ML20196F142
| ML20196F142 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 02/24/1988 |
| From: | Brock M AMESBURY, MA, HAMPTON, NH, NEW ENGLAND COALITION ON NUCLEAR POLLUTION, SEACOAST ANTI-POLLUTION LEAGUE, SHAINES & MCEACHERN |
| To: | NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20196F079 | List: |
| References | |
| OL, NUDOCS 8803020043 | |
| Download: ML20196F142 (51) | |
Text
--
k ,.
l 1
1 DOLKCTCO U8Nkc UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 1B FEB 29 P3:46
, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD OCHYE chij,$E['
BRANCH Before Administrative Judges: .
Alan S. Rosenthal,. Chairman
'Ghry J. Edles Howard A. uilber In the Matter of ) February 24, 1988
)
] PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF )
NEW HAMPSHIRE,'et al, ) Docket Nos. 50-443-OL
) 50-444-OL (Seabrook Station, Units 1 )
and 2) ) Off-Site Emergency
) Planning
- )
l .
JOINT INTERVENOR APPEAL BY MOTION EQB DIRECTED CERTIFICATION NOW COME the Town of Amesbury, Town of Hampton, Seacoast
> Anti-Pollution League and the New England Coalition on Nuclear' Pollution (hereinafter. "Intervenors') and jointly move for directed certification of the ASLB's MEMORANDUM AER 2RRER dated February 17, 1988, and served upon Intervenors on February 18, 1988, which, inter Alig, established the schedule for three discrete litigation "tracks" now pending before the off-site Licensing Board. Ah defined by the Board, the first, or "Main,"
track specifies time frames for filing proposed findings on all issues litigated concerning the New Hampshire Radiological Emergency Response Plan (NHRERP), excluding sheltering; the 8803020043 880224 PDR ADOCK 05000443 O PDR en bM MDM 25 Mao.reoco Am.T . p C BM W @TM."M NM OMh31
.,. , _ _ , _ _ , . . - - , . _ , , _ _ , . . _ _ . , _ _ . . - , _ . . _ . ~ . _ _ . , _ . - - , , . . _ _ _ , -
second, or sheltering track, requires further prefiled shelter testimony and hearings on shelter issues; and the final, or Seabrook Plan for Massachusetts Communities (SPMC), track, establishes a deadline for filing contentions on the SPMC.
The Licensing Board's three track schedule is so compressed as to preclude Intervenors from any meaningful opportunity to participate on significant issues raised in this licensing proceeding. Absent Appeal Board relief, Intervenors will be .
denied their rights to a fundamentally fair hearing secured under 10 CFR 2.718 and the United States Constitution.
STANDARD EOB Q DIRECTED CERTIFICATION This Appeal Board has stated that the standard for review of a scheduling order is whether the schedule deprives the appealing party of its right to procedural due process. ALAB-864, p.4 (5/1/87) quoting ALAB-858, p.5 (1/15/87). As discussed herein, the Licensing Board's schedule, based upon the totality of circumstances, deprives Intervenors of these due process rights.
PROCEDURAL
SUMMARY
on September 11, 1987, pursuant to the Licensing Board's ,
prior scheduling order, all parties prefiled testimony in advance of litigation on the New Hampshire portion of the Radiological f
Emergency Response Plan for Seabrook Station (NHRERP), with hearings to commence on October 5, 1987. On September 22, 1987, while Intervenors were in the process of reviewing literally i
hundreds of pages of testimony and exhibits prefiled by -
2 SHANES Es htEACHCHN - M. OPT 35K**4a ASSOCIATsoN M VapJnACCO avT L Y *
- B?t SA: M* T*?.N *s = T W -
t Applicants, and engaging in final preparation for hearings, Applicants served upon Intervenors the Seabrook Plan for Massachusetts Communities (SPMC) .1 As scheduled, hearings on the NHRERP commenced on October 5, and continued, on an essentially week on/ week off format, through the end of 1987, with further hearings extending to January and February, 1988, the last hearing date being February 10, 1988.
Specifically, hearings were held on the following dates:
October 5 through 9 October 19 through 23 November 2 through 6 November 16 through 20 November 30 through December 4 December 14 through 17 ,
January 11 through 13 ,
February 8 through 10 Accordingly, almost since the date of receipt of the SPMC, Intervenors have been engaged in hearings on the NHRERP, which effectively precluded Intervenors from any reasonable opportunity 1
Certain information ("redacted information") containing the identities of those providing emergency services under the SPMC, p including bus and ambulance drivers and utility workers l performing emergency response functions, was deleted from the SPMC provided to Intervenors on September 22, 1987. Applicants claimed a right to withhold this information from public scrutiny. The Commonwealth, on behalf of Intervenors, is presently requesting the ASLB to order public disclosure of thls information. Following entry of an interim protective order on February 17, 1988, to permit the ASLB to consider the merits of the issue, the redacted information was served upon Intervenors on February 24, 1988. Infra.
3 sets r. wom ouscw m,ca m y . .a , y . - a e= t t -*v*****-< - - ***'
l 4
to review, critique, or prepare contentions on the SPMC. Of equal significance, the hearings on the NHRERP have generated almost 10,000 pages of hearing transcript, which Intervenors are presently reviewing in preparation for the filing of proposed findings.2 By MEMORANDUM AliQ ORDER dated February 3, 1988, the Licensing Board itself proposed, for discussion, a schedule on the main, sheltering, and SPMC tracks. A copy of the Board's proposed schedule is attached hereto as Exhibit A. By its terms, the Board's own proposed schedule provided for a filing deadline of April 6, 1988 for Intervenors' proposed findings on the NHRERP, except sheltering, with an additicnal 30 days, or until May 6, 1988, for filing contentions on the SPMC.
At the discussion between the parties at the February 10, 1988 hearing, Intervenors generally acceded to the filing deadlines established by the Board's proposed schedule. Tr.
9658.3 Applicants, however, objected to the May 6 contention filing deadline and proposed the SPMC contention date be advance'd almost two months to March 15, 1988. See, Transcript, 9755-9757.
I 2
As of February 10, 1988, the last day of hearings on emergency plans to date, the hearing transcript had reached 9,776 pages in length.
l 3 The transcript pages cited in this memorandum are attached, in numerical sequence, as Exhibit B.
4 l
l mims a wtAoew - ouwa macarm
, . . n. m em . - r c -. v .-
.. t l
l Over Intervenors' objections, and in response to Applicants' request to expedite the filing of SFMC contentions, the Board stated:
Now, I haven't talked to the Board members.
We won't decide tonight. We'll go back and play a little bit more, but I'm trying to figure out if we've made the most efficient use of time, and to see if we cannot perhaps move up the contention date and perhaps give some relief on one of the other two tracks. .
Now vg expect ce ale 12 work Darallel. I mean, franklv. 11 Y.2M can't work 2D j;F2 tracks, pick the track y_2M Enn work s21,.
That's coina 1st hg your eroblem.
But nevertheless, we want to give the maximum amount of time to the parties that is possible and still keep the Board busy.
So we'll go back and look at this, and see if we cannot reduce the end-date of compaction, which is now -- I mean, not the end-date, but the operating date, for compaction, which is May 6, move that up and look at the other schedule, and try to give some relief.
(Tr. 9773.)
Under date of February 17, 1988, the Board issued a revised schedule, attached hereto as Exhibit C. That schedule advanced the deadline for filing contentions on the SPMC from 5/6/88 to 4/1/88, maintained the filing deadline for proposed findings on the NHRERP at 4/6/88, and thereby required Intervenors, within approximately eight weeks of the close of the hearing record on the NHRERP, to co= pile and submit proposed findings based upon approximately 10,000 pages of transcript while simultaneously preparing contentions on the SPMC.
5 1
mu r. mcem mmm usmarr 21 ua m.Ew X: As T%T .
- C f**
- W 8C** * " .%
- 1" ?"*
O
. r l
I
, The only apparent "relief" provided by the revised schedule concerned the "sheltering" track, whereby the deadline for l
prefiling shelter testimony was extended from 3/28/88 to 4/18/88, with the hearings on shelter issues similarly postponed from-4/18/88 to 5/2/88. Since, however, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts is serving as Lead Intervenor on shelter issues, a fact well known to the Licensing Board as early as the commencement of hearings on October 5, the modification of the shelter deadlines has minimal impact on Intervenors other than the Commonwealth and, as a practical matter, afforded Intervenors no significant "relief" from the compressed schedule.4 -
Following entry of the February 17 scheduling order, Applicants served upon Intervenors three separate amendments or additions to the SPMC. Infra.
4 With respect to the shelter issue, all parties have reserved the right to modify their testimony following submission of FEMA's updated position, schedaled for filing on 3/14/88.
Subject to this qualification, however, much of the direct I
shelter testimony has already been substantially completed, with l both Applicants and the Commonwealth having prefiled voluminous testimony on the issue back in September, 1987. Prior to' February 10, the remaining Intervenors advised the Licensing i
Board of their intent to make a limited supplemental presentation on the shelter issue. As compared with the substantial time and
( resource demands for preparing NHRERP findings and SPMC l contentions, however, the limited alteration of the sheltering, j track deadlines provided Intervenors no substantial "relief." In l the event FEMA alters its position on sheltering, however, which will not be known until 3/14/88, Intervenors will lickly require at least the time provided under the present schedule for discovery and amendments to sheltering teestimony. All of these facts were plainly known to the Licensing Board before the I present schedule was established.
6
- s.mc>as. - - semw a baum W asT'..* * ? * *
- M* 8"*7 " ~*
- A" M*"
L
i l
i l DJZE PROCESS VIOLATIONS i
i To understand the totality of circumstances imposing a grossly unfair burden upon Intervenors through the Board's truncated schedule, the following points should be noted:
- 1. As this Board is well aware, the Licensing Board's three track litigation schedule is but one component, which Intervenors must presently address, in this licensing proceeding. Additional issues include:
(a) At the invitation of this Board, Intervenors have further been engaged in supplementing their petition to review Applicants' financial qualifications in light of the recent bankruptcy of Applicants' lead owner, Public Sersice co=pany of New Hampshire. ALAB (1/29/88). By its terms, this Board's order required Intervenors to file the financial qualification supplement on or before March 1, 1988, which necessarily diverted Intervenors from focusing exclusively on the Off-Site Licensing Board's three litigation tracks. This supplement was filed by Intervenors under date of February 23, 1988.
(b) Intervenors have been preparing briefs for submission to the First Circrit Court of Appeals on the Commission's recent rulemakin7 concerning utility prepared t
emergency plans in situations in which state and/or local governments decline to participate further in emergency planning.
(c) Intervenors have been preparing comments to NUREG t
0654 FEMA-Rep.-1, Rev. 1, Supp. 1, issued by FEMA to provide 7
SHAPE 5 & McIACHERN - serwIssms alwKlatm 75 Me DLfv *C A %T%.T
- 7 k'
- W pr* *M*W *, ** *W'
1
. l l guidance criteria for implementation of the Commission's ruling on utility prepared emergency plans, which must be submitted on or about February 29, 1988.
(d) Intervenor NECNP is engaged in extensive litigation over the on-site technical issues previously remanded by this Board for further consideration to the On-Site Licensing Board. -
(e) This Board has directed the On-Site Licensing Board to re-open the record for the purpose of consideration of public notification contentions which the Commonwealth "and the other parties" will be allowed to submit based upon Applicants' amended public notification plan. ALAB-883 at p.39. Since Applicants' amended notification plan is anticipated in the near future, any late filed contentions on the plan must be prepared and submitted promptly to ensure the contentions will satisfy the Commission requirements for timeliness.6 All of these proceedings are in addition to the three litigation tracks imposed by the Licensing Board upon Intervenors in its February 17, 1988 order, with many of these issues, specifically raised by Intervenors to the Licensing Board at the
> February 10 hearing. Tr. 9759.
t 5
The Commonwealth, in addition to the foregoing, is engaged in addressing significant additional issues including appearance in the PSNH bankruptcy proceeding and preparing briefs on the SPMC redacted information. See Note 1, suora.
8 sawzsa wcacm. - aserm a m4Aryn N:: astN.T . o 9
- MS W%O.% *"tW'
- 2. Since entry of the scheduling ORDER on February 17, Applicants have served upon Intervenors, on February 18, 22 and 23 (Eng, Exhibits D, E and F), three substantial modifications or additions to the SPMC, totalling hundreds of pages of plans and materials. Necessarily, Intervenors have had no meaningful opportunity to review or assess these materials, which reasonably warrant an extension of the SPMC contention deadline bevond the May 6 date originally proposed by the Board.
- 3. Even considered in isolation, the Licensing Board's February 17 order imposes a wholly unreasonable and burdenso=e schedule upon Intervenors. The SPMC, in essence, is a wholly compensatory plan that relies upon more than 1,0'0 0 transportation service providers, including drivers for buses, ambulances and vans necessary to implement an emergency response. In addition, a significant contingent of utility mmployees or representatives have been designated under the SPMC to perform emergency response functions and/or to provide assistance to any participating state or local government. Accordingly, a critical element in assessing the efficacy of the SPMC will turn upon thorough survey research of these persons who have allegedly promised, through letters of agreement, to be available to respond to an actual emergency at t
- Seabrook Station. Only this week, on February 24, 1988, did Applicants serve upon Intervenors the identities of these 9
SHAMS & 6.tEACMM B.Em'e=A AimOAnw Pa v a r,r* T; a .n .Y 1r a p ? v **? *** ** " .% *=*t."
l i
businesses and individuals designated to provide these emergency services.6 Necessarily, Intervenors, including the Commonwealth 6
It is significant to note that, during the hearings on the NHRERP, certain companies that had signed letters of agreement stating that specific personnel would be "available" to respond to a Seabrook emergency provided testimony to the Licensing Board that the co=panies had never surveyed their employees to determine how many in fact would make themselves available to ,
respond to an accident at Seabrook. Sal Guadagna, who had previously signed letters of agreement stating that 300 bus drivern would be "available," provided this testimony to the Licensing Board:
Q Mr. Guadagna, I understood, in response to a question by Mr. Bisbee, you felt that it would be appropriate for you to take poll or survey of your drivers to determine how many would be available to drive in an actual emergency at Seabrook; is that correct?
A (Guadagna) That's correct. -
Q You have never taken such a poll or survey; is that correct?
A (Guadagna) No, I have not.
Q And you do not now know how many drivers would in fact drive in a Seabrook emergency?
A (Guadagna) No, I do not. ,
Q And you did not know at the time that you signed these letters of agreement?
A (Guadagnp) No , I did not.
Tr. 8174 Similar testimony was admitted into this proceeding by deposition of the Teamster Union representative, David Laughton, who signed the letter of agreement with the State of New Hampshire. Mr.
Laughton stated: "When the number of 1,500 (teamsters) comes up, -
as you can see clearly, it says approximately, because I cannot (Footnote Continued) 10 m s, moem . mem,sma enrm y te a my w a m .? , e ? e s w *M' t"* ' * *?9"
1 .
. I I
of Massachusetts, have had no opportunity to even begin to investigate or survey these hundreds of alleged service providers 7
- 3. Counsel for Applicants, himself, specifically advised
- the Licensing Board on February 10 that Applicants would not oppose an extension of the deadline for filing proposed findings (Footnote Continued) guarantee how many people would be available at any given time in any particular part of the state. . . . I don't thinx that the document guarantees that we are going to provide and require 1,500 people to go to evacuate Seabrook. I don't read it that way and did not intend it that way." Egg, Exhibit G, attached hereto. The history of this proceeding, therefore, strongly sugges'.s that there may be significant unreliability as to the letters of agreement proferred by Applicants to support their claim of an adequate pool of emergency personnel and resources.
Since examination of these resources is critical to Intervenors' case, a reasonable time should be allowed to explore these issues in advance of contention filing.
