ML13135A244: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| page count = 202 | | page count = 202 | ||
| project = TAC:MF0092, TAC:MF0093, TAC:MF0116, TAC:MF0159 | | project = TAC:MF0092, TAC:MF0093, TAC:MF0116, TAC:MF0159 | ||
| stage = | | stage = Other | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:46, 1 April 2018
| ML13135A244 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 08/10/2012 |
| From: | Beigi F, Guerra E, Helffrich A, Lucarelli B, Reddington J, Wakefield D ABS Consulting |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co |
| Shared Package | |
| ML131350549 | List:
|
| References | |
| L-13-118, TAC MF0092, TAC MF0093, TAC MF0116, TAC MF0159 | |
| Download: ML13135A244 (202) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:APPENDIX BSEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS (SWCS) Sheet I of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENCINEI,RS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2N Equip. Class 15. Battery Racksstatus(?)N UEquipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg. AUXBBATTERY 2NFloor El. 603Room428plManufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Mountingframe consists of single tier/two row braced racl$.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Rack tofloor anchorage verified and no significant degraded condition identified.3. ls the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?Anchorage inspected and no corrosion identified.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Drawings C-752 (Section B) and E-854Q-l I5-l identify the configuration as four cast in placeand it was confirmed in the field during walkdown inspection.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?N/AN/AN/AYbolts per rowNXXX XXX PCe Paul c'-Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENGINEERS & CONSUTTAT{TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2NEquipment DescriptionBATTERY 2NSheetEquip. Class 15. Battery RacksInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?Nearby wooden platfurm identified as a seismic concern.During inspection it was verffied in control process that scaffold is within working period..8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?Seismic capacity of block walls in the area verified.Blockwalls 4016 and 4026 verified to be to be seismically adequatebased on ref. VBW20-8001-100, Rev 14 (12/6/88).9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXXOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?of 379statusc;N u7l2sl20r27125/2012XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. GuerraAdam L. Helffrich Sheet 3 of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2N Equip. ClassStatusG)N uI 5. Battery RacksEquipment DescriptionBATTERY 2NOther supporting or relevant documents and2N plateID Plate of component2N generalGeneral view of componentphotos (if any): Sheet 4 of 379ENGINEERS &. CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2NPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Equip. ClassBATTERY 2NI 5. Battery Racks2N AnchoragePartial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors2N Masonry WallPotential interaction hazard from masonry wall near unitStatus/?)N uEquipment Description Sheet 5 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGIN EERS & CONSULTAT\ITSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Status/?)N UEquipment ID No. 2NEquip. Class 15. Battery RacksEquipment DescriptionBATTERY 2N2N wood platformWood platform erected above battery PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2PEquip. Class 15. Battery RacksEquipment DescriptionBATTERY 2PLocation: Bldg.AUXBFloor El. 6034284Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Mountingframe consists of single tier/two row braced racl<s.Same conJiguration as 2N.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Rack tofloor anchorage verified and no signfficant degraded condition identified.3.Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?Anchorage inspected and no corrosion identified.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Drawings C-752 (Section B) E-8548-I I5-l identify the configuration osfourcast in place bolts per row and it was confirmed in the field during walkdowninspection.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?Sheet 6 of379status$N uXXN/AN/AXX XX PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENCINEERS & CONSUTTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2PEquipment DescriptionBATTERY 2PSheetEquip. Class 15. Battery RacksInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?Nearby wooden platform identified as a seismic concern.During inspection it was verified in control process that scaffold is vithin working period..8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the area verified.Blockwalls 4016 and 4026 verified to be to be seismically odequatebased on ref. VBW20-800l-I00, Rev I 4 (l 2/6/88).9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXXOther Adverse ConditionsI 1. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?of 319statuf)N u712512012XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. GuerraAdam L. Helffrich Sheet 8 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTA}STSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. AFl9Equip. Class 0d. Other - check/manual valveStatus:EN UEquipment DescriptionLocation: Blds. AUXBCHECK VALVE AF 19Floor El.565Room237Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Valve in line with 6" pipe properly supported.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Main line supports inspected and no missing bolts/parts identified.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?Main line supports showed adequate condition and no missing parts.N/AXXXXXX PC? P-aul-C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENGINEERS & CONSUXTAT'{TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. AFl9Equip. ClassCHECK VALVE AFEquipment DescriptionSheet 9 of379Status(?)N u0d. Other - check/manual valvel9Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?NiAXXX XOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated bv:jli , ,./'vl-'/r,+rejA7t25t7012Eddie M. Guerra /"'!:' / '/' '/ 'l) ' /,, {,t. t .ir/ 7;I/ t /,b'i 7/'/7l2s/2012Adam L. Helffrich Sheet l0 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. AFl9Equip. Class 0d. Other - check/manual valveEquipment DescriptionCHECK VALVE AF 19Status(?\N uOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):AFl9 PlateID Plate of componentAF I 9 GeneralGeneral view of component Sheet 11 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENCINEERS & CONSUI]TANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)N/AN/Astatus(i) N uEquipment ID No. AF608Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated ValvesEquipment DescriptionAUX FEED TO STEAM GEN 1-I LINE STOP VLVLocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El. 585Room303Manufacturer. Model. Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Valve in line with 8" pipe properly supported.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. ts the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?XXXXXX Sheet 12 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENCINEERS {i CONSUITANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. AF608Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated ValvesEquipment DescriptionAUX FEED TO STEAM GEN I-I LINE STOP VLVstatusf)N uInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Pipe runs through shield buildingfrom Auxiliary Building.The effect of seismic dffirential displacement between the Auxiliary Building and theBuilding on this piping was verified from Calc No. I B M I 2 and found acceptable.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?N/AN/AShieldYXXXXOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:7t2512012Eddie M. Guerra/',",t-i/ . /' ,('i .,'i ,.':it*{ t ', t!-rt":W'7125/2012Adam L. Helffrich Sheet l3 of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. AF608Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated ValvesEquipment DescriptionAUX FEED TO STEAM GEN I-I LINE STOP VLVOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):AF608 plateID Plate of componentStatus(flN UAF608 generalGeneral view of component Sheet 14 of 379Pau[ C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. AF608Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated ValvesEquipment DescriptionAUX FEED TO STEAM GEN I-I LINE STOP VLVstatus(?)N uRun of pipe from AF608 from Auxiliary Building to Shield BuildingSubject to seismic anchor movements Sheet 15 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.ENGINEERS .\. CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. BW10Equip. ClassFlush Connection0d. Other - check valve or manual valveStatus:ON UEquipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El. 565'10.25"RoomManufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50%o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Valve located on pipe around 3" diameter.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?N/AN/AXXXXXX PCe Paul c. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENCINEERS & CONSLIIJTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. BWIO Equip. ClassEquipment Description Flush ConnectionSheet 16 of379Status0N U0d. Other - check valve or manual valveInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?NXXXXOther Adverse ConditionsI 1. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra7/25/2012,;f;,,,// ,i\#t'i,7/25/2012Adam L. Helffrich Sheet l7 of 379Paul C. Riz,zo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. BWl0 Equip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valveEquipment DescriptionFlush ConnectionOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):BW l0 Plate and GeneralID plate and general view of componentStatus@N U Sheet l8 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Statust?)N UEquipment ID No. BW21Equipment DescriptionEquip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valveBorated Water Storage Tank Outlet IsolationLocation: Bldg. AUXBManufacturer, Model, Etc.Floor El. 586'Room304Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50%o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?No degraded conditionfound. Valve located on -l0" pipe.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?N/AN/AXXXXXX Sheet 19 of319Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEERS S{ CONSUilANTTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. BW2lEquip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valveEquipment DescriptionBorated Water Storage Tank Outlet IsolationStatusON UInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9.Do attached lines have adequate flexibilif to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?N/AXXX XOther Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for andadverselv affect the safetvfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. GuerraAdam L. Helffrich7/25/2012// ) /,fj/,./h.i7t//712512012 Sheet 20 of 379Pau[ C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENCTNEERS 6( CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. BW21Equip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valveStatus(?)N uEquipment DescriptionBorated Water Storage Tank Outlet IsolationOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):BW21 PlateID plate of componentBW2l GeneralGeneral view of component Sheet 2l of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS S{ IIONSULTANTTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Cl Equip. Class 3. Medium Voltage SwitchgearStatus:QN UEquipment DescriptionBUS CILocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El.585Room325Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Cabinet could not be opened during walkdown. Mounting base found inadequate condition. (See also item 5 below)3. Is the anchorage freeoxidation?of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceNiAN/A4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Panel door was closed and anchorage inside cabinet could not be verified. However,SQUG C-C,SS-C1 calculation wqs used and it was verified that anchorage capacityis adequate for the configuration shown.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?XXXXXX SheetPaul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEERS S{ CONSULTAIT{TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. ClEquipment DescriptionEquip. Class 3. Medium VoltageBUS CIInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?Nearby fire extinguisher not fixed to wall. Judged not to be significant interaction8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXXof 319Status:tf).q USwitchgearOther Adverse Conditions1l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:--&/t"UdrrEddie M. Guerra,..o,,/ .i Lr.//1t,"' ';d'/i"'// b"f iW'Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 23 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTAI\TTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. ClEquip. Class 3. Medium Voltage SwitchgearEquipment Description BUS C IOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):C I PlateID Plate of componentStatus'O UC I GeneralGeneral view of component Sheet 24 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Cl l-lStatusfl).J uEquip. Class 12. Air CompressorsEquipment DescriptionEmergency Diesel Generator Starting Air compressor 1-1Location: Bldg. AUXBFloor El.585Room 318Manufacturer, Model, Etc.lnstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments'Anchoragel Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Compressor rigidly mounted on skidwith 4-l/2" bolts.Skid is welded to a larger skid. Larger skid anchored tofloor with eight I/2" bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Bolts onframe-skid mountingfound in adequate condition3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?XXXN/AXXX PCESeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Cl l-1 Equip. Class 12. Air CompressorsEquipment DescriptionEmergency Diesel Generator Starting Air compressor l-lSheetInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXXof 379StatusON UOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated bv:Eddie M. GueruaAdam L. Helffrich Sheet 26of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C I I - I Equip. Class 12. Air CompressorsStatus@N UEquipment DescriptionEmergency Diesel Generator Starting Air compressor 1- IOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):Cl l-l plateID Plate of componentCl l-l generalGeneral view of component Sheet27of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, l nc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Cl l-l Equip. Class12. Air CompressorsEquipment DescriptionEmergency Diesel Generator Starting Air compressor l-l,fo--Cl l-l skid anchorPartial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchorsCl l-l connection to skid underneathAttachment of component to skid underneathStatusON U Sheet 28 of 319Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.ENCINEf, RS ST CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C2l-lStatus:QN UEquip. Class 9. FansEquipment DescriptionCNTRL RM EMERG VENT SYS FANI-ILocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El.638Room603Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Mounted on 4 spring isolators, eachwith 2-5/8" anchor bolts foundin good condition.