ML083110590

From kanterella
Revision as of 16:44, 14 October 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
R. E. Ginna Final Outlines (Folder 3)
ML083110590
Person / Time
Site: Ginna Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/17/2008
From:
Ginna
To: Fish T H
Operations Branch I
Hansell S
Shared Package
ML080030004 List:
References
50-244/08-301, ES-401, ES-401-2, TAC U01687 50-244/08-301
Download: ML083110590 (25)
v • d • e


Text

~ ~~ ~ ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-40 1-2 .- Facility:

R. E. Ginna Date Of Exam: 09/05/2008 RO WA Category Points I SRO-Only Points Note: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.* 8. 9. Ensure that at least two topics from every applicable WA category are sampled within each tier of the RO and SRO-only outlines (Le., except for one category in Tier 3 of the SRO-only outline, the "Tier Totals" in each WA category shall not be less than two). The point total for each group and tier in the proposed outline must match that specified in the table. The final point total for each group and tier may deviate by k1 from that specified in the table based on NRC revisions. The final RO exam must total 75 points and the SRO-only exam must total 25 points. Systems/evolutions within each group are identified on the associated outline; systems or evolutions that do not apply at the facility should be deleted and justified; operationally important, site-specific systems/evolutions that are not included on the outline should be added. Refer to Section D.l .b of ES-401 for guidance regarding the elimination of inappropriate WA statements. Select topics from as many systems and evolutions as possible; sample every system or evolution in the group before selecting a second topic for any syslem or evolution.

Absent a plant-specific priority, only those WAS having an importance rating (IR) of 2.5 or higher shall be selected.

Use the RO and SRO ratings for the RO and SRO-only portions, respectively.

Select SRO topics for Tiers 1 and 2 from the shaded systems and WA categories. The generic (G)

WAS in Tiers 1 and 2 shall be selected from Section 2 of the WA Catalog, but the topics must be relevant to the applicable evolution or system. Refer to Section D.1.b of ES-401 for the applicable WAS. On the following pages, enter the WA numbers, a brief description of each topic, the topics' importance ratings (IRs) for the applicable license level, and the point totals

(#) for each system and category. Enter the group and tier totals for each category in the table above; if fuel handling equipment is sampled in other than Category A2 or G* on the SRO-only exam, enter it on the left side of Column A2 for Tier 2, Group 2 (Note #1 does not apply). Use duplicate pages for RO and SRO-only exams.

For Tier 3, select topics from Section 2 of the WA catalog, and enter the WA numbers, descriptions, IRs, and point totals

(#) on Form ES-401-3.

10 CFR 55.43. Limit SRO selections to WAS that are linked to 1

Facility:

R. E. Ginna ES - 401 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 1 I Group 1 ' WAPE # I Name I Safety Function 000007 Reactor Trip - Stabilization - Recovery I1 000008 Pressurizer Vapor Space Accident I 3 )000009 Small Break LOCA I 3 lo000 1 1 Large Break LOCA I 3 I 000022 Loss of Rx Coolant Makeup 12 000025 Loss of RHR System 14 PWR RO Examination Outline 000027 Pressurizer Pressure Control System Malfunction 13 000038 Steam Gen. Tube Rupture I 3 I000040 Steam Line Rupture - Excessive Heat insfer 14 ~00054 Loss of Main Feedwater 14 000055 Station Blackout 16 000056 Loss of Off-site Power I 6 000057 Loss of Vital AC Inst. Bus 16 000062 Loss of Nuclear Svc Water I4 000065 Loss of Instrument Air I 8 000077 Generator Voltage and Electric Grid Disturbances 16 WE04 LOCA Outside Containment I 3 WE05 Inadequate Heat Transfer - Loss of Secondary Heat Sink 14 I Form Eh-401-2 1 Facility:

R. E. Ginna ES - 401 PWR RO Examination Outline Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 1 / Group 1 Form ES-401-2 m 2 PWR RO Examination Outline Facility:

R. E. Ginna ES - 401 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 1 / Group 2 ' '4PE # / Name / Safety Function 000003 Dropped Control Rod

/ 1 000033 Loss of Intermediate Range NI / 7 00005 1 Loss of Condenser Vacuum I 4 000068 Control Room Evac.

