ML13135A235

Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Report, Appendices C Through E

ML13135A235
Person / Time
Site:	Beaver Valley
Issue date:	10/23/2012
From:	ABS Consulting
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
Shared Package
ML131350549	List: L-13-118, Resubmittal of FENOC Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Seismic Aspects of Recommendation 2.3 of Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from Fukushima. ML13135A229 ML13135A230 ML13135A231 ML13135A233 ML13135A234 ML13135A235 ML13135A236 ML13135A237 ML13135A238 ML13135A240 ML13135A241 ML13135A242 ML13135A243 ML13135A244 ML13135A245 ML13135A246 ML13135A247 ML13135A248 ML13135A249 ML13135A251
References
L-13-118, TAC MF0092, TAC MF0093, TAC MF0116, TAC MF0159
Download: ML13135A235 (197)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:APPENDIX C AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS (AWC') Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EN(;lNL IRS & CONST]L1-ILriTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)@Sheet I of l9l N/A NiA Room Floor El.#2 Battew Room 713 Bldg.SRVB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Blockwalls SBl-7 and SBl-8 are adequate based on Calculations DSC-0086 and DSC-0087, respectively. Blockwall SBI-10 is adequate based on calculation DSC-0089_1.These calculations are pqrt of afollow-up seismic analysis in support of IE80-11calculations. All blockwalls in area are adequate.Related equipment on SWEL for this area: BAT-1-2 N/A N/A x X X X PC? Paul c. Rizz. Associates, Inc.I]NCTN*ERS S CONTL]LT{\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Evaluated bv:#2 Battery Room Sheet 2 SRVBInteraction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the arca?All piping are well supported in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No ignition sources found in this area.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 713 Bldg.;-*tul&/;,ioEddie M. GuerraAdam L. Helffrich Xof 191 Status: N/A 9t28t20r2 9/28/20t2 X X X Sheet 3 of 191 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS s.

CONSUIiTAI{TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @RoomFloor El.#2Battery Room 713 Bldg.SRVBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: l-59-l-4-01 jpeg

Description:

General File Name: 1-60-l-4-01 jpeg

Description:

Block wall in area Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EI*GINF- ER$ & CONSI, ;LTA li'rs Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)@Sheet 4 of l9l N/A N/A N/A Room Floor El.AC Equip RlI 713 Bldg.SRVB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area: VS-AC-1A-BLOWER X X X X PC? Paul c. Rizz. Associates, [nc.ENCN NE I R$ s CONSLTLTA-\T.SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.SheetAC Equip RM Bldg.SRVBInteraction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?All piping are well supported in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No ignition sources found in this area.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporury installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv: Eddie M. Guerra 7t3 il-l'-= -/,.a'{ {fi"';a;.r 'tiit:ri" i: Date: Date: Adam L. Helffrich X X X N/A 9t28t2012 912812012 X Sheet 6 of 191 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUUTA,\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @RoomFloor El.AC Equip RM 713 Bldg.SRVBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: l-59-l 06jpeg

Description:

General I File Name: l-60-l-4-06jpeg

== Description:==

General 2 Sheet 7 of l9l RoomFloor El.AC Equip RM Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGTNEERS & CONSULTTTNTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: O Bldg.SRVB File Name: I l 06jpeg

Description:

Fire suppression system rugged File Name: l-66-l-4-06.jpeg

== Description:== Cable trays in area full, but not overflowing 713 BC? Paul c. Rizzo Associaters, lnc. T]N(;INEERS & C'ON:I,.;LTA:\'TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Sheet 8 of l9l Status:@AT QS-TK-I 735 Bldg.YARD Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the degraded conditions?area appear to be free of significant

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Cable tower near tank is a possible interaction. Tower is judged to be./hr enoughaway and rugged enough to be considered not credible. Related equipment on SWEL for this area: Lr- l QS- 100A X X X X pce Paul C. Rizz. Associatesn Inc-AT QS-TK-ISheet 9 of 191Ei'.(;l Nf ERS S" CO SNSL

LTA.\.TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.735 Bldg.YARD Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the arca?No ignition sources found in this area.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra', l -.1/'./ .-Y-i !,&*_r"j:-l i{-u:tYt/i i"; ./r '// ,:r../ ,// ,',t/7.,/:- i c'-,L/' ',',fz- r.'Date: Date: Adam L. Helffrich X Status: N/A 9t28/20t2 9t28t20r2 X X X Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINE,ERS &. CONzuLTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.735 Status:@N AT QS-TK-I Bldg.YARDOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: I I 09jpeg

Description:

General I l0 of l9l File Name: I l 09jpeg

Description:

General 2 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.E}iGI NEE RS & CONST:LTfu\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @N Bldg.YARD File Name: I I 09 jpeg

Description:

Tower near by is judged rugged, interaction is not credible. Sheet l1 ofl9l U RoomFloor El.AT QS-TK-I 73s N N Y U N/A U N/A N Y U N N/A U N Y N/A 4. Does it appear that the area is free interactions with other equipment lighting)? of potentially adverse seismic spatialin the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and Related equipment on SWEL for this area: RS-P-2B BC" Paul C. Rizz. Ass.ciates, [nc.EN{;IN!.ERS S CONSUUTA.\iTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@RoomFloor El.B RS PMP CUB 732 Bldg.SFGB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.L Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Sheet 12 of 191 U X X X X DC? Paul c. Rizz. Associaters, lnc.EI\C;INE ERS,{i CONSUUTA.\T$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Evaluated by: B RS PMP CUB Sheet Bldg.SFGB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? All piping are well supported in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No ignition sources found in this area.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 732-";=et-&r,Ia;,, Eddie M. Guerra t't/,/.'Date: Date: t';iL'l,fr/ iY,l' i,',;/iAdam L. Helffrich X Status: N/A N/A N/A 9t28t20r2 912812012 X X X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.E.r-G I N E ERS,ln CO N ti U LTA.\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 14 of 191 U N Room Floor El.732 B RS PMP CUB Bldg.SFGBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: I l-4-10 jpeg

Description:

General PC? Paul c. Rizz' Associates, Inc.EN(N NEERS .\ CONSULT,L\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room BAT-IROOM Floor El.7t3 Bldg.SRVBInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.L Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visibte without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Block wall SBI-l I and SBI-12 are adequate based on calculations DSC-0090 andDSC-0091, respectively. Blockwall SBl-14 is adequate based on calculation DSC-0089-2. This calculation is part of afollow-up seismic analysis in support o/'1E80-11calculations. All block walls in area ore adequate.Related equipment on SWEL for this area: BAT-1-1 X@Sheet l5 of 191 N/A N/A Y Y Y Y X X X DC? Paul C. Rizzo Associatesn [nc.E^*(;INEERS & C'ONSULTA.YTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC) RoomFloor El.BAT-1ROOM Bldg.SRVBInteraction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the arca?All piping are well supported in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the arca?No ignition sources found in this area.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Sheet 713 X X N/A 912812012 9t28/20r2 X X Evaluated by: "";-:ffi\/,&_1"":lu Eddie M. Guerra'7,/t/t'Adam L. Helffrich Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEERS &. CONSUUTANTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room BAT-IROOM Status: @Sheet l7 of 191 UFloor El.7l3 Bldg.SRVB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: I l-4-l I jpeg

Description:

General File Name: I l-4-l I jpeg

Description:

Block wall in area BCEArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Blender Room 722 Bldg.AXLB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.L Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area: HCV-1CH-186 XSheet l8 of 191@N/A N/A X X X PC\" Paul c. Rizzo Associates, [nc.Eti(JINEERS {i CONST:L"TA.\TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.Blender Room 722 Bldg.AXLB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?All piping are well supported in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No ignition sources found in this area.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffrich Sheet l9 of t9l N/A N/A 9/28t2012 9t28t2012 X X X X/i- / -t. 1'.[ \,ft*'.ag t Date'.Date: Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEERS & CONzuLTAIT$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 20 of l9l U N RoomFloor El.Blender Room 722 Bldg.AXLB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: I l-4-l2.1peg

== Description:==

General File Name: l l-4-l2Speg

== Description:== General 2 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. CONSUUTAhTTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Blender Room Status: @Bldg.AXLB

Description:

Block wall right to room entrance. East wall Sheet 2l of l9l U Floor El.722 File Name: I l-4-l2jpeg File Name: l-66-l-4-l2.1peg

== Description:==

Block wall located front of entrance. North wall PC? Paul c. Rizzo Associates, Inc. E}{GINEERS & CONSULTA,\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Boric Acid Pump Cubicle Status:@Floor El.752 Bldg.AXLB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.L Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area: CH-P-2ASheet 22 of l9I N/A N/A N/A X X X X PCe Paul c. Rizzo Associates, [nc.Boric Acid Pump Cubicle B EN'(;INE E RIi & CONSL;UTA.\1S Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.752 Bldg.AXLB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?All piping are well supported in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No ignition sources found in this area.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra , ?1/..:'-/-/,/Adam L. Helffrich il't .--i,.a'l {4n*;' r Date: Date: Sheetof 191 N/A NiA N/A 9/28/2012 9t28t20r2 X X X X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS {i'. CONSULT,TNT$ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Room Boric Acid Pump Cubicle BFloor El.7s2 Status: Sheet 24 of l9l U Bldg.AXLB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: I l-4-13 jpeg

Description:

General PCe P"gl-C.Rizzo Ass*ciates, [nc.Er*(;t NE ERS & CON\SU LTAIiTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@RoomFloor El.Boric Acid Tank 1A 752 Bldg.AXLBInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? There is a small gap between one o.f the nut's and base on the east support post for thetank. Gap is not considered significant. One anchor bolt is notfully engaged by hatfa thread on the north post of the tank. This minor thread engagement issue is judgednot significant.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limitsfSheet 25 of l9l N/A4. Does it appear that the area is free interactions with other equipment lighting)?

of potentially adverse seismic spatialin the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and Related equipment on SWEL for this area: CH-TK-IA X X X X PCe Paul c. Rizzo Associates, lnc.Area Room Floor EI{CINE ER:i .!i CONSI:LTA.\TS Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Boric Acid Tank 1A 752 AXLB Interaction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?All piping are well supported in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No ignition sources found in this area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra"/,//..'Adam L. HelffrichSheet 26 of I9l El.Bldg.Status: N/A 9t28t20t2 9t28t20t2 X X X Xtl- t .r,/,.^'{ /;,1'ta'<; I Date: Date: Sheet 27 of l9l Paul C. Rizzo Associateis, Inc.EN(;INEERS & CONSI:LTfu\T1lArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Status: Room Floor El.7s2 Boric Acid Tank 1A Bldg.AXLB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: l l-4-l4.jpeg

== Description:== General I File Name: I l 14 jpeg

Description:

