ML083110590

From kanterella
Revision as of 19:54, 12 March 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

R. E. Ginna Final Outlines (Folder 3)
ML083110590
Person / Time
Site: Ginna Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/17/2008
From:
Ginna
To: Todd Fish
Operations Branch I
Hansell S
Shared Package
ML080030004 List:
References
50-244/08-301, ES-401, ES-401-2, TAC U01687 50-244/08-301
Download: ML083110590 (25)


Text

~ ~~ ~

ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-40 1-2 Facility: R. E. Ginna Date Of Exam: 09/05/2008 RO WA Category Points I SRO-Only Points Note:

1. Ensure that at least two topics from every applicable W A category are sampled within each tier of the RO and SRO-only outlines (Le., except for one category in Tier 3 of the SRO-only outline, the "Tier Totals" in each WA category shall not be less than two).
2. The point total for each group and tier in the proposed outline must match that specified in the table.

The final point total for each group and tier may deviate by k1 from that specified in the table based on NRC revisions. The final RO exam must total 75 points and the SRO-only exam must total 25 points.

3. Systems/evolutions within each group are identified on the associated outline; systems or evolutions that do not apply at the facility should be deleted and justified; operationally important, site-specific systems/evolutions that are not included on the outline should be added. Refer to Section D.l .b of ES-401 for guidance regarding the elimination of inappropriate WA statements.
4. Select topics from as many systems and evolutions as possible; sample every system or evolution in the group before selecting a second topic for any syslem or evolution.
5. Absent a plant-specific priority, only those WAS having an importance rating (IR) of 2.5 or higher shall be selected. Use the RO and SRO ratings for the RO and SRO-only portions, respectively.
6. Select SRO topics for Tiers 1 and 2 from the shaded systems and WA categories.

7.* The generic (G) WAS in Tiers 1 and 2 shall be selected from Section 2 of the WA Catalog, but the topics must be relevant to the applicable evolution or system. Refer to Section D.1.b of ES-401 for the applicable WAS.

8. On the following pages, enter the WA numbers, a brief description of each topic, the topics' importance ratings (IRs) for the applicable license level, and the point totals (#) for each system and category. Enter the group and tier totals for each category in the table above; if fuel handling equipment is sampled in other than Category A2 or G*on the SRO-only exam, enter it on the left side of Column A2 for Tier 2, Group 2 (Note #1 does not apply). Use duplicate pages for RO and SRO-only exams.
9. For Tier 3, select topics from Section 2 of the WA catalog, and enter the WA numbers, descriptions, IRs, and point totals (#) on Form ES-401-3. Limit SRO selections to WAS that are linked to 10 CFR 55.43.

1

PWR RO Examination Outline Facility: R. E. Ginna ES - 401 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 1 I Group 1 Form Eh-401-2 WAPE # I Name I Safety Function 000007 Reactor Trip - Stabilization - Recovery I1 000008 Pressurizer Vapor Space Accident I 3

)000009Small Break LOCA I 3 lo000 1 1 Large Break LOCA I 3 I 000022 Loss of Rx Coolant Makeup 1 2 000025 Loss of RHR System 1 4 000027 Pressurizer Pressure Control System Malfunction 1 3 000038 Steam Gen. Tube Rupture I 3 I000040 Steam Line Rupture - Excessive Heat insfer 1 4

~00054Loss of Main Feedwater 1 4 000055 Station Blackout 1 6 000056 Loss of Off-site Power I 6 000057 Loss of Vital AC Inst. Bus 1 6 000062 Loss of Nuclear Svc Water I 4 000065 Loss of Instrument Air I 8 000077 Generator Voltage and Electric Grid Disturbances 1 6 WE04 LOCA Outside Containment I 3 W E 0 5 Inadequate Heat Transfer - Loss of Secondary Heat Sink 1 4 I

1

PWR RO Examination Outline Facility: R. E. Ginna ES - 401 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 1 / Group 1 Form ES-401-2 m 2

PWR RO Examination Outline Facility: R. E. Ginna ES - 401 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 1 / Group 2

' '4PE # / Name / Safety Function 000003 Dropped Control Rod / 1 AK3.05 - Tech-Spec limits for reduction 3.4" of load to 50% power if flux cannot be brought back within specified target band 000033 Loss of Intermediate Range NI / 7 1 modes of plant operation.

