Similar Documents at Byron |
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20207E0051999-03-0202 March 1999 Transcript of 990302 Public Meeting with Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-104.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20236H9381998-06-30030 June 1998 Transcript of 980630 Meeting W/Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-123.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20198P3001997-11-0404 November 1997 Transcript of 971104 Public Meeting W/Ceco in Rockville,Md Re Measures Established by Ceco to Track Plant Performance & to Gain Understanding of CAs Put Into Place to Improve Safety.Pp 1-105.W/Certificate & Viewgraphs ML20149M2951996-11-29029 November 1996 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.60 Re Safety Margins Recommended in ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Case N-514 TXX-9522, Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources1995-08-26026 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources ML20059C2351993-12-17017 December 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Commercial Grade Item Dedication ML20044A8111990-06-27027 June 1990 Comment Opposing Closure of Lpdr of Rockford Public Library ML20245J0191989-04-14014 April 1989 Comment Re Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20214X1871987-06-11011 June 1987 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $25,000 Based on Four Severity Level III Violations Noted During 860721-0808 Insp ML20205Q1711987-04-0202 April 1987 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $25,000. App Re Evaluations & Conclusions Encl IR 05000812/20100311987-02-26026 February 1987 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $100,000 Based on Violations Noted During Insps on 850812-1031 ML20210T7321987-02-11011 February 1987 Unexecuted Amend 6 to Indemnity Agreement B-97 Substituting Item 3 of Attachment to Indemnity Agreement in Entirety W/ Listed License Numbers,Effective 870130 ML20209J3251987-01-30030 January 1987 Transcript of 870130 Commission Discussion/Possible Vote on Full Power OL for Facility.Pp 1-72.Supporting Viewgraphs Encl ML20213G4381986-10-24024 October 1986 Unexecuted Amend 5 to Indemnity Agreement B-97,substituting Item 3 of Attachment to Agreement in Entirety W/Listed License Numbers,Effective on 861106 ML20211B0841986-08-0505 August 1986 Transcript of 860805 Meeting Between Region Iii,Computer Interference Elimination & Util in Redmond,Wa Re Plant as-built Drawing Review.Pp 1-200 IR 05000506/20070221986-05-0202 May 1986 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $25,000 for Violations Noted During Insp on 850506-0722.Violations Noted:Failure to Establish Radiological Safety Procedures & to Adequately Train Personnel ML20138C7301985-12-0909 December 1985 Order Imposing Civil Penalty in Amount of $25,000 Per 850606 Notice of Violation & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty.Licensee May Request Hearing within 30 Days of Date of Order ML20205E8741985-10-28028 October 1985 Exemption from GDC 4 of 10CFR50,App a Requirement to Install Protective Devices Associated W/Postulated Pipe Breaks Primary Coolant Sys.Topical Rept Evaluation Encl ML20102A2981985-01-0707 January 1985 Petition Requesting Aslab Grant Intervenor Appeal & Order Further Hearings on Safety of Plant ML20099L2581984-11-27027 November 1984 Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20099G5381984-11-23023 November 1984 Supplemental Appeal Brief in Response to Intervenor 841106 Supplemental Brief on Appeal & in Support of ASLB 841016 Supplemental Initial Decision Authorizing Issuance of Ol. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20100K0411984-11-22022 November 1984 Submits Concerns Re Safety of Local Residents in Event of Accident & Excessively High Cost of Projected Operation of Facility ML20107H7841984-11-0606 November 1984 Supplemental Brief on Appeal of ASLB 841016 Supplemental Initial Decision Granting Authority for Issuance of Ol. Decision Should Be Reversed.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20140E4081984-10-31031 October 1984 Executed Amend 1 to Indemnity Agreement B-97,deleting Items 2A & 3 in Entirety ML20098G8841984-10-0202 October 1984 Joint Statement of RW Manz & W Faires Re Findings 3-11 Through 3-17 of NRC 830930 Integrated Design Insp Rept. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20098G8681984-10-0202 October 1984 Answer to Intervenor Motion to Reopen Record Re Bechtel Independent Design Review.Motion Should Be Denied ML20098G8901984-10-0202 October 1984 Joint Statement of Kj Green & RW Hooks Re Integrated Design Insp ML20098G8911984-10-0202 October 1984 Joint Statement of Cw Dick & EM Hughes Re Independent Design Insp ML20098G8821984-10-0101 October 1984 Affidavit of Kj Green Re Integrated Design Insp Concerning Mechanical Engineering Work ML20098G8741984-10-0101 October 1984 Affidavit of Br Shelton Re Integrated Design Insp ML20098G8881984-09-29029 September 1984 Affidavit of RW Hooks Re Integrated Design Insp Concerning Structural Design ML20098G8831984-09-28028 September 1984 Affidavit of W Faires Re Findings 3-15 & 3-16 of NRC 830930 Integrated Design Insp Rept ML20098G8811984-09-28028 September 1984 Affidavit of Cw Dick Re Independent Design Review ML20098G8791984-09-28028 September 1984 Affidavit of RP Tuetken Re Readiness for Fuel Loading ML20098G8781984-09-28028 September 1984 Affidavit of RW Manz Concerning Findings 3-11 Through 3-14 & 3-17 of NRC 830930 Integrated Design Insp Re Westinghouse ML20098G8871984-09-28028 September 1984 Affidavit of EM Hughes Re Idvp ML20098G8851984-09-27027 September 1984 Affidavit of Rl Heumann Re Costs of Delay in Startup & Operation of Unit 1 ML20098E2371984-09-24024 September 1984 Reply to Intervenor 840918 Proposed Supplemental Initial Decision.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20097E7221984-09-13013 September 1984 Agreed Motion for Time Extension Until 841101 to File Petition for Hearing Re Emergency Planning Commitment W ML20097C5311984-09-12012 September 1984 Motion to Reopen Record to Include Plant Design as Issue. Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20097B7791984-09-10010 September 1984 Proposed Supplemental Initial Decision Re Reinsp Program. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20096A6391984-08-30030 August 1984 Rebuttal Testimony of RW Hooks Re Validity of Info in Attachment 7 to Stokes Testimony Concerning Design Assumption for Plant.Stokes Info Inapplicable to Plant. Related Correspondence ML20096A6191984-08-30030 August 1984 Rebuttal Testimony of B Erler Re Stokes Allegations Concerning Evaluations of Discrepancies in Calculated Actual Stress Performed by Sargent & Lundy.Related Correspondence ML20096A6261984-08-30030 August 1984 Summary of Rebuttal Testimony & Testimony of ML Somsag, Eb Branch,D Demoss,Mr Frankel,Bf Maurer & Jk Buchanan Re Plant QC Inspector Reinsp Program & C Stokes Allegations Re Welds.Related Correspondence ML20096A6441984-08-28028 August 1984 Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance in Proceeding.Related Correspondence ML20112D5271984-08-24024 August 1984 Applicant Exhibit A-R-4,consisting of Feb 1984 Rept on Bryon QC Inspector Reinsp Program ML20112D5031984-08-24024 August 1984 Applicant Exhibit A-R-5,consisting of June 1984 Suppl to Rept on Bryon QC Inspector Reinsp Program ML20112D7441984-08-23023 August 1984 Intervenor Exhibit I-R-1,consisting of Undated List of Teutken Safety Category Insp Types ML20112D7511984-08-21021 August 1984 Staff Exhibit S-R-1,consisting of 840813 Instruction for Walkdown of Cable Tray Hanger Connection Welds ML20112D4641984-08-21021 August 1984 Intervenor Exhibit I-R-11,consisting of Undated Chronological Date Listing of Util Responses to Interrogatory 12.VA Judson to Mi Miller Re Interrogatory 12 & Supplemental Responses Encl 1999-03-02
