|
---|
Category:INTERROGATORIES; RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES
MONTHYEARML20066A3931990-12-26026 December 1990 Commonwealth of Ma Atty General Response to Licensee First Set of Interrogatories Re Remanded Massachussetts Teacher Issues.W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20065T9551990-12-10010 December 1990 Licensee First Set of Interrogatories & First Request for Production of Documents to Commonwealth of Ma Atty General Re Remanded Massachusetts Teacher Issues.* W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20246H7051989-05-0505 May 1989 Applicant Supplementary Response to Intervenors Discovery Requests.* Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20245E6531989-04-21021 April 1989 Commonwealth of Ma Atty General Supplemental Answer to Applicant Expert Witness Interrogatories.* Prof Qualifications of Expert Witnesses Encl.W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20248F8531989-04-0303 April 1989 Applicant Voluntary Responses to Commonwealth of Ma Atty General Interrogatories on Use of Bed Buses & Seabrook Plan for Commonwealth of Ma Communities.* Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20248F6691989-04-0303 April 1989 Applicant Supplemental Answers to Commonwealth of Ma Atty General Expert Witness Interrogatory.* Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20247A5721989-03-24024 March 1989 Applicant Voluntary Responses to Commonwealth of Ma Atty General Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents That Pertain to Exercise Areas Requiring Corrective....* W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20247A5921989-03-24024 March 1989 Applicant Voluntary Responses to Commonwealth of Ma Atty General Requests for Documents & Info on Exercise.* W/ Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20236D5001989-03-16016 March 1989 NRC Staff Further Supplemental Response to Town of Hampton First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents to NRC Staff on 880628-29 Exercise (Exercise).* Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20236C2161989-03-10010 March 1989 NRC Staff Supplemental Response to Town of Hampton First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents to NRC Staff on 880628-29 Exercise.* W/Certificate of Svc. Related Correspondence ML20236C3901989-03-0808 March 1989 NRC Staff Supplemental Response to Town of Amesbury First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents to NRC on Seabrook Plan for Commonwealth of Ma Communities (Spmc).* W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20236A4311989-03-0707 March 1989 Applicant Supplemental Answers to Intervenors Interrogatories Re Transportation Resources.* Supporting Info & Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20235V6971989-02-28028 February 1989 Applicant Supplemental Answers to Intervenor Expert Witness Interrogatories.* Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20235N1821989-02-21021 February 1989 FEMA Responses to Town of Hampton First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents to FEMA on 880628-29 Exercise.* W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20206M9271988-11-22022 November 1988 Town of West Newbury Response to NRC Staff Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories & Production of Documents by Town of West Newbury.* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20206M9461988-11-22022 November 1988 Responses of FEMA to Town of Amesbury First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents to FEMA on Seabrook Plan for Commonwealth of Ma Communities.* W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20206J8331988-11-21021 November 1988 New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution Second Set of Supplemental Answers to Applicant First Set of Interrogatories Etc & Answers to Applicant Interrogatories & Request For....* Svc List Encl.Related Correspondence ML20206J6811988-11-15015 November 1988 Answers of Commonwealth of Ma Atty General to Applicant Request for Admissions to Commonwealth of Ma Atty General.* Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20206J6581988-11-15015 November 1988 Joint Intervenors Answers to Applicant Request for Admissions to Intervenors.* Related Correspondence ML20206J6381988-11-15015 November 1988 Commonwealth of Ma Atty General Response to Applicant Second Request for Protection of Documents.* Atty General Will Produce Response Documents from Agencies Listed in Response 2.Related Correspondence ML20206J8691988-11-15015 November 1988 Applicant Response to Commonwealth of Ma Atty General Second Request for Production of Documents to Applicant Re Seabrook Plan for Commonwealth of Ma Communities.* Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20206C5561988-11-11011 November 1988 Seacoast Anti-Pollution League Response to Applicant Second Request for Production of Documents to All Intervenor & Participating Local Govts Concerning Joint Intervenor Contentions.