ML032550382
| ML032550382 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | FitzPatrick  (DPR-059) |
| Issue date: | 08/29/2003 |
| From: | Izyk C Entergy Nuclear Northeast |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| IAP-1, Rev 31, SAP-6, Rev 20 | |
| Download: ML032550382 (75) | |
Text
7 77 RCONTROLLED COPY NUMBER: 34 TO:
FROM:
U.S.N.R.C. Document CenterlWashington, DC CATHY IZYK - EMERGENCY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT:
EMFREGFNCY PLAN AND IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURFS Enclosed are revisions to your assigned copy of the JAFNPP Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedures.
Please remove and DISCARD the old pages. Insert the attached, initial and date this routing sheet and return the completed routing sheet to Cathy Izyk In the Emergency Planning Department within 15 days.
If this transmittal is not returned within 15 days, your name will be removed from the controlled list.
THESE PROCEDURES ARE EFFECTIVE FRIDAY. AUGUST 29 2003 myU-2' Update it Da August 29.2003
^
X DOCUMENT PAGES REV.
INITIALS/DATE IAP-1 REPLACE ALL 31 X-Updatre-E3 st Date August 29. 2003 7
-i-,x, DOCUMENT PAGES REV.
INITIALS/DATE SAP-6 REPLACE ALL 20
)A(O clS
EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES/VOLUME 2
- UPDATE LIST I CONTROLLED COPY#35 I
.1
-0
Iu Date of Issue:
AUGUST 29. 2003 o
Procedure' Reisio date of -
' Number T
rtele; mb R
e Procedure N/A TABLE OF CONTENTS REV. 19 02/98 N/A EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTATiO LAY-1 CHECKLIST O
E.31 08/03 Informational
}'AP-2 CLASSIFICATION OF EMERGENCY REV. 24 05/03 Informational CONDITIONS____
EAP-1.1 OFFSITENOTIICATIONS REV. 49 08/03 Informational EAP-2 PERSONNEL INJURY REV. 26 01/03 Informational EAP-3 FIRE REV. 23 08102 Informational EAP-4 DOSE ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS REV. 33 06/03 Informational EAP-4.1 RELEASE RATE DETERMINATION REV. 16' 05/03 Informational EAP-5.1 DELETED (02/94)
EAP-5.2 DELETED (04/91) r
~ONSIrE/OFSTE DO IN SURYEYS EAP-NSTEOFSTEDONWND REV. 9 08/02 Informational EAP-5.3 AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING RE,9_8/2_______
EAP-6 IN-PLANT EMERGENCY SURVEY/ENTRY REV. 17 05/03 Informational EAP-7.:
DELETED (02/94)
EAP-7.2 DELETED (02/94)
EAP-8 PERSONNEL ACCOUNTABILITY REV. 62 08/03 Informational EAP-9 SEARCH AND RESCUE OPERATIONS REV.
11 05/03 Informational EAP-10 PROTECTED AREA EVACUATION REV.
17 05/03 Informational EAP-1 SITE EVACUATION REV.
19 05/03 Informatonal DOSE ESTIMATED FROM AN ACCIDENTAL EAP-12 RELEASE OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL TO REV.
11 04/02 Informational LAKE ONTARIO EAP-13 DAMAGE CONTROL REV. 14 06/02 Informational EAP-14.1 TECHNICAL SUPPORT CENTER REV 23 05/03 Informatonal EAP-14.21 CIVTO REV. 2 05/03 Informational ACTIVATION EAP-14.2 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS FACILITY REV. 21 05/03 Informational ACTIVATION EAP-14.5 OPERATIONAL SUPPORT CENTER REV.
14 03/00 Informational EAP-14.5 ACTIVATION Page 1 of 2
EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES/VOLUME 2 UPDATE LIST Date of Issue:
AUGUST 29 2003 U
\\
',7a i
,'-0','.'.Al a';\\t 4Date of f-Procedure Procedur Revision Dat o
U of N u mb er T t eN m er L sPr ced ur Review EAP-14.6 HABITABILITY OF THE EMERGENCY REV.
15 05/03 Informational EAP-.15 EMERGENCY RADIATION EXPOSURE REV.
11 06/02 Informational CRITERIA AND CONTROL EAP-16 PUBLIC INFORMATION PROCEDURE REV.
7 05/03 Informational EAP-16.2 JOINT NEWS CENTER OPERATION REV.
2 06/03 Informational EAP-17 EMERGENCY ORGANIZATION STAFFING REV. 107 08/03 Informational EAP-18 DELETED (12/93)
EAP-19 EMERGENCY USE OF POTASSIUM IODINE REV. 22 05/03 Informational (KI)
EAP-20 POST ACCIDENT SAMPLE, OFFSITE REV.
9 06/02 Informational SHIPMENT AND ANALYSIS RE.__6/2________
EAP-21 DELETED (12/85)
EAP-22 DELETED (02/98)
EAP-23 EMERGENCY ACCESS CONTROL REV.
11 06/02 Informational EAP-24 EOF VEHICLE AND PERSONNEL REV.
9 06/02 Informational DECONTAMINATION EAP-25 DELETED (02/94)
Page 2 of 2
.1 I~~~~~~~~~~~~
ENERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS., INC.
JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT EMERGENCY.PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST
-SlAP-i1:
R~~JEVISION 31 E
_L DATE:
8luJ o-5 APPROVED BY:
kSPONSIBPE PROCEDURE OWNER EFFECTIVE DATE:
?
, f;
qw d&d 0 !7 I
-- v- -- -
1-1
FIRST ISSUE 0 FULL REVISION 0 LIMITED REVISION
*****************************
INFORMATIONAL USE TSR a.. -
CONTROLLED COPY ADMINISTRATIVE
]
PERIODIC REVIEW DUE DATE:
AUGUST 2007
I I
I EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST IAP REVISION
SUMMARY
SHEET REV. NO.
31 On attachment 1 J & K and attachment 2 P & Q added the words "including plant announcements".
30 Modified order that information is given to SAS officer for pager/CAN activation in step C of and 2.
- Added provision to initiate EAP-19 upon declaration of a General Emergency.
29 On attachment 1 and 2; section "C", added additional wording to clarify that this phone number is for CAN activation verification.
- In section 4.2 deleted reference to the TSC or EOF in declaring or re-declaring an emergency, and changed the Emergency Director to Emergency Plant Manager.
- On Attachment 1, sections K and.L and on Attachment 2, section Q and R -
changed Director to Plant Manager.
- On Attachments 1 section L & Attachment 2 sections R added words to clarify the need to notify Security of SAE or GE classification time and direct them to start accountability.
28 On attachment 1 and 2 section "C", corrected reference to EAP-17 attachment 4 not 5.
- Added This is:(1) an actual emergency, OR (2) a drill, OR (3) a pager/on-call test" to attachments 1 and 2 section C".
- On attachment 1 and 2 section C", added clarification wording that CAN will call 315-349-6261 (located near RECS line) for verification of CAN activation from the Control Room.
26 On Attachment 1 added additional information in section J.
- On Attachment 1 section J & L and Attachment 2 section P & R added the words "30 Minute Limit To Complete" Rev. No.
31 Page 2 of 14
EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST I
-AP-1 I
It SECTION 1.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 3.0 4.0 5.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE PURPOSE
~~~~~~......................
4 REFERENCES...........
4.......
Performance References 4
Developmental References....
.....................4 PROCEDURE..........................
4 ATTACHMENTS 5
- 1. CONTROL ROOM EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST 6
- 2. TSC/EOF EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST.... 10 Rev. No.
3 1 Page 3 of 14
."II EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST IAP 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this procedure is to provide a checklist for implementing actions and direction in the use of additional procedures for implementing the emergency plan.
2.0 REFERENCES
2.1 Performance References None 2.2 Developmental References 2.2.1 JAFNPP Emergency Plan, Volumes 2 & 3, Implementing Procedures.
3.0 INITIATING EVENTS 3.1 Either an Unusual Event-, Alert, Site Area Emergency or General Emergency has been declared in accordance with IAP-2, CLASSIFICATION OF EMERGENCY CONDITIONS.
4.0 PROCEDURE NOTE:
As a quick reference tool for the implementor of this procedure, a new checklist should be completed at initial declaration and each reclassification as appropriate.
Additionally, a review of the checklist should be conducted for significant event related occurrences.
4.1 From the Control Room, when an emergency is classified or reclassified in accordance with IAP-2, CLASSIFICATION OF EMERGENCY CONDITIONS, the immediate actions for the Emergency Director are (see Attachment 1):
Rev. No.
31 Page 4 of 14
EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST IAP-1 FACILITY ACTIVATION REQUIREMENTS Facility Unusual Event Unusual Event Alert Site Area General (0700-1530)
(After 1530, Emergency Emergency Weekends, Holidays) l TSC ED Decides X
(1)
X X
x OSC t-ED Decides X'X X
X IJNC ED Decides ED Decides X
X TSCand OSC must be activated at the Unusual Event classification during off-hours UNLESS the ED is confident that the emergency will not escalate.
(Facility activation may be modified by the Emergency Director if the safety of incoming personnel may be jeopardized by a security event or other event hazardous to incoming personnel.)
