ML20071J049

From kanterella
Revision as of 09:49, 23 May 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Statement of Matl Fact as to Which There Is No Genuine Issue Re Reed Contention 20 on Authorization of Excess Radiological Worker Exposures & Spec of Decontamination Action Levels
ML20071J049
Person / Time
Site: Callaway Ameren icon.png
Issue date: 05/20/1983
From: Baxter T
SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE, UNION ELECTRIC CO.
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML20071H409 List: ... further results
References
ISSUANCES-OL, NUDOCS 8305250584
Download: ML20071J049 (2)


Text

. . - c. o ,,

50 V

.i D

< May 20, 1983

,s

.! y( r , ' r, -

h 2 .:

$@~;f' ,

'fa,3/% -7 UNITED STATESLOFJ& Meld N U C L E A R R E G U L'A T O R Y 'C O M M $ ION

,s , i ,'

.O

~

BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )

)

UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY ) Docket No. STN 50-483 OL

)

(Callaway Plant, Unit 1) )

APPLICANI'S STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS ON REED CONTENTION 20 AS TO WHICH THERE IS NO GENUINE ISSUE TO BE HEARD (AUTHORIZATION OF EXCESS RADIOLOGICAL EXPOSURES TO WORKERS & SPECIFICATION OF DECONTAMINATION ACTION LEVELS)

Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. $ 2.749(a), Applicant states, in support of its motion for summary disposition of intervenor John G. Reed's Contention 20 in this proceeding, that there is no. genuine issue to be heard with respect to the following material facts:

1. A clear decision chain for authorizing emergency workers to be exposed to radiation in excess of the Environmental Protection Agency's Protective Action Guides

! -..exista in the plans for :each .of:- the four counties located in

, ' . ' 8305250584 830520 PDR ADOCK 05000483 O -

PM Egg _-'. '

the Callaway Plant plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone. , _

2. The exposure levels which are applied in determining the need for authorizing excess exposures also are contained in the four county plans and are consistent with the PAG's established by the State of Missouri and 'ets forth in the Missouri Nuclear Accident Plan - Callaway (" State Plan").
3. The process that would be followed to authorize exposures in excess of the PAG's is specifically delineated in the four county plans.
4. The Bureau of Radiological Health ("BRH") is responsi-ble for determining the need for decontamination.
5. Decontamination action levels that will govern BRH's determinations about the need for decontamination are contained in the State Plan and in the four county plans.

Respectfully submitted, SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE

^ -

Thomas A. Baxter, P.C.

Deborah B. Bauser Counsel for Applicant 180: .M Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 822-1000 May 20, 1983 l

=.