IR 05000440/2012406: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
[[Issue date::June 25, 2012]] | [[Issue date::June 25, 2012]] | ||
EA-12-074 Mr. Vito Kaminskas Site Vice President, Nuclear FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Perry Nuclear Power Plant P. O. Box 97, 10 Center Road, A-PY-A290 Perry, OH 44081-0097 | EA-12-074 | ||
Mr. Vito Kaminskas Site Vice President, Nuclear | |||
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Perry Nuclear Power Plant P. O. Box 97, 10 Center Road, A-PY-A290 Perry, OH 44081-0097 | |||
SUBJECT: FINAL SIGNIFICANCE DETERMINATION OF A SECURITY-RELATED GREATER THAN GREEN FINDING WITH ASSESSMENT FOLLOWUP AND NOTICE OF VIOLATION; NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 05000440/2012406(DRS); PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT | SUBJECT: FINAL SIGNIFICANCE DETERMINATION OF A SECURITY-RELATED GREATER THAN GREEN FINDING WITH ASSESSMENT FOLLOWUP AND NOTICE OF VIOLATION; NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 05000440/2012406(DRS); PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT | ||
==Dear Mr. Kaminskas:== | ==Dear Mr. Kaminskas:== | ||
This letter provides you the final significance determination of the preliminary Greater than Green finding discussed in our previous communication dated May 7, 2012, which included U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Inspection Report No. 05000440/2012405(DRS). The Greater than Green finding was discussed in detail in Section 4OA5 of the subject inspection report. In a telephone conversation with Mr. Richard Skokowski of NRC, Region III, on May 18, 2012, Mr. Lloyd Zerr of your staff indicated that FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company did not contest the characterization of this finding, and | This letter provides you the final significance determination of the preliminary Greater than Green finding discussed in our previous communication dated May 7, 2012, which included U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Inspection Report No. 05000440/2012405(DRS). The Greater than Green finding was discussed in detail in Section 4OA5 of the subject inspection report. | ||
In a telephone conversation with Mr. Richard Skokowski of NRC, Region III, on May 18, 2012, Mr. Lloyd Zerr of your staff indicated that FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company did not contest the characterization of this finding, and t hat you declined your opportunity to discuss this issue in a Regulatory Conference or to provide a written response. FirstEnergy later followed this verbal notification with a letter dated June 1, 2012. | |||
After considering the information developed during the inspection, the NRC has concluded that the inspection finding is of at least low to moderate security significance, is appropriately characterized as Greater than Green, and will require a supplemental NRC inspection. | After considering the information developed during the inspection, the NRC has concluded that the inspection finding is of at least low to moderate security significance, is appropriately characterized as Greater than Green, and will require a supplemental NRC inspection. | ||
Line 33: | Line 39: | ||
According to NRC Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, appeal rights only apply to those licensees that have either attended a Regulatory Conference or have submitted a written response to the preliminary determination letter which submits additional information not previously considered by the NRC staff. In its June 1, 2012, letter, FirstEnergy noted that it did not contest the facts or assumptions used by the NRC to arrive at the finding and its significance. By this statement, FirstEnergy gave up its right to appeal the finding. | According to NRC Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, appeal rights only apply to those licensees that have either attended a Regulatory Conference or have submitted a written response to the preliminary determination letter which submits additional information not previously considered by the NRC staff. In its June 1, 2012, letter, FirstEnergy noted that it did not contest the facts or assumptions used by the NRC to arrive at the finding and its significance. By this statement, FirstEnergy gave up its right to appeal the finding. | ||
The enclosures contain Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information. Upon separation, this cover letter is decontrolled. Further details regarding the NRC's determination of the final significance and assessment of the appropriate security action matrix column can be found in Enclosure 1. The NRC has also determined that a violation was associated with the finding, as cited in the Notice of Violation (Notice) provided in Enclosure 2. The circumstances surrounding the violation were described in detail in NRC Inspection Report No. 05000440/2012405(DRS). | The enclosures contain Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information. Upon separation, this cover letter is decontrolled. Further details regarding the NRC's determination of the final significance and assessment of the appropriate security action matrix column can be found in Enclosure 1. | ||
The NRC has also determined that a violation was associated with the finding, as cited in the Notice of Violation (Notice) provided in Enclosure 2. The circumstances surrounding the violation were described in detail in NRC Inspection Report No. 05000440/2012405(DRS). | |||
In accordance with the NRC Enforcement | In accordance with the NRC Enforcement Po licy, the Notice is considered escalated enforcement action because it is associated with a Greater than Green finding. | ||
The NRC has concluded that information | The NRC has concluded that information regardi ng the reasons for the violation, the corrective actions taken and planned to be taken to correct the violation, and the date when full compliance was achieved is already adequately addressed on the docket in NRC Inspection Report No. 05000440/2012405(DRS). Therefore, you are not required to respond to this letter unless the description therein does not accurately reflect your corrective actions or your position. In that case, or if you choose to provide additional information, you should follow the instructions specified in the enclosed Notice. | ||
