ML050390525

License Amendment, Revised Action for Scam Discharge Volume Vent and Drain Valves

ML050390525
Person / Time
Site:	Clinton
Issue date:	02/10/2005
From:	Jabbour K NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLIII-2
To:	Crane C AmerGen Energy Co
Jabbour K, NRR/DLPM, 415-1496
Shared Package
ML050470481	List: ML050390525
References
TAC MC3617
Download: ML050390525 (11)

Text

February 10, 2005Mr. Christopher M. Crane, President and Chief Executive Officer AmerGen Energy Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, Illinois 60555

SUBJECT:

CLINTON POWER STATION, UNIT 1 - ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT RE:REVISED ACTION FOR SCRAM DISCHARGE VOLUME VENT AND DRAIN VALVES (TAC NO. MC3617)

Dear Mr. Crane:

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Commission) has issued the enclosed AmendmentNo. 162 to Facility Operating License No. NPF-62 for the Clinton Power Station, Unit 1. The amendment changes the Technical Specifications (TS) in response to your application dated June 22, 2004.The amendment revises TS 3.1.8, "Scram Discharge Volume (SDV) Vent and Drain Valves," forthe condition of having one or more SDV vent or drain lines with one valve inoperable. A notice of availability for this TS improvement using the consolidated line item improvement process was published in the Federal Register on April 15, 2003 (68 FR 18294).A copy of the Safety Evaluation is also enclosed. The Notice of Issuance will be included in theCommission's next biweekly Federal Register notice.Sincerely,/RA/Kahtan N. Jabbour, Senior Project Manager, Section 2Project Directorate III Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationDocket No. 50-461

Enclosures:

1. Amendment No.162 to NPF-62 2. Safety Evaluationcc w/encls: See next page

ML050390525OFFICECLIIP LPMPM:PD3-2LA:PD3-2SC:IROB-ASC:PD3-2 NAMEWReckleyKJabbourPCoatesTBoyceGSuhDATE01/25/05 01/25/05 01/25/0501/31/05 / /05 Clinton Power Station, Unit 1 cc:

Senior Vice President - Nuclear ServicesAmerGen Energy Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555Vice President Operations SupportAmerGen Energy Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555Vice President - Licensing andRegulatory Affairs AmerGen Energy Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555Manager Licensing - Clinton and LaSalleAmerGen Energy Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555Regulatory Assurance Manager - ClintonAmerGen Energy Company, LLC Clinton Power Station RR3, Box 228 Clinton, IL 61727-9351Director LicensingAmerGen Energy Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555Document Control Desk-LicensingAmerGen Energy Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555Site Vice President - Clinton Power StationAmerGen Energy Company, LLC Clinton Power Station RR 3, Box 228 Clinton, IL 61727-9351Clinton Power Station Plant ManagerAmerGen Energy Company, LLC Clinton Power Station RR 3, Box 228 Clinton, IL 61727-9351Resident InspectorU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission RR #3, Box 229A Clinton, IL 61727Chief Operating OfficerAmerGen Energy Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555Regional Administrator, Region IIIU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 801 Warrenville Road Lisle, IL 60532-4351Senior Counsel, NuclearAmerGen Energy Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555R. T. HillLicensing Services Manager General Electric Company 175 Curtner Avenue, M/C 481 San Jose, CA 95125Chairman of DeWitt Countyc/o County Clerk's Office DeWitt County Courthouse Clinton, IL 61727 Clinton Power Station, Unit 1- 2 -J. W. Blattner Project Manager Sargent & Lundy Engineers 55 East Monroe Street Chicago, IL 60603Illinois Emergency Management Agency Division of Disaster Assistance &

Preparedness 110 East Adams Street Springfield, IL 62701-1109 AMERGEN ENERGY COMPANY, LLC DOCKET NO. 50-461CLINTON POWER STATION, UNIT 1AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSEAmendment No. 162License No. NPF-621.The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:A.The application for amendment by AmerGen Energy Company, LLC (thelicensee), dated June 22, 2004, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I;B.The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of theAct, and the rules and regulations of the Commission;C.There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by thisamendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations;D.The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense andsecurity or to the health and safety of the public; andE.The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of theCommission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.2.Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications asindicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Facility Operating License No. NPF-62 is hereby amended to read as follows: (2)Technical Specifications and Environmental Protection PlanThe Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A and the EnvironmentalProtection Plan contained in Appendix B, as revised through Amendment No.

are hereby incorporated into this license. AmerGen Energy Company, LLC shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan.3.This license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance and shall be implementedwithin 60 days of the date of issuance. FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION/RA/Gene Y. Suh, Chief, Section 2Project Directorate III Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Attachment:

Changes to the Technical SpecificationsDate of Issuance: February 10, 2005 ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 162 FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-62DOCKET NO. 50-461Replace the following page of the Appendix "A" Technical Specifications with the attachedrevised page. The revised page is identified by an amendment number and contains marginal lines indicating the areas of change. Remove PageInsert Page 3.1-24 3.1-24

SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIONRELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 162 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-62AMERGEN ENERGY COMPANY, LLCCLINTON POWER STATION, UNIT 1DOCKET NO. 50-46

11.0 INTRODUCTION

By letter dated June 22, 2004 [ADAMS Accession No. ML041810504], AmerGen EnergyCompany, LLC (the licensee), proposed a license amendment to change the Technical Specifications (TS) for Clinton Power Station, Unit 1. The requested changes would revise the required actions within TS 3.1.8, "Scram Discharge Volume (SDV) Vent and Drain Valves," for the condition of having one or more SDV vent or drain lines with one valve inoperable. These changes are based on Technical Specifications Task Force (TSTF) change traveler TSTF-404(Revision 0) that has been approved generically for the Boiling Water Reactor/4 (BWR)Standard Technical Specifications, NUREG-1433, Revision 2. A notice announcing theavailability of this proposed TS change using the consolidated line item improvement process was published in the Federal Register on April 15, 2003 (68 FR 18294).

