. Green EDUCATION: B.S. Electrical Engineering, University of Michigan Cleveland State University Curriculum: Engineering Science-Physics WORK EXPERINCE: 1973/Present Detroit Edison Company Supervisor: Responsible for twenty Systems Engineers and ten Technical Specialists and for an annual budget of several million dollars. Technical responsibility for final approval of design modifications to the Fermi 2 plant. Support engineering management in providing engineering and problem solving capabilities to the production organization. Systems Engineers assure configuration control, complete safety evaluations and revise the FSAR. Technical Specialists are responsible for fire protection, the welding program, water chemistry and shielding within the plant. Major project responsibilities include design basis documentation, BWR Owners Group, Detailed Control Room Design Review, Severe Accident Issue and Station Blackout. (1985-Present) Systems Engineer: for the Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant and as such had overall responsibility for the engineering of assigned systems from conceptual design through licensing to successful operation. This involved technical direction, coordination and communication with in-house disciplines, the NRC, outside vendors and architect / engineers. Assigned systems
J l j 1 O were Control Rod Drive -(CRD), Emergency I Diesel' Generator (EDG), Standby Gas '
. Treatment (SGTS) , Emergency Response '
Information (ERIS)_ Systems. 1 1 Projects' included: -Development and .I designfof ERIS-(SPDS);. modifications,to'- " i EDG' including problem analysis of bearing failures; purge-valve closure analysis and acceptance by NRC; l presentation at ACRS;: review of preop tests /results and submittal to NRC of i
-Technical Specifications for assigned 1 systems.. l !
Special. assignments for participation in 1 IMGt Owners, Group Committees for Control Room Improvements, CRD Waterhammer j
' Analysis'and Regulatory Guide 1.97. ;
Participation'as member on INPO 1 committees for Control Room Design Review, Emergency Response Facilities and Verification and Sysstem Validation. (1979-1985)
' Instrumentation & Controls Engineer:
Responsibilities within the I&C Design Group included contract' administration .i of an A/E, Giffels Associates, Inc., and l system instrumentation design. Interface , work with Giffels included preparation l' of work' scopes / schedules, monitoring of i time / billings, dissemination of Fermi 2 i engineering philosphy'and coordination 1: of Giffels and Fermi'2 personnel in I accomplishing tasks.- i Instrumentation and controls for ; numerous power plant projects. In-house l design projects included conveyor and l plow feeder modifications at a coal ' receiving / shipping facility and switchgear scehmatics development for the conversion of an oil fired unit to low sulfur coal. Primary reviewer for y I&C systems of A/E, Bechtel, on major fuels and emissions project. Modifications or equipment purchases were completed for soot blowers, 28 coal mills, opacity monitoring and coal j handling / blending system. l l
Member and secretary of the Control Center Task Force (CCTF) for new coal fired plants, two 660 MW units. The CCTF is a multi-discipline effort to develop the Control Center (Control Room, Relay Room, Computer Room and Shift Supervisor Office) in line with Human Engineering and plant operational / maintenance needs. Responsible for generation of a series of standard drawings for panel instrumentation and control configurations. Review of the solid state interposing logic system which replaced conventional relays as the interface between field equipment and control room devices. (1976-1979) Relay Protection Engineer: Test Engineer in the Relay Division with responsibility for relay protection and switchgear testing on the transmission and distribution system. Surveillance testing and checkout of initial installations requiring extensive test equipment, technical procedures and report writing. Majority of the testing was in the field or at power plants with a lesser amount of laboratory testing and calibration. (1973-1976) MEMBERSHIPS: American Nuclear Society BWR Owners Group Committees INPO Nuclear Utility Task Action Committee
E
;, L .:. . . . . .
o NAME: Lothar.R. Schroeder EDUCATION:- Experimental / Applied Psychology, Ph.D.lgh Leh University Engineering Psychology, Lehigh M.S.iversity Un B.S.,-General Engineering, University of Illinois B.A., Psychology, University of Illinois ; WORK EXPERIENCE: 1982/Present General Physics Corporation Dr. Schroeder's arons of expertise ; include job and task analysis, l procedures validation, equipment design l studies,. operations research and ; organizational design and management. j He is currently managing all human ! factors integration services for Georgia Power Company in meeting their emergency response capability requirements at Plant Hatch. Dr. Schroeder has supported an NRC research project applying control crew. ! task analysis data in areas of human l engineering. design and staffing. He was 61so responsible for implementing a data management system for this project. He is currently managing a follow-on research project for the NRC which will use the existing task analysis database < to identify training needs and to evaluate emergency procedures. Other representative projects include: l evaluating computer displays and work , l areas, assessing human factors aspects i of flow charts and reviewing equipment !' tagging procedures. Dr. Schroeder has also developed and given numerous supervisory skills workshops for i operations and technical staff. ,
+
i l
1981/1982 U.N.C. Nuclear Industries Dr. Schroeder worked as a human factors specialist, interfacing with engineers and other staff in identifying and colving problems relating to equipment design, the use of procedures, and training efforts at Hanford's N-Reactor. He also performed a human factors review of the 105-N control room in support of an on-going control room upgrade program. 1974/1980 Department of Psychology, Moravian College Dr. Schroeder's responsibilities as Assistant Professor and Department Chairperson included planning and coordinating a day and evening program in psychology involving over 100 majors, serving on several college committees, supervising individual field study, independent study and honors projects, and serving as academic advisor to day and evening session students having an interest in applied psychology. 1973 Wigdahl Electric Company Dr. Schroeder worked as a consultant, identifying potential organization problems and conducting problem solving sessions. 1972 Jewish Employment and Vocational Services As an industrial psychologist, Dr. Schroeder consulted with several industries and governmental agencies in order to develop, validate and administer " job-related" personnel selection tests under a Department of Labor contract.
PROFESSIONAL t AFFILIATIONS: Member, Human Factors Society Member, American Nuclear Society PUBLICATIONS: "A Human Factors Guided Survey for Systems Development," American Nuclear Society Winter Meeting, December 1981, coauthor with D.R. Fowler.
" Control Room Human Factors in Context,"
American Nuclear Society Winter Meeting, November 1981, coauthor with D. R. Fowler and D. E. Friar.
" Learning Style Data Applied to Nuclear Power Plant Training Programs."
American Nuclear Society Annual Meeting, June 1983.
" Task Analysis of Nuclear Power Plant Control Room Crews, Vol.", NUREG/CR-3371, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, June 1983. Authored with D.
Burgy, C. Lempges, A. Miller, H. Van Cott and B. Paramore.
" Crew Task Analysis Database: SEEK System Users Manual NUREG/CR-3606, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Authored with D. Burgy, March 1984. l t s
Richard C. Anderson NAME : - EDUCATION: B.S. Electrical Engineering 1968 Lawrence Institute of Technology, Southfield, MI Detroit Edison Courses o ~ Power Systems Engineering - 1969 o Basic Supervision - 1970 o Report Writing - 1970 o Nuclear Utility Service - Introduction to Nuclear Power - 1975 o Problem Solving - 1977 o contract Administration - 1980 WORK EXPERIENCE: Detroit: Edison Company. 6-68/Present Power Plant Engineer: 6-68/3-70 - q Production Department Assistant :' Engineer; 3-70/3-72 Production Department Associate Engineer; 3-72/4-74 ; Production Department Engineer. Responsibilities and duties included 1 testing of plant and equipment, trouble set up and shooting equipmentof initial operation problems,ipment. new equ Systems Engineer: 4-74/6-81 on loan to l EF2 Project. 6-84/9 Generation Engineering Department, Principal i Engineer on loan to Nuclear Engineering as Systems Engineer. 9-85/Present - Nuclear Operations Department, Principal l Engineer Systems Engineer in Nuclear f l Engineer 1ng Department. s s L -- -- - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _
5 {l Systems Engi~neering was part'of the EF2 Project and then part of the Nuclear Engineering organization within Nuclear Operations. Typical duties of a System Engineer included the operability of the system, licensing, FSAR input and updating and design verification. The Project System Engineer assignment under Generation Engineering is equivalent to
.the Lead System Engineer assignment in Nuclear Engineering.
I i l
- - ' ' - - - - - - - - ~ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
o - a. i, i NAME: Robert N. Haupt J EDUCATION: B.S. Electrical' Engineering,.1971 Michigan State University Detroit Edison Courses i Power System Engineering Mini-Micro Computer Course Microprocessors Short Course (, Shift Technical Advisors 1 Training Program.(40 weeks) o Supplemental Education Requirements o EF2 Orientation ; o Radiation Worker o Respiratory Protection o Radiological Emergency Response Plan o Procedures Qualifications o Research Reactor o Thermal Science : , o Reactor Theory o Supervisory Concepts and Techniques o BWR Systems Training L' o Technical Specifications o Instrumentation and Controls s- o o Operation Characteristics & Procedures o Mitigation of Core Damage o Simulator. Training o Station Nuclear Engineering o Dose Assessment o Power Plant Order #77 (Protective Procedures) o Quality Assurance Awareness o Behavioral Reliability i o Certification Interview o Safety Evaluations ; 1
.l
~
Courses outside of Company t o Control Valve Seminar, Fishers Controls Inc. o Introduction to Modicon 584 , Programmable Controller, Gould Inc., Modicon Division o Instrument & Control Systems, Sensors & Transducers { t
1 I
)
i l l Lines and Main Turbine Drips and' Drains 4 System; HVAC Systems - Reactor Building, l Control Center, . Turbine Bu d ?. ding, . ' Radwaste Building, Oft.ve' Service Building, All Out Building; Standby Gas
-Treatment System; Drywell Cooling ]
System; Primary Containment Pressure Control, Inerting.and Purge Systems;
- Chlorination Systems; Natural Draft Cooling Towers; Seismic and Non-seismic ,
Instrument Racks - duties included provided work direction for assigned i engineers; prepared work plans, reviewod ' vendor documents; provided front end engineering, coordinated and monitored engineering and design efforts of { Architect Engineers; wrote purchase t specifications, Bills of Material, l Vendor Document Packages and Design Document Packages; prepared and/or reviewed P& ids, Logic and schematic diagrams, conduit and tubing diagrams. 1
-4 11-73/1-78 Giffels Associates Inc Junior Engineer, Electrical Department:
Took work direction from lead engineer. Engineer to the Energy Reserch and Development Administration Plant Upgrade Proiect: Duties included: drafting; prepared and/or reviewed wiring diagrams; prepared installation drawings; prepared underground electrical duct installation drawings. Engineer: Assigned to Detroit Edison's Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant Unit 2. Duties included master instrument list update; preparing annunciator schematics ; and wiring diagrams; prepared wiring diagrams for the main turbine protection cubicle. l 11-71/11-73 Drafted into the United States Army. ) Seved as a Military Policeman. Recieved honorable discharge, highest grade attained E-4.- l i I i
--_-__.-.---._a _.--
WORK EXPERIENCE: 7-85/Present Detroit Edison Commpany Senior Engineer, Proiects & Plant Engineering: Functioned as Plant Interface Engineer; functioned as Leid Plant Engineer; provided engineering I coverage during outage 85-01; functioned as work leader with three engineers assigned to me; reviewed procedures as requested; acted as interface between STAS and Plant Engineering; reviewed and checked EDPs, ECRs and ABNs as required. Shift Technical Advisor: Placed in the STA Training Program. Successfully completed the STA Training Program j December 1983. Certified as an STA February 1984. Assigned to the Plant Engineering Group of System & Plant Engineering, Nuclear Engineering which included responsibilities for checking EDPs; checking ECRs; checking ABNs; reviewing procedures; revising specific , procedures affecting plant engineering; j function as work leader in the absence of the work leader; interface with ] nuclear production to resolve problem ] between the two groups. Functioned on j shift as Shift Technical Advisor by 1 providing technical advice to nuclear j shift supervisor and reviewing l surveillance for tech spec l requirements. l Lead Engineer, I&C Group: Responsible for the following systems: RHR Complex l Mechanical Draft Cooling Towers; l Annunciator and Sequence Recorder System ) Bearing and Motor Winding Temperature Monitoring System; Off-Gas System; Circulating Water System; Demineralized j Water Makeup, Storage and Transfer i System; Potable Water; General Service l Water Gystem; Turbine Building Closed Cooling Water System; Station, Control and Breathing Air System; Auxiliary Boiler System; Water Oil System; Steam
'l I
i
)
{ i 71/11-71 Giffels Associates Inc-Draftsman: Electrical Department working.on the U.S. Post Office Bulk Mail Handling Facilities. PROFESSIONAL 1
-ACTIVITIES: Passed EIT. Exam, 1980 0
l l l l
l NAME: Jerome P. Flint' ' EDUCATION: Naval Nuclear Propulsion Training - Naval Nuclear Power School Bainbridge, MD-
. Nuclear Power Plant Prototype-SIC Windsor, CT DeV U Institute of Technology (Electronics Correspondence Idaho State Uni)versity.(53 credit hours)
Pocatello, ID NRC Senior Operator License (BWR) Monroe, MI WORK EXPERIENCE: 1982/Present Detroit Edison Company. Nuclear Supervising Operator (NSO): Supervising day-to-day construction and testing of Fermi 2. Nuclear Assistant Shift Supervisor (NASS): Licensed BWR/SRO. Performed all phases of Preoperational and Start-Up Testing. Acted as control room director'for Integrated Emergency Core Cooling System CECCS) injection test. SRO for validation of Emergency. Operating Procedures. (BWROG - Rev. 4). Operations Training Coordinator: Developed Non-Licensed Operator (NLO) Initial Training and Qualification Program. Operations representative to Nuclear Training. l ____________-____A
L 1978/1982 Naval Nuclear Prototype - SIW Member Staff Training Group: Coordinated requalification-and continuing training for 40 staff' instructors. . Developed Red Cross CPR course for Naval Reactors' Facility (NRF). Qualified Engineering Officer of the Watch (EOOW). , l 1973/1978 Sea Duty Aboard USS Alexander Hamilton SSB(N) Electrical Division Leading Petty Officer Completed 2-1/2-years refueling overhaul. Two deterent patrols. Commendation from Com Sub Ron 14. v l L .
I NAME: Mary Beth Laird EDUCATION: B.S. Biology University of North Carolina Wilmington 1978 Reactor Operator License - Brunswick, Units 1 & 2 WORK EXPERIENCE: 1986/Present Sargent & Lundy Operations Support Specialist Nuclear Safeguards & Licensing Division: Ms. Laird is responsible for integrating systems design with station operations. She is also responsible for reviewing Design Change Packages at operating
, stations to ensure compatibility with technical specifications and maintenance, operating and I administrative procedures.
Ms. Laird has spent the last year on-site at the Fermi 2 plant. She is currently involved with applying human factors to a control room modification program. Prior to this, she evaluated j operating experience reports and was 1 involved with developing a QA program l for BOP equipment. Ms. Laird's first 1 assignment at Fermi was in the Design ) Verification Review Program. i l Previously, Ms. Laird's assignments involved on-site support. Her activites included assisting station staff in completing mandated design change reviews and providing operations expertise to station engineering. Ms. Laird was also involved in reviewing ; planned plant modifications to determine ' potential impacts on plant operating and administrative procedures. q I l _ ____U
- i. .
.]
1 1981/1986 -Brunswick Nuclear. Plant Ms. Laird' worked as an Operator at the. two unit Brunswick Nuclear Plant (1981-1986).- Her duties included direct I I responsibility--for. unit activites in both on-line and outage conditions, supervision of Auxiliary Operators,1 review and revision of operations procedures and shift training of Operations personnel.
)
i 1 l l l l -
l 1
-. . . . . . . .. . . . , . . . , _ _ _. . . . _. _ )
l NAME:. Thomas J. Murphy EDUCATION: General Electric Technical School-Medium' Steam Turbine, Gear and Generator Department Three-year-evening course, Graduated 1959 1 General Electric Apprentice Program Drafting Apprenticeship { Four-year on-the-job training, i Graduated 1960 f 1 i WORK EXPERIENCE: 11/85 to Present Stone'& Webster Engineering Corporation t Cherry Hill, New Jersey ) Senior Designer: Assigned to Detroit Edison's Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant preparing Engineering Design Packages for making plant modifications. Since March 1987, a member of Detroit Edison's Detailed Control Room Design Review
.(DCRDR) Team. The DCRDR Team is responsible for reviewing the Fermi 2 Control Room to identify and correct design deficiencies in accordance with NUREG 0700, " Guidelines for Control Room Design Reviews."
t 7/77 to 11/85 Technical Services, Inc. Troy, Michigan Field Engineer: Assigned to Fermi 2 Control Center Start-Up Group. Field modifications of'the Main Control Room i l Combination Operating Panels (COP) and Panels located in the Auxiliary Building Relay Room. Responsible for expediting l fabrications through panel vendors and directing the assembly, wiring, l installation, check-out and testing of panels. Also resolved cable routing and interconnection problems. l
1 i j i Work Leader, COP Design Group: Detroit Edison's.on-site representative. ; at CDA1 Engineering, Inc.,Han l architec/ engineering firm to expedite design documentation required for Fermi , 2 fuel load., Responsible for l maintaining' schedules, resolving i technical problems and providing liaison between design and engineering. Senior Designer: Incorporated system-design changes and the latest NRC , requirements on the COP for Fermi 2. Duties included (1) design of new panels; (2) investigation and resolution of field engineering problems; (3) site surveys of equipment status; (4) preparation and checking of documentation ~to incorporate field changes; and (5) initiation.of component and equipment specifications. 12/73 to 7/77 Bechtel Associates Professional Corp Ann Arbor, Michigan i Senior Designer: Assigned to Midland Units 1 & 2 Control Sy. stems Group with responsibilities consisting of: (1) preparation of material requisitions and specifications for main control boards and auxiliary / local control panels; (2) evaluation of bid tabulations and vendor selection; (3) post-award administration of control panels orders; (4) determination of Main Control Room Layout and locations of auxiliary / local L control panels; (5) engineering supervision of panel arrangements and review of vendor documentation; and (6) review of flow diagrams, P & ID's, logic l diagrams and electrical schematics. 7/72 to 12/73 Omnitext, Inc. Ann Arbor, Michigan Design and Drafting Manager: . Responsible for the mecahnical design and electronic packaging of a line of
l word processing equipment using computer peripherals. Duties included ordering of purchased parts'and coordination with vendors, controlling and checking all engineering drawings and documentation. Also manufacturing plant layout and l establishment of work flow. 8/71 to 6/72 Canadian Design Services Ltd. I Ottawa, Ontario, Canada l Drafting Group Supervisor: Field assignment at Ottawa International Airport. Responsible for the design and drafting of a Landsat ground station for the Canadian Government. 11/67 to 7/71 Consultant & Designers, Inc. New York, New York Specifications Writer: Prepared equipment specifications for NASA's Landsat ground support stations located in the United States. Assigned to Bendix Corporation, Aerospace Systems Division, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Senior Designer / Checker: Checked drawings (assemblies, wiring diagrams and details) of equipment used on the moon in the APOLLO Lunar Surface Experiment Package. Assigned to Bendix Corporation, Aerospace Systems Division, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Designer: Designed mechanical components used in the photo-optical system of NASAS's Lunar Orbitar. Electromechanical packaging of ground support equipment, cabinets and consoles. Assigned to Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, New York.
11/61 to 4/63 High Temperature Materials, Inc Lowell, Massachusetts Layout Draftsman: ~ Design layout of high temperature furnaces to produce pyrolytic graphite, a material used in the missile and rocket industry. 4/56 to 11/61 General Electric Company Medium Steam Turbine, Gear'and Generator Department West Lynn, Massachusetts Draftsman: Detailed assembly, q machining, casting and' outline drawings - from layouts. Majority of work performed was on mechanical functioning of medium steam turbines. I i 1 l
\
i l ) 1 i ' s l I I 1 1 1 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~
i L NAME: Chester F. Kupiec l WORK EXPERIENCE: 1977/Present General Physics. Corporation Responsible for developing.and reviewing the content of advanced technical , courses on nuclear power plant technology. He participates in all l phases of engineering and' training ! activities for the-company. 1 Representative projects include: l Detailed Control Room Design Reviews (DCRDRs): Participated in various. phases-of Detailed Control Room Design Reviews for Crystal River 3 and Salem. Conducted task analysis of operator :! actions and related verification and-validation of control room instrumentation using simulators and walk through methods. In additilon, supported DCRDR phases of LER reviews, control room survey checklists and operator-interviews and PWR and BWR plants. NRC Crew Task Analysis Proiect: Served as a Subject Matter Expert (SME) in assisting the Project Team performing an operating crew task analysis at the Limerick Generating Station. Involvement included assistance in scenario development, tabletop analysis of normal and emergency operating tasks, on-site support. EPRI Performance Measurement System, Tennessee Valley Authority: Served as the lead investigator to develop an l objective operator performance evaluation method using the Browns Ferry Power Plant simulator under an Electric ' Power Research Institute (EPRI). 8:
Shift Technical Advisor Training: Participates as the senior instructor in l Shift Technical Advisor training -i programs: taught programs at eight commercial power plants, both BWR and PWR). Training Materials Development: Wrote General Physics course texts covering transient / accident analysis, j mitigathg reactor core damage, heat ; transfer, fluid flow and thermodynamics, materials science and PWR Indoctrination , courses. Also managed the development. I of system training manuals for the Byron and Braidwood PWR Stations. l 1968/1977: Westinghouse Electric Corporation Nine years as a Senior Training Engineer at Zion Training Center. Directed other training engineers and instructed in reactor theory and control, radiation protecticn and safety, process instrumentation and control, electricity and electronics. Responsibilities included lesson note writing, lesson plan preparation, test preparation and student evaluations. 1963/1968: National Bureau of Standards Conducted laboratory experiments of an applied and developmental nature in neutron physics, solid state radiation detectors and a fast neutron irradiation The irradiation facility was facility. to be used for testing and evaluating l reactor materials for better and safer energy production for reactors. I i \ l i i i I 4 N _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
1 g;; .- .. - - - . . , -_ . _ . . _ . _ - _ , , _ _ _ _ _ _ . i l l
.]
LICENSES AND: - CERTIFICATIONS:- Registered Professional Engineer - Illinois ,
~ Licensed Senior Reactor Operator - .
Zion Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 l Licensed Senior Reactor Operator Nuclear Training Reactor, Westing-house Nuclear Training Center at Zion. PUBLICATIONS: . " Light Water Reactor Hydrogen Manual." (NUREG/CR-2726, SAND 82-1137). Coauthor. with Allen L. Camp, John C. Cummings, et. al.
K t l :- i e . h , 4
!5 1
NAME:4 G. K. 'Sharma EDUCATION:: B.S. (Hon's)'EE, 1966,.P. Eng. (Ont.) 1KHUC EXPERIENCE: . 1969.to 1974 Detroit Edison Company, Detroit Michigan
. Mr. Sharma is.the review team leader:
providing the' administrative and
" technical direction for-the. project. j
- i. He partic'ipated in the EPRI sponsored R
. seminar on-Nuclear Control Rooms in 1980. He.was also an active participant' in the INPO Seminar at Atlanta.and BWR-Owner's group seminar-at Joliet, .
Illinois on Human Factors in control Rooms. He was a member of IEEE566 ) Working Group (recommended practice for- J the design of display and control facilities for central' control rooms of nuclear power generating stations). He visited CEGB, KWU, RISO and Halden Reactor Project in Europe on behalf of , IEEE to gain insight to their experience. and work in the area of Human Factors. He has participated in the IEEE Sponsored Myrtle Beach seminars. Mr. Sharma has worked in the Controls and Instrumentation Division at Detroit Edison'since 1977, working on the Fermi 2 project. He has good overall i background of the Fermi 2 Systems. , " Presently he is assigned to the~ Systems ! Engineering group of the Nuclear Engineering at Fermi 2. PUBLICATIONS: Fermi 2 Control Room contrasted with EPRI Report NP-1118-SY. Emergency Response Information System design for Fermi 2 - American Nuclear Society, November 1982. 1 I i m
i 1 os NAME: Frank M. McIntyre 1 EDUCATION:' B .' S . St. Josephs College Psychology, Philadelphia, PA - 1956 I M.A. Temple University Psychology, Philadelphia, PA Ph.D. Case Western Reserve . University -- q Industrial Psychology, Cleveland, OH .] I WORK EXPERIENCE: 1978/Present Consultant Projects in' validation research, job' analysis, performance appraisal, assessment centers - Quality of Work Life, Human Engineering. 1965/1978 General Motors - Various Divisions i' and Locations Administrator: Manpower Planning, Chevrolet, Sales; Detroit, Michigan (1971/78) Human Resources Management j System, managementitraining programs, ! Coached Rating Performance Appraisal 1 System, Assessment Center for middle management positions, nationwide selection of District Sales Managers. Department Head: Human Factors Engineering, Allison Division, Cleveland, OH (1966/69) Directed group providing human factors and safety engineering for design and manufacturer of military tracked vehicles. Human Factors Engineer: Joint Design Team, Allison Division, Augsburg, West Germany (1965/66) Provided human factors and safety desgin support for joint U.S. and German design team i developing a new main battle tank. I
4' v p. 1964/1965 'American' Institute Research, Pittsburg,1PA Research Scientist: Developed'jobL analysis and performance evaluation checklist for Nuclear Reactor Operators for Atomic Energy Commission Study. 1963/1964 . General Precision Aerospace Senior-Engineer: Human' factors and safety engineering support for Air Force: Missile System Developments. 1959/1963' U.S. Army Human Engineering
. Laboratories, Aberdeen Proving Grounds, MD Chief, Mobility Branch: Research and i evaluation of Army mobility projects.
1957/1959 . National Analysts, Inc, Philadelphia, PA l Researcher: Research in advertising l and visual impact of ads and packaging. 1 PAPERS AND ) MEETINGS: International Assessment Center Congress, New Orleans, Job Analysis. (1979) International Personnel Management-Association, Canadian and U.S. Meeting, Peformance Appraisal and Selection. (1978)
)
l _. .-_______-___b
s
' International Assessment Center- '
' Congress, Greenbriar, West: Virginia, selection of Supervisors in Automotive Industry. (1978); ,
1 i LConference Board, New York, Human Resources Management. (1976)
- Executive Study, Conference,. Palm-Beach; Coached Rating. Performance Appraisal System. (1974). i PROFESSIONAL .
ORGANIZATIONS: American Psychological ~ Association Human Factors Society Assessment Center Research Group Michigan Association of' Industrial and-Organizational Psychologists
-Michigan Assessment Center Association
* .i
1 I NAME:. Joseph L. Seminara WORK EXPERIENCE: Human Factors Consultant Mr. Seminara has 30 years experience in . the human factors engineering field.. J Since 1955, he has worked with a variety l of military and aerospace organizations # including the Rome Air Development Center, the Faltman Army Ordinance Research and Engineering Laboratories, United Technology Center and the 1 Lockheed-Missiles and-Space Company. He j has contributed to a wide range of complex systems including the Polaris i Missile, lunar vehicles and the Space Shuttle Oribitar. , 1 Since 1975, Mr. Seminara has been , exclusively concerned with human factors i' aspects of power plant operation and maintenance. Under EPRI sponsorship, he ; conducted pioneering studies to investigate human factors issues in nuclear power plant control room design i and enhancement avenues. In parallel I he has also been i with this research,iewing responsible for rev human factors l concerns in the area of power plant < maintenance. This work has produced the following reports: t EPRI NP-309 Human Factors Review of Nuclear Power Plant Control Room Design March 1977 l i l
.___________-__-___d
-,m .
p . ne,;. ..__. . .%...., . . . . . , . . . . . _ , _ . . . _ _ 1 EPRI NP-1118 Human Factors Methods for Nuclear N
. Control Room Design:-
Vol I Control Room Enhancement' 11/79
. Vol II ' Current Design Practices 11/79 Vol III' Conventional Control Room.
Design 2/80 Vol11V Advanced Control' Room Design 3/80' j
-EPRI NP-1567 Human Factors Methods for Assessing and
- Enhancing Power Plant Maintainability May 1982 EPRI NP-2411 Human Engineering Guide for Enhancing Nuclear Control Rooms May 1982 (subcontract to the Honeywell Corp)
Mr. Seminara has also supported the INPO human factors program during its formative stages and-has consulted with the GE BWROG in the performance of control room reviews.. He is presently involved in a review of the PG&E Diablo . Canyon Control Room, the Nebraska Public ' Power Cooper Plant and the Taiwan Power Company Kuosheng Plant. Mr. Seminara' holds a Masters degree in '! Industrial and Experimental Psychology from New University-(1952). He is a , Fellow in the Human Factors Society. In 1 1983 he served as a technical expert in Korea under the auspices of the , International Atomic Energy Agency of j the UN. Since 1971, he has visited all 11 of the Eastern European countries as part of the Scientific Exchange Program administered by the National Academy of- I Sciences. ! l
Mr. Seminara is the Human Factors Society's selection for the annual JACK g A. KRAFT 1983 award. 1This award is i granted to human factors specialist who have made highly significant contributions in applying human factors to a new. area of endeavor. Mr. Seminara was honored for his original work in the i operational and maintenance aspects of nuclear power plants. Mr. Seminara has conducted human factors. workshops for the U.S. power industry and has been invited to present three workshops in Israel (1981 and 1983), Sweden (1982), the USSR (1984) and Taiwan (1986). PUBLICATIONS: Seminara, J.L., and Smith, D.L. Remedial Ergonomics, Applied Ergonomics, in Press Seminra, J.L., and Parsons, S.O., Nuclear Power Plant Maintainability, Appl.ied Ergonomics, September 1982,-Vol. 13, No. 3, pps, 177-189. Seminara, J.L., Human Factors Methods for Assessing and Enhancing Power Plant-Maintainability,__ Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, EPRI NP-2360, May 1982. Seminara, J.L., and R.W. Pack, Communication Needs of the Nuclear Power Plant Operator, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, April 1982, Vol. PAS-101, No. 4, pps 792-796. i Seminara, J.L., and S.O. Parsons, Human Factors Review of Power Plant Maintainability, Electric Power Research j Institute, Palo Alto, CA, EPRI NP-1567, February 1981. , l i I
1 Seminara, J.L., et al, Human Factors Methods for Nuclear Control Room Design, I Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, EPRI NP-1118, Summary Volume, June 1979. Seminara, J.L., Gonzalez, W.R., and Parsons, 3.O., Human Factors Review of Nuclear Power Plant Control Room Design, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, EPRI NP-309, November 1976. ) Seminara, J.L., and Shavelson, R.J., Lunar Simulation, Human Factors, 1969, Volume XI, No. 5, pps. 451-462. Seminara, J.L., and Kincaid, W., Control Task Performance in the Lunar Visual Environment, Journal of Aerospace Medicine, Vol. 40, No. 4, April 1969. Seminara, J.L., and Simulating the Lunar Astronaut's Environment, Spaceflight: Journal of the British Interplanetary Society, 1969, Vol, XI, No. 2, pps 56-62. Seminara, J.L., Simulation of Manned Lunar Surface Operations, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 5, No. 8, August 1968. Seminara, J.L., and Ketcham, R.L., Combatting Confusion in Control Panels, Machine Design, April 1986. Seminara, J.L., Parsons, S.O., and Shavelson, R.J., Sensory Discrimination and Attitudes Toward Water Reclaimed from Urine, Journal of Aerospace Medicine, September 1967, Volume 38. No. 9., pps. 905-908.
.c .
i Seminara, J.L., Shavelson, R.J., and'
- Parsons, S.O.,.Effect of Reduced.
. Pressure on: Human: Performance,' Human ,
c Factors, 1967,-Vol. IX, No.'.5, pps. 409-418.: Seminara, J.L., Humanizing a Moon Rover, l Machine Design, November 24, 1966, Vol. 8 ,1 No. 4, pps. 346-359.. Seminara, J.L., Human Factors Shape
, 1Molab,: Machine Design, May 26,'1966, pps.'148-153.
.i Seminara, J. L. ,
Machine Design, _September Warning Systems-Design,- 30, 1966, pps. 106-116. Seminara, J.L., Seventeen Ways to Stop. Accidents, Control Engineering, November 1964. Seminara, J.L., Human Factors Engineering and Electrical Connector Failures, Machine Design, August 1964. Seminara, J.L., Display Systems Design, Machine Design, November 7, 1963, pps. 166-173. Seminara, J.L., and Parsons, S.O., Skills Inventory System, Machine Design, February 1963. Seminara, J.L., Accuracy and Speed of Tactual Reading, Ergonomics, January 1960, Vol. 3, No. 1, pps. 62-67. Seminara, J.L., Self-Luminous Materials, Materials in Design Engineering, September 1958, pps. 89-92.
-l 1
Seminara J Research in Human l Engineering.L., Aids Design, Industrial I Laboratories, May 1958, pps. 20-21. ) l Seminara,RJ.L. Designing for Human 3
' Strength, Machine Design, May. 28,.1959, j pps. 89-92. )
1
. . . ')
Seminara, J.L. Control: Identification, 1 Machine Design,, June 25,. 1969, pps. 137- J ' 139.. Seminara, J.L., Design fer the Sense of Touch, Industrial Laboratories, September 1959, pps. 5-8. Seminara, J.L., When Equipment Says'It i in color,' Product Engineerin,g, September, 14, 1959, pps. 51-54. [ l l j i
i
~ +- n --- - - __ ,
i. t-NAME: Laurence'D. DeLucia Sr. I?DUCATION: Monroe County Community. College Monroe, Michigan thirty-three credit hours Memphis State University, Memphis, Tennessee Bachelor of Professional Studies in Nuclear Plant Operations forty-six credit hours Henry Ford Community College,
Dearborn,
Michigan
~
i General six crsdit hours l 1 WORK EXPERIENCE: 1981/Present- Nuclear Assistant Shift Supervisor (NASS), Enrico Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant, Newport, Michigan l i i I 1977/1981 Nuclear Supervising Operator (NSO) Enrico Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant 1974/1977 Power Plant Operator (PPO), i River Rouge Power Plant, River Rouge, Michigan 1971/1974 Military Leave of Absence, United States Navy 1969/1971 Assistant Power Plant Operator (APPO), River Rouge Power Plant j l 1 1 i l 1 I { l l 4
)
\
Duties and Special Assignments ] l j Participated as Lead Operations l coordinator for Initial Main Turbine l Generator' testing. l 4 l Participated in Reactor Certification ! Hydro, Initial Fueling and Initial j Criticality Testing. l l Coordinated plant construction and i start-up testing. l Assumed duties and responsibilities of the Nuclear Shift Supervisor as required. l Oversee day-to-day plant activities of non-licensed and licensed operators, maintenance, instrument and radwaste personnel. Interface with start-up, construction and operations personnel. Write, review and approve operating and system procedures. Review, correct and approve system drawing and system description units. Oversee all on shift training of licensed and non-licensed operators. Conduct on-the-job, simulator and classroom training of licensed and non-licensed operators.
J LICENSES AND CERTIFICATES: Senior Reactor Operator License - Nuclear Regulatory Commission Senior Reactor Operator Certification General Physics Corporation l Nuclear Theory and Operations Certificate - University of Michigan First Class Stationary Engineers License City of Detroit
t NAME: J. F. Hanlon , EDUCATION: B.S. Business Administration, The. University of the State of New York 1981 WORK EXPERIENCE: General Electric Company Mr. Hanlon is Program Manager, Plant Analysis Services, in the Nuclear Products ~and Engineering Services Department of General Electric Company. Mr. Hanlon has 25 years of experience in the nuclear power field. He is currently providing program management.
'and technical leadership in human factors related projects. For the past several years he has been directly responsible for program management of several major Detailed Control Room Design Review programs, including the Kuosheng Plant DCRDR (Taiwan Power Company) and has been a technical contributor to other control room design review projects (Nebraska Public Power Cooper Plant and the CEI Perry Plant).
This work has culminated in successful representations of the DCRDR process before NRC audit teams. ! In connection with the Kuosheng project, a two-week control room enhancement workshop was developed to train utility personnel in the fundamentals of human factors theory and the specifics of applying human factors enhancement techniques. Mr. Hanlon was also instrumental in developing the GE Computer-Aided Panel Enhancement (CAPE) technique. This technique involves the development of , computer-generated panel mockups and enhancement candidates. l l _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
n ! For several years, Mr. Hanlon managed various business elements and service programs withia Nuclear Consulting
- Services / Plant Analysis Programs Unit of the Nuclear Services Department. This management function included, but was not limited to, program development and selection, cost benefit analysis, business and' sales planning, proposal and quotations preparation, sales presentation,. assignment.and~ funding of work, cost and schedule control, ,
dV,1very of services and initiation of I customer billing through final invoice l payment. Previous experience includes l diverse assignments in the Navy Nuclear l Power Program from extensive nuclear
. submarine duty through Division Office Assignment aboard both a nuclear submarine and a nuclear. cruiser until-transfer to the Fleet Reserve in 1981 as ;
a Senior Chief Petty Officer. 1 l i 1 1
. . _ ._ a w..m, l
-i 4
I l APPENDIX 3 l LINK ANALYSIS 1 l l [ 1 \ i (-
k LINK ANALYSIS As discussed in Section.3.5 of the DCRDR Report, a Link Analysis was performed during the EOP Validation.' The operating crew was. videotaped while responding to the various scenarios and a series of schematics were developed based on these. videotapes. , An EOP Validation' Scenario Index has been enclosed to provide guidance'as to each scenario and its associated
~
schematic. As indicated above a series of schematics were developed and these are also enclosed in this Appendix. As shown in each of the schematics, the larger numbers within the boxes are the particular control panel number. The' smaller numbers within the lines indicate the number of times the operator traveled that path during the course of that scenario.
. i1::
,,i it: l ':, F: EOP VALIDATION SCENARIO INDEX Scenario No. Title 2' Loss of All High Pressure' Injection Systems 7A Primary Containment Pressure Control Emergency Venting and Spray 9 Levol/ Power Control E 10 Steam Cooling 12 Torus Watar Temperature Control 15 Hydrogen and Oxygen Control i 18A- HPCI Steam Line Break Inside HPCI Room 20 Medium LOCA 22 Design Basis Accident (DBA) LOCA and Primary Containment Flooding
N ee .. O '- S ,- (U =O C $,E GO O M i i j s e ) w - - ao co co a { o . o ao so 1 ed
.j g o o mu, no i
I di pd b
# d idi i
~-
N --
-- o e
o ao so . "i
.) 1 __.
/
.. MS33
* = S.UO1YOINOFW400 "
o - e
# co i
Efl e W 45 I
>mm>=H 4wW
_._N
'lIl! lI m
m I v-b O *~~ I E* ""'"-"~
- 80 m. I ib a , c
.J l n m=
*4 0 dM mm ma NN W WP Ew e- we
.mW Wa il ti e
O
\ o INL.
p/
- n O
g I' 1' 1 1'i 1r s g
, o t
1. 1 N
.o -
6 3n gg gg uO C eCLtc GO O M
~
so e ao e , o o 1
"
- I o %
N O g _
/e mm . . S.UO1YOINn M O3 O W'"
CO l nn g-w E' g _. .E __.t g
- ,o, r., e e n-mw-=== ]
I
~*
.~ " "
4,
. F M y
, o ,aW . es 1i i 1e ir ir ir /
O O.
l' t I-l 1 1 N O $ s g0. cc w tz: C $M W O o , M { i N e y= w N @ l e m o o e e iu, 4, N o o ~'. co co . XS30
* - S.UO1VOINOMOD e,=
o ' W 4D W
,=
O e ns iPjl
-s e -
m --
-+
o o di @ c0 d6 di
!I
' /p!
i n e o j o g 1' 1' ii g ; e o W
n-
.. U
.O 2,Q b 6.
N EW E C O m O t= @ N 5
. o, O O 40 40
% O O v=
40 40
~
1 w/ - nw g S.UO1YOINON100 ;*
= =
80 e-
-m q'I Y -
. O
_= Te d
~'
.w *-
N* 1 f
-a y,
N i ~ f, g w O O W
<C d- ..
SS his
.O Sm b a
.Q
@ WE e O I O
~,= .
O N'" 00
- O O
,q n
3 -- o o ~~
;~
co ._ E
.i '
_m.e
./
StS30 en r* S.tjO1VOINnmOO o 2. _ E CO m l { m e i n e l > ji I Y e' w W "". Z. C3 v. o a ' ' ..L~
- Wd 29 N en l
l s' ir s h i, ,, o i,,, , ti o ID 1 1
7_--. 4 d-
.. L:
O
.O b
gon CC C O "@ O O O CD CD m tm O O v= 80 .. @ usu . g S.801VOINOMOO ; Lts 80
,. ,m ir" O
= m
~~
, l
/ l e a G
W ci O W
i ( l I< f i m
== ..
O 2 ,- 6 m (U - wo C E.E WO O l. i N t,o= i i e-to co i co a o o e co N o. o v > co co !
>lS30
- S1101YOINnmOO e.
o 3_. , co co 40 y= in ma e : - o -
.. v=
o c0 40 es (D iu, 4 muu me qP W N o q' in, o g ir a M o to I.
Din O O
- 8u b m (U wO C E.E G o O
N t,o so to co e o O co en e n n au6 p b
,1 ,
di _ . , L. O N ,- O ~~ so co . .. 3 -=
)tS30 so S.801YOINnrMOO ~
O = CO (D 2.
.,n
=
*h
~~
m, ~~ n a L ll .
.n E
{~' .-* - w E - - 8
- =1
,t L. ~_
-w -
umisemm==neN
. ens wN _
l N' '
~ ~l 2 r- _.
W N qo, O
,O q, , iiir i, m
(9 O W
_7 -__ _ _ _ - - _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ - ,
== ..
O
'C (U
$o w CI:
C $@
@O O
M
~
e v=
& O CO tlh O O ED ID N O O w EO CO usaa g S.BO1YOINf1N100 ;
.0 m in v-Oe di iiirit C
,O , -~ = -
O v= "~ O CO CD , ID a, ai aus== N
"~
l l'1 w / n O 1,q, O g ir irit g 1 M O W f l L-___-___----_-----__-_-_--
i -
'c @
-o CC C 8,M GO U
\r- /s e
5 5
= .
O o 40 CD N O
,=
O to CD MS30 e SkiO1VOINOMOO 5 m a
,0 e
=M I
L ,, ff- --
-~
,0 . ~~
= -
8 E. 8 e asus- N
".~. ..
1 Iri
/
h ,, oi. <n / h O O W
7 .; O V ea w o
.O_ ~w 1 m
b 20 em 1 g n -
@O O
O l c: to CD o E - # l i
- b. O o v-so e N
i um e S.UO1Y3lNnMOO E .; o CD k m e mp
!E Y
,- -n b c m --
c0 *- o O ' CD i i i I 4 v l
\\
.O (9
O W
O v=
.. L.
Q O
~N b
(U
$o eg C E GO U
N 5 m . O O EO CD e- O O 9-CD 10 nao g S.UO1YOINOrMOD ; e a t,o= _a ilP n, , e o . I
.h-- .
1, =W =P= qPll
\q' 1 1' ,
i, oi , e l (9 O W
l O T-
=* . Il i O i
.O- -o j b
(U ey Em i i C L) l GO l 0 M r,-
=
e s-O W CD cn O O EO sc JL a6 N O,- O to - 40 3
/
)lS30 ,
& ~~
; S.UO1Y31NnFMOO ._. ; !
m -.. e l; 5 i 1I lI r. T to O y E
,=
O ED O
= l O w
#9 O
W
)I!
2 1
- r i
oo a t1 r rO a np eR eO c S
/ 7 6 1 1 8 8 8 9 0 0 8 8
\ "
k ir 7 t' 0 I 1 0 f' 8 8 o Ni' 58 i 6 "'eo l 3B 8 i 0 B 3 5 1 8 p. 4 4 1 1 5 8 3 0 0 a 8 " 5 6 d, 2 1
,\ -
(',' 2 0 6 3 0 6 lll
y 9 1 l 4 i N f T"* l su U ' o
~N
.O
' 0 0 i
@ Wg C C~
GO O
@ l i
t,-- e e co ao co e o a
" au, o
n 3 _ ..
-< o, o ?- co c3 ,;
f' -w N Ii* \/ i MS30 " m O
.i. S.HOff0lNOr#100 ,=
CD co l m,= O tt .-
-===
~-
_.; e ,. m . O go
- p. *#
aui
" " , , , '" , o m
MP M N4MM6 Wi qpi N =O i
- n. e- >
e sl,
'/
e o ,e n O ,' ) ! O g ti int it 1, M Q W
N 7""
.. L:
o
.O
- ~O b
N Em Og C E G O O M N,- e e so co co cn o o so co
. ,a o
- m P=
o o ~~ co co ,, a. nr 40 S.B01Y3NOWWOO e" o CO so 8,0
=
O . l J q '
.m .e l "1 h 1 s .'1'1' _
y 3 E --- - .+ j _ . _ _ i .. I o 6 q p/ N w
/s i'
i
' O O
CD g ,, 1 ,, d 4D ("3 O 40 l l l
1 1
*AZ T* ae 0 . . u-i l
1
.O '4_ 0H0 o ,-
,i N f eg i CN N
(n v>
-e .,- ,
e co l co e i o o ' co co d6 s -. o g _ g NS30
- S.BO1VOINnFMOD "e o CO CD 1
l W i C"O 1 e
"~
,Y' ..
,, -N.
=
W *** ,* T,- - O O un ,, g Co CO ; @ -. - e i f
"[f ".g. '
1
-n
.M
*' j>
y Y q, Ng
- w n O qi qui q, ir o
g g e O W l 4
*A rZ
..O..
.O b4oHw"uO CU m C um Q O O
W>v N " w m W'"" E y m ,u_, <,
,dI i,
i, N o o .- a m ,.;
-=
-e_
~~
/
, naa i e S.tf01VOINnmOO l* g _. . m e O iP
, i-. : -
o
- - - - . ----+
g
. g 4, j
m. o
% n, n $
Y N o
\ i,i i, i, i, ,,
g n O
n 1
=.
3)N . 1 _
- O:o r _
o tO iT I a r A rR aI eS nRp O eA C S(V _
/
7 6 1 1 8 - 8 8 9 0 0 8
.Ir k &
)/ :
7 ' o 0 1i 1 i 8 8
'o- .
g8 , 6 08Tg3s8 5 1 0 8 8 a 1 l' 5 1 8
! 2'
'i
= ; i m' ,
{
.l 1 5 4 : f 0 1 . .' '
0 8 8 6 L-4 0 8
\ 2 0
6 N 3 0 6
1 li > ~ A 8 1 : r
- o ot a 1 i
r rO eR a p nO e c S 7 6 1 1 8 8 9 8 0 0 8 8 _i; 0 7 1 0 ,' I 8 8
;1 6 m$uga8 1 1
0 8 8 5 1 8 I l 2a g 7' 4 , l1
" 1 " ' ,
I 5 12'
- 8 1 I
0 8 1~
* ,j 5
m ' l2 I ll
' g ft3 8
3 2 4 0 0 : . = 6 8 3 0 6 L
co
?" ..
n em O O ~N
" f* o m a:
M ca. C O G U M
,- e to e e e C o so co 4, anu, N o-o '0 8
co MS30 '" m _, S.UO1VOINf1MWOO o _ co i 80 .. m v= O l L_: i _;
- L a- e m
o E- _.- o _ . _ co .='. _ a a6 i -m W w Pta _P { m. m b2 S a(y i,
,~. po
\ ,
m.
~
Q y,
), N l
g A o , e i, ,", f g o i I i l l
-~
co T" ..
