ML060950370
| ML060950370 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png |
| Issue date: | 03/22/2006 |
| From: | Morgan M NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR/RLRC |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| morgan M NRR/NRC/DLR/RLRC, 415-2232 | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML060950189 | List:
|
| References | |
| %dam200611, TAC MC9668 | |
| Download: ML060950370 (10) | |
Text
AUDIT WORKSHEET GALL REPORT AMP PLANT: ______________________________
LRA AMP: __________________________ REVIEWER: ______________________
GALL AMP: XI.M15, Neutron Noise Monitoring DATE: __________________________
Program Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding Element Program A. The program relies on monitoring the excore neutron detector Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Description signals due to core motion to detect and monitor significant loss Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
of axial preload at the core support barrels upper support flange in pressurized water reactors (PWRs). This inservice monitoring program is based on the recommendations from the American Society of Mechanical Engineers operation and maintenance Comment:
standards and guides (ASME OM-S/G)-1997, Part 5, Inservice Monitoring of Core Support Barrel Axial Preload in Pressurized Water Reactors Power Plants.
- 1. Scope of A. The program includes measures to monitor and detect loss of Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Program axial preload (loss of axial restraint) at the core support barrels Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
upper support flange in PWRs. The loss of axial restraint may arise from long-term changes resulting from abnormal wear at the reactor vessel core barrel mating surface or short-term changes due to improper installation of the reactor internals. Comment The program also includes guidelines for further data acquisition that may be needed to define future plant operation and/or program plans in order to maintain the capability of the structure/components to perform the intended function.
- 2. Preventive A. The program is a monitoring/detection program that provides Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Actions early indication and detection of the onset of aging degradation Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
of the core support barrelhold-down mechanism prior to a scheduled shutdown, thus reducing outage time and avoiding potential damage to the core support barrel and fuel assemblies. The AMP does not rely on preventive actions. Comment:
XI.M15 Neutron Noise Monitoring 1
Program Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding Element
- 3. Parameters A. The program relies on the use of excore neutron detector Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Monitored/ signals to provide information on the conditions of the axial Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Inspected preload. The excore neutron flux signal is composed of a steady state, direct current (DC) component that arises from the neutron flux produced by the power operation of the reactor, as well as a fluctuating (noise-like) component. This fluctuating Comment:
signal arises from the core reactivity changes due to lateral core motion from the loss of axial preload. This core motion is mainly the result of beam mode vibration of the core support barrel.
Despite the fact that this beam mode vibration provides only a very weak neutron noise source, it may be reliably detected and identified through Fourier Analysis of the fluctuating signal component of the excore neutron flux signal. This signal component has the characteristics of having 180-degree shifts and a high degree of coherence between signals obtained from pairs of excore neutron detectors that are positioned on diametrically opposite sides of the core. The neutron noise signals are characterized by parameters, which include the auto correlation, cross correlation, coherence, and phase. These parameters are to be monitored and evaluated.
- 4. Detection of A. Flow-induced vibration of the core support barrel will change Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Aging Effects the thickness of the downcomer annulus (water gap). This Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
variation in the thickness will give rise to fluctuating changes in the neutron flux, as monitored by the excore neutron detectors.
The natural frequencies and the amplitudes of the vibratory motion of the core barrel are related to the effective axial Comment:
preload at the upper support flange of the core support barrel.
Monitoring of the neutron noise signal obtained with the neutron flux detectors located around the external periphery of the reactor vessel provides detection of anomalous vibrational motion of the core support barrel, and hence significant loss of the axial preload. Decrease in the axial preload leads to decreases in the core support barrel beam mode frequency and an increase in the magnitude of the noise signal. The overall XI.M15 Neutron Noise Monitoring 2
Program Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding Element effect of a decrease in the axial preload is to shift the neutron noise power spectrum toward larger amplitudes for the lower frequency region.
- 5. Monitoring A. The neutron noise random fluctuation in the signals from the Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No and Trending excore detectors are monitored, recorded, and analyzed to Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
identify changes in the beam mode natural frequency of the core support barrel and its direction of motion for the purpose of a timely determination of the need and urgency for a detailed inspection and examination of the reactor vessel internals hold- Comment:
down mechanism and mating component surfaces. These activities and analytical methodology are performed, and associated personnel are qualified, in accordance with site-controlled procedures and processes as indicated by vendor, industry, or regulatory guidance documents.
