ML13008A063

Davis-Besse Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Report, Appendix B, Seismic Walk-Down Checklists, Sheet 121 of 461 Through Sheet 243 of 461

ML13008A063
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	08/10/2012
From:	Lucarelli B A, Beigi F, Guerra E, Helffrich A L, Reddington J, Wakefield D ABS Consulting, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
L-12-283
Download: ML13008A063 (123)

Text

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.S ENGINEEIRý,&

t oNSt I TAýIS Sheet 121 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. 1C41A0003 Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description SLC Auxiliary Mixing Tank Location:

Bldg.lB Floor El. 620 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Vertical tank mounted on 4 legs, each leg anchored with 2 -1" diam anchor bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Drawing 413-0237, Equipment Foundation "Detail N" confirms anchorage configuration.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N XLIIIIIZ Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A X Y N U xI L Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.rENGINEERS&

CONSUL'TAN't' Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 122 of 461 Status: (V N U Equipment IDNo. IC41AOO Equipment Description Equip.xClass

21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers SLC Auxiliary Mixing Tank Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x I Y N U N/A x Y N U X I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 IXPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.N;INEEL Rý & CONSL LTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 123 of 461 Status: (2)N U Equipment ID No. 1C41A0003 Equip.xClass

21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description SLC Auxiliary Mixing Tank and photos (if any): I ile Name: 2- 1-l-4-O9.jpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID[ile Name: 2-62-1-4-U9.Jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of Component C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

&

Sheet 124 of 461 Status: (Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1C41A0003 Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description SLC Auxiliary Mixing Tank File Name: 2-63-1-4-09.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of anchorage File Name: 2-64-1-4-09.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of attached lines Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINU~RS

& CONSt LTA%1S Sheet 125 of 461 Status: (Y)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. IC41CO001A Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Motor Pump I S 1 Location:

Bldg.CO Floor El. 642 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Small pump anchored through checkered grating with 7 -3/4" diam machine bolts.Base connected to floor by two wide flange sections.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration confirmed by Drawing 11-017.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N X I I Y N U N/A X :U N Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A X Y N U xI Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 126 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment IDNo. 1C41C0001A Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Motor Pump Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attachedpiping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x : Y N U x Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Patil C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 127 of 461 ENGINF.RS

& CONSI, TANT'Status: ) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. IC41C0001A Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Motor Pump Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-1-4-12.jpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-1-4-12.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of Component Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 128 of 461 ENG(INEERS

& CONSUI.TAN S Status: (Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. IC41CO001A Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Motor Pump tile Name: Z-o0-1-4-1,.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of attached lines File Name: 2-64-1-4-12.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of component Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Sheet 129 of 461 Status: (Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IC41FOO01A Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment Description Motor Valve Location:

Bldg.CO Floor El. 642 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Small MOV mounted on 6" diam pipe line at 45deg. Pipe supports located before and after MO V.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

EJN Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A Y N U X --T I IPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINE & CONSULTAfTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 130 of 461 Status: (Y)N U Equipment ID No. IC41FOO01A Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment Description Motor Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x 7 F7I I Y N U x I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 131 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment IDNo. IC41FOO01A Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment Description Motor Valve id photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-2-4-12.jpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-2-4-12.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of Component

'Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& "WNSULTA%-TS Sheet 132 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IC41F0029A Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description Relief Valve Location:

Bldg.CO Floor El. 642 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Small valve mounted integral with the pump skid and very well supported 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

~I X Y N U N/A I x Y N U N/A Y N U N/A Y N U N/A Y N U X _ _1 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.FMA'iRS Ci'. FN~t I IANIS Sheet 133 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IC41F0029A Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description Relief Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attachedpiping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U xI Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U X II I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 134 of 461 ENGINEERS& "ONMSUITANIS Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IC41F0029A Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description Relief Valve it documents and photos (if any): Upz rne iName: L-oI-:-4--L.jpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-5-4-12.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of Component I Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.L NGEIURý& tONSULTAINTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 135 of 461 Status: (Y)N U Equipment ID No. IEI2BOO01B Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description RI-R Heat Exchanger Location:

Bldg.AX Floor El. 599 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Very tall vertical Heat Ex. Hung from El. 599 platform.

