ML17261B035: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ACCELERATE UTION DEMONSATION SYSIEM REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:9004130181 DOC DATE: 90/03/28 NOTARIZED:
{{#Wiki_filter:ACCELERATE                                         UTION DEMONSATION               SYSIEM REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
NO FACIL:50-244 Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Rochester G AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION CAVANAUGH,M.E.
ACCESSION NBR:9004130181                         DOC DATE: 90/03/28   NOTARIZED: NO         DOCKET FACIL:50-244 Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Rochester                           G 05000244 AUTH. NAME           AUTHOR AFFILIATION CAVANAUGH,M.E.       Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.
Rochester Gas&Electric Corp.MECREDY,R.C.
MECREDY,R.C.         Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.
Rochester Gas&Electric Corp.RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION DOCKET 05000244
RECIP.NAME           RECIPIENT AFFILIATION


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
LER 90-002-00:on 900226,fire watch patrol hourly patrol performed in wrong areas due to'personnel error.W/9 DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE22T COPIES RECEIVED LTR ENCL SIZE: TITLE: 50.73/50.9 Licensee Event Report (LER), Incident Rpt, etc.NOTES:License Exp date in accordance with 10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72).
LER   90-002-00:on 900226,fire watch patrol hourly patrol performed in wrong areas due to'personnel error.
/05000244 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD1-3 LA JOHNSON,A INTERNAL: ACNW AEOD/DSP/TPAB DEDRO NRR/DET/EMEB9H3 NRR/DLPQ/LHFB11 NRR/DOEA/OEAB11 NRR/DST/SELB 8D D LB8D1 EG 02 RGN1 FILE 01 EXTERNAL: EG&G STUART, V.A LPDR NSIC MAYS,G NUDOCS FULL TXT COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD1-3 PD AEOD/DOA AEOD/ROAB/-DS P NRR/DET/ECMB 9H NRR/DET/ESGB 8D NRR/DLPQ/LPEB10 NRR/DREP/PRPB11 NRR/DST/SICB 7E NRR/DST/SRXB 8E RES/DSIR/EIB L ST LOBBY WARD NRC PDR NSIC MURPHY,G.A COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 D R D P>Vc Ps 72o>NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS'LEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTEl CONTACT~DOCUMENT CONSOL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT.20079)'IO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROM DISHUBVIION D D FULL TEXT, CONVERSION REQUIRED TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 35 ENCL 35 loam C, STATK ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION
W/9 DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE22T COPIES RECEIVED LTR                           ENCL     SIZE:
~89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER, N.K 14649-0001 March 23, 1990 TEI.C>~ONf.
TITLE: 50.73/50.9 Licensee Event Report (LER),                       Incident Rpt, etc.             /
Aec*cooa vie 546 2700 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555  
NOTES:License Exp date       in accordance with 10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72).                     05000244 RECIPIENT                           COPIES          RECIPIENT        COPIES ID   CODE/NAME                       LTTR ENCL    ID  CODE/NAME      LTTR ENCL PD1-3 LA                                 1    1    PD1-3 PD              1    1            D JOHNSON,A                                 1    1 INTERNAL: ACNW                                     2    2    AEOD/DOA              1    1 AEOD/DSP/TPAB                             1   1   AEOD/ROAB/-DS P       2    2 DEDRO                                    1    1    NRR/DET/ECMB 9H       1    1 NRR/DET/EMEB9H3                          1    1    NRR/DET/ESGB 8D       1    1 NRR/DLPQ/LHFB11                          1    1    NRR/DLPQ/LPEB10       1    1 NRR/DOEA/OEAB11                          1    1    NRR/DREP/PRPB11       2    2 NRR/DST/SELB 8D                          1    1    NRR/DST/SICB 7E       1    1 D      LB8D1                        1    1    NRR/DST/SRXB 8E       1    1 EG              02                      1    1    RES/DSIR/EIB         1    1 RGN1      FILE 01                        1    1 EXTERNAL: EG&G STUART, V.A                        , 4    4    L ST LOBBY WARD     1    1 LPDR                                      1    1    NRC PDR               1    1            R NSIC MAYS,G                              1    1    NSIC MURPHY,G.A       1     1 NUDOCS FULL TXT                          1   1 D
P>Vc Ps 72o >
D D
NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS'LEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTEl CONTACT               ~ DOCUMENT CONSOL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 20079) 'IO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISHUBVIION FULL TEXT, CONVERSION REQUIRED TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR                         35   ENCL   35
 
loam C,
STATK ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION ~ 89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER, N.K 14649-0001 TEI.C>~ONf.