* Svc List Encl.Related Correspondence ML20206C5641988-11-0707 November 1988 Applicant Response to Town of Amesbury First Request for Production of Documents to Applicant on Seabrook Plan for Commonwealth of Ma Communities.* Certificate of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML20206C2611988-11-0404 November 1988 Responses of FEMA to Commonwealth of Ma Atty General First Request for Production of Documents to FEMA Re Seabrook Plan for Commonwealth of Ma Communities.* Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20205R7461988-11-0404 November 1988 Errata to Applicant Response to Town of Amesbury First Set of Interrogatories to Applicant on Seabrook Plan for Commonwealth of Ma Communities.* W/Certificate of Svc. Related Correspondence ML20205R6901988-11-0404 November 1988 Errata to Applicant Response to Commonwealth of Ma Atty General First Set of Interrogatories to Applicant on Seabrook Plan for Commonwealth of Ma Communities.* W/ Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20205R5781988-11-0303 November 1988 Applicant Response to Commonwealth of Ma Atty General First Request for Production of Documents to Applicant Re Seabrook Plan for Commonwealth of Ma Communities.* W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20205R6541988-11-0202 November 1988 Town of Ambesbury Response to Applicant Second Request for Production of Documents to All Intervenors & Participating Local Govts Concerning Joint Intervenor Contentions.* W/ Related Info & Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20205R5621988-11-0101 November 1988 Applicant Response to Commonwealth of Ma (Mass Ag) Second Set of Interrogatories to Applicant on Seabrook Plan for Commonwealth of Ma Communities.* W/Certificate of Svc. Related Correspondence ML20205N3061988-10-31031 October 1988 New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution Supplemental Answers to Applicant First Set of Interrogatories,Etc & Answers to Applicant Interrogatories & Request for Production Of....* W/Svc List.Related Correspondence ML20205N3351988-10-31031 October 1988 Town of West Newbury Supplemental Answers to Applicant First Set of Interrogatories & First Request for Production of Documents to All Parties & Participating Local Govts Re Contentions.* W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20205N3681988-10-27027 October 1988 Seacoast Anti-Pollution League Response to Applicant Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents to All Intervenors & Participating Local Govts Concerning Joint Intervenor....* W/Svc List.Related Correspondence ML20205F9561988-10-26026 October 1988 Commonwealth of Ma Atty General Jm Shannon Answers & Responses to NRC Staff Second Set of Interrogatories & Second Request for Documents.* Notice of Depositions & Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20205K2331988-10-26026 October 1988 NRC Staff Response to Town of Amesbury First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents to NRC on Seabrook Plan for Commonwealth of Ma Communities.* W/ Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20205F8001988-10-25025 October 1988 Seacoast Anti-Pollution League Supplemental Answer to Applicant First Set of Interrogatories,Per Board Orders of 881018 & 19.* Supporting Documentation & Svc List Encl. Related Correspondence ML20205F7541988-10-25025 October 1988 Town of Amesbury First Suppl to NRC Staff First Set of Interrogatories & First Request for Production of Documents to Towns of Amesbury,Newbury,Salisbury,West Newbury & Merrimac & City of Newburyport.* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20205K4191988-10-25025 October 1988 Applicant Response to Commonwealth of Ma Atty General First Set of Interrogatories to Applicant on Seabrook Plan for Commonwealth of Ma Communities.* Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20205F9931988-10-25025 October 1988 Response of Commonwealth of Ma Atty General to NRC Staff Third Set of Interrrogatories & Request for Production.* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20205G0351988-10-24024 October 1988 Applicant Response to Town of Amesbury First Set of Interrogatories...To Applicant on Seabrook Plan for Commonwealth of Ma Communities.* Supporting Info & Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20205E3571988-10-24024 October 1988 Commonwealth of Ma Atty General Supplemental Response to NRC Staff First Set of Interrogatories & First Request for Documents.* Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20205D7771988-10-19019 October 1988 Commonwealth of Ma Atty General Second Request for Production of Documents to Applicant Re Seabrook Plan for Commonwealth of Ma Communities.* Related Correspondence ML20205D6951988-10-19019 October 1988 Commonwealth of Ma Atty General Second Set of Interrogatories to Applicant on Seabrook Plan for Commonwealth of Ma Communities.* Related Correspondence ML20205D8101988-10-19019 October 1988 Commonwealth of Ma Atty General First Request for Production Documents to FEMA Re Seabrook Plan for Commonwealth of Ma Communities.