ML13135A245

Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Report, Appendix B - Seismic Walkdown Checklists (Swcs), Sheet 202 of 379 Through Sheet 379 of 379

ML13135A245
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	08/10/2012
From:	Beigi F, Guerra E, Helffrich A, Lucarelli B, Reddington J, Wakefield D ABS Consulting
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
Shared Package
ML131350549	List: L-13-118, Resubmittal of FENOC Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Seismic Aspects of Recommendation 2.3 of Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from Fukushima ML13135A229 ML13135A230 ML13135A231 ML13135A233 ML13135A234 ML13135A235 ML13135A236 ML13135A237 ML13135A238 ML13135A240 ML13135A241 ML13135A242 ML13135A243 ML13135A244 ML13135A245 ML13135A246 ML13135A247 ML13135A248 ML13135A249 ML13135A251
References
L-13-118, TAC MF0092, TAC MF0093, TAC MF0116, TAC MF0159
Download: ML13135A245 (178)

Text

pcle Paul c. Rizzo Assoc-iates, Inc.

ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. HIS 7528 Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB Sheet 202 of 379 Status:@N U Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels SFAS CHANNEL 1 BLOCK SW inside PNL C5705 Ffoor El.

623 Room 505 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inside Panel C5705, which has similar anchorage to Panel C5702.

Back panel doors are adequately attached to panel structure with 4-l/2" screws.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

None observed.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

None observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

None observed.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X

X X

X X

PCe PaulC. Rizzo Assoc.iates, lnc.

ENCINEERS & CONSUXTAI\\\\ITS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. HIS 7528 Equipment Description Sheet 203 of 379 Status:f)N U Equip. Class SFAS CHANNEL I

20. Instrument and Control Panels BLOCK SW inside PNL C5705 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

NiA X

X X

X Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv:

Eddie M. Guerra 712512012

.'- i'

,/', /

/91"'4' 7t25/2012 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 204 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

E\\GINEERS

& CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Statusff)N U Equipment ID No.

hp2b Equipment Description Equip. Class MOTOR OPERATED 8A. Motor-Operated Valves VALVE HP-2B Location: Bldg.

AUXB Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Floor El.

565 Room 236 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Vafue is horizontally mounted on the pipe. There is an anchor right below the valve.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

MOVfoundwith good surfacefinish and no signs of conosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A X

X X

X X

X

Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.

E:r-CIN EERS & CONSULIANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. hp2b Equip. Class MOTOR OPERATED 8A. Motor-Operated Equipment Description VALVE HP-28 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

No potential interaction hazards identifiedfrom nearby equipment.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the area verified as walls 2337 and 2347.

Blockwall hazard identified as Non-Credible.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Flexible lines inspected and found with adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

205of 379 Status)N u

Valves N/A 7/25/2012 7/2s/20r2 X

Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Pipe enters containment penetration P-20from Aux. Building. The pipe is judged adequatefor Seismic Anchor Motion loads CI5' offlex. Length)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra I

/,. 1 i

/{klfri Adam L. Helffiich

Sheet 206 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS & CONSUUTANTTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Status(f,N u Equipment ID No.

hp2b Equipment Description Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves MOTOR OPERATED VALVE HP-2B HP2B Plate ID Plate of component HP2B General General view of component Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

PCe!"tl C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

nx Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

hp2c Equip. Class Equipment Description MOTOR OPERATED Sheet 207 of379 Statusfi)N U 8A. Motor-Operated Valves VALVE HP.zC Location: Bldg.

AUXB Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Floor El.

s65 Room 208 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL' The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Pipe is adequately supported at -24" on either side of the varve.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A X

X X

X X

X

PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENGINEERS d. CONSUI-TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

hp2c Equip. Class Equipment Description MOTOR OPERATED Sheet 8A. Motor-Operated Valves VALVE HP-2C Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Attached lines were found with adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

Other Adverse Conditions I l Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

208 of 379 StatusON U 7/25/2012 X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffiich

Sheet 209 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS 6( CONSUTTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

hp2c Equipment Description Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves StatusG)N u MOTOR OPERATED VALVE HP-2C Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

HP}C General General view of component

PCe PaulC. Rizzo Associates,

[nc.

ENCINEERS S. CONSULTANTS Sheet 210 of 379 StatusON U Seismic Walkdown Checktist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. HV5314 Equip. Class 0. Other Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB MOTOR-OPERATED DAMPER HV 5314 Ffoor El.

623 Room 5 1 5 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

HSS 6x6 rack anchored tofloor andwallfound in adequate condition.

Damper qttached to rackwithfour I/2" diameter bolts.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that oxidation?

is more than mild surface

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

NiA X

X X

X X

X

Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTA}TTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment tD No. HV5314 Equip. Class 0. Other Equipment Description MOTOR-OPERATED DAMPER HV 5314 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Flexible lines attached to componentfound in good condition.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

of 379 status(?)N u N/A N/A 7/25/2012 7/2512012 X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffrich i'1fi itlu/

. t ;,

Sheet 212 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENGTNEERS &. CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. HV5314 Equip. Class 0. Other Equipment Description MOTOR-OPERATED DAMPER HV 5314 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

Status@N U HV53l4 Plate ID Plate of component HV5314 General General view of component

Sheet 213 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. HV5314 Equip. Class 0. Other Equipment Description MOTOR-OPERATED DAMPER HV 5314 HV53 l4 anchorage View of anchorage Status(?)N u

PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENGINEERS & CT}NSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist Equipment ID No.14-636 Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB Sheet 214 of 319 Statusf)N U (swc)

Equip. Class IA PCV FOR MU66A

7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Floor El.

565 Room 208 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Small solenoid valve on strut channel. which is attached to concrete wall.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than oxidation?

surface

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X

X X

X X

PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENCINEERS d( CONSU LTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.14-636 Equip. Class Equipment Description IA PCV FOR MU66A Sheet

7. Pneumatic-Operated Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Attached lines were found with adequate Jlexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

215of 379 Statusf)N u Valves N/A Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv:

Eddie M. Guerra I

.. /

/

.);

./

it{'/:".r7/

./

' : /

,/.

l'

,,/,

i.'. t'

..,/ /

't-'././/,

/J-' r'y;,Z ;',?'

Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 216 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS

& CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

StatusON U Equipment ID No. 1,4-636 Equipment Description Equip. Class IA PCV FOR MU66A

7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

14-636 Plate and General General view of component

Sheet 217 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.

ENCINEERS S( CONSUTTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. ICSI IA Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Status(T) N u Equipment Description Location: Blde.

AUXB ICSI IA Atmosphere vent valve Floor El.

643 Room 602 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Top and bottom of valvefound to be restrained. No degraded conditionfound.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchoraqe free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X

X X

X X

PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates,

[nc.

ENGINEERS S. CGNSLII]TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. ICSI IA Equipment Description Sheet Equip.Class T.Pneumatic-Operated ICSI lA Atmosphere vent valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Flexible lines found with adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

2r8of 379 StatusFN U

Valves N/A N/A 7t25/2012 7/25/2012 X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv:

Eddie M. Guerra

/,',',//

,r/,t',r 4,/ lr/, x/,i'i!//

Adam L. Helffrich Date:

Sheet 219 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS

& CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. ICSI lA Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description ICSI lA Atmosphere vent valve Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

ICSI lA Plate ID Plate of component Status(flN U General view of component

Sheet 220 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS

& CONSI-}LTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentlDNo. ICSIIA Equip.Class T.Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description ICSI lA Atmosphere vent valve ICSI lA brace2 Brace support for component ICSI lA brace Brace support for component Status@N U

Sheet 221 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

E*"CINEERS

& CONSti L:TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment lD No.

ICSI lA Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description ICSI lA Atmosphere vent valve ICSI lA anchor View of anchorage Status@N U

Sheet 222 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

EN(} INEERS & CONSUL:TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. K5-l Equip. Class Diesel Generator Status$N U

17. Engine Generators Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

585 Room 3 1 8 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Equipment found to be stitch welded to base.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage detail found to be consistent with the presented in SQ(IG calc C-CSS-K5-1. I6 - I I/4" cast-in place bolts spaced around 5ft each.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X

X X

X X

PCe Paul c. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENGINEERS S. CONSUI.TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. K5-l Equip. Class Generator Equipment Description Diesel Sheet l 7. Engine Generators Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the areaverffied.

