ML20203C074

Discusses OI Rept 1-96-033 Re Alleged Falsification of Fire Protection Surveillance Test Documentation.Requests That OGC Analyze Rept & Determine If Sufficient Evidence for Action. EA-97-115 Assigned to Track Case

ML20203C074
Person / Time
Site:	Limerick
Issue date:	03/17/1997
From:	Lieberman J NRC OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT (OE)
To:	Collins S, Goldberg J, Miller H NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned), NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I), NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC)
Shared Package
ML20203B905	List: ML20203B900 ML20203B967 ML20203B978 ML20203B982 ML20203B989 ML20203B995 ML20203C004 ML20203C010 ML20203C016 ML20203C019 ML20203C025 ML20203C032 ML20203C048 ML20203C059 ML20203C074 ML20203C087 ML20203C092 ML20203C118 ML20203C125
References
FOIA-99-76 EA-97-115, NUDOCS 9902110179
Download: ML20203C074 (3)

Text

, .- . . _ _ - ..- - . .-- -

, ^ f ng l3 _

l

• t" UNITED STATES NUCLEAR RESULATORY COMMISSION '

f WASHINGTON, D.C. 3066M001

%, . . . . . ,o!

March 17, 1997 l

l MEMORANDUM TO: Hubert J. Miller, Regional Administrator Region I Samuel J. Collins, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation l Jack R. Goldberg, Deputy Assistant General Counsel for Enforcement Office of the General Counsel FROM: JamesLieberman, Director Office of Enforcement [

c "b '

SUBJECT:

01 REPORT l-96-033; RE: LIMERICK, ALLEGED FALSIFICATION OF F!RE PROTECTION SURVEILLANCE TEST DOCUMENTATION The above captioned OI report involves alleged falsification of fire protection test documentation at Limerick Generating Station. The findings of the report indicate that enforcement action may be appropriat.e in this case.

By copy of this memorandum, I am requesting that OGC analyze the report and determine has assigned whether theretoistrack EA 97-115 sufficient evidence to take enforcement action. OE this case.

Laban Coblentz of my staff has discussed this case with members of your staff and arranged a telephone conference for March 18, 1997 at 1:30 p.m. to discuss the development of an enforcement action. At the time this teleconference was scheduled, each of your offices expressed no conflict. Please ensure that someone from your staff will participate who can approve a course of action in this case. Should we fail to reach a consensus during the call, this matter will be referred to the DEDR for resolution.

Regional Staff may participate by calling my office at (301) 415-2741; those in headquarters may attend in Room 07-H-1. If there is a significant scheduling problem, please call me as soon as possible as an alternate time can be arranged.

cc: E. Jordan, DEDO R. Zimmerman, NRR G. Caputo, 01 S. Varga, NRR' F. Rinaldi, NRR NOT F P LIC DIS OSU WITHOUT APPROVAL Of-DIR DFFICE O CEMENT I

^

'l 9902110179 990208 PDR FOIA l

QUNTER99-76 PDR ttv< .1

s.

). ~

Multiple Addressees DISTRIBUTION: .

JLieberman, OE. '

MSatorius, OE L -LCoblentz, OE

RPedersen, OE Day File 01 File l-

)

L-DE I D:0_E LCoblentz 'JLMman

! 03/11/97 03/f{/97

. Doc Name: G:\01196033.RP-1 l

l

.NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE WITHOUT APPROVAL OF l . DIRECTOR, 0FFICE OF ENFORCEMENT i o

tAA iMANhM1IIAL - UNE PAGE ONLY TO: b b Lo/%4 FRON: Renade redk=MLTsu (366 W5mg 2 ..

I '

EA REQUEST & ENFORCEMENT STRATEGY F0'RM 1

l Del Case: 1st Penal: Post Board / Panel: Re-Panal: Post Caucus: Re-Caucus: Other: _

l EA _e r muEda.-(

l

3 lie A,

~ ~ ' " ' ' " ~ " -

93 p5 l l .. ,s.1. , 2 _ m . ,,p. m m m. w. . .

uc  : Pdu ' ,.cmt,< imi.c.u.n, cuu a u e c

m. .:so-xc;2 Ass 1 t ., m,., .a h e ln ID a 4, /,,

note oz Ref.: *l //9 /95 oI apt me.: / *lI. - o 33 or apt noter h fl 17 Conference C o ed 7:

I

• bm U vi awb D ss s u J = M' Inspection Rpt No. Keywords for ELIVs and NCTs O / D (p 0 ~C- -

O ~) O / OO ,

o / 0/00 ms: O  :

r_

1. SL Supp g Detallas td i d_ m O ae m- e_ Mo [t C.- S L_I / m_

b u m - c J trerit 6 MUO Ju b.e !24 GA c1b-CSO

<ut_._ <, 'L__ n T - %d C o -m b I C oei j 0,u tz mmo SL Supp k

• Details:

YO'T0 'o w nt 'u_ W.Y%rY $ WW L zuNL st Details supp

/ a-1d'\ # C43

( f-p A 'd @

d~~~VN A - dI-cM M W MOA. u 4-[

L M

(

)

Wl&O xAxh M k W A & - - n.- 3-SD 2'. Risk Significant Case? D fes O po: -

N / /4 / / ,#-e -

3. Prior Escalated Actiou? D No D Yes EA: Date:

4.'Lic.IDFDBofYes/OLic. Credit O 50 Credit O Inad. Info O BA Explain- 4

5. Corrective Action? D Lic. Credit c No credit [Imad. Info Exptain:

.. Concer.nc. . d.dr D .o p .. , tai.: 2 ,A Je s~ a hsra

7. CFF 0 No CP O Base CP O Double Base CF D Other: T 7 -f> 5 b)

8. Discretion or Order Needed? D 50 D Yes Esplalas

9. W111 fulness involved? D No Yes 01 Coordinated: D Needs OI Coord1:2ation 3 a. . Program Office Represented? %5o DYearb. 11. 00C Represented? O No fYest -

12. Action? O Bo violatico D Re panet forence Letter D Choice Letter P SL IV B07 0 Re-Caucus D Region Issues Esc. Action D Sulmait to OE for Quick Review Sukumit to CE for Full Package Review D DEDO Review D Commission D Disagreement G Oth'at:

13. 8"mts: Of J gM $b h Approved:.

+&[apAf&l)p 2-1) kkA ? .? ""!'""

W @M a... im * *

• MOT FOfLPUBLMPOTSDtOSUREWifiid(NAPPROVAL v -

OF THE DIRECTOR-0E--M

p

- - - - . .,