General 2 Paul C. Rizzo Associatr'$, Inc.Elf (; I NE E RS,S C0 s* S ULTtu\TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Bldg.AXLB File Name: I l-4-14 jpeg

Description:

One anchor bolt not fully engaged on north post by half a thread.File Name : 1-66-l 14 jpeg

Description:

Gap between nut and base on west post Sheet 28 of l9l NU RoomFloor El.Boric Acid Tank 1A 752 BC.'t" Prg!-c. Rizz. Associates, [nc-Iln*(:lNt ERS {i. CONSL;L"r dyTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)CCW Surge TankSheet 29 of 191 Status:@Room Floor El.Bldg.AXLB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area: CC-TK-I 768 N/A N/A X X X X pct? Ptg!-c. Rizzo Ass*ciates, lnc.CCW Surge TankSheet 30 of l9l Er-C;lNf ERS & CONSULTtu\I SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Bldg.AXLB Interaction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?All piping are well supported in this orea.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No ignition sources found in this area.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffrich 768 Status:@9t28t20r2 NiA N/A Y Date: Date: 9t28t20r2 X X X X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. SNGImERS & CCINSUTTAhITS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 3l of 191 U N RoomFloor El.768 CCW Surge Tank Bldg.AXLBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: l-59-l-4-l5jpeg

== Description:==

General File Name: l l-4-l 5jpeg

Description:

General 2 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.Sheet 32 of l9l N/A N/A NiA N/A ENClINEERIi & CONSLiLTA-\TS Walk-By Checklist (AWC)@Area RoomCharging Pump Cubicle lC Floor El.722 Bldg.AXLB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Two valves with reach rods through the wall ore on the supply piping to pump CH-P-IC. The gap at the wall penetration around each rod is approximately 1". The supply piping does not have lateral support and its potential movemenl in a seismic event could close the gap at reach rod wall penetration and cause binding. Judged acceptable, as the pipe goes through a ceiling penetration, which would provide some restraint, as well as the fact that the valves are manuol valves with reach rods and that potential reach rod binding would be acceptable. Related equipment on SWEL for this area: CH-P-1C X X X X PCte Paul C. Rizz. Associates, [nc,[:\T)!NEERS & CONSULT!A.\TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Charging Pump Cubicle l C Sheet 722 Bldg.AXLB Interaction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area'l AII piping are well supported in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No ignition sources.found in this area.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Room Floor El.Evaluated by: Jfldfu-t&rn;;,!0, Eddie M. Guerra , *ai*,,;*/ i'/, fi;;'Adam L. Helffrich X of 191 Status: N/A 912812012 9t28t20r2 X X X Sheet 34 of l9l Paul C. Rizzo Associatesn fnc.IiI\'GINE ERS & CONIiU LTA,\TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Charging Pump Cubicle lCFloor El.Status: O Bldg.AXLBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: I l-4-17 .jpeg

Description:

General File Name: I l-4-17 jpeg

Description:

Pipe is not restrained in the longitudinal direction R Paul c. Rizz. Associates., Inc.EN(;INE ERS {i. CONSULTA-\TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Charging Pump Cubicle I C Status: @Sheet 35 of 191 U RoomFloor El.722 Bldg.AXLB File Name: I l-4-17 jpeg

Description:

View of reach rod through wall penetration PC?Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Control Room 735 Bldg.SRVB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Control room ceiling main runners are supported.from concrete ceiling by wires at-4' spacing. Each ceiling tile (i.e., egg grating) is tied to the main runners at each of its four corners and judged not to be a potential .falling hazard. Btock walls SB3-1, SB3-5, SB3-8, and SB3-9 are adequate based on calculations DSC-0095_1, DSC-0097, DSC-0103, and DSC-}103, respectively. These calculations are part of afottow-up seismic analysis in support of IE80-I I calculations. Related equipment on SWEL for this area: BB-AI RK-NUC-INS-1 PNL-DC1-3 PNL-VITBUS I -2 PNL-VITBUS 1-3Sheet 36 of 191@X N/A X X X Sheet 37 Status: N/A 9t28t20r2 912812012 TNCTNELRS & CONSL; U]'A-\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Interaction Effects Control Room SRVB 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? Several.fire extinguishers, chairs, tables, and trash cans in areo are all unsecured, but are judged not significant interactions.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) All adjacent panels close to each other are bolted together. Evaluated bv: Date: Eddie M. Guerra 73s Bldg.i-1! -=.,J .-4'ua' 'r"i ,1 r Date: Adam L. Helffrich X X X X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.t.,r*(;I NEER:i & C:ONS t : L:rANIS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 38 of 191UN Room Floor El.Control Room 735 Bldg.SRVB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): I l-4-18 jpegGeneral I*:--*"ffi:ft File Name: I l l 8 jpeg

Description:

Fire extinguisher near computer room Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EN(;I NE ERS {*. CONSLJLTA.\TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 39 of l9l U RoomFloor El.Control Room 735 Bldg.SRVB File Name: I l-4-18 jpeg

Description:

Fire extinguisher near computer room File Name: l-66-l-4-18 jpeg

Description:

General 2 I t-4-18 jpeg Sheet 40 of I 9 I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) litttl C. lti:zo Asrociertc.s, Irrt'.l \(ll\t ili\ N ( 1r\\l I I \\ l\Control Room Status:@U N Room Floor El.735 Bldg SRVB Fif c Nanrc : l l I fl.j pcg

Description:

Rlock wall ncar computer room Filc Nanrc: I -6tl- l I ti..ipcg

Description:

F irc cxtinguishcr ltcar computer room I -6tl- l I ti..ipcg RPaul c. Rizz. Associates, Inc.L}iGINE ERS & CONSL; LTA.\TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) RoomFloor El.Sheet 4l of 191 U Control Room Status: @Bldg.SRVB File Name: l-69-l-4-18 jpeg

Description:

Several unrestrained tables, chairs, and trash cans in vicinity File Name: l-70-l-4-l Sjpeg

Description:

General 3 735 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. CONSULTANTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Bldg.SRVB File Name: I-7l-l-4-18 jpeg

Description:

Several LCD screens are secure and are not a falling concern Sheet 42 of l9l U Room Floor El.Control Room 735 DCe Paul c. Rizz' Associates, lnc.El..{; I Nf ERS,S. CONST : LTrt-\:IS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Room DG Room #1Sheet 43 of l9l Status: @ N UFloor El. 735 Bldg. DGBX Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.L Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the arca appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area: TI-1EE-301 YNUN/A X YNUN/A X YNUN/A X YNUN/A X PC?Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet 44 of l9l Room Floor El.DG Room #1 73s Bldg.DGBX Interaction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?All piping are well supported in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No ignition sources found in this area.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated bv: Eddie M. Guerra:'/,,{,, Adam L. Helffrich il- t .= 1...! /qlun.*' t X X N/A 9t28t20t2 912812012 X X R Paul c. RizzoAssociates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONTiUIJTAI.TTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.Status:@Sheet 45 of 191 U DG Room #l 73s Bldg.DGBX Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: l-59-l-4-lgjpeg

== Description:==

General BCeBgl-c. Rizz* Associates, lnc.Checklist (AWC)DG Room Train A EN-CINEERS & CONST:L't'AliTS Area Walk-By RoomFloor El.Bldg.DGBX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.L Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 1EE-EG-1 EE-P-1A EE-TK-2A LS-1-EE-201-l MCC-I-E7 MOV-lRW-1138

PNL-DGEA-1 PNL-DIGEN-I @Sheet 46 of l9l N/A N/A 735 N/A X X X X PCe Paul c. Rizzo Assnciates, [nc.E}{CINEERS & L'ONSL] LTA,\TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.DG Room Train A 735 Bldg.DGBX Interaction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?AII piping are well supported in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area? Fuel oil day tank and all its piping are well supported.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? Several unrestrained fire extinguishers in the area. Since the vertical accelerations i this area are well below Ig, it is judged that these extinguishers would not dislodge from their wall supports, and therefore the interaction is not credible.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Soot on ceiling indicates possible exhaust leak. A follow up with plant personnel has revealed that the soot is caused by a downdraft that naturally occurs on the roof leading to the deposit. This is normal and judged a non issue. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Date: Eddie M. Guerra Date: Adam L. Helffrich 47 of 191 Status: N/A N/A N/A 9t28t20t2 9t28t2012 Sheet X X X X l./ -t {,-/in-+j i/'; /; /l"'r1!i'":'(f' Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & qONSULTANTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 48 of l9l U N Room Floor El.735 DG Room Train A Bldg.DGBXOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: I l-4-20jpeg

== Description:== General I File Name: l l-4-20 jpeg

Description:

General 2 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. EliGlNEERS Si CONSUUTAj\iTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 49 of l9LUN RoomFloor El.DG Room Train A 735 Bldg.DGBX File Name: I l-4-20.jpeg

== Description:==

View of nearby fire extinguisher File Name: l-66-l 20.jpeg

== Description:==

View of nearby fire extinguisher I l-4-20.jpeg Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Eh-( jt N E E RS Si CONSU L I"A"\TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @N Bldg.DGBX File Name: l-67 -l 20.jpeg

== Description:==

View of nearby fire extinguisher File Name: I l-4-20.jpeg

== Description:== Soot on ceiling indicates possible exhaust leak inside buildingSheet 50 of 191 U Room Floor El.DG Room Train A 735 PC? Paul c. Rizzo Associates, Inc.F:li(jlNE ERS !t CONStl L-rA.\TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room DG Room Train B--East WallFloor El. 735 Bldg. DGBX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Sheet 51 of l9l Status: @ N U1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions? Spalled concrete at base of diesel generator is minor and will not reduce the capacity oJ'the anchorage.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? Related equipment on SWEL for this area: MCC-I-E8 YNUN/A X YNUN/A X YNUN/A X YNUNiA X BC" Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room DG Room Train B--East Wall SheetFloor El.73s Bldg.DGBX Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Fire pipe may interact with cable tray causing sproy. Tracing oJ'the line reveals line is filled with CO2, not water and is not aflooding source.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the arca?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?Several unrestrained fire extinguishers in room are considered not significant interactions8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by:4 / -,= {../qrt,+"<; +Eddie M. Guerra ,*,i-rf1 i;',/!,'.'/./.1.' Date: Adam L. Helffrich x52 of l9l N/A 912812012 9t28t2012 X X X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.E}{(;INEERS & CONSL]LTA}{TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 53 of 191 U RoomFloor El.73s DG Room Train B--East Wall Bldg.DGBX Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: I l-4-22.jpeg

== Description:== General I File Name: l l-4-22jpeg

== Description:== General 2 Paul C. Rizao Associates, Inc.EI*(iINEERS & SONSUUTANTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 54 of l9l U N Room Floor El.DG Room Train B--East Wall 735 Bldg.DGBX File Name: I l-4-22jpeg

