ML13008A062
ML13008A062 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Davis Besse ![]() |
Issue date: | 08/10/2012 |
From: | Lucarelli B A, Beigi F, Guerra E, Helffrich A L, Reddington J, Wakefield D ABS Consulting, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co |
To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
References | |
L-12-283 | |
Download: ML13008A062 (121) | |
Text
APPENDIX B: SEISMIC WALK-DOWN CHECKLISTS (SWCs)B-1 I~~ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.F M; I N E LRS & Ut)NSt I I A V1 S Sheet I of 461 N U Status: (Y Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0G41AO002A Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description FPCC Surge Tank Location:
Bldg.1B Floor El. 599 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Tall vertical tank. At top penetrates ceiling at elevation 620. Top bracing provided by floor slab.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Surrounding area found in adequate condition.
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
LIZX Y N U N/A I X Y N U N/A I- Ix -I Y N U N/A Y N U N/A I I I n x I Y N U x I
-Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONSULTAN"TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 461 Status: Y)N U Equipment ID No. OG41AO002A Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description FPCC Surge Tank Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 DOD Patil C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Sheet 3 of 461 N U Status: W Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OG41AO002A Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description FPCC Surge Tank Other supporting or rele)photos (if any): lile Name: L-b1-1-4-2L.Jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID vile Name: 2-02-1-4-22.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of component LKIYPauil C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGCINEE~RS&
ONSULTAM S Sheet 4 of 461 N U Status: (Y Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. OG41AO002A Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description FPCC Surge Tank ilie Name: Z-b-i1-4-ZL.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of attached lines to component rile INUame: L-o'-t-1'-LL.Jpeg
==
Description:==
View of component anchorage detail
' Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.E\( INRS ,& CON'S LI PY %NS Sheet 5 of 461 N U Status: (Y)Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OG41CO003A Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description FPCC Pump A Location:
Bldg.IB Floor El. 574 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Anchored with 10 -7/8" diam anchor bolts on -6" concrete pad 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage configuration confirmed by Drawing 18_0019-00000004.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N X _L I___ I Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U xI Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EN'GINERS
& CONVSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 6 of 461 N U Status: W Equipment IDNo. OG41CO003A Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description FPCC Pump A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 FW II- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.t'or tMNFCR' t 1)NMI MIN Sheet 7 of 461 N U Status: (Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. OG41CO003A Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description FPCC Pump A id photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-2-4-21.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of component File Name: 2-62-2-4-21.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of attached lines Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 8 of 461[OGINPERS
& CONSULTANTS Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OG41CO003A Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description FPCC Pump A File Name: 2-63-2-4-21.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of component anchorage configuration il-le Name: z-o4-2-4-2i.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of small tube line supports Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.FGINEER, & CONSLTTAVTS Sheet 9 of 461 N U Status: (2)Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. OG41CO003B Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description FPCC Pump B Location:
Bldg.IB Floor El. 574 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Anchored with 10 -7/8" diam anchor bolts on -6" concrete pad 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage configuration confirmed by Drawing 18_0019-00000_004.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N LX I I Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U X T -l LX-- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENG.INEERS
& CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 10 of 461 Status: (Y N U Equipment ID No. 0G41C0003B Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description FPCC Pump B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A Lucarelli Date: 8/26/20 12 rlullýI -.I%- %- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Sheet I I of 461 ENINPuRSl
& COSL I I AVs I S Status: ) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. 0G41CO003B Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description FPCC Pump B Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-1-4-21.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of component rlue ijaum:
==
Description:==
View of attached lines Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 12 of 461 ENGINEERS
& CONSU[LT.ATS Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OG41CO003B Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description FPCC Pump B File Name: 2-63-1-4-21.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of component anchorage configuration
-- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Sim Wa INEdoRS & tCh)NcLT(SWC)
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 13 of 461 Status: (Y)N U Equipment ID No. 0G41F0542A Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Equipment Description Fuel Pool Circ Pump Suction Valve Location:
Bldg.IB Floor El. 574 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Small manual valve on -14" diam pipe line. No degraded condition identified
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
LI X Y N U N/A I X Y N U N/A Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A x Y N U x LW` Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONSULTA+,S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 14 of 461 Status: T N U Equipment ID No. 0G41F0542A Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Equipment Description Fuel Pool Circ Pump Suction Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 I Q- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.UNCINFERS
& CON4 ULANTh Sheet 15 of 461 Status: (Y)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0G41F0542A Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Equipment Description Fuel Pool Circ Pump Suction Valve nd photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-6-1-21 .jpeg
Description:
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-6-1-21 .jpeg
Description:
General view of component Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEE.S
&
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 16 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment IDNo. 0G41F0542B Equipment Description Fue Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Il Pool Circ Pump B Suction Valve Location:
Bldg.IB Floor El. 574 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Small manual valve on -14" diam pipe line. No degraded condition identified
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