-4.2 When an emergency is classified or reclassified in accordance with AP-2, CLASSIFICATION OF EMERGENCY CONDITIONS, then the immediate actions-for the Emergency Director or Emergency Plant Manager are (see Attachment 2):
NOTE:
As a quick reference tool for the implementor of this procedure,a new checklist should be completed at initial declaration and each reclassification as appropriate.
Additionally, a review of the checklist should be conducted for significant event-related occurrences.
4.3 If plant conditions deteriorate, implement IAP-2, CLASSIFICATION OF EMERGENCY CONDITIONS, to-reclassify the emergency.
5.0 ATTACHMENTS
- 1. CONTROL ROOM EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST
- 2. TSC/EOF EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST Rev. No.
31 Page 5 of 14
CONTROL ROOM EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST Page 1 of 4 Implemented InitialslTime Actions/Procedures A.
Implement EAP-1.1, OFFSITE NOTIFICATIONS, in order to E_2 Initials notify offsite agencies.
UE*
ALERT*
Time SAE*
GE*
B.
If a General Emergency has been declared in accordance F-1 Initials with IAP-2, CLASSIFICATION OF EMERGENCY CONDITIONS, then recommend protective actions in accordance with GE*
procedure EAP-4, DOSE ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS, Time, Initial Protective Actions.
C.
Per EAP-l.1, notify Security (ext. 3456) to activate E
Initials pagers, and if necessary CAN.
Pagers-should be activated at the NUE, and once again at the ALERT or higher classification if escalation UE*
from the NUE occurs.
ALERT*
Provide the following information:
SAE*
Time
(3) a pager/on-call test
- 2. Emergency Classification and time declared.
- 3. IF AOP-43 in process, THEN direct SAS Officer to have Shift Security Supervisor make the plant announcement and offsite notifications.
- 4. Activate Pagers YES NO
- a. IF YES, provide 3 digit Pager Code
- 5. Activate CAN YES NO
- 6. Facilities activated:
- a. "Group 1" for (CR/TSC/OSC /JAF) or
- b. "Group'2" for (CR/TSC/OSC/JAF/EOF/JNC) or
- c. Selected: CR /TSC / OSC / JAF / EOF / JNC IF Security is unable to activate pagers and/or CAN, THEN the Shift Manager should utilize EAP-17, Attachment 4 to make the activation.
CAN will call 315-349-6261 (located near RECS line) for verification of CAN activation. This is the only CR number authorized for CAN activation verification from the CR.
PAGER CODES 1=Actual Event I=NUE 1 = Report to CR/OSC/TSC 2=Alert 2 = Report to CR/OSC/TSC/EOF/JNC 2=Drill or Exercise 3=SAE 3 =On duty only report to CR/OSC/TSC/EOF/JNC 4=GE 7 = Personnel assigned a pager call CAN 800-205-9=Pager/on-call 9=None 5175 (respond as directed) test only 8 = All personnel report to EOF for further instructions 9 = No response required
- IMPLEMENTATION IS REQUIRED AT THIS EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION.
IAP-1 EMERGENCY PLAN ATTACHMENT 1 Rev. No.
31 IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST Page 6 of 14
CONTROL ROOM EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST
.':,:."3-,
Jo-.,
Page 2 of 4 Implemented InifiaslTime ActionslProcedures D.
Activate emergency response facilities in Initials accordance with the-Facility Activation Requirements matrix in Section 4.1 ALERT*
SAE*
Time GE-E.
If a Gaseous Radioactivity Release is suspected, Initials imminent,.underway or has occurred, then implement EAP-4, DOSE ASSESSMENT-CALCULATIONS, Attachment 1, INITIAL PROTECTIVE ACTIONS,-in order to determine Time
-recommendations-to be.given to the County and State.
F.
If a Liquid Radioactivity Release is imminent, Initials underway or has occurred, 'then implement EAP-12, DOSE ESTIMATED-FROM AN ACCIDENTAL RELEASE OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL-TO LAKE ONTARIO, in order to Time determine dose projections and protective action recommendations to-be.given to the County and State.
G.
If a fire has occurred then implement EAP-3, 0_2 Initials FIRE, and conduct fire fighting efforts.
TIME H.
If a personnel-injury has occurred, then consider Initials implementation::of EAP-2,- PERSONNEL INJURY, based on the initiating events.'
Time
.I.
If a protected area and/or site evacuation have Initials been initiated and it is necessary to enter areas where abnormal radiological conditions exist, then
- consider implementation of EAP-6, IN-PLANT Time EMERGENCY-SURVEY/ENTRY, based on initiating events.
- IMPLEMENTATION IS REQUIRED AT THIS EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION.
.- EMERGENCY PLAN ATTACHMENT 1 Rev. No.
31 IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST Page 7 of 14
l-CONTROL ROOM EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST Page 3 of 4 Implemented Initialsfrime Actions/Pnxedures F_
J. If a Site Area Emergency or General Emergency has Initials been declared, or, if any of the following:
SAE*
unanticipated confirmed multiple area radiation GE*
monitor alarms, ventilation monitor alarms, fire, Time EAP-6 survey showing high radiation, high airborne activity indicated by process computer alarms, then implement EAP-10, PROTECTED AREA EVACUATION, including plant announcements.
K. If a General Emergency has been declared, or at Initials the discretion of the Emergency Plant Manager, implement EAP-11, SITE EVACUATION, based on the SAE+
If a Site Area Emergency has GE*
Time been declared, then consider implementation of EAP-11, SITE EVACUATION, based on the initiating events, including plant announcements.
30 L.
If a Site Area Emergency or General Emergency has Minute Initials been declared,-a Protected Area Evacuation or Limit To Site Evacuation has been completed, or-at the From Emergency Plant Manager's request, implement EAP-Time Time 8, PERSONNEL ACCOUNTABILITY.
Declared Notify Security of the time the SAE or GE was LI DECLARED, AND SAE*
Direct Security to commence Accountability GE*
F-1 M.
If onsite personnel are unaccounted for, or an Initials individual may be missing, trapped or disabled, then implement EAP-9, SEARCH AND RESCUE OPERATIONS, based on initiating events.
Time N.
If the TSC and OSC have been activated, and plant l~ l Initials equipment has been damaged, then consider implementation of EAP-13, DAMAGE CONTROL, based on initiating events.
Time
+ IMPLEMENTATION SHALL BE CONSIDERED AT THIS EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION.
- IMPLEMENTATION IS REQUIRED AT THIS EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION.
IAP-1 EMERGENCY PLAN ATTACHMENT 1 Rev. No.
31 IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST Page 8 of 14
CONTROL ROOM EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST Page 4 of 4
- 1.
Implemented Iniials/Time AcionsPfcedures
- 0. If authorization to receive emergency exposures Initials is needed, then implement EAP-15, EMERGENCY RADIATION EXPOSURE CRITERIA AND CONTROL, based on initiating events.
Time P.~ If abnormal radiological conditions are indicated Initials in the plant or environs, or, if a General Emergency has been declared, then implement EAP-GE*
19,-EMERGENCY USE OF POTASSIUM IODIDE (I).
Time Q.
If unusual weather conditions exist or are Initials imminent, consider implementation of SAP-19, SEVERE WEATHER,- based on initiating events.
Time R.- If plant conditions deteriorate, implement IAP-2, Initials CLASSIFICATION OF EMERGENCY CONDITIONS, to reclassify the emergency.
Time Signature Date Time I AP-1 EMERGENCY PLAN ATTACHMENT 1 Rev. No.
31 IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST Page 9 of 14
TSC/EOF EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST Page 1 of 5 Implemented InitialslTime Acdons/Procedures A. Implement EAP-l.1, OFFSITE NOTIFICATIONS, in L________
order to notify offsite agencies.
Initials UE*
ALERT*
SAE*
Time GE*
F-1 B. If a General Emergency has been declared, or if a
gaseous radioactivity release is suspected, Initials imminent, underway, or has occurred, then GE*
implement procedure EAP-4, DOSE ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS, Attachment 2, AUGMENTED DOSE Time ASSESSMENT PROTECTIVE ACTIONS, in order to determine recommendations to be given to the County and State.
C. IF not already accomplished from the CR, THEN Per EAP-D_2 1.1, notify Security (ext. 3456) to activate pagers, and if necessary CAN.
UE*
Pagers should be activated at the NUE, and once again ALERT* Initials at the ALERT or higher classification if escalation ALER*
from the NUE occurs; SGE*
Provide the following information:
GE Time
- 2. Emergency Classification and time declared.
- 3. Activate Pagers YES NO
- a. IF YES, provide 3 digit Pager Code
- 4. Activate CAN YES NO
- 5. Facilities activated:
- a. "Group 1" for (CR/TSC/OSC /JAF) or b."Group 2 for (CR/TSC/OSC/JAF/EOF/JNC) or c.Selected: CR / TSC / OSC / JAF /
EOF / JNC IF Security is unable to activate pagers and/or CAN, THEN activation must occur utilizing EAP-17,. CAN will call 315-349-6261 (located near RECS line) for verification of CAN activation.
This is the only CR number authorized for CAN activation verification from the CR.