Associated block walls identffied as: 308D, 309D, 3 l0D, 3l I D, 338D See Appendix C from report for references. Identified as seismically adequate.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

223of 379 status(V)N u N/A Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv:

Eddie M. Guerra 1. ;

/,

/,

)

i)l)t,.1lr/ i2", r/2 i'r,"/'

Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 224 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.

ENCINEERS & C(}NSULTANTTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. K5-2 Equip. Class 17. Engine Generators sffiu#T) N u Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB Diesel Generator Floor El.

585 Room 319 Manufacturer. Model. Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Equipment found to be stitch welded to base.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage detail found to be consistent with the presented in SQUG calc C-CSS-K5-2. I6 - I I/4" cast-in place bolts spaced around Sft each.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

X X

X X

X X

Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS & CONSUITANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. K5-2 Equip. Class Diesel Generator

17. Engine Generators Equipment Description Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Seismic capacity of blockwqlls in the areaverified.

Blockwall 304D verified to be to be seismically adequate based on ref. VBWl2-8001-064, Rev 8 (8/26/87)

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

Other Adverse Conditions I 1. Have you looked for and adverselv affect the safetv found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

225of 379 Status(?)N u 7125/2012 7t2sl20r2 X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 226 of 379 Paul C. Ri zz,o Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS & CONSUI TA,-\\TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

StatusftN U Equipment Equipment ID No. K5-2 Description Equip. Class Diesel Generator 17. Engine Generators Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

K5-2 plate ID Plate of component K5-2 general General view of component

H ry{ g:Jlirit: Ar,r,tcl.lte1-!:u, IN(;l N E I t { S. \\ ( '( 1 r r " 5 1 'l 'l, \\. \\ * 'I S

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment Equipment ID No. K5-2 Description Sheet 227 of 379 Status N U Equip. C lass Diesel Generator 17. Engine Generators K5-2 anchor bolt Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all

PCe Paul C.-Rizzo Associates,

[nc.

ENGINEERS & C{}NSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. L3l1 Equipment Description Sheet 228 of 379 Status@N U Equip. Class LOGIC CHANNEL I 20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinet MODULE L3I 1 Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

623 Room 502 Manufacturer. Model. Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inside of panel C5762C. While anchorage of the panel is external to the panel, they are covered by a trip protection covering that could not be removed.

Anchorage condition bosed on SQUG calc C-CSS-C5762C.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-CSS-C5762C calculations indicate that MOD?5-0032 resolves anchorage concerns and cabinet bolting issues. It was verffied that the adjacent panels are connected at the top.

A nc h or age ade q uacy de e me d s e i s mi c al ly ade q uat e.

Based on good condition of panel and SQUG SEWS, anchorage is judged to be in adequate condition.

NiA X

X X

X X

X

PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

EN(}]NEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. L3l I Equip. Class Equipment Description LOGIC CHANNEL I Sheet 229 of 379 Status$N U

20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinet MODULE L31I Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N Y

U N

Y N

Y U

N Y

N/A NiA U

NiA X

X X

X Other Adverse Conditions 1 l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

U N

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

-H,l,M^*1-i4hA'4i/

Eddie M. Guera Date:

7/25/2012 Date:

7125/2012

. - / /

-../r#/

Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 230 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSUUTAI{TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Status(?)N u Equipment ID No. L31 I Equipment Description Equip. Class 20a.Inst. in control panel/cabinet LOGIC CHANNEL I MODULEL3II Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

L3l I General view of component

Sheet 231 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS

&. CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. L3l I Equip. Class LOGIC CHANNEL I Equipment Description 20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinet Status(?)N u MODULE L3I I L31l-5ll cabinet General View of Cabinet housing components L3 I I -5 I I cabinets bolted together inbetween Cabinets are bolted together in the middle

Sheet 232 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

StatusON U Equipment ID No. L3 I I Equipment Description Equip. Class LOGIC CHANNEL 20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinet I MODULE L3 I I L3 I l-51I cabinets welded together on left Cabinets are welded together on the left side L3 I I -51 I cabinets welded together on right Cabinets are welded together on the right side

of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.

EI.C IN EERS & CONSUITANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. L51l Equip. Class LOGIC CHANNEL I 20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinet Status$N U Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB MODULE L51 I Floor El.

623 Room 502 Manufacturer. Model. Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inside of panel C5762C. While anchorage of the panel is external to the panel, they are covered by a trip protection covering that could not be removed. Anchorage condition based on SQUG calc C-CSS-C5762C.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-CSS-C5762C calculations indicate that MOD95-0032 resolves anchorage concerns and cabinet bolting issues. It was verified that the adjacent panels are connected at the top.

A n c h or age ade q uacy dee me d s e i s mi c al ly ade q u at e.

Based on good condition of panel and SQUG SEWS, anchorage is judged to be in adequate condition.

N U

N Y

U N

U N

Y U

N Y

U N

Y X

X X

X X

X

Sheet 234 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS & CONSUTTANTS Status(?)N u Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. L5l I Equip. Class Equipment Description LOGIC CHANNEL I 20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinet MODULE L5I I Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N/A X

X X

X Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv:

Eddie M. Guera Adam L. Helffrich 7/25/2012

/

/' /. I

'/: '/

tf* : :r/ i! /, //, i'/,"/'/

7/25t2012

Sheet 235 of 379 Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentIDNo. L5ll Equip.Class 20a.Inst.incontrolpanel/cabinet Equipment Description LOGIC CHANNEL I MODULE L5I I Status@N U Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

L5l I General view of component

Sheet 236 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

L5l I Equip. Class 20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinet Equipment Description LOGIC CHANNEL I MODULE L51I L3 I I -5 1 l cabinets bolted together inbetween Cabinets are bolted together in the middle status(?)N u L3ll-5ll cabinet General View of Cabinet housing components

Sheet 237 of 379 Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS S( CONST..}LTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. L5 I I Equip. Class Equipment Description LOGIC CHANNEL I 20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinet Status@N U MODULE L5 I I L3 I I -5 I I cabinets welded together on left Cabinets are welded together on the left side L3 1 I -5 I I cabinets welded together on right Cabinets are welded together on the right side

PCe Paul c. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENC INEf, RS &, CONSUI-TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Ll-1525A Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Sheet 238 of 319 Status:$N U Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels BWST LEVEL INDICATOR TNSIDE PNL C5716 Floor El.

623 Room 502 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage could not be verified due to mastic covering bottom of panel.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X

X X

X X

pce Paul C-. Rizzo-Associates,

[nc.

ENCINEERS

& C0NSU LTAI\\rTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

Ll-1525A Equipment Description of 319 StatusF)N u Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels BWST LEVEL INDICATOR INSIDE PNL C5716 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the area verified Blockwalls in room 502 found to be seismically adequate per 8A-l I documentation.

Refer to Appendix C for list of walls qssociated to component.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N Y

N Y

N Y

N Y

X X

X X

Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

N Y

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

-mt&Jdt Eddie M. Guerra Date:

7/25/2012 Date:

712512012

'r i

t ),,rt, //

i, /'t :/

/'/. 1/2 r/,'///'

Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 240 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. LI-1525A Equipment Description Status(?)N u Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels BWST LEVEL INDICATOR INSIDE PNL C5716 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

Lll525A Plate and General Overall view of component and anchorage

Sheet 241 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSUIJTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This switch is inside panel C576lA.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N X

Y N U

N/A Y N U N / A X

Y N U N / A X

Y N U N / A X

Y N U X

Statusf)N u Equipment ID No. LSHHSP9B6 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description SGI LEVEL SWITCH SP9B6 Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

623 Room 502 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

X

PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. LSHHSP9B6 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description SGl LEVEL SWITCH SP9B6 of 379 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Adjacent panels connected at top.

