ML13135A245

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Report, Appendix B - Seismic Walkdown Checklists (Swcs), Sheet 202 of 379 Through Sheet 379 of 379
ML13135A245
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 08/10/2012
From: Beigi F, Guerra E, Helffrich A, Lucarelli B, Reddington J, Wakefield D
ABS Consulting
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
Shared Package
ML131350549 List:
References
L-13-118, TAC MF0092, TAC MF0093, TAC MF0116, TAC MF0159
Download: ML13135A245 (178)


Text

pcle Paul c. Rizzo Assoc-iates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. HIS 7528Equipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg.

AUXBSheet 202 of 379 Status:@N UEquip. Class

20. Instrument and Control Panels SFAS CHANNEL 1 BLOCK SW inside PNL C5705 Ffoor El. 623 Room 505Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Inside Panel C5705, which has similar anchorage to Panel C5702.Back panel doors are adequately attached to panel structure with4-l/2" screws.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?None observed.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?None observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?None observed.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X X X X X PCe PaulC. Rizzo Assoc.iates, lnc.ENCINEERS & CONSUXTAI\\ITS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. HIS 7528 Equipment Description Sheet 203 of 379 Status:f)N UEquip. ClassSFAS CHANNEL I20. Instrument and Control Panels BLOCK SW inside PNL C5705 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?NiA X X X XOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv:Eddie M. Guerra 712512012.'- i',/', //91"'4'7t25/2012Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 204 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.E\GINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Statusff)N UEquipment ID No.

hp2bEquipment DescriptionEquip. Class MOTOR OPERATED8A. Motor-Operated Valves VALVE HP-2BLocation: Bldg.

AUXBManufacturer, Model, Etc.Floor El.565 Room 236Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50%o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Vafue is horizontally mounted on the pipe. There is an anchor right below the valve.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

MOVfoundwith good surfacefinish and no signs of conosion.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A X X X X X X Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.E:r-CIN EERS & CONSULIANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. hp2bEquip. Class MOTOR OPERATED 8A. Motor-Operated Equipment DescriptionVALVE HP-28 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

No potential interaction hazards identifiedfrom nearby equipment.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the area verified as walls 2337 and 2347.

Blockwall hazard identified as Non-Credible.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Flexible lines inspected and found with adequate flexibility.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X X X 205of 379Status*)N u Valves N/A 7/25/2012 7/2s/20r2 X Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Pipe enters containment penetration P-20from Aux. Building.

The pipe is judged adequatefor Seismic Anchor Motion loads CI5' offlex. Length)Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra I/,.1i/{klfri Adam L. Helffiich Sheet 206 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSUUTANTTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Status(f,N u Equipment ID No. hp2b Equipment Description Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves MOTOR OPERATED VALVE HP-2BHP2B PlateID Plate of component HP2B GeneralGeneral view of component Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

PCe!"tl C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.nx Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. hp2c Equip. Class Equipment Description MOTOR OPERATED Sheet 207 of379 Statusfi)N U 8A. Motor-Operated Valves VALVE HP.zC Location:

Bldg. AUXB Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Floor El.s65 Room 208 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL' The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Pipe is adequately supported at -24" on either side of the varve.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A X X X X X X PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENGINEERS d. CONSUI-TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. hp2c Equip. Class Equipment Description MOTOR OPERATED Sheet8A. Motor-Operated Valves VALVE HP-2C Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached lines were found with adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X XOther Adverse ConditionsI l Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?208 of 379StatusON U 7/25/2012 X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffiich Sheet 209 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS 6( CONSUTTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. hp2c Equipment Description Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves StatusG)N u MOTOR OPERATED VALVE HP-2C Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): HP}C General General view of component PCe PaulC. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENCINEERS S. CONSULTANTS Sheet 210 of 379 StatusON U Seismic Walkdown Checktist (SWC)Equipment ID No. HV5314 Equip. Class 0. Other Equipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg.

AUXB MOTOR-OPERATED DAMPER HV 5314 Ffoor El. 623 Room 515 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?HSS 6x6 rack anchored tofloor andwallfound in adequate condition.

Damper qttached to rackwithfour I/2" diameter bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?N/A3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that oxidation?is more than mild surface4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

NiA X X X X X X Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTA}TTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment tD No. HV5314 Equip. Class 0. OtherEquipment Description MOTOR-OPERATED DAMPER HV 5314 Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Flexible lines attached to componentfound in good condition.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?of 379status(?)N u N/A N/A 7/25/2012 7/2512012 X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffrich i'1fi itlu/. t;,

Sheet 212 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGTNEERS &. CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. HV5314 Equip. Class 0. OtherEquipment Description MOTOR-OPERATED DAMPER HV 5314Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Status@N U HV53l4 PlateID Plate of component HV5314 General General view of component Sheet 213 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. HV5314 Equip. Class 0. OtherEquipment DescriptionMOTOR-OPERATED DAMPER HV 5314 HV53 l4 anchorageView of anchorage Status(?)N u

PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENGINEERS & CT}NSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist Equipment ID No. 14-636Equipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg.

AUXBSheet 214 of 319 Statusf)N U (swc)Equip. ClassIA PCV FOR MU66A

7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Floor El.565 Room 208 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Small solenoid valve on strut channel. which is attached to concrete wall.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than oxidation?

surface4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X X X X X PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENCINEERS d( CONSU LTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.14-636 Equip. ClassEquipment Description IA PCV FOR MU66A Sheet 7. Pneumatic-OperatedInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached lines were found with adequate Jlexibility.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X 215of 379 Statusf)N u Valves N/A Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv: Eddie M. Guerra I.. / /.); ./it{'/:".r7/

./':/,/. l' , ,/, "!i.'. t' ..,/ / 't-'././/,/J-' r'y;,Z ;',?'Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 216 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)StatusON UEquipment ID No. 1,4-636Equipment Description Equip. ClassIA PCV FOR MU66A

7. Pneumatic-Operated ValvesOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):14-636 Plate and GeneralGeneral view of component Sheet 217 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENCINEERS S( CONSUTTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. ICSI IA Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Status(T) N u Equipment Description Location:

Blde. AUXBICSI IA Atmosphere vent valveFloor El.643 Room 602 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Top and bottom of valvefound to be restrained. No degraded conditionfound.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchoraqe free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%

forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X X X X X PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENGINEERS S. CGNSLII]TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. ICSI IA Equipment Description Sheet Equip.Class T.Pneumatic-OperatedICSI lA Atmosphere vent valve Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Flexible lines found with adequate flexibility.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

2r8of 379StatusFN U Valves N/A N/A 7t25/2012 7/25/2012 X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv: Eddie M. Guerra.',. / ,' ,' ,// '""',r/,t',r 4,/ lr/, x/,i'i!//Adam L. Helffrich Date:

Sheet 219 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. ICSI lA Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated ValvesEquipment DescriptionICSI lA Atmosphere vent valveOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):ICSI lA Plate ID Plate of component Status(flN U General view of component Sheet 220 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSI-}LTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlDNo. ICSIIA Equip.Class T.Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment DescriptionICSI lA Atmosphere vent valve ICSI lA brace2 Brace support for component ICSI lA brace Brace support for component Status@N U Sheet 221 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.E*"CINEERS & CONSti L:TANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment lD No. ICSI lA Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment DescriptionICSI lA Atmosphere vent valveICSI lA anchorView of anchorage Status@N U Sheet 222 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EN(} INEERS & CONSUL:TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. K5-lEquip. Class Diesel Generator Status$N U17. Engine Generators Equipment Description Location:

Bldg. AUXBFloor El.

585 Room 318 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Equipment found to be stitch welded to base.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%

for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage detail found to be consistent with the presented in SQ(IG calc C-CSS-K5-1.

I6 - I I/4" cast-in place bolts spaced around 5ft each.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X X X X X PCe Paul c. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENGINEERS S. CONSUI.TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. K5-lEquip. Class Generator Equipment Description Diesel Sheetl 7. Engine Generators Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the areaverffied.

Associated block walls identffied as: 308D, 309D, 3 l0D, 3l I D, 338D See Appendix C from report for references. Identified as seismically adequate.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X 223 of 379 status(V)N u N/A Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv: Eddie M. Guerra 1.; /, /, ) ,, ,'i)l)t,.1lr/

i2", r/2 i'r,"/'Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 224 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENCINEERS & C(}NSULTANTTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. K5-2 Equip. Class 17. Engine Generatorssffiu#T) N uEquipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg.