.. 3 O ~O c 2 cc
@ Q.
C O G O M
,u, a \. .
o o a
- h. a maa g S.UO1YOINnWWOO ;
. =
to b i
=
O
=
[, o o O e
0 2AC
- O r i
oL ot1 r M arO aU nI p eR eEDO cM S 8 0 8
.4
\
/ _
7 1 8 8 8 N9
/_Y i 0
8 7 l t 0
' 1
- 0 ,' l 8 8 , 1 l' N 1 6 " 1 i- l 1 0 1 8 8 5 1 8 5 0 [.n 4 1 8 i !.
}
; ,y
. 1 a.
a 8 i - S 3 , [ =
-l
=
; i '
,2i
)
li
? _ i L 7 d' Lv
] 2 4
0 8 r .
- 0 6
!l Il! 1 l ll
O N4o
==
.O a0 U Su
'I"Occ MD C-
-@@O U2 M
N e so co to e O ,, . O m so
.-m 4, on 4,n i, af n
3 4. .. o o e so
~ ~ -
so [ae,
--- MS30 m
o b-~ S.UO1VDINn#MO3 e to to 8/9 e di iP j' IF - a a e d 95W
~-
e g il J P~
, .N ,
y\ j u
$ 1, ir 1' i, / @
n o !.
k 1, t. 2 r%: i O. N4 s i. oO L'
.C - aoo N So: 3 b ,1 W 1
. c.C/) -
g@3 G O 3 U b u> N. j
?
i
, 4 >
, 7 I,j N,= e,- f m ao ao cn o o ,'
so so
/" ' "
o N .
- t -
N o,- o - @) 40 M
>s m
- S.UO1VOINOMO3 ,P-o CO CD 3).
,= -
M f ), M ma O m-*
~
o o o i o ,y -.~~~.: ~.] [ m , ,, a ', O ,= .7 O
@ l e 80 6 -n
'r
.Jf ( 3
-. ~
. " -) .
1 q> 1r
%r p* '
v v { n j 1 o
- i I
_---r - - , - - - N
. N
, - 12 O o r.
s
'c a, uo e
(U C 0m
, O O
M 3 E
. O O
t g . r db l %; . " 3 E , .. - g to . 1 S.BC1Y3No m 00 ;" S = i en 5
\ _ _ ,
"E
~
tr a
,n \+.- ._
n ,~y g
= -
a := .
,p .,
o o g _: -
~
p a . .. i p/ yp
, - ~
o q, O i, i in r g e O W em. Sab a ( ')
1 I i N i N I
.. u ?
Q ON 00 Gg l
)
C a GO O M n . e e e e cm co o o ao 1 so g a o ,
.m 4
l -. n - . _ _ o _. so co .. - NF~ - MS30
- _. SliO1YOINOrMOO ,F o '
CO CD to e
~"
e amamm -st
-._ .__ . l =r, ll . _, d ,, ,, ,, ,, , .a
[9-in w - O O CD p., g v. CD v3 e--nI ' t g appupua l
.-u qp
-' ,'1 p!
N e /, n h ,' it 1'i, l O W I 1 1 1
l l' ! N N
.. c o
.O
- -o 6 2 gx:
CU e C 0m G O O M
- r. .
e e to so ao e a o A e0 g 4W6 46
>= O o .. . .
e so ,
-. eo
=
P MS30 e i.. S.UO1V3NOWWOO '" o CD 4"0 to s=
~ ~
,~_~ _,
~
-N jt it jr M
O CD O T v= 4D
"?
O W P a.a .. pamnam hAD N d .. BEHN
" ** 11
*" 1 Eq i i p/
<r 1' ir O
...._,-4-,--- - --- _ -_____c . - - -- ~___
L APPENDIX 4 HEDs i l 4 l l 1 I J
h., f HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY -: FERMI 2
- HED NO.: 4'50 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION .REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 L^ PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM:-E2100 COMP / INSERT NO: E21-R601A LEGEND: CORE SPRAY LOOP A FLOW t
PANEL:'H11-P602' SYSTEM: E2100
' COMP / INSERT NO: E21-R601B LEGEND: CORE SP9AY_ LOOP.B FLOW KEYWORD: VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.5)
DESCRIPTION: FLOW METERS HAVE LOG SCALE OBSERVATION: Maters E21-R601A&B have. log-scales. Log scales are inappropriate for this function.
. PRIORITY: III ' RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED-CORRECTION, PLAN: 'A... Recommended Correction:
Replace the meter with a linear scale. B; Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Issue a PDC
. CLOSURE:
I L _ - - _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ - - - - - - _ _ - - _ - - _
r HUMAN.-ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 3 i I HED NO.: 451. SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 -PAGE 1 4 PANEL: H11-P6011 SYSTEM: B1106 , COMP / INSERT NO: 1D29 LEGEND: RHR INIT REAC VESSEL H2O LEVEL L1 KEYWORD: PROCEDURE _______________________________________________________-_________________J DESCRIPTION: DIFFERING SETPOINTS FOR VESSEL H2O LEVEL L1 OBSERVATION:
- Annunciator 1D29, "RHR INIT REACTOR VESSEL H2O LEVEL L1" setpoint in plant is at 13.94. PSTG requires setpoint of less than 31.8 inches TAF.
l ______________________________..__________________________________________q PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Refer to operations - setpoint questionable. 13.94 vs 31.8 for initiation of ADS. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): l STATUS: Item 8 of NP-OP-87-0154 i 1
)
CLOSURE: i _ __ _______ ____~
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 452 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: B2100 COMP / INSERT NO: 1A86 LEGEND: ADS DIVISION II TIMER LOGIC 1A117 ADS DIVISION I TIMER LOGIC B21-R625 ADS COUNTDOWN TIMER KEYWORD: NEED FOR LABELING (6.6.1.1) DESCRIPTION: ADS RESET NEEDS BOTH PB'S USED SIMULTANEOUSLY OBSERVATION: Operator resets one pushbutton and the timer does not re-zero because the other division is still actuated. If the operator subsequently resets only the other division of the logic, the timer will still countdown, because the earlier division has reactuated. The timer no longer shows the actual time to the ADS initiation. 1. Operator should have indication of actual time remaining to ADS initiation. 2. The control room is designed with the philosophy that one reset pushbutton is provided to reset one function whereas here we have to push two reset pushbuttons to reset one function. 3. ADS is a rarely used system and therefore the operator will not actually have a chance to use this on a routine basis. The error probability therefore increases. PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Provide an operator aid (permanent label plate) below the countdown timer directing the operator to push both ADS timer reset pushbuttons simultaneously. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Issue a PDC CLOSURE:
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO. :: 453 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV No.: 1 PAGE 1 _--_----________---___-___--_-_---.---_-_-__------_____--_____-_____ --__q PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: E4100 COMP / INSERT NO: E41-R613' LEGEND: HPCI TURBINE PUMP DISCHARGE FLOW j KEYWORD: . COLOR CODING'(6.5.1.6)' ____--________------__-___---------_--_-----___-----_---_--_----__-_-----u DESCRIPTION: FLOWMETER POINTER IS TOO FAR FROM INDEX LINES ;
- OBSERVATION:
E41-R613 flowmeter pointer is too far from index lines to read instrument' accurately. Accuracy is not required to support PSTGs, provided that meter is banded. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Meter to be properly banded. NRC Inspection Report 341/84-20-05, also' commitment per EF2-72259. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Issue a PDC CLOSURE: l l I l l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 454 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: B2100 COMP / INSERT NO: 1A189/190 LEGEND: OPEN/CLOSE B21-F013P 1A191/192 OPEN/CLOSE B21-F013J 1A193/194 OPEN/CLOSE B21-F013R 1A195/196 OPEN/CLOSE B21-F013H 1A197/198 DPEN/CLOSE B21-F013E KEYWORD: DEMARCATION (6.6.6.2) DESCRIPTION: ADS VALVES NOT CLEARLY DISTINGUISHED OBSERVATION: ADS valve indication (B21-F013H, E, R, P, and J) are not distinguished from other SRV indication. May not be able to rapidly verify correct valve automatic function during ADS actuation. PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: The five valves are grouped together on H11-P601 panel. Demarcation on the panel coupled with summary labeling is required. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interin Fix (For Priority I): 1 1 STATUS: Issue a PDC CLOSURE:
j HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
~
HED NO.: 4'55- SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1] PANEL: H11-P805 SYSTEM: VARIOUS KEYWORD: PANEL LAYOUT (6.8.1.2) )
-------------------------------------------------------------------------a DESCRIPTION: H11-P805 CLUTTERED l l
OBSERVATION- -PSTG requ' ires confirmation of closed FW. injection valves and open RFP. ) bypass line valve and open FW long cycle cleaning to main condenser 1 valve. -The panel is severely cluttered and it.is easy for the operator to lose the specific indicators for N21-F601, F602, F603, F604 and F616. -PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: I A. Recommended Col.ection: This HED will also address the concerns of HEDs 874, 876, 976 and 977. Detailed human' factors and engineering evaluation. required to determine overall msjor and-minor panel. changes. j J B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): 1 STATUS: Issue a PDC CLOSURE: l J
HUMAN' ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 456 SOURCE: ' TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE l'
~ PANEL: None SYSTEM: N2103
- KEYWORD: JUMPER SWITCH,,KEYLOCK DESCRIPTION: NO.KEYLOCK FOR INTERLOCK DEFEAT L8 OBSERVATION:
rPSTG requires " Defeat High Water Level Isolation Interlocks." Unable to "Dafeat high water level isolation' interlocks" from the control room. The operator must hold the valve open'in the control room while an operator locally deenergizes the valve. PRIORITY:' I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION. RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Install a key lock switch.in the control room with an annunciator to provide an alert to the operator. B. -Immediate Compensatory Actions'or Interim Fix (For Priority I): .i Provide jumper capability. Provide operator training and document same. Provide adequate labeling. Evaluate level of lighting in vicinity of jumper and upgrade as applicable. STATUS: Action Item 2 NE-NS-87-0156. CLOSURE: 1 1 1 I I i l i l i 1
I i HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 457 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 _________________________________________________________________________q PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: N2103 ) KEYWORD: POINTER, IND. DESCRIPTION: METER SCALE / POINTER (N21-R802) l l OBSERVATION: Meter N21-R802 pointer is too far from index lines. (SBFW flow rate) PRIORITY: II _________________________________________________________________________) RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION ' RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Provide an improved scale meeting NUREG 0700 guidelines and provide banding. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOO'7RE : , I 1 l
]
l l l HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 l 1 1 HED NO.: 458 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 g __________________________________________________________________________ j PANEL: None SYSTEM: E5100 j KEYWORD: JUMPER SWITCH, KEYLOCK DESCRIPTION: NO KEYLOCK FOR INTERLOCK DEFEAT L8 l OBSERVATION: 1 PSTG requirement to " defeat...,interloc4." Unable to " Defeat RCIC high RPV water level interlock" from the control room. PRIORITY: I ! RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Install a keylock switch in the control room with an annunciator to provide an alert to the operator. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): Provide jumper capability. Provide operator training an document same. Provide adequate labeling. Evaluate level of lighting in vicinity of jumper and upgrade as applicable. STATUS: Action Item 2 NE-NS-87-0156. CLOSURE: l 1 l
r l < } l L HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 ! f-l l HED NO.: 459 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 l
------------------------------------------------------------------------ a l PANEL: None SYSTEM: H9900 KEYWORD: INDICATOR, ELAPSED TIME -------------------------------------------------------------------------y I
DESCRIPTION: NO ELAPSED TIME METER / STOPWATCH UNCONTROLLED OBSERVATION: PSTG requires operator to " determine elapsed time." A stopwatch is l located in one of the control room drawers. However, it appears I uncontrolled and is questionable if it would be there if and when actually needed in an emergency. _---___--__------__---______-_-__________--_---__-_-__--__--_-_----------J PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Elapsed time meter is not required. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team Review 4/7/87. 1 i l l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI-2 HED NO.: 460 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: None- SYSTEM: H9900 KEYWORD: INDICATOR, ELAPSED TIME DESCRIPTION: NO. ELAPSED TIME METER OBSERVATION:
'PSTG' requires operator to'" determine time since reactor shutdown" and "
clapsed time since termination of injection." Elapsed time information is not readily available. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION
' RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
'A. Recommended Correction:
- Elapsed time meter is not required.
B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team Review 4/7/87. i a l i l 4 I _----_._._-.--.---________--__-_---a
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED No.: 461 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1
--___---____--_---_--_-_----------______-------___--_____----__-_---__-_-e PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: E2100 PANEL: H11-P502 SYSTEM: E2100 KEYWORD: SWITCH, KEYLOCK
-------__---___----__-____-------____-_-_-_-__-__--------____--___--____-c DESCRIPTION:' REVIEW KEYLOCK ON SUCTION VALVE
. OBSERVATION:
Operator is required to close "CS" suction valve from the suppression pool. The operator questions whether the key operator could delay operation. Valve pushbutton controls for E21-F036 A&B utilize a keylock. interlock. PRIORITY: IV
-----________-_______________-_______________--__-__----_--___-_-__-_____4 RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: No action recommended. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team Review 4/15/87 l l l f I l.
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
'HED NO.: 462 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIC/ VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1
. PANEL: None SYSTEM: T5000 KEYWORD: INDICATOR, NONE DESCRIPTION: NO PRIMARY CONTAINMENT WATER LEVEL INDICATOR OBSERVATION:
PSTG rquires the operator to determine if Primary Containment water is et or above 108 ft. No direct indication is available of the Primary Containment water level. PRIORITY: I i RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Install primary containment level instrumentation with direct indication in the "at controls" area of the control room. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): Indirect methods of determining Primary Containment water level are available and are documented in the EOP. These methods require the operator to perform calculations, manipulate manual valves and/or make temporary modificat1<:ms to plant systems during an accident condition. These methods should be acceptable until a permanent fix can be implemented. STATUS: CLOSURE: l l 1
.._______.________o
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 463 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1;
-----------------------------------------------------------------------.-o PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: G1100,T4500 KEYWORD: REC, LOCATION --------------_------------_----_---------------------_------------------e DESCRIPTION:-SUMP REC. OUTSIDE AT CONTROL AREA 1 OBSERVATION-Operator must leave "at controls" area. Floor drain sump water level ,
l recorders G11-R651, R652, R653, and R654 are located on the back of panel H11-P601. There is no instrument in the operating area to allow the operator to determine the RB Subbasement NE (SE, SW, and NW) Corner Water Levels. PRIORITY:'IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended' Correction: None is required. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS; Closed CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team Review 4/7/87. l i i ! )
)
e i HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 464 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: -H11-P601 SYSTEM: G1100 KEYWORD: PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION: SUMP. REC MIN LEVEL 6", ROOM FLR NOT 0 OBSERVATION: PSTG. Requires confirmation of room water level above zero inches. The
-water level recorders G11-R651, -R652, -R653 and -R654 located on back of panel H11-P601'have a minimum level of 6 inches.
PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. ' Recommended Correction: Change procedure to reference actual indicated floor level, vice 0" as entry condition to secondary containment control. B. Immediate Compensatory A6 cions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
\
STATUS: Item 4 of NP-OP-87-0154 & Action Item 1 of NE-NS-87-0166 CLOSURE: l. l l l l l 1 4 1
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY _ FERMI 2 HED NO.: 465 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 1 KEYWORD: JUMPER SWITCH, KEYLOCK l DESCRIPTION: NO KEYLOCK FOR INTERLOCK DEFEAT HI D/W PRESS OBSERVATION: PSTG requires operator to " defeat high DW pressure isolation interlock." There is no defeat switch to defeat the "High Drywell ' Pressure Isolation Interlock. There is a maintenance instruction on defeating interlocks. PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Install a keylock switch in the control room with an annunciator to provide an alert to the operator. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): I Provide jumper capability. Provide operator training and document same. Provide adequate labeling. Evaluate level of lighting in vicinity of jumper and upgrade as applicable. STATUS: Action Item 2 of NE-NS-87-0156. I CLOSURE: ll l
1 l HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 3- < l HED NO.: 466 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 ___________________________________________________________________PAGEl1 _______ PANEL: None SYSTEM: B2100 KEYWORD: JUMPER SWITCH, KEYLOCK o __________________________________________________________________________ : DESCRIPTION: NO KEYLOCK FOR INTERLOCK DEFEAT LO LEVEL : OBSERVATION: . J LPSTG-requires interlock defeat. There is no' defeat switch to defeat the ]
" Low RPV. Water. Level Isolation Interlock". There is a maintenance i instruction on defeating interlocks. ,
PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Install a keylock switch in the control rocm with an annunciator to provide an alert to the operator. B. -Immediate-Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): Provide jumper capability. Provide operator training and document same. Provide adequate labeling. Evaluate' level of lighting in vicinity of jumper and upgrade as applicable. STATUS: Action Item 2 NE-NS-87-0156. CLOSURE: L l l l_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
r-HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 1 l l HED NO.: 467- SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1- PAGE.li
- _________________________________________________________________________f l PANEL
- H11-P808 SYSTEM: T4700 )
PILNEL: -H11-P817 SYSTEM: T4700 I KEYWORD: RECORDER _________________________________________________________________________q DESCRIPTION: D/Wl TEMP REC (T47-R803A&B) RANGE NOT ADEQUATE OBSERVATION: Range required by PSTG greater than available. Recorders T47-R803 A & B (Drywell Temperature) are not adequate to " determine highest run temperature". PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION, PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction:- Install an instrument to include required range. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): Evaluate possibilities of. exceeding 400 Degrees F in an~ accident condition. Provide documentation. If this is a creditable condition, install instrumentation. If not creditable, change RPV Saturation Temperature Curve in the EOP. STATUS: Item 5 of NP-OP-87-0154 & Action Item 2 of NE-NS-87-0166 i i 1 CLOSURE: i
.l l
1 l l 1 1
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 468 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: E5100 KEYWORD: INDICATOR DESCRIPTION: BANDING ASAP (PRESENT BANDING INCORRECT) OBSERVATION: , Meter E51-R700 (RCIC Turbine Speed) color banding is green below 2100 RPM. This does not conform to control room conventions. PRIORITY: II RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Banding should be corrected. Meter is question is E51-R700. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: I l l
HUMAN; ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 469 ' SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: PAGE il _______________________________________________________________1______ PANEL: None SYSTEM: E5100 KEYWORD:-PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION: REVISE EOP: CAUTION TO INCL,UDE 25# TRIP STPT. OBSERVATION: Procedure requires operator to decide if high suppression chamber caused'{ " RCIC, Turbine to trip by stating " CAUTION: Elevated torus pressure may trip the.RCIC turbine on high exhaust pressure". A quantitative value in ! the procedure would be more meaningful than to rely on operator memory of required setpoint (s). PRIORITY: N/A
- RESOLUTION: PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: Revise the procedures to include the setpoint of RCIC Turbine Trip on high exhaust pressure (25 PSIG). B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per Item 10 of NP-OP-87-0154 1 a l 1 4 J ______._____._.___.____.m._ _
l HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 t HED NO.: 470 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: E5100 KEYWORD: INDICATION DESCRIPTION: RAD RELEASE 10X TECH SPEC ALARM OBSERVATION:
. Sat points for annunciator 3D35, 3D36, 3D12, etc. alert operator to a radioactivity release problem. These annunciator setpoints are below the alert level (ten times Tech Spec instantaneous.
PRIORITY: II RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION l RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Bring CT2-B terminal into the at controls area (or provide the CRT option in the at controls area). See also HEDs 490, 491, 492. B. .Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Action Item 1,2 & 3 NE-NS-0157. CLOSURE:
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 i HED No.: 471 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1
-----__-------_---_-_------_---------___--------__----_------_-__------_-a PANEL: None -SYSTEM: D1100 {
q KEYWORD:' INDICATION , DESCRIPTION: RAD RELEASE NO ACTION REQUIRED j OBSERVATION: Radioactivity release rate alert level indication is not available in-the control room. . Existing meters read in' dose rate units. Alert
- parameters.are Curie levels / rates.
PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: No action is required. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team Review 4/15/87. l
)
i i
]
I i i
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 472 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: None SYSTEM: D1100 KEYWORD: INDICATION DESCRIPTION: DON'T HAVE IND TB HVAC RAD REL (XREF 490) OBSERVATION: Connot verify Turbine Building high radiation level directly from the control room. CT-2B (D11-K610) can printout information, however, roquires back panel access. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION i. RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: No action is required. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team Review 4/7/87. i f i l l I 1 1 1
hf[ HUMAN ENGINEERING, DISCREPANCY - FERMI.d ' h
- d i
.i
., .d HED NO.: 473 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV MO : 1 lPAGE . . I- 1
-----.,---------_-----------_-----_------------------ L-- 2-.. -------- k-nd' PANEL: None SYSTEM: U4100 ! ,,ti y
,W : ~
y 4 KEYWORD: JUMPER SWITCH, KEYLOCK -
, s
--------------__----------_-----------------_--_-------------.... ---.. L_--d DE3CRIPTION: NO KEYLOCK FOR DEFEAT TB HVAC HI RAD TRIP-q
. OBSERVATION:- .-c i PSTG requires defeat "HVAC high radiation isolation interlocks "if' turbine building HVAC operation is required." There is'no switch ins the control room to satisfy the concern listed below. ,
> J l
-----_----------_-------_----_--------_----_---_--------__---___----_-_--q PRIORITY: I l RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION j i RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: '"
l A.- Recommended Correction: Install a key lock switch in the control room with an annunciator to provide an alert to the operator. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):. Provide jumper capability. Provide operator training.and document same. Provide adequate labeling. Evaluate level of lighting in vicinity of jumper and uprade as applicable. STATUS: Action Item 2 NE-NS-87-0156. CLOSURE: ,
]
i 1 I i
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 e HED NO.: 475 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: Various SYSTEM: T4100 I KEYWORD: INDICATION, LOC
----------------v---------- -----------------------------------------------
l D'4SCRIPTION : RB TEMP IND NEhR VARIABLE LEGS RPV LVL l \ l OBSERVATION: l Operator is required to know RD temperatures in area of RPV level l instrument reference leg runs, in order to determine reliability of indication. Reactor Building temperature indications are not availabe I in the control room. PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Assessment Team Review 4/24/87
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 476 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 ij - ____-__-_________-_______________--______________________________________c PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: T5000 KEYWORD: RECORDER
.__________-________________________________________--____________________m DESCRIPTION: D/W TEMP REC (T50-R800) RANGE NOT ADEQUATE OBSERVATION:
Recorder T50-R800 is not. adequate to determine temperature range required by plant specific Technical Guidelines. (need scale to 559 degrees F, actual only 400). Cannot read the numerical printouts readily on the recorder. Decal on recorder partially obscures chart recorder window. PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION, PROCEDURE-RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Install an ins +.rument to include required range. B. Immediate Compenshtcry Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): Evaluate possibilities of exceeding 400 Degrees F in an accident , condition. Provide documentation. If this is a creditable condition, install instrumentation. If'not creditable, change-RPV i Saturation Temperature Curve in the EOPs. STATUS: Item 5 of NP-OP-87-0154 & Action item 2 of NE-NS-87-0166 CLOSURE: l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY.- FERMI 2 4: HED NO.:- 477 SOURCE: TACK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: T2300,T5000 KEYWORD: RECORDER DESCRIPTION: DW-TOR TMP REC (T50R800A&B) TOR H2O TMP REC OBSERVATION: Racorders T23-R800'and T50-R800.do not have point select capability.
' PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: Replace T23-R800 with a point selectable recorder. (Banding should be considered) (Reference PDC 1762 for Torus water average indication. B.- Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): Implement PDC 1762. STATUS: CLOSURE: l l l I 4 i l l s
( ..
' HUMAN ENGINEERING' DISCREPANCY FERMI 2 HEC NO.: 479 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 1
___----_--__-_---------------__------_-----__-----__----------_---_--_---e l
. PANEL: All' SYSTEM::VARIOUS I
L KEYWORD:. MARKER PLATES' l
- 1. ----------_-------_--_--------------------_------------------------------a DESCRIPTION: PUT RECORDER # ON NAMEPLATE--GENERIC--
i l OBSF.RVATION : . L Labels - System / Instrument Identification designations are being placed behind instrument covers. 1 ----_-----__-----_---------------_--------_-_------------__-------------- l PRIORITY:'N/A RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: -j A.. Recommended Correction: Provide improved identification. Replace label. B. Immediate Compensatory-Actions or Interim'Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: l l 1 l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 480 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: G3300 KEYWORD: 1D66, SETPOINT DESCRIPTION: TEMP ALM 1D66 SETPT &/or PSTG RWCU PMP RM OBSERVATION: Annunciator setpoints differ from PSTG for requirements for alerting the operator. RWCU "A" pump room temperature. PSTG requires 125 Degrees F. Inventory =175 Degrees F. (Alarm window 1D66) PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION, PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction:
- 1) Change annunciator setpoints to match PSTG entry conditions (this would also lower the isolation temperature); or 2) Change PSTG ontrycondition; or 3) Add additional annunciator inputs to warn operator of increasing temperatures and approach to PSTG entry I conditions.
B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): l None. Implement above corrective action. STATUS: Item 6 of NP-OP-87-0154 CLOSURE: 1 i l l i l l i i I 4 b
1 HUMAN' ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
]
HED'NO.: 481 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION. REV NO.: 1 PAGE l'. _________________________________________________________________________q RANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: G336. 1 1 KEYWORD: 1D66, SETPOINT l l DESCRIPTION: TEMP ALM 1D66 SETPT &/or.PSTG RWCU PMP RM-OBSERVATION:
- Annunciator setpoint differs from PSTG' requirement. RWCU "B" pump room Temperature. PSTG requires 125 degrees F. Inventory =175 degres F.
(Alarm window 1D66)-
' PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION,' PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: 1)L Change annunciator setpoints to match' PSTG entry conditions .(this i would also lower the isolation temperature) ; or 2) Change PSTG entry condition; orJ3)-Add additional annunciator inputs to warn operator of increasing temperatures and approach to PSTG entry condition. B. Immediate. compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): None. Implement above corrective action.- STATUS: Item 6 of NP-OP-87-0154 CLOSURE: 4
_ _ _ _ - . _~ HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2. HED NO.: 482: SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601' SYSTEM:'G3300
. KEYWORD: 1D66, SETPOINT-DESCRIPTION: TEMP ALM 1D66 SETPT &/or PSTG RWCU HX RM
~ OBSERVATION:
- Annunciator setpoint differs from PSTG requirement. RWCU HXs. PSTG
'rsquires 125 degrees F. Inventory =175 degrees F. (Alarm window 1D66)
PRIORITY: I
-RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION,. PROCEDURE , RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
i A. Recommended Correction: 1). Change annunciator setpoints to match'PSTG entry conditions (this would also lower the isolation temperature); or 2) Change PSTG entry condition; or 3). Add additional' annunciator inputs to warn operator-of increasing ~ temperatures.and approach to PSTG entry conditions. B. Immediatc~ Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): None. Implement above corrective action.
.s -
STATUS:-Item 6 of NP-OP-87-0154 CLOSURE:
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 i HED NO.: .483 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE'1 _-_--___----_---_-__--_--______---_____-_--_________--____-_----_-___--_ 5
' PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: G3300 )
I KEYWORD: 1D66, SETPOINT 1
-_-----------_-______-----_-_-__-____-_--____-_--_-___--_4 DESCRIPTION: CH TEMP ALM-1D66 SETPT &.PR PSTG PH SEP RM 1
i OBSERVATION: Annunciator setpoint differs from PSTG requirement. RWCU phase seaprator room temperature. PSTG requires 125 degrees F. Inventory =175' degrees F. (Alarm window 1D66) PRIORITY: I
-----___________-_____---_-___--______----__________--_J RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION, PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correc 4on:
- 1) Change annuncit 5 >r setpoints to match PSTG entry conditions (this
.would also lower. the isolation temperature) ; or 2) Change PSTG entry condition; or 3) Add additional annunciator inputs to warn operator of increasing temperatures and approach to PSTG entry conditions. )
i B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
, None. Implement above corrective action.
STATUS: Item 6 of NP-OP-87-0154 CLOSURE: hmm_. ______ _ . . - . - _ _ -
e HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
,HED.NO : 484 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: E1100 KEYWORD: 1D56, SETPOINT DESCRIPTION:.CHNG TEMP ALM 1D66 SETPT &/or PsTG NW CORN RM OBSERVATION:
Annunciator setpoints differ from PSTG requirements. NW RHR pump room
' temperature. PSTG requires 148 degrees F. Inventory =175 degrees F. ,
(1D66) { { PRIORITY: I
-----------------------------------_--_--------------_-__---_____--------- )
RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION, PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. -Recommended Correction: The PSTG entry condition and the annunciator setpoint should be reviewed to determine an optimal setpoint/ entry condition. Either the PSTG entry' condition should be changed, the annunciator setpoint should be decreased or a combination of the two should be performed ie. change annunciator setpoint to 160 degrees.F, and increase PSTG entry condition to 160 degrees F. j B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim fix (For Priority I): None. Implement above recommended corrective action. STATUS: Item 6 of NP-OP-87-0154 & Action Item 3&4 of NE-NS-87-0166 CLOSURE: !
i l HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 l HED NO.: 485' SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE l' _________________________________________________________________________) PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: E1100 j 1 KEYWORD: 1D66, SETPOINT' ]1 DESCRIPTION: CHNG TEMP ALM.1D66 SETPT &/or PSTG SW CORN RM l i OBSERVATION: ! Annunciator setpoint differs from PSTG requirement. -SW RHR pump room temperature. PSTG requires 148 degrees F. Inventory (1D66)=175 degrees >] F.- (1D66) j l l PRIORITY:-I _________________________________________________________________________) RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION, PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: The PSTG entry condition and the annunciator setpoint should be j reviewed to determine an optimal setpoint/ entry condition. Either ' the PSTG entry condition should be changed, the annunciator setpoint' should be decreased or a combination of. the two should be performed ie. change annunciator'setpoint to 160 degrees F, and increase PSTG entry condition to 160 degrees F. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): None. Implement above recommended corrective action. STATUS: Item 6 of NP-OP-87-0154 & Action Item 3&4 of NE-NS-87-0166 CLOSURE:
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 486 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: E4100 KEYWOND: 1D66, SETPOINT DESCRIPTION:-CHNG TEMP ALM 1D66 SETPT &/or PSTG (HPCI CRD) OBSERVATION: Annunciator setpoint differs from PSTG requirement. HPCI/CRD pump area temp 3rature. PSTG requires 148 degrees F. . Inventory =175 degrees F. (1D66). PRIORITY: I
' RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION, PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: The problem should he corrected by either 1) Change the entry condition to 150 degrees F or 2) Change the annunciator setpoint to 148 degrees F. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): Implement above correction. STATUS:-Item 6 of NP-OP-87-0154 & Action Item 3&4 of NE-NS-87-0166 CLOSURE: f l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 487 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1
--__-----_---_-_---__----------_-----_-------_-----------__---_---------,l PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: E5100 KEYWORD: 1D66, SETPOINT l
----------.._----------------------_------_--_---_------------..-_---__-_-o DESCRIPTION: CHNG TMP ALM 1D66 SET &/or PSTG (NE CORN RCIC OBSERVATION:
Annunciator setpoint differs from PSTG requirement. NE RCIC and CS pump room. PSTG requires 148 degrees F. Inventory =150 degrees F. (1D66)
-_-----_-_-_----_____-----_-_---_-_-_----_-----_--_--_-----_-_-_----_---e PRIORITY: I
____-----_____--_-_-_----_-___---_-______-----______---_-_--_______--_--s RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION, PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: This discrepancy should be corrected by either 1) Changing the entry l condition to 150 degrees F or 2) Changing the annunciator setpoint to 148 degrees F. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): 1 Implement above correction. STATUS: Item 6 of NP-OP-87-0154 & Action Item 3&4 OF NE-N2-87-0166 CLOSURE: 1 l l l
1 HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY '-- FERMI 2 1
-HED NO.': .488 SOURCE:' TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION IEV No. : =1 PAGE 1 ]
LPANEL: H11-P601 ' SYSTEM: B2100 KEYWORD: 1D66, SETPOINT __________________________________________________________________________ 1 DESCRIPTION:'CHNG TEMP ALM 1D66 SETPT &/or PSTG STEAM SPLY a
. OBSERVATION: . 1 Annunciator setpoint' differs from.PSTG requirement. Main steam tunnel area-temperature. PSTG requires 140 degrees F. Inventory = 160 degrees F.- (1D66) ; . PRIORITY RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION, PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction:
.This discrepancy should be corrected by either 1) Changing the entry condition to 160 degrees F or 2) Changing the annunciator
- setpoint to.140 degrees F.
.B.- Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
. Implement above corrective action.
STATUS: Item 6 of.NP-OP-87-0154~& Action Item 3&4 of NE-NS-87-0166 CLOSURE: I
i HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 489 S' OURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1l PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: B3108 l COMP / INSERT NO: 1D66 LEGEND: STMLEAKDETECTIONAMBIENTTEMPHI@f KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR J l
-------------_-------------------_-_----_-----_---_-----_-----_---------e DESCRIPTION: CHNG SETPT &/or PSTG (RECIRC MG AREA)
OBSERVATION: ) RR MG Set Area Temperature. PSTG requires 120 degrees F. Inventory = l 210 degrees F. Alarm windows 3D142 & 3D166. PSTG requires operator being alert to various conditions. Annunciator setpoints (inventory) ! are other than required by PSTG. 3D142/166 are not area temperature annunciators. These are RR MG set motor temperature annunciators coming-from Temperature Switches directly on the motor-generator set exhaust. Actual problem is that no area temperature annunciator exists. PRIORITY: I
------------------------------------------------------------------------k RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION, PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: Install instrumentation providing indication of area temperature readily available to operator. l 1 B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
- 1. Continue use of computer until permanent fix. Train operators i in better use of process computer for these conditions. 2. ]
Reconsider requirement for EOP entry condition. l I STATUS: Action Item 3 & 4 NE-NS-87-0166, PDC 7339 issued l CLOSURE: ,
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - PERMI 2 HED NO.: 490 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: T4100 COMP / INSERT NO: 3D36 LEGEND: DIV RB VENT EXH RADN MON UPSCALE TRIP KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR DESCRIPTION: RB HVAC EXH RAD LVL-50 MREM /HR VS 120/135 CPM OBSERVATION: Rnactor Building HVAC exhaust radiation level. PSTG requires 50 mrcm/HR. Inventory = 120/135 CPM. (3D36) PSTG requires operator being alert to various conditions. Annunciator setpoints (inventory) are other than required by PSTG. Check out the use of units. PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A.- Recommended Correction:
- 1) Provide instrumentation which reads in required units of mrem /hr. 2) Provide a single annunciator (Reflashing) to provide an indication of all secondary containment radiation level (HVAC and area) EOP entry condition SOER printout should provide indication of specific condition. 3) Purchase the SPING CRT option and place in the at controls area. See also HEDs 491, 492 and 470.
B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): During training of operators on new EOPs, point out that there is a need for continued intermittent monitoring of the reactor building's 1 HVAC exhaust radiation levels, as there is no other indication of having reached this entry condition. STATUS: Action Item 4 NE-NS-87-0157 j CLOSURE: i l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 I HED NO.: 491 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1l _________________________________________________________________________q PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: T4100 COMP / INSERT NO: 3D35 LEGEND: DIV FP VENT EXH RADN MON UPSCALE TRI l l KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR DESCRIPTION: FUEL POOL HVAC ALM 5 MREM /HR VS 50 MREM /HR OBSERVATION: Fuel pool area HVAC exhaust radiation level. PSTG requires 50 mrem /HR. Inventory = 5 mrem /hr. (Alarm window 3D35) PSTG requires operator being alert to various conditions. Annunciator setpoints (inventory) ] are other than required by PSTG. Check out the values. 1 ________________________________________________________________________a PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Provide a single annunciator (Reflashing) to provide an indication of all secondary containment radiation level (HVAC & AREA) EOP entry conditions. SOER printout should provide indication of specific condition. See also HEDs 490 and 492. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): During training of operations on new EOPs point out that there is a need for continued intermittent monitoring of Fuel Pool HVAC exhaust radiation levels, as there is no other indication of having reached this entry condition. Document training. ; STATUS: Action Item 4 NE-NS-87-0157 l CLOSURE: l .
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 492 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P816 SYSTEM: D2100 COMP / INSERT NO: 16D5 LEGEND: REAC/ AUX BLDG BSMT/SUBBSMT HIGH RADN 16D6 REAC/ AUX BLDG FIRST FLOOR HIGH RADN KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR DESCRIPTION: AREA RADIATION OBSERVATION: RB subbasement HPCI Room, NE, NW, SW, and SE corners area radiation lovel. PSTG requires 10 mrem /Hr. Inventory (16DS) = 5 mrem /hr. RB first floor monitor control room area radiation level. PSTG requires 10 mrem /hr. Inventory (16D6) = 1 mrem /hr. PSTG requires operator being alert to various conditions. Annunciator setpoints (inventory) are other than required by PSTG. Check out the values. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Provide a single (reflashing) annunciator to provide an indication of all secondary containment radiation level (HVAC & Area) EOP entry conditions. SOER printout should provide indication of specific condition (Implementation of HED 490, 491. Correction plan should include consideration of this recommendation). B. Iminediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Action Item 4 NE-NS-87-0157 CLOSURE: 1
L HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 L I
'HED NO.: 498 _ SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1.
PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: G1100 COMP / INSERT NO: 2D105 LEGEND: REAC BLDG CORNER ROOMS FLOOD LEVEL i KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR ; _____-__-__---_-______-___--____________---__-_____-__-___-______________f DESCRIPTION: RB SUBBSMT WATER LEVEL NE'& SE CORNER RM OBSERVATION: l RB subbasement SE and NE corner room water level. PSTG requires O inches. Inventory = 43" (Alarm window 2D105). PSTG requires operator
'being alert to varicus~ conditions. Annunciator setpoints (inventory) are other than required by PSTG. Check out the values.
--___---._--_-________--_________._____--___--__________-_-____-_-__4 I PRIORITY: I
------__--__-__-_____-__-_-______________---___________-___-_--_________J RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION, PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. . Recommended Correction: Correct setpoint as in Interim Fix. Revise PSTG entry condition to ) ' match new setpoint for 2D105. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): Change setpoint for annunciator 2D105 from 43" to 62". This will result in annunciators being energized in proper order and still
-have approximately 5.5" before the sump is completely filled. This also results in setpoints for.all corner sumps. (i.e. D073, D074, ;
D075, and D076) being the same. STATUS: CLOSURE:
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 500 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: G1100 COMP / INSERT NO: 2D105 LEGEND: REAC BLDG CORNER ROOMS FLOOD LEVEL KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR DESCRIPTION: RB SUBBSMT WATER LVL NW & SW CORNER RM OBSERVATION: RB subbasement NW and SW corner room water level. PSTG requires O in. Inventory = 62 in. PSTG requires operator being alert to various conditions. Annunciator setpoints (inventory) are other than required by PSTG. Check out the values. PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Change 0" in PSTG to match actual plant conditions. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: l l l l 1 f l l-
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 502 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 _______________________________________________________________a_________c PANEL: H11-P603 6YSTEM: T4100 COMP / INSERT NO: 3D36 LEGEND: DIV RB VENT EXH RADN MON UPSCALE TR$ KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR _________________________________________________________________________s DESCRIPTION: 2ND CONT HVAC RAD 6 MREM /HR VS 120/135 CPM OBSERVATION: Secondary containment HVAC exhaust radiation level. PSTG requires 6 mrem /hr. Inventory equals 120 cpm & 135 cpm. Note: There are 2 initiating devices, each of which has a setpoint. (Alarm window 3D36) PSTG requires operator being alert to various conditions. Annunciator setpoints (inventory) are other than required by PSTG. Check out the values. RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction:
- 1) Provide instrumentation which reads in required units of nrem/hr.
- 2) Provide a single annunciator (Reflashing) to provide an indication of all secondary containment radiation level (HVAC and area) EOP entry conditions. SOER printout should provide indication of specific condition. 3) Purchase the SPING CRT option and place in the at controls area. See also HED 491, 492 and 470.
B. Immediate Compensatory Actionc or Interim Fix (For Priority I): During training of operators on new EOPs, point out that there is a need for continued intermittent monitoring of the reactor building's HVAC exhaust radiation levels, as there is no other indication of . having reached this entry condition. l l STATUS: Action Item 4, 8 NE-NS-87-0157 : CLOSURE: l l l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 503 SOURCE:-TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 _-____________________~__----_____________________________________________ PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: T4100 COMP / INSERT NO: D11-K808 LEGEND: REAC' BLDG VENT EXH RADIATION MONITOR KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR DESCRIPTION: RB HVAC RAD IND MREM /HR VS CPM OBSERVATION: Roactor Building HVAC exhaust radiation level. PSTG requires 6 mrem /hr. Inventory equals 10 to 1E7 cpm. Instrument number is D11-K808. PSTG requires operator being alert to various conditions. Annunciator satpoints'(inventory) are other than required by PSTG. Check out the values. PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction:
- 1) Provide instrumentation which reads-in required units of mrem /hr. 2) Provide a single annunciator (reflashing) to provide an indication.of all secondary containment radiation level (HVAC and area) for EOP entry conditions. SOER printout should provide indication of specific condition. 3) Purchase the SPING CRT option and place in the at' controls area. See also HEDs 491, 492, 470 and 490.
B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): During training of operators on new EOPs, point out that there is need for continued intermittent monitoring of the reactor building's HVAC exhaust radiation levels, as there is no other indication of having reached this entry condition. STATUS: Action Item 4, 8 NE-NS-87-0157 CLOSURE: I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FFRMI 2 ll
)
HED NO.: 504 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV No.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: T4100 i COMP / INSERT NO: D11-K810 LEGEND: REACBLDGVENTEXHRADIATIONMONIT0] l KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR ________________________________________________________________________q DESCRIPTION: 2ND CONT HVAC RAD IND MREM /HR VS CPM i i l OBSERVATION: ! Secondary Containment HVAC exhaust radiation level. PSTG requires 6 1 mrem /hr. Inventory equals 10 to 1E7 cpm. Instrument number is D11-K810. PSTG requires operator being alert to various conditions. Annunciator setpoints (inventory) are other than required by PSTG. Check out values. ________________________________________________________________________s PRIORITY: I ________________________________________________________________________5 RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction:
- 1) Provide instrumentation which reads in required units of i mrem /hr. 2) Provide a single annunciator (reflashing) to provide i I an indication of all secondary containment radiation level (HVAC andl area) EOP entry conditions. SOER printout should provide indication of specific condition. 3) Purchase the SPING CRT option and place j in the at controls area. See also HEDs 491, 492, and 470. l B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
During training of operators on new EOPs, point out that there is aj need for continued intermittent monitoring of the reactor building's' HVAC exhaust radiation levels, as there is no other indication of having reached this entry condition. STATUS: Action Item 4, 8 NE-NS-87-0157 , CLOSURE: i I l 1 1 s
l J HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 l HED NO.: 505 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 j __________________________________________________________________________ j PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: T4100 COMP / INSERT NO: 1D70 LEGEND: STEAM LEAK DETECTION DIFF TEMP HIGH KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR i ___________________________________________________..______________________ j DESCRIPTION: NO REFLASH i OBSERVATION: j Annunciator 1D70, Steam Leak Detection Differential Temperature High has i multiple inputs. This annunciator does not have reflash capability. The operator must go to the relay room to determine the location of the , high differential temperature. { i PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Add reflash capabilities to annunciator 1D70. If reflash is added i to 1D70, the dT indicators are acceptable in the relay room. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): j An operations directive requiring operators to go to the relay room to check that only one area has a high dT at least once every hour whenever annunciator 1D70 is alarming. STATUS: CLOSURE: I l 1 l l l .__.___._________._______i
1 HUMAN' ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY -' FERMI 2 HED NO.: 506 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV.NO.: 1 PAGE 1 RPANEL: 'NONE- SYSTEM: T5000~ KEYWORD:. INDICATOR DESCRIPTION: D/W: AVERAGE TEMP
. OBSERVATION:
There is no instrument in-the control room to inform the: operator.when Drywell Average. Temperature-exceeds 135 degrees.F. PSTG requires entry to Primary Containment' Control Guideline when Drywell Average Temperature exceeds 135. degrees F. _______________________________________________________________________ m PRIORITY: I
.... ....______________________________________..________________________e RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION.
RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
'A. Recommended Correction:
Provide'a display which measures drywell' average temperature. Presently temperatures' averaged manually. See HED 615.for annunciator requirement. B. Immediate1 Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): Operator can use ERIS information while permanent' instrumentation modification is made. However,.ERIS does not yet consider volumetric weighting factors. Engineering to provide immediate compensatory action. STATUS: CLOSURE:- I
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 'HED NO.: 508 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: T5000 PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: T5000 KEYWORD: RECORDER, INSUFFICIENT RANGE DESCRIPTION: WR TORUS WTR LVL INDICATION-INSUFF RANGE OBSERVATION: Wide range Torus water level instruments indicate torus level from -144" to 054" (-12 ft. to +4'6"). The PSTG requires the operator to initiate torus spray when Torus pressure exceeds 16.6 PSIG if torus water level i is less than 27'9". The PSTG requires the operator to vent the Torus if water level exceeds 30'6". The existing instruments do not have sufficient range to allow the operator to perform these steps. PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: An engineering evaluation should be performed to determine whether the existing taps for wide range Torus level indication is sufficient for adding an instrument with sufficient range. If so, the existing instrument should be changed. If the existing instrument taps will not support an instrument of sufficient range, engineering should determine the best way to provide the control room operator with the required information. Install appropriate instrumentation in the control room. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): The methods to be included in the EOPs should be sufficient until the new wide range instrument can be added. STATUS: CLOSURE:
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 509 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: None SYSTEM: T5000 KEYWORD: INDICATOR, NONE DESCRIPTION: PRIMARY CONTMT WTR LEVEL IND - NONE OBSERVATION: PSTG PC/P requires the operator to vent the Primary Containment if Torus pressure exceeds the Primary Containment Pressure Limit (PCPL) . The PCPL is determined by using Torus pressure and Primary Containment water level and a graph provided in the PSTG. No indication of Primary Containment water level is provided to the operator. ________________________________________________________________________q
!$IS$I511_I_______________________________________________
RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Install Primary Containment Level Instrumentation with direct indication in the "at controls" area of the Main Control Room. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): Indirect methods of determining Primary Containment water level is l available and is documented in the EOP. These methods require the operator to perform calculations, manipulate manual valves and/or make temporary modifications to plant systems during an accident condition. These methods should be acceptable until a permanent fixt can be implemented. STATUS-l CLOSURE: 1 I I i l i I 1
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 510 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: None SYSTEM: E2100 ( KEYWORD: INDICATOR, LOCATION DESCRIPTION: ROOM TEMP INDICATION-NONE IN CR-SE CS. PUMP RM OBSERVATION: Ths operator is required to enter the Secondary Containment Control ! Guideline when area temperatures exceed the maximum normal temperature. SC/T entry is required if the temperature in the SE Core Spray Pump Room cxceeds 148 degrees F. There is no instrument in the operating area. PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION, PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Have reflash and EOP entry setpoints for the annur.ciator. No action recommended provided HED 586 is corrected concerning annunciator setpoint. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): Operator' tours relay room hourly while alarm 1D66 is annunciated. STATUS: CLOSURE: i l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 511 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: NONE SYSTEM: VARIOUS KEYWORD: INDICATOR, LOCATION DESCRIPTION: AREA TEMP >210 F, INDICATION NONE IN CR OBSERVATION: The operator is required to enter the Secondary Containment Control Guideline when area temperatures exceed the maximum allowable temperature. The operator is required to perform step SC/T-4 when the temperature exceeds 210 degrees F in either the SE Core Spray Pump Room, South EECW Area, North RHR Hx Area or the South Hx Area. There is no instrument in the operating area. PRIORITY: II RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Install an " Ambient Temperature Hi-Hi" annunciator. It should receive input from all inputs to 1D66. Annunciator setpoint should be approximately 210 degrees F (maximum safe operating temperature). Annunciator should include reflash. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: 1 l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 512 SOURCE:-TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1: PAGE 1 PANEL: NONE SYSTEM: E1100 KEYWORD: INDICATOR,' LOCATION
. DESCRIPTION: ROOM TEMP INDICATION-NONE . IN . CR. (N RHR HX IM)
OBSERVATION: The operator.is required to enter the Secondary Containment Control Guideline when area temperatures exceed the maximum normal temperature. SC/T entry is required.if the temperature in the North RHR~HX Area
~ exceeds'140 degrees F.