End panels have 3" gap and also lop connected by conduit.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

Sheet242 Status/?\\N U Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra

,,"0'.,r./' rl', r'- r/Zt,/*,

,tdt.i.y/

tJ-t i.,,a ;'-1,t Adam L. Helffrich

R P.jrulc. Rizzo Ass.ciates, Inc-

, 2

{

s I

SP9B9-073 Switch View of component inside cabinet Sheet 243 of 379 EN(;INEITRS & C()NStll'IANT'S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. LSHHSP9B6 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description SGl LEVEL SWITCH SP9B6 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

fls#

ttr ft

• tr il StatusflN U t

t lrr I$ls

{

sP9B9 -073 General view of component

, 4 i 6

, 6 I

Sheet 244 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS &. CONSULTAI\\rTS Status(?)N u Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. LSHHSP9B6 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description SGI LEVEL SWITCH SP9B6 SP9B9 -073 bolted at top Cabinet is bolted to adjacent cabinet at the top

Sheet 245 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.

ENCINEERS & CONSULTANT S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. LT-1402 Equip. Class StatusON U

18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB CC SRG TNK I-I SIDE I LV TRANS Floor El.

623 Room 501 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Mounted on -24" tall HSS 6x6 cantilever rack, which is anchored to the Jloor by four I/2" diameter anchor bolts.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

While spalling of grout pad on one side was observed, it was judged adequote since the loads are very small (-<50 lbs)

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

X X

X X

X X

Sheet 246 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS 6( CONSUITA)qTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. LT-1402 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description CC SRG TNK I-I SIDE I LV TRANS status/V\\N U Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Attached flexib le line s found in addeq uate c ondit i on.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

X Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Anchor spacing to adjacent rackfound acceptable by engineering judgement and small demand loads.

Evaluated by:

7t2s/20r2 Eddie M. Guerra

,/

.t.,n./ /r,i,,/'1l/,u,,

t7'd+1",//

F' t d!t'; i"r 712512012 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 247 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINE}-RS & CONSUI-TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. LT-1402 Equip. Class l8. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description CC SRG TNK I-I SIDE 1 LV TRANS LTI 402 Plate ID Plate of component LT I 402 General General view of component StatusFN U

ing or relevant documents and

Sheet 248 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEE.RS 6i CONSU I.TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

StatusFN U Equipment ID No. LT-1402 Equipment Description CC Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks SRG TNK I-I SIDE I LV TRANS LTI 402 anchorage View of anchorage LTI 402 Spalled Grout on Anchor Grout around base plate has crumbled away

PCe Paul C. Rizzo.Associates, lnc.

ENCINEERS S( CONSUTT.4,NTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. LT-2787 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Sheet 249of 379 StatusgN U

Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB EDG DAY TANK I-I LVL TRANSMITT Floor El.

58s Room 318 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Transmitter mountedwith 4-3/8" diameter bolts to awall mounted HSS 6x6. which is onchored to wall with 4-l/2" diameter anchor bolts.

No degraded conditionsfoundfor the wall mounting supporting the transmitter.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorase free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N Y

U N

N N/A N

Y N

Y U

NiA U

N/A U

N/A N

Y X

X X

X X

X

Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.

ENGINEERS S. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. LT-2787 Equip. Class 18. lnstrument (on) Racks Equipment Description EDG DAY TANK I-I LVL TRANSMITT Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

250 of 379 status(?)N u N/A N/A Other Adverse Conditions 1l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 251 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSI,JLTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. LT-2787 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description EDG DAY TANK I-I LVL TRANSMITT Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

LT2787 Plate ID Plate of component Status(?)N U LT2787 General General view of component

Sheet 252 of 319 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, l"nc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. MS10l Equip. Class (MSrV SGI )

7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Status:ON U Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

643 MS lOI Room 601 Manufacturer, Model. Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No degraded conditions identified.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X

X X

X X

PCePaul

c. RizzoAssociates, lnc.

ENCINEERS & CONSUI-TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. MSl0l Equip. Class Equipment Description MS IOI (MSIV SGI)

Sheet Status$N U

7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y X

Y X

Y X

Y X

253of 379 N/A N/A Other Adverse Conditions 1l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra

'r,,

.,r,/',l. ri./i

.,,,r,,

tr'd//:,:.7/./ ti' t yj.rt :',:.

Date:

7tzs/2012 Date:

7/25/2012 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 254 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGTNEERS S( CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

StatusG)N U Equipment ID No. MSl0l Equipment Description Equip. Class MS r0l (MSrv scr)

7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves documents and Other supporting or relevant photos (if any):

M S l O I General view general of component MS l0l gen eral2 General view of component

Sheet 255 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS

& CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. MSl0l Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description MS 101 (MSrV SGI)

Ms l0l attachment to steam pipe Valve connection to main steam line Status(?)N u

PCel"*t C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Sheet 256 of 379 Status{Y)N u Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. MS5889,4 Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB AOV MS 58894 Floor El.

565 Room 237 Manufacturer, Model. Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Valve on 6" pipe line with considerable weight.

Pipe span -8', rigid supports on either side of valve. Valve -2'from one end.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X

X X

X X

PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

E**CIN EERS & CONSU TTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. MS5889A Equip. Class Equipment Description AOV MS 5889A of 379

7. Pneumatic-Operated Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution and masonry block walls not likely to systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Attached lines found with addequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

Other Adverse Conditions I 1. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

Sheet251 Status:ON U Valves N/A 7/25/2012 X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 258 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENGTNEERS & CONSULTA}ITS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Pl4-1 Equip. Class AFP/T-I Statu{3'} N u

5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

565 Room 237 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Mounted on skidwith B-l I/2" anchor bolts.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Configuration consistent with documented configuration in SQUG calculation C-CSS-P I4-I

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A Y

X X

X X

X X

Sheet 259 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Pl4-l Equip. Class Equipment Description AFP/T-l Status0N U

5. Horizontal Pumps Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N Y

N Y

N Y

N Y

N/A N/A U

N/A X

X X

X Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

U N

Y X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra

,'.,1't]!.

-,, /,! i ' tl','r/o.,

,ldr/.,!:T/

f-t t 1'.,rt :,.,.:,

Date:

712512012 Date:

712512012 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 260 of 379 Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS

&. CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Pl4-l Equip. Class Status(?'\\N u

5. Horiznntal Pumps Equipment Description AFP/T-I Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

P l4-I plate ID Plate of component P l4-I general General view of component

Equipment Description AFP/T-I Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Pl4-l Equip. Class 5. Hori zontal Pumps P l4-I general4 General view of component Pl4-l anchorage Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors Sheet 261of 379 Status@N U

Sheet 262 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEI-RS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Pl4-2 Equip.

AFP/T-2 Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Status/T)N U Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

565 Room 238 Manufacturer, Model. Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage 1.Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Mounted on skidwith eight I l/2" anchors.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

SQUG C-C,S^S-P1 4-I and C-CSS-P I4-2 calculation (page a of I 6) identifies the configuration as 8-I l/2" bolts and it was confirmed in the field during u,alkdown inspection.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A N/A X

X X

X X

X

PCe Paul c. Rizzo Associates,

[nc.

ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

Pl4-2 Equip. Class Equipment Description AFP/T.2 Sheet 263 of 379 StatusON U

5. Horizontal Pumps Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No potential interaction hazards identffied in the area.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N Y

N Y

N Y

U N

Y N/A U

N/A U

N/A X

X X

X Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

U N

Y X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffrich Date:

712512012 Date:

712512012

Sheet 264 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Pl4-2 Equip. Class Status@N U

5. Hori znntal Pumps Equipment Description AFPIT.2 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

Pl4-2 plate ID Plate of component Pl4-2 general3 General view of component

Sheet 265 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS &. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Pl4-2 Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description AFPIT.2 StatusON U Pl4-2 general General view of component Pl4-2 anchorage Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors

PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associares, tnc.

ENCINEERS & CONSU TTA}JTS Sheet 266 of 379 Statu{T) N u Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P3-2 Equip. Class 6. Vertical Pumps Equipment Description Pump P3-2 Location: Bldg.

INTK Floor El.

576 Room 52 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage l.ls the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one ofthe 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

N o degraded condition found for anchorage.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Slight corrosionfound on main pipe line ond on anchors due to humid environment.

Judged surface corrosion and adequate.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Y N X

Y N U

N/A Y N U N / A X

Y N U N / A X

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration verified with drowing M-04 5-00002.