AUXB Diesel Generator Floor El.585 Room 319Manufacturer. Model.

Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Equipment found to be stitch welded to base.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage detail found to be consistent with the presented in SQUG calcC-CSS-K5-2. I6 - I I/4" cast-in place bolts spaced around Sft each.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y Y Y Y Y Y X X X X X X Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS &

CONSUITANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. K5-2Equip. Class Diesel Generator 17. Engine Generators Equipment DescriptionInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?Seismic capacity of blockwqlls in the areaverified.Blockwall 304D verified to be to be seismically adequatebased on ref. VBWl2-8001-064, Rev 8 (8/26/87)9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X XOther Adverse ConditionsI 1. Have you looked for and adverselv affect the safetv found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

225of 379 Status(?)N u 7125/2012 7t2sl20r2 X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. GuerraAdam L. Helffrich Sheet 226 of 379 Paul C. Ri zz,o Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSUI TA,-\TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)StatusftN U Equipment Equipment ID No. K5-2 DescriptionEquip. Class Diesel Generator 17 . Engine GeneratorsOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): K5-2 plate ID Plate of component K5-2 generalGeneral view of component H ry{ g:Jlirit:

Ar,r,tcl.lte1-!:u, IN(;lNEI t{S .\ ('( 1rr"51 'l'l,\.\*'I SSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment Equipment ID No. K5-2 Description Sheet 227 of 379 Status N U Equip. C lassDiesel Generator17 . Engine Generators

  1. K5-2 anchor bolt Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all PCe Paul C.-Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENGINEERS & C{}NSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.

L3l1Equipment Description Sheet 228 of 379 Status@N UEquip. Class LOGIC CHANNEL I 20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinet MODULE L3I 1 Location:

Bldg.AUXBFloor El.

623 Room 502Manufacturer. Model.

Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inside of panel C5762C. While anchorage of the panel is external to the panel, theyare covered by a trip protection covering that could not be removed.Anchorage condition bosed on SQUG calc C-CSS-C5762C.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?C-CSS-C5762C calculations indicate that MOD?5-0032 resolves anchorage concerns and cabinet bolting issues. It was verffied that the adjacent panels are connected at the top.A nc h or age ade q uacy de e me d s e i s mi c al ly ade q uat e.Based on good condition of panel and SQUG SEWS, anchorage is judged to be in adequate condition.

NiA X X X X X X PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EN(}]NEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. L3l I Equip. ClassEquipment Description LOGIC CHANNEL I Sheet 229 of 379 Status$N U20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinetMODULE L31I Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?N Y U N Y N Y U N Y N/A NiA U NiA X X X XOther Adverse Conditions1 l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?

U N X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:-H,l,M^*1-i4hA'4i/Eddie M. Guera Date: 7/25/2012 Date: 7125/2012.- //-../r#/Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 230 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUUTAI{TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Status(?)N u Equipment ID No. L31 IEquipment Description Equip. Class 20a.Inst. in control panel/cabinetLOGIC CHANNEL I MODULEL3IIOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):L3l IGeneral view of component Sheet 231 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. L3l I Equip. Class LOGIC CHANNEL I Equipment Description 20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinet Status(?)N u MODULE L3I I L31l-5ll cabinetGeneral View of Cabinet housing components L3 I I -5 I I cabinets bolted together inbetweenCabinets are bolted together in the middle Sheet 232 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)StatusON UEquipment ID No. L3 I IEquipment Description Equip. Class LOGIC CHANNEL20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinetI MODULE L3 I IL3 I l-51I cabinets welded together on left Cabinets are welded together on the left sideL3 I I -51 I cabinets welded together on right Cabinets are welded together on the right side of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.EI.C IN EERS &

CONSUITANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. L51l Equip. ClassLOGIC CHANNEL I20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinet Status$N UEquipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg.

AUXB MODULE L51 IFloor El.623 Room 502Manufacturer. Model.

Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inside of panel C5762C. While anchorage of the panel is external to the panel, theyare covered by a trip protection covering that could not be removed. Anchorage conditionbased on SQUG calc C-CSS-C5762C.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-CSS-C5762C calculations indicate that MOD95-0032 resolves anchorage concerns and cabinet bolting issues. It was verified that the adjacent panels are connected at the top.

A n c h or age ade q uacy dee me d s e i s mi c al ly ade q u at e.Based on good condition of panel and SQUG SEWS, anchorage is judged to be in adequate condition.

N U N Y U N U N Y U N Y U N Y X X X X X X Sheet 234 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSUTTANTS Status(?)N u Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.

L5l I Equip. ClassEquipment Description LOGIC CHANNEL I 20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinetMODULE L5I IInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?N/A X X X XOther Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv:Eddie M. Guera Adam L. Helffrich 7/25/2012/.., ,, /'

/. I '/: '/tf* : :r/ i! /, //, i'/,"/'/7/25t2012 Sheet 235 of 379 Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

L5ll Equip.Class 20a.Inst.incontrolpanel/cabinetEquipment DescriptionLOGIC CHANNEL I MODULE L5I I Status@N U Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): L5l IGeneral view of component Sheet 236 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. L5l I Equip. Class 20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinetEquipment Description LOGIC CHANNEL I MODULE L51IL3 I I -5 1 l cabinets bolted together inbetweenCabinets are bolted together in the middle status(?)N uL3ll-5ll cabinet General View of Cabinet housing components Sheet 237 of 379 Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS S( CONST..}LTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. L5 I I Equip. ClassEquipment Description LOGIC CHANNEL I20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinet Status@N UMODULE L5 I IL3 I I -5 I I cabinets welded together on leftCabinets are welded together on the left sideL3 1 I -5 I I cabinets welded together on rightCabinets are welded together on the right side PCe Paul c. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENC INEf, RS &, CONSUI-TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Ll-1525A Equipment Description Location:

Bldg. AUXBManufacturer, Model, Etc.Sheet 238 of 319Status:$N UEquip. Class 20. Instrument and Control PanelsBWST LEVEL INDICATOR TNSIDE PNL C5716 Floor El. 623 Room 502 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50%o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage could not be verified due to mastic covering bottom of panel.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X X X X X pce Paul C-. Rizzo-Associates, [nc.

ENCINEERS & C0NSU LTAI\rTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Ll-1525A Equipment Descriptionof 319StatusF)N u Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels BWST LEVEL INDICATOR INSIDE PNL C5716 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the area verifiedBlockwalls in room 502 found to be seismically adequate per 8A-l I documentation.Refer to Appendix C for list of walls qssociated to component.
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N Y N Y N Y N Y X X X X Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

N Y X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:-mt&Jdt Eddie M. Guerra Date: 7/25/2012Date: 712512012

'r i t ) ,,rt, //i, /'t :/ /'/. 1/2 r/,'///'Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 240 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. LI-1525A Equipment Description Status(?)N uEquip. Class 20. Instrument and Control PanelsBWST LEVEL INDICATOR INSIDE PNL C5716Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):Lll525A Plate and General Overall view of component and anchorage Sheet 241 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &

CONSUIJTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?This switch is inside panel C576lA.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YN X YN U N/A YNUN/A X YNUN/A X YNUN/A X YNU X Statusf)N uEquipment ID No. LSHHSP9B6 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) RacksEquipment Description SGI LEVEL SWITCH SP9B6 Location:

Bldg. AUXB Floor El.

623 Room 502 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.X PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. LSHHSP9B6 Equip. Class18.

Instrument (on) RacksEquipment Description SGl LEVEL SWITCH SP9B6of 379Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Adjacent panels connected at top.End panels have 3" gap and also lop connected by conduit.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X Sheet 242 Status/?\N U Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra', ,,"0' .,r./' rl', r'- r/Zt,/*, ,tdt.i.y/

tJ- t i.,,a ;'-1,tAdam L. Helffrich R P.jrulc. Rizzo Ass.ciates, Inc-,2{s I SP9B9-073 Switch View of component inside cabinet Sheet 243 of 379 EN(;INEITRS & C()NStll'IANT'SSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. LSHHSP9B6 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description SGl LEVEL SWITCH SP9B6Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): fls##t tr ft***tr il StatusflN U t t lrr I$ls{sP9B9 -073 General view of component ,4 i6 ,6 I Sheet 244 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. CONSULTAI\rTS Status(?)N uSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. LSHHSP9B6 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) RacksEquipment Description SGI LEVEL SWITCH SP9B6 SP9B9 -073 bolted at top Cabinet is bolted to adjacent cabinet at the top Sheet 245 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.

