Similar Documents at Fermi |
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARNRC-99-0093, Comment on Prs 10CFR30,31,32,170 & 171 Re Requirements for Certain Generally Licensed Industrial Devices Containing Byproduct Matl. Licensee Unclear Whether Requirements Apply to Holder of Operating License1999-10-12012 October 1999 Comment on Prs 10CFR30,31,32,170 & 171 Re Requirements for Certain Generally Licensed Industrial Devices Containing Byproduct Matl. Licensee Unclear Whether Requirements Apply to Holder of Operating License NRC-99-0080, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Plans.Detroit Edison Strongly Urges NRC to Not Issue Amend to 10CFR50.471999-09-13013 September 1999 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Plans.Detroit Edison Strongly Urges NRC to Not Issue Amend to 10CFR50.47 NRC-99-0071, Comment Supporting Draft RG DG-1083, Content of Ufsar,Iaw 10CFR50.71(e), Dtd Dec 19981999-04-30030 April 1999 Comment Supporting Draft RG DG-1083, Content of Ufsar,Iaw 10CFR50.71(e), Dtd Dec 1998 ML20205A7871999-03-26026 March 1999 Error in LBP-99-16.* Informs That Footnote 2 on Pp 16 of LBP-99-16 Should Be Deleted.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 990329 ML20205A8321999-03-26026 March 1999 Initial Decision (License Granted to Sp O'Hern).* Orders That O'Hern Be Given Passing Grade for Written Portion of Reactor Operator License Exam Administered on 980406.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 990326.Re-serve on 990330 ML20202B1561999-01-28028 January 1999 Memorandum & Order (Required Filing for Sp O'Hern).* Petitioner Should Document,With Citations to Record, Precisely Where He Disagrees or Agrees with Staff by 990219. with Certificate of Svc.Served on 990128 NRC-98-0154, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50,52 & 72 Re Changes,Tests & Experiments.Detroit Edison Fully Supports Comments Being Submitted on Proposed Rule by NEI1998-12-21021 December 1998 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50,52 & 72 Re Changes,Tests & Experiments.Detroit Edison Fully Supports Comments Being Submitted on Proposed Rule by NEI ML20198B1131998-12-17017 December 1998 Memorandum & Order (Request for an Extension of Time).* Orders That Staff May Have Until 990115 to File Written Presentation.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 981217 NRC-98-0184, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50.65, Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Npps. Expresses Concern That Proposed Rule,As Drafted,Will Impose Significant Regulatory Burden on NPPs Which Have Already Developed Risk Programs1998-12-14014 December 1998 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50.65, Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Npps. Expresses Concern That Proposed Rule,As Drafted,Will Impose Significant Regulatory Burden on NPPs Which Have Already Developed Risk Programs ML20197J8971998-12-14014 December 1998 NRC Staff Request for Extension of Time to File Response to Sp O'Hern Written Presentation.* Staff Requests That Motion for Extension of Time Until 990115 to File Written Presentation Be Granted.With Certificate of Svc ML20154M8281998-10-20020 October 1998 Federal Register Notice of Hearing.* Grants Sp O'Hern 980922 Request for Hearing Re Denial of O'Hern Application to Operate Nuclear Reactor.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 981020 ML20154M9471998-10-19019 October 1998 Memorandum & Order (Establishing Schedule for Case).* Grants Request for Hearing Filed on 980922 by O'Hern & Orders O'Hern to Specify Exam Questions to Be Discussed at Hearing by 981103.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 981019 ML20154K8601998-10-14014 October 1998 NRC Staff Response to Request for Hearing Filed by Applicant Sp O'Hern.* Request Re Denial of Application for Senior Operator License Filed in Timely Manner.Staff Does Not Object to Granting Request.With Certificate of Svc ML20154F0551998-10-0808 October 1998 Designation of Presiding Officer.* Pb Bloch Designated as Presiding Officer & Rf Cole Designated to Assist Presiding Officer in Hearing Re Denial of Sp O'Hern RO License.