PRIORITY: I l
-RESOLUTION:. MODIFICATION, PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION. PLAN:-
A. Recommended Correction: Have reflash and EOP entry setpoints for the annunciator. No action recommended provided HED 586'is corrected concerning annunciator setpoints. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix-(For Priority I): Operator tours relay room hourly while alarm 1D66 is annunciated.
. STATUS:
CLOSURE: a
+
i [ v / r i 1'
. .) '
.s l J'
l HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY'- FERMI 2 HED NO.: 513 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1
)
KEYWORD: INDICATOR, LOCATION ________________________________________________________________________c DESCRIPTION: ROOM TEMP INDICATION-NONE IN CR (S-RHR Hx Rm) OBSERVATION: The operator is required to enter the Secondary Containment Control Guideline when area temperatures exceed the maximum normal temperature. " SC/T entry is required if the temperature in the South RHR HX Area exceeds 140 degrees F. There is no instrument in the operating area. PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION, PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Have reflash and EOP' entry setpoints for the annunciator. No action recommended provided HED 586 is corrected concerning annunciator setpoint. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): Operator tours relay room hourly while alarm 1D66 is annunciated. STATUS: CLOSURE: 3 I 1 I i I I
- . . . . - , . - . . . . ..-.-........a-
. . . ---...._..........i_.wa.....--.m.--
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2-HED NO.: 514 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1- PAGE 1 PANEL: NONE SYSTEM: C5100 l KEYWORD: INDICATOR DESCRIPTION: ROOM TEMP INDICATION-NONE IN CR (TIP AREA) OBSERVATION: Tha operator is required to enter the Secondary Containment Control Guideline when area temperatures exceed-the maximum normal temperature. SC/T entry. is. required if the temperature in the Neutron Monitor Area exceeds 140 degrees F. There is no instrument in the operating. area. PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION, PROCEDURE ! RE' COMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Install instrumentation providing indication of area temperature readily available to operator. Provide indication of sufficient ; range to satisfy HED 514 and HED 526. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions.or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
- 1. Continue use of computer until permanent fix. Train operators in better use of process computer for these conditions.
l 2. Reconsider requirement for EOP entry condition. STATUS: Action Item 4 NE-NS-87-0156 l CLOSURE: L i l l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 516 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: NONE SYSTEM: C5100 KEYWORD: INDICATOR, NONE DESCRIPTION: ROOM TEMP INDICATION-NONE IN CR (RB Sth Flr) OBSERVATION: The operator is required to enter the Secondary Containment Control Guideline when area temperatures exceed the maximum normal temperature. SC/T entry is required if the temperature in the 5th floor area of the Reactor Building exceeds 120 degrees F. There is no instrument in the operating area. PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION, PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: . A. Recommended Correction: l Install instrumentation providing indication of area temperature l readily available to operator. Provide indication of sufficient l range to satisfy HED 526 and HED 528. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
- 1. Continue use of computer until permanent fix. Train operators in better use of process computer for these conditions.
- 2. Reconsider requirement for EOP entry condition.
STATUS: Action Item 4 NE-NS-87-0156 CLOSURE:
F HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY FERMI 2 HED No.: 521 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1
' PANEL: 'NONE SYSTEM: E4100 . KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR, NONE-DESCRIPTION: HPCI ROOM WATER LEVEL INSTMT NONE i
OBSERVATION: i There is no control-room annunciator to inform the operator when the HPCI Room. Water Level _ exceeds 0" maximum normal operating value or 36" i maximum. safe operating value._ The. operator is required to enter the l Secondary Containment Control Guideline when water level in the HPCI l Room'is greater than 0 inches. Also, the operator is. required to enter ; the secondary Containment control guideline step SC/L-2 when the water , level in the HPCI' room' exceeds 36 inches if a primary system.is i discharging into Secondary Containment. PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: ' Add a ficat type level transmitter in the HPCI Room with a recorder on a back panel in the control room (ie. near G11-R651, R652, R653 and R654). An annunciator should be added with setpoints at 1) water level greater than 0" and 2) water level greater than 36" with floor level'as 0" reference. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix-(For Priority I): An operator should verify' visually that the HPCI room is not flooded (hourly while level in the SW Corner Room or SE Corner Room sump is HI-HI) (ie. annunciator 2D77 energized and recorders 1611-R651, R652, R653 and R654 checked to determine which sump has the high level). STATUS: CLOSURE:
)
l 1
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1. PAGE 1 HED NO.:
---______ _522 PANEL: NONE SYSTEM: P4400 KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR, INDICATOR-
<___________________--__ ___..__________--_______--___--___---_-_--_______e DESCRIPTION: AREA TEMP INDICATION-NONE (NW EECW AREA TEMP) OBSERVATION: The operator is required to enter the Secondary containment Control Guideline When area temperatures exceed the maximum allowable temperature. The operator is required to perform step SC/T-4 when the NW EECW area temperature exceeds 210 degrees F. 2. There.is no control room annunciator to inform the operator when the NW EECW Area temp exceeds 125 degrees F. 3. There is.no control room annunciator to inform the operator when the South EECW Area Temperatue exceeds 125 ) degrees F. There are no instruments in the operating area. ! I ___________--_____--____--________---______-____-______--_______________) PRIORITY: I l RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION, PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction:
- 1. Add a temperature monitoring system to the EECW area. This system should energize annunciator 1D66 when temperatures approach 125 degrees F and 210 degrees F. 2. Add reflash to annunciator 1D66. 3. Provide a temperature indicator for these areas in the ;
relay room in the vicinity of other area temperature indicators. l B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
- 1. Continue use of computer until permanent fix. Train operators in better use of process computer for these conditions.
- 2. Reconsider requirement for EOP entry condition.
STATUS: Action Item 4 NE-NS-87-0156 CLOSURE:
I i I HUMAN' ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 ] l HED NO.: 526 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1
.__________________________________________________________________________ i -PANEL: NONE SYSTEM: C5100 KEYWORD: INDICATOR.
l DESCRIPTION: ROOM TEMP IND - NONE IN CR (TIP AREA) 1 OBSERVATION: The operator is required to enter the Secondary Containment Control Guideline when area temperatures' exceed the maximum allowable temperature. The operator is required to perform step SC/T-4 when the Neutron Monitoring Area temperature exceeds-210 degrees F. There is no instrument in the operating area. ' PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION, PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: -A.. Recommended Correction: Install instrumentation providing indication of area temperature readily'available to operator. Provide-indication of sufficient range to satisfy HED 516 and HED 0528. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
- 1. Continue use of computer until permanent fix. Train operators in better use of process computer for these conditions.
- 2. Reconsider requirement for EOP entry condition.
STATUS: Action Item 4 NE-NS-87-0156 CLOSURE: i 1 1
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 ( HED NO.: 528 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: NONE SYSTEM: C5100 KEYWORD: INDICATOR, NONE DESCRIPTION: ROOM TEMP IND-NONE IN CR (RB Sth FLOOR) OBSERVATION: The operator is required to enter the Secondary Containment Control Guideline when area temperature exceeds the maximum allowable temperature. The operator is required to perform step SC/T-4 when the 5th floor area of the Reactor Building exceeds 210 degrees F-. There is no instrument in the operating area. l PRIORITY: I l ___________--_-____-_-_______--_______--____--___-_______-_-_--__________ RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION, PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Install instrumentation providing indication of area temperature readily available to operator. Provide indication of sufficient range to satisfy HED 516 and HED 526. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
- 1. Continue use of computer until permanent fix. Train Operators in better use of process computer for these conditions.
- 2. Reconsider requirement for EOP entry condition.
STATUS: Action Item 4 NE-NS-87-0156 CLOSURE:
HUMAN' ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
;HED NO.: 530 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: None SYSTEM: D2100 KEYWORL: INSTRUMENTATION DESCRIPTION: AREA RAD INSTMT - NONE OBSERVATION:
Tho' operator is required to enter the Secondary Containment Control
~ Guideline when area 1 radiation levels increase above specific levels.
The operator is required to. perform section SC/R when radiation levels in RB Subbasement SE, NE, NW, SW Corners; HPCI Room, RB Monitor Control Room, or 5th Floor RB Refueling Area exceeds 500 R/hr.
' PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: No action recommended. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: NE-NS-87-0157 CLOSURE: I l l 1 l l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 537 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: None SYSTEM: G33 KEYWORD: INDICATOR, LOCATION DESCRIPTION: AREA TEMP IND - NONE IN CR (A RWCU PUMP ROOM) OBSERVATION: There is no instrument in the operating area to allow the operator to determine temperature in the "A" RWCU Pump Room. Instrumentation oes exist in the relay room (recorder G33-R620 and indicator G33-N600A). PRIORITY: I 1 ------_--_-_-----_-_ -___------_____----_-_----__---____---__----__---__ RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION, PROCEDURE l l RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: l A. Recommended Correction: l 1. Add an annunciator that will inform the operator that the EOP entry condition is being approached or l 2. Change the entry condition to the existing annunciation set l point. Note that the existing annunciator setpoint is the same as the RWCU isolation setpoint. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): None. Implement above corrective action. STATUS: CLOSURE:
r HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 538 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION .REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: None SYSTEM: G33 KEYWORD: INDICATOR, LOCATION DESCRIPTION: AREA TEMP IND - NONE IN CR (B RWCU. PUMP ROOM) OBSERVATION: , There is no instrument in the operating area-to allow the operator to idstermine temperature in the "B" TWCU Pump Room. Instrumentation oes exist-in.the relay room (recorder G33-R620 and indicaotor N600B). ] i {
~ PRIORITY': I d
__________________________________________________________________________ i RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION, PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED' CORRECTION PLAN: $ A. Recommended Correction:
-1. Add an annunciator that will inform the operator that the EOP entry condition.is being approached or
- 2. Change the entry condition to the existing annunciation set point. . Note that the existing annunciator setpoint is the same as the RWCU Isolation setpoint.
B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): None. Implement the above corrective action. ! l
< STATUS: !
CLOSURE: i l
\
l l [ _ _ _ . _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 539 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1-PANEL: None SYSTEM: G33 ; l KEYWORD: INDICATOR, LOCATION ) DESCRIPTION: AREA TEMP IND - NONE IN CR (RWCU HX ROOM) 1 1 j OBSERVATION. There is no instrument in the operating area to allow the operator to . determine temperature in the RWCU Hx Room. Instrumentation does exist l in the relay room (recorder G33-R620 and indicator G33-N600C). I PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION, PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction:
- 1. Add an annunciator that will inform the operator that the EOP entry condition is being approached or
- 2. Change the entry condition to the existing annunciation set point. Note that the existing annunciator setpoint is the same as the RWCU isolation setpoint.
B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): No. Implement immediate corrective action. STATUS: CLOSURE: s
?
L HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY'-' FERMI 2 fHED NO.: L540 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: None- SYSTEM: G33 KEYWORD: INDICATOR, LOCATION
' DESCRIPTION: AREA TEMP IND - NONE'IN CR (PHASE SEP ROOM) ' OBSERVATION:
There'is no. instrument in the operating area to. allow the. operator to datermine temperature in the RWCU Phase Separator Room. Instrumentation-does exist in the relay room (recorder G33-R620 and indicator G33-N600D) .
' PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION,-PROCEDURE ' RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: 1.- Add an annunciator that will inform the operator that the EOP entry condition is being approached or
- 2. Change:the entry condition to the existing annunciation set point. Note that the existing annunciator setpoint is the same as the'RWCU isolation setpoint.
B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): None. Implement above immediate corrective action. STATUS: CLOSURE: l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 541 . SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 .PAGE 1 PANEL: None SYSTEM: E11
' KEYWORD: INDICATOR,' LOCATION
------------------------------------------------------------------------a DESCRIPTION: AREA TEMP IND - NONE IN CR (NW CORNCR. ROOM)
OBSERVATION: There is no instrument'in the operating area to: allow the operator to determine temperature in the NW RHR Pump Room. ; Instrumentation does . exist in the relay room (indicator E11-N600A).
-----------------------------------------------..------------------------a PRIORITY: I
------------------------------------------------------------------------e RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: None is required (provided HED 86-0484 is corrected). If no-annunciator is provided at EOP Entry setpoint, indication is required in the control room. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): Implement decision from HED 86-0484. j STATUS: CLOSURE: I
l 'l HUMAN ENGINEERING, DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 542 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE'1 PANEL: None' SYSTEM: E11 KEYWORD: ' INDICATOR, LOCATION
) ' DESCRIPTION: AREA TEMP IND - NONE IN CR (SW' CORNER ROOM)
OBSERVATION:- . I j There'is no instrument in the operating area to allow the operator to l datermine temperature in the.SW IUIR Pump Room. Instrumentation does-cxist in the relay room (indicator E11-N600B). i PRIORITY: I ' __________________________________________________________________________ i RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN. A. Recommended Correction: None is required (provided HED 86-0485 is corrected). If no annunciator is provided at EOP Entry setpoint, indication is required in the control room. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): Implement decision from HED 86-0484. STATUS: , CLOSURE: f l l 1
l HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 543 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: None SYSTEM: E41 KEYWORD: INDICATOR, LOCATION DESCRIPTION: AREA TEMP IND - NONE IN CR (HPCI/CRD ROOM) OBSERVATION: There is no instrument in the operating area to allow the operator to determine temperature in the HPCI/CRD Pump Area. Instrumentation does exist in the relay room (indicator E41-N024). PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION, PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: The NUREG requires that instruments be in the control room if 1) the instrument requires continuous monitoring or 2) the response is time critical. This instrument does not meet those requirements. Change PSTG entry condition to 150 deg rees F. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): Implement above correction. STATUS: CLOSURE:
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.:'_544 ; SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION -REV NO.:- 1 PAGE 1
' PANEL: 1None'- SYSTEM: E51 KEYWORD: INDICATOR,. LOCATION DESCRIPTION: AREA TEMP IND - NONE IN CR-(SE CORN /RCIC) ; ' OBSERVATION:. 'There'is no instrument in the operating area to allow the operator to datermine the. temperature in the NE'RCIC/CS Pump Room. Indication does -exist:in the relay' room'(indicator E51-N600).
PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION, PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
~A. Recommended Correction:
This HED requires no action if the setpoint~HED is corrected. See HED 86-0486. If HED 86-0486 is not corrected, relocate indicator to "at-controls-area". B. .Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): Implement above correction. STATUS: CLOSURE: l
)
l
)
l I l I i
- f. . HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
.HED NO.: 545 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1
_________________________________________________________________________q PANEL: None SYSTEM: E21 KEYWORD: INDICATOR, LOCATION ________________________________________________________________________m DESCRIPTION: AREA. TEMP IND - NONE IN CR (STEAM TUNNEL) j 1 OBSERVATION- l There is no. instrument in the operatinj area to allow the operator to I determine temperature in the Main Steam Tunnel Area. Instrumentation
.does exist in the relay room (indicator B21-N600 andB21-N800)'.
- i. ________________________________________________________________________q PRIORITY: I
________________________________________________________________________q RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION, PROCEDURE 1 i RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Have reflash and EOP entry setpoints for the annunciator. No actioni recommended provided HED 0586 is corrected. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): , Operator tours of relay room hourly. STATUS: CLOSURE:
f_
.~ HUMAN ENGINEERING 1 DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 i
.HED NO.:; 546 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV.NO.: 1- 'PAGE 1 PANEL: None SYSTEM: E11 KEYWORD:; INDICATOR, LOCATION DESCRIPTION: HVAC DIFF TEMP INSTMT - NONE p [ OBSERVATION: . .,. .
' : There:is no . instrument in the operating area to allow L the operattor to (datermine the1NW RHE-Pump Room HVAC Cooler differentialitemp. Instrumentation is available in the relay room (meter E11-N601) . . 2. LThe operator is required to enter the Secondary Containment Control Guideline when area HVAC Cooler Differential. temperatures exceed their maximum normal operating value. SC/T ' entry is required if North Torus area"(basement).,HVAC Cooler Differential PRIORITY: .IV
._____________________________________________________________c____________
' RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. ' Recommended Correction: No action required. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed
. CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team Review 4/10/87 1
L l l i
L HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2' i HED NO.: 551 ' SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.:- li PAGE 1;
.-------------------------------------------------------------------------y
. PANEL: NONE SYSTEM: D1100 1 i
KEYWORD: INDICATOR, LOCATION .. i 1 ! ) DESCRIPTION: No CR INDICATION OF RB HVAC RAD LEVELS OBSERVATION: . 3 There is no instrument in the operating area <to allow the operator to j
.; determine the Reactor Building HVAC Exhaust Radiation level. Indications
'is,available'in the relay room'(D11-K808 of-D11-K810). The operator is .
d
-required.toenterSCCGuidelineswhenradiation'levelexceeds50 mrem /hr.]
----------------------------------------------------------------------- e PRIORITY: I-
------------------------------------------------------------------------a RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION, PROCEDURE 1
RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A.- Recommended Correction:
- 1) Rad-Chem to calculate rate.(CPM) wPich is equivalent to 50.
mrem /hr based'on expected " normal" isot.)ic release rates.in this area.?2) PSTG/EOP entry condition should be revised to reference this. calculated rate in. CPM instead of mrem /hr. 1 B. -Immediate' Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For' Priority I): ! Provide temporary' operator aid provding conversion information.- STATUS: Action Item 5, 6, &'7 NE-NS-87-0157 CLOSURE: 1 l
.I r
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 552 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: NONE SYSTEM: D1100 KEYWORD: INDICATOR, RANGE 1 DESCRIPTION: HVAC EXHAUST RAD INSTMT - NONE OBSERVATION: There is no instrument in the operating area to allow the operator to determine the Fuel Pool Area HVAC Exhaust Radiation level. Instrumentation is available in the relay room (indicator Dll-K609). Operator is required to enter SCC Guideline when radiation level exceeds 50 mrem /hr. PRIORITY: II RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None required - present equipment is adequate and alarm response procedure 3D35 directs the operator to Rad Chem to perform sampling and trending of radiation levels. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team review 4/15/87 I I
1 HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY -.FERMIn2-1 1 HED NO.: 553 SOURCE: ' TASK 1 ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION. REV-NO.: ~1, PAGE'll _________________________________________________________________________I PANEL: H11-P601J SYSTEM: G1100 ! i KEYWORD: REC, LOCATION i i ________________________________________________________________________q DESCRIPTION: SUMP LEVEL INSTMT - NONE- ] . OBSERVATION: ' .There is'no instrument--in the operating' area to allow-the operator-to determine.the RB NE and SW Floor Drain Sump Level or NW or SE Equipment'? ~ Drain Sump Water: Level. . Instrumentation is available on the back panel. (recorder G11-R653, R651,:R652 and R654. LTheLoperator is required to enter SCC Guideline when level exceeds 45 inches. ________________________________________________________________________q ' PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION:' MODIFICATION- ) i RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A.. Recommended Correction:
.No action required. i B. .Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
' STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team review 4/10/87
.1 1
i 1 HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 , l HED NO.: 562 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: F4500 KEYWORD: SWITCH, LOCATION DESCRIPTION: CONTROL SWITCH LOCATION OBSERVATION: i The control switch and indication for the "A" Floor Drain Sump Pumps T45-C002A and C002B are located on the back panel of H11-P601. 2. The control switch and indication for the "B" Floor Drain Sump Pumps T45-C007A and T45-C007B are located on the back of panel H11-P601. SCC Guideline requires the operator to verify Drain Sump Pump start on high sump level or manually start the pump if it did not auto start. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: No action required. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team review 4/10/87 l 1 I i
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 581 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1! _________________________________________________________________________s PANEL: NONE SYSTEM: T2300 KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR DESCRIPTION: PROVIDE BULK TORUS WATER TEMP OBSERVATION: There is no control room annunciator to inform the operator when Bulk Torus Water Temperature exceeds 95 Degrees F. The operator is required to enter PCC Guideline when temperature exceeds 95 degrees F (Tech Spec Limit). ________________________________________________________________________c PRIORITY: I ________________________________________________________________________q RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Implement corrective action of HED 0645. Ensure PDC 1762 includes-annunciator recommendation of S/L 106 and annunciator setpoint to satisfy HED 581. ! B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): Per E. Preston: Use ERIS calculation for interim Fix. STATUS
- I CLOSURE:
l l 1
)
i
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 582 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: NONE SYSTEM: D1100 KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR, INDICATION DESCRIPTION: RAD. RELEASE RATE > T. SPEC LIMIT ANNUN - NONE OBSERVATION:
- 1) 'There.isi no control room annunciator.to inform the operator when the -
I cite radioactivity release rate exceeds Technical Specification Limits. (requirement to terminate Primary containment venting and purging; operative, or- '2) offsite radioactivity release rate approaches'the
. Alert Level (10 times Technical Specification instantaneous release rate) (Radioactivity Release Guideline entry condition). 3). There is no instrument in the operating area to allow the operator to determine the Secondary Containment HVAC Exhaust Radiation Level. Instrumentation is available in the relay room (indicator D11-K808 and D11-K810). Required for entry to SCC Guideline at 6 mrem /hr.
__________________________________________________________________________ j
' PRIORITY: II l RESOLUTION:. MODIFICATION l RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A.- Recommended Correction: ! Bring CT2-B terminal into the at controls area (or provide the CRT option in the at controls area). B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Action item 2 NE-NS-87-0157 CLOSURE: l l l i i
HUMAN' ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 586 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 ________________________________________________________________________o PANEL: NONE SYSTEM: E2100 KEYWORD: SETPOINT, ANNUN & PRPCEDURE l ______________________________________________________ . ,_______________q DESCRIPTION: AREA' TEMP ANNUN-SETPOINT CHANGE I l 1 OBSERVATION: i There is no control room annunciator to inform the operator when the SE . CS Pump Room Temperature exceeds 148 degrees F. The operator is required. to enter SCC Guideline when temperaure exceeds 148 degrees. _________________________ ______________________________________________q PRIORITY: I J ________________________________________________________________________4 RESOLUTION:' MODIFICATION, PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: One of two items will correct this discrepancy, either 1) Change the entry condition to SC control to 150 degrees or 2) Change the 1 annunciator setpoint to 148 degrees F. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): l Evaluate EOP entry condition setpoint. STATUS: ; CLOSURE:
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY FERMI 2 HED NO.: 587 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE l' PANEL: NONE SYSTEM: E1100 KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR SETPOINT DESCRIPTION: ROOM TEMP ANNUN -LNONE IN CR (N RHR Ex RM) OBSERVATION: There-is'no control room annunciator to inform the operator:when the temperature in the North RHR Hx Area exceeds 140. degrees F.-The operator is required to enter SCC Guideline when temperature exceeds-140 degrees F. PRIORITY: I-RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION ! y. RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: 1 Engineering should determine whether or not it is acceptable to raise PSTG entry' condition to 175 degrees F. If not, the annunciator setpoint should be lowered to less than PSTG entry condition or a combination setpoint change and entry condition change should be made. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): Implement above correction. STATUS: I CLOSURE: i 1 1 I l
)
4
. . . gY 7 j
' J a p(&
, 'l ,
HUMAN ENGINEERING ~ DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 -'- i 4 HED NO.: 588 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV N0.: 1 PAGE 1, 4 PANEL: NCNE SYSTEM: E1100 KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR SETPOINT 1
)
i ______________________________________________________________,.__________q
- DESCRIPTION: ROOM TEMP ANNUN - NONE IN CR-(S RHRJEx ROOM). fj .
l l OBSERVATION: -l There is no control room annunciator to inform the operator wnen the . j temperature.intheSouthRHRHxrocraexceeds140degreesF.)Theoperatorj is required to enter' SCC Guideline.When temperature exceeds 140 degrees y, ; w* s ll-
- ;9
_________________________.,___________________________________.:h,.____d 1 PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION ', C, 3 . , RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN. , A. Recommended Correction: .
' O f
Engineering'should determine whether or not,it islacceptable to*,/
- raise PSTG entry. condition to 175 degrees F. If not, the- ,s ;
annunciator setpoint should be. lowered to less than PSTG entry' I condition or a combination setpoint' change and entry condition ' change should be made. , ;
!i,, '
.B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fi:0 (For Priority lI): Implement.above. correction. s + 4' ;
/> s STATUS: k
> f. O CLOSURE:
d g
) .:
}Y Y k i
e'" . ).i
-y b
'i I
. 4
)
i ,
,t I A
g
' , .o o ,,
'4 J9' 4!_)
v/'
.2,. O i'
/
., HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI.2 1' ., ,n
'Y O
- ) [l _.
(, f ' ' > HED'NO.h589 , SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: .NONE f, y, SYSTEM: C5100 i KEYWORD: NO ANNUNCIATOR
? 1 DES'JRIPT7;ON: ROOM' TEMP ANNUN.- NONE IN CR (TIP AREA)
) * - ;
OBSERVATION: , i There is no control room annunciator to inform the operator when the l temperature in the. Neutron Monitoring area exceeds 140-degrees F. The
' operator is required to enter SCC Guideline when temperature exceeds 140 dagrees F. /'
PRIORITY: I f
--------------------- i --------------------------------------------------
. RE9OLUTION: MODIFICATION, PROCEDURE ,
i ' l RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: , Install annunciator at 14C degrees F. ! B. Immediate Compens5 tory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): .i
- 1. Continue use of computer until permanent fix. Train operators in better use os process computer for these conditions.
'2 . Reconsider regilirement for EOP entry condition.
STA US: Action Item 4 NE-NS-87-0156 CLOSURE: l l l l l 1 i I 1 l l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 590 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: NONE SYSTEM: T4800 KEYWORD: NO ANNUNCIATOR ____________________________________-------_____________________________o DESCRIPTION: ROOM TEMP INDICATION-NONE IN CR (H2 RECOMB) I OBSERVATION: l
- 1) There is no control room annunciator to inform the operator when thej temperature in the Hydrogen Recombiner Area exceeds 120 degrees F. (SCC I Guideline Entry Condition) 2) The operator is required to enter the Secondary Containment Control Guideline when area temperatures exceed {
the maximum normal temperature. SC/T entry is required if the I temperature in the Hydrogen Recombiner exceeds 120 degrees F. 3) The I operator is required to enter the Secondary Containment Guideline when area temperatures exceed the maximum allowable temperature. The operator is required to perform step SC/T-4 when Hydgrogen Recombiner Area tempe ature exceeds 210 degrees F. l PRIORITY: I _____________________-____________________________________-_______--____q RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION, PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction:
- 1. Add a temperature monitoring system to the Hydrogen Recombiner area. This system should energize annunciator 1D66 when temperatures approach 120 degrees F and 210 degrees F. 2. Add reflash to annunciator 1D66. 3. Provide a temperature indicator for these areas in the relay room preferably in the vicinity of other area temperature indicators.
B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
- 1. Reduce setpoints for D016 and D017 to less than or equal to 120 degrees F. 2. Continue use of process computer until permanent fik is implemented. Train operators in better use of process computers for these conditions. 3. Reconsider requirement for EGP entry condition.
STATUS: Action Item 4 NE-NS-87-0156 CLOSURE:
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 591 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: NONE SYSTEM: C5100 i KEYWORD: NO ANNUNCIATOR DESCRIPTION: ROOM TEMP ANNUN - NONE IN CR (RB 5th FLOOR) OBSERVATION: There is no control room annunciator to inform the operator when the temperature in the RB Sth floor area exceeds 120 Degrees F (SCC Guideline entry). __________________________________________________________________________ j i PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION, PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Install annunciator providing dedicated alarm window to alert operator to EOP entry condition. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
- 1. Continue use of computer until permanent fix. Train operators in better use of process computer f.or these conditions. 2.
Reconsider requirement for EOP entry condition. STATUS: Action Item 4 NE-NS-87-0156 CLOSURE: l l l l l l l l l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 597 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE PANEL: NONE SYSTEM: B1106 KEYWORD: NO ANNUNCIATOR DESCRIPTION: RPV LEVEL TREND ANNUN - NONE OBSERVATION: There is no control room annunciator to inform the operator when the reactor Water Level trend reverses. While performing Contingency #1 (Alternate Level Control), the operator is required to enter and exit various procedures depending on RPV water level trond. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Accept as is - no design change required. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team review 4/10/87
4 HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 1
.i HED NO.: 598 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION. REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: NONE SYSTEM: B1106 1
1 KEYWORD: '!K) ANNUNCIATOR I DESCRIPTION: RPV PRESSURE & LEVEL TREND ANNUN - NONE l OBSERVATION: Thora is no control room annunciator to inform the operator when RFV pressure is 392-PSIG (increasing or decreasing) with water level increasing.-During performance of Contingency #1,-the operator is required to enter and exit various procedures depending on level and pressure trends. ____________________-___________________________________-_________________ I PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION j
. RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
JL. Recommended Correction: No change is required. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix-(For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team review 4/10/87 i l 1 l l 1
- - - - - - - --- a
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 599 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.i 1 PAGE 1- _________________________________________________________________________j PANEL: NONE SYSTEM: B1106 ; KEYWORD: NO ANNUNCIATOR ________________________________________________________________________e DESCRIPTION: RF ' PRESSURE & LEVEL TREND ANNUN - NONE OBSERVATION: There is no control room annunciator to inform the operator when RPV pressure is 100 psig (increasing or decreasing) with water level , increasing. During performance of Contingency #1, the operator is required to ente: and exit various procedures depending on RPV water I level and pressure trends. l __.._____________________________________________________________________q PRIORITY: IV ________________________________________________________________________q RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION f RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: No change is required. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim rix (For Priority I): 1 I STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per Ass essm int Team review 4/10/87 i l l l l 1 l l l l ______________u
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
-1 HED NO.: 600 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: NONE SYSTEM: B1106 1 KEYWORD: NO ANNUNCIATOR ' DESCRIPTION: NO AUd FOR OPERATOR TO KNOW RPV AT 114.7 PSIG i . OBSERVATION: )
Thnre is no control room annunciator to inform the operator when Reactor J pressure is.114.7 psig (increasing or decreasing) with water. level decreasing. During performance of Contingency #1, the operator is required to enter and exit various proedures depending on RPV level and pressure trends. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. -Recommended Correction: No change is required. I B.. Insediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
' STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team review 4/10/87
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 601 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE
..- _ .. _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - _ _ - - - - - - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ .,_ _ _ - - - - _ _ _ _ - - - - _ _ _ _ - - - _ - - - - - _ _ _ m PidiEL: NONE SYSTEM: B1106 KEYWORD: NO ANNUNCIATOR .._----_-_--___-__-- .--______-____---_------_-__-_-----_____----____---n DESCRIPTION: NO ALM FOR OPERATOR TO KNOW RPV PWR > 3%
OBSERVATION: There is no control room annunciator to inform the operator when Reactor Power is greater than 3% or cannot be determined. While performing Contingency #5, the operator is required to enter or exit various procedures if reactor power exceeds 3% (APRM downscale trip) or cannot be determined. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: No action required. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team review 4/10/87
1
'i
)
i HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 l 1 HED'NO.: 602 ' SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 o__________________________________________________________________________,
, PANEL: NONE SYSTEM: B1106 l KEYWORD: NO ANNUNCIATOR DESCRIPTION: NO ALM FOR OPERATOR TO KNOW PWR' INCREASING
. OBSERVATION:
There is no control room annunciator to infont the operator when Reactor
- Power is. increasing. While performing Contingency #5, the operator is
. required to perform and/or reperform certain steps if reactor power is i increasing.
PRIORITY: IV d RESOLUTION:: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED. CORRECTION. PLAN:
, 'A. Recommended Correction:
No' action' required. B.- Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
~ STATUS:' Closed CLOSURE:-Per Assessment Team review 4/10/87 l
l i i l __m___m ___ _ _ _ _ _ . -
l HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO. : 603 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE1l PANEL: NONE SYSTEM: C7100 KEYWORD: NO ANNUNCIATOR 1 DESCRIPTION: NO ALM FOR OPERATOR-MODE SW IN " SHUTDOWN" : i l OBSERVATION: There is no control room annunciator to inform the operator when the Rx i Mode Switch is in " SHUTDOWN". RPV Control Guideline entry condition l based on subtask breakdown. l PRIORITY: IV
--_---____-------------_______-___________---_--_-____--__-____-__---___i RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION l RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: No action required. j l B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team review 4/10/87
I HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HEDI NO.': 604 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION. REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: NONE . SYSTEM: T2302~ KEYWORD: NO ANNUNCIATOR DESCRIPTION: NO ALM FOR SUPP'N POOL LOAD LIMIT (SPLL) OBSERVATION: There is no control room annunciator to inform the operator when Torus .
- Water Level is greater than the Suppression Pool. Load Limit. The RPV .i Control Guideline requires the' operator.to perform certain actions'of
' Torus water level cannot be maintained less than the SPLL.
.--------------..----------------------------------------------------------- \
' PRIORITY: II RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION 1
RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: ' A. . Recommended Correction: Engineering verify and ensure that SPDS alerts the operator to this 1 condition. Document same.
;B. Immediate Compensatory' Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): 1 l
l
. STATUS:
l CLOSURE: ) i 1 I L i i
, I b
f i
-l HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 I
HED NO.: 605 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE1) l _________________________________________________________________________< PANEL: None. SYSTEM: H1100 KEYWORD: NO ANNUNCIATOR ! l _____________________________________________.__________________________J DESCRIPTION: NO ALM FOR OPERATOR WHEN RX IS "NOT SHUTDOWN" OBSERVATION: There is no control room annunciator to inform the operator when the j Reactor is "NOT SHUTDOWN". The operator is directed by the-RPV Control i
-Guideline to perform certain specific steps if the reactor is not shutdown. i l
________________________________________________________________________q PRIORITY: IV j ________________________________________________________________________e RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: No action required. . i B. Immediate Compensatory. Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed i CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team review 4/10/87 I i l l i I i
I I HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY'- FERMI 2
.i HED NO.: 606 : SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 1
__________________________________________________________________________ 1 PANEL: None SYSTEM: C7100 , KEYWORD: NO ANNUNCIATOR DESCRIPTION: NO ALM FOR OPERATOR WHEN RX IS " SHUTDOWN" OBSERVATION: There is no control room annunciator to inform the operator when thtReactor is shutdown. During performance of.the RPV. Control Guideline, the operator is directed to enter the scram procedure when the reactor-is shutdown. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION i RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. ' Recommended Correction:
.No action required.
B.. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed I CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team review 4/10/87 i i l l l l l
l HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 1 1 \ HED NO.: 607 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: NONE SYSTEM: C4100 KEYWORD: NO ANNUNCIATOR ________________________________________________________________________q DESCRIPTION:.NO ALM WHEN SLC TANK IS EMPTY lj OBSERVATION: i I There is no control room annunciator to inform the operator when the standby liquid control tank is empty. RPV Control Guideline directs the operator to trip the SLC pumps when the'SLC tank is empty PRIORITY: I ______________________________________________________________ 1 RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION ! RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: ' ! A. Recommended Correction: I Install an annunciator for SLC tank empty. j B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): l Item'should be' stressed in training, emphasizing consequence of
. evolution. Document same.
STATUS: Action item 6 NE-NS-87-0156 CLOSURE: l i i l1
HUMAN ENGINEERING' DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 608 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION- REV'NO.: l' PAGE 1 I PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: C7100 KEYWORD:'NO ANNUNCIATOR l DESCRIPTION: NO ALM FOR OPERATOR WHEN SCRAM IS RESET-OBSERVATION:
-PSTG; requires _ operator being alert to reactor scram reset. There is no control room annunciator to.-inform the operator when the reactor scram-is'able to be reset. The RPV Control Guideline directs the operator to parform certain steps when the reactor scram can be reset.
PRIORITY: IV
! RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION , RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: -A. Recommended Correction:. !
No action required.
'B. 'Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
)
STATUS: Closed-CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team review 4/10/87. , l \ l i I1 I i I l l I i
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 i HED NO.: 609 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION- REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 _________________________________________________________________________s I PANEL: VARIOUS SYSTEM: H9900 1 l KEYWORD: INSTRUMENTS j
'l
_____________________________________________________________________-__m DESCRIPTION: TEMPORARY MAGNETIC DECALS IN CONTROL ROOM OBSERVATION:
.Various magnetic (not permanently affixed) decals on the panels. These .
decals are-used in lieu of scale banding. ) i ________________________________________________________________________q PRIORITY: N/A ) ________________________________________________________________________q I RESOLUTION: ' ENHANCEMENT l RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: l Provide permanent labels where appropriate. Remove temporary labelsj B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix-(For Priority I): ! I STATUS: CLOSURE: 1'. I I i
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 i i I
.HED NO.: 610 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 l
PANEL: NONE SYSTEM: H4000 KEYWORD: COMMUNICATION SYSTEM , i DESCRIPTION: COMM BETWEEN CR & RR IS POOR OBSERVATION: Communication System is inadequate between the Relay Room & Control Room. j l PRIORITY: I I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Provide a new and improved communication system. The NUREG 0700, Section 6.2.1 covers the various voice communication systems. To improve the existing system one should consider the available systems recommended in the NUREG. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): The new up-to-date communications system should be implemented as soon as possible. j 1 STATUS: CLOSURE: i l. f i
)
l 1 , t l l l l l 1 i
l 1 HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 i i HED NO.: .611 SOURCE:/ TASK-ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE l'
-----_____--____--_-_______--_-__--------__---------------__------____--_5 PANEL: NONE SYSTEM: B1100 i l
.1 KEYWORD:l SOP
-------_______------_------------------------------__--------_-------_--e
. DESCRIPTION: TEMP NEAR. LVL INSTMT RUN NOT AVAILABLE OBSERVATION: , . J Unable.to " Determine which temperature elements are near instrument runs for the water level instrument".
PRIORITY: N/A { __-__-___---------------------__ ---_-__---__-_--_----__----_-_--------_a I RESOLUTION: PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended' Correction- i I Procedures will be upgraded. No modifications to plant instrumentation required. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): , i STATUS: l CLOSURE: l l l l l l l
'l l
I l l l
HUMAN ENGINEERING. DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 612 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: NONE' SYSTEM: T4800 KEYWORD: VALVE DESCRIPTION: .N2 INERTING VALVE - MANUAL LOCAL OBSERVATION: 4 PSTG requires "Open nitrogen supply valve to Drywell (T48-F130). This is a' manual valve located on top _of the Torus and may not be accessible in a casualty. , PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION, PROCEDURE . RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Make T48-F130 a motor operated valve controllable from the control room. B.- Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): Immediate fix is-required or a procedural change is.needed. STATUS:- CLOSURE: l
1 1 4
'l
~ HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2-1
~
HED NO.:' 613' SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION' NO.: 1 _PAGE1) _____________________________________________________'REV ____________________q
' PANEL:LNONE SYSTEM: T4800- !
KEYWORD:' JUMPER SWITCH,,KEYLOCK ______________________________________________.__________________________s DESCRIPTION: DEFEAT INTERLOCK. ' OBSERVATION: lNo procedure exists. lNo defeat interlock' controls' exist. PSTG requires I
" Defeat. isolation interlocksLif necessary" to. vent the Primary Containment. .. )
J PRIORITY: I ________________________________________________________________________m RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED' CORRECTION' PLAN: 1 A. -Recommended Correction: Install a key lock switch in the control' room with.an annunciator toi provide an alert to the opeator. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): Provide jumper, capability. . Provide operator training and document j ' same. Provide adequate labeling. Evaluate level of' lighting in-
. vicinity'of jumper and. upgrade as applicable.
-STATUS: Action item NE-NS 87-0156. CLOSURE . i
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY FERMI 2
'HED NO.: 614 SOURCE: TASK-ANALISIS/ VERIFICATION REV.NO.: 1 PAGE 1 '
1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 7
. PANEL': - H11-P817 SYSTEM: T4700 KEYWORD: SCALE,. IND 1 DESCRIPTION: SCALE MARKINGS LEGIBILITY ]
]
OBSERVATION
- I For drywell' cooling fans motor amp meters,-the' dark numerals'on dark' i color background (banding) do not offer sufficient contrast for good legibility of scale numerals..
1 PRIORITY: II j RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION i RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:- A. Recommended Correction: .
' Provide new scales and add banding. The meters.should be replaced.
with aLtype which.provides good contrast between pointer and - banding; the meter should. conform with NUREG-0700 guidelines. Generic for all' motor ammeters in control room. i B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): . STATUS: ! CLOSURE: I
\
i i l l l t, i i
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 I HED NO.: 615. SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1l
-__----_-__-____________________--_________-_____-___-_______-___-_______q '
PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: T5000 KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR 1 __-____--____------__-_-------__-_-_--_-____-_----_-____----__-_-_--_-_-_I DESCRIPTION: PRIMARY CONTAINMENT AVERAGE TEMP ANNUNCIATOR OBSERVATION: PSTG requires operator to be alerted to Drywell average temperature >135 degrees F. The average temperature presently needs to be calculated. 4 The alarms 8D41, 17D41 get inputs from four different zone setpoints andI do not indicate average temperature. Also, these annunciators do not reflash.
-____-____--_-_______---___-__-___-__-_---______------____-____--_-_-___4 PRIORITY: I
----_-_--___-_----_____-_----_---__-___-_-__-_-_____--------_-___------_a RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION I
RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: i Install an annunciator to alarm at 135 Degrees F average Drywell temperature. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): , STATUS: l CLOSURE: l
- {
n HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 j 1 i HED NO.:' 616 REV NO.: PAGE 1 i SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION 1 j PANEL: H11-P808 SYSTEM: T5000 PANEL: H11-P817 SYSTEM: T5000 KEYWORD: PROCEDURE i DESCRIPTION: DRYWELL H2/02 RECORDER' ! t OBSERVATION: ; The recorder (T50-R806 A & B) is shared by Drywell and Torus. Sample I system must be shifted to monitor one or the other. PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Procedure should specify that one division of Primary Containment ; Monitoring System should normally be aligned to Torus and the other division normally aligned to Drywell. .This alignment will result in ! instantaneous-indication of hydrogen or oxygen concentration in area of concern-(without having to wait for sample line purge). . B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): ) STATUS: POM 23.408 to be upgraded j CLOSURE: l
)
(
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2-i r
'HED NO.: 617 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION- REV NO.: 1- PAGE 1l
-----_-----------------__---_--__-------------------------------_-----_--g PANEL: H11-P808 SYSTEM: T4700 :
PANEL: H11-P817 SYSTEM: T4700 KEYWORD: SCALE, REC-DESCRIPTION: TEMPORARY DECALS l OBSERVATION: j Recorders have their charts obscured by point identification decals. The recorders in question are T23-R800, T47-R803A and T47-R803B. PRICRITY: N/A ' _ RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: , Remove temporary decals and replace with a permanent marker plate j which does not obscure the charts. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: i CLOSURE: i
c. r l HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 ! HED NO.: 618 SOURCE: . TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION IUM/ . NO. : ll PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: H4000 KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR,'REFLASH q DESCRIPTION: AREA RM TEMP ANNUN REFLASHABILITY OBSERVATION:
.The room temperature alarm annunciator (1D66) is initiated by one.of thirteen (13) different inputs. 'The operator must go to the Relay Room 'to-determine which temperature.is annunciating. The annunciator does .not have reflash. ' PRIORITY: I DISSENT: . Disagree with recommendation to' station operator in Relay Room untilalarm' clears. Periodic inspection hourly should be adequate, and -to tie-up.an operator RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. . Recommended Correction: Add reflashing capability to annunciator (1D66). B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority.I): Whenever the first alarm comes in, constant (or very frequent) monitoring the. area temperature indicating panel in the relay room l shall be conducted, (maybe once every hour or position an operator ! in relay ro'om'for the monitoring job) until all annunciators'are .j clear. ; STATUS: CLOSURE: :
f HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 619- SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1- .PAGE.1: _________________________________________________________________________q
. PANEL: H11-P808 SYSTEM: T4700 IPANEL: 'H11-P617 SYSTEM: 'T4700 LKEYWORD: RECORDER DESCRIPTION: T47-R803 A&B DIFFICULT TO READ. NO POINT SEL.
OBSERVATION: Difficult 'txr read numeric points. Difficult to select specific points. The' recorders in question are T47-R803A and B (Drywell Temp). ________________________________________________________________________q PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION
' RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
- A. Recommended Correction: ~
Replace this recorder with a point slectable recorder. The.new recorder to have a digital readout of point being printed. The~new recorder to have an improved scale to increase readability. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):- Other indications of drywell temperatue exist on ERIS. These ERIS i points are acceptable until new recorders are installed. ; STATUS: CLOSURE: l
'I i
l l l i e
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO': . 621 SOURCE: TASK. ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION- REV NO.: 1- PAGE 1 PANEL:~H11-P601 SYSTEM: T5000 PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: T5000 KEYWORD:' RECORDER,-SCALE
' DESCRIPTION: T50-R804A-& B DOOR MUST BE OPENED TO READ OBSERVATION:
Oparator must openLrecorder door to'see scale clearly. The recorders in qusstion are T50-R804A and B'(Torus Water Level)
-PRIORITY: 'IV-RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION.
i RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction:
- 1) If HED 508,results-in replacement of these recorders in order to
~
provide an expanded range, then new recorders to be provided with-scales with improved legibility.. 2) If HED 508 resultE in addition of a separate,' expanded range instrument channel, then. replace the scales'on T50-R804A & B with scales with-improved ~ legibility. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): ' STATUS: 1 CLOSURE: i i l i 4
' a
/-
,e ,
HUMAN ENGINEERING D.TSCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 622 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P808 SYSTEM: T5000 i PANEL: H11-P817 SYSTEM: T5000 , i KEYWORD: RECORDER, SCALE , DESCRIPTION: T50-R806A & B PRI CONT OXYGEN / HYDROGEN CONC. OBSERVATION: i< Poor scale progression (0,6,12----). Wrong paper scale (0-1GO-inches). Poor illumination of recessed scales. High/ Low indication nbt appropriate. The recorders in question are'T50-R806 A and B.
- l. PRIORITY: IV ,;
1 _________ __________________________ ,___ _________ ________________ ____ RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION < t-RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: - A. Recommended Correction: ![
- 1. Provide paper of the correct tange for these recorders.
'l 1 2. Provide proper illumination for scale. ;
B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS:
/
CLOSURE: . j.
HUpiAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY'- FERMI 2 "HEDLNO.:
'623 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 FANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: T5000 PANEL: H11-P602- SYSTEM: T5000 KEYWORD:' SCALE, REC DESCRIPTION:~ RECORDER LEGIBILITY OBSERVATION:
'Cannot= read the top scale'with the recorder's window in place. The recorders in question are T50-R802A and B (Drywell Pressure).
\ _____________________________________________.._______________ ___________ PRIORITY: IV' l .__________________________________________________________________________ RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
.A. Recommended Correiction: '
None-required.
~
B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed
, .t i ' CLOSURE: 'Per Ak.sessment (> Team review'4/15/87 a
L i j l ! i
.1
- 1 i
tE ., l!
\
i k' \ l
_n _ . - - _ . . _ - _ , - . . _ - - - . _ - _ _ - - _ - - _ - - _ - _ _ - - _ - - - . - - .---- . h' HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
. . q HED NO.: . 625' SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1. PAGE 1-SYSTEM: T4100-
~
PANEL: H11-P808 PANEL: H11-P817- SYSTEM: T4100 KEYWORD: SCALE, REC DESCRIPTION: RECORDER SCALE 4 OBSERVATION: Meter scale is shadowed. Scale has two green bands and it is not clear which is relevant. Perhaps there should be a red band. The recorders. in question are T41-R800A and B. J PRIORITY:.II - ________________________________________________________________________d RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. ' Recommended Correction: Provide scales with better contrast (numbers and division markings). The banding question will have to be addressd thru the enhancement function. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): 1 1 i STATUS.: CLOSURE: ; l )
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 626 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: B3100 i KEYWORD: RECORDER DESCRIPTION: RECORDER SCALE & PRINT OUTS OBSERVATION: Difficult to read the numerical printouts. Too many intermediate markings on the scale. The recorder in question is B31-R601 (Area Temp). PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Replace the recorder with one that has clearer print markings and a point number display window. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: i l i l 1 i l l l l l l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 628 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601 BACK SYSTEM: G1100 KEYWORD: RECORDER, SCALE DESCRIPTION: RECORDER SCALE & PAPER OBSERVATION: Scale range and recorder paper range mismatched. Unusual scale termination (6, 10, 20, 30, 40, 6, 20, 40, 60, 78). Top scale is recessed and shadowed. The recorder in question is G11-R653 (Floor Drain Sump Water Level). PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: The scale range on this recorderis proper for its function. The sump level switch operates over a range of 6" to 78". Pen 1 of this recorder is a narrow range indication with a range of 6" to 48". Pen 2 is a wide range indicator with indication from 6" to 78". Specially ordered paper is available for these recorders and is normally used. Apparently the proper paper was not being used in the simulator during performance of the Task Analysis. Control room lighting in general and indicator / recorder shadowing in particular appears to be a generic deficiency as it appears in many of the HEDs and in operator interviews. An engineering evaluation should be performed to determine the best way to provide adequate lighting for control surfaces and indications. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE:
F HUMAN ENGINEERING-DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED.NO.: 629 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE l PANEL: H11-P808 SYSTEM: T4600 I PANEL: H11-P817 SYSTEM: T4600-KEYWORD: SCALE, REC. I _ DESCRIPTION: . RECORDER SCALE & SHADOWING OBSERVATION. LToo many intermediate markings between numerals. Scale is shadowed. The recorders in question are T46-R800A and B (SGTS Flow Rate). PRIORITY: II RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: l A. Recommended Correction: Replace the scale with one that has fewer intermediate markings and band the normal operating range. The shadow problem will be considered. . Control room lighting in gerieral and indicator / recorder shadowing in particular appears to be a generic deficiency as it appears in many of the HEOs and in operator interviews. An engineering evaluation should be performed to determine the best way to provide adequate lighting for control surfaces and indications. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS:
' CLOSURE:
i l l i l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 630 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P60?, SYSTEM: C3200 KEYWORD: LIGHTING SURVEY l DESCRIPTION: RECORDER SCALE AND SHADOWING OBSERVATION: Recorder is shadowed. Above anthropometric limits. Too many markings between numerals. The recorder in question is C32-R609. (RPV Pressure). PRIORITY: III DISSENT: GKS: Disagree - See Cat III review. GKS /s/ RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction:
- 1. Control room lighting in general and indicator / recorder shadowing in particular is a generic deficiency as it appears in many ofthe HEOs and in operator interviews. An engineering evaluation should be performed again to determine the best way to provide lighting for contr:1 surfaces and indications. 2.
Useability of the scale is enhanced by banding. Related HED 719 (banding) and HED 726 (banding). B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: R
- _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ . _
HUMAN ENGINEERING; DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
'HED NO.: REV NO.: 1 PAGE l
_ _ _ _ _ _'631. _ _SOURCE:. _ _ _ _ _TASK' _ _ _ANALYSIS _ _ _ _ _/ VERIFICATION PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: B2100 PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: B2100 KEYWORD: RECORDER DESCRIPTION: RECORDER SHADOWING OBSERVATION:
- Racorders.B21-R623A & B (RPV Pressure) are recessed and the upper scales are shadowed.
l PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: LA.. Recommended Correction: No correction recommended. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 4/16/87 i
'l
'l
.1
I HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 3 HED No.: 632 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NL.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P807 SYSTEM: G5100 i i KEYWORD: DEMARCATION DESCRIPTION: CS & RHR FLOW PATH LABELING OBSERVATION: Informal notes and markings found on labels to differentiate "CS" from "RHR". Return flow paths. ,
--___ -__-_---____------__----_-__-----_-----__--_--__--_-___-_---__----e PRIORITY: N/A
-------__----------_-_ ----_--_----_--_---------_- --___---__---_--_-_--y RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT l RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
j A. Recommended Correction: Add demarcation lines and labels where required. l l B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): _ f S'I ATUS : CLOSURE:
l HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 l HED NO.: 633 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: E5100 l KEYWORD: SCALE, IND. l __________________________________________________________________________ l DESCRIPTION: INDICATOR SCALE & POINTER OBSERVATION: E51-R613 (RCIC pump flow rate) meter pointer covers numerals and does not extend to markings. I __________________________________________________________________________ j l PRIORITY: II RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Provide banding per Stds. NOTE: This is generic to all " Hays Republic" meters. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: 1
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
)
)
HED NO.: 634 SOURCE:~ TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION. REV NO.: 1 PAGE.1 ____-_-______________-_______________-_________-________________--__-__-_c PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: E1100
-PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: E1100 KEYWORD: SCALE,' RECORDER
______-___________________-_____-__________________________________-_____W DESCRIPTION: RHR FLOW RATE REC. MULTIPLIER & SHADOWING j OBSERVATION: RHR flow rate' recorders are shadowed. It is difficult to see the multiplier (GPM X1000). Also, operating range is not indicated. The recorders in question are E11-R608A & B. PRIORITY: IV DISSENT: JLS: The illumination problem coupled with scale design problems ! creates a higher priority HED. i 1
-_-___-_______--_____--_____--___---____________________-_____________-_y RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION )
RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Provide an improved scale for the recorders. Consider ways to reduce shadows on recorders. Provide banding. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE:
4 1 1 i HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 l HED'NO.: 635 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: E1100 PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: E1100 1 KEYWORD: SCALE, IND. I DESCRIPTION: RHR LOOP-FLOW METERS OBSERVATION:
-RHR loop flow meter pointer covers numerals and does'not extend to the markings. This HEO is for flow indicators.E11-R603A & B.
PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION ,
' RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: Correct the meter's scale so as to prevent the peinter~from covering the numerals, and the pointer is closer to the scale'simarkings. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: i I l
i
-l HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 .
HED NO,: 637 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 _________________________________________________________________________e PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: E4100 KEYWORD: SCALE IND DESCRIPTION: HPCI FLOW RATE METER SCALE, POINTER OBSERVATION: HPCI flow rate meter (E41-R613). The pointer covers the numerals and does not extend to scale markings. Meter is not banded to indicate operating range. ________________________________________________________________________m PRIORITY: IV ! 1 ________________________________________________________________________q RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction:
- 1. Correct the scale layout. 2. Banding covered by HED 715.
B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: l l l l t.
l I l HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 l l l 1 HED NO.: 638 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1
)
PANEL: H11-P811 SYSTEM: R3000 l 4 , KEYWORD: SCALE, IND. DESCRIPTION: EDG VOLTMETER OBSERVATION: For meters R30-R804, R814, R822 and R832, 120 V is nominal value, and is i not consistently at the 12:00 o' clock position as various voltmeters in the control room. PRIORITY: II RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A0 Recommended Correction: Change the meter face to have indication of the nominal value shown at 1200 o' clock position. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Pricrity I): STATUS: CLOSURE:
I HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPPJiCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 639 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P809 SYSTEM: R3000 KEYWORD: SWITCH, CMC DESCRIPTION: CMC SPRING-RETURN-TO-CENTER SWITCH OBSERVATION: Use of CMC switches for "Off/Stop/ Start" violates DECO, design convention. PRIORITY: II l RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION 1 I l RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: l A. Recommended Correction:
- 1. Changeout the face plate to have all positions (close - normal -
open or tripped) clearly marked. 2. Replace the switches with larger movement to either side of the " normal" position, such as G.E. CR 2940 or SBM spring-return-to center switch which provides ! positive feel of knob movement. 1 l B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): 1 STATUS: CLOSURE :
i HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 I HED NO.: 640 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: C3200 KEYWORD: SCALE DESCRIPTION: RECORDER SCALE MULTIPLIER (FW) 1 OBSERVATION: ) There is no multiplier indicated on recorder C32-R607. (Feedwater Flow) i PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: '
- 1. Print multiplier on scale.
B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: l i f i i f I l l I
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 641. TASK. ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 1 _______________'__________________________________________________________s SOURCE: PANEL: NONE SYSTEM: E5100 l KEYWORD: JUMPER SWITCH, KEYLOCK i
-DESCRIPTION: INTERLOCKLBY-PASS SWITCH OBSERVATION:
Ne switch exists.Must.use jumper wires. .PSTG requires; " Defeat RCIC lov. pressure interlock." ________________________________________________________________________c PRIORITY: I ________________________________________________________________________q RESOLUTION- MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction:
- Install a key lock. switch in the control room with an annunciator to provide an alert to the operator.
B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):- Provide. jumper capability. Provide operator training and document same. Provide adequate labeling. Evaluate-level of lighting in vicinity.of jumper and upgrade as applicable.. STATUS: Action. items NE-NS-87-0156 CLOSURE: 1 l j
s HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2. 1
'HED.NO.: 642 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 .
i
~ PANEL:'H11-P601 SYSTEM: ES100 ;
KEYWORD: SWITCH, ENGRAVING DESCRIPTION: SWITCH MARKING OBSERVATION: LValva switch E51-F095,(Steam Supply' Bypass) is.a momentary contact dsvice. The operator therefore must hold the switch in-the " Test"
.' position. The word " Test"-should be changed to "Open". PSTG requires operator to " fully open" the steam supply bypass-valve.
I
. PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT. - RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A,-l Recommended Correction: I Change the word " test" on the switch to "open" to agree with the I actual function of the switch. B. Immediate Compensatory-Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: a 4 l l i i l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 643 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: E5100 KEYWORD: GEMAC, "C"/"0" PB's DESCRIPTION: GEMAC LABELING OBSERVATION: Operator questioned if RCIC Turbine Governing Valve valve position indication represents a demand signal or actual position? Switch in question is E51-F059. PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT l RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: l A. Recommended Correction:
-Review all GEMAC controllers in Control Room. Ensure all scales are labeled (abbreviate as appropriate) -output signal, -setpoint,
-deviation from setpoint. Also ensure that scales are in engineering units. Address problem of labeling pushbutton's labeling wearing off. Clearly identify all DEMAND (vs System Status) indications.
B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): 1 STATUS: i CLOSURE: I l l _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - -
i HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
~HED NO.: 644 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: NONE SYSTEM: G5100 REYWORD: JUMPER SWITCH, KEYLOCK DESCRIPTION: NO KEYLOCK-DEFEAT HI TORUS.WTR LVL XFER LOGIC OBSERVATION:
PSTG requires operator _to " Defeat high Torus water level suction transfer _ logic." No switch exists. Must use jumper wires. PRIORITY: I l RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION j l RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A' . Recommended Correction: Install a key lock switch in the control room with an annunciator to provide an alert to the operator. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): Provide jumper capability. Provide operator training and document j same. Provide adequate labeling. Evaluate level of lighting in j vicinity of jumper and upgrade as applicable. STATUS: Action Item 2 NE-NS-87-0156 n CLOSURE: ! l 1; i 1 1 1
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 645 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: T2300 KEYWORD: RECORDER DESCRIPTION: TORUS WATER AVERAGE TEMPERATURE OBSERVATION: No average torus water temperatue available. Operator must calculate based on multi-input. (Meter T23-R800) ____----__ _-_____ __a..._____--__ ---__--______--_______-___-___-______-_ PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Provide averaging capability. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): Use ERIS calculation for interim fix. STATUS: Issue PDC 1762 CLOSURE: l l l l l l 1
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 i HED NO.: 646 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: E1100 KEYWORD: METER STATION DESCRIPTION: RHR CROSS-TIE FLOW INDICATION i OBSERVATION: Parennt of crosstle-flow indication is needed by operator when containment flood is required. No indication is available. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction:
- 1. No corrections desired.
B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team Review 4/15/87
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 647 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P816 SYSTEM: D2100 KEYWORD: RECORDER DESCRIPTION: AREA RAD MON RECORDER l OBSERVATION: PSTG requires operator to determine if RB radiation levels are within normal range. Range multipliers need to be added to cover full range desired. Legend obscures scale. Units not shown. Points are hard to read. Range insufficient. The recorders in question are D21-R600, -R601 and -R602. PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction:
- 1. Replace with recorder similar to T47-R803A (D/W cooling) with log-scale.
B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Item 4 NE-NS-87-0157 CLOSURE: m L______. .__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ ._ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ __
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
- HED NO.: '648- ' SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION .REV NO.:- 1 PAGE 1
- PANEL: Hil-P808' SYSTEM: P5000 LPANEL: H11-P817. SYSTEM: P5000'
- KEYWORD:: SWITCH, KEYLOCK
-DESCRIPTION:.KEYLOCK SWITCH
' OBSERVATION:
PSTG requires operator.to Bypass' Pneumatic. System Iso. Interlock. Knylock label reads on/off, should be Normal / Bypass. Label reads
" Isolation Bypass" - not clearly defined.
PEIORITY: 'N/A RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT
. RECOMMENDED CORRECTION-PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: Replace label. B. lImmediate Compensatory Actions or' Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: 1 l 1
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED'NO.: 649 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: NONE SYSTEM: B2100 KEYWORD: JUMPER SWITCH, KEYLOCK DESCRIPTION: NO SWITCH TO BYPASS MSIV LO RPV LVL ISOLATION OBSERVATION: PSTG requires operator to " Bypass low RPV water level MSIV Isolation interlock." No bypass switch in the control room. PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Install a key lock switch in the control room with an annunciator to l provide an alert to the operator. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): Provide jumper capability. Provide operator training and document same. Provide adequate labeling. Evaluate level of lighting in vicinity of jumper and upgrade as applicable. STATUS: Action Item 2 NE-NS-87-0156 CLOSURE:
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 651 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P806 SYSTEM: N6200 KEYWORD: INDICATING LIGHT DESCRIPTION: SJAE VALVE INDICATION OBSERVATION: PSTG requires operator to " confirm open SJAE steam supply pressure control valves." There is no valve position indication in the control room. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None required. Primary information required by operator is the pressure available to the SJAE System, which is available by pressure indicator downstream of the valve. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team review 4/10/87
1 I HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 652 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: None SYSTEM: B2100 KEYWORD: VALVE, LOCKED DESCRIPTION: LOCAL MANUAL VALVE POSITION INDICATION OBSERVATION: B21-F020 is a manual valve with no position indication in the control room. PSTG requires " confirm opened outboard drainline header valve." PRIORITY: IV DISSENT: JLS: An ind. of vlv position may be needed on the control boards. There was an indication available earlier, but it is not clear that it was appropriate. RESOLUTION: PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Recommend to lock this valve open. (Change " locked valve guideline" B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE:
r%
?
1-\ Y,)\ 4. t
, -- e e
)
I N I .
. \,I l,
' I I/
v i
.).>
i,. ) s- .
\,
9 e f ' d
/
',4 a
. s '
- g
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 655 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIffVERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE PANEL: None SYSTEM: E1100 KEYWORD: INDICATING LIGHT DESCRIPTION: NO INDICATION OF RHR SDC INTERLOCK CLEARING OBSERVATION: There is no available indication in the control room. PSTG requires operator to determine if "RHR Shutdown Cooling Interlocks are clear."
------------_---_--- . _----_------------__----------------__-_--------e PRIORITY: IV --_-_____--_--m PESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: None decired. Multiple information available e.g. Group 4 isolatior indicating light, multiple annunciators for low water level and reactor pressure, etc. B. Immediate Con;..ensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I) : STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team review 4/16/87
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 f 1
, HED'NO.: 656 SOURCE: TASK' ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 l PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: C1100 KEYWORD: . INDICATION, CRD i ----------------_.--------------------------------------------------------
- DESCRIPTION: FULL CORE DISPLAY OBSERVATION:
Control ~ rod, position is' presently verified one of three ways. There is na annunciator or light for all rods. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: No action recommended. i' B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed i CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team review 4/15/87 l l j l. 4
i-i
' HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
;HED NO.: 657' SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE~1
.----------_-----------------------------...-------------------------------e PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: B2100 KEYWORD: SWITCH, INTERLOCK, KEYLOCK
-----------------------------------------_------.-------------------------c DESCRIPTION: ADS /SLC INTERLOCK OBSERVATION:
ADS override is not available-(except for reset of.each 105 second timer). PRIORITY: 1 RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Install an interlock toLdefeat ADS auto initiation on SLC
-initiation. This interlock should seal-in and a key lock reset-switch should be provided.
B. Immediate Compensatory _ Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): Clearly. label the wires which must be' lifted to defeat ADS during performance of the EOP. These' wires are located in the relay room. Provide a screwdriver mounted in the panel to ensure availability when'needed. STATUS: CLOSURE: 1 1 1
l HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 658 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: C7100 KEYWORD: LABEL ; DESCRIPTION: DISABLE RPS (F'TLL FUSE) OBSERVATION: A. Key located in tagging center in Turbine Bldg., 3rd Floor. The panel is in relay rcum 2nd Floor Auxiliary Bldg. B. Fuse label in relay room could cause confusion. Operators suggest . possibility redo circuitry with backup scram pushbuttons to open circuit as fuses. PRIORITY: I l RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION J l RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: l A. Recommended Correction: Conceptual design study required. Clearly label the specific fuses. Provide fuse pullers. Evaluate moving the terminal blocks to an easily located area or performance of this task. Evaluate proper lighting, etc. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): Provide labeling directly adjacent to terminal block, giving fuse position and fuse number (including system #). Label terminal blocks more clearly. Provide fuse pullers in the panel. Provide operator training in the interim and document the same. STATUS: Action item 7 NE-NS 87-0156 i CLOSURE: l
-_ _ _ __ _ - _ - _ _ _ _______._________m_
' HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
'1 1
HED NO.: 659 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: None. SYSTEM: C1100 j l KEYWORD: VALVE, INDICATION j 1
------______--____----______-__________-_-_._____--__________-_-__--___--4 DESCRIPTION: CRDH LOCAL-MANUAL VALVE l l
OBSERVATION. ) Valves C11-F095 & F008 are manually operated valves (Reactor Bldg) with ! no valve position indication available in the control room. ___-_-_________________________-____________________-__- ________--____-0 PRIORITY: IV _--____--_____-________--____--______----______-_--___--________-___-___d RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: No correction required.
'I B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): y STATUS: Closed I i
1 CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team review 4/14/87
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERM7 2 HED NO.: 661 SOUR < TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: C1100 KEYWORD: NONE DESCRIPTION: SDV LEVEL INDICATION OBSERVATION: Thsro is no direct reading of level available in the control room, only annunciator. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team Review 4/14/87 l
\
I 1
h HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY'- FERMI 2 REV NO.: l' PAGE l'
. ~
HED NO.: 662' SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION
------------------------------...-----------------------------------------4 SYSTEM: C1100 PANEL: None.
KEYWORD:.NONE
.---------.-------------------_---------------------_---------------------e DESCRIPTION: CRDH LOCAL MANUAL VALVE.
OBSERVATi'ON: Information is not available in the control room.
' PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION i . RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: i No correction required.. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed' I CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team review 4/15/87 i l s 1
f HUMAN: ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 . HED NO.: 663 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV.NO.: 1 PAGE 1-L PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: C1100 o l KEYWORD:. INDICATING LIGHT DESCRIPTION: SDV VENT.& DRAIN.VLAVES STATUS INDICATION OBSERVATION: Two ceram discharge vol. vent valves are indicated'on one lamp.
' PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED _ CORRECTION PLAN:
LA . . Recommended Correction: No r.'orrection required. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority.I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team. review 4/15/87 o t i l 1 l 1 I l j
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 EED'NO.: 6G4 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: None SYSTEM: C1100 KEYWORD: CRD DESCRIPTION:'CRD INDIVIDUAL SWITCH PANEL LOCATION OBSERVATION: Individual rod scram switch is located in the auxiliary room.
------------- ----------------------------------------------------------9 PRIORITY: IV ,
_-___-------_-_---_---_-_-___------_----_-----_--_-------_--------------q RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION l l RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: < A. Recommended Correction: l No corrections needed. 8 B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
. STATUS: Closed i
CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team review 4/15/87
1 HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 l HED NO.: 666 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV No.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: HIl-P808 SYSTEM: T4100 ; PANEL: H11-P817 SYSTEM: T4100 KEYWORD: LABEL DESCRIPTION: LABLEING OBSERVATION: Label does not conform to standards. Label for "Switchgear Room cooling Units" (T41-B002,3,4,5) needs PIS number. PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Replace label and include PIS number. Labels a.3 for T41-Boo 2, 3, 4
& S.
B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: i b l l 3 l 1 I
HUMAN' ENGINEERING' DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 ~HED NO.: 667 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE il __--___________-__________--__________________--__---___-____-,_________4 PANEL: H11-P808 SYSTEM: T4600 KEYWORD: LABEL _-_________________________________________________________-___-_________9 ' DESCRIPTION: LABELING OBSERVATION: Label does not conform to standards. Change-labels to " Fan Cool 1",-2,-3,-4. PRIORITY: N/A ___________-____________________________________________________________q j RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT ! l RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: -A. Recommended Correction: Replace labels. Change labels to " Fan Cool 1", " Fan Cool 2", Fan )' Cool 3" and " Fan Cool 4". B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): 1 STATUS: ) CLOSURE: I s i
t-HUMAN' ENGINEERING' DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 668 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: E2100 PANEL: H11-P602 -SYCTEM: E2100 KEYWORD: LABEL l DESCRI.WION: LABELING
' OBSERVATION: 'Ltbal does not conform to standards. Label for " Core Spray Test Line-Valves" (E21-F015A and B) needs PIS number.
PRIORITY: N/A
' RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT .
)
RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. ' Recommended Correction: Replace label and include PIS number. Labels are for E21-F015A & B. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): i
~
STATUS: j CLOSURE: 1 i I l i i 4 l l l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 l l HEDLNO.: .669 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV 1L 1l i l _________________________________________________________'NO.:___ ______( l PANEL: H11-P601- SYSTEM: E2100 1
-)
' PANEL:'H11-P602 SYSTEM: E2100 KEYWORD: LABEL 1
________________________________________________________________________o DESCRIPTION: LABELING
/
OBSERVATION: j Label does not conform to standards. Label for " Core Spray Suction Line j Valves" (E21-F036A & B) needs PIS number. ________________________________________________________________________q PRIORITY:'N/A ________________________________________________________________________q
]
I RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT ) RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A .. Recommended Correction: ; Replace label, include PIS number. Labels are for E21-F036A &.B. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority .I): 1 STATUS: ! CLOSURE:
r HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 1
.HED NO.:. 670- SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION. REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: E2100 PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: E2100 EEYWORD: LABEL DESCRIPTION: LABELING OBSERVATION:
Label does not conform to standards. Label for "Outbd Core Spray j Isolation Vlvs" (E21-F004A & B) needs PIS number. l _____________________________________________________________n____________ \ PRIORITY: N/A I RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction:
,Reolace label, include PIS number. Labels are for E21-f004 A & B. j 1
B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: ,
-l ;
1 l l I l
1 HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 1 l A ] HED NO.:- 671 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION ~ REV NO.: 1 PAGE li PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: E1100 PANEL: H11-602 SYSTEM: E1100 , i
. KEYWORD: LABEL I
o --------------_-----_-----_---------------_-----------_---_-------------w DESCRIPTION: LABELING 1 OBSERVATION: Label does not' conform to' standards. , Label for "Supp Pool Suction Valves" (E11-F004A,-B,-C, and -D).needs PIS number, j I
------------------------------------------------------------------------g
= PRIORITY: N/A )
------------------------------------------------------------------------J
. RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT -
RECOMMENDED ~ CORRECTION PLAN: Recommended Correction: l JL. Replace' label, include PIS number. Labels are For E11-f004A to D. B.- Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): LSTATUS: 1 CLOSURE: , j i l l
n HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
. . . j HED NO.:
672: SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION- REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1
. PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: E1100 PANEL: H11-P602- SYSTEMt E1100.
KEYWORD: LABEL DESCRIPTION: LABELING OBSERVATION:
'Labal does'not conform to standards. Label for "LPCI'Outbd Isolation
-. Valves" (E11-F017A and : B) needs PIS number.
PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
'A. Recommended Correction:
, Replace label. Add-PIS. number. Labels are for E11-F017A & B.
B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS:
~ CLOSURE:
1 i 1 1 l l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 673 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1;
-------------------------------------------------------------------------e PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: E1100 KEYWORD: LABEL DESCRIPTION: LABELING OBSERVATION:
Label does not conform to standards. Label for "LPCI Inbd Isolation Valves" (E11-F015A and B) needs PIS number.
------------------------------------------------------------------------i PRIORITY: N/A
------------------------------------------------------------------------g RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT l l
RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: i A. Recommended Correction: Replace label, include PIS number. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: i CLOSURE: 1 l l
i i HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 j 1
'HED NO.: 674 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION. REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 .____ _____________________________________________________________________ j PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: E1100 I l
i PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: E1100 KEYWORD: LABEL DESCRIPTION: LABELING
' OBSERVATION:
Label does not conform to standards. Label for "RHR Supp Chamber Spray Velves" (E11-F028A &'B) needs PIS number.
-PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED-CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: l Replace' label, include PIS number. Labels are for E11-F028 A & B. .B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: I l
- _ - _ _ ~
l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 ) HED NO.: 675 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: E1100 PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: E1100 KEYWORD: LABEL DESCRIPTION: LABELING OBSERVATION: Label does not conform to standards. Label for "RHR HX Inles Valves"
'(E11-F047 A & B needs PIS number).
PRIORITY: N/A
-----------------------------------------------------------------------n RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: Replace label, include PIS number. Labels are for E11-F047 A & B. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: 1 1
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 l i HED-NO.: 676 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANBL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: E1100 l l KEYWORD: LABEL DESCRIPTION: LABELING OBSERVATION: Lab 31 does not conform to standards. Label for "RHR Crosstie" (E11-F010) needs PIS number. PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Replace label, include PIS number. Labels are for Ell-F010 B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: 1 l I l i I i
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 677 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE _______________________________________________________________________m PANEL: H11-P804 SYSTEM: N1100 KEYWORD: LABEL _______________________________________________________________________c DESCRIPTION: LABELING OBSERVATION: Label does not conform to standards. Label for " Main Turbine Bypass Valve" (N11-F059) needs the valve number. _______________________________________________________________________c PRIORITY: N/A _______________________________________________________________________c RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Replace label, include PIS number. Label is for N11-F059. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: 1
b HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2-1
' HED NO. :: 678 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: PAGE 1 i
. PANEL: H11-P804 SYSTEM: N3000 i
KEYWORD: LABEL l DESCRIPTION: LABELING OBSERVATION: Label does-not conform to standards.- Add " ABS" to meter scale label. j PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended' Correction: l Change meter face to " PSIA". Label is for N30-R823. D. .Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority.I): L STATUS: 1 CLOSURE: l i i I i
)
I l l l l
y.,- 1 l. HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
'l
' HED NO.: '679 SOURCE:. TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION 'REV NO.: 1- PAGE l'
___________.__________________________________________________________q PANEL::H11-P805 SYSTEM: C3200 KEYWORD: LABEL DESCRIPTION: LABELING l OBSERVATI'ON:
' Label does not conform'to sandards.
. Label'" Post Scram FW Control
-Iogic". cLabel not consistent between control and indication. Also-see HEO number 0680.-
l PRIORITY: N/ RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Label is. unambiguous in its association with control'and indicatin. No action' required. See also HED 0455.
. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
1 1 STATUS: ~ Closed CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team review 4/10/87
.q 1
1 1 i L.L-.L____.___-2_--___---.______-_._.______.____.-_-____ _ _ . . - . _ - - . _ . - .
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 680 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: Hil-P805 SYSTEM: C3200 KEYWORD: LABEL DESCRIPTION: LABELING i OBSERVATION: i Labsl does not conform to standards. Label " level Setdown Logic". Label is not mounted per plant convention. See also HEo 0679. ____m_____________________________________________________________________ ; PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: , A. Recommended Correction: Label is unambiguous in its association with control and indication. No action required. See also HED 0455. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED No.: 681 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P805 SYSTEM: N1100 KEYWORD: LABEL DESCRIPTION: LABELING OBSERVATION: Label does not conform to standards. Label for "RFPT Stop Valves" (N11-F001 A & B) needs PIS number. PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRE'CTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Replace label. Include PIS number. Label is for N11-F001. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE:
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 682 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 EFLNEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: G3300 KEYWORD: LABEL DESCRIPTION: LABELING OBSERVATION: Labal does not conform to standards. Aad system "G33-F100" to Label. L PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Replace label. Add system "G33-F100" to label. Label is for G33-F100. l'
.B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
STATUS: CLOSURE: 3 1 l I 1 l
1-HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 3 i HED NO.: 683 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 l PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: G3300 KEYWORD: LABEL _____________________________________________._________________________e DESCRIPTION: LABELING OBSERVATION: , Label does not conform to standards. Add syste m "G33-F106" to label. l 1 _______________-_____________________________...._________________________\ PRIORITY: N/A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . .' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ m. RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Replace label. Add "G33-F106" to label. Label is for G33-F106. B. 'Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: i l 1 1
i f HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 684 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: G3300 KEYUORD: LABEL l, DESCRIPTION: LABELING OBSERVATION: Label does not conform to standards. Add system "G33-F102" to lebel. i PRIORITY: .N/A RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Replace label. Add "G33-F102" to label. Label is for G33-F102. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: o
1 l l HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 i HED NO.: 685 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------e PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: G3300 KEYWORD: LABEL DESCRIPTION LABELING OBSERVATION:
Label does not conform to standards. Add system "G33-F004" to label. i
---------------------..--------------------------------------------------l PRIORITY: N/A ~ ~ ~
l kbbb'bT$bN L NC NT ] RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: i Replace label. Add System "G33-F104" to label. Label is for l G33-F104. ] i B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): ! STATUS: CLOSURE: 1 I
I HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 1 HED NO.: 686 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 1
1 PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: G3300 ;
l KEYWORD: LABEL DESCRIPTION: LABELING 1 OBSERVATION: Label does not conform to standards. Add system "G33-F119" to label. PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Replace label. Add "G33-F119" to label. Label is for G33-F119. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE:
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 687. SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION -REV NO.: 1 PAGE.1 _______ _ ____ ..._______________,,.__________________ ______________ c PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: G3300
- KEYWORD:' LABEL .
. _______-___ .______________________ ..___________________..__________.__y DESCRIPTION: LABELING OBSERVATION:
Label does not conform to standards. "RWCU Pump" label not clear. -(2-pumps and 2 switches) _____________________________________________________________________l PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT ~ RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: , A. Recommended Correction: Change labels to read: " North RWCU Pump G33-C001A" and " South RWCU Pump G33-C001B" B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix'(For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE:
)
)
l l i I
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 688 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: Hil-P602 SYSTEM: G3300 KEYWORD: LABEL DESCRIPTION: LABELING OBSERVATION: Label does not conform to standards. Add system "G33-F033" to label. PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Replace label. Add "G33-F033" to label. Label is for G33-F033. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE:
)
1 1 I
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 689 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: G3300 KEYWORD: LABEL j l DESCRIPTION: LABELING I OBSERVATION: l Label does not conform to standards. Add "G33-F042" to the label. l
----------------_---------------------------------------------- >--------I PRIORITY: N/A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------i RESOIUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: Replace label. Add "G33-F042" to label. Label is for G33-F042. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): j STATUS: CLOSURE:
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 690 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: U11-P602 SYSTEM: G3300 4 l l KEYWORD: LABEL DESCRIPTION: LABELING l OBSERVATION: Label does not conform to standards. Add "G33-F034" to the label. , i 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- l PRIORITY: N/A l RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: Replace label. Add "G33-F034" to label. Label is for G33-F034. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): 1 STATUS: CLOSURE:
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 691 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: G33 KEYWORD: LABEL DESCRIPTION: LABELING OBSERVATION: Label does not conform to stnadards. Add "G33-F034" to the label. PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Replace label. Add "G33-F034" to label. Label is for G33-F034. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE:
HUMAN ENGINEE. RING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: -692 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: G33 KEYWORD: LABEL DESCRIPTION: LABELING OBSERVATION: Labol does not conform to standards. Add "G33-F035" to the label. PRIORITY: N/A
--_-___ _---__---___ _-_- --__ ____--------_____---___-----------_-__----- l RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT l
RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Replace label. Add "G33-F035" to label. Label is for G33-F035. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: I i l l I
i
' HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY -FERMI 3 l 1
l HED NO.: 693 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION: REV NO.: 1 PAGE l j PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: E11 PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: Ell 1 KEYWORD: LABEL
------------------------------------------------------------------------e DESCRIPTION: LABELING OBSERVATION:
Label does not conform to standards. Add system " Ell " to each label E11-F004A,-B,-C, and -D.
----------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 PRIORITY: N/A- _--____---------q I
' RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: )
A. : Recommended Correction: Replace labels. Add " Ell " to each label. Labels are for E11-f004A. to D Inc. B.- Immediate Compensatory Actions or. Interim Fix (For Priority I): 1 STATUS: CLOSURE:
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 1 i l HED NO.: 694 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 ________________ _________________________ _______________________________ q PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: E11 i I PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: E11 i KEYWORD: LABEL d DESCRIPTION: LABELING l OBSERVATION: Label does not conform to standards. Add system " Ell " to each label E11-F015A and B. PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: l Replace labels. Add " Ell " to each label. Labels are for E11-F015A ,
& B.
B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE:
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: B31 KEYWORD: LABEL DESCRIPTION: LABELING OBSERVATION: Label does not conform to standards. Label "B31-P621". Add "-A" and
"-B" to each label. Example: "B21-P621A".
______.._______________ _________________________ . ___.. ________________= PRIORITY: N/A ___________________________________________________________________= RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Replace labels. Add "A" and B" as applicable. Labels are for B31-R621 A & B. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: l t l l l l l l l
l l HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 696 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: B31 KEYWORD: LABEL DESCRIPTION: LABELING OBSERVATION:
"Open-Close" labels on Recirc MG Set Speed controllers B21-R621 A and B is engraved directly on pushbuttons. 1 PRIORITY:
DISSENT: N/A RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Add an "Open-Close" label below the pushbuttons on these controllers , (B31-R621 A & B) . This is generic. ! B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: s
i i HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 697 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 3
----_--_ -----------------------_--------------------_ ------------------y PANEL: H11-P808 SYSTEM: T46 KEYWORD: LABEL DESCRIPTION: LABELING OBSERVATION:
Label does not conform to standards. Label shown as "S' Chamber Purge Isolation". Should be corrected as "SGTS Supp Chamber EXh air Purge T46-F401". ]
------------------------------------------------------------------------f PRIORITY: N/A 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------4 RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: Replace label. Should read "SGTS Supp Chamber Exh Air Purge 1 T46-F401" vs present abbreviation. Label is for T46-F401.- l B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): 1 1 STATUS: CLOSURE:
)
i l 1 1 3 4 l 1 I 1_________.______ l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 698 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P805 SYSTEM: N20 KEYWORD: LABEL 1 DESCRIPTION: LABELING i OBSERVATION: I Label does not conform to standards. PIS number is missing. l PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT l RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Replace labels. Add PIS number. Labels are for 3 switches in panel H11-P805. The switches are shown on the arrangement drawing 6I721-2002-1 as 5B220, 5A207 and 5A267. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: s
- HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 i 'HED NO.: _ 699 ' SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 '.PAGE 1
__-------_---_--____--_----__-----_-_----_--_-------------__---_---_----_q PANEL: H11-P817 SYSTEM: T46 j KEYWORD: LABEL DESCRIPTION: LABELING 1 OBSERVATION
- i Label does not conform to standards. Revise the "6" in T46 so as to distinguish it from the "8" in T48.
1 _------_---_----__---------_----_-_---------_-_ -------------_--_------ 5 PRIORITY: N/A { RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. -Recommended Correction: Replace labels with' numerals that are clearly distinguishable and that conform.to NUREG 0700 guidelines. This is generic to all i labels in control room.~ l Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): o B. STATUS: CIOSURE: 1
-_ --.____m.______ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 700 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: T23 KEYWORD: RECORDER DESCRIPTION: RECORDER SCALE BANDING OBSERVATION: The recorder T23-R800 requires a scale banding at greater than 95 degrees F to verify Torus water temperature. FF.IORITY: II RESOLUTION : MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Band this recorder. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE:
1 l l HUMAM ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 l i
'l l
i i HED No.: 701 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1( _________________________________________________________________________q PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: T50 KEYWORD: RECORDER _________________________________________________________________________3 ' DESCRIPTION: RECORDER SCALE BANDING OBSERVATION: ! Recorders T50-R800 A & B require a scale banding at greater than 95 degrees F to verify Torus water temperature. ________________________________________________________________________i PRIORITY: IV ________________________________________________________________________q RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: ' No action recommended. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: l I CLOSURE: i
HUMAN ENGINEERING. DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.:- 702 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P808 SYSTEM: T47 PANEL: H11-P817 SYSTEM: T47 KEYWORD: RECORDER DESCRIPTION: RECORDER SCALE BANDING OBSERVATION: Racorders T47-R803A & B require scale banding at greater than 135 Dzgrees F to verify drywell. average temperature. FRIORITY: i RESOLITTION: MODIFICATION 1 RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended-Correction: Band these' recorders. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: l CLOSURE: l l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2-HED'NO.: 703 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE l' _________________________________________________________________________c PANEL: H11-P808 SYSTEM: T50 q i PANEL: H11-P817 SYSTEM: TSO 1 1
)
KEYWORD: RECORDER DESCRIPTION: RECORDER SCALE BANDING OBSERVATION: Recorders T50-R806A & B require scale banding at greater than 2% to l Verify the Primary Containment hydrogen concentration greater than 2%. ________________________________________________________________________e PRIORITY: II ____________________________________ __________________________________q RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION 1 RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: J A. Recommended Correction: 1 Band these recorders. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: , 1 l CLOSURE: j
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 704 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: TSO PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: TSO KEYWORD: RECORDER DESCRIPTION: RECORDER SCALE BANDING OBSERVATION: Rscorders T50-R802A B require scale banding at less than 1.68 PSIG to datormine Torus pressure. PRIORITY: II RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Band thsese recorders. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: I j i i l
)
I
l ( HUMAM ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 i HED NO.: 705 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1!
-------------------------------- ................------------------------y PANEL: H11-P807 SYSTEM: T50 !
1 l l PANEL: H11-P817 SYSTEM: TSO KEYWORD: RECORDER
----_----__---_-------_... _---___-_............ -_ -----_-_.....-------q DESCRIPTION: RECORDER SCALE BANDING ]
l I I l OBSERVATION: ) l Recorders TSO-R806A & B require scale banding for the hydrogen l l concentration scale. To determine Drywell hydrogen concentration, i l PRIORITY: II RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Band these recorders. l l B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE:
r HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 l
)
HED NO.: 706 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 ) PANEL: H11-602 SYSTEM: E41 KEYWORD: INDICATOR DESCRIPTION: INDICATOR SCALE BANDING OBSERVATION: Meter E41-R700 requires scale banding at less than 2100 RPM. This is to determine the HPCI Turbine speed. PRIORITY: II RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: l A. Recommended Correction: Band this indicator. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE:
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 3 HED NO.: 707 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1. PANEL: H11-808 SYSTEM: T46 PANEL: H11-817 SYSTEM: T46 KEYWORD: RECORDER
-------------------------------_----------------------------------------a DESCRIPTION: RECORDER SCALE BANDING OBSERVATION:
Recorders T46-R800A & B requres scale banding. Range is now 0-500 CFM. Band at the operating range. This is to verify the flow rate.
--------------------------------------------------------------.---------u PRIORITY: II !
------------------------------------------------------------------------9 RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: Band these recorders. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: i CLOSURE: i I l j l s l . l [ l I
J NUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 ; l i i HED NO.: 708 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 , PANEL:'H11-P603 SYSTEM: C32 1 KEYWORD: RECORDER 1 i, DESCRIPTION: RECORDER SCALE BANDING OBSERVATION: Rscorder C32-R607 requires scale banding at the maximum flow rate of the Condensate System injection flow.. PRIORITY: II RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Band this recorder.
'B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
STATUS: CLOSURE: 1
'I i
{
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
)
HED NO.: 709 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1] PANEL: H11-P601-P602 SYSTEM: E11 . J KEYWORD: RECORDER ________-_______________________________________________-________________( DESCRIPTION: RECORDER SCALE BANDING l OBSERVATION: Recorders E11-R608A & B require scale banding at the maximum flow rate. l This is to verify LPCI system injection flow at maximum rate.
... _-_____________...___._. .__. ____-____...-________ ____--___...-___e l
PRIORITY: IV _____7 ' RESOLUTION : RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: l A. Recommended Correction: None required. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): . l l STATUS: Closed j CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team review 4/10/87 l l
7 HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY -' FERMI'2 HED.NO.: 711'. SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: _B21,B21
-KEYWORD: INDICATOR DESCRIPTION: INDICATOR SCALE BANDING
- OBSERVATION:
Mstars E11-R603A & B require scale-banding at.the maximum. flow rate. This is to verify LPCI System injection flow at maximum rate.
' PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION- .
RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: i
'A. Recommended Correction:
No action recommended. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix.(For Priority'I): STATUS: Closed
. CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team Review 4/7/87 I
1 1 1 1
)
)
HUMAN ENGINEERING' DISCREPANCY - FERMI 3 HED NO.: 711 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE E _________________________________________________ ______________________e PANEL: H11-P601- SYSTEM: B21 PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: B21] KEYWORD: RECORDER
)
DESCRIPTION: RECORDER SCALE BANDING ] OBSERVATION: Recorders B21-R623A.& B require scale banding at less'than 31.8 inches. i
'Thisis to verify that the RPV water level is below 31.8 inches.. 1 4
_______________________________________________________________________<.c PRIORITY: II i ____________________________________________________________________,___J RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: If appropriate,. band these recorders. (This is somewhat questionable and requires overview at time of banding implementation B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority-I): i STATUS: I I i CLOSURE: l J
-l i
~ HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 PAGE 1 HED NO.: :712 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: .
PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: B21 KEYWORD: RECORDER DESCRIPTION: RECORDER SCALE BANDING OBSERVATION: Rsvorder B21-R615 requires scale bar. ding at less than 31.8 inches. This is to verify that the RPV water level is below 31.6 inches. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION i RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: No action required. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team review 4/7/87 L i l 4 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ U
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 i l l l HED NO.: 713 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1j PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: B21 PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: B21 KEYWORD: INDICATOR , 1 DESCRIPTION: INDICATOR SCALE BANDING ! OBSERVATION: Meters B21-R604A & B require scale banding at less than 31.8 inches. This is to verify that the RPV water level is below 31.8 inches. ] PRIORITY: IV l ______-______-_____-___---____________-___--____------_--___-___-___-___4 RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION ! RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: No action required. l B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): l 1 STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team Review 4/7/87
l I I HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2~ l l
'HED NO.: 714 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: B21
- KEYWORD: INDICATOR' L i
------------------------------..----------------------------------------u-DESCRIPTION: INDICATOR SCALE BANDING-OBSERVATION:
Mster B21-R610 requires scale banding at less than 31.8_ inches. This is to verify that the RPV water level is below 31.8 inches. PRIORITY: IV l 1 RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION j RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: j Recommended Correction: A. No action required. l B. Irmediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed ! CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team Review 4/7/87 3 l
. e HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED.NO.: 715- SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION- .REV NO.: 1 PAGEc11 PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: E41 i i
KEYWORD: INDICATOR
.l DESCRIPTION: INDICATOR SCALE BANDING OBSERVATION: l Meter E41-R613: requires scale banding in the: operating range. This'is l to determine if HPCI is operating.by determining if HPCI injection flow j '
rate is in the' operating range.
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------b PRIORITY: II RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction:
' Band.this indicator.
B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: I; i i i
)
a 1
.. . ... .. .. .. . .. . . . . . . . .. ..........s
l 1 i i 1 HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 i I I l i 1 HED NO.: 716 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 j PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: C11 KEYWORD: INDICATOR l
)
DESCRIPTION: INDICATOR SCALE BANDING l OBSERVATION: ' Mater C12-R605 requires scale banding in the operating range. This is ' to datermine if CRD is operating by observing if CRD cooling flow rate is in the operating range. i i PRIORITY: II RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Band this indicator. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: 4 i . 3 j
)
\
h l l \ l l l I
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 I i l HED NO.: 717 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE lj _________________________________________________________________________q PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: C32 KEYWORD: RECORDER DESCRIPTION: RECORDER SCALE BANDING OBSERVATION: Recorder C32-R614 requires scale banding at less than 171.9 inches. l This is to confirm that the RPV water level is below 171.9 inches. i ________________________________________________________________________q PRIORITY: II I ____________________.___________.__________________-_-__----------------y RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION ; i RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: ) A. Recommended Correction: Band this recorder. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): , 1 i i STATUS: l 1 CLOSURE: l l l 1 l l 1
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 718 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: C32 PANEL: H11-P602- SYSTEM: C32 KEYWORD: INDICATOR
-DESCRIPTION: INDICATOR SCALE BANDING OBSERVATION:
Msters C32-R606A,B, & C require scale banding.
-~~--------------_-_---------_------------------_-------------------------
PhiORITY: II y RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION 1 l RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: l A. Recommended Correction: Band these indicators.