* W/Notice of Deposition of R Donovan on 881109 & Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20205D7401988-10-14014 October 1988 Applicant Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents to All Intervenors & Participating Local Govts Concerning Joint Intervenor Contentions 6 & 27-63.* W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20204F9541988-10-14014 October 1988 Applicant Second Request for Production of Documents to All Intervenors & Participating Local Govts Concerning Joint Intervenor Contentions.* Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20155H4241988-10-11011 October 1988 Applicant Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents to All Intervenors & Participating Local Govts Concerning Joint Intervenor Contentions 1-26.* Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20155H3181988-10-0707 October 1988 Commonwealth of Ma Atty General Supplemental Responses to Applicant First Set of Interrogatories.* Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20155H3111988-10-0707 October 1988 Commonwealth of Ma Atty General First Set of Interrogatories to Applicant on Seabrook Plan for Commonwealth of Ma Communities.* Related Correspondence ML20155H0081988-10-0606 October 1988 Town of Amesbury Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents to FEMA on Seabrook Plan for Commonwealth of Ma Communities (Spmc).* Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20204G5731988-10-0606 October 1988 NRC Staff Third Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents to Towns of Amesbury,Newbury, Salisbury,West Newbury & Merrimac & City of Newburyport....* W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence 1990-12-26
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20217H9511999-10-21021 October 1999 Memorandum & Order.* Proceeding Re Nepco 990315 Application Seeking Commission Approval of Indirect License Transfers Consolidated,Petitioners Granted Standing & Two Issues Admitted.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 991021 ML20217N2561999-10-21021 October 1999 Transcript of Affirmation Session on 990121 in Rockville, Maryland Re Memorandum & Order Responding to Petitions to Intervene Filed by co-owners of Seabrook Station Unit 1 & Millstone Station Unit Three.Pp 1-3 ML20211L5141999-09-0202 September 1999 Comment on Draft Reg Guide DG-4006, Demonstrating Compliance with Radiological Criteria for License Termination. Author Requests Info as to When Seabrook Station Will Be Shut Down ML20211J1451999-08-24024 August 1999 Comment Opposing NRC Consideration of Waiving Enforcement Action Against Plants That Operate Outside Terms of Licenses Due to Y2K Problems ML20210S5641999-08-13013 August 1999 Motion of Connecticut Light & Power Co,Western Massachusetts Electric Co & North Atlantic Energy Corp to Strike Unauthorized Response of Nepco.* Unauthorized Response Fails to Comply with Commission Policy.With Certificate of Svc ML20210Q7531999-08-11011 August 1999 Order Approving Application Re Corporate Merger (Canal Electric Co). Canal Shall Provide Director of NRR Copy of Any Application,At Time Filed to Transfer Grants of Security Interests or Liens from Canal to Proposed Parent ML20210P6271999-08-10010 August 1999 Response of New England Power Company.* Nu Allegations Unsupported by Any Facts & No Genuine Issues of Matl Facts in Dispute.Commission Should Approve Application Without Hearing ML20210H8311999-08-0303 August 1999 Reply of Connecticut Light & Power Co,Western Massachusetts Electric Co & North Atlantic Energy Corp to Response of New England Power Co to Requests for Hearing.* Petitioners Request Hearing on Stated Issues.With Certificate of Svc ML20210J8501999-08-0303 August 1999 Order Approving Transfer of License & Conforming Amend.North Atlantic Energy Service Corp Authorized to Act as Agent for Joint Owners of Seabrook Unit 1 ML20211J1551999-07-30030 July 1999 Comment Opposing That NRC Allow Seabrook NPP to Operate Outside of Technical Specifications Due to Possible Y2K Problems ML20210E3011999-07-27027 July 1999 Response of New England Power Co to Requests for Hearing. Intervenors Have Presented No Justification for Oral Hearing in This Proceeding.Commission Should Reject Intervenors Request for Oral Hearing & Approve Application ML20209H9101999-07-20020 July 1999 Motion of Connecticut Light & Power Co & North Atlantic Energy Corp for Leave to Intervene & Petition for Hearing.* with Certificate of Svc & Notice of Appearance ML20195H1911999-06-15015 June 1999 Application of Montaup Electric Co & New England Power Co for Transfer of Licenses & Ownership Interests.Requests That Commission Consent to Two Indirect Transfers of Control & Direct Transfer ML20206A1611999-04-26026 April 1999 Memorandum & Order.* Informs That Montaup,Little Bay Power Corp & Nepco Settled Differences Re Transfer of Ownership of Seabrook Unit 1.Intervention Petition Withdrawn & Proceeding Terminated.