ML20071H773
| ML20071H773 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 05/20/1983 |
| From: | Bauser D SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE, UNION ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20071H409 | List:
|
| References | |
| ISSUANCES-OL, NUDOCS 8305250474 | |
| Download: ML20071H773 (22) | |
Text
.
.s . __
.-. .a ,
l m,,-.,.=. __.
_. __m May 20, 1983 1- Jug / >
// V( . . .
UNITED STA'12S OF AMERICA $...~
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION b, j N r,,
. w, h. y D
BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY I hI oco '
Ok
, r j
~' '
JD j In the Matter of -s
).
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY Z
')s)
Docket No. STN 50-483 OL
)
(Callaway Plant, Unit 1) )
I '_
APPLICANT'S MOTIOM.FOR,
SUMMARY
DISPOSITION OF REED CONTENTION 110 (MEDICAL TitEATMENT). _
y Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. $ 2.749, Union;, Electric Company
.(" Applicant") moves the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board for summary disposition of . Contention 10 adv'anced by intervenor
-3 .
John G. Reed. As shown( b.,'e low, summary disposition-is appropri-ate because there is.no. genuine iss.a of material fact to be
... s . .
m heard with respect to Contention 10. Accordingly, Applicant is
, , u, -
entitled to a decision in its favor on Contention 10 as a matter of law, s This Motion is suppoited by Appli' cant's Statement of.
Material Facts On Reed Contention.10 As To'knich here Is No
. s 1 5
<g .;
% J,. , . _ -
(
- m. k N,
.; 8305250474 830520 D -
s s
PDR ADOCK 05000483
- i' O PDR v.. s t - e i I \ ~+' . . . . m-un n w ~
, . um-- . - =_. _. m Genuine Issue To Be Heard (Medical Treatment), Applicant's Memorandum of Law In Support Of Motion For Summary Disposition On Emergency Planning Issues (. Memorandum of Law") , the Callaway Plant Radiological Emergency Response Plan ("RERP"),
, the Callaway County /Fulton Radiological Emergency Response Plan
("Callaway/Fulton Plan"), the Montgomery County Radiological Emergency Response Plan (" Montgomery Plan"), the Osage County Radiological Emergency Response Plan (" Osage Plan"), the Gasconade County Radiological Emergency Response Plan
("Gasconade Plan"), the Missouri Nuclear Accident Plan -
Callaway (" State Plan"), the Affidavit of Walter M. Clark on Reed Contention 15 (Letters of Agreement) (" Clark-15"), the Affidavit of Roger E. Linnemann, M.D. on Reed Contention 10 (Medical Treatment) ("Linnemann-10"), and the Affidavit of Gerald W. Stanfill on Reed Contention 2 _(Staffing-Clerk's Office) ("Stanfill-2"), all filed simultaneously herewith, as well as the pleadings and other papers filed by the parties in the proceeding.
I. Procedural Background Mr. Reed's Contention 10 states:
Arrangements have not been made for medical treatment of local governments' (Montgomery, Gasconade, Osage and Callaway counties) contami-nated, injured emergency workers or residents living within the plume exposure EPZ as required by 10 CFR, Part 50, Section 50.47(b)(12).
A. Letters of agreement between Montgomery County, other counties-and_ hospital.s-are not included in the Off-site plan or the SOPS.
, w.m ---
B. Without such letters or agreements, it becomes impossible to determine whether or not local medical facilities have the capability to handle such' patients. If selected hospitals are to take_ care _of.these cases, agreements are necessary to assure that said selected hospitals have space and resources to handle the potential volume of patients that may come from a particu-lar county.
C. No local letters of agreement exist between county government and local ambulance districts to transport radiological contami-nated, injured patients.
(1) A letter of agreement indicates that such local ambulance district has the knowledge and resources to properly transport a contami-nated, injured patient.
(2) The application for such a letter provides the ambulance district the opportunity to become aware of the special needs in such transport of radiologically contaminated patients and affords them a chance to indicate their equipment needs or other requirements prior to accepting this special responsibility.