12 total 2 3/4" diam anchors.3 anchors located on 4 opposite sides. Additional support identified at El. 615.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration confirmed by Drawing 21-0016-00000005.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U XI

[Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ESi i INcE a RS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 136 of 461 Status: (2)N U Equipment ID No. 1EI2BOO01B Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description RHR Heat Exchanger Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attachedpiping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/20 12 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.FNMINEERý

& LONSULTANIS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 137 of 461 Status: N U Equipment ID No. IE12BOO01B Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description RHR Heat Exchanger d photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-1-4-20.jpeg

==

Description:==

Anchorage view of component File Name: 2-62-1-4-20.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of anchorage detail of component FVX Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERlS

&. CONSULTAN-Ph Sheet 138 of 461 Status: (D N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IEI2BOOOID Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description RHR Heat Exchanger Plug Location:

Bldg.AX Floor El. 599 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Very tall vertical Heat Ex. Hung from El. 599 platform.

12 total 2 3/4" diam anchors.3 anchors located on 4 opposite sides. Additional support identified at El. 615.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration confirmed by Drawing 21_-0016-00000005.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N XIZ I I Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A x 7 Y N U X I Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.... I .E RS.& .N'.I.I.Sheet 139 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IEI2BO0OID Equip.Class

21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description RHR Heat Exchanger Plug Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Other Adverse Conditions 1i. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 140 of 461 ENGINEERS

& (QNSULTAN-TS Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. IE12BOOOID Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description RHR Heat Exchanger Plug Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-2-4-20.jpeg

==

Description:==

Anchorage view of component ru!c iName; L-a:-oL-/s-.-o.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of anchorage detail of component Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.[\( NURkS & CONSUTISIA1 Sheet 141 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IEI2CO002B Equip. Class 6. Vertical Pumps Equipment Description-RHR Pump B Location:

Bldg.AX Floor El. 574 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

24 total 2" anchors. No degradation identified for anchors and base plate.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration confirmed by Drawing 21-0005-00000_004.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N X ZIIIIZ Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U X vi--- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINE LRS & CONSULTANTS Sheet 142 of 461 Status: (S)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. IEI2CO002B Equip. Class 6. Vertical Pumps Equipment Description RHR Pump B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I -I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/20 12 LX4C Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.['. NFERS & L ONSI ITýN'TS Sheet 143 of 461 Status: (Y)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IEI2CO002B Equip. Class 6. Vertical Pumps Equipment Description-RHR Pump B nd photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-2-4-19.jpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-2-4-19.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of component Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 144 of 461 ENGINEERS

& CONSULTANTS Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IEI2CO002B Equip. Class 6. Vertical Pumps Equipment Description RHR Pump B File Name: 2-63-2-4-19.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of anchorage configuration Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.SeNsi IN lI .Check IsNt (ISW Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 145 of 461 Status: (Y)N U Equipment ID No. IEI2FOO03B Equipment Description RH Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves R B HXS Outlet Valve Location:

Bldg.AX Floor El. 574 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Large MO V with heavy yoke. Piping identified with adequate support near valve.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N E IIII Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A Y N U XI Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& UONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 146 of 461 Status: (2)N U Equipment IDNo. IE12F0003B Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment Description RHR B HXS Outlet Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012

'4C Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EtNGINEERS

& CON'SL I.T .N"I Sheet 147 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IEI2FOO03B Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment Description RHR B HXS Outlet Valve Other sunnorting or relevant docun its and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-3-4-19.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of valve location in main pipe line File Name: 2-62-3-4-19.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of valve location in pipe main line Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 148 of 461 ENGINEERS

& Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. IEI2FOO03B Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment Description RHR B HXS Outlet Valve File Name: 2-63-3-4-19.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of component L~Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.F \(NUI H& ('ONSUL TANT'Sheet 149 of 461 Status: (Y)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IE12FOO04B Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment Description Motor Valve Location:

Bldg.AX Floor El. 574 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Very large MOV identified with heavy yoke. Pipe line well supported 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A Y N U N/A X Y N U x --F LXQ- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& CONSULTAV1S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 150 of 461 Status: (Y) N U Equipment ID No. IEI2FOO04B Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment Description Motor Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 151 of 461 ING INFERS &

IS Status: © N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. IEI2FOO04B Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment Description Motor Valve Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): D1esipt ion: Z-Veof v e-,tJ-- ppig