PAGER CODES 1=Actual Event 1=NUE 1 = Report to CR/OSC/TSC 2=Alert 2 = Report to CR/OSC/TSc/EOF/JNC 2=Drill or Exercise 3=SAE 3 = On duty only report to CR/OSC/TSC/EOF/JNC 4=GE 7 = Personnel assigned a pager call CAN 800-205-5175 9=Pager/on-call test 9=None (respond as directed) only 8 = All personnel report to EOF for further instructions 9 = No response required
- IMPLEMENTATION IS REQUIRED AT THIS EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION.
IAP-l EMERGENCY PLAN ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No.
31 IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST Page 10 of 14
TSC/EOF EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST
-"I i::!,
Page 2 of 5 Implemented Inifialsrrime Aclions/Procedures D.
Activate emergency response facilities in accordance with the Facility Activation Initials Requirements matrix in Section 4.1 ALERT*
SAE*,
GE*
Time E. -If the TSC is activated, then implement EAP-L___l_
.14.1, TECHNICAL SUPPORT CENTER ACTIVATION.
Initials ALERT*
SAE*
GE*
Time F.
If the OSC isactivated, then implement EAP-L____
.- 14.5,- OPERATIONAL SUPPORT CENTER ACTIVATION.-:
Initials ALERT*
SAE* -
GE*
Time G.. If the EOF is activated,- then implement EAP-L_______
14.2, EMERGENCY OPERATIONS FACILITY ACTIVATION.
Initials ALERT*
SAE*
GE*
Time H.
If abnormal-radiological-conditions exist or are suspected, then consider implementation of EAP-Initials 14.6, HABITABILITY OF THE EMERGENCY FACILITIES, based on the initiating events.
Time I.
If a liquid radioactivity release is imminent, underway or has occurred then implement EAP-12, Initials DOSE ESTIMATED FROM AN ACCIDENTAL RELEASE OF ADIOACTIVE MATERIAL TO LAKE ONTARIO, in order f
to determine dose projections and protective action recommendations to be given to the County Time and State.
- IMPLEMENTATION IS REQUIRED AT THIS EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION.
-,EMERGENCY PLAN ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No.
31 IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST Page 11 of -14
TSC/EOF EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST Page 3 of 5 Implemented InitialsrTime ActionslProcedures IZ J. If a fire has occurred then implement EAP-3, FIRE, and conduct fire fighting efforts.
Initials Time aj K. If a personnel injury has occurred, then consider implementation of EAP-2, PERSONNEL Initials INJURY, based on the initiating events.
Time L. If downwind surveys/environmental monitoring are Initias
.needed, then consider implementation of EAP-5.3, Initials ONSITE/OFFSITE DOWNWIND SURVEYS AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, based on initiating events.
Time M. If an Alert or higher is declared, then implement EAP-23, EMERGENCY ACCESS CONTROL, Initials based on initiating events.
ALERT*
SAE*
GE*
Time N. -If an Alert or higher has been declared and the Initias lTSC has been activated, then implement EAP-28, Initials EMERGENCY RESPONSE DATA SYSTEM (ERDS)-
ALERT*
ACTIVATION.
SAE*
GE*
Time
- 0. If a protected area and/or site evacuation have been initiated and it is necessary to enter Initials areas where abnormal radiological conditions exist, then consider implementation of EAP-6, IN-PLANT EMERGENCY SURVEY/ENTRY, based on Time initiating events.
- IMPLEMENTATION IS REQUIRED AT THIS EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION.
IAP-1 EMERGENCY PLAN ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No.
31 IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST Page 12 of 14
TSC/EOF EMERGENCY-PLAN IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST
'Page 4 of 5 Implemented InitialslTime Ac-ions/Procedures P.
If a Site Area Emergency or General Emergency has been declared, or, if plant conditions EJ Initials -
reflect the initiating events, then implement SEAP-10FPROTECTED AREA EVACUATION, including GE*
Time plant announcements.
r-Q.
If a General Emergency has been declared, or at Init -ials the discretion of the Emergency Plant Manager, Initials implement EAP-1l, SITE EVACUATION, based on SAE+
initiating events.' If a Site Area Emergency GE*
has been declared, then consider implementation of EAP-li, SITE EVACUATION, based on the Tm initiating events, including plant announcements.
30 St rao eea inute R. If a Sit Area Emergency or General Emergency Limit To has been declared,-a Protected Area Evacuation Complete or Site Evacuation has been completed, or at the From Initials Emergency Plant Manager's request, implement Time EAP-8, PERSONNEL ACCOUNTABILITY.
Declared 0 Notify Security of the time the SAE or GE was Time DECLARED, AND SAE*
GE*
0 Direct Security to commence Accountability S. If onsite-personnel are unaccounted for, or an 0
individual may be missing, trapped or disabled, Initials then implement EAP-9, SEARCH AND RESCUE OPERATIONS, based on initiating events.
Time T. If the TSC and OSC have been activated, and L]
Ini plant equipment has been damaged, then consider Initials implementation of EAP-13, DAMAGE CONTROL, based on initiating events.
Time U. If authorization to receive emergency exposures 0-is needed, then implement EAP-15, EMERGENCY Initials RADIATION EXPOSURE CRITERIA AND CONTROL, based on initiating events.
Time
+ IMPLEMENTATION SHALL BE CONSIDERED AT THIS EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION.
- IMPLEMENTATION IS REQUIRED AT THIS EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION.
IAP-1 EMERGENCY PLAN ATTACHMENT-2.
Rev. No..
31 IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST Page 13 of 14
TSC/EOF EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST Page 5 of 5 I
V. If abnormal radiological conditions are LI indicated in the plant or environs, or, if a Initials General Emergency has been declared, then GE*
implement EAP-19, EMERGENCY USE OF POTASSIUM IODIDE (KI).
Time W. If unusual weather conditions exist or are L__
imminent, consider implementation of SAP-19, Initials SEVERE WEATHER, based on initiating events.
Time X. If all emergency facilities have been activated LI and it is necessary to provide long term Initials staffing, then implement EAP-43, EMERGENCY FACILITIES LONG TERM STAFFING.
Time Signature Date Time IAP-1 EMERGENCY PLAN ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No.
31 IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST Page 14 of 14
EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCED fl* SIVOLUME.
UPDATE LIST
- I r%'KTD T CTn r
(VnDlv 44 2.
I 31 I A
%,%OJL A Tr _,,F I
, -1 Date of Issue:
AUGUST 29. 2003
'Procedure
'Procedure Revision-Useof
-Nmber
-Title Number LA-:
Procedure R e ie w N/A TABLE OF CONTENTS REV. 23 12/98 N/A EAP-26 PLANTA ACQUISITION SYSTEM REV. 12 11/02 Informational ACCESS ESTIMATION OF POPULATION DOSE EAP-27 WITHIN 10 MILE EMERGENCY PLANNING REV. 10-06/02 Informational ZONE EAP-28 EMERGENCY RESPONSE DATA SYSTEM REV 6 07/00 Infonnational (ERDS) ACTIVATION EAP-29 L
ISOLATION DURING REV. 6 05/03 Informational
_______AN EMERGENCY EAP-30 EMERGENCYTERMINATION AND RV 1 05/03 Informational
,TRANSITION TO RECOVERY*.
EAP-31 RECOVERY MANAGER*
REV. 2 05/03 Informational EAP-32 RECOVERY SUPPORT GROUP*
-REV. 10 08/03 Informational EAP-33 DEVELOPMENT OF A RECOVERY-ACTION RV 50 nomtoa EAP-33 O
zREV.
05/03 Informaiaonal PLAN*-
ACCEPTANCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL EAP-34 SAMPLES AT THE EOF/EL DURING AN REV.