I2-I I/2"diam boltsfor square plate and B - I 5/8" diam boltsfor circum. plate.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N U N / A X

Y N U X

X

PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENC lNEt RS & CONSLILTAsNTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P3-2 Equipment Description Pump P3-2 of 379 Equip. Class 6. Vertical Pumps Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Attac hed lines found w ith adeq uate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Sheet267 StatusON U 7t2512012 712512012 X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv:

Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 268 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P3-2 Equip. Class 6. Vertical Pumps StatusG)N u Equipment Description Pump P3-2 Other supporting or relevant documents and P3-2 plate ID Plate of component P3-2 general General view of component P3-2 general2 General view of component photos (if any):

Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS C( CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

P3-2 Equip. Class 6. Vertical Pumps Equipment Description Pump P3-2 Sheet 269 of 379 Status(?\\N u P3-2 anchorage Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors P3-2 corrosion on bolts Surface corosion on bolts judged not significant

Sheet 270 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENCINEERS & CONSUI.TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Motor mounted on skid with 12. I " anchor bolts.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration verified based on SQUG calculation C-CSS-P-?

7-2 page 4 of 5.

Calc shows that I2-l"diam anchor boltsfor mounting are seismically adequate.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N X

Y N U

N/A Y N U N / A X

Y N U N / A X

Y N U N / A X

Y N U X

Status:$N U Equipment ID No. P3728 Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description MOTOR-DRIVEN PUMP Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

565 Room 225 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

X

Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENCINEERS & CONSUI.TANIS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

P3728 Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description MOTOR.DRIVEN PUMP Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Small cart nearby is not securely tied to wall, but judged not to be a potential interaction hazard.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Seismic capacity of block walls in the area verified.

Blockwall 2047 verified to be to be seismically adequate based on ref. VBW06-8001-028, Rev 4 (7/29/88)

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Attached lines rigidly connected to equipment. No concern idenifiedfrom potential relative movement.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

271of 379 Status$rl U Other Adverse Conditions I 1. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra

/r,fi

/"?/1./

l ' / '

Adam L. Helffiich

Sheet 272 of 379 Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS

& CONSUTTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P3728 Equip. Class 5. Horiznntal Pumps Equipment Description MOTOR-DRIVEN PUMP Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

P3728 plate ID Plate of component Status U

P3728 general General view of component

Sheet 273 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P3728 Equip. Class 5. Hori zontal Pumps Equipment Description MOTOR-DRIVEN PUMP StatusQl u P3728 anchorage Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors P3728 masonry wall Potential interaction hazard from masonry wall near unit

Sheet 274 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS &. CONSI.-}LTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P3728 Equip. Class 5. Hori znntal Pumps Equipment Description MOTOR-DRIVEN PUMP P3728 unsecured cart near unit Possible interaction with nearby cart StatustQN U

Sheet 275 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENGINEERS {i CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P4-l Equip. Class 0. Other Statu{RN U

Equipment Description Screenrvash pumpP4-l Location: Bldg.

INTK Floor El.

585 Room 50 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%ofor which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N X

Y N U

N/A Y N U N / A X

Y N U N / A X

Y N U N / A X

Y N U X

X

PCe Paul C. RizzoAssociates, lnc.

ENGINEERS & CONSUI.TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P4-l Equip. Class 0. Other Equipment Description Screen wash pump P4-l 276 of379 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

Sheet Status$N U Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv:

Eddie M. Guena

.:,:dr i

'*{;{"{ /1#

l:,t,1/.,,

Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 271 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.

ENGINEERS S( CONS ULTANI]S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P42-l Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Status:QN U Equipment Description P42-l Pump for decay heat l-l Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

545 Room 105 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage l Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Mounted on skidwith I - 3/4" anchor bolts.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration verified based on SQUG calculation C-CSS-P42-1.

Page 4 of 5 shows B-3/4"dium anchors spaced at -38".

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N X

Y N U

N/A Y N U N / A X

Y N U N / A X

Y N U N i A X

Y N U X

X

PCe Paul c. Rizzo Associates,

[nc.

EN(iINEERS S( CONSULT^{-I'TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P42-l Equip. Class Equipment Description P42-l Pump for decay Sheet

5. Horizontal Pumps heat l-l Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Surounding pipingfound to be rigidly supported.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

Other Adverse Conditions I 1. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

278of 379 Statusf)N u N/A N/A N/A 7/25/2012 X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv:

Adam L. Helffrich

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSUUTAIVTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

P42-l Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description P42-l Pump for decay heat I - I P42-l plate ID Plate of component P42-l general General view of component Sheet 279 of 379 Status(?')N u Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

Sheet 280 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS &, CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

P42-l Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description P42-l Pump for decay heat I - I P42-l general2 General view of component Status(?)N u P42-l anchorageZ Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors

PCe Paul C' Rizz-o Associates,

[nc.

ENGINEERS d. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P43-2 Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description CCW PUMP 1.2 Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

585 Room 328 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchoredwith 8-l" bolts on skid.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

No missing parts or degraded condition identifiedfor anchorage.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50%ofor which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

A nc hor age c o nfi gur ati on v e r ifi e d b as e d on dr aw ing M - 0 4 6 - 0 0 0 0 3.

Configuration consistent with 8-I " bolts.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Sheet 281 of379 StatusG)N U X

X N/A N/A N/A X

X X

x

PCe Paul c. Rizzo-Associates,

[nc' ENCINEERS & CONSUITAI{TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P43-2 Equipment Description CCW PUMP I.2 Sheet Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Nozzles rigidly supported.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

282of 379 StatusFN U

Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guera Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 283of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

P43-2 Equip. Class 5. Horiznntal Pumps Status(flN U Equipment Description CCW PUMP I-2 P43-2 plate ID Plate of component P43-2 general General view of component

Sheet 284 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS 6i CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

P43-2 Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps statusG)N u Equipment Description CCW PUMP I-2 P43-2 anchorage Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors

Sheet 285 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS & C()NSL'LTANTs^

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P58-1 Equip. Class HPI PUMP I-I StatusG)N u

5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

545 Room 105 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Mounted on skidwith I - I" anchor bolts.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

No missing parts or degraded condition identifiedfor anchoroge.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

No cracks identified on mounting grout.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchoroge configurationv erified with drawing M-5 I 8-0002 3.

Mounting skid anchoredwith I - l" diam. Bolts.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X

X X

X X

pCe Paul C. Rizzo-.4"ssociates,

[nc.

ENCINEERS {i CONSI,'TTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P58-1 Equip. Class HPI PUMP I-I Equipment Description

5. Horizontal Pumps Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

Sheet286 of 379 statusfi)N u Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Date:

Date:

Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 287 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Status(?)N u Equipment ID No. P58-l Equipment Description Equip. Class HPI PUMP I-I

5. Horizontal Pumps Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

P5 8-I plate ID Plate of component P5 8-I general General view of component

Sheet 288 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS & CONSULTAIYI'S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

StatusGJN u Equipment ID No. P58-l Equipment Description Equip. Class HPI PUMP I-I

5. Horizontal Pumps P58-l general}

General view of component P5 8-I anchorage Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors

PCle Paul c. Rizzo Associates,

[nc.

ENGINEERS 6{ CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. PS3689D Equip. Class 18. lnstrument (on) Racks Equipment Description PRESSURE SWITCH PS3689D Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

623 Room 501 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage l.Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Supported onwall-mounted rack. No degraded condition identified.

Racks anchoredwith 8-I/2" bolts.

Pressure switch is attached to the rackwith 4-l/2" diameter bolts.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Sheet 289 of 379 Statufr) N u X

X X.

X X

X

Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.

ENCINEERS & CONSUTTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. PS3689D Equipment Description Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on)

PRESSURE SWITCH PS3689D Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Attached line is Jlexible.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

Other Adverse Conditions I 1 Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

290 of 379 Status(?)N u Racks N/A N/A N/A 7l2s/2012 7/2512012 X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv:

Eddie M. Guerra

,'/

.,t'/.o./ li-./l,in,

tl4.i.T,/

F' t 1!.tt :);t Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 291 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGTNEERS

& CONSU UTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. PS3689D Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description PRESSURE SWITCH PS3689D Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

PS3689 plate ID Plate of component Status(?\\N u PS3689 general General view of component

Sheet 292 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, fnc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

StatusG\\N u Equipment ID No. PS3689D Equipment Description Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks PRESSURE SWITCH PS3689D PS3689 anchorage typical Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors

Sheet 293 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.

