ML20198E289
| ML20198E289 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 12/30/1997 |
| From: | Dennis Morey SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20198E295 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-348-97-11, 50-348-97-201, 50-364-97-11, 50-364-97-201, NUDOCS 9801090061 | |
| Download: ML20198E289 (2) | |
Text
, _ _
4 D;ve Money Southern Nulsar V*te P'eWent Operating Company Wey Progt FO. 60s 1M brmingham. Atanama 35201 te M M250 December 30, 1997 SOUTHERN COMPANY Energy:o Sme %r %rld" Docket Nos.:
50-348 10 CFR 50.90 50 364 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission A1TN.: Docunent Cortrol Desk Washington, DC 20555 Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Technical Specifications Change Request Auxiliary Buildina & Service Water Buildinn Battgrv Surveillances Ladies and Gentlemen:
In accordance with 10 CFR 50.90, Southern Nuclear Operating Company (SNC) proposes to an.end the Farley Nuclear Plant Unit I and Unit 2 Technical Specifications surveillance requirements far the Auxiliary Suilding (AB) and the Senice Water (SW) Building batteries. He proposed amerdcent removes the existing 1,75 volt minimum individual cell voltage (ICV) associated with the "scryice test" acceptance criterion and replaces it with a reference to the battery load profile specified in Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) Section 8.3.2. He proposed Tedmical Specifications changes are consistent with NUREO 1431, Resision 1," Standard Technical Specifications Westinghouse Plants." ne AB battery santillance change addresses NRC Staff concerns as described in Unresolved item (URI) 50 348; 50-364/97-201 19 and Notice of Violation VIO 50-348; 50-364/9711-07. The SW battery surveillance change casures consistency between the two separate battery st.till.mces.
In support of these changes, the FNP FSAR will be revised. For the AB battery, the FSAR revision will expand the "senice test" design load profile definition to include both minimum battery tenmnal voltage (to assure adequate voltage to emergency loads) and ICVs greater than or equal to 1.75 vults (to assure individual cells are not less than acceptable limits). For the SW battery, the FS AR revision will clarify that the ICV criterion is bounding for its design load profile and that that the minimum battery terminal voltage "senice test" criterion is based on the ICV design requirement.
He proposed Teclu.ical Specifications changes are provided in Attachment 1. De safety assessment report which explains the technical basis for the changes is prosided in Attachment 11.
he safety assessment report also descrilt:s the associated FSAR changes. SNC has detennined that the proposed changes to the Technical Specifications do not involve a significant nazards consideration as defined by 10 CFR 50.92. He significant hazards evaluation is provided in 11. In addition, SNC has determined that the propond changes will not significantly affect the quality of the human environment. In accordance with 10 CFR 50.91 (b)(1), a copy of f
the proposed changes has been sent to Dr. D. E. Williamson, the Alabama State Designee.
// )
f 4 n
- g. I..{,.{. I },l j,l ll, M
l 9001090061 971230 PDR ADOCK 05000349 P
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comn.insion Page 2 It is requested that the proposed Technical Specifications chraiges be approved by Docaaber 38 1998. If you have any question!., please adgise.
Respectfully submittod, e
SOUTilERN NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY ff l 9htu l
Dave Morey Sworn to and subscrtbed before me this RYy ofWhd1997
_2]gtal
- hBm-Notary Public.
My Commission Expires:YOPA n l, N0l t
MGE mar BATITSI. doc Attachnents:
1.
Tecimical Specifications Marked-up and Typod Pages 11.
Safety Analysis Ill.
Significant llazards Evaluation cc:
Mr. L. A. Reyes, Region 11 Administrator Mr. J.1. Zimmennan, NRR Project Manager Mr. T. M. Ross, FNP Senior Resident inspcctor Dr. D. E. Williamsan, State Department of Public ilcalth 1
._ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -- ___ _ _ _.