ML13340A163

Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Report Revision 1, Appendix C to Appendix G

ML13340A163
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	10/09/2013
From:	Paul C. Rizzo Associates, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML13340A277	List: L-13-358, Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Report Revision 1, Appendix B (2 of 2) ML13340A147 ML13340A155 ML13340A156 ML13340A157 ML13340A158 ML13340A159 ML13340A160 ML13340A162 ML13340A163
References
L-13-358
Download: ML13340A163 (171)

Text

APPENDIX C AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS (AWCs)

Sheet I of 123Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.t-NG t*-It RS 6- et!:islr L1.\lil sArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)105 Bldg. AUXB StatusO N U Room Floor El. 545 Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YNUN/A Xpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage for cover plate of E3 I-4 does not have nuts, see Photo 2.Concern has beenjudged not to represent an adverse coniditon re gar ding t he c o mp one nt's s e i s m ic pe rfor ma nc e.

YNUN/A2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cableiconduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

r)P42-r2) P58-l3) C3l-4 X YNUNiA X YNUNiA X Sheet 2 of 123Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomPaul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

tSG lNtt RS & CllissLr L'll\lt-Is 105Floor El.StatusO N U Bldg.545 AUXB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

N/A U N/A 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

N/A7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?Temporary scaffolding in area appears to be adequately restrained.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Fire Sources:NO No fire sources identi/ied in area.Flooding Sources: Punp Et98-1, Tonks 7198-1,7199-1, Piping: Aut steah, comp cooling, cont spray, decoy heat, demin water, rtre protection, high press iniect, prim water, makeup water,service $'ate/, reactor coolantEvaluated by:

'. Date: 712512012 7t25t2012 N N See Photo 3.Y N X X X XEddie M. Guerra Sheet 3 of 123Paul C. Rizzo As*ociates, [nc.Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 105 Floor El. 545 Bldg.Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): StatusO N U Photo I General View of Room 105 Area Sheet 4 of 123Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENG tNUt RS & CtlNl5Llrntt\'T$

StatusO N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 105 Supporting Photos (continued)

Floor El.545 Bldg.AUXB Photo 2Missing Nuts on Cover of 831-4 Photo 3 Tem porary Sceffolding Restrained Sheet 5 of 123 Paul Cl. Rizzc Associates, Inc.Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)StatusO N U Room ll3Floor El.545 Bldg.AUXB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.X NiAL Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

r)827-r 2)827-2 3) CCl469 X X X DCe Paul c. Rizzo ass'ciates, Inc.tiNGlN[tltN 6. C(l!\]L'L-I'At\'tS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 113 of Floor El.545 Bldg.Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Fire Sources:

NO No fire sources identified in area.Flooding Sourees:

NO No flood sources identified in area.Evaluated by:

Sheet t23 StatusO N U 7/2512012 X X X XEddie M. Guerra Sheet 7 of 123Paul C. Rizgo Associates, fnc.

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room I 13 StatusO N UFloor El.545 Bldg.Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Photo I Generel View of Room 113 AUXB Sheet 8 of 123Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.UNUlf{tt RS di. C('l.15UL-lAlsIS StatusO N UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 122Floor El.570',3.0625" Bldg.AUXB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.L Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Masowy walls identified in area Ilalls identiJied as I 157, I167, and I 187.Walls I t 57 and I 167 have been seismically analyzed per NRC IE Bulletin 80-1 t (Ref. VBll/03-8001-009, Rev 5 andVBW03-8001-010, Rav 8). llalt t 187 is etempt si ce no safety-related equipment is in the vicinity ofthe wall.

Relatad equipment on SWEL for this area:1) SFl6164 N/A N/A X X X X Sheet 9 of 123Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.llictljlt RS

& CoN\LTHillils StatusO N UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.570'3.0625" Bldg.AUXB Interaction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Fire Sources:

NONofire sources identified in area.Flooding Sources; NO No flood sources identified in area.Evaluated by: N NiA N/A U N/ATemporary scaffolding installed in area, judged not likely to cause interaction.

7t25/2012 712512012 X X X X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENG TNEf, N$ &' C\}T.T$U TTANT$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 122 Floor El. 570'3.0625" Bldg.Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Sheet l0 of 123 Statuse N U Photo I Generel View of Room 122 Sheet ll of 123Paul C. Riczo Associates, Inc.!r"G lNUt R5 di Ctll.lsl:

L'I.{tf nt Status:@N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 208Floor El.565 Bldg.AUXB Instructions for Com pleting Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.X 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Fire extinguisher is mounted on the wall and is not laterally supported. It is iudged that since the vertical acceleration at this location is less than I g, it is unlikely for the extinguisher to fall or cause signtficant interaction w ith nearby equipment.

Related equipment on SWEL for this area: l) FTHP3C 2)rA-636 3) hp2c4) hp3c N/A N/A X X X Sheet 12 of 123Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

E}($ tNL[ tLs & ConrsLr L-I At lli Status{T) N UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 565 208Floor El.Bldg.AUXB X Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?N is free of potentially adverse seismic a fire in the area?

N/A The potential tlood sources in the area are Coolers 826-1,826-2, component cooling, cont spray, decay heat, demin water, fire N 6. Does it appear that the area interactions that could cause N 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

equipmentfound in the vicinity of this dolly.

Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Fire Sources: NO No fire sources identified in area.Flooding Sources: No concerns identified regarding Jlood sources.Tank Tl 39-1, Piping: Aux system, borated water,A dolty was found unrestrained in the area. Since the dolly had restraining chainson it, it was judged that it is temporarily located at the positionfound in the room andwill be returned to its storage location and tied when work is done. Also, no sensitive N 8, Evaluated by: 7125/2012 7/25/2012 X X X Pau[ C. Rizeo Associates, lnc.ENG tNt[ Rtt {! U$tigLrL1AN t s Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 208 Floor El.565 Bldg.Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Sheet 13 of 123 Status:@ N U Unrestrained Dolly in AreaPhoto IGeneral View of Room 208 Sheet 14 of 123Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates.

lnc.rscrNttR$ {i c(arl'rIAs1s Status:@ N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 209 Floor El.565 Bldg.AUXB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.X1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Fire extinguisher is mounted on the wall and is not laterally supported. It is judged that since the vertical acceleration at this location is less than I g, it is unlikely for the extinguisher to fall or cause significantinter ac t i on w ith ne arby equipme nt.Related equipment on SWEL for this area: l) Bwl0 X X X Sheet 15 of 123Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.f N(: lNUl Rri di ctlNsLtL-IA!{I5 Status:@N UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 209 Floor El.565 Bldg.AUXB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? N/A N/A 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area? N/A 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? Nuclear filter cask cart unrestrained adjacent to components.There are no sensitive equipment in the zone of influence of this cart and it is judged OK. It is also noted that this cart appear to be temporarily in the area.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Fire Sources: Hydrogen Piping to Make Up Tank Noconcernsidentifiedregardingfiresowrces. Thep*eniatttgrmanraurczsin'lneurmureffiragYnTrymgro Make Up TankFlooding Sources: No concerns identified regarding flood sources. The potentiat Jlood sources in the area are BWST Heater E34,Piping: Aux steam, borated water, comp cooling, domestic water, Durateh demin water, fire protection, high pressure injection, main steam, makeup, primary water, spent fuel clean waste Evaluated by: 7/2512012Eddie M. Guerra 7t25t2012 N X X X X Pau[ C. Rizso Associates, Inc. UNGIFIUI R$ & CrOt{iU Hilr!.rTS Floor El. 565 Bldg.Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Sheet 16 of 123 Status:@N u AUXB Photo 2 Nuclear Filter Cask Cart Not Restrained Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 209Photo I General View of Room 209 Sheet 17 of 123Paut C. Rizso Associates, lnc,lN(i INUIRS {L (L}F..sLiL1^!\1 s Status:@N UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 225 Floor El.Bldg.AUXBInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.L Does anchorage of equipment in the arca appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the areaappear to be free of significant degraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Blockwall close to P3728.Walls identified as 2047, 2427, and 2437.All walls have been seismically analyzed per NRC IE Bulletin 80-l I (Ref VBWl0-8001-058, Rev 3 and VBWI0-8001-059, Rev l).Related equipment on SWEL for this area: r)P37282) DHgB 565 N/A N/A VBW06-8001-028, Rev 4, X X X X Pau[ C. Rizgo Associates, Inc,t]'l{i tNf tRS {L f $n..SLrL-t Al\'I f Sheet l8 of 123 Status:@ N UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 225Floor El.565 Bldg.AUXBInteraction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Y N/A U N/A N/A 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? RP cart and dolly not restrained.In a subsequent visit to his area on the next day, it was observed thatthis cart was properly restrained. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Fire Sources:Lighting Transformer No concerns identified regarding fire sources. The potential ignition sources in the area are Lighting TransformerFlooding Soutces: No concerns identiJied regardingflood soxrces. The potential flood sources in the dreo are Lube oil coolers EI88-1, 8188-2, E212-1, E2l2-2, cooler E36, Accumulators 76406 &T 6407, Piping: Conp Cooling, Core flood, makeup,reactor cooldntEvaluated by: 712512012 7/25/2012 N N X X X X Eddie M. Guerra Sheet 19 of 123Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 225 Floor El.565 Bldg.Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Status:@N U AUXB Photo 2 RP Cart Not Restrained Photo IDolly Not Restrained Sheet 20 of 123Pau[ C. Rizso Associates. Inc.tsc tNtL Rs G {--o!i^{L! L-( AlfIS Status:@N UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 236 Floor El.565 Bldg.AUXBInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cableiconduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Fire extinguisher is mounted on the wall and is not laterally supported. It ts iudged that since the verticalacceleration at this location is less than I g, it is unlikely for the extinguisher to fall or caltse signfficant interac t i on w ith ne arby eq uipment.Masonry wall in room, see Photo 2.Walls identified as 2317, 2327, 2337, and 2347. All walls seismically analyzed.per NRC IE Bulletin 80-11 (Ref VBW09-8001-049, Rev 8, VBW09-8001-050, Rev 4,VBW09-8001-051, Rev l0 and VBlIt09-8001-052, Rev 3).Related equipment on SWEL for this area:l) hp2b X N/A N/A X X X Sheet 2l of 123 Pau[ C, Rizzo Associates, [nc,Es(,lNEtRS ai ljar!\at!LIAlr'ls Status:O N UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.565 236 Bldg.AUXB X Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Fire Sources:

NONofire sources identified in area. Flooding Sources: No concerns identified regarding Jlood sources. The potential Jlood sources in the area are Tank TI i9-2, Aux feedwater, component cooling, containment spray, decay heat, fire protection, high pressure injection,steem, makeup, prim water, reactor coolant spent fitel, service water Evaluated by: 7125t20t2Eddie M. Guerra 7/25t20t2 N/A X X X Pau[ C. Rizr,o Ansociates, [nc.Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 236ENC TNUI R-S & c:Olq;LI LT ANT$Photo I General View of Room 236Floor El.565 Bldg.Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Sheet 22 of 123 Status:@N U Photo 2 Masonry Wall Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, lnc. Sheet 23 of 123 Status:@ N UuN$ tNu[ Rs & L.Ol\ -{ullhvl $Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 237 Floor El.565 Bldg.ATJXBInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each ofthe following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.N N/A U N/A N/A U N/Al. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

N Y N Y NRelated equipment on SWEL for this area: l) AFle2) PSL l06C

3) PSL4928A4) FV64s2 5) P r4-r 6) MS588eA 7) C73-r X X X X Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.Sheet 24 of 123 Status:@ N U UNC INUI Rtl {x {JON]$LI ljtAlf I liArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 237 Floor El.565 Bldg.AUXB X Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Fire Sources:

Flooding Sources: Evaluated by: N/A N/A N/A NONofire sources identified in area.Noconcernsidentifiedregardingfloodsources. ThepotentialfloodsourcesintheareaareOilcoolerEl94-1,condensate tank T2 I 7, Piping: Aux. feedwater, condensate, turbine plant cooling water, domestic wdter, mainsteam, Service water. Date: 712512012 Date: 7l2sl20r2 X X XEddie M. Guerra Paul C. Rigso Associates, lnc.ENC tNU[ R"{ {;. C.O:q$L?IJI AlfI S Photo I General View of Room 237 Sheet 25 of 123 Status:@ N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 237 Floor El.565 Bldg.Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): AUXB Photo 2 General View of Room 237 Status:@ N UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.565 Bldg.AUXB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Fire extinguisher is mounted on the wall and is not laterally supported. It is judged that since the vertical acceleration at this location is less than I g, it is unlikely for the extinguisher to fall or cause significantinteraction with ne arby equipment.Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

r)Pr4-22) FV645l pce Pau[ c. Rizz. Associate.s, Inc. Sheet 26 of 123 238 X X X N/A X Sheet 27 of 123Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, lnc. tl{(;lNUf RS {i, e$F*Sl-fL-I'ANt5 Status:@ N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 238 Floor E,l.565 Bldg.AUXB XInteraction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?N/A N/A7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?Scaffolding in area appears to be adequately restrained.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Fire Sources: NO No fire sources identified in area. FloodingSources: Noconcernsidentifiedregardingfloodsourees. Thepdterlridftaailxaarcvsin'lneurYaareAilcvdtersL'194t/, E30, seal water cooler 7218, condensate tank T2I8, Piping: Aux. feedwater, condensate, turbtne plant coolingwater. domestic water. main steam. service water Evaluated by: 712512012 712512012 X X X Paul C. Rizgo Asnociates, lnc.UNG lN gt s*!r & C\tliEitf L:rArfrsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 238 Floor El. 565 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): General View of Room 238 Sheet 28 of 123Status:@N u Sheet 29 of 123 Paul C. Riezo Associates, lnc.Lstl tNtI Rs tr C$NSL'L-IArits Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room PT Floor El.Bldg.AUXB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.L Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:l) Tl0 Status:@ N U 565 N/A X X X X Sheet 30 of 123Pau[ C. Rizso Associates, lnc.TNCINUTRS & EOXSL'L'IANIS Status:@ N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room PT Floor El.565 Bldg.AUXB XInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? Construction debris in area. Not likelv to cause adverse interaction.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Fire Sources: Flooding Sources: N/AEvaluated bv:Hydrogen Piping to Make Up TankNo concerns identified regardingfire sources. The potential ignition sources in the area are Hydrogen Piping toMake Up TankNo concerns identified regarding flood sources. The potential flood sources in the area are Borated water storage tankTI0, Piping: Boratedwater, Decay Heat, High Pressuer Iniection 7t2512012 7t2512012 X X XEddie M. Guerra =.{- .-l Lucarelh Sheet3l ofl23 Pau[ C. Rizso Associates, [nc.EN(; lNt[ R$ {i L.oN'tiU L"t hlfnt Status:@ N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room PT AUXB Floor El.565 Bldg.Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Photo 1 General View of PT Sheet 32 of 123 Pau[ C. Ricso Associates, lnc.rsclNtt Rs & coNsL'LTA!*'Irt 303 Statu0 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.585 Bldg.AUXB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items- The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? Small gap (-l/4") between grout and anchor plate. Judged to be acceptable, see Photo 2.CSI6, a checl<valve, has several nuts with what appears to be less than adequatethread engagement in that the threads do not extend beyond the nut, they are flush.Concluded that is acceptable per procedure DB-MM-09266-y 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:r) AF6082) CS1530 X X X X Sheet 33 of 123 Paul C, Rizzo Associates, lnc, E!{t'lNEt RS rL (]ah-sLrljlhNr$

Statufi N UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 303Floor El.585 Bldg.AUXB X Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Hydrogen line in the area is well supported.Fire Sources: NO Nofire sources identified in area.Flooding Sources: No concerns identified regardingflood sources.Accumulation tank T2 I 6, Piping: Aux. feedwater, The potential flood sources in the area are Moisture C ontainment Spray, F ire P r ote cti on, Fe e dw ater N/A N/AEvaluated by: 7/25/2012Eddie M. Guerra 7lz5l20l2 X X X Sheet 34 of 123 Pau[ C. Rizzo Assoclates, [nc.u!{G tNUl R-s & L.(}!.riu LT,tl\-r s Statu0 N UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 303 Floor El.585 AUXB Bldg.Photo 1 General View of Room 303 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Gap Between Grout and Anchor Plate Sheet 35 of 123 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc. Eilc INUI tas ai Ct]lsSClLAA^*rsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 304 Floor El.585 Bldg.AUXB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:r) El lB 2)YEZB 3) BW214) SFI r Statu0 N U NiA X X X X Sheet 36 of 123Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 304 Status:O N U Floor El.s85 Bldg.AUXB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Degraded insulation observed on domestic woter line. Judged not to be a concern. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Fire Sources:Flooding Sources:Evaluated by: N N N N/A YTransformer above L3701, Transformer above L4801 No concerns identified regardingfire sources. The potential ignition sources in the area are Transformer aboveL3701, Transformer abwe L18{tlNo concerns identified regardingJlood sources. The potentialflood sources in the area are Abandoned tank E72,Piping: Aux. Feedwater, Aux. Steam, Borated Water, Domestic water, Duratek, Deminwater, fire protection, main feedwater, makeup, primary water, SPF pool cooling, 7t25/20r2 7125/2012 X X X XEddie M. Guerra Sheet 37 of 123 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENG TNHT.R$ O "*'XSg g1'AFTts Status:@N UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 304 AUXB Floor El.585 Bldg.Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):General View of Room 304 Sheet 38 of 123Pau[ C. Rizzt'r Associates, lnc.l*-U lNUt RS {i CO,\}UfIAl{lSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)312 Bldg.AUXB Statu0 N U Room Floor El.590'6" Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)? Two anchor bolts missingfrom electrical conduit support near R3701 rack, see Photo 2.An additional inspection was performed and it was noted that the base support iswelded to the angle in the floor for the floor plug. Therefore, this finding is judged not to present a significant seismic concern. y 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?Minor corrosion noted in anchorage supporting sensor panel, see Photo 3.Deemed not a significant degraded condition.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Masonry wall in area, see Photo l. Check seismic adequacy.Walls identified as 3227, 3247, 3257, 3267, 3277, 3297, 3357, 3367, 3417, 3427.Wall 3427 is exempt. All other walls have been seismically analyzed.Related equipment on SWEL for this area:l) Frs l6l22) SF473) DHl0l X X X N/A X Sheet 39 of 123 Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates. lnc.tN(ilN!f tls {. ul}IruL-IAF'IS Statu0 N UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 312Floor El.

590'6" AUXB X Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?N/A N/A7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? Cart with gas cannisters loosely restrained to wall, see Photo 4.Judged not a concern since straps and chains will keepcannisters in place thus no direct contact with nearby equipment is expected.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Fire Sources: NO No fire sources identified in area.

