|
---|
Category:OPERATING LICENSES-APPLIATION TO AMEND-RENEW EXISTING
MONTHYEARL-99-033, Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,to Change TS Re Control Room,Penetration Room & Containment Purge Filtration Sys & Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation,Which Reflect Agreements Reached in 990909 & 16 Discussions1999-10-0404 October 1999 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,to Change TS Re Control Room,Penetration Room & Containment Purge Filtration Sys & Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation,Which Reflect Agreements Reached in 990909 & 16 Discussions ML20212C5831999-09-15015 September 1999 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,committing Util to Transfer Certain CTS Requirements Into Util Controlled Documents & Specifying Schedule for Performing New & Revised ITS Surveillances.Revised License Pages,Encl ML20210R5181999-08-12012 August 1999 Revised Page 6 to 990430 LAR to Operate Farley Nuclear Plant,Unit 1,for Cycle 16,based on risk-informed Approach for Evaluation of SG Tube Structural Integrity.Marked Page of Current License,Included L-99-018, Application for Amend to License NPF-2 for Approval to Operate Unit 1,cycle 16 Only,Based on risk-informed Approach for Evaluation of SG Tube Structural Integrity1999-04-30030 April 1999 Application for Amend to License NPF-2 for Approval to Operate Unit 1,cycle 16 Only,Based on risk-informed Approach for Evaluation of SG Tube Structural Integrity L-99-013, Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8.Amends Would Increase Dei Limit from 0.15 to 0.3 Uci/Gram IAW 10CFR50.90.Marked-up & Revised Current TS Encl1999-04-0202 April 1999 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8.Amends Would Increase Dei Limit from 0.15 to 0.3 Uci/Gram IAW 10CFR50.90.Marked-up & Revised Current TS Encl ML20155J4391998-11-0606 November 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,requesting Change to TS Nuclear Instrumentation Sys Power Range Daily Surveillance Requirement ML20154K2451998-10-12012 October 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,revising Section 6 of TS by Recognizing Addl Mgt Positions Associated with SG Replacement Project & Providing Ability to Approve Procedures Re Project Which May Affect Nuclear Safety ML20216F7051998-03-12012 March 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8 to Revise Existing TS in Entirety.Amend Consists Primarily of Conversion of Current TS to Improved Ts,Per NUREG-1431,rev 1.Vols 1-10 Contain Listed Attachments ML20198H3561998-01-0707 January 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,adding Note to TS to Specifically Indicate Normal or Emergency Power Supply May Be Inoperable in Modes 5 or 6 Provided That Requirements of TS 3.8.1.2 Are Satisified ML20198E6531997-12-31031 December 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,changing Nis IR Neutron Flux Reactor Trip Setpoint & Allowable Value to Be Consistent W/W Std TS,NUREG-1431,Rev 1.Proprietary Safety Analysis,Encl.Proprietary Info Withheld ML20198E2891997-12-30030 December 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,changing Requirements for Auxiliary Bldg & Svc Water Bldg Batteries, Per NRC Staff Concerns as Described in URI 50-348/97-201 & 50-364/97-201 & NOV 50-348/97-11 & 50-364/97-11 ML20211P5811997-10-16016 October 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,revising Number of Allowable Charging Pumps Capable of Injecting in RCS When Temperature of One or More of RCS Cold Leg Temperatures Is Less than 180 F ML20211A6811997-09-17017 September 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,amending Primary Coolant Specific Activity,Per GL 95-05 ML20216C9231997-09-0303 September 1997 Application for Amend to License NPF-2,allowing Reduction in Available Paths to Min of 50% w/3 Per Core Quadrant. Non-proprietary & Proprietary W Repts CAA-97-234 & CAA-97-235,encl.Proprietary Info,Withheld ML20149K0971997-07-23023 July 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,relocating RCS P/T Limits from TS to Proposed PT Limits Rept IAW Guidance Provided by GL 96-03, Relocation of P/T Limit Curves & LTOP Protection Sys Limits ML20148R7351997-06-30030 June 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8, Incorporating Requirements Necessary to Change Basis for Prevention of Criticality in Fuel Storage Pool.Change Eliminates Credit for Boraflex as Neutron Absorbing Matl ML20148Q0981997-06-30030 June 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,revising & Clarifying Requirements for CR Emergency & Penetration Room Filtration Sys & Related Storage Pool Ventilation Sys & Revises Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation Channels ML20148K7421997-06-13013 June 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,proposing Changes Found in Tech Specs 3/4.9.13, Storage Pool Ventilation (Fuel Movement) ML20140A3861997-05-28028 May 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,clarifying That Testing of Each Shared EDG to Comply W/Sr 4.8.1.1.2.e Is Only Required Once Per Five Years on a Per EDG Basis,Not on Per Unit Basis ML20148E5851997-05-27027 May 