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 990426 ML20205M7621999-04-15015 April 1999 Notice of Withdrawal of Intervention of New England Power Co.* New England Power Co Requests That Intervention in Proceeding Be Withdrawn & Hearing & Related Procedures Be Terminated.With Certificate of Svc CLI-99-06, Order.* Joint Request for ten-day Extension of Schedule Set Forth in CLI-99-06 in Order to Facilitate Parties Settlement Efforts Granted,With Exception of Date of Hearing. with Certificate of Svc.Served on 9904071999-04-0707 April 1999 Order.* Joint Request for ten-day Extension of Schedule Set Forth in CLI-99-06 in Order to Facilitate Parties Settlement Efforts Granted,With Exception of Date of Hearing. with Certificate of Svc.Served on 990407 ML20205G0921999-04-0505 April 1999 Joint Motion of All Active Participants for 10 Day Extension to Permit Continuation of Settlement Discussion.* Participants Request That Procedural Schedule Be Extended by 10 Days.With Certificate of Svc ML20205G3091999-03-31031 March 1999 Petition That Individuals Responsible for Discrimination Against Contract Electrician at Plant as Noted in OI Rept 1-98-005 Be Banned by NRC from Participation in Licensed Activities for at Least 5 Yrs ML20204E6401999-03-24024 March 1999 Protective Order.* Issues Protective Order to Govern Use of All Proprietary Data Contained in License Transfer Application or in Participants Written Submission & Oral Testimony.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 990324 ML20204G7671999-03-23023 March 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.54(a) Re Direct Final Rule,Changes to QA Programs ML20207K1941999-03-12012 March 1999 North Atlantic Energy Svc Corp Participation in Proceeding.* Naesco Wished to Remain on Svc List for All Filings.Option to Submit post-hearing Amicus Curiae Brief Will Be Retained by Naesco.With Certificate of Svc ML20207H4921999-02-12012 February 1999 Comment on Draft Contingency Plan for Year 2000 Issue in Nuclear Industry.Util Agrees to Approach Proposed by NEI ML20203F9471999-02-0909 February 1999 License Transfer Application Requesting NRC Consent to Indirect Transfer of Control of Interest in Operating License NPF-86 ML20199F7641999-01-21021 January 1999 Answer of Montaup Electric Co to Motion of Ui for Leave to Intervene & Petition to Allow Intervention out-of-time.* Requests Motion Be Denied on Basis of Late Filing.With Certificate of Svc ML20199H0451999-01-21021 January 1999 Answer of Little Bay Power Corp to Motion of Ui for Leave to Intervene & Petition to Allow Intervention out-of-time.* Requests That Ui Petition to Intervene & for Hearing Be Denied for Reasons Stated.With Certificate of Svc ML20199D2461999-01-19019 January 1999 Supplemental Affidavit of Js Robinson.* Affidavit of Js Robinson Providing Info Re Financial Results of Baycorp Holding Ltd & Baycorp Subsidiary,Great Bay Power Corp. with Certificate of Svc ML20199D2311999-01-19019 January 1999 Response of New England Power Co to Answers of Montaup Electric Co & Little Bay Power Corp.* Nep Requests That Nep Be Afforded Opportunity to File Appropriate Rule Challenge with Commission Pursuant to 10CFR2.1329 ML20206R1041999-01-13013 January 1999 Answer of Little Bay Power Corp to Motion of New England Power Co for Leave to Intervene & Petition for Summary Relief Or,In Alternative,For Hearing.* with Certificate of Svc ML20206Q8451999-01-12012 January 1999 Written Comments of Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Co.* Requests That Commission Consider Potential Financial Risk to Other Joint Owners Associated with License Transfer.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 990114 ML20199A4741999-01-12012 January 1999 Answer of Montaup Electric Co to Motion of Nepco for Leave to Intervene & Petition for Summary Relief Or,In Alternative,For Hearing.* Nepco 990104 Motion Should Be Denied for Reasons Stated.With Certificate of Svc ML20206Q0151999-01-12012 January 1999 North Atlantic Energy Svc Corp Answer to Petition to Intervene of New England Power Co.* If Commission Deems It Appropriate to Explore Issues Further in Subpart M Hearing Context,Naesco Will Participate.With Certificate of Svc ML20199A4331999-01-11011 January 1999 Motion of United Illuminating Co for Leave to Intervene & Petition to Allow Intervention out-of-time.* Company Requests That Petition to Allow Intervention out-of-time Be Granted.With Certificate of Svc ML20198P7181998-12-31031 December 1998 Motion of Nepco for Leave to Intervene & Petition for Summary Relief Or,In Alternative,For Hearing.* Moves to Intervene in Transfer of Montaup Seabrook Ownership Interest & Petitions for Summary Relief or for Hearing ML20198P7551998-12-30030 December 1998 Affidavit of J Robinson.* Affidavit of J Robinson Describing Events to Date in New England Re Premature Retirement of Npps,Current Plans to Construct New Generation in Region & Impact on Seabrook Unit 1 Operation.With Certificate of Svc ML20195K4061998-11-24024 November 1998 Memorandum & Order.