D. Ambulance districts outsido of the four counties impacted by the plume exposure EPZ have not agreed to provide transport for radiolog-ically contaminated, injured individuals. The off-site Plan and the SOPS do not reflect letters of agreement by any such ambulance district indicating they will provide such transport. Statements in "10.C(1) & (2)" apply to outside as well as local ambulance districts.
Final Particularization of Reed's Amended Contentions 1, 2 and 3, filed October 1, 1982. Neither Applicant nor the NRC Staff poeed an objection to Contention 10, which was admitted to the proceeding by Board Memorandum and Order dated December 7, 1982.
-- ~ ~ _ . , _ -
II. Governing Legal Standards The necessity for prior arrangements with medical facil-
~'
ities to treat members of the public who may be contaminated or exposed to radiation due to an accident at the Callaway Plant is based on the standard set forth in 10 C.F.R. 5 50.47(b)(12),
which requires that in on-site and off-site radiological emergency response plans, " Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated injured individuals." This regula-tory reg'..irement is further delineated in the guidance provided in NUREG-0654/ FEMA-REP-1 (Rev. 1), " Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants" (Nov. 1980)
("NUREG 0654"). See NUREG-0654,Section II.L.
The Commission recently has had the occasion to address the question of the scope of " arrangements . . . for medical services" that are needed for members of the public in the event of a nuclear plant accident in accordance with 10 C.F.R.
$ 50.47(b)(12). See Southern California Edison Company et al.
(San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3),
CLI-83-10, 17 N.R.C. (April 4, 1983). In San Onofre, the Commission first determined that the " arrangements" in question refer to immediate or near term care, in contrast to long term care which can be handled on an ad hoc basis and does not require advance planning. San Onofre, supra, slip op. at 10.
~ , - _ - . _ .
-~ -
- - - ., .. - . .. . . . ~ . - .
t n
t -
.It was never:the. intent of the regulation
..to. require directly or indirectly that state and' local governments adopt extra-- ,
ordinary measures. . . . The emphasis is !
oniprudent~ risk reduction measures. The l regulation does not require dedication of resources to handle every possible accident
-that can be~ imagined. . The-concept of the e regulation is that'there should be core planning with sufficient planning flexibil-ity to' develop a-reasonable "ad hoc" response' to those very serious low prob- .
. ability accidents'that could affect the general public.
Id. at 8. After reviewing the medical assumptions underlying
- the. regulation,.the Commission determined that the scope of
~
" medical services"'to be provided must focus on the special hazards from: radiation, which fall into two categories: (1) individuals who may become traumatically injured (non-radiation injuries for which emergency medical care ~is needed) who are ;
also' externally. contaminated with radiation; and (2)
]
individuals who may have been subjected to dangerous levels of
- j. radiation and who need medical treatment for that reason. Id.
at 10-12. With respect to.the.former category, the Commission i
concluded that -
[T]he arrangements that are: currently required for onsite. personnel 1and emergency
- workers' provide emergency' capabilities which should be adequate.'for. treatment of members of the general public. !Therefore,
~
no additional medical-facilities or' .
, ,- . capabilities.are require'd for.the general
- public. However, facilities with which prior. arrangements _are made or which have
.the; capability._to treat contaminated'
' injured ~ individuals should'be identified.
J
$ s a .
[
~
5 r
q r, g e 3 ..- ,a -4 , s..,,3 , , , - - - - , - - . -ee+ + + - + - , , , g ,
Id. at 13. As to the second category of individuals needing
~
medical treatment -- individuals subjected to dangerous levels _
of radiation -- the Commission determined, (T]he treatment requires a lesser degree of advance planning and can be arranged for on an as-needed basis during an emergency.
Emergency plans should, however, identify those local or regional medical facilities which have the capability to provide appropriate medical treatment for radiation exposure. No contractual agreements are necessary and no additional hospitals or other facilities need be constructed.
Id. at 13-14 (footnote omitted). In summary, because of a very limited immediate'need for medical resources by members of the public during a radiological emergency, 10 C.F.R. 5 50.47 does not require that elaborate arrangemente for medical services be made beyond those arrangements specifically made for on-site personnel and emergency workers.