[Table view] Category:TRANSCRIPTS
MONTHYEARML20207E0051999-03-0202 March 1999 Transcript of 990302 Public Meeting with Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-104.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20236H9381998-06-30030 June 1998 Transcript of 980630 Meeting W/Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-123.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20198P3001997-11-0404 November 1997 Transcript of 971104 Public Meeting W/Ceco in Rockville,Md Re Measures Established by Ceco to Track Plant Performance & to Gain Understanding of CAs Put Into Place to Improve Safety.Pp 1-105.W/Certificate & Viewgraphs ML20209J3251987-01-30030 January 1987 Transcript of 870130 Commission Discussion/Possible Vote on Full Power OL for Facility.Pp 1-72.Supporting Viewgraphs Encl ML20211B0841986-08-0505 August 1986 Transcript of 860805 Meeting Between Region Iii,Computer Interference Elimination & Util in Redmond,Wa Re Plant as-built Drawing Review.Pp 1-200 ML20096A6261984-08-30030 August 1984 Summary of Rebuttal Testimony & Testimony of ML Somsag, Eb Branch,D Demoss,Mr Frankel,Bf Maurer & Jk Buchanan Re Plant QC Inspector Reinsp Program & C Stokes Allegations Re Welds.Related Correspondence ML20096A6191984-08-30030 August 1984 Rebuttal Testimony of B Erler Re Stokes Allegations Concerning Evaluations of Discrepancies in Calculated Actual Stress Performed by Sargent & Lundy.Related Correspondence ML20096A6391984-08-30030 August 1984 Rebuttal Testimony of RW Hooks Re Validity of Info in Attachment 7 to Stokes Testimony Concerning Design Assumption for Plant.Stokes Info Inapplicable to Plant. Related Correspondence ML20094P7721984-08-17017 August 1984 Summary of Testimony & Direct Testimony of CC Stokes on Reinsp Program.Related Correspondence ML20094R1021984-08-17017 August 1984 Transcript of CC Stokes 840817 Deposition in Chicago,Il. Pp 1-173.Vol Ii.Related Correspondence ML20094P5991984-08-16016 August 1984 Direct Testimony of CC Stokes Re Engineering Evaluations Performed & Use of Engineering Judgement by Sargent & Lundy. Suggests Need for Independent Engineering Analysis of Safety Significance of Reinsp Program.Related Correspondence ML20094P6311984-08-14014 August 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Ds Kochhar on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20094P6831984-08-13013 August 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Wh Bleuel on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program.Resume Encl.Related Correspondence ML20094P6951984-08-13013 August 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of EP Erickson on Contention 1 Re Reinsp program-inspector Qualification & Work Quality.Resume & Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20093L4881984-07-30030 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Eb Branch Re Contention 1 (Reinsp Program,Work Quality).Related Correspondence ML20093L1811984-07-30030 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of KT Kostal on Contention 1 Re Capacity of Sys Control Corp Supplied Components to Carry Design Loads.Related Correspondence ML20093L2721984-07-30030 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Ak Singh on Contention 1 Re Evaluations of Discrepancies in Cable Tray Hanger Connections,Solid Bottom Tray Welds & Ladder Tray Weld Connections.Related Correspondence ML20093L2051984-07-30030 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Ld Johnson on Contention 1 Re Adequacy of Sys Control Corp Supplied Main Control Boards.Related Correspondence ML20090E5521984-07-17017 July 1984 Testimony of Eb Branch Re Job Responsibilities,Educ Background & Work Experience.Related Correspondence ML20090A7981984-07-0909 July 1984 Testimony of Gf Marcus Re Pittsburgh Testing Lab Source Insp of Equipment & Components Supplied by Sys Control Corp ML20090A8121984-07-0909 July 1984 Testimony of Bf Maurer Re Analysis of Structural Adequacy of Main Control Panels Designed & Fabricated by Sys Control Corp ML20092P7921984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of ML Somsag Re QA Inspector Reinsp Program for Hunter Corp.Related Correspondence ML20092P7891984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Rv Laney on Contention 1 Re Work Quality.Related Correspondence ML20092P7951984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Ak Singh on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program,Work Quality.Related Correspondence ML20092P7941984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of LO Delgeorge on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program,Inspector Qualification & Work Quality.Related Correspondence ML20092P5541984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Dl Leone on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program for Work Quality ML20092P5551984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of R French on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program ML20092P7781984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Wj Shewski on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program,Inspector Qualification.Related Correspondence ML20092P7811984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Jm Mclaughlin on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program,Work Quality.Related Correspondence ML20092P7871984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Direct Testimony & Testimony of RP Tuetken Re Reinsp Program.Related Correspondence ML20092P7851984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Wb Behnke on Contention 1 Re Overview of Quality Program,Work Quality. Related Correspondence ML20092N4971984-06-29029 June 1984 Testimony of Bg Treece on Issues 5 & 6 Re Cable Overtensioning,As Limited by ASLB 840608 Order.Related Correspondence ML20092N4911984-06-29029 June 1984 Summary of Direct Testimony of Jo Binder on Issues 5 & 6 Re Cable Overtensioning,As Limited by ASLB 840608 Order.Related Correspondence ML20092K7691984-06-26026 June 1984 Summary of Testimony of J Hansel on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML20205H8901983-08-10010 August 1983 Public Version of Transcript of 830810 in Camera,Ex Parte Hearing in Rockford,Il.Pp 7,585-7,610 ML20205H8941983-08-10010 August 1983 Public Version of Transcript of 830810 in Camera,Ex Parte Hearing W/Ofc of Investigations in Rockford,Il.Pp 7,611.1- 7,611.71 ML20205H8841983-08-0909 August 1983 Public Version of Transcript of 830809 in Camera,Ex Parte Hearing in Rockford,Il.Pp 7,304-7,405 ML20080B3051983-08-0303 August 1983 Testimony of RP Tuetken Re Util Reinsp Program of Work Performed by Contractor Insp Personnel Prior to NRC Region III Mar,Apr & May 1982 Insps.Appropriate Steps Taken to Remedy Problems ML20080B3091983-08-0303 August 1983 Testimony of Aw Koca Re General Nature of Hatfield Inspector Training & Certification Program.Certification of J Hughes Described ML20080B2951983-08-0303 August 1983 Testimony of Ma Stanish Re Recertification of Qa/Qc Inspectors Subsequent to NRC