FloodingSources: Noconcernstdentifiedregardingfloodsources. ThepotentialfloodsourcesintheareaareHXE23-1,823-2, Pumps P247, P248, P249 & P250, Piping: Component cooling, Decay heat, domestic water, demin wqter, spent fuelEvaluated by: 7/25t20r2 7lzsl20l2 X X X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 312Floor El. 590'6" Bldg.Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Sheet 40 of 123 statuO N U Missing Anchor Bolts Photo IGeneral View of Room 312 Showing Masonry Walls Sheet 41 of 123 Pau[ C. Rizzo Asnociates, [nc.ENc tNH[ RS & C:(}NtiU ullA.!{r$Statu0 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Supporting Photos (continued)

Photo 3 Minor Corrosion onAnchor Plate Photo 4 Cart Containing Gas Canisters Loosely Restrained Sheet 42Paul C. Rizzo Assaciates, lnc.llrtJ tN!t Rs

& ('(t!\:iLTrIAlfI S Status: V OUArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 314 Floor El.585 Bldg.AUXB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? Nut missing on conduit, see Photo I.Condition report issued : CR-2012-109202. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:1) RC370l U N U N X X X X PCe Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, [nc. gNctNttlts

l. !'tl:\:iLlL-lANlriArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 314 Sheet 43 of Status: V OUFloor El.585 Bldg.AUXB X Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse selsmrcinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Hydrogen line in this area is well supported. Fire Sources:Flooding Sources: N N UEvaluated bv: NONofire sources identified in area.No concerns identified regarding /lood sources. The potential flood sources in the area are Piping: Aux feedwater,Aux. steam, Component Cooling, Core Flood, Containment Spray, Decay Heat Removal, Fire Protection, High 7125/2012 7/25t20r2 X X XEddie M. Guerra Paul C. Rizso Aseociates, lnc.Sheet 44 of 123ENG tNUf Rs ll* C:$NSU lXAtfIs Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 314Floor El. 585Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Photo 1 Nut Missing on Conduit Status: Y @U Sheet 45 of 123Pau[ C. Rizzn Associates. lnc.Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)StatusON U Room 318Floor El.585 Bldg.AUXB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

N/AFire extinguisher is mounted on the wall and is not laterally supported. It is iudged that since the vertical acceleration at this location is less than I g, it is unlikely for the extinguisher to fall or cause significantinter acti on w ith ne ar by equipme nt.Masonrywalls identified as 308D, 309D, 310D, 3l ID, and 338D.All walls have been seismically analyzed per NRC IE Bulletin 80-l I (Ref, VBWI2-8001-068, Rev 3, VBWI3-8001-069, Rev 3, VBWl3-8001-070, Rev 3, VBWI3-8001-071, Rev 8 and VB{lrl9-8001-093, Rev 5).Related equipment on SWEL for this area:l) Fl08-1 2)Er2B3) Cl l-l4) K5-l 5) TE-53296) C36ls7) DA-3783 X X X X Sheet 46 of 123Paul C" Rizzo Associates, lnc.tl(i lNtI RS 6, ('(]n-$Ll L'I At\-l $ StatusON U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 318Floor El.585 Bldg.AUXB X Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Fire Sources: NO No /ire sources identified in area.Flooding Sources: No concerns identifiedregardingfioodsourees.

Thep*ermdftaailsaurcvsinltrcarmareLTJG MwttodterEI0-1, DG Oit Cooler 894-1, DG Jacket Water T12t-1, Piping: Component Cooling, Domestic water, DieselFuel Oil. Demin lllater, Fire Protection Evaluated by: 712512012 712512012 X X X Paul C, Rizz,o Associates, lnc.Sheet 47 of 123ENG ]NUT R*C & L:OTTSU L"T AHT s-Statusf;)N UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 318 Floor El.585 Bldg.AUXB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Photo I Masonry Wall Sheet 48 of 123Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.t!{c lN uf Rs 1& (:t}N-\lr LrAsI$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)319 Bldg.AUXB Statusf,)N u RoomFloor El.585 Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the arca appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the arca appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cableiconduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Fire extinguisher is mounted on the wall and is not laterally supported. It is iudged that since the vertical acceleration at this location is less than I g, it is unlikely for the extinguisher to fall or cause signtficantinteraction w ith nearby equipment.

Blockwalls 304D and 307D identified in room.All walls have been seismically analyzed per NRC IE Bulletin 80-11 (Ref, VBWL2-8001-064, Rev 8, and VBWI2-8001-067, Rev 7).Related equipment on SWEL for this area:1) YFr 2)Ks-z3) C25-3 X N/A N/A X X X Sheet 49 of 123 Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, lnc. g:!clNUtRS A (t}rauL"rAlflS Checklist (AWC)319 Floor El.585 StatusON U Area Walk-By Room Bldg.AUXB XInteraction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?

N/A7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Fire Sources: NO No /ire sources identified in area.Flooding Scnrces: No concerns identified regardingfloodsurees.

Thepoterlriilftooilxourczsin'lnealvdare'LTtG MWtQ.vdterEI0-2, DG Lube oil HX E94-2, DG Jacket water T12l-2, Piping: Component cooling, Domestic water, DieselFuel oil, demin water, fire protectionEvaluated by: 712512012Eddie M. Guerra 7t2512012 Brian X X X Pau[ C, Rizso Associates, [nc.usu tNtt R$ c. cr$ilrL!rtANr tiArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 319 Floor El. 585 Photo IGeneral View of Room 319 Sheet 50 of 123 statusON uOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Sheet 51 of 123Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 32tA StatusON U Floor El.585 Bldg.AUXBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Masonry wall, see Photo I.Walls identified as 305D and 306D. Both hove been seismically analyzed.All walls have been seismically analyzed per NRC IE Bulletin 80-l I (Ref.and VBWI2-8001-066, Rev 6).Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

r)LT-2787 2)146-r N/A VBWl2-8001-065, Rev 5, X X X X BC? Pau[ c. Rizzo Astociate's, lnc.Es'; INUI RT

• lIOTI$LIljT'AF-IsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 32lA Sheet 52 of 123 StatusON U Floor El.585 Bldg.AUXB X Interaction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?N/A N/A 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Fire Sources:EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR DAY TANK 1-]No concerns identified regardingfire sources.

The potential ignition sources in the area are EMERGENCYDIESEL GENERATOR DAY TANK I - IFlooding Sow'ces: No concerns identified regardingfood wrces. The potettidtfivo& nocesialtle areaare LwrDoyTatkl{o-1, Piping: Diesel Fuel Oil, Fire Protection Evaluated by: 7/25t2012 7/2s/2012 X X XEddie M. Guerra Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.SNGTNEBR$ e CorsrumA}{tt Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomSheet 53 of 12332lA Floor El. 585 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Photo I Masonry Wall Status0N U PCe Pau[ c' Rizzo Associates, lnc.EsCllrittRs {i. (j(l,\.sLlL'lAF"ISArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.Bldg.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk'By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Fire extinguisher is mounted on the wall and is not laterally supported. It is iudged that since the vertical acceleration at this location r's /ess than I g, it is unlikely for the extinguisher to fall or cause significant interaction w ith nearby equipment.Related equipment on SWEL for this area:1) DlSheet 54 of 123 Statusf)N u 585 323 X X X N/A X PCe Pau[ c. Rizzo Associates, [nc. ENCINXLRS S. CI}N\UL'IAl\'I5Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 323 Sheet 55 of 123 Status0N U Floor El.585 Bldg.AUXB X Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?Supply cabinet left open, see Photo 2.However this cabinet is anchored and iudged not to cause any interaction8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Fire Sources: NONofire sources identified in area.Flooding Sources: NO Noflood sources identified in area.Evaluated by: with nearby equipment. 7lzsl20I2 712512012 NEddie M. Guerra X X X Sheet 56 of 123Pau[ C. Rieco Associates, lnc.Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 323 ENG TNUT R$ TL L.O}i$Lt LI.AN'I $Photo IGeneral View of Room 323Floor El.585 Bldg.Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Statusf;)N U AUXB Photo 2 Supply Cabinet Left Open PCe Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, lnc. ENt;lNtl Rs {!, c(}l\'SUnANIli Sheet 57 of 123 Status0N UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 325 Floor El.585 Bldg.AUXB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. L Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Fire extinguisher is mounted on the wall and is not laterally supported. It is judged that since the verticalacceleration at this location is less than I g, it is unlikely for the extinguisher to fall or cause significant interaction w ith nearby equipment. Flourescent lights ovserved above sensitive equipment.Flourescent lights jusdged as OK based on testing of lights performedfor IPEEE.Related equipment on SWEL for this area: l) c3645 2) Cr X X X N/A N/A X Sheet 58 of 123 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.L!,r(: lNtt Rs u ellsrL!L'IANI 5 StatusON U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 325Floor El.585 Bldg.AUXB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Fire Sources: Flooding Sources: NO Evaluated by: Screens per FAQ07-0031; 30 kVA No concerns identified regardingfire sources. The potential ignition sources in the area are Screens per FAQ 07-0031; 30 kVANoflood sources identified in area.7t25t2012 Eddie M.712512012 N/A X X X X Lucarelli Sheet 59 of 123Pau[ C. Rizzo Ansociates, fnc, t!{c r Ntt R*r & u(}r.r$LuJli\lsl $StatusfYlN U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 325 AUXBFloor El.585 Bldg.Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): General View of Room 325 Sheet 60 of 123 Paul C. Rizco Associates. Inc.E:.li; lNtl.Rs {i coNlsL:L-t At{Is Statusf)N UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 328Floor El.585 Bldg.AUXB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?Need to verify anchorage of E 22- I (welded?)Anchorage confirmed to be consistent with design documentation2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Fire extinguisher is mounted on the wall and is not laterally supported. It is judged that since the verticalacceleration at this location ls /ess than Ig, it is unlikelyfor the extinguisher tofall or cause significant interaction w ith ne arby equipment.Masonrywall adjacent to E22-1, see Photo I.Llralls identified as 3307, 3347, 3397, and 3407. All walls have been seismically analyzed.per NRC IE Bulletin 80-l I (Ref VBWIT-8001-088, Rev 6, VBWIS-8001-090, Rev 3VBWL9-8001-094, Rev 5 and VBWI9-8001-095, Rev I0).Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

r)822-r 2)822-2 3\P43-2 X X X X BCeArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room of StatusON U 328Floor El.585 Bldg.AUXB X Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Scaffilding and stepladders in area appear to be properly restrained8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Fire Sources: NONofire sources identified in area.Flooding Sources: No concerns identified regarding flood sources. The potential Jlood sources in the area are CCW HX 822- I,2, 823-3, Chem pot feeder Tl 3, Piping: Fire Protection, Component Cooling, Demin woter, service water.Evaluated by: 7/2512012 712512012 N N N X X X Eddie M. Guerra Sheet 62 of 123Pau[ C, Rizso Ansociates, [nc.EN$TNUIR & C:ONELIL'T'AIfrU Statusf;)N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 328 AUXB Floor El.585 Bldg.Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Photo I General View of Room 328Masonry Wall Adjacent to Heat Exchan ge 822-l Sheet 63 of 123Pau[ C. Rizgo Associates, [nc'cN(; lNttRs f c(rn.rLlulAl{rliArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 427 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the a.rea appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

N/A NiA interaction with ne arby equipment.Related equipment on SWEL for this area:l) Fl lA Status:@N U Floor El.603 Bldg.AUXBFire extinguisher is mounted on the wall and is not laterally supported. It is judged that since the vertical acceleration at this location ls /ess than I g, it is unlikely for the extinguisher to fall or cause significant X X X X Sheet 64 of 123Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.t:\{;t}i!tR.\ {i coijsuLTlt'lsts Status:@N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 427 Floor El.603 Bldg.AUXB xInteraction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?Ladder is stored adjacent to MCC and is tied loosely, see Photo 2.Recommended to be tighten but judged not a significant adverse condition.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments(Additional pages may be added as necessary) Fire Sources: Transformer Feed to DP4502, 480V Transformer for MCC YF2 No concerns identified regarding fire sowrces. The potential igntnanrwrrces mltte arm areT ran$ormYr?eYiltoDP4502, 480V Transformer for MCC YF2 Flooding Sources; No concerns identified regarding flood sources. The potential flood sources in the area are Piping: Main Steam,Fire Protection Evaluated by: 7t25lz0l2 7t2512012 X X X Sheet 65 of 123 Paul C. Rizs,o Associates, lnc. tsc tNUt Rs {i (]custiu t_"I ANT$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 427 Floor El.603 Bldg.Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Status:QN U AUXB Photo 2 Ladder Loosely Tied Adjacent to MCC Fl lAPhoto IGeneral View of Room 427 Sheet 66 of 123Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.llrctNttRS 6. eoF'suLlAliIs 603 Status:QN UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 428 Floor El.Bldg.AUXB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Fire extinguisher is mounted on the wall and is not laterally supported. It is iudged that since the verticalacceleration at this location is less than I g, it is unlikely for the extinguisher to fall or caltse significant interaction w ith nearby equipment.Masonry walls adjacent to components, see Photo 2.Blockwalls identified as walls 4016, 4026, 4036, 4046, 4786, 4796, 4886, 4896, and 4906.All walls have been seismically analyzed per NRC IE Bulletin 80-11 (Ref, VBW20-8001-100, Rev 14, VBW2l-8001-102, Rev i,3, VBW25-8001-125, Rev 9, tr/8w25-8001-126, Rev 6, VBW27-8001-135, Rev 19,l/8W27-8001-136, Rev 3 andVBW2S-8001-137, Rev 3.Related equipment on SWEL for this area: X X X N/A X 1) C4606 2)Fr2A3) FDl062 4)D2 ED 5) D2P 6)Y2 7)YYz

8) YV4e) DBC2P 17) DCIl0) Fl 18) Yll l) D233

12) xDFl-2

13) C4605 14)D23315) DBCTPN16) DBC2PN Sheet 67 of 123Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.lNC lNttrRS &

(:('ti$L'L-I',ANtS Status:QN UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 428Floor El.603 Bldg.AUXB X Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?Electrical cart and tools unrestrained in room. See Photo 3.These equipment were found to be temporary as the equipmentwere being serviced.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Door to cabinet DCB-2P observed open. See Photo 4.Judged okny as the equipment was being serviced.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Fire Sources:Flooding Sources: NO Evaluated by: Y No concerns identified regarding fire sources. The potential ignition sources in the area are Power Transformer for Substation F2 &F1, Transformer for H3602 and H46ff2, Liglrtmg StationTrmrsformer,Consfant\lokagsTransformer XY2,Static Voltage Regulator No flood sources identified in area.7/25DAI7 7t25t2012 Brian X X XEddie M. GuerraNo concerns identified regarding fire sources. The potential ignition sources in the area are Power Transformer for Sheet 68 of 123Peul C. Rizso Asnociate.s, lnc.Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 428 Floor El.603 Bldg.Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Status:QN U AUXB Photo 2 Masonry Wall Adjacent to ComponentsPhoto I General View of Room 428 Sheet 69 of 123 Status:QN UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 428 Supporting Photos (continued): Floor El.603 llldg.Photo 3 Unrestrained Work Cart Cabinet DCB-2P Door Left Open Sheet 70 of 123Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc. EN{rlNtLRS 6 CC}i1iUL-IAN'l S Status:QN U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 4281lFloor El.603 Bldg.AUXBInstructions for Com pleting ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Masonry wall adjacent to battery rack.

Walls identified as 4016 and 4026, both seismically analyzed per NRC IEBulletin 80-11 (Ref. VBW20-8001-100, Rev l4).Related equipment on SWEL for this area: r)2P2) 2N3) C78-2 X N/A X X X SheetPaul C. Rizzo Associates. [nc.usclNtt Rs 6. co!r\l'L'l A'r\.ls Status:SN UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 428/l Floor El.603 Bldg.AUXB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Fire Sources: NO No fire sources identified in area.Flooding Sources: NO No flood sources identified in area.Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra Brian N N Y N Wooden scaffolding was found near battery rack which could represent a potential adverse condition. Control process confirmed scafold is temporary and complies with work period.712512012 712512012 X X X X Lucarelli Sheet 72 of 123Paul C. Rizso Asnociates, lnc.Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 4284 Status:QN UFloor El.603 Bldg.Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): General View of Room 428A AUXB Sheet 73 of 123PauI C. Rizeo Associates, lnc.E:{C lNtt R$ {*. L.(}}*SL: L"ths-ISl. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

YNUN/A X YNUN/A X YNUN/A X YNUN/A X Walls in the area identified as 4016 and 4026, both seismically analyzed per NRC IE Bulletin 80-l I (Ref. VBW20-8001-100, Rev I4).Related equipment on SWEL for this area:l) D2N Status:QN UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room4288 Floor El. 603 Bldg. AUXBInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Sheet 74 of 123Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.tllillNItR$ & CO!r1iL!L'IANIS Status:QN UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 4288 Floor El.603 Bldg.AUXB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?N N/A N/A N/A 6. Does it appear that the area is freeinteractions that could cause a fire of potentially adverse seismicin the area? N7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Fire Sources: NO No fire sources identified in area.Flooding Sources: NO No flood sources identified in area.Evaluated by: 7t2512012 7/25t7012 X X X XEddie M. Guerra Lucarelli Sheet 75 of 123 Pau[ C. Rizeo Associates, [nc.Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 4288 Floor El.603 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Status:QN U General View of Room 4288 Sheet 76 of 123Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.tNctN t t RS

• l'tlnsl! LlAN-tS 603 Status:@N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 429 Floor El.Bldg.AUXB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in degraded conditions?

the area appear to be free of significant

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area: l) Y1052) Dr ED 3) YRFI 4) El 5) XCEI-l X Y N/A X X X PCe Paul u^' Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENelNt:tR$ {;. t'Or\'liuL'IAS'ISArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 429 Sheet 77 of 123 Status:QN UFloor El.603 Bldg.AUXBInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? N N/A U N/A 6. Does it appear that the area isinteractions that could cause a free of potentially adverse seismicfire in the area?U N/A 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Fire Sources: Flooding Sources: NO Evaluated by: Power Transformer For Substation E2 & 81, Constant Voltage Transformer, Static Voltage Regulator No concerns identffied regardingfire sources. The potential ignition sources in the area are Power Transformer For Substation E2 & 81, Constant Voltage Transformer, Static Voltage Regulator No flood sources identified in area. 725/2Ar2Eddie M. Guerra 7l2sl20r2 X X X X Sheet 78 of 123 Paul C. Rizso Associates, lnc,Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 429 Floor El.603 Bldg.Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):General View of Room 429 Status:QN U Sheet 79 of 123Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates. lnc.tNclNIt Rs & coi\'liL!L1Atsls 603 Status:QN UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 429/lFloor El.Bldg.AUXB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

r) DIN N/A X X X X PC? Pau[ c. Rizzo aqnociates, lnc. ENC INUl R,C & (jON.TLILAAlfTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 429A Sheet 80 of 123 Status:ON U Floor El.603 Bldg.AUXB X Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free interactions that could cause a fire of potentially adverse seismicin the area? N/A 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Similar configuration as for D2N (Drawing E-20-4-7).Fire Sources:Flooding Sources: NO Evaluated by:C ons t ant Vol t age Tr ansfor me rNo concerns identified regardingfire sources. The potential ignition sources in the area are Constant Voltage Transformer No flood sources identified in area.7t25t20t2 7/2512012 X X X Eddie M. Guerra Sheet 81 of 123 Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates. lnc.ENC lr.itl RS [i UoNalrrIAS'IS StatusON U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 501Floor El.623 Bldg.AUXBInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.L Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?Grout damaged in nearby anchorage, see Photo l.Judged not a significant adverse condition since remaining anchors will provide adequate strength to support.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

r)LT-14022) PS3689D 3)rr2 X X X X PCe Pau[ c. Rizzo Associates, lnc.Et.l{;tNtln$ {L t:LrNauL'l .\!rlS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 501Floor El.623 Sheet 82 of 123 Status@N U Bldg.AUXB X Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Fire Sources: Flooding Sources:Evaluated by:Lighting Transformer No concerns identified regardingfire sources. The potential ignition sources in the area are Lighting Transformer No concerns identified regarding fiood sarees. The pffiridftaoilvourcysinltte arvaareLornponerttLodtmg Surg Tank 712, Piping: Chilled wqter, component cooling, demin water, Main Steam, Station Heating, Fire Protection 712512012 712512012 X X XEddie M. Guerra Sheet 83 of 123Paul C. Riszo Associate,t, lnc.Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status@N U Room 501 Floor El.623 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Photo I Damaged Grout Bldg.AUXB Status: "@ UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 502Floor El.623Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Unable to see due to ceiling panels4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Crack observed in Masonry Ll/all, See Photo 2.Condition Report issued: CR-20 I 2- I 097 3 Ceiling panels are anchored. Fire extinguishers are in cabinets Masonrywa\\sidentifiedas5017,5147,5157,5167,5177,5187,5197,5207,5227,5237,and5277-All walls have been seismically analyzed per NRC IE Bulletin 80-l I (Ref. VBW29-8001-143, Rev 10, VBW29-8001-148, Rev 6, VBW29-800t-149, Rev 5, VBW29-BA0L-151, Rev 2, VBW29-8001-152, Rev 5,VBW30-8001-153, Rev 3, VBW30-8001-154, Rev 9, VBW30-8001-156, Rev 2, VBW30-8001-158, Rev 4.Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 1) C5755 2) LSHHSP9B6 3) Lr-1525A.4) C5792ALB2