I 8 WE02 SI Termination

/ 3 WE03 LOCA Cooldown - Depress. 14 WE08 RCS Overcooling - PTS / 4 WE10 Natural Circ.

14 WE16 High Containment Radiation

/ 9 WA Category Totals: brought back within specified target band modes of plant operation.

AK3.05 - Tech-Spec limits for reduction of load to 50% power if flux cannot be brought back within specified target band 3.4" limitations in the facility's license and eam Void in Vessel withlwithout characteristics of the facility 1 ,- 1 1 ,- I 1 I- 1 .- 1 1 PWR RO Examination Outline Facility:

R. E. Ginna 06 1 AuxiliaryEmergency Feedwater 1

PWR RO Examination Outline Facility:

K. E. Ginna l7.s - An1 Plant Systems - Tier 2 / Group 1 Form ES-401-2 annunciator or alarm. purpose andor function.

078 Instrument Air 2

PWR RO Examination Outline Facility:

R. E. Ginna ES - 401 I dEvol# / Name d2 Reactor Coolant 0 15 Nuclear Instrumentation 0 17 In-core Temperature Monitor 034 Fuel Handling Equipment 04 1 Steam DumpiTurbine Bypass Control 045 Main Turbine Generator 07 1 Waste Gas Disposal 072 Area Radiation Monitoring 075 Circulating Water "56 Fire Protection WA Category Totals:

I Plant Systems - Tier 2 / Group 2 verify the status and operatior of system, and understand how onerator actions and Form ES-401-2 3.7 2.5" directives affect plant and system conditions. - 2.7 1 4.2 1 - - 3.3 1 - 3.4 1 2.6" 1 3. I 1 - - 1 Facilitv:

R. E. Ginna Generic Category 2.7 Generic Knowledge and Abilities Outline (Tier 3) PWR RO Examination Outline 1 ~ I Knowledge of refueling administrative requirements . Equipment Control

2.8 Radiation

Control 2.4.22 2.4.37 2.4.39 - KA Knowledge of the bases for prioritizing safety 3.6 1 Knowledge of the lines of authority during 3 .O 1 Knowledge of RO responsibilities in emergency 3.9 1 - functions during abnormaVemergency operations. - implementation of the emergency plan. - plan implementation.

KA Topic 2.1.15 2.1.20 2.1.40 Form ES-40 II -3 Imp. Point!! Knowledge of administrative requirements for temporary management directives, such as standing orders, night orders, Operations memos, etc. Ability lo interpret and execute procedure steps. 2.2.13 2.2.42 Knowledge of tagging and clearance procedures.

Ability to recognize system parameters that are entry-level conditions for Technical Specifications.

Category Total: 21 2.3.1 1 2.3.12 Ability to control radiation releases..

Knowledge of radiological safety principles pertaining to licensed operator duties, such as containment entry requirements, fuel handling responsibilities, access to locked high-radiation areas, aligning filters, etc.

Category Total: 2 - I I I I Emergency ProceduresPlan Generic Total: 10 ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-40 1-2 Facilitv:

R. E. Ginna Date Of Exam: 09/05/2008 I I RO wA Category Points 1 SRO-Only Points Note: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.* 8. 9. Ensure that at least two topics from every applicable WA category are sampled within each tier of the RO and SRO-only outlines (i.e., except for one category in Tier 3 of the SRO-only outline, the "Tier Totals" in each WA category shall not be less than two). The point total for each group and tier in the proposed autline must match that specified in the table.

The final point total for each group and tier may deviate by

  • 1 from that specified in the table based on NRC revisions. The final RO exam must total 75 points and the SRO-only exam must total 25 points Systemslevolutions within each group are identified on the associated outline; systems or evolutions that do not apply at the facility should be deleted and justified; operationally important, site-specific systems/evolutions that are not included on the outline should be added. Refer to Section D.l .b of ES-401 for guidance regarding the elimination of inappropriate WA statements. Select topics from as many systems and evolutions as possible; sample every system or evolution in the group before selecting a second topic for any system or evolution. Absent a plant-specific priority, only those WAS having an importance rating (IR) of 2.5 or higher shall be selected.