Description:

View of valve location in main pipe line r ie Iname: Z-oZ-4-,4-I1 .Jpeg

Description:

General view of component

'Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 152 of 461 Status: (2)N U Equipment IDNo. IE12F0029B Equipment Description RH Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve IR Pump B Manual Disch. Shutoff Valve Location:

Bldg.AX Floor El. 574 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Heavy yoke manual valve identified No degraded condition and pipe line shows adequate support.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N II X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A x ]Y N U N/A Y N U N/A I I I I x Y N U X F Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.F\(GINURRS

& CONSL LTANJfS Sheet 153 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. IE12F0029B Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Equipment Description

_RHR Pump B Manual Disch. Shutoff Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U x F --F Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x II I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 i Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 154 of 461 ENGINEERS

& CONSULTANTS Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1E12F0029B Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Equipment Description RHR Pump B Manual Disch. Shutoff Valve Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): , ilie Name: 2-01 4-19.jpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID rite iName: -o,-f 1 .jpeg

Description:

General view of component Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 155 of 461 ENGINERS.

& t'ONiS I TAVUýStatus: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IE12F0029B Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Equipment Description RHR Pump B Manual Disch. Shutoff Valve File Name: 2-63-1-4-19.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of component

`1Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINFERS

& CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 156 of 461 Status: (@N U Equipment IDNo. IE12F0048B Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment Description Motor Valve Location:

Bldg.AX Floor El. 599 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Very large MOViwith substantial yoke. Mounted on -24"pipe line with adequate supports.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N II X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A Y N U N/A I I I I x Y N U x T --

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ANSANFER & CONS LI TAS\V.Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 157 of 461 Status: (Y)N U EquipmentID No. ME12Foo48B Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment Description-Motor Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Valve is -10 inch away from a wall, judged no potential interaction.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attachedpiping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 FvY Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& CAVt6ULTANV Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 158 of 461 Status: (Y N U Equipment IDNo. IE12F0048B Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment Description Motor Valve and photos (if any): tlle Name: 2-tl-3-4-2U.Jpeg

==

Description:==

Scaffolding located in the area r ite Name: 0z-oL-3-'*-zu.J peg

Description:

View of scaffolding in the area UY 4Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 159 of 461 Status: (Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1E12F0048B Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment Description Motor Valve File Name: 2-6 3-3-4-2 0.jpeg

Description:

View of support condition for pipe line Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

& COSU LTA"IS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 160 of 461 Status: (©D N U Equipment IDNo. IE21CO001 Equip. Class 6. Vertical Pumps Equipment Description LPCS Motor Pump Location:

Bldg.AX Floor El. 574 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

24 total 2 1/2" anchors. No degradation identified for anchors and base plate.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration confirmed by Drawing 19_-0004-00000_005.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N L I III Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U x I I I

'4C Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.SNGINescWRa

& COhSclLT (TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 161 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment IDNo. IE21CO001 Equipment Description L Equip. Class 6. Vertical Pumps PCS Motor Pump Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x I Y N U x I I I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/20 12 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/20 12 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EXCINEERS

& CONSULTATS Status: (Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IE21CO001 Equip. Class 6. Vertical Pumps Equipment Description LPCS Motor Pump Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): rue iName: /-o i- i u i 5.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-10-4-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of Component Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 163 of 461 Status: ) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IE21CO001 Equip. Class 6. Vertical Pumps Equipment Description LPCS Motor Pump File Name: 2-63-10-4-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of component Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& CONSU LTANS1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 164 of 461 Status: (2)N U Equipment IDNo. 1E21FOO01 Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment Description Motor Valve Location:

Bldg.AX Floor El. 574 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

MOV well supported 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N II X I Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A x Y N U x I L --- Patul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEMES&

CONML LTAN1 Sheet 165 of 461 Status: () N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment D No. IE21FOOto Equipment Description Av Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves lotor Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Nearby scaffolding identified judged not to be a concern.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U xI Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U X II I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 II Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINFEWS

& MNSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 166 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment IDNo. IE21F0001 Equipment Description TV Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves lotor Valve and photos (if any): rue Name: Z-0I-5-4-15.jpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID rue i'ame:

==

Description:==

General view of Component

` Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& tLONSL .TAN IS Sheet 167 of 461 Status: (Y)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IE21F0001 Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment Description Motor Valve File Name: 2-63-8-4-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of main pipe line run through shield building File Name: 2-64-8-4-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

Scaffolding located in the area lPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 168 of 461 ENGINEERS&

CONS'ULTA%_f'S Status: ( N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. IE21F0001 Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment Description Motor Valve rile Name: Z-/J-5i-4-i1.jpeg

==

Description:==

View vertical support for main line rue IName:

==

Description:==

View of main pipe line support configuration L Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.s c GINWEkow & ChNclt LTA(SW Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 169 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment ID No. IE21N0050 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description-Pressure Sensor Location:

Bldg.AX Floor El. 574 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Sensor rack mounted with 4 -1/4" diam machine bolts to strut channels.

Rack made of L2 1/2 x 2 1/2. Rack is anchored to concrete pad with 14 -1/2" diam anchor bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N II x Y N U N/A I N I N/xA Y N U N/A Xx Y N U N/A XX Y N U N/A I I I I x I Y N U X "1g Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& ONSULLTA r"S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 170 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment ID No. IE21N0050 Equipment Description Pt Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks ressure Sensor Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x i I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Sheet 171 of 461 Status: (Y)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. IE21N0050 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Pressure Sensor A .o °Other su ortin or relevant documents a File Name: 2-61-7-4-1 8.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID nd photos (if any): File Name: 2-62-7-4-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of Component Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 172 of 461 ENGINEERS

& CONSULTAN TS Status: (1 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. IE21NO050 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Pressure Sensor rne Name: L-oi-/-4-i .jpeg

Description:

General view of component rack File Name: 2-64-7-4-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

Anchorage configuration for instrument rack Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 173 of 461 E(NGINEER'

& UONS t1 ]ANI1 Status: ( N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. IE21N0050 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Pressure Sensor File Name: 2-73-7-4-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of top attached lines L Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.SeiNsAl ERm& CONheLTA 'SWC Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 174 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment IDNo. IE22B5003 Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description-Division 3 DIG Lube Oil Cooler Location:

Bldg.DG Floor El. 620 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Component rigidly mounted on Diesel Generator Skid No degraded condition identified

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N I X Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I

$ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.[UNCINrFRS

& CONSI TI S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 175 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment ID No. IE22B50(Equipment Description Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Division 3 D/G Lube Oil Cooler Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attachedpiping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U xI Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x II Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Ba A. i Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Paul C. Rizzo Associatcs, Inc. Sheet 176 of 461 ENOINEERS

& CONSuLLTANTS Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1E22B5003 Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Division 3 D/G Lube Oil Cooler Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): W-Pile Name: 2-1-1-i-4-tJbjpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID rite iName:

==

Description:==

General view of Component C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 177 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment IDNo. IE22C001 Equipment Description Equip. Class 6. Vertical Pumps HPCS Motor Driven Pump Location:

Bldg.AX Floor El. 574 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

24 total 2 1/2" anchors. No degradation identifiedfor anchors and base plate.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Drawing 20 -0039-00001 000 confirms anchorage configuration.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Wi N Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& CONSI LTA.NVS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 178 of 461 Status: (2)N U Equipment IDNo. IE22C00(Equipment Description Equip. Class 6. Vertical Pumps HPCS Motor Driven Pump Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x I Y N U N/A x Y N U x --7 I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 L-3---- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 179 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IE22C0001 Equip. Class 6. Vertical Pumps Equipment Description HPCS Motor Driven Pump!ents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-14-4-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-14-4-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of Component K Paul C. Rizzo Associatcs, Inc.MENINEE[LS

& CO)NSIAUTt.