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 981008 NRC-98-0035, Comment on Draft RG DG-5008 (Rev 2 to Reg Guide 5.62), Reporting of Safeguards Events. Util Endorses Industry Comments Submitted by NEI1998-03-0909 March 1998 Comment on Draft RG DG-5008 (Rev 2 to Reg Guide 5.62), Reporting of Safeguards Events. Util Endorses Industry Comments Submitted by NEI NRC-98-0010, Comment Supporting Draft RG DG-1070, Sampling Plans Used for Dedicating Simple Metallic Commercial Grade Items for Use in NPP1998-02-17017 February 1998 Comment Supporting Draft RG DG-1070, Sampling Plans Used for Dedicating Simple Metallic Commercial Grade Items for Use in NPP NRC-98-0030, Comment Opposing PRM 50-63A by P Crane Re Prophylactic Use of Potassium Iodide for General Public1998-01-16016 January 1998 Comment Opposing PRM 50-63A by P Crane Re Prophylactic Use of Potassium Iodide for General Public NRC-98-0012, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 & 70 Re Exemption from Criticality Accident Requirements. Detroit Edison Concerned That Proposed Changes Will Not Provide Sufficient Flexibility Meeting Regulations to Criticality Monitoring1998-01-0202 January 1998 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 & 70 Re Exemption from Criticality Accident Requirements. Detroit Edison Concerned That Proposed Changes Will Not Provide Sufficient Flexibility Meeting Regulations to Criticality Monitoring NRC-97-0096, Comment on Draft Reg Guides DG-1061,1062,1064 & 1065,draft SRP Chapter 19 Rev L ,chapter 3.9.7 Rev 2C ,chapter 16.1 Rev 13 & Draft NUREG-1602 Dtd June 19971997-09-29029 September 1997 Comment on Draft Reg Guides DG-1061,1062,1064 & 1065,draft SRP Chapter 19 Rev L ,chapter 3.9.7 Rev 2C ,chapter 16.1 Rev 13 & Draft NUREG-1602 Dtd June 1997 NRC-97-0078, Comment on Draft Reg Guides DG-1061,1062,1064 & 1065,draft SRP Chapter 19 Rev L ,chapter 3.9.7 Rev 2C ,chapter 16.1 Rev 13 & Draft NUREG-1602 Dtd June 19971997-08-0606 August 1997 Comment on Draft Reg Guides DG-1061,1062,1064 & 1065,draft SRP Chapter 19 Rev L ,chapter 3.9.7 Rev 2C ,chapter 16.1 Rev 13 & Draft NUREG-1602 Dtd June 1997 ML20112G8451996-06-11011 June 1996 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Reporting Reliability & Availability Info for Risk-Significant Sys & Equipment NRC-96-0024, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Reporting Requirements for Unauthorized Use of Radioactive Matl.Util Supports Need for NRC to Be Promptly Informed of Incidents Involving Intentional Misuse of Licensed Matl1996-02-28028 February 1996 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Reporting Requirements for Unauthorized Use of Radioactive Matl.Util Supports Need for NRC to Be Promptly Informed of Incidents Involving Intentional Misuse of Licensed Matl NRC-96-0010, Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-63 Re Use of Potassium Iodide1996-02-12012 February 1996 Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-63 Re Use of Potassium Iodide NRC-95-0131, Comment on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-62 Re Changes to QA Program.Agrees That Changes Needed in Process for QA Program Revs1995-11-28028 November 1995 Comment on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-62 Re Changes to QA Program.Agrees That Changes Needed in Process for QA Program Revs NRC-95-0107, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 51 Re Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Reactors1995-10-12012 October 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 51 Re Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Reactors NRC-95-0103, Comment on Draft Reg Guide & NRC Bulletin, Potential Plugging of ECCS Strainers for Debris in Bwr. Supports Points That Bulletin Should Include Option of Justifying Operability of Currently Installed Passive Strainers1995-10-0202 October 1995 Comment on Draft Reg Guide & NRC Bulletin, Potential Plugging of ECCS Strainers for Debris in Bwr. Supports Points That Bulletin Should Include Option of Justifying Operability of Currently Installed Passive Strainers TXX-9522, Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources1995-08-26026 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources NRC-95-0080, Comment on Proposed Generic Communication Re Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits1995-07-21021 July 1995 Comment on Proposed Generic Communication Re Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits NRC-95-0078, Comment Supporting Proposed Generic Communication Re Process for Changes to Security Plans W/O Prior NRC Approval1995-07-14014 July 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Generic Communication Re Process for Changes to Security Plans W/O Prior NRC Approval NRC-95-0079, Comment Supporting Pr 10CFR50 Re Changes in Frequency Requirements for Emergency Planning & Preparedness Exercises from Annual to Biennial1995-07-13013 July 1995 Comment Supporting Pr 10CFR50 Re Changes in Frequency Requirements for Emergency Planning & Preparedness Exercises from Annual to Biennial NRC-95-0073, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR70 Re Change to NPP Security Requirements Associated W/Containment Access Control1995-06-0909 June 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR70 Re Change to NPP Security Requirements Associated W/Containment Access Control NRC-95-0056, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing1995-05-0808 May 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing NRC-95-0042, Comment Supporting Draft Policy Statement Re Freedom of Employees in Nuclear Industry to Raise Safety Concerns W/O Fear of Retaliation1995-04-10010 April 1995 Comment Supporting Draft Policy Statement Re Freedom of Employees in Nuclear Industry to Raise Safety Concerns W/O Fear of Retaliation NRC-95-0047, Comment on GL, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety Related Power-Operated Gate Valves. Draft GL Should Be Revised to Permit Some Use of Plant Operating Experience as Basis for Engineering Judgement1995-03-27027 March 1995 Comment on GL, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety Related Power-Operated Gate Valves. Draft GL Should Be Revised to Permit Some Use of Plant Operating Experience as Basis for Engineering Judgement NRC-95-0007, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule Re Proposed Policy Statement on Use of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Methods in Nuclear Regulatory Activities1995-02-0707 February 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule Re Proposed Policy Statement on Use of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Methods in Nuclear Regulatory Activities NRC-94-0145, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Low Power Operations for Np Reactors.All Util Outages Currently Controlled by Defense in Depth Philosophy Implemented by Operations & Work Control Group1995-01-11011 January 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Low Power Operations for Np Reactors.All Util Outages Currently Controlled by Defense in Depth Philosophy Implemented by Operations & Work Control Group NRC-95-0001, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR21 Re Procurement of Commercial Grade Items by NPP Licensees1995-01-0909 January 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR21 Re Procurement of Commercial Grade Items by NPP Licensees NRC-94-0130, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re NPP License Renewal1994-12-0909 December 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re NPP License Renewal NRC-94-0128, Comment Supporting & Opposing Sections of Proposed GL Re Reconsideration of NPP Security Requirements for an Internal Threat,1994-12-0707 December 1994 Comment Supporting & Opposing Sections of Proposed GL Re Reconsideration of NPP Security Requirements for an Internal Threat, NRC-94-0106, Comment Supporting NUMARC Responses Re Reexamination of NRC Enforcement Policy1994-11-30030 November 1994 Comment Supporting NUMARC Responses Re Reexamination of NRC Enforcement Policy NRC-94-0100, Comment on Pilot Program for NRC Recognition of Good Performance by Nuclear Power Plants.Endorses NEI Response to Ref 2 Submitted to NRC on 9410031994-10-13013 October 1994 Comment on Pilot Program for NRC Recognition of Good Performance by Nuclear Power Plants.Endorses NEI Response to Ref 2 Submitted to NRC on 941003 NRC-94-0074, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Consideration of Changes to fitness-for-duty Requirements.Recommends That Random Testing Scope Remain Same1994-08-0909 August 1994 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Consideration of Changes to fitness-for-duty Requirements.Recommends That Random Testing Scope Remain Same NRC-94-0070, Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-59 Re Changes to Security Program & Safeguards Contingency Plan Independent Reviews & Audit Frequency.Util Believes Further Rule Changes Should Be Made1994-07-19019 July 1994 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-59 Re Changes to Security Program & Safeguards Contingency Plan Independent Reviews & Audit Frequency.Util Believes Further Rule Changes Should Be Made ML20070P1161994-04-18018 April 1994 Comments on DE LLRW Onsite & Radwaste Disposal NRC-93-0149, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Protection Against Malevolent Use of Vehicles at NPP1993-12-17017 December 1993 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Protection Against Malevolent Use of Vehicles at NPP NRC-93-0145, Comment on NUMARC Petition for Rulemaking PRM 21-2, Commercial Grade Item Dedication Facilitation. Concurs W/ Petition1993-12-15015 December 1993 Comment on NUMARC Petition for Rulemaking PRM 21-2, Commercial Grade Item Dedication Facilitation. Concurs W/ Petition NRC-93-0144, Comment on Draft NUREG/BR-0058,Rev 2, Regulatory Analysis Guidelines of Us Nrc. Concurs W/Comments Submitted by NUMARC1993-12-0606 December 1993 Comment on Draft NUREG/BR-0058,Rev 2, Regulatory Analysis Guidelines of Us Nrc. Concurs W/Comments Submitted by NUMARC ML20059L3211993-11-24024 November 1993 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.120 Re Establishment, Implementation & Maintenance of Training Program NRC-93-0068, Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-58 Re VEPCO Petition to Change Frequency of Emergency Planning Exercises from Annual to Biennial1993-05-0505 May 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-58 Re VEPCO Petition to Change Frequency of Emergency Planning Exercises from Annual to Biennial DD-92-08, Director'S Decision DD-92-08 Re Enforcement Actions to Be Taken Against Util Due to Allegations Presented by Gap. Petition Denied1992-11-25025 November 1992 Director'S Decision DD-92-08 Re Enforcement Actions to Be Taken Against Util Due to Allegations Presented by Gap. Petition Denied 1999-09-13
