ML112840284: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Docket No. 05000003 Joseph E. Pollock Site Vice President UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I 475 ALLENDALE ROAD KING OF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19406-1415 October 11, 2011 License No. DPR-5 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, NY 10511-0249 SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 05000003/201100B, ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., BUCHANAN, NEW YORK SITE -CORRECTED COPY Dear Mr. Pollock: On September 26,2011, the NRC issued inspection report, No. 05000003/201100B, documenting an NRC inspection of an examination of your licensed activities as they relate to radiation safety and to compliance with the Commission's regulations and the license conditions. After the report was issued, errors were identified by your staff and reported to the NRC. The errors were located in the | {{#Wiki_filter:Docket No. 05000003 Joseph E. Pollock Site Vice President | ||
Docket No. 05000003 Joseph E. Pollock Site Vice President Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, NY 10511-0249 October 11, 2011 License No. DPR-5 SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 05000003/201100B, ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., BUCHANAN, NEW YORK SITE -CORRECTED COpy Dear Mr. Pollock: On September 26, 2011, the NRC issued inspection report, No. 05000003/2011 OOB, documenting an NRC inspection of an examination of your licensed activities as they relate to radiation safety and to compliance with the Commission's regulations and the license conditions. After the report was issued, errors were identified by your staff and reported to the NRC. The errors were located in the | UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY | ||
8.0 Effluent and Environmental Monitoring Programs a. Inspection Scope (IP 84750) The inspector evaluated the radioactive effluent control and the site radiological environmental monitoring programs. The evaluation included a review of the annual radioactive effluent release report for 2010, the annual radiological environmental operating report for 2010, and the associated analytical results for each program. The inspection also included a review of the Unit 1 TS and the ODCM. The inspector reviewed the associated radioactive liquid release permits, the analytical sample results, and the projected doses to the public associated with the groundwater in-leakage into the North Curtain Drain (NCO) and Sphere Foundation Drain (SFD) sumps. The inspector also reviewed the gaseous effluent results, the projected doses to the public associated with the stack vent, and the radiological environmental monitoring program, including the analytical results associated with samples of shoreline sediment, fish, and water from January 2011 through August 2011. b. Observations and Findings The annual effluent and environmental monitoring reports demonstrated that the calculated doses were well below regulatory dose criteria of 10 CFR 50, Appendix I. The radioactive liquid effluent release permits were completed in accordance with the ODCM. From a review of the analytical data, the inspector verified that the projected doses to the public from the liquid and gaseous effluent from Unit 1 were below TS limits and were performed in accordance with the ODCM and the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR 50.36a) for maintaining doses to the public from radioactive effluents as low as is reasonably achievable. The inspector verified that the licensee collected and analyzed the stack vent samples, NCO and SFD sump samples, and the liquid discharge monitor samples within the required frequencies and that the sample collection was conducted in accordance with applicable procedures. The inspector reviewed the analytical water sample results related to the groundwater monitoring program, specifically the NCO and SFD analytical sample results from January 2010 through December 2010. The levels of tritium ranged from 13,500 picoCuries per Liter (pCilL) to 3,340 pCilL for the NCO and from 642 pCilL to 480 pCi/L for the SFD. The licensee informed the inspector that the