ML20150D102

From kanterella
Revision as of 22:10, 25 October 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Finds Recipient Has Not Addressed All Matters Required for Cessar Sys 80 Preliminary Design Analysis Extension.When Info Is received,PDA-2 Will Be Extended for 2 Addl Years
ML20150D102
Person / Time
Site: 05000470
Issue date: 11/22/1978
From: Heltemes C
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Scherer A
ABB COMBUSTION ENGINEERING NUCLEAR FUEL (FORMERLY
References
NUDOCS 7812040203
Download: ML20150D102 (3)


Text

,

~ ~ , s x.i i e  ! w <

Distribution:

Docket File SB Chron SB Reading NOV P 21978 WPGammill Docket No. STN 50-470 H Gearin I Villalva NRC PDA Mr. A. E. Scherer, Licensing l tanager Combustion Engineering, Inc.

1000 Prospect Hill Road i Windsor, Connecticut 06095 '

Dear Mr. Scherer:

SUBJECT:

EXTENSION OF PDA-2 FOR THE CESSAR SYSTDt 80 DESIGN

References:

1) NRC Letter, R. S. Doyd to P. L. McGill, dated l October 19, 1978. i
2) C-E letter (LD-78-073), A. E. Scherer to C. J.

Heltemes, Jr., dated October 20, 1978.

3) C-E letter (LD-78-031), A. E. Scherer to R. S.

Boyd, dated November 8,1978.

Reference 1 identifies the RRRC Category I, II and III matters, and the HRR Category IV matters that must be addressed by C-E in order to extend the CESSAR System 80 PDA (PDA-2) for two additional years. Reference 1

'also describes the review process that will be undertaken by the NRC prior to extanding PDA-2.

C-E transmitted the CESSAP. System 80 FSAR for docketing considerations and an Appendix A to the FSAR as enclosures to Reference 2. Appendix A addresses most of the Category I, II and III matters that are applicable to the System 80 design. Although the Category IV matters are not addressed, Reference 2 includes a commitment to address the applicable Category IV matters on or about December 1,1978. Thus, C-E has not yet addressed all the matters required for a PDA extension.

In Reference 3, C-E requests that PDA-2 be extended to December 31,1980.

flowever, since C-E has not yet submitted all the required information, we cannot extend PDA-2 at this time. (Note: Dr. Joe Goldberg of your staff is aware of the information that must yet be provided.) After we have receiYed all the required information, and upon making a finding that said information is acceptable for PDA extension purposes, we will extend POA-2 for two additional years.

l OP PICE & l

,y Ret.tet b l

l ._

.m - m .- m.o

  • .. . . ._.g. .. . . - _

- . - - ~ _ . - - . ..- . . . . . _

+,

,,y, ..

Mr. A. E. Scherer .

1

, The subject of fees for PDA extensions is still being discussed with i the Cocuission. As soon as a decision is reached, we will promptly i noti fy you.

2 If you have any questions on the ratters discussed in this letter, please  :

i feel free to contact ra or I. Villaiva, the staff's assigned Licensing  :

Project itanager for the CESSAR Systea 80 design. j 1

i Sincerely, l Original Cisned by: l C. J. Halte=os, yr, l

j C. J. Helte:nes, Jr. , Chief )

Standardization Branch i Division of Project Management )

l

  • l I.

I i

4

}

4 t

1 i

J 1

1 1

4 i

l l

i i + l 2

i o,,,27,*740.DPM:SB c OPM,:Sk ,

l eua-*-e + .. lyi11 al.y.iuf) .g _

oan*- ..-.llL .RS J.1 8

v. ._
4. NRC FORM 318 (9 76) NRCM 0240 fr v. n. novsaamswt PaiwTime orricas t en -eas.eu 1

4

, , . ~ . ~ i._,,.._,.. ,,.__..,,-,,m. .,p,,g_m ,.,,,.,y..,,,my, 7._ .