ML20203C025

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses OI Rept 4-95-004 Re Alleged Discrimination & Termination for Refusal to Falsify Work Steps.Requests OGC Analyze Rept & Determine If There Is Sufficient Evidence to Support Regulatory Action.Ea 96-178 Assigned to Track Case
ML20203C025
Person / Time
Site: Arkansas Nuclear  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 05/22/1996
From: Gray J
NRC OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT (OE)
To: Callan L, Goldberg J, Russell W
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned), NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV), NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC)
Shared Package
ML20203B905 List:
References
FOIA-99-76 EA-96-178, NUDOCS 9902110142
Download: ML20203C025 (4)


Text

.. . ... - . - . - . - - _.. - - . - . - .. - . - . - . - ...-_. _ . - . _ _ -.._-.-

y-..

,p i s* j UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 3000H001

%, . . , g May 22, 1996 MEMORANDUM TO: L. J. Callan, Regional Administrator Region IV William T. Russell, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulatica Jack R. Goldberg, Deputy Assistant General Counsel for Enforcement -

Of ice of the e al Counsel

- A /,

, u FROM: p .G y, puty irector 0 fic of Enfor ment

SUBJECT:

01 REPORT 4-95-004; RE: ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE: ALLEGED DISCRIMINATION STEPS AND TERMINATION FOR REFUSAL TO FALSIFY i

The above captioned 0! report involves an allegation that a former employee was the subject of discrimination and was terminated because he refused to sign off on Controlled Work Packages (CWP) used to install fire barrier

- penetration seals as being complete without performing all required work steps. The former employee stated that his supervisor went into his locker workretrieved and steps. Athe CWP, and had a superintendent sign-off as completing the review of this matter by the Region IV technical staff and Regional Counsel determined that the procedure requiring the CWP work steps was not an NRC record requirement; however, the alleger's supervisor admitted that he caused a superintendent to falsify information on the CWP by informing him'that all work steps had been completed which he knew was not correct.

The findings of'the OI report-indicate that some action with regard to the licensee and the individual may be warranted in this case. By copy of this memorandum, I am requesting that OGC analyze the report and determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support regulatory action. OE has assigned EA 96-178 to track this case.

Garry Harris of my staff has' discussed this case with members of the NRR and OGC staffs and arranged a telephone conference for June 6,1996 at 1:30 p.m.

l to discuss the issues. Regional Staff may participate by calling my office at (301) 415-2741; those in headquarters may attend in Room 07-H-1. If there is

a significar& scheduling problem, please call me as soon as possible as an L

alternate tsme can be arranged..

l l cc: 'J. Milhoan, DEDR

! R. Zimmerman, NRR G. Caputo, 01 G. Sanborn, RIV- l 2tt01G MOM 3 PDR FOIA ~

OUNTER99-76 PDR ,

U fl i i

__- -... . . ._.... ~. -.- .

May 22, 1996 3._

Multiple Addressees DISTRIBUTION:

JLieberman, OE JGray, OE Enforcement Specialist Day File.(96163)

OI File OE n /h 00:qE m GHaN k JGrb

!&>Mi 41Lyx Doc Name: G:\01194006.MHS s l

l I

l' I

2 i ,.

e i

FAX TRANSMITTAL - ONE PAGE ONLY '

TO: br4 Sesdor n FRON: C nu s/ fo M (301) 415- 30 8 0 I I OE UNDERSTANDING AND EA REQUEST FORM ere Conf.r.nc.:

[

Poet Conference:

EAYS Date Entry Information Date of Request: b b Region: CeeeYype: E Reg.

Contact:

Xso vrd Licensee k o rC(1 J.At f Cd b /\ t_' CO Tacility (Unit)/ Location: O "' f Docket No.: b Leet Day of Insp. :' h b Late of 01 Ref.

0: Rpt No.t b/-. W- DO N 0 Rpt Det.: 2/N)d l I Confer. nee op.n 7:

N 4 0 eA ed d h cc; d n A % a cc\ k 0 a n h m A a e c M ,' n 4 . < < n A m . '

Ukrk 6he sniM a s %% 1sodAr ,uken ce meknd.-ke e .%

haI NA he1 15cde)<.J 85- A M '## M N A renw% mvA n} <dakrM.12ee,id 106 % k%d nrd11

~

EA Nuznber: Ol (o - l'78 ES: GN bd hvo ccv *[ k m.hn'c/ -t*

1. SL Det i/ PM t t 0/2l'/0($ /C1L.DL / /L4 L1 I /66NO7 fP2Nd?11.I /@0li iLL[ // 7 /'&ift47 - E K%hN/ G7PNtM/

$bel5C4 t ,flLYW /9(.e/ .MLNh5iC4[, /)W.d4/id ._ , . -

.teile:

Y'

$&h b ,1f$/ f/ f.

i

/!{Y k Af/ Y /l(YI l p/Y { Y Y xslou9AdK<.__ . I t SL Supp Drta11e:

2. Prior Eeceleted Action? O No D Yes
  • EA: Date:

3.

Identification? O Lic. Credit c No Credit D Inad. Info O NA Commente:

4. Corrective Action? D Lic. Credit D No Credit O Inad. Info Consnente :

S. Enforcement conference Needed? No D Yee Commente:

6. Discretion or Order Needed? D Yes

[No Commente:

7 Action? DJutunittoOE E Regional Acti n . O Cho e Lettpr Q EDO Review c Disagreement 0 Other: f/# VYGd D Y n4 P_r4 y v#

/tl410 ' 80rY . 7_LiMMA0 ffCoanniesion 00M f f j

6. CP? O No CF 0 Base CP O Double Bees CF 0 Other:
9. Willfulness involved? D No O Yes D 01 Coordinated D Neede O! Coordinetton

'rogram Office Represented? O Mo O Yee 11. OGC Represented?

l O No 0 Yes Conssente : AN/ tr 4/ C JAA CQ/h M KAA A tt L 13. Approved: / \.

aca,n o w M i L 4sa J *"*

'l'/7/y4 \\

work pod A7 documnkeAkJ

        • wESK FOR PUBLICNSCLOSURE -

WIm001 APPROVAL 4F THE-DIR5tTOR'Ot ****,

Y. *.

4 E UNfTD STATES 5 I NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

\s,~ ~ ' ,/ WASHINGTON. D.C. 20liti64001

~, m a

  1. d n & g /m j,,

m4

~

N 3 se en s or /er + s ,_ ,y Ad&* g ce r

W  % ~ (d-m/ ch/es)J g/J b w g # M &^

a m p

  • A~- @

~

a y j& & #

y a _ a - 2 ,~us y*p ,, & ~f y A~' 5, # &f, e yfu os h f W

  • Mg ud$

>>su- c AcdAlb bA~'

%y----

QfWS& MG $

_ -- -