E*- CINEERS & CONSULTA)*]TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. PSL l06C Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description PRESS SWITCH LOW FOR AFP TURB I-1 INLET status@N U Location: Bldg.

AUXB Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Floor El.

565 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50Vo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Switch mounted on 6x6 tube section with 4-l/2" diameter bolts

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Room 237 N/A NiA X

X X

X X

X

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

EI{GINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. PSL 106C Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description PRESS SWITCH LOW FOR AFP TURB I-I INLET Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y X

Y X

Y X

Y X

Sheet 294of 379 status(?)N u Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv:

Eddie M. Guerra

'.,r'

.. /',tl'r". /r','rr.

t iE:ti// t , /t'i'//!t/

Date:

7/2512012 Date:

7/2512012 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 295 of 379 ENGINEERS &. CONSI-}I.;TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks PRESS SWITCH LOW FOR AFP TURB 1-I TNLET StatusG)N u Equipment ID No. PSL 106C Equipment Description Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

i

• .s.

1. 1. {

PSLI06C Plate and General Overall view of component and anchorage PSLI06C General General view of comPonent

Sheet 296 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.

EN{}INELRS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. PSL4928A Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks StatusQN U Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB PRESS SWITCH PS 49284 Floor El.

565 Room 237 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Switch is mounted on a cantileveredfloor mountedrackwhich is anchoredwith 4-l/2" diameter anchors.

Switch is connected to the strut member, which is welded to the rack by 4-l/2" diameter channel nuts.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N Y

X X

X X

X X

of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.

ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. PSL4928A Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on)

Equipment Description PRESS SWITCH PS 4928A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

Other Adverse Conditions 1l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Anchor spacing to adjacent floor mounted rack is judged adequate.

Sheet297 StatusON U Racks 7t25t2012 7/25/2012 X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra t't 4rt

' ' i 1 ' '

Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 298 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS &. CONSI-}LTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. PSL4928A Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description PRESS SWITCH PS 49284 PSL 4928A plate ID Plate of component PSL4928A General General view of component Status(?\\N u

Sheet 299 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. PSL4928A Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description PRESS SWITCH PS 49284 PSL 4gzS{anchorage View of anchorage StatusG)N u PSL 4928A Anchor Spacing to Adjacent Rack

Sheet 300 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENGINEERS & CONSUI,TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment tD No. RC370l Equip. Class 20. lnstrument and Control Panels Status@N U Equipment Description Relav Cabinet in Mechanical Penetration Room 4 Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

585 Room 314 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Mounted on short steel brace stand anchoredwith 4-l/2" bolts.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50Yo for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchor age c onfiguration consistent w ith SQU G calculation C-CSS-RC 3 7 0 I.

4 angle-section legs anchroredwith 4-I/2" bolts.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

NiA N/A N/A X

X X

X X

X

Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

E\\GINEERS

& CON SU LT.{,NNTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. RC3701 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Relav Cabinet in Mechanical Penetration Room 4 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

No potential interaction hazards identffied in the area.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Attached top conduits provide lateral restraint to cabinet.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

301of 379 Status/?)N U Other Adverse Conditions I 1. Have you looked for and adverselv affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guera i'

i

)

,./t

'/

',r!?:1,// -l' /r'7/2 i't'if' Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 302 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

RC370l Equip. Class 20. lnstrument and Control Panels Status@N U Equipment Description Relay Cabinet in Mechanical Penetration Room 4 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

RC370l plate ID Plate of component RC370l general General view of component

of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS & CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

RC370l Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Relay Cabinet in Mechanical Penetration Room 4 RC370l Conduits Conduits Going into Cabinet Sheet 303 Status(flN U

Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.

ENGINEERS & CONSU I_TAI\\TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment tD No.

SFl1 Equip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valve Statu{'hN u Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB BWST Supply Line to SFP Pumps Floor El.

586' Room 304 Manufacturer" Model. Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such No degraded condition identified.

required (i.e., is the item one verification)?

N Y

N Y

N Y

N N

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than oxidation?

Valvefound in good condition. No signs of corrosing mild surface identified in main line.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N Y

X X

X X

X X

PCe Paul c. Rizzo-Associates,

[nc.

ENGINEERS.S( CONSUI-TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

SFI I Equip. Class BWST Supply Line to Equipment Description Sheet 305 of 379 Statusff)N U 0d. Other - check valve or manual valve SFP Pumps Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse ceiling tiles and lighting, onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

/ :--/

a -'t-ft' t\\4j-,1 712512012 Eddie M. Guerra

':l i i :

l'

/

,'$**!/ b" {it'/"?'/

7t2512012 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 306 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS

& CONSUI.JTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. SFI I Equip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valve Equipment Description BWST Supply Line to SFP Pumps Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

Status(?')N u SFI I component ID ID Plate of component SFI I general view General view of component

Sheet 307 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.

ENCINEERS 6{ CONSUI-T"A.NTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Status:ON U Equipment ID No. SFl6164' Equipment Description Equip. Class SFP Cleanup System 0d. Other - check valve or manual valve FE 1616 KI Source Location: Bldg.

AUXB Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Floor El.

570'3" Room 122 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Small hand value on -l " diameter pipe.

Pipe rigidly supported to wall within -10" of valve.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Wall mounted supports found in adequate condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N Y

N Y

N N

Y N

Y N/A N

X X

X X

X X

Sheet 308 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

SF1616.4 Equip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valve Equipment Description SFP Cleanup System FE l616 KI Source Status(?)N u Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

N

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse ceiling tiles and lighting, onto the equipment?

N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv:

7lzsl20r2 Eddie M. Guerra

,' / i

,r, u

l /{t/..t::// ! t,'//, :'i'r 712512012 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 309 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

EN( ; INEI RS & C]ONST; LTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. SFl616A Equip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valve StatusffiN U Equipment Description SFP Cleanup System FE 1616 Kl Source Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

SF I 616A Plate ID Plate of component SF l6l64 General Overall view of component and anchorage

PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENGINEERS Sr CONSUI.TANTTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

SF47 Equipment Description SFP Inlet From SFP Heat Exchangers Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

Sheet 310 of379 Status'rf') N U Equip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valve 591'2.5" Room 312 Manufacturer. Model. Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Horizontally mounted manual valve on -10" pipe.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A X

X X

X X

X

Sheet 311 of319 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENC}INEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Status@N U Equipment Equipment ID No. SF47 Equip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valve Description SFP Inlet From SFP Heat Exchansers Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the area verified.

Blockwalls 3257 and 3267 verffied to be to be seismically adequate based on ref. VBWL6-8001-083, Rev 2 (4/27/88) and VBWI6-8001-084, Rev 5 (4/27/88)

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N/A X

X X

X Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra 7l2sl20r2 ii';.,/ilf ir 7t2512012 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 312 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

SF47 Equip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valve Equipment Description SFP Inlet From SFP Heat Exchangers Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

status(?)N u SF47 plate ID Plate of component SF47 general General view of component

Sheet 313 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

SF47 Equip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valve Equipment Description SFP Inlet From SFP Heat Exchangers Sfl+7 adjacent block wall Potential interaction hazard from masonry wall near unit Status(?')N u

PCe Paul C. Rizz-o Associates,

[nc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

SP17A7 Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Sheet 314 of379 status'-4N u Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves CODE SAFETY VALVE SP17A7 Floor El.

643 Room 602 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No degraded condition identified.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Valve and main line found with no signs of corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X

X X

X X

PCe Paul C-Rizzo Associates,

[nc.

ENCINEERS & CONSUIJTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

SP17A7 Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Equipment Description CODE SAFETY VALVE SP17A7 of 319 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

Other Adverse Conditions I 1. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

Sheet315 status$N U

Valves 7t2512012 X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 316 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENGTNEERS & CONSUITANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. SWl399 Equip. Class MOV SW-1399 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Status'.QN U Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

INTK Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Floor El.