- 7 Intervenors do not suggest that all survey research need be completed prior to filing contentions. At a minimum, however, a reasonable sampling of the service providers should be completed prior to contention filing to ensure Intervenors have adsquate information to frame appropriate contentions and bases. It is well settled that a party is bound by the literal terms of its own contention. Carolina Power i Licht Co., gt al (Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant), ALAB-852, 24 NRC 532, 54? (1986),
and it is impermissible for an Intervenor to atteri- ,o amend his contentions or advance new bases for them which v/dd have been submitted earlier. Houston Lichtina i Power Luz (Allens Creek Nuclear Generatina Station. Unit 11, ALAB-565, 10 NRC 521, 523, n.11 (1979). Without a reasonable opportunity to develop contentions through at least limited survey research on the key resource components of the SPMC, Intervenors may be bound by inadequately researched and prepared contentions.
11 sames a moem . < men uwcaro.
.M w a m. rem a m .T e ? O W p w%ar N ***e e-
t I on the NHRERP, if Applicants were accommodated by advancing the date for filing SPMC contentions.
Mr. Dignan: Your Honor, as the Board is doing that, could I advise the Board that the Applicant would have no objection if one oi' the forms of relief considered and cidered by the Board were this: That I am held to my proposed findings date on the main track; and that the Intervenors are j given relief to be longer. I have no objection to their having longer to answer my proposed findings than the schedule would give them.
Judge Smith: I understand.
t Mr. Dignan: And I am more than happy to trade that to move this contention date back.
Judge Smith: Mr. Dignan, we put this',date down here wondering what reaction it would i have from you. You know, sometimes this is a soft date. I think we should work hard to !
give you some relief. And we will see if we can do it within that framework.
Mr. Dignan: Thank you.
Judge Smith: I think y_g have tha carties verv. y_gry busv in thg gnd 9.1 Februarv ADA durina March, busier than thty Itally w_ ant 12 & Maybe some relief GAD kg civen there. ;
(Tr. 9773, 9774.) ,
i Applicants' above-referenced comments suggest an admission by Applicants that compressing the SPMc contention deadline -
t ylthout extending the Intervenors' proposed filing deadline, would present an unreasonable schedule for Intervenors.
Additionally, notwithstanding Applicants' express offer that Intervenors be afforded this relief, the Licensing Board ignored J
12 ,
Ed4 ANES Es htEACMDW f.costssAh asSX1ATEJN n u .m m ., . . . w ., ..,~.w.
I i
the requests of all parties on this issue. The Boaid disecunted these requests although the Board itself recognized that *the ,
parties were very, very busy," even under the prior proposed schedule which provided a May 5 EPMC contention deadline. (Tr.
9774, auprA.)8
- 4. Intervanors believe there is a fundancntal inequity in the Licensing Board's view on ths Lead Intervenor concept. For the Licensing Board has so expanded the notion of Lead Intervenor, as to effectually preclude Intervenors from a I
reasonable opportunity to develop issues on behalf of their clients in this case.
Judge Smith: You've alluded now to the thrse tracks that we've sent out. Yet two other tracks, plus possibly even a sixth track that was going to be occupying the parties, and of course, the fact is if the parties chousa to litigate on so many tracks, that's a situation of their own making, and I'm refering particularly to the
-- not to the AG, but to the town ,
Intervenors, that if they elect to litigate everything, well thea, that's the choice that you've made and we just can't tako --
give it that much weight. We just simply can't do it.
8 Given the recent and snbstantial amendments to the SPMC, p.8 JLup_ra, the survey research necessary to frame adequate contentions, and tM logic of preparing findings on the already completed testimony before embarking on the SPMC, Intervenors suggest that the contention cnd finding deadlines should be expanded beyond the dates provided for in the Board's proposed schedule of February 3. Applicants' request for a trade-off of edvancing the contantion deadline, yet allowing more time for findings, is net reasonable under the circumstances l and should be rejected, f
13 1
SMAJNES Es M1.ACHUWW 6 A.tWCA%
M w a mm t m x0 a s T% .T * ? W 7 ' W 'r**** " * * *
- W '
o I mean, you have to mako choices, and va've urged all along that your choices be made as i to the area where you could make the best
, contribution and where your interests are moro sharply focused, and we vill always ;
assist on the Lead Intervenor process.
So we can't do much for you along that line.
(Tr. 9767) e as Nov ve expect people to work parallel. I mean, frainkly, if you can't work on two tracks, pick the track you can work on.
That's going to bo your problem.
(Tr. 9770)
Although Intervenors have generally adhered to the Lead Intervanor concept throughout the months of litigation on the NHRERP, the Lead Intervenor should not be utilized, as has this Licensing Board, as a means to impocr wholly unrealistic burdens upon non-commonwealth intervenors. 2ntervenors silauld not be required to assemble a battery of attorneys in order to meaningfully participate in a licensing hearing. Additionally, pursuant to 10 CFR 2.715a, the Lead Intervenor concept cannot be ,
i extended so as to deny Intervenors their fundamental rights to a ,
fair hearing.
On motion or on its o.; his own initiative, the !
Conmision or the presiding of2icer may order any parties in a proceeding for the issuance ,
of a cenptruction permit or an operating license for a production or utilization facility who have substantially the same interests and may be affected by the proceeding and who raise substantially the ,
same questions, to consolidate the presentation the evidence, cross-examination, briefs, proposed findings of ,
fact, and conclusions of law and argument.
- 4 14 i
mm. - . -m--
as tAA*,Jw XC AVTh.T # C o r w m:m*ws.w A e tw-
O However it REY D2t order ADy consolidation j that would creiudice thg richts 21 ADY carty. A consolidation under this section may be for all purposes of the proceeding, all of the issues of the proceeding, or with I respect to any one or more issues thereof.
Since 7.he Licensing Board previously proposed a schedule for All parties in this proceeding, which would have afforded Intervenors an additional 35 days, or until May 6, for filing SPMC ccatentions, it is blatantly unfair to suggest that those Intervenors with more limited resources somehow will unreasonably delay this proceeding when all Intervenors were willing to agree with the Board's own prior proposed schedule.
- 5. Finally, the arguments proferred by Applicants to the Board at the February 10 hearing as justification for substantially reducing the time frame for filing SPMC contentions provides no reasonable basis for saddling Intervenors with a fundamentally unfair schedule. Eitraerald y2 Hareten, 467 F.2d, 755, 767 (D.C. Circuit, 1972). Eeg, Transcript 9755-9757.
For example, Applicants' plea for a compressed schedule on grounds present costs of Seabrook are running at "$50 million a ,
month" should not override Intervenors' due process rights. Tr.
9757. Similarly, Applicants' claim that Intervenors' receipt t
only this week of SPMC service providers should not prevent co= pressing the contention deadline, Tr. 9756, is simply wrong.
See N. 1, supra. Applicants' assertion that this information is not voluminous, "only about that thick," Tr. 9756, and therefore >
15 -
!sMAPs!$ Em 6ATACMDL*d + SMVIWasAL A&ECATLaw 25 MA R.fwM A wY%E F C 931 1htC 50R v s ? w A = C W '
i i would not impact upon Intervanors' scheduling need3, ignores the laborious field research, and additional contentions necessitated by this information. Finally, Applicants' claim that "contentions aren't that difficult to writa' ignores the history of this case where the Licensing Board summarily dismissed, prior to litigation, approximately two-thirds, or roughly 65 contentions, proferred by Intervenors on the NHRERP. Many ,
contentions were rejected on grounds the contention bases lacked the requisite specificity. 3.13, e.g., ASLB MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 5/18/87, pp. 5-7, 44, 47, and 56. Subsequent attempts to amend certain contentions were also rejected as an untimely effort to broaden the scope of the litigation. Sig, e.g.,',ASLB MEMORANDUM i l
AND ORDER 5/18/87, pp. 56, 62-64. Intervenors should not be [
whipsawed between an unduly compressed schedule and wholesale !
e rejection by the ASLB of ill-defined contentions, resulting from Intervenors' inadequate preparation time.
Finally, Applicants' claim that Intervenors should be denied a reasonable schedule on grounds this could extend the hearings f on off-site emergency plans until January or February, 1989 is simply irrelevant. Clearly, Intervenors' rights to due process outweigh Applicants' desire for an unreasonably expedited proceeding.9 l
9 .
l
'Due process in administrative hearings does not yield to administrative convenience or expediency, or because of a natural desire to be rid of harassing delay." ALAB-864, p.6, n.13, quoting Fitraerald yu Haroton, supra. l t
r 16 I'
h
- bhhk N IEh ,
M war.mx a .Ys.t . e : o a w .ce+sv: .
- s = enns-t
t i
i e
CONCLUSION Under the present Licensing Board schedule, Intervenors will, at a minimum, be effectually precluded fatom a reasonable time to prepare proposed findings on the NHRERP. Alternatively, Intervenors will be denied a meaningful opportunity to develop critical safety issues through contentions on the SPMC.
Intervenors are, therefore, saddled with a classic Hobson's choice from which this Appeal Board should provide appropriate and reasonable relief.
Given the limited time available, Intervenors respectfully geuest this Board to expedite consideration of this appeal.
Respectfully submitted, TOWN OF AMESBURY TOWN OF HAMPTON By Their Attorneys SHAINES & McEACHERN Professional Association Dated: February 24, 1988 By \t _ _
s . N Matthew T. B~ rock i
Intervenors SEACOAST ANTI-POLLUTION LEAGUE and NEW ENGLAND COALITION ON NUCLEAR POLLUTION f [
Dated: February 24, 1988 By 7 L s_
Matthew T. Brock Authorized Representative 17 .
MAbDbOMh M
- M DEN O.56 Tm
,.~.,,r.,,.., ..,. e .,..~ . ., .
= ;
.. 1
-l C 2/3/88 LN:TED STATES OF MERICA W: LEAR REGULATORY C W :55:0N .
ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOArc Before Aorinistrative Judges:
Ivan W. Sr.ith, Cnairn 3 Gustave A. Linenberger, Jr.
Dr. Jerry Harcour i
Docket Nos. 50 443-OL In the Matter of 1) 50-444-OL !
) (ASLIPNo. 82-471-02-0L)
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
) (Offsite Imrgency Planning) ;
0F NEW HMP5 HIRE, et al.
.) !
February 3, 1988 (Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2) )
i MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ;
SETTING AC PROPOSING SCHEDULE MILESTONES l
During telephone conferences among the parties and the Licensing Boardondanuary27and28,1988, the Board granted the NRC Staff's d i motion to defer the evidentiary hearing on sheltering issues, considere !
i proposals for scheduling the hearing on the balance of the New Hampsh Radiological Emergency Response Plan (NHRERP), and considered a sche i
for beginning the litigation of the emergency plan for the Massachusetts 1 i
cocaunities.
As a conseguence there are now three separate tracks for f
In the schedule set or l
~ Seabrook offsite em rgency planning issues.
proposed bt' low, the NMRERP, without shenering issues, is the subject o The "5PMC j the ' Main Trad." The "Sheltering Track" describes itself.
I Track" relates to the litigation of the Seabrook Plan for the L
Massachusetts Cocnunities.
j f
EXHIBIT A f i
o .
_2 Most of the milestones listed below were agreec upon by the parties
~ ~ ~ ~
or set by the Board following :horough discussions with tne parties.
Milestones indicated by asterisks (*), in contrast, are somewhat softer and are regarded by the Board as emposals open to further discussion.
Tne schedules are carallel in that the parties may be required to a tire. For example, parties will be attend to more than one track required to work on proposed . indings and conclusions on the Main Track during the same period that FDM's evaluation of New Hampshire's respcnse to FD%'s concems on the sheltering issue is being considered.
However, the Board does not believe that this presents any undue burden.
The Main Track issues have been heard in discrete sehn October 5,1987; there have been generous gaps between hearing weeks; and specific responsibility for all issues has been allocated among lead interveners from the very beginning. The Board expects that the parties will adhere to tne lead-intervenor approach through the filing of In addition, the schedt!1e for the Main Track affords proposed findings.
to the intervenors eight weeks after the close of the record for filing proposed findings co= pared to the forty days anticipated by 10.C.F.R.
l 5 2.754.1
\
1 To provide even greater flexibility to the intervenors, the Board has shortened the tire available to the Applicants for filing l
proposed findings.
Counsel for Applicants agrees to a shorter l
Tr. 9118 (Dignan). The time for filing prooosed findings period.
is counted on the assu=ption that the record of the Main Track closes on February 12. We expect to adhere to that timing even (Footnote Continued) l t
- g_
The plan for Tne Sheltering Track continues into the SPM; Track.
I - the Massachusetts coentnities, except for redacted inforr.ation The Board concerning service agreerents, was filed in September 1987.
expects to r.ake an early nJ11ng on whether the redacted infennation will be subject to a protective order, but, in any event, the redacted inforr.ation will be in the hancs of the intervenors with or without a The Massachusetts protective order long before contentions are due.
Attorney General and counsel for NECHP argue that the litigation clock on the Massachusetts plan should not run until the redacted infonnation is released. We find no reason for such a delay.
The Board designates the Fassachusetts Attorney' General as the lead As has been intervenor on the plan for the Massachusetts cc:munities.
the practice, other intenenors may take the lead on subissues on the SPMC where their respective interests cannot be served by the Massachusetts Attorney General.
Miscellaneous Matters Although the schedule below establishes a traditional sequence for the filing of proposed findings and conclusions, the Board has additional requirements not apparent on the schedule. The Applicants I
shall, at their earliest convenience, propose to the other parties a 4
(Foo*moteContinued) though a clean-up session, reserved for the week of February 22, s:ay be required.
4
_4-stipulation for proposed findings of fact on all uncontrover:ed matters on the Main Track, for example, the procedural background, so :nat tne Tne Board will Board r.ay adoot a stipulation as its own without delay.
also recuire the parties to agree upon amco. en organi:stion for their respective proposed findings and conclusions so that the Board may easily and reliably locate each party's position on a particular issue.
This too will be Applicants' icad. Those parties with the capability to do so are recuired to file their proposed findings in electronic femat so that the Board e.ay readily adept proposed findings with which it agrees, These and other matters pertaining to prcpesed findings will be discussed at the evidentiary hearing during the week.of February 8.
The schedule for the Sheltering Track calls for the filing of .
The Board "hypothetical testirony" by the NRC Staff on February 22.
recognizes that the Staff has agreed to file such testimony as an accostnodation to the Board so that a prehearing schedule can be set and discovery problecs avoided. Tr. 9113 (Turk). The Staff has not yet decided whether it intends to present testimony on the sheltering issue.
In the event that the Board rules that the infomation redacte from the plan for the Massachusetts comunities should be released unde a protective orfer and agreement, the Applicants will have the To responsibility of proposing the tems of the order and agreerent.
l save time, if Applicants choose, they may seek in advance the approval By of the other parties as to the fom of any such order and agreecent.
agreeing to a possible femat, the parties opposing any protective or would not be deemed to be abandoning their opposition.
w
)
l
. 1 The transcript :f a dialogue between Juege Sr.ith and Mr. Flynn, counsel for FEFA, needs to be corrected. On page 9106, line 23, the words "even though" should be inserted in pl6ce of the word "because,"
The and the word "not" should be inserted between "does" and "provide."
corrected version now reads:
JUDGE SMITH: Mr. Flynn, let ce ask you some questions about your testimony to see if I can enhance my understanding of it.
As I understand it now, you do not categorically rule out finding a plan acecuate [because) even thouen it ooes not provide for sheltering.
MR. FLYNN: That's correct.
Tr. 9105. '
SCHEDULING MILESTONES e ?* Track
, Jate Event SPMC 2/5/88 FOIA detemination by NRC Main 2/8/88 Hearings begin - rebuttal New Har::pshire response to FEMA supplerental Sheltering 2/11/88 position Nain 2/12/88 Record closed, except for sheltering S?MC 2/16/88 Massachusetts brief on redacted infomation Main 2/22/88 Possible hearing to finish rebuttal Sheltering s
2/22/88 Staff hypothetical testimony on sheltering i SPMC 2/23/88 Applicants brief on redacted infomation Sheltering 2/24/88 Discovery requests, if any, on sheltering SPMC 2/26/88 Staff brief on redac.ed infomation 3/1/88 Board ruling on protective order for SPMC redacted infomation
O O
Main 3/9/S8 /cplicants proposed findings, ex:e:::
sneltering FEMA evaluation of New Hampshire response 3/14/88 Sheltering on sheltering Prefiled sheltering testimony Shel tering 3/28/88 4/6/S8 Intervenors proposed findings, except Main sheltering Sheltering 4/18/88
- Evidentiary hearing on sheltering begins Staff proposed findings, excect sheltering Main 4/18/SS Main 4/26/88 Applicants response to proposed findings Sheltering 5/2/88
- Record closed on sheltering SPMC 5/6/88
- Contentions due on SPMC l
= Proposed milestone Another version of the foregoing schedule, organized according to tracks, is attached for the convenience of the parties.
FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
$$/ -
Ivan W. 5mitn, Gnainnan -
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
- Bethesda, Maryland l %
February 3,1988 ATTACHMENT: Seabrook Proceeding Schedule h
l-
e -
e i GUADAGNA - REDIRECT 81 4 1 JUDGE SE"'H: Any follow up on that point?
r.r?-f>A.d; 2 r.m c . _. -. MR.- BROCK:..Your Honor, given that the deposition has
- ~ ~ - -
m .==- = c.= +-. been stricken, I just wanted to ask a couple of questions for
' ' . . . _ . _ 13 -
- .=. . :.z- r. :- =,-.--4: : :. cl.arification.
REDIRECT EIAMINATION
. It r -. m 5
.a. 1.,r = .
- .l Z '. . 6' .
3Y MR. BROCK:
Mr. Guadagna, I understood, in response to a question
. g .'.J . . e . .4
~7 m
O r _.s..
~y " 8
.. 4 by Mr. Bisbee, you felt that it would be appropriate for vou to 7 ;, . ,;.
- - . -. :,- '
- 9 take poll or survey of your drivers to determine how many would
- ...L-
.:. =._. :w. ..
be available to drive in an actual emergency at Seabrook; is
.x.::c ;p.;u 10..; ..
x:. . . ... .
Ci. that.correc t?1--
3.th ..
-...- M '..1.._'.
^
- '-ii 2b-i+3 ;rf ;--'. -i. A
- -: :- (Guadagna)-
.2' .
.'i.1;-N That's correct.
M - r-1 x ....: x.- .. - . -
. s. . . . . . .
m.- m : w .: .s.: . . .. ... ...
. Q ^ You have never taken such a poll or survey; is that .
.7'
. g_4 . ,W: 13 =,.a.. =
s me
. , . . 2. _
.,ra w- . w ,;; ...a ...s, a a. . .. _y -z* .
.. . v. ~. sp
-.-..- . ..s.
4 m
.~-
-; U,pW G
. . -. . . : - ~ . . . . .
s.a.0.r n.e...M ~ :.u . 14_'.g n. .n.- Correc. t? '.W. m
. - . .i - .
w
.e m . : e .. .m -., A . .: . ~(Guadagna)- No, I have not.
,-- % -; _ .w x .:~.;. s --- & ,.
- +
.wm. m. .f. . -; s . ,.
..,.g s&is.i.
M.416 a.4.aw 0 ,. . . And you do not now know how many drivers would in <
a . .m' . . .. .- ~. ..-.. .
.m . ..4c.:.- c. g., .x .- .-
- w - . :x < =.: .m :- ?=:-~ . :. =
n.v - :: .Q:-=c. W.m,
-m? '
3.ww:
$ p, >g:;:17.'.a,c.f -. < .,w
... - ,h art drive in a Seabrook emergency? -_
. .mn, 4. , *7 ...E s.
- 1. -. . .. d r e.s. .. . ..
- 2. . 3 ' .
. as.
..'**e. N.e.an' e . s.s6ti
.,, '.'. .s aA.._.
u.i
- ,m ..o not. . ..
. ;.. o. ,c
- c. . .f.,... ,. 1 8.....-s... (Guadagna) N o , I .
.... 1.
wra_w.. ._wa..
._ . . - . . _ . : . . . . ... ._.And
. . . . . ~
. .. _.you _ .. did c.. .not know that at the time that you signed M Wl-l.C Q' 7.'
~ ;.19 '5 .:.. -[. C'.;; Q'*~.~:- 'l
. . . - - - . ..'- a w
~-
.". .+ .
==
c#w.n.r.r 20 --n R...,,these-letters of sgreement?.- - . =
. ~
- m
,....m...
. .w .. . ~
. , . , .. ~
.y...
- bN U ,.( uadagna)'
@.Ma y:.c8a.-...-[.2i.'A. E._.m No, I'did not._ ,
~ m.. . , :.a .
m
=
- nc m.... .+ .. =.. ..
.s ....
,,,han.k 4 v. ou. . ,. . Your Honor, wm . .:t.s
~.,.o
. - 2 2 m.4. .--
% .o.
-... MR. BROCK: - .
w
. p , as : . :. . <= . 4 :.T.. -- .c .- .,: ... : If the record would reflect that
..,That's all I :have.~
. h.: v. .< .p. ;r.. ,
M wig ,23
._.-n.
Ci$n;.M:% E i_:- 1...
- 3 .: ' -
h e arked Exhibits 11 n.a9..m.
.: --.-L 24..n'v.2, I.~: am.no.w giving to theo-court :' reporter t e r m r.g b.r=:; n h :9.ci-.;-.S r.C.225 0 through 16 to be. bound into the transcript.
+..- - . . .
.p-- -m. x ,+mg~ .
- m., , . . , . .
.?-
- _. . - - .'i, * - ~. . -* : L I *: M ;;.? Lvr.Lr- : .& t-**'2~ W7-* ~w' * .* .
- - .% '** r* .- .
. 3
- ~: = m - ,
"wx-w+ h M .4.n.r#-M...*Q'-/ .
.,m -U.e.'.1.Q w .< .. * =?
e
..ul'F. ..a ~ ~ @... y. .ar .- C;;-p .ur . ., . -.e..? O...
.. Heritage. Reporting' Corporation
--- J
. . \'202'I. 628-4888
- m. . , .e . %g.re_ & .a.-
..-: ..: ..,..~.s . . . -
- h x4.. k 2.a moi .s .c. . -
' '* ~
^~
^~ ~ *T w .
.h *.1-h f. hA5?
-- 1 ~ ~
~
,n
. EXHIBIT B
RO -
r 4
9G59 l 4. Just as a preliminary matter, I think you're going to I
find much less disagreement f rom the Commonwealth and Isthink
.f rom the other Intervenors than you might anticipate as to'the general f ormat here.
,. The problem is --
l 1
JUDGE SMITH: Format?
.' MR. TRAFICONTE: -- must less disagreement.
l ,
JUDGE SMITH: Yes. Right.
i.t i MR. TRAFICONTE: But if we take main trac k , f or example, and you put to us collectively, are you --
{ essen ti al ly , can you live by this; and we say, yes. It 1
i e
is -- we say that obviously in view of the; whole schedule.. So i e ye can live with this part when this part, the second treck is I
g laid out the way it is and the Mass plan litigation is laid
{ ut the way it is.
3- I already iraagine that Mr. Dignan is going to argue t-that certain parts of it should be altered. If they're
, Itered, then we mey have a different view on whether we can 9 .-
$ et the work done.
M JUDGE SMITH: Yes. But the only way I know to go '
'out i t i s , I don't know how to work thera all three s situul taneoush y . If we could just work out -- if this -- if the 6'in track meets the needs of the parties, end get that nai.1.ed
- n. And then, if the main track has to be adjusted becausa
, [ adjustments in the sheltering track, then we'll go back to l .
t .
j I Heritage Reporting Corporation
{ (202) 628-4888
( -
[ EXHIBIT B
i .
4 .
tL -
$1 9755
- *4*
1 argument goes basi: ally like this, Your Honor. The plan was
/*i 2 originally suomitted with none of this inf ortnat ion we' re
??lk -
gg 3 talking about, including that sent out the 30th -- on September kk' 4 the 18th, 1986, sent to all parties.
05
- st 5 If you will -- excuse me, '07. If you recall that di '
-?2 6 I've indicated that, as early as December 1987, December 22nd, 71r%
40-M 7 I started saying to the Commonwealth, you know, under a l
J.L'g S protective order you can have it now. I don't want to get into
'gs 9 whether it was miscommunication or anything else, but anyway,
..3:d x.
NY 10 'that didn't work out. .
l~5 Ei 11 On December 30 -- that was before, incidently Mi ,
[g{ . 12 redacted information, so-called, was subm'itted. On December
- tr T- 13 30, 1987, was when the redacted information was submitted.
t.
h1 14 Now, since that time there has been, at least in my view, a
$$k i y) '
15 standing offer to all the parties to take a' protective order
,3-g 16 that you could fight about later.. I'll give i t to you now.
pg Mi :. - 17 Nobody wanted to do it, and maybe it was just not understanding ,
INb -
18 me well, but in any event, that was the situation.
l 19 We now have a situation where as I understand it and
})h(,
c - -
?? n&
A 20 hope an order is going to enter and everybody is going to have
. 21 it at the egd of next week, at which point they will have the
']j E 22 complete plan. g g
'l b l i
((. 3 23 Now, that being the case, I just think that.this date
'3 j l 7;[ [ 24 of May 6, 1983 is an awfully long date for when contentions j p i
\ ~
(( y 25 have to be filed. Even if you don't think there's any equity to 5,d b
.x 5* '
Heritage Reporting Corporation h (202) 628-4888 ikk '
Y 7.r-m i
Eic '
J F -
- f t .
I 9756
- t, Y
my position, that they could have had this inf ork.ation that .
'I 2
lot of the plan l-they're concerned about earlier, they've had a
?
2 ,
'l 3 for a long time; they're certainly going to have it all next 15 isn't 4 week, and I ,en't d see when a date in the area of March Understand, this 5 a reasonable date f or contentions.
This 6 information that is coming is only about that thick.
. It's only about that thick.
7 isn' t books and ' books of stuf f .
} lett ers of agreement. You know, 8 .And what it is is a lot of
~ .)
9 things of that nature.-
Now, I just think that it's an awfully long time
$y 10 4 11 you',ve built in here before contentions are set, because when 3 the tightest schedule that most 4 contentions are filed, even on y 12 it seems to me you're almost l 13 - licensing boards can run, 14, inevitably about six months f ro*n the hearing room on the date
%':c ..
l; ; ; 15 the contentions are filed. into And that means we won't put the Mass. plan kk b~ 16 ~
know that, 44 this year, and we all litigation until November of
[hh [,. 17 l
- in November, assuming it went into litigation then, unless we f'k [. .
18
?l h ., 19 were very lucky and you know, got an early November start and uis i the holiday season is going to C
g 20 bang-bang-bang, f inished it, closing until k interrupt ahd I'm begining to see that record not
[ 3 21 22 January or February 1989.
}'
^
23 Now, I think I've been good in this case at not doing R it, but I can't help but remind the Board, maybe Seabrook 24 That'll be your ultimate decision.
_ 25 shouldn't be licensed. '
3 -
L L l Heritage Reporting
- Corporation j d (202) 628-4888 i
m -
.-r L
g 9
I o
e 5757 That 1
Hopefully it will be that it will be licensed. l
$Q "I
2 plant is sitting up there. It's not one that, you know,
- l . That thing's ready _to run.
I 3 they've got to fix another pipe.
it sits 4 It's loaded with fuel and it costs $50 million a month 5 there.
i 6
Now I'm not - you know, the Board, I think , will f ind .
7 I've never used that argument yet because I'm not big on 8 yelling that every c' hance I get. But it's a fact and 7 don't 15, which 9 see why these contentions can't be in nere by March 10 would at least would put us on a track where we might be into the f all of 11 hearings on this second plan by the early part of 12 this year. I don't think that's unreasonable.
A 13 The contentions aren't t. bat cifficult to write in one I mean, these emergency plan
{I,I -
14 of these evacuation cases --
15 cases. They really are nct.
rr
?'
JUDGE SMITH:
Think they have experience in writing 2 , 16 W g y 17 them?
.< t MR. DIGNAN: Yes, and I've had experience in arguing ih 18
- 19 with them.
sc Can we be heard on that?
%" 20 MR. TRAFICONTE:
,jg 4.
Oh, certainly. It's pretty important.
74 qUDGE SMITH:
dT 21 .
pa .
A couple of points: in a vacuum, I at 22 MR. TRAFICONTE:
I don't really 23 -- 11 we were just looking at Track 3 here,
[hf the point think I would have much problem in the abstract with 24 l in a 25 that we should be able to get our contentions together
~
$I -
- ? *
~
1 h
1ve l Heritage Reporting Corporation l ggg' (202) 628-4888 '
)$%V1
\ :;ii?
-m
j .
S7G7 1 JUOGE SMITH: You've allud:d r.ow to the three tracks 2 that we've set out. Yet two other tracks, plus possibly even a 3 sixth track that was going to be occupying the par'.;es, and of I.
4' course, the f act is if the parties cnoose to litigate on so 5 many tracks, that's a situation of thei r own making , ar.d I'm [.
6 referring particularly to the -- not to the AG, but to the town
]
7 Intervenors, that if they elect to litigate everything, well l
8 then, that's the choice that you've made and we just can't take 9- that -- give it that much weight. We just simply cen't do it, i 10 I mean, you have to make choices, and we've urged all 11 along that your choices be mace as to the area where you could 12 make the best centribution and where your interests are more 13 sharply focused, and we will always assist on t,.h e l ead 14 Intervenor, process.
E y 15 So we can't do much f or you along ths.t line.
5 '
$ 16 Let's go back to this schedule, and the Board hasn' t 17 hid a chance to discuss this, but something that occurred to me k: 18 during this afternoon's discussion is that, have we as 1* '
l 19 carefully as possible scheduled this so that we have narrowed j b 1 4 20 the impaction? -
1 t;
M 21 And Mr. Dignan is exac tly right whether he wins or
.s 4 i 22 ffg loses the case. Even more if he loses the case, he's entitled E 23 to a prornpt decision because he's got a lot of work to do going 2
-p?
i 24 up to court. So he is entitled, without dispute, to the 4
y,
- 25 fastest possible decision that we can get out consistent with em Heritage Reporting Corporaticin i
- (202) 628-4088 p 1 . i t
-h [ l L_
n
- e
, 9770 1 Adminictrative Procedure Act.
2 So there are other collateral issues at work here 3 that could affect this whole --
'$ 4 JUDGE SMITH: Okay. -
r 5 MR. TRAFICONTE: Well, there's a similar point, and
- ^
6 we don't want to belabor this. Just look at what happens to 7 the main track and to the sheltering track if the 5/6 deadline 8 is moved up. I mean, I'm just looking at the schedule.
9 JUDGE SMITH: Now, I haven't talked to the Board 10 toernbe rs . We won't decide tonight. We'll go back end play a 11 little bit more, but I'm trying to 11gure out if we've made the 12 most efficient use of time, and to see if we cannot perhaps 13 move up the contention date and perhaps give some relief on one
-jy.. 14 g j of the other two tracks.
5 dhI 15 Now we expect people to work parallel. I mean, VI
?@ 16 frankly, if you can't work on two tracks, pick the track you M
$3i 17 can work on. That's going to be your problem.
af2 DC 18 (M. ~ But nevertheless, we want to give the maximum amount m.
va Eg yk. 19 of time to the parties that is possible and still keep.the 2dk 20 Board busy. So we'll go back and look at this, and see if we FEi .
21 cannot reduce the end-date of compaction, which is now -- I i@@1 J43
%$ _r 22 mean, not trie end-date , but the operating date , for compaction, dem 23 which is May 6, rnove that up and look at the other schedule, s
24 and try to give some relief,.
i 25 MR DIGNAN: Your Honor, as the Board is doing that,
\.
- V .
[ l. Heritage Reporting Corporation M -
(202) 628-4808 w
Md
2 . _
z-..
C. w .
9774 1 could I adviss t.*.s Board the Appli car.t would. have no ob j ec ticr.
2 if one of the forms of relief considered and ordered by the e
3 Board were this: that I am held to my preposed findin&s date
- 4 on the main trac'k; and that the Interven' ors are given relief. to i 5 be longer.
.~. I have no objection to their having longer to 6
answer my proposed findings than this schedule would give them.
7 JUDGE SMITH: I understand.
8 MR. DIGNAN: And I'm more than happy to trade that to 9 move this conten^n date back.
10 JUDGE SMITH:
Mr. Dignan, we put this date down here 11 wondering what reaction it would have from you. You know, some 12 times this is a sof t date.