~I X Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A T I Ix Y N U N/A I I I I x I Y N U x F -1 I L Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENSsINcERSd
& ow ONSL S C Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 17 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment ID No. 0G41F0542B Equipment Description Fue Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve I Pool Circ Pump B Suction Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attachedpiping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 LPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 18 of 461 EN(INEER'
& CONSULT.N.VM Status: (Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0G41F0542B Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Equipment Description Fuel Pool Circ Pump B Suction Valve Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): rlle Name: -oi--/-i-2i.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-7-1-21.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of component L C Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONSU ITANT Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 19 of 461 Status: (D N U Equipment ID No. 0G41F0545A Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Equipment Description FPCC Pump A Disch Check Valve Location:
Bldg.IB Floor El. 574 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Inline check valve on-14 " diam pipe line. Pipe line shows adequate support. No degraded condition identified
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A Y N U N/A Y N U N/A Y N U x -
I y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONSLiTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 20 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment ID No. 0G41F0545A Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Equipment Description FPCC Pump A Disch Check Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012
~Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINliltS
& (4)NSULTAIS Sheet 21 of 461 Status: (Y)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0G41F0545A Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Equipment Description FPCC Pump A Disch Check Valve orting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-3-4-2 l.jpeg
Description:
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-3-4-21 .jpeg
Description:
View of valve location in pipe main line LK-- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 22 of 461 ENGINEERS
& "I'NSULTAVTS Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0G41F0545A Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Equipment Description FPCC Pump A Disch Check Valve File Name: 2-63-3-4-21.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of main pipe line connected to component Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.NCINIURS & CONSUITANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 23 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment ID No. 0G41 F05 Equipment Description Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve-FPCC Pump B Disch Check Valve Location:
Bldg.IB Floor El. 574 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Inline check valve on-1 4" diam pipe line. Pipe line shows adequate support. No degraded condition identified
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N LI X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A Y N U xI PleYNPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONSULTAN'TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 24 of 461 Status: T N U Equipment ID No. 0G41F054 Equipment Description Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve FPCC Pump B Disch Check Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 IPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 25 of 461 FNGINFERS
& CONSLIANVTS Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0G41F0545B Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Equipment Description FPCC Pump B Disch Check Valve Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-4-4-21.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of valve location in main pipe line D-- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONSULTArNTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 26 of 461 Status: T N U Equipment IDNo. 0G41F0546A Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Equipment Description Fuel Pool Circ Pump A Discharge Valve Location:
Bldg.lB Floor El. 574 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Small manual valve on -14" diam pipe line. No degraded condition identified
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N II X I Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A SN U N x/A Y N U N/A Y N U N/A I I I I x Y N U x FlXY Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENG.INE IRS & COM it TANITS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 27 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment ID No. 0G41F0546A Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Equipment Description Fuel Pool Circ Pump A Discharge Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attachedpiping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/20 12/Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Fvl'Z Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 28 of 461 ENGINEERS
& CONSULtTAN7TS Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0G41F0546A Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Equipment Description Fuel Pool Circ Pump A Discharge Valve Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-5-1-21.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID rite Iname: z-oL-)-i-Li.Jpeg
==
Description:==
View of valve location in pipe main line LXY Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& COMNSIAN1'"4 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 29 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment ID No. 0G41 F0546B Equipment Description Fue Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve I Pool Circ Pump B Discharge Isol Valve Location:
Bldg.IB Floor El. 574 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Small manual valve on -14" diam pipe line. No degraded condition identified
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N~Y N U N/A I X Y N U N/A 7x E Y N U N/A Y N U N/A I I I I xx Y N U x LK Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EN.GINEERS
& CONSULTANTS Sheet 30 of 461 Status: T Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0G41F0546B Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve N U Equipment Description Fuel Pool Circ Pump B Discharge Isol Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONS.LtAN71 Status: (Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0G41F0546B Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Equipment Description Fuel Pool Circ Pump B Discharge Isol Valve Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-8-1-21.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-8-1-21.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of wall mounted pipe line support Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 32 of 461 ENGINEERS
& CONSU LTAN-FS Status: (9) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0G41F0546B Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Equipment Description Fuel Pool Circ Pump B Discharge Isol Valve File Name: 2-63-8-1-21.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of pipe line support configuration
[Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.SNGINE s.RS &o COhec LTA (SWC Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 33 of 461 Status: (Y)N U Equipment ID No. OH51P0039 Equipment Description E4 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels CC & ESW Inst Rack Location:
Bldg.CC Floor El. 574 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Braced rack made of L2x2xli4.