== Description:==

View of nearby fire extinguisher File Name: I-66-14-22jpeg

== Description:==

View of nearby fire extinguisher Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. F:N(;I NEERS S. C(}NST: I":I AII.I S Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 55 of 191 U N RoomFloor El.DG Room Train B--East Wall 73s Bldg.DGBX File Name: l-67 -l 22jpeg

== Description:==

View of nearby fire extinguisherFile Name: I l-4-22jpeg

== Description:==

View of nearby fire extinguisher Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENC;INEERS {L CONSI,.}LTATITS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@DG Room Train B--East Wall 735 Bldg.DGBX File Name: l l-4-22jpeg

== Description:==

Minor spalling underneath diesel generator File Name: I l-4-22.ipeg

== Description:==

Fire pipe in proximity of cable tray, is a co2 lineSheet 56 of 191 U RoomFloor El. PC? Paul c. Rizz. Associates, Inc. E}.C:INE I RS {\ CO NS LiLTA-\TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.East Cable Vault 735 Bldg.SFGBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in degraded conditions?the area appear to be free of significant

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area: MCC-I-812 MCC-1-E6 TRS-BIP-PNL1 X@Sheet 57 of l9l N/A N/A N/A N/A X X X PC? Paul c. Rizzo Associates, Inc.tli..(:lNE E RS {i CONSU L fA"\TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.East Cable Vault SFGB Interaction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Fire protection pipe above TRS BIP PNL l judged to be rigidly supported.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Unrestrainedfire extinguishers and a poorly secured ladder in area are considerednot significant.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) A mostly rod hung cable tray (with minimal lateral supports) has a gap of about 4" to MCC-l-86 and MCC-1-812. It is judged that the available gap is adequate to preclude interaction of the tray with these MCC's. Evaluated by: Date: Eddie M. Guerra Date: Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 58 of 191 735 Bldg.Status: N/A N/A 9t28t2012 9t28t2012 X X X X R Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 59 of 191 U Room Floor El.735 East Cable Vault Bldg.SFGB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: I l-4-23jpeg

== Description:== General I File Name: I l-4-23jpeg

== Description:==

General2 pce Paul C. ltizzo Associatcrs, lpc.l:\{;lN[]: Rs& C(),r,-tl If,\NlSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room East Cable Vault Status:@Sheet 60 of l9lUN 73s Bldg.SFGB File Name: l l-4-23.jpeg

== Description:==

Fire pipe over panel is rig File Name : l l 23.jpcg

== Description:==

Fire extinguisher and loose ladder rn area ilE Gt ft portedFloor El.l J Y Paul C. Rizzo Associatee, Inc.ETTGINEERS & COISUEI'AI\ITSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room East Cable Vault Status: @Sheet 6l of l9l UFloor El.735 Bldg.SFGB File Name: l l4-23jpeg

Description:

Fire extinguisher in area PC? Paul C. Rizz. Ass.ciaters, [nc.Emer Swgr Room Train A 713 E\t;INEERS & CONST: LT'A"\T.TArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El, Bldg.SRVBInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

INV-VITBUS I panel has a gap qf 1" to a wall. It is judged that this gap is adequateand there will be no impact to the wall. HVAC grill over INV-Vitbusl-3 is held with small screws, but appears to be rugged, it is not a credible fall hazard. Block wall SBI-I I and SBI-12 are adequate under calculqtion DSC-0090 and DSC-0091, respectively. Block wall SBI-l5 is adequate under calculation DSC-0093. These calculations are part of a follow-up seismic analysis in support of IE80- I I calculations. Related equipment on SWEL for this area: BAT-CHG-3 PNL-ACI-EI BAT-CHG-I SAF-SW-65 48OVUS-I-8.N TRANS-I-8N 4KVS- I AE TRF-10I5 DC-SWBDI-I DC-SWBDl-3 DC-SWBDI-4 INV-VITBUSl-1 INV-VITBUS 1-3@Sheet 62 of l9l N/A N/A X X X X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.tl i..(; I Nt ERS & C-ONSU LT{\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Emer Swgr Room Train @Sheet 63 of 191 N/A N/A N/A AFloor El.lnteraction Effects 713 Bldg.SRVB 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the arca? Dangerfire sign posted on battery room door. Batteries are well restrained and no potential interaction or Jblling of objects that could short the battery terminals andcause afire werefound. Judged adequate.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?Several unrestrained fire extinguishers in area are judged not significant.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the arca? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) In general, all cabinets appear to be bolted together if within proximity of'another cabinet Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffrich 912812012 9t2812012 X X X X Sheet 64 of l9lPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS E GONSUUTAhITSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Emer Swgr Room Train A Floor El.7r3 Bldg.Status: @SRVBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: l l-4-25jpeg

== Description:== General IFile Name: l-60-l-4-25jpeg

== Description:==

General 2 Paul C. Rizzo Associatc'sn Inc.I;}i(iI NE ERS &. CONSL;LTAIlI SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @NSheet 65 of 191 U Room Floor El.Emer SWgr Room Train A 713 Bldg.SRVBFile Name: I l-4-25jpeg

== Description:==

Block wall and unrestrained fire extinguisher in area.File Name

l-66-l 25jpeg

Description:

View of nearby fire extinguisher Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENC:INEERS sI. CONSUUTA-'YTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Sheet 66 of l9l U Room Floor El.713 Emer Swgr Room Train A Bldg.SRVB File Name: l-67 -l-4-25jpeg

== Description:== Gap of I " between VITBUS 1 and wall judged adequate File Name: l-68-l-4-25jpeg

== Description:== Light has burn marks on it, appears disused.Considered a non issue. Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGTNEERS &, CONSULTANYTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Sheet 67 of l9l U Room Floor El.713 Emer Slvgr Room Train A Bldg.SRVB File Name: l-69-l-4-25jpeg

== Description:==

View of nearby fire extinguisher File Name: l-70-l-4-25jpeg

== Description:==

DC-SWGR-3 and DC-SWBD-3 are bolted

together, PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.l:\(;lNt tlts .!. ( {-)Nsl LI:\IIS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Emer Swg{ Room Train ASheet 68 of l9l Status: @N U Room Floor El.7t3 Bldg.SRVB File Name : l -7 l -l 25.jpeg

== Description:==

HVAC grill over INV-VITBUSI-3 judged adequately restrained. ]Filc Nanrc . l l 25 .1pcgDcscription: Vicw of-ncarby firc cxtinguisher Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.T)I{C;INE ERS & CONSULTru\TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 69 of 191 U N Room Floor El.713 Emer Swgr Room Train A Bldg.SRVBFile Name

l -7 5-l-4-25jpeg

== Description:== View of unused cables in cable tray. Sheet 70 of 191Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ElicjlNEERii & coNsr.;LTASiTsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Emer Swgr Room Train o B Floor El.713 SRVB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Blockwall SBI-6, SBI-7, and SBI-B are adequate under calculations DSC-0085, DSC-0086 and DSC-0087, respectively. Block wall SB l-9 adequate under calculation DSC-0088. These calculations are part of afollow-up seismic analysis in support oJ'1E80-I I calculations. Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 480VUS-1-9-P 4KVS-1DF BAT-CHGI-2-A DC.SWBDI-2 INV-VITBUSI-4 TRANS-I-9P Bldg.X X X X Sheet 71 of 191Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.EliGlNEERri S{ CONSUUIA,\rSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Emer Swsr Room TrainFloor El.7t3 Bldg.SRVBInteraction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Shower in areajudged rugged and not a spray hazard.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a frre in the area?Fire signs posted on battery room door. Batteries are well restrained and no potential interaction orfalling of objects that could short the battery terminals and cause afire were found. Judged adequate.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Potential fallingfrom several fire extinguishers in area is judged not o concern.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) In general, all cabinets appear to be bolted together if within proximity of another cabinet Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffrich @/'&/;,i9t28t20r2 912812012 X X X X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.E i\*G I N E ERS & CO NSULTA,\TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 72 of l9l U N Room Floor El.713 Emer Swgr Room Train B Bldg.SRVB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: I l-4-26jpeg

== Description:==

General I File Name: I l-4-26 jpeg

Description:

General2 RPaul c. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Elf (;t N t_E Rs,si coNst" :L'rtu\T's Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Emer Swgr Room Train BSheet 73 of l9l Status: @N U RoomFloor El.7t3 Bldg.SRVB File Name: I l-4-26.jpeg

== Description:==

Block wall, fire ext, fire danger sign File Name : l l 26.jpeg

== Description:== SUB STA l-9 BUS lP, with un-racked breaker Sheet 74 of I9l Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. CI}NSULTANTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Room Floor El.713 Emer Swgr Room Train B Bldg.SRVB File Name: l-67 -l-4-26jpeg

== Description:== SUB STA l-9 BUS lP, with un-racked breaker File Name: l-69-I-4-26 jpeg

Description:

View of unrestrained fire extinguisher, and properly secured box.l-69-I-4-26 jpeg Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

c. CON$ULTA"\TS Area \ilalk-By Checklist (AWC)Emer Swgr Room Train B Status: @Sheet 75 of l9l U Room Floor El.7t3 Bldg.SRVBFile Name: l-70-l-4-26jpegDescription: View of unrestrained fire ext, ladder is properly secured.File Name: l-7 l-l-4-26jpegDescription: Emergency shower is rugged, judged not a spray concern l-70-r-4-26 jpeg Sheet 76 of l9I Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS &. CONSULTfu\TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: RoomFloor El.7t3 Emer Swgr Room Train B Bldg.SRVBFile Name: l-72-l-4-26 jpeg

Description:

Cable tray has long rod support, but is laterally braced and judged a non issue Sheet 77 of Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.Eli{:l N[ [Rs & coNsuLrturTs Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@RoomFloor El.INTSInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions? Surface rust at base plate of some components judged acceptable.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Light above cabinet PNL IFPI is in contact with conduit. Lamp may impact conduit,so impact is credible, but judged not significant Related equipment on SWEL for this area: VS-D-57A1 WR-P-1A INTS Pump Cubicle 1(A) 705 Bldg.N Y N Y N Y N Y X X X X PCe P"g!-c. Rizzo Associates, [nc.E.'$GINEERS &. CONSULTfu\I5Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.INTS Pump Cubicle 1(A) Bldg.INTSInteraction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?All piping are well supported in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No ignition sources found in this area.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Sheet 78 of 705 Y N Y N Y Status:@9128/2012 N Y_;ffitr- t&ir;J, Evaluated by: Date: Date: 9/28/2012 Eddie M. Guerra X X X X Adam L. Helffrich Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.