00005 1 Loss of Condenser Vacuum I 4 1 000068 Control Room Evac. I 8 1 WE02 SI Termination / 3 I limitations in the facility's license and WE03 LOCA Cooldown - Depress. 1 4 1

-I WE08 RCS Overcooling - PTS / 4 1 W E 1 0 Natural Circ. 1 4 1 eam Void in Vessel withlwithout WE16 High Containment Radiation / 9 characteristics of the facility WA Category Totals:

1

PWR RO Examination Outline Facility: R. E. Ginna 06 1 AuxiliaryEmergency Feedwater 1

PWR RO Examination Outline Facility: K.E. Ginna l7.s An1 Plant Systems - Tier 2 / Group 1 Form ES-401-2 annunciator or alarm.

purpose andor function.

078 Instrument Air 2

PWR RO Examination Outline Facility: R. E. Ginna ES - 401 Plant Systems - Tier 2 / Group 2 Form ES-401-2 I d E v o l # / Name d 2 Reactor Coolant 0 15 Nuclear Instrumentation 0 17 In-core Temperature Monitor 3.7 034 Fuel Handling Equipment 2.5 04 1 Steam DumpiTurbine Bypass 2.7 1 Control -

045 Main Turbine Generator 4.2 1 verify the status and operatior of system, and understand how onerator actions and directives affect plant and system conditions.

07 1 Waste Gas Disposal 3.3 1 072 Area Radiation Monitoring -3.4 1 075 Circulating Water 2.6 1 56 Fire Protection 3. I 1 I WA Category Totals:

1

Generic Knowledge and Abilities Outline (Tier 3)

PWR RO Examination Outline Facilitv: R. E. Ginna Form ES-40II -3 Generic Category -

KA KA Topic Imp. Point!!

2.1.15 Knowledge of administrative requirements for 2.7 1 temporary management directives, such as standing orders, night orders, Operations memos, etc.

2.1.20 Ability lo interpret and execute procedure steps.

2.1.40 Knowledge of refueling administrative 2.8 requirements.

~

I Equipment Control 2.2.13 Knowledge of tagging and clearance procedures.

2.2.42 Ability to recognize system parameters that are entry-level conditions for Technical Specifications.

Category Total: 2 1 Radiation Control 2.3.1 1 Ability to control radiation releases..

2.3.12 Knowledge of radiological safety principles pertaining to licensed operator duties, such as containment entry requirements, fuel handling responsibilities, access to locked high-radiation areas, aligning filters, etc.

Category Total: 2 I I I I Emergency ProceduresPlan 2.4.22 Knowledge of the bases for prioritizing safety 3.6 1 functions during abnormaVemergency operations. -

2.4.37 Knowledge of the lines of authority during 3 .O 1 implementation of the emergency plan. -

2.4.39 Knowledge of RO responsibilities in emergency 3.9 1 plan implementation. -

Generic Total: 10

ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-40 1-2 Facilitv: R. E. Ginna Date Of Exam: 09/05/2008 I I RO w A Category Points 1 SRO-Only Points Note:

1. Ensure that at least two topics from every applicable WA category are sampled within each tier of the RO and SRO-only outlines (i.e., except for one category in Tier 3 of the SRO-only outline, the "Tier Totals" in each WA category shall not be less than two).
2. The point total for each group and tier in the proposed autline must match that specified in the table.

The final point total for each group and tier may deviate by *1 from that specified in the table based on NRC revisions. The final RO exam must total 75 points and the SRO-only exam must total 25 points

3. Systemslevolutions within each group are identified on the associated outline; systems or evolutions that do not apply at the facility should be deleted and justified; operationally important, site-specific systems/evolutions that are not included on the outline should be added. Refer to Section D.l .b of ES-401 for guidance regarding the elimination of inappropriate WA statements.
4. Select topics from as many systems and evolutions as possible; sample every system or evolution in the group before selecting a second topic for any system or evolution.
5. Absent a plant-specific priority, only those WAS having an importance rating (IR) of 2.5 or higher shall be selected. Use the RO and SRO ratings for the RO and SRO-only portions, respectively.
6. Select SRO topics for Tiers 1 and 2 from the shaded systems and WA categories.