levels of radioactivity appear to be trending downward. The inspector's review of this data confirmed the licensee's conclusion. The inspector reviewed the analytical results for shoreline sediment, fish, and water from January 2011 through August 2011 for the radiological environmental monitoring program and noted that the results indicated that no significant radioactivity was identified in fish and the environment. c. Conclusions The licensee effectively implemented and maintained the radioactive effluent controls program, the groundwater monitoring program, and the radiological monitoring program. No safety concerns or violations were identified. 5 | COMMISSION | ||
REGION I 475 ALLENDALE | |||
ROAD KING OF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA | |||
19406-1415 | |||
October 11, 2011 License No. DPR-5 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, NY 10511-0249 | |||
SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION | |||
REPORT NO. 05000003/201100B, ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., BUCHANAN, NEW YORK SITE -CORRECTED | |||
COPY Dear Mr. Pollock: On September | |||
26,2011, the NRC issued inspection | |||
report, No. 05000003/201100B, documenting | |||
an NRC inspection | |||
of an examination | |||
of your licensed activities | |||
as they relate to radiation | |||
safety and to compliance | |||
with the Commission's | |||
regulations | |||
and the license conditions. | |||
After the report was issued, errors were identified | |||
by your staff and reported to the NRC. The errors were located in the 2 nd paragraph | |||
of section B.b on page 5. Specifically, a comparison | |||
of the groundwater | |||
data was not performed | |||
because the data for 2011 was not available | |||
during the inspection. | |||
The dates reviewed for the groundwater | |||
monitoring | |||
program, related to the North Curtain Drain (NCO) and the Sphere Foundation | |||
Drain (SFD) analytical | |||
sample results, were from January 2010 through December 2010. Also, the levels of tritium ranged from 13,500 picoCuries | |||
per Liter (pCi/L) to 3,340 pCi/L for the NCO, rather than 13,500 picoCuries | |||
per Liter (pCi/L) to 3 pCi/L for the NCO. We have corrected | |||
this page and have enclosed the corrected | |||
copy of the page. Please replace this page of the report with the enclosed page. We apologize | |||
for any inconvenience | |||
or problems this error may have caused you. Enclosure: | |||
As Stated cc: Distribution | |||
via ListServ State of New York | |||
dith A. Joust:' ecommissioning | |||
Branch Division of Nuclear Materials | |||
Safety | |||
Docket No. 05000003 Joseph E. Pollock Site Vice President | |||
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, NY 10511-0249 | |||
October 11, 2011 License No. DPR-5 SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION | |||
REPORT NO. 05000003/201100B, ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., BUCHANAN, NEW YORK SITE -CORRECTED | |||
COpy Dear Mr. Pollock: On September | |||
26, 2011, the NRC issued inspection | |||
report, No. 05000003/2011 | |||
OOB, documenting | |||
an NRC inspection | |||
of an examination | |||
of your licensed activities | |||
as they relate to radiation | |||
safety and to compliance | |||
with the Commission's | |||
regulations | |||
and the license conditions. | |||
After the report was issued, errors were identified | |||
by your staff and reported to the NRC. The errors were located in the 2 nd paragraph | |||
of section B.b on page 5. Specifically, a comparison | |||
of the groundwater | |||
data was not performed | |||
because the data for 2011 was not available | |||
during the inspection. | |||
The dates reviewed for the groundwater | |||
monitoring | |||
program, related to the North Curtain Drain (NCO) and the Sphere Foundation | |||
Drain (SFD) analytical | |||
sample results, were from January 2010 through December 2010. Also, the levels of tritium ranged from 13,500 picoCuries | |||
per Liter (pCilL) to 3,340 pCi/L for the NCO, rather than 13,500 picoCuries | |||
per Liter (pCi/L) to 3 pCi/L for the NCO. We have corrected | |||
this page and have enclosed the corrected | |||