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No degraded conditionfoundfor bolts on component baseframe3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%oforwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)SQUG C-CSS-C2I -I calculation identffies the configuration as four springisolators and it was confirmed in thefield duringwalkdown inspection.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?SQUG calculation C-CSS-C2l-l identffied outlier - vibration isolators onfan basedid not provide adequate restraint of overturning moment.Fixity provided to resolve outlier presented in SQUG calc (MOD95-0031).XXXXXX PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTATITSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C2l-lEquipment DescriptionSheetEquip. ClassCNTRL RM EMERGVENT SYS FANI -I9. FansInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?No maintenance equipment identffied in the congested area.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXXof 379StatusON UN/AOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:/'+il'i;Eddie M. Guerra.', -, /:rlit4;//Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 30 of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSUUTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Status(?)N uEquipment ID No. C2l-lEquipment DescriptionEquip. Class 9. FansCNTRL RM EMERG VENT SYS FANI-IOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):C2l-1 PlateID Plate of componentCzl- I GeneralGeneral view of component Sheet 3lof 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSUUTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Czl-l Equip. Class 9. FansEquipment DescriptionCNTRL RM EMERG VENT SYS FANI-IStatusG)N UCzl- I anchorage typicalView of anchorage Sheet 32 of 379Paul C, Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C25-3 Equip. Class 9. FansStatus:*)N UEquipment DescriptionVENT FAN 3Location: Bldg. AUXBFloor El.s85Room319Manufacturer. Model. Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Fan suspendedfrom aframe, anchor bolted to ceiling.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Fan is part of ventilation system.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Previous SQUG calculation C-CSS-C25-3 identified connection has adequateflexibility (p.5 of 8)SQUG calculation identified anchors that did not achieve full embedment.Anchorage found acceptable after calculation (p 8 of 8)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?N/AN/AXX XXXX PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENGI NEERS & CONSULTAI{TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C25-3Equip. Class 9. FansEquipment DescriptionVENT FAN 3SheetInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?No potential interaction due tofan location.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXXOther Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?of 379Status(?)N u712512012XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated bv:Eddie M. GuerraDate:tii,tt'/..,,' . /// / t '/. /b4 /gitilzAdam L. Helffrich Sheet 34 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONST,}LTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C25-3Equip. Class 9. FansStatusG)N uEquipment DescriptionVENT FAN 3Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):Vent Fan C25-3 PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENGTNEERS & CONSUUIANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C3l-4 Equip. ClassEquipment Description FAN C31-4Sheet 35 of319Status:*)N U9. FansLocation: Bldg.AUXBFloor El. 545Room105Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Mounted on 4 lV-shape supports.Each W-shape is anchoredwith two 5/8" diameter anchor bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Missing closure nuts along one side of the unit.Confirmedwith maintenance that sheet metal screws are used and nuts are3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?Slight corrosion found in wide flanges used for mounting base.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?not required.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?XXXXXX SheetPaul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.E *- GIN EERS & L-ONSU LTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C3l-4 Equip.Equipment Description FAN C3l-4Class 9. FansInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Several pipe lines running intofan housing properly supported vithJloormounted HSS sections.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXXOther Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?36 of 379statusON uN/A7/25/20t2XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated bv:Eddie M. Guerra,iiir,,fi/ &\fu;;Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 37 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS &. CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Status@N UEquipment ID No. C3l-4Equipment DescriptionEquip. ClassFAN C3I-49. FansOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):C3l -4 plateID Plate of componentC3l -4 generalGeneral view of component Sheet 38 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGTNEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C3l-4 Equip. ClassEquipment Description FAN C3l-49. FansC3l -4 anchoragePartial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchorsStatus(?)N u Status(?) N uEquip. Class 20. Instrument and Control PanelsEquipment DescriptionEDG 1 CONTROL PANELLocation: Bldg.AUXBFloor El. 585Room318Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?3 sectionpanel anchoredwith I0-1/2" bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Cabinetwas openedfor inspection and no degraded conditionor missing parts were observed.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Calculation C-CSS-C3615 identifies the configuration as ten anchor bolts and it wasc onfi r me d in the fi e I d dur i ng w al kdow n ins p e c t i o n.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?pc-e Paul C. Riz-zoAs-sociates, lnc.ENCiINEERS S{ CONSULTAI{TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C3615Sheet 39 of 379XXXXXX SheetPaul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENC;INEERS S* CONSUIJIANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C3615Equip. Class 20. lnstrument andEquipment DescriptionEDG I CONTROL PANELInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXXof 379Statusf)N uControlPanelsOther Adverse ConditionsI 1. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerrai,""r' / t' ; '/; '/i /ri/:,: :// &', /h !i//{,'Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 41 of379Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Status(?)N uEquipment ID No. C3615Equipment DescriptionEquip. Class 20. Instrument and Control PanelsEDG I CONTROL PANELC3615 plateID Plate of componentOther supportins or relevant documents andif any):C3615 generalGeneral view of component Sheet 42 of 379Pau[ C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C3615 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control PanelsEquipment DescriptionEDG I CONTROL PANELStatus(?)N uC3616 anchorageAnchorage from unit C3616 is similarto C3615 which is cuffently energized Sheet 43 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.Ef,." G t N E ERS & C()NSU LTAN'TSstatus$ uSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C3645 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control PanelsEquipment DescriptionCONTROL PANEL (AUX FEEDWATER)Location: Bldg. AUXBFloor El.585Room325Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Cabinet anchoredwith 6-I" bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Mounting base found in adequate condition.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?No signs of significant corrosionfound.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks inNo cracks identified in mounting base.the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)SQUG C-CSS-C3645 and C-CSS-C4625 calculations were used and it wasis adequate for the configuration shown.verified that anchorage capacity6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?XXXXXX SheetPaul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEERS S{ CONSULTA]STSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C3645Equip. Class 20. Instrument and ControlEquipment DescriptionCONTROL PANEL (AUX FEEDWATER)Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXXof 379Statusfi)N uPanelsOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Mantainance or movable equipmentfound in the areawith proper tight conditions.Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guera,;i*,///&it'Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 45 of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS 6{ CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C3645Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control PanelsEquipment DescriptionCONTROL PANEL (AUX FEEDWATER)C3645 PlateID Plate of componentC3645 GeneralGeneral view of componentStatus/?)N U Sheet 46 of 379Patrl C. Rizzo Associates, lnr'.LN(;INEI:RS & C()NS[ :l'I ANT sStatusffN USeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C3645 Equip. Class20.lnstrument and Control PanelsEquipment DescriptionCONTROL PANEL (AUX FEEDWATER)C3645 Achor BoltsPartial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C4606Equip. Class 2.Low Voltage SwitchgearEquipment DescriptionREACTOR TRIP BREAKER A (TYPICAL OF 4)Location: Bldg.AUXBFloor El. 603Room428Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Ponel is welded to embed with stitch welds around the perimeter of the panelbase, similar to as-built shown in Calc. C-CSS-4603.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Component could not be opened during walkdown. Mounting base found inadequate condition.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)SQUG C-CSS-C4606 and C-CSS-C4603 calculations were used ond it wasverffied that anchorage capacity is adequatefor the configuration shown.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?Sheet 47 of379Status$N UXXX XXX Sheet 48 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS 6i CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C4606Equip. Class 2.Low Voltage SwitchgearEquipment DescriptionREACTOR TRIP BREAKER A (TYPICAL OF 4)StatusON UInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?Monorail-hoist located in vicinitv deemed not an interaction concern.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Rigid conduits on end have rigid supports andwill provide lateral restraint10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXXOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:7/25/2012Eddie M. GuerraJ.." /'/,'/t:/'.,//;t, {j,,r'/,1/.,'7t25t2012Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 49 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGTNEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C4606Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage SwitchgearEquipment DescriptionREACTOR TRIP BREAKER A (TYPICAL OF 4)Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):C4606 PlateID Plate of componentStatus(?)N uC4606 GeneralGeneral view of component Sheet 50 of 379Pau[ C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. CONSI.,ILTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C4606Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage SwitchgearEquipment DescriptionREACTOR TRIP BREAKER A (TYPICAL OF 4)C4606 stitch weldPartial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchorsStatus(?)N uC4606 crane intSliding crane located in component vicinity. Sheet 5l of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENC lN E[.RS & CONSU LT.A.nNTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C5702Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control PanelsStatus0N UEquipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg. AUXBoperator console panels - leftFloor El.623Room505Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50Vo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Anchorage not verffied since is coveredwithfire proofing material.Back panel doors are adequately attached to panel structure with4-l/2" screws.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?None observed during inspection.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?No significant corrosion observed in the component.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?None observed.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%oforwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)SQUG C-CS,9-C5702 calculation was used and it was verified that anchoragecapacity is adequate for the configuration shown.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?XXXXXX PCe Paul c. Rizzo-Associates, [nc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTA}.JTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C5702Equipment Descriptionoperator console panels - leftSheet 52of379Statusfi)N uEquip. Class 20. Instrument and Control PanelsInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?No maintenance equipment identified in the area.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXXOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated bv:Eddie M. GuerraAdam L. Helffrich7/25/2012bifii /,.!{/712512012 Sheet 53 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.EN( ;INEDRS .\ CONSUI-TANT SStatusFN USeismic Walkdown ChecklistEquipment ID No. C5702(swc)Equip. Class20.lnstrument and Control PanelsEquipment Descriptionoperator console panels - leftOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):c5702General view of component Sheet 54 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANITSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C5706Equipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El.623Room505Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.AnchorageL Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50oh of SWEL items requiring such verification)?2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Anchorage not accessible during inspection since it was covered withfireproofing material.