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,revising Applicable Modes for Source Range Nuclear Instrumentation & Providing Allowances for an Exception to Requirements for State of Power Supplies for RHR Discharge to Pump Valves ML20138B9161997-04-23023 April 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,revising Proposed TS Pages to Include Footnote Concerning Filter Pressure Drop Testing & Mechanical Heater Testing ML20137H6011997-03-25025 March 1997 Application for Amend to License NPF-2,requesting Implementation of voltage-based Alternate Repair Criteria, Per GL 95-05 ML20136F8141997-03-0707 March 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,revising TS 3/4.6.3 Re Containment Isolation Valves Surveillance Requirements ML20135C6511997-02-24024 February 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,requesting Revision & Clarification to Surveillance Requirements for Control Room Emergency Filtration Sys,Penetration Room Filtration Sys & Containment Purge Exhaust Filter ML20135C8311997-02-14014 February 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,revising Specified Max Power Level & Definition of Rated Thermal Power ML20138G9451996-12-26026 December 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,reflecting Guidance in GL 95-05, SG Tube Support Plate Voltage-Based Repair..., to Use Revised Accident Leakage Limit of 20 Gpm & Include 50% of Rpc Ndds in Calculation.W/O Unit 2 TSs ML20134K5501996-11-15015 November 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,requesting Deletion of TS 3.6.2.2 Re Containment Spray Additive Sys ML20128F8681996-09-30030 September 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,relocating cycle-specific Core Operating Parameter Limits to Colr. Proposed Changes Based on Guidance Found in NRC GL 88-16, WOG-90-016,NUREG-1431 & VEGP COLR Approved by NRC ML20117G2911996-08-30030 August 1996 Application for Amend to License NPF-8,requesting Deletion of References to Cycle Specific L* Criteria ML20117D2201996-08-23023 August 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,requesting to Allow Use of Elevated Sleeve ML20113B6931996-06-24024 June 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,deleting Requirement for Surveillance of Manual SI Input to Reactor Trip Circuitry Until Next Unit Shutdown ML20113A7991996-06-20020 June 1996 Application to Revise Ts,Reflecting Implementation of 10CFR50,App J,Option B & Represent Crossed Beneficial Licensee Actions ML20112G9711996-06-12012 June 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,providing Improved Operating Margins as Well as Increased Flexibility W/Respect to Core Designs & Plant Operating Strategy. Rev 2 to NSD-NT-OPL-96-152 Withheld ML20107J9551996-04-23023 April 1996 Application for Amend to License NPF-8,requesting Unit 2 Cycle 11 TS Change for SG Tubes Remaining in Svc ML20107J1521996-04-22022 April 1996 Application for Amend to License NPF-8,reflecting Implementation of New F* Criteria Based on Maintaining Existing Safety Margins for SG Tube Structural Integrity Concurrent W/Allowance for NDE Eddy Current Uncertainty ML20101L9041996-03-29029 March 1996 Application for Amend to License NPF-8,revising TS 3/4.4.6, Steam Generators & Associated Bases,Reflecting Guidance in GL 95-05.Responses to GL & Revised TS Encl ML20095L0161995-12-19019 December 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,revising Tech Specs Section 3/.7.7 Re Control Room Emergency Ventilation Sys ML20098B0911995-09-26026 September 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,changing TS 4.6.1.3 to Incorporate Improvements to Containment Air Lock Testing Ref in Chapter 3.6,containment Sys of NUREG-1431, Sts,Westinghouse Plants ML20092F3821995-09-15015 September 1995 Application for Amend to License NPF-2 & NPF-8,eliminating Periodic Pressure Sensor Response Time Testing Requirements ML20084P4901995-05-31031 May 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,revising TS Associated W/Steam Generator Tube Support Plate voltage- Based Repair Criteria ML20080R8201995-03-0606 March 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,relocating Seismic & Meteorological Monitoring Instrumentation TSs to FSAR ML20078P8331995-02-14014 February 1995 Application for Amend to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8 Re Permanent voltage-based Repair Criteria for Outside Diameter Stress Corrosion Cracking at SG Tube Support Plates for Both Units at Plant ML20077R4071995-01-0909 January 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8, Incorporating line-item TS Improvements to Reduce Surveillance Requirements for Testing During Power Operation in Response to GL 93-05 ML20078S7531994-12-19019 December 1994 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,revising TS Pages for Mssv,Per NRC Information Notice 94-060, Potential Overpressurization of Main Steam Sys ML20077E3461994-12-0707 December 1994 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,revising TS to Reflect Guidance in Draft GL 94-XX, Voltage-Based Repair Criteria for Repair of Westinghouse SG Tubes Affected by Outside Diameter Stress Corrosion