ML060950606: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:XI.M28 Buried Piping And Tanks Surveillance 1 AUDIT W ORKSHEET  GALL R EPORT AMP PLANT: ______________________________
{{#Wiki_filter:AUDIT WORKSHEET GALL REPORT AMP PLANT: ______________________________
LRA AMP: __________________________
LRA AMP: __________________________                                                       REVIEWER: ______________________
R EVIEWER: ______________________
GALL AMP: XI.M28, Buried Piping and Tanks Surveillance                                   DATE: __________________________
GALL AMP: XI.M28, Buried Piping and Tanks Surveillance DATE: __________________________
Program               Auditable GALL Criteria                                             Documentation of Audit Finding Element Program               A. The program includes surveillance and preventive measures       Consistent with GALL AMP:      Yes  No Description          to mitigate corrosion by protecting the external surface of buried Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Program Element Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding Program Description A. The program includes surveillance and preventive measures to mitigate corrosion by protecting the external surface of buried carbon steel piping and tanks. Surveillance and preventive measures are in accordance with standard industry practice, based on National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE) Standards RP-0285-95 and RP-0169-96, and include external coatings, wrappings, and cathodic protection systems. Consistent with GALL AMP:
carbon steel piping and tanks. Surveillance and preventive measures are in accordance with standard industry practice, based on National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE)
Yes  No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Standards RP-0285-95 and RP-0169-96, and include external           Comment:
Comment: 1. Scope of Program A. The program relies on preventive measures, such as coating, wrapping, and cathodic protection, and surveillance, based on NACE Standard RP-0285-95 and NACE Standard RP-0169-96, to manage the effects of corrosion on the intended function of buried tanks and piping, respectively. Consistent with GALL AMP:
coatings, wrappings, and cathodic protection systems.
Yes  No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
: 1. Scope of           A. The program relies on preventive measures, such as coating,     Consistent with GALL AMP:      Yes  No Program              wrapping, and cathodic protection, and surveillance, based on       Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment 2. Preventive Actions A. In accordance with industry practice, underground piping and tanks are coated during installation with a protective coating system, such as coal tar enamel with a fiberglass wrap and a kraft paper outer wrap, a polyolifin tape coating, or a fusion bonded epoxy coating to protect the piping from contacting the aggressive soil environment. Consistent with GALL AMP:
NACE Standard RP-0285-95 and NACE Standard RP-0169-96, to manage the effects of corrosion on the intended function of buried tanks and piping, respectively.
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:  
Comment
: 2. Preventive         A. In accordance with industry practice, underground piping and     Consistent with GALL AMP:      Yes  No Actions              tanks are coated during installation with a protective coating     Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
system, such as coal tar enamel with a fiberglass wrap and a kraft paper outer wrap, a polyolifin tape coating, or a fusion bonded epoxy coating to protect the piping from contacting the aggressive soil environment.                                       Comment:
B. A cathodic protection system is used to mitigate corrosion      Consistent with GALL AMP:       Yes   No where pinholes in the coating allow the piping or components to    Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
be in contact with the aggressive soil environment. The cathodic protection imposes a current from an anode onto the pipe or tank to stop corrosion from occurring at defects in the coating.
XI.M28 Buried Piping And Tanks Surveillance                                            1


Comment: " B. A cathodic protection system is used to mitigate corrosion where pinholes in the coating allow the piping or components to be in contact with the aggressive soil environment. The cathodic protection imposes a current from an anode onto the pipe or tank to stop corrosion from occurring at defects in the coating. Consistent with GALL AMP:
Program              Auditable GALL Criteria                                            Documentation of Audit Finding Element Comment:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:  
: 3. Parameters        A. The effectiveness of the coatings and cathodic protection       Consistent with GALL AMP:      Yes  No Monitored/            system, per standard industry practice, is determined by            Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Inspected            measuring coating conductance, by surveying pipe-to-soil potential, and by conducting bell hole examinations to visually examine the condition of the coating.
Comment:
: 4. Detection of      A. Coatings and wrapping can be damaged during installation or      Consistent with GALL AMP:      Yes  No Aging Effects        while in service and the cathodic protection system is relied      Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
upon to avoid any corrosion at the damaged locations.
Degradation of the coatings and wrapping during service will result in the requirement for more current from the cathodic protection rectifier in order to maintain the proper cathodic      Comment:
protect potentials. Any increase in current requirements is an indication of coating and wrapping degradation. A close interval pipe-to-soil potential survey can be used to locate the locations where degradation has occurred.
: 5. Monitoring        A. Monitoring the coating conductance versus time or the            Consistent with GALL AMP:      Yes  No and Trending          current requirement versus time provides an indication of the      Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
condition of the coating and cathodic protection system when compared to predetermined values.
Comment:
: 6. Acceptance        A. In accordance with accepted industry practice, per              Consistent with GALL AMP:      Yes  No Criteria              NACE Standard RP-0285-95 and NACE Standard RP-0169-96,              Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
the assessment of the condition of the coating and cathodic protection system is to be conducted on an annual basis and compared to predetermined values.
Comment:
: 7. Corrective        A. The site corrective actions program, quality assurance (QA)      Consistent with GALL AMP:      Yes   No Actions              procedures, site review and approval process, and                  Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
administrative controls are implemented in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B. As discussed in XI.M28 Buried Piping And Tanks Surveillance                                            2