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?None observed due tofireproofing materisl.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?N one ob se rve d dur i ng w alkdow n.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%oforwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)SQUG C-C,S,S-C5702 and C-C,9S-C5706 calculations were used and it was verifiedthat anchorage copacity is adequatefor the configuration shown.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?314urf9N uEquip. Class 2. Low Voltage SwitchgearMANUAL REACTOR TRrp SWTTCHES (2) rN CONTROL ROOMXXXXXX PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTAI{TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C5706Equip. Class 2.Low Voltage SwitchgearEquipment DescriptionMANUAL REACTOR TRrp SWTTCHES (2) rN CONTROL ROOMSheetInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?No maintenance equipment identified in the area.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXXOther Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?of 379StatusON UN/A712512012XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra,,.."/ i // ,/,r. /,,t{L',:,//' .,b', /h'//gAdam L. Helffrich Sheet 56 of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, f nc.ENGINETRS & CONSULTAI.ITSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C5706Equipment DescriptionC5706 plateID Plate of componentC5706 frontGeneral view of componentStatusON UEquip. Class 2. Low Voltage SwitchgearMANUAL REACTOR TRIP SWTTCHES (2) IN CONTROL ROOMOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):,Ol Sheet 57 of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSUIJTANTSStatusG)N uSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C5706 Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage SwitchgearEquipment DescriptionMANUAL REACTOR TRrp SWTTCHES (2) rN CONTROL ROOMC57 06 typical interior3Typical view of interior componentsC5706 rearGeneral view of component Sheet 5E of 379Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.ENGINEERS &. CONSULTATIITSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Status@N UEquipment ID No. C5706Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage SwitchgearEquipment DescriptionMANUAL REACTORTRJP SWTTCruS (2) MC5706 bolted to left and right sidesCabinets are bolted together on both sides PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTAI\iTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C5712Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control PanelsEquipment Descriptionoperator console panels - rightLocation: Bldg.AUXBFloor El.Room505Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Anchorage not verffied since is coveredwithfire proofing material.Back panel doors are adequately attached to panel structure with4-l/2" screws.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?None observed during inspection.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?No significsnt corrosion observed in the component.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?None observed.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Panel is similar to Panel C5702. SQUG calculation C-CSS-C5702 verffies thatanchorage capacity is adequate for the configuration shown.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?Sheet 59 of379Status0N U623XXXN/AXXX SheetPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENC INEERS .s{ CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C5712Equipment DescriptionEquip. Class 20. Instrument andoperator console panels - rightInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?No maintenance equipment identified in the area.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXXOther Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?60 of 379StatusFN UControlPanelsN/AN/A7/2512012XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra.1, ./' /. ) l, '",rnt:.r/ b/, //,r4l//Adam L. Helffrich PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.E}JC INEERS & CONSULTAN'TSSheet 6l of379Status@ N USeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C5755 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control PanelsEquipment DescriptionControl Room cabinet roomLocation: Blde. AUXBFloor El. 623Room502Manufacturer. Model. Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.AnchorageL Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the itemof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?7-Sections cabinet. End cabinets connected by -l/l" welded plates.No access available inside of cabinet.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Anchor bolts are inaccessible for inspection. However, calculation referencesC-CSS-C5755C, D & G shows anchorage oultiers were resolved.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?None obsented during inspection.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?None observed during inspection.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Panel door was closed and anchorage inside cabinet could not be verified. However,C-C,SS-C5755C, D & G calculations indicate that MOD95-0032 resolves anchorage concerns.A nc h o r age ade q uacy de e me d s e i s mi c al ly ade q uate.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?N/AXXXXXX of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEE,RS 6. CONSUTTA}TTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C5755Equip. Class 20. Instrument andEquipment DescriptionControl Room cabinet roomInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attoched lines found with adequate flexibility.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXXSheet62Status(?)N UControlPanels7t2512012XOther Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)C-C,S^S-C5755C, D & G indicate cabinets A to G need to be bolted together to prevent pounding interaction.Issue resolved by MOD95-0032.Field walkdown verified top connection of adjacent panels are per MOD?5-0032.Evaluated bv:Eddie M.Adam L. HelffrichGuerra:! /' ./. ) /; 'l, ): {2.:7/ u', /j'i4l/t Sheet 63 of 379Paul C. Ri z,zo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSUIJTAI\$TSStatus@N USeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C5755 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control PanelsEquipment DescriptionControl Room cabinet roomOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):C57 55 plateID Plate of componentC57 55 anchorageGeneral view of anchorage detailC57 55 generalGeneral view of componentC57 55 anchorageCloseup of anchor bolts andchannel mounting base. Sheet 64 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.ENGINEERS & CONSL}LTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C5755Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control PanelsStatus(?)N uEquipment DescriptionControl Room cabinet roomC5755 anchorage blocked interiorC57 55 Cabinet bracingTop bracing detail for end cabinetsC57 55 Cabinets weldingWelded plates detail for middle cabinets DCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTA]qTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentEquipmentID No. C5792ALB2Equip. Class 20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinetDescriptionSFRCS CHANNEL 2 LOGIC BOARDLocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El. 623Room502Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?No degraded condition identified.Cabinet is attached to adjacent panelC5782 at top. Panel is composed of 2 sections which are attachedtagether at top and mounted on some skidwith I2-l/2" bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Anchor bolts are inaccessible for inspection. However, SOUG calculation C-CSS-C5792Apresents no significant degraded condition.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?None observed during walkdow n.Sheet 65 of379Status:@N UXXX4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks inlVa cracks identffied near cabinet base.the concrete near the anchors?5. ls the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)At the time of the walkdown the equipment could not be opened.for inspection.SQUG C-CS^S-CS792 calculation was used and it was verified that anchorage capacityis adequate for the configuration shown.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?Skid mounting and base framingfound in adequate conditions.XXX Sheet 66 of379Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment lD No. C5792ALB2 Equip. Class20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinetEquipment DescriptionSFRCS CHANNEL 2 LOGIC BOARDStatus(?)N uXInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the area verified.Wall identified as 5197 confirmed to be adequqate based on Ref C-CSS-C57929. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?NiAN/AXXXOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. GuerraAdam L. Helffiich7/25/2012 7/25/2012 Sheet 67 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C5792ALB2 Equip. Class 20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinetEquipment DescriptionSFRCS CHANNEL2 LOGIC BOARDOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):C5792A plateID Plate of componentStatus(?)N uC5792A generalGeneral view of component RPau_l c. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENGINEERS {iI CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C5792ALBZ Equip. Class20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinetEquipment DescriptionSFRCS CHANNEL 2 LOGIC BOARDC5792A anchoragePartial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchorsC5792A bolted to cabin et at rightAdjacent cabinets are bolted togetherSheet 68 of 379StatusG'\N u Sheet 69 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C5792ALB2 Equip. Class 20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinetEquipment DescriptionSFRCS CHANNEL2 LOGIC BOARDC5792A bolted to cabinet at leftAdjacent cabinets are bolted togetherC5792A logic board inside cabinetView of Logic Board inside the cabinetStatus(?)N u Sheet 70 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.EN(}INEERS & CONSUTTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C73-lStatus*)N uEquip. Class 9. FansEquipment DescriptionAFP ROOM EXHAUST FANLocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El.s65Room237Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the itemof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Fan is mounted onfour spring isolators supported by rod hangers.Rod hangers are attached to steel support structure, which is anchored to theQ-deckwithfour 3/8" diameter anchor bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No missing bolts identified associated with component supports.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?None observed during inspection.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)3/8" diameter anchor bolts supporting the fan support assembly are shown tobe seismically adequate in Calculation C-CSS-73-1.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?XXN/AN/AN/AN/AXXXX of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENC INEE RS & CONSUXTAI\TTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C73-lEquipment DescriptionEquip. Class 9. FansAFP ROOM EXHAUST FANInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXXOther Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?Calculation C-CSS-73-l evaluates the expansion joints and shows seismic adequacy.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. GuerraSheet7lStatus@N U712512012XAdam L. Helffrich Sheet 72 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGTNEERS & CONSUUTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)statusG)N uEquipment ID No. C73-lEquipment DescriptionEquip. Class 9. FansAFP ROOM EXHAUST FANOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):C73-l GeneralGeneral view of componentC73-l plate and anchorage no lateral bracingView of anchorage, no lateral bracing is visible for hanging fan Sheet 73 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS d. CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C78-2Equip. Class 9. FansStatus:O. UEquipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg. AUXBBATTERY ROOM VENT FAN 2-2Floor El. 603Room428/tManufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Anchors identified to be tnstalled into decking ridges.SQUG calc C-CSS-C79-L used as reference since is similar component.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?N one observed during w alkdow n.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?None ob served during w alkdow n.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Anchors installed through steel decking.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Yes. Verffication based on calculations for component C78-l , calc ID C-CSS-C78-l .Calcualtion C-CSS-C79-I shows I/2"diam anchors inserted into ridges are acceptable.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?N/AXXXXXX PCe Paul C. Rizzo Asso-ciates, Inc.ENGINEERS S. CONSULTAI.{TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C78-2 Equip. Class 9. FansEquipment DescriptionBATTERY ROOM VENT FAN 2.2Sheet 74 of379StatusG)N uInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?Scaffold in the area not a concern due tofan elevation.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?Seismic capaciQ of block walls in the area verified.Blockwall 4016 verified to be seismicolly adequatebased on ref. VBW20-8001-100, Rev 14 (12/6/58).9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?N/AXXXXOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Fanfound to be adequately stffined against lateral motionwith bracing and componentframing.Evaluated by:7125t20r2-_-fu-/MdrEddie M. Guerra"..! t I; ,./r"'"t 1' . ,,t./ i/ ./ . / /. .'/J.//,/,4r/.,'.{/' ?- t [:,4: ,'7125t20r2Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 75 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.ENGINEERS &. CONSUUIANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C78-2Equip. Class 9. FansEquipment DescriptionBATTERY ROOM VENT FAN 2-2Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):C78-2 PlateID Plate of componentstatus(?)N uC78-2 GeneralGeneral view of component Sheet 76 of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, f nc.ENGINEERS S( CONSUUTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C78-2Equip. Class 9. FansEquipment DescriptionBATTERY ROOM VENT FAN 2-2Status@N UC78-2 anchoragePartial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors Sheet 77 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEERS & CONSUI]TANTTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CCl469Equip. ClassAOV CC T4697. Pneumatic-Operated ValvesStatusO N UEquipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El. 545Roomll3Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Com pleting ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Mounted on -16" diam line installed right before containment penetration.