I think we should we should work 3r 13 hard to give you some relief.
, And we will see if we can do it .
g) 14 within that f ramework.
, 15 MR. DIGNAN: Thank you.
? 16 JUDCE SMITH:
?
I think we have the parties very, very
$ . 17 busy in the end of February and during March, busier 5 . .. .
than they
~
1 18 really want to be.
T Maybe some relief can be given t h e.r e .
I"
~
19 E Let's go back and talk about it, and we have a good f eeling f or 20 it now. I can't make any rulings now.
4
-3 21 e Mr. Fierce, the Board conf erred during the break , and h" 22 we cannot giye you leave now to file surrebuttal. You can
.s, ,
y 23 prof f er it if y su want to.
0 V -
E 24 MR. FIERCE:
'l -
Your Honor, when Mr. Oleskey left, he g 25 M
already told me that he would not recommend to our budget ;
i v
l 1 l'
d'j Heritage Reporting Corporation I.!
(202) 628-4888
!! l
- i pt -
sh W *
- g, BD 2/17/83 -
UNIH D STATES OF AWERICA l NUCLEAR REGULATORY COW.ISSION g > F, ; ; ,- l ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD 1.. -.
' - " - - ,, 7~
Sefere Administrative Jucges: '
Ivan W. Smith, Chairman Gustave A. Linenberger, Jr.
Dr. Jerry Harbour SE.5VED IE318133]
In the Matter of ) Docket hos. 50 443-OL 50-444-OL
. PUBLIC SERVICE COMDANY 1 (ASLSP No. 82-471-02-OL) 0F NEW HAMPSHIRE, et al. ) (Offsite Emergency Planning)
(Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2) February 17, 1988 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Revisino Schedule and Accrovina Protective Order)
Schedule
'~'
As a result of the discussion among the parties following the hearing session of February 10, 1988, the Board has revised the schedule a.
set cut in the Order of February 3,1988. The revised schedule is
~
attached. .
Two schedule milestones require explanation. The Board advanced the date for filing proposed findings by Applicants from March 9 to March 2. Counsehfor Applicants advised the Board, through its clerk,,
that Applicants can accept the change. The Board added a milestone for filing answers to contentions on the plan for Massachusetts conr.anities.
u No additional time was provided to the NRC $taff for filing answers to .
contentions. However, the Staff may request additional time.
EXHIBIT C
4 2
ter to-a-v :-cte:tive 0-cer Applicants su =itted a prop: sed fonn of Protective Order and Affidavit of Non-disclosure on February I2,1938. In general the protective order and affidavit cover infomation, heretofore withheld from public disclosure, concerning the suppliers of services in tne plan for the Passachusetts cor:rnunities. The Board has modified, approved and issued the order. It is ten orary, intended to provide access to the infonation until the Board can rule finally en whether any protective order should issue.
As modified by the Board, the order and affidavit closely follew the discussion among the parties. TheBoardexpandebthedescriptionof "authorized persons" for the receipt of protected infomation to include any non-lawyer representative of an active party a,nd. an advisor to any such representative. By expanding the description of authorized persons, the Board has not abandoned its intention to limit access to protected information to only those who need access for this proceeding.
Th'e Board understands that the Applicants do not intend to require attorneys at law to execute affidavits of non-disclosure. The.
protective ordtr should be so construed. The modified order and affidavit is attarped. ,
FOR THE AT0".IC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD .
~
fh41 sffk Avan n. xn ai, unaiman ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE Bethesda, Maryland February 17, 1988
5FEOL'LIN3 MILESTONES
' Revised 2/17/S3 T*a:k Da:e Event Main 2/S/SS Hearings begin - rebuttal Record closed, except for sneltering Main 2/10/S8 New Hamoshire response to FEMA supplemental 2/11/88 Sheltering position
. Sheltering 2/17/S8 Board issues Protective Order SPMC 2/17/88 Massachusetts brief on redacted information Staff hypothetical testimony on sheltering Sheltering 2/22/ES SPMC 2/23/SS Applicants brief on redacted infor ation 2/24/88 Discovery reouests, if any, on NH response Sheltering on sheltering .
',, SPM 2/2G/88 Staff brief on redacted information 3/1/BS Board ruling on protective order for SPMC
. redacted information (tentative)
...- Main
- 3/2/88 Applicants proposed findings, except sheltering .
3/14/88 FEMA eviluation of New Hampshire response Sheltering on sheltering FEMA officials available for discovery Sheltering 3/21/88.
Sheltering 3/28/88 Discovery on Sheltering complete SPM 4/1/83 Contentions due on SPMC .
4/6/88 Intervenors proposed findings, except
' Main sheltering f Sheltering 4/18/S3 Prefiled sheltering testimony Main 4/18/88 Staff proposed findings, except sheltering Sheltering 4/18/83 Answers to Contentions ,
Main 4/25/88 Applicants response to preposed findings Evidentiary hearing on sheltering begins Sheltering 5/2/83 e g
.t .
g.
Gectge S.Them::s E
]
, - ve. Preuo.re Nue.ar %
.f -
6 j 3 February 12,19SS Pubic **n.4ce cd New HQiTQ=MG am -m .m . . . . . . . .
New HampsNre Yankee Division i- .
.,c.- '
7
' .'~---_ - NYN -88017
- x. --_....._ _;_ -. _
. . .....e..-,..-
~
~ . . .
. ' United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 9 Attention: Document Control Desk
~
References:
(a) Facility Operating License h7?-56, Const:uction Permit CPPR-136, Docket Nos. 50-443 and 50-444
- c. -
(b) PSN31.etter (hTN-87143), dated Dece=ber 18, 1987, "Seabrook Plan for Massachusetts (SPMC)", C. S.
e - - ..
- :;.; - Thosa s to USNRC _ .. u. _ . . ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~
(( L -cu L ..;. ;
' : : ; n.J (c) USSRC Letter, dated Dece=ber 23,1987, "Seabrook~
- --^ -- Plan for Massachusetts Co== unities - Informtion
. ;- J^.; ?"; ' _
2 -
Required fot Full Po'ver Review", f,.;Nerses to -
- 74. 6. ~ ~T . . ..w . ..
R. J. Batrison
.t.D.'.?. . ., . . , m ,.,_ . . . ~(d)_ - PSNH
.J.- Letter (hTN-87149), dated Dece=ber 2d,1987,
w: ; --- _ . _ _. .,.- - J. . ;, f - .^g . ---- "Seabrook Plan for liassachusetts Coc= unities M - E. Cw=. . J '.?. ,, .
~y, i 5- l'4i-O l.4 -C c, __'j [i ,., T.. jC..{.
M&f.rR:A.. -'
(SPMC);
Feigenbaum to USNRC Information Required '-
7 -
for Full
. ".. Po (e) USnc Letter, dated February 5,1988, "Time 1 T.ZF.TJf:S ~! . - Support for the Review of the Seabrook Plan for
- p g ...m,.1.7 f .. ..
. _ Massachusetts Com=anities", S. A. Varga to.
.-..J. e .:iuMm' _.. -x 9 _
- ? . .*- _
E 6_W.i h . W Q Yv.u,7 n. -: nG . ;7 9. {; =-i :.~ R.- J. Harrison w;. pf g -2. _- % y : : ::.nlw.4.';f
- ~ ~~'
- &R=<.
~ Seabrook Plan for Massachusetts Comnities (SPMC);-
.,M,n -w. ._ . . ...
~ ~ Request for Additional Information
.~ . .A;;,.i. !.- fr..Subj e ct:
<; ; .. .:;;. w .
.. ~. -_ . +g
- . . , . . .' - ~, _ . .
" - * ~ - . . . ~ . ' _.
7 ,[ .-
-' ,
- e -s Gggg}gggg.
T:; . ; . f 5- ?,, : .
i l infomation on
^; C ;--y_;e,d,:: ., in Reference (d), the NRC Staff requested addit onaEnclosed please -
'"i f.M i several issues pertaining to their review of the 5PMC.
Ty,$,3'k find our response y9to the issues raised in your letter. .
- ~ - . . - ,
NEY trusts that the enclosed responses and schedules which the Staf f
"[?n,Jr#.?/
$Y,7 ~ requested are satisfactory and supportive of the Ipring 1988 grade J + 4 -rm.; exercise.
$h"@%M. has been established.- NET recognizes the signifi 3 76 W.sc-ypp.- , the E?MC review and its ' exercise;inand is co==itted to ensure atothorough, giving the S?MC order
.N"w!C.f.*f.~.r n;.y - review procer s the necessary support c:w_r--I-
. ww'w ?' ef.fective and quality plan. . . .
L
'"~}. .'
'T Q'. p 'g 2*gqin-[ K 9 3 - -
~ % .- w : .:n .... .- . . -
9 GXJs.s. .:.: w. , .,. - -
G i M rr i 'i: n'r":- n------
EXHIBIT D [ ,
- ',5'U'M. 2? 5- -e r.
.--e,.....
--- e.o...v w m?z . Te'eee*e IS03) 474 9574
. .s n hTN-
- Unitsd Stotcs Nuclear R2gulatory Cec-ission Pega 2 Attention: Document Control Desk ,
i
- In accordance with the NRC Staf f's direction, one copy of the enclosed document has been sent to the SPM TEMA/RAC Chairr.an.
y .y . - ~ .. ..
~~ f
~= 21 - .-.E:I Should you have questions reFarding this response, please con-
^
tact our Bethesda Licensing Of fice (Mr. R. E. Sweeney) at (301) 2
.. 656-6100. .
. . .- Very truly yours,
-~
.~
j,f4 -
George S. Thanas y- Enclosure '
- { ., . ,cc
- Attnic Safety and Licensing Board Service List (Offsite EP)
~-
. . :. . (w/o Enclosure Docu=ents)
..; d a . -d , Mr. Steven A. Varga, Director T E~T -
Division of Reactor Projects 1/II. .. .
Of fice of Nunlear Reactor Regulation T.~.ti 22.r. . ~':; ._. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission g@. .r.-, $--- Washington, DC 20555
. .c f 4 '.7., ~;s.'.f. . .
w w~ . s . : . ..u-- :
(w/o Enclosure Documents)
~
1 .G f, Mr.- Victor Kerses, P uj it Manager-.- . ~
~ - -
~
yhq-- r , Project Directorate I .1 ~
p'Cf,pg Division of Reactor ProjectsMM't.iEM United States " Kunlear Regulatory Com 20555
'7.C'T,Z '".'.~Washington, DC ms' ~.r. , r .- g .
- .a
. . , , = ,
(w/o Enclosure Docuuents) 5./Eh ii;9 Mr. William T. Russell '
fd't.-AG AiCL Regianal Ad-f nf atrator'ONt~-%7.7 United States Nuclear Regulatory Co==issi -
v g m 1' JL.ir.Sj.;M,.. Region I .
- y Av.re ^; y 425 Allendale Road ~ 19406' .
ea.klC. ia.C._:La., King .- of -. Prussia, P.A .
. 7.- .~ . . . - m...
... ... ,.. n - -
(w/o Enclosure Documents)
.c .:v 8. .
.M:.srT.M.'.:.I'n .a Mr. Antone C. Cerne
- KRC Scior Resident inspector .
W W 5;.G.4.E..'5,. ':'
m u --
rt.26_.4. i y'r..i.-Z. . . Seabrook Stati.on 03874 ~ ,
3T.M.TZM.
-:- ---c.
.'Q._'O,' Seabrook,' NHy
~
N5 w w .x w .w S E O S E. Mr Richa'rd Donovan.
Federal Emergency Management Agency
..t, q--9 .-..g n
'L.-E-M, Region 10 ~-
.YIvJi$ _3.~.7 1"',8Cfd .130 228th Street,' S. W. ~
'dEM&.G.'jf', Bothell, Washington. 98021-9796-.'.
l+**-*'kr. h" T bd T : U ;7 *. .. =- -13.9-'---^ '"r*: ' f" * ** ' *E C ; ,D ,--
.. R Q, e i7im'. P. w : mw;... & 2 ; _;
- c -~ .
WA'3C"!W -* P +A?.;;v..~; *: .< w
.E..j.6. m. + W..' M ';'l[ Q:'?.3- -
1-. m.
e.'E Y.fef f. +.0,.,..:., . . ~.
. ~ ., . t. 2..
QJg.2.* E+ ~. -. ~-
w .
WT&fic- y . i .-.; ~;
7 y ., . .- ~ .
Saset 1 of .
^ l CON RO*.'ID DOCT.:.N- 2ANIM:- AI.
.. I N N . Eso R.*O Ira:s=1::al 1.cg Nu=cer l j MTTIEW T. secCI 'Eso I '
. s u ists ne aceA:nres !
'rC-!?-9613 or wtr.cxm Avtam page P.o. 83t 360 74:s=1 :ed PoetsuxtTE, s.E. c3ac1 2-16-88 1.r. w .n t-w +
tass._..-_
~- =*ge-= $'
-c ,e ' -
DOCUMINT TYPE -
.w --m.
. VENDOR MANUAL C CVD C MANUAL
. . g_.; .
0 attorT O I:.n O Dcx
- - .e.; .s..
{.j C DRAWING P&ID @ OTEER SEU TM N: P
- .;. TITLE ANE f 1 'Ib The' hTA HAM?SEIRS YAh.: .; SD.'s'.CK PIAN r;b s . :s . , .
. .i - ym ,esx . m C:2'tM"IES
~ .
j12f
.a , . . . . . . .. .- .. --.
. Ear M r%
RIASON FOR TRANSMIT!AL: ,
..c .~...~
O trTuaN SurztSrDtD CorY To aMD
- 4:
.20-O Ix1TIAL ISSuz* O COMrtrTz arvrSIon
<M 3y.
O arrLAc= - r.r .. . ; -: @ r^1TIAL
- vision Go STROT SurtrStoro cort ~-
?* * . -
Q'd,Q - - - .. ' . ' * -' -
A,W M INSTRUCTIONS: , ?; . ~ s : *. T . r d .
INSERT / ADD
?E C .
. . ;. , , m 2rMOVE 1. - , , ;.f 7
-y-fe w 7..
- 2. M.V .
. a -a .z-.:a -
. . ~ ~ . .s. -s -
n .. w .
. .LX6C - - E:A TJs; . . --3 ~ ~.' ' A r- O . ~ '
'~sEM SIE INSTRUCTIONS ON BACE OF TRANSMITIAL - - - -
gz p_.m, ws -
._ .. .. ~
=;pzu . attached controlled document _ (identified above) represents a change to your i
SaE The
},$gdcontrolled document status for i.:entro11ed documents assigned A: knowledgeto you..receipt Pleaseof M :swensure this transmittal that all documentation by completing the referenced is attached.
endorsement below andThis returning this formthat to vill indicate Nw:L.N:w. the.EMD WITEIN TIVE (5) votrING DAYS following receipt.'
Y p.J yj you have recatved tse attached documents and incorporated them into your m(d .@;zi .
m controlled document saf.1 satellite file.
- W*
.= w . : .
- *zzcrIFT ACrsownrDcIMrn---
C L9M '. . . . , _.
M51 TEIS TRAiShriAL'WAS IICEIVID ON ' 2 / d / THE RITIEINCb DOCUMENTS VERE
/
t
' *rtas, ' -in INCORPoEATID IITO OUR CONTEDLLID DOCUMENI SET /SATILLITE FILES OR TEE DIREC ..
~
--- ACTION WAS Tarts II ACCORDANCE
,s,.. :. <. . . ,- - r... WITH TEE RETERINCED INSTRUCTIONS.
- .'sssr'
,-~ g g
- t g 'ii s : -: - i DATE- / /
wm
-y j y " v.,.e .e u.m -sw_A .s . -
NTEM FORM 3-10B
@ RITU1N SIGNED.: E
9 Rev. 7
.,TL-TRANSMITTAL TO: MAIL CODE:
' T.W c u , >. . . . . - --
Page 1 of 2 i ;t-Mfp?.1 b ,. c ~ -
EXHIBIT E
[.
Enee: Of 4 .
m ICC ~'F-9513 ,
4 s.