Anchored with 8-1/2" anchors. Rack is on a -6" concrete pad 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
No significant corrosion identified
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Document SP-594 confirms the anchorage configuration.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N X I.. _. .. _ I_Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A x Y N U x F -T Fl'Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS
& CONSULTAN-S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 34 of 461 Status: (Y N U Equipment ID No. 0H51P0039 Equipment Description E(Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels XC & ESW Inst Rack Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attachedpiping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENG INF RS & CONS ULTANTS Sheet 35 of 461 Status: (2)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OH51P0039 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description ECC & ESW Inst Rack Other suoaortine or relevant d(nents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-6-4-01 .jpeg
Description:
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-6-4-01 .jpeg
Description:
General view of component LKYM Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONSUITAN-17 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 36 of 461 Status: (Y N U Equipment ID No. 0H51P0039 Equipment Description E4 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels CC & ESW Inst Rack File Name: 2-63-6-4-0 l.jpeg
Description:
Anchorage view of component File Name: 2-64-6-4-01.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of attached top lines
'WC Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EN.INFRS & CONStLTAVI.S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 37 of 461 Status: (Y)N U Equipment IDNo. 0H51P0193 Equipment Description E4 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels CCW Pumps & CC Chill H20 Inst Rack A Location:
Bldg.CC Floor El. 574 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Braced rack made of L2x2xl/4.
Anchored with 8-1/2" anchors. Rack is on a -6" concrete pad.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Document SP-594 confirms the anchorage configuration.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N X ZI IIZ Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A x Y N U x T --F L Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONSULTAN'TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 38 of 461 Status: (2)N U Equipment IDNo. 0H51P0193 Equipment Description E Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels CCW Pumps & CC Chill H20 Inst Rack A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate flexibility.
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x -T Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 FPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 39 of 461 Status: ) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0H51P0193 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description ECCW Pumps & CC Chill H20 Inst Rack A Other su orting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-7-4-0I.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID F &ALUO ,I&File Name: 2-62-7-4-01 .jpeg
Description:
General view of component Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 40 of 461 ENGINEERS
&
Status: Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0H51P0193 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description ECCW Pumps & CC Chill H20 Inst Rack A File Name: 2-63-7-4-01.jpeg
==
Description:==
Anchorage view of component rne iName: L-o,-I-,-uI.Jpeg
==
Description:==
View of attached top lines Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONM4ITA\N1 I Sheet 41 of 461 Status: ()N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0H51P0318 Equipment Description C Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels ontrol Complex Chiller A Control Panel Location:
Bldg.CC Floor El. 574 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Mounted to HX skid on two steel plates (L shape, -1/2 "thick) braced with cantilever posts. Posts welded all around to HX steel framing. Panel attached to framing w/ 4-3/8" diam. machine bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?None observed during inspection.
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
None observed during inspection.
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N II X Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A Y N U N/A I I I I x I Y N U X --T I Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONSILTAI:TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 42 of 461 Status: (Y)N U Equipment ID No. OH51P0318 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Control Complex Chiller A Control Panel Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Fire protection piping not directly above panel.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 IPaul C. Rizzo Asociates, Inc. Sheet 43 of 461 ENGINEERS&
Status: W1 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0H51P0318 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Control Complex Chiller A Control Panel Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-1-1-O0.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-1-1-01 .jpeg
Description:
General view of component LPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 44 of 461 ENGINEERS
& (X)NSULTANT1S Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0H51P03 18 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Control Complex Chiller A Control Panel File Name: 2-63-1-1-01.jpeg
==
Description:==
Isolator close up rIte iName; z-o'- I -I -I- jpeg
Description:
Isolators, plate welded to chiller Paul C. Rizzo Associatcs, Inc. Sheet 45 of 461 PNGINFERS
& CONIL ITANT" Status: ( N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OH51P0318 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Control Complex Chiller A Control Panel File Name: 2-73-1-1-01.jpeg
==
Description:==
Control panel base weld detail File Name: 2-94-1-1-01 .jpeg
Description:
Left side isolators attached to L Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 46 of 461 ENGINEERS
& CON.SULTA.-rS Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0H51P0318 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Control Complex Chiller A Control Panel rle Name: /-Y3-i-i-uI jpeg
Description:
Back view of component Lv'- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.FSimINFRS
& CONSCLT (NS C Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 47 of 461 Status: (Y)N U Equipment IDNo. OH51P1310 Equipment Description L Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels)cal Panel Location:
Bldg.EW Floor El. 586 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Mounted on a HSS6x6 post anchored to floor through its baseplate with 4-11/2" diam.anchor bolts. Two other components attached to post: P49NO040A-B by 2 -1/4" diam anchors and P49N00040A with 4 -1/2" diam anchors.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A Y N U x T --F L Y Paul C. Rizzo Associatcs, Inc.UNGGNEERS
&
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 48 of 461 Status: (D N U Equipment IDNo. oH51PI310 Equipment Description L(Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels ocaI Panel Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x 7 17I I Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Sheet 49 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. oH51PI310 Equipment Description L Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels ocal Panel id photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-3-1-05.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-3-1-05.jpeg
==
Description:==
Attached lines with adequate flexibility 12Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& COMSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 50 of 461 Status: Y)N U Equipment IDNo. OH51PI310 Equipment Description L Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels ocal Panel File Name: 2-63-3-1-05.jpeg
==
Description:==
Anchorage view of component rne iName: L-o4-)-i-ou.jpeg
==
Description:==
Close up view of angle support K Patul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ESi c aNEERS & ChONkL LTAN S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 51 of 461 Status: (Y)N U Equipment IDNo. 0H51P1310 Equipment Description L Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels ocal Panel File Name: 2-73-3-1-05.jpeg
==
Description:==
Instrumentation support detail File Name: 2-94-3-1-05.jpeg
==
Description:==
Differential not expected t---- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONSU LTA1'ES Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 52 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment IDNo. OM23CO001A Equip. Class 9. Fans Equipment Description Supply Fan M23-COOO1A Location:
Bldg.CC Floor El. 679 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Large fan supported by four C5 channelsfromfloor.
C4's welded to embedded angles with at least 10" of wrap around welds. Fan motor on concrete pad attached to angle embeds with 4 -3/4" bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Several hairline cracks identified but judged no adverse condition.
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage configuration confirmed by Drawing 68-0112.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N X I I Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x I Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I E quip Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 53 of 461 Status: N U EquipmentID No. OM23CO001A Equip. Class 9. Fans Equipment Description Supply Fan M23-COOOIA Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U xI Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x II I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012.. ......../ ,/ -- t "/Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 IviYý Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 54 of 461 ENG.INFERS
& CO'7NS U lTANTS Status: W1 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. OM23CO001A Equip. Class 9. Fans Equipment Description Supply Fan M23-COOO1A Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-3-4-04.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-3-4-04.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of Component IPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 55 of 461NO;NFURI & t O)NSI I T,.,%"I Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OM23CO001A Equip. Class 9. Fans Equipment Description Supply Fan M23-COOO1A File Name: 2-63-3-4-04.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of anchorage File Name: 2-64-3-4-04.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of Component
-- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& (rX)NSULTA%-rT Sheet 56 of 461 Status: (Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. OM23CO001A Equip. Class 9. Fans Equipment Description Supply Fan M23-COOO1A File Name: 2-73-3-4-04.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of attached line Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.I N(SINi I R'. & ChI eckis TSWA\Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 57 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment ID No. 0M23C0002A Equip. Class 9. Fans Equipment Description Return Fan M23-CO002A Location:
Bldg.CC Floor El. 679 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Large fan supported by four C5 channelsfromfloor.
C4's welded to embedded angles with at least 10" of wrap around welds. Fan motor on concrete pad attached to angle embeds with 4 -3/4" bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Several hairline cracks identified but judged no adverse condition.
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage configuration confirmed by Drawing 68-0112.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N X I_ ..I.. .. _Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I 'qr Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.E\CGINEERIý
& CONSULTA~rS Sheet 58 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0M23C0002A Equip. Class 9. Fans Equipment Description Return Fan M23-CO002A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A Lucarelli Date: 8/26/20 12 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.['(INJI IRý & CONSLI ITANI h Sheet 59 of 461 N U Status: W Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0M23C0002A Equip. Class 9.Equipment Description Return Fan M23-CO002A Other suooortin2 or relevant ents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-3-4-04.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-3-4-04.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of Component Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 60 of 461 ENGNlEERS
& CONSULTANTS Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0M23C0002A Equip. Class 9. Fans Equipment Description Return Fan M23-CO002A lvle Name: 2-03-i-4-U4.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of anchorage rite iName: L-o+-3-i-u'f.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of Component Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 61 of 461 EN(lNU MRS & UO 'I ITAN-I" Status: ( N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0M23C0002A Equip. Class 9. Fans Equipment Description Return Fan M23-CO002A File Name: 2-73-3-4-04.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of attached line DOZQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS.
