ML20112D464

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Intervenor Exhibit I-R-11,consisting of Undated Chronological Date Listing of Util Responses to Interrogatory 12.VA Judson to Mi Miller Re Interrogatory 12 & Supplemental Responses Encl
ML20112D464
Person / Time
Site: Byron  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/21/1984
From:
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
References
OL-I-R-011, OL-I-R-11, NUDOCS 8501140309
Download: ML20112D464 (5)


Text

I-- sw K4/v.si 0L- ,

INTERVENOR EXHIBIT G

2 ,l / / .T- fedRl -nlE CHRONOLOGY OF EDISON'S RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORY 12 May 9,1984 ,_ ,.

,' ,4ntervenors' First Set of Interrogatories o? e s6ded. '; y. , .

t . .

June 25, 1984 .p .;. Responses to First Set of Interrogatories 3: MTf 3.[E(including Interrogatory 12) provided.

July 26,1984 After cross-examination of Mr. Singh, Edis-on informed Intervenors that Edison's re-sponse to Interrogatory 12 was incorrect.

July 31,1984 Edison provided First Amended Response to Interrogatory 12.

August 3,1984 Intervenors informally requested breakdown of numbers contained in response to Interrogat-ory 12. (serv 7d August 6, 198ft)

August 13, 1984 ,

Dr. Ericksen's testimony was filed.

August 14, 1984 Edison provided unsigned answer t;o Inter-venors' requested breakdown of Interrogatory 12 August 15, 1984 Intervenors sent letter (Attachment A) in-forming Edison's counsel that Edison's First Amended Response to Interrogatory 12 was in-consistent with the breakdown.

Counsel for Edison and Intervenors discus-August 15, 1984 and 16, sed the inconsistencies. On the 16th.coun-sel for Edison orally provided new tallies of the breakdown and stated he could be contacted regarding the tallies on August 18, 1984.

August 18, 1984 Counsel for Intervenors unsuccessfully at-tempted to reach counsel for Edison to re-solve inconsistencies.

August 20, 1984 Edison provided a Second Amended Response to Interrogatory 12.

/ August 20, 1984 counsel'for Edr. son that Intervenors this secondinformed counsel was amended response for stJ.1]. incon"istent provided Infervenorswith *hebreakdown and taliys.

August 20, 1984 Counsel for Edison informed Intervenors that (evening) Intervenors tally was correct and stated Edi-son would provide a corrected response to In-terrogatory 12.

8501140309 840821 PDR ADOCK 05000454

7 i l' I i N

% h e  %

eg le, .

s I 9 aa 5 4 8 . e, u

m ei x gj au nh a u

=

y o, -

5 d 3 CV '

u$

e g .

3

y. y a b 2 s .

gh 1 C

4 E a .4 m 3 13a311338 3

"

  • Page 2 (Chronology cont.)

August 22, 1984 Edison provided an (Untitled) Third Amended (afternoon) Response to Interrogatory 12.

August 22, 1984 counsel for Intervenors informed Edison that (evening) the (Untitled) Third Amended Response con-tained one error and received authorization to change the incorrect number.

O l

l l-l l

l l

I l

I

ATTAthMEAiT A 'PAGS t onc 2.

. ( )

BPI o

( 'T f' ~

Business and Professional People for the Public Interest 109 North Dearborn Street. Suite 1300 . Chicago tilinois 60602 = Telephone. (312) 6415570 y

August 15, 1984 BY MESSENGER Mr. Michael I. Miller Isham, Lincoln & Beale Three First National Plaza 52nd Floor Chicago, IL 60602 Re: NRC Docket Nos. 50-454 50-455

Dear Mike:

Yesterday, we received Edison's response to Intervenor's First Set of Supplemental Interrogatories.

4 In checking the answers to Interrogatory 12 Supplement noted that many numbers are inconsistent with Commonwealth,we Edison Company's First Amended Response to Interrogatory 12 that we received on July 31, 1984.

For example, for "25 PIPING AND COMPONENT SUPPORTS TEMP.

ATTACHMENT INSPECTION" Edison's most recent answer lists 373 original inspections made by 11 original inspectors and 0 reinspections of 0 inspectors. Edison's " corrected" response to Interrogatory 12 that we received on July 31, 1984 listed 27 original inspections made by 4 original inspectors and 13 reinspections of 2 inspectors. It appears that almost every other element listed in Edison's response to Interrogatory 12 Supplement also contains at least one inconsistency.

We would appreciate your checking with the Company immediately to determine the reason for the inconsistencies and to let us know whether Edison's First Amended Response to Interrogatory 12 is in error and/or the Response to Supplemental Interrogatory 12 '

is in error.

o,,,...,

.. , s,. . s,...

....,,.,t Lucy B ASCO .. o .,, d H.ft) t 8 F E .n. 8 owic.ny k.a.nd., Polao.,

T.'.,*.f,'**' OO.'i"sL%n ll:'02T,%. 12*O.','*4"....

  • aaaa a'"'-

Jule. M h2 .

a'a'- ca*'* a' l,2", n"2, h'. *L' .*. ' * " L".'L*n"'n".',** i' L","** """  %%'" %'"st " Chi,*%. nmu.e

  • 4' 'O."l.,,,.  %;" E%" M,o"e"'. .ei., s'2" Nfo',i"*" d*," "."*"",f.,,,. . 'a""'*""

c,.... . . .. u

  • ~

[gaa o.t;, r =.;== &" $7;,'., g egag:=,-

a M" ',,5t*""a

" ""~""

s,s "~s,cn n,. '%f,i3*'

c,.........

s 02.,'.c_

m, .o'0';.".,.. ..  ;%, 's.'O.'". N," ,*)'a-L.on D Finney J%n L. ocMneght ~. n. W Wh.i.n W

. . . o PR6GL OF E-Mr. Michael I. Miller Isham, Lincoln & Beale

  • August 15, 1984

'Page Two Until we are provided with. material that we know is correct, we cannot file supplemental testimony. I, therefore, would appreciate your contacting me about the inconsistencies as soon as possible.

Sincerely,

'. 'v 4 4 -

O!.W Victoria A. son VAJ/lds 9

e 4

r