.s l
1 CRANCE INS *RUC* IONS i
NEW HAMPSil!1E Y.O'KP.E SEA 5 ROOK PLAN TOR MASSACHUSE**S COMM*JNI~IES
~- 1... u .. - .
m... ... _ .. , , _
- u. . . . -
~
l REMOVE INSERT -- -
l I
PLAN .
Cover Page -
Cover Page - Rev. O, Amendment 1
._ - List of Effective Pages (entire) - List of Effective Pages Logy-1/ Logy 2 -
- _ . . _ . . . . . .~ . . _ . . - J_ . - - --
Rev. 0,' Amendment 1/Rev. O, Amendment 1
~
_ _. j.._ .
togy.3/togp_4 - --- -
. - _ . . . = - -- --
- Rev.' 0~ Amendment' 1/Rev ~ 0, Amendment 1
' T..
Pages 3.1-1/3.1-2 Pages 3.1-1/3.1'-2.
1/Rev. 0 7:
c.; Rev..Of Amendment-
.. . a. ..
~
! ~~ T. ~ Pages 3.2 .13/.3.2-14. . -N. . ..
9
. .. Pa8es.3.2-13/3.2-14 " .. :.. _.
Tec7, :; 7
- A .
.... _.___ _ _.Rev.
O,_ Amendment-- 1/.Re.v. 0._. . . ..~
. . . -% - t
. ..# .,. 2 Pages 3.7-1/3.7-2 .!" '".. T
~
~ Page s 3.7-1/3. 7-2
-' : Rev. O, Amendment 1/Rev. 0
. ; .-: m. . . .f Pages 5.1-1/5.1-2 .
- Pages 5.1-1/5.1 .-
22 ,. - .:. _ 2- Rev. 0/Rev. O, Amendment 1 _ . .
.. . . : . c. . :. ... -- -
+' ^ } - ..
. ut-t_ .
. _ _ - Page 5.1 Rev. O, Amendment 1 Pases 6.5-1/6.5-2 *: ' ' - '
p.m.:. . -y7 Pages 6.5-1/6.5-2... ... . ._.
. 7;,.,
.n: -
.. ~- :- c.< : , i : 6 .- - -;. ...
Rev.* 0, Amendment 1/Revi 0, Amendment 1 4 . . . . # .. -: , . . . . ....v..
. %-..--. r.- .1<- . . . . ,, .
_,.._ =----
Pages 7.2-1/7.2-2 # "
-3':"Wp:i.Pages 7.2-1/7.2-2 u .. :
- r M-
~
. cq .- . 1. r.- .-%.- .
Rev. O, Amendment 1/Re'v. O, Amendment 1
, . g: . :yy. '.A w. . _ , , . . . ,
ff,...
t: , . . -. w ...:...
. c ... . :.:- :. :=:.::: u
..,: +
s .. .
ww.-':_
,.,.s-PLAN APPENDICES A THROUGH G ____ _ . . .
..f_.
2::. :.-:-: . .
ru .-
-2 _. uu . ~ .
.. :. List n.a w o f.. ,f fee.t tve Pagesc.-
.. . i List of Effective Pages , . -- -
'e JW.gsv.s.~@. .U.n. s', ,. h. .. - . ..a
. . w1, . . --a: .. . :r ;- - Rev. . . .O . Ame n dme n t .1
, . *s... ., ..
s -
. se,r- ~- . .~. -. ~ .
~.7-*=:4Appendtx m . . .
- g;;Q.;j D (enttre) -
~
Append ix D," Cover Page , * ~" - * "
-sc w . r v - ' - Pages D-1 through D :. . : ..
a-.1,w m
- g--v c - > - . . .
- Rev .- 0, Ame n d me n t 1 - -- -
i
. zwp. 9. . -': e. . -
. sy- :. . . < w -
.w ' .~% ~ . ,a y . m. .
I . #. . s.,* t.. ?*. . . . . . . . . . .
e a .
4 -. -.. .. ..
....-. 3. . -. .
, . v. ,. . . . . ,
.a . . .. ..
w .w : .. _ . . . . s. ....r= , . ,, ,
4 'y . , j . . .E < L *i e '.
v..,
-e "er .
- - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - _--.___2 -
Sheet 3 ed 4
- u DC: *'s-9R3 o
- 1. .
CF.AEE INS *RCO* IONS 8
NEW KAMPSEIRE YANKEE SEA.5R00E P' AN FOR MSSACHUSET*S COMM'.,'K!!IES 9~- .. _. . . ...:. :: .. . .. . . .
s i g- .
a._. '
g- ; _ .. ; . . REM 0'.'E - '~ '-
INSERT
. " ~ ' ' PROCEDURES Cover Page . . -
Cover Page - Rev. O, Amendment 1
..9 . .
. . . .. . IP 1.7 . s . .,.w
.. .. ... IP 1.7 Pages 1/2 . . . ... ..
Pages 1/2 - . .
- o.. .. .
.....,.3 .
Rev. O, Amendment 1/Rev. O Amendment 1 e
-. ...... Page 6
..~ .
- Page 6 - . ... . .
,,.:..t.:,e...:
... .: .. Rev. O, Amenduent 1
. . :, c. . . w... a. .. _ ..-...f~
-9 ..
ya IP.2.2. . ..n... .
.. . . ~ . . . .
IP 2.2 Pages 1/2- - _. . ... . . . .
Pages 1/2 - '
' ~
.h. Rev. O, Amendmen,t'1/Rev. 0, Amendment 1 i5 ~
. Pages 3/4..,.-
e ~1 .a.m t n.
- f. .
Pages 3/4 - -
.m. .
+ %. _.m. . 7. ~---. -- -
Rev. 0/Rev. O, Amendment 1 ,., ' . . . -.
O.m. .m. c - -
i ; . > ..w , .; e , . .: t r , . e. '
---A pr..c..,..Page s 5/6 ;__ . s [.ci_.. .. -. .
.., .; rages 5/6 . .
Rev. O. Amendment 1/Rev. O, Amendment 1'
.~.W7l.-:T. .
c 7.; 4.;.8 :n.u nub *f 9- ? T .3..r.G: n .a page.7.~~.%. W r **.>v,2: ; _. page y .~ .. ...
..._ . ... ,- e
....,; x .. Rev. O, Amendment. 1 -
_-t-. .. s,....r .. . .. . e =
Page 34...
. g. nv .... ~e
.e Page 34 - -
.'w.~ Rev. O, Amendment 1
. ~
.i-F. 1.2,d.:u.-;..s .v 5 .
. i..t.._. . n.
/.,w . ...-.. . . n .
~
.a.,. .:. ,.....a. .~ . ~ . r_.w a. . . .m.
ox
.r. .e. ... . .
. a. . c.:.2. . . , . . . . :...
.. . ~ , . - . . .ae - "w. . . --*t. .
.a. . ,.. .., .. . ..
Mm .-- v5
~-
'~ '-
- . 'c. IP 2 3- -
r -~ci 2
- 3 '< .'-m~~~I . ::w".".--- :.s w:.3... -::2.
Pages 1/2M.. .v. .s. v ~ . ; ..:a Pages 1/2 .. . . . . . . - .-. . . . - c.
Rev. O, Amr.ndment 1/Rev. O, Amendment 1 Q .sV....a..-.-
dp .
ages
- . O. .-
- c. u : . . . : r. .. - r
^
-- - a
- 1 Pages 5 6 ....-- ~ .. ,
. p .:. ~
.. . t. .- . . . - . .
~
. v,...ye a.c .. .. .. . .1. , .,.s 3.
Rev. O, Amendment 1/Rev. 0,- Amendment 1
. -. . c ~s ... . . :.s 1 -
- a. ~
- -W J. . Pages 7/8
- . -:- - - -
. . .. ., Pages 7/8 - --
... -~
- .=.-.. ....r--.. . - .-
Rev. O, Amendment 1/Rev. O, Amendment 1-
.c.c.g.!. ..c :3 v .. g ,,3 , g .c, m ., .
.,xra w Pages 9./10
- - - Pages 9/10 -.- .
wm .c -
~
r4 f r .nt. .:- Rev. O, Amendment 1/Rev. Oe Amendment 1 M. .
. L.:.;/.e_
M.a s
_ W. Pages 11/12- ,. . . .
. ... f .. : . . .. ... ..
. Pages 11/12
~e.~ .. .
s m e.a w.
... Rev. O, Amendment 1/Rev. O, Amendment 1
- .J.- M (..Q. Pages 13/14 . . . . .. . Pages 13/14 - -
. . w.
C .M s.u ic.c:.: :. .A ,.: . :., i Rev. O. Aneadment 1/Rev. O, Amendment 1 .
MT.E_ik.
i -s.: - ~-. . ,,
- . p~G_F} .~v.<
w.
p, , g_ . . .u
. q -
.ts,.W.p;m .p.n .i. .~ ..
Rev. 0*' Amendment 1 v.<.n n =,..a. ,
. - ~ ~ ..c .u.-
-.~~--n:ww
-- :. m. _ .
Pa g e . 23 .,..:~.;- ...:..2.., Page 23 .
M, .'s-M.
3 -
Rev. O, Amendment 1 n ;. wp W .M }
,: ~~-
s e.-~. L.......
-p L ,. . ,.- ~
,p as s p.c v. w c ss. pt. : .:
- - .<*..; +.:..-p. ce -. .-- .
- .s. - ; . .-
. t ', * - s M w .
. :. - A3.-
7.2 O .0;;.",., g; . .T 1
.J ~ .. U*...L -- ,. ...- -
l *,
ln.%. .#ig..h,.e.'-
O. m..2 .1 ."w: . .~. r. &-
r : ,. .v f. .
.. a ( .- ea s .
.1,. : . - --. -
a-
- .tem.:n:u tp:
I
- r - . . . 1. . - b. %. i. ..
-J. a- v . s u. . e : 2.. p ,. s. f.
~W3?+2
..m.. 't --::! D, ac stws.% . 5- ."r..t - s. eu- -
^'s*5 n . - : . : -.;. *: .;. . - -. . ~ . *
%i E c ,
DC~~~'"--9 613 ,
. .s k
CEAM E I'tS~RUC*!ONS s
NEii E.U!PSEIRE YANKEE SEA 5 ROOK P:.AN FOR MASSA 0BCSET S CO.*0fUNIIIES
. n m ,. . - . - .
n m.-- . _. . _ , .
INSERT -
- ._.=_.._ ._ -.. REMOVE
_._~_.
PROCEDURES __ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _
- u. ; _,.'- ; -
- : IP 2.4 IP 2.4 e . _.
" -- Pages 1/2 Pages 1/2 -
~
- e - i. . . Rev. O, Amendment 1/Rev. O, Amen h nt 1
~
Pages 3/4 Pages 3/4 - _
Rev. 0/Rev. O, Amendment 1...
Pages 5/6 - Pages 5/6 -
Rr,~-~< - al . . - -
. Rev. O, Amendment 1/Rev. O. Amendment 1
^.'
Pages 7/S
' ~
Pages 7/8 -
. w _. '
Rev. O, Amendment 1/Rev. O, Amendment 1 cMn.c .. . . . .
.'t- -' " " . - .
.yppa e, p+
Pages 9/10 Pages 9/10 -
Rev. O, Amendment 1/Rev. O, Amendment 1
.;-is: :U i n. . . _ .. .
Pages -
_..._a. . . . ._. Pages 1 Rev. O, Amendmen't 1/Rev. O f.i. ',:g.i: 1. .. .. C .i.::.trer i. r Page 23 - Rev. O, Amendment 12 r -
.-e e w. e.-' Page 23 u T 2 < Page 25- W 'T *'. - ";"
Page 25 - Rev. O, Amendment *' 1
$$$ = :"?- ^ . N l-- -i ??M-
w..s-n..:~ N..~.IP.2.6 W W h'd y W t^ ,
IP 2.6 Pages 1/2 -
"@/t Pages 1/2':.
Rev. O, Amendment 1/Rev. O Amendment 1
+..=,, . . .
. :, . . : m ,
'^
Pages 5/6 -
C f.%..Pages au $- .J :m 5/6- . . . .
- " -
- Rev. O, Amendment 1/Rev. O, Amendment 1 TQ:- -7p:;,5.1.'i'KJ - '.- J -. '.~.2- .t.
Pages 7/8 -' - -
7/8 v?;Q f.'. w.; 7.F-"
2 -6e.,Pages :- .
x '" - -
Rev. O, Amendment 1/Rev. O, Amend,ent 1
~.s...f.. . . . . , s..
w v.. w_. m.%,m% .
.. .. . . .- . v. .
.z,
..-m u ,. . .. . ..o . . . . . .
.--m,.-,.+ .. '- IP 2.13 i.,...'.,..',
-7 2 L. % :. w zy w .2.13 E _'~cd,.i_,,'r~~;
t
- Pages 1/2 -
- ~ ; --- -
Sf? ~~;='. Pages 1/2. . , ,
- .c " Rev. O, Amendment 1/Rev. 6, Amendment 1
- y J;pr e e w.:.,e .- @ j 3 : s: * :. -
. E i 3 3.Pages 5/6 E f' % _.
' k.U "51 Pages 5/6 - - : . .-
2 -' 1': Rev. 0/Rev. O, Ar odment 1 l W'J$F5e:cpt'. ?.cW -*::: .
- t_
T *-
c ~_- s.
.u ...
.. i-
\
.c.1 awa_. .w c,. r ;. ._. . .. - ..
IP 3.1 - Rev. O, Amendment 1 i .
~
~
'~~F l
M$--hdi 1P 3'.1 t
(entire)' ft ".' '. . M.. .. .,.
... :.u - N~. .rr. .
~,
'vw:u zy g . ., 3 . . w . . .w. .s v . .u . - . . . .: . . . . - zy 4,3 ~
-I
^
*' Pages 1/2 -
N. M F.5'i Pages 1/2;N f.,.:h. .58. Rev. O, Amendment N..'.d N1/Rev. ".s O, Amendment 1
. <- M. .....=.W I -
. - - . . ' ....a .,
Pages 3/4 -
- <=
- w # .
+
- s Pages-_m 3/.4..;" ..+. . . . .'. s
. - ~ -
. .t . r . .. :-
Rev. O, Amendment 1/Rev. O, Amendment 1 a- _ _'
$~ M 8 Pages 5/6 -
M'Sb_ i. Pa'ges 5/6_. . . .
~
f. .~ '-.Md. .:p A f.r. .~. _ u . . . - t .= *: A I " r.P.~ Rev. O, Anenduent 1/Rev. O w.,gm.
.,w w x,.=- Pages -. ~ / 8 7 . . 7, ,
s, Pages 7/8 -
~ - ' Rev. O, Amendment 1/Rev. O, Amen 6 ct 1 y:%
=
Z ,+.,'. t. D. Page 9e..C. f- ~ -., " ~
-- ~. -
3 t Page 9 - Rev. O, Amendment 1 Page 10 - Rev. O, Amendment 1
~W m*'3.Page T f' 10 ". .n . .
I Page 11 - Rev. O. Amendment 1
- P.,a. Page 11 4 -. .
.. c_= -% . I Page 13 - Rev. O, Amendment 1 rf ;: :- Page 13
.- - - . - - _ . _ = - - - _ - - _ - _ . - -
s . .
.s . Snect 1 -g 6
.C0.m 0L'.ED DoCCMEN RAS 5M-- A.
w ransm al Leg Nu=oer i 710K: M psa. acia: e s, tsa l urtutv 1. srxx, tso suturs um acta:ss l D C -n-9643 -
l
{
To: . . - er ser.com Avoaz . . . , I-c.are ransmitten t
4
.m... - ~.- -
C p.n. n E _ .~ --- sE . y - -
2-19-5S
';.- .-A.. DEPT / LOC:- : _ _pa m parts, s.s. ,c3a01_ ,
Et33--
- . = -- -
...m .
DOCUwENT TYPE - '
- .i...
1c.
. O CwD ~ O xxxcAL
.m.
O vsxDon xxxcAL.. . . _
n *C r REPORT ILD C DCE
-i= 0 Daavisc ' . .' -
' ~
O rarD E oTart srs :I' tm
.- - m =
c -..v. .
