ML030790017

From kanterella
Revision as of 14:32, 23 March 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Emergency Plan & Implementing Procedures
ML030790017
Person / Time
Site: FitzPatrick Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/07/2003
From: Izyk C
Entergy Nuclear Northeast
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
34 SAP-6, Rev 19
Download: ML030790017 (57)
v • d • e


Text

ENTERGY NUCLEAR NORTHEAST

"*JAMESA. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT P.O. BOX110 LYCOMING.,NY 13093, DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL AND RECEIPT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM DATE: MARCH 7, 2003 CONTROLLED COPY NUMBER: 34 TO: U.S.N.R.C. Document Center/Washington, DC FROM: CATHY IZYK - EMERGENCY PLANNING DEPARTMENT

SUBJECT:

EMERGENCY PLAN AND IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES Enclosed are revisions to your assigned copy of the JAFNPP Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedures. Please remove and DISCARD the old pages. Insert the attached, initial and date this routing sheet and return the completed routing sheet to Cathy izyk in the Emergency Planning Department within 15 days. If this transmittal is not returned within 15 days, your name will be removed from the controlled list.

VOLUME 3 UOdate List ,Dated MARCH 7.2003 DOCUMENT PAGES REV. # INITIALS/DATE SAP-6 REPLACE ALL 19

EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMEN-FING-PROCEDURES/VOLUME 3 UPDATE LIST I CONTROLLED c°PY -Zt I l

Date of Issue: MARCH 7,2003 Date of Procedure Procedure Revision Last Use of Number :Numer." "... Title , _/* v-,Number *.Review Procedure N/A TABLE OF CONTENTS REV. 23 12/98 N/A EAP-26 PLANT DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEM REV. 12 11/02 Informational ACCESS ESTIMATION OF POPULATION DOSE EAP-27 WITHIN 10 MILE EMERGENCY PLANNING REV. 10 06/02 Informational ZONE EAP-28 EMERGENCY RESPONSE DATA SYSTEM REV. 6 07/00 Reference (ERDS) ACTIVATION EAP-29 EOF VENTILATION ISOLATION DURING REV. 5 02/98 Informational AN EMERGENCY EAP-30 EMERGENCY TOTERMINATION AND REV.0 12/98 Informational TRANSITION RECOVERY*

EAP-31 RECOVERY MANAGER* REV. 1 07/01 Informational EAP-32 RECOVERY SUPPORT GROUP* REV. 8 02/02 Informational EAP-33 DEVELOPMENT OF A RECOVERY ACTION REV.0 12/98 Informational PLAN*

ACCEPTANCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL REV.3 EAP-34 SAMPLES AT THE EOF/EL DURING AN 02/98 Informational EMERGENCY EAP-35 EOF TLD ISSUANCE DURING AN REV. 6 02/98 Informational EMERGENCY EAP-36 ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY USE REV. 4 02/98 Informational EAP-36_ DURING AN EMERGENCY SECURITY OF THE EOF AND EL DURING REV. 7 EAP-37 DRILLS, EXERCISES AND ACTUAL 02/03 Informational EVENTS EAP-39 DELETED (02/95)

EAP-40 DELETED (02/98)

EAP-41 DELETED (12/85)

EAP-42 OBTAINING METEOROLOGICAL DATA REV. 18 08/02 Informational EAP43) EMERGENCY FACILITIES LONG TERM REV. 59 02/03 Informational EAP-43___ STAFFING EAP-44 CORE DAMAGE ESTIMATION REV. 4 06/02 Informational EMERGENCY RESPONSE DATA SYSTEM EAP-45 (ERDS CONFIGURATION CONTROL REV. 6 07/00 Informational PROGRAM)

SAP-1 MAINTAINING EMERGENCY REV. 17 02/03 Informational PREPAREDNESS SAP-2 EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT INVENTORY REV. 35 01/03 Reference SAP-3 EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS REV. 73 02/03 Reference TESTING Page 1 of 2

EMERGENCY PLAN 2MPL1-MENTING PROCEDURES/VOLUME 3 UPDATE LIST Date of Issue: MARCH 7.2003 Date of Procedure Procedure Revision Use of Last Number Title Number ,Procedure Review SAP-4 NYS/OSWEGO COUNTY EMERGENCY Informational PREPAREDNESS PHOTO IDENTIFICATION REV. 9 06/02 CARDS SAP-5 DELETED (3/98)

SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT REV. 19 03/03 Informational SAP-7 MONTHLY SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURE Informational FOR ON-CALL EMPLOYEES REV. 36 08/02 SAP-8 PROMPT NOTIFICATION SYSTEM Informational FAILURE/SIREN SYSTEM FALSE REV. 13 12/02 ACTIVATION SAP-9 DELETED (02/94)

SAP-10 METEOROLOGICAL MONITORING REV. 11 03/02 Informational SYSTEM SURVEILLANCE SAP-Il EOF DOCUMENT CONTROL REV. 11 06/02 Informational SAP-13 EOF SECURITY AND FIRE ALARM Informational SYSTEMS DURING NORMAL OPERATIONS REV. 4 06/02 SAP-14 DELETED (02/95)

SAP-15 DELETED (11/92)

-y SAP-16 UTILIZING EPIC IDT TERMINALS FROM Informational DESTINY SYSTEM REV. 4 06/02 SAP-17 EMERGENCY RESPONSE DATA SYSTEM Continuous (ERDS) QUARTERLY TESTING REV. 7 07/00 SAP-19 SEVERE WEATHER REV. 4 01/01 Informational SAP-20 EMERGENCY PLAN ASSIGNMENTS REV. 21 08/02 Informational SAP-21 DELETED (04/01)

SAP-22 EMERGENCY PLANNING PROGRAM SELF REV. 1 10/98 Informational ASSESSMENT IEV. I I0/98 Page 2 of 2

-i ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.

JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT EMERGENCY PLAN'IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT SAP-6 REVISION 19 REVIEWED BY: PLANT OPERATING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NO. N/A DATE: N/A APPROVED BY: DATE: 76t4 RE4O~hfcEDCEURE OWNER EFFECTIVE DATE: I~{L41 egocr FIRST ISSUE El FULL REVISION Z LIMITED REVISION 0

  • INFORMATIONAL USE *
  • TSR *
  • AT CONTROLLED COPY #
  • ADMINISTRATIVE
  • COTRLLD OP PERIODIC REVIEW DUE DATE: MARCH 2008

DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT SAP-6 f REVISION

SUMMARY

SHEET REV. NO.

19 0 Changed Emergency Planning Coordinator to Emergency Planning Manager throughout procedure.

  • Added controller to section 5.6
  • Added new section 5.6.1 to perform walkdowns.
  • Added "Emergency Manager" to section 7.8.4.C.

18 0 Added new step in Attachment 1, DRILL OR EXERCISE CONDUCT CHECKLIST, to evaluate potential adverse affects of the quantity of ERO trainees.

  • Added observer form for the Training Building in attachment 2.

17 0 Changed Observer to Evaluator throughout the entire procedure.

  • In sections 5.2.5 updated the plant personnel's titles
  • In section 6.2 reworded information on lead controller being station in the CR.
  • Deleted 7.2 section that refers to observer being selected with the concurrence of the Site Ex.

Officer.

  • Deleted reference to DER's in section 8.2 and referred it to CRs.

0 On attachment 1 changed responsibility for resenting the drill EPC rather than the Plant Management.

0 Changed any reference to Niagara Mohawk'with NMPC.

16 0 An adjustment was made to the cover sheet to reflect the Company name change.

0 Added Section 9.0 to clarify acceptance criteria for NRC performance indicators.

  • In Section 2.2, two additional references were listed.
  • Step 4.5 was added; referencing section 9 of this procedure.
  • Editorial corrections were made on page 6 acknowledging the resent company change.

15

  • Revised Observer Evaluation forms (Attachment 2) to collect NRC performance indicator data points for Drill/Exercise Performance.

0 Revised Attachment 1 Drill or Exercise Conduct Checklist, to tabulate and calculate NRC performance indicators for Drill/Exercise Performance.

Rev. No. 19 Page 2 of 54

L-DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT - SAP-6 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 PURPOSE .. ............................................... 4

2.0 REFERENCES

.............. .............................. 4 3.0 INITIATING EVENTS ...................................... 4 4.0 PROCEDURE .............................................. 4 5.0 DRILL CONDUCT .......................................... 5 6.0 EXERCISE CONDUCT. ......................................... 7 7.0 EVALUATOR CONDUCT ...................................... 8 8.0 CRITIQUES AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ...................... 14 9.0 DRILL AND EXERCISE PERFORMANCE INDICATOR (DEP)

EVALUATION ........ . . ................................ 15 9.3 Classification ........... .................... 16 9.4 Protective Action Recommendations (PARs) ............... 16 9.5 Notifications ........... . .............................. 16 10.0 ATTACHMENTS ........... . ............................ 17

1. DRILL OR EXERCISE CONDUCT CHECKLIST ................ 18
2. EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM ........................ 19 Rev. No. 19 Page 3 of 54

DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT SAP-6 1.0 PURPOSE To establish a procedure for the conduct and evaluation of all Emergency Plan Drills and Exercises at JAFNPP. This procedure also outlines the management controls used to ensure that corrective actions are implemented.

2.0 REFERENCES

2.1 Performance References None 2.2 Developmental References 2.2.1 NUREG-0654, Criteria for the Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants 2.2.2 JAFNPP Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedures, Volumes 1, 2 and 3 2.2.3 SAP-l, MAINTAINING EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 2.2.4 AP-02.03, EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 2.2.5 AP-02.04, CONTROL OF PROCEDURES 2.2.6 NEI 99-02, Revision 0, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline' 2.2.3 2.2.7 NUREG-0654, Criteria for the Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants 3.0 INITIATING EVENTS None 4.0 PROCEDURE 4.1 Drill conduct is discussed in Section 5 of this procedure.

This section delineates the minimum acceptable activity for a drill at JAFNPP.

Rev. No. 19 Page 4 of 54

DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT SAP-6 4.2 Exercise conduct is discussed in section 6 of this procedure. This section delineates the minimum acceptable activity for an exercise at JAFNPP.

4.3 Evaluator conduct is discussed in Section 7 of this procedure. This section specifies the minimum acceptable, preparation, training and response required for an evaluator of a JAFNPP drill or exercise.

4.4 Critiques and corrective actions are discussed in Section 8 of this procedure. This section specifies the method in which problems with Emergency Preparedness at JAFNPP are handled.

4.5 Drill and Exercise Performance Indicator (PI) evaluation is discussed in Section 9 of this procedure. This section describes the minimum acceptable performance indicator evaluation criteria.

5.0 DRILL CONDUCT 5.1 Drills shall be directed with the frequency established by SAP-l, MAINTAINING EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS.

K> 5.2 Drills shall be directed by a lead'controller who shall be responsible for conducting the drill in accordance with the drill scenario and the drill report.

5.2.1 The lead controller may conduct a briefing with drill participants. The intent of such a briefing would be to insure that drill participants understand their function and purpose in the drill. The control room briefing should be similar to a shift turnover briefing.

5.2.2 The lead controller may delegate controller responsibilities to other individuals.

Controllers and evaluators can be used for this purpose. A controller shall be called such when that individual's sole responsibility is to assist in the conduct of a drill. An evaluator can function as a controller when assigned the task of providing information or instruction during a certain aspect of a drill.

Rev. No. 19 Page. 5 of 54

DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT SAP-6 5.2.3 The lead controller shall insure that plant safety is not compromised by a drill, and may stop a drill at any time if in his opinion plant safety may be affected.

5.2.4 The Lead Controller shall attempt to collect the signatures of as many participants as possible for training documentation. This responsibility can be delegated to other controllers, or evaluator.