5) L3l I 6) L5l I PCq Paul c. Rizro Associates, lnc-E:{(jtNtlRs t*. LaINTLIL:IANI.SSheet 84 of 123 Bldg, N/A X X X X Sheet 85 of 123 Paul C. Rizro Associates, lnc.E:'l(;INIIR$ d, eol\alr[rAl{l s Status:Y@

UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 502Floor El.623 Bldg.AUXB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Unrestrained trash can, light bulb storage container, and I&C cart.Judged not to cause damaging interaction with nearby panels.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Fire Sources: NO Nofire sources identified in areaFlooding Sources: NO No flood sources identified in area.Evaluated by: N U N/A N/A NiA See Photos 3 and 4.7tz5t20t2 7t25t2012 N X X X XEddie M. Guerra Paul C. Rizgo Asnociates, [nc.Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 502 Floor El.623 Bldg.Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Sheet 86 of 123 Status: Y@ U Crack in Masonry WallPhoto IGeneral View of Room 502 Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.us( ; tNUl- Rs *' clrFjliL! ut,tlfltj Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 502 Supporting Photos (Continued): Floor El.623 Bldg.Sheet 87 of 123 Status: Y@ U Photo 4 Unrestrained Trash Can and Light Bulb StoragePhoto 3 Unrestrained I&C Cart PCe Pau[ c. Rizzo Associates, lnc.tl:otNtIR$ 6 cotiSL!Iir^l\'t$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.623 Bldg.AUXB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.L Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Due to presence of ceiling , these items could not be verified.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? Ceiling panels anchored, see Photo l.Masonry walls in area. Verifu seismic adequacy of walls Walls identified as 5107, 5127, 5287, 5297, 5i47, 5357, 5367.AllwallshavebeenseismicallyanalyzedperNRClEBulletinS0-11(Ref,VBW29-8001-L45,Rev 13, VBW29-8001-146, Rev 8, VBW3I-8001-159, Rev 9, VBI'l/31-8001-160, Rev 3, VBW3l-8001-161, Rev 4, VBW3l-8001-162, Rev l, VBW3I-8001-163, Rev 2.Related equipment on SWEL for this area:l) c57062) Cs7023) C57r24) HrS 58894

5) HrS 7528 6) CS 571 I 7) CS 5716Sheet 88 of 123 Status:O N U 505 X X N N N/A N X X 89Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, [nc, gNGtNUIRS {L CLTNTULIAN:IS Status:O N UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 505 Floor El.623 Bldg.AUXB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Small podium not anchored (see Photo 2), however it is judged that itwill not pose any unacceptable adverse condition to nearby panels.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Fire Sources: NO No fire sources identified in area.Flooding Sources: NO No flood sources identified in area. Evaluated by: 7t75t20t2 712512012 Y X Y X Y X Y XEddie M. Guerra Sheet 90 of 123Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENG TNUT R$ & C:(}N1iU UTAI{TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 505 Floor El.623 Bldg.Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Status:@ N UPhoto ICeiling Tiles and Lighting Fixtures Anchored Small Podium Not Anchored of Pau[ C. Rizgo Associates, lnc.CHC lNUt R$ {i tAtlrTL:L-IhlfIS Status:O N UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room sl5Floor El.623 Bldg.AUXBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lightingX Related equipment on SWEL for this area:l) HV5314 N Y N N X X X X PC? Pau[ c. Rizzo Ass.ciates, lnc.Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 515Sheet 92 of 123 Status:O N UFloor El.623 Bldg.AUXBInteraction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Dolly loosely tied to column adjacent to MCC, however it is unlikely that this dolly would have an interaction with the MCC nearby.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Fire Sources: NO Nofire sources identified in area. Flooding Scnrces: PIPING: Fire ProtectionEvaluated by: N N N/A NiA U NiA U N No concerns identified regarding flood sources. The potential flood sources in the area are PIPING: Fire Protection 712512012 7/25/2012 X X X XEddie M. Guerra Lucarelli Paul C. Rizgo Associates, lnc.ENG rNU[ R-c & (]ol\$U LI'ANIS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 515 Floor El.623 Bldg.Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Sheet 93 of 123 Status:@ N U General View of Room 515 General View of Room 515 Paul C. Riu,zo Associates, [nc.Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room5 15 Floor El.623 Supporting Photos (continued): Sheet 94 of 123 Status:@ N U Loosely Tied Dolly in Room 515Cylinder tanks properly fixed to wall were found in the area PCe Pau[ c. Rizzo Associates, Inc. gN(;lNttRS {r, C$N1iLf L"t A1\1$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 600 Floor El.Bldg.AUXB Instructions for Com pleting ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cableiconduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area: l) cv-5005Sheet 95 of 123 Status*) N U 643 N/A N/A X X X X Sheet 96 of 123Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.EN(; 1NtI RS { (:CT,\$L!L'IAi'T$Status0N UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 600Floor El.643 Bldg.AUXB Interaction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Fire Sources: NO No fire sources identified in area.Flooding Sources: Piping: Station Heating Evaluated by: N N N NNo concerns identified regarding Jlood sources. The potential flood sources in the area qre Piping: Station Heating 7/25t20r2Eddie M. Guera 7/2st20r2 X X X X Sheet 97 of r23Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc. gNctNf [Rs (t cr]t$L,L'r^rl$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 601 643 Bldg.AUXB StatusON UFloor El.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

l) 14.608 2) PY-l0lA3) MSl01 N NiA N N Y N/A X X X X Sheet 98 of 123Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, lnc. El.l(:INE!RS {; L'(}j\5UL-lAif lS Statusf) N UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 601Floor El.643 Bldg.AUXB X Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?(Jnrestrained temporary storage containers observed in area, see Photo 2 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Fire Sources: NO No fire sources identified in area.Flooding Sources: Cont Purge Suppty Heating Coil 838, Piping: Domestic water, Fire Protection, Main Steam, Station Heating No concerns identified regarding flood sources. The potential flood sources in the area are Cont Purge Supply Heating Coil E38, Piping: Domestic water, Fire Protection, Main Steam, Station Heating Evaluated by: 7/25t2012 7/2512012 N N N N X X X Eddie M. Guerra Sheet 99 of 123Pau[ C. Risso Associates, Inc.Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Statusf\N U Room 601 Floor El.Photo I General View of Room 601 643 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Bldg.AUXB Photo 2 Unrestrained Storage Containers Sheet 100 of 123Paul C, Rizzo Arsociates, Inc.EN(; INEIR-{ {; LUl\SliL-Ihlil S 602 StatusG)N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.643 Bldg.AUXBInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:l) sP17A72) rcsllA X X X X

Sheet 101 of 123 Paul C. Riazo Associates, lnc. ENC lNtt Rs & e(!^-XllL-I AN'l $ StatusON U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 602 Floor El.643 Bldg.AUXB X Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Unrestrained temporary storage container in the area, see Photo 2.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Fire Sources: N N/A N N480V Transformer No concerns identified regarding fire sources. The potential tgrclnan r(ntrces m'ltte arva ure 4$Ul'1'ranfiornrer Flooding Sources: Piping: Fire Protection, Main Steam, Station HeatingNo concerns identified regardingJlood sources. The potential flood sources in the area are Piping: Fire Protection, Main Steam, Station HeatingEvaluated by: 7/2s/20r2 7/2s/20r2 X X XEddie M. Guerra Sheet 102 of 123Paul C. Rizeo Ansociates, lnc.EN(; INUI RS 6. Ll(rNliLf L.I AN"[S Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 602 Floor El.643 Bldg.Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): StatusfYlN U AUXB Photo 2 Unrestrained Storage ContainerPhoto IGeneral View of Room 602 Sheet 103 of 123Paul C. Rizzo Associates. Inc.Ls(;INEt RS {i L'O:\ISUrIAF'I S 603 Statusf) N UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El. 638 Bldg. AUXE Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YNUN/A X potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)? YNUN/A2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions? X 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

YNUN/A X YNUN/A X Fire extinguisher is mounted on the wall and is not laterally supported.It is judged that it is unlikely for the extinguisher to fall or cause significantinteraction w ith nearby equipment.Masonry walls in area, see Photo l.Walls identified as 6017, 6027 6037, 6087, 6097, 6107, and 6047Wall 6027 is exempt. All other walls have been seismically analyzed per NRC IE Bulletin 80-l I (Ref. VBIlt3l-800t-164, Rev 3,SK-C-997, Rev 0, VBW3I-8001-165, Rev 9,VBW32-8001-166, Rev 5, YBW32-8001-167, Rev 8, VBW32-8001-168, Rev 2 , VBW32-8001-177, Rev 0Related equipment on SWEL for this area:l) TS-s261

2) Czr-r 3) SW-58964) SW39275) SW3928 Sheet 104 of 123Pau[ C. Rizza Associates, lnc.ES(;INt I RS & L:(]!\TL!L1a!.1S StatusON UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 638 603 Floor El.Bldg.AUXB Interaction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

N N N N/A N/A 6. Does it appear that the area is interactions that could cause afree of potentially adverse seismicfire in the area? N/A 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? I&C Cart not restrained, see Photo 2.It ts iudged that the I&C cart and the ladder (Photo 3)cause an unacceptable interaction with nearby.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Fire Sources: NO No fire sources identified in area. would not equipment.Flooding Sources: No concens idenfirted regardingllood sources. The potential Jlood sources inthe qrca are Demin vater rtorage tank 7108, Ceu Pot Feeder Tl54, Expansion tank T88, Piping: Chilled water, Domestic vater, denih wate4 fire protection, Station Heating, Service waterEvaluated by: 712512017 7D'DA2 Brian X X X XEddie M. Guerra Sheet 105 of 123Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc. Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 603Floor El. 638 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): StatusON U AUXB Photo 2 Cart Not RestrainedPhoto I Fire Extinguisher not Restrained and Masonry Wall PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.E:\l(;lNItRs {t L-$N!L'L'IAiTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 25r Sheet 106 of 123 Status'6)N UFloor El.565 Bldg.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? Anchor threads shown with substantial length past nuL see Photo I.Judged acceptable as the support loads are very insignificant.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the arca appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Hanging light touching component, see Photo 2.Judged not a significant concern due to weight of hanging light Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 1) SW82 N/A N/A X X X X ofPaul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

lsclNttRs &. c(ttirt'rtAFlsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 251 Floor El.565 Bldg.Sheet r07 r23 status'1qN u Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Fire Sources:

NONofire sources identified in area.Flooding Sozrces: No concerns identified regardingtloodsourees. ThepltermdftuoilxaarcvsinlttearmareYrymg:TtantvStrcWater, Demin Water, Service Water, Clean WaterEvaluated by: Brian x X X XEddie M. Guerra Lucarelli Sheet 108 of 123Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.INC lNUt Rs $- CC]!$!iUL"tAtff \iArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 251 Floor El.Photo 1Anchor ThreadingSubstantially Past Nut 565Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Bldg.Statusf)N U INTK Photo 2 Hanging Light Touching Component PC? Paul c. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENtjINIERS {i' {'(}n\L!L'tAN'IS Sheet 109 of 123 50 Statusf)N uArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El. 585 Bldg. INTK Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YNUN/A X potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? YNUN/A2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions? Minor corrosion on various components, see Photo l.Judged not to affect component opearbility or seismic capacity.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Rod hung pipe (Photo 2) attached to building structural beam withfrictionclamps. It ts judged that this condition is acceptable due to short span of pipe.X YNUN/A X YNUN/A X4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lightingX Fire extinguisher is mounted on the wall and is not laterally supported.It is iudged that it is unlikely for the extinguisher to fall or caltse signfficantinte racti on w ith ne arby equipme nt.Related equipment on SWEL for this area: l) P4-l 2\Fr-2 PCe Pau[ C. Rizro Associates, lnc.ttlClNttR$

• , U(}!.l!'ljIA!.-IsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Sheet I l0 of 123 Statu6 N U 50Floor El.585 Bldg.INTK Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

U N/A N/A 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area? N/A 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Fire Sources: NO No fire sources identi/ied in area.Flooding Sources: No concerns identified regardingflood sources. The potential flood sources in the area are Piping: Attx. Steam,Chlorination, circulating water, fire protection, screenwash, service water, water treatment Evaluated by: 712512012 712512017 N N Y U X X X XEddie M. Guera Lucarelli Sheet lll ofl23Paul C. Rizgo Associates, lnc.gNG tNU[ R^{ & C:otSiL! ljtAlsl $ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 50Floor El.585 Bldg.Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Photo 1Minor Corrosion Statufi N U INTK Photo 2 Rod Hung Pipes t2Paul C. Rizzo Assoclates, lnc. g:,.crNtlRs f,, cul\:sLll-'IAtslsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 5lFloor El.576 TNTK Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?Grout damaged, see Photo I.Judged not a significant adverse seismic condition.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that.the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area(e.9, ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Movement of MCC restrained, see Photo 2.Top conduits will provide lateral restraint. Deemed not significantRelated equipment on SWEL for this area:l) El2c Status0N U Bldg.N N N of 123 X X X X Sheet ll3 of 123Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.E:{ClNUtRll & L.$liliLlL-IA:\-rii StatusON UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 5lFloor El.576 Bldg.X Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?Scaffolding in area appears to be adequately restrained.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Fire Sources: Flooding Sources: N/A Evaluated by: Transformer For Lighting Panel L3012 No concerns identified regardingfire sources. The potential ignition sources in the area are Transformer ForLighting Panel L3012No concerns identifiedregardingfloodsources. Thepowrfndftaailvourcesin'*teureaareYtptng:TreProtection, Aux. steam, diesel fuel oil, screenwash, water treatment 7/2.5t2012Eddie M. Guera 7/2512012 X X X Sheet ll4 of 123 Paul C. Rizzo Ansociates, lnc.Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room ENG INT ER$

• CIOI.ISUUT'ANTS 5l Floor El.Bldg.576 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):Photo I Damaged Grout Statusf)N U INTK Photo 2 Movement of MCC Restrained by Adjacent Component Sheet ll5 of 123Pau[ C, Rizzo Associates, lnc.g:iJC lNhI tt$ *. !.(}NTLILIAFaS 52 StatusON U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.576 Bldg.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Minor bolt coruosion notedfor Service Water Pumps P3-1, P3-2, P3-3.Judged not to affect component opearbility or seismic capacity.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? See Photos 1,2 and 3.Fire extinguisher is mounted on the wall and is not laterally supported. It is judged thqt it is unlikely for the extinguisher to foll or cause significantinteraction w ith nearby equipment.Fire extinguishers not restrained Masonry wall 2371 in area has been seismically analyzed per NRC IE Bulletin 80-l I (Ref. VBIlrl0-8001-055, Rev l4)Related equipment on SWEL for this area: l) Fl2D 21EFrzc 3) P3-2 X X N/A N/A X X Sheet lL6 of 123Paul C. Riezo Associates, lnc.EIICINtIRS ti c$r\LrLl-AF'r!t Statusf) N uArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 52 Floor El.576 Bldg.INTKInteraction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Fire Sources: NONofire sources identified in area.FloodingSources: Noconcernsidentifiedregardingfloodsourees. Thepdtertndfrcrailxourczstn'ltreursaareYrpmg:TreProtection, Aux. Steam, Circulating Water, Circulating water tubing, Service water tubing, water treatmentEvaluated by: 7tzst20r2Eddie M. Guerra 7/25t2012 N N/A N/A N/A U U N N X X X X Sheet II7 of 123Pau[ C. Rigzo Associates, [nc.ENG TNTER$ E COI\ISULI'AIfIS Status0N UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 52 Floor El. 576 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Photo I Minor Corrosion of Pump P3-l Photo 2 Minor Corrosion of Pump P3-3Photo 3 Minor Corrision of Pump P3-2 BC? Paul C. Riego Associates, lnc.!I{;INt[R-s 6. (-(}!\tL!LIIAN.t $Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Sheet I l8 of 123 Status0N U 53Floor El.566.25 Bldg.INTKInstructions for Com pleting ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?

Damaged grout, see Photo l.Judged not to have an adverse ffict on support's seismic capacity.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

1) SW39632) SWl399 Y N/A N/A N/A X X X X Sheet ll9 of 123 Paul C. Rizzo Asnociates, lnc.

ESC INUIRS S. tj0,r\aL!L'IA!t'l$ Statusf)N uArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room 53 Floor El.566.25 Bldg.X Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area? N/A 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse selsmlc interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? Ladder in area is not restrained, butjudged not an interaction concern. See Photo 2.Scaffolding in area appears to be adequate.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Ffre Sources: NO No fire sources identified in area.Flooding Sources: No concerns identified regardingflood sources.