Cracking ML20078B5451994-10-20020 October 1994 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,proposing TS 3/4.3.3.6 & Associated Bases,Which Will Delete Requirements for Chlorine Detection Sys from Units 1 & 2 TS ML20072F3401994-08-17017 August 1994 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,eliminating Periodic Pressure Sensor Response Time Testing Requirements. Rev 1 to WCAP-13787 & Proprietary Rev 1 to WCAP-13632, Elimination of Pressure... encl.WCAP-13632,Rev 1 Withheld ML20070A1001994-06-17017 June 1994 Application for Amend to License NPF-2,revising TS 3/4.2.3 to Increase Nuclear Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor Limit from 1.65 to 1.70 for Vantage 5 Fuel,In Order to Provide Greater Flexibility in Farley Unit 1 Core Design ML20069K2781994-06-10010 June 1994 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,changing RTS & ESFAS Setpoints Associated W/Sg Water Level. Westinghouse Nonproprietary & Proprietary Version of Rept, SG Lower Level Tap... Encl.Proprietary Rept Withheld ML20064C2111994-02-23023 February 1994 Application for Amend to License NPF-2,revising TS, to Allow Implementation of 2 Volt Interim Plugging Criteria 1999-09-15
[Table view] Category:TEXT-LICENSE APPLICATIONS & PERMITS
MONTHYEARL-99-033, Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,to Change TS Re Control Room,Penetration Room & Containment Purge Filtration Sys & Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation,Which Reflect Agreements Reached in 990909 & 16 Discussions1999-10-0404 October 1999 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,to Change TS Re Control Room,Penetration Room & Containment Purge Filtration Sys & Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation,Which Reflect Agreements Reached in 990909 & 16 Discussions ML20212C5831999-09-15015 September 1999 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,committing Util to Transfer Certain CTS Requirements Into Util Controlled Documents & Specifying Schedule for Performing New & Revised ITS Surveillances.Revised License Pages,Encl ML20210R5181999-08-12012 August 1999 Revised Page 6 to 990430 LAR to Operate Farley Nuclear Plant,Unit 1,for Cycle 16,based on risk-informed Approach for Evaluation of SG Tube Structural Integrity.Marked Page of Current License,Included L-99-018, Application for Amend to License NPF-2 for Approval to Operate Unit 1,cycle 16 Only,Based on risk-informed Approach for Evaluation of SG Tube Structural Integrity1999-04-30030 April 1999 Application for Amend to License NPF-2 for Approval to Operate Unit 1,cycle 16 Only,Based on risk-informed Approach for Evaluation of SG Tube Structural Integrity L-99-013, Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8.Amends Would Increase Dei Limit from 0.15 to 0.3 Uci/Gram IAW 10CFR50.90.Marked-up & Revised Current TS Encl1999-04-0202 April 1999 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8.Amends Would Increase Dei Limit from 0.15 to 0.3 Uci/Gram IAW 10CFR50.90.Marked-up & Revised Current TS Encl ML20155J4391998-11-0606 November 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,requesting Change to TS Nuclear Instrumentation Sys Power Range Daily Surveillance Requirement ML20154K2451998-10-12012 October 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,revising Section 6 of TS by Recognizing Addl Mgt Positions Associated with SG Replacement Project & Providing Ability to Approve Procedures Re Project Which May Affect Nuclear Safety ML20216F7051998-03-12012 March 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8 to Revise Existing TS in Entirety.Amend Consists Primarily of Conversion of Current TS to Improved Ts,Per NUREG-1431,rev 1.Vols 1-10 Contain Listed Attachments ML20198H3561998-01-0707 January 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,adding Note to TS to Specifically Indicate Normal or Emergency Power Supply May Be Inoperable in Modes 5 or 6 Provided That Requirements of TS 3.8.1.2 Are Satisified ML20198E6531997-12-31031 December 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,changing Nis IR Neutron Flux Reactor Trip Setpoint & Allowable Value to Be Consistent W/W Std TS,NUREG-1431,Rev 1.Proprietary Safety Analysis,Encl.Proprietary Info Withheld ML20198E2891997-12-30030 December 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,changing Requirements for Auxiliary Bldg & Svc Water Bldg Batteries, Per NRC Staff Concerns as Described in URI 50-348/97-201 & 50-364/97-201 & NOV 50-348/97-11 & 50-364/97-11 ML20198R5181997-10-29029 October 1997 Amends 132 & 124 to Licenses NPF-02 & NPF-08,respectively, Changing TS 3/4.4.9, Specific Activity & Associated Bases to Reduce Limit Associated W/Dose Equivalent iodine-131 ML20211P5811997-10-16016 October 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,revising Number of Allowable Charging Pumps Capable of Injecting in RCS When Temperature of One or More of RCS Cold Leg Temperatures Is Less than 180 F ML20211A6811997-09-17017 September 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,amending Primary Coolant Specific Activity,Per GL 95-05 ML20216C9231997-09-0303 September 1997 Application for Amend