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC | In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Pub lic Document Room or from the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. However, because the material in the enclosures is considered security-related information, as defined in 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1), its disclosure to unauthorized individuals could present a security vulnerability. Therefore, the material in these enclosures will not be made available electronically for public inspection. Additionally, if you choose to respond and security-related information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please follow the instructions for withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1). | ||
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response, if any. | In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response, if any. | ||
Sincerely,/RA by C. Pederson for/ | Sincerely,/RA by C. Pederson for/ | ||
Charles A. Casto Regional Administrator Docket Nos. 50-440 License Nos. NPF-58 | |||
Charles A. Casto | |||
Regional Administrator Docket Nos. 50-440 | |||
License Nos. NPF-58 | |||
===Enclosures:=== | ===Enclosures:=== | ||
1. Final Significance Determination (non-public) | 1. Final Significance Determination (non-public) | ||
2. Notice of Violation (non-public) | 2. Notice of Violation (non-public) | ||
cc w/o encls: Distribution via ListServ | cc w/o encls: Distribution via ListServ | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 05:59, 28 July 2018
ML12179A267 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Perry ![]() |
Issue date: | 06/25/2012 |
From: | Casto C A Region 3 Administrator |
To: | Kaminskas V A FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co |
References | |
EA-12-074 IR-12-406 | |
Download: ML12179A267 (2) | |
Text
June 25, 2012
Mr. Vito Kaminskas Site Vice President, Nuclear
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Perry Nuclear Power Plant P. O. Box 97, 10 Center Road, A-PY-A290 Perry, OH 44081-0097
SUBJECT: FINAL SIGNIFICANCE DETERMINATION OF A SECURITY-RELATED GREATER THAN GREEN FINDING WITH ASSESSMENT FOLLOWUP AND NOTICE OF VIOLATION; NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 05000440/2012406(DRS); PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT
Dear Mr. Kaminskas:
This letter provides you the final significance determination of the preliminary Greater than Green finding discussed in our previous communication dated May 7, 2012, which included U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Inspection Report No. 05000440/2012405(DRS). The Greater than Green finding was discussed in detail in Section 4OA5 of the subject inspection report.
In a telephone conversation with Mr. Richard Skokowski of NRC, Region III, on May 18, 2012, Mr. Lloyd Zerr of your staff indicated that FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company did not contest the characterization of this finding, and t hat you declined your opportunity to discuss this issue in a Regulatory Conference or to provide a written response. FirstEnergy later followed this verbal notification with a letter dated June 1, 2012.
After considering the information developed during the inspection, the NRC has concluded that the inspection finding is of at least low to moderate security significance, is appropriately characterized as Greater than Green, and will require a supplemental NRC inspection.
According to NRC Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, appeal rights only apply to those licensees that have either attended a Regulatory Conference or have submitted a written response to the preliminary determination letter which submits additional information not previously considered by the NRC staff. In its June 1, 2012, letter, FirstEnergy noted that it did not contest the facts or assumptions used by the NRC to arrive at the finding and its significance. By this statement, FirstEnergy gave up its right to appeal the finding.
The enclosures contain Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information. Upon separation, this cover letter is decontrolled. Further details regarding the NRC's determination of the final significance and assessment of the appropriate security action matrix column can be found in Enclosure 1.
The NRC has also determined that a violation was associated with the finding, as cited in the Notice of Violation (Notice) provided in Enclosure 2. The circumstances surrounding the violation were described in detail in NRC Inspection Report No. 05000440/2012405(DRS).
In accordance with the NRC Enforcement Po licy, the Notice is considered escalated enforcement action because it is associated with a Greater than Green finding.
The NRC has concluded that information regardi ng the reasons for the violation, the corrective actions taken and planned to be taken to correct the violation, and the date when full compliance was achieved is already adequately addressed on the docket in NRC Inspection Report No. 05000440/2012405(DRS). Therefore, you are not required to respond to this letter unless the description therein does not accurately reflect your corrective actions or your position. In that case, or if you choose to provide additional information, you should follow the instructions specified in the enclosed Notice.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Pub lic Document Room or from the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. However, because the material in the enclosures is considered security-related information, as defined in 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1), its disclosure to unauthorized individuals could present a security vulnerability. Therefore, the material in these enclosures will not be made available electronically for public inspection. Additionally, if you choose to respond and security-related information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please follow the instructions for withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1).
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response, if any.
Sincerely,/RA by C. Pederson for/
Charles A. Casto
Regional Administrator Docket Nos. 50-440
License Nos. NPF-58
Enclosures:
1. Final Significance Determination (non-public)
2. Notice of Violation (non-public)
cc w/o encls: Distribution via ListServ