The potential flood sources in the area are Piping: FireProtection, Aux. Steam, Circulating Water, Domestic Water, Diesel Fuel Oil, Demi water, Screenwash, Servicewater, Water treatment, Neutralizing Tank dischargeEvaluated by: 7/2512012 712512012 X X X Sheet 120 of 123Paul C. Rizso Associates, lnc.Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room[:{(; Itrjljl,Rs 6- C$tiSL'I I AlfI S 53 Floor El. 566.25 Bldg.Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):Photo I Damaged Grout Statusf) N U INTK Photo 2 Ladder Not Restrained PCe Paul C' Rizzo Assoclates, lnc.EN(;lNtf R-( {L L'0!*iUL'lAfr'Ili Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room YARDFloor El.585 Bldg.Instructions for Com pleting Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipmentdegraded conditions?in the area appear to be free of significant3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area: l) T153-l Sheet l2l of 123 StatusQN U X X X X Sheet 122 of 123 Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, lnc. ENC rNtt R*r 6, L1r.\5t' L-[A!\-I$ Status:QN UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room YARDFloor El.585 Bldg.YARD X Interaction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Fire Sources: DIESEL GENERATOR FUEL OIL STOR Flooding Srntrces: No concerns identffied regarding flood sourees.T149, T150, TI5l-1, TI5l-2, T160,7168, T188,EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR FUEL OIL STOR No concerns identified regardingfire sources. The potential ignition sources in the area are EMERGENCYT he p dtumd f wod soa rces i n I trc area are T t t'!{o, ol' I 4/, af l /&, 7212.745Evaluated by: 7/2512012 7/2512012 X X XEddie M. Guerua Sheet 123 of 123I ttc,Floor [rl. 5 tt5 Status:ON UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room YARDI) ldg.YARDOther supporting or rclcvant clocunrcrrts ancl pltotos (if any): Photo l APPENDIX D COMPONENT LIST FOR ANCHORAGB CONFIGURATION CHECKCOMPONENT ID References 2N Drawing C-O752 Rev 0011Drawing E-854Q-115-1 2P Draw Drawng C-0752 Rev 0011ng E-854Q-tt5-2 CzI-ICa lculation C-CSS-CZL-I c25-3Calculation C-CSS-C25-3 c3615Ca lculation C-CSS-C3615 c3645 Ca lcu lation C-CSS-C3645 c4606 Ca lculation C-CSS-C4606Calculation C-CSS-C4603 c73-1 Ca lcu lation C-CSS-C7 3-L c78-2 Ca lcu lation C-CSS-C7 8-LDI EDCa lcu lation C-CSS-DCMCC-1 Drawing C-0233 Rev 0011 D1NDrawing E-2O-4-7(21 Drawing C-0220D Rev 0004D2 ED Calculat Calculaton C-CSS-DCMCC-002 on C-CSS-DCMCC-1 D2NDrawing E-2O-4-7(21

Drawing C-0220D Rev 0004Calculation C-CSS-YV4 DzPDrawing C-OZ?OE Rev 0003 DBC2P Calculation C-CSS-DBC2 PEI lBCa lcu lation C-CSS-E 1 1BDrawing C-0233 Rev 0011 ELZB Ca lcu lation C-CSS-E12B EI}CCa lcu lation C-CSS-E12CDrawing C-0233 Rev 0011Drawing C-O4LZB Rev 0004 822-t Ca lcu latio n C-CSS-E 22-tDrawing M-23-5-3 Drawing 7749-M-23-3-5Ca lcu latio n 97 209-TR-0 1-REVO (Altra n) COMPONENT II) References 822-2Ca lcu lation C-CSS-E22-L Drawing M-23-5-3 Drawing 7749-M-23-3-5Caf culatio n 97209-TR-01_REVO (Altran)827 -lCalculation C-CSS-E?7 -t F'27-2 Ca lculation C-CSS-E27 -2Fl IA Ca lculation C-CSS-F1 1A Drawing C-0233 Rev 0011 FI2ACa lculation C-CSS-F12A FI2D Ca lculation C-CSS-E12CCa lcu lation C-CSS-F12DDrawing C-O4L?B Rev 0004 K5-l Ca lcu lation C-CSS-KS-1 K5-2Ca lcu lation C-CSS-K5-2 P14-1 Ca lcu lation C-CSS-P14-1 Pt4-2Ca lcu lation C-CSS-P14-1 Calculation C-CSS-P14-2 P3-2D rawi ng M-045-00002-001 1 P372B,Caf cu lation C-CSS-P 37 -2 P42-lCa lcu lation C-CSS-P 42-t P43-2Ca lcu lation C-CSS-P 43-2 Ca lculation C-CSS-P43-001 P58-lCa lcu lation C-CSS-P58-1 RC3701 Ca lcu lation C-CSS-RC3701 T10Calculation C-CSS-T10D rawi ng 7 7 49 -C-34-L47 -3 TT2 Calcu lation C-CSS-T].2 T46-l Drawing C-0213A Rev 0001Ca f culation C-CSS-T46-L XCEl-ICalcu lation C-CSS-CE1-00LCalculation C-CSS-E1 XDFl-2 Ca lculation C-CSS-DF1-2Calculation C-CSS-F1 Y2Calculation C-CSS-Y2 YF1Calculation C-CSS-YF1 Ca lcu lation C-CSS-F12 B YRF2 Ca lcu lation C-CSS-YRF2Calculation C-CSS-D2P COMPONBNT ID References YV2Calculation C-CSS-YV2Calculation C-CSS-D2P YV4Calculation C-CSS-YV4 APPENDIX E MASONRY BLOCK WALLS VERIFIED UNDER IE BULLBTIN 80-11 Elevation Room Wall Seismically Analyzed Reference 545 r22 tr57 Yes VBW03-8001-009, Rev 5 (8/16193)t167 Yes VBW03-8001-010, Rev 8 (4120/89)tt87 Exempt SK-C-992, Rev A (616189)565 225 2047 Yes VBW06-8001-028, Rev 4 (7129188)2427 Yes VBW10-8001-058, Rev 3 (112106)2437 Yes VBW10-8001-059, Rev I (6129181)227 2077 Yes VBW06-B001-031, Rev 2 (1211186)2081 Yes VBW06-B001 -032, Rev 3 (2l4l9I)2447 Yes VBW10-B001-060, Rev 4 (31L4186)236 2317 Yes VBW09-8001-049, Rev 8 (216106)2327 Yes VBW09-8001-050, Rev 4 (214106)2337 Yes VBW09-B001-051, Rev l0 (l/15106)2347 Yes VBW09-B001 -052, Rev 3 (2l8l9l)576 52 237r Yes VBW10-B001-055, Rev 14 (2110187)585 312 3227 Yes VBW15-8001-080, Rev 6 (5118/88)3247 Yes VBWI6-B001-082, Rev 5 (8/5/81)3257 Yes VBW16-8001-083, Rev 2 (4127188)3267 Yes VBW16-8001-084, Rev 5 (4127188)3277 Yes VBW17-8001-085, Rev 4 (4125188)3291 Yes VBW17-B001-087, Rev 4 (4125188)3351 Yes VBWIS-B001-091, Rev 5 (4125188)3367 Yes VBW19-B001-092, Rev 2 (10/28187) 3417 Yes VBW19-8001-096, Rev 5 (4127188)3427 Exempt SK-C-994, Rev A (616189)318 308D Yes VBW12-B001-068, Rev 3 (5127181)309D Yes VBW13-B001-069, Rev 3 (5128181)3lOD Yes VBW13-8001-070, Rev 3 (5128181)31 1D Yes VBW13-8001-071, Rev 8 (4120188)338D Yes VBW19-8001-093, Rev 5 (9126181)319 304D Yes VBW12-8001 -064, Rev 8 (8126187)307D Yes VBW12-8001 -067, Rev 7 (4120188)32tA 305D Yes VBW12-8001-065, Rev 5 (4121188)306D Yes VBW12-B001-066, Rev 6 (8126187)328 3301 Yes VBW17-8001-088, Rev 6 (6121189)3347 Yes VBW18-8001-090, Rev 3 (6114189)E-1 Elevation Room Wall Seismically Analvzed Reference 3397 Yes VBWI9-8001-094, Rev 5 (613106)3407 Yes VBW19-B001-095, Rev 10 (115106)603 428 4016 Yes VBW20-8001-100, Rev 14 (1216188)4026 4036 Yes VBW21-8001 -102, Rev 13 (3131199)4046 4786 Yes VBW25-8001-125, Rev 9 (6/26190)4796 Yes VBW25-B001-126, Rev 6 (l2llIl90) 4886 Yes VBW27-8001-135, Rev l9 (4129188)4896 Yes VBW27-B001-136, Rev 3 (7/18/06)4906 Yes VBW28-B001 -137, Rev 3 (9123181)623 502 5017 Yes VBW29-8001 -143, Rev l0 (117106)5147 Yes VBW29-B001-148, Rev 6 (6110106)5t57 Yes VBW29-B001 -149, Rev 5 (8114196)5167 5177 Yes VBW29-8001-151, Rev 2 (9127186)5187 Yes VBW29-8001 -152, Rev 5 (117106)5197 Yes VBW30-8001-153, Rev 3 (3131186)5207 Yes VBW30-8001-154, Rev 9 (9/17193)5227 5237 Yes VBW30-8001 -156, Rev 2 (ll3l9l)5217 Yes VBW30-8001-158, Rev 4 (6/10106)505 5107 Yes VBW29-8001-145, Rev 13 (615106)5127 Yes VBW29-8001 -146, Rev 8 (l/12106)5287 Yes VBW3l-8001-159, Rev 9 (11116/89) 5297 Yes VBW3I-8001-160, Rev 3 (2116188)5347 Yes VBW31-8001-161, Rev 4 (4127182)5357 Yes VBW3l-8001-162, Rev I (5llll8l)5367 Yes VBW3l-8001-163, Rev 2 (l0l17l85) 643 603 6017 Yes VBW3l-B001-164, Rev 3 (2114106)6427 Exempt SK-C-997, Rev 0 (ll4l99)6037 Yes VBW31-8001 -165, Rev 9 (l0l7l05)6087 Yes VBW32-8001 -166, Rev 5 (lllll90)6097 Yes VBW32-8001 -167 , Rev 8 (lll7184)6t07 Yes VBW32-8001-168, Rev 2 (5110188)6047 Yes VBW32-B001-177, Rev 0 (l2l2Il83) E-2 APPENDIX F DAVIS.BESSE DBSIGN CRITERIA MANUAL 1.0 DB-01r9{lDFSIGH EAX"fiIOUSKE BA$ISThe deeign carthqunke hs$is d*pend$ on the regional geologS site ssinmologl, and historicnlocsur*nceq etc. Thesc rubjccle arc diccuescd in deiail in the Davis-Bdss USAR Appcnfir 2C.ThiE seetion sonsi*rE of prrrcntrng the de*igp respons* spectm nnd dosign tinre hirtory uscd in thcseismic ffialpis and seiqnie design of Category I structurcs whieh form lhe Davi*Bcssc licauing cornrnihnent. Although thie s*tiotr is essmtially historical, it is nl$o applictble to Fq$t 1979Category I building desiglr" r,l DEST$TJIABTIIOUAKE The tiRC's $eismic and Gmlogy Siling Criteria (10 tFR-100, Appcndix A) roquircs lhat forpurposffi ofanalysis ild de*ign, two dcsign carthquakes be sp*eifid; i.c,, a maximum posible (largcr) earthquakc and r maximum probable (srnaller) earthquak*. 'fhe maximum possible {targer) earthquake is definal as that earthquake preducing the msximrun vibratory ground motion tbat the nuclear power generating plant i* de*ignat ta withstand wlthoutflrnctional inrprirment sf those fcaturps necessary to shut dnr.n the reactor and maintain the phnt ina safe cond.ition without undue risk to thc health and safefy of the public. Thc mnxirlult horimntrl ground accelmation for fre maltimurn possible (largcr) aarthquakc is 0.15 g. The maximum poe*ibte mrtlrquakc is aho refen*d to as $afe-Shutdown Esrthqunkt cr S$8.The Matimum Probfibls Erthquako is thp con$*rustively detcrmird ffithqurkt and amsciated gnound motion tlrat

• r$i rsflsonobly or probably be Ec$Gctod tro ofifur at the nuclsar plsui Eitc. Thc Maxirnum hohablc Earfiquako is'similar to the Opereting Fesis E*rttrquake

{OBE} terminologypresnntly being usd by the hlRC. fic maximum horizantsl groud afic*hfiation fur the mrximmt probable (smaller) carttrquake is 0.08 g.l.?, DE$ISI.I RESFOHSE $PFqfRA-Thc dcsign rccponss spfftra for horirotrtsl ground motiori of ths utsxirnrun possihlc (largcr, $SE)eutlquake for 0 percent" l/? percenl I percEnq 2 pcrccnt ,5 ptrcart, and l0 percent of critied damping arc sho$rn ln FiS$rs U.B. l -l - Figurs II.E" l'2 showe the conusponding rteponsc rycctr8 for tha maximum probable {smaller, OBE} earttrquakc, which m obtainsd by multiplyrng lhe msimum po*sibti (tmgcr) e*ltlrquale epecra valucs by a factor of 8/15, Figurc II'E'I'3 Sows theDavis-Bessc tim+hjstory desif;F spchrm plotted with the ground dmigt rpe*firrr* fur 4-percenr darnping. Thir figUre alm shou/E thd the timc-history r6pors$ sP60trum oonservatiwly envclo'p*thc Davis-B*ssc desien spectnrm. i:s Design Criteria Manual f;tffi Davis-Besse ItEoLa.l.mm.tlllin$estbn ritte: SEISMIC DE$IGN Rat'i*to : tlP*g*: tl.E.l-lRoepomtble Englnrm Chrcker: Th*o $win +qPFrwsr:Ddr: d/2?188 DB+rfll-0 The input dmign fc.sponfa spsctrq ofteo refennd lo as a 'Norrmsrk" sprsuan is banad an rcsearch condustd by Dr. Hsrrms* in oonjunction with the NRC. esed on site strrdics prcpared for Davis'Bessc Power Station Unit l. lhe msximurs grourld accclcratioU velocity, dirylacanert, and eertquakc duration art shonn in Trblc [I.E"I-I" Thevcrtieal eomponwrt af e*ch Gflrthquate is defined as two-ttrirdE of tbs horiaonUl oon]psnsnt-l3 DESIGNTn{FHISTORy ACCEI TIROGRAIVI Thc cs+t-wcd acc+lerogrun qf ths Helsrq Montana carttrquoko of ffctob*r 3 I ' 1935 was ued asthc basis for ilevelopment of the pojcct acccleralion time-bistoriw fqr both design euttrquf,kc& Tha Helsr* rueond was modified ts obtrin an accelcration time-hietory hntring th* rrqnirod dudio,n, rnaximgnr gqnnd acqsl*rstions, and a resulting rrsponsc spffitra with wluer SmffilV gr*ntc'r thm the*ilewmark desigrr sFGotFo. Figurc ItE. t-,4 shows the modilied llclmehorizontel time-hisory accelaogrmr &velapcd for Fsvis-Bessc Power Station Unit l. Ref*rfficc I presfltG thia t?cord tsa digitized tim+history of 30 s*comds in intervalt of 0.0t Eemnil Davis-Be$se Design Griteria lJlanual (Condnu#ion)lFElEtro$rrt. '!r*s*fon rlltrr SEISMIC DESIGT{F*uFion; SPagc lI"E.t-? D&01ilI0Table II.E. l- ILIMTTIHG PARAIVIETERS FOR THE DESTGN EARfiIQUAI{E$I- HORIZO}ilTAL VIBRATORY GROUh{D MOTIONS s,{. rr -& Mq$iryFn ?ossjblg-Erythqugkp (lener-eatlqui*c. S$b)b, MsldrrorF ProbablpElthgu$be-(E$sllsr esrthqunka.flBFl Maximun ground accelerntion : fufaximum ground velm,ity: Mruimurn ground displmanent:Total duralion:Max inrum grourd acceleration

Max irnr.un ground vclociqc Malrimum ground displacenrent:Tctal drrdi*n:

VERTICAL VIFRATORY CROI,JND T,IOTIONS0.15 G"'-'5 inehn#seondL33 inelrcs30 eocotde n08 *2.6? inche#second 1.78 inches10 rcoauds 2" Mariimum PEeiblc,(lgger!-Ep'thouqke and Marimum Pmbshle-Lsmaile*,Ssrtlugdg* Verticnl vibratory gfomd motbn$ arc two-ftirds of the rcspectiv* rnaximum horizontel vibratory gruund nptions.Davis-Besse Design Griteria tUlanuaf{GonSnu*fion} Flfffi*..Frat.lt-{r $*cuqn Tlsr: SEISMIC trESIGnNEevf*ion: 0 Page; II.E.I -3

1. ryq Davis-Besse Design Criteria Manual J'r1 (Gontinuatlon)

Scstlsn fitle: SElStv{IC DISIGN Figure It.E.l-l RECOMMEHN IiI) RESPON S E SPECTRA FO R H OR IU.O}.{TAL fi RO Lil{tr MOTIONS SF MAXIMLJM POSStsLE EARTHQTJAK I{IARGER EARTHQUAKE) FORSEVERAL DAMPING RATIOS frrtfr.s&2 0 ,,(J OJ l' ,.:?tT-qO 1il 1.*\1'-l-1r/;{ u1 t:.a.s f*s I o8 tr o.30. oGoBi z rt 4 Freqr.ternn cffttvR*tio of crltlsrl denpinry ftev. O EB-ors0-0 Figure II.E.l -2 RECOMMET.TDED RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR HORIEONTAL GROIJNDMOTIONS OF MAXIMUM PROBABLE EARTHQUAKE (SM ALLER EARTHQUAKE} FOR SEVERAL DAIvIPINC RATIOS t0 ftaoatogy'.d'frx I r lrlic sf srlElm,l {.lfrn0 t t$t-s g E rO*6{I OE g6 Davis-Besse Design Criteria Manual (Corrtinuationl GrilulBl.flrutt.E F;$ectlon ritle: SETSMIC DESIGN Page: ILE.l -5 Rwirlqn: 0 frrq:. wrItt- I DS4rHl'O Davis-Besse Design Sriteria Manual (Contlnualion) BtrrlFl rt*llt.rFil*l Sectlon TIth: Rsvtalon: 0 SEISMIC DH$ISN Itigure I I. F'. l -3 DESIGN TIME-HI$TORY SPBCTRI.JM VERSUS DESISN SPECTRUId COMFARIS{}N g s 5 .r;d*Ft rt**s IT FT tsF Tf;flr4 gulr, +ra tA SH*ftl;E v t+s G w l.t J L T r J- ---n__\-.F3 - r rrJl*.fj:) m-0rs04 I a i a!l I*: d a T a tFigure n.E.l4 MQDIFIED HELET{A TIME.H TSTORY ACCELEROGRAM = = t t I rlaaaQ irttls!ltrlf I;t srt t ll B I t uiu 31t 1a q;I I I I[*t['It^l.e l-lf I IrF I I t..-r-I I I t aD I i I t-D I Davis*esse De*ign Crlteria Manual (Continuttien) rldllllroInmrExl?r sec.lan rlse: SEISMIC DESIGNRsvlrion: 0 F*ge: II.AI-? Davis-Besse Design Crlteria flllanual rtlllltl+*Ut lll5fl!(slrsflon Tlth; $EISMIC At{ALyStS OF STRUCTTTRES Rrulrlon: 3 RffponCbl'r Engffimt: Glrre*rr: Jon ltook Frge: AA2-l ApF+ru.r: Ihgg $wirn Ddr: ?n3$6 Dg$r?s4This suction discrr$$*$ lhc rcismic annlytical approach for botlr Seisrnic Category I and Non{$cinnic Catcgory I} *buenrrss. ModEling consideratimq and tlra tim+histry msthod of analpa, sFE dff{ribed for the miljor Cacgory I buiHingF. Althougb this *c$tion is ffi*Gntia$yhistorial, nsr# structurc$ would also rquire the considerations dffcribed hnrcin 2.r SL'ISMICCATE#ORY-.r$TRUCTURESThE Seismic Catcgsry I structtues which hgve beerr dcsigrrcd to withshd thc effegs of the dc*igr eallquaka* are listsd below: I Shicld building l f;onteinntgltt vcsstl;. . : Conlninnrent ini$isl strttctures ' Auxiliary building r lnfaks stnrcftrre excluding supcstnrcJtltp ..-t Smricc wntcr hmnel rnd valve roonl ' t Effitd weter f,torags turk and foundation. Seisnric CategOry I alec.tical duct butks and mmholes r Erntxgency dicsel ftrcl oil tarrks crd foundetions r Chlorine detmtor buildingTlre Seisruic Category I ryetenrs and componentie locared in tbctE sfiufir*s hnve also beGnt dcsignd for thc eff*e sfthe dmign carthquak*. F-9 Davis-Bes$e Design Criteria Manual (Continudion! $cc{lo*r Tllfc: Re{rGton: }SEI$MIC AI.IATYSIS OF STRUCTT'RESFage: It-E,l-2 oB'0180"0.ThG design of Seisrnic fl*tegory [ euuctures has bcEn ba$d on the techniquer of TID 7fi24 (Rsfercnce ?) and the aprplicablc eections of BC-TOP-aA (Refenencc 3). Lurnped $asE rnathematical mdel* fuwn in Figprec II.E.2-I thrcugh ttEt-8 rrfirc used to analyze the major$cisrnic Cdegory I strtn$rss applyrng both timc-history md epwutl rcspollss tachnirye' A discus$ion of timc-hist+ry analSnic is given in Soction 11.E 2.2, illd the upecmat r@s tetmiqueis dissus*ed in Sc*tion II.E.3.I" It should be notcd that the major plant stflIctrrgfi es wdl u Areac 6?, ard I ofthe auxiliarybuitding erc eeparatcd by I inch enrpansion {ueismric} joints in order tocn$ure indepmdent rcsponse tnder seismic excitation. the lurnp nm$s modcls wsru dynamically cxoitcd using ground sp*ctra and tirnefri*ory as givcn inFigures IIJ.I-l'drd ILE"I-?, nud in Refcrcncc I, Seisric fortes for the dccigt of buildings lvtrc obtaind using ttre sperhal rusponso techniquc. Using the tirne-history techniquq {hor rcspon&spestra wetp developed at efich floor level for thrce dirwtions af urtbquake arcitation. The fhorspectrq found in Ref*ffirtes 4 md 5 as wcll as in calculstions listd in Table n"8.2-?' rrs u*d b ohtain seisilric to,ads farthe design of sysierns, subeystcmq and s$mponemts th*t src uoosuPted

