ML20097E722
| ML20097E722 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Byron  |
| Issue date: | 09/13/1984 |
| From: | Bielawski A COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO., ISHAM, LINCOLN & BEALE |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| OL, NUDOCS 8409180281 | |
| Download: ML20097E722 (3) | |
Text
-
.. =_.
=
\\
o.
- i..
9/13/84
?] BETE 9 U3 t.H C UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 04.7P 17 A10:45 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD:,,..
M; "r In the Matter of
)
)
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY
)
Docket Nos. 50-454 OL
)
50-455 OL (Byron Nuclear Power Station,
)
l Units 1 & 2)
)
AGREED MOTION FOR TIME EXTENSION REGARDING EMERGENCY PLANNING COMMITMENT W Commonwealth Edison Company
(" Applicant"), with the concurrence of DAARE/ SAFE and the Rockford League of Women Voters ("Intervenors"), respectfully requests that this' Licensing Board extend until November 1, 1984 the time in which Intervenors may file a petition for hearing regarding
-Commitment W under the March 30, 1983 Emergency Planning 4
Stipulation.
In support of this agreed motion, Applicant states as follows:
1.
In its Memorandum and Order of July 16, 1984, the Licensing Board granted a time extension until September 14, 1984 for Intervenors to file any petition for hearing under the Emergency Planning Stipulation.
As stated in the July 13, 1984 letter to the Licensing Board from counsel for Applicant, Intervenors would use that time to complete their assessment of Applicant's responses that were submitted in g gg4
' GRANTED satisfaction of the stipulated commitments.
For the Atomic Safety and Licensi, g card b
- 1**'
's 8409180281 840913 lV3n N. b U ChOiImbn e
PDR ADOCM 05000454
"[
9 PDR
_2-2.
Intervenors have been able to complete their assessment within the September 14 time period with regard
' to all of the commitments except Commitment W.
That commitment concerns Applicant's agreement to communicate with the mayors o;f Dixon, Rockford, and Rochelle regarding emergency planning matters; In accordance with the terms of Commitment W, Applicant has contacted the mayors.
(See Applicants' response regarding Commitment W, served on the Licensing Board and parties on June 7, 1984.)
The mayors of Rockford and Dixon have since expressed an interest in meeting with Applicant, and meetings have been scheduled for
~,
September 13, 1984.
3.
Intervenors desire that they have a reasonable
- amount of time'after the mayors' meetings to assess Applicant's Eesolution of Cer nitment W.
Applicant and.Intervenors agree that a time extension until November 1, 1984 is a reasonable amount of time for this purpose.
As stated in the July 13 letter from counsel for Applican't, Intervenors have agreed that they can only challenge Applicant's resolution of Cea strent W based upon evidence 1from;the mayors that AprL. -ar lid not in good faich discuss concerns raised by sne maycrs or did not in good "A th critically review plans proposed by the mayors.
5.
Intervenors have revic ed this motion and agree with its rerms.
s
.-_w,
~.
w
r t
.s. WHEREFORE, this agreed motion for time extension should be granted.
Respectfully s bmitted, 4
Alan PV@lawski One of Ene attorneys for Commonwealth Edison Company Isham, Lincoln & Beale Three First National Plaza Chicago, Illinois 60602 (312) 558-7500 i