& CONSU[AN-rS Sheet 62 of 461 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OM23FO100A Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description Supply Fan Vortex Damper Location:
Bldg.CC Floor El. 679 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Small motor operator on heavy bracedframe.
Anchored to floor with 16 -5/8" diam anchor bolts. Operator attached to frame with 4 -1/4" diam machine bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N II X I Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x F _ I 1ýI 1Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.FN(;NEER'& LTANITS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 63 of 461 Status: (N U Equipment IDNo. OM23FO100A Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description Supply Fan Vortex Damper Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U x Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x II I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012
~Qj Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EN.GINEERS
& CONSULTANT" Sheet 64 of 461 N U Status: (Y)Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OM23FO100A Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description Supply Fan Vortex Damper rting or relev and photos (if any): rile iName: z-ol-t-4-u4jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID L I I1,0 -File Name: 2-62-1-4-04.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of Component
'IC Pauil C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.F%'( I'LR' E& CONSULTAN~T, Sheet 65 of 461 Status: (Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OM23FO100A Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description Supply Fan Vortex Damper N U File Name: 2-63-1-4-04.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of attached lines File Name: 2-64-1-4-04.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of anchorage LVY- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONMiLTATVTIS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 66 of 461 Status: ()N U Equipment ID No. 0P47B00(Equipment Description Equip. Class 11. Chillers CCCW Chiller 0P47-BOOO1A Location:
Bldg.CC Floor El. 574 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Chiller mounted on two steel -8" HSS sections anchored with 4 -1 3/4" anchor bolts to a 6"-thick concrete pad Motor and pump on the same skid 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Anchors inspected found in adequate condition.
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage configuration confirmed by Drawing 414-046, Auxiliary Plan "K".6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N X I I Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I
---Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Sheet 67 of 461 Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0P47B00(Equipment Description Equip. Class 11. Chillers CCCW Chiller 0P47-BOOO IA Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
No potential ineraction hazards identified
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attachedpiping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Paul C. Rizzo Associatcs, Inc. Sheet 68 of 461 ENCINEERS
& CONSULTVAIS Status: (1 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OP47BOO01A Equip. Class 11. Chillers Equipment Description CCCW Chiller 0P47-BOOOIA rting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-8-4-U1jIpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-8-4-01 .jpeg
Description:
General view of component LQPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Ss(;mNWL RSk & CONShit (WAN )Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 69 of 461 Status: (2)N U Equipment ID No. 0P47B00(Equipment Description Equip. Class 01. Chillers CCCW Chiller 0P47-BOOO IA tlre iname: ,Z-oi-5-4-u-.jpeg
==
Description:==
Scaffolding located in the area tile Name: L-o4-b-4-ul.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of insulation material in concrete wall
~Q Paul C.. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINFERIS& (AMSt)TANTI, Sheet 70 of 461 Status: (v N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0P47B00(Equipment Description Equip. Class 11. Chillers CCCW Chiller 0P47-BOOOIA File Name: 2-73-8-4-01 .jpeg
Description:
View of flexible attached lines Desripiame:
V-ewo-a- ch-ur.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of anchorage condition CPaul C. Rizzo Associatcs, Inc. Sheet 71 of 461 I MANI fRS & LON'St ILTANTr, Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0P47B0001A Equip. Class I1. Chillers Equipment Description CCCW Chiller 0P47-BOOOIA File Name: 2-95-8-4-01.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of mounting base detail
~Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.PE4.INEER'
& CONSULTM~TS Sheet 72 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OP47CO001A Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description CCCW Pump Location:
Bldg.CC Floor El. 574 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Pump housing mounted on steel boxed base anchored with 6 -7/8" diam anchors spaced around 3ft each 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Pump housing found with good exterior condition.
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage configuration confirmed by Drawing 414-046, Foundation Plan "G" 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N zX I I Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I4ICQ Paul C. Rizzo Asisociates, Inc..FNG(INEERS
&, CONSEILTAIS Sheet 73 of 461 Status: (2) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OP47CO001A Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description CCCW Pump Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Hanging lights identified above component.