ENCINEERS & CONSULTANT SSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. LT-1402 Equip.

Class StatusON U18. Instrument (on) RacksEquipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg.

AUXBCC SRG TNK I-I SIDE I LV TRANS Floor El.623 Room 501Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Mounted on

-24" tall HSS 6x6 cantilever rack, which is anchored to the Jloor by four I/2" diameter anchor bolts.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?While spalling of grout pad on one side was observed, it was judged adequotesince the loads are very small (-<50 lbs)5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y Y Y Y Y Y X X X X X X Sheet 246 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS 6( CONSUITA)qTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. LT-1402 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) RacksEquipment Description CC SRG TNK I-I SIDE I LV TRANS status/V\N U Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Attached flexib le line s found in addeq uate c ondit i on.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X X Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Anchor spacing to adjacent rackfound acceptable by engineering judgement and small demand loads.Evaluated by: 7t2s/20r2Eddie M. Guerra ,/.t. ,n./ /r,i, ,/'1l/,u,, t7'd+1",//

F' t d!t'; i"r 712512012Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 247 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENCINE}-RS & CONSUI-TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. LT- 1402 Equip. Classl8. Instrument (on) RacksEquipment DescriptionCC SRG TNK I-I SIDE 1 LV TRANSLTI 402 PlateID Plate of componentLT I 402 General General view of component StatusFN U ing or relevant documents and Sheet 248 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEE.RS 6i CONSU I.TANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)StatusFN UEquipment ID No. LT- 1402Equipment Description CC Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks SRG TNK I-I SIDE I LV TRANS

LTI 402 anchorageView of anchorage LTI 402 Spalled Grout on AnchorGrout around base plate has crumbled away PCe Paul C. Rizzo.Associates, lnc.ENCINEERS S( CONSUTT.4,NTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. LT-2787 Equip. Class18. Instrument (on) Racks Sheet 249of 379 StatusgN UEquipment DescriptionLocation
Bldg.

AUXBEDG DAY TANK I-I LVL TRANSMITTFloor El.58sRoom 318 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Transmitter mountedwith 4-3/8" diameter bolts to awall mounted HSS 6x6. which is onchored to wall with 4-l/2" diameter anchor bolts.No degraded conditionsfoundfor the wall mounting supporting the transmitter.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorase free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N Y U N N N/A N Y N Y U NiA U N/A U N/A N Y X X X X X X Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEERS S. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. LT-2787Equip. Class 18.

lnstrument (on) Racks Equipment Description EDG DAY TANK I-I LVL TRANSMITT Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X250 of 379 status(?)N u N/A N/A Other Adverse Conditions 1l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:Eddie M. GuerraAdam L. Helffrich Sheet 251 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSI,JLTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. LT-2787 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) RacksEquipment DescriptionEDG DAY TANK I-I LVL TRANSMITT Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): LT2787 PlateID Plate of componentStatus(?)N ULT2787 General General view of component Sheet 252 of 319 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, l"nc.

ENGINEERS

& CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. MS10l Equip. Class (MSrV SGI )7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Status:ON U Equipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg.

AUXBFloor El.

643MS lOI Room 601Manufacturer, Model.

Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No degraded conditions identified.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X X X X X PCePaul c. RizzoAssociates, lnc.ENCINEERS &

CONSUI-TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. MSl0l Equip. ClassEquipment DescriptionMS IOI (MSIV SGI)Sheet Status$N U 7. Pneumatic-Operated ValvesInteraction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y X Y X Y X Y X 253of 379 N/A N/AOther Adverse Conditions 1l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra. ,,. 'r,, .,r,/' ,l. ri ./i ., ,,r, , tr'd//:,:.7/./

ti' t yj.rt :',:.Date: 7tzs/2012 Date: 7/25/2012Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 254 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGTNEERS S( CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)StatusG)N U Equipment ID No. MSl0l Equipment Description Equip. ClassMS r0l (MSrv scr)7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves documents andOther supporting or relevant photos (if any): MSlOI General view generalof component MS l0l gen eral2 General view of component Sheet 255 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.

MSl0l Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated ValvesEquipment DescriptionMS 101 (MSrV SGI)Ms l0l attachment to steam pipeValve connection to main steam line Status(?)N u

PCel"*t C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENGINEERS &

CONSULTANTSSheet 256 of 379 Status{Y)N uSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. MS5889,4 Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated ValvesEquipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg.

AUXB AOV MS 58894 Floor El. 565 Room 237 Manufacturer, Model. Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Valve on 6" pipe line with considerable weight.Pipe span -8', rigid supports on either side of valve. Valve

-2'from one end.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X X X X X PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

E**CIN EERS & CONSU TTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. MS5889A Equip. ClassEquipment Description AOV MS 5889A of 379 7. Pneumatic-OperatedInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distributionand masonry block walls not likely tosystems, ceiling tiles and lighting,collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached lines found with addequate flexibility.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X XOther Adverse ConditionsI 1. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

Sheet 251 Status:ON U Valves N/A 7/25/2012 X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:Eddie M. GuerraAdam L. Helffrich Sheet 258 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENGTNEERS & CONSULTA}ITS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Pl4-1 Equip. Class AFP/T-I Statu{3'} N u5. Horizontal PumpsEquipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg.

AUXBFloor El.565 Room 237Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Mounted on skidwith B-l I/2" anchor bolts.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Configuration consistent with documented configuration in SQUG calculation C-CSS-P I4-I 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A Y X X X X X X Sheet 259 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Pl4-l Equip. Class Equipment Description AFP/T-lStatus0N U5. Horizontal PumpsInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?N Y N Y N Y N Y N/A N/A U N/A X X X X Other Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

U N Y X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra ,'.,1't]!.

-,, / ,! i ' tl' ,'r/o., ,ldr/.,!:T/

f-t t 1'.,rt : ,.,.:,Date: 712512012Date: 712512012 Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 260 of 379 Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Pl4-l Equip. Class Status(?'\N u 5. Horiznntal Pumps Equipment Description AFP/T-IOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):P l4- I plateID Plate of componentP l4- I generalGeneral view of component Equipment Description AFP/T-I Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Pl4-l Equip. Class

5. Hori zontal Pumps P l4- I general4 General view of componentPl4-l anchorage Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors Sheet 261 of 379 Status@N U Sheet 262 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEI-RS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Pl4-2 Equip.AFP/T-2 Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Status/T)N UEquipment Description Location:

Bldg. AUXB Floor El.565 Room 238 Manufacturer, Model. Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage 1.Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Mounted on skidwith eight I l/2" anchors.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

SQUG C-C,S^S-P1 4- I and C-CSS-P I4-2 calculation (page a of I 6) identifies the configurationas 8- I l/2" bolts and it was confirmed in the field during u,alkdown inspection.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A N/A X X X X X X PCe Paul c. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Pl4-2 Equip. Class Equipment Description AFP/T.2 Sheet 263 of 379 StatusON U5. Horizontal Pumps Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No potential interaction hazards identffied in the area.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N Y N Y N Y U N Y N/A U N/A U N/A X X X XOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

U N Y X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. HelffrichDate: 712512012 Date: 712512012 Sheet 264 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Pl4-2 Equip. Class Status@N U 5. Hori znntal PumpsEquipment Description AFPIT.2Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Pl4-2 plateID Plate of component Pl4-2 general3 General view of component Sheet 265 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Pl4-2 Equip. Class

5. Horizontal PumpsEquipment Description AFPIT.2 StatusON U Pl4-2 generalGeneral view of component Pl4-2 anchoragePartial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associares, tnc.ENCINEERS & CONSU TTA}JTS Sheet 266 of 379Statu{T) N uSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. P3-2 Equip. Class 6. Vertical Pumps Equipment Description Pump P3-2 Location:

Bldg. INTK Floor El. 576 Room 52 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoragel.ls the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one ofthe 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

N o degraded condition found for anchorage.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?Slight corrosionfound on main pipe line ond on anchors due to humid environment.Judged surface corrosion and adequate.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YN X YN U N/A YNUN/A X YNUN/A X 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration verified with drowing M-04 5-00002.I2- I I/2"diam boltsfor square plate and B - I 5/8" diam boltsfor circum.

plate.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YNUN/A X YNU X X PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENC lNEt RS & CONSLILTAsNTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. P3-2Equipment DescriptionPump P3-2of 379 Equip. Class 6. Vertical PumpsInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attac hed lines found w ith adeq uate flexibility.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Sheet267 StatusON U 7t2512012 712512012 X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv:Eddie M. GuerraAdam L. Helffrich Sheet 268 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. P3-2Equip. Class 6. Vertical Pumps StatusG)N uEquipment DescriptionPump P3-2 Other supporting or relevant documents and P3-2 plate ID Plate of component P3-2 general General view of component P3-2 general2General view of component photos (if any):

Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS C( CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. P3-2Equip. Class

6. Vertical Pumps Equipment DescriptionPump P3-2 Sheet 269 of 379 Status(?\N uP3-2 anchorage Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchorsP3-2 corrosion on boltsSurface corosion on bolts judged not significant Sheet 270 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENCINEERS & CONSUI.TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Motor mounted on skid with 12. I " anchor bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Anchorage configuration verified based on SQUG calculation C-CSS-P-?