05/03 Informational EMERGENCY EAP-35 EOF TLD ISSUANCE DURING AN REV. 7 05/03 Informatonal
_______EMERGENCY EAP-3G UENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY USE RV 5 05/03 Informational
_______DURING AN EMERGENCY SECURITY OF THE EOF AND EL DURING R
=
0 EAP-37 DRILLS, EXERCISES AND ACTUAL REV.7 02/03 Informational EVENTS EAP-39 DELETED (02/95)
EAP40 DELETED (02/98)
EAP-41 DELETED (12/85)
EAP-42 OBTAINING METEOROLOGICAL DATA REV. 20 06/03 Informational EAP-43 EMERGENCY FACILITIES LONG TERM REV. 61 08/03 Informational EAP-44 CORE DAMAGE ESTIMATION REV. 5 05/03 Informational EMERGENCY RESPONSE DATA SYSTEM EAP-45 (ERDS CONFIGURATION CONTROL REV. 6 07/00 Informational PROGRAM)
SAP-I MAINTAINING EMERGENCY REV. 17 02/03 Informational PREPAREDNESS__
SAP-2 EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT INVENTORY REV. 36 07/03 Informational SAP3 EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS REV. 73 02/03 Infomational TESTING 02P03 Inforageio Page 1 of 2
EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES/VOLUME 3 UPDATE LIST Date of Issue:
AUGUST 29, 2003 Date of U
o Procedure Procedure:
Revision La-t Poedf Number-Title 1
Number R
____Procedure SAP-4 NYS/OSWEGO COUNTY EMERGENCY Informational PREPAREDNESS PHOTO IDENTIFICATION REV. 10 05/03 CARDS SAP-5 DELETED (3/98)
SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT REV. 20 08/03 Informational SAP-7 MONTHLY SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURE Informational FOR ON-CALL EMPLOYEES REV. 37 08/03 SAP-8 PROMPT NOTIFICATION SYSTEM Informational FAILURE/SIREN SYSTEM FALSE REV. 13 12/02 ACTIVATION SAP-9 DELETED (02/94)
SAP-10 METEOROLOGICAL MONITORING REV. I I 03/02 Informational SYSTEM SURVEILLANCE SAP-11 EOF DOCUMENT CONTROL REV. 11 06/02 Informational SAP-13 EOF SECURITY AND FIRE ALARM Informational SYSTEMS DURING NORMAL OPERATIONS REV. 4 06/02 SAP-14 DELETED (02/95)
SAP-15 DELETED (11/92)
SAP-16 UTILIZING EPIC IDT TERMINALS FROM Informational DESTINY SYSTEM REV. 4 06/02 SAP-17 EMERGENCY RESPONSE DATA SYSTEM (ERDS) QUARTERLY TESTING REV. 7 07/00 Informational SAP-19 SEVERE WEATHER REV. 4 01/01 Infornational SAP-20 EMERGENCY PLAN ASSIGNMENTS REV. 22 05/03 Informational SAP-21 DELETED (04/01)
SAP-22 EMERGENCY PLANNING PROGRAM SELF REV. 2 05/03 Informational ASSESSM ENT__
Page 2 of 2
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT SAP REVISION 20
.~~
p-y tb~kqz'j APPROVED BY:
DATE:
81 VIO3 RFvONS IBLE(PROCEDURE OWNER rE~ ~
~
~~~ ::.: ;-ll
.9 EFFECTIVE DA:
'3 FULL REVISION 0 FIRST ISSUE 0 LIMITED REVISION
~~*-*
INFORMATIONAL USE TSR-
- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLLED COPY PERIODIC REVIEW DUE DATE:
MARCH 2008
DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT SAP-6 REVISION
SUMMARY
SHEET REV. NO.
20 On attachment 2 added column for EAL checkoff.
- Deleted section 2.2.3 -
reference to NUREG-0654.
- In section 8.1 changed information regarding critiques.
- In section 8.2 deleted reference to ACTS system and added information on the use of SDP process for tracking improvement items.
- Deleted section 8.3 regarding process for E-Plan improvement items/lessons learned.
- Changed EPC to Emergency Preparedness Manager -
title change throughout the procedure.
- Added section 9.2.4 regarding annual control room operator license requal.
- Added number 16 on attachment 1.
- On attachment 2 -
TSC section, added information about training building being notified of habitability in number 24.
- On attachment 2 section Repair & Corrective Action Teams; number 6, deleted "or Emergency Plant Entery Form".
- On attachment 2 Security/Accountability sheet; number 13;-
changed Howard Road to Oswego County Airport for the remot assembly area.
- On attachment 2 Dose Assessment sheet, number 3, added questions regarding transfer of activities from TSC to EOF deleted info on Part II forms and EAP-4 forms, added information to number 8, 9, & 10.
19 Changed Emergency Planning Coordinator to Emergency Planning Manager throughout procedure.
- Added controller to section 5.6
- Added new section 5.6.1 to perform walkdowns.
- Added "Emergency Manager" to section 7.8.4.C.
18
- Added new step in Attachment 1, DRILL OR EXERCISE CONDUCT CHECKLIST, to evaluate potential adverse affects of the quantity of ERO trainees.
- Added observer form for the Training Building in attachment 2.
Rev. No.
20 Page 2 of 56
DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCTv X
SAP-6 SECTI 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 9.3 9.4 9.5 10.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS ON PAGE PURPOSE......
.4 REFERENCES 4
DRILL CONDUCT...............
5 EXERCISE CONDUCT 7
EVAUATOR CONDUCT 8
CRITIQUES AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS............... 1 DRILL AND EXERCISE PERFORMANCE INDICATOR-(DEP)
Protective Action Reco~imendations (PARs)........
16
.7 1
DRILL OR EXERCISE CONDUCT CHECKLIST.18
- 2.
EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM
.................. 19 Rev. No.
2 0-Page 3 of 56
DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT SAP-6 1.0 PURPOSE To establish a procedure for the conduct and evaluation of all Emergency Plan Drills and Exercises at JAFNPP.
This procedure also outlines the management controls used to ensure that corrective actions are implemented.
2.0 REFERENCES
2.1 Performance References None 2.2 Developmental References 2.2.1 2.2.2 NUREG-0654, Criteria for the Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants JAFNPP Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedures, Volumes 1, 2 and 3 2.2.3 SAP-1, MAINTAINING EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 2.2.4 AP-02.03, EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 2.2.5 AP-02.04, CONTROL OF PROCEDURES 2.2.6 NEI 99-02, Revision 0, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline' 3.0 INITIATING EVENTS None 4.0 PROCEDURE 4.1 Drill conduct is discussed in Section 5 of this procedure.
This section delineates the minimum acceptable activity for a drill at JAFNPP.
4.2 Exercise conduct is discussed in section 6 of this procedure.
This section delineates the minimum acceptable activity for an exercise at JAFNPP.
Rev. No.
20 Page 4
of 56
DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT SAP-6 4.3 Evaluator conduct is discussed in Section 7 of this procedure. This section specifies the minimum acceptable, preparation,'training and response required.for an evaluator of a JAFNPP drill or exercise.
4.4 Critiques and corrective actions are discussed in Section 8 of this procedure.
This section specifies the method in which problems with Emergency Preparedness at JAFNPP are handled.
4.5 Drill and Exercise Performance Indicator (PI) evaluation is discussed in-Section 9 of this-procedure. This section describes the minimum acceptable performance indicator evaluation criteria.
5.0 DRILL CONDUCT 5.1 Drills shall be directed with-the frequency established by SAP-1,-MAINTAINING EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS.
5.2 Drills shall be directed by a lead controller who shall be responsible for conducting the-drill in accordance with the drill scenario and the drill report.
5.2.1 The lead controller may conduct a briefing with drill'participants. --The intent of such a briefing would be to insure that drill participants understand their lfunction and purpose in the drill.
The control room briefing should be similar to a shift turnover briefing.
5.2.2 The lead controller may delegate controller responsibilities to other individuals.
Controllers and evaluators can be used for this purpose.
A controller shall be called such when that-individual's sole responsibility is to assist in the conduct of a drill.
An evaluator can function as a controller when assigned the task of providing information or instruction during a certain aspect of a drill.
Rev. No.
20.
Page 5 of 56
DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT SAP-6 5.2.3 The lead controller shall insure that plant safety is not compromised by a drill, and may stop a drill at any time if in his opinion plant safety may be affected.
5.2.4 The Lead Controller shall attempt to collect the signatures of as many participants as possible for training documentation.
This responsibility can be delegated to other controllers, or evaluator._
5.2.5 The Lead Controller shall commence and end the Drill, upon approval from the JAFNPP Manager of Plant Operations.
5.2.6 The Lead Controller shall ensure that drill evaluators are stationed to properly observe and evaluate the drill.
5.2.7 The Lead Controller should distribute a fact sheet to the emergency response facilities describing plant conditions in effect approximately eight (8) hours prior to drill commencement.
5.3 During a drill, when (public address system) announcements are made, those announcements shall be prefaced or followed by the words "This is a Drill."
5.4 During a drill when contacting any offsite or non-JAF institution, the individual shall insure that the organization fully realizes that no emergency exists onsite and that it is a test of the JAFNPP Emergency Plan.
5.5 Drills shall be conducted using the guidance established by, Drill or Exercise Conduct Checklist.
Rev. No.
2 0 Page 6 of 56
DRILL/EXERCISE COND5UCT-SAP-6 5.6 The Emergency Planning Manager shall conduct a controller /
evaluator meeting prior to a drill.
The meeting shall be to inform the evaluators of their specific tasks.
5.6.1 Controllers are expected to familiarize themselves with the scenario specifics assigned to them and should perform a plant walkdown of their assigned
,area-prior to the drill/exercise to increase familiarity with the equipment location and current plant conditions, identify problems such as obstructions and inappropriate or unrealistic mock-up locations determine data presentation needs, increase knowledge of materials and tools needed to complete repairs, and identify possible alternate repair options.'
5.7 Radiological Emergency Medical Drills are limited in scope and participation by plant personnel.
Therefore, only one lead controller is necessary-in:the Control Room, one evaluator/controller-accompanying the victim and one controller at the destinationhospital.
Each evaluator/controller-may be'briefed individually.
The Control Room controller must be an Entergy employee and the other controllers/evaluators may' be medical consultant personnel.
Drill documentation will be a combination of Entergy-drill report and Control Room Evaluator Evaluation Form (Attachment 2) supplemented by the medical consultant's evaluation of performance.
6.0 EXERCISE CONDUCT An Exercise shall include all items specified for a drill with the following differences:
6.1 Exercises shall be.conducted with the frequency established by SAP-1, MAINTAINING EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS.
6.2 A Lead Controller shall be responsible for conducting the exercise in accordance with the written scenario. As a minimum, controllers shall be present in the Control Room, Technical Support Center, Operational'Support Center, and the Emergency Operations Facility.
