ML092290034: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Fire Protection: A U.S. Regulatory Perspective11th International Seminar on FIRE SAFETY IN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS AND INSTALLATIONS INSTALLATIONSAlexander Klein, PE August 17-19, 2009 BACKGROUND*Fire Protection Regulations-Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 50.48, "Fire protection"-General Design Criterion (GDC)3, "Fire 2 protection" -AppendixR, "Fire Protection Program for Nuclear Power Facilities Operating Prior to January1,1979"-10 CFR 50.48(c) "National Fire Protection Association Standard NFPA 805" REGULATORY INFRASTRUCTURE*Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.205, "Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Fire Protection for Existing Light-Water Nuclear Power Plants" NEI 04 02"GuidanceforImplementingaRisk Informed 3-NEI 04-02 , Guidance for Implementing a Risk-Informed , Performance-Based Fire Protection Program Under 10CFR50.48(c)"*NUREG-0800, "Standard Review Plan"-SRP Section 9.5.1.1 -new SRP Section 9.5.1.2 (draft)*Triennial fire protection inspection procedures PILOT PLANTS *Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant*Oconee Nuclear Power Plant (Units 1, 2, 3) 4*Pilot Plant Process-status*NFPA 805 Frequently Asked Question (FAQ)
{{#Wiki_filter:Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Fire Protection: A U.S. Regulatory Perspective 11th International Seminar on FIRE SAFETY IN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS AND INSTALLATIONS Alexander Klein, PE August 17-19, 2009
Process LESSONS LEARNED*What are some of the initial lessons learned from the pilot plants?-License Amendment Request 5-Review of engineering evaluations-Treatment of the risk of prior approved recovery actions-Interface between RG 1.205 and RG 1.200 LEVERAGING NFPA 805 TOOLS*Reduce regulatory burden  
 
*A ddress emer g ent issues 6 g*Improve fire risk management
BACKGROUND
*Use in non-fire protection areas PATH FORWARD*Update regulatory guidance*Develop inspection procedures
* Fire Protection Regulations
*Com plete the p ilot p lant p rocess 7pppp*Communicate lessons learned
  - Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
*Prepare for license amendment requests QUESTIONS 8}}
Section 50.48, Fire protection
  - General Design Criterion (GDC) 3, Fire protection
  - Appendix R, Fire Protection Program for Nuclear Power Facilities Operating Prior to January 1, 1979
  - 10 CFR 50.48(c) National Fire Protection Association Standard NFPA 805 2
 
REGULATORY INFRASTRUCTURE
* Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.205, Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Fire Protection for Existing Light-Water Nuclear Power Plants
  - NEI 04-02, 04 02 Guidance Guidance for Implementing a Risk Risk-Informed, Informed Performance-Based Fire Protection Program Under 10 CFR 50.48(c)
* NUREG-0800, Standard Review Plan
  - SRP Section 9.5.1.1
  - new SRP Section 9.5.1.2 (draft)
* Triennial fire protection inspection procedures 3
 
PILOT PLANTS
* Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant
* Oconee Nuclear Power Plant (Units 1, 2, 3)
* Pilot Plant Process
  - status
* NFPA 805 Frequently Asked Question (FAQ)
Process 4
 
LESSONS LEARNED
* What are some of the initial lessons learned from the pilot plants?
  - License Amendment Request
  - Review of engineering evaluations
  - Treatment of the risk of prior approved recovery actions
  - Interface between RG 1.205 and RG 1.200 5
 
LEVERAGING NFPA 805 TOOLS
* Reduce regulatory burden
* Address emergent g   issues
* Improve fire risk management
* Use in non-fire protection areas 6
 
PATH FORWARD
* Update regulatory guidance
* Develop inspection procedures
* p Complete  the ppilot p plant p process
* Communicate lessons learned
* Prepare for license amendment requests 7
 
QUESTIONS 8}}

Revision as of 04:10, 14 November 2019

08/17/09 - 08/19/09-Meeting Slides for 11th International Seminar on Fire Safety in Nuclear Power Plants and Installations, Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Fire Protection: a U.S. Regulatory Perspective
ML092290034
Person / Time
Site: Oconee, Harris  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/17/2009
From: Klein A
NRC/NRR/DRA/AFPB
To:
Alex Klein, 415-3477
References
Download: ML092290034 (8)
v • d • e


Text

Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Fire Protection: A U.S. Regulatory Perspective 11th International Seminar on FIRE SAFETY IN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS AND INSTALLATIONS Alexander Klein, PE August 17-19, 2009

BACKGROUND

  • Fire Protection Regulations

- Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)

Section 50.48, Fire protection

- General Design Criterion (GDC) 3, Fire protection

- Appendix R, Fire Protection Program for Nuclear Power Facilities Operating Prior to January 1, 1979

- 10 CFR 50.48(c) National Fire Protection Association Standard NFPA 805 2

REGULATORY INFRASTRUCTURE

- NEI 04-02, 04 02 Guidance Guidance for Implementing a Risk Risk-Informed, Informed Performance-Based Fire Protection Program Under 10 CFR 50.48(c)

- SRP Section 9.5.1.1

- new SRP Section 9.5.1.2 (draft)

  • Triennial fire protection inspection procedures 3

PILOT PLANTS

  • Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant
  • Oconee Nuclear Power Plant (Units 1, 2, 3)
  • Pilot Plant Process

- status

Process 4

LESSONS LEARNED

  • What are some of the initial lessons learned from the pilot plants?

- License Amendment Request

- Review of engineering evaluations

- Treatment of the risk of prior approved recovery actions

- Interface between RG 1.205 and RG 1.200 5

LEVERAGING NFPA 805 TOOLS

  • Reduce regulatory burden
  • Address emergent g issues
  • Improve fire risk management
  • Use in non-fire protection areas 6

PATH FORWARD

  • Update regulatory guidance
  • Develop inspection procedures
  • p Complete the ppilot p plant p process
  • Communicate lessons learned
  • Prepare for license amendment requests 7

QUESTIONS 8

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML092290034&oldid=2142547"