7-2 page 4 of 5.Calc shows that I2-l"diam anchor boltsfor mounting are seismically adequate.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YN X YN U N/A YNUN/A X YNUN/A X YNUN/A X YNU X Status:$N UEquipment ID No. P3728 Equip. Class 5. Horizontal PumpsEquipment Description MOTOR-DRIVEN PUMPLocation: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El. 565Room 225 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.X SheetPaul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENCINEERS &

CONSUI.TANIS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. P3728 Equip. Class 5. Horizontal PumpsEquipment DescriptionMOTOR.DRIVEN PUMP Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?Small cart nearby is not securely tied to wall, but judged not to be a potential interaction hazard.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Seismic capacity of block walls in the area verified.Blockwall 2047 verified to be to be seismically adequatebased on ref. VBW06-8001-028, Rev 4 (7/29/88)9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached lines rigidly connected to equipment. No concern idenifiedfrom potential relative movement.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X 271of 379 Status$rl U Other Adverse ConditionsI 1. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra/r,fi/"?/1./' l'/'Adam L. Helffiich Sheet 272 of 379 Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUTTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. P3728Equip. Class

5. Horiznntal PumpsEquipment Description MOTOR-DRIVEN PUMPOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): P3728 plateID Plate of component Status U P3728 general General view of component Sheet 273 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. P3728Equip. Class
5. Hori zontal Pumps Equipment Description MOTOR-DRIVEN PUMP StatusQl uP3728 anchorage Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchorsP3728 masonry wallPotential interaction hazard from masonry wall near unit Sheet 274 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. CONSI.-}LTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. P3728Equip.

Class 5. Hori znntal PumpsEquipment Description MOTOR-DRIVEN PUMP P3728 unsecured cart near unitPossible interaction with nearby cart StatustQN U

Sheet 275 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENGINEERS {i CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.

P4-l Equip. Class 0. Other Statu{RN UEquipment Description Screenrvash pumpP4-l Location:

Bldg. INTK Floor El.

585Room 50Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%oforwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YN X YN U N/A YNUN/A X YNUN/A X YNUN/A X YNU X X PCe Paul C. RizzoAssociates, lnc.ENGINEERS & CONSUI.TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. P4-lEquip. Class 0.

OtherEquipment Description Screen wash pump P4-l276 of379 Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X Sheet Status$N UOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv:Eddie M. Guena.:,:dr i'*{;{"{

/1#l:,t,1/.,,Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 271 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENGINEERS S( CONS ULTANI]SSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. P42-l Equip.

Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Status:QN UEquipment Description P42-l Pump for decay heat l-lLocation: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

545Room 105 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage l Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Mounted on skidwith I - 3/4" anchor bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration verified based on SQUG calculation C-CSS-P42-1.Page 4 of 5 shows B-3/4"dium anchors spaced at

-38".6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YN X YN U N/A YNUN/A X YNUN/A X YNUNiA X YNU X X PCe Paul c. Rizzo Associates, [nc.EN(iINEERS S( CONSULT^{-I'TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. P42-l Equip. Class Equipment Description P42-l Pump for decay Sheet5. Horizontal Pumps heat l-lInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Surounding pipingfound to be rigidly supported.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X Other Adverse ConditionsI 1. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

278of 379 Statusf)N u N/A N/A N/A 7/25/2012 X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv:Adam L. Helffrich Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUUTAIVTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. P42-l Equip. Class 5. Horizontal PumpsEquipment DescriptionP42-l Pump for decay heat I - I P42-l plateID Plate of component P42-l generalGeneral view of component Sheet 279 of 379 Status(?')N uOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

Sheet 280 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &, CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. P42-l Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment DescriptionP42-l Pump for decay heat I - I P42-l general2General view of component Status(?)N u P42-l anchorageZPartial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors PCe Paul C' Rizz-o Associates, [nc.ENGINEERS d. CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. P43-2Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment DescriptionCCW PUMP 1.2Location: Bldg.

AUXBFloor El.585 Room 328Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchoredwith 8-l" bolts on skid.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No missing parts or degraded condition identifiedfor anchorage.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50%oforwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

A nc hor age c o nfi gur ati on v e r ifi e d b as e d on dr aw ing M - 0 4 6 - 0 0 0 0 3 .Configuration consistent with 8- I " bolts.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Sheet 281 of379 StatusG)N U X X N/A N/A N/A X X X x PCe Paul c. Rizzo-Associates, [nc'ENCINEERS & CONSUITAI{TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. P43-2 Equipment DescriptionCCW PUMP I.2 SheetEquip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Nozzles rigidly supported.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X 282of 379 StatusFN U Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. GueraAdam L. Helffrich Sheet 283of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. P43-2 Equip. Class 5. Horiznntal Pumps Status(flN U Equipment Description CCW PUMP I-2 P43-2 plateID Plate of component P43-2 generalGeneral view of component Sheet 284 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS 6i CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. P43-2 Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps statusG)N uEquipment Description CCW PUMP I-2 P43-2 anchorage Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors Sheet 285 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & C()NSL'LTANTs^

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. P58-1 Equip. ClassHPI PUMP I-I StatusG)N u5. Horizontal PumpsEquipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El. 545 Room 105Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Mounted on skidwith I - I" anchor bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No missing parts or degraded condition identifiedfor anchoroge.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No cracks identified on mounting grout.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchoroge configurationv erified with drawing M-5 I 8-0002 3.Mounting skid anchoredwith I - l" diam. Bolts.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X X X X X pCe Paul C. Rizzo-.4"ssociates, [nc.

ENCINEERS {i CONSI,'TTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. P58-1Equip.

ClassHPI PUMP I-IEquipment Description5. Horizontal Pumps Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X Sheet286 of 379 statusfi)N u Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: Date: Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 287 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Status(?)N u Equipment ID No. P58-l Equipment Description Equip. ClassHPI PUMP I-I5. Horizontal PumpsOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): P5 8- I plateID Plate of componentP5 8- I general General view of component Sheet 288 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS

& CONSULTAIYI'S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)StatusGJN u Equipment ID No. P58-lEquipment Description Equip. ClassHPI PUMP I-I

5. Horizontal Pumps P58- l general}General view of componentP5 8- I anchoragePartial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors PCle Paul c. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENGINEERS 6{ CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. PS3689DEquip. Class 18.

lnstrument (on) RacksEquipment Description PRESSURE SWITCH PS3689DLocation: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El. 623 Room 501Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel.Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Supported onwall-mounted rack. No degraded condition identified.

Racks anchoredwith 8-I/2" bolts.Pressure switch is attached to the rackwith 4-l/2" diameter bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Sheet 289 of 379Statufr) N u X X X.X X X SheetPaul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENCINEERS & CONSUTTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. PS3689DEquipment Description Equip. Class 18.

Instrument (on)PRESSURE SWITCH PS3689DInteraction Effects 7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached line is Jlexible.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X Other Adverse ConditionsI 1 Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

290 of 379 Status(?)N u Racks N/A N/A N/A 7l2s/2012 7/2512012 X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv: Eddie M. Guerra ,'/.,t'/ .o./ li-./l,in,:tl4.i.T,/

F' t 1!.tt :);t Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 291 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGTNEERS & CONSU UTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. PS3689DEquip. Class

18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment DescriptionPRESSURE SWITCH PS3689DOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): PS3689 plateID Plate of component Status(?\N u PS3689 general General view of component Sheet 292 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)StatusG\N uEquipment ID No. PS3689D Equipment DescriptionEquip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks PRESSURE SWITCH PS3689DPS3689 anchorage typicalPartial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors Sheet 293 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.E*- CINEERS & CONSULTA)*]TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. PSL l06CEquip. Class
18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description PRESS SWITCH LOW FOR AFP TURB I-1 INLET status@N U Location:

Bldg. AUXB Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Floor El. 565 Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50Vo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Switch mounted on 6x6 tube section with 4-l/2" diameter bolts2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Room 237 N/A NiA X X X X X X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EI{GINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. PSL 106C Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description PRESS SWITCH LOW FOR AFP TURB I-I INLET Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y X Y X Y X Y X Sheet 294of 379 status(?)N u Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv: Eddie M. Guerra'.,r' .. /' ,tl'r" . /r' ,'rr.t iE:ti// t , /t'i'//!t/

Date: 7/2512012 Date: 7/2512012 Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 295 of 379ENGINEERS &.