III. Argument The standards governing summary disposition motions in an NRC proceeding are set forth in Applicant's Memorandum of Law.
In summary, where, as here, a properly supported motion for
, summary disposition is made, the party opposing the motion must come forward with substantial facts establishing that a genuine issue of fact remains to be heard. In the absence of such a showing, the movant is entitled to a decision in its favor on that contention as a matter of law.
\ .
Applying the foregoing standards to this case, it is clear i
that Applicant's motion for summary disposition on Reed _
l Contention 10 should be granted. Applicant does not contest !
the need for arrangements for. medical services, which is the subject'of Reed Contention 10. But it is clear from the State Plan, the radiological emergency response plans for the four counties in the Callaway Plant plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone ("EPZ"), and the affidavit of Dr. Roger E.
Linnemann on the issue of necessary medical treatment, that more than adequate arrangements for medical services have been made for local governments' contaminated, injured emergency workers and members of the public. See Reed Contention 10.
Accordingly, there are no material issues in controversy between Mr. Reed and Applicant with respect to arrangements for medical services. In making this judgment, it must be kept in mind that there are fewer than 17,000 residents in the entire Callaway Plant EPZ: approximately 15,300 in Callaway County,
, including Fulton, 860 in Osage County, 200 in Gasconade County, and 500 in Montgomery County. Stanfill-2, 1 4.
A review of the.four EPZ county radiological emergency response plans and the State Plan establishes *that adequate arrangements for medical services have been made. Annex K of the county plans is entitled Medical and Public Health. Support.
Annex K of the Callaway/Fulton Plan provides that in Callaway
3s tT
-County /Fulton, Callaway Memorial Hospital has been designated
'to receive and treat individuals with injuries, including those _
- complicated by.the presence of radioactive contamination or
- having.significant overexposure to radiation. Callaway
- County /Fulton is obtaining a letter of agreement with Callaway
- Memorial Hospital. See Clark-15, Exhibit E. ' Applicant already
. has obtained and included in Appendix C of the RERP such a i letter for on-site pernonnel. See Attachment 1. Callaway Memorial Hospital also will coordinate the provisione of
- hospital medical care and treatment in support of emergency response for an incident'at the Callaway Plant. For Osage County.and Gasconade County residents, this function is assumed
- by the Memorial Community Hospital in Jefferson City.1/ See Annex.K,Section I.A of Osage Plan and of Gasconade Plan. For Montgomery County, Boone County Hospital in Columbia, Missouri will receive.and treat individuals with injuries, including-those complicated by the presence of radiological contamination er exposure. Montgomery Plan, Annex K,Section I.A. Should space at Callaway Memorial Hospital, Memorial Community 1/ In his deposition, Mr. Reed expressed concern about the-
-a bility of:the Hermann-Area Hospital to handle injuries compli-cated by contamination. Deposition at 306. While the
. Gasconade Plan provides that.the Hermann-Area Hospital will be the primary' medical facility ~ serving'the County population, the l contaminated or exposed' individual will be sent to Memorial i Community-Hospital. Gasconade Plan, Annex K, if I.A and II.A. H See ' also Montgomery Plan, -' Annex K, : 55 J.A~and II.A.
6 4
g e-w y --w ,- e- ~,en-w-
Hospital or Boone County Hospital become-saturated, or the evacuation of Fulton be. ordered, back-up medical facilities are _
located.at St. Mary's Health Center and Charles E. Still Hospital in Jefferson City, as well as the University of Missouri Medical Center in Columbia, Missouri. All of these facilities are capable of evaluating radiation exposure and uptake, and include staff who are adequately prepared to handle contaminated' individuals. See Annex K,Section II of each of the county plans. The State has obtained a letter of agreement applicable to the counties from' Memorial Community Hospital and has requested letters of agreement with Boone County Hospital, 1
St. Mary's Health Center and Charles E. Still Hospital. State Plan,-' Appendix 7 at pages 7.1 and 7.7.