2.0 REGULATORY EVALUATION

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulations and review standards such as Appendix A,"General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants," to Title 10 of the Code of FederalRegulations (10 CFR) Part 50, include specific requirements for reactor protection and reactivitycontrol systems. The reactor protection systems for BWRs use a hydraulic system to insert control rods into the reactor core. During an actuation of the reactor protection system (a scram), water is exhausted from the control rod drive mechanisms to the SDVs. Proper maintenance and operation of the SDVs in terms of instrumentation and limiting water volumes are essential for assuring the reliability of the reactor protection system (see NRC Bulletin 80-17, "Failure of Control Rods to Insert During a Scram at a BWR," related Orders to specific facilities, and information provided in plant final safety analysis reports and TS Bases).

Maintaining the SDVs to ensure that accumulated water does not hamper or slow the insertion of control rods requires vent and drain valves. The vent and drain valves isolate during a scram to limit the amount of coolant discharged so that adequate core cooling is maintained and offsite doses remain within regulatory limits. Specific regulatory requirements for SDV vent and drain valves are defined in TS 3.1.8. Theexisting Limiting Condition for Operation 3.1.8, requires that each SDV vent and drain valve be operable. The operability of all SDV vent and drain valves ensures that the SDV vent and drain valves will close during a scram to contain reactor water discharged to the SDV piping. Since the vent and drain lines are provided with two valves in series, the single failure of one valve in the open position will not impair the isolation function of the system. Additionally, the valves are required to open on scram reset and during plant operation to control the amount of water accumulating in the SDV. If one or more SDV vent and drain lines have a single valve that is inoperable, the existing required action is to restore the valve(s) to operable status within 7 days. If an inoperable valve is not restored to operable status, a plant shutdown to MODE 3 is required within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />. If one or more SDV vent or drain lines have both valves inoperable, the associated line must beisolated within 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />. In this condition, the plant is allowed to operate indefinitely. A note associated with the required action clarifies that the valves may be opened under administrative controls to allow draining of the SDV. The existing SDV vent and drain valve required actions are inconsistent in that, although the operational and safety concerns are similar for having one or both valves in a line being inoperable, the actions for a single inoperable valve do not allow for the isolation of the line and administrative controls to support the draining of the SDV.The proposed change would revise the required actions to be more consistent with the safetysignificance of one inoperable valve in a SDV line versus two inoperable valves in an SDV line.

3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION

The proposed changes to TS 3.1.8 are:

1.Required Action A.1 is revised from restoring the single inoperable SDV vent and drainvalve in one or more SDV vent and drain lines to operable status to isolating the associated line.2.The Note to Required Action B.1, which allows an isolated line to be unisolated underadministrative controls for the purpose of draining and venting the SDV, is moved to a note that applies to both Conditions A (single inoperable valve) and B (both valves inoperable). With one SDV vent or drain valve inoperable in one or more lines, the isolation function wouldbe maintained since the redundant valve in the affected line would perform its safety function of isolating the SDV. The current ACTION statement allows 7 days to repair the inoperable valve; the proposed change is to allow for the isolation of the affected line and continue operation. If the affected line is not isolated within the 7-day time period (or the inoperable valve is not restored), the licensee would then be required to proceed to MODE 3 in the next 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />.

Maintaining the 7-day Completion Time is acceptable because of the low probability of the concurrent events of a scram within the 7 days of the Completion Time and a failure of the redundant valve(s). Alternately, if the inoperable valve was initially closed, there would be ample time and warning available to drain the SDV before an automatic scram would occur due to SDV high level. The allowance to administratively open a line that is isolated to comply with the actions (topermit draining and venting the SDV) is allowed by existing Required Action B.1. This allowance is being moved to apply to all ACTIONS based on the change proposed to Action A.

This would allow any accumulated water in the line to be drained, to preclude a reactor scram on SDV high level. A reactor scram is initiated if the SDV water level in the instrument volume exceeds a specified setpoint. The setpoint is chosen so that all control rods are inserted before the SDV has insufficient volume to accept a full scram. Regarding the isolation of the SDV, the remaining operable SDV vent and drain valve(s) would close automatically on a scram signal to isolate the lines. Or, if both valves in a line were inoperable (and opened under this provision),

the reactor coolant release could be terminated by resetting the scram from the control room, or by manually closing the valves. Resetting the scram automatically closes the scram outlet valves, isolating the control rod drive discharge path to the SDV. Based on the low probability of an event occurring during the defined Completion Timeassociated with this condition, the subsequent isolation of the affected lines, and the ability to open and drain the lines before an automatic scram due to SDV high water level, the proposed change maintains the necessary safety features and, is therefore, acceptable.The licensee stated that associated changes to the Bases Section for TS 3.1.8 will be made inaccordance with the Bases Control Program defined by TS 5.5.11. The NRC staff agrees that the TS Bases Control Program is the appropriate process for updating the affected TS Bases pages.

4.0 STATE CONSULTATION

In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the Illinois State official was notified of theproposed issuance of the amendment. The State official had no comments.

5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION

This amendment changes a requirement with respect to installation or use of a facilitycomponent located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20 or changes a surveillance requirement. The NRC staff has determined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed findingthat the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration and there has been no public comment on such finding (68 FR 53099). Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b),

no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendment.

6.0 CONCLUSION

The staff has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) there isreasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.Principal Contributor: W. Reckley, NRR/DLPM Date: Februry 10, 2005