7.* The generic (G) WAS in Tiers 1 and 2 shall be selected from Section 2 of the WA Catalog, but the topics must be relevant to the applicable evolution or system. Refer to Section D.l .b of ES-401 for the applicable WAS.

8. On the following pages, enter the WA numbers, a brief description of each topic, the topics' importance ratings (IRs) for the applicable license level, and the point totals (#) for each system and category. Enter the group and tier totals for each category in the table above; if fuel handling equipment is sampled in other than Category A2 or G* on the SRO-only exam, enter it on the left side of Column A2 for Tier 2, Group 2 (Note #1 does not apply). Use duplicate pages for RO and SRO-only exams.
9. For Tier 3, select topics from Section 2 of the WA catalog, and enter the WA numbers, descriptions, IRs, and point totals (#) on Form ES-401-3. Limit SRO selections to WAS that are linked to 10 CFR 55.43.

1

PWR SRO Examination Outline Facility: R. E. Ginna Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 1 I Group I

'ES - 401 Form ES-401-2

. \PE # I Name I Safety Function I K1 L2 K3 >oints r 0000 15/000017 RCP Malfunctions I 4 000026 Loss of Component Cooling Water I 8 I

000029 ATWS I 1 and integrated plant procedures during all modes of plant operation.

000058 Loss of DC Power 16 r W E I I Loss of Emergency Coolant Recirc. I 4 W E 1 2 - Steam Line Rupture - Excessive Heat I -

1 1

I WA Category Totals: I 0 0 0 - 6 I

PWR SRO Examination Outline Facility: R. E. Ginna ES - 401 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 1 I Group 2

Form Ef-401-2

-APE ## I Name I Safety Function Points 3 000036 Fuel Handling Accident I 8 000037 Steam Generator Tube Leak 1 3 I

1 1

W E I4 Loss of CTMT Integrity I 5 1 WA Category Totals:

-0 4 1

PWR SRO Examination Outline Facility: R. E. Ginna Plant Systems - Tier 2 / Group 1 ES - 401 --

Form ES-401-2 dEvol##I Name K5 K6 --Imp. 'oints d 6 Emergency Core Cooling 4.4 1 I -- -

0 10 Pressurizer Pressure Control 4.7 1 technical specifications for a 2.2.40 - Ability to apply 4.7 1 a1 specifications for a 026 Containment Spray 3.9 1 caused by clogged sump screen, pump inlet high temperature exceeded cavitation, voiding), or sump level below cutoff (interlock)

A2.16 - Loss of offsite power 3.7 1 during full-load testing of WA Category Totals: 0 0 0121 Group Point Total: 5 1

PWR SRO Examination Outline Facility: R. E. Ginna ES - 401 Plant Systems - Tier 2 / Group 2 Form ES-401-2 1

Generic Knowledge and Abilities Outline (Tier 3)

PWR SRO Examination Outline Facility: R. E. Ginna Form ES-40 1-3 Generic Category -

KA KA Topic Imp. Points Conduct of Operations 2. Ability to use procedures related to shift staffing, 3.9 such as minimum crew complement, overtime limitation:;, etc.

2.1.37 Knowledge of procedures, guidelines, or limitations 4.6 associated with reactivity management.

Category Total: 2 Equipment Control 2.2.19 Knowledge of maintenance work order requirements. 1 I3.4 1

2.2.44 Ability to interpret control room indications to I verify the status and operation of system, and understand how operator actions and directives Category Total: 2 Radiation Control 2.3.6 Ability to approve release permits. 3.8 I I Category Total:

I I I I 1 Emergency ProceduresPlan 2.4.40 I Knowledge of SRO responsibilities in emergency olan imdementation.

~~

Knowledge of EOP implementation hierarchy and coordination with other suppin I 4.5 I I 2.4.16 procedure^ or guidelines such as, operating procedures, abnormal operating 4.4 procedure\. and Zvere accident management guidelme\.

Generic Total: 7 1

ES-401 Record of Rejected WAS Form ES-401-4 R. E. Ginna 2008 Written Exam for 11/7/2008 Tier / Randomly

roup Selected WA Reason for Rejection 112 RO W/E02 EA2.1 WA required selection of appropriate procedures for SI Termination and no credible distracters can be developed against this topic. Replaced with EA2.1 through random selection.

