ML20071H815

Statement of Matl Fact as to Which There Is No Genuine Issue Re Reed Contention 11 on Recovery & Reentry Radiation Stds

ML20071H815
Person / Time
Site:	Callaway
Issue date:	05/20/1983
From:	Baxter T SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE, UNION ELECTRIC CO.
To:	Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML20071H409	List: ML20071H404 ML20071H415 ML20071H425 ML20071H436 ML20071H490 ML20071H496 ML20071H504 ML20071H509 ML20071H513 ML20071H518 ML20071H522 ML20071H527 ML20071H531 ML20071H541 ML20071H553 ML20071H563 ML20071H570 ML20071H577 ML20071H582 ML20071H596 ML20071H604 ML20071H614 ML20071H625 ML20071H636 ML20071H647 ML20071H655 ML20071H671 ML20071H687 ML20071H708 ML20071H718 ML20071H740 ML20071H750 ML20071H753 ML20071H761 ML20071H773 ML20071H783 ML20071H790 ML20071H801 ML20071H815 ML20071H832 ML20071H852 ML20071H864 ML20071H883 ML20071H888 ML20071H904 ML20071H906 ML20071H927 ML20071H937 ML20071H945 ML20071H952 ... further results
References
ISSUANCES-OL, NUDOCS 8305250490
Download: ML20071H815 (2)

Text

.

May 2N

/p I

l-4

~

O h

UNITED STATES OF AMERI MJ'Pgy 7

i

- NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMI SION7 t

4 %,

A '6 t

Lic.)

~

A s4 BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENS

,-,,/

In the Matter of

)

)

UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY

)

Docket No. STN 50-483 OL

)

(Callaway Plant, Unit.1)

)

i APPLICANT'S STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS AS TO WHICH THERE IS NO GENUINE ISSUE TO BE HEARD (CONTENTION 11)

Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 6 2.749(a), Applicant states, in support of its motion for summary disposition of intervenor Reed's' Contention.11, that there is no genuine issue to be heard with respect to the following material facts:

l

[

' 1.

The off-site plans' provide.that the designated local i

l decision-makers on recovery and reeatry will utilize recom-mendations and information from the (Missouri) Bureau of j

Radiological Health and the.Callaway Plant.

2.

Standards need not be written to a level of detail which would permit' local decision-makers-to implement reentry i

and recovery operations independently of Applicant, State and Federal agencies.

l

.18305250490 830520 P,DRADOCK05000g8 -

.. a 3.

Only general plans for recovery and reentry are required.

4.

Radiation levels alone constitute an incomplete and inadequate basis for recovery and reentry decisions.

5.

Utilization of a number of criteria, some of which are judgmental, calls for a degree of flexibility in the decision process.

6.

The decision criteria specified in the off-site plans,.for recovery and reentry, include radiation standards in the form of State Protective Action Guides, which are a part of the State plan, and which are recognized, endorsed and utilized in the local plans.

Respectfully submitted, SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE 1

A

/kM.

Thomas A.

Baxter, P.C.

Deborah B.

Bauser Counsel for Applicant 1800 M Street N.W.

Washington, D.C.

20036 (202) 822-1000 May 20, 1983

...i