5.2.5 The Lead Controller shall commence and end the Drill, upon approval from the JAFNPP Manager of Plant Operations.

5.2.6 The Lead Controller shall ensure that drill evaluators are stationed to properly observe and evaluate the drill.

5.2.7 The Lead Controller should distribute a fact sheet to the emergency response facilities describing plant conditions in effect approximately eight (8) hours prior to drill commencement.

5.3 During a drill, when (public address system) announcements are made, those announcements shall be prefaced or followed by the words "This is a Drill."

5.4 During a drill when contacting any offsite or non-JAF institution, the individual shall insure that the organization fully realizes that no emergency exists onsite and that it is a test of the JAFNPP Emergency Plan.

5.5 Drills shall be conducted using the guidance established by Attachment 1, Drill or Exercise Conduct Checklist.

Rev. No. 19 Page 6 of 54

DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT _ SAP-6 5.6 The Emergency Planning Manager shall conduct a controller /

evaluator meeting prior to a drill. The-meeting shall be to inform the evaluators of their specific tasks.

5.6.1 Controllers are expected to familiarize themselves with the scenario specifics assigned to them and should perform a plant walkdown of their assigned area prior to the drill/exercise to increase familiarity with the equipment location and current plant conditions, identify problems such as obstructions and inappropriate or unrealistic mock-up locations, determine data presentation needs, increase knowledge of materials and tools needed to complete repairs, and identify possible alternate repair options.

5.7 Radiological Emergency Medical Drills are limited in scope and participation by plant personnel. Therefore, only one lead controller is necessary in the Control Room, one evaluator/controller accompanying the victim and one controller at the destination hospital. Each evaluator/controller may be briefed individually. The Control Room controller must be an Entergy employee and the other controllers/evaluators may be medical consultant personnel. Drill documentation will be a combination of Entergy'drill report and Control Room Evaluator Evaluation Form (Attachment 2) supplemented by the medical consultant's evaluation of performance.

6.0 EXERCISE CONDUCT An Exercise shall include all items specified for a drill with the following differences:

6.1 Exercises shall be conducted with the frequency established by SAP-l, MAINTAINING EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS.

6.2 A Lead Controller shall be responsible for conducting the exercise in accordance with the written scenario. As a minimum, controllers shall be present in the Control Room, Technical Support Center, Operational Support Center, and the Emergency Operations Facility.

6.3 Every attempt should be made to include Federal, State and local input into the development of the exercise scenario.

Rev. No. 19 Page 7 of 54

DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT SAP- 6 6.3.1 The Exercise scenario shall be developed by a committee headed and organized by the Emergency Planning Manager at JAFNPP.

7.0 EVALUATOR CONDUCT 7.1 Evaluators shall be used to record all significant events and the time at which they occur during a drill or exercise using Attachment 2, Evaluator Evaluation Form. The drill or exercise scenario shall state the objectives of the drill or exercise which will determine the major areas for the evaluators to concentrate their observation. Actions to be evaluated include: the ability to control the emergency, timely and proper notification, availability and use of equipment and personnel for control and recovery, assessment of consequences of the emergency actions taken by emergency personnel, and the necessity for off-shift notifications.

7.2 Evaluators and controllers will be assigned as determined by the Emergency Planning Manager. The degree of evaluation shall be made based on the extent of the drill or scenario. As a general rule, however, evaluators shall be stationed to observe all expected major actions of the drill expected and as listed in objectives statement of the drill or exercise scenario. At least two evaluators must be available for drills and at least eight evaluators for an exercise.

7.3 In plant evaluators shall be badged following normal plant badging procedures, and are required to participate during accountability drills.

7.4 Evaluators and/or controllers shall be visibly identified as evaluators or controllers, and they should take no part in the action of the drill or exercise except to:

7.4.1 Indicate simulated conditions to the exercise or drill participants, (e.g., survey meter readings, contamination levels, etc.), but only after instructions by the lead controller or individual acting on behalf of lead controller.

7.4.2 Observe poor communication techniques and procedures and note/correct such occurrences when they occur.

Rev. No. 19 Page 8 of 54

DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT SAP-6 7.4.3 Prevent the communication of simulated emergency conditions as actual conditions outside of the exercise or drill area and to ensure that radio or telephone messages are preceded and ended by the statement "This is a Drill."

7.4.4 Prevent actions which might create a hazard to personnel or equipment. In such cases, evaluators shall require personnel participating in the exercise or drill to indicate the action verbally.

7.5 Evaluators shall be briefed as to their duties prior to the commencement of the drill or exercise. Drill evaluators should be briefed within 24-hours of the commencement of a drill. Exercise evaluators should be briefed within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of the commencement of an exercise and written aids and procedures shall be provided for use by the evaluators.

This 24-hour time frame may be adjusted to compensate for unannounced exercises.

7.6 Training shall be provided to evaluators by the JAFNPP Training Department and/or drill/exercise lead controllers.

The training provided for evaluators will entail the briefing listed in Section 7.5. The briefing shall include a review of the drill or exercise scenario, the evaluator duties with regard to the assigned areas of evaluation, and the key points to be noted. The Emergency Planning Manager shall develop a list of evaluators to be trained.

Exceptions to the qualified evaluators list may be made by the Emergency Planning Manager.

7.7 At the conclusion of the drill or exercise, the Emergency Planning Manager shall collect the completed Evaluation Forms (Attachment 2), compile a list of participants and conduct a critique with the evaluators and supervisors.

7.8 Evaluators shall familiarize themselves with the duties and action requirements of the personnel they are monitoring.

The Drill Subject Report, Attachment 1 of SAP-l, Maintaining Emergency Preparedness, shall list evaluator's Name, Organization, and Area of Responsibility. Evaluators shall review applicable procedures. Evaluators shall use the following as guidelines.