• 'ith the building wells or slabs {refer to Scction II.E"3).2-?, MODELINCThe $eimic Catcgory I strnctum rcsting on sourrd bcdrc;k hsvc been ideatistd re fixed&ase, turnpcd-mmc qnrtcrnr as strourn in Figures tl.E.2-2 through II.EJ-?. The $eismic Category I snuiturcs which have bton uralyd considering soil smrcturc intmastion effects include Arer 6 of ths auxilirry building arrd the borated wster storige tanlc (sot Figrues tr.8.2-I a*d II.E.Z-SJ.In thc rnod*l fur th6 rhrffi ares of the auxiliary building thc inlake sfii'scture, and ths eontsiDtFcnl intcrnalq a csncentraled msss nae loceted at each floor hvd to msth*matically sWreEE$t the rnasrof alahs, wsll* and quipmsrt. Tlris ideelizrtion was bored on the a*slryticn thet ths floor sl**

wilt act as rigid diaphragurs. Tbem mss$es w*re connettcd by masnlem bee$ elernmts rcFrcsctlting ihc stiftrme of thc wnlls and cohuurs betrvocn floore The lum@ msss points fm ths shietd building, cantniffilsnt veesel, and boratd water $tiorqgp tauk $'rett estsblisH in scsffdaDco with the building geornefry and structural propcrtics. For Ar*s 6 of the nrxilirry building the foundstion coneiets of a ryrtem sf b*srns and reinforcd concrttc colurms (Caissoru) cmtending ?? fost lluough CIm I snuch$sl bs*,fill to thc rqsk surfacc. ln &r methcrntical mpdcl shown in Figrre II.E.2-1, thc soil aild soncrtte massss bshreen the grade shb and the rock srrrfacs have becn lunpcd at tlrroe points Trmslstisaal uoil spfing$ located st thr.sc poiuts rryreseffed the shearrigidify of ths soil. A rutationnl springat the tqp sf ths columns rcpresented the rotatimrl stifEress of ttre coturnn Sfroup, Tle systEm rvg rsrrrrtd Set ta rotato at thi rock surfse and laterel stebility was providod by thc farr,slstional snil springn DB.ol80{Davis-Besse Design Criteria Manual (Condnuatlon! E*fillcl.-UnriqllF$ection riua; SEISMIC AHALYSIS OF STRUCTURES Ravlrlon: 3Fr.ge: n.E.?.3 iFl'..,"q Far the borated wslcr storage tanh the foundation is a reinforced mncrtile rlab ryproximately 6 fe*dop and 49 feEt in diamcter, which rest$ on structurel backfill extcnding to the in ;ittt rock at elwation 560 feet. The mathwratical model shown in Figure II.E.2-8 consisted of a lurnped mas idealisation of thc superstnrcture gnd foundation which, in lum, lrrss snForted by upringc reprrocnting the horizonlal, vertieal, and rotetional stiffrress of the compfisted stnuctursl baekfiU.Thcse *iffnessm havc been dctmrrincd using methods preecntcd in Refsrsncc 3.Other Category I slrusturts srrch as ttre scrvice water tumef vrlrle fitoul$r buricd oil stor*grtank,and elecrical manlrolce vvith asssciatcd duct banl$, have best idmlled aEsi ngl+degrw-aFfresdorfi systerns. Since the lindamenl aImodes were in the rigld rmgq design rc,$ponse spectra for thqse struf,tures was the gruund qF*ctrfr"?.-3 TIMF-Hr.$TORE.AN4LYSTS The tirn+histary rncthod of arralysis has bccn uriliznd to analyae the Seismq$qt*,L*ry I buildingsfor purpos*$ of developing the structurE s re,sponsc necessaly for evalrtating equiimert instsllsti+ns,Althrugh thie method of seismic analysis hns principally hesn usad for thc *nal3nis sf tluilding$, it is applicable to anystruetural s)6tcm whcre ftc base excitation is defind ss a funclion of tiincffid accileration. As prcsented in $ectian ILE'I-I, rndhenraticsl rnodels re,prcscrrting the huildings have been rrsed todacrrrine the time-hi*tory rc$Fonsc of the buildings subjected ta the desigr eartlquelce rirnc-hictnrry using a modal lcchniquc. For assh building at lcast one mode of vibration wa$ considcred, and all rnodeu below 33 He werc usad for rnodal synthesis in each dirwtion of cxcitation-In thctcinstsr*s, the tokt sffn afthe rnodal ntarsos used in the analyris wss *t le*st 90 pmnt of tbc building ma$$, A cet of unruupled modsl aquetioru, reprrcenting th'e id$eliusd slstern rnrder dyn*mic loading; hss beEil sslvsd rsrng e rnathcmetical ruutine emuh as the Rrtngp.Kuttt Fourth0ndcr mcthod, By *tgebraically combining thc modrl responss st eaqh tirne incremmt acceleration tiute-histones rt the various floor elwations have beqr obtf,in*d-Thess tim*hintoryrecords, have been uscd to davelop thc floor r*$ponsc spwhn for s*ismic qualificstion of installation$- Thc responsc sp+cus have bcen sonctructcd by nonitoring thc rnaximurn re$parss qf intcrG$t st each rtry of time-hiet*ry integration. It is assumod that the time-history varim linearly b,ar*ccn data poinn. Frequurcy date pointc are thoae listed in Tabte 5-l of Rrf-ssrs$ 3 in addition to thc nstursl frrrqucrrcict of th* structurc. Pcaks aseociarcd with structurel frquencim hsve bem bruaderred by *tCI p*rccflt of thc pedc frcquency value and srbsqutntly smoothad to account for unccrlainties in fhe modpl ruprccentations.$incc Sre building models are of a planar natult, no cross-coupling fioor ft$poas spoctra hsvc b**rt gPne'rated. F-l1 Davis-Besse Design Criteria l/lanual{Contlnuailon} grcilon Tltl*F{rvltlon: 3$EISMIC AI'{AIYSIS OF STRU TURESPef,re: II.E,2-4 ffi-ot80-oThe tirn+hisrsry analysic tcchniquo hae besn uscd prineipally to obtain fioor rcsPonsc sp,#hf, whiuhin turn'are ugod ta defina the scismic input for decoupled systrns, subsygtelns, and componcffS $t their respective sttachnrcnt points to the building structure' 7..4 IJAIilPTryli Whcn v*rious comporrentc wiftin e sfilrctural sysrcm possessed difftrc rt pcrccntagsr of*ritieal darnping composit* modsl damping was calcuiated using tlm nmss wtightod method in the CSgt?pr"gr*r (sce Sertion III"B" l0l, or the lowest darnping v*lue wse cr$strvatlvely ueed in tha d*ignt* otl eorynh*n13' Sincc 19S0, certein stnrctural analysis coFpltcr prugrar$8 such es BSAF hancutilized * *irrin-mcrglr msthod for computing composite modal damping' This approach is prefened si1ce thc dampins magnitudc carr be relstd to patantial component deforrnatioua The pwcmrtngos of sritical dan ping for rnalping structures, sy$terns srd somponcnts ffE uhqffi in Tablt n.E"?- [. ttr* damping uitum shown above the dashod line in the teble are thore to whish the plant hae bcffl licmrcd. Th. damping valuet bclow the dashed linc in tlre teble hsve bEcrl used littc" lgl0 and werederivcd on thcbasis of rcfcrcncc l0 (CMU walts) ard refcrmec lI {canduit'eable rrily! wireway). pint tp 1980, danping values for itenrs hulow th* dashcrl linc wcrc derivcdby comprimn wiih tlic drmping valucs for the structurally rimilr items above the dashed lina Iflighcr danpfug lalum than tlrosc lisred in Tsble II.E.2-I ars sltorted, provided proper justificil.tisn {i.i ttrt rcaults, etc.} ir available fat spmific comPoncntr or equipment.For examplg, nFpruprirtc damping values for seismicrlly qrdirying +quipfircnt by analysig zueh Hsclectrical caUinru, housing "omponcrrtr, or deviccs such as met*rs snd sqritchcs sltflIl bG bagd sn the t1ryc of mpport mswnbly and whctlrer it is bohcd or wclded, Morc drtst dampitg valuct cm be obtained fram qualification test rcports ofsimilrr equipnwrt ifsvail*blc, x-5 N0N-{q.FISMIC CATEGORY D STRUCrIJBFS Non-(scierric Cafcgsry I) sUucturcr harc bccn dcigned in rctordnrrse with tht seisffiic requiruuc,nts of thJUtiintm Building Code {Rcfcrance ?) m t}rc Ohio Bssio Buildir*g Code Gelerurca Scuti$n II.Ifl. Stmctures designod to thse codca include:. T\ubine building {UBC}I Tnrbinc gcnerator pedcstal (UBC)r Olfice building {LIBC}l Water bcatmcfrt buiHing (UBC)F-12 Davis-Besse Design Griteria lHanual (Gontlnuatlonl sccrton nttr: SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF STRUCTTIRES Fagt: II-8.2-5 Fwirion: 3 Cooling turer Cooling water Fump house Persunnel prncessi ng facility Fcrssiiiel shopc frcility Adminirtration bui ldin g Training *irnulator faci I i tyLow lwel mdrtrask storage facitity $tation Blgcksut Diesel Building (uBcl (uBc)(oBBCl (oBBCl(IJBC, l 979, Zone i)(oBBC)(oBBC)(uBc)r Yard skucfures not listed in (ttBC)Section II.E-2. l, includingi ntake sbrrcture supcrstructurc. $ectfum U3l2 of the Uniforrn Building Code deocribes thc roquirements forevalualing thc lttsral wtfuuake forcn* fsr Non- (seisrnie Catcgory t) snucturus rtd slco the lateral farsa qn clcrnmls ofshrcturus and nons&usturd cornponents. For Drvis-Bcsse PoIHET Smian Unit I, stnrctur*F aredcsigned to requiremrrrte of Zone l of thc LJBC Seisrnic ?nne Map $(cqpt rn mtcd in $ection II.Hfor TED struc$rcs" The intcracrion bctwecn $eismic Catcgury I illd Hon- {$eirmic Cntsgpry Dbuildings hs,s bem pruchdad such hst in the building dcsign eash $tructurs reryorrds indryendentlyts $eismic motions" F- 13 DB.OTE+0 II.E,?-6Sectlon Tlflr: Rovisiolr: lItern. EgFinrnent, or S!ructtrtF* ' Largc diameter piping $ystcmsr pipe diameter grcaterthan l 2 in,* Small diameter piping syslerns, diameler less than or equal to l2 in.Welded steel sfructures Boltcd $t'oel strusfiuer Rein forccd concrete structules EquipmwtDavis-Besse Design Criteria Manual (Gontlnuattsnl SEISM I{T AhIALYSIS OF STRUCTI.IRESTable II.E"2-l PERCENT OF CRITICAL DAMPTNG FACTffR Maximum Probable&rthriu{kq 0.5 0.5 2 2 1 I Maxirnum Paesibls Feglqssks 0.5 0.5 2 5 4 ICMIJ walh Conduit slryport sy$erus Cable fray/wireuray slnetenrs I{llAC supporr s}*rurns{ 4 4?7 1 v ZRefcr to $ocrion [ILB.I I.3.5.1.8.3.b for use of altcrnativc {higtcr} darnping r alum pcr ASMIICodc Case N-41 I.F-14 DBSTEO-o Table II-E-2-3 IhtDEX TO CALCULANON$ roR SEISMIC ACCELERAfiON RESPON$g SFECTRA t" Davis-Besse Design Criteria Hlanual (Contlnu*tion) A*Afl.al.lltltr.ftfirt S*ctlwr Trde: Rnvtrlon: 3 SEI.$MIC AI.TALYSIS OF STR.UCTT IRESPage: ll.gJ-? Fuilding/Location Earlft Qurkc No.Sheets ffmund Auxilirry Building - Aron 6 Auxiliary Building - Arca 7 Auxilitry Building - Arca I Contninment Shield Bldg, Containrnent Ves$el Contrinment lnter$alsIntake SmcnueVslve Room Auxiliary Buildine - Arca 6 Atrxiliaq' Building - Arm 7 Auxiliary Building - Arce S Conlainrnent Shield Bui lding Contairrment Vmsel Contsinment Intenrnls Intahc $hucture Vatve Room U$AR T Sect.3.?$-r I 12 s- ls ?t$-2CI 3l$-?t lt s-2? 16 s-23 36 s-?4 I3 s-25 ?s-I8 1?stg ?l F-?0 ll s-?l tx$-?2 16 s-31 36 s-r4 I2$-35 2 OBH ssE ssl ssE s$E ssH$sE ssE$sE ssE OEE OBE oBn OBE OBE OBE OBE OBEF- 15 DB0r5t}{r Davis-Besse Design Criteria Manual (Gonilnuation) SETSMIC AHALYSIS OF STRUCII.IRFS Ir_9.3-8Figure II.E,Z-I MAT}IEMATICAL MODEL AI'XILIARY BUILDING A}EA6 H\5.* ll{t+rtGfi a*t'.t'&rHt5l-d.il'r0'6f,t+s'-itnh ldr..lr*ffi,*sr?q: tt'ffi\ oad-.fl Htlr'lf -rr"*"h gt '4**r Ee . 3i 1ll rrhr r*f q r t jotlg lol. *tF NOTE:The Shear ArEr and Mornent of lncnis dcsignnted a$ A,1* rnd Iu* is th: $herr Aret and Monent af Inertia for an erthquake in the North-South dircctio* rryhic l meslr$ it is the Moment of Inwtia shout the East-Wcst axis. t{Glcilf trrp6 J+rst Nl.ffirtir fFn rir*tilrl{AIE FFI n0fiTlt-f#uf{t tr111-urlT t{rrn&llr firfl*ii{L tttlmfit trt*t fffrtl[r*rt{}frl lilt tfitnt I^frq l*0f l4n 1c'c latQlr lorF.9olt E H H H*EI EI FI eto 61fi*10 zl'lo l8.o 1.0{I I t f88 ts**ftr ilts trlt{00{oi Bsg sli lgf rofr ril,tlf gs?4ts lSl-4*f t*qgl tl&'***z?;{t?.tf,rl 1,1?te 111 a t rr#tte rtr t16 rtJ Ztfr'Ete tg?tJlr.r11 F-16 Deo:6+0 Davis-Besse Design Griteria lt/fanual{Contlnuation} Secllorr Tlllo: Rsvblon; 3 SETSMIC ANALYSIS OF STR,UCTURES Fag+: II.E.?-gFigure ll.E,2-2 MATHET!ilATICALMODEL. AUXILIARY BUNDMG AREA ?AS-gt LT mr$l, r-F{AEE ltO.r-\eus6o'-o' UHEHT TTFS losff fn tmrl'l*Er 14rf lEllt}tr'!4F* tl$f-ffi?rltF F!Fl T'ffi ilr[rn ffi lr*J:llltrr t,lF INTIT[F?_a ]4so6 t483 3ffiO a5*6 g74s$s5 g&3$lts 98 7E 67 5S 40^eo o 164 703 6*gT?gf3 1go4 l??t 4sg SEET{ffi sffil 5EF nilL{ffia rffinrt'rwx;d r$erxd f$6oxrd ffit3rcrf ffSxtP ssmxtf 616 3rfi HT 4eE 357?EE 858 fiETI X:CF SntSxrd ffimxtF n=mxrd q.a*r+xrd!.SlE*tCfA*iBr ilf T.r'r*,tk.4ftti I if,r.ltSF l G t , EC3'-O*'H-.6rd.o' Et-.6fil:.S" 6030" ie$:d&*s6cd EI-.543'.S' BTfiE r4$:FCFi Ec.*,3dS x mF NOTE:Thc Strear Area snd Moment of Inertia designated as An-s and Ir*, is the $har Ales end Momcnt of luqtia for arr earthquake in the North-South dirnction which mcsnc it iq ttrcMommt of Inertia abont thc Enst-West axis. C F-17 tlB.0tEt!^0 il-E.1- l0$acthn Tlth: Radrlon: 3Favis-Besse Design Gritef'ia Manual (Contlnuatlonl SElSh,ltC ANALYSIS OF STRIICTI IRESFigurc lI.E,2-3MAfi{EMATICAL MODEL, AUXILIARY BUILPTNG AR :A S ffi AS.HJIUf mF$.h'tAES hn EL.GSSIB ", H-.653'* 3*EL.6ae'-6' ?ffio*OGt 4559 5&rO 73r7 13e?4 rgoss r?'d t si ;iil-H5 FCF ; Ec.*e4S x tf ruf ;G*.ffi$xrd NOTE:Thc Shcer Arca s$d Momsnt of Inertis designated as A,** and In-* is th : Shear Area anrl Moment oflnertis furm earthquake in theNorth-Southdirectionwhic r rn*an$ it is the Moment of Inertia about thc EaEt-West axis, Q=t'6ef-6' qla-.6oa'-d I AEI-.584'*o-T fil EL. s6+'.o*YI EL.$so'.3-

• f-q BASE_L EL.94s1o" 43AO7e-ffl5$tS13.