CONSI-}I.;TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Equip. Class

18. Instrument (on) Racks PRESS SWITCH LOW FOR AFP TURB 1-I TNLET StatusG)N u Equipment ID No. PSL 106C Equipment Description Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): i*.s.##{PSLI06C Plate and General Overall view of component and anchorage PSLI06C General General view of comPonent Sheet 296 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.EN{}INELRS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. PSL4928A Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks StatusQN U Equipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg. AUXBPRESS SWITCH PS 49284Floor El.565 Room 237Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Switch is mounted on a cantileveredfloor mountedrackwhich is anchoredwith 4-l/2" diameter anchors.Switch is connected to the strut member, which is welded to the rack by 4-l/2" diameter channel nuts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N Y X X X X X X of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. PSL4928AEquip. Class

18. Instrument (on)Equipment Description PRESS SWITCH PS 4928AInteraction Effects 7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X X XOther Adverse Conditions 1l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Anchor spacing to adjacent floor mounted rack is judged adequate.Sheet 297 StatusON U Racks 7t25t2012 7/25/2012 X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra t't 4rt' 'i 1Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 298 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. CONSI-}LTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. PSL4928AEquip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment DescriptionPRESS SWITCH PS 49284PSL 4928A plateID Plate of componentPSL4928A GeneralGeneral view of component Status(?\N u

Sheet 299 of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &

CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. PSL4928AEquip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment DescriptionPRESS SWITCH PS 49284PSL 4gzS{anchorageView of anchorage StatusG)N u PSL 4928A Anchor Spacing to Adjacent Rack Sheet 300 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENGINEERS & CONSUI,TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment tD No. RC370l Equip. Class 20. lnstrument and Control Panels Status@N UEquipment DescriptionRelav Cabinet in Mechanical Penetration Room 4 Location:

Bldg. AUXBFloor El.

585 Room 314Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50%o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Mounted on short steel brace stand anchoredwith 4-l/2" bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50Yo forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Anchor age c onfiguration consistent w ith SQU G calculation C-CSS- RC 3 7 0 I .4 angle-section legs anchroredwith 4-I/2" bolts.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

NiA N/A N/A X X X X X X SheetPaul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.E\GINEERS & CON SU LT.{,NNTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RC3701 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment DescriptionRelav Cabinet in Mechanical Penetration Room 4Interaction Effects 7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

No potential interaction hazards identffied in the area.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached top conduits provide lateral restraint to cabinet.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X X X 301of 379 Status/?)N U Other Adverse Conditions I 1. Have you looked for and adverselv affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guera.:.. i' i ) ,./t '/',r!?:1,// -l' /r'7/2 i't'if'Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 302 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RC370l Equip. Class 20. lnstrument and Control Panels Status@N U Equipment DescriptionRelay Cabinet in Mechanical Penetration Room 4Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): RC370l plateID Plate of component RC370l general General view of component of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSUUTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RC370l Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment DescriptionRelay Cabinet in Mechanical Penetration Room 4RC370l ConduitsConduits Going into Cabinet Sheet 303 Status(flN U

Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEERS & CONSU I_TAI\TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment tD No.

SFl1 Equip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valve Statu{'hN uEquipment Description Location:

Bldg. AUXBBWST Supply Line to SFP Pumps Floor El.586'Room 304 Manufacturer" Model. Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring suchNo degraded condition identified.

required (i.e., is the item one verification)?

N Y N Y N Y N N2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than oxidation?Valvefound in good condition.

No signs of corrosingmild surface identified in main line.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%

forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N Y X X X X X X PCe Paul c. Rizzo-Associates, [nc.ENGINEERS .S( CONSUI-TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SFI IEquip. Class BWST Supply Line to Equipment Description Sheet 305 of 379 Statusff)N U 0d. Other - check valve or manual valve SFP Pumps Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse ceiling tiles and lighting, onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X Other Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:

/ :--/a -'t-ft't\4j-,1 712512012Eddie M. Guerra':l i i : l' /,'$**!/ b" {it'/"?'/7t2512012Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 306 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUI.JTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SFI IEquip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valve Equipment Description BWST Supply Line to SFP PumpsOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Status(?')N u SFI I component IDID Plate of component SFI I general view General view of component Sheet 307 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENCINEERS 6{ CONSUI-T"A.NTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Status:ON U Equipment ID No. SFl6164'Equipment DescriptionEquip. Class SFP Cleanup System0d. Other - check valve or manual valveFE 1616 KI Source Location:

Bldg. AUXBManufacturer, Model, Etc.

Floor El.570'3" Room 122Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Small hand value on -l " diameter pipe.Pipe rigidly supported to wall within

-10" of valve.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Wall mounted supports found in adequate condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N Y N Y N N Y N Y N/A N X X X X X X Sheet 308 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SF1616.4 Equip. Class 0d.

Other - check valve or manual valve Equipment Description SFP Cleanup System FE l616 KI Source Status(?)N uInteraction Effects 7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

N8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse ceiling tiles and lighting, onto the equipment?

N/A 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X X XOther Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated bv:

7lzsl20r2Eddie M. Guerra. ..., ,' / i ,r, ul /{t/..t:://

! t,'//, :'i'r 712512012Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 309 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EN( ; INEI RS & C]ONST; LTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SFl616A Equip. Class0d. Other - check valve or manual valve StatusffiN U Equipment Description SFP Cleanup System FE 1616 Kl Source Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): SF I 616A PlateID Plate of component SF l6l64 General Overall view of component and anchorage PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENGINEERS Sr CONSUI.TANTTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SF47Equipment Description SFP Inlet From SFP Heat ExchangersLocation: Bldg.

AUXBFloor El.Sheet 310 of379 Status'rf') N UEquip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valve 591'2.5" Room 312 Manufacturer. Model. Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Horizontally mounted manual valve on -10" pipe.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A X X X X X X Sheet 311 of319Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENC}INEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Status@N U Equipment Equipment ID No. SF47 Equip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valveDescriptionSFP Inlet From SFP Heat Exchansers Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the area verified.Blockwalls 3257 and 3267 verffied to be to be seismically adequate based on ref. VBWL6-8001-083, Rev 2 (4/27/88) and VBWI6-8001-084, Rev 5 (4/27/88)9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N/A X X X X Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra 7l2sl20r2 ii';.,/ilf ir 7t2512012 Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 312 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SF47 Equip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valve Equipment Description SFP Inlet From SFP Heat Exchangers Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): status(?)N u SF47 plateID Plate of component SF47 general General view of component Sheet 313 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SF47Equip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valve Equipment Description SFP Inlet From SFP Heat ExchangersSfl+7 adjacent block wall Potential interaction hazard from masonry wall near unit Status(?')N u

PCe Paul C. Rizz-o Associates, [nc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SP17A7Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXBManufacturer, Model, Etc.Sheet 314 of379 status'-4N uEquip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves CODE SAFETY VALVE SP17A7 Floor El. 643 Room 602Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No degraded condition identified.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?Valve and main line found with no signs of corrosion.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X X X X X PCe Paul C- Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENCINEERS & CONSUIJTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SP17A7 Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Equipment DescriptionCODE SAFETY VALVE SP17A7of 319 Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X X XOther Adverse Conditions I 1. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?

Sheet 315 status$N U Valves 7t2512012 X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 316 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENGTNEERS & CONSUITANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SWl399Equip. ClassMOV SW-13998A. Motor-Operated Valves Status'.QN U Equipment Description Location:

Bldg. INTK Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Floor El. 566.25 Room 53 Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?No degraded condition identified.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A N/A N/A X X X X X X Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEERS S{ CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist Equipment ID No. SWl399 (swc)Equip. ClassMOV SW-13998A. Motor-Operated Equipment Description Interaction Effects 7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached lines found w ith adeq uate fl exibility.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X X X Other Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?