Rev. No. 19 Page 9 of 54

DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT SAP-6 7.8.1 Control Room and/or Simulator The evaluator shall observe the action of personnel assigned to the Control Room and personnel who report to the Control Room for assignment. In addition, special attention will be given to the following:

A. Notifications to onsite personnel and offsite agencies.

B. Request for the call-in of off duty personnel.

C. Operations handling of accident conditions.

D. Instructions given to Search and Rescue, Repair and Corrective Action Teams and H.P. Techs by the Shift Manager (SM), as applicable.

E. Does the SM handle the emergency by directing people or by trying to do the work himself?

F. Are the time frames of actions by the SM reasonable enough?

G. Actions of personnel in the Control Room.

H. Communications with the EOF.

I. Communications with the TSC.

7.8.2 Control Point It is to be noted that all normal practices such as sign out and use of frisker and the portal monitor are to be accomplished unless the H.P.

Technician gives other directions because of radiological conditions. The evaluator will pay special attention to the above along with the following.

A. No one is wearing radiological protection clothing when leaving.

B. All alarms from monitoring equipment are acknowledged.

Rev. No. 19 Page 10 of 54

DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT SAP-6 7.8.3 Assembly Area Observe the following for assembly area personnel:

A. They seek out their assembly area, generally stay together as a group and remain orderly.

B. Time of assembly and completed accountability.

7.8.4 Emergency Operation Facility, This is the command post for the Emergency and it should seem so to the evaluator. Look for the following things:

A. The Emergency Director is in command of the EOF.

B. Any extra personnel, spectators and those awaiting orders, are quietly standing out of the way.

C. Has the Emergency Director contacted the TSC Manager/Emergency Manager?

D. The Radiation Protection or Support Personnel are performing duties in an efficient manner and reporting results to the Emergency Director.

E. Instrumentation/equipment in the EOF is placed as not to interfere with movement or cause a safety hazard.

F. How problems with the radio and telephone are handled.

G. Release rates, TEDE doses and CDE Thyroid doses to the offsite population are calculated quickly after tle receipt of data from the Control Room or the Offsite Monitoring Team(s).

H. The time frame of updates to offsite agencies and the reporting of exposure data and changes to site meteorological conditions, to those same agencies.

Rev. ,No. 19 Page 11 of 54

DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT SAP-6 I. The Emergency Director assigns, where possible, the duty of making routine calls to someone else thereby leaving himself free to command the action.

J. How assessment teams make protective actions to offsite populations.

7.8.5 Off-Site Monitoring Teams The evaluators shall observe the following items:

A. Received KI dose, if necessary.

B. Operational check performed on survey instruments, sample counter and air sampler before leaving the site.

C. Equipment availability verified.

D. Assignment of TLDs and dosimeters before leaving the site.

E. Silver Zeolite Cartridges made available before leaving the site.

F. Survey instrument operationally checked out and turned on prior to leaving to take field readings.

G. Radio checked out by communicating to EOF or TSC before leaving.

H. Beta and gamma field surveys performed on the way to sample point.

I. Sampling and field surveys performed at sample location.

J. Instrument calibration performed and samples counted.

K. Work performed in a professional manner.

Rev. No. 19 Page 12 of 54

DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT SAP-6 7.8.6 On-Site Monitoring Team On-site monitoring teams may be assigned field survey work along the perimeter of the site.

Check on the following items:

A. Where do they receive their instructions?

B. Dosimeter and TLD are being worn.

C. What type of survey instruments used.

D. Do they have radio/cellular phone available?

E. Radio/phone check performed.

F. Field readings taken along the route to the designated area.

G. Work performed in a professional manner.

7.8.7 Security Force A. Are all security personnel accounted for?

B. Does security-direct people to the assembly area for accountability?

C. Are access and egress roads controlled?

7.8.8 Technical Support Center A. The area maintained as a controlled area.

B. Are communications initiated?

C. Are H.P. Surveys performed and by whom?

7.8.9 Operations Support Center A. How is it staffed?

B. What and how many teams are brought to the OSC?

C. Are phones continuously manned?

D. Are H.P. Surveys performed and by whom?

Rev. No. 19 Page 13 of 54

DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT SAP- 6 E. Who are survey results reported to? (CR and or TSC)

F. Are accurate protective measures taken if an entry into the controlled area is required?

7.8.10 Fire Brigade A. Do they receive instructions and from whom?

B. Are protective measures taken if an entry into a controlled are is required?

C. Are Fire preplans consulted?

D. Is assistance requested from local support fire departments?

7.8.11 Immediately following the exercise/drill, evaluators/controllers should conduct a short critique for participants in their assigned area.

8.0 CRITIQUES AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS 8.1 A post exercise/drill critique should be held for evaluators and plant supervision by the Emergency Planning Manager or designee. The critique should be held within 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> of the drill/exercise, at a time and place specified by the Emergency Planning Manager or designee. This meeting shall be held to help resolve questions raised by various evaluators and plant supervisors and to develop a list of corrective actions as necessary. The observations should include those actions noted by the evaluators which were not in accordance with approved procedures. In addition, the exercise/drill evaluators should identify any areas which require clarification, development or revision of procedures.

Rev. No. 19 Page 14 of 54

DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT, SAP-6 8.2 Emergency Plan Improvement Items/Lessons Learned Report Following the critique, the Emergency Planning Manager or designee shall develop a list of Condition Reports (CRs),

improvement items and lessons learned as a result of the drill or exercise. -These items may be generated as a result of comments made at the critique, comments made by evaluators and controllers, or comments made by drill/exercise participants. The Emergency Planning Manager or designee shall review these comments and categorize significant comments into "CRs", "Lessons Learned" or "Improvement Items." The Emergency Planning Manager shall decide which of these items warrant entry into the JAFNPP Paperless Condition Reporting system (PCRS) and/or Action Commitment Tracking System (ACTS) and assign a completion date.

8.3 The Emergency Planning Manager or designee shall, after the preparation and review of the Emergency Plan Improvement Items/Lessons Learned listing, present the listing to responsible plant management staff for correction.