Use the RO and SRO ratings for the RO and SRO-only portions, respectively. Select SRO topics for Tiers 1 and 2 from the shaded systems and WA categories. The generic (G)

WAS in Tiers 1 and 2 shall be selected from Section 2 of the WA Catalog, but the topics must be relevant to the applicable evolution or system. Refer to Section D.l .b of ES-401 for the applicable WAS. On the following pages, enter the WA numbers, a brief description of each topic, the topics' importance ratings (IRs) for the applicable license level, and the point totals (#) for each system and category. Enter the group and tier totals for each category in the table above; if fuel handling equipment is sampled in other than Category A2 or G* on the SRO-only exam, enter it on the left side of Column A2 for Tier 2, Group 2 (Note #1 does not apply). Use duplicate pages for RO and SRO-only exams.

For Tier 3, select topics from Section 2 of the WA catalog, and enter the WA numbers, descriptions, IRs, and point totals

(#) on Form ES-401-3.

10 CFR 55.43. Limit SRO selections to WAS that are linked to 1 PWR SRO Examination Outline L2 0 Facility:

R. E. Ginna ES - 401 K3 0 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 1 I Group I I K1 ' . \PE # I Name I Safety Function I 0000 15/0000 17 RCP Malfunctions I 4 r 000026 Loss of Component Cooling Water I 8 000029 ATWS I 1 000058 Loss of DC Power 16 WE I I Loss of Emergency Coolant Recirc.

I 4 r I WE1 2 - Steam Line Rupture - Excessive Heat I WA Category Totals: I 0 Form ES-401-2 and integrated plant procedures during all modes of plant operation.

-- >oints 6 - 1 -- I Facility:

R. E. Ginna ES - 401 PWR SRO Examination Outline Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 1 I Group 2 ' -'APE ## I Name I Safety Function 000036 Fuel Handling Accident I 8 3 000037 Steam Generator Tube Leak 13 WE I4 Loss of CTMT Integrity I 5 WA Category Totals:

0 - Form Ef-401-2 Points I 1 1 1 4 1 Facility:

R. E. Ginna K5 ES - 401 K6 00 dEvol## I Name d6 Emergency Core Cooling I 0 10 Pressurizer Pressure Control 026 Containment Spray WA Category Totals:

PWR SRO Examination Outline Plant Systems - Tier 2 / Group 1 Form ES-401-2 technical specifications for a 2.2.40 - Ability to apply a1 specifications for a caused by clogged sump screen, pump inlet high temperature exceeded cavitation, voiding), or sump level below cutoff (interlock)

A2.16 - Loss of offsite power during full-load testing of -- Imp. 4.4 4.7 -- -- 4.7 -- 3.9 -- 3.7 -- 0121 Group Point Total:

'oints 1 1 1 5 1 PWR SRO Examination Outline Facility:

R. E. Ginna ES - 401 Plant Systems - Tier 2 / Group 2 Form ES-401-2 1 Generic Knowledge and Abilities Outline (Tier

3) PWR SRO Examination Outline Ability to use procedures related to shift staffing, such as minimum crew complement, overtime limitation:;, etc. Knowledge of procedures, guidelines, or limitations associated with reactivity management.

3.9 4.6 2.4.16 ~~ Knowledge of EOP implementation hierarchy and coordination with other suppin procedure\.

and Zvere accident management guidelme\.

procedure^

or guidelines such as, operating procedures, abnormal operating 4.4 Form ES-40 1-3 Facility:

R. E. Ginna Generic Category KA - KA Topic Imp. Points Conduct of Operations

2. - 2.1.37 Category Total:

2 1 3.4 I 1 2.2.19 Knowledge of maintenance work order requirements. Equipment Control I 2.2.44 Ability to interpret control room indications to verify the status and operation of system, and understand how operator actions and directives Category Total:

2 Ability to approve release permits.

3.8 Radiation

Control 2.3.6 I I Category Total: I I I I 1 Emergency ProceduresPlan I 4.5 I I Knowledge of SRO responsibilities in emergency 2.4.40 I olan imdementation.

Generic Total: 7 1 ES-401 Record of Rejected WAS Form ES-401-4 R. E. Ginna 2008 Written Exam for 11/7/2008 Tier / :roup Randomly Selected WA Reason for Rejection 112 RO 3 SRO W/E02 EA2.1 2.4.41 211 RO 006 K5.07 3 RO 1/1 SRO 2.2.18 00001 7 AA2.07 111 RO RO Q3 1/1 RO RO Q4 1/1 RO RO Q8 WA required selection of appropriate procedures for SI Termination and no credible distracters can be developed against this topic.