ENGINEERS & CONSIJLTi$\ITSArea \ilalk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 79 of l9l U N RoomFloor El.705 INTS Pump Cubicle l(A)Bldg.INTSOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l-59-14-27 jpeg

Description:

General File Name: l l-4-27 jpeg

Description:

General 2 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. ENGTNEERS 6. CON S[-)LTA"\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room INTS Pump Cubicle l(A)Status: Bldg.INTS File Name: l-65-l-4-27 jpeg

Description:

Light above Cabinet PNL I FP I . Judged non-damaging. Sheet 80 of l9l UFloor El.705 PC? Paul c. Rizzo Associates, Inc.En-(;lNEERS & CONSI:tTA:ITS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)INTS Pump Cubicle 2(B)Sheet 8l of 191@Room Floor El.70s Bldg.INTS Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions? Minor surface rust on vertical pump judged a non issue 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? Related equipment on SWEL for this area: VS-D-5781 VS-F-578 WR-P-IB N/A N/A X X X X PCe Paul c. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENGINEEBS & CONST.: LTA,{TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room INTS Pump Cubicle 2(B) Floor El.705 Bldg.TNTS Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?All piping are well supported in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No ignition sources found in this area.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? Temporary scaffold are secured and judged a non issue. Nearby ladders are secure.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated bv: "F*{t/",!tEddie M. Guerra Adam L. HelffrichSheet 82 of l9l N/A 9128120t2 9t28/2012 x X X x Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

6. CONSUUTANT$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room INTS Pump Cubicle 2(B\

Status:@Sheet 83 of 191 UFloor El.705 Bldg.INTSOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: I l-4-28jpeg

== Description:==

General File Name: I l-4-28jpeg

== Description:== General 2 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS & CONSULTA}ITSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Sheet 84 of 191 U Room Floor El.INTS Pump Cubicle 2(B)705 Bldg.INTSFile Name: I l-4-28 jpeg

Description:

Surface rust on pump lWR P 1B not an issue File Name: l-66-l-4-28jpeg

== Description:== Temporary scaffold not an issue Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc,ENGINEERS & GONSUIjTANTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)INTS Pump Cubicle 2(B)Status: @Sheet 85 of l9l U Room Floor El.705 Bldg.INTS File Name: l-67 -l-4-28jpegDescription: Ladders are secure File Name: I 14-28jpeg

== Description:==

General 3 Paul C. Rizzo Associates. Inc, ENT;INT]ERS S. CONSL;LTA-\'TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Y Sheet 86 of l9l N/A N/A RoomFloor El.INTS Pump Cubicle 3(C)705 Bldg.INTSInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in tbe area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?Pump IWR-P-IC has two bolts with significant corrosion. CR 2012-13969 was generated because of the issue.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?N/A4. Does it appear that the area is free interactions with other equipment lighting)?

Light just above feeder breaker 48 is not considered a significant interactionRelated equipment on SWEL for this area: VS-D-s7CI of potentially adverse seismic spatial in the arca (e.g., ceiling tiles and X X X X Sheet 87 Paul C. Rizzo Associattrs. [nc-L)i(;INf, ERS & CONSL;LT,{\TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.INTS Pump Cubicle 3(C)Bldg.INTS Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?All piping are well supported in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No ignition sources found in this area.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?Temporary scalfold judged non damaging to surrounding piping.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra r v/./,..Adam L. Helffrich 705 Status: 9t28t20r2";-w_r,,4/a,',' ," i."'r:i!i" Date: Date: 912812012 Y X Y x Y X Y X Sheet 88 of 191 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc. EI*GINEERS &. CONSULTA"\TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room INTS Pump Cubicle 3(C) Status: Floor El.705 Bldg.Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: I l-4-29 jpeg

Description:

General IFile Name: I l-4-29 jpeg

Description:

General2 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc-. ENGI NEERS .S. CONSULTA.\Ts Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)INTS Pump Cubicle 3(C)Status: Y@Sheet 89 of 191 U Room Floor El.705 Bldg.INTSFile Name: I l-4-29.jpegDescription: View of light above feed breaker. Judged not a concern.File Name : l l-4-29.jpeg

== Description:== Temp scaffold judged non damaging to sulrounding piping Sheet 90 of 191Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.It:\dGlNt ERS & CONSl,; LT,L\IS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Y@U Room Floor El.705 INTS Pump Cubicle 3(C)Bldg.INTSFile Name : l l-4-29jpeg

== Description:==

Scaffold deficient tag File Name: I l-4-29.jpeg

== Description:==

Corroded bolt near pump. Bolt hold nothing PCe Paul c. Rizzo Associates, [nc-E}i(;I NELRS &. CONSUATA"\TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.@Sheet 91 of 191 N/A N/A N/ALHSI Pump 18 Bldg.SFGBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.L Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.9., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

SI-P-IA 751 X X X X Sheet 92Paul C. Rizzo Associater, lnc,EN(;tNEERS & CONST:Ut4-.\1SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.LHSI Pump lB 75r Bldg.Status: 9t28t20r2 SFGBInteraction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

All piping are well supported in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No ignition sources found in this area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. GuerraAdam L. Helffrich Date: Date: 9t28t20r2 Y X Y X Y X Y X Sheet 93 of l9lPaul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc. ENGINEERS & CONSUUTA"\TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room LHSI Pump 1B Status:Floor El.7 5r Bldg.SFGBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: I l-4-31 jpegDescription: General PCe Paul c. Rizzo Associates, lnc.F])iGINEERS S. CONSL:LTA.\TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Main Steam Valve Room @Sheet 94 of l9l NiA N/A N/A Room Floor El.75r Bldg.SFGB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?A damaged pipe insulation near valve MOV-IMS-LlS was judged to be due to servicing of the valve and not a seismic concern. A pipe connected to a containment penetration 89 (valve TV-ISV-100A is on this pipe) has a gop oJ'l/8" to a knee brace mounted on Safeguards Building.

The effect o./'differential building displacements atthis elevation between the two buildings was investigated andfound that the pipe has adequateflexibility to accommodate the demand seismic displacements of the two buildings. Related equipment on SWEL for this area: MCC-1-E13 MOV-1MS-105 PCV-IMS-I OI C PNL.lMS-1OIA PNL-1MS-101B SV-MS-104B TV-1MS-IOlC

TV-1MS-105A X X X X PC? Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inr-:' E\INNIERS & CONST:LTA*\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Main Steam Valve Room RoomFloor El.751 Bldg.SFGB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? All piping are well supported in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No ignition sources found in this area.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Ladder in lower area is loosely secured thus judged not to be a concern since thereare no soft targets in the vicinity.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Date: Eddie M. Guerra Date:Adam L. Helffiich XSheet 95 9t28t20t2 912812012 X X X-::*&rt{{*,,' ..r /tti'1,,17' Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & OONSL}LTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Sheet 96 of 191 U Main Steam Valve Room 751 Bldg.SFGB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: I l-4-32jpeg

== Description:==

General I Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTA"\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Main Steam Valve Room Status: Sheet 97 of l9l UFloor El.751 Bldg.SFGBFile Name: l l-4-32jpeg

== Description:==

Ducting in area adequately supported Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EN-GINEERS&CONSULT,I"I\TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:Sheet 98 of l9l U RoomFloor El.751 Main Steam Valve Room Bldg.SFGB File Name: l-67 -l-4-32jpeg

== Description:== General 3 File Name: I l-4-32 jpeg

Description:

General 4 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.EN(;INE ERs &. CONSULTA.\TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Sheet 99 of l9l U RoomFloor El.75r Main Steam Valve Room Bldg.SFGB File Name: l-69-l-4-32jpeg

== Description:==

Spalled grout on main steam support, not significantFile Name: l -7 0-l 32 jpeg

Description:

Insulation damage believed to be due to valve servicing MOV I MS 105 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGTNEERS &. COI.ISUUTAF{TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Main Steam Valve Room Status: Sheet 100 of 191 U RoomFloor El.751 Bldg.SFGB Sheet l0l of 191Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. CONSWTiTNTSArea \ilalk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @N U Room Floor El.751 Main Steam Valve Room Bldg.SFGB File Name: l-7 4-l-4-32 jpegDescription: Fire line is secure.File Name: l-7 5-14-32jpeg

== Description:== View of pipe going into containment building with nearby knee brace.located on the floor of Safeguards Building. Interaction due to differential motion judged not a concern. BCe Paul c. Rizzo Associatesn Inc, EN(;tNf ERS {;. CONSULTTL\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Motor Generator Room Status:@Sheet 102 of l9l N/A N/A N/A NiA RoomFloor El.7t3 Bldg.SRVB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.[. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? Related equipment on SWEL for this area: REAC-TR-SWGR-IA X X X X pce Paul c. Rizzt-r Associates, Inc-f, :\i(;lNrER:i &. CoNSL;LTA.\TSArea Watk-By Checklist (AWC)Motor Generator Room 103 Bldg.SRVB Interaction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the arca? All piping are well supported in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?

No ignilion sources found in this area.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e. 9., scaffolding, lead shielding) ?Unrestrainedfire extinguishers in area are not considered significant.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)DC hold power supply cabinet, logic cabinet, power cabinet IBD, and power cabinet 2 BD all have after market air conditioning units added to them. AC units appear tobe lighnueight and judged not to affect the structural integrity o/'the csbinets.Room Floor El.Evaluated bv: 713;-e1&l{{,Eddie M. Guerra Date: Date: ,';.i.a,';,ry/,f/" '/!/.t.. ,.//.:,//,/,,l / L-. /.), 'ii'-' f .'Adam L. Helffrich X Sheet of 191 Status: N/A 9t2812012 912812012 X X X Sheet 104 of 191 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.ENG TNEERS &. CI}NSULTA!{TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@N RoomFloor El.Motor Generator Room 7l3 Bldg.SRVBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: l-59-l-4-33jpeg

== Description:==

General File Name: l-60-l-4-33jpeg

== Description:==

General 2 Sheet 105 of 191 Floor El.713Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.EM;INEERS & CONSL}LTA"\TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Motor Generator Room Status: Bldg.SRVBFile Name: I l-4-33jpeg

== Description:==

View of carts, ladders and fire extinguisher in the area File Name: l-66-l-4-33jpeg

== Description:== View of AC units modification for several cabinets. PCe P"gLC. Rizz. Associates, lnc.Normal Switchgear AreaSheet 106 of l9l ENC;INEERS & CONSULT{\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC) RoomFloor El.Bldg.SRVB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lightingX Related equipment on SWEL for this area: TRANS-1-8N1

@713 N/A N/A X X X X PC? Paul c. Rizz. Asscciates, lnc. L\t:tNE [.R$ {!. CONSLiLTtu\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Normal Switchgear Area Sheet 107 of l9l N/A N/A Room Floor El.713 Bldg.SRVBInteraction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?All piping are well supported in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No ignition sources