to License NPF-2,allowing Reduction in Available Paths to Min of 50% w/3 Per Core Quadrant. Non-proprietary & Proprietary W Repts CAA-97-234 & CAA-97-235,encl.Proprietary Info,Withheld ML20149K0971997-07-23023 July 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,relocating RCS P/T Limits from TS to Proposed PT Limits Rept IAW Guidance Provided by GL 96-03, Relocation of P/T Limit Curves & LTOP Protection Sys Limits ML20148R7351997-06-30030 June 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8, Incorporating Requirements Necessary to Change Basis for Prevention of Criticality in Fuel Storage Pool.Change Eliminates Credit for Boraflex as Neutron Absorbing Matl ML20148Q0981997-06-30030 June 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,revising & Clarifying Requirements for CR Emergency & Penetration Room Filtration Sys & Related Storage Pool Ventilation Sys & Revises Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation Channels ML20148K7421997-06-13013 June 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,proposing Changes Found in Tech Specs 3/4.9.13, Storage Pool Ventilation (Fuel Movement) ML20140A3861997-05-28028 May 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,clarifying That Testing of Each Shared EDG to Comply W/Sr 4.8.1.1.2.e Is Only Required Once Per Five Years on a Per EDG Basis,Not on Per Unit Basis ML20148E5851997-05-27027 May 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,revising Applicable Modes for Source Range Nuclear Instrumentation & Providing Allowances for an Exception to Requirements for State of Power Supplies for RHR Discharge to Pump Valves ML20138B9161997-04-23023 April 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,revising Proposed TS Pages to Include Footnote Concerning Filter Pressure Drop Testing & Mechanical Heater Testing ML20137H6011997-03-25025 March 1997 Application for Amend to License NPF-2,requesting Implementation of voltage-based Alternate Repair Criteria, Per GL 95-05 ML20137E2891997-03-24024 March 1997 Amends 125 & 119 to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,respectively, Revising TS to Incorporate Latest Revised Topical Repts Governing Installation of Laser Welded SG Tube Sleeves ML20136F8141997-03-0707 March 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,revising TS 3/4.6.3 Re Containment Isolation Valves Surveillance Requirements ML20135C6511997-02-24024 February 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,requesting Revision & Clarification to Surveillance Requirements for Control Room Emergency Filtration Sys,Penetration Room Filtration Sys & Containment Purge Exhaust Filter ML20135C8311997-02-14014 February 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,revising Specified Max Power Level & Definition of Rated Thermal Power ML20138G9451996-12-26026 December 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,reflecting Guidance in GL 95-05, SG Tube Support Plate Voltage-Based Repair..., to Use Revised Accident Leakage Limit of 20 Gpm & Include 50% of Rpc Ndds in Calculation.W/O Unit 2 TSs ML20134K5501996-11-15015 November 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,requesting Deletion of TS 3.6.2.2 Re Containment Spray Additive Sys ML20128F8681996-09-30030 September 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,relocating cycle-specific Core Operating Parameter Limits to Colr. Proposed Changes Based on Guidance Found in NRC GL 88-16, WOG-90-016,NUREG-1431 & VEGP COLR Approved by NRC ML20117G2911996-08-30030 August 1996 Application for Amend to License NPF-8,requesting Deletion of References to Cycle Specific L* Criteria ML20117D2201996-08-23023 August 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,requesting to Allow Use of Elevated Sleeve ML20113B6931996-06-24024 June 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,deleting Requirement for Surveillance of Manual SI Input to Reactor Trip Circuitry Until Next Unit Shutdown ML20113A7991996-06-20020 June 1996 Application to Revise Ts,Reflecting Implementation of 10CFR50,App J,Option B & Represent Crossed Beneficial Licensee Actions ML20112G9711996-06-12012 June 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,providing Improved Operating Margins as Well as Increased Flexibility W/Respect to Core Designs & Plant Operating Strategy. Rev 2 to NSD-NT-OPL-96-152 Withheld ML20107J9551996-04-23023 April 1996 Application for Amend to License NPF-8,requesting Unit 2 Cycle 11 TS Change for SG Tubes Remaining in Svc ML20107J1521996-04-22022 April 1996 Application for Amend to License NPF-8,reflecting Implementation of New F* Criteria Based on Maintaining Existing Safety Margins for SG Tube Structural Integrity Concurrent W/Allowance for NDE Eddy Current Uncertainty ML20101L9041996-03-29029 March 1996 Application for Amend to License NPF-8,revising TS 3/4.4.6, Steam Generators & Associated Bases,Reflecting Guidance in GL 95-05.Responses to GL & Revised TS Encl ML20095L0161995-12-19019 December 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,revising Tech Specs Section 3/.7.7 Re Control Room Emergency Ventilation Sys ML20098B0911995-09-26026 September 