Replaced with EA2.1 through random selection.

WA is ambiguous and low operational validity (Expected temperature levels in various locations of the RCS due to various plant conditions). Replaced with K5.05 through random selection.

Low operational validity for an RO. Replaced with 2.2.13 through random selection. Low operational validity.

No procedures require the SRO to calculate natural circulation flow only verify that it exists against specific criteria.

The SRO would not be performing this in the event of an RCP Malfunction.

Replaced with AA2.10 through random selection. Replaced due to over sampling. This K/A was previously sampled in Tier l/Group 2 and is also being given as an Administrative JPM on the Operating Test. Replaced with 2.4.'16 through random selection.

-~ -~ Draft Written Submittal 000009 EA1.15 - Ability to operate and monitor the following as they apply to a small break LOCA: PORV and PORV block valve 00001 1 EK2.02 - Knowledge of the interrelations between the and the following Large Break LOCA: Pumps 000038 2.4.4 - Ability to recognize abnormal indications for system operating parameters that are entry-level conditions for emergency and abnormal operating procedures.

Changedl to: 00001 1 EA1.06 - Ability to operate and monitor the following as they apply to a Large Break LOCA: D/Gs Reason: Unable to write a discriminating question with out writing a double jeopardy question due to other questions already written. Changed to: 000009 EK3.23 - Knowledge of the reasons for the following responses as they apply to the small break LOCA: RCP tripping requirements Reason: There are no required reasons to trip RCPs during a LBLOCA but there are specific, good and testable reasons to trip RCPs during a SBLOCA.

Changed to: 000038 2.4.18 - Knowledge of the specific bases for EOPs. Reason: Unable to write a discriminating question at the RO level and not risk exam overlap/double jeopardy.

Record of Rejected WAS Form ES-401-4 -___. ES-401 R. E. Ginna 2008 Written Exam for 11/7/2008 Tier / Group 2/1 RO RO Q36 2/1 RO RO Q49 2/2 RO 1/1 SRO SRO Q77 1/1 SRO SRO Q80 Randomly Selected WA 01 2 Al.01 - Ability to predict and/or monitor Changes in parameters (to prevent exceeding design limits) associated with operating the RPS controls including: Trip se tpoi n t adjustment 073 A2.01 - Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following malfunctions or operations on the PRM system; and (b) based on those predictions, use procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those malfunctions or operations:

Erratic or failed power supply 071 A4.13 - Ability to manually operate and/or monitor in the control room: Recovery from automatic termination of gas release due to PRM system alarm 000026 2.2.39 - Knowledge of less than or equal to one hour Technical Specification action statements for systems W/E11 EA2.2 - Ability to determine and interpret the following as they apply to the (Loss of Emergency Coolant Recirculation):

Adherence to appropriate procedures and operation within the limitations in the facility's license and amendments.

Reason for Rejection

____ ~~~ :hanged to: 012 K6.06 - Knowledge of the effect of a oss or malfunction of the following will have on the RPS: Sensors and detectors Reason: Unable to write a discriminating question at the RO level. Changed to: 073 A2.02 - Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following malfunctions or operations on the PRM system; and (b) based on those predictions, use procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those malfunctions or operations:

Detector failure Reason: Unable to write a discriminating question at the RO level. Changed to: 071 A4.09 - Ability to manually operate and/or monitor in the control room: Waste gas release rad monitors Reason: Unable to write a discriminating question at the RO level. Changed to: 000026 2.2.37 - Ability to determine operability and/or availability of safety related equipment. Reason: Unable to write a discriminating question at the SRO level. Changed to: W/Ell EA2.1 - Ability to determine and interpret the following as they apply to the (Loss of Emergency Coolant Recirculation):

Facility conditions and selection of appropriate procedures during abnormal and emergency operations. Reason: Unable to write a discriminating question at the SRO level.