3t7 of 379 StatusON U Valves N/A 7t25/20r2 X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra'.' ,1..,.11"t' . / ,( i,/'/t'rn*

a,r{l/:,7,//'

5'/" t !/: :";;'Adam L. Helffrich Sheet3lS of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SW1399 Equip. Class 8A.

Motor-Operated Valves Equipment DescriptionMOV SW-r399 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): SW 1399 plateID Plate of component Status@N U SW 1399 general General view of component PC? Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENCINEERS &

CONSULIANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SW3963Equip. Class 7 . Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment DescriptionRELIEF VALVE SW 3963 Location:

Bldg. INTKFloor El.566.25 Room 53 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Mounted on insludated pipe. No degraded condition identified.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Sheet 319 of3l9 Statusff)N U X X 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that oxidation?

is more than mild surface N/A4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Anchorage of supporting main line found with minor spalled grout.Judged not to reduce seismic capacity of support base.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X X X Sheet 320 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEERS S. CONSU LTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SW3963Equip. Class

7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment DescriptionRELIEF VALVE SW 3963 statusG)N u Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N/A X X X XOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?Scaffold is the area is properly restrained.

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv:-::3/ 4,f/'--/o- -.-----W,l i /q,*.A'+j . t 7/25/2012Eddie M. Guerra

,";;/ ", /' ,l j

  • t'rf', i>i'/:*' E ', ftr!'+!" 7/25/2012Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 321 of 379Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGTNEERS 6( CONSUITANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SW3963Equip. Class 7.

Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment DescriptionRELIEF VALVE SW 3963Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): SW3963 PlateID Plate of component Status/?)N U SW3963 General General view of component Sheet 322 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.ENGINEERS .\

CONSU [T.{N1TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SW-5896 Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves 516urff)N U Equipment Description Location:

Bldg. AUXB CTRM EMERG COND I-IFloor El.

638 Room 603 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Small valve on

-2.5" diameter pipe. Pipe span <-6.5' with rigid supports. Value is -I2" from one end of the spqn. Valve height

-24". OK.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorase free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

NiA X X X X X X Sheet 323 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTAT\ITS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SW-5896Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment DescriptionCTRM EMERG COND I-I StatusF)N u Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X X X Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra 712512012.if;,;{/

712512012Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 324 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SW-5896Equip. Class

7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description CTRMEMERG COND I-IOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): SW5896 general General view of component Status(?)N u

PCe Paul c. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENCINEERS & CONST,}LTAI{TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SW82Sheet 325 of 379StatusON U Equip. Class 0d.

Other - checklmanual valveEquipment Description Location:

Bldg. INTK MANUAL VALVE SW 82Floor El.s65 Room 251 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Small manual valve on -12" diameter insulated pipe. Pipe is rigidly supported at about three pipe diamters on either side of valve. OK.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A X X X X X X Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SW82 Equipment DescriptionMANUAL VALVE SW 82 Equip. Class 0d. Other - check/manualInteraction Effects 7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X X X 326of 379 Status(?')N u valve Other Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra ,;i*','g' E i f2':;'Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 327 of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SW82Equip. Class 0d. Other - check/manual valve Equipment Description MANUAL VALVE SW 82Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): SW82 Plate and General Overall view of component Status(?)N u

Sheet 328 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.EN(}INEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Status:QN U Equipment ID No. Tl0 Equipment Description Equip. Class BORATED WATER 2l. Tanks and Heat Exchangers STORAGE TANK I-I Location:

Bldg. AUXB Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Floor El. 565 Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel.Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No missing parts identified.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Slight surface rust on one anchor bolt. OK.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Tank anchorage verifiedfrom drawing C 117 and SQUG calculation C-CSS-TI0 showing 48 - 2.S"diam. Bolts.
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Room PT NiA X X X X X X PCe Paul C' Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENGINEERS *( CONSUUTAT{TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Tl0 Equip. Class BORATED WATER Equipment DescriptionSheet 329 of379Status(?)N u

21. Tanks and Heat Exchansers STORAGE TANK I.I Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Temporary maintenance equipment identified in the area but no significant potential interoction was expected.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?N/A N/A X X X X Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated bv:

712512012Eddie M. Guerra.i,';it ..,r,/ ,!r ri ,,//,r;1,;Slt/!,t;7.

,/ !2-' t +1,t2 i'1t:.7lzsl20r2Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 330 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.Er-GINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Tl0 Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment DescriptionBORATED WATER STORAGE TANK I-IOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):BWST GeneralIt) Plate of corttponent Status(?\N u BWST AnchoragePartial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors Sheet 331 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Tl2Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Status:ON U Equipment Description Location:

Bldg.AUXB COMPONENT COOLING SURGE TANLK T12 Room 501 Floor El. 623 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Horizontal tank on two saddles with cross bracing anchored to short concrete pedestals.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?A small gap -l/4" found between a nut and washer at one anchor location.Judged not to be a significant adverse condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

See item 6 below.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Anchorage verification based on SQUG calculation C-CSS-TI2 showing 8-l"diambolts.
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?Hairline crack on one of the concrete pedestals. Judged not a significant adverse condition N/A N/A X X X X X X Sheet 332 of319 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENCINEERS

& CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. T12 Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description COMPONENT COOLING SURGE TANLK, T12 Statusff)N u lnteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Adjacent pipe lines running close to tankjudged not an adverse condition N/A X X X X Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: 712512012Eddie M. Guerra ,rti',,,/

r:! : r4, t,.'.t.U,/, '! 7/'712512012 Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 333 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Irrc.Ex*G I NH ERS $r CONSU LTAN'I S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)StatusON U Equipment ID No. Tl2 Equipment DescriptionEquip. Class 21 . Tanks and Heat Exchangers COMPONENT COOLING SURGE TANLK.TI2Other suooortins or relevant documents and photos (if an Tl2 plateID Plate of component Tl2 generalGeneral view of component Sheet 334 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, lnc.ENGINEERS

& CONSULTAN]TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)StatusG)N u Equipment ID No. Tl2 Equipment DescriptionEquip. Class 21 . Tanks and Heat Exchangers COMPONENT COOLING SURGE TANLK,TIZ I I I I Tl2loose bolt front rightAnchor bolt coming loose on the front right of componentTl2 anchorage typicalPartial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors Sheet 335 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Status(?')N u Equipment ID No. Tl2 Equipment DescriptionEquip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat ExchangersCOMPONENT COOLING SURGE TANLK,TIZ Tl2 Pedestal with Minor Hairline Crack Sheet 336 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.E}iGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Floor El. YARDRoom YARDManufacturer. Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Tank partially buried, unable to view anchorage.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?None observed.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?None observed, anchorage not accessible.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?None observed, anchorage not accessible.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Status:$N U Equipment ID No. Tl53-l Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Location:

Blde. YARD EDG FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK I.I. FOR EDG I-1. PARTIALLY BELOW GROUND N/A X X X X X X PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENGTNEERS S{ CONSUITAIfTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. T153-1 Equipment Description Sheet 337 of379 Status(TlN uEquip. Class

21. Tanks and Heat ExchangersEDG FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK I-I, FOR EDG I-1 PARTIALLY BELOW GROUND Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N/A N/A X X X XOther Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)SQUG Calc C-CSS-TL53-l concludes anchorage and attached lines are adequate.Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffrich

---:tz/ ,/)/n/*.-.--ffi/-7;goal.r, 7125/2012 7/25/2012 Sheet 338 of 379 Paul C. Ri z,ze AssocilltL:s, I ttc.I:\( ilNF-[RS .\ ('( )N\t I l \\ I r Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. T153-l Equip.Class Status N U2l . Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment DescriptionEDG FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK I-I, FOR EDG I-I, PARTIALLY BELOW GROUNDOther supporting or relevant docutnents and photos (if any):{r . -6', i .:i Tl53-lGeneral General View of Component Sheet 339 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EN(}INEERS S{ CONSULTAN1TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. T46-l Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat ExchangersStatus:$N U Equipment Description Location:

Bldg. AUXBEMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR DAY TANK I-I, FOR EDG I-IFloor El.

585 Room 32lA Manufacturer.

Model. Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Each tank saddle anchoredwith 4-3/4" anchor bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion oxidation?