The neutron noise monitoring program has three separate phases: a baseline phase, a surveillance phase, and a diagnostic phase. The baseline phase establishes the database to be used as a reference for developing limits and trends in the surveillance phase and to support data evaluation and interpretation in the diagnostic phase. During the baseline phase, data on the time history and DC level of each neutron flux detector and each cross-core detector pair are obtained.
From this database, the characteristic amplitudes and frequencies of the core barrel motion are extracted. The wide and narrow frequency bands with their associated normalized root mean square (NRMS) values are established. The ASME-OMS/G-1997, Part 5, recommends collecting the baseline data during the first fuel cycle that the neutron noise monitoring program is applied to an already operating plant. Whenever XI.M15 Neutron Noise Monitoring 3
Program Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding Element significant changes takes place for the core, reactor internals, or operating conditions, additional baseline data is obtained.
B. In the surveillance phase, routine neutron noise monitoring of Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No normal plant operations is performed over the life of the plant. Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
The DC level and data for frequency analysis of each detector and two pair of cross-core detectors, may be collected.
Comparisons of the measured amplitude and frequency data, with limits established from the baseline data, are made. In Comment:
using neutron noise monitoring, accounts are taken of the effect of core burn-up, decreasing boron concentration, changes in fuel management, and in-core contact with the reactor vessel mechanical snubbers, which may affect the neutron noise signatures. Proper allowances for these factors during the baseline and surveillance phases will help toward detecting loss of axial preload before the core barrel becomes sufficiently free to wear against the reactor vessel and will also reduce the need to invoke the diagnostic phase.
C. If the diagnostic phase becomes necessary, then evaluations Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No are carried out to establish whether any deviations from the Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
baseline data detected during the surveillance phase arises from core barrel motion due to loss of axial preload. The need and frequency of additional data collection on the time history and DC level of each neutron flux detector and each cross-core Comment:
detector pair collection are guided by the results of these evaluations.
XI.M15 Neutron Noise Monitoring 4
Program Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding Element
- 6. Acceptance A. If evaluation of the baseline data indicates normal operation Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Criteria for the applicable structure/component, the surveillance phase Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
may commence. If evaluation indicates anomalous behavior, the monitoring program enters the diagnostic phase.
Comment:
B. During the surveillance phase, if deviations from the baseline Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No fall within predetermined acceptable limits, the surveillance will Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
continue. Otherwise, the diagnostic phase will commence.
Comment:
- 7. Corrective A. Initial results from the diagnostic phase of the program may Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Actions be used to determine whether there is a need to increase the Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
minimum frequency with which the surveillance data are acquired. In addition, if necessary, corrective actions may be taken to change the type of data acquisition and analysis from that previously recommended for the surveillance part of the Comment:
program. The data trends may be established to guide further data acquisition that may be needed to define future plant operation and/or program plans. As discussed in the appendix to this report, the staff finds the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, acceptable to address the corrective actions.
- 8. A. Site quality assurance (QA) procedures, review and approval Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Confirmation processes, and administrative controls are implemented in Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Process accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B. As discussed in the appendix to this report, the staff finds the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, acceptable to address the confirmation process and administrative controls. Comment:
- 9. A. See Item 8, above. Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Administrative Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Controls XI.M15 Neutron Noise Monitoring 5
Program Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding Element Comment:
- 10. Operating A. The neutron noise monitoring program and procedures were Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Experience developed by the industry and published as a guide in ASME Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
OM-S/G-1997, Part 5, an American National Standard. This monitoring program and procedures have been effective in limited industry use for monitoring and detecting loss of core support barrel axial preload in PWR power plants. Comment:
XI.M15 Neutron Noise Monitoring 6
EXCEPTIONS Item Program Elements LRA Exception Description Basis for Accepting Exception Documents Reviewed Number (Identifier, Para.# and/or Page #)
1.
2.
ENHANCEMENTS Item Program Elements LRA Enhancement Description Basis for Accepting Enhancement Documents Reviewed Number (Identifier, Para.# and/or Page #)
1.
2.
DOCUMENT REVIEWED DURING AUDIT Document Number Identifier (number) Title Revision and/or Date 1.
2.
3.
4.
.
XI.M15 Neutron Noise Monitoring 7