- In Callaway County /Fulton.and in Montgomery. County, the primary ambulance service serving the EPZ population is the Callaway County Ambulance District. In Osage. County, this function is assumed by the Osage-County Ambulance District;-in Gasconade County,.this function is assumed by the Hermann Ambulance District. See Annex K,Section III of each of the county plans. The primary ambulance service:would coordinate and' dispatch ambulances required to support local emergency response, provide first' aid and emergency transportation for ill or injured 1 individuals, including those complicated by the presence of radioactive contamination or having significant 4
+
_g.
1
-l'
, overexposure to radiation and, if necessary, invoke agreements with ambulance' services located outside of the EPZ. Id. at
'Section I.B.
Agreements.that have been or will be obtained from
' ambulance' services are-listed in Appendix 4 of the Callaway/
Fulton Plan. Those letters that already have been obtained are attached to-the Affidavit of Walter M. Clark on Reed Contention 15.(Letters of Agreement) as Exhibit "D". In addition,
' Applicant has obtained a letter cf agreement from Callaway
- County Ambulance District-which is contained in Appendix C of t
the RERP (see Attachment 2), and the letter of agreement '
lbetween the State of Missouri and Memorial Community Hospital includes the commitment of ambulance services. State Plan, j Appendix 7 at 7.7.
Each-of the county plans also provides that if transporta-tion is-needed beyond normal ambulance range, or_if time-is critical, air transport will be provided by the Missouri State Highway Patrol or the National Guard, as requested.by the State Emergency Management Agency ("SEMA"). See Annex K, Section III.C of each of the four county plans. Letters of' agreement from-the Highway Patrol and.the National. Guard to SEMA are
~
contained in Annex A of the State-Plan'and are appended heretoi as Attachments 3 and 4.
-c . , , . .,- , ,- - -.
i l
The' State Plan contains a list of medical facilities in
-the Callaway Plant area capable of handling radiologically _
injured or potentially radioactive contaminated patients.
State Plan, Annex F, Attachment 1.
See Attachment 5.
The sufficiency of the medical arrangements made for county emergency workers and members of the public who might need treatment as a result of a radiological accident at the Callaway Plant is confirmed by Dr. Roger E. Linnemann in his affidavit on. Reed Contention 10. Dr. Linnemann is a medical doctor with particular expertise in the area of radiological health. Dr. Linnemann is the Vice Chairman of Radiation Management Corporation ("RMC"), a consulting firm that provides medical expertise and support in the event of an accident involving injury to workers at nuclear power plants. RMC's Emergency Medical Assistance Program provides 24-hour emergency support to some 20 nuclear power plant sites throughout the country. The Callaway Plant will participate in this program.
Linnemann-10, 1 1, 18; RERP, S 5.3.5.
In his affidavit, Dr. Linnemann endorses the medical arrangements established in the RERP, the county plans and the State Plan for injured, contaminated and/or exposed individuals. Dr. Linnemann first explains the distinction between exposure and contamination. In the case of radiation exposure, the radiation passes through the body as it does in 1
medical x-rays. The patient suffers injury as a result of the energy deposited.in the cells during the period of radiation, _
but 'the patient is not radioactive and presents no hazard to response personnel. Once the body has been irradiated, a predictable clinical course ensues which is directly correlated with exposure dose and dose rate. This clinical course cannot be interrupted and will evolve over a period of days and weeks.
Linnemann-10, 1 4. Consequently, in the case of an irradiated patient who is also traumatically injured, treatment of the injury always takes precedence over treatment of the exposure.
Id. at 1 8.
Contamination, on the other hand, results from loose radioactive particles adhering to the body. By definitien, these particles emit radiation, and so exposure hazards remain until these particles are removed. Fortunately, radioactive contamination is easy to detect and decontamination is easily accomplished through removal of clothes and bathing. Again, whatever expcsure is suffered through contamination will follow a predictable clinical course based on the exposure level of the dose and the dose rate. This course cannot be interrupted and will evolve over a period of time. Id. at 1 S.