Anchorage found in good condition.

that is more than mild surfaceNo signs of corrosion identified4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%

for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage verifiedfrom SQUG calc C-CSS-716-l and drmuing C-0213A for two saddles and 4-3/4"diam bolts ot each support.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X X X X X Sheet 340 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENC IN EERS & CONSULTAI\TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.

T46-lEquipment Description status(QN UEquip. Class 2l. Tanks and Heat ExchangersEMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR DAY TANK FOR EDG I.IInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the area verified.

Blockwalls 305D and 306D verified to be to be seismically adequate based on refs.VBWI2-8001-065, Rev 5 (4/21/88) andVBWI2-8001-066, Rev 6 (8/26/87)9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X XOther Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated bv:

/,e/e 7lzs/2012Eddie M. Guerra ,rtir'7/ / , /'2: rir"'7/2s/20r2 Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 341 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. T46-l Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Status@N U Equipment Description EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR DAY TANK 1-I, FOR EDG I-I T46-l plateID Plate of component T46-l general General view of component Sheet 342 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUUTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. T46-l Equipment Description I I I I T46-l anchorage Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchorsT46-l masonry wall Potential interaction hazard from masonry wall near unit Status(?)N uEquip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR DAY TANK I-I FOR EDG I-I Sheet 343 of 319Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS d. CONSUTTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. TE-5329 Equip. Class

19. Temperature Sensors StatusON U Equipment Description Location:

Bldg. AUXB EDG RM 3I8 TEMP ELEMENT Floor El.585 Room 318Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50oh of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Very small temperature element mounted on a strut channelwith huo l/4" diameter channel nuts. The strut channel is then anchored to a blockwqll with two 3/S" diameter anchor bolts. OK.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that oxidation?is more than mild surface4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50oh for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A X X X X X X PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENCINEERS dr CONSUITAilTTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. TE-5329Equip. Class 19. Temperature Sensors Equipment DescriptionEDG RM 3I8 TEMP ELEMENT Sheet 344 of 379 StatusFN UInteraction Effects 7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?Component is anchored to Block Walls 308D/309D. Seismic adequacy verified bycalculations VBWI2-8001-068, Rev 3 (5/27/81) and VBWI3-8001-069, Rev 3 (5/28/8l)9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N/A Y X X X X Other Adverse Conditions1l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. GuerraAdam L. Helffrich 7125/2012 7125/2012 Sheet 345 of 379 Pau[ C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. TE-5329Equip. Class 19. Temperature Sensors Equipment DescriptionEDG RM 3I8 TEMP ELEMENTOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): T85329 plate and generalOverall view of component and anchorage Status(?)N u

Sheet 346 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEERS &" CONSUTJTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. T5-5261Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) RacksEquipment Description CTRM EMERG VENT FAN I TEMP SWT StatusON ULocation: Bldg.

AUXBManufacturer, Model, Etc.Floor El. 638 Room 603Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Very lightweight temperature switch mounted on a cantilevered rack (HSS 6x6) which isanchored to floor withfour l/2" diameter anchor bolts. The sensor is attached to two welded strut channels (to HSS) with four l/4" diameter channel nuts. OK.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that oxidation?is more than mild surface 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50Yo forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N/A N/A X X X X X X 347Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENCINEERS Si CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. T5-5261 Equipment Description Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks CTRM EMERG VENT FAN I TEMP SWT Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the areaverified.Blockwalls 6017, 6107 and 6097 verified to be to be seismically adequatebased on ref. VBW3I-8001-164, Rev 3 (2/14/06), VBW32-8001-168, Rev 2 (5/10/88) and VBW32-8001-167, Rev I (l I/7/84).9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X Sheet of 379 Status(T)N u N/A Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Anchor spacing to other nearby instrument rqcks was iudged adequate.X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:

Eddie M. GuerraAdam L. Helffrich Sheet 348 of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Lnc.ENCINEERS &. CONSU LTAI -NTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. T5-5261 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description CTRM EMERG VENT FAN I TEMP SWT Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): T5261 plateID Plate of component Status@N U T5261 general General view of comPonent Sheet 349 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. T5-5261Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description CTRM EMERG VENT FAN I TEMP SWT StatusG)N u T5261 block wall Potential interaction hazard from masonry wall near unit T5261 anchorageView of anchorage pCe Paul C. Rizzo-4.ssocia-tes, lnc.EN(iINEERS S{ CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. XCEI-l Equipment Description Location:

Bldg. AUXBSheet 350 of 379 Status0N UEquip. Class

4. TransforrnersTRANSFORMER CE I-I Floor El. 603 Room 429 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1.Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Attached to unit substation EI. The transformer is welded to embed channelswith stitchwelds at one side and plugwelds at the opposite side.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Anchorage configuration evaluated in SQUG calculations C-CSS-CEI-l and C-CSS-DFI-2 andfound acceptable.Based on page 6 of I I of C-CSS-DFL-2, confirmed that oneside has two 3/8" thick, 3.5" Iongwelds and opposite side has plugwelds.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A N/A X X X X X X pCe lggl-9-.-Bizzo

-4ggociates, I nc.Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. XCEI-1 Equip. Class 4. TransforrnersEquipment Description TRANSFORMER CE I-I SheetInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No potential interaction hazard indetified in the area.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

351of 379 statusfi)N u 7/25/2012 X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M.,a;l/-1*th"4eJ..(,// 1 : l, -/,". / ,.// .t't/t.t!.,- t !.lz "i;rtAdam L. Helffrich Guerra Sheet 352 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSUIiTAI,ITS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. XCEI-l Equip. Class StatusG)N u4. Transformers Equipment Description TRANSFORMER CE I.IOther supporting or relevant documents and photpq(4g!XCE- l PlateID Plate of component XCE- I General General view of component Sheet 353 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)StatusG)N u Equipment ID No. XCEI-l Equipment DescriptionEquip. Class TRANSFORMER CE4. Transformers l-lXCE- I Stitch WeldPartial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors Sheet 354 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTA\TTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. XDF1-2Equip. Class TRANSFORMER DF Status:QN U4. Transforrners Equipment Description Location:

Bldg. AUXBFloor El. 603 Room 428 t-2 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage l.Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the itemof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Attached to unit substation FL. The transformer is welded to embed channelswith stitch welds at one side and plug welds at the opposite side.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

As-installed anchorage configuration evaluated andfound adequate in SQUG calculation C-CSS-DFI-2.Based on page 6 of I I of C-CSS-DFI-2, confirmed that one side has two 3/8" thick, 3.5" longwelds and opposite side has plugwelds.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A X X X X X X PCe Paul C. Rizzo Ass-ociates, lnc.E:{GINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. XDFI-2Equip. Class TRANSFORMER DF Equipment Description Sheet 4. Transforrners t-2 Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No potential interaction hazard indetified in the area.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X Other Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

355of 379 StatusON u N/A N/A N/A 7/2s12012 7/25/2012 X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated bv:Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 356 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Status(1)N uEquipment ID No. XDFI-2Equipment DescriptionEquip. Class 4.

TransformersTRANSFORMER DF I-2Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): XDFI-2Plate ID Plate of componentXDFI-2 General General view of component Sheet 357 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENG INE[-.RS S{ C]()NSL-:l T ANT'S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)StatusffiN UEquipment ID No. XDFI-2 Equipment DescriptionEquip. Class TRANSFORMER DF4. Transformers l-2 XDF l -2 Stitch Weld Unit is stitch welded along the entire XDFI -2 No Anchorage No welding apparent on rear of component as the front of the unit Front front of the Rearused on component Sheet 358 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.ENGINEERS & CONSUI.TANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Yl05 Equip. Class 20.

Instrument and Control Panels Status:ff)N UEquipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg.

AUXBFloor El.

603 Room 429 EDG l-l DISCONNECT SWITCH FOR C3615 inside PNL Yl Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inside Panel YI. Panel mountedwith four 3/4" anchors.No degraded c ondition found.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?None ob served during w alkdown.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?None observed during w alkdow n.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?None observed during walkdown.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A X X X X X X PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENCINEERS & CONSUI.TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Yl05 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control PanelsEquipment DescriptionEDG l-l DISCONNECT SWITCH FOR C3615 inside PNL SheetInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Top bracing provided by top entry conduit.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X X XOther Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safetv found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

359of 379 Status:*)N U 7t25/2012 7/25/2012 X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra ,'l,trr' I:)dY':t:"?/

i1i3 l,'./,/./,/Adam L. Helffrich PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENGINEERS & CONSUITANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Yz Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment DescriptionPNL Y2Location: Bldg.