Nf*Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 180 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment ID No. I E22C00(Equipment Description Equip. Class 6. Vertical Pumps HPCS Motor Driven Pump File Name: 2-63-14-4-1.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of attached lines File Name: 2-64-14-4-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of attached lines to component

'NC Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEER'

& CONSI Sheet 181 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. IE22F0004 Equipment Description M Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves lotor Valve Location:

Bldg.AX Floor El. 620 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Large MO" mounted on 12" diam pipe line. No degraded condition identified

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U X I I Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EN'GINFERS

& CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 182 of 461 Status: W N U EquipmentIDlNo.

oE22FoV04 Equipment Description IV Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves lotor Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x ---Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Rlr Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 183 of 461 1 NX.INI HRS & It 11. " 1FM .T-Status: & N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IE22F0004 Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment Description Motor Valve Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-1-1-4-1u.jpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID.V II!, 7 t File Name: 2-62-1-4-1 O.jpeg

Description:

General view of Component LKY Paul C. Rizzo Associates~, Inc.Sheet 184 of 461 Status: (9 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IE22F0004 Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment Description Motor Valve riie Name: L-oj-i-4-Iu.Jpeg

==

Description:==

View of attached lines File Name: 2-64-1-4-10.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of main line support configuration Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Seismc Wk S & hOSckI I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 185 of 461 Status: W)N U Equipment ID No. IE22F0010 Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment Description Motor Operated Valve Location:

Bldg.AX Floor El. 574 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

MOV mounted on 12" diam pipe line.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N II x Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A I I I I x Y N U X I FLlY Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEER & CONL LTAiNTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 186 of 461 Status: (2)N U Equipment ID No. 1E22F0010 Equipment Description Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves lotor Operated Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 187 of 461[N(;IMI H's& tUIN'L1 IT,\'"I..Status: () N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IE22F0010 Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment Description Motor Operated Valve Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-12-4-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of component File Name: 2-62-12-4-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of Component Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& CONSULTAI-S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 188 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment ID No. I E22F0024 Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Equipment Description Pump Disch. Check Valve Location:

Bldg.AX Floor El. 574 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Valve mounted on -24" pipe line supported at both sides of valve by wall anchored supports spaced about 6fi.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Slight corrosion identified but judged not significant.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N II x Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A Y N U N/A I I I I x I Y N U x I I I Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 189 of 461 Status: (2) N U Equipment I DNo. 1E22F00W Equipment Description Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Pump Disch. Check Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012

~Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.4VENGINEERS&

CONI'ULTA%-rS Sheet 190 of 461 N U Status: (S)Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IE22F0024 Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Equipment Description Pump Disch. Check Valve--1.1 photos (if any): rIe iName: Z-oI-1.3-4-1O.Jpeg

==

Description:==

Close up view of component File Name: 2-62-13-4-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of Component

[IY Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 191 of 461 FNGINFIERS

& CONSL MvANT Status: (S) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. I E22F0024 Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Equipment Description Pump Disch. Check Valve r ie iName:

==

Description:==

View of pipe line lateral supports C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& CONSULTAN1S Sheet 192 of 461 Status: Y)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1E22N0005 Equipment Description Fl Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks ow Transmitter Location:

Bldg.AX Floor El. 574 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Rack framing made of L2x2xl/4.

Anchored with 14- 1/2" anchors. Rack is on a -6" concrete pad.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

No significant corrosion identified

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N I X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A x I Y N U N/A X Y N U X I I I C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.SeNsi INc &kd ChecONk S I ANI, Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 193 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment IDNo. IE22N0005 Equipment Description FI Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks ow Transmitter Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x --TI Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x II Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& CONSULTANMT Status: ) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1E22N0005 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Flow Transmitter Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-5-4-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-5-4-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of Component L~YPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENINFL( &N~ COW LIAM.S Sheet 195 of 461 Status: W)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. IE22N0005 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Flow Transmitter File Name: 2-63-5-4-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of component anchorage configuration File Name: 2-64-5-4-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of attached small lines Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.FM, IHRNEERS f CON'1TAN7S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 196 of 461 Status: (2)N U Equipment ID No. 1E22S0001 Equipment Description E Equip. Class 17. Engine Generators)ivision 3 HPCS Diesel Generator Location:

Bldg.DG Floor El. 620 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of'judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Diesel generator anchored to concrete pad with 34 1 1/2" anchor bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?All anchors inspected and no cracks were identified

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Drawing 417-0067, Foundation Plan "B" confirms anchorage configuration.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N X I I Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x Pw- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENG INEEiRS & t(ONS IITAN NI Sheet 197 of 461 Status: () N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1E22S0001 Equip. Class 17. Engine Generators Equipment Description Division 3 HPCS Diesel Generator Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012/7 _ -, C L~/Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 RPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& CONSULTANTS Status: ( N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1E22S0001 Equip. Class 17. Engine Generators Equipment Description Division 3 HPCS Diesel Generator Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-12-4-UgLjpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID tile Name: z-oL-iL-4-v5.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of Component Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 199 of 461 FNGINEILRS