~
TITI.E Aurh*DVE'?T A 2 To The NEW RA.".PSET2E YANKIE SEA 3 ROOK PLAN T-C r - - - - - roa v.,ssAenest-s coMutmITTIs
-L2..- ,
-i.- 6 E.-
.j REASON FOR TRANSMITTAL: ~-*,-[{ " , ,
g'.g:',yh g z. . '
RE=tx surtzSEDED Cort TO axD .
.nied: s u :.:.: m:
O IxITIAL .ISsurt O courtrTE a.'vIstox
.-r < .r - .,
. -~ .
( DESTROY SUPERSEDED COPT yyg.g.. d REPTE N#NT 7 - @ PAETIA6.EEVISION ..-
y 5 7 x- . .. .. .. .
n- -v. -
- ,, .*^' s . r.
- ~ . ?
. ...e .
.C.r......"..- INSTRUCTION S: - - v..,..
INSERT / ADD.....- .. -
'J:1- d l~ .,
.. .._ RrMD7E
._, ,..v . . . ,. _,. . .. .n.. tm. . . .
m,e 4- ..c., .e-
. ,.L,7.y p-v.g . *x . e. - y . ~ ~..,e. .,
,. z , . . ,,e ,,
..e:S.a a M u..- g _, - .. , . . . .: ;,
e~ . . .:.- u ... -. ,
. 3.- +*;13 __ - 9? . . . ~ . . . . . . . .
- 4. .. f e ,,v _J, .
e.. .
- *---9 7 .e. . ..
b ,a.~ x:r + .. ..,
(identsfted ..
above) represents a change'to your
.m ;z_fr: _2.; . .:The attached controlled document for controlled documents assigned to you. Please status
,, c.. r7... controlled documaut d is attached. Ack.nowledge receipt of
.b.D". '~ ensure that all documentation references transatttal by complettagform the to
~ ~ .
endorse =
sr:r.:.7.s, .- . th s.the RXD WITEIN FTV1' (5) WORKING DAYS following receipt. This M 11 indicate that 5.E:
. :.T.i'.t - 2' - E , you have received tne attacnea cocuments and incorporated them~~'- in:o '*7 your . -
~-e.? vf !xWa controlled -- . :document ~.: .u. set / satellite file..
'.2D ' -wp; .
.....:.. ..r.... ***RECEIFT ACKNOWLEDGEMENI--- - ... : ..t t: ;:.
dsr:.:u.;'. .~ - .- ;.. . ..;.. . e. ~. . . m. s.
%. . -... p.. .
. s. .s ., /. / . TEE RI?PENCED DOCCMENTS VERE
.. w-... . THIS TRANSMIT"AL WAS EICIIVED ON'
.INC01P01ATED INTO OUR CONT 101.1.rD DOCUMENT "#' SET / S TC.- ~.e.
^ 7. -f ACTION 4AS TAKEN IN ACC01 DANCE VITH THE RITE 1ENCED
.v w.
9>, -~.: -:: . . ., e. ~< .,v . . . .
- . .: .. . . y
}* . . .
- .a. . ., , .. .
DATE: / /
~~
.'.-. SIGN:.D 5Y:
.~- w..:
.~. < . - - NYRM FQEM 3-105 EITURN SIGNED MAIL CODE: 49/DC 2ev. 7 4
i
~' 2. ANSMI TAL D:
RWD Page 1 of 2 D Y U
- Y Y PU'D 4
y --
,,,.u.-_ _
DOC-T.-9643 v . Oc.AL"E 'KS'"ROC"IONS a - .
NEW EAMPSEIRE YANKEE SEABROOK PLAN FOR MASSACHOSE~~S
' CO*0CNITIES t
_. REMOVE ISSER*
m~
- x. - :- x. ; " . . .
7-- __
_. PLAN _ -.
" ' - Cover Page Cover Page - Rev. 0, Amendment 2 .
List of Ef fective Pages (entire) List of Effective Pages f LOEP-1 through LEOP 6 all
~
~
^~ -
Rev. 0,- Amendment 2 Table 2.0-1.. .. .
Table 2.0 Rev. O. Amendment 2 ,
_ 7 -~ ~
._~. Pages 2.1-1 through 2.1-28.~. -. --
Pages 2.1 Rev. O and Pages 2.1-2 through 2.1-30 all.
. . .- .;._. _ . _. .. _ _ a n _
..- lev. 0; Amendment 2 ~-
3.. ,
..; 3 _'.w .._. Figure 2.1-1 .___. _ . - ... -
Figure 2.1 Rev. O,. -A=endment - -- _ _....
2 y
y* - -Table 2.2-1 (entire) Table 2.2 Page*g 1 of 4 through 4 of 4 -
All Rev. O, Amendment 2- --
.a..{. . . . . .. s 7 v G. . : . . ;.' F .. :.... . ... . .
- fp'-P-_Pages 2. 3-1/ 2. 3-2 ' --" ~ ~ - - Pa ges' 2.3-1/2.3- 2 '--
~
1 7g _ ,,:. , L.. , _ .. ,. a. . -. . .. Rev 0./Rev. .-
O, Amendment. 2. . .
f....n.E .*E'J. ,.. - . . .
>g ; y . . . : ..
-# Pages 2.3-13/2.3 - -
Pa Ees 2. 3-13/2.3-14 ----~ --~ ~
a . . '. . . . . .
~
.- 4 - Rev. 0/Rav. O. Amendment 2 .- -.. --- - -
, T . ' * ;c W i ' ..
Pages 2.3-15/2.3 '
.',c.t,. 4.;.4 Pages 2.3-15/2.3-16 .
V..-e. .' gw w .w. .e,. .,2.a . -
Rev. 0/Rev. O Amendment 2 I
.~' '
9.,h.W. *- . ' . . **4.*er..**.--:r,..'7 g :g g f - - . - Pages 2.3-17/2.3-18 .:
4.Q--E Pages 2.3-17/2.3- 18 . .,.- .. -.
Z~ 7 Rev. O, Amendment 2/Rev. O, Amendnent 2 A.- t@. ~ 4 'A. I fr.. . . .
y . ._
Table 2.3-1, Pages 1 of 11 throuEh f,e t. t. . ,, .Table
.- . >..2,.3 . ..-1,(entire) . . . -
. 11 of 11, all Rev. O, Amendment 2 n e. .:y. .i ;1.. .u, _. .._ _. ..._.. . ,.... ... . . ... . ,
m . . . . .. .. .~:
. {. .1 .* 1.; : - . . .& .'* . . .' S. <. . .
E. E..-F. ,.Pa ges. 3.1.-1, Pages 3.'1'-1 through 3'.1-3311".CI.
........through 3.1 ~ .c ..
. Rev. O, Amendment 2 m_- 5 .s ,,.
v3 :.A.. q.c.r - -c.. .. .. . . .#....
. . . . .. n ,,. . ... . . . :.. . .
-- -- - - - ~ : .. . .-: . a-- --
c .2:. .
g y g Pages 3.2-3/3.2-4;... . Pages . 3.2-3/3.2-4 , . . . . _ . , , , . . .
Rev. 0/Rev. O, Amendment 2
%-g?. 9 _.-? - _ . . .
. . _ . .~;.... ..;.,..
.n..o
- q. w..s
.-_ _ - - . - - . - ~ _ . .
.z.e,,tv..e,. :cu.Pages c:p 3.2-5/3.2-6 Pages 3.2-5/3.2-6 rm ,.s ye,-y e w 4.--... . m .a . . .
Rev. 0/Rev. O, Anendment 2 -.
- wr -W ". .c;; c. .ya. u :.", . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . - . . - . . .. .. . . .
-,..,e..<.. . .... . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.. : ..y Pages 3.2-7/3.2.-8.. ...... .
. z.._.,,... ... . Pages 3.2-7/3.2 -
Rev. O, Amendment 2/Rev. O, Amendment 2 m ~. .
.m n..~ . ,. . .
- a . .w w. o a. .+t. s. .. .
- .e** *[ ~.( ".,~ U
- .b A 7% ** !* -~ e *. .. %
m,m m w.2
. 1 b . . f.** .' " E M. 4s.T 1. N. h *.2W
%*X M Wp'.' .ap.- . : ~ *'
.. .. __. . * ..~:. 4 .
.8.'u=..m . .. T.
e.
.S ->*
. g . .
w -- n -- - - - - , - -
1 Shen -3 of 6
<*e' 1 DCC ~'R-9643 CRANGE IN!*R"O* IONS NI~i EAMPSHIRE TANKIE SP.A3RDOK PLAN FOR %SSACHUSIT~S
. - . . . -- - COMMUNITIES - - - - - - - - - - -
- l. ___._r_.. .
RDME _ . :._.._.- .._. _ . _ .
_ _ . . - . INSERT....
i ,_Pages 3.2-9/3.2-10 -
. Pages 3.2-9/3.2-10
- ;(, , . : ' ~^ '
3.- . :n 4 - .__ . c 2
_ ,~ ~,_- Rev. O, Amendent 2/Rev. 0 .' ~2
. ~ . ., . . .. . .~
' "~
Pages 3.2-11/3'.2-12'~ Pages 3.2-11/3.2-12
-1 N +- .. .
. .1 Rev. O, Amendment 2/Rev. O, Amendment 2 Table 3.2-1 Pages' 1" of 9/2 of 9 ~~ -~ Table 3.2-1 Pages 1 of 9/2 of 9
~~ ~
~
Rev. O, Amendment 2/Rev. O, Amendment 2 2; . ?- Table 3.2-1 Pag'es'3 of 9/4 of 9 -- Table 3.2-1 Pages 3 of 9/4 of 9 N. ..
,O+ ; . . . r. 2 .,...
. . . . . . . ....e. .. _.
Rev. O, Amendent 2/Rev. 0 .: ... -
,W- .
i~ 1 . Table 3.2-1 Pag'es'5 of 9/6 of 9 ..
Table 3.2-1 Pages 5 of 9/6 of 9 Rev. O, Amendment 2/Rev. O, Amendaent 2
_ wf q. M . _.r _ ..~ ;. . 4 7,, . . y... .. .. .. .. ..e. . . Q .,.,.
a.
~ .. , . ,
O r .1_.n _, Table 3. 2 _2 Pag'e' l' 'of. l' f " .* . *' " '.
.. . . . . . . . . - _,. Table 3.2-2 PaEe ( of 1 .. . . . . .
e ;;.. . . pa. : v.. ., - _ _ e. ,. ;;. . .........$..,.- e.> . . .
, . Rev. O, A= ad- nt 2,.; .: .-....s .. ....
- m. =gg . .a.--r..r...
. .... - .. ..s . ., ......
~. .=.* . . . -
.: - -
- s G Wr-L Figur.e _3. 2_-3..(3__ p ages ) ' _' *-'.".. * . ' .
v.igure 3.2_~3 (3 pages) - -
.-m:.m
,e-- _.-P. w -~.= x -
Rev. 0
- Amendment 2 * "-. . . .". I
-v a C..
a 2.;. 4.e. s. .p- 4 . c 4 9. : . .. .. .
m s cw e at im.< .i -~~, :: _;
g.,~p;:y-a . m r,.; - m. m 3 x g .
- , .. 3 ~
' ' '.F"
'.Md.i6 Pages 3.3-1/3.3-2f ; t.c= .W. r a :. . :.a c 'r: if;. 9,D,, Pages 3.3-1/3.3-2 " /'ent 2~--; .i - ~
. :. ..;; - . ...t . .
.rwah,a. :a w.w.-r .
g.,. .,. w .. .s .
Rev. 0/Rev. O. Anandm .
- - - . ~
. ... #..w. m., ,e..% ..%..
..,. .g ~-, 7 gPages 3.3-3 throughw.3.3-6. -
as ~.~:..v. -- ~ m ... Pages 3.3-3 t.hrough 3. 3.-6. an. . ~-,.... ~, a r-
, e - .- : , . s u s ,..
w.,.w .. :x~.- m.
.. w.~.w : . . .~ a . . . - --
.. Rev O' am.Am at 3 - .
y +m. ,-:.gmV. y -. ;.,.1
.y,t ..c. . r,y;
.. . .a- ..-e-..-t =w:2,:::n n . p . ~ .:..>.
... m..n. -en . y N.
. .e :.A. . . . .. - ..;. _ - . - ~- . . .. - - . - .~-
r
.. c_
.a*
- ~..c. ......... ,.
,r .y :
4
,';; M.sPages 3.3-7/3.3-8 71., y y ; f Pages3.3-7/'i.3-8' ~ ~~ *
- ~ ~ ' -'J
.-c?m:M rw- M*'ca"N i c.dM.: . -I- M.9 - 1. Rev. 0/Rev. 0, Anendment' J'- - < -
x.:;. m
..~r n. m : .z ...c .- ~. - .~ . .? - -
- .n . -
-~ -
- .. 2-.. . .. . - -
c..
"'"-i 4
2.T. .M. m.p~Pages',,,3.'.3 .
. *r .9 throngli' 3.3-11 . - PaEes f ' T3.3-9 M - throu8h 3.3-12'" . -
m :C . 4L. 4.. .-
- ~n=+
.. e . .. .. an Rev. 0,- Amendment 2 . . . *' . .a. .. . -
- ." m +;~.#. -e.=.-- .... =.w.
~ ~ - f.2 -- ; ~-... : . - . . . . . . . . . - - . . . ...
t .1. Y.. [,J .3 -- 'T~
~
~
4 c4 W_.E .Pages,,3.5-3/3.5-4 ,
.n, .. ..
l .. ... _.....
,.f-,~,{, p,ges 3.5-3/3.5-4 .-
Rev. O, Amendment 2/Rev. O a. r -
.s .k u u p x %,.. a. .. .: r. -J . . .m _:c-2.:-'4-cf#c..c
.. ,, , - ~ . .
..~n.,.: . . ,. m ._ :... ..
ar ~. s - Pa . + 8es,3. 6_ .3/3. .- 6.-4
- es.. . F.Pages 2.u#~'m.3 . : , 3.6 . ..-3/3.6-4 ... . .-.- .
- 12 . . . - -
,- . .s.~
4 s a .. .r. .
Rev. O, A-nA=nt 2/Rev. O Anendment 2. . . .
.-.m-n g .c w _ .:.. s..---. m.
.r :. , :. . .v . .. , ... r,
- ru3c .m -.. ', :.-
.@kg.n .-Pages. 3.6-5/3.6 Pages 3.6-5/3.6 . ..' '- '.~ ? ".'~' '.. : .. . . .
~. . . . . ..6(3.. _ + .( .;-s.i. (. ;i.--1 ..,
. . ~ .
.z - ,,g,qq n ,.w ,c..
. . ' . Rev. 0/Rev. Os AmenAw nt 2.< m :.,~ ,. '-",.'
a,
-ver-.p x ar m -.m. y. c :.wm.-vwn . ,3 :.x.g.;: s ,. a--~> .
.- r...
. . . . . : e. .y . :. , ...
~ '
-* ]* ,,, p g., 3,' 6-7 through 3.6-10. .: s . . .". E ' . . '
y$.Ef833.*~* Eft 7, .f 'M rl "(Pages, 3.6-7 ~*2 through,3.6-10 , ~ ; ' f2/Rev. -
'/
Rev. O, Amendment O, Anendment 2 .l .
.s.+n ;.;;;.% p.o ..-:.w 7 m _..., . , . - .. .. . . . . . ,;. . . , , . . ...
N. "' . .M ^ ,< '
- ^'~- ' "l ' .'
7/fT. ..f.;.'.; Pages 3. 6-11/3.6-13'.M; PaEes 3.6-11/3.6-12 N . .
c ., u. Rev. O, Amendent.2/.Rev. . .0 :- e r . .s . .
.m8=.::::;
~ p .. p.w.- c . . .p :. '.. w e m .p. a ,.e. m . . ,. . ..
, m.
y .
.4 .
. . .s
. s. ...,,' . , . . . ..
...c'.-.
- ';;w %. % . . . .1; L ,
s ..cr .
.v <.
H. ,ryU s,p b .Y,,.s;.
.t .. . .. _ , . . . _
.. o .%. ,,., n. . .
. 2. .
- r. .
. ,..- m .....j p.. .