211 RO 006 K5.07 WA is ambiguous and low operational validity (Expected temperature levels in various locations of the RCS due to various plant conditions). Replaced with K5.05 through random selection.

-~

3 RO 2.2.18 Low operational validity for an RO. Replaced with 2.2.13 through

-~

random selection.

1/1 SRO 000017 AA2.07 Low operational validity. No procedures require the SRO to calculate natural circulation flow only verify that it exists against specific criteria. The SRO would not be performing this in the event of an RCP Malfunction.

Replaced with AA2.10 through random selection.

3 SRO 2.4.41 Replaced due to over sampling. This K/A was previously sampled in Tier l/Group 2 and is also being given as an Administrative JPM on the Operating Test. Replaced with 2.4.'16 through random selection.

Draft Written Submittal 111 RO 000009 EA1.15 - Ability Changedl to: 00001 1 EA1.06 - Ability to operate and to operate and monitor monitor the following as they apply to a Large Break the following as they LOCA: D/Gs RO Q3 apply to a small break LOCA: PORV and PORV Reason: Unable to write a discriminating question with block valve out writing a double jeopardy question due to other questions already written.

1/1 RO 00001 1 EK2.02 - Changed to: 000009 EK3.23 - Knowledge of the reasons Knowledge of the for the following responses as they apply to the small interrelations between the break LOCA: RCP tripping requirements RO Q4 and the following Large Break LOCA: Pumps Reason: There are no required reasons to trip RCPs during a LBLOCA but there are specific, good and testable reasons to trip RCPs during a SBLOCA.

1/1 RO 000038 2.4.4 - Ability to Changed to: 000038 2.4.18 - Knowledge of the specific recognize abnormal bases for EOPs.

RO Q8 indications for system operating parameters that Reason: Unable to write a discriminating question at the are entry-level conditions RO level and not risk exam overlap/double jeopardy.

for emergency and abnormal operating procedures.

ES-401 of Rejected WAS Record-___. Form ES-401-4 R. E. Ginna 2008 Written Exam for 11/7/2008 Tier / Randomly Group Selected WA Reason for Rejection

_ _ _ _ ~~~

2/1 RO 012 Al.01 - Ability to :hanged to: 012 K6.06 - Knowledge of the effect of a predict and/or monitor oss or malfunction of the following will have on the RPS:

RO Q36 Changes in parameters Sensors and detectors (to prevent exceeding design limits) associated Reason: Unable to write a discriminating question at the with operating the RPS RO level.

controls including: Trip setpoint adjustment 2/1 RO 073 A2.01 - Ability to (a) Changed to: 073 A2.02 - Ability to (a) predict the impacts predict the impacts of the of the following malfunctions or operations on the PRM RO Q49 following malfunctions or system; and (b) based on those predictions, use operations on the PRM procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the system; and (b) based on consequences of those malfunctions or operations:

those predictions, use Detector failure procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the Reason: Unable to write a discriminating question at the consequences of those RO level.

malfunctions or operations: Erratic or failed power supply 2/2 RO 071 A4.13 - Ability to Changed to: 071 A4.09 - Ability to manually operate manually operate and/or and/or monitor in the control room: Waste gas release monitor in the control rad monitors room: Recovery from automatic termination of Reason: Unable to write a discriminating question at the gas release due to PRM RO level.

system alarm 1/1 SRO 000026 2.2.39 - Changed to: 000026 2.2.37 - Ability to determine Knowledge of less than or operability and/or availability of safety related equipment.

SRO equal to one hour Q77 Technical Specification Reason: Unable to write a discriminating question at the action statements for SRO level.

systems 1/1 SRO W/E11 EA2.2 - Ability to Changed to: W / E l l EA2.1 - Ability to determine and determine and interpret interpret the following as they apply to the (Loss of SRO the following as they Emergency Coolant Recirculation): Facility conditions Q80 apply to the (Loss of and selection of appropriate procedures during abnormal Emergency Coolant and emergency operations.

Recirculation): Adherence to appropriate procedures Reason: Unable to write a discriminating question at the and operation within the SRO level.

limitations in the facility's license and amendments.

ES-401 Record of Rejected WAS Form ES-401-4 R. E. Ginna 2008 Written Exam for 11/7/2008

- ~  :

Tier / Randomly Group Selected KIA Reason for Rejection 3 SRO 2.1.4 - Knowledge of Changed to: 2.1.5 Ability to use procedures related to individual licensed shift staffing, such as minimum crew complement, SRO operator responsibilities overtime limitations. etc.