ES-401 Record of Rejected WAS Form ES-401-4 R. E. Ginna 2008 Written Exam for 11/7/2008 Tier / Group 3 SRO SRO Q94 212 RO RO Q56 212 RO RO Q59 3 RO RO Q67 3 RO RO Q71 212 SRO SRO Q93 Randomly Selected KIA 2.1.4 - Knowledge of individual licensed operator responsibilities related to shift staffing, such as medical requirements, "no-solo operation, maintenance of active license status, 1 OCFR55, etc. -~: Reason for Rejection Changed to: 2.1.5 Ability to use procedures related to shift staffing, such as minimum crew complement, overtime limitations. etc. Reason: Unable to write a discriminating question at the SRO level Final Written Submittal 002 K1.05 - Knowledge of the physical connections and/or cause-effect relationships between the RCS and the following systems: PRT 034 K6.02 - Knowledge of the effect of a loss or malfunction on the following will have on the Fuel Handling System: Radiation monitoring systems 2.1.38 - Knowledge of the station's requirements for verbal communications when implementing procedures.

2.3.5 - Ability to use radiation monitoring systems, such as fixed radiation monitors and alarms, portable survey instruments, personal monitoring equipment, etc. Liquid Radwaste 068 2.2.38 - Knowledge of conditions and limitations in the facility license Changed to: 002 K1.07 - Knowledge of the physical connections and/or cause-effect relationships between the RCS and the following systems: Reactor vessel level indication system Reason: Unable to write a discriminating question at the RO level. Changed to: 034 K3.01 - Ability to monitor automatic operatiori of the Fuel Handling System including:

Travel limits Reason: Unable to write a discriminating question at the RO level Changed to: 2.1.20 - Ability to interpret and execute procedure steps. Reason: Unable to write a discriminating question at the RO level.. Changed to: 2.3.1 1 - Ability to control radiation releases. Reason: Unable to write a discriminating question at the RO level. Changed to: 068 2.1.32 - Ability to explain and apply system limits and precautions. Reason: Unable to write a discriminating question at the SRO level.

ES-301, Rev.

9 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility:

R. E. Ginna Examination Level:

RO [XI SRO 0 Date of Examination: 08/25/2008 Operating Test Number:

1 Administrative Topic Type (see Note) Code*

Conduct of Operations M,S or R I Conduct of Operations Equipment Control Radiation Control Emergency Plan M,S or R Describe activity to be performed CRITICAL ROD POSITION CALCULATION JPM N-RA-I WA 2.1.25 3.9 t 4.2 Manually Calculate QPTR JPM N-RA-2 KIA 2.1.7 4.4 14.7 Tagout Boundary for "B" Heater Drain Tank Pump JPM N-RA-3 WA 2.2.13 4.1 14.3 Monitor Critical Safety Function Status Trees JPM N-RA-4 WA 2A.13 4.0 14.6 NOTE: All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when all 5 are required.

  • Type Codes

& Criteria: (C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, or Class(R)oom (D)irect from bank (I 3 for ROs; I 4 for SROs & RO retakes) (N)ew or (M)odified from bank (2 1) (P)revious 2 exarns (5 1; randomly selected)

Type Code* a. Alternate Dilution of the RCS (RIB occurs during dilutiion) JPM A 004 A2.16 3.213.6 b. Transfer ECCS to Cold Leg Recirculation (Ah. Path) JPM B EPE 01 1 EA1.11 4.214.2 Safety Function c. Placing LTOP on Service 11 010 A4.03 4.013.8 JPM JPM JPM f. Shutdown the "A" Emergency Diesel Generator 064 A4.06 3.913.9 g. Remove a Power Range Channel From Service 015 A2.02 3.1 /3.5* h. Shutdown Containment Purge APE 036 AA1.01 3.313.8 JPM I S.N,L S.D 6 S,D 7 S,D,L 8 13 d. Respond To a Control Room Evacuation (AH Path) APE 068 AA1.23 4.3 14.4 e. Respond to a Total Loss of SW 076 A2.01 3.5*/3.7*

JPM E I S,M,A In-Plant Systems@ (3 for RO); (3 for SRO-I); (3 or 2 for SRO-U) I. Startup and Parallel Rod Drive MGSet (Parallel Fails) 001 A4.08 3.713.4 J. Align Fire Water System to Fill the CSTs Using Condensate Transfer System 061 K4.01 4.114.2 APE 077 AA1.05 3.914.0 JPM I JPM J k. Trip of Failed AC Emergency UV Relay JPM K 1 D.E 4s @ All RO and SRO-I control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; all 5 SRO-U systems must serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.