8.4 Any items identified during the critique that pertain to the scenario package used for the drill/exercise shall also be used to improve the package for future use. Scenario packages do not need to be updated until subsequent use.

9.0 DRILL AND EXERCISE PERFORMANCE INDICATOR (DEP) EVALUATION 9.1 This indicator monitors timely and accurate JAF performance in drills, exercises and actual events when presented with opportunities for classification of emergencies, notification of offsite authorities, and development of protective action recommendations (PARs).

This section provides guidance to determine success of applicable emergency planning NRC Performance Indicator (PI) data points.

9.2 The following will be included in the DEP indicator:

9.2.1 Evaluated exercises; 9.2.2 Actual emergency declarations; 9.2.3 And/or selected performance enhancing drills as determined by the EPC. The selection must be made in advance and documented.

Rev. No. 19 Page 15 of 54

DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT SAP-6 9.3 Classification 9.3.1 A classification opportunity exists when plant parameters (observable and verifiable indications) reach an Emergency Action Level (EAL). This includes changes in classifications.

9.3.2 Timely is when the classification is declared in 15 minutes or less from the time the opportunity existed.

9.3.3 Accurate is when the correct classification is declared per IAP-2.

9.4 Protective Action Recommendations (PARs) 9.4.1 A PAR opportunity exists when criteria in applicable EP procedures require a PAR to be developed and/or made. This includes initial PARs and any PAR changes.

9.4.2 Timely is when the PAR is developed/made in 15 minutes or less from the time the opportunity existed.

9.4.3 Accurate is when the correct PAR is developed as required by procedure, subject to information available at the time of the PAR.

9.5 Notifications 9.5.1 A classification notification opportunity exists when an emergency classification is declared.

9.5.2 A PAR notification opportunity exists when a PAR is required.

9.5.3 Timely is when offsite notifications are initiated (contact) in 15 minutes or less from event classification and/or PAR development.

Rev. No. 19 Page 16 of 54

DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT SAP-6 9.5.4 Accurate is when the following information is completed on the New York State Part I form and approved, as applicable:

A. Item #2 - Designation of exercise or not; B. Item #3 - Facility; C. Item #4 - Event classification, as declared (e.g. NUE, Alert, SAE, GE);

D. Item #5 - Date and time of classification; E. Item #6 - Radioactive release status; F. Item #7 - PAR as determined (eg ERPAs, Sheltering) and effected population (ERPAs);

G. Item #8 - Applicable EAL #;

H. Item #11 and 12 - Wind speed and direction if PAR is made.

10.0 ATTACHMENTS

1. DRILL OR EXERCISE CONDUCT CHECKLIST
2. EVALUATOR FORM Rev. No. 19 Page 17 of 54

DRILL OR EXERCISE CONDUCT CHECKLIST

1. Prepare a drill or exercise scenario.
2. Prepare a drill or exercise report.
3. Evaluate the quantity of ERO trainees for potential impact on a successful drill or exercise.
4. Present the drill or exercise to EPC for approval.
5. Brief evaluators on the entire drill or exercise.
6. Brief the individual evaluators on specified tasks.
7. Issue evaluator Aids and Drill/Exercise Observation Sheet.
8. Initiate the drill or exercise.
9. Ensure the "flow" of activity throughout the drill or exercise.
10. Terminate the drill or exercise when it's purpose is accomplished.
11. Conduct a critique with participants or evaluators.
12. Collect Drill/Exercise Observation Sheets.
13. Complete a list of all deficiencies and recommendations.
14. Tabulate PERFORMANCE INDICATOR (PI) data points for:

"* Number of successful emergency classifications

"* Number of timely notifications once classified/reclassified

"* Number of PARs (initial and PAR changes) This information can be obtained from observation sheets, Shift Manager logs, Emergency Director logs, NRC event notification forms, etc.,

depending on extent of drill or exercise and participating facilities.

15. Complete action required on deficiencies.

SAP-6 Rev.6 No. 19DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT P ATTACHMENT Age 1 1 Rev. No. 19 Page 18 of 54

_EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM DATE: LOCATION:_ CONTROL ROOM EVALUATOR: CONTROLLER:

YES NO

1. Did the Shift Manager/ED demonstrate he is in charge?
2. Did the Control Room classify the emergency correctly in accordance with IAP-2?
3. Were notifications made to NYS and Oswego County
  • within 15 minutes of event classification?

Were updates timely?

4. Were Protective Action Recommendations made to NYS and Oswego County?
5. Was timely notification made to the NRC (must be
  • completed within one hour from event classification)?
6. Were communications prefaced with "This is a drill?"
7. Log the following times for event classification and notifications:

Class. RECS Plant Staff NRC EAL Time Time Time Time NUE

  • ALERT
  • Did the SM/ED direct Security to initiate call outs?

(Not necessary during normal working hours.

8. Were timely briefings given to plant staff?
9. Was the ENS phone manned?

SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No. 19 Page 19 of--54

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (Control Room Continued)

YES NO

10. Did the Control Room experience any emergency plan equipment failures?

If yes what were the failures and how was the problem addressed:

11. Did Control Room personnel adhere to procedures (EOPs, AOPs, Tech. Specs., etc.)?
12. Was staffing level adequate?
13. Was Emergency Director turnover from the SM thorough?

Was plant staff advised of this transfer of responsibility?

14. Once initiated, was accountability conducted and maintained throughout the emergency?
15. Was shift turnover demonstrated?
16. Were logs properly maintained by key personnel?
17. Was the plant staff adequately informed regarding plant status?
18. Was data flow between facilities and teams accurate, timely and complete?
19. Was habitability performed in accordance with EAP-14.6?

SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No. 19 Page 20 of 54

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (Control Room Continued)

YES NO

20. Were all objectives met?

If not, explain:

  • Performance Indicator Data Points SAP 6ATTACHMENT SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT AgeE2 2 SRev. No. 19 Page- 21 of 54

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (Control Room Continued)

21. Miscellaneous Comments and Notes:

SAP-6 ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No. 19 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT22 of 54

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM DATE: LOCATION: TSC EVALUATOR: CONTROLLER:

YES NO

1. Was the TSC activation process timely?

Time TSC was called for activation Time TSC was staffed Time TSC declared themselves operational

2. Was the TSC set-up in accordance with EAP-14.1?
3. Did the TSC Manager demonstrate he is in charge?
4. Were offsite notifications made in accordance with EAP-1.1?
5. Were onsite notifications made in accordance with EAP-I.1?
6. Were communications prefaced with "This is a drill?"
7. Log the following times for event classification and notifications (if applicable):

Class. RECS Plant Staff NRC EAL Time Time Time Time NUE ALERT SAE GE

8. Was staff familiar with their equipment and responsibilities?
9. Was the staffing level adequate?
10. Were periodic briefings held on plant status?
11. Were plant staff aware of changes in emergency classification?
12. Were status boards updated in a timely manner?

SAP-6 ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No. 19 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT Pag e 23 of 54

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (TSC CONTINUED)

YES NO

13. Were logs properly maintained by key personnel?
14. Did the technical staff support the Control Room?
15. Were corrective actions/solutions well thought out?
16. Did the TSC experience any emergency plan equipment failures?

If yes, what were the failures and how was the problem addressed:

17. Did the Emergency Director classify/re-classify the emergency correctly?
  • If reclassified, were offsite notifications made to NYS/Oswego County within 15 minutes and NRC within one (1) hour? *
18. Were protective action recommendations made to NYS/Oswego County? *
19. Was a site evacuation called for?

If yes, were local authorities and NMPC notified?

20. Was the transfer of the Emergency Director and his responsibilities from the TSC to the EOF smooth and complete?
21. Once initiated, was accountability conducted and maintained throughout the emergency?
22. Was shift turnover demonstrated?
23. Was data flow between facilities and teams accurate, timely and complete?
24. Was habitability performed in accordance with EAP-14.6?

SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No. ].9 Page 24 of 54

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (TSC CONTINUED)

YES NO

25. Were all objectives met?

If not, explain:

  • Performance Indicator Data Points SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No. 19 Page 25 of 54

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (TSC CONTINUED)

26. Miscellaneous Comments and Notes:

SAP -6 No. 19DRILL/EXERCISE ATTACHMENT 2 Rev.6 CONDUCT P Age 2

Rev. No. 19 Page 26 of 54

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM DATE: LOCATION: OSC EVALUATOR: CONTROLLER:

YES NO

1. Was the OSC activation process timely?
a. Time OSC was called for activation
b. Time OSC was staffed
c. Time OSC declared operational
2. Was the OSC set up in accordance with EAP-14.5?
3. Did the OSC Manager demonstrate he is in charge?
4. Was the staffing level adequate?
5. Was shift turnover demonstrated?
6. Were logs properly maintained by key personnel?
7. Were status boards updated in a timely manner?
8. Log the following times OSC became aware of event classification.

NUE Alert SAE GE

9. Were periodic briefings conducted in the OSC regarding plant status?
10. Was data flow between facilities and teams accurate, timely and complete?
11. Did the OSC experience any emergency plan equipment failures?

If yes, what were the failures and how was the problem addressed:

SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No. 19 Page 27 of 54

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (OSC CONTINUED)

YES NO

12. Once initiated, was accountability conducted and maintained throughout the emergency?
13. Was habitability performed in accordance with EAP-14.6?
14. Were repair team briefings adequate and timely?
15. Were repair team debriefings adequate and timely?
16. Were emergency exposure authorizations necessary?

If yes, were actions consistent with procedures?

17. Were individual personnel exposure histories obtained in a timely manner for repair team personnel availability?
18. Was status of repair teams adequately maintained?
19. Were emergency tasks prioritized and acted upon in assigned priority?
20. Were all objectives met?

If not, explain:

SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No. 19 Page 28 of 54

EVALUATOREVALUATION FORM (OSC CONTINUED)

21. Miscellaneous Comments and Notes:

SAP- 6 Rev.6 No.

Rev. No. 19 19DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT Page 29 A29of Mof 544 2]

ATTAC:HMENT Age

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM DATE: LOCATION: REPAIR & CORRECTIVE ACTION TEAMS EVALUATOR: CONTROLLER:

TEAM ACTIVITY:

YES NO

1. Did the team consist of a minimum of two individuals?
2. Was a briefing conducted?

If so, did it include:

a. most direct route
b. proper tools
c. tasks understanding
d. visual aids (maps, drawings, etc.)
e. simulations
f. radiation area dose rates
3. Were the OSC Manager and Emergency Maintenance Coordinator cognizant of all Repair and Corrective Action Team efforts?
4. Did SM approve work on safety related items?
5. Was TSC direction obtained for engineering repair work?
6. Was RWP or Emergency Plant Entry Form prepared?

(circle one)

7. Was dosimetry, protective clothing, etc. issued in accordance with the above form?
8. Were there any Emergency Plan equipment failures?

If so, what were they and how was problem addressed?

SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No. 19 Page 30 of 54

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (REPAIR & CORRECTIVE ACTION TEAMS CONTINUED)

YES NO

9. Was a debrief conducted?
10. Were all objectives met?

If not, explain: _________________________

SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No. 19 Page 31 of 54

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (REPAIR & CORRECTIVE ACTION TEAMS CONTINUED)

11. Miscellaneous Comments and Notes:

SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT P Age 3

SA- No.

Rev. 19 Page ATTACHMENT 32 of 54 2

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM DATE: LOCATION: -FIRE BRIGADE EVALUATOR: CONTROLLER:

YES NO

1. Time Control Room notified of fire Time fire alarm sounded Time fire brigade dispatched Time fire brigade responded to scene
2. Was fire alarm sounded and the announcement properly made over the plant page?
3. Was offsite assistance requested?