68ra6&rs 4tT d6q 5St ffiro g7 86e5 4A25 7-75/649 1e6B 133I 145ts 357S ts?dgl h3$rgg6.857 l3B6i45g-867 l3A85OCO.90e lgH"473oa F-18 Davis-Be$se Design Criteria lHanual (Gontinuatlonl $ecflon Tldr:Rsvl$lofi: 3 SEIS}v{IC ANALYS IS OF,STRUCTURES Pag*: II.E-?-l I El-?ilco#'EL8AIS ,+_ral__... F!6T.I1*4.,,.*FL-fc * {[00Fgt E = $2*fE7 Hrl G -O,{**?S{1"t00ltrl Figurc U.8,24 MATHEMATICAL MODEI. SHMLN BUILtrING Wtt*{fl5x I r !f,ff*s!l *t$Odtlt t r*llQ,llfl =lrffiltrE I n'Ft'A c fTr E-tIl.00 tr r tfiStl t6r tTl 'Q Axt*tffil frffF r it{D,(Ar r lll*l Aarf

• Il*l fr r t*ff.O rrrf3rtr Ar
• ttl*l Aisf 'ffif,T lll*fitl FOIHT t't$'.,fitttrtlo.

ilEfffifiR t't$'nr*g$FSltuT ,&t!It I ffis.! Hr $ltrr P1* fil$lt t F-19 DB,0t80'0Davis-Besse Design Criteria Manual (GontinuaHon) $ect[,on rltls: SEISMIC AI.TALYSIS OF STRUCTURES ft-E 2-l?Figurc II.E.2-5 MATH}IMATICAL MODE L, COI{I'AINMENT VESS EI{,r g*r*f*r#r E S.SL f-&r n;s a ' 45r 5'9t A* = i-5""+Atff s ft.0?Ir 53r13.?Ar = 25,St A+,{f l ?-??,= tafi.t54 Att:5f'oT' Arffszs.g+- ft* {rt76.0co KgF AE o"3ilF e I l,6f,s .iao Kg F J'ftt-3* {T3 A:HT.Ss FO HT HO*_ 0- fctnT f\ttl't6gft

• i.i - ne$Btn +ltttdgEft I firAts F'0 I t'{ T-lVt s 663{

Davis-Besse Design Criteria Manual{Co*tlnuatlon} Seettsn TitluRwi*iqnl 3SEISMTC AHALYSIS OF STRUCTURES Pago: Il.E.l-ll 0s-0r8fr0 FigPrc U.8.2{ , II4ATHEIv{AIIICAL MODEL CONTAINIVfENT INTERNAL $TRUCTURES HSfTH HOOELHr+* t'rulrf,t*. wefi:ttttFsl lorltT Hf[ffilqt{r (Fn fturrLl fr, (;ttl TuDFlll*totffll ElfiT-Wt tntrG r.nt*'(ftr1*:r+*lt*iTf+.ffrtt Illtltf, Af,I*{Ftr}riltr ilttrhr IFtT}ertS i6B?Itrs tat?tgrg tsrl&ltri s31l Srfo 1t+&ls+l l6l+ce lett ult rg5 g.?5 4l 38 ao?o l1 9 a?l tbll gEt tllrsoo{?*ltlrtoo tlll str-t nLDAp 4l6'I$lrttE rt'tt toll rfflFtrU+fft ltttffs Itgl gft l*a*of hpt t,tw t?trrt 9'1?4.+ffi iaf td't fu, ttE??ol f{tett Fsr f,dItfir Ir.lt I tt-+fr$[a!st#Ffi/0il lsll It5+htt[ooo Srs h{rijffl tztt l*tt rtrtltr q*s Ff+fi{sils t*to ffirrilt??{'q Ft?erl 2tl?Irs IfilGist tio*ttf-ftl?l1I rstt L$qfo+N?s*?lEf*r 61 3 i--h-ab-2fi,ltl fl r Sose F$t E * !?&r oec.rlF s

• tsgr*sp xtf NOTE:The $hear Ar*a and Momcnt of lnortia designatoi nE Ao.s and h+ is th* $haar Alsa alldlvlcnrcrrt of tncrtis for an earthquakc in thc Norttrsouth direction which mcur$ it is thcMumtilt of lqdia sbout thc East-West s(is.-r r ?tooa { roae e 4*rd rrril"tLgltio-gL. 6llt l'-Er.Atst,f

-r,l.-68{*- g1,6ttl$'ffi*#.9'*Lfl01'.f-ft.ltjFo'rL..tstg tt,Slgid 1 ffi ELSrr'-df f;illqi-$t.br0't9'

• -r",tra.

l.A-F'\pl8)tgFn r,r*at* -\ Dts'0lsr-0 S'ecdon TlllrrR*rrbfiun: 3Davis-Besse Design Critet'ia.Manual (Continuatlon) SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF STRUCTI,TRESll,[ 3- t4Figurc Il,E.2-7 MATHEMATICAL MODEL, INTAIdE STRUCTURE E*t# tr r Serfl? r {tdtgt'l'$ct

• ffi llODtfi.il8 gFiliHSTlGlTt G rfilil?tl lfitr SGfrft if0fiilril$*A* IflS,ffi J0fiF E 3?f.tEt-erITrqt -E{f#St EL5$f y EL.SEfE-Eljrsr ELTfI!F ELE{f['*,ffir FfHNA fn NOTE:The $hesr Aru gnd Moment of lnertia designated NE A*, anrl I** is tht: $henr Aret andMoment of Inatia for rn carthquakc in thc Nortlr-South direcrion whielr mean$ it is the Moment of Incrtir about thc Esst-Wcsr axis.at AI AI AI h#fdm*HgttrHf F#31 Jotlff rf,nFcn l*oHr IFT}rffiA Ttr*L (#)ficfit AREA Itrt st0 1t?!fi{to lTco m a CD cn fs g9 to t3*fJ fi!tfl.0 ffi f!6,0 at0 lE0 tlI tflnrus$fIH rFtf{[3s0rs t$+o0o flqilru tEtlrtsrrffift+l[d*x Davis-Besse Design $riteria Manual (Gontlnuatlonl Scgfion Tltle: FeviElon:

3 SEISMIC A}IALYSIS OF STRUCTURESFag* ILE'2-15 o8.0r804Figuru lI.E.2-8 MATHEh,IATICAL MODEL BORATED WATER STORAGE TAHK Mrrg698l(Mr.23.43F xr*8g.4 FT {tz.gsr' Axol.3 tr'=1954,51 s/p1 Ms= ff36.S+n Dr. 1OO7,45 P1 a 4-3.650' AJq = l.gJo'Mr*3?f.4.1?l(Lx*16e6.1O54 S, r 5.87 E'$s.3.11n'Kxr3JlgS+ 06 lt&r: -K?t'I.647i + osFfnrn) Ky'alt6+ ffi?tl-7 lE'ooElTg,e4ll'FTE F-23 Davis-Besse Deslgn Criteria Manual t+tSI.crlrl.Eljnilt 8st{lon rltre: SEI$MIC ANALYSIS OF SYSTEMS Revlrlon: I Rrapontlblo Enginsef: Checlter. The.o.SyimFrst: lI"E.f "t ipprovw: VerqJeghq!- o*le: 7&d#$I DE.of ?s0 During the operatiunal phase of tre plant, many equipmcnt modifiestions hsve be*n implernentod,and it is arrticipated that, in thc futrre equiprnent upgrading will csrrtinue" This seclion ir presentodto dcscribo the post-lfi9 goismic qualificuion procedures ufilizcd for Sei$mie Class I cquipmmt modifications" This saction is e$ssntiafly cuneut in applicability but ie based on Fast urpcricn-caPrior to pmforming any rypc of scismic qualilicuion,.thc syBtsrt ilufil, bc idcrtifid rs bcing cithc,rSeismic Caregory I or Non- ($eismic Category I) sptem thrt coutd affect thc fimetionality of e Sci$nic C*tegory I systmn, Ffu order to perlbrm scismie quelificarion of sytlerns, threa rytiont ars avaitable:

a. Spectr*l resFsnse anrlYsis O. Sirnplified seismic analysis c. Seisrnic:eeting Althaug,h rhc tirne-history rnethod of analpis can be classified s$ a s*ismie,qullification method, itsuse is generally restrictd to studies where in- stnlcnre rc$ponsc is accesgilry.

Equiprnent and componenr inetallations ars catcgorized ss either llsxiblt or rigid. Seismically rigid instailations ffe thoJe whoce ftmdamental frequency is eqnat to or groater thsn 33 Hz" All othsr installarions nrc flcxible. Forrigid installationq th+ sSmtern is nrbjected to thc zcro-period ac*els*tion (ZFA) far ennly*is ind dcsign. For insrallations wfii*tr have a nntural frequency below 33 Ha one of dre quntification options list*d abova may be ueed to ensure structural adcqurcy'It should bc noted that structurill rtcol framing and platforms shnlt not span eeisEr is juints, thereby rltcring seicrnie indepmd+ncc of the $tntcrur*s. Howotrcr, elqstsns such as conduinr' cablc tra)4q ffVAC ducts, rtc. rupported brtwccn structurs thu ale seismically indcpmdent, su*r ns bctwscoAraas 6,7,nnd I of the ruxiliary building or bctwecrr lloors of fie $ame building, shnll also beuralf'zcd for thc diffcrtntisl movcrncnts of the supporr Fornt$. ?hc rq+ns* due to rnibretory motion frarn seismic excitation shflll bc sombined absolutcly with the response dus ts *re diffenerrtial support morrrments nnd the dcad load, Iive load, ard contingfficf lo'ads. $yttums of thist1ryc includr piping conduiL tryAC lincs, or other equiprnemt rrhi*h rny sFen a ssisilrie joint'F-24 Davls-Besse Design Criteria fUlanual (Contlnurtlonl Sectt*n TIB*: R*vfefon; I SEI$MIC AHALYSIS OF SYSTEMS Fagg: II.A3-2 DB41&0 The foilowing crite,ria defure the boundery between a slmtem (snd its stlpForts) snd the zuppcriingstructura $lruremr nre decoupled frorn thc structuc at thc systenr fiuFport rnd strucfire intcrfaca piping; .oni,rit, snd cebte tray sptcrnr are dccorryled at the point of connstion lo a piere of uq'uipmont. Senerslly, the ErutcNn being investigated is coneideltd dwoupled ftom the rupportingst;1rcturc whcn its furrdasrentrl frcqueney is signilicurtly lowe thsn thd of the eupporting sfiucturc-Specilie criteris for dmoupling src-sxprcased in tenns of frquency and mts rnlitr md arc givxr in Referance 3, S.T,SPFCTRALRESPqI{SE A}IALYS$A structural syutem ir idealised into discrete eleinents and a mathsmatical rnodel is formiiiatcd* which rgpr*sents, in tftree-dimenoions, bsth thc stiffness and incrtial charasteristics of tbe cystan-A finite ilement coilputsr proEram is used tb analyec tris npm*entation. Natursl fiuquenciee urdassociard mode rhrpee wtrien ecscribe the vibration tnttt*tr6ri+tics of ths EHttcm rrc obtnindusing a modal cxtruntion rouline.The spectrtl respcnsc technique subjocts each mode of tho $lrutcrrt to nacelsration lwsls r,a gtvcn bythe design floor rcsponsc rpectra.Seismic analpes prior to l9?4 sombined modal recpons*s using shic.tly sn SR$S technique-tsf$don recottrrnsrdatisn$ a.s eitd in NRC Regulatory Guides, rhe iruportanee of considoing the effecteof closely spaced mqde$ bec*me evident.SincE lg?4, the practice ir to pmform an SRSS summqtion ofmodsl rEspo{tses to obtein totalrcqponse for cach direction of seismic occitation. Howcver, if thc mode* me closcly 8pq{i,e., le$$ thffi l0 pmsnt betrreen nAnual frequeircies) thc abcslute mmr ofthc rcrponfrcc ofsch i*rip of cloeely W.ceA rndw shall be obtei@ rud the resltr ftom sll thc clomely.spacud gIuNtPs are then aornbind with the offrer rnodes using ltrc SRSS mc*hod. Rceponscs ofsimila,r corryoffimtq rusulttng ftgri different dirudions of euthqrrake excitation shnll Elm be earnbincd by ttn SR$$' rnethodl** a bfisis for this modal resporuremctho4 refer ro NEC Regrrlatory Guidc 1.9t, RE1t U Dec. t974 $octiong B ad CJ prior to t9?4, mismic analysce mmbining spatial rcsponBes rffFro detsmined by the lerger of the X +y andttri t +Y earttr{uenanctpo,rro.c*trereXand Z$ethepwpadicnrlarhorimntsl directions rnd Y is the vsrtic;d dircctiou $ince thcn, Brc prcfened toehniqut is b wurhiue cpatial respon*cs fur thrcc diroctione of excitation using thc SRS'$ tcdnique fi$ p(*sintd In NRC Regulatory Ouidc 1.Y2, F-25 Davis-Be$se Design Griteria Manual lGontlnuationl Srctfon Ti[e;ftg'rlrlon: I SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF SYSTEMS Pasr: II.E.3-3 DB-SIE{H}For sys{em having significnnt natural frequcnoies above 3l Ha seismic analysee sincc lg83 h*w incorporatd ne Effecrsof thesc highcr modcs as described in Reftrr*rcaS, Swlion 3.1, ln lieu of the merhods of I{RC R*gulatory Guide 1.y2. This technique ar*umcs thrt the modm sbove 33 Hg wilt resporrd in phace s'ith c*ch other to thc peak ?h. Therefore, thc elfects of thcse rnodm Erc cornbincrl algeblaicalty. This ie oquivalcnt to a pseudo+tatic rcryofiss ta the inertial forcs frorn these higher modro cxcitcd at the ZPA. To dete$ninr the overslt strurturel pe"k rcspon$e, the total eombined resF$nse to high frequcncymodee is combined with the total mnrbined r?sponse frsm lower ftcquency modec using the $R5S Method.3.3 $IMFLIFIEp$SI$MK: SI-ALYSISIf the sysrem or quipnrcnt i* structurally simple, i.c. thc dytramis msdet mey be re'pmented by qnc flra,$s and one $prin& thr natural ftequency of the systfin or cquipme*t ir determined ustng the techniques of Referencc 6. The natural frequency, togcther with tlre appropriare dnmping value, is used to enter the *ppropristc acceleration response spetnrm to obtain the equignrent accelsratisn in units of g's. Thc conesponding inertia force is obtaincd by mulfiplyrng thc wcigltl tirne* the acceleration. Under certain corrditions, thc nahuat'fi=qu*ncies of lhe systerus or equipnenl nray nst b*cslculated. Undcr thesc conditionq using the appropriate dunping voluc, the prak valus ofaocelerstian rcrponse cuyver or ihe values obtairrcd ftom duplicatc or dynamically

• imilar syrternswhieh have be6nr analyred are used to calculate the raeporutc. Thi$ respsfi$c ir then multiptied hy *static coeflici*nt of t.J to sscourlr for thc affccts of botb multi{lquersy exeitatian sild muitimod*rfspon$e in order ts obuin thc dasign incrtial forse. A lowtr coelficiemt runy be u'sed if it will yield csilurcrvstiw result$ glld is tGc,bnically justificd

{Reference J" D. $tepharscn Pf,psr, Cirua l9?I}.3-3 SETSMIC qUALIFICATION BY TEETS$cismic qurlificarion of most $eiamic Category t original cquipnrmt purcharEd ald inqtnlled dunngthe constnrotion phnm hs$ bccn qualified to rcquirements as dcscribocl in mEE-344-?1' In msgt stutc$, as slard in rtrc qmlifieatioil rtportq rhc luput motion for qu*lificgtion rvra *ingle axir, sinBlcfrequency, either of tlrc farm of sin* beet or sirre dwsll. $incc t975, seisrnie quatificetion of equipment has been accomplished by testing whan the equipment is $o comptex ttrat it canrct be modelad to adoquately pt"Cirt its rcsponse or rrhen strrrctural integrity nlone carrnot eruilre thc design-intendd f,rncfon S*s-i* qrnliticntion ruing tst me{hods shall bc brod on the ra$smillsndatisns citFd inIEEE- 344- l 975 {Referencc 9}. Davis-Besse Design Crlteria Manual (Gontinuation) frgFlr5ff rri{rl't.tlffisrctroft t-rtlr: $EISMIC ANAIYSIS OF SYSTEMS

• svlclon:

1Fage: II"E.3*4 Two rnqier categorier of test methode are used for risrnic qualificrtian; proof tcsting and fmgility testirg. A pmof tcst ruluircs quipnmt to bc subjccted to the particrlor rccpsnse spmtrrrm m time.history defucd for tha mounting location of thc equipmcnl-Fregility teting is utcd to qurli$oquipment by determining its ulrimrtc capability. Test methods simulating sciunric, snvironrnent also fsll into two genercl categuries: ainglc hruncy gnd multiplc ftqucncy.In ganeral, the p'roof twt seisrnic simulation n'araforms shall: a. Produee r te$t ru$pofi$c spcctrum (TRS) which closely envelopn rhe requid rs$pqnss-spwtrum ARS)b- Havc an input shakc tablc accclcmtion magnitude equ*l tc or Srffiter thsn the ZPA

c. Include liaquoncice up to but tpt above the ZPA ruympfolc

d. ffil.iX?H#1" each test Srould nt tcrst cqual the struusmoti+n pofiio'rt af th+Procf testing cur utilize wnveftrms Euch as continuous sioe, sinc bcst, dccaying $iilq rnuftiplc frcquucy, or tirnc*history, pnovided thc frequcncy End amptitude srs chs$trt to propmly quslify thtrtest itcrn.

Ttrb molp $onunon state-oFthe-ert testing sr&jecS the test spcimcn tro a rardour oxcitatiqn wheiu thc arnplitude i* controllod in ono.third octavc or narrowatr bsndwidths. Thc ensitation is conhollsd to pmvide a TR$ u'hich rnods or cncocds thc RRS. Ttrc rmdom exeitntion sltottld tr*re r nirfrnun duration of 30 s*ands. Fivs OBB (sma[*r eartlrquake) Isvd teste follourcd by

• gSE flogcr- carthquake) should dofrnc thc qualification sequcocc bavinga minimum sffitrsbinxial testl.Equipmcnt originally O*oi** for Davis-Bcs$c Power Station Unit I rrm seisrrically qusliliod to qpacificf,tions bfrflad on nethods dffirib*d in IEEE-344, l97l aditicn Ncur cqulpmun and eurcot modifications rlre qu*tiffed by teat mahods described in IEEF344-?S (Rcfercnm 9). ReplnctrHtt parts for original equiprnc,lrt ahatL r a rninimutn, rnaintain their originel lwcl sfmismic qualification.

Rcphcrrre,nt part qudification mry bc bised cn onc of thc following:

s. IEEE-34+?I b- IEEE-rq+rs F-27 DB-{If80{Detailed test lrquirsm*nts ars defin*d in the seisrnic guatifrcation sttachmemt tn the purchasc spedficatisr listed in Table II.EJ-I, along with tlr accrytancc crit*,ria- dcpending ur tlrc tyf 0f equiprnent hcing qualificd.Davis-Besse De$ign Criteria Manuaf (Contlnu*tlonl Sostlon n$or Rsvlrlon; I$EI$MIC AT'IALY$IS OF SYSTEMSPgn: II.E.5-5 DB.0tffo'0 Davis-Besse Design Griteria Manual (Gonlinuatlon!SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF SYS'fEMSTable tI.E 3-I sErsMIC QUALIFICATION SPECIFICATIOH ATTACHM iNTS Title Scisrnic Qudification Requirements forClass lE Etwtric rl Equipment, Device$, and Supports Seismic Qualification Rcquirements forClasr I E C*ntrol Panel r\sscmbli$$and Clns..f I E Control and Instrumentalion D+viccc Seismic Qualification Rcquircrr:ents fur Power-Actuatcd