  • Type Codes (A)lternate path (C)ontrol room (D)irect from bank (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant (L)ow-Power I Shutdown (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1(A) (P)revious 2 exams (WCA (S)imulator Criteria for RO I SRO-I / SRO-U 4-6 14-6 12-3 59/58/54 21 I21 I21 2lI2ll21 22/22/21 5 3 I 5 3 15 2 (randomly selected) 2 1/21 I2 1 ES-301, Rev. 9 Ad mi n i st rat i ve Topics 0 ut I i ne Form ES-301-1 Facility:

R. E. Ginna Examination Level:

RO c] Administrative Topic (see Note)

Conduct of Operations Conduct of Operations Equipment Control Radiation Control Emergency Plan SRO Type Code* N,R N,S or R D,S or R Date of Examination:

08/25/2008 Operating Test Number: 1 Describe activity to be performed Verify Estimated Critical Rod Position Calculation JPM N-SA-I WA 2.1.37 4.6 A-52.112, Inoperability of Equipment JPM NSA-2 WA 2.1.18 3.8 Review the Tagout Boundary for "B" Heater Drain Tank Pump JPM hl-SA-3 KIA 2.2.13 4.3 Implenient the Requirenienh of ODC'M tot IZMS Operability JPM h[-SA-4 WA 2.3.15 3.1 Event Classification JPM N-SA-5 WA 2.4.41 4.6 NOTE: All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when all 5 are required.

  • Type Codes

& Criteria: (C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, or Class(R)oom (D)irect from bank (5 3 for ROs; I4 for SROs & RO retakes) (N)ew or (M)odified from bank (2 1) (P)revious 2 exams (I 1 ; randomly selected)

ES-301, Rev. 9 Control Room/ln-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility:

R. E. Ginna Exam Level: RO SRO-I SRO-U 0 Operating Test No.: 1 Control Room Systems@ (8 for RO); (7 for SRO-I); (2 or 3 for SRO-U, including 1 ESF) Date of Examination:

0812512008 Type Code*

Safety Function S,N,A 1 a. Alternate Dilution of the RCS (RIB occurs during dilutiion) 004 A2.16 3.213.6 JPM A b. Transfer ECCS to Cold Leg Recirculation (Alt. Path)

JPM B EPE 01 1 EAl.11 4.214.2 2 C. S,N,A 4P d. Respond To a Control Room Evacuation (Alt Path)

JPM D APE 068 AAl.23 4.3 14.4 e. Respond to a Total Loss of SW 076 A2.01 3.5*/3.7*

JPM E 4s f. Shutdown the "A" Emergency Diesel Generator JPM F 064 A4.06 3.913.9 S,D 6 g. Remove a Power Range Channel From Service JPM G- 01 5 A2.02 3.1 13.5* 7 8 h. Shutdown Containment Purge APE 036 AAl.01 3.313.8 JPM H Implant Systems@ (3 for RO); (3 for SRO-I); (3 or 2 for SRO-U) i. Startup and Parallel Rod Drive MG Set (Parallel Fails) 001 A4.08 3.713.4 j. Align Fire Water System to Fill the CSTs Using Condensate Transfer System 061 K4.01 4.114.2 APE 077 AA1.05 3.914.0 JPM I JPM J k. Trip of Failed AC Emergency UV Relay JPM K I D,R,E ~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ @ All RO and SRO-I control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; all 5 SRO-U systems must serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.

Appendix D Scenario Outline Form EIS-D-1 1 -- Facility:

R. E. Ginna Scenario No.: 1 Op-Test No.: -- Examiners: Operators: - - - Initial Conditions: 70%, EOL Turnover:

SI Pump A 00s to refurbish failed motor, S/G A LT-461 00s due to failed electronics, MDAFW Pump A 00s for impeller replacement Event No. 1 2 5 6 Malf. No. TUR16B RCS11 F SGNO4B N/A RCS15B, RCS15D SGN04B, STM03, STM05B, RHRO1 A, RPS07C, RPS07D Event Type* I-SRO l-All. TS-SRO C-ATC/SRO, TS-SRO R-ATC, N-BO P/S RO C-ATC/S RO M-All, C-BOP Event Description - PT-486, Turbine First Stage Pressure Fails Low. Loop B Tbt TE-404A fails high. S/G B Tube Leak of = 10 gpm Plant Power Reduction RCP 1 B High Vibration Main Steam Line Break Downstream of MSlVs which causes S/G tube leak to rise to a 400 GPM tube rupture in S/G B. MSlV B fails to close automatically or manually from the MCB, SI Pump C fails to Auto Stilrt on SI Signal, RHR Pump A trips on auto start.