Region III Mar,Apr & May 1982 Special Team Insps.Reinsp Program Implemented to Review Work Performed by Inspectors Before NRC 1982 Insp ML20023C7151983-05-12012 May 1983 Testimony of P Holmbeck Re Investigation Into Adequacy of Emergency Plans Re Emergency Planning Contentions.Util Made No Attempt to Study Protective Value of Sheltering Populations Around Plant ML20204F5721983-04-26026 April 1983 Transcript of 830426 Hearing in Rockford,Il.Pp 5,964-6,156 ML20069M4791983-04-25025 April 1983 Handwritten Testimony of J Hughes Re Qa/Qc at Facility ML20069K5691983-04-21021 April 1983 Testimony of Ld Butterfield Re Steam Generator Tube Integrity.Proposed Steam Generator Mods Would Minimize Tube Wear Due to Flow Induced Vibration.Related Correspondence ML20069K5631983-04-21021 April 1983 Revised Testimony of Tf Timmons Re Steam Generator Tube Integrity (Flow Induced Vibration Phenomenon).No Significant Tube Wear Will Be Experienced in Steam Generators Due to Flow Induced Vibration.Related Correspondence ML20073J6691983-04-18018 April 1983 Testimony of Jl Murphy on Rockford League of Women Voters & Dekalb Area Alliance for Responsible Energy/Sinnissippi Alliance for Environ Consolidated Emergency Planning Contentions 3 & 13.Related Correspondence ML20073K4461983-04-18018 April 1983 Rebuttal Testimony of Levine Re Rockford League of Women Voters Contentions 8 & 62 & Dekalb Area Alliance for Responsible Energy/Sinnissippi Alliance for Environ Contention 2a on Public Risk.Related Correspondence ML20073G4241983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Ee Jones Re State of Il Emergency Svc & Disaster Agency Responsibilities Concerning Emergency Planning for Nuclear Facilities & Intervenor Amended Emergency Planning Contention ML20073G4051983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Jc Golden Re Amended Emergency Planning Contention ML20073G4121983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Dl Smith Re Resources Available for Transport & Treatment of Contaminated Injured Persons.Resume Encl 1999-03-02
[Table view] Category:DEPOSITIONS
MONTHYEARML20207E0051999-03-0202 March 1999 Transcript of 990302 Public Meeting with Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-104.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20236H9381998-06-30030 June 1998 Transcript of 980630 Meeting W/Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-123.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20198P3001997-11-0404 November 1997 Transcript of 971104 Public Meeting W/Ceco in Rockville,Md Re Measures Established by Ceco to Track Plant Performance & to Gain Understanding of CAs Put Into Place to Improve Safety.Pp 1-105.W/Certificate & Viewgraphs ML20209J3251987-01-30030 January 1987 Transcript of 870130 Commission Discussion/Possible Vote on Full Power OL for Facility.Pp 1-72.Supporting Viewgraphs Encl ML20211B0841986-08-0505 August 1986 Transcript of 860805 Meeting Between Region Iii,Computer Interference Elimination & Util in Redmond,Wa Re Plant as-built Drawing Review.Pp 1-200 ML20096A6261984-08-30030 August 1984 Summary of Rebuttal Testimony & Testimony of ML Somsag, Eb Branch,D Demoss,Mr Frankel,Bf Maurer & Jk Buchanan Re Plant QC Inspector Reinsp Program & C Stokes Allegations Re Welds.Related Correspondence ML20096A6191984-08-30030 August 1984 Rebuttal Testimony of B Erler Re Stokes Allegations Concerning Evaluations of Discrepancies in Calculated Actual Stress Performed by Sargent & Lundy.Related Correspondence ML20096A6391984-08-30030 August 1984 Rebuttal Testimony of RW Hooks Re Validity of Info in Attachment 7 to Stokes Testimony Concerning Design Assumption for Plant.Stokes Info Inapplicable to Plant. Related Correspondence ML20094P7721984-08-17017 August 1984 Summary of Testimony & Direct Testimony of CC Stokes on Reinsp Program.Related Correspondence ML20094R1021984-08-17017 August 1984 Transcript of CC Stokes 840817 Deposition in Chicago,Il. Pp 1-173.Vol Ii.Related Correspondence ML20094P5991984-08-16016 August 1984 Direct Testimony of CC Stokes Re Engineering Evaluations Performed & Use of Engineering Judgement by Sargent & Lundy. Suggests Need for Independent Engineering Analysis of Safety Significance of Reinsp Program.Related Correspondence ML20094P6311984-08-14014 August 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Ds Kochhar on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20094P6831984-08-13013 August 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Wh Bleuel on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program.Resume Encl.Related Correspondence ML20094P6951984-08-13013 August 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of EP Erickson on Contention 1 Re Reinsp program-inspector Qualification & Work Quality.Resume & Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20093L4881984-07-30030 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Eb Branch Re Contention 1 (Reinsp Program,Work Quality).Related Correspondence ML20093L1811984-07-30030 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of KT Kostal on Contention 1 Re Capacity of Sys Control Corp Supplied Components to Carry Design Loads.Related Correspondence ML20093L2721984-07-30030 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Ak Singh on Contention 1 Re Evaluations of Discrepancies in Cable Tray Hanger Connections,Solid Bottom Tray Welds & Ladder Tray Weld Connections.Related Correspondence ML20093L2051984-07-30030 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Ld Johnson on Contention 1 Re Adequacy of Sys Control Corp Supplied Main Control Boards.Related Correspondence ML20090E5521984-07-17017 July 1984 Testimony of Eb Branch Re Job Responsibilities,Educ Background & Work Experience.Related Correspondence ML20090A7981984-07-0909 July 1984 Testimony of Gf Marcus Re Pittsburgh Testing Lab Source Insp of Equipment & Components Supplied by Sys Control Corp ML20090A8121984-07-0909 July 1984 Testimony of Bf Maurer Re Analysis of Structural Adequacy of Main Control Panels Designed & Fabricated by Sys Control Corp ML20092P7921984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of ML Somsag Re QA Inspector Reinsp Program for Hunter Corp.Related Correspondence ML20092P7891984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Rv Laney on Contention 1 Re Work Quality.Related Correspondence ML20092P7951984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Ak Singh on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program,Work Quality.Related Correspondence ML20092P7941984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of LO Delgeorge on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program,Inspector Qualification & Work Quality.Related Correspondence ML20092P5541984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Dl Leone on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program for Work Quality ML20092P5551984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of R French on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program ML20092P7781984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Wj Shewski on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program,Inspector Qualification.Related Correspondence ML20092P7811984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Jm Mclaughlin on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program,Work Quality.Related Correspondence ML20092P7871984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Direct