6.3 Every attempt should be made to include Federal, State and local input into the development of the exercise scenario.
Rev. No.
20...
Page 7 of 56
DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT SAP-6 6.3.1 The Exercise scenario shall be developed by a committee headed and organized by the Emergency Planning Manager at JAFNPP.
7.0 EVALUATOR CONDUCT 7.1 Evaluators shall be used to record all significant events and the time at which they occur during a drill or exercise using Attachment 2, Evaluator Evaluation Form.
The drill or exercise scenario shall state the objectives of the drill or exercise which will determine the major areas for the evaluators to concentrate their observation.
Actions to be evaluated include: the ability to control the emergency, timely and proper notification, availability and use of equipment and personnel for control and recovery, assessment of consequences of the emergency actions taken by emergency personnel, and the necessity for off-shift notifications.
7.2 Evaluators and controllers will be assigned as determined by the Emergency Planning Manager.
The degree of evaluation shall be made based on the extent of the drill or scenario.
As a general rule, however, evaluators shall be stationed to observe all expected major actions of the drill expected and as listed in objectives statement of the drill or exercise scenario.
At least two evaluators must be available for drills and at least eight evaluators for an exercise.
7.3 In plant evaluators shall be badged following normal plant badging procedures, and are required to participate during accountability drills.
7.4 Evaluators and/or controllers shall be visibly identified as evaluators or controllers, and they should take no part in the action of the drill or exercise except to:
7.4.1 Indicate simulated conditions to the exercise or drill participants, (e.g., survey meter readings, contamination levels, etc.), but only after instructions by the lead controller or individual acting on behalf of lead controller.
7.4.2 Observe poor communication techniques and procedures and note/correct such occurrences when they occur.
Rev. No.
2 0 Page 8 of 56
DRILL/EXERCISE CONbUCft
'SAP-6 7.4.3 Prevent the communication of simulated emergency conditions as actual conditions outside of the exercise or drill area and to ensure that radio or telephone messages are preceded and ended by the statement "This is a Drill. 1 7.4.4 Prevent actions which'might create ahazard to personnel or equipment.
In such cases, evaluators shall require personnel participating in the
-exercise or drill to indicate the action verbally.
7.5 Evaluators shall be briefed as to their duties prior to the commencement of the drill or exercise.
Drill evaluators should be briefed within 24-hours of the commencement of a drill.
Exercise evaluators should be briefed within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of the commencement-of-an-exercise and written aids and procedures shall be'provided for use by the evaluators.
This 24-hour time frame may be adjusted to compensate for unannounced exercises.
7.6 Training shall be provided-to evaluators by the JAFNPP Training Department and/or drill/exercise lead controllers.
The training provided forievaluators will entail the briefing listed in Section 7.5.
The briefing shall include a review of the drill or-exercise scenario, the evaluator duties with regard to the assigned areas of evaluation, and the key points to be noted.- The Emergency Planning Manager shall develop a list of evaluators to be trained.
Exceptions to the qualified evaluators list may be made by the Emergency Planning Manager.
7.7 At the conclusion of the drill or exercise, the Emergency Planning Manager shall collect the completed.Evaluation Forms (Attachment 2), compile a list of participants and conduct a critique with the evaluators and supervisors.
7.8 Evaluators shall familiarize themselves with-the duties and action-requirements of the personnel they are monitoring.
The Drill Subject Report, Attachment 1 of SAP-1, Maintaining Emergency Preparedness, shall list evaluator's Name, Organization, and' Area of Responsibility.
Evaluators shall review applicable procedures.
Evaluators shall use the following as guidelines...
Rev. No.
20 Page 9 of 56
DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT SAP-6 7.8.1 Control Room and/or Simulator The evaluator shall observe the action of personnel assigned to the Control Room and personnel who report to the Control Room for assignment.
In addition, special attention will be given to the following:
A. Notifications to onsite personnel and offsite agencies.
B. Request for the call-in of off duty personnel.
C. Operations handling of accident conditions.
D. Instructions given to Search and Rescue, Repair and Corrective Action Teams and H.P. Techs by the Shift Manager (SM), as applicable.
E. Does the SM handle the emergency by directing people or by trying to do the work himself?
F. Are the time frames of actions by the SM reasonable enough?
G. Actions of personnel in the Control Room.
H. Communications with the EOF.
I. Communications with the TSC.
7.8.2 Control Point It is to be noted that all normal practices such as sign out and use of frisker and the portal monitor are to be accomplished unless the H.P.
Technician gives other directions because of radiological conditions.
The evaluator will pay special attention to the above along with the following.
A. No one is wearing radiological protection clothing when leaving.
B. All alarms from monitoring equipment are acknowledged.
Rev. No.
20 Page 10 of 56
DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUt SAP-6 7.8.3 Assembly Area Observe the following for'assembly area personnel:
A. They seek out their assembly area, generally stay together as-a group and remain orderly.
B. Time of assembly and completed accountability.
7.8.4 Emergency Operation Facility This is the command post for the Emergency and it should seem so to the evaluator.
Look for the following things:
- A. The Emergency Director is in command of the EOF.
B-.Any extra personnel, spectators and those awaiting orders, are quietly standing out of the way.
C. Has the Emergency Director contacted the TSC Manager/Emergency Manager?
D. The Radiation Protection or Support Personnel
..are performing duties in an efficient manner and reporting results to the Emergency Director.
E. Instrumentation/equipment in the EOF is placed as not to interfere with movement or cause a safety hazard.
F. How problems with the radio and telephone are handled.
G. Release rates, TEDE doses and CDE Thyroid doses to the offsite-population are calculated quickly after the receipt of data from the Control Room or the Offsite Monitoring Team(s).
H. The time.frame of updates to offsite agencies and the reporting of exposure data and changes to site meteorological conditions, to those same agencies.
Rev. No.
2 Page 11 of 56
DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT SAP-6 I. The Emergency Director assigns, where possible, the duty of making routine calls to someone else thereby leaving himself free to command the action.
J. How assessment teams make protective actions to offsite populations.
7.8.5 Off-Site Monitoring Teams The evaluators shall observe the following items:
A. Received KI dose, if necessary.
B. Operational check performed on survey instruments, sample counter and air sampler before leaving the site.
C. Equipment availability verified.
D. Assignment of TLDs and dosimeters before leaving the site.
E. Silver Zeolite Cartridges made available before leaving the site.
F. Survey instrument operationally checked out and turned on prior to leaving to take field readings.
G. Radio checked out by communicating to EOF or TSC before leaving.
H. Beta and gamma field surveys performed on the way to sample point.
I. Sampling and field surveys performed at sample location.
J. Instrument calibration performed and samples counted.
K. Work performed in a professional manner.
Rev. No.
20 Page 12 of 56
DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT SAP-6 7.8.6 On-Site Monitoring Team On-site monitoring teams may be assigned field survey work along the perimeter of the site.
Check on the following items:
A. Where do they receive their instructions?
B. Dosimeter and TLD are being worn.
C. What type of survey instruments used.
D. Do they have radio/cellular phone available?
E. Radio/phone check performed.
F. Field readings taken along the route to the designated area.
G. Work performed in a professional manner.
7.8.7 Security Force A. Are all security personnel accounted for?
-B. Does security direct people to the assembly area for accountability?
C. Are access and egress roads controlled?
7.8.8 Technical Support-Center A. The area maintained as a controlled area.
B. Are communications initiated?
C. Are H.P. Surveys performed and by whom?
7.8.9 Operations Support Center A. How is it staffed?
B. What and how many teams are brought to the OSC?
C. Are phones continuously manned?
D. Are H.P. Surveys performed and by whom?
Rev. No.
2 0 Page 13 of 56
DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT SAP-6 E. Who are survey results reported to? (CR and or TSC)
F. Are accurate protective measures taken if an entry into the controlled area is required?
7.8.10 Fire Brigade A. Do they receive instructions and from whom?
B. Are protective measures taken if an entry into a controlled are is required?
C. Are Fire preplans consulted?
D. Is assistance requested from local support fire departments?
7.8.11 Immediately following the exercise/drill, evaluators/controllers should conduct a short critique for participants in their assigned area.
8.0 CRITIQUES AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS 8.1 A post exercise/drill critique consists of three meetings.
Each facility debriefs lead by the facility manager immediately following the drill/exercise. The Emergency Director will conduct a roll-up meeting with the facility managers, department managers and controller/evaluators held following the facility debriefs. After all observations and findings are captured and summarized the Emergency Preparedness Manager will report out at the Plan of the Day meeting.
The observations should include those actions noted by the evaluators which were not in accordance with approved procedures.
In addition, the exercise/drill evaluators should identify any areas which require clarification, development or revision of procedures.
Rev. No.
20 Page 14 of 56
DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT SAP-6 8.2 Emergency Plan Improvement Items/Lessons Learned Report Following the critique, the Emergency Planning Manager or designee shall develop a list of Condition Reports (CRs),
improvement items and lessons learned as a result of the drill or exercise.
These items may be generated as a result of comments made at the critique, comments made by evaluators and controllers, or comments made by drill/exercise participants.
The Emergency Planning Manager or designee shall review these comments and categorize significant comments into CRs'-,
Lessons Learned" or "Improvement Items."