* North Atlantic Energy Services Corp Granted Motion to Withdraw Proposed Amends & Dismiss Related Adjudicatory Proceedings as Moot.Board Decision LBP-98-23 Vacated.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 981124 ML20155J1071998-11-0909 November 1998 NRC Staff Answer to North Atlantic Energy Svc Corp Motion for Leave to File Reply.* Staff Does Not Object to North Atlantic Energy Svc Corp Motion.With Certificate of Svc ML20155D0041998-10-30030 October 1998 Motion for Leave to File Reply.* Licensee Requests Leave to Reply to Petitioner 981026 Response to Licensee 981015 Motion to Terminate Proceedings.Reply Necessary to Assure That Commission Is Fully Aware of Licensee Position ML20155D0121998-10-30030 October 1998 Reply to Petitioner Response to Motion to Terminate Proceedings.* Licensee Views Segmentation Issue as Moot & Requests Termination of Subj Proceedings.With Certificate of Svc ML20155B1641998-10-26026 October 1998 Response to Motion by Naesco to Withdraw Applications & to Terminate Proceedings.* If Commission Undertakes to Promptly Proceed on Issue on Generic Basis,Sapl & Necnp Will Have No Objection to Naesco Motion.With Certificate of Svc ML20154K8751998-10-15015 October 1998 Motion to Withdraw Applications & to Terminate Proceedings.* NRC Does Not Intend to Oppose Motion.With Certificate of Svc ML17265A8071998-10-0606 October 1998 Comment on Integrated Review of Assessment Process for Commercial Npps.Util Endorses Comments Being Provided by NEI on Behalf of Nuclear Industry ML20154C8171998-10-0606 October 1998 Notice of Appointment of Adjudicatory Employee.* Notice Given That W Reckley Appointed as Commission Adjudicatory Employee to Advise Commission on Issues Related to Review of LBP-98-23.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 981006 CLI-98-18, Order.* Grants Joint Motion Filed by Naesco,Sapl & Necnp for Two Week Deferral of Briefing Schedule Set by Commission in CLI-98-18.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 9810061998-10-0505 October 1998 Order.* Grants Joint Motion Filed by Naesco,Sapl & Necnp for Two Week Deferral of Briefing Schedule Set by Commission in CLI-98-18.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 981006 ML20153H4471998-10-0101 October 1998 Joint Motion of Schedule Deferral.* Naesco,Sapl & Necnp Jointly Request Temporary Deferral of Briefing Schedule as Established by Commission Order of 980917 (CLI-98-18). with Certificate of Svc ML20154F9891998-09-29029 September 1998 License Transfer Application Requesting Consent for Transfer of Montaup Electric Co Interest in Operating License NPF-86 for Seabrook Station,Unit 1,to Little Bay Power Corp ML20154D7381998-09-21021 September 1998 Affidavit of FW Getman Requesting Exhibit 1 to License Transfer Application Be Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR2.790 ML20153C7791998-09-18018 September 1998 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors.Util Endorses NRC Staff Focus on Operability & Funtionality of Equipment & NEI Comments ML20151Z5611998-09-18018 September 1998 Order.* Pursuant to Commission Order CLI-98-18 Re Seabrook Unit 1 Proceeding,Schedule Described in Board 980904 Memorandum & Order Hereby Revoked Pending Further Action. with Certificate of Svc.Served on 980918 ML20151Y0331998-09-17017 September 1998 Order.* All Parties,Including Util,May File Brief No Later than 981007.Brief Shall Not Exceed 30 Pages.Commission May Schedule Oral Argument to Discuss Issues,After Receiving Responses.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 980917 ML20153E8771998-09-16016 September 1998 Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1633, Assessment of Use of Potassium Iodide (Ki) as Protective Action During Severe Reactor Accidents. Recommends That NRC Reverse Decision to Revise Emergency Planning Regulation as Listed 1999-09-02
[Table view] |
Text
_ _ _
L s-
, REl.ATED CORRESPO.NQEg .
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA USNRC -
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION M iEB 29 Fi:58 ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENS;NG' BOARD QHICT U ICLm.w? *'
l Before Administrative Judges: uGCXCI H;r. q;eggy ,
Ivan W. Smith, Chairman ~ U "".T Gustave A. Linenberger,.Jr._ ' '
Dr. Jerry Harbour
)
In the Matter of )
)
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW ) Docket Nos.
HAMPSHIRE, ET AL. ) 50-443/444-OL (Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2) ) (Off-Site EP)
)
) February 24, 1988 ATTORNEY GENERAL JAMES M. SHANNON'S OFF-SITE EP INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO THE APPLICANTS (SET NO. 3) i Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 52.740 and 2.740b, Attorney General James M. Shannon hereby propounds the following interrogatories to the Applicants These interrogatories are to be answered in writing on or before March 28, 1988 and under oath by an employee, representative, or agent with personal konvledge of the facts or information requested in each interr )ry.