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50Yoforwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?XXXXXX PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.EN{}INEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CCl469 Equip. ClassEquipment Description AOV CC 1469Sheet7. Pneumatic-OperatedInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do affached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached lines showed adequote flexibility.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXXOther Adverse Conditions1 l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?of 319Status/?)N UValves7/2s/2012XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. GuerraAdam L. Helffrich Sheet 79 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSI,-}LTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CC I 469 Equip. ClassEquipment DescriptionAOV CC I4697. Pneumatic-Operated ValvesStatusG)N uOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):cc I 469General view of component PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENC INEERS & CONSI,'LTAhJTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CS1530 Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated ValvesSheet 80 of379Statu$ N uEquipment DescriptionCONTAINMENT SPRAY TRAIN I INJECTION VALVE AT PUMP 1-I DISCHARGELocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El. 585Room303Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel.Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Limitorgue has a nut on the lower part of the actuator that holds thecover on that is notfully torgued down. Judged not to affect operabilityof component.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?N/A4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Main line anchor support shows not enough grout below anchor plate.Main line presents sfficient lateral bracing. Not considered as adverse condition,5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?N/AXXXXXX PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENCINEERS & CONSUI-TANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CSl530Equipment DescriptionStatusON UEquip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated ValvesCONTAINMENT SPRAY TRATN I INJECTION VALVE AT PUMPDISCHARGESheet 8l of379Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Seismic anchor motion confirmed acceptable per calc I B R/12.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXX XOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra7/25/2012, '. ,.,L/r , #rti{'4/7/25t20r2Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 82 of 379Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS S( CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CS 1530 Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated ValvesStatus(?)N uEquipment DescriptionCONTAINMENT SPRAY TRAIN I INJECTION VALVE AT PUMP I-I DISCHARGECS 1530 plateID Plate of componentCS 1530 generalGeneral view of componentOther supporting or relevant documents and DCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CV-5005Equip. Class 0d. Other - check/manual valveEquipment DescriptionPURGE VALVE ISOLATIONLocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El. 643Room600Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?Valve located to the side of main line right before wall penetration.Sheet 83 of379Status:@N UXXXXXX PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CV-5005Equip. Class 0d. Other - checUmanualEquipment DescriptionPURGE VALVE ISOLATIONSheetInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?A tt ac he d I i ne s found w ith adequate fl exib il i ty.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXx84of 379Statusfr)N uvalveN/AN/AN/AOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra,iiot,'/^/,/i/. /{i+r/.,Jt z'lFtAdam L. Helffiich Sheet 85 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUI-JTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CV-5005Equip. Class 0d. Other - check/manual valveEquipment DescriptionPURGE VALVE ISOLATIONOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):Status@N UCV-5005 generalGeneral view of valve connected to main lines PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Equip. Class 3. Medium Voltage SwitchgearLocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El. 585Rooma ^-lJLJManufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Sheet 86 of379ENCTNEERS & CONSULTAT{TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DlEquipment Description BUS DlAnchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Cabinet composed of I3 sections.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Verified plug welds at the front of one section that was opened.for inspection.Verification of anchorage of other sections deferred to previous SEWS in Calc3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?None observed during inspection.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?None observed during inspection.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50Yoforwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Panel door was closed and anchorage inside cabinet could not be verified. However,SOUG C-CSS-DI calculation'was used and it was verified that onchorage capacityis adequatefor the configuration shown. Verified the three 7/8" to 1.25" plugwelds atfront ofone opened panel section.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?statu$ uC-CSS-D1.N/AYXXXXXX SheetPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEf,RS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Dl Equip. Class 3. Medium VoltageEquipment DescriptionBUS DIInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free fromNo maintenance equipmentimpact by nearby equipment or structures?identified in the area.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Relative movement not a concern since attached linesare rigidly c onnected w ith component.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Fire extinguisher in area judged not to be operability issue.XXXX87of 379StatusG)N uSwitchgearN/AN/AOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated bv:Eddie M. Guerrai t , 'r' " ,' .-t / lt ,/ ,t'./,)'ft + ".,7/ E/ r!i,lr't't{'Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 88 of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. CONSUUTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Dl Equip. Class3. Medium Voltage SwitchgearStatus'O* UEquipment DescriptionBUS DIOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):Dl Plate IDID Plate of componentDl GeneralGeneral view of component Sheet 89 of 379Paul C. Rizz,o Associates, Inc.Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Dl Equip. Class 3. Medium Voltage SwitchgearEquipment DescriptionBUS DID I Inside CabinetView of floor detail inside Dl cabinetStatus'O* U PCePaul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENGINEERS ST CONSU LTAN'TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Dl ED Equip. Class l. Motor Control CentersSheet 90 of 379Statuff\N UEquipment DescriptionMCC 1Location: Bldg.AUXBFloor El.Room429Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?MCC composed of I4 sections welded to embedded channels with an cverageof 5.5" long 3/16" welds atfront and back of the unit.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?6033. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that isoxidation?N one observed during w alkdow n.more than mild surface4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?N one observed during w alkdow n.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Top bracingverified against drawing C-0233 and SQ(lG colculationC,S^9-CS-D C MCC I verified existing anchorage.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?XXXXXX SheetPaul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Dl EDEquipment Description MCC IEquip. Class l Motor Control CentersInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Cabinets are interconnected and braced to wall at top.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXXof 319StatusON uOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:_-_w{&/.drEddie M./ t 't, ./,L/, /hi'i//,,Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 92 of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Dl EDEquipment Description MCC IEquip. Classl. Motor Control CentersOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):StatusG)N uDl ED plateID Plate of componentDl ED generalGeneral view of componentDl ED stitch weldPartial view of welded base detail. Sheet 93 of3l9Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENG INEERS & CONSUITA\TTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DIN Equip. Class 14. Distributionstatufr)N uPanelsEquipment DescriptionPNL DINLocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El. 603Room429/iManufacturer, Model. Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Similar anchorage configurotion asfor D2N (Drm,ing E-20-4-7).2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Mounting inspected and no missing parts identified.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?No signs of excesive corrosion identffied during inspection.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No craclrs identffied at based anchorage grout.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%oforwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Configurationfor D2N is used as reference. Drowing C-0220Didentifies the configuration as four 7/8"diam anchor bolts and it wasconfirmed in the field during walkdown inspection.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?XXXXXX Sheet 94Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.ENGINEf, RS & CONST,'LTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DIN Equip. ClassEquipment Description PNL DINI 4. Distribution PanelsInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?No maintenance equipment identified in the area.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXXof 379StatusG)N uOther Adverse ConditionsI 1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?XComments (AdditionalComponents YRF3 andpages may be added as necessary)YV3 associated with D I N.Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra,! /' / I ,/,, :if'trr,'/ E', /i'!7,?Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 95 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGTNEERS &. CONSULTAhITSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)status(?')N uEquipment ID No. DINEquipment DescriptionEquip. ClassPNL DIN14. Distribution PanelsOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):Q0s$3{S$T'46 NO. DINDIN plateID Plate of componentDIN GeneralGeneral view of component Sheet 96 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENC INEERS {S{ CONSUI TANT'SSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DIN Equip. ClassStatus(fiN Ul 4. Distribution PanelsEquipment DescriptionPNL DIND lN anchoragePartial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.E}I(]INEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. D2 EDEquip. Class l. Motor Control CentersEquipment DescriptionMCC2Location: Bldg. AUXBFloor El. 603Room428Manufacturer. Model. Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1.Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., isof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?MCC composed of I4 sections welded to embedded channelsof 5.5" long 3/16" welds atfront and back of the unit.Sheet 97 of379Status$N Uthe item onewith an overage2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No access to inside of component for anchorap;e inspection.Missing bolt mentioned in C-CSS-DCMCC-002. Resolved by work request 95-13683. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?No excesive corrosion identified around base detail.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No cracks identified at cabinet base.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Top bracing provided by numerous top entry conduit. SQUG calculationC,S,S- C,S-, C MC C I and C S- D C MC C 2 v e r ffi ed e x i s t i ng a nc h o r age.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?N/AXXXXXX PCe PaulC. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENG INEERS E( CONSUIXAI{TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. D2 EDEquip. Class l. Motor Control CentersEquipment Description }dCC 2Sheet 98 of379Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?MCC supported at the top b1t large conduits providing lateral restraint.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXXOther Adverse ConditionsI 1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?Mantainance cartfound near the area. Judged not to be a significant interaction.Status/?)N uN/A7125t2012XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra,;ii',ry/ p',#"i,Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 99 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCTNEE RS S( CONSULTAI{TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. D2 EDEquip. Class l. Motor Control CentersEquipment DescriptionMCC2D2 ED plateID Plate of componentStatus(?'\N uD2 ED generalGeneral view of component Sheet I 00 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS 6. CONSI-ILTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. D2 EDEquip. Class l. Motor Control CentersEquipment DescriptionMCC 2Status(?\N uD2 ED stitch weldPartial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchorsD2 ED carts intUnsecured carts near unit can cause relay chatter on impact PC? Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENGI NEERS \{{ CONSULT,q.IVNSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. D2NEquip. Class 14. Distribution PanelsEquipment DescriptionPNL D2NLocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El. 603Room4288Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50%o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?This panel is part of a line-up thut includes YRF4 and YV4. Each panelis anchored to the concrete withfour 3/4" diameter anchor bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No missing parts or degraded condition identified during the inspection.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?No significant corrosion identffied in cabinet and mounting base.