/alves Seisnric Qualification Raluircrnents for Class 1E Field lvlaunled lnstnrmenls Sei$mic Qualification Requirernsnts for Nuele*r Clas* Ius trument Vdvts Qualificatiott of $eisrnic Caregory I Me*anicnt Equiprnc ttEarthquake Resistance Design of Class t Equipment Earrhquake Resistance Design of Class I EquipmentSsctlon Tltl*:Fbvisiianl I Attechmmt Dq,slFretio.rl EA.I J-l r.3 J-5 J-6 tM-e00)' c-41* C-41-A F-29 DB{1t+0Davis-Besse De slgn Griteria ilIanual a.r'lulcl +cflf. Ilffi sectlor rfttr, REFERENCES Revl*isn: ?Pago: II-8.4-l Apprsror: Ygt${*&n- Oct r ?/1ff90 Rrrpondble Errglnerr:Chclren Tlreo Swirt t.2.Davis-Bcsse Nuclesr Power Station No. l, Civil Engineering Cclculstian; $eisrnic *nalyeic R@rt, Volum+$l, Ho" t May lYI3.Nuelem Rsqctom end Eadhquakes, TtD-?024 Lnckheed Aircrafi Corf. and Hohnm and Nlvrcr, Ina, prrparcd foTUSAEG August 1963.licirmic fuisbrc* of $tnrctrnes and Equiprncot for Nuclcsr Fow*r Flan{s, Topicat R+oriBCjTOP*{-A Rev. 3, Bechtel Power Corp., Nov. l974.Lster No. 8T-168?7, dated 6/13/86, frorn V. R. Marathe {Bechtet} to B" J. Csrick flfE}.teiler No. BT-12774, dated 2119182, from J. W. Fay (B*ht*l) to C- R. Dsmeck {TE}, Biggs, John M.,Introduction to $tnrctural Dynamics, McGrsrv-Hill, 1964.Unifonn Building Cods, International Confcrcnce of Building Officials, Whittier" Califorhia, 1967.Recommended Revisions to Nuclear Regulatory Commission $eisnric Desigrl Crirsia NUREG/CR-I ldlRn, preprred by Lawrence Livcrmoru [.sboratory, lvlay 19S0.IEEE Recommended hs*ticss for Seisrnic Qualifieation of CIasE t B Equiprnrut for Nucler Power Gsrcrnting Stations (IEEE-344-75} by thc lrratituts of Elcqtricsl aad Elestronic$ Enginoere, 1975.'T.e-evaluatien Critsria for Concrete Mmnry Walls," I-E. Bullctin No. S0-l I, Dnvin Be$$c Nuclear Pows $tafiorr, Doqrmcnt No, C-1, Rcv. [, May l9$l""Cable Tmy md Con&rit Raceway Seisnic Tcst Flogram', Anco Engincrrs, hG., Rcport l.lo. lO53-?1.1.+, I 5, Dccember l9?8. 3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.ll, F-30 APPENDIX GDAVIS-BESSE A-46NPBEE VULNERABILITIES c{I o o E (g L ct o L CL IJJ IIJ UT o.I (0 st I o-c+, ct)c.I L 5 o!t o a-rts'F c o I o.!l E t-lt (E lr o g-=o F o=o tt o o g (r-c tr IIJ f tr o E CL.I f E UJ rF o F o a-J-I (t-g.cl G 1-96 86 EE 8e oo EE (o o, o, r cf)r (\I r@o)o)(f)ol!+o)q)r C\I r (o o, o, r cf)o, dgg 5-g*fi$688$-Fefi$z z rr)o, o)q)r r to o)o)a L o o gs E9 o.E rrE oo=o gE r-#Eo o q-o E (9 o o I rO O)o o cf)o o I LO o)o o 6-$C\I T$tcr ol Ra r-O T=$(t oro+E o{>o==cf)C\I o o I rO o)o o HFE-; 8;.E*dP-: eH+ a'acREt>d9E9 H;E=;8;.E EHEF, SgBeH s#s*g a.T a (U o-o (s o-o o ().9, I a (s o-o$o-o ()o (o$o o I ro o)o o (o t+o o I ro o, o o c o H E o o o E L.g f o o o, (5 o ()c (s o)c a'x o=a o o o, (U L o?()c (s o)c.9 X o=E o o o o (s E.o o L o 3 U)=o_o o, c'a.9, E o F c\l o o o E o E c (!o 9-r.* LIJ E@- (l)9o (!-C oP OF 6b_9 o o)c=o c'd L o o E..9 o-o, c=o c'(s a o G E;oP oo 6=.<2 a Efr oP (l)F tr.6 Ero crc Eat 8e.9 .9 q.6:o'9 E*o E;5g oo 6E.9o EO co-- ut oP (I)E F: .T,!E ec E(s 8E.e .9 9.6-'a ruE**L o o-o_=a o)c.9 X o=E o L o o-o- =o (')c.a x o=E o tr.9.F CL L (, o o o L.9 F 5 o E o otr pb BE sc oc-=OE Oo eB o..Eo o-.9'16 EE it r-is'=g oq (4o fiE E o otr p6 BE sc oc-=*5 EB o..Eo EE.9'5*E i!-ts9'>E oo (ao fiE (s o o o=c o c', c'an.9 E a=o-o o)c F.i:fc oo EE+3 xE o c o (g=L (u o o)o E=o;i.E go oo FO.-oP o.=(s0 ho=-o.:(U EE F(6 o c.9-c.9-c 3 o p;a FE o ttJ 9o fo OC FE O,E C:f E()=.E o c.9,-.9=o p 2a Jjtr otll 9rs fo AC FE-o c',E c=EE J-L.9=o)o--o 6c!pb oro$lf oG;>Eo-bo qO E*JE o-6 (s=Or-F(l)o(6>o y('t-U,.9=o, o*-o 6N.pb o)o (\t f oG;>Eo-Eo OO E5 J-o-fr (sF ()r-FO o(d>o yo, t- .9 o p a o o (s C'o E (s o g o (u a o ct E a'-P cr (g oto o p@o o (s f o o c (5 o c o L (s a o (s o a'l or'=E o(U A-o uJ l()@lr)rr)@lr)cf)C\I@ro@ro cr)o (o C9 o (o (o tr)(o ro@cr)(o@(f)(o ci, It o m X f m X:)co X=o X f co x f m X f Y F z Y F z co X=a0 X 3.ts c a ao'5 ct UJ I C\I O c\I I C\I (J cr)O lo ()(\l o[rJ tL I cr)(L C\I I cr)(L I cf)@C\I I cf)a o E (r L ct)o L CL IJJ ltJ lll o--(0=f I o.C f ct)c a-L=o It o a-rF E C o I o.9 E a-ll (r L o E=o F o 5 o!t o o tr (r.C c IJJ H c o E.g=C'IJJ IF o+t.9 J!t F I (5-9 lr tr F g6 A6 EE 8e oo E.=zzzzzzzzzz o)o)$ti : Try r-S(')(O ,aO) ^O)9?QP;\=il_=o, o)\t L o o Ptt--E HE o.E EE oo=o 8E L.H Eo o q-o E E o (s ()o o c o o_o@(s o o ($o!o o m E o (U C)o o g o o-o o (d o a (U ()ll o o m o o (s ()o o L o o-o a (u o v, (U o v o o m E o (u o o o c o o-o a (tt-c o a (!o l<o o c0 E o (!o o o c o o-o U'(!-c o a (u o l<o o co E o (6 C)o o c o o_o a (!-c o a (5 o l<o o m E o (E ()o o c o o_o a (5 q)a (!o J o o co o o (s C)o o L c o o-o a (s o a (s o i<o o m E o (s ()o o E o o-o a (g-c o a (s C)l<o o m E o F ct o o o L g o o-o@(s-c o@(d o Y o o a0 c\I cf)o o I rO o)o o T C\I$o o I$o, I 5 C\I s o o I$o, I o o=o-o C\I (9 o o I rr)o, o o c.9 IP 5 o o o E L.g y=o a o (s o o o c o o_o a (s o v, (s ()l<o o co a)o (s C)o o L c o o-o v, (d-c o a (U ()l<o o d)1)o (u c)o o C o o-o a (u o o (u o l<o o m E o (U o o o L c o o-o o (u o o (s o.Y o o m E o (g ()o o L c o o-o o (s-g o o (s o-Y o o m E o (U ()o o L c o o-o o (s o U'(U o lz o o m E o (s o o o c o o-o o (s s o a (s o l<o o m p o (u o o o L c o o-cr a (U-c o a (U o J o o m a o (6 C)o o c o o-o o (d g (I)CI'(s ()l<o o co c o (s o o o L c o o-o a (s o a (U C)-:a o o m o-c#o)==b=>.=po o-E 99 CA (uo nb Y(U o3 arC E9l=.E_s- E o- ftt o o o o o ()o-o o F o 5sD F,c b=>-b po o-E 99 cvt!uo n-o Y(U o!SF=.E fiE c.9.ts EL L (, o o o L.g lH f o o J L a E c (u (u E f, o o o o (!o l<o o-o.(f o L 9*t9 (d-o cfit 5O c9<!o l<L o E c (u (U E J o o o U'(g o l<o o-o o o 9*tP (d9 c(I'=o c9<!o l<L a E c ($(s o=o o o o (s o-Y o o_o E o 9*bP (u9 e(It=o r-O<5 o!L a E c G'(d o f o o o Cn (s o-:<o o_o o o 9*-oP (6Q c(It=o c9<!o l<.E U'o (!(U E f o o o Cn (s o l<o o_o E o 9-tP Fb c(It 3O c9<!o-v.L U'E (U (!a f o o o o$o J o o_o E'o 9-t9 Fb c(u 5O sO<!o l<L U'p c (U (u E f o ()o o (s ()l<o o-o E o 9--oP EE cGt=()eO<E-o l<L a e c (u (E io f, o ()o a (u o Y o o-o E o L 9*,-oP Eb c(U 3O rO<5 o J L a E c (s (6 p f o o o o (5 ()l<o o-o!o 9*tP (dq C(I'f()rO<5 o ll L a]f, c (U (s o o c)o U'(5 ()-Y, o o-o c o 9*tP F5 c(I'3t)r(D<E_*6 o'=o.= o 5*E EE8 d.-: E (U.=-=E.'$E-OF o-6 Eg I; HE (d(/)c-oftl*t: EHA Hg*ro o o c o o'o c.9.9 o E o, c'o o E o E c o o-@=U)PO o-x o).= o 5*E EE8*EE 3sE bg5 EgI F f;E-([(/)c-@(6*i=gHFs s+oat;lrJ (f)N@(f)N (o (9 c\l (o (f)C\I@(f)C\I (o (f)C\I@cf)(\l@CTJ C\I@(f)C\I (o (f)C\I (o cf)C\I (o cf)C\I (o cr)C\I (o tit I o m x f m X f m X =co X:)m X:)d)X f co X 3 m X f m X=co X 3 m X =m X f m x l F tr a ao'5 C'IJJ (\I o ro ()cf, o ro ()$o rO (J ro o tO ()(o o ro C)O to C)@o 1()O o)o lr)C)o ro C)C\I ro O ()ro ro t\rr)O ()ro lr)ro C)o LO ro rr)() o E (r L E)o L CL IJJ IJJ IIJ o.-(o st I o?-F ct)c a-L=o!t o II rf-'E c o I o o t-H=a-.cl (r L o c-f o H o f o t, o C)F-G?-e-IIJ*.c o E.g=cr IIJ rts o{J.t2 J lt F I (t-g-cl G]-g6 86 EE 8e oo EE*: TS r\f,(f)(o ,+O) ^O)9PQP^5 ii-v o, o)r r$ti +TS r$(f)(oaO) ^O)af o) 1'\ o) J-{r r\5 x v o, o, r\t r-i +T$r-$CD(O:O) ^O)ctoloo, 4-{r/\=d V ti +T$rttr(f)(o gFgF t_=N q)o)r r$Fl: T$r-$CD(O?pgp E=o, o, r r$L o o Pgr.!a E HE o-E EE oo=o-.L]lo L#Eo o rF o E!C\I.+o o I$q)I N C\t s o o I\f o)I a ()=o-o c\l (f)o o I LO o)o o I c\l sf o o I\f o)I C\I!+o O T$o, I a o=o-o (\l cf)o o I lr)o)o o T (\l$o o I s o)I 5 N$o o I$o)I o O=(Lo I C\I st o o I$o, I C\T$o o I{'o, I a C)A o_o c\I cf)o o I 1r)q, o o I c\I\t o o I$q, I ol$o o I$o)I o ()3 o-o (\l (f)O o I rr)o)o o c o F 3 o q o t L.g F=o E o o o L o o o_o o F o-+, (,)=c b=>': Qo o-E oo CA (U(l)n'o Y(s (s: arC E -ql EE_r; E o_(s io o ()o L o ()o-o o o#()F,=b=>-t po o-E 99 CA (o(l)Rb Y(E (6: nrC E9l=E-r; E rL(6 E o ()o L o o o_o o F E o ()o L L o ()o_o o F o Ho)F,c bE> .t=o i,n o-E oo#L CA!50 g?b Y(s (s: arC E9l=.E_s.'tC o-(d a o ()o L L o C)o-o o F o!#o)=c b=>.=po o-E oo CO (uo gl -o g(6 (U: arC a9l=.E_r; Q o-(6 g.9 IF CL o o o o L.g f J o E o o c a o'()g_g o o E o, c'o o E o E c o o_a 5 a PO o'=o.= o-*,*E EE8 SEE groQ 888 be5 EgI E f;E-(6(/,c-o(u PT: EHAe s+oat;io o o c o.tu ()c o:0 o ro (')c'o C)p o E c o o-a f a vU)o'*o.E o 5*E EEd SEE CI)o.Q eB8- (l)F o-6:oE I F f;E (!(,)c-O(!.8is'5 s'F e5gs $+o a6!o o c a o'o c o'o o E o, c'o o io o E c o o-a f U)a o o c a o-6 c o:g o o o, c'6 ()1)o ro c o o-v,=a yA o'=o.g o**E EE8#EE 3sE- (l)F o-6 EgI F fiE-(o(/)c-ocl.Pis sHa H g-;E o o c U'.9 ()c o'o o ro c', c'o ()E o E c o o-a a-6 o'x o.S o t**E EE8 SEE gsE bg5 fr98 E f;E-(s(,)C-O(E Pt=EHFs s+o d_t;ul cf)N (o cD c\l@cf)(\l@cf)C\I (o (f)cl (o cf)C\I CO cf)C\I (o (f)C\I (o cf)c\I (o 6 g o m X 3 co x=co x f d)X f m X=m x f dl X f m X f m X =F tr e ao'5 C'ul o ro LO rO ()O (o rf)ro ()C)@rO ro ()o (o lr)rf)C)o (o ro ro ()r (o rr)C)C\I (o lf)O C\I@rr)()o C\(o tO () \n I o o E G'L ct)o L o.IIJ ITJ ltJ o--(o st I o)-c+.ct)tr t-L=o tt o t-q-'E g o I o.9 E a-.ct (r L o E=o H o 5 o!t o C)tr$-c c IrJ H c o E.g=ct UJ rF o f.t2 J ll F I o-g lt (u l-g5 86 EE 8E oo 8.ts*+TT r$(f)(OaO) ^O)9PQP^s;-v o)o)r$t.i : T$rt(f)(o ,+O) ^O)af o, a't cD J-{-/\5 i'V o)o, r$*: 5$r$(f)(.o+O) ^O)9? Q P^5 d_a z o, o,$r.l *TT r$CO(OaO) ^O)gsgP EE z b o do at .F 69 o-E EE oo=o 8E L .F'Eo o rts o E I C\I t+o o!\t o)T T\(\l$o c)I s o, I g ()3 o-o (\l cr)o o T LO o, o o t c\l t o o I$ o, I C\I$o o I$o, I a o=o-o C\I cf)o o I rr, o)o o I C\I$o o I$ o, I c\I$o o I$o)I a ()A (Lo lf, o (u o o o L c o o_o o ($L ($o o F c!(f)o o I rO o)o o T C\I$o o T$o)!b c\l$o o I$o)I o O=o-o E o (s ()o o o o-o o (s L (6 o o F tr o*E o o o E L.9 H=o E o o o o o o_o o F o#o)=c b=E(/)o-E 99 CA (50 Rb Yat (6:*F.=.E_so o_(U E o c)o o C)o-o o o E Po)F,c 6#E(,)o-E 99 CA$o R '-o Y(6 (U: nrC E9l=.E-t- O L(d E o o o L o C)o_o o F o o (5 o o o q)o-o a (5 E (tr ()o F o{J OD F,c b=>-b aa L o-E oo CA (u(l)nb Y(u (u: nrC E9l=.E_go o-(s lf, o ()o l-L o o o-o o F o o (s o o o L c o o_o U'(It-c E (s C)o-c F c.9.F EL L (, o o o L.9 f 3 o o o o c a o'o c.!q.9 o io o)c'o o ro o E c o o-@f,@-6 ,.9 6**E EE8 d-: E ct .= --otoQ PB8- OF o-6 EE 8 E EE'(d(')c rO(!Pi=;HF I6+o ai;E o o c 6 o'o c o:a o E o, c'o o E o E c o o-o f U'-6 o'i o.E o**E EE8*EE gsE r- OF o-6 EgI E HE-(s(/)c-O(6 Pas sHFs $+oa6 c o o c a o'()c.9.9 o E (')c'o o-o o E c o o-U'f a o l<L U'E f o o o c 5 (u o o o c o C)(6 E ct +, rO (6.=o-o-(6 (s()tro 6E eA o'=o.s o 5*E EE8ct: I ct .= .-()roQP e8 bgE EgI F FE-(E(/)c-o(!Pi='69t=e5gs s+o d_ii E o o c v).9 C)c o'c)o 1O o)c'o o E o E o o-a f U)o Y L@io f, o o o c b (u ()o P o P c o ()(U E (s *.rO (d_=o-o-(s rdc)tro 6E ul cr)(\I (o cf)N (o cf, C\I (o cf)C\I (o (r)(\l (o cf, c\I@cf)c!(o cr)AI (o (r, C\I (o CD g o m X f m x f d)x f co x f m x 3 m X =d]X =co X f m x f lF tr e ao'5 ct tJl ()C!(o ro ()o C\I (o lr)o o C\.1 (o ro O ()cf)(o ro o ()cf)(o ro C)O (f, (o ro ()o (f)CO ro ()o cf)(o rr)o o cf)(o ro () o E (r L ct)o L CL IJJ IJJ IJJ o.I (0 sf T o-c f ct)c.I L=o E o.T rF E c o g o.!9 E t--ct$L o tr I=o+, o=o!l o C)C (u F-tr uJ f tr o E CL II=E IJJ rF o fl o II J-I (,-9 ll (r F g6 A6 EE 8e oo E.:*+T$rg(f)(O?sgp d v t'l : T$F$(D(OaO) ^O)9PQP;\=dl V o)O)o)@q)o)o)r r@o, o, s C\I o)N o)o)r+c\I o, z z z O)o) o, r o C!z L o o (io.,F E9 o.E EE oo=o 8E L#Eo o rts o E I c!$o o I$o, I (\I$o o I$o, a ()=o-o I C\I\t o o I$o, I C\J$o o I$o, o OA o-o r lt o o I rr)o, o o o$o o I rr)o, o o ro o p o cf)$O o I t'c)o)o o+r o.rr -g (U*E_c o*EE O-=\v--(I)(s@of (f)(s0 x o->,Y O=rAL(E 616.9 ncE6 b.c=88 c'(s o o o P E o a f, o l2 o E o (s ()o o c o o-o a (u o E (s o-c F E o o E o L o a-o-f{, (d o E (U O s$o o I ro o)o o c'6 a o L o E o (, f o o o c.9.P E o o o E L.g F 5 o E o ()o o o o_o o F E o ()o L o ()o-o o F o#(')=c b=>-b po o-E 99 CC,!uo Rb Y(U (U: 6rC*91 EE.^l- E o- at o#q)*-c 6E>b E(/, o-E 99 CA (5(l)9p'o Y(!(5:*F=.E^r- O o-(u o#o)F,c b=>-b$o o-E oo CA ($(t)g?b Y(s (U: nrC Eq=.E FE o-(s o Fo)6#>,>So o-E oo PL CA!tro RE Y(s (U: arC a9t'>H_Y b-o-(6 o G E a()_c().=-=1, ag (I)F 8e o_E 9o oc)-o(g ef;@E l.C Q(o 4A ao (DC (Lo E o (5 ()o o c o o-o o (U o E (U L o-c F a o o E o E o o-o_=U'(U o-o (5 (J c'($o o o o-'a o, c.9 x o=E o o E E (/)c)-cO'E>E9 OF 8e o-T'9o oo-o$9H ao JC 9(6:a po rDc o-o c.9 F.CL L o o o o L..9 f=o o o o c@.9 ()c.9 o o E o)c'o o E o E c o o_(tt f a 1)o o c vt o'o c o'o o E o, c'o C)a o T'c o o-(t)=U)yA ,g5 5*E EEd SEE olo*a \(II E(E0 g(t)F o-6 EgI; HE-SEF.P; s EHis $*oa6-6 o'=o.E o 5*E EEd SEE gto*e_48 bg5 EgI F fiE-(u(,)C-oGl*is EHFs s*oa5 eO o'=o.= o 5*E EE8 s=E 3st- OF o-d:o* I F fiE-(o(,)c-O(!.8rs EHFs $+o d_t;yA o'i o.E o**E EEd*EE oroQ 8_48- oF o-6 EE 8 F E*-(5(')c ro(5 Pa=EHF Hg#(t)l(o o E (U o_o ftt fc:\1 ()!l>1' q)o-c-c##o c-Y L 9,6-9 .e Ro Y9-o .=FE 6(s AE@E o E E.g-o_o E.9O (U()E>EE s6 El< (U'=rF 0D 9o-o=eg O-o-(d oE 9c: SO o o-@Q)ov oE ca'-E sl=rO 6o o-c o-o 3E EO;g a1, (U(l)()-c 69 Eb (s'F t'i c-l 599 o CL-a (s t-o L o o-o_U'o-g E=o (U c o ()oc.:'6 LJF () -a>9 a J o o E ($o-o (u f<:\?()s/>-o o-c-c#PO cl<E6-9s*o YO-O *: EE 6(6 dE@b UJ cr)C\I@(f)C\I (o ro (o 1()Cr)o (o cr)O (o (f, o (o ro@rr)rO@ro rO (o ro lO@ro (f)o (o E;3 o m X l m X f c0 X =co X=)m X D m X f m X l co X f m X =m X f m X:f F tr!u=o'5 C'tJl ol (o LO ()C\I o, ro ()o tu o o C\I I LL C]()z o o-C!o m uJ ()r r tJJ o r r TU m c\l[rJ LL f-I O o E (u L ct)o L CL IJJ IJJ IIJ o.I (o=t I o-c H ct)C ar L=o E o a-rF E c o g o.!l E II lt o L o g=o P o=o It o ()q (r F-c tu P tr o E.g 5 C'IJJ rF o H.9, J tl F I o g.Cl (r F g6 86 EE 8e oo E.=o) o)o,@o)o)o,@rO o)o, t (\I r lO o, o)r o (\l@lO o)o)@ol@o)o)o r o)o)r f-o rzz z o)O)o)@r (\I o)o,{t o, o)o c)(o o)o, o, r@c!L o o Pc x=HE o-E EE oo=o!aoL a-t Eo o rF o E o$o o I lr)O)o o O$o o I lr)o)o o o o, I (o o I ro o)E.L TL t cf)o o I$o)o o t+cf)o o I$o, o o (f)o o I ro o, o o cf)O o I lr)o)o o a o L f o o a U'(5=c'6-()E o L f o o a a (s=c'(s o gE p8 E;gF$e EE iE c\l!f, o o I rf, o)()o (o cr)o o I ro O)o o lO (f)o o I ro o)Cf o\f$o o I ro o)o o c o F g o U'o E, L.g+,:t o o-c Po)=c b=>-b po o-E 99 c.a!so Rb Y(s o!nrC p,q e .E,_'-, E tr_(s x o_o c o o c.a=!o E o (s o o o CT C)(!o-.E c o o L a-o L o L L (U_o (U o p o L (L E o o-o-o E L o-(s o p o o-L o o_o-:f a E o ($o p o L o L o E o o-o-f a E L o ($oE T): '5 +/96 o- o_o o E o o-o-:f a E L o (s oE E=-5 .l/96 (LE-a o=o o a (f, ct=c'6 ()E o L:f o o o a (u=c.G-O E c (s E o o E o L a (u=E (s-o o-=E:fo (u r-pd 3(l)J-A E o o-o_=o--=E c o o ll o=o E.L o o.o.f a (I)c b (6 C)l<l-o=o (r ()()o!L o o o)(s L o-c C)E (6 o p o L (L c'6 L P a o L o o-'a o)E.9 x o o=E o tr.9.F CL t-(t o o o l-.g H 5 o yv)o'=o.s o=**E EE8*EE oro*PE8 r- OF o-6=oQ ru= GI F f;*'([(nc-O(6*ts'6 si'E e5gs s+oa6 oo A _C.Ov E6.s8 oF 5T.Qf, eQ 6o oc)J>D E8 E>9o o5 Ee gb (u -=E-F.:c OO<a>o L o.9, f o)c X o o (s o.+O X ar\P='tc o O-c llo 6.ts-qa ()9