& L 0ON. I I TAN17 Status: ) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1E22S0001 Equip. Class 17. Engine Generators Equipment Description Division 3 HPCS Diesel Generator File Name: 2-6 3-1 2-4-08.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of top conduits File Name: 2-64-12-4-08.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of mounting base

[Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& (ONSL LTAVT'S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 200 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment ID No. 1E22S0005 Equipment Description U Equip. Class 15. Battery Racks nit 1 Div 3 Battery Location:

Bldg.CC Floor El. 620 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

4 bays, double tier braced racks. 4 out of 5 verticalframes welded to embedment and 5th vertical support is anchored with 4 -1/2" diam anchors. Each frame welded with-24" of 1/4" weld to embed 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Rack to floor anchorage verified and no degraded condition identified

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Anchorage inspected and no corrosion identified

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Calculation 40:71 confirms welding and anchor bolt configuration.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N X I I Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x 7 -i-i i Y N U N/A x Y N U x I Paul C. Rizzo Associatcs, Inc.

ItIN'IUTA'NTS Sheet 201 of 461 Status: (D N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IE22S0005 Equip. Class 15. Battery Racks Equipment Description Unit I Div 3 Battery Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U xI Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U X II I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 FPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 202 of 461 ENGINEERS

& M ONStITANfS Status: ) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. 1E22S0005 Equip. Class 15. Battery Racks Equipment Description Unit 1 Div 3 Battery Other supporting or rele vant documents and photos (if any): tile Name: /-oi--'-4-uo.jpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-5-4-06.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of Component I Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

& I Sheet 203 of 461 Status: (Y)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. 1E22S0005 Equipment Description U Equip. Class 15. Battery Racks nit I Div 3 Battery I1 File Name: 2-63-5-4-06.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of component base detail File Name: 2-64-5-4-06.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of component base detail PlKQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.'le .IN NFERS & CONSLULTAITS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 204 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment IDNo. 1E51B0002 Equipment Description R Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers CIC Lube Oil Cooler Location:

Bldg.AX Floor El. 574 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Mounted rigidly on pump skid. Pump skid anchored with 6 -1" diam anchor bolts.Motor anchored with 4 -1 1/2" diam anchors.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorange configuration confirmed with Drawing 25-0007-00002.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N XI I I Y N U N/A X I Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U X I I I Fvl- Pattl C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.I\ GIN.ERS & COWS tTAVI$Sheet 205 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IE51B0002 Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description RCIC Lube Oil Cooler Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/20 12 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 206 of 461 ENGINEERS

&

Status: (S) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IE51B0002 Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description RCIC Lube Oil Cooler Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): F1le Name: 2-61-2-4-1 bjpeg

Description:

Geenral view of component File Name: 2-62-2-4-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of component Patil C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.UMA.4 INHH"& CONMA TAX-rS Sheet 207 of 461 Status: (Y)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IE51B0002 Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description RCIC Lube Oil Cooler File Name: 2-63-2-4-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of anchorrage configuration File Name: 2-64-2-4-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of component concrete base Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENMINEERS

& (ONSULLTAVI\S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 208 of 461 Status: N U Equipment IDNo. 1E51F0045 Equipment Description 1 Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves lotor Valve Location:

Bldg.AX Floor El. 574 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Valve mounted on main line at 45degfrom horiz. Pipe line is well supported with supports before and after valve.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N II x Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A Y N U N/A I I I I x Y N U x J I T Fl Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.SesmIcNE W Ra k , ChONSlI TANiS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 209 of 461 Status: (2) N U Equipment D No. IE51F lo45 Equipment Description N Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves lotor Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 L[Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGlNEL1R6.