In view of the difference between exposure and contami-nation, special emergency facilities are unnecessary for the exposed, injured individual. If however, it is determined that 1
1 I
I
the patient-is contaminated, procedures are modified to control
, the spread of. contamination and to reduce exposures to others.
.These procedures are not unique to medical radiological response planning. They are philosophically the same ac used in dealing.with chemical contamination or septic cases. Id. at
-11 6-7. .
Consistent with the Commission's position in San Onofre, Dr. Linnemann does not see a need for large numbers of hospital beds for an injured, exposed or contaminated population. Id.
at 11 10-15. At most, selective medical tests will need to be performed;~however, this can be done_in an unhurried, organized manner in the days following the accident. Id. at 11 16-17.
Arrangements can be made for any necessary treatment on an ad hoc basis following the accident. Id. at 11 20-22.
. The Callaway Plant-is in the process of becoming a part of
- RMC's national emergency medical' assistance program. As a part of that program,-Callaway Memorial Hospital and the Callaway
. County. Ambulance District are the primary medical services that will be trained to be able to respond properly to the need to
~
transport and treat contaminated, injured or exposed'on-site personnel. RMC will bach up this support at both the plant and~
Callaway Memorial Hospital with 24-hour medical.and health physics expertise to consult on any type of. radiation injury.
This expertise consists of radiation medical physicians,
- -~s -
g- n + w ygre m ~,+ --s-gW
certified health physics technicians, and special instrumentation which can be transported immediately upon notification to the Callaway Plant or the Callaway Memorial Hospital. In' addition, RMC maintains laboratory support for evaluation of a patient's exposures. An outline of the training program for Callaway Memorial Hospital is attached to Dr. Linnemann's affidavit on medical treatment as Exhibit "B".
RERP, S 6.8.4; Linnemann-lO at 11 18, 24.
In Dr. Linnemann's professional opinion, Callaway Memorial Hospital can adequately handle any off-site contamination and injured patients that may result from the course of an accident at the Callaway Plant. Furthermore, other specified hospitals in the area as well as all ambulances that potentially will be required to respond to radiological emergencies as a result of an accident at the Callaway Plant will have the opportunity to participate in the medical training that will be provided to Callaway Memerial Hospital and the Callaway County Ambulance District. Id. at 11 23-24.
The medical arrangements described above more than satisfy the required degree of planning for medical arrangements established by the Commission in the San Onofre cas'e as sufficient, pursuant to-10 C.F.R. $ 50.47(b)(12). The on-site and off-site plans identify the primary local medical service
. facilities capable of providing support for on-site and l
l u
l
1 i
-off-site contaminated injured individuals as well as back up facilities in the area. RERP $ 6.8.4; County Plans at Annex K; _
State Plan, Annex F, Attachment 1 (Attachment 5 hereto). No l special arrangements need to be made for the treatment of individuals with radiation injuries. Diagnosis and treatment could take place at most existing medical facilities. In addition, available if necessary are the medical facilities around the country with which-RMC is affiliated. See Attachment 6 (letter of agreement).
IV. ' Conclusion Arrangements for providing medical services to off-site emergency workers and the public have been made. Reed Contention 10 therefore has been fully-satisfied because there D
1 l,
is no outstanding issue of material fact. Accordingly, p Applicant's motion for summary dispostion should be granted. ,
u Respectfully submitted, SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE l
b fd. k?LA Thomas A. Baxter, P.C. j Deborah B. Bauser j 1
Counsel for Applicant I 1800 M Street, N.W ,
Washington, D.C. 20036 j (202) 822-1000 j May 20, 1983 I
l
'Ch- CONTENTION 10, ATTACHMENT 1
'._. ,. . . . ca-e 4 .g : CALLAWAY M EMORI AL H O SPITAL
.I one.scrranson sTncer
.. 8 as . ,,,
.. y :~ > .