()=>U o (s b o-o o-*=o o E o-oP oX ox=o_(!U'-19 cr (-t <a>EI 3E o=Ep=(U o ct L o o-o o 5 c o o E o-oP oh ox=o_(U(, 9<: e<a>E-*E o;E-(sX=(!.g.9 C!o$!F o T (\l F-EE oo nr6 co.:=.c 5'=E6:t(tr o==o.E.9 (f)o\f I F J o I C\I tr EE oont -E co-:=.c 6'=E5 f(U o==o J a (L o.:<L a E o ()_9 o io (s o o o E o L ,-{.=@!9 c\t 6g J@o_o v L a ro f o o o'o E (s o o o E o-CO.=@1! C\l+o)(J \t o o c o o ($E (u.9 E (5-o o c.N (u E-c c o 5o c}c (,)'F_- ct JC)If c (s o)c.=a E o o L o o-o_a=f E C-Qo rv, C g,*fo fo Ell<o'E E6 E o o.o.=a o.9 cl-=B ()(s c o o.E.9 o c b (s o o l<C)(U m E o L o-c)c (!c f, c (U o C)(U o_g.9.c o E 3<: t;()c>o.g o-(6 o L o a-o-o o.==o (s c o o c AC ,:-6 Ob>E UJ cr)o (o cf)o (o lr)(o ro@cD (o@

(f)(o (r)C\I (0 (f)C!(o to (o ro ro (o lr)lr)(o ro ro (o rO ro@ro@cf)(o LO o ro ED I o a0 X f co X 3 o X f co X f m X l m x f d)x f m X f m X f m x 3 Y F z dl x f m X=m X f.F tr tu ae'=C'UJ LL r r TL ()LL r (o C!lr)I ol@(\l l()-(\l o$I F cf)o$I F J@C\I o,$J (f)o-d)@c!o)tf, J a (L (o C\I@C\I O cr$o o cr)(J CT o T\ cr)C)E.C\I (o c\l rO U)F ul o E G L ct)o L CL UI UJ IJJ o--(0 sf I o-g{J ct)tr a-1-=o tt o t-rF E tr o g o.!9 E t-.cl (r L o tr I=o{r o 5 o!t o (t tr o-c c llJ#tr o E.g J ct IJJ rf-o F.32 J tt F I (t o-.cl (r F g6 A6 EE 8e oo EE T\o, o,$C!o, o, o,+=c\I o)o)o)r o C9 o,+E rT r@to AE'b<-A P6: o, O)o)rO@o)o)q)r rr)b N pa*P O, N\?a O>(L pa+P O, N\?a O>o-z z ro o, o, r o)c!@L o o Pgr LE HE o.E oE oo=o-.L HO Lfl Eo o o t+t ot^ -=q*!-c o*:E\v--(D(U@o=c9(u(t X O->" Y (l)=rAL(U d 6.9 ncE-b.s=88;ot^ .=o-c o SEt 9oE-o(d CDOf$(s0 9E_>,Y O=E;g/1 cE7i b.q=88$(r)o o I lr, o, o o rf)so O, lr)-O d?o)@^o)Ya riO o->@rO o o I@o, o o@ro O o I@o)o o\t N@-(O rO Fl?o) I\-o, Yo dO d_>$I\@r(O rO Fl?o)N^o)Yor-i O d>.9, a (s o_o (U P o-o ()o.9 a (u o-o (d o_o C)C)@$c\l o I ro 0)LL E.L o o-io o o o o tr o F J o o o t L.9 F 5 o o Po)=c.b=>.:$o o-E oo CA!uo g?b Y(s o!drC EQ EE.^r- -o o_(d o-c Po)F,c b=>.=po o-E 99=a!uo NE Y(s o!nrC ro 9l=.E^i io o-(s o c o o 3s, o-#(sF ())(/, otr=g oh 3E o.="i -O=(d=()E o E_=Cf (uu oP E;oE-o EO-oo-ga (,t -tU oc-co A'ro EE Eo> -If, 9'5 o9 Ed_T]o E .r-Cf (sq oP (u .-oE-a EO-oo-qa (',G oc-co AE EE Eo>io 9'5 69 GA E o E.=C:f (u0 o9-ts oE-o Eo.oo.9a (/)-(u oc-co EE gE Eo>E 9't 69 Ed o o ro .=Cf, (s0 oP E;-ec-o EO.oo.ga (/,E oc-co AE SE iio>E 9'5 69 Ed E o a.=c:f (E(t o9-ts 9r-o Eo.oo.9a (/)E oc_co AEirt E=(d Go>E 9-5 q9 LL O.o=(u;9.e (g_.9'6 F6.= a)Eg, IF"Ep bp aAt -*(u (l)H p,E>,.= =E.E 6E XE<o(o o=(s*E 9o (d'-,9'6 P6.= iO Eg, tsu Fe 69 AL=(s o.9 o16 YCf 6'E F& 6E a o ()c (U o c o a E (s o o o (U E o I o cr c o P CL L (t o o o L.9 f f o*6 o'i o.E o 5*E EE8 d-: E (d-=-=gto4 P_48- OF o-6 E-g I; fiE'(sU)c-o(6.Pts'6 s'F e5g s $+o d_i;*6 , g'6**E EE8*EE oro4 eE8 r OF o-6 EE 8 fi f;E-(U(,)C-o(o Pa=EHis 6+o ai;o ro of+c)-o Eh.cl 9 P=*:3 oE 6(/)g5 a,c$.e o-c (E(l)q,EP.E or.=(!c F e.-a c.y.,xsE=o-o L o-c o c (s o-c E o o C)X o U'fil (,l oo!2 ct q,>::)60 (o=o-o o o c$o E o o o x o a Erd U)6(l)EE:>60 (o=o-o L o (J c (s o!o o ()x o o lf, ftt(/)aio: --r EE::>crO{o=o-o o C)c (6 o s E o o C)x o C, (rl (l)6(x)-=EE::>60{o=o-o L o o c (5 o a o o o x o a Errl U, iio EE:>60{o c (u-P a o_9.9.=o dl I-o*o O-O g)o)ts gf oc+t'7 otr a=tso tro ru t: c (U o o o.9 z o m I-o Eo oE s)o)t E5 og Ft'=(l)tr f,(L 6n.ol-, FO LIE=o-a o ()c (s o E o o ()x o U'ftl U)i-o- --r E-g::>oO{o lU cf)o (o (r)o (o (f)O (o rO@ro rO@lr)lr)@lO rO$ro ro$ro cf)C\I (0 (f)c\l (o lr)(o LO ct)g o m x f m X f dl X l co X=)o X f co X f m X f m X f m X =m X f o X:)aJ tr tD ae'5 C'lrJ C\I cr)I (\l c\l tu C\I l C\I c\l I.JJ (f)I (\I ol I.IJ I C\I r.u C\I I C\I tu I C\I F c\l I c!F@F o\I o o E (g L ct)o L CL IJJ ul IJJ o--(0 sf I o-c+t ct)tr a-L 5 o It o l-rts'E tr o I o.!g E l-ct (r L o c I=o f o 5 o tt o o tr (r-g g IJJ{J c o E CL l-=ct l^lJ rF o f.c2 J lt lr-t (t g.Cl$F g6 8zt EE gE E.=zz o, o, r r o r o)o, r r o L o o Pgt.y, =HE o-E EE oo Eo r.L xo L# Eo o rF o E.9 a (u o_o (U o-o ()o.9, a (s o-o ct o-o C)C)(f)O o I ro o)o o cf, o o I LO o)o o E.9 Its E o o o E.L.9 H=o o=(g;.9o (u'-.9'A P6.-E ES t(s*e 69 a^t L-(u (l)# p'E eEf& 6E o=(6;9a (o'-.9 'd E6.-E Eg, tsu*e oP NL-(d o'8 g,E eEf& 6E o L o L o o-o-f o (U o (U oE E: '5 .ll 96 o- o_o o L o o-o_=o E L o (U oE E='5 .lJ 96 o- o_tr.9 lts CL L C)o o o L.9 F=o c (5 a a o.9,=o m I-o 5e oE g)o)t E5 (Dc{-'=-L Og;o-\t, /l\-ov, FO UJE c (6 a o o.9.=o m I-o 5e oE g)o)t C3 OE e'7 (l)tr a=ts(5 tro uJ5.=.9 c\l o$I F o c\l F EE oo ntN co-:=c 5'=E6:)(U a==o.E.9 (f)O$I J o I C\I tr EE oo ar6 co-:=-c 6'=E6 f({a=:o ul LO (o rO ro (o ro (f) $l (o C9 ol (o Et p m co X f m X=dl X f m X f lP tr a ae'=E lrJ I F C\I I F C\I I (\l t-Table G-2. List of Relays Replaced Due to Vulnerabilities Identified During the A-46ilPEEE Prosrams Safe Shutdown Equin Relay Name From Dwg.Contacts Location Area-Room-Elevation MOD Package YV2 K1 YV2 6-428-603 95-0019-00P37-2, AD105, HISMU24B 5OGSDl BUS 6-323-585 95-0021-00 AC101 51-1 Cl BUS 6-325-585 95-0024-00 ADlO1 5r-2 DI BUS 6-323-585 95-0024-00 ADlO1 51-3Dl BUS 6-323-585 9s-0024-00 AC1O1 51-4 Cl BUS 6-325-585 95-0024-00 AD10l 5 1-5 Dl BUS 6-323-58s 95-0024-0r AACDl 52XIAACDl Dl BUS 6-323-58s 95-0022-00 ABDCl 52XIABDCl Cl BUS 6-325-58s 95-0022-00 AC110 52)VAC110 Cl BUS 6-325-585 95-0022-00 ADllO 52XnDCDl BUS 6-323-585 95-0022-00 AACDl 62nDODl BUS 6-323-585 95-0023-00 AD10l 87IDG c36r6 6-319-585 95-0020-00 c3618 BUR-1,8UR.2 c3618 6-319-585 95-0028-00 AC1Ol CR3.X C3617 6-318-585 95-0028-00 AC1Ol FSS.X c36r7 6-318-585 95-0028,00 RC.2A. HISRC2-6 PSH/RC2-5 c5759D 7 -502-623 95-0019-00 C36T7 R3X1 C36T7 6-318-585 95-0028-00 c36t7 R3X2 C3617 6-318-585 9s-0028-00 c5762C, C5755C, c5763C, C5756D, PSH7528A.PSH753IA, PTzOOz, PT2003, HIS7528, HI57524, HIS753O, HIS7531 sl (PWR SUPPLIES)c5755C&D, c5756C&D, c5762C&D, c5763C&D 7 -502-623 95-0032-00 AClOI VIF C36T7 6-318-58s 95-0028-00 G-10 I O U)-F I 6t L bo ,r 0{ri ri F]il-\o t I ()A-!q0 d I.-li ra-lr{16 q)a-cri.l.1.)a I q)E-(A ()o-.a.a o--.T A-c!L C)A-E t-*(l)I-lo E (9 I a I cg a rl a I F1 I.-l FI-E--A (J E s x cg 0 c!L Fl q)-ar-cl Q cF{{ra rA.-F]aa (a I rh\J q)r-a\I c6 Fi q)&"e-l? Fr';-i -^FH g -A E-EO<U sg OA liv a CJ&\o I FrX Q++q o\ r'-c/c fF 0rA c\YO t'- l-Prl"H 5fi 3HF,( tJ<c.l I F-\o\n I\n o\o U 0r ca I f-\o\n I rn o\a U ca I l-\o\n I\n o\a U 0{gi I l-\o rn I rn o\o U$OX l- l\Hrl?*\NO e*3HOr II.i c.l I f-\o\n I rn o\q U 0i c.l I f-\o\n I\n o\o U Fi f-I F{ )(q++q o\ 5-t^/ n fB X>f-I Frx q++q O\F clo flB X>-I.-*a---/A (a q)&L (u.- -t)-)A v (n t-r U)g'o ()(l)*t-r 0r*o'o ()I bo v)a ()U)t-.a a a 6J U)I C)&.\4 l.<cn a tr Oq;an b(.-r- Cd'a=u)o trtr.E b{.!tr U*O9 do)--9 0.))4 F a a E&>' .g (d=.!o bog'^ b(iid cg c)(n=g ()()=:*tr o0 oo 6))=u)+, b{Qtr=a UA L{o B o a (l)!)*r*cdc qo F6 ()O OY{-. A Xc)(tsE o->trtr cda ()O s {-l\l/.t.Fo o.o E *'E o =o)& 6d ()C)()t-{*v)C)C)j4 -o atr GF{t-{ C)ts.9=c)J E9 a-g d ()(J ()J4 l-{ts o g, v)tr ti a o o ()$<0r A--l.I*g.tl L I (a q)n L q).l-*ra I r-t v C)vl<c)A a{> tr X F q) L,,,.E: R oo={-)FA-F9 E* E\JU):r8)<!.o o.2i 6)CO O=o Eox lV-.F*'X..r'2 a-Eb H (lj) l1\=ssE r-\ H I4Jc)l/l C)a (.)C)C)Ebo og F'A rd a.$-r tr*a o).F(Eb E),C E()#i F63 o g o tr C)-o Xc)av)=ii()ox c{o k o)(.)v)bo a a (t)irrg2.tH c.l trO\ c*caE\./ ()(l)r!t ME EO d.F n.g mo U9 mF bE bur o.E E8 8E 0r o i l-i o o Fi oo g u)U)='(, o vd ca c6>t u9-=o F8 q;d ePo ge c/.Or 1l\ Li 5XO-v'-'(J +'- i-{ .l.1j Pr*-= Ft F4-H*ao ioe 8* F\FH F{(Jt/-!H6 LV.JJ E (.! Li 6= d.b\o F FtU)Y-J'F.l lV *.,*E gi \ 'l-J t'V .- a\ v r-{ ) a1!r;.H 5x8" q'= X s{P-\J e{-,:(J.r-l :, -= icFi-o9o.i Hf,.99;EEg lgu tr*E; R'ii -8 *e 96 96 cq.Nb ts.E9 cat O+r Q r-r+E 6o ()=c EO t:c)oq UE*o bo bo c)h (l)q 1..{q a B*H5-!a 4e Frj\J .=c.)gE qH tra-=a o.F hO+r=q-c E()op<+ijJ o.2 C)g 0()==o A.P*b 8o g.-!{ E}flo li 6)=d EZ A v I I rn I o\c!I oo c{ol I oo c{I\o ea c{I.f, c{I ca ca I+ca I-f, c{I-f, a-l F I c*L b0 L 0{f-l rd ri 0{F-{\0 t I q)a-:.o0 A-.l tr=n E (),7<.rH.-*./x q)E-(A q).-tr).--.Fa a\-cg L q)A I-t)**)rt-E E Q.)I t-c*F4-/I rd*..-FI-rEt d I U E A H G U)G k Fr q)-A-6g U+r rlj U).l Fl aa ra I zh v (9-a\-cg Ei ti q)P,':qE^FH TE EE>?E.l6 v-ItP q)A liY e O&\n-f, I rn o\o$? ".r ER qc\n \n 3*ilf;s?-ER qE\n rn e*3HOr IL rn-t I\n o\o o-T.l{ra t J-a O&L q).Il-rF)t-A v (.)J4 O r<e C)c!3 s<(.)O (J C)o O p o g, o L<O t-{(t)bo s l<a q=a ()L{a q 3 v)o 0i*o ,9)l-{O o p B t<=v)a F-E.-{r)e.-L I (a q)a , q).--rFa t-A v o J ()t-r p L.{C)();i q)Hc)cd.o ocg ots EO vo OT=5)-=o P.'. H qU YI()rii 6 O^EH BO trq=s gho ()E8:1X HC)VH tr R.F u) l'l FV.L{5'Lr Li agu ur F!;\ t.l >a4= d E;io A-/ H V)a (.;) F{Eo-o c{='-r fi H}CS Cd Bo 63()8o ,c*'5F E-q O l-r t)g{9 cq bI O tr ()(*(.)p o b{g o (d (J 1 tr iid EZ v ca I c\c!s 1\n I c{\n I\o}}