(ýONS ULTATS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 210 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment IDNo. IE51F0045 Equipment Description Tv Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves lotor Valve and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-1-4-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

Geenral view of component rile IName: /-- -I-,.i-io.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of component I Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.[XGIM, IN'g & C ON'St TANTS Sheet 211 of 461 Status: (2)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IESIN0055A Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Pressure Sensor Location:

Bldg.AX Floor El. 574 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Sensor rack anchored with 16 anchors to 6" thick concrete pad Nearby rack inspected and noted it was bolted together with 4 -1/2" bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N II X Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A 7-x-Y N U x --F I

~Qj Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.PMINE RS &C0%,NSLLTAT4Th Sheet 212 of 461 Status: T N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1E51N0055A Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Pressure Sensor Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 U=- Paul C. Rizzo Asswciates, Inc. Sheet 213 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IE5INO055A Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Pressure Sensor Other su or relevant documents and photos (if any): M ~ ~ NM1 1A A File Name: 2-61-6-4-18.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-6-4-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of Component Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& cONSULTA\1S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 214 of 461 Status: (S)N U Equipment ID No. 1E51N0055A Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Pressure Sensor File Name: 2-63-6-4-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of component rack File Name: 2-64-6-4-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

Anchorage configuration for instrument rack y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. of 461 UNGINTEIRý 6, COML LIAN71 Status: ( N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IE51N0055A Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Pressure Sensor File Name: 2-73-6-4-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of top attached lines

[Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc."M.INFERS

& CONSULTAT'S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 216 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment ID No. IG41FO1'Equipment Description Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves CNTMT Pools RTN OTBD Isol Location:

Bldg.1B Floor El. 620 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Mounted on -10" diam line well supported around valve.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y Nz Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I T

'Ar Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 217 of 461 Status: (2) N U Equipment IDNo. IG41F01z Equipment Description Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves CNTMT Pools RTN OTBD Isol Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?A ttachedpiping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 L~QIPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.E\(,lNFERS

& MNSL'LTANqS Sheet 218 of 461 Status: )Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. 1G41F0145 Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment Description CNTMT Pools RTN OTBD Isol Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): N U File Name: 2-61-1-4-16.jpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-1-4-16.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of Component Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.S NeiNsRS & Wa(oNSL ltANClt Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 219 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment IDNo. IG43N0060A Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Level Transmitter Location:

Bldg.AX Floor El. 574 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Small trasnmitter on wall all verified to have their attachment bolts and supporting rack was found in adequate condition.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y Nz Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X 71 Y N U N/A T X--Y N U XI I ---- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& CONI'ULTA I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 220 of 461 Status: (Y) N U Equipment ID No. 1G43N0060A Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Level Transmitter Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 FPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 221 of 461 ENGINEERlS

& CONSL LTA%-], Status: ) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. lG43N0060A Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Level Transmitter documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-3-4-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of component location File Name: 2-62-3-4-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

High radiation area signage Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& CONSULTANVS Status: Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IG43N0060A Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Level Transmitter rie iName: L-oj-i-4-i5.Jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of component L Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Ssc INWlSkd & o hecIsTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 223 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment ID No. IG43N0060B Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Level Transmitter Location:

Bldg.AX Floor El. 574 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of-judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Small trasnmitter on wall all verified to have their attachment bolts and supporting rack was found in adequate condition.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N II x I Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U X I Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EN'GINEERS

& CONSULTAVTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 224 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment ID No. IG43N0060B Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Level Transmitter Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 225 of 461 FNGINEER.

& tONSI. LTANT'Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. IG43N0060B Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Level Transmitter ,ant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-4-4-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of component location File Name: 2-62-4-4-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

High radiation area signage v Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 226 of 461 ENGINEERS

& CONSULTATS Status: ( N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1G43N0060B Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Level Transmitter File Name: 2-63-4 1 jpeg

Description:

General view of component L Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Seisic EELRSo & ChONSLTA (S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 227 of 461 Status: (D N U Equipment IDNo. IH13P0701 Equipment Description T Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels ermination Cabinet Location:

Bldg.CC Floor El. 654 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

4 section panel, each section anchored with 4 -5/8" diam anchors. Adjacent to another 4-section panel and verified to be bolted together.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

EI X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x--E Y N U x I Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& C ONSULTAN%" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 228 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment ID No. IH13PO70 Equipment Description I Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Termination Cabinet Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A x Y N U x Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 L[ Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 229 of 461 IN N(INUIR'S

& klNSULZANIh Status: ( N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. I HI 3P0701 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Termination Cabinet Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): r Ie I aUIic: Z0-o -I -,+-uL.jpeg

==

Description:==

Partial view of component anchorage detail rile IName: L-OI-J-'+-uL.Jpeg

==

Description:==

Inside view of component I Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& CONSU LTAN'TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 230 of 461 G U Status: Y Equipment IDNo. IH51P0037 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description ECCS pump room cool HVAC control panel.Location:

Bldg.AX Floor El. 599 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.ECCS pump room cool HVAC control panel.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N I X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A Y N U N/A I I I I x I Y N U I I I x I Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.FNGINEER.

& LTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 231 of 461 8 U Status: Y Equipment IDNo. IH51P0037 Equipment Description E4 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels CCS pump room cool HVAC control panel.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Potential interaction from scaffolding staging near cabinet. Condition Report issued for this condition (CR-2012-12375).

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A X Y N U F-x -Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U X II I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EV;INEERS

& CO'N-,L LTA Th Sheet 232 of 461 Status: Y U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IH51P0037 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description ECCS pump room cool HVAC control panel.and photos (if any): r ie iName: /-oj-z--,-zz.jpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-2-4-22.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of component Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 233 of 461 ENGINEERt

& CONSULtTANT'.

Status: Y U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IH51P0037 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description ECCS pump room cool HVAC control panel.File Name: 2-63-2-4-22.jpeg

==

Description:==

Scaffolding staging area File Name: 2-64-2-4-22.jpeg

==

Description:==

Tag for scaffolding staging area P -F Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 234 of 461 ENGINEERS

& CONSULTAITS Status: Y U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1H51P0037 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description ECCS pump room cool HVAC control panel.tile Name: /-/i-L-4-AA.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of ties for scaffolding staging File Name: 2-94-2-4-22.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of top attached lines

'qg Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.SimcW INEER CheckliSt (STWNT )Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 235 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment ID No. IH51P0871 Equipment Description A Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels uxiliary Relay Panel Location:

Bldg.CC Floor El. 620 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

8 -5/8" diam anchors identified inside component.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage confirmed per Document 1-6-7, page 170.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N XLI I Y N U N/A X T U /Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A X Y N U x L[Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.E'(INI-RS f& CONSULTAN-TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 236 of 461 Status: N U Equipment ID No. IH51P0871 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Auxiliary Relay Panel Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

1. .1 -/Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012

~Q Paul C. Rizzo Associate~s, Inc.INCINT~E~RS, CONSL I T.%%1, Sheet 237 of 461 Status: (2)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IH51P0871 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Auxiliary Relay Panel id photos (if any):-- -- I AlIZI 4111 "1 1 Al CAN I File Name: 2-61-15-4-06.jpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-15-4-06.jpeg

==

Description:==

General View Inside Component X Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEEPS

& CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 238 of 461 Status: (Y)N U Equipment IDNo. IH51P0871 Equipment Description A Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels kuxiliary Relay Panel vile Name: L-Oc-I)-4-UD.Jpeg

==

Description:==

View of top attached lines File Name: 2-64-15-4-06.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of anchorage L Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 239 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment ID No. IH51P0975 Equipment Description D Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels iv 2 pump cooling cooling HVAC control panel Location:

Bldg.AX Floor El. 599 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Approx. 3'x 3'x 12" panel mounted to concrete column with 4 -3/8" diam anchor bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Bolts found in good condition.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

dz N Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A Y N U N/A X Y N U xI

[--Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& CONSULTAN'IS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 240 of 461 Status: N) N U Equipment ID No. 1H51P0975 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Div 2 pump cooling cooling HVAC control panel Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Scaffolding located in the area. Judged not an adverse condition due to distance and proper bracing of scaffold.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x ::I :=Y N U N/A x I Y N U x I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 "KQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 241 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IH51P0975 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Div 2 pump cooling cooling HVAC control panel-Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-3-4-22.jpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-3-4-22.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of component Q O Z Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 242 of 461 ENGINEERS

& CONSULTANTS Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IH51P0975 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Div 2 pump cooling cooling HVAC control panel File Name: 2-63-3-4-22.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of top conduit attachment File Name: 2-04-3-4-22.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of attached line Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 243 of 461 EN;INER' .CONt I TANL S Status: ) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1H51P0975 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Div 2 pump cooling cooling HVAC control panel File Name: 2-73-3-4-22.jpeg

==

Description:==

Scaffolding located in the area