Definitions As rised in these interrogatories, the following terms have the following meanings:
(($
0
e
- 1. "Litigate" with regard to a topic or contention means to offer direct testimony relating to, to cross-examine on, to offer propoced findings or rulings regarding, or to urge the donial (or allowance subject to conditions) of the pending application on the basis of the topic or contention.
2 "Document" .. ans any written or graphic matter of communication, however produced or reproduced, and is intended to oe comprehensive and include without limitation any and all correspondence, letters, telegrams, agreements, notes, contracts, instructions, reports, demands, memoranda, data, senedules, notices, work papers, recordings, shether electronic or by other means, computer data, computer printouts, photographs, microfilm, microfiche, charts, analyses, intra-corporate or intra-office communications, notebooks, diaries, sketches, diagrams, forms, manuals, brochures, lists, publications, drafts, telephone minutes, minutes of meetings, statements, calendars, journals, orders, confirmations and all other written or graphic materials of any nature whatsoever.
- 3. "Identify" wich respect to any document means to state ene following respecting the document: .ts title, its date, the author of the document, the person to whom the document was sent, all persons who received or reviewed the document, the substance and nature of the document, and the present custodian of tne document and of any and all copies of the document.
2-
~
4 _ . . . _ .. . _ _
_O
- 4. "Identify" with respect to any action or conduct means to state the following regarding any such action or conduct:
the person or persons proposing and taking such action the date such action was_ proposed and/or taken; all persons with knowledge or information'about such action; tne purpose or proposed effect of such action; any document recording or documenting such action.
- 5. "Describe" with respect to any action or matter means to state _the following regarding such action or matter: the
. substance or nature of such action or_ matter; the persons participating in or having knowledge of such action or matter; the current and past business positions and addresses of such persons; the existence and location of any and all documents relating to such action or matter.
- 6. "Identify" with respect to an expert witness means to state:
(a) The name, mailing address, age and presen professional or employment affiliation of the pe. son; (c) The profession or occupation and field of claimed I
expertise of the person; (c) The history of formal education or tra!.ning of the person, including, but not limited to, (i) the name and i
address of each school where the person received special l t
l education or training, (ii) the date those schools were f attended, and (iii) a description of each degree earned, f L
including the cate and granting institution; [
[
l i
i
'd) The history of specialized training in the area of claimed expertise, including, but not limited to, (i) the type of training received, (ii) the name and address of the institution providing :his training, and (iii) the dates of such training; (e) A list of publications of any kind by the person in the area of claimed expertise, including, but not limited to, (i) the title and subject natter, (ii) the name and address of the publisher, and (iii) the date of publication; (f) A list of any and all licenses in the area of claimed expertise, including, but not limited to, (i) the designation of the authority by which the license was issued, (ii) the date(s) of the licensiiig, (iii) the requirements for obtaining each license, and (iv) the manner by which these requirements were met; (g) The amount of time the person has worked in the field of claimed expertise, stating periods where work was other than on a full-time basist (h) The name and address of every person, or every corporation or other institution, that has employed the person within the last ten years of employment; (i) All periods of claimed self-employment, including a description of all duties and responsibilities thereof; (j) All previous experience in ene field of claimed expertise which involved problems, analyses or studies similar to those concerning which the person is expected to testify in this proceeding; 4 -
(k) All other litigation in which the person has been consulted, specifying those matters in which the person has testified, including the name of the case or matter and the court or other forum in which testimony was given; and (1) Any other experience in the field of claimed expertise.
7 "Identify" with respect to a non-expert witness neans to state:
(a) The name, mailing address, age and present professional or employment affiliation of the witness; (o) The profession or occupation of the witness; (c) The name of the supervisor and department of the witness; (d) The current employment or professional relationship, if any, between the witness and your (e) The past employment or professional relationship between the witness and you, including the dates of that relationship; and (f) All litigation in which the person has testified on any matter in which you have had an interest, including the name of the case or matter and the court or other forum in which testimony was given.
Wherever appearing in these interrogatories, the masculine form is defined to include the feminine and/or the neuter and the singular form is defined to include the plural wherever necessary to apply tne context to any factual situation that may oxist or to render the interrogatory more inclusive in scope.
Notice Regarding Supplementation Your attention is called to the provisions of 10 C.F.R.
S 2.740(e) regarding your obligation to supplenent interrogatories and requests for the production of documents.