Testimony & Testimony of RP Tuetken Re Reinsp Program.Related Correspondence ML20092P7851984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Wb Behnke on Contention 1 Re Overview of Quality Program,Work Quality. Related Correspondence ML20092N4971984-06-29029 June 1984 Testimony of Bg Treece on Issues 5 & 6 Re Cable Overtensioning,As Limited by ASLB 840608 Order.Related Correspondence ML20092N4911984-06-29029 June 1984 Summary of Direct Testimony of Jo Binder on Issues 5 & 6 Re Cable Overtensioning,As Limited by ASLB 840608 Order.Related Correspondence ML20092K7691984-06-26026 June 1984 Summary of Testimony of J Hansel on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML20205H8901983-08-10010 August 1983 Public Version of Transcript of 830810 in Camera,Ex Parte Hearing in Rockford,Il.Pp 7,585-7,610 ML20205H8941983-08-10010 August 1983 Public Version of Transcript of 830810 in Camera,Ex Parte Hearing W/Ofc of Investigations in Rockford,Il.Pp 7,611.1- 7,611.71 ML20205H8841983-08-0909 August 1983 Public Version of Transcript of 830809 in Camera,Ex Parte Hearing in Rockford,Il.Pp 7,304-7,405 ML20080B3051983-08-0303 August 1983 Testimony of RP Tuetken Re Util Reinsp Program of Work Performed by Contractor Insp Personnel Prior to NRC Region III Mar,Apr & May 1982 Insps.Appropriate Steps Taken to Remedy Problems ML20080B3091983-08-0303 August 1983 Testimony of Aw Koca Re General Nature of Hatfield Inspector Training & Certification Program.Certification of J Hughes Described ML20080B2951983-08-0303 August 1983 Testimony of Ma Stanish Re Recertification of Qa/Qc Inspectors Subsequent to NRC Region III Mar,Apr & May 1982 Special Team Insps.Reinsp Program Implemented to Review Work Performed by Inspectors Before NRC 1982 Insp ML20023C7151983-05-12012 May 1983 Testimony of P Holmbeck Re Investigation Into Adequacy of Emergency Plans Re Emergency Planning Contentions.Util Made No Attempt to Study Protective Value of Sheltering Populations Around Plant ML20204F5721983-04-26026 April 1983 Transcript of 830426 Hearing in Rockford,Il.Pp 5,964-6,156 ML20069M4791983-04-25025 April 1983 Handwritten Testimony of J Hughes Re Qa/Qc at Facility ML20069K5691983-04-21021 April 1983 Testimony of Ld Butterfield Re Steam Generator Tube Integrity.Proposed Steam Generator Mods Would Minimize Tube Wear Due to Flow Induced Vibration.Related Correspondence ML20069K5631983-04-21021 April 1983 Revised Testimony of Tf Timmons Re Steam Generator Tube Integrity (Flow Induced Vibration Phenomenon).No Significant Tube Wear Will Be Experienced in Steam Generators Due to Flow Induced Vibration.Related Correspondence ML20073J6691983-04-18018 April 1983 Testimony of Jl Murphy on Rockford League of Women Voters & Dekalb Area Alliance for Responsible Energy/Sinnissippi Alliance for Environ Consolidated Emergency Planning Contentions 3 & 13.Related Correspondence ML20073K4461983-04-18018 April 1983 Rebuttal Testimony of Levine Re Rockford League of Women Voters Contentions 8 & 62 & Dekalb Area Alliance for Responsible Energy/Sinnissippi Alliance for Environ Contention 2a on Public Risk.Related Correspondence ML20073G4241983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Ee Jones Re State of Il Emergency Svc & Disaster Agency Responsibilities Concerning Emergency Planning for Nuclear Facilities & Intervenor Amended Emergency Planning Contention ML20073G4051983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Jc Golden Re Amended Emergency Planning Contention ML20073G4121983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Dl Smith Re Resources Available for Transport & Treatment of Contaminated Injured Persons.Resume Encl 1999-03-02
[Table view] Category:NARRATIVE TESTIMONY
MONTHYEARML20207E0051999-03-0202 March 1999 Transcript of 990302 Public Meeting with Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-104.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20236H9381998-06-30030 June 1998 Transcript of 980630 Meeting W/Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-123.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20198P3001997-11-0404 November 1997 Transcript of 971104 Public Meeting W/Ceco in Rockville,Md Re Measures Established by Ceco to Track Plant Performance & to Gain Understanding of CAs Put Into Place to Improve Safety.Pp 1-105.W/Certificate & Viewgraphs ML20209J3251987-01-30030 January 1987 Transcript of 870130 Commission Discussion/Possible Vote on Full Power OL for Facility.Pp 1-72.Supporting Viewgraphs Encl ML20211B0841986-08-0505 August 1986 Transcript of 860805 Meeting Between Region Iii,Computer Interference Elimination & Util in Redmond,Wa Re Plant as-built Drawing Review.Pp 1-200 ML20096A6261984-08-30030 August 1984 Summary of Rebuttal Testimony & Testimony of ML Somsag, Eb Branch,D Demoss,Mr Frankel,Bf Maurer & Jk Buchanan Re Plant QC Inspector Reinsp Program & C Stokes Allegations Re Welds.Related Correspondence ML20096A6191984-08-30030 August 1984 Rebuttal Testimony of B Erler Re Stokes Allegations Concerning Evaluations of Discrepancies in Calculated Actual Stress Performed by Sargent & Lundy.Related Correspondence ML20096A6391984-08-30030 August 1984 Rebuttal Testimony of RW Hooks Re Validity of Info in Attachment 7 to Stokes Testimony Concerning Design Assumption for Plant.Stokes Info Inapplicable to Plant. Related Correspondence ML20094P7721984-08-17017 August 1984 Summary of Testimony & Direct Testimony of CC Stokes on Reinsp Program.Related Correspondence ML20094R1021984-08-17017 August 1984 Transcript of CC Stokes 840817 Deposition in Chicago,Il. Pp 1-173.Vol Ii.Related Correspondence ML20094P5991984-08-16016 August 1984 Direct Testimony of CC Stokes Re Engineering Evaluations Performed & Use of Engineering Judgement by Sargent & Lundy. Suggests Need for Independent Engineering Analysis of Safety Significance of Reinsp Program.Related Correspondence ML20094P6311984-08-14014 August 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Ds Kochhar on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20094P6831984-08-13013 August 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Wh Bleuel on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program.Resume Encl.Related Correspondence ML20094P6951984-08-13013 August 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of EP Erickson on Contention 1 Re Reinsp program-inspector Qualification & Work Quality.Resume & Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20093L4881984-07-30030 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Eb Branch Re Contention 1 (Reinsp Program,Work Quality).Related Correspondence ML20093L1811984-07-30030 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of KT Kostal on Contention 1 Re Capacity of Sys Control Corp Supplied Components to Carry Design Loads.Related Correspondence ML20093L2721984-07-30030 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Ak Singh on Contention 1 Re Evaluations of Discrepancies in Cable Tray Hanger Connections,Solid Bottom Tray Welds & Ladder Tray Weld Connections.Related Correspondence ML20093L2051984-07-30030 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Ld Johnson on Contention 1 Re Adequacy of Sys Control Corp Supplied Main Control Boards.Related Correspondence ML20090E5521984-07-17017 July 1984 Testimony of Eb Branch Re Job Responsibilities,Educ Background & Work Experience.Related Correspondence ML20090A7981984-07-0909 July 1984 Testimony of Gf Marcus Re Pittsburgh Testing Lab Source Insp of