The Emergency Planning Manager shall decide which of these items warrant entry into the JAFNPP Paperless Condition Reporting system (PCRS) and assign a completion-date.- Improvement items will be entered into the Learning Organization system as corrective actions with due dates in accordance with the SDP process.
8.3 Any items identified during the critique that pertain to the scenario package used for-the drill/exercise shall also be used to-improve the package for future use.
Scenario packages do not need tbe'updated until subsequent use.
9.0 -DRILL AND EXERCISE PERFORMANCE INDICATOR (DEP) EVALUATION 9.1 This-indicator monitors.timely and-accurate JAF performance in-drills, exercises and actual events when presented with opportunities for classification of emergencies, notification of offsite 'authorities, and development of protective action recommendations PARs).
This section provides guidance-to determine success-of applicable emergency planning NRC Performance Indicator (PI) data points.
9.2 The following will be included in the DEP indicator:
9.2.1 Evaluated exercises; 9.2.2 Actual emergency declarations; 9.2.3 And/or selected performance enhancing drills as determined by the Emergency Preparedness Manager.
The selection must be made in advance and documented.
Rev. No.
2 0 Page 15 of 56
DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT SAP-6 9.2.4 Annual control room operator license requal.
9.3 Classification 9.3.1 A classification opportunity exists when plant parameters (observable and verifiable indications) reach an Emergency Action Level (EAL). This includes changes in classifications.
9.3.2 Timely is when the classification is declared in 15 minutes or less from the time the opportunity existed.
9.3.3 Accurate is when the correct classification is declared per IAP-2.
9.4 Protective Action Recommendations (PARs) 9.4.1 A PAR opportunity exists when criteria in applicable EP procedures require a PAR to be developed and/or made.
This includes initial PARs and any PAR changes.
9.4.2 Timely is when the PAR is'developed/made in 15 minutes or less from the time the opportunity existed.
9.4.3 Accurate is when the correct PAR is developed as required by procedure, subject to information available at the time of the PAR.
9.5 Notifications 9.5.1 A classification notification opportunity exists when an emergency classification is declared.
9.5.2 A PAR notification opportunity exists when a PAR is required.
9.5.3 Timely is when offsite notifications are initiated (contact) in 15 minutes or less from event classification and/or PAR development.
Rev. No.
20 Page 16 of 56
DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT SAP-6 9.5.4-Accurate is when the following information is completed on the New York State Part I form and approved, as applicable:
A. Item #2 -
Designation of exercise or not; B. Item #3 -
Facility; C. Item #4 -
Event classification, as declared (e.g. NUE,- Alert, SAE, GE);.
D. Item #5 -
Date and time of classification; E. Item #6 -
Radioactive release status; F.-Item #7 -- PAR as determined (eg ERPAs, Sheltering) and effected population (ERPAs);
G. Item #8 - -Applicable EAL #;
H. Item #11 and 12 -
Wind speed and direction if PAR is made.
ATTACHMENTS
- 1.
DRILL OR EXERCISE CONDUCT CHECKLIST
- 2.
EVALUATOR FORM 10.0 Rev. No.
2 0 Page 17 of 56
DRILL OR EXERCISE dONDUCT CHECKLIST
- 1.
Prepare a drill or exercise scenario.
- 2.
Prepare a drill or exercise report.
- 3.
Evaluate the quantity of ERO trainees for potential impact on a successful drill or exercise.
- 4.
Present the drill or exercise to Emergency Preparedness Manager for approval.
- 5.
Brief evaluators on the entire drill or exercise.
- 6.
Brief the individual evaluators on specified tasks.
- 7.
Issue evaluator Aids and Drill/Exercise Observation Sheet.
- 8.
Initiate the drill or exercise.
- 9.
Ensure the "flow" of activity throughout the drill or exercise.
- 10.
Terminate the drill or exercise when it's purpose is accomplished.
- 11.
Conduct a critique with participants or evaluators.
- 12.
Collect Drill/Exercise Observation Sheets.
- 13.
Complete a list of all deficiencies and recommendations.
- 14.
Tabulate PERFORMANCE INDICATOR (PI) data points for:
- Number of successful emergency classifications
- Number of timely notifications once classified/reclassified
This information can be obtained from observation sheets, Shift Manager logs, Emergency Director logs, NRC event notification forms, etc.,
depending on extent of drill or exercise and participating facilities.
- 15.
Complete action required on deficiencies.
- 16.
Pre drill/exercise notification to Senior Risk Analyst Loss Control at 504-576-2222.
SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 1 Rev. No.
20 Page 18 of 56
=,.. -EVALTATOR EVALUATION-FORM DATE:_
LOCATION:
CONTROL ROOM EVALUATOR:
CONTROLLER:
YES NO
- 1. Did the Shift Manager/ED demonstrate he is in charge?
- 2. Did the Control Room classify the emergency correctly in accordance with IAP-2?
- 3. Were notifications made to NYS and Oswego County within 15 minutes of event classification?
Were updates timely?
- 4. Were Protective Action Recommendations made to NYS and Oswego County?
- 5. Was timely notification made to the NRC (must be completed within one-hour from-event classification)?
- 6. Were communications prefaced with nThis is adrill?"
- 7. Log the following times for event classification and notifications:
Class.
Time RECS
'Plant Staff '
Time Time NRC Time EAL EAL NUE ALERT SAE GE Did the SM/ED direct Security to initiate call outs?
(Not necessary during normal working hours.
- 8. Were timely briefings given to-plant staff?
- 9. Was the ENS phone manned?
SAP-6 Rev. No.
20 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Page 19 of 56
EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (Control Room Continued)
YES NO
- 10.
Did the Control Room experience any emergency plan equipment failures?
If yes what were the failures and how was the problem addressed:
- 11.
Did Control Room personnel adhere to procedures (EOPs, AOPs, Tech. Specs., etc.)?
- 12.
Was staffing level adequate?
- 13.
Was Emergency Director turnover from the SM thorough?
Was plant staff advised of this transfer of responsibility?
- 14.
Once initiated, was accountability conducted and maintained throughout the emergency?
- 15.
Was shift turnover demonstrated?
- 16.
Were logs properly maintained by key personnel?
- 17.
Was the plant staff adequately informed regarding plant status?
- 18.
Was data flow between facilities and teams accurate, timely and complete?
- 19.
Was habitability performed in accordance with EAP-14.6?
SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No.
20 Page 20 of 56
EVALUATOR EVALUATION IFORK (Control Room Continued)
YES NO
- 20.
Were all objectives met?
If not, explain:
- Performance Indicator Data Points ISAP-6 ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No., 20 DRL/EECIECODC Page 21 of 56
-
-
-- I EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (Control Room Continued)
- 21.
Miscellaneous Comments and Notes:
Rev. No.
20 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2
j
-z I
A,
- t e
EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM LOCATION:
CONTROLLER:
DATE:
EVALUATOR:
TSC YES NO
- 1.
Was the TSC activation process timely?
Time TSC was called for activation Time TSC was staffed Time TSC declared themselves operational
- 2.
Was the TSC set-up in accordance.with EAP-14.1?
- 3.
Did the TSC Manager demonstrate he is in charge?
- 4.
Were offsite notifications made in accordance with EAP-l.1?
- 5.
Were onsite notifications made in accordance with EAP-1.1?
- 6.
Were communications prefaced with'"This is a drill?"
- 7.
Log the following times for event classification and notifications (if applicable)-
Class.
RECS Plant. Staff NRC EAL Time Time Time Time NUE.*
- 8.
Was staff familiar with their equipment and responsibilities?
- 9.
Was the staffing level adequate?
- 10.
Were periodic briefings held on plant status?
- 11.
Were plant staff aware of changes in emergency classification?
- 12.
Were status boards updated in a timely manner?
20 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Page 23 of 56
EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (TSC CONTINUED)
YES NO
- 13.
Were logs properly maintained by key personnel?
- 14.
Did the technical staff support the Control Room?
- 15.
Were corrective actions/solutions well thought out?
- 16.
Did the TSC experience any emergency plan equipment failures?
If yes, what were the failures and how was the problem addressed:
- 17.
Did the Emergency Director classify/re-classify the emergency correctly?.
If reclassified, were offsite notifications made to NYS/Oswego County within 15 minutes and NRC within one (1) hour?
- 18.
Were protective action recommendations made to NYS/Oswego County?
- 19.
Was a site evacuation called for?
If yes, were local authorities and NMPC notified?
- 20.
Was the transfer of the Emergency Director and his responsibilities from the TSC to the EOF smooth and complete?
- 21.
Once initiated, was accountability conducted and maintained throughout the emergency?
- 22.
Was shift turnover demonstrated?
- 23.
Was data flow between facilities and teams accurate, timely and complete?
- 24.
Was habitability performed in accordance with EAP-14.6?
Was the training building notified of habitability?
SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No.
20 Page 24 of 56
EVALUATOR-EVALUATION FORM (TSC CONTINUED)
- 25.
Were all objectives met? -
If not, explain:
YES NO L
- Performance Indicator Data Points I N.2 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT eATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No.
20 DILEECS ODC Page 25 of 56
EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (TSC CONTINUED)
- 26.
Miscellaneous Comments and Notes:
SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No.
_2 Page 26 of 56
EVALUATOR EVALUATION.FORM LOCATION:
CONTROLLER:
DATE:
EVALUATOR:
OsC
- 1.