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,changing TS 4.6.1.3 to Incorporate Improvements to Containment Air Lock Testing Ref in Chapter 3.6,containment Sys of NUREG-1431, Sts,Westinghouse Plants ML20092F3821995-09-15015 September 1995 Application for Amend to License NPF-2 & NPF-8,eliminating Periodic Pressure Sensor Response Time Testing Requirements ML20084P4901995-05-31031 May 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,revising TS Associated W/Steam Generator Tube Support Plate voltage- Based Repair Criteria ML20080R8201995-03-0606 March 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,relocating Seismic & Meteorological Monitoring Instrumentation TSs to FSAR ML20078P8331995-02-14014 February 1995 Application for Amend to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8 Re Permanent voltage-based Repair Criteria for Outside Diameter Stress Corrosion Cracking at SG Tube Support Plates for Both Units at Plant ML20077R4071995-01-0909 January 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8, Incorporating line-item TS Improvements to Reduce Surveillance Requirements for Testing During Power Operation in Response to GL 93-05 ML20078S7531994-12-19019 December 1994 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,revising TS Pages for Mssv,Per NRC Information Notice 94-060, Potential Overpressurization of Main Steam Sys ML20077E3461994-12-0707 December 1994 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,revising TS to Reflect Guidance in Draft GL 94-XX, Voltage-Based Repair Criteria for Repair of Westinghouse SG Tubes Affected by Outside Diameter Stress Corrosion Cracking ML20078B5451994-10-20020 October 1994 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,proposing TS 3/4.3.3.6 & Associated Bases,Which Will Delete Requirements for Chlorine Detection Sys from Units 1 & 2 TS ML20072F3401994-08-17017 August 1994 Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,eliminating Periodic Pressure Sensor Response Time Testing Requirements. Rev 1 to WCAP-13787 & Proprietary Rev 1 to WCAP-13632, Elimination of Pressure... encl.WCAP-13632,Rev 1 Withheld ML20070A1001994-06-17017 June 1994 Application for Amend to License NPF-2,revising TS 3/4.2.3 to Increase Nuclear Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor Limit from 1.65 to 1.70 for Vantage 5 Fuel,In Order to Provide Greater Flexibility in Farley Unit 1 Core Design 1999-09-15
[Table view] |
Text
_. .
g Diva Mir:y Southern Nuclear Vice President Oper#3g Compary fa-ley Proje;t P.O. Box 1295 Birmingharr Alabama 35201 Tel 205.992.5131 SOUTHERN .
l May 27, 1997 gg g ,
Energy tderve hur%rld*
Docket Nos.: 50-348 10 CFR 50.90 l 50-364
! U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission l ATrN.: Document Control Desk
( Washington, DC 20555 l
Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant l Request to Revise Technical Specifications l Technical Snecification Compliance issues Amenmnents Ladies and Gentlemen:
Southern Nuu ar Operating Company (SNC) has recently identified two Technical Specification (TS) compliance issues. These issues were reported in shared LERs97-003 and 97-005. As a result of l recent phone conversations between SNC and NRR to resolve these issues, it was determined that l entry into TS condition 3.0.3 for the referenced conditions of shared LER 97-003 would be reportable l l under 50.73(a)(2)(i) as a 30-day LER. While voluntary entry into 3.0.3 is not a desirable condition, l l
this case would require a short period of entry into 3.0.3 because the design features of the system l l were not correctly addressed in the TS. He safety significance of these compliance issues is low.
The NRC staff concurred with this.
l In accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 50.90, SNC proposes to amend the Joseph M. Farley l- Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications. The proposed changes will revise the Applicable Modes for Source Range Nuclear Instrumentation (Specification 3/4.3.1, " Reactor Trip System Instrumentation") and provide allowances for an exception to the requirements for the state of the power supplies for RIIR Discharge to Charging Pump Suction Valves (MOVs,8706A and 8706B) following Mode changes (Speci{ications 3/4.5.2,"ECCS Subsystems - T , > 350 F", and 3/4.5.3, l
"ECCS Subsystems - T., < 350 F"). These changes will allow transitioning between Modes where conflicting requirements exist or where TS requirements conflict with design features, and provide i . time to allow interlocks to function end to realign power supplies to the appropriate status. Rese proposed changes are technically consistent with the requirements and standard format of NUREG-1431, Revision 1," Westinghouse Standard Technical Specifications," issued on April 7,1995. In addition, an allowance for time to perform the Source Range channel check aller the auto re-
[
! energization of the SR NI below P-6 is added to be consistent with the above Applicability change.
Finally, cycle-specific guidance concerning manual ESF functional input checks has been deleted /
since the surveillances have been completed and the allowance is no longer needed.