FUt. TON. MISSOURI 65251 A
~HLr-'-- a-s- . p I4 2
~~
TEUPHONE 314 642 3376 s...
a d
! p -
1 s
August 22, 1979 l
l
& , D. F. Scimell Managar-Nuclear Enp=ving thian Electric Cc:rpany P.O. Box 149 St. Iouis, Missouri '63166 t
Dear Mr. Phnall:
c=11=ay Comty Mecorial Hospital Board of Trustees and the Staff Fave discussed and expressed tb=iv willingness to provide health services for IJbion Electric e=ployees, for eir~rar energency or non-emergency care.
The Callaway County Memorial Hospital offers Emergency Rocm service twenty-four hours a day, with a doctor on call arotnd the clock. We have a 4-bed Intensive Care Unit. Also, our X-ray ard Laboratory de-partments have 24-hour coverage.
The c=11=ay County Ambulance Service i.s based at tFa hospital, with 24-hour coverage.
At scue later date perhaps we c'ould have a discussion regarding any wi=1 services needed by your coupany's employees.
Please feel free to call or drop by for any other infozzation needed.
i Sincerely.,
's /*
/
Sbon((R..Feinlengemu'.y. EsN n Chief Executive Officer SRH/mf
CONTENTION 10, ATTACHMENT 2 CALLAWAY . COUNTY AMBULANCE DISTRICT FULTON, MISSOURI 65251 -
I May 18,1982 Mr. Donald F. Schnell Vice President Union Electric Company J P. O. Box 149 St. Louis, Missouri RE: Agreement between Callaway Ambulance and U. E.
Dear Mr. Schnell:
This letter will serve to notify you and Union Electric of the decision of the Callaway County Ambulance Board of Directors to provide service to the Union Electric Power Plant at Reform.
The Board in a vote of 3 in favor, O against, and 1 abstaining to provide the services in agreement to the letter attached. The Board understands that according to the attached letter, training and other needed items will be provided by Union Electric.
Attached please find a copy of the Special Board Meeting Minutes of March 30, 1982 and a copy of the letter to the County- Court with attachments (This is the agreement we are speaking of).
Thank you again.
If there are any other questions, or comments, please do not hesitate to call on me.
S ncerel , -
CV.
Mar {ilynS coe,>M}'74WG2s Chairman Callaway County Ambulance Board of Directors cca file Milt Stiller All Board Members N
i 1
_. . . _-- .-z U
- c. . . . - , .
._ = - - . - . . . e f, -- -. w - . w . e. f Director /
CONTENTION 10, ATTACHMENT 3 ;
8
.i DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY MISSOURI STATE HIGHWAY PATROL .
! A. S. Whitmer, Superintendent
!$le East Else Street 4 Meiling Address: I
- s. as t Janeerse Q y. Missouri 65102 Teispheme 334 7513313 June 29, 1982 q
Mr. William R. Beaty, Director State Emergency Management Agency .
Post Office Box 116 Jefferson City, Missouri 63102 .
Dear Mr. Beaty:
~
i
- The Missouri State Highway Patrol agrees to support the total emergency response recovery effort of the State in the event of an accident involv-f-
ing a nuclear power plant in the following manner: ,
i. ) l'. By providing emergency traffic control coordination.
- 2. By providing augnantatien of local law enforcement.
- 3. By performing mobile radiological monitoring as needed.
4 .' By providing emergency enemmmmiestions for Sta.:e operations.
- 5. By assisting in the evacuation of commsunities.
- 6. By providing emergency transportation by air or land for emergency teams if required.
Major J. H. Little has been designated to manage Patrol operations should such an accident occur. You can contact Major Little at the Eighway Patrol General Headquarters.
Sincerely,-
l h. $.
l A. S. WHITMER 1 Superintendent -- - -
-~
i 94r l
CALLAWAY SNP 1 MAY 1963 L_m, . _ . . . . _ _ .._ . . - - - - - -e- -" -- - ' ' ~ - - - "
cM" CONTENTION,10, ATTACHMENT 4 j "-[ ,
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY ***Cd
- ~
- HEADQUARTERS MISSOURI NATIONAL GUARD !