XI.M28 Buried Piping And Tanks Surveillance 2 Program Element Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding Comment: 3. Parameters Monitored/
Program               Auditable GALL Criteria                                           Documentation of Audit Finding Element the appendix to this report, the staff finds the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, acceptable to address the              Comment:
Inspected A. The effectiveness of the coatings and cathodic protection system, per standard industry practice, is determined by measuring coating conductance, by surveying pipe-to-soil potential, and by conducting bell hole examinations to visually examine the condition of the coating. Consistent with GALL AMP:
corrective actions, confirmation process, and administrative controls.
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:  
: 8.                    A. See Item 7, above.                                              Consistent with GALL AMP:      Yes  No Confirmation                                                                            Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Process Comment:
: 9.                    A. See Item 7, above.                                              Consistent with GALL AMP:      Yes  No Administrative                                                                          Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Controls Comment:
: 10. Operating        A. Corrosion pits from the outside diameter have been              Consistent with GALL AMP:       Yes   No Experience            discovered in buried piping with far less than 60 years of        Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
operation. Buried pipe that is coated and cathodically protected is unaffected after 60 years of service. Accordingly, operating experience from application of the NACE standards on non-nuclear systems demonstrates the effectiveness of this            Comment:
program.
XI.M28 Buried Piping And Tanks Surveillance                                            3


Comment: 4. Detection of Aging Effects A. Coatings and wrapping can be damaged during installation or while in service and the cathodic protection system is relied upon to avoid any corrosion at the damaged locations. Degradation of the coatings and wrapping during service will result in the requirement for more current from the cathodic protection rectifier in order to maintain the proper cathodic protect potentials. Any increase in current requirements is an indication of coating and wrapping degradation. A close interval pipe-to-soil potential survey can be used to locate the locations where degradation has occurred. Consistent with GALL AMP:
EXCEPTIONS Item          Program Elements              LRA Exception Description  Basis for Accepting Exception  Documents Reviewed Number                                                                                                  (Identifier, Para.# and/or Page #)
Yes  No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
1.
2.


Comment: 5. Monitoring and Trending A. Monitoring the coating conductance versus time or the current requirement versus time provides an indication of the condition of the coating and cathodic protection system when compared to predetermined values. Consistent with GALL AMP:
ENHANCEMENTS Item          Program Elements              LRA Enhancement Description Basis for Accepting Enhancement Documents Reviewed Number                                                                                                  (Identifier, Para.# and/or Page #)
Yes  No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
1.
Comment: 6. Acceptance Criteria A. In accordance with accepted industry practice, per NACE Standard RP-0285-95 and NACE Standard RP-0169-96, the assessment of the condition of the coating and cathodic protection system is to be conducted on an annual basis and compared to predetermined values. Consistent with GALL AMP:
2.
Yes  No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:


Comment: 7. Corrective Actions A. The site corrective actions program, quality assurance (QA) procedures, site review and approval process, and administrative controls are implemented in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B. As discussed in Consistent with GALL AMP:
DOCUMENT REVIEWED DURING AUDIT Document Number                    Identifier (number)       Title                                                Revision and/or Date 1.
Yes  No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
2.
 
3.
XI.M28 Buried Piping And Tanks Surveillance 3 Program Element Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding  the appendix to this report, the staff finds the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, acceptable to address the corrective actions, confirmation process, and administrative controls.
4.
Comment: 8.
.
Confirmation Process A. See Item 7, above. Consistent with GALL AMP:
XI.M28 Buried Piping And Tanks Surveillance                                       4}}
Yes  No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
 
Comment: 9.
Administrative Controls A. See Item 7, above. Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes  No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
 
Comment: 10. Operating Experience A. Corrosion pits from the outside diameter have been discovered in buried piping with far less than 60 years of operation. Buried pipe that is coated and cathodically protected is unaffected after 60 years of service. Accordingly, operating experience from application of the NACE standards on non-nuclear systems demonstrates the effectiveness of this program. Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes  No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment:
XI.M28 Buried Piping And Tanks Surveillance 4 EXCEPTIONS  Item Number Program Elements LRA Exception Description Basis for Accepting Exception Documents Reviewed  (Identifier, Para.# and/or Page #) 1. 2.    -
ENHANCEMENTS Item Number Program Elements LRA Enhancement Description Basis for Accepting Enhancement Documents Reviewed  (Identifier, Para.# and/or Page #) 1. 2.    -
DOCUMENT REVIEWED D URING A UDIT  Document Number Identifier (number) Title Revision and/or Date 1. 2. 3. 4.    -.}}