Q94 related to shift staffing, such as medical Reason: Unable to write a discriminating question at the requirements, "no-solo SRO level operation, maintenance of active license status, 10CFR55, etc.

Final Written Submittal 212 RO 002 K1.05 - Knowledge of Changed to: 002 K1.07 - Knowledge of the physical the physical connections connections and/or cause-effect relationships between and/or cause-effect the RCS and the following systems: Reactor vessel level RO Q56 indication system relationships between the RCS and the following systems: PRT Reason: Unable to write a discriminating question at the RO level.

212 RO 034 K6.02 - Knowledge Changed to: 034 K3.01 - Ability to monitor automatic of the effect of a loss or operatiori of the Fuel Handling System including: Travel RO Q59 malfunction on the limits following will have on the Fuel Handling System: Reason: Unable to write a discriminating question at the Radiation monitoring RO level systems 3 RO 2.1.38 - Knowledge of the Changed to: 2.1.20 - Ability to interpret and execute station's requirements for procedure steps.

RO Q67 verbal communications when implementing Reason: Unable to write a discriminating question at the procedures. RO level..

3 RO 2.3.5 - Ability to use Changed to: 2.3.1 1 - Ability to control radiation releases.

radiation monitoring RO Q71 systems, such as fixed Reason: Unable to write a discriminating question at the radiation monitors and RO level.

alarms, portable survey instruments, personal monitoring equipment, etc.

212 SRO Liquid Radwaste Changed to: 068 2.1.32 - Ability to explain and apply 068 2.2.38 - Knowledge system limits and precautions.

SRO of conditions and Q93 limitations in the facility Reason: Unable to write a discriminating question at the license SRO level.

ES-301, Rev. 9 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility: R. E. Ginna Date of Examination: 08/25/2008 Examination Level: RO [XI SRO 0 Operating Test Number: 1 Administrative Topic Type Describe activity to be performed (see Note) Code*

CRITICAL ROD POSITION CALCULATION Conduct of Operations M,S or R JPM N-RA-I WA 2.1.25 3.9 t 4.2 I

Conduct of Operations Manually Calculate QPTR JPM N-RA-2 KIA 2.1.7 4.4 14.7 Tagout Boundary for B Heater Drain Tank Pump Equipment Control JPM N-RA-3 WA 2.2.13 4.1 14.3 Radiation Control Monitor Critical Safety Function Status Trees Emergency Plan M,S or R JPM N-RA-4 WA 2A.13 4.0 14.6 NOTE: All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when all 5 are required.

  • Type Codes & Criteria: (C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, or Class(R)oom (D)irect from bank (I 3 for ROs; I 4 for SROs & RO retakes)

(N)ew or (M)odified from bank (2 1)

(P)revious 2 exarns (5 1; randomly selected)

Type Code* Safety Function

a. Alternate Dilution of the RCS (RIB occurs during dilutiion) JPM A 004 A2.16 3.213.6
b. Transfer ECCS to Cold Leg Recirculation (Ah. Path) JPM B EPE 01 1 EA1.11 4.214.2 1 c. Placing LTOP on Service 010 A4.03 4.013.8 JPM I S.N,L 1 3
d. Respond To a Control Room Evacuation (AH Path)

APE 068 AA1.23 4.3 14.4

e. Respond to a Total Loss of SW 076 A2.01 3.5*/3.7*

JPM E I S,M,A

f. Shutdown the "A" Emergency Diesel Generator JPM S.D 6 064 A4.06 3.913.9
g. Remove a Power Range Channel From Service JPM S,D 7 015 A2.02 3.1/3.5*
h. Shutdown Containment Purge JPM S,D,L 8 APE 036 AA1.01 3.313.8 In-Plant Systems@(3 for RO); (3 for SRO-I); (3 or 2 for SRO-U)

I. Startup and Parallel Rod Drive MGSet (Parallel Fails) JPM I 1

001 A4.08 3.713.4 J . Align Fire Water System to Fill the CSTs Using JPM J Condensate Transfer System D.E 4s 061 K4.01 4.114.2

k. Trip of Failed AC Emergency UV Relay JPM K APE 077 AA1.05 3.914.0

@ All RO and SRO-I control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; all 5 SRO-U systems must serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.