[Table view] Category:ORDERS
MONTHYEARML20202B1561999-01-28028 January 1999 Memorandum & Order (Required Filing for Sp O'Hern).* Petitioner Should Document,With Citations to Record, Precisely Where He Disagrees or Agrees with Staff by 990219. with Certificate of Svc.Served on 990128 ML20198B1131998-12-17017 December 1998 Memorandum & Order (Request for an Extension of Time).* Orders That Staff May Have Until 990115 to File Written Presentation.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 981217 ML20154M9471998-10-19019 October 1998 Memorandum & Order (Establishing Schedule for Case).* Grants Request for Hearing Filed on 980922 by O'Hern & Orders O'Hern to Specify Exam Questions to Be Discussed at Hearing by 981103.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 981019 ML20209E8321986-07-0303 July 1986 Order Modifying License NPF-43 to Require Submittal & Implementation of Control Room Audit,As Listed & to Direct Util Not to Assign D Aniol to Duties Which Require Licensed Operator Until Expertise Determined DD-85-13, Order Extending Time Until 850927 for Commission to Act to Review Director'S Decision DD-85-13.Served on 8508281985-08-27027 August 1985 Order Extending Time Until 850927 for Commission to Act to Review Director'S Decision DD-85-13.Served on 850828 1999-01-28
[Table view] |
Text
__ __ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _
WITED STATES OF NERICA IEJCLEAR REGULATORY Com!$$ ION In the Matter of p I
DETRDlf EDIS0N COMPANY h Docket No. 50-341 (Femi-2) J License No. NPF-43 J EA 86-51 ORDER MODIFYING L!rENSE (EFFECTIVE IW4EDIATELY) 1 Detmit Edison Company (Deco or Licensee) is the holder of Facility Operating License No. NPF-43 which authorizes the licensee to operate the Femi-2 facility in Newport, Michigar..
, 11 On July 1,1985, a reactor operator, about an hour into his shift, while with-drawing control rods to achieve criticality on his first attempt ever to bring
! a coemercial power reactor critical, pulled 11 rods in Group 3 to the full out
! position, rather than position 04 requiruf by the rod pull sheet. This resulted in the reactor prematurely reaching criticality although this was not fully recognized until July 5,1985.
l While pulling the lith control rod in Group 3. the Short Period Alam
- annunciated five times and the pen for the Channel A Sourca Range Monitor jd failed to int for about three minutes. When the pen began inking again the PE O S8%
count rate was increasing. At about the same time, t,he rod pull error was l
M W
- $m@ recognized and the reactor operator began reinserting the 11 rods. Mr. Anto1, ecao i "" the Nuclear Shif t Supervisor, was called and he came out of his office to consult with the reactor operator. The Nuclear Shift Supervisor who was also l
i
t nsponsible'for directing his first start up of a cesseercial power roector, reviewed the event with the reactor operator and Shift Technic'al Advisor in -
Training and dataruined that the reactor had not gone critical. He then !
authorized recommencing of rod pulls. In making this decision he did not consult with the Shift Reactor Engineer, the Shift Operations Advisor or the Shift Technical Advisor. However, after the recomunencement of rod pulling he did contact the Operations Supervisor at his home and briefly discussed the event with him.
During the event both the Nuclear shift Supervisor and the Nuclear Assistant Shif t $Vpervisor were in the Shif t $wpervisor's office. While the rod pull error was documented in a nur.ber of records, it was not recorded in the control roor log or the Shift Supervisor's log. The Nuclear Supervising Operator in charge of the coa. trol roor with responsibility for the cor. trol roor lo; did not learn of the event until after the shift was over. Neither the Shift Operations Advisor nor the Shift Technical Advisor was observing the rod pulling nor was aware of the incident at the time it happened. The violations identified during this event are described in the Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil penalties which accompanies this Order.
i t
In view of the above, the NRC has concluded there was insufficient supervision of licensed activities in the control room on July 1-1,1986, during startup.