Equipment & Components Supplied by Sys Control Corp ML20090A8121984-07-0909 July 1984 Testimony of Bf Maurer Re Analysis of Structural Adequacy of Main Control Panels Designed & Fabricated by Sys Control Corp ML20092P7921984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of ML Somsag Re QA Inspector Reinsp Program for Hunter Corp.Related Correspondence ML20092P7891984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Rv Laney on Contention 1 Re Work Quality.Related Correspondence ML20092P7951984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Ak Singh on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program,Work Quality.Related Correspondence ML20092P7941984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of LO Delgeorge on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program,Inspector Qualification & Work Quality.Related Correspondence ML20092P5541984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Dl Leone on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program for Work Quality ML20092P5551984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of R French on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program ML20092P7781984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Wj Shewski on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program,Inspector Qualification.Related Correspondence ML20092P7811984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Jm Mclaughlin on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program,Work Quality.Related Correspondence ML20092P7871984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Direct Testimony & Testimony of RP Tuetken Re Reinsp Program.Related Correspondence ML20092P7851984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Wb Behnke on Contention 1 Re Overview of Quality Program,Work Quality. Related Correspondence ML20092N4971984-06-29029 June 1984 Testimony of Bg Treece on Issues 5 & 6 Re Cable Overtensioning,As Limited by ASLB 840608 Order.Related Correspondence ML20092N4911984-06-29029 June 1984 Summary of Direct Testimony of Jo Binder on Issues 5 & 6 Re Cable Overtensioning,As Limited by ASLB 840608 Order.Related Correspondence ML20092K7691984-06-26026 June 1984 Summary of Testimony of J Hansel on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML20205H8901983-08-10010 August 1983 Public Version of Transcript of 830810 in Camera,Ex Parte Hearing in Rockford,Il.Pp 7,585-7,610 ML20205H8941983-08-10010 August 1983 Public Version of Transcript of 830810 in Camera,Ex Parte Hearing W/Ofc of Investigations in Rockford,Il.Pp 7,611.1- 7,611.71 ML20205H8841983-08-0909 August 1983 Public Version of Transcript of 830809 in Camera,Ex Parte Hearing in Rockford,Il.Pp 7,304-7,405 ML20080B3051983-08-0303 August 1983 Testimony of RP Tuetken Re Util Reinsp Program of Work Performed by Contractor Insp Personnel Prior to NRC Region III Mar,Apr & May 1982 Insps.Appropriate Steps Taken to Remedy Problems ML20080B3091983-08-0303 August 1983 Testimony of Aw Koca Re General Nature of Hatfield Inspector Training & Certification Program.Certification of J Hughes Described ML20080B2951983-08-0303 August 1983 Testimony of Ma Stanish Re Recertification of Qa/Qc Inspectors Subsequent to NRC Region III Mar,Apr & May 1982 Special Team Insps.Reinsp Program Implemented to Review Work Performed by Inspectors Before NRC 1982 Insp ML20023C7151983-05-12012 May 1983 Testimony of P Holmbeck Re Investigation Into Adequacy of Emergency Plans Re Emergency Planning Contentions.Util Made No Attempt to Study Protective Value of Sheltering Populations Around Plant ML20204F5721983-04-26026 April 1983 Transcript of 830426 Hearing in Rockford,Il.Pp 5,964-6,156 ML20069M4791983-04-25025 April 1983 Handwritten Testimony of J Hughes Re Qa/Qc at Facility ML20069K5691983-04-21021 April 1983 Testimony of Ld Butterfield Re Steam Generator Tube Integrity.Proposed Steam Generator Mods Would Minimize Tube Wear Due to Flow Induced Vibration.Related Correspondence ML20069K5631983-04-21021 April 1983 Revised Testimony of Tf Timmons Re Steam Generator Tube Integrity (Flow Induced Vibration Phenomenon).No Significant Tube Wear Will Be Experienced in Steam Generators Due to Flow Induced Vibration.Related Correspondence ML20073J6691983-04-18018 April 1983 Testimony of Jl Murphy on Rockford League of Women Voters & Dekalb Area Alliance for Responsible Energy/Sinnissippi Alliance for Environ Consolidated Emergency Planning Contentions 3 & 13.Related Correspondence ML20073K4461983-04-18018 April 1983 Rebuttal Testimony of Levine Re Rockford League of Women Voters Contentions 8 & 62 & Dekalb Area Alliance for Responsible Energy/Sinnissippi Alliance for Environ Contention 2a on Public Risk.Related Correspondence ML20073G4241983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Ee Jones Re State of Il Emergency Svc & Disaster Agency Responsibilities Concerning Emergency Planning for Nuclear Facilities & Intervenor Amended Emergency Planning Contention ML20073G4051983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Jc Golden Re Amended Emergency Planning Contention ML20073G4121983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Dl Smith Re Resources Available for Transport & Treatment of Contaminated Injured Persons.Resume Encl 1999-03-02
[Table view] |
Text
,
\
4 Dated:
a 4/11/83 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )
)
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY ) Docket Nos. 50-454 OL
) 50-455 OL Byron Nuclear Power Station, )
(Units 1 & 2) )
SUMMARY
OF TESTIMONY OF JOHN C. GOLDEN Dr. John C. Golden is the Supervisor of Emergency Planning for Applicant and as such is responsible for the Applicant's Generating Stations Emergency Plan (GSEP) and the site specific Byron annex of GSEP. His testimony addresses the portions of paragraphs 3 and 8 of the amended
{ emergency planning contention that fall under the ambit of his responsibilities as Supervisor of Emergency Planning.
Dr. Golden introduces the GSEP and site specific Byron annex to GSEP. He describes the previous testing that has been done of GSEP at Applicant's operating nuclear power plant and confirms that the GSEP site specific annex for Byron will be tested during the scheduled exercise. Dr.
Golden explains the ongoing review and revision of these
, documents.
Dr. Golden then describes the arrangements that are being made by Edison for contaminated injured personnel at its site. He goes on to describe the training that will l
be provided to those who may be involved in the treatment of 8304180276 830411 PDR ADDCK 05000454 T PDR
s Edison's personnel who have suffered radiological injuries and discusses the trained personnel that will support the trained hospital personnel. Dr. Golden also describes the procedure by which Edison arrives at a recommended protective a action. Dr. Golden concludes that, under current procedures, sheltering is recommended only when evacuation is infeasible due to various operational considerations. Accordingly, it is unnecessary to determine the sheltering capability afforded by each specific structure in the EPZ.
1 i
~.
__ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ a
r 4/11/83 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )
)
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY ) Docket Nos. 50-454 OL
) 50-455 OL (Byron Nuclear Power Station, )
Units 1 & 2) )
TESTIMONY OF JOHN C. GOLDEN l
Ql: Please state your name, present occupation, and present position.
Al: My name is John C. Golden. I am employed by
- the Commonwealth Edison Company (" Edison") as Supervisor of Emergency Planning. I have been employed by Commonwealth Edison since January 11, 1971.
l Briefly state your educational and professional Q2:
qualifications.
A2: I have a Bachelor of Science in Physics (1962) from the University of Massachusetts, and a Master of Public Health (1964) and Doctor of Public Health (1970) from the University of Michigan. At Michigan I majored in Radiological and Environmental Health. Prior to working for Commonwealth Edison, I worked as a Health Physicist for the Florida State Board of Health (1964-1966) and Sandia Corporation, Albuquerque, New Mexico (1966-1968).
Q3: Describe your duties and responsibilities as Supervisor of Emergency Planning.
A3: I am responsible for the development, review, coordination and approval of nuclear station environmental radiological monitoring programs and emergency planning.
04: To which contention is this testimony addressed?
A4: This testimony is addressed to the portions of paragraphs 3 and 8 of the amended emergency planning con-tention that relate to my responsibilities as Supervisor of Emergency Planning for Edison.
05: Briefly describe the emergency preparedness plan for Byron Station.
A5: The emergency preparedness plan in Illinois for Byron Station is composed of five parts: (1) the generic Commonwealth Edison Generating Stations Emergency Plan (GSEP); (2) the site specific Byron annex of GSEP: (3) the generic Illinois Plan for Radiological Accidents (IPRA Vol.
- 1) ; (4) the site specific Byron local plan (IP RA , Vol. 6);
and (5) the various plans of the Federal agencies (such as NRC and FEMA). GSEP and the site specific Byron annex of GSEP are in final form and attached as Exhibits 1 and 2 Jrespectively. The other three parts of the plan are ad-dressed by witnesses from the respective agencies.
06: Has GSEP been tested and reviewed in connection with exercises conducted at Commonwealth Edison's nuclear power plants?
A6: Yes. GSEP has been successfully tested and reviewed nine times in connection with exercises at Commonwealth Edison's four operating plants, Dresden (1980, 1981, 1932),
LaSalle (1980, 1982), Quad Cities, (1981, 1982), and Zion (1981, 1983). GSEP will again be tested and reviewed along with the site specific Byron Annex to GSEP in connection with an exercise at Byron scheduled for the week of August 22, 1983. Prior to this Byron exercise we will test the GSEP twice more, once at Quad Cities in May and once at LaSalle in July.
07: Please clarify your statement that the GSEP and site specific Byron annex to GSEP are in final form.
A7: GSEP and the site specific annexes to GSEP are documents which are subject to constant review and revision. GSEP is reviewed annually and on a routine basis.
The GSEP annexes are reviewed annually following or con-i currently with the GSEP review. Any changes which are deemed necessary as a result of this review process are incorporated into the documents. Indeed, both GSEP and its annexes are
.. being reviewed now.
l 08: What arrangements have been made or are being
made by Edison for medical services for contaminated injured personnel at its Byron plant?
A8: Edison has contracted with Rockford Memorial Hospital to provide emergency services for its onsite Byron personnel who may be injured and contaminated. A copy of this agreement is attached as Exhibit 3. Edison has an agreement with the Byron Fire Protection District to provide any emergency services needed at the Byron plant including ambulance service for the transportation of contaminated injured personnel. (See Exhibit 4, attached.) Edison also has contracted with Northwestern Memorial Hospital in Chicago to provide treatment for its onsite Byron personnel who have been exposed to dangerous levels of radiation. (See Exhibit 5, attached.)
09: What facilities will Rockford Memorial Hospital have for treatment of contaminated injured in-dividuals?
A9: The Rockford Memorial Hospital is presently l
! constructing a new wing that will include a new emergency room for general use. This was one of the considerations that led to the selection of Rockford Memorial Hospital as a
, support hospital for Byron inasmuch as it provides an l
opportunity to construct the emergency room in a way that will facilitate the treatment of contaminated injured in-
dividuals. The emergency room will have a large buffer area surrounding it to reduce the possibility of spreading con-tamination to other areas of the hospital where treatment is being conducted. In addition, the physical layout of the new wing minimizes the amount of potential disruption to other hospital areas caused by ingress of patients to the emergency room.
010: What training is being provided by Edison for the personnel who will be called on to treat injured con-taminated persons?
A10: Edison has contracted with Radiation Management Corporation (RMC) to provide a comprehensive annual training program for Byron plant, Byron Fire Protection District and Rockford Memorial Hospital personnel who may be directly or indirectly involved in the treatment of individuals suffering a radiological injury. (The Edison contract with RMC includes I
several other services, particularly the availability of RMC's expert consultants, physicians and technicians in an emergency. See Exhibit 6, attached.) The training entails instructi6n on the treatment of contaminated injured in-dividuals. The RMC training will also include a radiation medical emergency drill based upon an accident scenario.
The drill will be monitored, videotaped and critiqued by RMC. RMC will submit two Drill Evacuation Reports, one
relating to the observations made at the station, the other relating to observations made at the hospital. The first annual training for the plant, ambulance and hospital staff is scheduled for June 14, 1983 and the drill and videotape critique is scheduled for June 15, 1983.
The onsite workers at Byron plant and the ambulance personnel of the Byron Fire Protection District already have received Nuclear General Employee Training (NGET) which i consists of a full day of training on radiological protection followed by an examination. I believe NGET training was discussed earlier in this proceeding with respect to the ALARA contention. In addition, Edison is attempting to arrange a seminar for physicians in Winnebago County on the subject of treatment of radiological injuries.
l Oll: Will any other trained personnel be available to support the trained hospital personnel in treatment of l
contaminated injured individuals?
All: Yes. The Radiation Protection and Chemistry Department of the Byron plant will provide any needed assistance to hospital personnel in treatment of contaminated injured persons. Personnel from The Radiation Protection and Chemistry Departments of Edison's other nuclear plants will also be available if needed. The Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety (DNS) also has a staff of health physicists that can l
provide any needed assistance to a hospital concerning radiological matters, including treatment of contaminated l
injured persons. Further, RMC has a Radiation Emergency Medical Team consisting of a physican, certified health physicist, and technicians with portable instrumentation.
As part of its contract with Edison, this RMC team is available on a 24 hour-per-day basis to provide radiological emergency support._ (See Exhibit 7, attached.) In addition, every hospital licensed to handle radioactive medical materials has a Radiation Safety Officer who is trained and knowledgable in decontamination procedures and can supervise the treatment of a contaminated injured patient.
012: Is Commonwealth Edison Company charged with responsibility for recommending a protective action in the event of a radiological incident at the Byron plant?