The basis for the proposed technical specification changes is provided in Enclosure 1. The supporting significant hazards evaluation pursuant to 10 CFR 50.91 is provided in Enclosure 2. Based upon the 030002 evaluation provided, SNC has determinal the proposed changes to the technical specifications do not involve a significant hazards consideration as defined by 10 CFR 50.92. SNC has also determined
~
9706030176 970527 ADOCK 0500 8 l lll l ll L . ;DR
w Q ;
U.S. uclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 l
1-that the proposed license amendment will not significantly affect the quality of the human environment. The revised typed pages of the proposed technical specifications, including page ;
change instructions, are included in Enclosure 3. The marked pages are provided in Enclosure 4. A copy of these proposed changes is being sent to Dr. Donald E. Williamson, the Alabama State l Designee, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.91(b)(1). ;
NRC review and approval of these proposed changes is requested on an expedited basis. ,
t 10 CFR 50.73 requires reporting each entry into TS 3.0.3. With the FNP Ursts 1 and 2 TS as currently written, this will occur each time normal unit operations require ttansitioning between Modes 3 and 4. Therefore,10 CFR 50.73 reports (LERs) will be required for non-safety significant i F reasons due to the current TS wording. SNC will revise shared LER 97003 each time unit operations require transitioning between Modes 3 and 4 until these TS changes are approved. 1
- 4. -
. If there are any questions, please advise.
4
- Respectfully submitted, ,
i 4 SOUTIIERN NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY Dave Morey >
- j. Sworn to and subscribed before me this$_Yy of 7W l997 Y7/d<xL l114 c3sar
~
Notary Pubfic My Commission Expires: k#At Ao A / EU -
WA. Mt:lRi1RTSCH. DOC
Enclosures:
- 1. Basis for Change Request
- 2. 10 CFR 10S2 Evaluation
- 3. Page Change Instructions and Revised Pages 4 lland Marked Pages-
)
cc: Mr. L. A. Reyes, Region II Administrator Mr. J. I. Zimmerman, NRR Project Manager Mr. T. M. Ross, Plant Sr. Resident inspector Dr. D. E. Williamson, State Department of Public Ilealth )
i
+
se ENCLOSUREl i
Joseph M. Farley Nuclen Plant Request to Revise Technieni Specifications f Technical Specification Compliance Issues Amendments :
Basis for Change Reaues_t !
Currently, the Technical Specifications (TS) for Farley Nuclear Plant (r:NP) Units 1 and 2 '
require plant configurations in various Modes which are either in conflict with plant design :
features or do not provide adequate time in which to comply when changing Modes. The i proposed changes would revise TS 3/4.3.1,3/4.5.2, and 3/4.5.3 for both Units 1 and 2. The. .
' TS changes would allow the demonstration ofoperability during plant Mode and condition changes. Currently, TS 3/4.5.2 (Modes 1-3) requires that the RHR Discharge to Charging . I Pump Suction Valves be closed with power supplied to the valves while TS 3/4.5.3 (Mode 4)
. requires that the RHR Discharge to Charging Pump Suction Valves be closed with power !
removed from the valves. In addition, TS 3/4.3.1 requires that the Source Range Nuclear Instrumentation (SR NI) provide visual indication in Mo' des 3,4, and 5. In Mode 3, above l Permissive P-6, the SR NI is de-energized. A design feature of the plant is to auto re-energize !
the SR NI below P-6, Manually unblocking the SR NI between P-10 and P-6 may cause a :
reactor trip. By procedure, FNP verifies that the SR NI auto re-energize below P-6. The channel check for the source range detector can not be performed above the P-6 while the SR NIs are de-energized. Therefore, a revision to the existing TS note to allow for time _to perform the channel check after the auto re-energization of the SR NI below P-6 'is needed. I Because'of the specific wording that presently exists, the operability of the ECCS System and l the Reactor Trip System Instrumentation (Source Range) cannot be demonstrated while ,
changing Modes, The area ofconcern for the SR NI Applicability-was suitably addressed -l
- when the improved Westinghouse Standard Technical Specifications (STS) NUREG-1431, j Revision I were issued on April 7,1995. The note concerning the RHR Discharge to {
Charging Pump Suction Valves follows the standard format of the STS. These changes are ~i technically consistent with the requirements and standard format of the STS. The literal i compliance issue related to the inability to perform the surveillance prior to the applicability was not addressed in the STS and has been addressed using a time allowance consistent with the action statement for an inoperable Source Range channel below P-6. Finally, cycle- ,
specific guidance concerning manual ESF functional input checks has been deleted since the l surveillances have been completed and the allowance is no longer needed. This is deemed an l administrative change. ,
i 4 h El-1 ;
i
. - ,. J
_7_______.
i ts 1
. 4 i ENCLOSURE 2 ;
i I: ;
l Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant i Request to Revise Technical Specifications Technical Specification Compliance Issues Amendments !
i 10 CFR 50.92 Evaluation i Pursuant to 10 CFR .50.92 each application for amendment to an operating license must be .
reviewed to determine if the proposed change involves a significant hazards consideration. l The amendments, as defined below, describing the changes to the Technical Specifications for !
the requirements associated with the Source Range Nuclear Instrumentation and the Residual i j Heat Removal (RHR) Discharge to Charging Pump Suction Valves (Motor Operated Valves l (MOVs) 8706A and 87068) has been reviewed and deemed not to involve a significant l hazards consideration. The basis for this determination follows. j t
BACKGROUND !