'B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
STATUS: l l CLOSURE: l l l l J l l I i l l l l l
i
'I HUMAN-ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 .
i HED NO.: 719 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE R ________________________________________________________________________e PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: C32-KEYWORD: RECORDER ________________________________________________________________________q DESCRIPTION: RECORDER SCALE BANDING ! l OBSERVATION: Recorder C32-R609 requires scale banding at more than 1088 PSIG. This is for RPV pressure guidelines. PRIORITY: II RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION. l RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: L A. Recommended Correction: 1 Band this recorder. - l l B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): l l STATUS: CLOSURE: m .
u HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI-2 HED NO.: 720- SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 -PAGE l' j PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: C32 KEYWORD: INDICATOR l l DESCRIPTION: INDICATOR SCALE BANDING . OBSERVATION: Mctors C32-R605A & B require scale banding at more than 1088 PSIG. This is'for RPV pressure guidelines. PRIORITY: II RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Band these indicators. B. .Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE:
\
I I
i HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 : ( HED NO.: 721 ' SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1l ________________________________________________________________________J - PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: B21 i l l KEYWORD: RECORDER l 1 a DESCRIPTION: RECORDER SCALE BANDING: OBSERVATION: Recorder B21-R623 requires scale banding at more than 1088.PSIG. This is for RPV pressure guidelines. PRIORITY: II ________________________________________________________________________3 RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Band this recorder. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: I l
/
\-
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 i HED NO.: 722 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 j PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM:.T50 PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: T40 KEYWORD: RECORDER DESCRIPTION: RECORDER SCALE BANDING OBSERVATION: ; Rscorders T50-R802A & B require scale banding at more than 1.68 PSIG. This is for the drywell pressure. PRIORITY:
' RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A.. Recommended Correction: Band these recorders. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): r STATUS: CLOSURE: l i i 1
7,---__---_ l l HUMAM ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2. . HED'NO.: 7' 23 SOURCE: TASK' ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1: PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM:-C51 l KEYWORD: RECORDER ________________________________________________________________________d DESCRIPTION: RECORDER SCALE. BANDING OBSERVATION: Recorders.C51-R603A,B,C & D require high side scale' banding to confirm neutron flux upscale. _________________________________________________________ l PRIORITY: II J RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Band these recorders. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: I I I
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 724 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 L
---____--__--_-__ ---_-_-___--___----____--_-___--___-_-___-__--___-______ f RANEL: H11-P804 SYSTEM: N11 l KEYWORD: RECORDER .
l DESCRIPTION: RECORDER SCALE BANDING OBSERVATION: Rtcorder N11-R800 for main turbine inlet low steam pressure requires low cteam pressure setpoint banding. This is required to determine if main trubine inlet low steam pressure (run mode) exists. PRIORITY: II RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Band this recorder. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: I 1
- _____ -__ - ____ A
T HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 B
.HED NO.: 725 -SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.': 1 PAGE &
________________________________________________________________________q
. PANEL: H11-P804 SYSTEM: 1N30 l
- KEYWORD: INDICATOR
.________________________________________________________________________c DESCRIPTION: INDICATOR SCALE BANDING
. OBSERVATION:
Meter N30-R823 requires banding at the low vacuum trip. This is to-
- determine if.the1 main condenser low vacuum trip.has occurred..
PRIORITY: II
- RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION-
- RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: Band this indicator. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fic (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: l i l
'i l
l l i l
- _ = _ _ . -
HUMAN' ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY'- FERMI 2 HED NO.: 726 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION IUV NO.: 1 PAGE 1-PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: C32 KEYWORD: RECORDER DESCRIPTION: RECORDER SCALE BANDING OBSERVATION: Rscorder C32-R609 requires banding at less than the RHR; interlock pressure. This is to. determine if the reactor vessel pressure is above the RHR interlock pressure.
=--------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRIORITY: II j RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION' PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Band the recorder. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: ). CLOSURE: 1 1 l
.i i
l I 1 l I
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
.HED NO.: 727 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1,
_________________________________________________________________________c PANEL:'H11-P603 SYSTEd: C32
' KEYWORD: INDICATOR DESCRIPTION: INDICATOR SCALE BANDING OBSERVATION:
Meters C32-R605A & B require banding at less than the RHR interlock pressure. This is to' determine if the reactor vessel pressure is above the RHR interlock pressure. _______________________________ ________________________________________c PRIORITY: II i ________________________________________________________________________e RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Band these indicators. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: 1
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 728 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: B21 PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: B21 KEYWORD: RECORDER DESCRIPTION:~ RECORDER SCALE BANDING i OBSERVATION: Rncorders B21-R623A & B require banding at less than the RHR interlock pressure. This is to determine if the reactor vessel pressure is above the RHR interlock pressure. PRIORITY: II RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION
' RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: Band these indicators. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: l l l l l 1 l l l l i l 1 i l l i l l l l l l l - - _ - - - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 729 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: C41 KEYWORD: INDICATOR _______________________________________________________________________ c DESCRIPTION: INDICATOR SCALE BANDING OBSERVATION: Meter C41-R600 requires banding within its operating range. This is to determine if standby liquid control system has been initiated. ________________________________________________________________________q PRIORITY: II ________________________________________________________________________9 RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION 1 RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Band this indicator. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: 1 1
.. .. ..am m_________.
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 l HED NO.: 730 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: C51 KEYWORD: INDICATOR DESCRIPTION: INDICATOR SCALE BANDING OBSERVATION: Meters C51-R602 A & B require banding within its operating range. This is to determine if standby liquid control system has been initiated. 1 PRIORITY: II RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Band these indicators. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE:
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 1 i s HED'NO.: 731 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION ; REV NO.: 1 PAGE lj PANEL: H11-P603' SYSTEM: C41 i KEYWORD: INDICATOR
.________________________________________________________________________7 DESCRIPTION: INDICATOR SCALE BANDING 1 1
1
.. OBSERVATION: .
This is to- I
~
Meter C41-R601 requries banding within its operating range. determine if standby liquid control has been initiated. j u ________________________________________________________________________J PRIORITY: II ________________________________________________________________________5 RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION f RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Band this indicator. i B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): i STATUS: CLOSURE: 1 1 I t
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 732 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: E21 PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: E21 KEYWORD: INDICATOR g , DESCRIPTION: INDICATOR SCALE BANDING OBSERVATION:
.Msters E21-R601 A & B require banding within its operating range. This in to show that the core spray rate is correct.
i PRIORITY: II l RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION l RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Band these indicators. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: i 1 l l 1 1 i
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 3 HED.NO.: 733 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGEIf _________________________________________________________________________) PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: E41-1 KEYWORD: INDICATOR !
)
DESCRIPTION: INDICATOR SCALE BANDING OBSERVATION: . :) Meter E41-R613 requires banding'to determine if-HPCI flow rate is in the operating range. ________________________________________________________________________4 PRIORITY: II i ________________________________________________________________________a 1 RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION 1 1 RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: ! A. Recommended Correction: i Band this indicator. I B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I)* i STATUS: j i l CLOSURE. - l l l t l
i:- HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY.- FERMI 2 HED NO.:- 734 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1i PAGE 1 ( PANEL: H11-P804 SYSTEM: R30 KEYWORD: INDICATOR DESCRIPTION: INDICATOR SCALE. BANDING-
. OBSERVATION:
'Mster R30-R804 requires banding to determine if the EDG generator's output voltage'is in the operating range.
PRIORITY: II RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Band this indicator. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: I i 1 1 3 i i
i HUMAN ENGINEERING ~ DISCREPANCY - FERMI ~2. J HED NO.: 735, SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1. PAGE li _________________________________________________________________________4 PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: T50 1 PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: T50 KEYWORD: RECORDER l ________________________________________________________________________e DESCRIPTION: RECORDER SCALE BANDING OBSERVATION: Recorders T50-R804 A & B require banding greater than the logic setpoint. This is to determine if: Torus water level is above IIPCI suction transfer logic setpint. ________________________________________________________________________q PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION 'l RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: No action recommended.
.B.- Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
STATUS: Closed j i CLOSURE: Per. Assessment Team review 4/7/87 ) l I J 4 1
\
I
]
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 { HED NO'.: 736 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE'1
, PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: E11 PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: E11 KEYWORD: INDICATOR DESCRIPTION: INDICATOR SCALE BANDING i
, OBSERVATION:
Maters E11-R602A & B require banding in the operating range. This is to
!- confirm RHR Nx service water's flow rate.
PRIORITY: II RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED-CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction:
' Band these indicators.
'B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
STATUS: CLOSURE: } ( l i
HUMAN' ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 3 HED NO.: 737 SOURCE:' TASK ANAL,YSIS/ VERIFICATION REV NO.:- 1 -PAGE 1 _______-______________-___-_______-_____________________-______________-a PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM:-B21
'I' PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: B21 KEYWORD: RECORDER
________________-_______________________________________________________a DESCRIPTION: RECORDER SCALE BANDING ) OBSERVATION: { Recorders B21-R623 A & B require banding in.the operating range. This j
.is to determine if RPV water is icreasing, decreasing or remaining )
stable. ] PRIORITY: I ________________________________________________________________________q RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION l 1 i RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: j A. Recommended Correction: J No action required. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): , i STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team review 4/7/87
m -. i HUMAN. ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 l 1 HED:NO.: 738- SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE-1 , __________________________________________________________________________ )
. PANEL: 1H11-P805- SYSTEM: N30' ? ' PANEL: H11-P805 SYSTEM: N30 l KEYWORD: RECORDER
__________________________________________________________________________ I DESCRIPTION: RECORDER: SCALE BANDING I OBSERVATION:. q
- Racorder N30-R824-requires-banding in the operating. range. This is to l
'datermine if the main condenser's vacuum is within the operating range. .
j 4 PRIORITY: II _____________________________________________________au_______________--,;,,, RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION ' ' '# . !' RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: , , [}L
'A. Recommended Correction: ! <
Band this recorder. 'l 3 B...ImmediateCompensatoryActionsorInterbdFix(ForPriority,I): N
\ ;l STATUS: N)
+
' CLOSURE:
* ' q' i
$1 1
4
.I ,
'k
.s
. .a o.
I f
'y
'N e
-4 ' 9, 5. , . .
_g l HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 .) HED NO.: '739 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV No.: 1 PAGE1l
------------------------------------------------------------~~---------~~e PANEL: H11-P804 SYSTEM: N30 i
KEYWORD: ., INDICATOR j i DESCP.IPTION: INDICATOR' SCALE BANDING , 1 OBSERVATION: (B Meter N30-R823 requires banding in the operating range. This is to determine if the main condenser's vacuum is within the operating range.-
'1r ------------------------------------------------------------------------e PRIORITY: II-
------------------------------------------------------------------------e
. RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION
.\
. RECOMMENDED CORPECITON PLAN:
A. S.ecommended Cc'rrection: Band this indicator.
'B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
STATUS:' TI )' CLOSURE:
- W v
\
i
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 740 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: D11 KEYWORD: RECORDER L' DESCRIPTION: RECORDER SCALE. BANDING OBSERVATION:
.R: corder D11-R600 requires banding in the normal range. This is to i datermine if the main condenser air ejector off-gas radiation levels are within normal range.
PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION ! RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: No action required. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team review 4/7/87 1 I
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED No.: 741 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE'1
' PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: D11 KEYWORD: RECORDER
------------------_-----------------------------------------------------a DESCRIPTION: RECORDER SCALE BANDING OBSERVATION:
Recorder D11-R602 requires banding in the normal range. This is to determine if the main condenser air ejector off-gas radiation levels are withing normal range.
------------. ,. .--------------------------------------------------------e PRIORITY: IV
--------------_---------------------------------------------------------e RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PIAN:
A. Recommended Correction: None required. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team review 4/7/87 k
l* HUMAN ENGINEERING' DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO : 742 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE l' PANEL: H11-P601' SYSTEM: D11 l KEYWORD: RECORDER 4 i DESCRIPTION: RECORDER SCALE BANDING OBSERVATION: Racorder D11-R601 requires banding in the normal range. This is to datarmine if the main condenser air ejector ff-gas radiation levels are within normal range. PRIORITY: IV
----_- ---------------__------------________ ---_________-__--___-_-____-- j RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
.A. Recommended Correction:
No action is required. B, Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team review 4/7/87. i
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 i i HED NO : 743 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 ____--________________-__________________________________--______________4 PANEL: H11-P602' SYSTEM: G33 KEYWORD: INDICATOR 1 DESCRIPTION: INDICATOR SCALE BANDING i OBSERVATION: Meter G33-R602 requires banding in its operating range. This is to j verify that the flow rate (blowdown) is in the operating range. { ______________________________________________________________________._J PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: No action recommended. i B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team Review 4/7/87 i I I l l l
. 4 1
( 1
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: '744 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: '1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: B31 KEYWORD: INDICATOR DESCRIPTION: INDICATOR SCALE BANDING I OBSERVATION: ! Mstors B31-R625 A & B require banding at the minimum speed. This will , dstermine the recirc flow runback has occured by observing if
. recirculation M?G set generator's speed is at minimum.
' PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
.A. Recommended Correction:
No action recommended. l B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed i CLOSURE: Per Assessment Team Review 4/7/87 t i - I l i l i i
]
a
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 745 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1! _________________________________________________________________________i PANEL: NONE SYSTEM: ALL KEYWORD: KEYS, PROCEDURE ______________________________________________________________-_________a DESCRIPTION: NEED A CONTROLLED SET OF KEYS IN CONTROL ROOM OBSERVATION: Relay room cabinet keys are stored in the Research Tagging Center (RTC) , (outside the control room envelope). ________________________________________________________________________q PRIORITY: II j ________________________________________________________________________q RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION, ! I' RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN-I A. Recommended Correction: Establish a controlled dedicated set of keys within the control room' envelope. Clearly label each cabinet lock with the require key i number and clearly number and label each key. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: 1 I l i i j 1
I HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 746 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 lPANEL: Various SYSTEM: H99 KEYWORD: METER DESCRIPTION: DECO. STANDARD 6I721-2960-1 OBSERVATION:
.Th3 following discrepancies have been noted on various Hays Republic Indicators in the control room: 1. Pointer does not extend to the ecolo markings. 2. Pointer covers numbers.
PRIORITY: II RESOLUTION: RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Revise Deco Standard 6I721-2960-1 to incorporate the guidelines from NUREG 0700. No instrument changes are required at this time unless the instrument is identified in a specific HED as requiring a' change. Any instruments replaced in the future are to be purchased to. meet the requirements of the revised Standard (and therefore NUREG 0700). B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim FiX (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: 1 l
L p HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 3 l l HED NO.: 747 SOURCE:-OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: N/A SYSTEM: N/A j a KEYWORD: TRAINING
' DESCRIPTION: INDIVIDUAL TRAINIPG NEEDS ARE NOT BEING MET l OBSERVATION: -)
When asked to comment about Operator training, Operators suggested that too much attention was given.by the instructors to the material'needed to pass the examination and not enough attention given to the training needs of the operator. Operators suggest that the emphasis is on satisfy,tng the requirements and following tha plans that have been l generated. Training may not cover all the imaortant training.needs of. the Operators. Individual needs are not being met in all cases. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION:- ALREADY CORRECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. The Fermi training program has recieved INPO Accreditation and has incorporated operator feedback. The operator requalification program has received NRC approval. Further, students are encouraged to identify problem area to the Nuclear Training Department, Currently (June, 1987) there is a job task analysis (JTA) being performed for the NSO position. These JTA findings will provide additional input to fine tune the existing INPO Accredited Programs. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/18/87 1
)
i l i
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 748 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: ALL SYSTEM: ALL KEYWORD: TRAINING, SIMULATOR DESCRIPTION: TRAINING MAY NOT COVER ALL IMPORTANT NEEDS OBSERVATION: Oparctors responded to questions concerning training by noting that training (in the Fermi Simulator) will often emphasize casualty event control and not the routine, normal operation of the plant. Training may not cover all the important training needs of the Operators. PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. The Fermi training program has recieved INPO accreditation and has incorporated operator. feedback. Routine evaluations are now part of normal requalification training. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/12/87 (NE-NS-87-0184) l l i
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 749 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE li _________________________________________________________________________q PANEL: N/A SYSTEM: N/A l KEYWORD: TRAINING DESCRIPTION: POWER PRODUCTION / DISTRIBUTION TRAINING NEEDED OBSERVATION: I Training in power production, transmission and distribution is not j sufficiently covered in Operator License Training. The majority of licensed operators come from Navy Nuclear backgrounds rather than l previous power plant experience. Lack of power plant experience may be detrimental for the plant during commercial operation. l 1 ________________________________________________________________________q PRIORITY: III l ________________________________________________________________________q RESOLUTION: TRAINING RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Nuclear operator training to develop licensed operator training lessons covering basic power transmission and distribution on the electrical grid. These new lessons should also include the fundamentals of protective relaying schemes as employed by Detroit Edison. It has been determined that present licensed operator training adequately covers the areas of power production, station electrical distribution and the electrical switchyard (13.8kV, 120kV, and 345kV). At present, there is a temporary assignment of a Shift Operating Advisor (SOA) at Fermi 2. The SOA is assigned to the control room to advise the NSS, NASS and NSD in carrying out their responsibilities. In addition to this, Fermi 2 licensed Operator Training was accredited by INPO in December, 1985 and meets-the nuclear industry standards. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Prepare a memo / meeting with Training required CLOSURE:
i HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 ? HED NO.: 750 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: ALL SYSTEM: ALL KEYWORD: TRAINING, SIMULATOR DESCRIPTION: SIMULATOR DYNAMICS DO NOT MATCH PLANT-OBSERVATION: Formi 2 Simulator response does not correspond completely to that in the plant Control Room. The Simulator does match the control room in most respects, but there are some differences that the operators see. To be offective, simulator dynamics should match the control room more closely. . 1 PRIORITY: IV
' RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: None. There is an ongoing program presently in place to correct simulator / Plant control room differences. Nuclear Operations-Training Procedure NOT 020, " Training Work Request" describes the process to. initiate simulator updating. Training Requests (Form DE 963-6398 5-84X) are coded onto a computer, ' evaluated and then a resolution is pursued. This is followed by feedback to the originator as to the progress on any simulator / plant control room deviation. There is also an' electronic casel at the simulator that serves to identify any present simulator / control room differences, 1 B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/11/87 (NE-NS-87-0184) l 1 1 i l
)
l __________________________-_________a
HUMAN ENGINEERING ~ DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 I i HED NO.: 751 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O .PAGE 1
y PANEL: ALL SYSTEM: ALL KEYWORD: TRAINING l
g)
DESCRIPTION: OPERATORS DO NOT RECEIVE TEAM TRAINING l OBSERVATION: q operators responded.to questions concerning training by noting that the ' training did not always. include the whole team that'would.be performing the operations. Operators were concerned that the shifts working in the j Control Room together were trained, but not always were the other i specialist and engineers that would be needed in support in the event of-an incident. Operators did note that some shifts had different ways of doing things that could present problems when support personnel are mixed. The concern was that under conditions of stress such as a major event, it would be helpful to have a team working together that had trained together.
------------------------------------------------------------------------g PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: None.. Shift teams now train together and team training has already been incorporated into the licensed operator requalification. (Course number 02 02) L B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/12/87 (NE-NS-87-0184)
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 752 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: 2 PAGE 1 PANEL: VARIOUS SYSTEM: VARIOUS KEYWORD: TRAINING DESCRIPTION: OPERATORS NOT TRAINED ON SEVERAL COMPUTERS l I OBSERVATION: l Tha control room has more than one computer system. Operators suggest they have not been trained on all computer systems and need to pick up op3rctions on their own. This leads to operators who do not trust a epecific computer or who is less able to use all the computer systems to the maximum. The operators suggest the problem is they have not been trained on the several computer systems completely. The fact that there are multiple systems may be part of the problem. l PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: TRAINING RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: , A. Recommended Correction: The correction required by this HED is also to address the concerns of HED 828, 829, 830, and 831. Provide Training. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: I l l l
. - e
l HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 l l HED NO.:- 753 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: 0 PAGE 1l _________________________________________________________________________q PANEL: ALL SYSTEM: ALL i KEYWORD: TRAINING l l _________________________________________________________________________q DESCRIPTION: TRAINING PROGRAM UPDATING REQUIRED l l I OBSERVATION: Training programs must be updated to correspond to job task requirements. Operators have reported that on occasions the skills thatj are trained are not skills required on the job. Part of the quality j i control check of training needs to be checking on the validity of training on an ongoing basis. ________________________________________________________________________f RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED ], RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None, There is a detailed job task analysis (JTA) that is currently (June, 1987) in progress for the Nuclear Supervising Operator (NSO). Additionally, Nuclear Operations-Training Procedure NOT 020, 4
" Training Work Request" describes the process whereby training {
program updating and modification recommend actions made by plant q personnel are initiated, evaluated, approved and implemented. ] Further, there is a plaque in each classroom encouraging each ' training session attendee to notify Nuclear Training Department Supervision of any differences between a given Training presentation! and actual plant practice. l B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): l STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/12/87 (NE-NS-87-0134)
I HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 I HED NO.: 754 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: VARIOUS SYSTEM: VARIOUS KEYWORD: ANTHROPOMETRIC (6.1.2.2) ! DESCRIPTION: PLACEMENT OF INDICATORS OUTSIDE STANDARDS OBSERVATION: Tha placement of indications on some panels is outside the Anthrompometric standards. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: No correction. The readability of these meters was inspected to determine if highly placed meters caused parallax problems with adverse effects or operator discomfort. The meters offer good ; contrast'between pointer markings and background. In addition, color coding of dual scale Foxboro meters is being provided (PDC 3515) by HED 775. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/25/87 I l l l ! l 1
-i>
i HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 755 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3-FINDING. REV NO'.: O PAGE E PANEL: H11-P808 SYSTEM: N/A PANEL: H11-P810 SYSTEM: N/A PANEL: H11-P813 SYSTEM: VARIOUS KEYWORD: ANTHROPOMETRIC (6.1.2.5)
-----_----------------------------------------_---_-_------------------_e
_ DESCRIPTION: PLACEMENT OF RECORDERS OUTSIDE STANDARDS OBSERVATION: Recorders on. panels H11-P808, H11-P810 and H11-P813 are too high and too; far;back for easy reading by 5th percentile persons. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED-RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: < None. l B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority.I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/19/87
)
I i
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 756 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: N/A SYSTEM: N/A KEYWORD: CHAIRS (6.1.2.8) DESCRIPTION: CHAIRS DO NOT HAVE ADJUSTABLE SEAT HEIGHT OBSERVATION: All of the chairs in the control room do not have adjustable seat height. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Already corrected. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed i CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/19/87 i
-----_---____--_-a
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 757 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1- _________________________________________________________________________c PANEL: H11-P805 SYSTEM: N2000,N2100,N2200,N6100 COMP / INSERT NO: N20-R803A LEGEND: EAST CUTLET OF NORTH HOTWELL TEMP N20-R803B WEST OUTLET OF SOUTH HOTWELL TEMP N21-R820 SEAL WATER RETURN TANK LEVEL N22-R800A FEEDWATER HEATER IN LEVEL N22-R800B FEEDWATER HEATER 1C LEVEL 1 N22-R800C FEEDWATER HEATER 1S LEVEL N22-R801A FEEDWATER HEATER 2N LEVEL N22+R801B FEEDWATER HEATER 2C LEVEL N22-R801C FEEDWATER HEATER 2S LEVEL N22-R802A FEEDWATER HEATER 3N LEVEL N22-R802B FEEDWATER HEATER 3S LEVEL i N22-R803A FEEDWATER HEATER 4N LEVEL j FEEDWATER HEATER 4S LEVEL N22-R803B N22-R804A FEEDWATER HEATER 5N LEVEL N22-R804B FEEDWATER HEATER SS LEVEL N22-R805A FEEDWATER HEATER 6N LEVEL , N22-RB05B FEEDWATER HEATER 6S LEVEL { N22-R806 REHEATER SEAL TANK LEVEL N22-R807A SEPARATOR SEAL TANK N LEVEL N22-R807B SEPARATOR SEAL TANK S LEVEL N61-R805 CNDR N & S WIDE RANGE LEVEL N61-R807A N COND HOTWELL NARROW RANGE LEVEL N61-R807B S COND HOTWELL NARROW RANGE LEVEL N61-R809 NORTH CONDENSER WIDE WIDE RANGE LV) KEYWORD: ILLUMINATION (6.1.5.3) j DESCRIPTION: INSUFFICIENT LIGHTING ! OBSERVATION: 3 On H11-P805 the lighting on the 'C' surface was below guideline levels ! whereas 'A' and 'B' surfaces were within the guideline range. l ________________________________________-___-______----_-_-------------a PRIORITY: III l ___________.___________________________________________________________q RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: The scales on the vertical meters should be replaced with ones offering bolder and larger markings and numerals. (N61-R807A, R807B, R809 & R805; N20-R803A & R803B, N21-R820; N22-R800A R800B R800C, R801A, R801B, R801C, R802A and R802B, R803 A, R803B, R804A, R804B, R805A, R805B, R806, R807A and B. STATUS: CLOSURE:
i HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 i HED NO.: 757 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 2 B.. Immediate' Compensatory Actions or. Interim Fix (For Priority I): i l S l
'l l
8 a
3 i i l HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 j l I HED NO.: 758 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1) _________________________________________________________________________j PANEL: H11-P805 SYSTEM: VARIOUS KEYWORD: ILLUMINATION (6.1.5.3)
] ~~ ~
-DES P POh~ Sh hD G S/B G ND i OBSERVATION: ) Under some lighting conditions the contrast between indicator light s and J background is low on panel H11-P805. (CMC switches on "B" surface; PB 1 switches on sloping "A" surface). ___________________________________________________________________~____c PRIORITY: IV ________________________________________________________________________c RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. Operators prefer to set illumination levels below maximum to avoid indicator light " washout." At illumination levels selected by operators there is no problem in distinguishing illuminated from non-illuminated indicator lights. B .. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/19/87 I 1 1 1 i i l l 1 l l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
) ~HED NO.: 759' SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P814 SYSTEM: C9100 KEYWORD: ILLUMINATION (6.1.5.3)
DESCRIPTION:, REFLECTIONS.ON CRT SCREENS i OBSERVATION: It is difficult to read the'CRT's on panels H11-P603, H11-P804 and the opsrators console because of low contrast caused by reflections. PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: The 'CRT' on H11-P814 (Operator's console) should be hooded. B. Immediate. Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS-: Defer to NUREG 0700 Survey CLOSURE: l 1 l l l l l l l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 3 l l
'HED NO.: 760 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: 0 PAGE'1
_--------_--_-----_-_--_-----_-_-_---------_-----_______----__----------_9
~ PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: VARIOUS 1 PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: VARIOUS i
PANEL:.H11-P804 SYSTEM: VARIOUS KEYWORD: VISIBILITY (SEE HED 945) 1 1 1 DESCRIPTION: SHADOWS ON THE LABELS l
'l OBSERVATION: i There are shadows on the labels under the recorders on Panels H11-P601, l H11-P603, H11-P804 and H11-P805 which make them difficult to read. !)
--__-__--_____---____------_____--__-____-----__-___----_-_--_----___-__c PRIORITY: N/A
_--_---_-_-__-___--_---_-_-__--____---_-____---__-_--_-__--_--__---_-___d RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION l RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. HED 945 addresses this-concern. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed j CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/23/87 3 1 a l l l I
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 i HED NO.: 761 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P808 SYSTEM: N/A KEYWORD: ANTHROPOMETRIC (6.1.2.2) DESCRIPTION: PLACEMENT OF RECORDERS OUTSIDE STANDARDS OBSERVATION: On the "C" surface of Panel H11-P808, all recorders are too high for cacy maintenance by a 5th percentile person. The most extreme case is suppression chamber bulk water temperature. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: No correction. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed - CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/19/87 l
L HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 I i HED NO.: 762 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------e PANEL: H11-P806 SYSTEM: N7100 ' COMP / INSERT. NO: LEGEND: EDG 14 GOVERNOR CONTROL 1
PANEL: H11-P807 SYSTEM: P4100 j COMP / INSERT NO: 7D63 LEGEND: DIESEL FIRE PUMP AUTO START 1
-7D64 DIESEL FIRE PUMP TROUBLE -l 7D67 ELECTRIC FIRE PUMP AUTO START j 7D68 ELECTRIC FIRE PUMP LOCAL START j q
KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.3.1)
------------------------------------------------------------------------y DESCRIPTION: WINDOWS AT WRONG LOCATIONS f i
OBSERVATION: The locations of'some annunciators are not optimally placed with respect to the related controls on Panels H11-P806 & H11-P807. Fire pump alarm l (D-11,12; E-11,12) are on right matrix while related controls are on j left side of Panel B. Circulating water pump alarms are on Panel H11-P806 while controls are on Panel H11-P807.
}
RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION i I RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. These alarms are very close to the controls and displays and they are readily visible from the "at controls" area. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): 1 l STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/19/87 l 1 i 1 i I i i l i
.4
')
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 ij
-i d
l 4 HED'NO.: 763 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: 'l PAGE 1 lPANEL: VARIOUS SYSTEM: H3000
- KEYWORD: AN7UNCIATOR-(6.3.1.3) )
i q DESCRIPTION: : NO "FIRST OUT:' ALARM FEATURE l OBSERVATION:
'Thsro is no "First-out" alarm feature provided for high priority alarms. ;
.I
-----------_-------_-----_-_-_----_---------_------------__---_----------- l PRIORITY:-III RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: '
A.- Recommended Correction: Provide a "First-out" alarm feature. Issue a PDC for the Sequence of' Events (SOE) Recorder software development. This HED is to also 1 i cddress the concern of HED 849. B.. Immediate Compensatory Actions.or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Issue a PDC CLOSURE: i-l
;l '.
y
-! l
\ sy :
i HUMAN ENGINEERING' DISCREPANCY'- FERMI 2 1
.i
-HED NO.: 764' SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING; REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1)
_________________________________________________________________________a 1 PANEL: 1VARIOUS SYSTEM: H3000 4
' KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.1.5) ]
l t
. DESCRIPTION:.NO CUE;FOR CLEARED ALARMS-7 i .-. OBSERVATION:
There is no' positive indicat' ion that an alarm has cleared. I ________________________________________________________________________q
-PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION l i
RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: No correction required. The lack of a special. auditory or visual cue tx) signify.that an alarm'has cleared.has not presented operators with'a problem. .In emergency situations with an influx of large number of annunciators, additional sound or blinking due to clearing annunciators?could be the cause.of extra operator mental overload. The' SOE recorder is used to' review alarms after a transient. l Therefore,1the ability tx) individually clear alarms is not necessary but.is-actually a detriment to operator response under casualty situations. B '. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): i 4 i STATUS: Closed i CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/25/87 l. i , i I J I
.l '
f L_._ nf _ __ __ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
s a
# 1) I, ,5
, I.
9 ,V t # Y fy HUMAN ENGINEER NG DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 l s.
- h. -
HED NO.: 765 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV No.: O PAGE 3 PANEL: H11-P805 SYSTEM: N6200 COMP / INSERT NO: SD127 LEGEND: SJAE STEAM PRESSURE HIGH/ LOW ' s PANEL: H11-P806 SYSTEM: N1100 COMP / INSERT NO: N11-R802 LEGEND: MN S'6M "'O SJAE & PRE-HEATERS PRESS t KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.3.1) - 4.
- w. ,. ...
DESCRIPTION: WINDOW LOCATED ON WRONG PANELi OBSERVATION: 4 , ; Annunciator tile B-23 is inappropriately located on H11-P805, over the condensate feedwater panel. It should have been located on H11-P806. , i PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION * - RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PIJdi: >
; Y A. Recommended Corrections' T ,
Eslocate the alarm tile 5D127 to Panel H11-P806. s.,
~
1 . 4 B. Immediate Compensatory Act.';ons or Interim Fix (For ~Priorigy.'~I): h k, s
,j w %
STATUS: - CLOSURE: s
'I a f d p.
g a p, #
's J
t - I 'g a 3 k
\ ,
y 1 A
'b g
e
\ #-
l s u k
> l
, N -!
14 3, HUMAN ENGINEERING. DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2-
'( :
HED NO.:- 766 SOURCE: 1981 REV NO.: 1 PAGE II ______. ..____.._____________' CATEGORY 3 FINDING _____________________________________________q Jk' PANEL: H11-P809 SYSTEM: H3000 R3000 COMP / INSERT NO: 9D35 LEGEND: DIV I EDG 11 AUTO START i 9D59 DIV I EDG 12 AUTO START {
'PM4EL: H11-P810 SYSTEM: H3000 R3000 4, COMP / INSERT NO: 10D11 LEGEND: DIV II EDG 14 AUTO START 10D35 DIV II EDG 13' AUTO START KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.3.3)
.w DESCRIPTION: POOR GROUPING
-OBSERVATION:
auto-start annunciators are in same groupings as
%gdn Panels 809 and 810, Lthe
* ' troub R alarms.
s PRIORITY: III s ____________________________________________________________________c RESOLUTION: .140DIFICATION t
, \
7 RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: 3 A. Recommended Correction: . The correction required by this HED is also to include the I ( annunciator concern of HED 941. Relocate individual windows to
, , improve ? grouping." This HED to address a " generic" concern.
4~ s, / 5 . 4 k B. Immediate' Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): ! [5 q ,
" ^U STATUS: Defer to NUREG 0700 Survey i
'i CLOSURE: j ft 12 L: n i 1
- I .' .g g a a,
, s i
,, s' i l
fn Uwp
'\
r y 1 Y>g k .,
"a t /
g -t
)
1 i 1 _,x- . ._
l HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 767 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P810 SYSTEM: H3000 l j KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.1.2)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- l DESCRIPTION: MULTIPLE INPUTS 1
OBSERVATION: , The annunciator on Panel H11-P810 includes multiple inputs to a single tile. Individual breaker tiles would prevent an unnecessary alarm when a breaker is scheduled out of service. PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED
. RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: None. Already corrected as the breaker tiles have been separated. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/19/87
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 768 SOURCE: 1981 REV NO.: O PAGE 1) ____-_______________________ CATEGORY 3 FINDING _____________________________________________q PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: B2100 J COMP / INSERT NO: 1D61 LEGEND: SRV OPEN KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.1.2) ! I _________________________________________________________________________4 DESCRIPTION: GENERAL ALARM ! OBSERVATION: ! Tile 1D61 on Panel H11-P601 alarms to indicate an ADS safety valve leak. The temperature recorder is in the relay room but there is no reference to the location of the leak on the panel. The location of the leak must be determined by the temperature recorders located in the relay room. ______.______________________ __________________________________________c PRIORITY: I ________________________________________________________________________c RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. Already corrected by providing direct valve leak info through status lights directly below on the control surface. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/19/87
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 3 HED NO.: 769 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: ALL SYSTEM: ALL KEYWORD: TRAINING DESCRIPTION: "CAUSE AND EFFECT OPERATOR" TRAINING OBSERVATION: Operators perceive themselves as being trained to be "cause and effect operators" who react to problems and do not plan ahead or see the implications of actions. Conditions with a gradual onset and which require interpretation are often missed. Problem solving tends to be overlooked in training in favor of following the procedures. However, not every problem will have a procedure for direct action and operators need to use judgement and problem solving abilities. PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. The Fermi 2 Training Department has addressed this issue by increasing the scope and length of the Supervisory Concepts and Techniques (SCAT) Course (No. 04110000) from one week to two weeks to encompass diagnostic skills. Further, as of January, 1986, Fermi 2 Simulator Training incorporated the Team Training Concept that places significant emphasis upon event diagnosis. Additionally, the associated operating crew Simulator Performance Rating (SPR) used by Nuclear Training evaluates the operating crew specifically on event diagnosis. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/12/87 (NE-NS-87-0184)
a l l i
, .UMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 H l I .HED'NO.: 770 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV No.: O PAGE il
_________________________________________________________________________d PANEL: N/A SYSTEM: N/A. KEYWORD: TRAINING ________________..__________________________________________________ _____) DESCRIPTION: PROBLEM ANALYSIS / EVENT DIAGNOSIS OBSERVATION: Operators report they have been trained to follow procedures.. When they do not follow procedures they are punished. Operators. feel that the procedures are followed instead of determining the problem. Operators need to be trained in problem analysis. Operators are concerned that there is too much emphasis on following procedures and not enough on u
. problem solving.
________________________________________________________________________c PRIORITY: III ________________________________________________________________________e RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. Safe operation of the plant depends upon operators.following procedures. There is a Nuclear Operations Directive, NOD 20,
" Procedural Control of Activities" which clarifies management position on the importance of following procedures. Nuclear Training addressed the issue of problem analysis and problem solving; by increasing the scope and length of'the Supervisory Concepts and Techniques (SCAT) Course (No. 04110000) from one week to two weeks to present diagnostic skill training. Further, as of January, 1986, Fermi 2 Simulator Training incorporated the Team Training concept that places specific emphasis upon problem analysis and problem solving. Additionally, there is a Simulator Performance Rating (SPR) used by Nuclear Training to specifically evaluate the entire operating crew on Event Diagnosis.
B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed I CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/18/87 __ - _ _ - - - _ - - - - . _ __________ _ _ _- - _ _ _ _ A
HUMAN' ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI.2 HED NO.: .771 SOURCE: OPERATOR. INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 l PANEL:.ALL. SYSTEM: VARIOUS
. KEYWORD: COLOR CODING (6.5.1.6)
DESCRIPTION: INCONSISTENT COLOR CODED CONTROLS & DISPLAYS OBSERVATION:
.Oparators report that a different color coding philosophy has been used 'to code controls than for displays. For example, red is used'for an on condition for controls and light indicators. ' Red is used to show a dangerous condition for meter banding and for some annunciator alarms.
PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For. Priority I): STATUS: Defer to NUREG 0700 Survey e CLOSURE:
)
i I
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 i i HED NO.: 772 SOURCE: TASK ANALYSIS / VERIFICATION REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1) ________________________________m________________________________________q PANEL: H11-P808 SYSTEM: T5000 i l PANEL: H11-P817 SYSTEM: T5000 KEYWORD: SETPOINT _________________________________________________________________________j DESCRIPTION: HYDROGEN CONCENTRATION INSTRUMENT RESOLUTION 1 i OBSERVATION: Primary Containment Hydrogen concentration required resolution (Per EOP l Validation) is 0.25%. Control Room Inventory is 0.6%. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Entry level condition for PC/H is currently 2%. With the implementation of PDC 7578, the entry condition and the annunciator setpoint will be reduced to 1%. Neither of the setpoints are .25%, therefore this observation is void. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (for Priority I): STATUS: Closed i i CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/13/87 j
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 I -HED NO.: -773 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS :REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P805 SYSTEM: N2100 PANEL: H11-P806 SYSTEM: N6200 PANEL: H11-P808
- SYSTEM: T4102 KEYWORD: VISUAL DISPLAYS-(6.5.3.1)
DESCRIPTION: BLINKING LIGHTS CAUSE OPERATOR DISTRACTION OBSERVATI<ON: Operators report that blinking lights which should be used to call Operators attention to an out of tolerance situation are used in some casas to indicate a normal operating condition. Examples are: 1) Control Center Heating Ventilation Air Conditioning System, 2) Off Gas
- 3) Station Air and 4) Reactor Feed pump Seal water. The use of
' flashing or blinking' lights should be restricted to those necessary to ..alort the Operator of a condition that requires action. Flashing lights that are on continually will tend to be ignored and may cause the operator to miss seeing a condition that requires action.
- Also H11-P817 PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: Modify design to prevent continuous blinking lights in accordance with operating practice and design convention. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): j STATUS: PDC 7582 will be issued CLOSURE: l 1
'l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
~HED NO.: 774 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS :REV NO.: O PAGE 1
______________________________________________________________________m__q PANEL: H11-P807 SYSTEM: P6100 l COMP / INSERT NO: P61-R813A LEGEND: BLR NORTH PRESS-WIND BOX, FURNACE Bd P61-R813B BLR SOUTH PRESS-WIND BOX, FURNACEB%
' KEYWORD: ZONE MARKING (6.5.2.3)
_________________________________________________________________________q l DESCRIPTION: METERS ARE COLOR CODED INCORRECTLY OBSERVATION: 3 operators noted that two of the scales used in this system were color i banded with the operating range not correctly identified. These scales are the Furnace Pressure-and-the Windbox Pressure. This system has been in operation for some time with the scales banded. PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION l RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Operations to identify the proper banding ranges. The color banding of these meters then be corrected. Issue PDC. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): j i i 1 STATUS: PDC 7583 will be issued l j CLOSURE: l
i HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 i HED NO.: 775 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 ________________.._________________________________________________________ l PANEL: VARIOUS SYSTEM: VARIOUS I 1 l KEYWORD: COLOR CODING (6.5.1.6) DESCRIPTION: INCOMPLETE COLOR CODING OF SCALES j I OBSERVATION: ) Op3rators have noted that some of the scales have not been color coded, ! particularly those related to tank levels. In some other cases the high ' icvsls are shown but not the minimal levels which are most important to ths Operators. In some cases these could not be done because of the , atatus of the plant, but they do present a potential problem that should j 6 be rasolved. PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Implement PDC 3515. This HED is to also address the concerns of HEDs 980 and 992. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): l l STATUS: Implement PDC 3515 l CLOSURE: l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 776 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE l l PANEL: H11-P809 SYSTEM: R3001 ' COMP / INSERT NO: 9A23 LEGEND: EDG 11 GOVERNOR CONTROL 9A24 EDG 11 VOLTAGE CONTROL 9A41 EDG 12 GOVERNOR CONTROL 9A42 EDG 12 VOLTAGE CONTROL PANEL: H11-P810 SYSTEM: R3001 l COMP / INSERT NO: 10A8 LEGEND: EDG 13 GOVERNOR CONTROL i 10A9 EDG 13 VOLTAGE CONTROL l 10A21 EDG 14 GOVERNOR CONTROL 10A22 EDG 14 VOLTAGE CONTROL i PANEL: H11-P811 SYSTEM: R3001 COMP / INSERT NO: 11A50 LEGEND: CTG 11 POWER BLOCK CONTROL-VOLTAGE 11A64 CTG 11 POWER BLOCK CONTROL-GOVERNOR 11A74 CTG 11 UNIT CONTROL - UNIT 1 VOLTAG; 11A75 CTG 11 UNIT CONTROL - UNIT 2 VOLTA @ 11A76 CTG 11 UNIT CONTROL - UNIT 3 VOLTA $ 11A77 CTG 11 UNIT CONTROL - UNIT 4 VOLTAG 11A78 CTG 11 UNIT CONTROL - UNIT 1 GOVERN 11A79 CTG 11 UNIT CONTROL - UNIT 2 GOVERN 11A80 CTG 11 UNIT CONTROL - UNIT 3 GOVERa 11A81 CTG 11 UNIT CONTROL - UNIT 4 GOVERA l KEYWORD: SHAPE CODING (6.4.2.2) ________________________________________________________________________e DESCRIPTION: SAME SHAPE HANDLES ON DIFFERENT CTL SWITCHES OBSERVATION: The pistol grip switches used for Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG) i Voltage Control and Governor Control are identical in size and shape. This could be a source of error, particularly as these Generators are used only under extreme stress. The knobs are close together and can i easily be confused. The same configuration is used for the field panels { 1 PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION , RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Issue a PDC to add a unique handle shape for each Governor Control at control board and local panel. (Refer to Drawing No. 6M-2290, ' Sheet 3) STATUS: PDC 7593 will be issued CLOSURE: J l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 776 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 2 B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): b
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 3 HED NO.: 777 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1: PANEL: ALL SYSTEM: ALL i I KEYWORD: CONTROL ROOM (6.1.1.7) 1
-_----_-_--_-----_----_-_--------------_---_-----------_--------_--------q
)
DESCRIPTION: ACCESS PROBLEMS OBSERVATION: Operators suggest a concern about the number of people in the control Room and the access to the room. A lack of pre-planning requires a constant flow of meetings to work out details that could have been ! worked out in advance. Work is planned well in advance but the details of how to get it done are too often left until the last minutes i requiring meetings with the Shift Supervisor and the people who are i doing the work. The layout of the control room includes the office of the Shift Supervisor and other technical personnel.