- ..a e . , .- u DCC ~~R-5643 -*
- --4 -
C'4ANGE INS ~RI':""IONS .
y-NEW HA.MPS E RE TANKEE SEA 3 ROOK P!.AN FOR MASSACH"SI TS CO.CCNITIES >
i INSERT
~ -
- ~ ~ ~
REMOVE
~~
J. - r- Pages 3.6-13 through 3.6-15 --- 'Pages 3.6-13 through 3.6-15 ---
all Rev. O, Amendment 2 Pages 3.7-1/3.7-2m-.. ..
f, _-
Pages 3.7-1/3.7-2 Rev. O, Amendment 2/Rev. 0 - - -
. . . . u .1 .
~; - Pages 3.7-3/3.7-4 : - ' ' ' ' - '-'
Pages 3.7-3/3.7-4 Rev. 0/Rev. O. Amendment 2 . .
][ -
Pages 3.7-5 through 3.7-8 - 2 Pages 3.7-5 through 3.7-8 All Rev. O, Amendment 2 ,.
- ~ , ,\r 5. r . . . r . .: t . .
.~. . .
. - 1, Q. - Pages 3.8-1 through'3.8-3 2' .
Pages 3.8-1 through 3.8-3 n-All Rev. O, Amendment 2 - -
- . . : . :: ~-
2m- ". - .- -
. .t:.3u- - - .
- .~ . . .
M.. - - Pa ges 3. -1/ 3. 9-2 . . *. . . . . .- - = ~ ~ , . .-. - - -
Pages 3.9-1/3.9-2
"". J :-- i ......i_... . ' . _ . _ . , . ._- _ . .
. ........ Rev. 0/Rev. O, Amendment ,2 ... .. .. .
--m____..
Pages 4.5-1/4.5-2 - - ' ~ ~ " - - *~ ~ - Pages 4.5-1/4.5-2 '-
51.'r
.y_.. R./. . .~ n - -
Rev. 0/Rev. O, Amendment 2. . .
-...m : .; . - - - e :. .
.m~e_ y.w . . _ m'. n .s .....,.,e ._~ _ . .
- 1. - . . .c .,
. - . ,.,. s.-_ .;
~ ~~ ~
'.7. E l Piges. . .3.1,1/5 1-2. ~r;: =:r* . C ."_E Pages 5.1-1/5.1-2 ' c.
a m 2 ,,- v ._.. . . o . a . ..
Rev. 0/Rev. O, Asendment 2 - . a s.;
k ;x E
~
+n.27 .vn t -=-:,- m. r. C.. .- .c.. .
._r e.: m * (: ',-=,; .e ~..
- .- ^ -
- ~ . - ; >:
z=' w m . -- ~ i w .-- .::.. ;. ;- :
,
- P a ge 5.1 -3. - - -- - =~ - -----.------
q z - _ ar c -; ,
.a.--
- f. r e.mi.: . 2-; '*..' 2- *-g*y E *- ; t
-'~~' -
.J* .t .....a. 7.=.. . ... . - - .
- .ru v. m s.
- Pa ge.w. s 3 , through e.c.:5. 2-1.. ~f ;... . . . .--.- m- y -w" 5.2 .9.. . -- g? '
Pages 5.2-1 through 5.2-9 -
ry. - +-w.z;7_._; & w.- e :: ; I-.~.- All Rev. _0,. Artendment 2 .., . -
<.,u, .
- r. ..y %. .
,. ,. s. .- .r"..- - ._....A...'...
m
. _ .2
-. wa
.... .. .c c . . . .,. . o . ...-
_a.
....s.
y Fi gure 5. .,.-2.-.....,....
. Figure,,5.,22 ., Rev. O, Amendment 2.
- ---~ -- 'r
.r...t..t. o c. a.
. . ,. n>-..:
x.. . .
- -m .,s c.' ~ _ .- .
...,.y,y..gr---.., ~ . . ....y.. .
%. .- .. -.-.-s . ~ .
.c.
4 % . . - ; - * . --
- --c.
c., .> .nn-t Figure.y.5.2-3 .- . -. Figure 5.2.3, Paav.-r- 0, , Amendment 2. . , r_ .-
- ;- . .-cM. c rN ,.v;:
. r. .- - .- . .
s
.m - e q, . .
.? (.'t.M. x . -- . . --Figure . 5.2-4 9 0#-'?" " "'-! 9,'
. Figure 5.2-4, F.ev. 0, Amendment 2 ,
~ %._,.b5- 5 : ICE-5.,.,-5 E N W =_b?. --'r .:. - W.R. : =- - ==*:~ ' = ;. . : .=. . . .
r er.' M Figure
- *..~...mz .-
Figure 5.2-5, Eev. O, Amendment 2 . "
i W' *' - - .- - -
i, 'G. .~. = % c. = ;y U. W : = ** - W-i::r .-.j Figure,5.2-6 (2 pageh, , . ... . .. ,, Figure 5.2-6, Ecth pages Rev. O, ~ ,-
-m.. - .-,.. v,- .,. :
4;*.m 4.*.-.
.. ~.3. m ... . .c
- :-* r./.O 3s.:=& @ . vfl- 1. 3*.2 2. W
.o..-
.o . *. SP .
Amenhat 2 .
. ~
. +*. %. . . .% . .&. . . ~ . ~ . .
,s. w - , .
es.. Figuee 5.2-7, Rev. O, Amen.' ment 2 .---
, . F..igu_re r..5.2. 7.. - .x::- r . .:
...-m...-
?$.n,.c
..r. s... v c;;&c... u * . m. .. ._. - . .
s.._c ...
.. .~..
= -
v.. Figure 5.2-8 m.. - - - - - - - . a *-
.~,......-,
Figure S.2-8, Rev. Oe Amendment 2; 22.
s n:~+c.4. .s. _ . ._ 3 s . z. . w . -- ,, - , .
- 1, . 3
'- * - c- .
t og ? j . _ _ .. .: ~. T .,,- , ' .,.~3
- .E "';,..n-"' W M ** r p M . m W*, 1
- 4. - H N : ~(* ,'r M.. *
~
Pa ge ' 5.' 4-1", P'se'y." O , '. Am"e ni.en't 2 ' '
- xu
- w:S M. 7? ?%. 4 w.A. .,, Pa ge 5. 4 , y,I~ 'A.yi.M .:: e r ..-
,c =. %. .
w .. _ , . . . . .
gy %,-r ,,. .Table .,,, .;
- Table 6.3-1, Rev. O. . Amen. hnt 2. .e
. m, .~.p.,=6.3-1,.s.
- - r,.. ~, . . . ~ - ;. . . , . .: t . c, . . . .rr,n e , -. . . .
... ..e ^ .. , . . .
" *- ,a
. J.E:&, 5 Table 6.5- l' (2 pages) ~ , ; -:- * - . -
Table 6.5-1~, Both pages Rev. O, g , ,7. ,3...
vs;;p-.=.-
g w.. , g.. . , N .> . ~ . " . . --- _ ,
Amendment 2 .
a, , , e. m .,,. p1 .. .. _.; . . . . ,
ShGor. 3~c: c D00-TR-9643
~ ~i e
1-NEV EAMPSEIRE YANKEE SEABROOK Pl.AN FOR MASSACH"S:.alS CO'OCNITIES INSERT
..g 7 g :,f.: . - .
REMOVE .
~
.~.r PROCEDURES _ ~ .
2'~ IN- R-, -
Cover Page, Rev. O, Amendment 2
_- M Cover Page 4
. Table of Contents (i, ii)
Iable of Contents (i, ii), Rev. O,
- Amendment 2
...x _
List of Effective Pages (1.0EP-1). List of Effective Pages (LOEP-1),
r
' d Rev O, Amendment 2 IP 1.1, Entire: - _ :.
~
'~
IP 1.1, Eev. O. Amendment 2 IP 1.2, Entire IP 1.2, Rev. O, Amendnent 2 .
- IP 1.3, Entire w s'. J. t . ' . - .- '-- IP 1.3, Rev. O, Amendment 2 *. .
u r-.
! IP 1.4, Rev. O, Amendment 2 j ,': ,:
IP 1.4. Entire _. ,e . 0 . r ./ ..--
IP 1.5, Rev. O, Amendment 2 4 . ' .:
-7
_. . . r IP 1.5, Entire.n -: t .t .~r' .
~ '
IP 1.6, Entirear. = i. ' . .
- IP 1.6, Rev. O, Amendment 2 - ,
" T. 7 - IP 1.7, Entire: :-s-J , C . . :. . ' . L IP 1.7, lev. O, Anendment 2;- ""
y -; ; '
'.' M IP.1.8, Entire.2 ..- . _ _ . . .-
IP 1.8, Rev. O, Amendment 2 . . .,. _ .
~
IP 1.9, Rev. O, Amendment 2 9'"2;1 1 IP 1.9, Entire ^^ IP 1.10, Rev. O, Amendment 2 -
c?; IP 1.10. Entire ' .. '
IP 1.11. Rev. O, Amendment 2 1 IP 1.11; EntireJ .',- ,..
IP 1.12, Rev. O, Amendment 2 7.- ~I.1 . . . .s
. . - . . - IP.1.12,' s .
Entire-. .,
- ,- ~
IP 2.1, Entire IP 2.1, Rev. O, s,Amendment 2 - .
1 ' . ..
J . . ;. .
- w. .,. ->. . . . - 6. . .
....... P-.,. ~ , -
IP 2.2.'. ' O '- .
i,v --.. .-,,...m.s -
'. ~c.
.7 I -
. W F IP 2.27;~. ':- T '." u' ..
Pages 1/2-w .- - -
~
~ Pa 1/2 : _
Rev. O, A=endment 2/Rev. O, Amendment 2 ges .m i .w- J. . L ., em. .
,c.". '.- co..t . - ~ _ - '
..f~.W . c .. .
' ' 2-Page 34, Rev. O, Amendment 2 .-
y--2 @ y Page 34' ' ^!
. Pages 37/38 . .
.. . . . .. . _c
'_ i.1.#.;- . - Pages 37/38 ' .
~
~
2 .~ ' ' -
. N ~.;' ~. " u 3
,Rev. 0/Rev. O, Amendment. .
. e s ; & = k : 3: . -
! . IP 2.3, Rev. O, Amendment 2 C-K - IP 2.3, Intire - ) IP 2.4, Rev. O, Amendment 2
-- uz -E IP 2.4, Entire a IP 2.5, Rev. O, Amendment 2 ;
g y- IP 2.5, Entire IP 2.6, Rev. O, Amandment 2 3 j; IP 2.6, Entire
- IP 2.7, Rev. O, Amendment 2 '
-90 .~e.i IP 2.7, Entire : - -
IP 2.8, Rev. O, Amendment 2-C*W IP 2.8 Entire!- -
' ' IP 2. 9, Rev. O, Ar.,endment 2 ' _-
$*'.'fM IP. 2.9, Intire ' ~ -
IP 2.10, Rev. O, Anenameat 2
- VT ' IP 2.10, Entire
~
IP 2.11, b f. O, Amendment. 2 S
- F# IP 2.11, Intire - -
IP 2.12, Rev. O, Amendment 2
-erv
., ; ., a... .
.IP. 2.12. Entire
.i _. .;
. .- T .
- I' _...J.' . , , .
-4 -. sus.. .- . . - , -
's. p h'9 9
. .4 .
300-TR-96'3, ,
CHAN~E INS RUC~ IONS
.EW'EAMPSHIRE Y YANKEE y.. h .. .,S SEA 3R00E PLAN FOR MASSACHUSE TS INSERT
..w 7._...
. ~ . -..-.
MVE . .
.- IP 2.13 ._ .
. S 2.~. .
1 .-IP Pages2.13 1/2 - Pages 1/2
--- Rev. O. Amendment 2/Rev. O, Amendment 2
.f. r . _,.. .... . ... . .
Pages 5/6 Pages 5/6 .
Rev. O, Amendment 2/Rev. O Amendaent 2 Page 9.~.__ . . _.. . . .. .
. . Page. 9. .
Rev. O, Amendment 2 r . .. .s....
. . * - IF 2.14, Rev. O. Amendnent 2 . .
. I . IP 2.14. Entire _ . . -
- m. ... . . . .
. . l'
. .. ..... . . . . . .. .~...
IP 3.1, Rev. O, Amendment 2 ..
. .. IP 3.1, Entire i. ..._,..
....r. . .... c. .
c IP 3.2, Rev. O, Amendment 2n
- , .. IP 3.2, Ent.ir.e..... _,. ... . .. , ..e . ...
IP 3.3, Rev. O, Amendment 2- .: - ' - * -
e . . . f - - -
2 IP 3.3, Entire _ a IP 3.4, Rev. O, Ame.ndment 2 : .
.. IP 3.4. Entire T _;s A . . 2.
. 1..... .
IP 3.5, Rev. O, Amendment 2..
...; 7
~7,. ..,- .
" 7 7.P .3. 5, Ent. ir. e. ..;. .r.s ,. - - s:.. e.e-. . s. .
e
.x . r . , a , ., r. . ..p-._,.... . ...._
y ; , ~ .O -
_ _. -., .. .__ y . , . . . . .. *'**gr. ,
._ _. . . . w4.. 4. --..._..a_..,
?
~*...(~~
? ~-
L 3?Mr2.b W .*,0- W d! ,s EI 'E
~.. . . . ..a'. a.. -
- ^i i.}i . 4
- * .- 7 . 7, , ,.
." 2 .i.7 -
y"{ pg .. . . . . . , . . .... : ..r.ss,
- f,7 ..
~4r -". L . 2_ " , * , . . . ~ ~
. ., . . . . ~ . . ,_.. ' ew-es ,.. . . . . . . . .
.a .s . _f
.- . ,, ..,a
. . .+.. ..
. ~ . ,.., ..
- f. . . .. .. r>. * * .
s.. n. . , t. . ,. .. g ( .. g- ....t. ., . ~
.*s .,". : .a .. . - ' ; .. r ...
..,.a. . . . 2...., ,,.... . . . .. .
'.1 . . -.
.,...'a.
... . ~.
~m -. 3 -- . *,s*...e-.--%.....
.a '. a .
m -e. . =s %4 m rrw. --. . %. .* .- .
.u-. m, ~e..w - , u .c. ..v~ r% . .A.*a./ -
- .. . s" a- .
- ' L : ' t .: wse - \n..e-t. --. a.t. --%.-
- ... . - - . -' ..% . w. -s-
. ~
~ - . -
.,..;f.e ,;.-% .. a.u v .*-n.,.o% .q_. .a .... . .m*- .3."- . .-s w ..b. m,
. . 4 : v M m.% ...m.;3 w_g,ai.
r... .-.- o. ..>...s w .v
- * . m.. *G e ~ !. . .<< e,9. -;.. .. . - ~ - < . . . . . -
~ .
n s.k.' %. .gs. eam.me.e.s.o T.u . ~ .G s , h., w me.k
- a.u a , - - .u- ...
. - s1
. . . .~.. -
?...n*..r.. .
.. - ~ -
.3..%. w .. . . . . -
w .wr~-. .. .e w . Ustr
-ma c.* r* u . = t. t g a 4 -
-- ~ ar . - .:ev3
. p
.p,. ,
-.:.p:3 ,
1 -; . , ...
. . . . t r.1 M -. - .
- ~ , . . :.
... :: n ; . ..m : x. .. .
.. s .~ \ *s? f .t.J. r *
~~..-
. ::: n . .
. .-,e .:
. . . . . .. . . . . - ..m. y. .~ . : .e. ~...:: ~ *-..,.7 ..
i.
- , .~: -* :: . ?... .-..>.~ , .u p~ e..,..e- .....g~ . .
- v.v. ..g ... . .
- y. '.;.: . _ q. ...~, -. ~. y. . .r3. .. j ... . . , . .
._ . ~ . . . , . .
.*.~~ r**. *. -
...~.. ...- p , r eu. ,L.,.. s.
. .. a
- pg k. y a n1
._.%..s+ & '. ~ ;, ... ...,
n... . < ,,
~ ~. .
,e.. 't .
- a . . *,
.a.-.... %
. D...2,
...,t.
.e
- .u<..,.t,... . . .. . . . -.% . . ..
A* . ** f /.. .... b*- < ::' t . . .. ' . . .