/bund in this area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e. g., scaffolding, lead shielding)

?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra/l' / .,--,/,. a'liA**; r Date: 9t28/20t2 ,,.i t ,' ./' ' ,: l'.r . ./ .: ,, i .:i ., ,./ / ."t//..'!l{t'.'::,// /:' 1t'-'.tt "'i'Date: 912812012 Adam L. Helffrich X X x X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. EI.-IIGINE ERS {ir CONSI"}UTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Sheet 108 of l9l U Room Floor El.713 Normal Switchgear Area Bldg.SRVB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: I l-4-34 jpeg

Description:

General File Name: l-60-l-4-34jpeg

== Description:== Top entry conduit with flexible joints judged adequate Sheet 109 of l9l Paul C. Rizzo Associates, I"nc.Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @N U Room Floor El.7t3 Normal Switchgear Area Bldg.SRVBFile Name: l-66-l-4-34jpegDescription: No connection between cage and transfoffner,File Name: l-67 -I-4-34jpeg

== Description:== No connection between cage and transfoffner,approx 2 in Eap,judged a non issue. PC? Paul c. Rizzo Asscciates, Inc. En*(itNt E8.S S CONS LiLTA,\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Pipe Penetration C 722 Bldg.SFGB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area: TV-IBD-IOOA TV-ICV-I02

TV-1CV-I5OB X Y Sheet I l0 of 191 N/A N/A Y Y N/A Y N/A X X X PC? Paul c. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Pipe Penetration C Sheet E:\J(TINEERS & CONST :LTi"\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.722 Bldg.SFGBInteraction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

All piping are well supported in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No ignition sources found in this area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Several potential seismic interactionsfound (see Photos), all judged not signfficant,except one. Temporary bullet shield placed by Securiq, poses risk to adjacent Pressure Transmitter. CR-2012-14020 was generated. A.follow-up walkdown showed thebarrier moved and properly secured.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Several sources of'minor corrosion in room (see photos). Only two instances were significant. CR-2012-13970 and CR-2012-13971 were generated to address corrosionon Component TV-ICC-I I0F2 and Valve IAC-L 150, respectively. Both valves arecurrently operable. Minor cracking on the east u,all was judged as surface crackingond not significant, Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Date: Eddie M. Guerra Date: Adam L. Helffrich Status: 9t28t20t2 9t28t20t2 Y X Y X Y X Y X Sheet ll2 of l9l Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENGINEERS &. CONSUUTAi"TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)lrye Penetration C Bldg.SFGB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: I l 38jpeg

== Description:==

General File Name: I l-4-38 jpeg

Description:

General 2 I l3 of l9l Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENGINEERS 6T. CONSULTANTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) RoomFloor El.722 Bldg.SFGB File Name: I l-4-38jpeg

== Description:== Noted minor corrosion in area File Name: l l-4-38 jpeg

Description:

Noted minor corrosion in area RPaul c. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. CONST.}UTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Sheet ll4 of l9l Status: Pipe Penetration C 722 Bldg.SFGB File Name: l-68-l-4-38jpeg

== Description:== Noted minor corrosion in areaFile Name: l-67 -l 38jpegDescription: Noted minor corrosion in area I l5 of l9l RoomFloor El.Paul C. Rizzo Associatesn fnc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Bldg.SFGB File Name: l-69-l-4-38jpeg

== Description:== Noted corrosion in area, CR-2012-13971 initiated File Name: l l-4-38jpeg

== Description:==

Noted corrosion in area, CR-2012-13970 initiated Pipe Penetration C 722 I l6 of 191 RoomFloor El.Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Ei\*G INE ERli $l. CO N S L1 LTtu\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Y Bldg.SFGBFile Name: l-7 l -l 38jpeg

== Description:== Noted corrosion in area, CR-2012-13970 initiated File Name: l-72-l-4-38jpeg

== Description:== Noted corrosion in area, CR-2012-13970 initiated Pipe Penetration C 722 t-7l-t-4-38 jpeg RPaul c. Rizzo Associates, [nc.H.\*GINE ERS & CONSLiLTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Y Sheet Il7 of 191 U Pipe Penetration C 722 Bldg.SFGB File Name: l-7 5-l-4-38 jpeg

Description:

Wall with potential cracking, eastwall, judged not significant Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEENS & COI$IULTASITSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Pipe Penetration C Status: Bldg.SFGB File Name: l-7 6-1 4-38jpegDescription: Wall with potential cracking, east wall, judged not significant File Name: l-77 -l 38jpeg

== Description:==

Wall with potential cracking judged not significant, east wall.Sheet I l8 of l9l UFloor El.722 PCe Paul c. Rizzo Associates, Inc. EN(;INEERS & CC]*"St

LTAIlTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Prim. Aux. BLDG 722'6 NE ComerFloor El.722 Bldg.AXLBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area: TCV-1CH-I44 Sheet 119 of191@N/A X X X X Er*Gl NEERS & CONST jLTA,\T SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Prim. Aux. BLDG 722'6 NE Corner 722 Bldg.AXLB Interaction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?All piping are well supported in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No ignition sources found in this area.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Unsecured pole and fire extinguisher in the area considered nol to cause unacceptable interactions.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra@Sheet 120 of 191 N/A il / --.f ..'"!,(hn'4'-'.' 9t28t2012 , ,u)i'ir,o" 9t28t2012Adam L. Helffrich X X X X Sheet l2l of l9l Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.E N.*G INEERS {i. CON S ULTA"\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@RoomFloor El.722 Prim. Aux. BLDG 722'6 NE Corner Bldg.AXLBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: I l-4-41 jpegDescription: GeneralFile Name: I l 41 jpegDescription: Fire extinguisher in area I t 41 jpeg Sheet 122 of l9l Paul C. Rizzo Associatee, Inc. EI{GINEERS T, OODlsufTA}ITBArea \ilalk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Prim. Aux. BLDG 722'6 NE CornerFloor El.722 Bldg.AXLB Status: @File Name: l-65-1441 jpegDescription: Loose pole could impact Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Area Room EN(;INEERS & CONSULTASTS Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Prim. Aux. BLDG 722'6 BIT Cub.Floor El.722 Bldg.AXLBInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? Tank SI-TK-2 approximately 3 inches Jiom wall not considered a credible impact. Block wall AB I - I is qualffied under reference DSC-000I . This calculation is part of a.follow-up seismic analysis in support o.f IE80-l I calculations. Related equipment on SWEL for this area: SI-TK-2@Sheet 123 of l9l N/A N/A N/A X X X X BCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Area Room Floor g:..GINEERS & CON SL l LTA-\TS Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Prim. Aux. BLDG 722'6 BIT Cub.722 AXLB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? All piping are well supported in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No ignilion sources found in this area.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the arca? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffrich 124 of 191 Status: N/A 9t28t2012 9t28/2012 Sheet El.Bldg.X X X X Date: Date: 125 of l9l Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EN'GINEERS & CONST ILTA}{TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@RoomFloor El.722 Prim. Aux. BLDG 722'6 BIT Cub.Bldg.AXLBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: I l-4-42jpeg

== Description:==

General I File Name: I l-4-42jpeg

== Description:==

General 2 Sheet 126 of 191 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENGI NE ERS & CONSI. J L"I'[\:"TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @RoomFloor El.Prim. Aux. BLDG 722'6 BIT Cub.722 Bldg.AXLBFile Name: I l-4-42jpeg

== Description:== SI TKZ approximately 3 inches from block wall.Judged not a concern. Paul C. Rizzo Associates" [nc, El\titNt tRS S CONST:LTA..fISArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Prim. Aux. BLDG 722'6 E Cent.722 Bldg.AXLB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?AS TK 6 is unanchored at the base, but it is rod hung. Component is not Cat I and is not considered a credible impact to other components.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the arca appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? Blockwalls ABI-10, ABI-l1, ABI-13, and ABI-15 are all qualified under references DCS-0009, DCS-0010, DCS-0012, and DCS-0014 respectively. These calculations ore part of afollow-up seismic analysis in support of'1E80-1 I calculations. Related equipment on SWEL for this area: MOV-tRW-103A MOV-lRW-103B MOV-IRW-I14B MOV-IRW-117 @Sheet 127 of l9l N/A NiA N/A N/A X X X X SheetPaul C. Rizzo Associates. lnc.E:S(itNEERS & C'ONSr-:LTA-\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.Prim. Aux. BLDG 722'6 E Cent.722 Bldg.AXLB Interaction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? All piping are well supported in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the arca?No ignition sources found in this area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by:.7./,/,/Date: Date: Eddie M. Guerra ,,;&:;Pi/::'#' Adam L. Helffrich 128 of 191 Status: N/A 9t28/20r2 9t28t20r2 X X X X RPaul C. Rizz. Ass.ciates, Inc.F}i(;l Nt ERS &. CONSl": L:r,,\*\-tS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Sheet 129 of 191 Status:@U N 722 Prim. Aux. BLDG 722'6 E Cent.Bldg.AXLBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: I l-4-43jpegDescription: General I File Name:

Description:

Sheet 130 of l9l Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc. ENGINEERS &. COI{SI.}LTA}ITS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Prim. Aux. BLDG 722'6 E Cent.722 Bldg.AXLB File Name: I l-4-43jpeg

== Description:== Block wall East Sheet 13l of 191 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. ET((JINE ERS ili CONST iLTAJ\TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@U N RoomFloor El.Prim. Aux. BLDG 722'6 E Cent. 722 Bldg.AXLBFile Name: l-67 -l-4-43jpeg

== Description:== Blocks wall North File Name: I l-4-43jpeg

== Description:== Block walls, South I I I I Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EN*GINEERS&CONSLiLTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Sheet 132 of 191 U Room Floor El.Prim. Aux. BLDG 722'6 E Cent.722 Bldg.AXLBFile Name: l-69-l-4-43jpegDescription: Block wall West RPaul c. Rizz. Associates, [nc.F.N(;l Nt t RS .\ C()N:L I f {N TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.Prim. Aux. BLDG 722'6 E Cent.722 Sheet 133 of 191 Status' @N U Bldg.AXLBFile Name: l-7l-l 43 jpeg

Description:

Surface corrosion identified on large pipes. Judged not a concern.tFile Name: l l 43.jpegDescription: Unanchored tank, but rod hung.No interaction concern. (The tank is not Cat I) Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGIMERS E. SOTSULTANT$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Prim. Aux. BLDG 722'6 E Cent.722 Status:@Sheet 134 of l9l U Bldg.AXLBDescription: Unanchored tank, but rod hung.File Name: l-7 5-l-4-43jpegDescription: Unanchored tank, but rod hung.No interaction concern. (The tank is not Cat I)File Name: l-7 4-l-4-43jpeg Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.P\(rINtERS {i" CONST:1TA-\TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.Prim. AUX. BLDG 735'6 735 Bldg.AXLB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipmentdegraded conditions?in the area appear to be free of significant