Request for the Production of Documents Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. S 2.741, you are hereby requested r.o produce, for inspectio and copying, each document identified in response to these interrogatories and each document required to be identified in response to theae interrogatories, at the offices of Attorney General James M. Shannon, Room 1902, One Ashburton Place, Boston, MA 02108 on March 28, 1988 at 10:00 o' clock a.m., attn.: Carol Sneider, Assistant Attorney General. Each document produced in response to this request should be labeled to indicate the interrogatory or interrogatories in response to which it is produced.
INTERROGATORIES
- 1. Identify all documents on which you will rely to support your position on the sheltering contentions, and nroduce all such documents not previously produced. Identify the information in each document on which you wil?. rely and the specific subpart of each contention which that. information Concerns.
- 2. State wnether you have relied, do rely, or will rely on any study, calculation, or analysis to support you: position on the sheltering contentions. If so, to the extent you have not already done so, please:
y_ _ _
- a. Describe the nature of the study, calculation or dnalysis and identify any documents that discuss or describe the study, calculation or analysis;
- b. Identify the persons who performed the stady, calculation or analysis;
- c. State when and where the study, calculation or analysis was performed;
- d. Describe in detail the information or data that was studied, calcolated or analyzed;
- e. Describe the results of the study, calculation or analysis;
- f. Explain how such study, calculation, or analysis provides support for your position on each of these contentions.
- 3. Do you intend to offer the testimony of any expert witness witn respect to sheltering contentions? If so, please:
- a. Identify each expert witness who you intend to present with respect to each subpart of each such contention;
- b. State the substance of the facts to which each expert witness is expected to testify;
- c. State the substance of the opinion or opinions to which each expert witness is expected to testify;
- d. Provide a summary of the grounds for each opinion to wnich each expert witness is expected to testify;
- e. State whether the facts and opinions listed in response to the foregoing are contained in any document;
- f. State whether the opinion of any expert witness is based in whole or in part on any scientific rule or principle, and, if so, set forth such rule or principle;
- g. State whether the opinion of any expert witness is based in whole or in part on any code or regulation, governmental or otherwise, and, if so, identify each such code or regulation and the specific section or portion thereof relied upon; and
- 7-
- n. State whether the opinion of any expert witness is based in whole or in part upon any scientific or engineering book or other publication, and, if so, identify the book or publication.
- 4. Do you intend to offer the testimony of any non-expert witness with respect to the sheltering contentions to be litigated by the Attorney General? If so, please:
- a. Identify each non-expert witness who you intend to present with respect to each subpart of each such contention;
- b. State the substance of the facts to which each non-expert witness is expected to testify; and
- c. State whether the facts listed in response to the foregoing are contained in any document, and produce the same.
- 5. Identify, as defined in Paragraph 4, all experts and other persons you have retained to prepare testimony on the sheltering contentions and all experts and other persons wien whom you have consulted in preparation of any testimony on the. sheltering contentions, whether or not you have decided to introduce such testimony, and for each such person, please:
- a. Identify the contention or subpart of the contention on which he was consulted, or on which he has or is preparing testimony;
- b. State the substance of the facts to which each expert may testify
- c. State the substance of the opinion or opinions to which each expert may testify:
- d. Provide a summary of the grounds for each opinion to wnich each expert may testify;
- e. State whether the facts and opinions listed in response to the foregoing are contained in any document; S.
l l
O 6
- f. State whether the opinion of any expert is based in whole or in part on any scientific rule or principle, and, if so, set forth such rule or principle;
- g. State whether the opinion of any expert is based in whole or in part on any code or regulation, governnental or othewise, and, if so, identify each such code or regulation and the specific section or portion thereof relied upon; and
- h. State whether the opinion of any expert is based in whole or in part upon any scientific or engineering book or other publication, and, if so, identify the book or publication.
- 6. In accordance with 10 C.F.R. S 2.740(e), please supplement your answers with respect to sheltering contentions to Massachusetts Attorney General's Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents, filed March 5, 1987 and May 19, 1987 7 State how and in what manner, if any, your current position with respect to sheltering the summer beach population diilers from the position articulated in Applicants' prefiled Direct Testimony No. 6 on Sheltering, dated September 10, 1987, and provide, for each specific change in position, the basis for that change, including all supporting documentatio'.
