ML060950195
Text
Plant-Specific Program 1
AUDIT WORKSHEET GALL REPORT AMP PLANT: ______________________________
LRA AMP: __________________________
REVIEWER: ______________________
GALL AMP: Plant-Specific Program DATE: __________________________
Program Element Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding Program Description
- 1. Scope of Program A. The specific program necessary for license renewal should be identified. The scope of the program should include the specific structures and components of which the program manages the aging.
Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment
- 2. Preventive Actions A. The activities for prevention and mitigation programs should be described. These actions should mitigate or prevent aging degradation.
Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment:
B. For condition or performance monitoring programs, they do not rely on preventive actions and thus, this information need not be provided. More than one type of aging management program may be implemented to ensure that aging effects are managed.
Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment
Plant-Specific Program 2
Program Element Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding
- 3. Parameters Monitored/
Inspected A. The parameters to be monitored or inspected should be identified and linked to the degradation of the particular structure and component intended function(s).
Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment:
B. For a condition monitoring program, the parameter monitored or inspected should detect the presence and extent of aging effects. Some examples are measurements of wall thickness and detection and sizing of cracks.
Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment C. For a performance monitoring program, a link should be established between the degradation of the particular structure or component intended function(s) and the parameter(s) being monitored. A performance monitoring program may not ensure the structure and component intended function(s) without linking the degradation of passive intended functions with the performance being monitored.
Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment D. For prevention and mitigation programs, the parameters monitored should be the specific parameters being controlled to achieve prevention or mitigation of aging effects.
Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment
- 4. Detection of Aging Effects A. The parameters to be monitored or inspected should be appropriate to ensure that the structure and component intended function(s) will be adequately maintained for license renewal under all CLB design conditions.
Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment:
Plant-Specific Program 3
Program Element Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding B. Provide information that links the parameters to be monitored or inspected to the aging effects being managed.
Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment:
C. Thus, the effects of aging on a structure or component should be managed to ensure its availability to perform its intended function(s) as designed when called upon.
Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment D. A program based solely on detecting structure and component failure should not be considered as an effective aging management program for license renewal.
Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment E. This program element describes when, where, and how program data are collected (i.e., all aspects of activities to collect data as part of the program).
Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment F. Provide justification, including codes and standards referenced, that the technique and frequency are adequate to detect the aging effects before a loss of SC intended function. A program based solely on detecting SC failures is not considered an effective aging management program.
Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment
Plant-Specific Program 4
Program Element Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding G. When sampling is used to inspect a group of SCs, provide the basis for the inspection population and sample size. The inspection population should be based on such aspects of the SCs as a similarity of materials of construction, fabrication, procurement, design, installation, operating environment, or aging effects. The sample size should be based on such aspects of the SCs as the specific aging effect, location, existing technical information, system and structure design, materials of construction, service environment, or previous failure history.
Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment H. The samples should be biased toward concern in the period of extended operation. Provisions should also be included on expanding the sample size when degradation is detected in the initial sample.
Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment:
- 5. Monitoring and Trending A. Monitoring and trending activities should be described, and they should provide predictability of the extent of degradation and thus effect timely corrective or mitigative actions. Plant-specific and/or industry-wide operating experience may be considered in evaluating the appropriateness of the technique and frequency.
Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment:
B. This program element describes how the data collected are evaluated and may also include trending for a forward look. This includes an evaluation of the results against the acceptance criteria and a prediction regarding the rate of degradation in order to confirm that timing of the next scheduled inspection will occur before a loss of SC intended function.
Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment:
C. The parameter or indicator trended should be described.
Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment
Plant-Specific Program 5
Program Element Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding D. The methodology for analyzing the inspection or test results against the acceptance criteria should be described.
Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment E. Trending is a comparison of the current monitoring results with previous monitoring results in order to make predictions for the future.
Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment
- 6. Acceptance Criteria A. The acceptance criteria of the program and its basis should be described.
Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment:
B. The acceptance criteria, against which the need for corrective actions will be evaluated, should ensure that the structure and component intended function(s) are maintained under all CLB design conditions during the period of extended operation.
Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment C. The program should include a methodology for analyzing the results against applicable acceptance criteria.
Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment
Plant-Specific Program 6
Program Element Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding D. Corrective action is taken, such as piping replacement, before reaching this acceptance criterion.
Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment E. Acceptance criteria could be specific numerical values, or could consist of a discussion of the process for calculating specific numerical values of conditional acceptance criteria to ensure that the structure and component intended function(s) will be maintained under all CLB design conditions. Information from available references may be cited.
Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment F. It is not necessary to justify any acceptance criteria taken directly from the design basis information that is included in the FSAR because that is a part of the CLB. Also, it is not necessary to discuss CLB design loads if the acceptance criteria do not permit degradation because a structure and component without degradation should continue to function as originally designed.
Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment G. Acceptance criteria, which do permit degradation, are based on maintaining the intended function under all CLB design loads.
Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment H. Qualitative inspections should be performed to same predetermined criteria as quantitative inspections by personnel in accordance with ASME Code and through approved site specific programs.
Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment
Plant-Specific Program 7
Program Element Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding
- 7. Corrective Actions Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment
- 8.
Confirmation Process Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment
- 9.
Administrative Controls Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment
- 10. Operating Experience A. Operating experience with existing programs should be discussed. The operating experience of aging management programs, including past corrective actions resulting in program enhancements or additional programs, should be considered. A past failure would not necessarily invalidate an aging management program because the feedback from operating experience should have resulted in appropriate program enhancements or new programs. This information can show where an existing program has succeeded and where it has failed (if at all) in intercepting aging degradation in a timely manner. This information should provide objective evidence to support the conclusion that the effects of aging will be managed adequately so that the structure and component intended function(s) will be maintained during the period of extended operation.
Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment:
Plant-Specific Program 8
EXCEPTIONS Item Number Program Elements LRA Exception Description Basis for Accepting Exception Documents Reviewed (Identifier, Para.# and/or Page #)
- 1.
- 2.
ENHANCEMENTS Item Number Program Elements LRA Enhancement Description Basis for Accepting Enhancement Documents Reviewed (Identifier, Para.# and/or Page #)
- 1.
- 2.
DOCUMENT REVIEWED DURING AUDIT Document Number Identifier (number)
Title Revision and/or Date
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
.