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

ICC-E-IA@Sheet 135 of 191 N/A N/A N/A Y Y Y X X X X PCt? Paul c. Rizz* Associates, Inc. EN(;lNrLRS {i CONST":1:r,rSTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Prim. AUX. BLDG 735'6Floor El.735 Bldg.AXLBInteraction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?All piping are well supported in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a ftre in the area?No ignition sources found in this area.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:)=66,fiu/;-1, Eddie M. Guerra Status:@9128120t2 Sheet 136 of 191 N/A N/A , {;i",',':r// }'j,'#.'/ /./.,'"/'/Date: Date: 9t28t2012 Adam L. Helffrich X X X X Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, [nc. HN-GINEERS&.CONSULTtu\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Prim. AUX. BLDG 735'6 Status:@Sheet 137 of 191 U Floor El.735 Bldg.AXLBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 1 l-4-44jpeg

== Description:==

General File Name: l-60-l-4-44jpeg

== Description:== Rod hung fire pipe is sufficiently rugged Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ET{GINEENS & COI\I$UUNAITITSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Prim. A[IX. BLDG 735'6 Status: Sheet 138 of l9l U Floor El.735 Bldg.AXLBFile Name: l-65-l44jpeg

== Description:==

Cart properly restrained Paul C. Rizzo Assaciates, lnc.F:\T;INf ERS si. CONSULTA,YTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Room Floor El.Prim Aux Blde 735'6 HX Inlet 735 Bldg.AXLB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitracewayi and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limitsf4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area: PT-lRW-1134. Sheet 139 of l9l N/A NiA X X X X PC? Paul c- Rizz. Associates, [nc-F]f,.G INE f RS & CL)NSLJ LT,{\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Evaluated by: Prim Aux Blde735'6 HX Inlet of 735 Bldg. AXLB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the areal All piping are well supported in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No ignition sources found in this area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) /,f - l ---:f .,{{4",<1,tEddie M. Guerra. tr/i*;77 ,t,: ,/,,/ / .,7/./.'t': tz ""7-L/,i t /"tAdam L. Helffrich X Sheet t40 NiA 9t2812012 912812012 X X X Sheet l4l of l9l Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. GOT*$UUTEhIISArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)U Room Floor El.73s Status: @N Prim Aux Bldg 735'6 HX Inlet Bldg.AXLBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l l-445jpeg

== Description:==

GeneralFile Name: I 14-45jpegDescription: Fire system identified to be adequately supported. I r4-45jpeg PC? Paul c. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Fli(;lN[ LRS s C:ONst-:LTA-YTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Prim. Aux Bldg 735'6 E Central 735 AXLB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?Some components in area have minor surface corrosion, judged a non issue.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Missing bolt identified on hanger (H-70) close to MOV-RW- I 87. Condition report CR20I 2- 14047 was issued to address the situation. A review of calculation for Pipe Support H-70 was performed (Ref: Calculation I3387.02-S (B)-24CC2-B) and it concluded that the base plate was qualffied withfive bolts configuration and themissing bolt was noted. Therefore this is only a configuration issue and not a plantoperability concern as the support design is infull compliance with the design basis requirements.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? Related equipment on SWEL for this area: RW-I83 Sheet 142 of l9l@Bldg.X X X N/A X Paul C, Rizzo Associates, lnc.El-( jlNE ERS & C'O NS U LT{\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.Prim. Aux Blde 735'6 E Central 735 Bldg.AXLBInteraction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

All piping are well supported in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No ignition sources found in this area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Gas bottle with only one chain at top is near Post Accident Sampling panel PA5CI judged not to cause an interaction concern.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) @Sheet 143 of 191 N/A N/A N/A 1/"";i, Evaluated by: 9t2812012 Eddie M. Guerra:'itir";;* 9t2812012Adam L. Helffrich X X X X Sheet 144 of 191 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.Flli(;lN t, ERS e. coNsuL"IA*\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@U N Room Floor El.735Prim. Aux Bldg 735'6 E Central Bldg.AXLBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: I l-4-46.jpeg

== Description:==

GeneralFile Name: I l-4-46.jpegDescription: Fire system is rugged. Sheet 145 of 191Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EITGI NE ERS &. CONSULTA*\fTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@U N Room Floor El.Prim. Aux Bldg 735'6 E Central 735 Bldg.AXLBFile Name: I l-4-46.jpeg

== Description:== HSS hung cable tray is adequately bracedFile Name: l-66-l-4-46.jpeg

== Description:== HSS hung cable tray is axially braced and judged a non issue. Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINE ERS & CONSULTfu\'ISArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Sheet 146 of l9l U Room Floor El.Prim. Aux Bldg 735'6 E Central 73s Bldg.AXLBFile Name:

== Description:==

r-67 -r-4-46 jpes Gas bottle with only one chain at top near PostFile Name: I l-4-46 jpeg

Description:

Surface coffosion, judged a non issue Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc. ENGINEERS & CONSUUTANT$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Sheet 147 of l9l U Room Floor El.Prim. Aux Bldg 735'6 E Central 735 Bldg.AXLB File Name: l-69-l-4-46 jpeg

Description:

Support for CC Water Pump outlet is missing I bolt. Mounted oncolumn near MOV RW 187. CR 2012-14047 was generated DC? Paul c. Rizz. Associates, [nc.E\T;INT ERS 6{ CONSULTA-\.IsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.148 of Status:@Prim Aux Bldg 735'6 W. Wall Bldg.AXLBInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?MCC I-84 I Inchfrom adjacent panel. MCC is top braced by the top entry conduitand the panel is rigidly attached to wall. Judged no interaction concern.Related equipment on SWEL for this area: MCC-I-84 735 N Y N Y N Y N Y X X X X PCe Paul c. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

F]N(JINEERS S{ CONIULTA}iTS Walk-By Checklist (AWC)I4m Aux Bldg 735'6 W. Wall 149 of Area Room Floor 735 El.Bldg. AXLB Status:@9t28t2012Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?All piping are well supported in this orea.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No ignition sources found in this area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra N Y N Y N Y N Y',/ -,>.,1,, riMw,l Date: Date: 9t28t20t2 Adam L. Helffrich X X X X Sheet 150 of l9l Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS E CONSUUTAI{TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Prim Aux Bldg 735'6 W. Wall Bldg.AXLB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: l-59-l-447 jpeg

Description:

General Status:@U N 73s File Name:

Description:

MCC l-E4 approximately I in from panel judged to have no interaction I l-4-47 ipeg PC?Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room QS-AFW Pump Room Sheet 151 of 19l Status: Y @ UFloor El. 735 Bldg. SFGBInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? Related equipment on SWEL for this area: FCV-1FW-103B FW-59 FW-P-2 FW-P-3A FW-T-2 MOV-1FW-151E QS-P-lB YNUN/A X YNUN/A X YNUN/A X YNUN/A X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.FN(;tNEERS & CONSULT,1-\ISArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.QS-AFW Pump Room 735 Bldg.SFGB Interaction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?All piping are well supported in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area? No ignition sources found in this area.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?Fire extinguishers located in the area. Judged not to present an interaction concern.Scaffold in vicinity of pumps identified not to present a signi/icant concernfor nearby components.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Corrosion identified on several valves noted in the area. Several de/icient tags torepair corrosion are dated as old as 2003. CR 20 I 2- I 3972, and CR 20 I 2- I 3974 are generated to deal with corroded valves. All valves are still operable. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) _F4-/1./";: , Evaluated bv: Date: Date:Eddie M. Guerra:r/i,urr/' i; ,",4,Adam L. Helffrich Sheet152 of l9l 9t2812012 912812012 X X X X Sheet 153 of l9l Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS & CONSUUTiiI{TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Y U@RoomFloor El.735 QS-AFW Pump Room Bldg.SFGBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: l-59-l-4-50jpeg

== Description:== General I File Name: l-60-l 50jpeg

Description:

General 2 PCe. Patrl C. ItizzoAssociates, Inc.Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)QS-AFW Pump RoomSheet 154 of I 9 I Status: Y@U RoomFloor El.735 Bldg.SFGB File Name: I l-4-50.jpeg

== Description:==

View of fire extinguisher located in the area Filc Name:

Description:

6 Corrodcd valvc identified. CR-2012-13972 issued to address this condition. l l-4-50 jpcg Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEERS &. CTONSUUTAI'STS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Bldg.SFGB

Description:

Corroded valve identified. CR-2012-13972 issued to address File Name: l-68-l-4-50jpeg

== Description:==

Example of very old deficiency tag.Sheet 155 of l9l@u RoomFloor El.QS-AFW Pump Room 735 File Name: l-67 -l-4-50jpeg this condition. Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & OONSI.}LTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room QS-AFW Pump Room Status: Sheet 156 of 191 U Floor El.735 Bldg.SFGB File Name: l-69-l-4-50jpeg

== Description:==

Very old deficiency tag Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINE ERS {i. CONSUUTA!{TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Bldg.SFGB File Name: l-7 l-l 50jpeg

Description:

Scaffold identified in the area. Judged not a seismic concern. File Name: l-72-l 50jpeg

Description:

Fire pipe system appears secure, no risk identified.Sheet 157 of 191 @u RoomFloor El.Q!4FWPump Room 73sr-7l- I 50 jpeg PC? Paul C' Rizzo Ass*ciates, lnc.EN(JINEERS {. CONSULTA,\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Service Building Floor 725 Status:@Sheet 158 of 191 N/A RoomFloor El.Bldg.725 SRVBInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.I . Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limitsf4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area: IVS-F-s5A Y Y X X X X Sheet 159 of 191 Paul C. Rizzo '{ssociates, lnc.T\T; INE LRS {i CONSULTA-\TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.Service Building Floor 725 SRVB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the arca?