copy of the page. Please replace this page of the report with the enclosed page. We apologize | |||
for any inconvenience | |||
or problems this error may have caused you. Enclosure: | |||
As Stated cc: Distribution | |||
via ListServ State of New YorkDistribution | |||
w/encl: W. Dean, RA (R10RAMAIL | |||
RESOURCE) | |||
D. Lew, ORA (R10RAMAIL | |||
RESOURCE) | |||
Sincerely, Original signed by Judith A. Joustra Judith A. Joustra, Chief Decommissioning | |||
Branch Division of Nuclear Materials | |||
Safety S. McCarver, DRP M. Jennerich, DRP M. Catts, SRI A. Ayegbusi, RI M. Ferdas, DNMS L. Kauffman, DNMS B. Watson, FSME S. Giebel, FSME D. Roberts, DRP (R1DRPMAIL | |||
RESOURCE) | |||
D. Ayres, DRP (R1DRPMAIL | |||
RESOURCE) | |||
C. Miller, DRS (R1DRSMAIL | |||
RESOURCE) | |||
P. Wilson, DRS (R1DRSMAIL | |||
RESOURCE) | |||
J. McHale, RI OEDO M. Gray, DRP P. Cataldo, SRI M. Halter, RI R. Lorson, DNMS D. Collins, DNMS D. Hochmuth, DRP RidsNrrPMlndianPoint | |||
Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl1-1 | |||
Resource ROPreport | |||
Resource@nrc | |||
B. Bickett, DRP J. Joustra, DNMS DOCUMENT NAME: G:\WordDocs\Current\lnsp | |||
Letter\LDPR-5.2011 | |||
OOa.Corrected | |||
Copy. doc SUNSI Review Complete: | |||
LKauffman | |||
After declaring | |||
this document "An Official Agency Record" it will be released to the Public. To receive a cop of this document, Indicate in the box: "C" = Copy w/o attach/encl "E" = Copy w/ attach/end "N" = No copy ML 112840284 | |||
-Ltr; M L 112840312 | |||
-Rpt OFFICE DNMS/RI IN DNMS/RI I I J NAME LKauffman/lak* | |||
JJoustra.JAJ | |||
DATE 09/30/11 10/11/11 | |||
8.0 Effluent and Environmental | |||
Monitoring | |||
Programs a. Inspection | |||
Scope (IP 84750) The inspector | |||
evaluated | |||
the radioactive | |||
effluent control and the site radiological | |||
environmental | |||
monitoring | |||
programs. | |||
The evaluation | |||
included a review of the annual radioactive | |||
effluent release report for 2010, the annual radiological | |||
environmental | |||
operating | |||
report for 2010, and the associated | |||
analytical | |||
results for each program. The inspection | |||
also included a review of the Unit 1 TS and the ODCM. The inspector | |||
reviewed the associated | |||
radioactive | |||
liquid release permits, the analytical | |||
sample results, and the projected | |||
doses to the public associated | |||
with the groundwater | |||
in-leakage | |||
into the North Curtain | |||
Drain (NCO) and Sphere Foundation | |||
Drain (SFD) sumps. The inspector | |||
also reviewed the gaseous effluent results, the projected | |||
doses to the public associated | |||
with the stack vent, and the radiological | |||
environmental | |||
monitoring | |||
program, including | |||
the analytical | |||
results associated | |||
with samples of shoreline | |||
sediment, fish, and water from January 2011 through August 2011. b. Observations | |||
and Findings The annual effluent and environmental | |||
monitoring | |||
reports demonstrated | |||
that the calculated | |||
doses were well below regulatory | |||
dose criteria of 10 CFR 50, Appendix I. The radioactive | |||
liquid effluent release permits were completed | |||
in accordance | |||
with the ODCM. From a review of the analytical | |||
data, the inspector | |||
verified that the projected | |||
doses to the public from the liquid and gaseous effluent from Unit 1 were below TS limits and were performed | |||
in accordance | |||
with the ODCM and the Code of Federal Regulations | |||
(10 CFR 50.36a) for maintaining | |||
doses to the public from radioactive | |||
effluents | |||
as low as is reasonably | |||
achievable. | |||
The inspector | |||
verified that the licensee collected | |||
and analyzed the stack vent samples, NCO and SFD sump samples, and the liquid discharge | |||
monitor samples within the required frequencies | |||
and that the sample collection | |||
was conducted | |||
in accordance | |||
with applicable | |||
procedures. | |||
The inspector | |||
reviewed the analytical | |||
water sample results related to the groundwater | |||
monitoring | |||
program, specifically | |||
the NCO and SFD analytical | |||
