ML20203C025

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses OI Rept 4-95-004 Re Alleged Discrimination & Termination for Refusal to Falsify Work Steps.Requests OGC Analyze Rept & Determine If There Is Sufficient Evidence to Support Regulatory Action.Ea 96-178 Assigned to Track Case
ML20203C025
Person / Time
Site: Arkansas Nuclear  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 05/22/1996
From: Gray J
NRC OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT (OE)
To: Callan L, Goldberg J, Russell W
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned), NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV), NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC)
Shared Package
ML20203B905 List:
References
FOIA-99-76 EA-96-178, NUDOCS 9902110142
Download: ML20203C025 (4)


Text

..

y-..

,p i

UNITED STATES s

j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 3000H001

%,.., g May 22, 1996 MEMORANDUM TO:

L. J. Callan, Regional Administrator Region IV William T. Russell, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulatica Jack R. Goldberg, Deputy Assistant General Counsel for Enforcement -

Of ice of the e al Counsel

- A /,

u FROM:

p

.G y,

puty irector 0 fic of Enfor ment

SUBJECT:

01 REPORT 4-95-004; RE: ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE: ALLEGED DISCRIMINATION AND TERMINATION FOR REFUSAL TO FALSIFY STEPS i

The above captioned 0! report involves an allegation that a former employee was the subject of discrimination and was terminated because he refused to sign off on Controlled Work Packages (CWP) used to install fire barrier

- penetration seals as being complete without performing all required work steps. The former employee stated that his supervisor went into his locker and retrieved the CWP, and had a superintendent sign-off as completing the work steps.

A review of this matter by the Region IV technical staff and Regional Counsel determined that the procedure requiring the CWP work steps was not an NRC record requirement; however, the alleger's supervisor admitted that he caused a superintendent to falsify information on the CWP by informing him'that all work steps had been completed which he knew was not correct.

The findings of'the OI report-indicate that some action with regard to the licensee and the individual may be warranted in this case. By copy of this memorandum, I am requesting that OGC analyze the report and determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support regulatory action.

OE has assigned EA 96-178 to track this case.

Garry Harris of my staff has' discussed this case with members of the NRR and OGC staffs and arranged a telephone conference for June 6,1996 at 1:30 p.m.

to discuss the issues. Regional Staff may participate by calling my office at l

(301) 415-2741; those in headquarters may attend in Room 07-H-1.

If there is

a significar& scheduling problem, please call me as soon as possible as an L

alternate tsme can be arranged..

l l

cc:

'J. Milhoan, DEDR R. Zimmerman, NRR G. Caputo, 01 G. Sanborn, RIV-l 2tt01G MOM 3

PDR FOIA

~

OUNTER99-76 PDR U fl i

i

._.... ~. -.-

3._

May 22, 1996 Multiple Addressees DISTRIBUTION:

JLieberman, OE JGray, OE Enforcement Specialist Day File.(96163)

OI File OE n /h 00:qE m GHaN k JGrb

!&>Mi 41Lyx Doc Name:

G:\\01194006.MHS s

l l

I l'

I 2

i,.

e i

FAX TRANSMITTAL - ONE PAGE ONLY TO:

br4 Sesdor n FRON:

C nu s/ fo M (301) 415-30 8 0 I

I OE UNDERSTANDING AND EA REQUEST FORM

[

ere Conf.r.nc.:

Poet Conference:

EAYS Date Entry Information Date of Request: b b

Region:

CeeeYype: E Reg.

Contact:

Xso vrd Licensee k

o rC(1 J.At f Cd b /\\ t_' CO Tacility (Unit)/ Location:

O "' f Docket No.:

b Leet Day of Insp. :' h b

Late of 01 Ref.

0: Rpt No.t b/-. W-DO N 2/N)d 0 Rpt Det.:

Confer. nee op.n 7:

l I

N

4 0 eA ed d h cc; d n A % a cc\\ k 0 a n h m A a e c M,' n 4. < < n A m. Ukrk 6he sniM a s %% 1sodAr,uken ce meknd.-ke e haI NA he1 15cde)<.J 85-A M '## M N A renw% mvA n} <dakrM.12ee,id 106 % k%d nrd11

~

O (o - l'78 ES:

GN bd hvo *[ k m.hn'c/ -t*

EA Nuznber:

l ccv

1. SL i/ PM t t 0/2l'/0($

/C1L.DL / /L4 L1 /66NO7 I

Det fP2Nd?11.I /@0li iLL[ // 7 /'&ift47 - E K%hN/ G7PNtM/

$bel5C4 t,flLYW /9(.e/.MLNh5iC4[, /)W.d4/id._

Y'

$&h b

,1f$/ f/

f.

.teile:

i

/!{Y k Af/

Y

/l(YI l

p/Y { Y Y xslou9AdK<.__.

I t

SL Supp Drta11e:

2.

Prior Eeceleted Action?

O No D Yes

  • EA:

Date:

3.

Identification? O Lic. Credit c No Credit D Inad. Info O NA Commente:

4.

Corrective Action?

D Lic. Credit D No Credit O Inad. Info Consnente :

S.

Enforcement conference Needed?

No D Yee Commente:

6.

Discretion or Order Needed?

[No D Yes Commente:

7 Action?

DJutunittoOE E Regional Acti n

. O Cho e Lettpr Q EDO Review 0 Coanniesion j c Disagreement 0 Other:

f/# VYGd D Y n4 P_r4 y

/tl410 '

80rY

. 7_LiMMA ff 00M f f v#

6.

CP? O No CF 0 Base CP O Double Bees CF 0 Other:

9.

Willfulness involved? D No O Yes D 01 Coordinated D Neede O! Coordinetton l

'rogram Office Represented?

O Mo O Yee

11. OGC Represented?

O No 0 Yes Conssente :

AN/ tr 4/ C JAA CQ/h M KAA tt L 13.

Approved:

/

\\.

A aca,n o w M i L 4sa J

'l'/7/y4

\\\\

work pod A7 documnkeAkJ

        • ESK FOR PUBLICNSCLOSURE WIm001 APPROVAL 4F THE-DIR5tTOR'Ot ****,

w

Y.

4 E

UNfTD STATES 5

I NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

\\s,~ ~ ',/

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20liti64001

  1. d n &

~, m

'a m4 N 3

~

g /m j,,

se en s or /er + s,_,y Ad&*

g ce (d-m/ ch/es)

W

~

J r

g/J b

w g M

&^

a m p A~-

y j& & #

~

a y a _ a - 2,~us

& ~f y

  • p y

A~' 5, # &f, e yfu os h f W

  • M ud$

>>su-c AcdAlb bA~'

g

%y----

MG QfWS&

-