------------------------------------------------------------------------4 PRIORITY: III l
------------------------------------------------------------------------g RESOLUTION: PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: 1 B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Defer to NUREG 0700 Survey CLOSURE:
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 778 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: N/A SYSTEM: N/A KEYWORD: CONTROL ROOM & RELAY ROOM J DESCRIPTION: ACCESS PROBLEMS 1 OBSERVATION: Operators are concerned about control access problems. These include: Air lock door - The door has been designed with the security door opening into the airlock. The number of activations (200 or more per shift), the mass of the door, and problems with the key lock security system combine to make entry and exit a concern. Additional door to control room - The door at the south end of the room is not seen as a solution. Failed card reader - occasional failure of the card reader has isolated the control room for short periods. Relay room access - operators have no physical control over access to relay room. They can't visually monitor relay room activities. PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Already corrected. The issues identified here were largely a concern during plant construction and the' pre-operational testing phases. Since then the heavy security door has been equipped with new hinges. Emergency exit from the control room during isolation due to a card reader failure is by means of the thumb latches to release the door. Additionally, there are far fewer persons needing to have access to the control room. The cabinets in the relay room are locked under operations administrative control, thus, the relay room concern is no longer an issue. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/18/87
HUMAN ENGINEERING-DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 779 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV O PAGE 1) ________________________________________________________ NO.: _________________y PANEL: H11-P813 SYSTEM: N3014 COMP / INSERT NO: N30-R836 LEGEND: BEARING OIL SUPPLY PRESSURE l KEYWORD: PANEL LAYOUT (SEE HED 783) _________________________________________________________________________q DESCRIPTION: MAIN OIL LUBRICATION INDICATOR PLACEMENT ; OBSERVATION: CONTROL PANEL LAYOUT - Operators were positive about the layout of the control room, when compared to other control rooms in the industry. They generally liked the groupings of controls. However, there are controls behind the main panels which require operator attention. Main 1 011 Lubrication Indicator: A low pressure condition could cause a scram. Indication is not alarmed in the control room. ________________________________________________________________________c PRIORITY: N/A ________________________________________________________________________c RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. HED 783 addresses this concern. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/18/87 1 l 1 i j i l l I I
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMZ 2 l i HED NO.: 780 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P813 SYSTEM: N3014 1 J KEYWORD: PANEL LAYOUT AND DESIGN DESCRIPTION: TURBINE AUXILIARY RECORDER PLACEMENT OBSERVATION: j CONTROL PANEL LAYOUT - Operators were positive about the layout of the ! control room, when compared to other control rooms in the industry. l They generally liked the groupings of controls. However, there are l controls behind the main panel which require operator attention. 1 Turbine Auxiliary Recorder: This is required for some operations and d Operator needs to go behind main panel to observe. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: The action taken by this HED must also satisfy the concern of HED 783. Perform a task analysis to evaluate the required information for turbine startup, power operation and shutdown. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE:
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 3 4 HED NO.: 781 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 ________________________________________________________________________q PANEL: Hll-P805-BACK PANEL SYSTEM: N3000 l
. COMP / INSERT NO: 805C540 LEGEND: UNITIZED ACTUATORS / JACKING OIL PUMB 1
EIYWORD: PANEL LAYOUT AND DESIGN 4 DESCRIPTION: UNITIZED ACTUATOR CMC SWITCH PLACEMENT l OBSERVATION: CONTROL PANEL LAYOUT - Operators were positive about the layout of the control room, when compared to other control rooms in the industry. They generally liked the groupings of controls. However, there are controls behind the main panels which require operator attention. Unitized Actuator Controls: This is required for some operations and Operator needs to go behind main panel to use the control. I ________________________________________________________________________e PRIORITY: IV ________________________________________________________________________3 RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. Equipment deficiencies causing the need for actuator controls-on the H11-P804 have been corrected. Additionally, the controls are only useful below 25% power. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/25/87 i
i HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 l J l HED NO.: :782 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P805 BACK PANEL SYSTEM: N2200 l COMP / INSERT NO: 805C541B' LEGEND: HEATER DRAINS SYSTEM KEYWORD: PANEL LAYOUT AND DESIGN l . DESCRIPTION:' FW HEATER VENT CONTROL PLACEMENT OBSERVATION: CONTROL PANEL LAYOUT - Operators were positive about the layout of the control room, when compared to other control rooms in the industry. They generally liked the groupings of controls. However, there are controls behind the main panels which require operator attention. Vents for the Feedwater Heaters: This is required for some operations and Operator needs to go behind main panel to use the controls. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. FW vents (motor operated) are used during unit startup and shutdown only, thus are not needed at the controls area. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/18/87
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 783 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 ________________________________________________________________________c PANEL: Hil-P813 SYSTEM: N3014 COMP / INSERT NO: N30-R836 LEGEND: BEARING OIL SUPPLY PRESSURE KEYWORD: PANEL LAYOUT (SEE HED 780) ________________________________________________________________________c DESCRIPTION: TURBINE LUBE OIL PRESS RECORDER PLACEMENT OBSERVATION: CONTROL PANEL LAYOUT - Operators were positive about the layout of the control room, when compared to other control rooms in the industry. They generally liked the groupings of controls. However, there are controls behind the main panels which require operator attention. 3 Turbine Fabrication Oil - Pressure Indication: This is required for some operations and Operator needs to go behind main panel to observe. PRIORITY: IV DISSENT: Turbine Lube Oil Pressure Recorder should be moved to the front. The error. potential is high. Priority III - GKS RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Issue a PDC to change the alarm setpoint to provide earlier indication of a low pressure condition. HED 780 will have a task analysis performed to evaluate the required information needed for turbine startup, power operation and shutdown. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: PDC 7641 will be issued CLOSURE:
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 784 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 J PANEL: H11-P812 SYSTEM: D1100 COMP / INSERT NO: D11-K610 LEGEND: EFFLUENT RADN MONITOR CTL TERMINAL KEYWORD: PANEL LAYOUT AND DESIGN DESCRIPTION: CT-2B INFO NOT AVAILABLE IN AT CONTROLS AREA OBSERVATION: CT-2B Recorder is required for some operations and operator needs to go behind main panel to observe. PRIORITY: II I -________________________ __-_---____-_-________--___---__________________ 1 RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recomutended Correction: Bring information provided on CT-2B into the at controls area of the Control Room. B. Immeditte Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Issue a PDC CLOSURE:
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 785 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE PANEL: H11-P805 BACK PANEL SYSTEM: N2200 COMP / INSERT NO: 5C398/399 LEGEND: OPEN/CLOSE N22-F686 5C400/401 OPEN/CLOSE N22-F688 5C402/403 OPEN/CLOSE N22-F689 5C404/405 OPEN/CLOSE N22-F687 KEYWORD: PANEL LAYOUT AND DESIGN _-_______---____---____-_____---__-_-____-___--_-_-__--___--_-___---___m DESCRIPTION: HEATER SEP SEAL TANK MANUAL CONTROL BACK PANL OBSERVATION: The heater level manual controls are located on the back panel. It is required for some operations that the operator go behind the main panel for control. _--..--_-_____--__--__-----___--_---_-___--______ _-____--___---___--___m PRIORITY: III ---_______---________-_____ ---___-_-___-___---_____________--_____--__m RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTICN RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. Current temp Mod is an unusual condition related to initial plant start up. Temp Mod 85-193, REV A PDC 6121 4111 soon be removed. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/11/87 (NE-NS-87-0184)
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 T HED NO.: 786 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 ,
------------------------------_-------------------_----------------------- 1 PANEL: H11-P805 BACK PANEL SYSTEM: N2200 COMP / INSERT NO: SC398/399 LEGEND: OPEN/CLOSE N22-F686 5C400/401 OPEN/CLOSE N22-F688 SC402/403 OPEN/CLOSE N22-F689 i SC404/405 OPEN/CLOSE N22-F687 KEYWORD: PANEL LAYOUT AND DESIGN DESCRIPTION: STEAM SEPARATOR-SEAL WATER TANK CONTROLS OBSERVATION:
The steam separator - Seal Water Tank MOV control is on the back of panel H11-P805. It is required for some operations that the operator go behind the main panel to control. PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Current Temp Mod 85-193A (PDC 6121) is an unusual condition related to initial plant start up. The Temp Mod will be removed. Upon removal, the system will revert back to automatic level control. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Pending removal of Temp Mod 85-193A. CLOSURE: I ( l 1
L [ . HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 i
,1 HED'NO.: 787 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV No.: O PAGE lj -_-___-__-_________---_-_-__..-_-__-______-_____________-_-___'_____-_____q PANEL: H11-P601 BACK PANEL SYSTEM: P3400 l COMP / INSERT NO: 601C540 LEGEND:
1 KEYWORD: PANEL' LAYOUT AND DESIGN l 1 __-__-_-__-_______-_________________---_-___-____-___-__-__-___--_-_____-4 DESCRIPTION: SAMPLING ISOLATION VALVES OBSERVATION: The sampling isolation valves are located on the back of Panel H11-P601. For some. operations the operator needs to go behind the main panel to control i d l _-_---___-----______--_-__________--____-__-_--_-_________----__________W
. PRIORITY: IV
__-__-----_-_-______---_____________-_--_---_-_____-_-___-________---___p RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. Back panel location is appropriate. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I). STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/11/87 (NE-NS-87-0184) { l l i i i I J 4 I i j 1 i l 1 I r
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 788 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601 BACK PANEL. SYSTEM: T4500 COMP / INSERT NO: 601C541 LEGEND: KEYWORD: PANEL LAYOUT AND DESIGN -.,___ ______--_-_----___-___-___-___---_____----____--__---___________-___ l DESCRIPTION: REAC BLDG SUMP PUMP CONTROLS I OBSERVATION: The Reactor Building Sump Pump Controls are located on the rear of panel H11-P601. For some operations it is required that the operator go behind P601 for control. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. Location on back of H11-P601 is appropriate due to infrequent use and because it is not a time dependent operation. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Revieti 6/11/87 (NE-NS-87-0184)
HUMAN ENGINEERING: DISCREPANCY . FERMI 2 l l HED'NO.: 789. SOURCE:. OPERATOR. INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE.1 PANEL: H11-P601 BACK PANEL SYSTEM: T4500 COMP / INSERT NO: 601C541 LEGEND: KEYWORD: ' PANEL LAYOUT'AND DESIGN DESCRIPTION: DRYWELL SUMPS LEVEL INDICATION l OBSERVATION: l .The Drywell Sump Level Indication is located on the rear of Panel . i i H11-P601. 'For some operations the operator needs to go behind.the. main ! panel to. check the levels. ________________________________________________________________________c
. PRIORITY: IV
___________-____________________________________________________________e RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION. PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: . None. Concern assumed to be over Reactor Building sump indication-as Drywell indication not.on back panel. Infrequent use and non time-dependant' operation is the basis that the back panel-location is appropriate. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: 1Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/11/87 (NE-NS-87-0184) _.._.,m.m.______:.m.._-- _ _ _ _ . _ _ -_.--_.-_---_m __mm
h-n) 1
,'. x.
dj q j v .i l
'I 2 HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2- )
1
)
)
i
.HED NO.: 790 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS- REV NO.: O PAGE 1 '
P NEL H1 -P601 BACK PANEL SYShEM G410 I COMP / INSERT NO: IC70/71 ' LEGEND: OPEN/CLOSE G41-F032 i i KEYWORD: PANEL LAYOUT AND DESIGN qi { J
.. DESCRIPTION: G41-F032 POSITION INDICATOR NOT IN CONTROL RM I
OBSERVATION: Fuel Poof Cooling & Cleanup valve F032 must be throttled but.there is no position' indication in control' room. To position the valve to the-propar 304 position, an operator must be dispatched to.a potentially high radiation area to observe the valve position. 1 PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION TLAN: 1 A. Recommended Correction: Implement PDC 1025 to add valve G41-F032 position indication in the main control room or provide local control and position. indication outside the FPCCS Hx Room.
Reference:
NE-85-0259. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Implement PDC 1025 CLOSURE: I I I 1
\
\
, i i o
y -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
\-
S'(, ? "y HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 y: ,, REV NO.: 1 q HEDiNO.: 791 SO'UR'CE : OPERATOR INTERVIEWS c Mg"------------------.._----_----- PAGE 11
; 9; ' ... _-------------------_.------------_---d
' t;'/ . PANEL:fH11-P601 ' SYSTEM: P5002 4 COMP / INSERT NO: 601B514 LEGEND:
,x .
L. b
/ C M / NSERT /O: 6d2B510 LEGEND:
l E PANEL: H11-P807 SYSTEM: P5001,P5002 COMP / INSERT NO: 807B512 ; LEGEND: 1 3 KEYWORD: PANEL' LAYOUT (6.8.1.1) j
-...----------....----------------_------------ --_------------_----------e DESCRIPTION: LOCATION OF N & S AIR COMPRESSOR CONTROLS
. OBSERVATION:
The controls for the North and South Air Compressor are on Panel' H11-P601/607,'while the air system mimic and annunciation are on H11-P807. Operators feel the control and display should be joined. PRIORITY: 'III
.------------_---_.....----------------...--___---------._----------q RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION
. RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction:
, The correction required by this HED is also to address the concern 1
of HED 934. Relocate the CMC controls on panels H11-P601 and H11-P602 to a position on or closer to H11-P807. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE :[.. I i ( i
\
I-s
s ,x ., s , _q
.I
(. r f A i
.i HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 1
- ,,. jl t ,
1
; aJ HED NO.: 792 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEFW ! REV No.: O PAGE 1 "
PANEL: H11-P807 CYSTDI: P5001 ' 1
< . , j
,. 4 KEYWORD: INSTRUMENTATION & HARDWARE . ,% l
, '4 t
___ ______ __ . ___________ ___.A ...c..____ ____ ..... ______. _________ e DESCRIPTION: NO STATION AIR PRESSURE 1$DICATION , 3 4 OBSERVATION: s
) l Stction air pressure is not ind1cated'in the control room.t operators feal it should be availabic. ;
m,.,
...._____________________________________________.7_.._________.__.Ls j PRIORITY: IV f I
RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION i , t ! RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A.- Recommended Correction: 2 None. Existing annunciation p?/ovides notification ' when operating cteps are to be taken. ,
,1 &
B. Immediate Compensatory Actions'or* Interim Rix.,(For Priority I): !
. A I, s
-t (t
- STATUS: Closed 4
.
- I+ Jl CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Rev$ew 6/11/87 (NE-NS 018 4 ) '
I , , i, s ! N'\l r ' i t ;
' r,. S t
( r t 4 Lt' 4 , 8
" ( +
( k. i ..
' i g ]
3 v, ,' 6 g t
=
l 7 l. 1 l 1 ( 1 ~
-s 3 1 '.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ m
8 L 1 I
, HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
..-f 4 l
. t ' 5/ L 11i <. .
HED NOa:f'793 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1
------D.........---------------------..----_--_------_-_--_---------------t PANEL: H11-P805 SYSTEM: N2000 h COMP*/JNSERT /'
NO: 5A234 LEGEND:. CONDENSER PUMP NORTH I !*D' - 5A236' ' CONDENSER PUMP CENTER. {
' 5A238 CONDENSER PUMP SOUTH l t y i ) ,' %.
KETWOitD: CONTROLS (SEE HED 794)
'y't-a~~,
<n (
--?
1 DESCP.IPU IO V; CONDENf R PUMP CMC RUN LIGHT STAYS ON i
- n. > ! { l' ?
1DBSERVA'fICH : k i The CMC ct4!tch'is a ccsbination pushbutton control and visual display. .g r Oper' a tors moted that.in,some cases the display can be in error as the i eqitlpmen': rIas a different power source from the control and the eqtspment , thing controlled. In some cases when the power fails the puppr,go dft', but the indication in the control room stays in the 'run' J{ ' q( ' 1, position.' The CONDENSER PUMPS are an example of this condition.
~
I i-
,I (5 t i '
sY ' l' y, PRIORITY:: N/A s,,g',,T..- t REGOLUTION: NO CORRECTION
\3. .!
i
'T RECOMMENDED COfMECTION PLAN:
l Recommended Correction: [ A. 'None. 4HED 794 addresses this concern. 1 i B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): e s STATUS: Closed ' ? , CLOSURE: Per HEDI Assessment Team Review 6/19/87
< \
~,
k
'l k
l} s k l
., t A) '\i I
g e
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 794 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P807 SYSTEM: P4100 COMP / INSERT NO: 7A4 LEGEND: GEN SERVICE WATER PUMP 2 7A6 GEN SERVICE WATER PUMP 3 7A8 GEN SERVICE WATER PUMP 4 7A10 GEN SERVICE WATER PUMP 5 7A12 GEN SERVICE WATER PUMP 6 KEYWORD: CONTROL - DISPLAY (6.9.3.2) DESCRIPTION: CMC CONTROL SWITCH RUN LIGHT STAYS ON OBSERVATION: The CMC switch is a combination pushbutton control and visual display. Operators noted that in some cases, the display can be in error as the equipment has a different power source from the control and the equipment being controlled. In some cases when the power fails the pumps go off, but the indication in the control room stays in the 'run' position. The GENERAL SERVICE WATER PUMPS are an example of this condition. PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION, TRAINING RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Issue a PDC to request that all pumps that have this problem be identified. Create a unique identifier for the CMC switch for each of these pumps and have training train the operators to use the proper instrument for pump running status. The correction required by this HED is also to address the concerns of HED 793. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Issue a PDC CLOSURE:
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 795 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: 1 PAGE li PANEL: N/A SYSTEM: H4000 l
)
KEYWORD: VOICE COMM.(6.2.1.6) i _________________________________________________________________________q DESCRIPTION: HI-COM & RADIO SPEAKERS DO NOT COVER CTL RM j OBSERVATION
- The Hi-Com and Radio speakers-(two) are directed to the center of the )
- room and are often too loud at the center of the control room and cannot' beLheard at.other. points in the room. Under noraal conditions this can be lived with but under abnormal conditions such as an upset or startup; the control room has so many people that communication becomes very difficult.
________________________________________________________________________n PRIORITY: III ________________________________________________________________________q RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION l 1 RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: The correction required by this HED is also to address the concerns of HED 796, 797, 798, 800, 801, 802, 803, and 812. . Enhance the telephone, Hi-Com, and radio systems. ! l Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): B. STATUS:- CLOSURE:
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
'HED'No.: 796 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: N/A SYSTEM: H4000 KEYWORD: VOICE COMM (SEE HED 795)
DESCRIPTION: TOO MANY HI-COM MESSAGES
-OBSERVATION:
All:Hi-Com messages are heard in the control room even though many are not of interest or concern. While the operator needs to stay aware of the entire plant conditions some operators feel that the clutter of noice makes for potential errors. These operators would prefer some mathed of screening the Hi-Com calls or having separate systems for routine maintenance or servicing operations. PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION i RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. HED 795 addresses this concern. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/18/87 I 1 I 6 5 i
r HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 h HED NO.: -797 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV.NO.: 0- PAGE &
-----------------_----------_--------------_----------------------------y PANEL: N/A SYSTEM: H4000 KEYWORD: VOICE COMM (SEE HED 795) ;
'l
------------------------------------------------------------------------d DESCRIPTION: HI-COM SPEAKERS DROWN OUT RADIO MESSAGES OBSERVATION:
The noise from the Hi-Com often drowns out the message coming over the radio. The radio message is often more important for the operator.
----------------------_------_----...-----------------------------------q PRIORITY: N/A I
-_-----_------_---------__---------------_---_---------_-------------_--a I RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: None. HED 795 addresses this concern. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For-Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/18/87 , l i- - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 ! HED NO.: 798 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: N/A SYSTEM: H4000 KEYWORD: VOICE COMM (SEE HED 795) DESCRIPTION: POOR QUALITY HI-COM & RADIO SPEAKERS , 1 OBSERVATION: The speakers used for the Hi-Com systems are of poor quality and-often-mask the messages that are coming into the control room. Operators do not feel they have adequate control over the volume' level of the apsakers. PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION i RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: ; A. Recommended Correction: 1 None. HED 795 addresses this concern. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED' Assessment Team Review 6/18/87 l l l \
\
- f. !
l i 1 l 1 l
)
l
. J
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 799 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGElf
--_-_-----_-_-_----------------_--_--------------------------_-----------s PANEL: N/A SYSTEM: H4000 I
KEYWORD: VOICE COMMUNICATION DESCRIPTION: TOO MANY TELEPHONE MESSAGES OBSERVATION: TELEPHONE SYSTEM - The number of telephone messages to the control room .are excessive. The control room has become the message center for the plant. Many of the calls are administrative or housekeeping in nature and of no concern to the operator.
----------_------_-------_---------_-----_---_----------_---_-----------a PRIORITY: III ----_-__-------__---------------------_-------____--------------_-----_-o RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: l The control roo operator's phone number has been changed. Other l i control room pho..es are to be used for administrative functions. This concern to be reviewed during the control room survey to determine if it is still valid. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Defer to NUREG 0700 Survey CLOSURE:
'.(
HUMAN. ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 I4 HED NO.: .800 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: N/A SYSTEM: H4000 KEYWORD: VOICE COMM (SEE HED 795) ' DESCRIPTION: ADDITIONAL TELEPNONES REQUIRED OBSERVATION: TELEPHONE SYSTEM - A need exists in the plant for dial telephones so that the~ excessive use of the HI-Com can be reduced. Telephones are epacially needed for communication with GENERAL SERVICE WATER PUMP HOUSE and the CIRCULATING WATER PUMP HOUSE.- PRIORITY: N/A ! RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION i < RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: ! A. Recommended. Correction: ! None. HED 795' addresses this concern. B '. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/18/87 , l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 801 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: N/A SYSTEM: H4000 KEYWORD: VOICE COMM (SEE HED 795) DESCRIPTION: HI-COM HANDSET CORDS ARE TOO SHORT OBSERVATION: TELEPHONE SYSTEM - The cords for the telephone handsets used at the panels are too short. These could be longer. A trade off has been made to assure that the cords do not dangle excessively on the panel and yet are long enough to be reached by the operator for most of the activity. Tho operator should be able to stand in front of the panel section with the phone in hand and read the meters and manipulate controls and still have the phone in hand. PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. HED 795 addresses this concern. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/26/87 l l 1
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 l l HED NO.: 802 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 I PANEL: N/A SYSTEM: H4000 l KEYWORD: VOICE COMM (SEE HED 795) __________________________________________________________________________ j DESCRIPTION: CONTROL ROOM SPEAKER PROBLEM OBSERVATION: SPEAKERS - Communication is dependent on phone and hi-com hand sets. An opsrctor suggests the use of small speakers in the panel to reduce the n :d to have hands filled when communicating. This would be in place of ths large speakers in the center of the room. PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. HED 795 addresses this concern. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/18/87 l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE l' EED _. ______NO.: _803 _______________________________________________________________c PANEL: N/A SYSTEM: H4000-KEYWORD: VOICE COMM (SEE HED 795) _________________________________________________________________________s DESCRIPTION: NEED SPEAKERS IN BACK OF PANELS OBSERVATION: SPEAKERS - Operators often need to communicate from the locations in back of the panels. The number of communication devices here are limited.- More speakers would be helpful in the back of the panel. PRIORITY: N/A
--______________________________________________________________________m RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: l None. 'HED 795 addresses this concern. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/18/87 4 l i 4 I I l l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 804 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: N/A SYSTEM: H4000 R3601 KEYWORD: VOICE COMM (6.2.1.6) DESCRIPTION: SITE EVACUATION ALARM PROBLEM OBSERVATION: SITE EVACUATION ALARM - This alarm is audible all over the site. The Hi-Com announcement that tells it is a test cannot be heard in some areas. The test information is not available outside the plant. An unannounced test could present problems if personnel in the field did not know it was a test. The possibility of personnel not recognizing a real alarm because they have not heard the Hi-Com presents another potential concern. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. The outside siren is energized for only a few seconds. An actual Site Evacuation Alarm would remain sounded for an extended time period. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/25/87 m
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 I HED NO.: 805 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1: _________________________________________________________________________d PANEL: N/A SYSTEM: T4102 KEYWORD: ENVIRONMENT (6.1.5.1) DESCRIPTION: CONTROL ROOM TEMPERATURE CONTROL PROBLEM i OBSERVATION: Temperature Control - Operators were concerned that they were not able i to control the temperature in the control room directly. They did control the temperature indirectly (by using the lights as heaters). Operatorsfeltthatiftheycouldcontrolalargepowerproductionunit,) they should be able to adjust a thermostat in the control room without j calling for maintenance. Notbeingabletocontrolheatandventilationj would certainly have an effect on morale and motivation. i i i PRIORITY: III ________________________________________________________________________J RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: The correction required by this HED is also to address the concerns l of HED 807. Provide the operating crew with an effective means of l controlling the control room temperature within defined limits. ! B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): l l l l STATUS: CLOSURE:
p HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 806 SOURCE:-OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: VARIOUS~ SYSTEM: R3600~ KEYWORD: ILLUMINATION (SEE HED 811) DESCRIPTION: PANEL SURFACE LIGHTING PROBLEM OBSERVATION: ) Oparators agree that overall. lighting is adequate. The problems that ware noted'were related to the level of, lighting on the panel surface end to the control of the lighting. The lighting on the. panel surface may be raised to the point where colors bleed out and are not discernable. This is particularly true for the indicators and controls l on the 'A' Panel surfaces.
]
PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: i None. HED 811 addresses this concern. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): ; i i STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/13/87 i I, 1 l l ll
-HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 )
i l HED NO.: 807 SOURCE: . OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: 0 FAGE il _________________________________________________________________________q PANEL: N/A SYSTEM: R3600 T4102 l 4 j KEYWORD: ENVIRONMENT (SEE HED 805) J _________________________________________________________________________q DESCRIPTION: LIGHTING USED AS SUPPLEMENTAL HEATING 1 i OBSERVATION: Operators agree that overall lighting is adequate. The problems that were noted were related to the level of lighting on the panel. surface ; and to the control of the lighting. The problem involves the necessity ; to use additional lighting (by means of lighting control)_as a
. supplemental mode of heating the control room when it gets too cold. ,
l ________________________________________________________________________a I PRIORITY: N/A ________________________________________________________________________a RESOLUTION: NO-CORRECTION l RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: ' l A.- Recommended Correction:
'None. HED 805 addresses this concern.
B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/25/87 s t I i.
HUMAN ENGINEERING' DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO'.: 808 SOURCE: OPERATOR. INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE l' PANEL:-ALL SYSTEM: R3600 KEYWORD: ILLUMINATION (SEE HED.811) DESCRIPTION: SOME LIGHT CONTROLS-ARE NOT.IN CONTROL ROOM OBSERVATION: Oparators agree that overall lighting is adequate. The problems that wara noted were.related to the level of lighting on the panel surface
.and to the control of the lighting. Some-of the controls for the lights ara not in.the control room.- Operators would. prefer to be able to
, control. light levels inside.the control room.
PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: . ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. . Recommended Correction: L Lighting panels outside the control room be labeled to show which
. breakers supply which lights. (Usa picture of control room ceiling-and numbers on the breakers.) HED'811 addresses lighting problems for the control room.
'B. .Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix-(For Priority I):
STATUS: CLOSURE: I i i
\
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 j I HED NO.: 809 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV No.: 0 'PAGE ________________________________________________________________________'1 _d PANEL: ALL SYSTEM: R3600 1 KEYWORD: . ILLUMINATION (SEE HED.Bil) _________________________________________________________________________q
. DESCRIPTION: MIXED CONTROL OF LIGHT BANKS OBSERVATION:
Operators agree that overall lighting is adequate. The problems that were noted were related to the level of lighting on the panel surface and to the control of.the lighting. Control-of the lighting level is i mixed with some banks over therpanel combined with lights in center.of d the: room. Operators would prefer to have the. lights better integrated. j
.' _______________________________________________________________________ c PRIORITY: N/A _________________________.______________e RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION 1 RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:-
A. Recommended Correction: None. HED 811 addresses this concern. B.- .Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For' Priority I): ! i STATUS:-Closed , i CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/25/87 l l l l 1 l 1 l l l l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
- 1 --- --- - - - _--------_-- - b-- --- - - -
PANEL:.H11-P819 SYSTEM: R3600 KEYWORD: ILLUMINATION (SEE HED 811) DESCRIPTION: COMMUNICATIONS CONSOLE LIGHTING PROBLEM i OBSERVATION: Opsrctors agree that overall lighting is adequate. The problems that. wara noted were related to the level of lighting on the panel surface and to.the control of the lighting. Lights above the communications i console are not on a dimmer and are often too bright and are turned off by. operator at the breaker. PRIORITY: N/A 1 RESOLUTION:.NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. HED 811 addresses this concern. 1 B.- Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/25/87 i i l 1 i I I l l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 1 HED NO.: 811 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: 2 PAGE 1
-------------------------------------------------- ....------------------4 PANEL:.ALL SYSTEM: R3600 KEYWORD: ILLUMINATION (6.1.5.3) ;
1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------g DESCRIPTION: CONTROL ROOM-LIGHTING 1 l
OBSERVATION: Operators agree that overall lighting is adequate. The problems that were'noted were related to the level of lighting on the panel surface l
'and to the control of the lighting. The requirements for adequate lighting on the C panel surface seems to require excessive lighting on J the A and B surfaces. Better control of the direction of lighting would ;
reduce this problem. , i
------_------------------------------------__-------------------------- g PRIORITY: III l ------------------------------------------------------------------------a RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: ( Concerns raised in this HED and other HEDs 806, 808, 809, 810, and i 1087 will be covered under the NUREG 0700 Survey. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Defer to NUREG 0700 Survey. CLOSURE: l t
1 HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY -' FERMI 2
?
HED NO.: 812 SOURCE:' OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: 'N/A. SYSTEM: N/A i KEYWORD: ENVIRON (6.1.5.5) (HED 795) ___________________________________________________________ ______________ l DESCRIPTION: NOISE IN THE CONTROL ROOM- ; OBSERVATION: Voica Communication - the high ceilings and the size of the room along with'the equipment that is working make for a noisy atmosphere that could affect communication between operators, particularly under conditions of stress. Noise level under stress conditions could be a , problem for operators. l 1 __________________________________________________________________________ \ PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION: I ( RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
'A. Recommended Correction:
None. HED 795 addresses this concern. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For-Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review S/26/87 i l i l l 1 1
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 013 SOURCE:. OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: 0- PAGE 1
-----_____-----___---_-____________--__-_------_-___--___---___________-_9 PANEL: VARIOUS SYSTEM: VARIOUS KEYWORD: DOCUMENTATION DESCRIPTION: QUESTIONABLE DATA LOGGING OBSERVATION:
Operators suggest'many of the logs they have to keep are not important and simply serve to "make extra work" for them. An example cited is torus level. There are three' indications of tor"s level in the control room. The operator.is required to log the wide range reading which is available on a recorder. The more critical information is the narrow band torus level and on an indicator and is not logged. ____________----______-_____-______-_____-_-______________--__________--e PRIORITY: IV _____---________---__-_-___--___-____________--________-____________--__c RESOLUTION: PROCEDURE RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Recommend that Operations review the logging of all data presently-carried out in the Control Room to ensure that it is deemed to be appropriate in providing a useful historical record for the plant. The operators collecting this specific data need to be adequately informed regarding the purpose of each data entry. In response to the specific example cited here, wide range torus level is obtained from a qualified instrument that denotes one of the EOP' Entry Conditions. On the other hand, narrow range torus level does not provide an EOP Entry condition and simply needs to be maintained a "on scale" during plant operation. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: l I ---_______mu_________ _ _ _ . _ __
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
'HED NO.: 814 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV No.: 0- PAGE 1 PANEL: VARIOUS SYSTEM: VARIOUS KEYWORD: GRAPHIC RECORDER (6.5.4.1)
' DESCRIPTION: STAMPING OF CONTROL ROOM CHART RECORDERS
~ OBSERVATION:.
Oparators suggest that the stamping of a total of 187 chart recorders covsry-shift is not.important and is viewed as simply making extra work
'for the' operators. Operators do not believe this needs to be carried out during each shift.
PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: .NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED-CORRECTION PLAN: A. ' Recommended Correction: None. The chart stamping serves to provide a good record of the date.and time on the chart and it also serves to ensure the
' operability.of the recorder.
B. . Immediate' Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/25/87 1 i l l I l
1
'l1 L l l 1 HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 l i.
I- ! I i' HED NO.:- 815 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1)
.-------------------------------------------------------------------------4 PANEL: N/A ' SYSTEM: N2200
' KEYWORD: ' DOCUMENTATION 1
I DESCRIPTION: . POOR FUNCTIONAL OPERATING SKETCH. QUALITY .!
. OBSERVATION:
Operators have. stated that the quality of some Functional Operating Sketches (FOS Drawings) for use in the Control Room is poor. . One-example given is the Heater Drains System.' This drawing is cluttered and hard to read and understand. i
---------------------------------------------- ...... ------------------y PRIORITY: IV l
---------------------------------------- ......-------------------------p l
RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: L A.- Recommended Correction: l The Heater Drain / Vent System FOS should be reviewed with Operations 4 and revised and simplified in:accordance with operator requirements.
.B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I'):
STATUS: CLOSURE:
m , i HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY -~ FERMI l2.- ) 1 HED NO.: 816 . SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: N/A- ' SYSTEM:'N/A
.-KEYWORD:1 COMMUNICATION DESCRIPTION: OPERATOR FEELS POORLY INFORMED ON ACTIVITIES I
' OBSERVATION:
, .The exchange of information between Operators'and with-information icystems in the plant are the subject of Operator comments. Sharing of i information:- The. operators noted that often1when a test-is~being set up' or,n surveillance started, the technician spends'30 minutes with the Shift Supervisor and then-takes two minutes-to explain to the Operator. H
,who.is;most' involved. .The operator has to know.the details of the rest of,the procedure but is.often the least informed person in the control
' room.about a particular. procedure.
PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED. RECOMMENDED CORRECTION. PLAN:
. A'. , Recommended Correction:
;None. .This is no longer a' concern because the exchange of information between the technicians performing surveillance testing' and the Operations Staff has been an area of marked improvement for the plant..Ani" impact statement" is prepared to provide the operations staff with the details of'how the test will affect the plant. This is being performed.under the'I&C Surveillance Re-format Program. Additionally, increased' operator experience has'also served to help resolve this operator concern.
B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): i STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Reveiw 6/26/87 I l' I - .-__ _ ___
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 i HED NO.: 817 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: VARIOUS SYSTEM: VARIOUS KEYWORD: TEMPORARY LABELS (6.6.5.1) _________________________________________________________________________q ' DESCRIPTION: PLANT EQUIPMENT STATUS
SUMMARY
OBSERVATION: The operators comment that.there is a need for a plant equipment status summary which is not available in the control room. It is suggested that this be on a CRT display, i ________________________________________________________________________q PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED ,
'1 RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: Already corrected. There'is a Control Room Information System (CRIS) .in place whereby colored dots are placed on out of service ! equipment. There is a CRIS Book in the Control Room that summarizes ! the " dots" thus providing the Operations Staff with information that! denotes the plant equipment status. The use of a CRT would be an' f alternative method of maintaining this same information, however, this method is not being used. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed l r CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/26/87 i 1 i i l
-l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 818 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV No.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: N/A SYSTEM: N/A - KEYWORD: ILLUMINATION (6.1.5.3) DESCRIPTION: TV MONITORING OF CONTROL ROOM OBSERVATION: The use of the TV camera to make a videotape record of the Control Board onco-a-day is a subject of operator comments. Lighting intensity needs to bo increased during this time period. The concern centers around the una of this system during a plant emergency where it is used to obtain pinnt status information remotely from the Technical Support Conter (TSC). PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. The use of TV camere is an addition to other plant status information at the TSC. Although increased lighting for the TV camera is used during the videotaping process, the plant instrumentation is still readable at normal and lower lighting levels. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed i CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/26/87 y i 4 l I ___ _____ ______ _ O
t [ y, - 95 i HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: '819 SOURCE:. OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.:- O PAGE 1
--__------_---_-------__---_--------_-_-__ --_-----_-__----_---_--------_4 PANEL: N/A SYSTEM: N/A ]
9 KEYWORD: CHAIRS (SEE HED 756) i
---- -__-__-__-_-__------__---_-------------__-_--_-_-__---_---_-_-----_-< i DESCRIPTION: CHAIRS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH NUREG.0700 -
OBSERVATION:- 1
>< Operators are concerned that chairs are not matched and are not within )
7 the standards for human engineering for adjustments and positioning as ] kper NUREG 0700 (6.1.2.8).- { _-_-_-------__-_---__---___-____---_---__---_---__-------_-_---_-------_a PRIORITY: IV -
----_------------__----__---_---_----__---_-_--_------_---_--__-----_--_o
' RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: LNone. This is a duplicate of HED 756. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87 i
.Y
_ _ _ _ . _ _ - _ - _ _ - _ _ _ w
1 .t- .l r l
. j.
8
;r l t i
.s
' HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY DSR14I ). 4 , y 'Y
,;z 820 PAGE 1 HED NO.: SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O
-------------------------------------------------------------- -...------- g SYSTEM: N/A PANEL:.Hil-P814 l
\
l
~
KEYWORD: FURNITURE &' EQUIP.(6.1.1.3)
=
[
' DESCRIPTION: PLASTIC. FLOOR PAD PROBLEM ,.
(;. ., OBSERVATION:
' s C i t(
The plastic: floor pad in front of.the operator'$)c' horsole ,. pre.sents a potsntial hazard in that it could trip'_ an' . operator d ' catch the rollers .
'on a chair. T s '9 h, {
i 1 PRIORITY: IV
-----------------------------------. a lI (h
---,..--~s..-------------------------
j
\
RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION
\i 'I I ' RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: ,, . , . .) ~A. ' Recommended Correction: ,; .
None. The plastic floor pads are only a problem s when they get worn out. These should and lately.are being replaced as required.
}
B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (Fcs- Priority I): 4
,i STATUS: Closed g 5, ' t CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Revien 6/26/6,7 ,. . p-
"l ),i n g'
s 5 s \ ( y 5
')5g{
s'
~
,l\
[ , ( / i
- t i
,s
[ , s , s' e I ,,
. ,,c ,' , , ,-
. .h,j. '
1
, 1 s y y.,
.3 t i
< . t. e ,
-f s N
'l A
}.~
\
e l 1 . j 1 y t f (ts. i I %, N ! , x > i s l
, , , e, 1
/
i i _ ._ 4
3
?
-4 HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
\
L , HED NO.: 821 SOURCE: OMEPA2dR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H1/g P814 - SYSTEM: N/A 6
.e KEYWORD:( WORK STATION (6.1.2.7)
DESCRIP'110N: INSUFFICIENT WORKSPACE AT OPERATOR'S CONSOLE 5 OBSERVATION: - 4lThe operator's comment that the operator's console (Panel H11-P814) is K34 >*not deep enough for workbooks and prfmts that are used at the console.
~
Operators suggest that a table is needed in the control room for spreading drawings. 1 i. } ______ ______________ _ ..______________________._________________________ 4 PRIORITY: IV ____.________________.__________q.._________________________________. RESOI/0 TION: NO CORRECTION ,
' RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN'.
t A. Recommended Correction: 5 n. None. The books containing these drawings are presently placed on top of the CRTs Mt the operator'd console and may be read from the opposite side of the operhtor's console. This arrangement has been
.l, found to be generally acceptable. There is also space at the adjacent conr, ole, the Alarm Records Desk (Panel H11-P815) to lay out and view dr. wings if necessary.' In addition, there is desk space a and a conference room with ampirotable space in the control room, but outside of the "At Controls Area" that could also be used if necessary.
B. Immediate Compensatory Actions cr Interim Pix (For Priority I):
<T 1 s STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Astiessment Team Leview 7/S/87
\
-\ r' i
\
t
.t y
1 i HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 i i HED No.:- 822 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: N/A SYSTEM: N/A . KEYWORD: WORK STATION (6.1.2.6) __________________________________________________________________________ q DESCRIPTION: PROCEDURE CART IS BIG AND BULKY 1 OBSERVATION: Oparators report'the cart that;has been designed to store procedures in -j
- notebooks'is big and bulky and not used as a cart but as a fixed piece of furniture. ' Operators prefer to use the smaller racks that have been procured for carrying one procedure at a time to a panel.
PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: ! -A. Recommended Correction: None. There are lightweight mobile carts presently in the control room for this expressed purpose. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/26/87
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 823 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: N/A SYSTEM: N/A KEYWORD: DOCUMENT STORAGE (6.1.1.4) DESCRIPTION: NEED FILE FOR EXTRA COPIES OF PROCEDURES OBSERVATION: Operators suggest that they need a file cabinet for loose copies of procedures which are used in place of the bound procedure when extra copies of procedures are needed for checking or for monitoring. PRIORITY: IV i RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. There are file cabinets in the control room (outside of the "At controls area" and behind Panel H11-P810) that are provided for this purpose. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/26/87 L--______________
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 824 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: N/A SYSTEM: N/A KEYWORD: DOCUMENT STORAGE-(6.1.1.4) DESCRIPTION: REPLACE BULKY. BOOKS WITH HANGING FILES OBSERVATION: Ons Operator suggested that hanging files would be helpful to replace the bulky books now used to store. procedures. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. The books containing the procedures within the At Controls Area" is the preferable method for procedure storage and use. The present method minimizes the probability for misplacing a given procedure within the "At Controls Area." B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): l STATUS: Closed l-1 i CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/26/87 l l l l i
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 825 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1; _________________________________________________________________________c PANEL: N/A SYSTEM: N/A KEYWORD: DOCUMENT STORAGE (6.1.1.4) _________________________________________________________________________s DESCRIPTION: NEED ADDITIONAL PLANT DRAWINGS ON FILE OBSERVATION: It was suggested that a more complete card file is needed in the RTC to assure that most drawings can be called up when required. ________________________________________________________________________m PRIORITY: IV ________________________________________________________________________a RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION j l I RECOMMENDED CORRECTION FLAN: 1 A. Recommended Correction: None. Any specific cards for additional drawings can be added as desired by operations. I B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): 1 STATUS: Closed i i CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87 f 1 i
)
l 1 1 1 l l l l l l l l J
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: -826 SOURCE: OPERATOR-INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 t ____________________________.._____________________________________________ PANEL: H11-P815 SYSTEM: N/A KEYWORD: DOCUMENT STORAGE (6.1.1.4) DESCRIPTION: ALARM RESPONSE PROCEDURE STORAGE NOT ADEQUATE OBSERVATION: Storage.for Procedures - The storage area for all procedures is not adsquate. . In particular, the Alarm Response Procedures are stored under the operators desk, not at the panels,where_they a~e used. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. Storage space at the operator's console is adequate. In eddition, Operations prefers to have the Alarm Response Procedures centrally located. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): i STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 827 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1
---__-__--____--_-_-_----______---___---------____-----___---_---_______-e PANEL: H11-P814 SYSTEM: H4000 KEYWORD: VOICE COMMUNICATION
__-----__-----_-------_-_--------_--_---------_-----_----_____--------_-_e DESCRIPTION: AUTO-DIAL TELEPHONE OBSERVATION: An auto-dial telephone on the desk would help the operators when they need to make calls inside or outside the plant. The auto dial would have a preset list of numbers and require only calling up a two digit number.
-___--_------------____________-_-_____--_____---___-____-______-__--_- J PRIORITY: IV
---__-----____-----______----__-----_------------_------__-------_-___-_e RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: The observation applies to the non-emergency phones only. (Emergency response phones have direct lines). Operations to determine if they want auto-dialer; and if so, what type. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: 1
HUMAN' ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 828 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1-EPANEL: VARIOUS SYSTEM: VARIOUS KEYWORD: . TRAINING (SEE HED 752)
' DESCRIPTION: DIFFERENT VINTAGE COMPUTER SYSTEMS OBSERVATION:
i Opsretors noted that the computers are of different vintages and require
'different skill levels for operation. There is no consistency in the data or the formats used. Several newer P/C's have been suggested for
~
une in.the area and these will add to the Operators problems as they try to stay proficient on several different systems. __________________________________________________________________________ j PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION. RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. HED 752 addresses this concern. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/26/87 L 1 l l I { l l t 1 L_---_--_-_.
HUMAN' ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 829' SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1
- PANEL
- VARIOUS- SYSTEM: VARIOUS KEYWORD: TRAINING (SEE HED 752)
DESCRIPTION: INADEQUATE TRAINING TIME ON COMPUT3RS OBSERVATION: Operators noted that training time on computer systems is limited and with.the number of systems it is not possible to stay proficient on each system. _______________________________________________________________________ c PRIORITY: N/A
-..___________..________________________________________________________c RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: '
A. Recommended Correction: None. HED 752 addresses this concern. i B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/19/87
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 l MED NO.: 830 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL:'VARIOUS SYSTEM: VARIOUS KEYWORD: TRAINING (SEE HED 752) DESCRIPTION: IACK OF TRAINING ON COMPUTERS
' OBSERVATION: .It;has been suggested that some operators.are reluctant to use the computers. -This is because of'the lack of familiarity with them and the' lock of consistent training on computers.
PRIORITY: N/A' RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION
-RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: 'A. Recommended Correction:
None. HED 752 addresses this concern.
)B . . Immediate Compensatory Actions'or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/19/87 I h l l l
e l i i
'I HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 l
l HED NO.: 831. SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1,l . _________________________________.______________________________________q ' PANEL: VARIOUS SYSTEM: VARIOUS KEYWORD: TRAINING (SEE HED 752) l 4 ______-_-______--___-______--_-_________--_________________-____-_______e DESCRIPTION: LACK OF HELP. PROGRAMS ON COMPUTERS OBSERVATION: Computers do not have help programs as they were developed for specific
, applications. More modern computers have help' programs which provide assistance to Operators.
________________________________________________________________________q PRIORITY: N/A
----_.._________________________________________________________________c RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: j None. HED 752 addresses this concern. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): B. l l l STATUS: Closed ; CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/19/87 l i l i i I = _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - - - _ -
k HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.:- 832 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: VARIOUS SYSTEM: VARIOUS
- KEYWORD: SURVEILLANCE 7 _------------------------------_-------------------_--__-------_--------_--
DESCRIPTION: LOGGING DATA BY HAND
' OBSERVATION:.
Operators'suggest that.the computers are not used-for logging data but for monitoring. They are concerned that they need to write numbers down from the computer to make up logs. The computer lacks the capability to store data for future use in many of the points that are monitored. PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. -Recommended Correction: None. Most logs sheets are developed as a record that the operator directly observes the parameter indicated. Information that needs. to be retained for historical purposes is maintained on hard copy. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: l l l .i i 1 4 l 1
' HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 833 ' SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1
_________________________________________________________________________c PANEL: VARIOUS SYSTEM: VARIOUS KEYWORD: TRAINING DESCRIPTION: COMPUTERS NOT AVAILABLE TO OPERATORS OBSERVATION: . Operators suggest that some programs and information is not.available to the operators but only to the technicians in.the computer room. Some of .these are data or programs that they might use if they had the capability. ________________________________________________________________________a PRIORITY:.IV ________________________________________________________________________a RESOLUTION: RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. Training is provided for the computer systems the operator.isL expected to use. For example, the Safety Parameter Display System (SPDS) and Emergency Response Information System (ERIS) training require yearly requalification. Other computers in the control room are used for information gathering and secondary indications. 'B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: i i I i
i HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 834 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: N/A SYSTEM: D1100 l
' KEYWORD: COMPUTERS DESCRIPTION: GAS EFF UNITS DIFFER FROM TECH SPEC UNITS
'h OBSERVATION:
Soms of the guidelines in the Technical Specifications are given in unite-per-day or units-per-month, while the readings that are obtained are in other units. This requires calculations at a critical time and when the operators are under some stress and could make a significant , crror. Of particular concern are the Gaseous Effluent measures which i n:ed to be converted from the units measured to other units for comparison with the specifications. PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION, TRAINING RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Human Factor Engineer to review the Offsite Dose Calculation and recommendations to be incorporated into revision to PDC 6016. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): Training on use of the present ERIS calculations for offsite dose. ! STATUS: CLOSURE: i I 1 i I 1 1 ____________O
l HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI'2 HED NO.: 835- SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1, _________________________________________________________________________s PANEL:'VARIOUS. SYSTEM: VARIOUS
' KEYWORD: DOCUMENTATION i
________________________________________________________________________q DESCRIPTION: A USABLE POWER SUPPLY LOAD LIST IS REQUIRED' OBSERVATION: Power Supplies ' When ' the .IUUt Hi-Com was lost, it required cons'iderable i search time.to~come up with the correct' buss. There is no convenient. j i listnof power supplies below the 480V. ________________________________________________________________________a PRIORITY: III .i ________________________________________________________________________q RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT-RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
. A. Recommended Correction:
Provide' operator usable load' list. 1 B. 'Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: PDC 7196'will'be issued , CLOSURE: 1 1 1 1 1
-f I~
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY -' FERMI 2 l l HED NO.: 836 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV-NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: N/A SYSTEM: N/A KEYWORDi ENVIRONMENT DESCRIPTION: OPERATOR UNIFORMS OBSERVATION: ; Uniforms - Operators have been provided with uniforms to wear on the !
-job. Two comments were made relative to these uniforms. 1) The i uniforms would collect radon in the event of an accident. 2) The uniforms are very close to the military style. You can see the ranks and the hierarchy that has developed.
PRIORITY: IV i l RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION l RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: ! A. Recommended' Correction: None. Issue not in the scope of Control-Room Assessment Team. i B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): 1 i STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/13/87 I 1 1 l l l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 837 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE < PANEL: N/A SYSTEM: P5003 KEYWORD: EMERGENCY SITUATIONS DESCRIPTION: ISOLATION VALVES IN BREATHING AIR SYSTEM OBSERVATION: ! Emergency Breathing Equipment - these are provided in the control room for Operators use under emergency operating conditions. The operator is connected to the tanks. It is suggested that isolation valves for use under emergency conditions are desirable. ____---------_____--_---_-__------______--------_____-----_-___________m PRIORITY: IV ____-_-_--------_-_---------__--_________----_______--_________________m RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. The observation is not clear as to where isolation valves are needed but the present system allows the operators to use the masks when and where desired, and the bottles can be changed out without interrupting service. B. Immediate Compensatory ? + lons or Interim Fix (For Priority I) : STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/13/87
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
'HED NO.: 838 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS .]REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL:_N/A' SYSTEM: N/A KEYWORD:' ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT
- DESCRIPTION: ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT OBSERVATION:
Opsrators1were concerned that they do not have secretarial support
.bsyond the-day shift.. For the other shift they need to provide own typing and filing.
PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION ~ RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. . Recommended Correction: None. Issue not in the scope of the DCRDR Assessment Team. l B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: I t 1 l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 839 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: VARIOUS SYSTEM: VARIOUS KEYWORD: LABELS (SEE HED 945) __---_____---________________--_-____-__-___________________________--__a. DESCRIPTION: LABELING CONCERNS OBSERVATION: LABELING-This was not a specific question in the interview but many responses were generated. Following are some of the concerns brought to the attention of the Task force in the Interview. AMBIGUITY-There are different labels for the same function and equipment in the procedures, ' on the panels, and in the field. Numerous examples were given in the interviews and the panel walkdowns. WRONG INFORMATION ON LABELS-Labels identify equipment not the function being controlled or monitored. IDENTIFICATION NOT CONSISTENT-In some cases the labels use numbers; procedures use directions (such as East or West). TURBINE CONTROLS use English idioms which are not common to US control rooms. IDENTIFICATION OUTSIDE INSTRUMENT-Some recorders & meters which should have identification No. visible on the outside or from the front of the panel do not have this identification. 1 I I __-___________________________________________________________________-_q PRIORITY: N/A ) __---________.--_______..______________--_-__-_-_______________________--y RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION I l l RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. HED 945 addresses this concern. , 1 l B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): ! i l STATUS: Closed l CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/13/87
\
l HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 840 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P805 SYSTEM: VARIOUS KEYWORD: PANEL LAYOUT (6.8.1.1) DESCRIPTION: MIMIC IS NOT ACCURATE AND CAUSES CONFUSION OBSERVATION: The mimic on panel H11-P805 is not accurate and causes confusion. PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Perform task analysis to determine what controls / indications are required on the H11-P805 panel. Modify panel in accordance with the result of the task analysis. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): 1 1 STATUS: Defer to NUREG 0700 Survey CLOSURE: l l l l l l l l l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2-n MED NO.: 841 SOURCE: REV NO.: O PAGE 1
----_-------_--_--__--_' OPERATOR INTERVIEWS
_-_----__-_---_-_-___--_--____---__-_--__--_--_--_4
. PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: VARIOUS
- COMP / INSERT.NO: .601C522. LEGEND: ISOLATION VALVES MIMIC DISPLAY KEYWORD: PANEL' LAYOUT (6.8.1.1)
)
DESCRIPTION: ISOLATION VALVES MIMIC DISPLAY PROBLEMS
. OBSERVATION:
. PRIMARY ISOLATION MIMIC-The Isolation Signal Present light indicators do l The-isolation _section position indicators now'show dark when not work.
valves / dampers for that group are in the mixed positions., Lines on the- ,
' mimic portion should only light up if a complete flow is.present. An example of this.is the RHR system. The present mimic does not recognize {
the _ bypasses for some maj or valves (i.e. E11-F611's).- This results in the appearance that the pumps are running; deadheaded. The RHR suction. I section.shows flowpaths from bothLvessel'and torus when in the shutdown cooling mode of operations._ Some valves that were added to the mimic still do not have field pickups and therefore do not reflect actual position. . Systems are backwards, Division 1 is.on the right and-division 2 on the left. PRIORITY: .III _--_--_-___--__--_-_-_-_--________________-____-_-----__-_-_-__-________c RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Temp Mod has eliminated use of most of the Primary Isolation Mimic.-
.l B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority'I):
i I i STATUS: . Implement EDP 1708 CLOSURE: l a
a f.. HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY'- FERMI 2 ' :HED NO.: 842 . SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1
'. PANEL: VARIOUS. SYSTEM: VARIOUS KEYWORD:'USE 0F. MIMICS (6.6.6.4)
DESCRIPTION:JMIMICS'SOMETIMES LACK INFORMATION OBSERVATION: This was a general comment 1to'the effect that mimics did not always.
. include all the information needed. Some valves on mimics are not shown lcnd should be shown for completeness.
PRIORITY: IV __---_--_-__-__--____-______ ----________---__---__---________----______-- .l LRESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT i RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: ' A
.. Recommended Correction: .l
'B. .Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
STATUS: Defer to NUREG 0700 Survey CLOSURE: i l 4 _ _ - _ - _-- ________ _O
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI'2 l l l HED NO.: -843 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS, REV NO.: 0 . l' PANEL: H11-P815 SYSTEM: 'H3000 KEYWORD: ALARM MESSAGES (6.7.3.2) ________________________________________________________________________g DESCRIPTION: ALARMS NOT-PRINTED BY ALARM PRINTER i L l OBSERVATION: . l Some alarms are'not printed out by the alarm printer. ________________________________________________________________________q PRIORITY:.IV j ________________________________________________________________________4 RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION' PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. All inputs that appear on the visual. alarm _ system will be. printed on_at least'one of the three (3) alarm printers as the input signal is shared between both sub-systems (visual and sequence recorder) B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix ('For Priority I)': STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/26/87
i HUMAN ENGINEERING' DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2' I
.HED ~ NO. :l 844 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS ~ REV NO.: .0 -PAGE 1' 1 PANEL:: rf1l' -P815 SYSTEM: H3000 KEYWORD:' ALARM MESSAGES-(6'7."3'.2) .
i
- DESCRIPTION: PRINTED MESSAGES DON'T ADD INFORMATION.
g OBSERVATION. .; Mont printed alarm messages are.a repeat of what is on the annunciator. . window and do not add any additional information or clarification for i
~ths. operator.
- g. PRIORITY: IV.
. RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION .
RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: !
. A'. Recommended Correction:
None. By design, the printed message is identical to that of the
- corresponding window inscription except for reflash type alarms.
The printed message for reflash points.are more descriptive.than~the window inscription ~. The-operator responds to the visual alarm in-accordance'with the associated Alarm Response Procedure. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): I
. STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/26/87
" HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 845' SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE l' ________________________________________________________________________.4 PANEL: H11-P815 SYSTEM: H3000 KEYWORD: ALARM MESSAGES.(6.7.3.2)
' ~ ~
D SC PT O S SbNNTB C D P OBSERVATION: Alarm summaries cannot be called up. Only the previous printed sheets may be reviewed. Where a number of alarms comes in, this could be a' problem and could reduce the ability of the operator.to solve problems. PRIORITY: III ________________________________________________________________________e RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION
. l . RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: 1 A. Recommended Correction:
Both the old Sequence of Events Recorder (SOER) System.and None. the new SOER have the ability to produce alarm summaries on operator; ' demand. The existing SOER allows the operator to request an alarm summary from the control room terminal keyboard. POM 23.621 describes how to obtain an alarm summary. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): 1 STATUS: Closed ! CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/26/87 l 1 i l l
.___.m_ _ _ _
- y HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 n,
HED NO.:' 84' 6 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- l PANEL: H11-P815 SYSTEM: H3000
,y KEYWORD:1 ALARM MESSAGES (6.7.3.2)
DESCRIPTION: ALARM PRINTER COLORS DON'T MATCH WINDOW. COLOR OBSERVATION: The Alarm Printer prints alarms in more than one color. These colors
;chould match the colors used in the annunciators but they do not.
PRIORITY: IV , j RESCLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED < ; RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: ! A. Recommended Correction: None. The two-alarm printers in the. control room only print in black. Alarm messages are printed to the11 eft of the center of the page; return to normals are printed to the ' Tight of the center of the page. The CRT displays all alarms in red and the return to , normal ia' green. The two colors were chosen for their good contrast. j B. Imbediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix-(For Priority I): ! STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/26/87 l
/
-t 1
i s I
4. HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 847 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1: PANEL: H11-P815 SYSTEM: H3000 KEYWORD: ALARM MESSAGES (6.7.3.2) DESCRIPTION: TOO MANY STATUS POINTS ARE RECORDED OBSERVATION: Too many status points are recorded on the sequence of events recorder and these mask out the real alarms. ________________________________________________________________________q PRIORITY: IV ________________________________________________________________________q RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION l RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: J A. Recommended Correction:
- None. Per NUREG 0700 6.7.3.2a guidelines, all annunciator alarms should be recorded. Present system meets these guidelines. In addition, procedure 23.621 provides guidelines for manually defeating an alarm that may be masking other valid alarms.
B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/26/87
3 T. ;' , i j 3. HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 i
\
HED NO.: 848 SOURCE: OJERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO. - 0 PAGE 1 SYSTEM: H3000 i PANEL: H11-P815 s 1 i KEYWORD: ALARM MESSAGES (6.7.3.2) r DESCRIPTION: SOER MESSAGE SHOULD MATCH ANN?NCIATOR WINDOW OBSERVATION: l For the Operator to understand the Sequence of Events Recorder (SOER), j m : cge quickly, the wcrds on the recordar should match the annuncia. tor ; clerm window. The Operrter should not nave to gress what the alarm is. !
\
PRIORITY: IV { RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. The SOER printed message is. identical to that of the corresponding window inscription, except for refit.sh points. Fol: reflash points, the SOER printed message is more descriptive, than the corresponding window of the problem. All SOER pr.inted messa7ss identify the corresponding alarm window number so that the operator doesn't have to guess what the alarm is. , i B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Iyterim Fix (FoiiPriority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/26/87 t j l
.)
i l l l l l f L _ . . _-
.) HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 ,
l I
- t I 1
( HED NO.: 849 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 ________________________..________________________________________________q PANEL: VARIOUS SYSTEM: H3000 l i KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR (SE HED 763) as _________________________________________________________________________< [. DESCRIPTION: FIRST OUT. ANNUNCIATION i OBSERVATION: .i The comments do noti reNate to the function of the printers but to the information the rrinter s produces. Operators do not have a first out l indication thaf. works for thevi. They de not see the Sequence of Events f Recordue as prtviding this information. I ________________..,.,L_____________________________________________________ FRIORITY: N/A
^i RE90LUTT0tt: NO CORRECTION
( RECO.M ENDED CSBRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended C:srection: Ncne. HED 763' addresses this concern. B.i Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
+
t Od'ATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/13/87 1 i i
-= l 1
r e
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 i i J
'HED NO.: 850 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P805 SYSTEM: N2102 COMP / INSERT NO: 5B14 LEGEND: TACHOMETER SELECT 5B40 TACHOMETER SELECT i
KEYWORD: CONTROLS (6.4.1.1)
}
DESCRIPTION: DIFFICULT TO OPERATE SWITCHES i OBSERVATION: Some controls are just hard to operate physically. REACTOR FEEDPUMP GOVERNOR TEST SWITCHES - Stiff springs and shape of handle make the ' switch difficult to hold in' test position. PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: l A. Recommended Correction: Replace existing knurled handles with ones that are easier to hold onto. Reference PDC-6999. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Issue PDC 6999 CLOSURE: I
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 851 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: C7100 COMP / INSERT NO: 3A48 LEGEND: REAC MODE KEYWORD: CONTROLS (6.4.4.2) ___--_---___________________--_____________-______--______--___--_-__-__m DESCRIPTION: REACTOR MODE SWITCH DIFFICULT TO OPERATE OBSERVATION: Some controls are just hard to operate physically. REACTOR MODE SWITCH
- Stiff springs and shape of handle and the resistance of the multiple l switches make the switch difficult to operate.
__-----_____--_ ----____--___________----_________________---_--_____-_ a PRIORITY: IV _-_-----____--____________________--_---_____________ .-_____-_-___--__-9 RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION 1 RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. The high resistance prevents any inadvertent operation of the! switch. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interin Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/13/87 1
l a HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 852 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: C1100 PANEL: H11-P805 SYSTEM: C1100 KEYWORD: PANEL LAYOUT (6.8.1.1) i DESCRIPTION: HARD TO SEE CRD DISCH INDICATOR ON H11-P805 ! OBSERVATION: In come situations displays cannot be seen when operating control rods. l While pulling rods, it is not easy to see the CONTROL ROD DRIVE DISCHARGE PRESSURE indication on panel H11-P805. PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION ' i RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: A discharge pressure indicator for CRD does not exist on H11-P805. All indication immediately pertinent to control rod withdrawal is ! located on H11-P603. l B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87 1 l 4 I l 1 i< l l l 4 1
)
l l l I l i
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 , i HED NO.: 853 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 COMP / INSERT NO: 3A40 LEGEND: IRM A 3A41 IRM C 3A42 IRM H 3A43 IRM F 3A44 IRM D 3A45 IRM B 3A46 IRM E 3A47 IRM G KEYWORD: CONTROLS (6.4.2.1) _____---_____-_-____-____---____--____--__--___-__-_---___-_-_--___-____J DESCRIPTION: IRM SCALE SWITCH DIRECTION UNCONVENTIONAL OBSERVATION: The Intermediate Range Monitor Switch is used to k9ep the ronitors on scale. These controls have been set so that the control movement tracks! the display movement. Operators have learned this response, but under stress conditions, they may revert to a more natural movement which could cause a partial scram. Changing these switches at this time is not a simple matter of reversing, but would require putting in place a different switch with different characteristics, so that new learning , I would be required rather than changed learning. i
----__-----_-_,----_------_---_--------_---__---__-__----_---__----_-_-_d PRIORITY: III
--____-_--_-____-__-___-_-----___-----__--_-----_-_------_--------------q RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: '
A. Recommended Correction: Add label to describe switch operation. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Issue a PDC 1 i CLOSURE: j J l l 1 i l 4
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 854 SOURCE: ' OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P806 SYSTEM: N6200 ,
! ~ KEYWORD: PANEL LAYOUT (6.8.1.2)
DESCRIPTION:.-. POOR LAYOUT FOR OFF GAS SYSTEM OBSERVATION: Th2 H11-P806 Panel appears to be a symptom of a mimic that has been carried too far and which has lost the simplicity-that a mimic should
. imp 2rt. The number and complexity of controls and indications on H11-P806 p nel make it difficult to operate. A number of the indicators and come of the controls could be removed and operated in the field when raquired. A Gystematic' effort is required to reduce the complexity of this panel arid the clutter and noise it causes the operator.
PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
-A. Recommended Correction:
B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Prio:-ity I): STATUS: Defer to NUREG 0700 Survey CLOSURE: f i l i
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 855 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 _________________________________________________________________________\ PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: N2100,B3100 j COMP / INSERT NO: 3A108 LEGEND: RECIRC MG B GEN SPEED CONTROL ! 3A112 FEEDWATER FLOW A CONTROL KEYWORD: PANEL LAYOUT (6.8.1.3) t ________________________________________________________________________q DESCRIPTION: FEEDWATER & RECIRCULATION CONTROLS TOO CLOSE l OBSERVATION: > The FEEDWATER and the RECIRCULATING controls are similar in appearance and could be mistaken and operated in error. The controls are close together and are operated while watching indicators on another panel section. ________________________________________________________________________q PRIORITY: III ________________________________________________________________________c RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Add label just above pushbuttons identifying controller function for; both the feedwater and recirc pump controllers. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): i STATUS: Issue a PDC CLOSURE: l l
t . L i 4 HUMAN _ ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY -' FERMI 2 ;l s. HED:NO.: 85'6 . SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601' SYSTEM:'B2106
. PANEL:'H11-P602 SYSTEM: B2106 KEYWORD:~ CONTROL-DISPLAY-(6.9.3.2)
DESCRIPTION: DIFFICULT MANUEVER FOR MSIV-LCS SURVEILLANCE OBSERVATION: Tiur Main Steam Line Leakage Control system requires surveillance testing
'onca-a month..'It takes some time to stroke the. valves open. While this ils happening, the Operator must (1) Hold a spring operated test switch' (2) Operate a stop watch (3) push and hold in a pushbutton. This is a two man operation,.for a simple surveillance test.
PRIORITY: IV
-RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION-RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: None. Larger potential for error exists if' test switch is not spring' return. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix1(For Priority I): STATUS: Closed ! CLOSUREi Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/13/87 l f I
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 857 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1: _________________________________________________________________________e PANEL: VARIOUS SYSTEM: VARIOUS KEYWORD: VISUAL DISP (6.5.1.1&6.5.1.2) DESCRIPTION: GEMAC CONTROLLER CONCERN OBSERVATION: ; Operators were asked about controls that might be a source of I inadvertent operation. They did not report any directly. However, in ! response to other questions Operators-did point out potential problems ! that they were able to deal with because of training. The GEMAC controller has some problems. One of these is'that the indicators are in percent, not in engineering units as are suggested by the NUREG 0700 and human engineering standards in use by DECO. Use of percent requires Operator to make a calculation or to have a table of values available to j ' know what the control is doing. PRIORITY: III ________________________________________________________________________q RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: l A. Recommended Correction: Recommend that a PDC be generated to provide modification of GEMAC scales to provide engineering units. This PDC needs to be ; coordinated with PDC 3515 " Color Coding and Units of Main Control l Room Indication and Recorder Scales." 1 B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE:
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED No.: 858 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: VARIOUS SYSTEM: VARIOUS KEYWORD: VISUAL DISPLAYS (SEE HED 857) DESCRIPTION: GEMAC CONTROLLER CONCERN l OBSERVATION: Op2rators were asked about controls that might be a source of ; inadvertent operation. They did not report any directly. However, in rs ponse to other questions, Operators did point out potential problems that they were able to deal with because of training. The GEMAC l controller has some problems. One of these is that the indicators are ! in percent, not in engineering units as are suggested by the NUREG 0700 and human engineering standards in use by DECO. Use of percent requires Oparator to make a calculation or to have a table of values available to know what the control is doing. PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION l RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Already addressed. This is a duplicate of HED 857. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87 I l l I y 1 i i 1 l 4 I t : 1
I l HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 l l HED NO.: 859 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 ! PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: C1107 l COMP / INSERT NO: 603C521 LEGEND: ROD & DETECTOR DISPLAY MODULE KEYWORD: VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.3.1) 1
--_-------_---__--_-----_---_----_-__-----__-_-__----___-_--___--_--__--w DESCRIPTION: No LAMP TEST FOR FULL CORE DISPLAY OBSERVATION: ,
The FULL CORE DISPLAY is on the H11-P603 panel 'C' surface and includes ! indication of position for all 185 rods with eight lights for each one. Lamps do not have a lamp test. Failure is observed in the dual lamps by the burned out lamp being noted as less bright. Under the lighting conditions in the Control Room these may not be easily apparent. Changing lamps in the display is difficult so these changes may be put off and not happen as often as they should.
----_-_----____------________--_____---_-_____---__________-----__----__d PRIORITY: IV
----------__--______--_----____--_---____--____--_-----___--_------_-_--q RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION l
RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. In the event both bulbs were burned out for a given indicator? window, the operator could easily identify this and verify particular control rod condition from running an OD-7, option 2 or by selecting and observing rod position indication on the four rod display. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): , I STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87 l
I HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY'- FERMI 2 j HED NO.: 860 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: S1300 KEYWORD: PANEL LAYOUT (6.8.1.1) __________________________________________________________________________. 1 DESCRIPTION:. ADDITIONAL MEGAWATT METER 1
=
OBSERVATION: Optrctors use the output of the unit as a measure of performance. The indication of output is not easily apparent or accessible to the Opsrator. Two indications are provided, one on the 'A' surface of the H11-P804 panel,'and the other on the H11-P811 panel. Operators would liko to have an indication of power being put out available to them in and easily read from any place in the control room. They suggest this would be best in a digital meter similar to that on H11-P811, but on the ; H11-P603 panel. { I PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. -Recommended Correction: None. The present indications for main generator megawatts in the ; Control Room are effective and do not present inconvenience for the - operator. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): ; STATUS: Closed 1 CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87 l \ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ .
i HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 J HED NO.: 861 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: 0 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P805 SYSTEM: VARIOUS l KEYWORD: VISUAL DISPLAYS (SEE HED 857) DESCRIPTION: DUPLEX GAGES IN CONTROL ROOM l OBSERVATION: These meters have two scales, one to show set point and the other the process variable. For some of these scales the set points and the process variabic are not in matching units. This makes it difficult for the operator to scan the panel and see that the two values are matched.
. Operator would have difficulty in the early identification of differences in the set point and process variable. Scanning of the panel would be difficult if not impractical.
________-----____.--_-_----_. ____-----_--_---__-_---_--__--__-_-_----__a PRIORITY: N/A. _-------_-____---_---___--_--_--_-__-----_---_--_----_--___-_-__---__---e RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. HED 857 addresses this concern. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed ,
' CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87 1
l
)
l 1 l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 l HED'NO.: 862 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: VARIOUS SYSTEM: VARIOUS KEYWORD: LABEL CONTENT (6.6.3.3) DESCRIPTION: INCONSISTENT LABELING OF RESET PUSHBUTTONS OBSERVATION:
-A' number of reset pushbuttons are used on the panels. These are not lEbsled consistently. .Some have no labels.and others are not associated with the control they reset. As these reset pushbuttons may be infrequently used, they should have sufficient identification to allow thsm to be easily identified and associated with the. control they are reactting. j PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT.
RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A.- Recommended Correction: i B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Defer to NUREG 0700 Survey { i CLOSURE: L l i
, _ _ _ ~ _ - _ _ _ _ . _ HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 3 i HED NO.: 863 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE lj _________________________________________________________________________q PANEL: VARIOUS SYSTEM: VARIOUS ) i KEYWORD: VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.3.1) DESCRIPTION: HAYS REPUBLIC METER ALARM BACKLIGHTING , OBSERVATION: At one time the Hays-Republic Meters were backlit and had a red indicator-lamp which showed when they were in an alarm condition. This lamp has been removed or is no longer in use. One operator saw the i reactivation of this red backlighting as desirable to alert Operators toj where the. alarm condition is coming from. This is a feature that had been available but is now removed from the system. ________________________________________________________________________f PRIORITY: IV l ________________________________________________________________________q RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION j i RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: j None. The red backlighting feature was not found to be reliable forl ' all systems utilizing meters of this type. Therefore, for consistency and reliability, the red backlighting feature was removed. , 1 B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87 i
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.:- 864 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 1
------... ----------------------------------------------------------------- l l
PANEL: N/A SYSTEM: N/A KEYWORD: VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.3) DESCRIPTION: " REACTOR WASTE FLOW METER" READABILITY POOR 1 OBSERVATION: Op rator noted that this meter has a matte blue ribbon scale which is not' visible from many positions in the control room as the viewing angle ic restricted. An indicator with an arrow and a scale would be more vicible. The problem with reading this at other positions except directly in front of the scale. , PRIORITY: N/A l l RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION I i RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: ! A. Recommended Correction: None. This description doesn't match any blue ribbon scale I indicator in the control room. l B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): l STATUS: Closed l CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87 l i l, 1 l l l 1 l l i
1 HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 ! 1 HED NO.: 865 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 _-____---_-_------___-______---____________-_-___--------__-_______-____d PANEL: VARIOUS SYSTEM: VARIOUS KEYWORD:-RECORDER- ___ ---___---______-___---___--_-__---__ ---__-__---_--___-__---______--_t DESCRIPTION: BAILEY RECORDERS NOT RELIABLE 1 OBSERVATION: Operator suggest the Bailey'RecordersLare unreliable and difficult to maintain. Operators do not have confidence in them and recommend they be removed. They are reported as hard to read, difficult to maintain, and not reliable. The'Baile y Recorders have poor mechanical design, a j poor paper feeding mechanism and often do not track the indicator and l the scale. 1
----___--_______--____-___-_--______---____---_ ----____-_-___-__--__ -_J PRIORITY: III i
___----___-_-____ --________---___--___--____-___--_----__--__--___-____d RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED. CORRECTION PLAN: , A. Recommended Correction: ] Replace Bailey Recorders per PDC-5695A. : 1 B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: PDC 5695, Rev A has been approved. j CLOSURE: i l 1 I l l
i l I l
}
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 l HED No.: 866 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV No.: O PAGE 1 i __________________________________________________________________________ j ' PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: G3304 j j KEYWORD: GRAPHIC RECORDERS (6.5.4.1) DESCRIPTION: RWCU RECORDER MAINTENANCE CAUSES FALSE ALARMS OBSERVATION: Reactor Water _ Cleanup Recorder - This recorder is'outside the control room.- The alarm point is from the recorder and when the pen is moved. for adjustment or replacement of the tip, the alarm comes in and erratic control activity' takes place. Operators should be able to verify any alarms that come in from the control room. False alarms that cannot be verified should be avoided. PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Recommend that a PDC be prepared to remove these control / alarm functions from these recorders. These features should be taken from separate flow transmitters to remove a problem of this type. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Issue a PDC CLOSURE: i
\
V. HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
.. HED NO.: 867 . SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1
.__________'__________________________________________________________c PANEL: VARIOUS SYSTEM: VARIOUS
' KEYWORD: GRAPHIC' RECORDERS (6.5.4.1)
~ ~
~
bESbN$P T1G OF C P S ]
- OBSERVATION:'
One Operator pointed out that recorders are calibrated to the position
'of the pen. When readings are made, they are made at the scale position. Significant differences are possible between these readings and this could be the source of problems for operators.
_______________ ___________________ ________ ___________ _______________c PRIORITY: III
. ____ ___ ___ _____ ____________ _____ __ _____ ____ _______ _______ e RESOLUTION: PROCEDURE l
RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: I&c Maintenance to revise procedure to align scale with pen position on paper prior to recorder calibration. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): 1 STATUS: Prepare a memo / meeting with I&C Maintenance required CLOSURE
- I i
i l :. f
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
'HED NO.': 868 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS- REV NO.: 0 .PAGE 1.
PANEL: VARIOUS SYSTEM: VARIOUS KEYWORD: RECORDER H
. DESCRIPTION: : RECORDERS LOCKING DEVICE FOR SERVICING OBSERVATION:
'Rscorders are not all mounted' safely. Several recorders are mounted on the 'A" panel. surface. These.have a problem that they may not stay in plcca when they are being serviced. They may and have fallen back into the panel wit . Recorders that fall back into the panel could cause an
; upsat or damage tcr the recorder. . The design of the locking device-should be checked to be sure it will hold.
1 PRIORITY: IV . l l RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED. CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: All 'A' surface recorders will be replaced with recorders which have a locking device. .(reference' PDC-5695A). B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or-Interim Fix (For Priority I):. i STATUS: PDC-5695, Rev A has been approved. l ' CLOSURE:
I HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 i HED NO.: 863 SOURCE:-OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1. PANEL: H11-P812 SYSTEM: D1100 l COMP / INSERT NO: D11-K610 LEGEND: EFFLUENT'RADN MONITOR CTL TERMINAL I KEYWORD: PANEL LAYOUT AND DESIGN DESCRIPTION: CT-2B INFO NOT AVAILABLE IN AT CONTROLS AREA 1 OBSERVATION: The CT-2B RADIATION MONITOR RECORDER is in back of the H11-P602 panel and is required to be checked several times a shift and as part of several procedures. PRIORITY: II RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION . RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Bring information provided on CT-2B into the at controls area of the control room. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Issue a PDC CLOSURE: l 4
F HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 870 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601 BACK PANEL SYSTEM: D1100 KEYWORD: PANEL LAYOUT (6.8.1.1) DESCRIPTION: MAIN STM LINE RADIATION MONITOR REC PLACEMENT OBSERVATION: Savoral recorders or meters require checking several times a shift or as part of procedures that are completed in the control room. In several casos these are located behind the main panels and require an operator - to leave the horseshoe to check. The MAIN STEAM LINE RADIATION MONITOR 10 in back of the H11-P601 panel and is required to be checked several timas a shift and as part of several procedures. PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Shiftly surveillance and annunciator alarms are used to monitor these rad levels adequately. Alarm setpoints are conservatively set to ensure proper action.
.B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87 i i l I i i
l L L i HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 871 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1:
----_-----____-___---__---__---__---_---__---_---------_-___-----__----_-c L PANEL: H11-P601 BACK PANEL SYSTEM: D1100 l
KEYWORD: PANEL LAYOUT (6.8.1.1) 1 l __-----__--___----_---_---__----__-_---_____---_-------_--__-----__--_--_? l DESCRIPTION: OFF. GAS RADIATION MONITOR PLACEMENT OBSERVATION: , Several recorders or meters require checking several times a shift or as l part of procedures that are completed in the control room. In several l cases these are located behind the main panels and require an operator j to leave the horseshoe to check. The OFF GAS RADIATION MONITOR is in i back of the H11-P601 panel and is required to be checked several times aj shift and as part of several procedures. ! i
--__--------------_____---___----___-----------__---__---_--__-----_____4l PRIORITY: III
--_-_---____----____---____--____-_-__---___--__-___--____------------__q RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION l RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: Shiftly surveillance and annunciator alarms are used to monitor these rad levels adequately. Alarm setpoints are conservatively set L to ensure proper action. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87 I i i ( l 1 l l L___________.____
-l HUMAN-ENGINEERING. DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 872 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL:.H11-P602 SYSTEM: G4100 KEYWORD: VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.1)
-DESCRIPTION: LEVEL INDICATION UNAVAILABLE IN CONTROL ROOM , l OBSERVATION: I Tha Fuel Pool Purging Surge Tank Level Indication tells the Operator when more water is needed. The information is not available to the i Opsrator now except.as a level alarm. The Operator needs to send to the ! RAD Waste Control Room to check status. This information should be available in the control room. Operator should have all information 'rsquired for operation available in the control room. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: No correction necessary. The level information is available in the .; main control: room from the Sequence of Events Recorder. 'B.- Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): j STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/13/87 i
~
1 I l l l i l 1 I
HUMAM ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
'HED NO.: 873 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.:- O PAGE il
--_---------_---------_-----------_---___--_----------------------------_f PANEL: Hil-P602 SYSTEM: T4500 KEYWORD: PANEL LAYOUT (6.8.1.1) 1
--------_-------------------_-__------_-_-_-------------------__---_-----q DESCRIPTION: DRYWELL EQUIP DRAIN SUMP LEVEL NOT AVAILABLE OBSERVATION:
Drywell Equipment Drain Sump Indicator Level'information not available in the control' room. Information is available for the floor Drain Sump,, but the equipment Drain is available only outside the control room. 1 Another pen position on the recorder would be helpful in solving this problem. Operator should have all information required for operation ; available in the control room. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: No correction. A flow recorder and a high sump level annunciator are provided for the DWED. Abnormal leakage is expected to go to the DWFD rather than the DWED, making another level indicator unnecessary. .; B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority.I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87 I 1 I
,= a Wib r fj) sth.
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY'- FERMI 2 4, 1
'h HED NO.:? 374 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS _ REV NO.:- 0 lPAGE l
' PANEL: 'H11-P805 SYSTEM: N2200 KEYWORD: CONTROLS (SEE HED 455)
-DESCRIPTION: UNNECESSARY CONTROLS / DISPLAYS IN CONTROL ROOM 1 OBSERVATION: 3, . .
Thn operators' admit that_they have. limited experience with some controls~ cand displays, butLthey see some that have limited utility. Some.' systems have_been' replaced functionally over. time while the need:for others is
.not asiapparent as was once.seen. 'The basis for recommended deletions.
-from the-control room is low rate of use.and low importance. Heater Drain Valves - (Hll-P805 Panel) -
are)seen as being not essential for-Control' Room Operations.- Removing'these.would provid9 some space for reducing thefclutter that'thiscpanel has developed. *
' ' PRIORITY:.N/A RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION q,
. RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: 'j None. HED 455 addresses this concern. , B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority _I): STATUS: Closed
~
CLOSURE: Per'HED Assessment Team Review 7/23/87 o 9 h ___E_______.._________. . . . _ . .
3 HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 REV NO.: PAGE 11 HED NO.: 875 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS O
' PANEL: H11-P808 SYSTEM: R3001 1 PANEL: H11-P817 SYSTEM: R3001 KEYWORD: PANEL LAYOUT (6.8.1.1)
DESCRIPTION: DIESEL GEN FAN CONTROLS NOT NEEDED IN CTL RM OBSERVATION: UNNECESSARY CONTROLS OR DISPLAYS IN THE CONTROL ROOM - The operators s admit that they have limited experience with some controls and displays, but they.see some that have limited utility. Some systems have been replaced functionally over time while the need for others is not as apparent as was once seen. The basis for recommended deletions from the control room is low rate of use and' low importance. Diesel Fans Auto Start - are not seen as needed in the control room.
----------------.-------------------------------------------------------e PRIORITY:'IV
------------------------------------------------------------------------a RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: None. It is' plant philosophy to maintain component control from the main control room. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/13/87
7 i f h HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 ,
, s
- i HED NO.: 876 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O! FAGE'~ 1
_____________________________________._____________________.___.~_..________ PANEL: H11-P805 3y SYSTEM: N2200 4 s KEYWORD: CONTROLS (SEE HED 455) DESCRIPTION: HEATER EMERGENCY DRAINS CONTROLS NOT NEEDED i OBSERVATION: ' The operators admit that they have limited experichce with some controis cnd displays, but they cee some that have limited utility. Some systegn, huvo been replaced functionally over time while t?te need for others is not as apparent as was once seen. The basics for recommended deletions fromthe control room is low rate of use and low importaren. Heater emnrgency Drains are Motor Operated Valves whic't are not seen as needed in the control room. s PRIORITY: N/A _____________________________________________...__.___________________~ __ RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. HED 455 covers this concern. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interin Mix (For Priority I)'; STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/23/87 l T
]
.. .g ! ~ .
t i-
' MUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 ]
i HED NO. : 877 ' SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1
----------- ..-- .... ------------------------ ..-------------------------- y i
PANEL: H11-P307 SYSTEM: P6100 KEYWORD; PANEL IiAYOUT (6.8.1.1) 4 DESCRIPTION: acMOVE AUX BOILER CONTROLS FROM CCNTROL ROOM OBSERVATION: The operat' ors admit that they have limited experience with some controls and displays, but they see some that have limited utility. Some systems have been replaced functionally over time while the need for others is not as apparent as was once seen. The basis for recommended deletions from the control room is low rate of use and low importance. The Auxiliary Boilers are used for plant heating and as a source of steam for dehydrating. These are now in the control room and take a large sectio,n of a panel. These could be in the Auxiliary Boiler House and controlled from that location.
-------. ---..-------------------..---------------------------------------e PRIORITY: IV
----------__----------_-_ ..--- ...-_------------------_------------------d RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION--
RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: f Hone. It is the plant philosophy to maintsin component control from{ the control room. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interin Fix (For Priority I): I STATUS: Closed ,
)
CLOSURE : Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87 j i i w ._____ _____ - -._ m _.- _ _ __
t ;- ' HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS- REV NO.: O PAGE 1 LHED _________ NO.: _878-
' PANEL: H11-P814 SYSTEM: H1100
' COMP / INSERT NO: 814A500. LEGEND: ESFSD SWITCHES-814B511 ESFSD DISPLAY j l KEYWORD: DISPLAY. ,
DESCRIPTION:; EMERGENCY' STATUS SYSTEM UNNECESSARY' l'
= OBSERVATION:
The Emergency Status' System is in the middle of the Operator's. Console. ! ilt; takes up: prime sptse but has limited utility. Operators.would not be upset by removing it from the' console. PRIORITY:'IV RESOLUTION: NO: CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
'A. Recommended Correction:
None.. The Emergency Status System was installed to meet the intent. of Reg.' Guide 1.47 and is therefore required and was a' condition for receiving an operating license. Even though the unit takes up prime space of the Operator's console, t here still. exists ample desk space for operator use. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
. STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team review 6/4/87 - (NE-NS-87-0177) i 1
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 I HED NO.: 879 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 _________________________________________________________________________3 PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: E1000 i COMP / INSERT NO: E10-K800 LEGEND: REAC SUB-BSMT PIPE LEAK DETECTION l E10-M800 REAC SUB-BSMT PIPE LEAK DETECTION ! l KEYWORD: VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.1) ________________________________________________________________________q DESCRIPTION: ECCS SUCTION LEAK DETECTION SYSTEM NOT USED , i OBSERVATION: I UNNECESSARY CONTROLS OR DISPLAYS IN THE CONTROL ROOM - The operators I admit that they have limited experience with some controls and displays,l but they see some that have limited utility. Some systems have been replaced functionally apparent as was once over time while the need for others is not asThe basis for recom seen. ) control ro6m is low rate of use and low importance. The Leak Detector System Display has never been used and Operators suggest it could be removed. ________________________________________________________________________q PRIORITY: IV i ________________________________________________________________________q RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION l RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PIAN: A. Recommended Corrections Revise PDC 3613 " Deletion of ECCS Suction Line Leak Detection System" to include removal of the controls and displays for system E1000 from Panel H11-P601. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Issue Revised PDC 3613 CLOSURE:
HUMAN-ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 I l HED NO.: 880 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 l PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: G1100 COMP / INSERT NO: G11-R600 LEGEND: DRYWELL SUMP FLOW (FLR& EQUIP DRAINS) l KEYWORD: PANEL LAYOUT (6.8.1.1) 1 1 DESCRIPTION: DRYWELL SYSTEM FLOW RECORDER UNNECESSARY OBSERVATION: ) UNNECESSARY CONTROLS OR DISPLAYS IN THE CONTROL ROOM - The operators admit that they have limited experience with some controls and displays, ; but they see some that have limited utility. Some systems have been replaced functionally over time while the need for others is not as cpparent as was once seen. The basis for recommended deletions from the control room is low rate of use and low importance. The Drywell Systcm Flow Recorder could be removed from the control room. __________________________________________________________________________ i PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION l RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: - A. Recommended Correction: None. Tech Specs 3.4.3.1.b requires that this flow recorder be operable. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
'HED NO.: 881 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1;
______________________________________o__________________________________< PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: E4102 KEYWORD: VISUAL DISPLAY DESCRIPTION: HPCI VIBRATION METER OBSERVATION: UNNECESSARY CONTROLS OR DISPLAYS IN THE CONTROL ROOM - The operators admit that they have limited experience with some controls and displays, but they see some that have limited utility. Some systems have been replaced functionally over time while the need for others is not as apparent as was once seen. The basis for recommended deletions from the control room is low rate of use and low importance. The High Pressure i Coolant Injection Vibration Meter could be removed from the Control Room, i ________________________________________________________________________e PRIORITY: I ________________________________________________________________________q RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION l l RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: l A. Recommended Correction: 1 None. The HPCI' Vibration meter serves to provide information ) regarding potential HPCI Pump Turbine problems. l 1' B. Inmediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: i t
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 882 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: VARIOUS SYSTEM: VARIOUS KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR DESCRIPTION: TOO MANY ALARMS IN AT ANY ONE TIME OBSERVATION: -Tha number of alarms in at any one time is seen as too many. Under shut down conditions, about 200 alarms are in at any one time. Under op: rating conditions, about 100 are in. PRIORITY: III f 1 RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORREJTED
\
RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. Nuclear Operations has in place a program to minimize the number of inoperable or continuously alarming annunciators in the Control Room (ROIP Indicator - Goal C). This program is reviewed by Nuclear Operations Management on an ongoing basis. Additionally, an administrative procedure exists (POM 23.621, REV 11) which allows the operator to manually defeat the alarm if the alarm becomes a distraction. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/11/87 (NE-NS-87-0184)
i 1 HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 883 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: VARIOUS SYSTEM: VARIOUS KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR _________________________________________________________________________q DESCRIPTION: NUISANCE ALARMS 1 i OBSERVATION: Too many alarms indicate status or status change and are not.true alarms.' ________________________________________________________________________) PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. This concern is assumed to be illuminated nuisance alarms. Nuclear Operations has.in place a program to minimize the number of problem annunciators in the control room (ROIP Indicator-Goal C). This program is reviewed by Nuclear Operations Management on an ongoing basis.- Additionally, an administrative procedure exists (POM 23.621, REV 11) which allows the operator to manually defeat the alarm if the alarm is reflashing so often as to mask other alarms.- B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix-(For Priority I): STATUS: Closed 1 CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/11/87 (NE-NS-87-0184) ; l 1 t i a i
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 884 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE.1 PANEL: VARIOUS SYSTEM: VARIOUS KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR I DESCRIPTION: SPURIOUS ALARMS j J OBSERVATION: Annunciator - The annunciator alarm system consists of 1224 alarm l windows many of which have multiple inputs. Each of the alarms are codsd with one of four colors. Too many spurious alarms suggest that an auto bypass would be useful to screen out those alarms which are due to ; spikes or intermittent plant conditions. ' i PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. Nuclear Operations has in place a program to minimize the number of inoperable or continuously alarming annunciators in the Control Room (ROIP Indicator-Goal C). This program is reviewed by Nuclear Operations Management on an ongoing basis. Additionally, an administrative procedure exists, POM 23.621, REV 11, which allows the operator to manually defeat the alarm if the alarm is reflashing so often as to nask other alarms. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/11/87 (NE-NS-87-0184) 4 I < l 1 I l l i i _---_-- - __-- - -_____ a
i i HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
- i HED NO.: 885 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: VARIOUS SYSTEM: VARIOUS KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.1.2)
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _______________________________________________a DESCRIPTION: TOO MANY HI/w ALARMS WITH NO ADDITIONAL INFO OBSERVATION: There are too many Hi/ Low Alarms which do not give the true problem. Main Oil Pressure Hi-/ Low - with no additional control room indication is one example. l l _________________________________________._______________________________y PRIORITY: IV ______________________________________________________________...__________j RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION I' RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. Main Oil Press Hi/ Low alarm doesn't exist. Main Control Room has 106 high/ low type alarms. 82 of these high/ low alarms have additional control room indication available. The remaining 24 i alarms have local indication. Action can not be taken on these froml the control room to correct the problem. Local action is required i to correct and/or stabilize the problem. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Reveiw 6/26/87
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 i i HED NO.: 886 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1
-PANEL: H11-P809 SYSTEM: H3000 R3000 COMP / INSERT - NO: 9D49- LEGEND: EDG 11/12 STARTING AIR TANK PRESS LOW PANEL: H11-P810 SYSTEM: H3000 R3000 COMP / INSERT.NO: 10D1 LEGEND: EDG 13/14 STARTING AIR TANK PRESS LOW i
KEYWORD: ' ANNUNCIATOR DESCRIPTION: ALARM DOES NOT PROVIDE ENOUGH INFORMATION OBSERVATION: EDG_11/12 Air Pressure Low Alarm does not tell which unit brings in the alarm nor does the alarm printer separate the problem. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A.- Recommended Correction: None. Alarm Window 9D49, EDG 11/12 Starting Air Tank Pressure Low is a reflash alarm point. The alarm printer, sequence of events 1 recorder, does identify which EDG has low starting air pressure. Be Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): l STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/18/87 f I l I i l
l HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 887 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1l ________________________________________________-________________________4 PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: H3000 COMP / INSERT NO: 3D51 LEGEND: SRM PERIOD SHORT KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR _________________________________________________________________________W 1 DESCRIPTION: DISTRACTING ALARM ! OBSERVATION: SRM PERIOD SHORT ALARM - now comes in every five minutes without any real problem being evident. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PIAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. This alarm can be " defeated" in accordance with SOP 23.621 when it becomes a. distraction. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team review 6/4/87 (NF-NS-87-0177) i j l 1
i HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 I i l 1 HED NO.: 888 ' SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P805. SYSTEM: H3000,N2000,P1100 COMP / INSERT NO: SD107 LEGEND:. CONDENSATE SUPPLY HDR PRESS HIGH/ LOW i KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR DESCRIPTION: MISLABELED OBSERVATION: Alarm SD107, CONDENSATE SUPPLY HDR PRESSURE HIGH/ LOW is a misleading label . . PRIORITY: IV DISSENT: Believed' priority should be III/LRS RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Change alarm window inscription to prevent possible confusion between Condensate and Condensate Storage & Transfer Systems. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: I
)
I I
i HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 4 HED NO.: 889 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE ll PANEL: H11-P805 SYSTEM: N2000 COMP / INSERT NO: 5D111 LEGEND: CONDENSATE COOLING LINE PRESS HIGH/ KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR DESCRIPTION: 5D111 IS MISLABELED OBSERVATION: Alarm SD111, CONDENSATE COOLING LINE PRESSURE HIGH/ LOW, has a misleading label. ________________________________________________________________________q PRIORITY: III i ________________________________________________________________________a RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Prepare PDC to change alarm window inscription to prevent confusion,l B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: 1 4 1 I i i i l
l HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 l l HED NO.: 890 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 l __________________________________________________________________________ j PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: C1100,C7100 ] COMP / INSERT NO: 3D10 LEGEND: CRD ACCUMULATOR TROUBLE ] i KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR j 1 J DESCRIPTION: HYDRAULIC CONTROL TROUBLE ALARM UNCLEAR
]
1 OBSERVATION: I Soms windows have confusing and misleading legends. Hydraulic Control l Trouble Alarm could refer to any number of controls and indicators in ) the plant. The legend is not clear. l I __________________________________________________________________________ 1 PRIORITY: IV l __________________________________________________________________________ J RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION l RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: J A. Recommended Correction: ) None. Actual legend inscription is "CRD ACCUMULATOR TROUBLE." The ] Alarm Response Procedure (ARP) gives specific directions for j personnel to take action. The legend is clear. ] l B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): I STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/19/87 i l i l f l r . . . . . . .
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 891 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 _________________________________________________________________________c PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: H3000 COMP / INSERT NO: 601C530 LEGEND: ALARM DEFEAT MATRIX KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR DESCRIPTION: ALARM DEFEAT MATRIX NOT CLEAR OBSERVATION: There is an alarm defeat matrix at the end of the H11-P601 panel, but it is not clear and only defeats selected alarms. A more complete alarm defeat matrix is desirable to allow for most alarms to be cleared when the operator is sure that they would not cause further problems. ________________________________________________________________________m PRIORITY: III i ________________________________________________________________________o RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: ! None. System Operating Procedure (SOP) 23.621 contains appropriate l guidance and ac?ministrative controls on defeating " nuisance" alarms. The alarm defeat matrix was not intended for nuisance alarms. i i B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): I 1 l STATUS: Closed l I CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/19/87 i l l
1 1 i HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI'2 ) l HED NO.: 892 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: ALL- SYSTEM: ALL KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR
' DESCRIPTION: ALARM NOISE TOO HIGH DURING MULTIPLE ALARMS
' OBSERVATION:
Tho.cudible alarm signal'seems to have an excessive high noise level. It is not.too bad-when individual alarms are in, but under system upset
. conditions with a large number of alarms coming in, the noise would add to the stress of the situation. Some system of reducing the noise level when multiple alarms are in or when frequent alarms are being transmitted would-be desirable to reduce the noise and the stress under upset conditions.