Aec* cooa vie 546 2700 March 23, 1990 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document   Control Desk Washington,   DC   20555


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
LER 90-002, Fire Watch Patrol Performed Technical Specification Hourly Patrol in the Wrong Areas Due to Personnel Error.R.E.Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Docket: No.50-244 In accordance with 10CFR50.73, Licensee Event Report System, Item (a)(2)(i)(B), which requires reporting of<<Any Operation Or Condition Prohibited by the Plant's Technical Specifications", the attached Licensee Event Report LER 90-002 is being submitted.
LER   90-002,   Fire Watch Patrol Performed Technical Specification Hourly Patrol in the Wrong Areas Due to Personnel Error.
This LER is being submitted because an Hourly Fire Watch Patrol patrolled the wrong area and did not meet the Ginna Technical Specification 3.14 requirements for hourly patrol for two (2)Technical Specifications systems.This event in no way affected the public health and safety.Very truly yours, Robert C.Mec dy Division Manager Nuclear Production xc: U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Ginna USNRC Senior Resident Inspector 9004l30i8i 90032''PDR ADOCK 05000244 S PDC p4.0~  
R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Docket: No. 50-244 In accordance with 10CFR50.73, Licensee Event Report System, Item (a)(2)(i)(B), which requires reporting of Specifications",
<<AC P>>>>S00>00II LICENSEE EVENT REPORT{LER)VS, NUCLSAA 1IOULATOAY COMMIHION APPAOVIO OMS HO.SI00 0IOV SXPIASS~0/Sll~S PACILITY HAMS III R.E.Ginna Nuclear Power Plant OOCXIT NVMSS1 QI 0 6 0 0 0 2 4 1OF 0 in the Wron Area D e r onnel Fire Watch Patrol Performed Technical Specification Hourly Patrol SYIHT OATS III LS1 HVM001 IM ASPOAT OATS III OTHIA PACILITISS INYOLYIO NI UO<<T<<O*Y YTAA YTA1~IOVI<<TIAL<<v<<PPA MVS~Mo<<I<<<<valPPA OAY YSAA~ACILITT<<AMLS OOCKIT HUMSSHISI 0 6 0 0 0 0 2 2 6 9 9 0 0 0 p pp 3 2 8 9 0 0 6 0 0 0 Ot I A AT I<<0 MOOS PPI PONS A LSVSL I I 0 I SOAOlltl S0.A00 li I I I I I I S0.4CO 4 I I I I I I I SOA004III IIMI So A00 4 I I I I l<<l S0.400 4 I II I lil IO.MHIil~0 004I III lOMIM Ql X 00.TS4IQIIU SO.TS4IQII
                                                            <<Any Operation Or Condition Prohibited by the       Plant's Technical                               the attached Licensee Event Report LER 90-002 is being submitted.
~I l0.7 S 4 I Q I I M I LICSHSSI CONTACT toll TIIQ LS1 IISI~0, 1 S4)Q I I<<I~0.TSV IQIIPI 00.TS4IQllwl SOS S4 I QI I<<X IIAI l0.PS 4 I IS II>WII~I~0.T S41 Q lltl 0 Till AIOVI ASMIHTT Ot 14 Ct 1$i IO>>>t>><<>>>>>>P PP t>P Pttt<<>>ti Ill Tlllt ASPOAT IS IVAMITTSO WAPVA<<T T TLTIQI TS.)I10I OTHS1 ISttt<<P r A>>Y>>I~>>P<<P<<0 M PttL N1C I>>><<BASSA/"*"'ark E.Cavanaugh Fire Protection Engineer ANSA COOS TILSPHOHI HVLQl1 1 5 5 2 4 4 4 4 COMPLSTS ONS LINT POA SAC>i COMPO<<THY PAll V1S OIPCAISSO IH THQ 1IPO1T IISI CAUS S SYSTIM COMPOHINT MAHUPAC TVIIS1 IPONTASLS To HP1OS SYSTIM COMPO<<SHY MAHVP*O TU101 SPOHTASL TO HPOOS SjKa$~4>,&gg>>+'<<I
This   LER is being submitted because an Hourly Fire Watch Patrol patrolled the wrong area and did not meet the Ginna Technical Specification 3.14 requirements for hourly patrol for two (2)
'pe~>SQ4(:
Technical Specifications systems.