Office of the Adjutant General -
. 1717 !adustnal Drive I e .- Jefferson City, Missouri 65101
, Phone 314 - 7512321 TAG 12 July 1982
~ SUBJEfT: Missouri Nuclear Accident Plan for Nuclear Power Plants l l
William R. Beaty, Director 1
State Emergency Management Agency l P.'0. box 116 l Jefferson City, Missouri 65102 l
I
- 1. The Missouri National Guard agrees to support the total emergency response
! and recovery effort of the State in the event of an accident involving a j nuclear power plant, when ordered by the Governor, in the 'following menner:
l.3 f;
- a. Evacuation and security of communities to include augmentation of emergency traffic control. '
l l b. Radiological monitoring by traffic control personnel and periodic
] reporting of radiological information using equipment provided by the MONET.
- c. Emergency transportation of health physics personnel and other i resources.
1 j d. Transportation of emergency potable water.
! e. Military assistance.
- 2. Procedures for iglementation of the above can be found in the M3ARNG-
, . State Emergency Duty SOP and the SOP for Nuclear Power Plant accidents /
1 incidents.
- l 3. Alerting procedures and Emergency Call List: Alerting or activation of personnel from the NONG will be accomplished by notifying one of the personnel listed below (in priority)-at 75142321. Activation of personnel will be )
'secomplished in accordance with ; atinent SOPS and regulations. 1
. l l
, . N. -
. , . . - . m .w *.su w E . *
~)
1; CALLMULY AG 1 NAY 1983 MM MO
_. n w ._ _ _- - - - - . - -
4- -
CONTENTION 10, ATTACHMENT-5 NUCLEAR ACCIDENT PLAN di
~
ATTACEMENT 1 TO ANNEX F i
MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES - i Following are medical t care f acilities which have the cap onctive contaminated pati en s.
C W -AWAY PLANT AREk Callaway Memorial Hospital Administrator: Sharon Heinien ;
314/642-3376 828 Jefferson
- - Fulton, MO l
Memorial Community Hospital! Administrator: Gordon Butler l 314/635-6811 1432 Southwest Blvd.
Jefferson City, MO Boone County Hospital Administrator: Warren Rutherford 1600 E. Broadway 314/875-4545 Columbia, MO Robert Smith b:.,i
. Univ, of Missouri Medical Centar 314/882-4141 Director:
Stadium Drive
' Columbia, MO Administrator: Gary Stremel E St. Mary's Health Center 314/635-8141 Jefferson City, MO Charles E. Still Hospital Administrator: James Cox Jefferson City, MD 314/635-7141 NOTE:
There are no hospitals in Missouri with whole body counters and only limited bioassay evaluation-Therefore, Missouri will depend upon the exists. c 1
following resources'for these services:
Radiation Management Corporation retained RMC will provide by' Union Electric mobile (if Callaway has an accident) .-
o whole body counter on request-from Union Electric.
\
- 6- .m p . ,
= Gd -
MAY 1983 CALLAMAY F1.1 w
- - - -= __ =m_
~'
CONTENTION 10, ATTACHMENT 6 I . '
9,0 UM n.L.A & _
August 29, 1979 Mr. D. F. Schnell l Manager, Nuclear Engineering Dept. i Union Electric Company P.O. Box 149 i
St. Louis, MO 63166 Dear Mr. Schnell; This letter confirms our support of the Union Electric Radio-logical Emergency Response Plan (RERP) at the Callaway Plant.
We will cooperate in the implementation of the RERP by providing medical and heal.th physics support as delineated in our Emergency Medical Assistance Plan. This support includes training of hospital and ambulance personnel, consultation to supporting hospitals concerning emergency medical treatment of contaminated patients, and provision for a radiation medical facility at Northwestern Memorial Hospital, in Chicago, or the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
t Signed /M /(/48)(MM Title VICC M.9/05N7 - 41V/ DJ'J.
%geDila,.L
%. .f@M.Ul".Pl",
d4 UliJJi CDITCPullDil Midwest Di9:r- -- . - , - -
- 3358 C:mmercial Avenue
.nohbrook, Ilhnois 600G2
~291 1030
._~...% -4 .
_ ,