566.25 Room 53 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No degraded condition identified.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A N/A N/A X

X X

X X

X

Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.

ENGINEERS S{ CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist Equipment ID No. SWl399 (swc)

Equip. Class MOV SW-1399 8A. Motor-Operated Equipment Description Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Attached lines found w ith adeq uate fl exibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

3t7 of 379 StatusON U Valves N/A 7t25/20r2 X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra

'. ', 1

..,.11"t'. /

,( i,/'/t'rn*

a,r{l/:,7,//' 5'/" t !/:

Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet3lS of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. SW1399 Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment Description MOV SW-r399 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

SW 1399 plate ID Plate of component Status@N U SW 1399 general General view of component

PC?

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENCINEERS & CONSULIANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. SW3963 Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description RELIEF VALVE SW 3963 Location: Bldg.

INTK Floor El.

566.25 Room 53 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Mounted on insludated pipe. No degraded condition identified.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Sheet 319 of3l9 Statusff)N U X

X

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that oxidation?

is more than mild surface N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Anchorage of supporting main line found with minor spalled grout.

Judged not to reduce seismic capacity of support base.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X

X X

Sheet 320 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.

ENGINEERS S. CONSU LTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. SW3963 Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description RELIEF VALVE SW 3963 statusG)N u Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N/A X

X X

X Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Scaffold is the area is properly restrained.

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv:

-::3/

4,f/'--/o

- -.-----W,l i /q,*.A'+j

. t 7/25/2012 Eddie M. Guerra

,";;/ ", /',l j

• t'rf'

, i>i'/:*' E ', ftr!'+!"

7/25/2012 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 321 of 379 Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGTNEERS 6( CONSUITANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. SW3963 Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description RELIEF VALVE SW 3963 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

SW3963 Plate ID Plate of component Status/?)N U SW3963 General General view of component

Sheet 322 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.

ENGINEERS.\\ CONSU [T.{N1TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. SW-5896 Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves 516urff)N U Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB CTRM EMERG COND I-I Floor El.

638 Room 603 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Small valve on -2.5" diameter pipe. Pipe span <-6.5' with rigid supports. Value is -I2" from one end of the spqn. Valve height -24". OK.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorase free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

NiA X

X X

X X

X

Sheet 323 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTAT\\ITS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

SW-5896 Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description CTRM EMERG COND I-I StatusF)N u Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra 712512012

.if;,;{/

712512012 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 324 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. SW-5896 Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description CTRMEMERG COND I-I Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

SW5896 general General view of component Status(?)N u

PCe Paul c. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENCINEERS & CONST,}LTAI{TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

SW82 Sheet 325 of 379 StatusON U Equip. Class 0d. Other - checklmanual valve Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

INTK MANUAL VALVE SW 82 Floor El.

s65 Room 251 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Small manual valve on -12" diameter insulated pipe. Pipe is rigidly supported at about three pipe diamters on either side of valve. OK.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A X

X X

X X

X

Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.

ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

SW82 Equipment Description MANUAL VALVE SW 82 Equip. Class 0d. Other - check/manual Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

326of 379 Status(?')N u valve Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra

,;i*','g' E i f2':;'

Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 327 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. SW82 Equip. Class 0d. Other - check/manual valve Equipment Description MANUAL VALVE SW 82 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

SW82 Plate and General Overall view of component Status(?)N u

Sheet 328 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

EN(}INEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Status:QN U Equipment ID No. Tl0 Equipment Description Equip. Class BORATED WATER 2l. Tanks and Heat Exchangers STORAGE TANK I-I Location: Bldg.

AUXB Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Floor El.

565 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage l.Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

No missing parts identified.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Slight surface rust on one anchor bolt. OK.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Tank anchorage verifiedfrom drawing C 117 and SQUG calculation C-CSS-TI0 showing 48 - 2.S"diam. Bolts.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Room PT NiA X

X X

X X

X

PCe Paul C' Rizzo Associates,

[nc.

ENGINEERS ( CONSUUTAT{TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Tl0 Equip. Class BORATED WATER Equipment Description Sheet 329 of379 Status(?)N u

21. Tanks and Heat Exchansers STORAGE TANK I.I Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Temporary maintenance equipment identified in the area but no significant potential interoction was expected.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N/A N/A X

X X

X Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv:

712512012 Eddie M. Guerra

.i,';it..,r,/,!r ri,,//,r;1,

Slt/!,t;7.

,/

!2-'

t +1,t2 i'1t:.

7lzsl20r2 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 330 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

Er-GINEERS

& CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Tl0 Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description BORATED WATER STORAGE TANK I-I Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

BWST General It) Plate of corttponent Status(?\\N u BWST Anchorage Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors

Sheet 331 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.

ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Tl2 Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Status:ON U Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB COMPONENT COOLING SURGE TANLK T12 Room 501 Floor El.

623 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Horizontal tank on two saddles with cross bracing anchored to short concrete pedestals.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

A small gap -l/4" found between a nut and washer at one anchor location.

Judged not to be a significant adverse condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

See item 6 below.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage verification based on SQUG calculation C-CSS-TI2 showing 8-l"diambolts.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Hairline crack on one of the concrete pedestals. Judged not a significant adverse condition N/A N/A X

X X

X X

X

Sheet 332 of319 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.

ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. T12 Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description COMPONENT COOLING SURGE TANLK, T12 Statusff)N u lnteraction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Adjacent pipe lines running close to tankjudged not an adverse condition N/A X

X X

X Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

712512012 Eddie M. Guerra

,rti',,,/ r:! : r4, t,.'.t.U,/

, ' ! 7 / '

712512012 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 333 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Irrc.

Ex*G I NH ERS $r CONSU LTAN'I S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

StatusON U Equipment ID No. Tl2 Equipment Description Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers COMPONENT COOLING SURGE TANLK.TI2 Other suooortins or relevant documents and photos (if an Tl2 plate ID Plate of component Tl2 general General view of component

Sheet 334 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, lnc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTAN]TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

StatusG)N u Equipment ID No. Tl2 Equipment Description Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers COMPONENT COOLING SURGE TANLK,TIZ III I

Tl2loose bolt front right Anchor bolt coming loose on the front right of component Tl2 anchorage typical Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors

Sheet 335 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS &. CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Status(?')N u Equipment ID No.

Tl2 Equipment Description Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers COMPONENT COOLING SURGE TANLK,TIZ Tl2 Pedestal with Minor Hairline Crack

Sheet 336 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.

E}iGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Floor El.

YARD Room YARD Manufacturer. Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Tank partially buried, unable to view anchorage.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

None observed.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

None observed, anchorage not accessible.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

None observed, anchorage not accessible.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Status:$N U Equipment ID No. Tl53-l Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Location: Blde.

YARD EDG FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK I.I. FOR EDG I-1. PARTIALLY BELOWGROUND N/A X

X X

X X

X

PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENGTNEERS S{ CONSUITAIfTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. T153-1 Equipment Description Sheet 337 of379 Status(TlN u Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers EDG FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK I-I, FOR EDG I-1 PARTIALLY BELOW GROUND Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N/A N/A X

X X

X Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SQUG Calc C-CSS-TL53-l concludes anchorage and attached lines are adequate.

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffrich

---:tz/

,/)/n/*

.-.--ffi/-7;goal.r, 7125/2012 7/25/2012

Sheet 338 of 379 Paul C. Ri z,ze AssocilltL:s, I ttc.

I:\\( i l N F - [ R S

. \\ ( '( ) N \\ t I l \\ \\

I r Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. T153-l Equip.Class Status N U 2l. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description EDG FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK I-I, FOR EDG I-I, PARTIALLY BELOW GROUND Other supporting or relevant docutnents and photos (if any):

{

r

- 6 '

i

. : i T l 5 3 - l G e n e r a l General View of Component

Sheet 339 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

EN(}INEERS S{ CONSULTAN1TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. T46-l Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Status:$N U Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR DAY TANK I-I, FOR EDG I-I Floor El.

585 Room 32lA Manufacturer. Model. Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Each tank saddle anchoredwith 4-3/4" anchor bolts.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion oxidation?