Was the OSC activation.process timely?
- a. Time OSC was.called for activation
- b. Time OSC was staffed
- c. Time OSC declared-operational._:
- 2.
Was the.OSC set up in accordance with EAP-14.5?
- 3.
Did.the OSC-Manager demonstrate he is in charge?
.4.
Was the staffing level adequate? -.
- 5.
Was.shift turnover demonstrated?..
- 6.
Were logs properly maintained by-key personnel?
- 7.
Were status boards updated in a timely manner?.
- 8.
Log the following times OSC became aware of event classification.
- 9.
Were periodic briefings conducted in the OSC regarding plant status?
- 10.
.Was data flow between facilities and teams accurate, timely and complete?
- 11.
Did the OSC experience any emergency plan equipment failures?-
If yes, what were the failures and how was the problem addressed:
YES NO ISAP -6 Rev. No.
20.
DRILL/EXERCISE.CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Page 27 of 56
EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (OSC CONTINUED)
YES NO
- 12.
Once initiated, was accountability conducted and maintained throughout the emergency?
- 13.
Was habitability performed in accordance with EAP-14.6?
- 14.
Were repair team briefings adequate and timely?
- 15.
Were repair team debriefings adequate and timely?
- 16.
Were emergency exposure authorizations necessary?
If yes, were actions consistent with procedures?
- 17.
Were individual personnel exposure histories obtained in a timely manner for repair team personnel availability?
- 18.
Was status of repair teams adequately maintained?
- 19.
Were emergency tasks prioritized and acted upon in assigned priority?
- 20.
Were all objectives met?
If not, explain:
SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No.
20 Page 28 of 56
I VALUATOR EVALUATION-VORM (OSC CONTINUED)
- 21.
Miscellaneous-Comments and Notes:
-.i?
- X
- f
=:
f C
- 7.
4 r
T r
7
-I X
SAP-6 ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No.
20-.
DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT Page 29 of 56
EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM DATE:
LOCATION:
REPAIR & CORRECTIVE ACTION TEAMS EVALUATOR:
TEAM ACTIVITY:
CONTROLLER:
YES NO
- 1. Did the team consist of a minimum of two individuals?
- 2. Was a briefing conducted?
If so, did it include:
- a. most direct route
- b. proper tools
- c. tasks understanding
- d. visual aids (maps, drawings, etc.)
- e. simulations
- f. radiation area dose rates
- 3. Were the OSC Manager and Emergency Maintenance Coordinator cognizant of all Repair and Corrective Action Team efforts?
- 4. Did SM approve work on safety related items?
- 5. Was TSC direction obtained for engineering repair work?
- 6. Was RWP for Emergency Plan Entry used?
- 7. Was dosimetry, protective clothing, etc. issued in accordance with the above form?
- 8. Were there any Emergency Plan equipment failures?
If so, what were they and how was problem addressed?
~
SAP-6 ATTACHMENT 21 Rev.6 No.
20DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT Page C30 Eof 5
Rev. No.
20 Page 30 of 56
.*-EVALUATOR EVALUATION FOR (REPAIR & CORRECTIVE ACTION TEAMS CONTINUED)
YES NO
- 9.
Was a debrief conducted?
- 10.
Were all objectives met?-
If not, explain:
Rev. No.
20 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMEPg 3
EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (REPAIR & CORRECTIVE ACTION TEAMS CONTINUED)
- 11.
Miscellaneous Comments and Notes:
Rev. No.
20 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2
EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM DATE:_
LOCATION:
FIRE BRIGADE EVALUATOR:
CONTROLLER:
YES NO
- 1.
Time Control Room notified of fire Time fire alarm sounded -_
Time fire brigade dispatched Time fire-brigade-responded to scene
-2.
Was fire alarm sounded and-the announcement properly made over the plant page?
- 3.
Was offsite assistance requested?
If yes, was Security directed to:
- a. allow immediate access
- b. provide dosimetry
- c. direct and escort fire company
- d. collect dosimetry upon-exit
- 4.
Were all unnecessary personnel evacuated from the fire area?
- 5.
Was Rad Protection requested to perform a survey?
- 6.
Were radiological conditions properly assessed?
- 7.
Was emergency exposure criteria addressed and implemented?
- 8.
Were all communications preceded with "This is a Drill?"
- 9.
Were fire brigade members familiar with their duties?
- 10.
Was the emergency classified correctly?
- 11.
If the OSC was activated, was the fire brigade dispatched from the OSC with a radiation protection technician?
- 12.
Were all objectives met?
If not, explain:
Rev. No.
20 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2
EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (FIRE BRIGADE CONTINUED)
- 13.
Miscellaneous Comments and Notes:
SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No.
20 DILEECS ODC Page 34 of 56
DATE:_
EVALUATOR:
EVALUATOR EVALUATION TFO LOCATION:
SECURITY/ACCOUNTABILITY CONTROLLER:
L I
YES NO 1.- Was the emergency classification posted at main security?
- 2. Were call-outs performed as directed by the SM/ED?
(Not required during normal working hours.)
- 3. Was site access controlled?-
- 4. Were guards dispatched to access roads?
- 5. If accountability was called for:
- a.
Time site access/egress was restricted
- b.
Time accountability-was initiated
- c.
Time accountability completed
- 6. Did accountability clerks report to their assigned assembly areas when directed?
- 7. Were accountability readers and sign-in sheets used?
- 8. Did accountability clerks experience-any emergency plan equipment failures?
If yes, explain:
"I.
- 9. Was movement of personnel between'onsite facilities adequately controlled?
- 10. Was movement of personnel badging offsite timely and orderly?
I
'SAP-6 Rev. No.
20 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Page 35 of 56
EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (SECURITY/ACCOUNTABILITY CONTINUED)
YES NO
- 11.
Was assembly in the Training Building auditorium controlled?
Were personnel updated regarding plant conditions?
- 12.
Was continuous accountability maintained for the remainder of the emergency?
- 13.
Was site evacuation called for?
If yes, were personnel directed to proceed to the Oswego County Airport remote assembly area?
If yes, did the maps distributed to evacuating personnel coincide with the selected evacuation route?
- 14.
Were all objectives met?
If not, explain:
I SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No.
20 Page 36 of 56
EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORK (SECURITY/ACCOUNTABILITY CONTINUED)
- 15.
Miscellaneous Comments and Notes:
I SAP -6 ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No.
20 DILEECS ODC Page 37 of 56
EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM DATE:
EVALUATOR:
LOCATION:
CHEMISTRY TECHNICIAN CONTROLLER:
YES NO
- 1.
Did he/she report to Control Room upon implementing the Emergency Plan?
- 2.
What tasks were required by the ED for the Chemistry Technician?
- 3.
Was the technician familiar with the procedures for the tasks?
- 4.
What tasks were required by the Chemistry Supervisor for the technicians?
Were they familiar with the procedures for the tasks?
- 5.
Did any emergency plan equipment fail to operate?
If yes, what were the failures and how was the problem addressed?
SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No.
20 Page 38 of 56
E.ALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (CHEMISTRY TECHNICIAN CONTINUED)
YES NO
- 6.
If PASS was demonstrated, was the above 3-hour time commitment met?
7.
=0-
-I 0
f. 7 L:.
S i
Miscellaneous Comments and Notes:
0 t
o w f
it=
?
f D
E a
SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 IRev. No.
20 Page 39 of 56
l EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM DATE:
LOCATION:
FIELD MONITORING EVALUATOR:
CONTROLLER:
YES NO
- 1.
Were teams assembled in a timely manner?
- 2.
Were teams familiar with procedures?
- 3.
Time the team was dispatched:
Team was dispatched from OSC/EOF (circle one)
- 4.
Did team obtain the proper equipment prior to leaving?_
- 5.
Were equipment checks performed prior to departure?
- 6.
Were calibration dates current?
- 7.
Were communication checks conducted prior to departure?
- 8.
Was a vehicle/110V power supply check conducted?
- 9.
Was the team briefing adequate?
- 10.
Did the briefings include:
- a.
Plant conditions/nature of release?
- b.
Meteorological conditions?
- c.
Projected dose rates/stay time
- d.
Protective measures?
- e.
Use of KI?
- f.
Dosimetry recording?
- g.
Types of readings/samples to be obtained?
- h.
Means of communication?
- i.
Emergency exposure limits?
- 11.
Was the communications flow between team and dispatcher timely and accurate and complete?
- 12.
Were teams briefed frequently by the dispatcher?
- 13.
Were survey results properly relayed to the dispatcher?
DSAP-6 ATTACHMENT 2 Re.
No.
20 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT Page 40 of 56
EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (PIELD MONITORING CONTINUED)
YES NO
- 14.
Were communications prefaced with "This is a Drill?"
- 15.
Were teams proficient in proper survey/sampling techniques?
- 16.
Were proper plume traversing techniques demonstrated?
If no, explain:
- 17.
Were vehicles and equipment checked for upon return?
- 18.
Was shift turnover demonstrated?
- 19.
Did teams experience any Emergency Plan failures?
If yes, explain:
contamination equipment 20.
Were all objectives met?
If not, explain:
SAP-6 Rev. No.
20 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Page 41 of 56
EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (FIELD MONITORING CONTINUED)
- 21.