Judged not to be an adverse condition.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U IX II I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U X II I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 74 of 461 ENGINEERS
& OX)NSULTAN'T'S Status: (2) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. OP47CO001A Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description CCCW Pump er su orting or relevant documents and photos (if any): tile Name: 2-0 1--4-U .Jpeg
Description:
Component Plate ID Kr rne iName: L-oL--,*-u i.jpeg
Description:
General view of component L~Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc."3k '4g ING4ERS & U&)NSI T..NIýSheet 75 of 461 Status: (2)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OP47CO001A Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description CCCW Pump File Name: 2-63-5-4-01 .jpeg
Description:
Anchorage view of component File Name: 2-64-5-4-01.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of attached lines at component base Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 76 of 461 ENGINEERS, & CONSULTA.1T Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. OP47CO001A Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description CCCW Pump rue iName: -/j-)-4-u i.jpeg
Description:
View of flexible attached lines Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Sesi IN ERSkl &ONSC It ANST.Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 77 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment IDNo. OP49DO001A Equip. Class 0. Other Equipment Description ESW Traveling Screen Location:
Bldg.EW Floor El. 586 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Anchored with 7 -1/2" diam anchors.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Slight surface corrosion identified on anchor bolts and base plates. Judged not to affect operability and seismic capacity.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Drawing 22_-002 7-00001008 confirms anchorage configuration.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N X IYI I Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A x Y N U xI Pl v--) Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Seismic1ýENGINEERS
& COheULTANT(S Seismic Waikdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 78 of 461 Status: T)N U Equipment IDNo. 0P49D0001A Equip. Class 0. Other Equipment Description ESW Traveling Screen Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Scafolding identified next to screen. Scaffolding properly tied and supported thus no adverse potential condition.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate flexibility.
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012
'Ar1 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.SNiGINiERS
& k ONSI C TecIst S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 79 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment IDNo. OP49DO001A Equip. Class 0. Other Equipment Description ESW Traveling Screen and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-2-4-05.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-2-4-05.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of component LPaul C. Rizzo Associatcs, Inc. Sheet 80 of 461 ENGINEERS
& (XONSULTA'.TS Status: ) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment 1DNo. OP49DO001A Equip. Class 0. Other Equipment Description ESW Traveling Screen File Name: 2-63-2-4-05.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of component mounting base File Name: 2-64-2-4-05.jpeg
==
Description:==
Anchorage view of component L~2YPatil C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.[%( INFERS& COW ITArNIS Sheet 81 of 461 Status: (Y)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OP49DO001A Equip. Class 0. Other Equipment Description ESW Traveling Screen File Name: 2-73-2-4-05.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of anchorage detail File Name: 2-94-2-4-05.jpeg
==
Description:==
Scaffold located near component Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 82 of 461 ENGINEERS
& CONSULTANTS Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OP49DO001A Equip. Class 0. Other Equipment Description ESW Traveling Screen File Name: 2-95-2-4-05.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of attached lines
~Q Patul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.P\(ANFERS.
& COW I TA%-TS Sheet 83 of 461 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0P49F0502A Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Equipment Description ESW Check Valve Location:
Bldg.EW Floor El. 586 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Valve is inside an insulation/protective covering.
It is on a short pipe between two well anchored screen wash pumps.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
ZulN Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A Y N U N/A I X Y N U xT rLKY Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 84 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment ID No. 0P49F0502A Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Equipment Description ESW Check Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 IX Y - Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.MA1NI LR.E, & 'NSL LT.%N1.Sheet 85 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CP49FV502A Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Equipment Description ESW Check Valve d photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-6-1-05.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-6-1-05.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of component Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 86 of 461 Status: (S)N U Equipment ID No. 0R24S0020 Equipment Description 48 Equip. Class 1. Motor Control Centers 0 V MCC EF1A09 Location:
Bldg.CC Floor El. 620 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Inside MCC EFIA09. Anchored with welds on shims that are plug welded to base perimeter concrete pad angles. 20 shims atfront and 17 shims at back of MCC. 3 -3" welds at back of the first section. This configuration was addressed adequately in calculation SQ-01 78 for ECP 02-0184 rev 0. No further action was required 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Document "Class IE MCC Seismic Qualification" confirms the anchorage configuration.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N X I I Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x 7T7771 Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x
'qeY Pauli C. Rizzo Associates, I ric.i'.GINtots& "ONthLI Sheet 87 of 461 Status: (Y)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0R24S0020 Equip. Class 1. Motor Control Centers Equipment Description 480 V MCC EF IA09 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/20 12 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet EMAINEERS
&
Status: (2) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0R24S0020 Equip. Class 1. Motor Control Centers Equipment Description 480 V MCC EFIA09 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-1 1-4-06.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-11-4-06.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of component L Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.S'isiI NWlEd & ChOecL I IsAtNSW Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 89 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment ID No. 0R24S0020 Equipment Description 4 Equip. Class 1. Motor Control Centers 80 V MCC EFIA09 File Name: 2-63-1 l-4-06.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of base anchorage detail File Name: 2-64-1 I-4-06.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of base anchorage detail
'4C- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.rCGINEERS
& CONSUITAN-rS Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0R24S0020 Equip. Class 1. Motor Control Centers Equipment Description 480 V MCC EF1A09 Hile Name: 2-13-1 l-4-U6.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of top attached lines
'or- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.UNGINERS & CONStI TAM.S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 91 of 461 Status: W1 N U Equipment IDNo. 0R42S0011 Equipment Description E Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters FD- 1 2-C Reserve Battery Charger Location:
Bldg.CC Floor El. 620 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Mounted on C4 channels each one welded to embed perimeter pad angle with -18" of 1/4" welds at flanges of C4's. Charger to C4flange connected with 6 -1/2" diam drilled tapped bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
LY N Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A Y N U xI IX --- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONSTLTANYS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 92 of 461 Status: (2) N U Equipment IDNo. 0R42S0011 Equipment Description E Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters FD- 1 2-C Reserve Battery Charger Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Hanging fluorescent lights identified with compression-type fittings.