  • Type Codes Criteria for RO I SRO-I / SRO-U (A)lternate path 4-614-6 12-3 (C)ontrol room (D)irect from bank 59/58/54 (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant 21I 2 1I 2 1 (L)ow-Power I Shutdown 2lI2ll21 (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1(A) 22/22/21 (P)revious 2 exams 5 3 I 5 3 1 5 2 (randomly selected)

(WCA 2 1 / 2 1I 2 1 (S)imulator

ES-301, Rev. 9 Ad min ist rative Topics 0utIine Form ES-301-1 Facility: R. E. Ginna Date of Examination: 08/25/2008 Examination Level: RO c] SRO Operating Test Number: 1 Administrative Topic Type Describe activity to be performed (see Note) Code*

Verify Estimated Critical Rod Position Calculation Conduct of Operations JPM N-SA-I WA 2.1.37 4.6 A-52.112, Inoperability of Equipment Conduct of Operations N,R JPM N S A - 2 WA 2.1.18 3.8 Review the Tagout Boundary for B Heater Drain Tank Pump Equipment Control JPM hl-SA-3 KIA 2.2.13 4.3 Implenient the Requirenienh of ODCM tot IZMS Operability Radiation Control N,S or R JPM h[-SA-4 WA 2.3.15 3.1 Event Classification Emergency Plan D , S or R JPM N-SA-5 WA 2.4.41 4.6 NOTE: All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when all 5 are required.

  • Type Codes & Criteria: (C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, or Class(R)oom (D)irect from bank (5 3 for ROs; I 4 for SROs & RO retakes)

(N)ew or (M)odified from bank (2 1)

(P)revious 2 exams ( I 1; randomly selected)

ES-301, Rev. 9 Control Room/ln-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility: R. E. Ginna Date of Examination: 0812512008 Exam Level: RO SRO-I SRO-U 0 Operating Test No.: 1 Control Room Systems@(8 for RO); (7 for SRO-I); (2 or 3 for SRO-U, including 1 ESF)

Type Code* Safety Function

a. Alternate Dilution of the RCS (RIB occurs during dilutiion) JPM A S,N,A 1 004 A2.16 3.213.6
b. Transfer ECCS to Cold Leg Recirculation (Alt. Path) JPM B 2

EPE 01 1 EAl.11 4.214.2 C.

d. Respond To a Control Room Evacuation (Alt Path) JPM D S,N,A 4P APE 068 AAl.23 4.3 14.4
e. Respond to a Total Loss of SW JPM E 4s 076 A2.01 3.5*/3.7*
f. Shutdown the "A" Emergency Diesel Generator JPM F S,D 6 064 A4.06 3.913.9
g. Remove a Power Range Channel From Service JPM G-7 015 A2.02 3.113.5*
h. Shutdown Containment Purge JPM H 8

APE 036 AAl.01 3.313.8 Implant Systems@(3 for RO); (3 for SRO-I); (3 or 2 for SRO-U)

i. Startup and Parallel Rod Drive MG Set (Parallel Fails) JPM I 001 A4.08 3.713.4
j. Align Fire Water System to Fill the CSTs Using Condensate Transfer System 061 K4.01 APE 077 AA1.05 3.914.0

~ ~~~~~

4.114.2

k. Trip of Failed AC Emergency UV Relay

~~

JPM J JPM K I

D,R,E

~~

All RO and SRO-I control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; all 5 SRO-U systems must serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.

Appendix D Scenario Outline Form EIS-D-1 Facility: R. E. Ginna Scenario No.: -- 1 Op-Test No.: -- 1 Examiners: Operators: -

Initial Conditions: 70%, EOL Turnover: SI Pump A 00s to refurbish failed motor, S/G A LT-461 00s due to failed electronics, MDAFW Pump A 00s for impeller replacement Event Malf. Event Event Description No. No. Type*

1 TUR16B I-SRO PT-486, Turbine First Stage Pressure Fails Low.

2 RCS11F l-All. TS-SRO Loop B Tbt TE-404A fails high.

C-ATC/SRO, SGNO4B TS-SRO S/G B Tube Leak of = 10 gpm R-ATC, N/A N-BOP/SRO Plant Power Reduction RCS15B, 5 RCS15D C-ATC/SRO RCP 1B High Vibration SGN04B, STM03, STM05B, Main Steam Line Break Downstream of MSlVs which causes S/G tube RHRO1A, leak to rise to a 400 GPM tube rupture in S/G B. MSlV B fails to close M-All, RPS07C, automatically or manually from the MCB, SI Pump C fails to Auto Stilrt on 6 RPS07D C-BOP SI Signal, RHR Pump A trips on auto start.