If yes, was Security directed to:

a. allow immediate access
b. provide dosimetry
c. direct and escort fire company
d. collect dosimetry upon exit
4. Were all unnecessary personnel evacuated from the fire area?
5. Was Rad Protection requested to perform a survey?
6. Were radiological conditions properly assessed?
7. Was emergency exposure criteria addressed and implemented?
8. Were all communications preceded with "This is a Drill?"
9. Were fire brigade members familiar with their duties?
10. Was the emergency classified correctly?

l1. If the OSC was activated, was the fire brigade dispatched from the OSC with a radiation protection technician?

12. Were-all objectives met?

If not, explain:

SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No. 19 Page 33 of 54

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (FIRE BRIGADE CONTINUED)

13. Miscellaneous Comments and Notes:

SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No. 19 Page 34 of 54

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM DATE: LOCATION: SECURITY/ACCOUNTABILITY EVALUATOR: CONTROLLER:

YES NO

1. Was the emergency classification posted at main security?
2. Were call-outs performed as directed by the SM/ED?

(Not required during normal working hours.)

3. Was site access controlled?
4. Were guards dispatched to access roads?
5. If accountability was called for:
a. Time site access/egress was restricted
b. Time accountability was initiated
c. Time accountability completed
6. Did accountability clerks report to their assigned assembly areas when directed?
7. Were accountability readers and sign-in sheets used?
8. Did accountability clerks experience any emergency plan equipment failures?

If yes, explain:

9. Was movement of personnel between onsite facilities adequately controlled?
10. Was movement of personnel badging offsite timely and orderly?

SAP-6 SA- No. DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT P 3 Age ATTACHMENT 2 19 Page 35 of 54

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (SECURITY/ACCOUNTABILITY CONTINUED)

YES NO

11. Was assembly in the Training Building auditorium controlled?

Were personnel updated regarding plant conditions?

12. Was continuous accountability maintained for the remainder of the emergency?
13. Was site evacuation called for?

If yes, were personnel directed to proceed to the Howard Road remote assembly area?

If yes, did the maps distributed to evacuating personnel coincide with the selected evacuation route?

14. Were all objectives met?

If not, explain:

SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No. 19 Page 36 of 54

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (SECURITY/ACCOUNTABILITY CONTINUED)

15. Miscellaneous Comments and Notes:

<_I SA-6ATTACHMENT 2 SAP-R6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT P 3 Age Rev. No.. 19 Page 37 of 54

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM DATE: LOCATION: CHEMISTRY TECHNICIAN EVALUATOR: CONTROLLER:

YES NO

1. Did he/she report to Control Room upon implementing the Emergency Plan?
2. What tasks were required by the ED for the Chemistry Technician?
3. Was the technician familiar with the procedures for the tasks?
4. What tasks were required by the Chemistry Supervisor for the technicians?

Were they familiar with the procedures for the tasks?

5. Did any emergency plan equipment fail to operate?

If yes, what were the failures and how was the problem addressed?

SAP-6 Rev.6 No. 19DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT P ATTACHMENT Age 3 2 Rev. No. 19 Page 38 of 54

-EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (CHEMISTRY TECHNICIAN CONTINUED)

YES NO

6. If PASS was demonstrated, was the above 3-hour time commitment met?
7. Miscellaneous Comments and Notes:

SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE-CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No. 19 Page 39 of 54

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM DATE: LOCATION: FIELD MONITORING EVALUATOR: CONTROLLER:

YES NO

1. Were teams assembled in a timely manner?
2. Were teams familiar with procedures?
3. Time the team was dispatched:

Team was dispatched from OSC/EOF (circle one)

4. Did team obtain the proper equipment prior to leaving?_
5. Were equipment checks performed prior to departure?
6. Were calibration dates current?
7. Were communication checks conducted prior to departure?
8. Was a vehicle/110V power supply check conducted?
9. Was the team briefing adequate?
10. Did the briefings include:
a. Plant conditions/nature of release?
b. Meteorological conditions?
c. Projected dose rates/stay time
d. Protective measures?
e. Use of KI?
f. Dosimetry recording?
g. Types of readings/samples to be obtained?
h. Means of communication?
i. Emergency exposure limits?
11. Was the communications flow between team and dispatcher timely and accurate and complete?
12. Were teams briefed frequently by the dispatcher?
13. Were survey results properly relayed to the dispatcher?

SAP-6 No.

Rev.6 19DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT P ATTACHMENT Age 4 2 Rev. No. 19 Page 40 of 54

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (FIELD MONITORING CONTINUED)

YES NO

14. Were communications prefaced with "This is a Drill?"-
15. Were teams proficient in proper survey/sampling techniques?
16. Were proper plume traversing techniques demonstrated?

If no, explain:

17. Were vehicles and equipment checked for contamination upon return?
18. Was shift turnover demonstrated?
19. Did teams experience any Emergency Plan equipment failures?

If yes, explain:

20. Were all objectives met?

If not, explain:

SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No. 19 Page 41 of 54

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (FIELD MONITORING CONTINUED)

21. Miscellaneous Comments and Notes:

SAP-6 ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No. 19 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT Page 42 of 54

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM DATE: LOCATION: EOF EVALUATOR: CONTROLLER:

YES NO

1. Was the EOF activation process timely?
a. Time EOF was called for activation
b. Time EOF was staffed
c. Time EOF declared themselves operational
2. Was the EOF activated in accordance with EAP-14.2?
3. Did the EOF Manager demonstrate he is in charge?
4. Was the transfer of command and control from the TSC to the EOF adequate?

Time ED assumed duties at the EOF

5. Were offsite notifications made in accordance with EAP-1.1?

(Note the time forms are issued in comments section.)