3* w E- c.2; Es.e. '7- . .T. M *.f. . S.* .4
-~ s. ** *- *f k R .n < ~*?: % .
...B . . . . .
.s. ~. =~ . n.. - ~ .
- * * * ~ ~ ,**
- .; r.,
- J. . g.T - ; , ., w z.;>:.**, . - ' .. ::
efW
- .... z ~ ,.
- s: ,se, .
?. . ar
.v s=e -a. . .
~
.e*~ ..^ N: p -".%* !.Q. , .'*,e .
n U.s **'$. ..h .'fu. ,..t'. .c .: . e ew
- r. .? w, . . .a . s..-..u,.. .
e
- ,. '*~T~~~<
<' *- - '+ ' T. .. .d ..*. 1. c ..'
- r;.%.r% *a- t se-~t= 3.N=a & g n . ~.s .$ . 3 ,$ 15 ; i 2..
- e. 4 A_ . .
im
.;. t..Q Lw.v".yw.'.w.
,m r,,.M., . .gw.r
..su .,
s+...
er.:..g a .- . . ,. . , t.e. , c . . . e. . .
. s
.e w ,, m, -m.o a. * . . e
.s g- s
- 3 *9 , *e . 4 . . +
9.*- #4
- g. . . u. .ca g, ,
s
.s... - * . S. e w- * ~.. - -
&.f .). * -r.w. % *m.r:* Me . . . .
- **t* .A>e& -
- P*'e* W;t W 3p w/A*J.'4 ar"J
-e .g.*
M M*y' . .". J .-
q= 4 f .a54:.>.,*e W W ... , * -
L..:,** u..P . '.L
% *.%1'.L
.. *w. L:... .
. . pes . go ..
'..s.- t .
y e.m. -. h is T3 p +.i.
.,..a p. e
,e
%s D. e. ". ,. <*qgh~ 4mme . e t.,,
- , ~" '
9%.
- a MW 2%% .9*%.. .,m ... a . .. .
.o..Ay ,'.M 9l.*j W< " '*.
M% M s. 'S V es. .. . e
- . # ..lP 9 -
- . . . 67. .. .f. L. . . - .
d' y-
- 25 t
1 .
our own time. I have been doing that personally, myself, ,
1l
- 1 b-l-T y ' = for' nineteen -
-r n.
years,.and all . :1 of the other merbership -- - !
- - 1 .. .
7, _ : .. i 1 ._ 3 we donate cur time and efforts whenever and wherever :
8
._ ~
. p :~ <
. ; .i .'- --4 c
we can. -
In this document, and in this instance our *
- --w; - ,
concernwaswiththepeopleofthestateofNewHampshire,lt
$![5
- y. .. .
I
- in any way that we could help or assist in a disaster.
-R: 7f'6 When the number of 1,500 comes up, as you ca.n.see
.s,. ..
~ .
W 'T ' 7 . . ,, -
.: .,.s . c .- .,. L : :
-f;y clearly, it says approximately,,,because I cannot guarantee
< n.L 8 .. L. f. .
ti--5. .: Lf; .. ..
how'manp~peopiewould be ava
~
ilable at any 9 iv'en time iri~ ,l
'i~~'T'r
- J. ?"~~ 9.* . .
- ~.w.g n.: . . ~
. .. n., : 7..., ..
Fo:', example , if itr -
C.E .lE V.E.G.any'particular part of the state.- - .
.-- ~ . .. .
l
..~ r. . ,. :. . .; .::::2. r-w; ,;.a., .:.; e e . . r. r ..
P."M were Berlin, New::Hampshire, it would be a little different l ~ .*
' E-!A ~ 1 p -
= - :.m . . -
? 5_'.:"Shi E = . s a ,- .>_ ..1.-n r a .' - i' -
~ - - - -
4
.mam w. .m.. .
r
'Gr12: e.x-% !
t-;d. F E. % d v'Z' c. wrk.M .. -
thar. if it' were Manchesterf because l of the
.>. r. . . . - .:.c . . .*
- ^ W .-.
- .. , - : r : .. - l T.-T 13' gN;qM* =; %= -M:: - . . : ' 'W' - O = '.' * ' -ig.~'^ of our mer.bership, s -
~- m.2 ,_ r. , .~,...~;.+ -
.-v . .. . ,s . . .
i -
4&mg:.
' ~;
iA.. s 14 eG'4W<:
- -zw . ; .. .
- .also m , .
?;hau,
= ; - led hay down
- % : .south a ': last e. year...
...:..to help . v. .s+ i out th ,-
< ~ .. m .. u ..t. w.
- I
- a , ~.
gig 15:.
%x.n- farmers'id their drought,
~
and
.-m the International
... . Union .
- m , , .v . . _ . a -. -..;-_.- , . . - .
- w. ;,:.c -
g . zwe y.~~. I .
W5flN.151
~
M . N is always quick to react and assist in a dis"ster. - ,-- .
' cEvr~c .. .. m- ..
- . MM'*
'7. .'A,.d. :.a..r '. , . M. - ; y - . c didn't incorporate them into.this or the joint' council ~ ~;
1-rx'.? .=.._.. .-
1537117 .. - . . . .
z.a.
. -cA ..a.,..s,...
.=._..=.m . .
into this, which covers New England, I stuck with the
.,. 8
=di.ni.J13 :- ..w.,... . - - --
.- n y e. p yp ;.r e. _ ' -e. . - + . . . . . - . ,
r,; w :..m.sp . - . f,g .. .
ople here in New- ~,.. Hampshire, and the nu=ber v- of 1,500
- ~ . .
- U. ;..... . ..j. .
MC 19.'. ~ . . . . .
. . .. - ,s,-
mra .W.:- w.y + 4 - - -
?g m .-w. '
v . . ... represents 1,gn than half of nur en.bepMo here .in-..r. ,..:..r.. .,,
20--
_ :p:a
,.r. .:.
-? -
. ,--,-.c _ mx:x.s; * . -. .
- - ". :)-.
..... a
. .nhw .the state,- and it is an aoproximte number.. - -I would . .
f,.wdy n q... * ~
- , ~~
-- ,.-,-+;., '
n- ,-- 21; .... - .
...s.
<w&- o: . ;>4 r.%,, _ _ . , . . - _ . _ . .
from time to time', depending -. < ..
[
wome
. (22} n$ 7v-.,think M - ~ ethat , it would
-.-:n.- ..:.~. vary.. *. .-- . r . .. ..
s
- c
~
a es;Wm. eg - a- ....-v. a . . - .
W*eg.w : c;E. : : on the area ar.! depending upon the disaster~ .
...._ that is% <
ES. *,.'.w..
23 -; :..w n. . -. .- .
.. .m . *- . **- *- ** P ,
,es e- ,4 %-
- e * . . .- . , . .
.-,m d # ..T, o *g . ,
- e. '.c. , w . . r- .-
4>
e ; -* %
. i..7,,,... .
~
gg .g. ,
.;... . ~
EXHIBIT G f
- w. _ . _ _ _ .
f .
.B 26 i
s 1 being dealt with. I don't think that the docu=ent e ,
-e e. guarantees that.we are going to provide and recuire -- ..
. -~. Tr. _2 . . _ . .
mr r. , .
3 1,500 people to go to evacuate Seabrook. I don't read .
== :. - .. -
Ig T ' .i
' it that way and did not intend it that way.
25 d You have just told us at some length about the charitable
- - =. ;...'
- .r 6 activities that the union has done for many years in
, g
,,,,,e- --
g , 7. .. .
many areas to the general betterment of the co== unity
- .J '
cj g ~ and the state, and I guess I'm asking you, in your f.~r';;_5 91 E ~ opinion, 2 then, this commitment made in this letter of
. x s .: . . .
'^ ^
- ;,;; e ;, . . . . .
. . - . . ~
, ; g- .10 - .~. . : ' _' .' agreement is just in peace with those o,ther activities,:.-.
r n
. f. .y --: x -
., : ~. . . . .
m ,.,.y . - ...,
. , a. - ..~ -
.ziCr, 11, .
.G.1. i s th a t rig h t_ -- _ , . __ __ .., . .. .. .. _ . -
f . ~. 4. - - -
- 7 -- .
c ;3 :_ t _ . . . - .. .. ,z .. _..
- s - . ...
. . - - ~- : : .-
~ -
2 - : - . :, - . .
- _. 20
.. ~3"4 12: n.g ,c.w - e . .- . , s.
- A &.' This agreement is designed to help and assist in any. s-
..~" . -
- "~~ - . - ' .2 a:..n.. w . .w g'. Ag.,,,A .: -
r x:. . :- : .:. . - -
y-M, n .13 A. -_,r7: di:saster in this state that we can partake in in any
... - v .
NN I way e can do it.: obviously, as I said before, it- "~ ' ~
kh$$ N$$$:5.:b? ~.kh N9:~$.O*5::-E*' L." i DL: 5 --c
':CW" 151 M ~C C would vary on'where it was. I mean, if the Mer.'limack -
~-
v g.,1 w -gy y.: '"w Y: . .- .
a . * ~ r - -n .
.e. . , . - . . - . *.-
- -* ' *- ^ ~ * '
- i -
J" "
x(T5 s.-,,a,16 .x.
u m> . River
..u:n, . , - ..
was -flooding in Nashua, and + hey needed help, - - - -
- m. .. ....
y8,.,. 4
, 3
. w. "- we would be there. If they wanted us to put sand bags, -
d~=w 17- d.?:Th' =.- ...:. : x. -. . :. - ^ :-- : , - b .- - ' ^
..f~
'.i - . .,
i
$w~E~)E 2 .a -
",hq.d..we would do it, or drive dump tiucks' or bulldozers,t. ' .
2
- g-y .*5.llL&m
^* * ~ ~ '
.. :- ~ - ~
' s : lse, or buses, or haul food in -- we would .
-- r 1 . "'? : or whatever e >
,5 nw, 2 M,9'. m n-:3.':.u ~; . . . . '. .
-- - ~
-s --.
(
- h. - ne.20,t: hv do whatever we could do within reason, and we would be - f i g... g. _.,.
-. _. . s,. ....,;..
.- . . 2.- : . . ,... r.
. c.a: 4 . s ,.n~-_.i
- -' . ' 't.-4 %. . .. -
- 4 ;2n es
- ,.; G quick to react, and that is the feeling of our member -.
g'. .Q .
.w : -rm, . ~. . m. ..
4., .
M3
' ~
That is what' A.,u.
- c,, ., y
$v s m, m . niN Nhi[-- we want e --
=
- a. .
to.
help.
in --
time of need.
. .n y. .ewwt-m: we are, a non-profit organization designed to help out * .
. . . , , - 1
. ,_ "n~.a<,
yv . m__t:.. m-.a . .; . .
C 8+*,
vy=>s* m.
C tj i Et w- sE. e We.'h* l .h ?h * ' -
- ? a- . .. , .. -..
s
- -m., -, --- _ _,
.+ 0000tETED de . USNPC
- 29 P3 :46 CERTIFICATE OE SERVICE fikr kp'f BitANcV I, Matthew T. Brock, one of the attorneys for the Town of Amesbury and Town of Hampton herein, hereby certify that on February 24, 1988, I made service of the foregoing _ document, INTERVENORS' NOTICE OF APPEAL and JOINT INTERVENOR APPEAL BY MOTION FOR DIRECTED CERTIFICATION, by depositing copies thereof in the United States Mail, first class postage prepaid for delivery (or, where indicated, by Express Mail, prepaid) addressed to:
- Ivan Smith, Esq., Chairman
- Judge Gustave A. Linenberger, Jr.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatery Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission East West Towers Building East West Towers Building 4350 East West Highway 4350 East West Highway Bethesda, MD 20814 Bethesda, MD 20814
- Dr. Jerry Harbour
- Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission East West Towers Building Washington, DC 20555 4350 East West Highway Bethesda, MD 20814
- Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal.
Board Panel
- Docketing and Service U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Washington, DC 20555
- Philip Ahrens, Esq.
- Thomas Dignan, Esq.
. Assistant Attorney General George H. Lewald, Esq.
Office of the Attorney General Kathryn A. Selleck, Esq.
State House Ropes & Gray
- Station 6 225 Frankin Street Augusta, ME 04333 Boston, MA 02110
- Sherwin E. Turk, Esq.
- Carol S. Sneider, Esq.
Office of the Exec. Legal Dir. Donald F- Bronstein, Esq.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Allan I 'ierce, Esq.
Tenth Floor Departms..t of the Attorney General 7735 Old Georgetown Road One Ashburton Place Bethesda, MD 20814 Boston, MA 02108
- Diane Curran, Esq.
- George Dana Bisbee, Esq.
Andrea C. Ferster, Esq. Stephen E. Merrill, Esg.
Harmon & Weiss Office of the Attorney General 2001 S Street, N.W., Suite 430 State House Annex Washington, DC 20009-1125 Concord, NH 02301 1
e
- o.
- Edward A. Thomas Robert A. Backus, Esq.
Federal Emergency Mgmt. Agency Backus, Meyer & Solomon 442 J.W. McCormack (POCH) 111 Lowell Street Boston, MA 02109 Manchester, NH 03105 Mrs. Anne E. Goodman Jane Doughty Board of Selectmen Seacoast Anti-Pollution League 13-15 Newmarket Road 5 Market Street Durham, NH 03824 Portsmouth, NH 03801 William S. Lord, Selectman Rep. Roberta C. Pevar Town Hall Drinkwater Road Friend Street Hampton Falls, NH 03844 Amesbury. MA 01913 Mr. Angie Machiros, Chairman H. Joseph Flynn, Esq.
Board of Selectmen Office of General Counsel Newbury, MA 01950 Federal Emergency Mgmt. Agency 500 C Street, S.W.
Washington, DC 20472 Stanley W. Knowles Richard E. Sullivan Board of Selectmen Mayor ',
P.O. Box 710 City Hall North Hampton, NH 03862 Newburyport, MA 01950 J.P. Nadeau, Selectman Alfred V. Sargent, Chairman Selectmen's Office Board of Selectmen 10 Central Road Town of Salisbury Rya, NH 03870 Salisbury, MA 01950 Senator Gordon J. Humphrey Senator Gordon J. Humphrey U.S. Senate One Eagle Square, Suite 507 Washington, DC 20510 Concord, NH 0301 (Attn: Tom Burack) (Attn: Herb Boynton)
William Armstrong Allen Lampert Civil Defense Director Civil Defense Director 10 Front Street Town of Brentwood f Exeter, NH 03833 Exeter, NH 03833 Richard A. Hampe, 6:sq. Gary W. Holmes, Esq.
Hampe and McNicholas Holmes and Ells 35 Pleasant Street 47 Winnacunnet Road Concord, NH 03301 Hampton, NH 03842 Charles P. Graham, Esq. Calvin A. Canney, City Manager McKay, Murphy & Graham City Hall 100 Main Street 126 Daniel Street Amesbury, MA 01913 Portsmouth, NH 03801 1 2 l
F .
.o Sandra Gavutis Brentwood Board of Selectmen Town of Kensington RFD Dalton Road RFD 1, Box 1154 Brentwood, NH 03833 East Kensington, NH 03827 Robert Carrigg, Chairman Mr. Thomas H. Powers, III Board of Selectmen Town Manager Town Office. Town of Exeter Atlantic Avenue . 10 Front Sreet No. Hampton, NH 03862 Exeter, NH 03833 Judith H. Mizner, Esq.
Silvergate, Gertner, Baker, Fine, Good & Mizner 88 Broad Street Boston, MA 02110
- Gary J. Edles
- Alan S. Rosenthal, Chairman Atomic Safety & Licensing Atomic Safety & Licensing Appeal Board Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.
East West Towers Building East West Towers Building Third Floor Mailroom Third Floor Mailroom 4350 East West Highway 4350 East West Highway Bethesda, MD 20814 Bethesda, MD 20814
- Howard A. Wilber Atomic Safety & Licensing Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission East West Towers Building Third Floor Mailroom 4350 East West Highway Bethesda, MD 20814 gV
~
,, \ ~~ .
" ~
\\ e ,
Matthew T. Brock .'
- UPS Next Day Air g 3
l
._. . _ - - _ . _ _ . ___ _