sample results from January 2010 through December 2010. The levels of tritium ranged from 13,500 picoCuries | |||
per Liter (pCilL) to 3,340 pCilL for the NCO and from 642 pCilL to 480 pCi/L for the SFD. The licensee informed the inspector | |||
that the levels of radioactivity | |||
appear to be trending downward. | |||
The inspector's | |||
review of this data confirmed | |||
the licensee's | |||
conclusion. | |||
The inspector | |||
reviewed the analytical | |||
results for shoreline | |||
sediment, fish, and water from January 2011 through August 2011 for the radiological | |||
environmental | |||
monitoring | |||
program and noted that the results indicated | |||
that no significant | |||
radioactivity | |||
was identified | |||
in fish and the environment. | |||
c. Conclusions | |||
The licensee effectively | |||
implemented | |||
and maintained | |||
the radioactive | |||
effluent controls program, the groundwater | |||
monitoring | |||
program, and the radiological | |||
monitoring | |||
program. No safety concerns or violations | |||
were identified. | |||
5 | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 21:18, 2 August 2018
ML112840284 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Indian Point |
Issue date: | 10/11/2011 |
From: | Joustra J A Decommissioning Branch I |
To: | Pollock J E Entergy Nuclear Operations |
References | |
IR-11-008 | |
Download: ML112840284 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000003/2011008
Text
Docket No. 05000003 Joseph E. Pollock Site Vice President
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
REGION I 475 ALLENDALE
ROAD KING OF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA
19406-1415
October 11, 2011 License No. DPR-5 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, NY 10511-0249
SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION
REPORT NO. 05000003/201100B, ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., BUCHANAN, NEW YORK SITE -CORRECTED
COPY Dear Mr. Pollock: On September
26,2011, the NRC issued inspection
report, No. 05000003/201100B, documenting
an NRC inspection
of an examination
of your licensed activities
as they relate to radiation
safety and to compliance
with the Commission's
regulations
and the license conditions.
After the report was issued, errors were identified
by your staff and reported to the NRC. The errors were located in the 2 nd paragraph
of section B.b on page 5. Specifically, a comparison
of the groundwater
data was not performed
because the data for 2011 was not available
during the inspection.
The dates reviewed for the groundwater
monitoring
program, related to the North Curtain Drain (NCO) and the Sphere Foundation
Drain (SFD) analytical
sample results, were from January 2010 through December 2010. Also, the levels of tritium ranged from 13,500 picoCuries
per Liter (pCi/L) to 3,340 pCi/L for the NCO, rather than 13,500 picoCuries
per Liter (pCi/L) to 3 pCi/L for the NCO. We have corrected
this page and have enclosed the corrected
copy of the page. Please replace this page of the report with the enclosed page. We apologize
for any inconvenience
or problems this error may have caused you. Enclosure:
As Stated cc: Distribution
via ListServ State of New York
dith A. Joust:' ecommissioning
Branch Division of Nuclear Materials
Safety
Docket No. 05000003 Joseph E. Pollock Site Vice President
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, NY 10511-0249
October 11, 2011 License No. DPR-5 SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION
REPORT NO. 05000003/201100B, ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., BUCHANAN, NEW YORK SITE -CORRECTED
COpy Dear Mr. Pollock: On September
26, 2011, the NRC issued inspection
report, No. 05000003/2011
OOB, documenting
an NRC inspection
of an examination
of your licensed activities
as they relate to radiation
safety and to compliance
with the Commission's
regulations
and the license conditions.
After the report was issued, errors were identified
by your staff and reported to the NRC. The errors were located in the 2 nd paragraph
of section B.b on page 5. Specifically, a comparison
of the groundwater
data was not performed
because the data for 2011 was not available
during the inspection.