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)SQUG calculation C-CSS-YV4 includes seismic qualification of the anchorage for this panel.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?Sheet l0l of379StatuseN uXXXNiAN/AN/AYXXX PCe Paul C. Rizzo- Associates, [nc.ENGINEERS & C()NSL; l-TAs..T'SSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. D2NEquipment DescriptionPNL D2NSheetEquip. Class 14. Distribution PanelsInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the areaverified.Blockwall 4016 verffied to be to be seismically adequatebased on ref. I/8W20-8001-100, Rev I4 (12/6/SS).9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXXOther Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for andadverselv affect the safetvfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?t02of 379statu$N uN/AN/A7/25/2012XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:,4;ffi'4,{/{h,.1".Vr4Eddie M. Guerra'u,/ / /, / ,/;" ":1{:}:.:r"/ bt, fi, t,'///'/Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 103 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGTNEERS & CONSULTAI\STSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. D2NEquip. ClassPNL D2NStatuff) N UI 4. Distribution PanelsEquipment DescriptionOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):D2N plateID Plate of componentD2N generalGeneral view of component Sheet 104 of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, [nc.ENGINEERS S,. CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Statuft N UEquipmentEquipmentID No. D2NDescriptionEquip. ClassPNL D2NI 4. Distribution PanelstD2N 4 anchor boltsPartial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchorsD2N masonry wallsPotential interaction hazard from masonry wall near unit Sheet 105 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENCINEERS &" CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. D2PEquip. Class 14. Distribution PanelsStatus(T)N uEquipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg. AUXBPNL D2PFloor El.603Room428Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1.Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?No signrficant c orrosion identifeid4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Drawing C-0220E identffies the configuration as four 3/4" anchor bolts and it wasc o nfi r me d in the fi e I d dur i n g w al kdow n i nspe c t i o n.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?N/AN/AXXXX XX SheetPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. D2PEquip. Class 14. Distribution PanelsEquipment DescriptionPNL D2PInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?Fire extinguisher in area judged not to be an operability issue.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXXOther Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?106of 379statusf?)N u7t2s/2012XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated bv:Eddie M. Guerraiiiz',71 /':'fiipAdam L. Helffrich Sheet 107 of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS 6( CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DZPEquip. ClassPNL DzPStatusG\N u14. Distribution PanelsEquipment DescriptionD2P plateID Plate of componentOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):DzP generalGeneral view of componentDzP anchor boltsPartial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors Pcel"tl C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS S{ CONSULIANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DA-3783Equip. Class 8B. Solenoid ValvesEquipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg. AUXBSheet 108 of379Status:$rl USOLENOTD VALVE FROM AIR START RECEIVER I-I-1, T86.IFloor El. 585Room 318Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided atthe end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1.Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50oh of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Mounted on I/4" pipe line.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?XXXXXX PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment lD No. DA-3783Equip. Class 88. Solenoid ValvesEquipment DescriptionSOLENOID VALVE FROM AIR START RECEIVER I-1.1T86-1Sheet 109 of379StatusON UInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?Components is surrounded by air compressor tanks.N o s i gnrfi c ant p ot e nt ial i nte r act i on w as founde d.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXXOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guera!ifn'"'//. t .'/, '/"b',1/*i'#,'Date:7t25/2012Date:7/2s/2012Adam L. Helffrich Sheet I l0 of379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DA-3783Equip. Class 88. Solenoid ValvesEquipment DescriptionSOLENOID VALVE FROM AIR START RECEIVER I-I-I, T86-IOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):Status/?)N UDA3783 plateID Plate of componentDA3 783 generalGeneral view of component Sheet lll of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCTNEERS & C(}NSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DBCIPN Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Invertersstatu$N uEquipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg. AUXBCHARGER (Newly installed equipment)Floor El. 603Room429Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50%o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Four ] " diameter anchors at corners and six l " diameter anchors on sides. OKStffined base on -l l/2" grout pad.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No access to mounting anchorage and/or documentation.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion thatoxidation?is more than mild surfaceN/AN/AN/AN/A4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50oh forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?Based on previously inspected similar mounting and skid details, it is judged that no potential adverse conditionis presented by this newly installed charger. Outside condition looks in good state and noadverse condition were identified for previous similar cases.XXXXXX SheetPaul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENGIN EERS 6. CONSUITAN'TSSeismic Walkdown ChecklistEquipment ID No. DBCIPNEquipment Description(swc)Equip. ClassCHARGER (Newly16. Battery Chargers and Invertersinstalled equipment)Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?L Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?Seismic capacity of block walls in the area verified.Blockwall 4016 verified to be to be seismically adequatebased on ref. VBW20-8001-l 00, Rev I 4 (l 2/6/88).Nearby fire extinguisher judged not to be an operability issue.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?of 379StatusON U7/25/2012XXXXOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra,'ir,t1 / t,' ; '/l '/,';f,* "// i-", 7//" i"{'*'Adam L. Helffrich Sheet I 13 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. CONSUUTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Status(?)N uEquipment ID No. DBCIPNEquipment DescriptionEquip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and InvertersCHARGER (Newly installed equipment)Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):DBCIPN plateID Plate of componentDBCIPN generalGeneral view of component lI4 of 379Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUUTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DBCIPNEquipment DescriptionEquip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Invertersstatus(?)N uCHARGER (Newly installed equipment)DBC I PN anchorage inaccessibleAnchorage is not visible PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.E\CINEERS & CONSUTTANTSSheet I l5 of379statusc\ uSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DBC2PEquip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and InvertersEquipment DescriptionCHARGER 2PLocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El.603Room 428Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1 Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Skid mounting identffiedwith 4-I" anchor bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No missing parts or degraded condition identified during the inspection.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?No significant corrosion identffied in cabinet and mounting base.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No cracks identified at base grout.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)SQUG C-CSS-DBC2P calculation was used and it was verified that anchorage capacityis adequate for the configuration shown.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?YYYYYN/AN/AN/AYXXXXXX PCe Paul C. Rizzo-Associates, [nc.ENGINEERS & CONSU LTAXISSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DBC2P Equip. Class16. Battery Chargers and InvertersEquipment Description CHARGER 2PSheet 116 of3l9StatusON UInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the area verified.Blockwall 4026 no referencesfoundfor seismic analysis.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXXOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated bv:Eddie M. Guerra ,'!1 i i. i Zr' /if'r ; 1/ Ett/h"'/'/'t2'Date:7lzsl20r2Date:7/2s120r2Adam L. Helffrich R Paul crlizz-:r Associates. Inc.ENCINET,RS & CONSL]I TANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DBC2P Equip. Class16. Battery Chargers and InvertersEquipment DescriptionCHARGER 2POther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):DBC2P plateStatusffiN USheet 117 of 379ID Plate of componentDBC2P masonryPotential interaction hazard fromwallsmasonry wall near unit Sheet I l8 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc,ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DBC2PNEquipment DescriptionEquip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and InvertersStatus:O UCHARGER (Newly installed equipment)Location: Bldg. AUXBManufacturer, Model, Etc.Floor El. 603Room428Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50%o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?No access to inside of cabinets.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No access to mounting anchorage and/or documentation.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?Based on previously inspected similar mounting and skid details, it is judged that no potential adverse conditionis presented by this newly installed charger. Outside condition looks in good state and noadverse condition were identifiedfor previous similar coses.N/AN/AN/AXXXXXX 19 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENCINEERS 6( CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DBC2PNEquipment DescriptionEquip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and InvertersCHARGER (Newly installed equipment)Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the areaverified.Blockwall 4016 verified to be to be seismically adequatebased onref. VBW20-8001-100, Rev I4 (12/6/SS).Nearby fire extinguisher and barrier judged not to be significant interactions.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?SheetStatusSN u7t2s/2012XXXXOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Date:Eddie M. Guerra,4.sj' .. i /, / . "/l', '/ii/i'/,,/ /t,"/2 i'{,/i1."Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 120 of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEI,RS & CONSULTANTSStatus'S USeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DBC2PN Equip. Class16. Battery Chargers and InvertersEquipment DescriptionCHARGER (Newly installed equipment)Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):DBC2PN plateID Plate of componentDBC2PN generalGeneral view of componentDBC2PN anchorage inaccessibleAnchorage is not visible PCePaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.E NGINEERS 6i CONSL;' LTATHTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DHl0l Equip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valveof 379Statusff)N UEquipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg. AUXBSFP Inlet Line Vent from DHRFloor El.597',Room312Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Small checkvalve located on -10" diameter pipe line.No degraded condition identified.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?NYNYNYNYNNYXXXXXX PC? Paul C. Rizzo Asso-ciates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DHl0lEquip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manualEquipment DescriptionSFP Inlet Line Vent from DHRSheetInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the area verffied.Blockwalls 3257 and 3267 verffied to be to be seismically odequatebased on ref. VBWI6-8001-083, Rev 2 (4/27/88) andVBWI6-8001-084, Rev 5 (4/27/SS)9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?122of 379StatusFN Uvalve7/25/20127t25/2012X XX XOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?XDate: Date:Guerra:t /'/.),/, /. rii/. t:/// it', {j i'412'Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M.Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 123 of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUTTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DHl0l Equip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valveEquipment DescriptionSFP Inlet Line Vent from DHROther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):DH l0l generalGeneral view of componentStatusG)N uS:ffii$ Sheet 124 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Eir-GINEERS & CONSU ffANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DH9BEquip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated ValvesStatusif)N uEquipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El.545MOV DH 98Room225Manufacturer. Model. Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Valve located on line attached to containment wall.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?N/ANiAXXXXXX SheetPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGIN EERS !I CONSUITANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DH9BEquipment DescriptionMOV DH 98Equip. Class 8A. Motor-OperatedInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached lines found with adequote flexibility.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXXOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?125of 379Status:(V)N uValvesN/A7/2512012XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra-i,", i /.t,'/, '/' r/,r t,7l' b', /l"i :1,'rV./Adam L. Helffrich PC? Paul C. Rizzo-Associates, [nc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. El Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage SwitchgearSheet 126 of379StatusSN UEquipment DescriptionBUS El, Low Voltage SwitchgearLocation: Blde. AUXBFloor El. 603Room429Manufacturer, Model. Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.AnchorageL Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Component composed of 7 sections. End panels were opened undverified plug welds at front (2-l/4"diam at I9"oc).2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Anchorage not vissible thus verification based on adequacy per SQUG calc C-CSS-EI.SQUG calculations show anchorage to be adequatefrom previous outlier resolution.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?N/AXXXXXX PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENCINEERS & CONSUUIANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. El Equip. ClassEquipment Description BUS El, Low Voltageof 3792. Low Voltage SwitchgearSwitchgearInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Top entry conduit rigidly supported.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXXOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?Sheett27status(?1N u7/25/2012XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. GuerraDate:Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 128 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS C( CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. El Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage SwitchgearEquipment DescriptionBUS El, Low Voltage SwitchgearOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):E I plateID Plate of componentE I generalGeneral view of componentStatus(?)N u Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS S( CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. El Equip. Class 2.Low Voltage SwitchgearEquipment DescriptionBUS El, Low Voltage SwitchgearE I anchorage inaccessibleAnchorage is not visibleSheet 129 of 379Status(?'\N u Sheet 130 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUTTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. El lB Equip. class l. Motor control centersStatus0N UEquipment DescriptionMCC EI lBLocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El.585Room304Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?This is a I0 sections trICC. Each section is welded to embedded channel withan average of 6" long, 3/I6" welds. Top bracing provided per drawing C-0233.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50oh forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Top bracing of this MCC verified against Drmuing C-0233. SQUG calculationC-CSS-EI I B provides qualffication calculationsfor the base welds and the top bracing.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?NiAN/AXXXX XX PCe Paul C' Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTATJTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. El lB Equip. ClassEquipment Description MCC El1Bl. Motor Control CentersInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXXSheetof 379StatusON UN/AOther Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. GuerraAdam L. HelffrichDate: Date: Sheet 132 of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS 6( CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. El lB Equip. ClassEquipment Description MCC El lBStatus(?)N ul. Motor Control CentersOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):El lB plateID Plate of componentEl lB generalGeneral view of component Sheet 133 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.ENGINEERS &. CONSUIXAI{TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. El lB Equip. ClassEquipment Description MCC El lBl. Motor Control CentersEl lB stitch weldPartial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchorsStatus(?)N uEl lB is bolted between El lCUnits are bolted together to prevent pounding PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENCINEERS & CONSUUTAI{TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. El2B Equip.Equipment Description MCC El2BSheet 134 of379Status:f)N UClass 1. Motor Control CentersLocation: Bldg.AUXBFloor El.585Room318Manufacturer. Model. Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?This is a 4 section MCC (including panel YEI), welded to embed channels withan average of 6" long 3/16" fillet welds per section.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Top bracing provided by several top entry conduit. sQ(lG calculationC-CSS-El28 provides qualification calculations for the base welds.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?N/AN/AXXXXXX PCe Paul c. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. E12B Equip. ClassEquipment Description MCC El2BSheetl. Motor Control CentersInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?Scafoldingfound near equipment properly braced. No interoction concern.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached lines rigidly connected to cabinet.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?-l/2" gapfound between back of cabinet andwater line.Interactioniudged not to be a problem due to rigidity of cabinet and provided top bracing.XXXX135of 379Statusrf)N UN/AOther Adverse Conditions1 l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated bv:, '.)tclt-JvT4-rEddie M. Guerra./'j""' / t I //' /u/2',:,',/ li t r' /U'i'tfi,Date:Date:Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 136 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTAIVTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Elzc Equip. class l. Motor control centersStatus*')N uEquipment DescriptionMCC EI2CLocation: Bldg. INTKFloor El. 576Room5lManufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?This is a 4 section MCC, welded to embed channels vith an average of atleast 5" long, j/l6" fillet welds per section (front and back).2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No degraded conditions found for base stitch welds.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that isoxidation?more than mild surface4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No cracl<s identified in grout at mounting base.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Top bracing of this MCC verified against Drmuing C-0233. SQ(IG calculationC-CSS-EI28 provides qualification calculations for the base welds and the top bracing.Base welds verified against drawing C-04128, section L.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?No significant degraded condition identified during inspection. Anchorage configuration capacityis provided in C-CSS-EI2C and VFI2/800-008 shown to be adequate.N/AN/AXXXXXX SheetPaul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENCINEERS C. CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. El2C Equip. ClassEquipment Description MCC El2Cl. Motor Control CentersInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?S c afo I ding fo und n e ar c o mp o ne nt a de q uat e ly b r ac e d.No interaction concern.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached lines rigidly connected to cabinet.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?l/2 gapfound betuueen bock of cabinet andwater line.No interaction concern due to overall rigidity of cabinet and provided top bracing.XXXXr37of 379Status$ uN/AOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Missing grout at lower right of component is cosmetic and judged not to bean adverse seismic condition.Evaluated by:Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 138 of379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS E4 CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. ElzC Equip. ClassEquipment Description MCC ElzCstatus(?\N ul. Motor Control CentersOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):ElzC plateID Plate of componentElzC generalGeneral view of component Sheet 139 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Status(?)N uEquipment ID No. El2CEquipment DescriptionEquip. ClassMCC EI2Cl. Motor Control CentersEl2C grout missingView of mounting base showing stitch weld detail and groutClose up view of gap identified between back ofcabinet and conduit.ElzC gap conduit and cabinet Sheet 140 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUUTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. ElzC Equip. ClassEquipment Description MCC ElzCStatus(?)N ul. Motor Control CentersElzC ScaffoldView of scafolding near component Sheet 141 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENCINEERS & CONSLJLTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 822-l Equip. Class 2l. Tanks and Heat Exchangersstatusf?)N UEquipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg. AUXBCCW HEAT EXCHANGER 1-I AT DISCHARGE OF CCW PUMP 43-1Floor El.585Room 328Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.AnchorageL Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?NiA3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion thatoxidation?is more than mild surface4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Nozzle load issue identffied and documented in PCAQ99-1945, and subsequently resolvedby MoD 98-0058. ]QUG calculation c-css-E22-l shows seismic adequacyof the as-installed design.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?XXXXXX Sheet 142 of379Paul C, Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEI,RS S. CONSUUIANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. E22-l Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat ExchangersStatus(?)N uEquipment DescriptionCCW HEAT EXCHANGER I.I AT DISCHARGE OF CCW PUMP 43-1XInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?Seismic capacity of block walls in the area verified.Blockwalls 3307, 3397 and 3407 verffied to be to be seismically adequatebased on ref. VBWl7-8001-088, Rev 6 (6/21/89),vBWl9-8001-094, Rev 5 (6/3/06) and VBWI9-8001-095, Rev t 0 (7/5/06).9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Flexibilily of drain piping judged acceptable to accommodate thermal growth ofthe heat exchanger.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?N/AN/AN/AX XXOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:7 t25/2012Eddie M. Guerrar't',r' / li'/;'/;;lht!/ /U"'#';rW'7t2s/20r2Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 143 of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUIJTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 822-lEquipment DescriptionOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):822-l plateID Plate of component822-l generalGeneral view of componentStatus(?)N uEquip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat ExchangersCCW HEAT EXCHANGER I-I AT DISCHARGE OF CCW PUMP 43-I Sheet 144 of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUXTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 822-l Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat ExchangersStatus(?)N uEquipment DescriptionCCW HEAT EXCHANGER I-I AT DISCHARGE OF CCW PUMP 43-I822-l anchorage leftPartial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors822-l Welded AnchorConfiguration of the Welded Anchor Plate Sheet 145 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENCINEERS & CONSUTTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 822-2Equipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg. AUXBManufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verificationof the 50oh of SWEL items requiring suchrequired (i.e., is the item oneverification)?2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Nozzle load issue identified and documented in PCAQ9}-t945, and subsequently resolvedby MoD 98-0058. ]QUG calculation G-CSS-E22-l shows seismic adequacyof the as-installed design.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?N/AN/AStatus:QN UEquip. Class 2l. Tanks and Heat ExchangersCCW HEAT EXCHANGER I -2 AT DISCHARGE OF CCW PUMP 43-2Floor El. 585Room 328XXXXXX Sheet 146of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.ENGINEERS & CONSUITAT.TTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)status(?)N uEquipment ID No. E22-2Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat ExchangersEquipment DescriptionCCW HEAT EXCHANGER I-2 AT DISCHARGE OF CCW PUMP 43-2Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Flexibility of drain piping judged acceptable to accommodate thermal growth ofthe heat exchanger.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXXOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated bv:Eddie M. GuerraAdam L. HelffrichDate:7/25/20t2Date:7 /2s/20r2 Sheet 147 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.ENGINEERS &. CONSUUTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 822-2Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat ExchangersEquipment DescriptionCCW HEAT EXCHANGER I-2 AT DISCHARGE OF CCW PUMP 43-2822-2 plateID Plate of component822-2 generalGeneral view of componentStatus@N U RPaul c. Rizzo-Ass,ociates, [nc.ENGINEERS & CONSU LTAT -NTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 822-2Equip. Class 2l . Tanks and Heat ExchangersEquipment DescriptionCCW HEAT EXCHANGER I-2 AT DISCHARGE OF CCW PUMP 43-2822-2 anchorage left sideAnchorage at left side of the saddle at fixed endSheet 148 of 379StatusON U822-2 anchorage right sidePartial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors Sheet 149 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS S. CONSUXTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 827-l Equip. Class 2l. Tanks and Heat ExchangersStatus@N UEquipment DescriptionDECAY HEAT REMOVAL COOLER I-1 .827.1Location: Bldg. AUXBFloor El.545Roomll3 _Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50oh of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Tank mounted on two saddles, each anchored with 4- I " bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Nozzle load identified and documented in PCAQ?7-0068, subsequently resolvedby MOD97-0068. SQUG Calculation C-CSS-E27-001 shows seismic adequacy of thess - ins tal I e d c onfi gur at i o n.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?N/AN/AN/AXXXXXX SheetPaul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. E27-l Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat ExchangersEquipment DescriptionDECAY HEAT REMOVAL COOLER I-1 .827.1Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?I 50 of379StatusON U7t25120127/25/2012XXXXOther Adverse ConditionsI l Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated bv:Eddie M. Guerra,u',{ i /,, / {t, i'll.?rt:/ fr', /h4W'Date:XAdam L. HelffrichDate: Sheet 151 of379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 827-l Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat ExchangersEquipment DescriptionDECAY HEAT REMOVAL COOLER I -1,827-IOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):827-l plateID Plate of componentStatus U827-l general2General view of component Sheet 152 of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, [nc.ENCINEE,RS d{ CONSUIJTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 827-lEquipment DescriptionEquip. Class 21 . Tanks and Heat ExchangersStatus$ UDECAY HEAT REMOVAL COOLER I.I.E27-I827 - I anchoragePartial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchorsE27 -l Slotted hole toSlotted hole betweenallow for expansionsaddle and component Sheet I 53 of 379Paul C. Ri zz,o Associates, lnc.En"(j INEERS & CONSU LTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 827-1 Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat ExchangersEquipment DescriptionDECAY HEAT REMOVAL COOLER I -1,827-IStatus$ U827-l weldedjointJoint welded as specified in MOD 97-0068 PC? t"d c. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEERS & CONSUITAT\TTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 827-2 Equip. Class21. Tanks and Heat ExchangersEquipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg. AUXBSheet 154 of379StatusG)N UDECAY HEAT REMOVAL COOLER I-2. E27-2Floor El.545Roomll3Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Tank mounted on two saddles, each anchoredwith 4-1" bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Nozzle load identified and documented in PCAQ97-0068, subsequently resolvedby MOD97-0068. SQUG Calculation C-CSS-E27-001 shows seismic adequacy of theas - i ns t al I e d c o nfi gur at i o n.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?N/AXXXXXX PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS ST CONSULTA}ITSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 827-2Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat ExchangersEquipment DescriptionDECAY FIEAT REMOVAL COOLER I-2" 827-2SheetInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?155of 379Status:C} uN/AN/A7t25/2012XxXXOther Adverse ConditionsI 1. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Eddie M. GuerraXEvaluated bv:Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 1 56 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. E27-2Equip. Class 21 . Tanks and Heat ExchangersEquipment DescriptionDECAY HEAT REMOVAL COOLER I -2,E27-2Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):827 -2 plateID Plate of componentStatus: UE27 -2 generalGeneral view of component Sheet 157 of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS S( CONSUIiTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. E27-2Equip. Class 21 . Tanks and Heat ExchangersEquipment DescriptionDECAY HEAT REMOVAL COOLER I -2,827-2Status.S U827 -Z anchoragePartial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors827-2 weldJoint welded as specified in MOD 97-0068 PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENGINEERS & CONSLiLTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. EFI2C Equip. ClassEquipment Description MCC EFI2CSheet 158 of379status(f) N ul. Motor Control CentersLocation: Bldg.INTKFloor El.576Room52Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1.ls the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50ah of SWEL items requiring such verification)?2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)This is a 4 section MCC, welded to embed channels with an average of at least5" long, 3/l6" fillet welds per section (front and back). Top bracing providedper drmuing C-0233.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?N/AN/AN/AXX XXXX SheetPaul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEI,RS & CONSULTAISTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. EF12C Equip. ClassEquipment Description MCC EFI2Cl. Motor Control CentersInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?Seismic capacigt of blockwalls in the area verifiedBlockwall 2371verified to be to be seismically adequatebased on ref. VBWL0-8001-055, Rev I4 (2/10/57)9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXX159 of 379StatusFN UOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated bv:Eddie M. Guerra,,-,! . /' i, 1' ;r: '/.rf,t:,/ i/,, /t :1i/,/Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 160 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENCINEERS &. CONSI,ILTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. EFI2C Equip. ClassEquipment Description MCC EFI}CEFI2C plateID Plate of componentStatus Ul. Motor Control CentersOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):EFI2C generalGeneral view of component RPa*l c. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EN(; I N EE,RS & CONSU I,T.{n:TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. EFI}C Equip. ClassEquipment Description MCC EFI}CSheet 16l of 379Status$Irr Ul . Motor Control CentersEF I 2C anchorage hiddenView of mounting base showing stitch weld detailEFI2C brace leftView of channel section used to restrain front-to-back motion. Same detail at opposite side. PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENGINEERS S. CONSULTAN1TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FlEquipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg. AUXBSheet 162 of379StatusQN UEquip. Class 2. Low Voltage SwitchgearBUS Fl, Low Voltage SwitchgearFloor El. 603Room428Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel.Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Component composed of 7 sections. Inspected two end sections atfrontand verffied n'vo plug welds -3/4" diameter.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Base groutfound in good condition.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Verffication based on adequacy per SQUG calc C-CSS-Ft.SQUG calculations show anchorage to be adequate from previous outlier resolution,page 9 of28.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?N/AXXXXXX Sheet 163 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Fl Equip. class 2.Low Voltage SwitchgearEquipment DescriptionIUq Fl, Low Voltage SwitchgearStatusf)N UInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXXOther Adverse ConditionsI L Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:7/25/2012Eddie M. Guerra,,t i,1, 1,';r;.. ,'itir'.:g' E t,lij,'i'W'7/25/2012Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 164 of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, I nc.E NG I N E tlRS 6i CONS[." l.TAl -**T'SSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Fl Equip. ClassEquipment Description BUS Fl, Low VoltageStatusftN U2. Low Voltage Switch gearSwitchgearOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):Fl general (plate inaccessible)General view of componentF I anchorage inaccessible Sheet 165 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTAI\r1TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. F108-l Equip. class 0c. other - sub-componentStatus$N UEquipment DescriptionEDG I-I INTAKE FILTERLocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El.585Room318Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instruitions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50%o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Anchorage could not be verified since it was fully covered by roof cover.SQUG Calc C-CSS-F108 taken as referencefor anchorage condition.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No detail provided in calc. Unable to view during inspection.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50yo forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?Outlier specified in calculation C-CSS-F108 with respect to anchorage capacityCalculation provides an outliner close out note specifuing a modification (#MOD 95-0029) for additional anchors.N/AXXXXXX pce Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENG TNET,RS & CONSU LTAIJTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. F108-lEquipment Description EDGSheet 166 of3l9StatusON UEquip. Class 0c. Other - sub-componentI-I INTAKE FILTERInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?Filter cover deemed to be capable of resisting external hazards.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?N/AN/AXXXXOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated bv:7t25/20t2Eddie M. Guerra,., ! /' ,", ,l ,l; '/'., t{u"": !/ /'/t'/}" !';'!;('7 /25t2012Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 167 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSI,-'LTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Status UEquipment ID No. Fl08-lEquipment DescriptionEquip. Class 0c. Other - sub-componentEDG I-I INTAKE FILTEROther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):Fl08-l plate IDID Plate of componentF 108- I generalGeneral view of componentF I 08- I Encasing AnchroageView of Intake encasing anchroage condition. Sheet 168 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENG IN EERS & CONSULIAINTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Fl lA Equip. class 1. Motor control centersStatu{TJ N uEquipment DescriptionMCC FI IALocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El. 603Room427Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?This is an I I section MCC, welded to embed channels with an average of atleast 5" long, 3/l6" fillet welds per section (front and back).2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?N o de grade d c onditi ons found for b ase stitch w e I ds.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Separationfound on base grout at end of cabinet.Identified as an aestetic concern, therefore no significant adverse ffict.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50Yo forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Stitch weld detail verified in detail I 5 of drawing C-02 3 3 and confirmed to beconsistent with walkdown inspection (drawing I /4" weld 3-6oc). SQUG CalculationC-CSS-FI IA provides qualification of as-installedwelded anchorage.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?N/AN/AN/AXXXXXX SheetPaul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEERS & CONSU LTA}TTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Fl lA Equip. ClassEquipment Description MCC F11A1. Motor Control CentersInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?Nearby ladderfoundwith poor tie-ffi but judged not a potentialhazard to this MCC.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached top conduits provide adequate top bracing to MCC.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Adjacent panels CDFI IA-1 and CDFL lA-2 have a gap of -l/4" to this MCC, butthe top connection of these panels to the MCC negates any interaction potential.XXXX169of 379status N uN/AOther Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. GuerraAdam L. Helffrich Sheet 170 of 379Paul C. Rizza Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. CONSUTJTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Status(?)N uEquipment ID No. Fl lAEquipment DescriptionEquip. Class l. Motor Control CentersMCC FIIAOther supporting or relevant documents andhotosif any):Fl lA plateID Plate of componentFl lA generalGeneral view of component R Pa*l-9. Rr:ro Al,::r:,i1tes, t:rs,EN(;INE[RS & CONSL;I TAI{T SSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Fl lA Equip. Classl . Motor Control CentersEquipment DescriptionMCC Fl IASheet 17 l of 379StatusfhN uFl lA stitch weldPartial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchorsFl lA rigid connection to adjoining conduit and MCCA rigid connection is used to fasten the unit to adjoining conduit Sheet 172 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. CONSUUTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Fl lA Equip. Class l. Motor Control CentersEquipment DescriptionMCC FI lAStatus(?)N uF I I A crack in base of grout on cornerSeparation in base grout. Appears to be aestetic grout only.Fl lA poorly secured ladder in area of MCCLadder loosely tied off. PCe Paul c. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENCINEERS & CONSL]LTA}.TTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Fl-2Equipment DescriptionEquip. Class 0. OtherTraveline water screen F I -2Sheet 113 of379Statufr)N ULocation: BIdg. INTKManufacturer, Model, Etc.Floor El. 585Room50Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.AnchorageL Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?Slight corrosion identified in bolts due to humid environment.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50oh forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?Although slight corrosionfound on screen mounting base, no significant degraded conditionwas identified during inspection.XXXXXX pc"te Paul c. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENGTNEERS & CONSULTATITSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Fl-z Equip. ClassEquipment Description Traveling water screenSheet 114 of379StatusFN U0. OtherFt-2Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Rigidly attqched lines, no concern of dffirential displacement.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?N/AN/AXXXXOther Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Inside of screen housingwas accessible and no degraded condition was identffied.Motor located on top of screen housingfound in adequate condition.Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra7/25/2012,/;-,"*/ lL4'ir&'.i;7/25120t2Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 175 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. CONSUUTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Fl-zEquipment DescriptionStatus(?)N uEquip. Class 0. OtherTraveling water scree n F l -2Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):Fl-2 plateID Plate of componentFl-2 generalGeneral view of component Sheet 176 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINET]RS t! CONSUI TANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Fl-2Equip. Class 0. OtherEquipment DescriptionTraveling water screen F l -2Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchorsF l-l is opened for inspection because it is morevisible than Fl-2StatusffiN U"h-1*tttF l-2 anchorageFl-l inside Sheet 177 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENCINEERS & CONSUI,TANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Fl2A Equip. class l. Motor control centersstatus$\ uEquipment DescriptionMCC FI2ALocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El. 603Room 428Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?This is an 8 section MCC, but it is in-line with two other MCC sections (MCC FI4 and MCC FI 5).It was verified that all adjacent sections are bolted together. Each section of MCC is welded toembed channels atfront and backwith an average of at least 5" long, 3/16" fillet welds.Y2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No degraded conditions foundfor base stitch welds.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No craclrs identified in sloped grout at mounting base.