  • (N)ormal, (R)eactivity, (I)nstrument, (C)omponent, (M)ajor Revision 00 Page 1 of 17

Appendix D Scenario Outline Form ES-D-1 Facility: R. E. Ginna Scenario No.: 2 Op-Test No.: 1 -

Examiners: Clperators: -

Initial Conditions: 1OO%, BOL Turnover: SI Pump A 00s to refurbish failed motor, S/GA LT-461 00s due to failed electronics, MDARY Pump A 00s for impeller replacement Event Event P

Description -

I-ATC/SRO, TS-SRO Pressurizer Pressure Master Controller PC-431K output fails high C-SRO, TS-SRO RCS Leak Hot Leg B C-BOP/S RO Heater Drain Tank Pump 1A Trips R-ATC, N-BOP/SRO Power Reduction to 70%

I-BOP/SRO, TS-SRO S/G A Level LT-463 fails high Large Break LOCA Hot Leg B, RHR Pumps A and B fail to auto start on SI Signal, MDAFW Pump B and the TDAFW Pump fail to autlo M-ALL, start, MOV-313 fails to close on CI, RWST Level Channel 921 Fails C-BOP Low during Injection Phase Revision 00 Page 1 of 21

Appendix D Scenario Outline Form ES-D-1 Facility: R. E. Ginna Scenario No.: - 3 Op-Test No.: 1 I Examiners: Operators: -

Initial Conditions: 70%, BOL Turnover: SI Pump A 00s to refurbish failed motor, S/G A LT-461 00s due to failed electronics Event Malf. Event Event No. No. Type* Description -

R-ATC, 1 N/A N-BOP/SRO Power Ascension RCS11C, I-ALL, 2 ROD12 TS-SRO Loop A TcoldTE-401B Fails Low, Rod Block failed

~~

OVR-MISOGB, OVR-MIS06D, 3 A-EDS16 TS-SRO Conta.inment Recirculation Fan Cooler A Trips 4 CVCl OA I-ATC/SRO VCT Level Transmitter LT-112 Fails High Feedwater Control Valve B, FCV-476, Auto Controller Fails 5 FDW07C I-BOP/SRO High, w/Manual Control available STM03, STM05A, STM05B, Main Steam line break downstream of MSIVs, both MSlVs fail to SIS02A, M-ALL, close automatically or from the MCB, SI fails to actuate when 6 SIS02B I-ATC setpoint reached

" (N)orrnal, (R)eactivity, (I)nstrument, (C)ornponent, (M)ajor 1

Revision 00 Page 1 of 16

Appendix D Scenario Outline Form ES-D-1 7

Facility: R. E. Ginna Scenario No.: - 4 Op-Test No.: 1 -

Examiners: Operators: -

Initial Conditions: 70%, MOL Turnover: SI Pump A 00s to refurbish failed motor, S/G A LT-461 00s due to failed Electronics, MDAFVJ Pump A 00s for impeller replacement Event Malf. Event Event No. No. Type* Description -

C-ATC/SRO, 1 RCS16 TS-SRO High RCS Activity

~~~

I-BOP/SRO, 2 SGN03B TS-SRO Steam Generator A Pressure Transmitter PT-469 Fails Low Letdown Non-RegenerativeHeat Exchanger Outlet Temperature TT-3 cvco5 I-ATC/SRO 130 Fails Low 4 FDW04B C-BOP/SRO Feedwater Pump B Lube Oil System Leak N-BOP/SRO, 5 N/A R-ATC Down Power to 50%

CND08, EDS04B, RPS05A, RPS05B, RPS07M, RPS07N, Condensate Line Break, Bus 16 Fault, Loss of Feedwater &

FDW12 M-All, C-BOP Preferred AFW Revision 00 Page 1 of 18