3 There was eso special attention given to the inexperienced reacter operator en his first criticality experience with power reactors. There ass no special attention given by the inexperienced leuclear Shift Supervisor on his first criticality experience at a power reactor. The Nuclear Shift Supervisor, who is responsible for oversight of plant operations, did not demonstrate adequate appreciation for the need to assure that operators strictly followed procedures, for the need to use the senior operators and advisors as a team, and for ~
, the need for good comunication logs and general awamness of activities by
! control room Personnel. In addition. the Nuclear shift Supervisor demonstrated a lack of appreciation of the potential significance of the event by failing to require ar, adequate evaluation of the situation before authorizing recorsnencement of rod pulling. I have concluded that further oversight in the control room is necessary to provide reasonable assurance that operation of the facility will be in compliance with Coenission requirements. I have else concluded that further training and examination of the Nuclear Shift Superv'isor is necessary to assure that he understands the responsibilities of a supervisor of licensed activities and duties of a reactor operator. Therefore, I have detemined the public health and safety requires that the actions in this Order be effective imediately. In addition, since the purpose of this Order is to assure that the facility will operate in compliance with existing Comission requirements, I have determined that this Order is not a backfit within the meaning of 10 CFR
- 50.10g of the Commiission's Regulations.
IV J
In view of the foregoing, pursuant to Sections 103,107,1611 and 161o of the Atomic Enery Act of 1954, as amended, and the Caemission's regulations in
4 10 CFR t.20'4 and 10 CFR Part 50 and 55. IT IS MEREBY ORDDtED. FFECTIVE IDMEDIATELY. THAT THE LICENSEE:
1 l 1
(A) Submit a control room audit program to the Regional Administrator, Region III within two weeks of the date of this Order and shall i implement it following approval by the Regional Administrator. The
~
pmgram shall include at least the following-i i
(1) Unannounced audits, at least one each shift each week to be l l
conducted at varying times on the shift (beginning, middle, and, etc.) and to cover each shift team. !
i (2) Each audit to be conducted by at least one corporate manager
- assisted by an er.ployee or consultant not repe ting to plant management who either (a) has been qualified as a SRO at a
( licensed facility, and has had satisfactory experience supervising licensed operations at a nuclear power reactor for which j he has held a license, and is or becomes fart 11ar with operations and procedures at Fermi before connencing this audit or (b) has
! similar qualifications, such as being a certified instructor. The persons appointed to conduct the audit must be approved by the Regional Administrator.
l I
(3) The audits shall include examination of: procedural compliances awareness of plant status and fulfillment of the duties !
and responsibilities of control room personnel including, operators, supervisors, and shift advisors; post-trip and
w - ._
5 post-event evaluations; personnel errors log keeping; and control room decorum, discipline, and attitude for the purpose of monitoring safe operations in compliance with Commission raquirements.
(4) Sufficient documentation of each audit shall be kept to pemit a corporate and NRC review of findings and development of recorrendations as appropriate to assum continued safe operation in compliance with Commission requirements. The prograr shall also provide for a final report to be submitted to the Regional l Adr.inistrator describing the findings and recanumendations and actier.s taken or to be taken as a result of the recosmandations j or, if no action is to be taken on a recomendation, an explanation i
of the basis for no action. l (B) Shall not assign Mr. D. Anic1, Nuclear Shift Supervisor, to duties associated with operation of Fami-2 which require a Senior Reactor Operator License or a Reactor Operator License without at least 30 days prior notice to the Regional Administrator at which time the licensee
. shall demonstrate that Mr. Anto1 has been adequately trained and exartned, including simulator exercises, to assure that be will properly perform and supervise licensed operations.
l l
v The Regional Atkinistrator. Region III, any relax or taminate any of the
- j. above condition 1 for good cause.
4 1
VI The Licensee or any other person whose interest is adversely affected by this Order may request a hearing on this Order. Any roguest for hearing shall be sutunitted to the Director. Office of Inspection and Enforcement. U. 5.
Nuclear Regulatory Cassission Washington, D. C. 20555, within 30 days of
~
the date of the Order. A copy of the request shall also be sent to the seneral Counsel at the same address and to the Regional Administrator, Region !!!, 799 Roosevelt Road, Glenn Ellyn, Illinois 60137. If a persor other l than the Licensee or the Nuclear Shift Supervisor requests a hearing, that person shall set forth with particularity the manner in which the petitioner's interest is adversely affected by this Order and should address the criteria set forth in 10 CFR 2.714(d). AN ANSWER TO THIS ORDER OR A REQUEST FOR HEARING i
$ HALL NOT STAY THE IPNEDIATE EFFECTIVENESS OF SECTION !Y OF THIS ORDER. l l l l l If a hearing is to be held concerning this Order, the Coreission will issue an order designating the time and place of hearing. If a hearing is held, the issue to be considered at such hearing shall be whether this Order shall be sustained.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY C0pmIS$10N
- a N mes Taylor. ter Office of Inspection and Enforcement Dated at Bethesda, Maryland this % ay of July 1986
_ . - . - _ - _ - - - - _ _ _ - _ _ - - - _ - _- _ - - - . - _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ - - - _