ML20198H356
| ML20198H356 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 01/07/1998 |
| From: | Dennis Morey SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20198H361 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9801130265 | |
| Download: ML20198H356 (2) | |
Text
.
Dave Morey Southern Wclear Wte heuhnt Operating Cunpany Iado Punn.
PO Boa 12%
birmegham. Aiatoma 35?01 Tel 205 !!375131 January 7,1998 SOUTHERN COMPANY i
hergy to Se rve)'our World" Docket Nos.: 50-348 10 C' R 50.90 50-364 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document control Desk Washington,DC 20555 Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Storace Pool Ventilation iFuel Movement) Technical Snecification Amendment Ladies and Gentlemen:
By letter dated June 13,1997, Southern Nuclear submitted an amendment request to revise the technical specifications and associated bases associated with storage pool ventilation (fuel movement). The amendment consisted of two parts:
- 1. A note added in the technical specificat;ons to specifically indicate the normal or emergency power supply may be inoperable in Modes 5 or 6 provided that the requirements of Technical Specification 3.8.1.2 are satisfied; and
- 2. An extension of the Technical Specification 3.9.13 completion time allowed for returning one out of service penetration room filtration system from 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> to 7 days.
Based on recent discussion the NRC Staff has mformed SNC that it can not review the portion of the amendment request associated with time allowed for setuming a out-of service penetration room filtration i,ystem item 2 above, in the near future. Consequently, in order to provide flexibility and significant cost savings for the upcoming refueling outage on Farley Unit 2, Southern Nuclear is re-submitting this revised amendment forjust the power supply portion of the original submittal. The conclusions of the Basis for Change Request and the 10 CFR 50.92 Evaluation associated with the power supply portion of the amendment request remain valid, and as such, no new significant hazards evaluation is required.
\\
.fY y
9001130265 900107 PDR ADOCK 05000'348
%3
U.$. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2
- provides revised technical specification pages. It should alm be noted that the associated bases page has been revised to provide clearer guidance on the intent of the technical specification amendment.
Respectfully submitted, SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY I
SinrtY Dave Morey Sworn to amisubscribed before me this day o(5
& 1998 dt.A Q%i h
Notary Public D
~
My Commission Expire b a 4.c et REM /maf:PRFPWR. DOC
Enclosures:
Technical Specification Pages cc: Mr. L. A. Reyes, Region 11 Administrator Mr. J,1. Zimmerman, NRR Project Manager Mr. T. M. Ross, Plant Sr. Resident Inspector Dr. D. E. Williamson, State Department ofPublic 11ealth i
r