A12: Yes. In the event of a radiological incident, Commonwealth Edison Company is responsible for assessing the situation, activating other emerge:,cy personnel and initiating measures to mitigate or avoid damage to the plant. The event is reported to the state through the Nuclear Accident Reporting System (NARS) which requires that Commonwealth Edison recommend a protective action. It is important to remember that Edison's recommended protective actions are just that--recommendations. The Illinois Emergency Services
i and Disaster Agnecy (ESDA) and the Department of Nuclear Safety (DNS) are responsible for the evaluation of our
, recommendation and preparing their own recommended protective
, actions to the Governor or his appointed agent. Only on his order does a recommended protective action become a directed protective action.
Ol3: How does Edison arrive at a recommended protective action?
A13: Commonwealth Edison uses the following general procedure in preparing a protective action recom-mendation:
(a) The initial step is to classify the emergency condition. This is done through the use of Emergency Action Levels (EAL's). The generic section of the Edison Generating Station Emergency Plan (GSEP) provides EAL's based on those in Appendix 1 to NUREG-0654. The station specific i
Annex provides the specific initiating conditions for each emergency class. These emergency i
classes are Unusual Event (the least serious l
j event), Alert, Site Area Emergency, and General Emergency (the most serious event).
l (b) The next step is to determine the potential or actual release of radioactive material.
1
- - - - - - - - , --,n--.,=- - ,,-,--,,.--.. w n.- - , - - - - . -- - , , - - . - - , , . - - - , . . , _ , , , - - - - - - - - - . . , - - - , - , , - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
_9_
(c) The actual or potential release is then used to compute a projection of offsite radiation doses. Assistance may be provided by the Offsite Dose Calculation System (ODCS). The ODCS is a computer-based operation that converts potential or actual releases of radioactive material into projections of offsite radiation doses.
(d) GSEP Table 6.3-1 suggests a series of protective actions based upon the offsite dose projections, the likelihood that the release will occur, and the accident classification. This table is based on the Illinois Plan for Radiological Accidents and is consistent with Appendix 1 of NUREG-0654. Operational considerations such as warning time, weather conditions, and road conditions, to the extent we have knowledge of them, might alter the recommendations shown in this table.
(e) The information from Table 6.3-1, as modified by a consideration of the known operational.
factors, is then transferred to the NARS form and a recommendation is communicated to the state.
(f) As the incident develops, further recommendations
(
will be made, such as whether or not to issue and use potassium iodide, whether special contamination control measures should be in-stituted, or whether there should be inter-
- diction of.the food chain pathways. To assist in these later recommendations the radiological status of the offsite environ-ment is measured by environmental teams.
Each Edison nuclear station is provisioned so that two such teams may be fielded; support teams would be dispatched from other stations if necessary. The field information provided by these teams is analyzed first by field'en-vironmental personnel and later by similar personnel in the emergency operations facility.
Recommendations from the environmental group i are given to the Station Director or Recovery Manager who then uses these data to formulate a subsequent recommendation.
l 014: Is it necessary for Commonwealth Edison to have knowledge of the sheltering capability of every structure in the EPZ in order to recommend a protective measure to the
' state?
l l
l l
e-A14: No. The alternative protective actions Edison will recommend are listed in GSEP Tables 6.3-1, 6.3-2 and 6.3-3. Evacuation potentially provides the greatest degree of protection and should be the primary means of protective emergency action in the event of a radiological release. Inasmuch as sheltering may be implemented in less time than evacuation, it may be the recommended protective action if rapid ~ evacuation is impeded for any reason. In such a case, sheltering is generally intended as a protective action while awaiting further instructions relative to evacuation. Because sheltering is utilized as a protective measure only when evacuation is infeasible, deriving the sheltering capability of every structure in the EPZ would not only be impractical, but would serve no useful purpose.
It should be noted that as GSEP is currently written, sheltering is considered as an alternative to evacuation. In order to consider adequately whether sheltering should be recommended as a protective action, Edison, under GSEP, has utilized a procedure based on a similar Department of Nuclear Safety procedure to evaluate the sheltering versus evacuation option. This analysis uses generic shelter protection factors. However, recent studies indicate that
-if a potential dose exceeds the PAG, evacuation will always be the recommendation if it is feasible in light of known operational conditions.
Commonwealth Eison 72 West Adams Street ChicaQo. fHmois Address Riply 0: P:st Offica Box 767 Chic;g;, Ithnois 60690 AGREEMENT BETWEEN ROCKFORD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AND COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY FOR THE EMERGENCY TREATMENT OF RADIOACTIVE CONTAMINATED INJURED PERSONS The Commonwealth Edison Company owns and oper-ates Byron Nuclear Power Station, other nuclear power stations in operation and under construction and uses radioactive materials in measuring devices in some of Commonwealth its fossil fueled generating stations.
Edison is interested in assuring the availability of facilities and personnel for the prompt treatment of injured persons that have radioactive contamination on or in their person.
Rockford Memorial Hospital agrees to provide its facilities and staff for treatment of persons having Com-radioactive contamination on or in their persons.
monwealth Edison Company agrees to reimburse Rockford Memorial Hospital for appropriate replacement, repair or decontamination of contaminated facilities and its to pay the hospital for its staff and other services at usual rates of compensation. In addition, Commonwealth training Edison agrees to provide technical assistance, and radiation monitoring to help in the treatment of contaminated persons, clean-up or other radiation If con-trol measures deemed necessary by the Hospital.
Rockford Memorial Hospital requests, Commonwealth Edison further agrees to provide instructions to staff in radiation protection and control procedures and to initially and periodically review, with respect to its radiation emer-adequacy of contamination control, gency plans.
AGREED TO:
BY: ( e'c E'M
(
f 1 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY l
DATE: 7 2 ff 8 V f BY:
/
./ 4 7 M<c < iR/
ROCKFORD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL DATE: 2[/a a 3
GOLDEN EXHIBIT
t
/
7 .
Byron Fire Protection District 232 W. SECOND STREEj$B 0 h k L IN0!$
EMERGENCY: 234-234I ADMINISTRATIVE: (815) 234-4911 January 8, 198:
Commonwealth F0180n liyron 5ttstion Dyron, Illinois 61010 ORE: Fire and unublence Protect. ion for Cor*monwealth Edi:. ion Byron SL&tj on:
To Whom It May Concetrn, The Byorn rire Prot.ection Dir-trict will provide any Fire Protection, or Emergency Ambulance Serv i c c, to the Co.ronwealth Edison Byron Station that th,y require.
The Byron Fire Protection District al.so has Muto.:1 Aid Agreements with cany sur. ounding T' ire lustricts l for any extra support if necessary.
l l
Always at your service, Ret _E. y chief fnyron J?Y( c4 Tire l' ret. District 2'12 W. :-:ccand S t.ront flyron, Illinois 61010 RED /bjm I
b GOLDEN EXHIBIT 4 7- -
. . . . f' fi(R1LE '
PARTfCIPATION AGREEMENT Agreement, entered into this 1821 day of Mmmh ., 1983, by and between Commonwealth Edison Company, an Illinois corporation (herein-after called " Edison"), and Northwestern Memorial Hospital, ,
a not-for-profit corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois (hereinafter called " Northwestern Memorial").