The purpose of surveilknees 4.5.2 a and b,4.5.3.1, and 4.5.3.2 is to ensure that the Emergency Core Coohag System (ECCS) System is aligned properly such that the assumptions used in the safety analyses are met. In Modes 1-3, power is removed from ,
certain valves which, if they were to change position as a result of an active failure or an .;
p inadvertent misalignment, could disable the function of both ECCS trains and invalidate the !
accident analyses. TS 3.5.2 requires that in Modes 1,2, and 3, two independent ECCS subsystems be operable with each subsystem comprised of an operable flow path capable of ;
taking suction from the refueling water storage tank on a safety injection signal and transferring suction to the containment sump during the recirculation phase of operation. In .
L order to transfer to the recirculation phase of operation as assumed in the Farley Nuclear Plant l Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) in Modes 1,2 and 3, power to the valve operators would {
be required for the realignment of the RHR discharge to charging pump suction MOVs 8706A ' j
. (Train A RHR to charging pump suction) and 8706B (Train B RHR to charging pump j suction). In Mode 4, Surveillance 4.5.3.2 specifies that MOVs 8706A and 87%B be closed j
~ with the breaker / disconnect for the respective valve operator locked open. The reason for -
ensuring the breakers / disconnects remain open during Mode 4 operation is to prevent possible overpressurization of the charging pump suction line piping. Therefore, in order to comply with TS surveillance requirement 4.5.3.2 concerning the removal of power from MOVs
- 8706A and 87%B prior to Mode 4 entry from Mode 3, FNP would have to be in a condition 1 prohibited by TS 3.5.2. Therefore, due to an inconsistency existing within TS, upon changing Modes between Modes 3 and 4 it is not possible to comply fully with the TS. Specifically, TS L fails to provide an allowed time betvceen Modes 3 and 4 to lock open the MOV
- ' breakers / disconnects or to close the breakers / disconnects when transitioning between Modes 4 and 3.
' 2 i ,
l:
I E21 ;
I:
l- j
i
, s- l 1 I l
t Enclosure 2' 10 CFR 50.92 Evaluation l
l The requirements listed in Table 3.3-1 of TS 3/4.3.1, Functional Unit 6B, for the Source Range Nuclear Instrumentation are as follows in Modes 3,4, and 5: One Source Range Nuclear Instrument is required to provide indication. Surveillance Requirement 4.3.1.1, l Functional Unit 6, requires a channel check once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> below the P-6 (Block of Source l Range Reactor Trip) setpoint. The requirement to have indication in Mode 3, above P-6 indicates an inconsistency existing within TS. Specifically, the indication is not available until the Source Ranges are energized which, due to plant design, does not occur until after Mode 3 entry during a shutdown. Therefore, the Surveillance 4.3.1.1, Functional Unit 6, channel check cannot be performed until the Source Range Nuclear Instrumentation are
!- energized which, due to plant design, does not occur until after Mode 3 entry, below P-6, during a shutdown. Typically, following unit shutdown from at power conditions, it takes
, approximately 20 minutes for the neutron flux to decay to below an Intermediate Range l Neutron Detector signal of 10* amps which corresponds to the P-6 setpoint. Note (7) of j Table 4.3.1.1 is also being revised to allow for time to perform the channel check after the '
auto re-energization of the SR NI below P-6. The time limit of one hour was chosen to be l consistent with the action statement for an inoperable Source Range channel below P-6. .
Finally, as a part of this change, cycle-specific guidance conceming manual ESF functional I input checks has been deleted since the surveillances have been completed and the allowance I is no longer needed. This is deemed an administrative change.
DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE REOUEST The proposed changes would revise the Modes of Applicability for the SR NI, Functional Unit 6B, for both Units 1 and 2 to only require indication below the P-6 setpoint in Mode 3, and in Modes 4 and 5. In addition the sufficient time is provided to perform a channel check once P-6 is reached from Mode 2. Also, notes would be added to TS 3/4.5.2 and 3/4.5.3 to allow time after transitioning between Modes 3 and 4 to reposition the MOV l breakers / disconnects as required in either Mode 3 or 4. The proposed changes will correct the inconsistencies which currently exist in TS. These proposed changes are technically consistent with the requirements and standard format of the improved Westinghouse Standard Technical Specifications (STS), NUREG-1431. Revision 1 issued on April 7,1995. Finally, cycle-specific guidance concerning manual ESF functional input checks has been deleted since the surveillances have been completed and the allowance is no longer needed. This is deemed an administrative change.
i E2-2 1
l.
f ,
, ,, i l
)
Enclosure 2 10 CFR 50.92 Evaluation
- l. ANALYSIS l Allowance to reposition the MOV breakers / disconnects as required in either Mode 3 or 4 i
- . upon transitioning between these two Modes, will continue to meet the necessary intent of the !
l surveillance requirements. The time limit of 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> was chosen to be consistent with the
! standard format of the improved Westinghouse Standard Technical Specifications (STS),
NUREG-1431, Revision 1 issued on April 7,1995, where time is required to perform in-plant ;
evolutions. The time limit of 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> is of sufficient duration to perform the task without !
adversely affecting operations shift resources during Mode changes. Also, the likelihood of a l severe transient occurring in this time frame is very small. The:efore, allowing time to i reposition the MOV breakers / disconnects as required in either Mode 3 or 4 upon transitioning .