The dates reviewed for the groundwater
monitoring
program, related to the North Curtain Drain (NCO) and the Sphere Foundation
Drain (SFD) analytical
sample results, were from January 2010 through December 2010. Also, the levels of tritium ranged from 13,500 picoCuries
per Liter (pCilL) to 3,340 pCi/L for the NCO, rather than 13,500 picoCuries
per Liter (pCi/L) to 3 pCi/L for the NCO. We have corrected
this page and have enclosed the corrected
copy of the page. Please replace this page of the report with the enclosed page. We apologize
for any inconvenience
or problems this error may have caused you. Enclosure:
As Stated cc: Distribution
via ListServ State of New YorkDistribution
w/encl: W. Dean, RA (R10RAMAIL
RESOURCE)
D. Lew, ORA (R10RAMAIL
RESOURCE)
Sincerely, Original signed by Judith A. Joustra Judith A. Joustra, Chief Decommissioning
Branch Division of Nuclear Materials
Safety S. McCarver, DRP M. Jennerich, DRP M. Catts, SRI A. Ayegbusi, RI M. Ferdas, DNMS L. Kauffman, DNMS B. Watson, FSME S. Giebel, FSME D. Roberts, DRP (R1DRPMAIL
RESOURCE)
D. Ayres, DRP (R1DRPMAIL
RESOURCE)
C. Miller, DRS (R1DRSMAIL
RESOURCE)
P. Wilson, DRS (R1DRSMAIL
RESOURCE)
J. McHale, RI OEDO M. Gray, DRP P. Cataldo, SRI M. Halter, RI R. Lorson, DNMS D. Collins, DNMS D. Hochmuth, DRP RidsNrrPMlndianPoint
Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl1-1
Resource ROPreport
Resource@nrc
B. Bickett, DRP J. Joustra, DNMS DOCUMENT NAME: G:\WordDocs\Current\lnsp
Letter\LDPR-5.2011
OOa.Corrected
Copy. doc SUNSI Review Complete:
LKauffman
After declaring
this document "An Official Agency Record" it will be released to the Public. To receive a cop of this document, Indicate in the box: "C" = Copy w/o attach/encl "E" = Copy w/ attach/end "N" = No copy ML 112840284
-Ltr; M L 112840312
-Rpt OFFICE DNMS/RI IN DNMS/RI I I J NAME LKauffman/lak*
JJoustra.JAJ
DATE 09/30/11 10/11/11
8.0 Effluent and Environmental
Monitoring
Programs a. Inspection
Scope (IP 84750) The inspector
evaluated
the radioactive
effluent control and the site radiological
environmental
monitoring
programs.
The evaluation
included a review of the annual radioactive
effluent release report for 2010, the annual radiological
environmental
operating
report for 2010, and the associated
analytical
results for each program. The inspection
also included a review of the Unit 1 TS and the ODCM. The inspector
reviewed the associated
radioactive
liquid release permits, the analytical
sample results, and the projected
doses to the public associated
with the groundwater
in-leakage
into the North Curtain
Drain (NCO) and Sphere Foundation
Drain (SFD) sumps. The inspector
also reviewed the gaseous effluent results, the projected
doses to the public associated
with the stack vent, and the radiological
environmental
monitoring
program, including
the analytical
results associated
with samples of shoreline
sediment, fish, and water from January 2011 through August 2011. b. Observations
and Findings The annual effluent and environmental
monitoring
reports demonstrated
that the calculated
doses were well below regulatory
dose criteria of 10 CFR 50, Appendix I. The radioactive
liquid effluent release permits were completed
in accordance
with the ODCM. From a review of the analytical
data, the inspector
verified that the projected
doses to the public from the liquid and gaseous effluent from Unit 1 were below TS limits and were performed
in accordance
with the ODCM and the Code of Federal Regulations
(10 CFR 50.36a) for maintaining
doses to the public from radioactive
effluents
as low as is reasonably
achievable.
The inspector
verified that the licensee collected
and analyzed the stack vent samples, NCO and SFD sump samples, and the liquid discharge
monitor samples within the required frequencies
and that the sample collection
was conducted
in accordance
with applicable
procedures.
The inspector
reviewed the analytical
water sample results related to the groundwater
monitoring
program, specifically
the NCO and SFD analytical
sample results from January 2010 through December 2010. The levels of tritium ranged from 13,500 picoCuries
per Liter (pCilL) to 3,340 pCilL for the NCO and from 642 pCilL to 480 pCi/L for the SFD. The licensee informed the inspector
that the levels of radioactivity
appear to be trending downward.
The inspector's
review of this data confirmed
the licensee's
conclusion.
The inspector
reviewed the analytical
results for shoreline
sediment, fish, and water from January 2011 through August 2011 for the radiological
environmental
monitoring
program and noted that the results indicated
that no significant
radioactivity
was identified
in fish and the environment.
c. Conclusions
The licensee effectively
implemented
and maintained
the radioactive
effluent controls program, the groundwater
monitoring
program, and the radiological
monitoring
program. No safety concerns or violations
were identified.
5