Judged adequate to prevent falling offluorescent tubes.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 I"IY Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc..ENG(INERS
& CONN.LLTAV1 Sheet 93 of 461 Status: (Y)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. 0R42S001 ! Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description EFD- 12-C Reserve Battery Charger Other sunnortiny or relevant and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-6-1-06.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-6-1-06.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID
'Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEFRS& "N'S.ULTANTS Sheet 94 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. 0R42S0011 Equipment Description E Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters FD- 12-C Reserve Battery Charger File Name: 2-63-6-1-06.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of component File Name: 2-64-6-1-06.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of base anchorage detail I[ w Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 95 of 461 NSGINEER5 I ITATI Status: l N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0R42S0011 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description EFD-12-C Reserve Battery Charger File Name: 2-73-6-1-06.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of base anchorage detail File Name: 2-94-6-1-06.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of mounting base detail Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 96 of 461 ENGINEERS
& CONSULTA "S Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0R42S0011 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description EFD-12-C Reserve Battery Charger File Name: 2-95-6-1-06.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of top attached lines V% Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.iImaNEkRo
& CONShliTAN(SW Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 97 of 461 Status: (2)N U Equipment IDNo. IB21NO067C Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Press Element Location:
Bldg.CO Floor El. 620 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Rack mounted, attached to P1000 with 4 -1/4" diam. Rack attached to steelframing with 14 -5/8" diam machine bolts. Bolted to adjacent racks.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Slight surface corrosion identified but judged not a concern.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N I X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A Y N U N/A Y N U XI r-v Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.r\(,NEERS, & CUNST'1TAN-TS Sheet 98 of 461 Status: (2) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. IB21N0067C Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Press Element Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate flexibility.
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Paul C. Rizzo Associatcs, Inc. Sheet 99 of 461 I sG.N1[ER&
1 t -LX IANTI'Status: (2) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IB21N0067C Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Press Element Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-i-4-13.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-1-4-13.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of Component L Q Paul C. Rizzo Associatcs, Inc.EN(FINEERS
& CONS ULTA%"S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 100 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment ID No. IB21N0067C Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Press Element File Name: 2-63-1-4-13.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of component rack File Name: 2-64-1-4-13.jpeg
==
Description:==
View or top attached lines Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.['o (INE ERS & CONSL LT N*T'Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 101 of 461 Status: (Y)N U Equipment ID No. IB21N0073C Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Level Element Location:
Bldg.CO Floor El. 620 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Rack mounted, attached to P1000 with 4 -1/4" diam. Rack attached to steel framing with 14 -5/8" diam machine bolts. Bolted to adjacent racks.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N I X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A Y N U N/A x Y N U x F --F
~tQ1 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.'rENGLINEEtRS
& CONSULTANTS, Sheet 102 of 461 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1B21N0073C Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Level Element Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate flexibility.