Miscellaneous Comments and Notes:
SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No.
20 Page 42 of 56
EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM DATE:_
LOCATION:
EOF EVALUATOR:
CONTROLLER:
YES NO
- 1.
Was the EOF activation process timely?
- a.
Time EOF was called for activation
- b.
Time EOF was staffed
- c.
Time EOF declared themselves operational_
- 2.
Was the EOF activated in accordance with EAP-14.2?
- 3.
Did the EOF-Manager demonstrate he is in charge?
- 4.
Was the transfer of command and control-from the.TSC to the EOF adequate?
-Time ED assumed duties-at-the-EOF-
- 5.
Were offsite notifications made-in accordance with EAP-1.1?
(Note the time forms are -issued in comments section.)
- 6.
-Were communications prefaced with "This is a-Drill?"
- 7.
Log the following times for event classification and notifications (if applicable):
Class.
RECS Plant Staff NRC EAL Time Time Time Time EAL NUB~~
NUE ALERT SAE-GE
- 8.
Was staff familiar with their equipment and.
responsibilities?
- 9.
Was the staffing-level adequate?
- 10.
Were periodic briefings held on plant status?
SAP -6 ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No.
20 DILEECS ODC Page 43-of 56
EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (EOF CONTINUED)
YES NO
- 11.
Was EOF staff aware of changes in emergency classification?
- 12.
Were EALs classified correctly?
- 13.
Were status boards updated in a timely manner?
- 14.
Were logs properly maintained by key personnel?
- 15.
Did the EOF experience any emergency plan equipment failures?
If yes, what were the failures and how was the problem addressed:
- 16.
Did the ED consult with state and county representatives regarding protective action recommendations?
- 17.
Were protective action recommendations made to NYS/Oswego County?
- 18.
Was long term facility staffing considered in accordance with EAP-43?
- 19.
Was shift turnover demonstrated?
- 20.
Was data flow between facilities accurate, timely and complete?
- 21.
Was the ED aware of plant decisions?
- 22.
Was access control adequate?
SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No.
20 Page 44 of 56
EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM
- a.
(EOF CONTINUED)
YES NO
- 23.
If a release was in progress, were incoming personnel monitored to prevent spread of contamination? -
- 24.
Were all objectives met?
If not, explain:
- Performance Indicator Data Points SAP D
ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No.
20 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT Page 45 of 56
EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (EOF CONTINUED)
V
- 25.
Miscellaneous Comments and Notes:
SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No.
20 Page 46 of 56
-EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM LOCATION:
DOSE ASSESSMENT CONTROLLER:
DATE:
EVALUATOR:
- 1. Did dose assessment-personnel-perform equipment checks upon arrival?
- 2. Were personnel familiar with the equipment?
- 3. During the transfer of activities from the TSC to the EOF:
Was telephone contact made-between TSC and EOF Dose Assessment?
Were the responsibilit-iesestablished for Part 2's?
Were the responsibilities established for PARS?--
Do the TSC hand calc's match EOF hand calcs?
Does the TSC model match the EOF model?
- 4. Were meteorological forecasts obtained?
- 5. Were status boards updated and utilized?:
- 6. Was field survey data utilized for comparison with computer projected doses?
Were discrepancies resolved?
- 7. Were field teams briefed periodically regarding plant status?
- 8. Were hand prepared release rate calculations performed efficiently and in a timely manner?
Were EAP-4.1 forms used in preparing release rate
- calculations?
Was field survey data utilized in the calculations?
Were---Release rate calculations performed correctly?
/
YES NO ISAP ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No.
20 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT P
Age 4
Rev. No.
20
'Page 47 of 56
EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (DOSE ASSESSMENT CONTINUED)
YES NO
- 8.
Continued:
Were % Tech Spec calculations performed correctly?
Were calculations to determine monitor readings that correspond to 100% Tech Spec values for Noble Gas performed correctly?
Were calculations to determine monitor readings that correspond to 100% Tech Spec values for Iodine performed correctly?
Was self-checking used to verify accuracy?
Was peer-checking used to verify accuracy?
With whom?__
- 9.
Was the EDAMS model used to determine PARS?
Were EAP-4.1 forms used in preparing release rate calculations?
Was field survey data utilized in the calculations?
Did the model operator integrate cumulative dose during Forecasting?
Were PARS developed based on dose projections (i.e.
Forecasts)?
Was self-checking used to verify accuracy?
Was peer-checking used to verify accuracy?
With whom?_
Were PARS developed on time?
Well within time.
Close.
Problematic.
SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No.
20 Page 48 of 56
EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (DOSE ASSESSMENT CONTINUED)
YES NO
- 10.
Were Part II forms completed in a timely manner?
PAR PAR 2 PAR 3 PAR 4 PAR S Opportunity time Time PAR determined Time PAR to ED RECS time Were offsite liaisons (County and State personnel at EOF) included in discussions.-regarding PARS?
- 11.
Was the interface with TSC radiological personnel (re: effluent monitor readings, effluent sample results, PASS samples, etc.) adequate?
- 12.
Were offsite liaisons (EOF County and State personnel) utilized for the-exchange and comparison of field survey data and dose projections?
- 13.
Was there someone (EOF Rad Support Coordinator) available to interface with-and answer questions for offsite liaisons?
- 14.
Were all communications prefaced with "This is a Drill?"
- 15.
Was shift turnover demonstrated?
SAP-6 ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No.
20 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT Page 49 of 56
I EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (DOSE ASSESSMENT CONTINUED)
YES NO
- 16.
Did any emergency plan equipment fail to operate?
If yes, what were the failures and how was the problem address?
- 17.
Were all objectives met?
If not, explain:
iSAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev N.
20 DILEECS ODC Page 50 of 56
4 I -, 4 - -J il I X
EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (DOSE ASSESSMENT CONTINUED)
- 18.
Miscellaneous Comments and Notes:
0 X
.=
X E
T.
- 0 f
=
f V
T lSAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 21
EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM DATE:
LOCATION:
JNC EVALUATOR:
CONTROLLER:
YES NO
- 1.
Was the JNC activated in a timely manner?
- a. Time JNC was called for activation
- b. Time JNC was operational
- 2.
Was the JNC set up in accordance with JNC procedures?
- 3.
Was information flow between the plant, EOF and JNC accurate, timely and complete?
- 4.
Did the utility effectively share information with state and county public information staff?
- 5.
If technical information was required, was the information obtained from appropriate personnel?
- 6.
Were briefing notes reviewed by designated personnel prior to their release to the media?
- 7.
Were news briefings and summary notes timely, accurate and complete?
- 8.
Was county activation of the EAS system timely?
- 9.
Were county EAS messages appropriate, timely, and complete?
- 10.
Was information provided to the media consistent with the EAS messages?
- 11.
Was information released understandable to the public?
- 12.
If protective actions were implemented, were affected areas appropriately specified?
- 13.
Were press briefings held frequently to give available information as conditions changed?
SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No.
20 Page 52 of 56
X -
T7 EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORK (JNC CONTINUED)
YES NO
- 14.
When conditions were static, were briehings held frequently to keep the media updated?-.
- 15.
Did the media spokesperson present material effectively?
- 16.
Were questions by the media handled properly by the media spokesperson?.
- 17.
Were status boards and displays updated accurately and timely?
- 18.
Was the JNC staff aware of changes in emergency classification?
- 19.
Did the rumor control staff.respond promptly and accurately to calls?
- 20.
Were measures taken to control.the spread of rumors that threaten to have an adverse-effect on adherence to protective actions?
- 21.
Were support functions such as registration and security performed effectively?
- 22.
Did the JNC experience any emergency plan equipment failures?
If yes, explain:
- 23.
Were communications prefaced with "This is a Drill??"
- 24.
Was shift turnover demonstrated?
SAP-6 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No.
20 D
Page 53 of 56'
EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (JNC CONTINUED)
YES NO
- 25.
Were all the objectives met?
If not, explain:
VSAP-6 ATCMN Rev. No.
20 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2
EVALUATOR EVALUATION FORM (JNC CONTINUED)
- 26.
Miscellaneous Cotnments and Notes:
SAP-6 DRILLIEXERCISE CONDUCT ATTACHMENT 2 I
Rev. No.
20 DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT Page 55 of 56
OBSERVER EVALUATION FORM DATE:
LOCATION:
TRAINING BUILDING EVALUATOR:
CONTROLLER:
YES NO
- 1.
Time the Training Building was called for activation
- 2.
Did the Training Building Accountability Supervisor demonstrate their being in charge?
- 3.
Were communications prefaced with "This is a drill?"
- 4.
Did the proper non-essential personnel sign in?
- 5.
Was staff familiar with their responsibilities?
- 6.
Were periodic announcements made to the personnel?
- 7.
Were logs properly maintained by key personnel?
- 8.
Did the Training Building experience any building equipment failures?
- 9.
If yes, what were the failures and how was the problem addressed:
- 10.
Were personnel notified of when to return to their work stations?
- 11.
Was habitability performed in accordance with EAP-14.6?
- 12.
Miscellaneous Comments and Notes:
SAP -6 ATTACHMENT 2l Rev.6 No.
20DRILL/EXERCISE CONDUCT PageC56 Eof 5
Rev. No.
20 Page 56 of 56