Anchorage found in good condition.

that is more than mild surface No signs of corrosion identified

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage verifiedfrom SQUG calc C-CSS-716-l and drmuing C-0213A for two saddles and 4-3/4"diam bolts ot each support.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X

X X

X X

Sheet 340 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENC IN EERS & CONSULTAI\\TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. T46-l Equipment Description status(QN U Equip. Class 2l. Tanks and Heat Exchangers EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR DAY TANK FOR EDG I.I Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the area verified.

Blockwalls 305D and 306D verified to be to be seismically adequate based on refs.

VBWI2-8001-065, Rev 5 (4/21/88) andVBWI2-8001-066, Rev 6 (8/26/87)

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv:

/,e/e 7lzs/2012 Eddie M. Guerra

,rtir'7/ / , /'2: rir"'

7/2s/20r2 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 341 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. T46-l Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Status@N U Equipment Description EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR DAY TANK 1-I, FOR EDG I-I T46-l plate ID Plate of component T46-l general General view of component

Sheet 342 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

T46-l Equipment Description I

I I

I T46-l anchorage Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors T46-l masonry wall Potential interaction hazard from masonry wall near unit Status(?)N u Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR DAY TANK I-I FOR EDG I-I

Sheet 343 of 319 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS d. CONSUTTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. TE-5329 Equip. Class 19. Temperature Sensors StatusON U Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB EDG RM 3I8 TEMP ELEMENT Floor El.

585 Room 3 1 8 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50oh of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Very small temperature element mounted on a strut channelwith huo l/4" diameter channel nuts. The strut channel is then anchored to a blockwqll with two 3/S" diameter anchor bolts. OK.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that oxidation?

is more than mild surface

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50oh for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A X

X X

X X

X

PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENCINEERS dr CONSUITAilTTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

TE-5329 Equip. Class 19. Temperature Sensors Equipment Description EDG RM 3I8 TEMP ELEMENT Sheet 344 of 379 StatusFN U Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Component is anchored to Block Walls 308D/309D. Seismic adequacy verified by calculations VBWI2-8001-068, Rev 3 (5/27/81) and VBWI3-8001-069, Rev 3 (5/28/8l)

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N/A Y

X X

X X

Other Adverse Conditions 1l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffrich 7125/2012 7125/2012

Sheet 345 of 379 Pau[ C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

TE-5329 Equip. Class 19. Temperature Sensors Equipment Description EDG RM 3I8 TEMP ELEMENT Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

T85329 plate and general Overall view of component and anchorage Status(?)N u

Sheet 346 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.

ENGINEERS &" CONSUTJTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. T5-5261 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description CTRM EMERG VENT FAN I TEMP SWT StatusON U Location: Bldg.

AUXB Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Floor El.

638 Room 603 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Very lightweight temperature switch mounted on a cantilevered rack (HSS 6x6) which is anchored to floor withfour l/2" diameter anchor bolts. The sensor is attached to two welded strut channels (to HSS) with four l/4" diameter channel nuts. OK.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that oxidation?

is more than mild surface

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50Yo for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N/A N/A X

X X

X X

X

347 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.

ENCINEERS Si CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. T5-5261 Equipment Description Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks CTRM EMERG VENT FAN I TEMP SWT Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the areaverified.

Blockwalls 6017, 6107 and 6097 verified to be to be seismically adequate based on ref. VBW3I-8001-164, Rev 3 (2/14/06),

VBW32-8001-168, Rev 2 (5/10/88) and VBW32-8001-167, Rev I (l I/7/84).

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

Sheet of 379 Status(T)N u N/A Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Anchor spacing to other nearby instrument rqcks was iudged adequate.

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 348 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Lnc.

ENCINEERS &. CONSU LTAI -NTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. T5-5261 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description CTRM EMERG VENT FAN I TEMP SWT Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

T5261 plate ID Plate of component Status@N U T5261 general General view of comPonent

Sheet 349 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. T5-5261 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description CTRM EMERG VENT FAN I TEMP SWT StatusG)N u T5261 block wall Potential interaction hazard from masonry wall near unit T5261 anchorage View of anchorage

pCe Paul C. Rizzo-4.ssocia-tes, lnc.

EN(iINEERS S{ CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. XCEI-l Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB Sheet 350 of 379 Status0N U

Equip. Class 4. Transforrners TRANSFORMER CE I-I Floor El.

603 Room 429 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage 1.Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Attached to unit substation EI. The transformer is welded to embed channels with stitchwelds at one side and plugwelds at the opposite side.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration evaluated in SQUG calculations C-CSS-CEI-l and C-CSS-DFI-2 andfound acceptable.

Based on page 6 of I I of C-CSS-DFL-2, confirmed that one side has two 3/8" thick, 3.5" Iongwelds and opposite side has plugwelds.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A N/A X

X X

X X

X

pCe lggl-9-.-Bizzo

-4ggociates, I nc.

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. XCEI-1 Equip. Class 4. Transforrners Equipment Description TRANSFORMER CE I-I Sheet Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No potential interaction hazard indetified in the area.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

351of 379 statusfi)N u 7/25/2012 X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M.

, a ; l

/-1*

th"4eJ..(

,/

/

1 l,

- /

,". /

,.//

.t't/t.t t !.lz "i;rt Adam L. Helffrich Guerra

Sheet 352 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS & CONSUIiTAI,ITS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. XCEI-l Equip. Class StatusG)N u

4. Transformers Equipment Description TRANSFORMER CE I.I Other supporting or relevant documents and photpq(4g!

XCE-l Plate ID Plate of component XCE-I General General view of component

Sheet 353 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

StatusG)N u Equipment ID No. XCEI-l Equipment Description Equip. Class TRANSFORMER CE

4. Transformers l - l XCE-I Stitch Weld Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors

Sheet 354 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTA\\TTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. XDF1-2 Equip. Class TRANSFORMER DF Status:QN U

4. Transforrners Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

603 Room 428 t-2 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage l.Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Attached to unit substation FL. The transformer is welded to embed channels with stitch welds at one side and plug welds at the opposite side.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

As-installed anchorage configuration evaluated andfound adequate in SQUG calculation C-CSS-DFI-2.

Based on page 6 of I I of C-CSS-DFI-2, confirmed that one side has two 3/8" thick, 3.5" longwelds and opposite side has plugwelds.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A X

X X

X X

X

PCe Paul C. Rizzo Ass-ociates, lnc.

E:{GINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. XDFI-2 Equip. Class TRANSFORMER DF Equipment Description Sheet

4. Transforrners t-2 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No potential interaction hazard indetified in the area.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

355of 379 StatusON u N/A N/A N/A 7/2s12012 7/25/2012 X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv:

Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 356 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Status(1)N u Equipment ID No. XDFI-2 Equipment Description Equip. Class 4. Transformers TRANSFORMER DF I-2 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

XDFI-2Plate ID Plate of component XDFI-2 General General view of component

Sheet 357 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENG INE[-.RS S{ C]()NSL-:l T ANT'S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

StatusffiN U Equipment ID No. XDFI-2 Equipment Description Equip. Class TRANSFORMER DF

4. Transformers l-2 XDF l -2 Stitch Weld Unit is stitch welded along the entire XDFI -2 No Anchorage No welding apparent on rear of component as the front of the unit Front front of the Rear used on component

Sheet 358 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.

ENGINEERS & CONSUI.TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Yl05 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Status:ff)N U Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

603 Room 429 EDG l-l DISCONNECT SWITCH FOR C3615 inside PNL Yl Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inside Panel YI. Panel mountedwith four 3/4" anchors.

No degraded c ondition found.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

None ob served during w alkdown.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

None observed during w alkdow n.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

None observed during walkdown.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A X

X X

X X

X

PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates,

[nc.

ENCINEERS & CONSUI.TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Yl05 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description EDG l-l DISCONNECT SWITCH FOR C3615 inside PNL Sheet Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Top bracing provided by top entry conduit.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safetv found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

359of 379 Status:)N U

7t25/2012 7/25/2012 X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra

,'l,trr' I

)dY':t:"?/ i1i3 l,'./,/./,/

Adam L. Helffrich

PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates,

[nc.