Revision as of 20:18, 23 November 2019

2006/03/22-GALL AMP: XI.M28, Buried Piping and Tanks Surveillance (Audit Worksheet GALL Report AMP)
ML060950606
Person / Time
Site: Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png
Issue date: 03/22/2006
From: Morgan M
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR/RLRC
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
morgan M NRR/NRC/DLR/RLRC, 415-2232
Shared Package
ML060950189 List: ... further results
References
%dam200611, TAC MC9668
Download: ML060950606 (5)
v • d • e


Text

AUDIT WORKSHEET GALL REPORT AMP PLANT: ______________________________

LRA AMP: __________________________ REVIEWER: ______________________

GALL AMP: XI.M28, Buried Piping and Tanks Surveillance DATE: __________________________

Program Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding Element Program A. The program includes surveillance and preventive measures Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Description to mitigate corrosion by protecting the external surface of buried Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

carbon steel piping and tanks. Surveillance and preventive measures are in accordance with standard industry practice, based on National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE)

Standards RP-0285-95 and RP-0169-96, and include external Comment:

coatings, wrappings, and cathodic protection systems.

1. Scope of A. The program relies on preventive measures, such as coating, Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Program wrapping, and cathodic protection, and surveillance, based on Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

NACE Standard RP-0285-95 and NACE Standard RP-0169-96, to manage the effects of corrosion on the intended function of buried tanks and piping, respectively.

Comment

2. Preventive A. In accordance with industry practice, underground piping and Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Actions tanks are coated during installation with a protective coating Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

system, such as coal tar enamel with a fiberglass wrap and a kraft paper outer wrap, a polyolifin tape coating, or a fusion bonded epoxy coating to protect the piping from contacting the aggressive soil environment. Comment:

B. A cathodic protection system is used to mitigate corrosion Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No where pinholes in the coating allow the piping or components to Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

be in contact with the aggressive soil environment. The cathodic protection imposes a current from an anode onto the pipe or tank to stop corrosion from occurring at defects in the coating.

XI.M28 Buried Piping And Tanks Surveillance 1

Program Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding Element Comment:

3. Parameters A. The effectiveness of the coatings and cathodic protection Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Monitored/ system, per standard industry practice, is determined by Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

Inspected measuring coating conductance, by surveying pipe-to-soil potential, and by conducting bell hole examinations to visually examine the condition of the coating.

Comment:

4. Detection of A. Coatings and wrapping can be damaged during installation or Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Aging Effects while in service and the cathodic protection system is relied Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

upon to avoid any corrosion at the damaged locations.

Degradation of the coatings and wrapping during service will result in the requirement for more current from the cathodic protection rectifier in order to maintain the proper cathodic Comment:

protect potentials. Any increase in current requirements is an indication of coating and wrapping degradation. A close interval pipe-to-soil potential survey can be used to locate the locations where degradation has occurred.

5. Monitoring A. Monitoring the coating conductance versus time or the Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No and Trending current requirement versus time provides an indication of the Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

condition of the coating and cathodic protection system when compared to predetermined values.

Comment:

6. Acceptance A. In accordance with accepted industry practice, per Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Criteria NACE Standard RP-0285-95 and NACE Standard RP-0169-96, Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

the assessment of the condition of the coating and cathodic protection system is to be conducted on an annual basis and compared to predetermined values.

Comment:

7. Corrective A. The site corrective actions program, quality assurance (QA) Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Actions procedures, site review and approval process, and Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

administrative controls are implemented in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B. As discussed in XI.M28 Buried Piping And Tanks Surveillance 2

Program Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding Element the appendix to this report, the staff finds the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, acceptable to address the Comment:

corrective actions, confirmation process, and administrative controls.

8. A. See Item 7, above. Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Confirmation Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

Process Comment:

9. A. See Item 7, above. Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Administrative Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

Controls Comment:

10. Operating A. Corrosion pits from the outside diameter have been Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Experience discovered in buried piping with far less than 60 years of Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

operation. Buried pipe that is coated and cathodically protected is unaffected after 60 years of service. Accordingly, operating experience from application of the NACE standards on non-nuclear systems demonstrates the effectiveness of this Comment:

program.

XI.M28 Buried Piping And Tanks Surveillance 3

EXCEPTIONS Item Program Elements LRA Exception Description Basis for Accepting Exception Documents Reviewed Number (Identifier, Para.# and/or Page #)

1.

2.

ENHANCEMENTS Item Program Elements LRA Enhancement Description Basis for Accepting Enhancement Documents Reviewed Number (Identifier, Para.# and/or Page #)

1.

2.

DOCUMENT REVIEWED DURING AUDIT Document Number Identifier (number) Title Revision and/or Date 1.

2.

3.

4.

.

XI.M28 Buried Piping And Tanks Surveillance 4

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML060950606&oldid=2193743"