- 8. On p. 3, at 5 2, of the "New Hampshire Response to FEMA Supplemental Testimor y' ("dH Response") it is stated with respect to the State's position on sheltering, "This position does not preclude the State from considering and selecting sheltering as a protective action for the beach population." Please identify and describe:
- a. under what conditions the State would consider and migne select sheltering as a protective action for the oeach population;
- b. the neans by which the beach population will be instructed to shelter, including any emergency messages;
- c. now the buildings which will shelter the beach population will be identified;
- d. the specific buildings which will oe relied upon to shelter the beach population;
- e. the personnel who may be employed to assist the beach population in seeking shelter, including the numbers of such personnel who may be available and a description of any training such personnel will receive certinent to that tasks and
- f. any agreements, understandings, or other connunications with the owners of buildings that may be used as public shelters relating to the owners' consent to use their buildings as public shelters in the event of an accident at Seabrook Station, 9 On page 22 of Applicants' Direct Testimony flo. 6 (Sheltering), dated September 10, 1987, it is stated with respect to ene beach population, that:
Sheltering for example may be the appropriate protective action for a puff release -- a gaseous or gaseous and particulate release -- of less than two nours duration. (Manual of Protective Action Guides, U.S. EPA, p. 129.)
Do you still contend that sheltering of the beach population may be the appropriate p.otective action for a puff release of less than two hours duration?
10 Do you anticipate that there might be circumstances in which transients with access to transportation would be instructed to shelter?
10 -
- 11. Please define the term "transient beach population" as used in the !1H Response, stating whether the term applies only to day-trippers to the beach area or whether it also includes overnight visitors staying .in notels, hotels or rental cottages.
- 12. On page 4 of the ilH Response it is stated, "The addition of these precautionary measures alleviates most concerns about sheltering the beach population." What State concerns does it not alleviate?
- 13. On p. 4 of ne :1H Response it is stated, "These precautionary actions and the Stata emphasis on getting the population out early are consisten: with actions planned at other nuclear power plant sites with transient populations."
- a. What are the "other nuclear power plant sites" referred to in the above sentence?
- b. What is the size of the transient populations at these other sites?
- c. What are une evacuation time estimates for the transient populations at these other nuclear power plant sites?
- d. What is the proximity of the transient populations at these other sites to the nuclear power plant?
- e. Is any sheltering available for the transient populations at these other sites, and, if so, what are the Dose Reduction Factors (DRF) of these shelters?
- 14. On p. 7 of the NH Response, it is stated: "It Ithe Shelter Study) identified a large number of shelte:s that may serve as a pool from which public shelter choices will be made."
Please answer:
O
- a. How and when will such choices be made?
- b. On what criteria will the choices be based?
- 15. Provide copies of all draft or proposed amendments to the NHRERP concerning protective actions for the beach population that the State is presently considering and for each proposed amendment:
- a. state whether the State has any present intention to adopt such amendment;
- b. describe the aceps that must be taken before such amendment is adopted;
- c. provide the anticipated date by which such amendment will be adopted;
- d. state whether there are any considerations against cdopting such amendment, and the basis of such considerations; and
- e. provide any proposed changes to the draft amendment.
- 16. Does the term "beach population" as used in the NH Response include permanent residents of the Seabrook and Hampton beach area?
17 Do you foresee any situation in which the transient beach population would be instructed to evacuate and the residents of the Seabrook and Hamption beach area instructed to shelter?
- 18. On page 29 of Applicants' Direct Testimony No. 6 it states:
The result of the residential survey showed that 34 percent of 3,036 residences in Hampton Beach and 51 percent of 758 residences in Seabrook Beach provide basement and masonry sheltering capability.
Tne remaining percentage of residences provide sheltering characteristics at least as effective as that assumed by the NHRERP, The field survey revealed very few wood-frame residences that would not meet these sheltering characteristics.
4 s
Please produce such survey, and all documentation, notes, calculations and memosanda pertinent thereto, and for each residence surveyed:
- a. prcride the address of the residence; b.. indicate the type of residence, e.g., whether it is an apartment, house, condominium, etc.
- c. indicate whether the residence has a basement or nasonry sheltering capability;
- d. indicate whether the residence does or does not "provide sheltering characteristics at least as effective as that assumed by the NHRERP.*
- 19. On what basis do you contend that the sirens in the beach area, when used in the voice mode to instruct the beach population, can be intelligably heard and understood by all persons in the beach area't Please provide copies of any and all documentation, calculations and analyses including any acoustical tests, that form, or are in any way relevant to, the basis for your response, whether or not it supports your response.
JAMES M. SHANNON ATTORNEY GENERAL By: A Carol S. Sneider Assistant Attorney General Department of the Attorney Gener:1 One Ashburton Place, Rm. 1902 i Boston, Massachusetts 02108 (617)727-2265 i
Date: February 24, 1988