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U-x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 "I- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 103 of 461 ENCINEERI
& CONSUL TAN II Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IB21N0073C Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Level Element or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-2-4-13.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-2-4-13.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of Component Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 104 of 461 ENGINEERS
& CONSULTANTS Status: ( N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. IB21N0073C Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description Level Element File Name: 2-63-2-4-13.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of component rack L=6 V- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Sheet 105 of 461 Status: (Y)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. ICI F0083 Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment Description MOV Location:
Bldg.FH Floor El. 620 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Valve mounted on 3" pipe line supported with HSS 4x4 floor supports.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YdzN Y N U N/A Y N U N/A T NxUN/Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U xI KY Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONSULTAVrS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 106 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment ID No. IC11F0083 Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment Description MOV Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.SNGsmE L RS & Ow ChSe Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 107 of 461 Status: (2)N U Equipment ID No. IC11F0083 Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment Description.MOY nd photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-1-4-17.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-1-4-17.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of Component Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONSULTAN\S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 108 of 461 Status: (Y)N U Equipment ID No. IC11F0083 Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment Description MOV ru e Name: L-oJ-1-4-1/.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of attached lines File Name: 2-64-1-4-17.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of attached line
% Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Sheet 109 of 461 ENGINEERS
& CONIqL IT V%11ýStatus: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. ICI 1F0083 Equipment Description MOV Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves File Name: 2-73-1-4-17.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of pipe line support Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONS[ LTAN r-S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 110 of 461 Status: (Y)N U Equipment ID No. ICIIFOIOA Equip. Class 8B. Solenoid Valves Equipment Description RPS Valve Location:
Bldg.CO Floor El. 642 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Very small valve mounted to a heavy steel wall bracket with 2 -3/8" diam machine bolts. The support bracket is attached to concrete wall with 2 -5/8" diam anchor bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N II x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A Y N U N/A Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 111 of 461 Status: (Y) N U Equipment ID No. ICI 1F0110A Equip. Class 8B. Solenoid Valves Equipment Description RPS Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Scaffolding in the area found with adequate bracing.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/20 12 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 112 of 461 ENGINEERS
& CONSULTANTS Status: ) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. ICI IF0110A Equip. Class 8B. Solenoid Valves Equipment Description RPS Valve Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): t lie Name: 2-0 I-J-4-IL.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID rite iName: L-oL-.-,-Iz.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of attached lines
'IC' Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EMINELRS & )ONXL LTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 113 of 461 Status: (S)N U Equipment ID No. ICIIFO060A Equip. Class 8B. Solenoid Valves Equipment Description RRCS Valve Location:
Bldg.CO Floor El. 642 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Very small valve mounted to a heavy steel wall bracket with 2 -3/8" diam machine bolts. 7he support bracket is attached to concrete wall with 4 -5/8" diam anchor bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N Y N U N/A Y N U N/A Y N U N/A Y N U N/A Y N U xI LK-- Paul C. Rizzo Associarts, Inc.ENGINEERS
& COMULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 114 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment ID No. ICI1F0160A Equip. Class 8B. Solenoid Valves Equipment Description RRCS Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attachedpiping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012
'4CY Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.t'(IMANEIR'
& UC)NSL LTI %1 Sheet 115 of 461 Status: W Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)N U Equipment IDNo. ICI IFO160A Equip. Class 8B. Solenoid Valves Equipment Description RRCS Valve n"A documents and photos (if any): rite Name: 2-0l-4-4-12.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID rite Name: 2-b2-4-4-12.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of Component DPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 116 of 461 ENGINEERS
& CONU.L"ANJS Status: ) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. ICI IFO160A Equip. Class 8B. Solenoid Valves Equipment Description RRCS Valve File Name: 2-63-4-4-12Jpeg
==
Description:==
View of top attached lines L qZY Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENSINmERS
& CONSli IT(NI C Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 117 of 461 Status: W N U Equipment IDNo. IC22P0001 Equipment Description A Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels.TWS Panel Location:
Bldg.CC Floor El. 654 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Panels bolted to flanges of-CIO channels with 10 -1/2" diam bolts. CIO's are welded to cross steel members at floor level.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
No excessive corrosion identified for anchorage.
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N EIIZLK Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U X I Q IPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.FNGINF1RS
& CONSULTAYI'S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 118 of 461 Status: N U Equipment ID No. 1C22P0001 Equipment Description A Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels TWS Panel Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Ceiling panels identified with diagonal braces and rod hangers.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping is rigidly supported and attached conduits were found with adequate 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 8/26/2012 Y Patti C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ESiNsmiRS
& W k ONSI s TA% (W Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 119 of 461 Status: (Y)N U Equipment IDNo. 1C22P0001 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description AIWS Panel id photos (if any): File Name: 2-62-1-4-03.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-63-1-4-03.jpeg
==
Description:==
Inside view of component Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.P'GINEERS
& CONSULTArTS Sheet 120 of 461 Status: (Y)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. 1C22P0001 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description ATWS Panel File Name: 2-61-1-4-03.jpeg
==
Description:==
Anchorage view