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, Northwestern Memorial owns and operates hospital facilities in the City of Chicago, Illinois; and WHEREAS, Northwestern Memorial is engaged in providing hospital care and other related services to all persons admitted as patients of its medical staff; and WHEREAS, Northwestern Memorial is affiliated with Northwestern University for the purposes of providing medical education to students of such University; and WHEREAS, Northwestern Memorial maintains capability for primary and tertiary medical and patient care of persons injured as a result i of exposure to ionizing radiation, including provision of such support facilities as two laminar flow controlled environment intensive care units, emergency room facilities equipped for radionuclide decontami-nation, special instrumentation for measuring the body burden of radionuclides, cell separator equipment, and other facilities required l for special handling of radiation injury cases within the hospital; and
+
WHEREAS, such facilities are an integral part of Northwestern Memorial's medical, patient care, research, and education programs; and J
GOLDEN EXHIBIT 5
. u '
-g-WHEREAS, Edison regards the existence of such a facility as of importance, particularly in the event of an unlikely exposure of its employees, and, under prior agreements, provided financial assi. stance toward the acquisition and relocation of such facilities, and in consideration thereof received certain preemptive rights to their use; and WHEREAS, periodic expenditures are required for equipment maintenance and testing, for training of personnel, and other purposes necessary to maintain the aforementioned facilities in a state of readiness for use; and WHEREAS, Edison desires to assure the continued availability of such facilities and to maintain its preemptive rights to their use; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the undertakings and of the premises contained herein, the parties covenant and agree as follows:
ARTICLE I. TERM OF AGREEMENT A. This Agreement will remain in full force and effect for five (5) years from the date hereof, and thereafter until terminated by notice given by Northwestern Memorial 120 days in advance of the date of termination.
ARTICLE II. OTHER CONTRIBUTORS A. Edison agrees that Northwestern Memorial may solicit and accept other grants and assistance in support of and make use of any or all parts of the facilities committed to the treatment of radiation injuries, provided that such uses do not conflict with the purposes of this Agreement.
B. Northwestern Memorial agrees not to extend preemptive rights for use of such facilities to other persons without written consent of Edison, provided, however, that such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld by Edison.
- ARTICLE III. NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL'S OBLIGATION A. Northwestern Memorial agrees to maintain a suitable capability of providing primary and tertiary medical and patient care to persons afflicted with injuries from exposure to ionizing radiation, and accordingly will:
- 1. Make space available within the hospital as required and own and maintain two or more Reverse Isolation Units with laminar air flow, and related ancillary facilities as herein described.
- 2. Ensure the availability of an adequate staff of pro-fessional and other persons qualified in the care and treatment of persons exposed to ionizing radiation.
- 3. Provide for receiving, admitting, and treating persons with radiation injuries.
It is acknowledged, however, that if Northwestern Memorial performs remodeling and renovation of the Reverse Isolation Units facilities described above, that the operation of these facilities may be restricted for the period of time required to complete the remodeling.
Edison agrees that its obligations under Article IV of this Agreement shall continue notwithstanding temporary restriction of facility operation during remodeling; provided, however, that Northwestern Memorial shall provide written notice to Edison at least 30 days prior to any such restrictions.
B. Northwestern Memorial agrees to grant preemptive rights for the use of such facilities to Edison's employees admitted to the hospital, to the extent that such facilities are, in the opinion of the attending physician, necessary to the treatment of injuries involving ionizing radiation. Northwestern Memorial may make such facilities available to employees of other contributors, and may grant them preemptive rights similar to those provided herein with the i
written consent of Edison. All conflicts as to the use of such q m --.y-- 7--..-,- - -
c -- - _ -
,*s ,
facilities by contributors shall be resolved by the Utilization Committee of Northwestern Memorial's medical staff. It is under-stood and agreed that the obligation to make payment for treatment of such patients will not be affected by this Agreement.
C. Northwestern Memorial agrees to continue the integration of these facilities into its regular teaching and hospital care program.
ARTICLE IV. EDISON'S OBLIGATION A. In consideration of the foregoing, Edison agrees to pay the sum of S 9,000.00 to Northwestern Memorial within twenty (20) days following the date of this Agreement, and to pay such amount each year during the term of this Agreement on or before the anniversary date of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement thit 18dday of Varch , 1983.
For Commonwealth Edison Company
') _)
' 8/ Mnq OK c O-I ATTEST; 7
M %a-o Northwestern Memorial Hospital
/
ATTEST: {
l
/ / 6.\
.h y !xecutifeVicePresident E
W.H. Mehn, M.D.
Medical Director Commonwealth Edison Company P.O. Box 767 Chicago, IL 60690
SUBJECT:
Emergency Medical Assistance Program
Dear Dr. Mehn:
This confirms an agreement between Radiation Management Corpora-tion (RMC) and Commonwealth Edison Company, wherein RMC agrees to furnish certain services to nuclear generating stations operated by Commonwealth Edison Corpany. These services comprise a program that is identified by RMC as an Erergency Medical Assistance Program (EMAP). With regard to Byron Nuclear Station, the DIAP contains the following provisions:
- 1. Semi-annual inventories of plant and hospital equipment and supplies for use in handling radiation accident victims; one of these inventories will be in conjunction with (6.)
below, and annual review of the hospital procedural manual;
- 2. Twenty-four-hour-per-day availability of expert consultatien on management of radiation accidents;
- 3. Availability of Bioassay Laboratory for evaluation of radiatien accidents;
- 4. Twenty-four-hour-per-day access to a Radiation Emergency Medical Team consisting of a physician, certified health physicist, Iadiali0n end technicians with porteb1e instrumentet1on to 10:etion of accident victim; management 5. Availability and access to a medical center equipped for the d***"i'i"* *"^ ""*i " ""* **'=*"' * ""**"'i " *"5"'**"'
COIp0Iad0n
- 6. Annual training for the plant, ambulance and hospital personnel who may be directly or indirectly involved in the executien of the radiation medical emergency program; 35DB MARKET STREET i PHIL AD E LPHI A, PA 19104 l (2151 2:3-2950 7. Preparation of an " accident" scenario for use as a training aid in a radiation medical emergency drill or review scenario developed by the plant:
1 1 8. Coordination of a radiation medical emergency drill based on the scenario; umpired, videotaped and critiqued by RMC; GOLDEN EXHIBIT 6 continued...........
9 mi .
Byron Nuclear Station Page Two
- 9. Submission of two Drill Evaluation Reports; one relating to the observations made at the station, and another relating to observations made at the hospital; and. . . . . . . .
- 10. Participation in an annual one-day seminar in philadelphia on the management of radiation accidents for physicians. Each plant site may send one person, and each utility company may send one person.
Accident Response Consultation and laboratory services by RMC personnel are at no charge, except incremental costs associated with consultative dCtivities, such as travel, lodging, collection and transportation of samples, and other related expenses.
IATION MANAGEMENT C9RPORATION j/ Ns
.t
, g/f z A n w --
gge . innemann, M.D.
Vite (Chairman
/
/
REL:tc
.