ENGINEERS & CONSUITANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

Yz Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description PNL Y2 Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

603 Room 428 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Panel anchored withfour I " diameter anchor bolts and two stffined brackets at one side of the panel which are anchored eachwith one 3/4" diameter onchor.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration is shown seismically adequate in SQUG calculation C-CSS-Y2.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Sheet 360 of 379 gl4urtf)N U

X X

Y N/A X

X X

X

Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.

EN(}INEERS Tt{ CONSU LTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Y2 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description PNL Y2 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Top entry conduits are rigidly connected and provide laterql restraint.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

361of 379 StatuslV)N u NiA 7125/2012 X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv:

Eddie M. Guerra

/

t'"1" ;/

'ii '//'")

';#,/7rt

/i-'

t d,za :'i-:.'

Date:

Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 362 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS

&. CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Y2 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels status(?)N u Equipment Description PNL Y2 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

Y2 plate ID Plate of component Y2 general General view of component

Sheet 363 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, [nc.

ENGINET,RS di CONSU IJTANTTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. YZ Equip. Class StatusFN U

I 4. Distribution Panels Equipment Description PNL Y2 Y2 anchorage Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors

.b' Y2 anchorage one side only Additional anchorage on outside of the unit, on one side only

PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates,

[nc.

ENGINEERS & CONSL}LTANITS Sheet 364 of 379 statu{ft U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

YE2B Equip. Class 4. Transforrners Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB 24O.I2OV TRANSFORMER Floor El.

585 Room 304 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. ls the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Tronsformer is located inside MCC YE2. 3 Section MCC, typical ll{CC anchorage.

(i.e. MCC connected to its inverted base channels with 3/8" diameter bolts and the base channel is stitch welded to the embedded channel in concrete floor)

No adverse condition identifiedfor stitchv,eld of cabinet.

X X

X X

X X

Sheet 365 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.

ENGINEERS S( CONSUITANTTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. YE2B Equip. Class 4. Transformers Equipment Description 240-I2OV TRANSFORMER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

No maintenance equipment identified in the area.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Rigid conduits on end have rigid supports andwill provide lateral restraint

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

of 379 status(DN u N/A N/A 712512012 7/2s/20r2 X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra

.Ftu/l:/4r

,;ii*,,r/ /i, /i',tii' Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 366 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.

ENGINEERS &. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

YE2B Equip. Class 4. Transformers Equipment Description 24O.I2OV TRANSFORMER Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

Status/?)N U YE2B Plate ID Plate of component YE2B General General view of comPonent

R Paul-(]. RizzirA$:sj:rl:r ll'l:

I ; \\ ( ; I N L I t l s \\. ( ' ( ) n N S l - l l, \\ N f r Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. YE2B Equip. Class 4. Transformers Equipment Description 240-I2OV TRANSFORMER Sheet 367 of 379 Status N U YE2B stirch Partial view of anchorage, view weld is typical of all anchors

PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENCINEERS & CONSU I.TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. YFI Equipment Description Sheet 368 of379 Statuq(?) N u Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels MCC YFI. Emersencv Diesel Generator Room 2 Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

585 Room 319 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

in line with MCC FI28 welded to embeded channel with an average of at least 5" of 3/16" fillet welds at.front and back.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%ofor which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

SQUG calculations C-CSS-YFI and C-CSS-FI28 verifies seismic adequacy of the as-built anc horage c onfigur ation.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X

X X

X X

PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENGINEERS d( CONSUITAT{TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. YFI Equip. Class Sheet 369 of379 StatusG)N u I 4. Distribution Panels Equipment Description MCC YFI, Emergency Diesel Generator Room 2 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

No maintenance equipment identified in the area.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N/A X

X x

X Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra 7t25/20r2

• iir*!/ i lti

i,,llt 7/25/2012 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 370 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS

&. CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. YFI Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Status/?)N u Equipment Description YFI Plate ID Plate of component MCC YFI, Emergency Diesel Generator Room 2 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

YFI General General view of component

PCe Paul C' Rizzo Asso-ciates, lnc.

ENGINEERS & CONSUITANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. YRF2 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Regulating Rectifier YRF2 Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

603 Room 428 Manufacturer. Model. Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The equipment is in a line with other cabinets D2P and W2. The internal connection of these panels was verified. Each of these panels are anchored to the concrete floor withfour l" diameter anchor bolts.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

SQUG calculation C-CSS-YV2 references YRF2 with no anchorage concerns.

yRF2 is referenced as lighter and exact same cabinet as YV2.

The seismic qualification of the line-up that consists of YRF2, D2P and YV2 is in SQUG calculation C-CSS-D2 P.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Sheet 311 of379 Status:${ U X

X X

X X

X

DCe Paul C. Riezo Associates,

[nc.

ENGINEERS

& CONSULTANTTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

YRF2 Equipment Description Regulating Rectifi er YRF2 Sheet 312 of 379 StatusSN U Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Nearbyfire extinguisher not strapped to wall. Judged not to be a significant interaction.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Top entry conduits have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X x

Other Adverse Conditions 1L Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffrich 7t2512012

' ' :. f i "

7/25/2012

Sheet 373 of 379 Pau[ C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS

&. CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. YR.F2 Equipment Description Status'Q\\

U Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Resulatine Rectifi er YRF2 v v Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

YRF2 plate ID Plate of component YRF2 general General view of component

Sheet 374 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS & CONSI,-}LTAT.TTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. YRF2 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Status'$\\ U Equipment Description Regulating Rectifi er YRF2 YRFI open connected to DIP Corresponding train I component opened to view internal bolting

Sheet 375 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENC INET],RS {i CON$UITANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. YV2 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB Regulating Inverter YV2 statusG)N u Floor El.

603 Room 428 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The equipment is in a line with other cabinets D2P and YRF2. The internal connection of these panels was verified. Eqch of these panels are anchored to the concrete floor withfour l" diameter anchor bolts.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

N o significant c orrosion identifeid

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The seismic qualification of the line-up that consists of YRF2, D2P and YV2 is in SOUG calculation C-CSS-D2P.

SQUG calculation C-CSS-YV2 indicates FCR 86-0272 implemented to resolte a pounding concern.

No gap observed between cabinets, confirming I.'CR 86-0272.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A N/A X

X X

X X

X

Sheet 376 of 379 Paul C, Rizzo Associates, Inc.

E\\GINEERS S. CONSIT! IiT.A.NTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. YV2 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters StatusFN U Equipment Description Regulating Inverter YV2 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

No maintenance equipment identified in the area.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N/A N/A N/A X

X X

X Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

- -=:7J

/.["./ *-l*

---

ffi/(X1;i:f 7t2512012 Eddie M. Guerra

,,iin',,r/

/a,1,

'!,'/.2t 712512012 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 377 of 379 Paul C. Rizz,o Associates, f nc.

ENGINEERS di CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Equipment ID No.

YYZ 4 anchor bolts Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors StatusON U Checklist (SWC)

YV2 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Regulating Inverter YV2 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

YV2 plate ID Plate of component YVz general General view of component uf*tT ? TA6 rd$. Yve tEs$EitTrA[

tt{$rRuH[r$T eil

Sheet 378 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CT}NSULTAI$T-S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e.,

of the 50%o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This panel is part of a line-up that includes D2N and YRF4.

to the concrete with four 3/4" diameter anchor bolts.

is the item one Each panel is anchored

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 5Ao/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

SQUG Calculation C-CSS-YV4 indicatesfour 3/4" anchors and that ll4OD-95-0034 resolves a pounding concern.

Anchorage and implementation of MOD-95-0034 vere confirmed duringwalkdown

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A U

N Status$rr U Equipment ID No. YV4 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description I25VDC/l2OVAC INVERTER CH 4 Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

603 Room 4288 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

X X

X X

X X

Sheet 379 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.

ENCINEERS S. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. YV4 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description I25VDCII2OVAC INVERTER CH 4 status$

u Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Seismic capacity of block walls in the area verified.

Blockwall 4016 verffied to be to be seismically adequate based on ref. VBW20-8001-100, Rev I4 (12/6/88).

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

X X

Other Adverse Conditions I 1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra

ri';t:l'"r/'

Adam L. Helffrich 712512012 7/25/2012