All piping are well supported in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No ignition sources found in this area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Table in area is properly secured.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra 72s Bldg.il.'/'-.-.,{,. r','-/;An*; t/,, ,tt.t/,t)l'r::,/t' i+r'r(J""r'r'/r'Date: Date: 9t28t2012 9t28t2012Adam L. Helffrich x X X X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 160 of 191 U Room Floor El.725Service Building Floor 725 Bldg.SRVB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: I I-4-56jpeg

== Description:==

GeneralFile Name: l-60-l-4-56jpeg

== Description:==

Table, secured Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUUTATIfTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet l6l of l9l U RoomFloor El.Service Building Floor 725 725 Bldg.SRVB File Name: l l-4-56jpeg

== Description:== General view of cable trays in the area File Name: l-66-l-4-56.jpeg

== Description:==

View of cast iron pipe located in the area. pc\e Paul c. Rizz. Associates, Inc. E)i(;lNt ER*.S CONST_]LTA-\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.Valve Pit 688 747 Bldg.SFGB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.L Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area: MOV-1SL-8608 MOV-1SL-862A X Status:@Sheet 162 of 191 NiA N/A N/A X X X PC? Paul C' Rizzo Associates, lnc.EIICINEERS {! CONSULTA-\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC) RoomFloor El.Interaction EffectsValve Pit 688 747 Bldg.SFGB 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the arca?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the arca?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? Unsecuredfire extinguishers are not considered significant. (Jnsecured lifting crane hook judged not to cause unacceptable interactions.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Found deficient tagfrom 2003 for MOV-I5I-8648. Condition report CR-2012-l3974issued to address this condition. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) r63 N Y N Y N Y Status:@912812012 N/A N/A N Y Evaluated by: "'=#*t&tk;t Eddie M. Guerra Date: Date: 9t28t20t2 X X X X Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 164 of 191 Paul C. Rizzo Associatcrsn Inc.ENGINEER$ & CONSULT{\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@U N RoomFloor El.Valve Pit 688 747 Bldg.SFGB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: I l-4-58jpeg

== Description:== General IFile Name: I l-4-58 jpeg

Description:

General 2 Sheet 165 of 191 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.t Nct Nt t-Rs & ccNst)LTA-\T',sArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @N Bldg.SFGB File Name: I l-4-58jpeg

== Description:== Lifting hook unsecured. Judged not to cause interaction concerns. File Name : l-66-l 58jpeg

Description:

Fire extinguisher U RoomFloor El.Valve Pit 688 747 Sheet 166 of 191 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.TiNCT INE ERS {*. CONSULTA-\Is Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Valve Pit 688 Status:@U NFloor El.747 Bldg.SFGB File Name: l-67 -l 58jpeg

== Description:==

Fire extinguisher File Name : l-69-l 58jpeg

Description:

Deficient tag out of date. PC? Paul c. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENCINIERS S. CONSL;LT.4.\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@RoomFloor El.Fuel Building 735Bldg.FULBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.L Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)? Small gap under base of one of the saddles of heat exchanger FC-E-IB judged not bean issue of concern.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? Temp. gage TI-lFC-1028 is on a 6" diam. nozzle out of HX FC-E-18. There is a gap of -3/l6" between this temp. gage and rigid HVAC support. It is judged that the nozzle piping and HVAC support would not displace by 3/16" in a seismic event andthis interaction is not credible. Related equipment on SWEL for this area: IFC-E-1A 1FC-P-1A IPC-145 1 PC- 1 FC- 1 O2A XSheet 167 of 191 NiA N/A X X X pc-e Paul c. Rizz. Asscciates, [nc.Hi*GINE ERlt & CON5LI LTA,YTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Fuel Building 73s Bldg.FULB Interaction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?A space heater and its attached piping in the area are rod hung. Displacement of this heater in a seismic event would cause an interaction between its inlet piping and nearby large diameter pipe, which could potentially couse spray concern in the area. Lighting transformer LTG-TFMR-F2 and lighting panel AC-LTG-PNL-F2 are judgedto be outside of the spray zone of this piping and judged acceptable. Also, noflooding concernfor this area is identified.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Unsecuredfire extinguisher and posts do not pose seismic interactions. Scaffuld inarea is judged acceptable.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the areaTOne of ten bolts connecting the bonnet of manual valve ICCR-106 to its body does not havefull thread engagement (approximately one-haff'thread is not engaged). Judged acceptable, as the valve is very light and has a very low moment arm. Similar thread engagement issue observed at Valve FC-E-IB and judged acceptable as-is. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 168 of t9l N/A N/A 9t28/2012 912812012 Sheet X X X X,l r -.///r- / ' ,' """[ tu,ft,t'+' t Evaluated bv: Date: Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffrich Date: Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENG INEERS & CONSULTANTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Fuel Building Status:@Sheet 169 of l9l U 73s Bldg.FULB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 1-59-3-4-60jpeg

== Description:==

General File Name: I 3-4-60jpeg

== Description:==

General 2 R Paul c. Rizzo Associatesn Inc.ENCINEERS {it' CONSULTA,\TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Sheet 170 of l9l U Fuel Building Status: @Bldg.FULB File Name: l-65-3-4-60jpeg

== Description:==

Nut at 12 o'clock not engaged on underside. Judged acceptable. 735 File Name: l-66-3-4-60jpeg

== Description:==

Underside of not engaged nut. Judged acceptable. Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.E.**GINEERS&.CON$ULTA"\TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Fuel Building Status: @Sheet I7l of l9l U 735 Bldg.FULB File Name: l 3-4-60jpeg

== Description:==

One nut with one-half thread engagement missing, judged acceptable. File Name: I 3-4-60jpeg

== Description:==

Small gap under base of FC-E-IB judged not a concern. Room Fuel Building Floor El.735 RPaul c. Rizz. Associates, Inc.ENGI NE ERS & CONSl,]LTA.\1SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet 172 of 191 Status: @N Bldg.FULB File Name: l-69-3-4-60 jpeg

Description:

Fire extinguisher in areaFile Name: l-70-3-4-60 jpeg

Description:

Temperature gage near HVAC supports judged acceptable U Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.E N-GINEERS {i( CON$ULTA"\TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Sheet 173 of I9l U RoomFloor El.Fuel Building 735 File Name: l-72-3-4-60jpeg

== Description:== Scaffold in area is adequately braced. PCe Paul C. Rizz* Assqrciates, lnc.IiN(;l Nt [.RS {i, CO:"\SL: [, FA-NISArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Sheet 174 ot Status:@Bldg.FULBFife Name: l-74-3-4-60 jpegDescription: Posts located near component. Judged not a significant seismic concern. File Name : l-7 5-3-4-60jpeg

== Description:== Thread engagement at heat exchanger FC-E-18nozzle is judged acceptable. U N Fuel Building 735 Sheet 175 of l9l Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS &. COT{SULTA}lTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @N Bldg.FULBFile Name: l-7 6-34-60jpeg

== Description:==

Cart, ladder, and fire pipe, all secured, judged a non issue. File Name: l-77 4-60jpegDescription: View of space heater in the area. U RoomFloor El.Fuel Building 735 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Sheet 176 of l9l U RoomFloor El.Fuel Building 73s Bldg.FULB File Name: I 3-4-60jpeg

== Description:==

Lighting transfonner and lighting panel are judged to be outside of potential spray hazard zone of the space heater Sheet 177 of I9l Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.fiNCt NEERS & CONSI:L]'AliTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@RoomFloor El.768 Bldg.AXLBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in degraded conditions?the area appear to be free of significant3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limitsf

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Block wall AB4-2, and AB4-3 sre adequate by re.ference DSC-0055, and DSC-0056, respectively.

These calculations are part of a /bllow-up seismic analysis in support of IE80-I I calculations. Related equipment on SWEL for this area: CH-BL-2 Aux bldg768 Y N/A Y Y Y X X X X BC? Paul c. Rizz. Ass.ciates, [nc.Aux bldg768 BIi(TINEERS & CONSUUTA_\.TI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Bldg.AXLB Interaction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? Water heater in area is not secured and may tip and spill. Spill from water heater is minor and is not considered a significant risk.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fre in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Fire extinguisher in area unsecured, considered not significant. Gas bottles in the area ore secured with only one chain at top and are judged acceptable as they do notcause any interaction concerns.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra 768 Date: ' iii:";1r Date: Adam L. Helffrich Sheet r78 of 191 N/A N/A 9tz8t20r2 9t28t20r2 X X X X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc, tstr*G INE ERS {i CO N Stj LTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 179 of l9l U RoomFloor El.Aux blde768 768 Bldg.AXLB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: l-59-4-4-60jpeg

== Description:==

General File Name: l-60-4-4-60jpeg

== Description:==

Fire pipe looks secured judged a non issue Sheet 180 of 19l Paul C. Rizzo Associatee, Inc.EITlGINEERS & COtrlS[.!f,TAIITS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Bldg.AXLB File Name: l-65-44-60jpeg

== Description:==

Unsecured poles, not healy significant File Name: l-66-44-60jpeg

== Description:== Fire extinguisher in area and chained gas bottle judgednot to be interaction concerns U N RoomFloor El.Aux blde768 768 RoomFloor El.RPaul c. Rizz. Associates, Inc.ENGINE ERS &. CONSULTA-\TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Aux bldg768 Sheet l8l of 191 Status:@U N Bldg.AXLB File Name: l-67 4-60jpeg

== Description:==

Block wall in area File Name: I 4-4-60 jpeg

Description:

Unsecured water heater may fall and flood PCe Paut C. Rizzo Ass*ciates, [nc.F]\T;INEERS & CONSLILTA"\TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) RoomFloor El.West Cable Vault - SE Corner 735 SFGB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the arca appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable Tray above MCC-EI I is rod hung with minimal lateral support. Expected swing of about 2 .5 inches is /ess than the available gap of 3 .5 inches and therefore iudged acceptable.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area: IFW-PNL-lOOB of 191 Status:@Bldg.X N Y N N Y N Y X X X pct? Paul c. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EI-(;INEERS & CONSLi ljI't\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.West Cable Vault - SE Corner 735 SFGB Interaction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?All piping are well supported in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No ignition sources.found in this area.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?Ladder poorly secured at ladder station 34. Fire extinguishers in area are unsecured.These potential interactions are judged not credible.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Date: Eddie M. Guerra Date: Adam L. Helffrichof 191 Bldg.N Y N Y N Y Status:@9t28t2012 N Y;=&#1i;,! 9t28t2012 X X X X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. CONSULTA}ETS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 184 of l9l U Room Floor El.735West Cable Vault - SE Corner Bldg.SFGBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: I l 60jpeg

== Description:==

GeneralFile Name: 1-60-l 60 jpeg

Description:

General 2 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS {K CONSULTANTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 185 of 191 U RoomFloor El.West Cable Vault - SE Corner 735 Bldg.SFGB File Name: l-65-l-4-60jpeg

== Description:==

Poorly secured ladder at ladder station34 File Name: l-66-l 60jpeg

Description:

Fire extinguisher unsecured in area Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. EN'GINE ERS & CONTTULTANTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room West Cable Vault - SE CornerFloor El.73s Status: @Bldg.SFGB File Name: l-67 -l-4-60jpeg

== Description:== Cable tray is rod hung with minimal lateral support. File Name: I I 60 jpeg

Description:

MCC-EI I and nearby cable tray Sheet 186 of 191 U Paul C. Rizzo Associatesn Lnc.E\rcINEERS Si CONSLILTANTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Status:@Sheet 187 of 191 U Room Floor El.West Cable Vault - SE Corner 735 Bldg.SFGB File Name: l-69-l 60jpeg

Description:

MCC-EI I and nearby cable tray PC? Paul c. Rizzo Associates, [nc' E}i(;INEERS S. CONSULTA}iTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Relav RoomFloor El. 713 Sheet 188 of 191 Status: @ N UBldg. AXLBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area: PNL-AC1-BUS-IE YNUN/A X YNUN/A X YNUNiA X YNUN/A X PC?Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Relav RoomFloor El. 713 Bldg.AXLB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is interactions that could cause a free of potentially adverse seismic fire in the area? Y Status:@9128t2012 Sheet 189 of 191 N/A N/A Y Y 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Eddie M. GuerraAdam L. Helffrich Y Date: Date: 9t28t2012 X X X X Sheet 190 of l9l Paul C. Rizzo Associatesn Inc. S I$GINE ERS ili CONST:LTAJ{TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@U N RoomFloor El.Relay Room 7t3 Bldg.AXLBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: I 5-4-60 jpeg

Description:

General I File Name: I 5-4-60 jpeg

Description:

General 2 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.F]NGI NE ERS & (]ON5L:LTfu\'TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Sheet l9l of 191 U RoomFloor El.Relay Room 713 Bldg.AXLB File Name: I 5-4-60 jpeg

Description:

Fire extinguisher File Name: I 5-4-60 jpeg

Description:

Fire extinguisher APPENDIX D COMPONENT LIST FOR ANCHORAGE CONFIGURATION CHECKComponent ID References lCC-E-1A Drawings RV-0076A and RV-00768 1EE-EG-1Calculatton 52233-C-01 8, page 4l 11 IEE-EG-2 Calculatron 52233-C-0 I 8, page 4l 17 lVS-F-55A Vibration Eliminator Calculation for Models 55A-B BAT-1-1 Drawing 8700- 1.24-1E and Calculatton 52233-C-01 6 BAT-1-2 Drawins 8700- l .24-1 E and Calculatron 52233-C-0 1 6 BAT-CHG-1-1Calculation DSC-6698 CH-P-ICCalculations CH-P- lC and 52233-C-007 CH-TK-1ACalculati on 52233 -C-03 1 DC-SWBDI-1C alculat ion 52233 -C -0I 4 DC-SWBDI-2Calculation 52233 -C-0 1 4 DC-SWBDI-3C alculat ion 52233 -C -0I 4 DC-SWBDI-4C alculat ron 52233 -C-Ol 4 EE-P-1AC alculat ron 52233 - C-007 EE-TK-2ADrawins RS-001 FW-P-2 Drawing 08700-02.040-0005, Rev. E.FW-P-3A Drawing 02.040-00118Drawing 8700-RC-2IMCalculat ion 52233 -C -007 INV-VITBUSl-1Drawing RE-0038DCalculat ton 52233 -C -0 17 INV-VITBUSl-3 Drawing RE-0038DC alculat ron 52233 -C-0 17 INV-VITBUSl-4Drawing RE-0038DC alculat ion 52233 -C -0I7 MCC-1-E1C alculat ion 52233 - C -00 1 MCC-I-EIzC alculat ion 52233 - C -00 I MCC-1-E13C al culat ion 52233 - C -002 MCC-I-E6C alculat ion 52233 - C -00 I MCC-I-E7C alculat ion 52233 - C -00 I MCC-I-E8C alculatton 52233 -C-00 I PNL-1MS-101APNL-lMS-101A SEWS PNL-1MS-101BPNL-lMS-1018 SEWS PNL-DCI-3 Calculation PNL-DC1-3Calculatron 52233 -C-0 1 5 Component ID References PNL-DGEA-1 PNL-DGEA.I SEWSC alc u lat ion 52233 -C -022 PNL-DIGEN-1PNL-DIGEN.I SEWSC alculat ron 52233 -C -025 PNL-DIGEN-2PNL.DIGEN.2 SEWS C al cul at ion 5 2233 - C-025 REAC-TR-SWGR-1AC alculat ion 52233 -C-003 RK-AUX-RPTST-ARK-AUX-RPTST-A SEWSC alcul at ron 52233 -C -023 RK-NUC-INS-1C alculat ion 52233 -C -023 TRANS-1-8N1C alculat ion 52233 -C -006 VS-F-578C alculation 52233 -C-0 1 0 WR-P-1ADrawing 2C-5011C alculat ton 52233 - C-008 WR-P-IBDrawing 2C-501IC alculat ron 52233 - C-00 8 APPENDIX E MASONRY BLOCKWALLS VERIFIED UNDER IE BULLETIN 80.1-1-Elevation Building Wall Seismically Analvzed Reference 713',-6" SERVICE BUILDING sBl-10 Yes Calculation DSC-0089 1sB 1-1 I Yes Calculation DSC-0090 sBl-12 Yes Calculation DSC-0091 sBl-13 Yes Calculation DSC-0092 sBl-14 Yes Calculation DSC-0089 2 sB1-15 Yes Calculation DSC-0093 SBI-1 Yes Calculation DSC-0080SB 1-2 Yes Calculation DSC-0081 SB 1-3 Yes Calculation DSC-0082 SB 1-4 Yes Calculation DSC-0083SB 1-5 Yes Calculation DSC-0084SB 1-6 Yes Calculation DSC-0085SB 1-7 YesCalculation DSC-0086 SB 1-8 Yes Calculation DSC-0087 SB 1-9 Yes Calculation DSC-0088 722',-6" AUX.BUILDING ABI-1 YesCalculation DSC-0001 ABI-3 YesCalculation DSC-0002AB 1-4 YesCalculation DSC-0003 AB1-5 YesCalculation DSC-0004 ABI-6 Yes Calculation DSC-0005 ABI-7 Yes Calculation DSC-0006 ABI-8 Yes Calculation DSC-0007AB 1-9 Yes Calculation DSC-0008 AB 1-10 Yes Calculation DSC-0009 AB1-11 Yes Calculation DSC-0010 AB 1-12 Yes Calculation DSC-0011AB 1-13 YesCalculation DSC-0012AB 1-14 Yes Calculation DSC-0013 AB1-15 YesCalculation DSC-0014AB 1-16 YesCalculation DSC-0015AB 1-17 Yes Calculation DSC-0016AB 1-18 YesCalculation DSC-0017 AB I -19 Yes Calculation DSC-0018AB 1-20 Yes Calculation DSC-0019AB 1-21 Yes Calculation DSC-1-21 ABt-22 Yes Calculation DSC-0021 ElevationBuildingWall Seismically Analvzed Reference ABt-23 Yes Calculation DSC-0022 ABl-24 Yes Calculation DSC-0023AB 1-25No Wall N/A ABr-26 Yes Calculation DSC-0024 ABl-27 Yes Calculation DSC-0025AB 1-28 Yes Calculation DSC-0026AB I -29 Yes Calculation DSC-0027AB 1-30 Yes Calculation DSC-0028AB I -31 Yes Calculation DSC-0029 ABl-32 Yes Calculation DSC-0030 AB 1-33 Yes Calculation DSC-0031AB I -34 Yes Calculation DSC-0032 CABLE VAULT CVI-1 Yes Calculation DSC-0069 cvl-2 Yes Calculation DSC-0070 CV1-3 Yes Calculation DSC-0071 cvl-4 Yes Calculation DSC-0072 CVl-5 Yes Calculation DSC-0073 CVl-6 Yes Calculation DSC-0074 CVl -7 Yes Calculation DSC-0075 725',-6" SERVICE BUILDING SB2-1 Yes Calculation DSC-0094'135',-6" AUX.BUILDING AB2-1 Yes Calculation DSC-0035 AB2-2A Yes Calculation DSC-0036 AB2-28 Yes Calculation DSC-0037 AB2-3 Yes Calculation DSC-0038 AB2-4 Yes Calculation DSC-0039 AB2-5 Yes Calculation DSC-0040 AB2-6 Yes Calculation DSC-0041 AB2-1 Yes Calculation DSC-0042 AB2-8 Yes Calculation DSC-0043 FUEL BUILDING FBI-1 Yes Calculation DSC-0078FB 1-2 Yes Calculation DSC-0079 SERVICE BUILDING SB3-1 Yes Calculation DSC-0095 1sB3- I 0 Yes Calculation DSC-O104 sB3-11 Yes Calculation DSC-0105sB3- 12 Yes Calculation DSC-0106 sB3-13 Yes Calculation DSC-0107 SB3-2 Yes Calculation DSC-0096 SB3-3 Yes Calculation DSC-0097 Elevation Building Wall Seismically Analyzed Reference SB3-4 Yes Calculation DSC-0098 SB3-5 Yes Calculation DSC-0099 1 SB3-6 Yes Calculation DSC-0100 SB3-7 Yes Calculation DSC-0101 SB3-8 Yes Calculation DSC-0102 SB3-9 Yes Calculation DSC-0103 CABLE VAULT cv2-l Yes Calculation DSC-0076 cv2-2 Yes Calculation DSC-0077 743',-6" AUX.BUILDINGAB 1 -35 Yes Calculation DSC-0033 AB I -36 Yes Calculation DSC-00347 52'-6" AUX.BUILDING AB3-I Yes Calculation DSC-0044 AB3-10 Yes Calculation DSC-0053 AB3-11 Yes Calculation DSC-00532 AB3-2 Yes Calculation DSC-0045 AB3-3 Yes Calculation DSC-0046 AB3-4 Yes Calculation DSC-0047 AB3-5 Yes Calculation DSC-0048 AB3-6 Yes Calculation DSC-0049 AB3-7 Yes Calculation DSC-0050 AB3-8 Yes Calculation DSC-0051 AB3-9 Yes Calculation DSC-0052'168',-7" AUX.BUILDING AB4-1 Yes Calculation DSC-0054 AB4-10 Yes Calculation DSC-0063 AB4-11 Yes Calculation DSC-0064 AB4-12 Yes Calculation DSC-0065 AB4-13 Yes Calculation DSC-0066 AB4-14 Yes Calculation DSC-0067 AB4-15 Yes Calculation DSC-0068 AB4-2 Yes Calculation DSC-0055 AB4-3 Yes Calculation DSC-0056 AB4-4 Yes Calculation DSC-0057 AB4-5 Yes Calculation DSC-0058 AB4-6 Yes Calculation DSC-0059 AB4-]Yes Calculation DSC-0060 AB4-8 Yes Calculation DSC-0061 AB4-9 Yes Calculation DSC-0062}}