AUXBFloor El.

603 Room 428Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Panel anchored withfour I " diameter anchor bolts and two stffinedbrackets at one side of the panel which are anchored eachwith one 3/4" diameter onchor.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Anchorage configuration is shown seismically adequate in SQUG calculation C-CSS-Y2.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Sheet 360 of 379 gl4urtf)N U X X Y N/A X X X X Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.EN(}INEERS Tt{ CONSU LTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Y2Equip. Class

14. Distribution PanelsEquipment Description PNL Y2Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Top entry conduits are rigidly connected and providelaterql restraint.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X X XOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?361of 379 StatuslV)N u NiA 7125/2012 X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv: Eddie M. Guerra/t'"1" ;/ 'ii '//'")

';#,/7rt /i-' t d,za :'i-:.'Date: Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 362 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Y2Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels status(?)N uEquipment DescriptionPNL Y2 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Y2 plateID Plate of component Y2 generalGeneral view of component Sheet 363 of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, [nc.ENGINET,RS di CONSU IJTANTTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. YZ Equip. Class StatusFN UI 4. Distribution Panels Equipment Description PNL Y2 ,,*Y2 anchoragePartial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors.b'Y2 anchorage one side only Additional anchorage on outside of the unit, on one side only PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENGINEERS & CONSL}LTANITS Sheet 364 of 379 statu{ft USeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. YE2B Equip. Class 4.

TransforrnersEquipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg.

AUXB24O.I2OV TRANSFORMERFloor El.

585 Room 304Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50%o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. ls the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?Tronsformer is located inside MCC YE2. 3 Section MCC, typical ll{CC anchorage.(i.e. MCC connected to its inverted base channels with 3/8" diameter bolts and the base channelis stitch welded to the embedded channel in concrete floor)No adverse condition identifiedfor stitchv,eld of cabinet.

X X X X X X Sheet 365Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.ENGINEERS S( CONSUITANTTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. YE2BEquip. Class 4.

Transformers Equipment Description240-I2OV TRANSFORMERInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?No maintenance equipment identified in the area.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Rigid conduits on end have rigid supports andwill provide lateral restraint10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X X X Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?of 379 status(DN u N/A N/A 712512012 7/2s/20r2 X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra.Ftu/l:/4r

,;ii*,,r/

/i, /i',tii'Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 366 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.ENGINEERS &. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. YE2BEquip. Class 4. Transformers Equipment Description 24O.I2OV TRANSFORMEROther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Status/?)N UYE2B PlateID Plate of component YE2B General General view of comPonent R Paul-(]. RizzirA$:sj:rl:r ll'l:I;\(;INLI tls \.

('()nNSl -l l,\N f r Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. YE2BEquip. Class 4. Transformers Equipment Description 240-I2OV TRANSFORMER Sheet 367 of 379 Status N UYE2B stirchPartial view of anchorage, view weld is typical of all anchors PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENCINEERS & CONSU I.TANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. YFIEquipment Description Sheet 368 of379 Statuq(?) N uEquip. Class 14.

Distribution PanelsMCC YFI . Emersencv Diesel Generator Room 2Location: Bldg. AUXBFloor El.

585 Room 319Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?in line with MCC FI28 welded to embeded channel withan average of at least 5" of 3/16" fillet welds at.front and back.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%oforwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

SQUG calculations C-CSS-YFI and C-CSS-FI28 verifies seismic adequacy of the as-built anc horage c onfigur ation.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X X X X X PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENGINEERS d( CONSUITAT{TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. YFI Equip. ClassSheet 369 of379 StatusG)N u I 4. Distribution Panels Equipment Description MCC YFI , Emergency Diesel Generator Room 2 Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?No maintenance equipment identified in the area.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?N/A X X x X Other Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra 7t25/20r2*iir*!/ i lti:i,,llt 7/25/2012Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 370 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. YFI Equip. Class

14. Distribution Panels Status/?)N u Equipment Description YFI PlateID Plate of component MCC YFI , Emergency Diesel Generator Room 2Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):YFI General General view of component PCe Paul C' Rizzo Asso-ciates, lnc.ENGINEERS

& CONSUITANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. YRF2Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Regulating Rectifier YRF2Location: Bldg.

AUXBFloor El.603 Room 428 Manufacturer. Model. Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?The equipment is in a line with other cabinets D2P and W2. The internal connectionof these panels was verified.

Each of these panels are anchored to the concrete floorwithfour l" diameter anchor bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)SQUG calculation C-CSS-YV2 references YRF2 with no anchorage concerns.

yRF2 is referenced as lighter and exact same cabinet as YV2.

The seismic qualification of the line-up that consists of YRF2, D2P and YV2 is inSQUG calculation C-CSS-D2 P.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Sheet 311 of379 Status:${

U X X X X X X DCe Paul C. Riezo Associates, [nc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. YRF2 Equipment Description Regulating Rectifi er YRF2 Sheet 312 of 379 StatusSN U Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and InvertersInteraction Effects 7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?Nearbyfire extinguisher not strapped to wall. Judged not to be a significant interaction.
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Top entry conduits have adequate flexibility.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X X x Other Adverse Conditions1L Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:

Eddie M. GuerraAdam L. Helffrich 7t2512012:.fi" 7/25/2012 Sheet 373 of 379 Pau[ C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. YR.F2 Equipment Description Status'Q\

UEquip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Resulatine Rectifi er YRF2 vvOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): YRF2 plateID Plate of component YRF2 generalGeneral view of component Sheet 374 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSI,-}LTAT.TTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. YRF2Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Status'$\

UEquipment DescriptionRegulating Rectifi er YRF2YRFI open connected to DIP Corresponding train I component opened to view internal bolting Sheet 375 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENC INET],RS {i CON$UITANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. YV2 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and InvertersEquipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg.

AUXB Regulating Inverter YV2 statusG)N uFloor El. 603 Room 428Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The equipment is in a line with other cabinets D2P and YRF2. The internal connectionof these panels was verified. Eqch of these panels are anchored to the concrete floor withfour l" diameter anchor bolts.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

N o significant c orrosion identifeid

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The seismic qualification of the line-up that consists of YRF2, D2P and YV2 is in SOUG calculation C-CSS-D2P.SQUG calculation C-CSS-YV2 indicates FCR 86-0272 implemented to resolte a pounding concern.

No gap observed between cabinets, confirming I.'CR 86-0272.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A N/A X X X X X X Sheet 376 of 379 Paul C, Rizzo Associates, Inc.E\GINEERS S. CONSIT!

IiT.A.NTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. YV2 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters StatusFN UEquipment DescriptionRegulating Inverter YV2Interaction Effects 7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

No maintenance equipment identified in the area.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N/A N/A N/A X X X X Other Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:- -=:7J /.["./ *-l*----ffi/(X1;i:f 7t2512012 Eddie M. Guerra ,,iin',,r/

/a,1,'!,'/.2t 712512012Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 377 of 379 Paul C. Rizz,o Associates, f nc.ENGINEERS di CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Equipment ID No.YYZ 4 anchor bolts Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors StatusON U Checklist (SWC)YV2 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Regulating Inverter YV2 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): YV2 plateID Plate of component YVz general General view of component

  • uf*tT ? TA6 rd$. Yve tEs$EitTrA[

tt{$rRuH[r$T eil Sheet 378 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& CT}NSULTAI$T-S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Anchorage l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., of the 50%o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This panel is part of a line-up that includes D2N and YRF4.to the concrete with four 3/4" diameter anchor bolts.is the item one Each panel is anchored 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 5Ao/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)SQUG Calculation C-CSS-YV4 indicatesfour 3/4" anchors and that ll4OD-95-0034 resolves a pounding concern.Anchorage and implementation of MOD-95-0034 vere confirmed duringwalkdown6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A U N Status$rr U Equipment ID No. YV4Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description I25VDC/l2OVAC INVERTER CH 4 Location:

Bldg.AUXBFloor El.603 Room 4288 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

X X X X X X Sheet 379 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENCINEERS S. CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. YV4 Equip. Class 16.

Battery Chargers and InvertersEquipment Description I25VDCII2OVAC INVERTER CH 4 status$ uInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?Seismic capacity of block walls in the area verified.Blockwall 4016 verffied to be to be seismically adequatebased on ref. VBW20-8001-100, Rev I4 (12/6/88).
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X Other Adverse ConditionsI 1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra:ri';t:l'"r/'Adam L. Helffrich 712512012 7/25/2012