~ PRIORITY: III
-RESOLUTION:
1 RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
'A. Recommended Correction:
B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interin Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: i b
I HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 893 SOURCE: OPEKATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 l PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: D1100 KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR DESCRIPTION: 3D44 HAS NO REFLASH CAPABILITY OBSERVATION: Some of the alarm windows will reflash if a new observation or different alarm comes in to the annunciator. Some windows have no reflash, and the Operator must go to a back panel to check if a new alarm has come in. The Effluent Radiation Monitor has no reflash and Operators suggest it should have that capability. PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Split into 3 windows (trouble, alarm, trip). Perform this corrective action in conjunction with HED 869. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE:
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 894 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: 0 PACE 1 PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: B2100,H3000 COMP / INSERT NO: 1D61 LEGEND: SRV OPEN KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.1.2) DESCRIPTION: ALARM WINDOW SHOULD HAVE REFLASH CAPABILITY OBSERVATION: Som3 of the alarm windows will reflash if a new or different alarm comes in to the annunciator. Some windows have no reflash, and the operator must go to a back panel to check if a new alarm has come in. The Safety Rolief Valve Open (1D61) has no reflash and operators suggest it should have that capability. 1
. PRIORITY: III ;
RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Provide individual identification of which SRV is alarming on high l temperature. 1 B. Immadiate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Issue a PDC CLOSURE: 1 1 _ - - - - - - - - _a
7-1 HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 ! HED NO.: 895 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P603. SYSTEM: D1100 KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR, DUPLICATE DESCRIPTION: 3D44 HAS NO REFLASH CAPABILITY OBSERVATION: , Some of-the alarm windows will reflash if a new or.different alarm comes' in to the annunciator. Some windows have no reflash, and the Operator i must go to a back panel to check if.a.new alarm has come in. The EFF l RAD PROB (3D44) has no reflash and Operators suggest it should have that ' capability. ________________________________________________________________________q PRIORITY: I ________________________________________________________________________q RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED. CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. This HED is a duplicate. HED 893 addresses this concern. B. Immediate Compensatory' Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: l l I 1
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 896 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: C1102, H3000 COMP / INSERT NO: 3D101 LEGEND: CRD HYDRAULIC TEMPERATURE HIGH l l t KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.2.2) ' DESCRIPTION: ALARM WINDOW SHOULD HAVE REFLASH CAPABILITY OBSERVATION: ! Som3 of the alarm windows will reflash if a new or different alarm comes ; in to the annunciator. Some windows have no reflash, and the Operator must go to a back panel to check if a new alarm has come in. The CONTROL ! ROD DRIVE TEMP HI (3D101) has no reflash and Operators suggest it should have that capability. PRIORITY: III s RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED COi:RECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Replace the existing recorder for this system with a data logging unit having the capabilities of displaying an alarm point on an LED display and capable of bypassing an individual alarm. (similar to ; the Bearing Winding Monitor on Panel H11-P805) B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Issue a PDC CLOSURE:
)
l: i l I 1 l l l 1
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 897 SOURCE: CPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGEif ________________________________________________________________.________q PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: C1102 l KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR, REFLASH I _________________________________________________________________________q DESCRIPTION: ANNUNCIATOR, 3D10, NO REFLASH OBSERVATION: Some of the alarm windows will reflash if a new or different alarm comes i in to the annunciator. Some windows have no reflash, and the operator j must go to a back panel to check if a new alarm has come in. The ( ACCUMULATOR TROUBLE (3D10) has no reflash and Operators suggest it should have that capability. ________________________________________________________________________e PRIORITY: I _______________,.________________________________________________________a RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: i Recommend that capability for individual accumulator alarm defeat be provided to providefor anthe operator alarm to enable if trouble with a thesecondexisting annunciator Hydraulic Controlsystem Unit ! (HCU) occurred. 1 B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): 1 1 STATUS: CLOSURE: l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: .898 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: - 0 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P816 . SYSTEM: P8000,VARIOUS e COMP / INSERT NO: 16D27 LEGEND: FIRE ALARM I KEYWORD:' ANNUNCIATOR'(6.3.1.2)
- DESCRIPTION: ALARM WINDOW SHOULD HAVE REFLASH CAPABILITY OBSERVATION: , .
Some of the alarm windows will reflash if a new or different, alarm comes
;in to the annunciator. Some windows have no reflash, and the Operator-
- must go to a back panel to check if a new alarm has'come in.~The FIRE ALARM (16D27) has no reflash and Operators suggest it should have-that
.capabii l ty.
l PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION:' MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Provide a means to alert operators if more fire alarms ~come in. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Issue PDC
. CLOSURE:
i l l a
)
4 e-_____---_-..___.._--.-
1 HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 899 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 _________________________________________________________________________) PANEL: VARIOUS SYSTEM: H3000 l
~
KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.1.2) J 1 i l DESCRIPTION: ALARM SETPOINTS CANNOT BE CHANGED IN CTL RM 1 OBSERVATION: L Operators were concerned that the alarm setpoints could not be changed from within the control room but could be changed in the relay room. l' Some operators would prefer to have the capability of changing set points from within the control room. j PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. An alarm setpoint change is not a routine. operation. An alarm setpoint change is only accomplished through an approved work package. Therefore, performing this activity in the relay room is i an acceptable method of making such a change. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87 i I l 1 _ _ - - - - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 o HED NO.: 900 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P805 BACK PANEL SYSTEM: H3000 COMP / INSERT NO: 805C541A LEGEND: EXCESS FLOW CHECK VALVES KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.1.2) DESCRIPTION: EXCESS FLOW CHECK VALVE ANNUNCIATOR NEEDED OBSERVATION: Opsrators have discussed the need for additional alarm windows to add to the existing windows. Excess flow check valve closed should be considered as a point for an alarm. PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Channel checks are performed routinely that would serve to denote a pchential problem with these excess flow check valves. Having the indication of these valves in the control is an enhancement over having them scattered around plant. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed : l l CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Reveiw 7/8/87 l l l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 i l HED NO.: 901 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE.1) _-----------------------__-------_--------------_------------------------q PANEL: VARIOUS SYSTEM: H3000 i KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR (SEE HED 972) i l 1 DESCRIPTION: CONFUSION OVER WHAT CONSTITUTES AN ALARM j i OBSERVATION: 1 Thenumberofwindowsandthelackofaconsistentpolicyregardingwhatf requires an alarm has led to many windows being used to convey operational information or changes in status rather than alarms. Alarms I should be used to alert.the operator to an out of tolerance change in plant status. A continuing effort to verify the need for each alarm should be considered. PRIORITY: N/A
------------------------------------------------------------------------e RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION-RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A.- Recommended Correction: None. HED 972 addresses this concern. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87 f
HUMAN ENGINEERING' DISCREPANCY - FERMI'2 1 1 HED NO.: '902 L SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS RIV NO.: O PAGE 1
' PANEL:.VARIOUS SYSTEM: VARIOUS ' KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.4.1) ' DESCRIPTION-ANNUNCIATOR ACKNOWLEDGE BUTTON LOCATIONS OBSERVATION:- .I .
Alarm messages are acknowledged by the Operator and the alarm window changes from4 flashing to a steady glow until the alarm or out of . l tolerance: condition is removed or another alarm comes.in to the same. window. It'has been suggested that the system provide for the silencing i of.one panel while the operator is working at that panel. This would reduce the noise level'at times of unusual' activity. Often what will. hnppon is that alarms:will continue to come in after one.has been-removed as the parameter sits on the edge of being out of tolerance. PRIORITY-:_ IV 1
. RESOLUTION: 'NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: None. It is not desirable to have an individual panel silenced, whether the operator is present or not. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed: CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/23/87 Il l i i
~_- _l______.__m_. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _
1 HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 1
)
HED NO.: 903 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL:.VARIOUS SYSTEM: H3000 KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.4.1) , I _-____--___-______-----__-__-____---------__---_---__-___--_--__----__---q DESCRIPTION: ANNUNCIATOR LAMP TEST
. OBSERVATION: 1 The lamps inside the annunciator panels are tested by turning all the panels on at one time. One switch is used to check all the lamps. The !
operator must then go through the room and visually check each panel for i l lamps being out. This adds to the life of each lamp and provides a window in time where an alarm coming in would not quickly be seen. 4 Operators have suggested that a separate lamp' test for each panel l section would be desirable.and would avoid some of the potential concern noted above. _-__-__--_-----------__-------_____------_-_-_-_----__---_--__-----__---e PRIORITY: IV -;
-_____---_----__---____-_________------_-_---- _.._-_-_-------_------__-_c RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLANS A. Recommended Correction: (
None. Capability exists for testing portions of the control board in four separate sections. The time to carry out an annunciator lamp test for the overall control room is not of sufficient duration to warrant implementation of the proposed change. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87 L__ _ ___
g
) .
8 HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2( j yJ i
. 4 ?.
) y
. HED NO.: 904 -SOURCE: OPERATOR _ INTERVIEWS . REV NO.: '
0 'PAGE 1. h t
...___________________________________________...._______.t PANEL: VARIOUS- SYSTEM: H3000 -
I s, , 1
$' [ ' .p #
KEYWORD: ' ANNUNCIATOR'(SEE HED 764) ; 1 i l ,
' DESCRIPTION: NO CUE FOR CLEARED ALARMS- -
i
> i OBSERVATION: , , y .3 y '
i The alarm flash rate stays constant until phe alarm lis acknowledged and l than' reverts to a steady on condition (untess another alarm comes in or as made that changing the a new rate finch alarmfrom is called fast forth) . Awhen to slow suggestion the alarm -y/ clears would provide additional data to the operator and enable them to see where an alarm,, has cleared on its own. > j , 1 PRIORITY: N/A , ,
. RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION l,
.(
RECOMMENDED' CORRECTION PLAN: m A. Recommended Correction: , 4% Y Already addressed. This is a duplicatA of HT,D 764. t . B. Immediate compensatory' Actions or Interi.mtFix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed * , a CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/6/87,t
*y t .,
8
\
l' l t ; h { I
. l l
1 i 1 I i 1 i l l l l 1
p
- e u :
;, 7 HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY' -FEP.MI 2 .
4 t .
< :.[
s
- v. ,I.
HED-NO.:. 905- OPERATOR INTE!! VIEWS L' REV N9.: ' O PAGE 11 _- __...________ SOURCE: ___________..-_-_...___..__.__.,...__________-----____...< FANRL:7H11-P807 SYSTf24: . G5100,H3000 COMP / INSERT NO: 7D45' LEGEND: TWMS WATER LEVEL TROUBLE a ,
*)
KEYWORDi ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.1.2) l
- )
ij _4t.-..----__- _-_ ------ --- ._------_---__ . ---___- _-__-._-_-__ _-_-o DESCRIPTION:-ALARM SETPOINT HAS TOO NARROW OF A BAND WIDTH l OBSERVATION: 3 - ,
, uone of the alarms seem te have too narrow a band width for normal
~
esperations., Because of'that, some alarms:Are in too often and for no ,7j 1.',O 'Nood -widthyand
~
reason. Thetoo being torus often Water in alarmLevelwithout alatxt is seen as having a narrow band a reason. a; . . r ! d
;' PRIORITY: III , y ,
3, ----. _______ ...c_ _________ __--- -____ . _- .____ ___ _____ . ---___a tj RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMM5NDED CORRECTION PLAN: > A. Re.::ommende4 Correction: >
,( Provide a fi.x for nuisance alarm.
B. 'Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): ) I 1 I t
.3 . ;
STATUS: PDC 7f.34 will be issued
,- y
.;. . CLOSURE:
. ).
l L. i.,
.T, i i
l l t s
'4 1 1
F. k i J. 1,4 p
1 l 1 l l HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 906 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P816 SYSTEM: D2100 COMP / INSERT NO: 16D1 LEGEND: RB REFUELING AREA STH FLOOR HIGH RADN j 16D3 REAC BLDG 2ND/3RD/4TH FLOOR HIGH RADN 16D4 AREA RADN MONITOR FAILURE DOWNSCALE 16D5 REAC/ AUX BLDG BSMT/SUBBSMT HIGH-RADN 16D6 REAC/ AUX BLDG FIRST FLOOR HIGH RADN 16D7 AUX BLDG 2ND/3RD/4TH FLOORS HIGH RADN 16D8 TURBINE BLDG HIGH RADN. 16D9 RADWASTE BUILDING BSMT/MEZZ HIGH RADN 16D10 RADWASTE BUILDING 1ST FLOOR HIGH RADN
.16D11 ONSITE STORAGE BLDG 1ST FLR HIGH RADN a KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR (SEE HED 766)
DESCRIPTION: AREA RADIATION MONITOR ANNUNCIATOR PROBLEM
. OBSERVATION:
Soma alarms that could come in several times as levels and conditions change seem to require a reflash and this has not been provided. The Area Radiation Monitor Alarm does not have a reflash capability to show that additional alarms have been received. ; PRIORITY: N/A ,
' RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: i' A. Recommended Correction:
None. HED 766 addresses this concern. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/23/B7 l l \ .______-__ _ __ -
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2. HED NO.: 907 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1
._______________________ ...____________________________________________a PANEL: N/A SYSTEM: N/A KEYWORD: PROCEDURE
__________________________ ____________________________________ .._____.c DESCRIPTION: SIMPLIFY TITLES
. OBSERVATION:
Procedure titles - The names of the procedures could be simplified to help in getting access to the correct procedure quickly. _____________________________________________________ _.._______________c PRIORITY: IV _-__________--______________________.--____-____-_-____-________________e RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Procedures requiring action to be taken from another procedure, reference the procedure number and the procedure title. In' abnormal: conditions, licensed operators are required to know the immediate actions for RPS alarms and to know all entry conditions for EOPs. Increase the size of the print of the POM Index for 23.XXX procedure B. Immediate Compensatory Action [ or Interim Fix (For Priority I):- ) STATUS: CLOSURE:
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 I HED NO.: 908 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL:.N/A. SYSTEM: N/A j 1 KEYWORD: DOCUMENT STORAGE (6.1.1.4)
' DESCRIPTION: TABS IN PROCEDURE BOOKS SHOULD HAVE NAMES l . OBSERVATION:
Tebs'in procedure books should have names as well as numbers to avoid lost time looking through index for SOP numbers. __________________________________________________________________________ l PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. There exists 132 active System Operating Procedures located in the control room. These procedures are maintained in numerous binders and are filed in numerical order. Prior to using any procedure, the users must verify that the latest procedure is in hand. To do this, the user must know the procedure number. Reference still must be made to the procedure index. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed
-CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87 l
l i
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 909 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: 1 PAGE 3 ______________________________-_________________________________________m PANEL: N/A SYSTEM: N/A KEYWORD: PROCEDURE .--_____-___________________________________________-___--______-____-_-e DESCRIPTION: PROCEDURES OVERLY COMPLICATED OBSERVATION: Procedures are overly complicated and do not always reflect how the system is operated. Some Operators report problems in understanding procedures. ___________-_________________--_______________-_____-__________-_____-__e PRIORITY: III ____________-___-_____-_-_--____--________--_-___---_____-_---_-______--d RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Procedure improvements are an ongoing progress. Per procedure NOIP 11.000.131, a writers guide is required to provide guidance in the preparation of procedures. All procedures are presently receiving a' Human Factors review, techincal review, administrative review, QA review, and an OSRO review. In addition, procedtres shall be verified during preparation. Where possible, verification shall be accomplished by actual use on the control room simulator. If during the performance of a procedure, the next required step cannot be performed (for whatever reasons) the activity shall be terminated until it is resolved with their supervisor or work leader (referencei EFP-1047). B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): ST,TUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/13/87
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI'2 HED NO.: 910 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: 0 .PAGE 1 PANEL: 1N/A SYSTEM: N,i KEYWORD: DOCUMENTATION DESCRIPTION: DESIGNATE WHICH EQUIPMENT IS OPERATED BY WHOM OBSERVATION:
. Shift technicians are able to operate some controls under the direction cnd supervision.of an RO but this.is not the case on other shifts. A nned exists to document what equipment may be' operated by which paroonnel so that the difference between understandings at each shift .loval are removed or reduced.
PRIORITY:~III RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION
' RECOMMENDED CORRECTION. PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: Power Plant Order EFP-1081 and procedure POM 21.000,01 provide guidance on who can operate equipment. RB, Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): i STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87 1 8' l i
)
i 1. l l-l l
i HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 911 SOURCE: OPERATOR INTERVIEWS REV NO.: O PAGE li _________________________________________________________________________q PANEL: N/A SYSTEM: N/A KEYWORO: PROCEDURE _________________________________________________________________________i DESCRIPTION: PROCEDURES TOO RIGID OBSERVATION: Procedures do not allow for slight abnormalities in system alignment. It may be difficult to recover from a problem as the procedures call for perfect systems and under upset conditions may not allow for makeshift solutions. Procedures should be a guide for the operator, not a cookbook. Procedures are not always complete as some loops are often j omitted. Procedures may be to rigid to allow for use under less than ) optimum conditions. Procedures may be overly complicated and not well j structured for the intended use. 1 I ________________________________________________________________________q PRIORITY: III I ______,~________________________________________________________________d RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Procedure improvements are an ongoing progress. Per procedure NOIP 11.000.131, a writers guide is required to provide guidance in the , preparation of procedures. All procedures are presently receiving a' Human Factors review, technical review, administrative review, QA , review and an OSRO review. In addition, procedures shall be l Verified during preparation. Where possible, verification shall be j accomplished by actual use on the control room simulator. ! Procedures are required for plant activities because they provide ] the minimum acceptable standard, consistency and the best ; commutative knowledge. POM 21.000.01 allows the NSS to modify j existing procedures to allow for plant abnormalities as long as the ' intent of the procedure is not altered. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): I l STATUS: Closed l CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/13/87 , I l l l .. !
l HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FE'1MI 2 HED NO.:. 912 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: VARIOUS SYSTEM: VARIOUS COMP / INSERT NO: 601C530 LEGEND: ALARM DEFEAT MATRIX KEYWORD: TEMPORARY LABELS (6.6.5.1) DESCRIPTION: ANNUNCIATOR ALARM WINDOW OUT OF SERVICE OBSERVATION: There is1no positive means.available to indicate to an operator when an
. alarm is out of service. Pushbuttons on the panel at the side of Panel H11-P601 allow selection and indication of tiles removed from service:-
but the panel does not cover all alarms, and is not considered easy to , recognize. , 1 PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: ALREADY "ORRECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: l
.Already corrected. The alarm pushbutton defeat matrix is used to isolate signals from equipment that is in the standby condition.
When such equipment is reactivated, the isolating' switch will automatically-reset. .In addition, POM 23.621 provides administrative guidance for defeating all alarms. This procedure requires the following: 1) An Alarm Defeated Tag is placed over an out-of-servico alarm. 2) A magnetic dot with an arrow and identifying number is affixed to the alarm frame. This device refers the operator to an appropriate log which describes the specific problem.
.B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/26/87
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 '4 HED NO.: 913 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1) PANEL: VARIOUS SYSTEM: VARIOUS ) l KEYWORD:-ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.1.4) DESCRIPTION: ALARM VS ALERT l OBSERVATION: i There is no auditory annunciator signal code which differentiates an alarm from an alert. _______----_------__--__-_-_______----_-__--_--________--_----------___-o PRIORITY: I DISSENT: Color coding could correct this problem if code is deemed appropriate ; (see HED 972) LRS j i RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
- A. Recommended Correction:
None. A visual cue is provided to differentiate between an alarm q and an alert. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/19/87 i
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 914 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P810 SYSTEM: R1200 COMP / INSERT NO: 10B14 LEGEND: SYNCHRONIZE BUS 65F BKR POS F6 KEYWORD: CONTROLS ( 6. 4 .1.1) i DESCRIPTION: COVERS TO PREVENT DIRT INTO PANELS OBSERVATION:
.There are no covers to prevent dirt from falling into openings left when )
handles are removed from switches on Panel H11-P810 (65F Bus). The removed handic was hung on another handle. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. The switches without handles are bus-synchronizing switches. 1 The observation was made during construction days. The control room i atmosphere presently is a controlled environment where dirt has not been a problem. Switches of these type are traditionally left without handles with no maintenance or operational impact. The practice of hanging one handle on another has since been discontinued. 1 B.- Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/19/87 i l l I 1 l 1 __________-____ D
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 915 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 3!
------------------------------------------------------------------------o ' PANEL: H11-P603. SYSTEM: C1100 KEYWORD: CONTROLS-(6.4.4.3) ------------_-------------------------------------_---------------------a DESCRIPTION: KEYLOCK SWITCHES ARE NOT CONSISTENT OBSERVATION:
The tooth down key operated switch (scram discharge volume Hi H2O level < Bypass) on. Panel H11-P603 violates the. tooth up plant convention position.for key operated switchss.
---------------------------------------------------_--------------------e PRIORITY: III
------------------------------------------------------------------------d RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION
)
RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Re-orient keylock switches to tooth up operation to meet NUREG 0700 ; guidelines 6.4.4.3b. j l B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): 1
.1 STATUS:
CLOSURE: 4 l 1 I i i I J
\
l l 4
3 I HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY --FERMI 2 HED NO.: 916. SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O. JPAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM::T5000 ' COMP / INSERT NO: T50-R802B LEGEND: DRYWELL NARROW & WIDE FWG & - TORUS PRESS KEYWORD: VISUAL DISPLAYS.(6.5.1.2) i DESCRIPTION: ' INAPPROPRIATE SCALE OBSERVATION: Drywall pressure is scaled in " inches of H20". PRIORITY: I
-_____---__--_--------_--_-_----_-_----------____ ---_----_----- .-_______ l RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED.
RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: 1 A. Recommended Correction: None. <Already corrected. Drywell Pressure has been corrected to PSIG. B. Immediate Compensatory Actionc or Interfm Fix (For Priority I):- STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Por HED Assessment Team Review 6/19/87'
\
I l-L HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED'NO.: 917 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY'3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE lt
-________-_________________________________________________-_____-____-__4
- PANEL: .H11-P602 SYSTEM: P4500 COMP / INSERT NO: .P45-R803A LEGEND: )
P45-R803B DIVIEESERVWTRDI DIV II EE SERV WTR'DISCH FLO/EECWS 4 KEYWORD: VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.2) ( 1 _________________________________________________________-______________J DESCRIPTION: INAPPROPRIATE SCALE i t OBSERVATION: EECSW. Hx Flow is scaled in percent. ,
.1 PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION i RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended' Correction: Change scale on indicators P45-R803A & R803B to read in GPMs. ! B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: '! CLOSURE: i l i I 1 1 j i.,_m..m... . .... . . .__,___..m.,_..._...______m_. . . . , . _ _ _ .
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 -HED NO.: 918 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING- REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601- SYSTEM: B2100 COMP / INSERT NO: B21-R623A LEGEND: POST ACCIDENT MONIT REAC PRESS & LVL PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: B2100 COMP / INSERT NO: B21-R623B. LEGEND: POST ACCIDENT MONIT REAC PRESS & LVL KEYWORD: -VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.2) j i
-DESCRIPTION: INAPPROPRIATE SCALE OBSERVATION:
Post accident reactor pressure is in " inches of H2o." PRIORITY: I RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTION' PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: None. Already corrected. The scale has been changed to PSIG. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions. or Interim Fix (For Priority I): l STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/19/87 ( { 1 i j 3 1 r I 1 J J
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 919 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 11 PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: R3000 COMP / INSERT NO: R30-R850A LEGEND: DIESEL GEN SERV WATER PUMP A FLOW R30-R850C DIESEL GEN SERV WATER PUMP C FLOW PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: R3000 '
' COMP / INSERT NO: R30-R850B LEGEND: DIESEL GEN SERV WATER PUMP B FLOW R30-R850D DIESEL GEN SERV WATER PUMP D FLOW ,
-i KEYWORD: VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.2)
----_ -_------------_--------_-______-__-----__----___------_----_-_---_s DESCRIPTION: INAPPROPRIATE SCALE l OBSERVATION:
Diesel Service Water Flow is scaled in percent. a
-_ ----__--_--_-____________---_____ -_--_---___--_--__---___-_---____ -q PRIORITY: IV i
---------_----------__-- ..---------_---_----_-_----__-_ ---__----_--_--_d RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: Change scale on control room indicators R30-R850A, B, C and D to 1 GPMs. l B, Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: i I l l l 1 l 1 ! l 1 1
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 i , .HED NO.: 920 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1 j PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: B2100 I COMP / INSERT NO: B21-R613 LEGEND: REACTOR CORE DP & JET PMP TOTAL FLOW l KEYWORD: VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.2) _ DESCRIPTION: INAPPROPRIATE SCALE OBSERVATION: Coroplate D/P is scaled in percent. III
'_ ___________________n_____________________________________________________
PRIORITY: RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: l A. Recommended Correction: None. Already corrected to PSIG. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): l STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/19/87 n i 1 i 1 i
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 921 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: N2100 COMP / INSERT NO: N21-R805 LEGEND: REACTOR FLOW THRU STARTUP LINE KEYWORD: VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.2) DESCRIPTION: INAPPROPRIATE SCALE OBSERVATION: Startup line is scaled in percent. ________________________________________________________________________c PRIORITY: IV ______________________________________________________________._________c . RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Change to engineering units. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: l i I
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 922 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P804 SYSTEM: N3000 COMP / INSERT NO: N30-R806 LEGEND: HYDROGEN COOLERS TEMPERATURE KEYWORD: VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.2) i DESCRIPTION: INAPPROPRIATE SCALE OBSERVATION: H2 Cooler Temperature uses a decimal scale and multiplier which is not appropriate. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Change scale to 0-200 degrees F. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Issue a PDC CLOSURE: i I
)
l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY FERMI 2 HED NO.: 923 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE $ ________________________________________________________________________e PANEL: H11-P804 SYSTEM: N3000 COMP / INSERT NO:.N30-R823 LEGEND: MAIN CONSENSER VACUUM PRESSURE KEYWORD: VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.2) ________________________________________________________________________4 DESCRIPTION: CONFLICT BETWEEN DISPLAY & PROCEDURE OBSERVATION: Condenser vacuum is scaled in " PSIA", but the trips are known in "inchesi of-HG". , ________________________________________________________________________a PRIORITY: III ) __________________________________._____________________________________4 RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A.- Recommended Correction: None. Already corrected by changing the procedures to reflect the' ' pressure in PSIA. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed d CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/19/87 ! j
l l HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 924 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P808 SYSTEM: T4600 COMP / INSERT NO: T46-R800A LEGEND: SGTS EXHAUST GAS FLOW DIV I l PANEL: H11-P817 SYSTEM: T4600 l COMP / INSERT NO: T46-R800B LEGEND: SGTS EXHAUST GAS FLOW DIV II KEYWORD: VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.2) DESCRIPTION: INAPPROPRIATE SCALE OBSERVATION: SGTS flow is scaled in percent. __________________________________________________________________________ i PRIORITY: III i RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED ' RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Already corrected. Bo Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/26/87 I
< c i
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 l HED:NO.: 925 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 REV NO.: O. PAGE A ________-_-____-_______________________'_______--________.--_____________a FINDING PANEL: H11-P808 SYSTEM: U4100 COMP / INSERT NO: U41-R801 LEGEND: TURBINE' BLDG ATMOSPHERE DIFF PRESS @ KEYWORD: VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.2)' l __________-_________________________--_____-_. _________________________e DESCRIPTION: INAPPROPRIATE SCALE OBSERVATION:
. Turbine Building Atmosphere D/P is scaled in percent. ;
_______________________--__-__________-_______ ____-_--____---_______---e PRIORITY: III _______-_________________________.-______ .__ _________________________-c RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: ] A. Recommended Correction: 1 None. Already corrected to inches of water column. , B.' Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): .j i i
. STATUS: Closed
. CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/19/87
-)
l l l l l b
'l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 926 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P808 SYSTEM: T4100 COMP / INSERT NO: T41-R800A LEGEND: CR'& RB DIV I DIFF PRESS. PANEL: H11-P817 SYSTEM: T4100 COMP / INSERT NO: T41-R800B LEGEND: CR & RB DIV-II DIFF PRESS KEYWORD: VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.2) DESCRIPTION: INAPPROPRIATE SCALE OBSERVATION: Raactor Building control center D/P is scaled-in percent. PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED
' RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
-A. Recommended Correction:
Already corrected. B. Immediate' Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For. Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/26/87
. . . _ _ _ - _ . _ ._.. .__.__-...__________m.____m
1
]
a HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 ; l l HED NO.: 927 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE % ___------_---------_-----__----------------_-------------__------_--_---a PANEL: 'Hll-P806 . SYSTEM: N6200 I COMP / INSERT NO: N62-R800 LEGEND: 18 IN MANIFOLD PRESSURE KEYWORD: VISUAL DISPLAYS (6.5.1.4)
-_----_---_--_---__----_----_-_---_--_____----__----_---_------___------c DESCRIPTION: AMBIGUOUS SCALE OBSERVATION:
A meter scale on Panel Hil-P806 that reads "lbs. per square inch" does not clearly label that the pressures indicated are negative value. q l PRIORITY: III RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Defer to NUREG 0700 Survey. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Defer To Nureg 0700 Survey CLOSURE: 1 1 I
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 l i HED NO.: 928 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1 __________________________________________________________________________ 1 PANEL: VARIOUS SYSTEM: VARIOUS KEYWORD: SCALE MARKING (6.5.1.5) l q DESCRIPTION: UNCONVENTIONAL GRADUATIONS l OBSERVATION: In ceveral cases the number of scale graduations between numbers is l gracter than the guideline recommendation 9. (Panels 603, 807, 810, ! Bil, 816) Unit graduations in some cases are not 1, 2, or 5 divisions. PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Specific meters with corrections will be identified during NUREG 0700 Survey. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): i STATUS: Defer to NUREG 0700 Survey CLOSURE: l l l l ! l 1 , 1 l b l __--_-___-____--_O
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 929 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE R _______________________________________---_--_____________._---____-____q PANEL: H11-P804 SYSTEM: N3000 i KEYWORD: SCALE MARKING (6.5.1.5) -{ ,
- ________________________________________________________________________J DESCRIPTION: SCALE .
OBSERVATION: The casing gas purity indicator on Panel H11-P804 moves in a direction opposite to that recommended. ; l __________________________________ .._ .________________________________e PRIORITY: III ________________________________________________________________________e RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Modify existing color' coding on the meter scale. Review and change alarm set point as required. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE:
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 930 SOURCE: 1981' CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: 1 PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: VARIOUS-COMP / INSERT NO: 601C522 LEGEND: ISOLATION VALVES MIMIC DISPIAY KEYWORD:.USE OF MIMICS (6.6.6.4) DESCRIPTION: COLOR CODING IS INCONSISTENT OBSERVATION: Th3 color coding of the vertical illuminated mimic display (RHRS) of L P:nal H11-P601 is not consistent with the color coding of the. mimic displays of the associated systems. PRIORITY: N/A RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A'. Recommended Correction: None. The mimic referred to at that time no longer exists. B.- Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interin Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED A$sessment Team Review.7/13/87 i l r
\
1
]
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
-HED NO.: 931I SOURCE: 1981-CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL:.H11-P804 SYSTEM: N3000' COMP / INSERT NO: N30-R926. LEGEND: TURBINE' BEARING VIBRATION - BRG 1 N30-R927 TURBINE BEARING VIBRATION 'BRG 2 N30-R928 TURBINE BEARING VIBRATION - BRG 3 N30-R929 TURBINE BEARING VIBRATION - BRG 4 N30-R930 TURBINE BEARING VIBRATION'- BRG 5
- .. N30-R931 TURBINE BEARING VIBRATION - BRG 6 N30-R932 TURBINE BEARING VIBRATION - BRG 7 N30-R933 TURBINE BEARING VIBRATION - BRG 8 N30-R934 TURBINE BEARING VIBRATION - BRG.9 N30-R935 TURBINE BEARING VIBRATION - BRG 10 N30-R936 TURBINE BEARING VIBRATION - BRG.11 KEYWORD: PANEL LAYOUT (6.8.1.1)
DESCRIPTION: TURBINE SHAFT VIBRATION RECORDER PLACEMENT
= OBSERVATION:
The main turbine shaft vibration recorder group would be more useful if relocated to front of Panel H11-P804.
------------------------------------------------------------------------e PRIORITY: III
------------------------------------------------------------------------e i RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
l A. Recommended Correction: Already corrected. This information is now provided on Panel H11-P804.in the form of eleven turbine bearing vibration meters. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): 1 STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 6/26/87 l i I
y ..
}
't, . , .
1
]
HUMAN' ENGINEERING' DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 i HED NO.: 932 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.:.o.O. PAGE I- . PANEL: H11-.P603 SYSTEM: C3200 . KEYWORD:' MIRROR-IMAGING (6.8.3.3) : t a -DESCRIPTION:'RECIRC PUMPS CONTROLS ARE MIRRORED
;) 1 OBSERVATION: f Somn of the controls of the Recirc ptrspd, on Panel E11-P603 are mirrored.
PRIORITY: III ', RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED '( , RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
- 4 A. Recommended Correction: i t
Already corrected. Lines of demarcation added. B. .Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): e STATUS: Closed - 1 1, . CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review f/26/87 f f f ,
'k ( ,
l / ;~ [ 4
/
/
,) '
l l i (f
/
e I I l 1 l I e
i ; i 'i' HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 - HED NO.: '933 ' SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1 y..--.....--------------_-----------_-__L..-----------------------------------<
' PANEL: H11-F809 SYSTEM: R1400 COMP / INSERT NO:<R14-R809' LEGEND: DIV I 480V ESF BUS VOLTS
,' R14-R838 480V EQUIP BUS VOLTS R14-R849 DIV.I 480V EDG BUS VOLTS PANEL: H11-P810 ,
SYSTEM: R1400 COMP / INSERT NO: a14-R826 < LEGEND: DIV.II 480V EDG BUS VOLTS "j R14-R839 '
.DIV II 480V EQUIP BUS VOLTS R14-R852 DIV II 480V ESF BUS VOLTS KEYWORD: PIEEL LAYOUT (6.8.2.3)
--------------------..--------...--------------------------------~~--------
DESCRIPTION: 480V:EUS VOLTMETER LOCATIONS OBSERVATION':. The. switch.ed 480V Bus Voltmeters are not located consistently with respect to the buses on Pitt,el H11-P809 and Panel H11-P810 and should be seperated by some kind of demarcation. 4-PRIORITY: II/
-------_----------------------------------------------------------------y RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION .
RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: . l A. Recommended Correction: Demarcati6n lines and labeling enhancements should be added. s 'B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: CLOSURE: l f f f I 1 I 5 l -
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY' FERMI 2
.HED-NO.:- 934 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: F11-P601 SYSTEM: P5002 COMP / INSERT. NO: 601B514 LEGEND:
PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: P5002 COMP / INSERT NO: L 602B510 LEGEND: PANEL: H11-P807 . . SYSTEM: P5001,P5002 COMP / INSERT NO: 807B512 LEGEND: KEYWORD: PANEL LAYOUT -(SEE HED - 791)
' DESCRIPTION: LOCATION OF N & S AIR COMPRESSOR CONTROLS
' OBSERVATION:
An Air Alarm at Panel H11-P807 requires the operator to activate CMC on Panel.H11-P601"and H11-P602 and then return to Panel .1-P807 to control
'nir compressor CMC. ,
PRIORITY:-N/A
' RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A.' Recommended Correction: None. HED 791 addresses this concern. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed I
- CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87 1
l
),
l L l 1'
--_--_-_---_____--_A
I i HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 935 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1: PANEL: H11-P804 SYSTEM: C9100 ] KEYWORD: DEMARCATION (6.6.6.2) DESCRIPTION: CRT CONTROLS DIFFICULT TO LOCATE l OBSERVATION: The thumbwheel and pushbutton controls for the CRT display are located within the drain systems mimic on Panel H11-P804. ________.._______________________________________________________________a PRIORITY: III _______________________________.. _______________________________________c RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Already corrected. Functional demarcation added around these controls. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interin Fix (For Priority I): 1-STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87 i 1 l l 1 l l
~ '
- l. 1 I
l HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 l HED NO.: 936 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P816 SYSTEM: R3000 i COMP / INSERT NO: 16B109/110 LEGEND: OPEN/CLOSE R30-F601 l 16B111/112 OPEN/CLOSE R30-F602 { 16B113/114 OPEN/CLOSE R30-F603 ! 16B115/116 OPEN/CLOSE R30-F604 ) 16B117/118 OPEN/CLOSE R30-F605 I 16B119/120 OPEN/CLOSE R30-F606 { 16B121/122 OPEN/CLOSE R30-F607 J 16B123/124 OPEN/CLOSE R30-F608 16B49 EDG 13 ROOM CO2 ACTIVATED 16B51 EDG 14 ROOM CO2 ACTIVATED 16B182 EDG 11 ROOM CO2 ACTIVATED 16B184 EDG 12 ROOM CO2 ACTIVATED 16B363 EDG 11 ROOM FAULT IN CO2 SYSTEM 16B364 EDG 12 ROOM FAULT IN CO2 SYSTEM 16B365 EDG 13 ROOM FAULT IN CO2 SYSTEM 16B366 EDG 14 ROOM FAULT IN CO2 SYSTEM KEYWORD: PANEL LAYOUT (6.8.2.2) DESCRIPTION: FUEL TANK DUMP VALVES - ARRANGEMENT OBSERVATION: The Tank Dump Valves on Panel H11-P816 are not positioned in numerical order (i.e. 3,4,1,2). PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: MODIFICATION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: Modify valve group layout to a 11, 12, 13 and 14 from left to right arrangement as opposed to the present 12, 11, 14 and 13 arrangement. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: l l CLOSURE:
1 i HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2
' HED NO.: 937 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: C1100 KEYWORD: GENERAL LAYOUT (6.1.1.1) J J - DESCRIPTION: SCRAM' RESET VERIFICATION I OBSERVATION:
Verification of scram reset' requires an operator to leave panel 603 and to to the relay room. PRIORITY: III ________________________________________________________________________J RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: The problem has been corrected. Scram reset indications are now provided in the control room. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87 1 I l 1 i L..
}
{ J HUMAN ENGINEERING' DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 i HED NO.: 938 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1
. PANEL: H11-P808 SYSTEM: T4804 ,
COMP / INSERT NO: BD13 LEGEND: DIV I RECOMBINER TROUBLE ' KEYWORD: ANNUNCIATOR (6.3.3.1) ! DESCRIPTION: ALARM WINDOW NOT DIRECTLY ABOVE CONTROLS OBSERVATION:
'Tha annunciator for the Hydrogen Recombiner is located to the far left of the H11-P808 panel while the associated controls are to the far right. ,
1 PRIORITY: IV
-RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: No correction. Alarm action location is in close proximity. B. Immediate Compensatory. Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87 i l i 1
)
I
o; HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 939 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P601 SYSTEM: E1000 COMP / INSERT NO: E10-K800 LEGEND: REAC SUB-BSMT PIPE LEAK DETECTION E10-M800 REAC SUB-BSMT PIPE LEAK DETECTION KEYWORD: LABEL CONTENT (6.6.3.1) DESCRIPTION: ECCS SUCTION LEAK DETECTION SYSTEM NOT CLEAR OBSERVATION: Leak detectors on Panel H11-P601'are numbered 1 through 8 without any indication of the location of the leak. ________________________________________________________________________c PRIORITY: N/A , ____--_____-__________--_-___-__--_-__________---_____ -_-_--______--___e RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: No correction. System is obsolete and no longer used. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix.(For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87 l l l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.:- 940 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P805 SYSTEM: N2100 KEYWORD: CONTROL-DISPLAY (6.9.1.1) DESCRIPTION: CONTROLS / INDICATORS - RELATIONSHIP'IS UNCLEAR-OBSERVATION: It is not clear.which controls are related to which indicators for the RFPT North turning gear on Panel H11-P805. _______________________m__________________________________________________ .
- PRIORITY:'III RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A.- Recommended Correction: Perform ~ task analysis for control-display arrangements of RFPT controls and displays and modify as required. This also addresses concern of HED 979.
.B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
STATUS: Issue a PDC CLOSURE: 1 4 1 _ -__________a
t HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY'- FERMZ 2
-HED NO.: 941 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1 JPANEL: H11-P810 SYSTEM: R1400 l
l ' KEYWORD: CONTROL-DISPLAY'(6.9.2.3) i o ____--------______------------_------_-__-----_--_------_---------_--____
. DESCRIPTION: ANNUNCIATOR VS CONTROLS FOR BUS 72J & BUS 72K OBSERVATION:
The breaker trip annunciator trip' tiles for Bus 72J and 72K are on panel H11-P810 while the' associated controls are on' panel H11-P809.
.---_-_---------_-_---_.-__-------------_-------_-----_------__-----__---e PRIORITY: IV
------------------_-__--_____---_--------_-___------------------_-----__a RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A. Recommended Correction: No' correction. Manual' LOP breakers with no controls.in the control room. HED 766 will cover the' annunciator portion of this HED.- B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87 i
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2' HED NO.:- 942 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1 1 PANEL: H11-P807 SYSTEM: P4100 KEYWORD: CONTROL-DISPLAY (6.9.2.2) ; 1 DESCRIPTION: RECORDER DISPLAY FOR CHLORINATION / SERV. WATER ! OBSERVATION: , The recorders'for the chlorination and service water levels are inverted i with respect to their associated controls on panel H11-P807. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION j RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: i No correction. Controls.are different for each system and are clearly labeled. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed i CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87 i l 4 l 1 l 1 1 i ) l l l l l l
\
l l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 l l HED NO. : 943 -SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV No.: O PAGEL11 _________________________________________________________________________q PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: C5100
. KEYWORD: CONTROL-DISPLAY (6.9.2.2) l 1
I ______________________________________________._______________________..__l
. DESCRIPTION: IRM RECORDER &-RANGE SWITCH PATTERN -.4 i
OBSERVATION:
- The IRM recorders.and range switches on H11-P603 are arranged in an-unconventional x pattern rather than a. vertical pattern.
a
.d
__________________________________________________________,_____________q PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction:
'No correction. Laid out to human factors principles. e.g. a clear-association between each recorder and its associated controls.
B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or' Interim Fix (For Priority I):
~
STATUS: Closed' CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87
)
l i 1 1 I l __-_-__ a
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 h l HED NO.: 944 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1
.______________ -___---_----__n______________ -___- ______---_______-_____
PANEL: H11-P808 SYSTEM: U4100 COMP / INSERT NO: 8A9 LEGEND: TURBINE BLDG EXHAUST-FAN NORTH 8A12 TURBINE BLDG EXHAUST FAN CENTER. j 8A15 TUF.BINE BLDG EXHAUST FAN SOUTH ! 8B14 TURB BLDG SPLY FAN N i 8B17 TURB BLDG SPLY FAN CTR l 8B20 TURB BLDG SPLY' FAN S KEYWORD: LAYOUT ARRANGEMENT (6.8.2.1) , DESCRIPTION: EXHAUST-SUPPLY FAN SELECTOR SWITCHES ! OBSERVATION- I The Turbine Building Exhaust Fans select switches on panel H11-P808 do not clearly indicate the relationship between the exhaust fans and the supply fans. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: l No correction. Procedure covers use of the switches. Labels are deemed adequate. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
. STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87 l
l f I _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - J
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 1 1
-HED NO.: 945 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: 2 PAGE d
________________________________________________________________________e PANEL: VARIOUS SYSTEM: VARIOUS KEYWORD: . LABEL CONTENT (6.6.3.1) ________________________________________________________________________e DESCRIPTION: LABELING PROBLEMS-OBSERVATION: i System designation is not shown on instrument nameplates on H11-P602. 1 ________________________________________________________________________m PRIORITY: IV ________________________________________________________________________4 RESOLUTION: ENHANCEMENT i RECOMMENDED l CORRECTION PLAN: ! A. Recommended Correction: ! Develop and implement a labeling system for all control room devices. This HED will also cover the concerns of HEDs 760, 839, and 948. B. Immediate Compensatory' Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Issue.a PDC CLOSURE: -! 1 l l i j
g. HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY'- FERMI 2
'HED NO.: .946 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.:- 0 PAGE 1-l -PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: VARIOUS l
l
-PANEL: H11-P804 SYSTEM: VARIOUS KEYWORD: READABILITY (6.6.4.1)
DESCRIPTION: WHITE ON BLACK LABELS
. OBSERVATION:
Labels on Panel H11-P602 and H11-P804 have both black on white and white. L on-black.
. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A.- Recommended Correction: Already corrected. Consistent black on white labels provided on the panels. B.' Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority-I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87 i i i l I o :
]
l l 1 l i
lI HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 947 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1l ___________________________________________________________..___________i PANEL: H11-P602 SYSTEM: E1100 KEYWORD: DEMARCATION (6.6.6.2) yl ____________________________________ ______________________..____-_______m DESCRIPTION: GROUP DEMARCATION OF RHR l
.1 . OBSERVATION:
There is a lack.of group demarcation in the mimic display of the RHR.on. Panel H11-P602. ________________________________________________________________________0 PRIORITY: II ; ________________________________________________________________________.j RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED
. RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: ~A. Recommended Correction:
Already corrected.- Added lines of functional demarcation. B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87 4 1 1 i l l
i i HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 l l i HED NO.: 948 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY ~3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1 _________-_-_-_--___-__-__________-__------__-_-________________---___--__ ? PANEL: H11-P603 SYSTEM: VARIOUS
.KEYNORD: LABEL CONTENT (SEE HED 945).
______-_-_--_______---__-____-______-__-_-_-______________-______----_____ j
. DESCRIPTION: INCONSISTENT USE OF ABBREVIATIONS ON LABELS OBSERVATION:
Laboling for.similar parameters on Panel.H11-P603.is inconsistent (ie. Racirc vs Recirculation; FW vs Feedwater). l PRIORITY: N/A I RESOLUTION: NO CORRECTION ! l
-RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN:
A.- Recommended Correction: None. HED 945 addresses this concern.
.B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I):
STATUS: Closed CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87 t 1 l
) - - ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 HED NO.: 949 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1 PANEL: H11-P805 SYSTEM: N2000 N2100 N2200 N6100 COMP / INSERT NO: N20-R803A LEGEND: EAST OUTLET OF NORTH HOTWELL TEMP N20-R803B WEST OUTLET OF SOUTH HOTWELL TEMP N21-R820 SEAL WATER RETURN TANK LEVEL N22-R800A FEEDWATER HEATER IN LEVEL N22-R800B FEEDWATER HEATER 1C LEVEL N22-R800C FEEDWATER HEATER IS LEVEL N22-R801A FEEDWATER HEATER 2N LEVEL N22-R801B FEEDWATER HEATER 2C LEVEL N22-R801C FEEDWATER HEATER 2S LEVEL f N22-R802A FEEDWATER HEATER 3N LEVEL N22-R802B FEEDWATER HEATER 3S LEVEL N22-R803A FEEDWATER HEATER 4N LEVEL N22-R803B FEEDWATER HEATER 4S LEVEL N22-R804A FEEDWATER HEATER SN LEVEL ! N22-R804B FEEDWATER HEATER SS LEVEL- , N22-R805A FEEDWATER' HEATER 6N LEVEL l i N22-R805B FEEDWATER HEATER 6S LEVEL N22-R806 REHEATER SEAL TANK LEVEL N22-R807A SEPARATOR SEAL TANK N LEVEL N22-R807B SEPARATOR SEAL TANK S LEVEL ? N61-R805 CNDR N & S WIDE RANGE LEVEL N61-R807A N COND HOTWELL NARROW RANGE LEVEL N61-R807B S COND HOTWELL NARROW RANGE LEVEL N61-R809 NORTH CONDENSER WIDE WIDE RANGE LVZ KEYWORD: DEMARCATION (6.6.6.2) ________________________________________________________________________s DESCRIPTION: CONFUSING FEEDWATER HEATER LABELS OBSERVATION: Labels for center, North and South Feedwater heater levels on Panel H11-P805 are confusing. ________________________________________________________________________e PRIORITY: III ________________________________________________________________________q RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTION PLAN: A. Recommended Correction: ' Already corrected. Added summary labels and functional demarcation.l B. Immediate Compensatory Actions or Interim Fix (For Priority I): STATUS: Closed i CLOSURE: Per HED Assessment Team Review 7/8/87 I
' HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY - FERMI 2 l
HED NO.: 950 SOURCE: 1981 CATEGORY 3 FINDING REV NO.: O PAGE 1- ! 1 PANEL: H11-P805 SYSTEM: N2000 l KEYWORD: SYMBOLS (6.6.3.4) DESCRIPTION: VALVE SYMBOL INCONSISTENCY ON CONDENSER MIMIC , OBSERVATION: l Vcive symbols are used inconsistent)y on the condenser mimic on Panel ! H11-P805. PRIORITY: IV RESOLUTION: ALREADY CORRECTED}}