L between these.two Modes is not a safety concern and does not pose undue risk to public health l and safety.
L . Revising the Applicability of the TS for the Source Range Nuclear Instrumentation during l- Shutdown conditions to require indication only below the P-6 setpoint in Mode 3 and to allow ,
for time to perform the channel check upon eaching P-6 from Mode 2 corrects the inconsistency which currently exists in the TS and brings the TS requirements into agreement with the design of the plant. The time limit of one hour to perform the Source Range channel l check was chosen to be consistent with the action statement for an inoperable Source Range l channel below P-6.
l Deleting cycle-specific guidance concerning manual ESF functional input checks is deemed
, an admimstrative change and has no effect on the public health and safety. I
! l L These proposed changes are technically consistent with the requirements and standard format - !
of NUREG-1431, Revision 1. ;
10 CFR 50.92 EVALUATION CONCLUSIONS Based on the preceding evaluation, the following conclusions are provided with respect -
to the criteria contained in 10 CFR 50.92.
_ (1) ' The proposed changes do not significantly increase the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated in the FSAR. The purposes for repositioning the breakers / disconnects for MOVs 8706A and 8706B are to ensure that the ECCS System i
is aligned properly such that the assumptions used in the safety analyses are met and to l prevent possible overpressurization of the charging pump suction line piping. The
[ likelihood of a severe transient occurring in this time frame is very small and has to be weighed against the possibility of over pressurizing the CVCS charging pump suction
- piping. The allowance of a 4 hour4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> time period to perform the required alignment
! appropriately weighs this risk. Changing the e,91i nhility of the requirement to have E2-3 l
, t>
0 l Enclosure 2 '
i 10 CFR 50.92 Evaluation ,
indication from a Source Range Nuclear Instrument available to agree with the design of the plant does not change the physical design of the plant or affect any assumptions used l in accident analyses and, therefore, has no effect on the probability or consequences of I
an accident previously evaluated in the FSAR. The allowance of I hour to perform the l
Source Range Channel Check upon reaching P-6 from Mode 2 is consistent with the i
current basis for a source range channel inoperable. Therefore, these changes do not mvolve a significant increase in the consequences of an accident previously evaluated.
(2) The proposed changes to the Technical Specifications do not increase the possibility of a l new or different kind of accident than any accident already evaluated in the FS AR. No new limiting single failure or accident scenario has been created or identified due to the i i proposed changes. Safety-related systems will continue to perform as designed. )
Therefore, the proposed changes do not create the possibility of a new or different kind j of accident from any previously evaluated.
(3) The proposed changes do not involve a significant reduction in the margin of safety. l The margin of safety is not significantly reduced due to the proposed changes to the breaker / disconnect positioning requirements of TS 3/4.5.2 and 3/4.5.3 when transitioning between Modes 3 and 4. The likelihood of either a severe transient occurring in Mode 3 or the possible overpressurization of the CVCS charging pump suction line by the RHR system in Mode 4 is very small. Changing the Applicability of i
the requirement to have indication from a Source Range Nuclear Instrument available to i agree with the design of the plant does not change the physical design of the plant or affect any assumptions used in accident analyses and, therefore, has no effect on the margin of safety. These proposed changes are technically consistent with the .
requirements and standard format of NUREG-1431, Revision 1. Performing the source !
range channel check within I hour upon reaching P-6 from Mode 2 does not change the I physical design of the plant or affect any assumptions used in accident analyses and,
! therefore, also does not effect the margin of safety. Thus, the proposed changes do not involve a significant reduction in the margin of safety.
Accordingly, Southern Nuclear Operating Company has determined that the proposed changes with respect to the Source Range Nuclear Instrumentation and the RHR Discharge to l Charging Pump Suction Valves power alignment requirements do not involve a significant l hazards consideration.
! l l
E2-4
, v C
ENCLOSURE 3 l Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant
!. Request to Revise Technical Specifications l Technical Specification Compliance Issues Amendments i
Changed Pages i
Unit 1 !
Remove Pag Insert Page Page 3/4 3-2 Replace ;
Page 3/4 3-6 Replace Page 3/4 3-14 Replace Page 3/4 5-3 Replace l Page 3/4 5-7 Replace ;
l-Unit 2
. Remove Page Insert Page Page 3/4 3-2 Replace l Page 3/4 3-6 Replace i Page 3/4 3-14 Replace
- Page 3/4 5-3 Replace Page 3/4 5-7 Replace l
i t
i l'
e
_ .. ~ -