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the S0o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)SOUG Calculation C-CSS-FI2A provides qualification of as-installedwelded anchorage.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?N/AXXxXXX Sheet 178 of3l9Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENCINEERS ET CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. F12A Equip. ClassEquipment Description MCC F12AStatusG)N ul. Motor Control CentersInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Top entry conduit rigidly supported to backwall.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?N/AXXXXXOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)This 8 section MCC is adjacent to MCC FI4 ond MCC Fl5. These MCCs were opened and inspected. It was verffied thattheseMCCsareboltedtogether. AtthesouthendofthisMCC,thereisal.5"gaptopanelCDFl2A-l,whichisjudgedacceptable to preclude pounding.Evaluated bv:7/25/2012p' ,) //( , J --4.-/ti-{h,',RJ/Eddie M. Guerra tt,.r,j / ,i' / ,t /, :)d?,':?'t /-", )/,!ri"//YAdam L. Helffrich7t25t2012 Sheet 179 of 379Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.ENGINEERS &. CONSUUTAI{TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)status(?)N uEquipment ID No. FlzAEquipment DescriptionEquip. ClassMCC FI2Al. Motor Control CentersOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):Fl2A plateID Plate of componentF l2A generalGeneral view of component Sheet I 80 of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUT-TANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Fl2A Equip. ClassEquipment Description MCC FlzAl. Motor Control CentersFl2A stitch weldPartial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchorsStatusG)N u Sheet l8l of379Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENGINEERS S{ CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Fl2D Equip. Class l. Motor control Centersstatu{T)N uEquipment DescriptionMCC FI2DLocation: Bldg. INTKFloor El. 576Room52Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?This a single section MCC welded to embedwith an overage of 9" of 3/l6" fillet welds atfront and back.No degraded conditionfound around cabinet base.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No significant craclts identified around cabinet mounting base.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Since cabinet could not be opened, configuration is verified basedon SQUG calculotion C-CSS-F12D. This calculation evaluates anchorage based oncalculation C-CSS-EL2C which conlcudes anchorage configuration is adequate.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?Outlier close out note (C-CSS-FI2D, page 7 of 7) indicates comparisonw/ El2Chas shown anchorage is adequate. Anchorage is also checked withsection L of dratuing C-041 28 and confirmed to be consistent with walkdown inspection.NXXXXXX PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSUUTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Fl2DEquipment DescriptionSheetEquip. Class l. Motor ControlMCC F12DInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?Potential interaction hazard due to near byfire extinguishers withoutadequate wallfixity. It was agreed thal no significant effect expected during seismic event.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXX182of 379Status0N UCentersN/AN/AOther Adverse Conditions1l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra',, i /.i /t"/.r/ir1,7r/ rz'/,'r//, iWAdam L. Helffrich Sheet I 83 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS C'. CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. F l2D Equip. ClassEquipment Description MCC Fl2DFl2D plateID Plate of componentFl2D anchorageMounting base detail with embedded channelStatus(?)N ul. Motor Control CentersOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):FlzD generalGeneral view of componentPotential interaction hazard from fire extinguisherin the vicinity of component.F I 2D fire ext to right PCePaul c. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANJTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FDl062 Equip. ClassEquipment Description FIRE DAMPER FDSheet 184 of379statuf)N u0. Otherr062Location: Bldg.AUXBFloor El. 603Room428Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.AnchorageL Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Component attached to ceiling and braced to wall with HSS sections.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Damper vertical supports connected to upper floor decking behueen ribs.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?Damperfound adequately supported against laterol movement HS'S sectionsfound in adequate condition. No signs of corrosion observed on support members.N/AXXXXXX PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FDl062Equip. ClassFIRE DAMPER FDSheet0. OtherEquipment Description1062Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distributionand masonry block walls not likely tosystems, ceiling tiles and lighting,collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Electric line c onnec te d w ith adequate flexib ility.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXX185of 379StatusGlN uOther Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra, rii*C /*':',rU. ;,'r:"Adam L. Helffrich Sheet I 86 of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGTNEERS C( CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FDl062Equip. Class 0. OtherEquipment DescriptionFIRE DAMPER FD 1062Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):FDl062General view of componentStatus(?)N uFDl062 anchorageView of anchorage PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.EA*CiINEERS & CONSUITAIITSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FIS l612 Equip. ClassEquipmentDescription SFPHX l FIS-I612Sheet 187 of379Status*)N u20. Instrument and Control PanelsCool Water Outlet Flow Indicatine SwitchLocation: Bldg. AUXBManufacturer, Model, Etc.Floor El. 590'6"Room 312Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided atthe end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Floor mounted rackfound in adequate condition anchoredwith 4-1/2" diam bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?No signs of corrosionfound on anchor bolts and bottom-l/2" plate.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No visible cracks on groutfor bottom plate anchorage.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50Yo forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?Anchor spacing to adjacent floor mounted rack is judged adequate.N/AN/AN/AXXXXXX pc-'te Paul c. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENCINEI.RS & CONSI,ILTAI{TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FIS 1612 Equip. ClassEquipment Description SFP HX I FIS-1612Sheet20. Instrument and Control PanelsCool Water Outlet Flow IndicatineInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the area verified.Blockwalls 3257 and 3267 verified to be to be seismically adequatebased on ref. VBWL6-8001-083, Rev 2 (4/27/88) andVBWI6-8001-084, Rev 5 (4/27/88).9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Flexible line and small piping were identified with adequate flexibility.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XXXX188of 379Status(T)N uSwitchN/AOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated bv:Eddie M. Guemai{r:#'// //.,/' . i;2.i/,r,,./iAdam L. Helffrich Sheet I 89 of 379ENGINEERS & CONSIJLTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control PanelsSFP FD( I FIS- 1612 Cool Water Outlet Flow Indicating SwitchFIS 1612 plateID Plate of componentFI S 1612 generalGeneral view of componentStatus@N UEquipment ID No. FIS 1612Equipment Description Sheet 190 of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUTTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FIs 1612 Equip. class 20. Instrument and control PanelsEquipment DescriptionSFP HX I FIS-1612 Cool Water Outlet Flow Indicating SwitchFIS 1612 anchorageView of anchorageFIS 1612 adjacent masonry wallPotential interaction hazard from masonry wall near unitStatus/?)N U PC)e Paul c. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FTHP3CEquip. Class 18. Instrument (on) RacksEquipment DescriptionFLOW TRANSMITTER FT HP3CLocation: Bldg.AUXBFloor El.565Room208Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completin g ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 5Ao/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Mounted on tube section 6x6 which is attached to concrete wall withfour1/2" diameter anchors. The lightweight transmitter (<-20 lbs) is attached to therackwithfour 3/8" diameter machine bolts. OK.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Supporting wall tubesfound in good condition.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?No signs of coruosionfound on mounting support and piping4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No cracks identified on wall near flow transmitter.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?Sheet l9l of379Status9 N UXXN/AXXXX PCe PauI c. Rizzo Associates, [nc.Eir-CINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FTHP3CEquip. Class 18. Instrument (on)Equipment DescriptionFLOW TRANSMITTER FT HP3CSheetInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Small piping connected to transmitter found with adequate flexibility.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?No potential interaction identified on the vicinity of component.XXXX192of 379Statusfi)N uRacks712512012XOther Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Pipe lines rigidly attached to containment wall. No adverse fficts due to dffirential motion are expected.Evaluated bv:Eddie M. GuerraAdam L. Helffrich Sheet 193 of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEE,RS,& CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FTHP3CEquip. Class 18. Instrument (on) RacksEquipment DescriptionFLOW TRANSMITTER FT HP3COther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):Status@N UFTHP3CID Plate of componentFTHP3C GeneralGeneral view of component pce Paul C.Rizz-o Asso-ciates, [nc.ENGINEERS & CONSU1TANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FV645lEquip. ClassSOLENOID VALVESheet 194 of379Status:$ U88. Solenoid ValvesEquipment DescriptionAF645lLocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El.Room 238Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the itemof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Installed on a 4" diameter pipe line.2. ls the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?Valve and main pipe line found with no signs of corrosion.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50Yo forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?Main pipe line adequatelly supported. No excessive unsupported lengths identffied.565XXXXXX PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENGINEERS & CONSU LTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FV645l Equip. ClassSheet 195 of379Status0N U8B. Solenoid ValvesEquipment DescriptionSOLENOID VALVE AF645IInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?No blockwalls or potential interaction hazard identified in the area.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Lines connected with adequate flexibility.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?NiAXXXXOther Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra7/2512012Adam L. Helffrich7/2st20r2 SheetPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS Cl CONSUTiTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Status(?)N uEquipment ID No. FV645lEquipment DescriptionEquip. Class 88. Solenoid ValvesSOLENOID VALVE AF645IOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):FV-6451 PlateID Plate of componentFV-6451 General2General view of component196 of 379 Sheet 197 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTSStatus:ON USeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FV6452 Equip. Class 88. Solenoid ValvesEquipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg. AUXBSOLENOID VALVE AF6452Floor El.565Room237Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Mounted on pipe line spannig around l}ft.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?Valve and pipe line found with good surface condition and no signs of corrosion.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/oforwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?N/AN/AN/AN/AXXXXXX pc-\e Paul c. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENGINEERS & CONSUTTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FV6452Equip. Class 88. Solenoid ValvesEquipment DescriptionSOLENOID VALVE AF6452Sheet 198 of379Statusfi\N uInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached lines found with adequate flexibiliy.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?N/AXXXXOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated bv:7125/2012Eddie M. Guerra,r! / /,),,r) 'lt. i/L.:,,/ ,/r rr /n,'/,{1,,7/2s/2012Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 199 of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FV6452Equip. Class 8B. Solenoid ValvesEquipment DescriptionSOLENOID VALVE 4F6452Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):FV645 2 generalGeneral view of componentStatus@N U PCe Paul C. Rizzo As-sociates, [nc.ENCTNEERS & CONSULTANTSSheet 200 of 319Status:QN USeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. HIS 5889A Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control PanelsEquipment DescriptionAFP TURB 1-l STEAM INLET VALVE inside PNL C5709Location: Bldg. AUXBFloor El. 623Room 505Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Inside Panel C5709, which has similar anchorage to Panel C5702.Back panel doors are adequately attached to panel structure with4-l/2" screws.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?None observed.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?None observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?None observed.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50oh forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?XXXXXX PCeIo:l:lER'SJ::c", ""t"r"', h..Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. HIS 58894' Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control PanelsEquipment DescriptionAFP TURB l-l STEAM INLET VALVE inside PNL C5709Sheet 201 of 379Status:ON UInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?N/AN/AXXXXOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?XComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:7/25/2012Eddie M. Guerra't /' ./, i .r/.,r/'t':/ b,t/21"t{/.t7/25/2012Adam L. Helffrich }}