  • (N)ormal, (R)eactivity, (I)nstrument, (C)omponent, (M)ajor Revision 00 Page 1 of 17 Appendix D Scenario Outline Form ES-D-1 Event I -ATC/SRO, TS-SRO C-SRO, TS-SRO C-BO P/S RO R-ATC, N-BO P/S RO I-BOP/SRO, TS-SRO Event Description P - Pressurizer Pressure Master Controller PC-431 K output fails high - Facility:

R. E. Ginna Scenario No.: 2 Op-Test No.: 1 - Examiners:

Clperators: - - Initial Conditions: 1 OO%, BOL Turnover:

SI Pump A 00s to refurbish failed motor, S/G A LT-461 00s due to failed electronics, MDARY Pump A 00s for impeller replacement M-ALL, C-BOP RCS Leak Hot Leg B Heater Drain Tank Pump 1A Trips Power Reduction to 70% S/G A Level LT-463 fails high Large Break LOCA Hot Leg B, RHR Pumps A and B fail to auto start on SI Signal, MDAFW Pump B and the TDAFW Pump fail to autlo start, MOV-313 fails to close on CI, RWST Level Channel 921 Fails Low during Injection Phase Revision 00 Page 1 of 21 Appendix D Scenario Outline Form ES-D-1 I Facility:

R. E. Ginna Scenario No.: 3 Op-Test No.: 1 Examiners: Operators: - - - - Initial Conditions: 70%, BOL Turnover:

SI Pump A 00s to refurbish failed motor, S/G A LT-461 00s due to failed electronics Event No. Malf. No. Event Description - - Event Type* R-ATC, N-BO P/S RO N/A Power Ascension 1 RCS11 C, ROD1 2 I-ALL, TS-SRO 2 Loop A Tcold TE-401 B Fails Low, Rod Block failed ~~ Conta.inment Recirculation Fan Cooler A Trips OVR-MISOGB, OVR-M IS06D, A-EDS16 3 TS-SRO I-ATC/SRO 4 CVCl OA VCT Level Transmitter LT-112 Fails High Feedwater Control Valve B, FCV-476, Auto Controller Fails High, w/Manual Control available 5 FDW07C I -BO P/S RO STM03, STM05A, STM05B, SIS02A, SIS02B Main Steam line break downstream of MSIVs, both MSlVs fail to close automatically or from the MCB, SI fails to actuate when setpoint reached M-ALL, I-ATC 6 " (N)orrnal, (R)eactivity, (I)nstrument, (C)ornponent, (M)ajor 1- Revision 00 Page 1 of 16 Appendix D Scenario Outline Form ES-D-1 7 - Facility:

R. E. Ginna Scenario No.: 4 Op-Test No.: 1 Examiners: Operators: - - - Initial Conditions: 70%, MOL Turnover:

SI Pump A 00s to refurbish failed motor, S/G A LT-461 00s due to failed Electronics, MDAFVJ Pump A 00s for impeller replacement Event No. 1 2 3 4 5 Malf. No. RCS16 SGN03B cvco5 FDW04B N/A CND08, EDS04B, RPS05A,

RPS05B, RPS07M, RPS07N, FDW12 Event Type* C-ATC/S RO, TS-SRO I-BO P/S RO , TS-SRO I-ATC/SRO C-BOP/SRO N-BO P/S RO , R-ATC M-All, C-BOP Event Description - - High RCS Activity ~~~ Steam Generator A Pressure Transmitter PT-469 Fails Low Letdown Non-Regenerative Heat Exchanger Outlet Temperature TT- 130 Fails Low Feedwater Pump B Lube Oil System Leak Down Power to 50% Condensate Line Break, Bus 16 Fault, Loss of Feedwater

& Preferred AFW Revision 00 Page 1 of 18

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML083110590&oldid=1110084"