6. Were communications prefaced with "This is a Drill?"
7. Log the following times for event classification and notifications (if applicable):

Class. RECS Plant Staff NRC EAL Time Time Time Time NUE

  • ALERT
8. Was staff familiar with their equipment and responsibilities?
9. Was the staffing level adequate?
10. Were periodic briefings held on plant status?

SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No. 19 Page 43 of 54

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (EOF CONTINUED)

YES NO

11. Was EOF staff aware of changes in emergency classification
12. Were EALs classified correctly? *
13. Were status boards updated in a timely manner?
14. Were logs properly maintained by key personnel?
15. Did the EOF experience any emergency plan equipment failures:

If yes, what were the failures and how was the problem addressed:

16. Did the ED consult with state and county representatives regarding protective action recommendations?
17. Were protective action recommendations made to NYS/Oswego County? *
18. Was long term facility staffing considered in accordance with EAP-43?
19. Was shift turnover demonstrated?
20. Was data flow between facilities accurate, timely and complete?
21. Was the ED aware of plant decisions?
22. Was access control adequate?

SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No. 19 Page 44 of 54

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (EOF CONTINUED)

YES NO

23. If a release was in progress, were incoming personnel monitored to prevent spread of contamination?
24. Were all objectives met?

If not, explain:

  • Performance Indicator Data Points SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT-2 Rev. No. 19 Page 45 of 54

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (EOF CONTINUED)

25. Miscellaneous Comments and Notes:

SAP-6 Rev.6 No. 19DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT P ATTACHMENT 22 AgeM4NT Rev. No. 19 Page 46 of S4

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM DATE: LOCATION: DOSE ASSESSMENT EVALUATOR: CONTROLLER:

YES NO

1. Did dose assessment personnel perform equipment checks upon arrival?
2. Were personnel familiar with the equipment?
3. Was the transfer of activities from the TSC to the EOF timely and complete?
4. Were meteorological forecasts obtained?
5. Were status boards updated and utilized?
6. Were Part II forms completed accurately and on time?
7. Were EAP-4 forms properly completed and utilized?
8. Was field survey data utilized for comparison with computer projected doses?

Were discrepancies resolved?

9. Were field teams briefed periodically regarding plant status?
10. Were dose calculations and the determination of protective action recommendations performed efficiently and in a timely manner?
11. Was the interface with TSC radiological personnel (re: effluent monitor readings, effluent sample results, PASS samples, etc.) adequate?
12. Were offsite liaisons utilized for the exchange and comparison of field survey data and dose projections?
13. Was there someone available to interface with and answer questions for offsite liaisons?

SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No. 19 Page 47 of 54

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (DOSE ASSESSMENT CONTINUED)

YES NO

14. Were offsite liaisons included in discussions regarding PARs?
15. Were the results of dose calculations and protective action recommendations correct and in accordance with established procedures?
16. Were all communications prefaced with "This is a Drill?"
17. Was shift turnover demonstrated?
18. Did any emergency plan equipment fail to operate?

If yes, what were the failures and how was the problem address?

19. Were all objectives met?

If not, explain:

SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No. 19 Page 48 of 54

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (DOSE ASSESSMENT CONTINUED)

20. Miscellaneous Comments and Notes:

SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No. 19 Page 49 of 54

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM DATE: LOCATION: JNC EVALUATOR: CONTROLLER:

YES NO

1. Was the JNC activated in a timely manner?
a. Time JNC was called for activation
b. Time JNC was operational
2. Was the JNC set up in accordance with JNC procedures?
3. Was information flow between the plant, EOF and JNC accurate, timely and complete?
4. Did the utility effectively share information with state and county public information staff?
5. If technical information was required, was the information obtained from appropriate personnel?
6. Were briefing notes reviewed by designated personnel prior to their release to the media?
7. Were news briefings and summary notes timely, accurate and complete?
8. Was county activation of the EAS system timely?
9. Were county EAS messages appropriate, timely, and complete?
10. Was information provided to the media consistent with the EAS messages?
11. Was information released understandable to the public?
12. If protective actions were implemented, were affected areas appropriately specified?
13. Were press briefings held frequently to give available information as conditions changed?

SAP-6 Rev.6 No. 19DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT P ATTACHMENT Age 5 21 Rev. No. 19 Page 50 of 54

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (JNC CONTINUED)

YES NO

14. When conditions were static, were briefings held frequently to keep the media updated?,
15. Did the media spokesperson present material effectively?
16. Were questions by the media handled properly by the media spokesperson?
17. Were status boards and displays updated accurately and timely?
18. Was the JNC staff aware of changes in emergency classification?
19. Did the rumor control staff respond promptly and accurately to calls?
20. Were measures taken to control the spread of rumors that threaten to have an adverse effect on adherence to protective actions?
21. Were support functions such as registration and security performed effectively?
22. Did the JNC experience any emergency plan equipment failures?

If yes, explain:

23. Were communications prefaced with "This is a Drill?"
24. Was shift turnover demonstrated?

SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No. 19 Page 51 of 54

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (JNC CONTINUED)

YES NO

25. Were all the objectives met?

If not, explain:

SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No. 19 Page 52 of 54

EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (JNC CONTINUED)

26. Miscellaneous Comments and Notes:

SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No. 19 Page 53 of 54

OBSERVER EVALUATION FORM DATE: LOCATION: TRAINING BUILDING EVALUATOR: CONTROLLER:

YES NO

1. Time the Training Building was called for activation
2. Did the Training Building Accountability Supervisor demonstrate their being in charge?
3. Were communications prefaced with "This is a drill?"
4. Did the proper non-essential personnel sign in?
5. Was staff familiar with their responsibilities?
6. Were periodic announcements made to the personnel?
7. Were logs properly maintained by key personnel?
8. Did the Training Building experience any building equipment failures?
9. If yes, what were the failures and how was the problem addressed:
10. Were personnel notified of when to return to their work stations?
11. Was habitability performed in accordance with EAP-14.6?
12. Miscellaneous Comments and Notes:

SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No. 19 Page 54 of 54

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML030790017&oldid=2669162"