SVPPLIMLHTAL 1SPOAT SXPTCTlo II4I YSS III P>>.P>><<t<<N CXPSCTSO SVPVISSION OATSI<<0 ASSTAACT IIJ<<>H>>lt00 MW>>, I~., ttt>>i>>V>>it Nt>>t<<el~i~t Itre~<<>>A A~>>I ll~I SXPICTSO LVSMISSIOH OATS II II Rgb)"T>>.-." MONT<<CAY YCA1 On February 26, 1990, at approximately 1544 EST with the Reactor at approximately 98%, it was determined that the roving Fire Watch that was assigned to perform the hourly tours of the"A" and"B" Battery Rooms mistakenly performed the tours of the"A" and"B" Diesel Generator Rooms.The error was identified by the responsible Fire Watch during an afternoon pre-turnover meeting.Immediate action was to ensure an hourly patrol covered the"A" and"B" Battery Rooms.The cause of the event was determined to be personnel error by the assigned Fire Watch.Corrective action has been taken by the Fire Protection section by issuing a card to each individual performing a Technical Specifi-cation Fire Watch commitment, which identifies the area of their responsibility.
This event in no way affected the public health and safety.
N<<AC Pv>>S00 I}0SI
Very   truly yours, Robert C. Mec   dy Division Manager Nuclear Production xc:   U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region   I 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA     19406 Ginna   USNRC Senior Resident Inspector 9004l30i8i 90032''
, I NRC Rerm 344A I444I LICENSEE EVENT REPORT{LER)TEXT CONTINUATION V.E.NUCLEAR REOULATORY COMMIEEION ARAROVEO OM4 40 5I50&IOI EXlrIRES EflII45 RACILITY NAME III OOCKET NVMEE R ITI LER NUMEER IEI SEOUE4TIAL i rlEYIEIO4 4@M ER 4IIM EA~AOE IEI R.E.Ginna Nuclear Power Plant TEXT Ih'rrrr roect R rRRrrnd.rrer aamonel HlK'rxrrr 444A'I I I IT)o so oo 244-0 0 2-0 0 02o~0 5 I.I IA PLA 0 T ON The plant was at approximately 98%steady state full power with no major activities in progress.II.DESCRIPTION 0 EVENT A.DATES AND APPROXIMATE TIMES FOR MAJOR OCCURRENCES:
PDR S
February 26, 1990, 1544 EST: Discovery date and time.February 26, 1990, 1551 EST: Fire Watch correctly performed hourly patrol of"A" and"B" Battery Rooms, in compliance'ith Technical Specif ications.February 26, 1990, 1744 EST: Fire Detection System which was inoperable due to construction activities was restored to service, B.EVENT: C.On February 26, 1990, at approximately 1544 EST with the Reactor at approximately 98%full power, it was determined.by the Fire Watch Patrol that she was touring the"A" and"B" Diesel Generator Rooms instead of the"A" and"B" Battery Rooms, On February 26, 1990, at approximately 1551 EST, a Fire Watch was sent to the"A" and"B" Battery Rooms to perform the hourly tour.INOPERABLE STRUCTURES,.
ADOCK 05000244 PDC p4.0~
COMPONENTS OR SYSTEM THAT CONTRIBUTED TO THE EVENT: Inoperable Fire Detection System-Pyrotronics VRC AORM 544A I443I NRC So<~944A I945I LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LERI TEXT CONTINUATION V.S.NUCLEAR REOULATORY COMMISSION AFSROVEO OM4 NO 5150&IOC EXPIRES 4/SI/45 FACILITY NAME I11 OOCKET NVM'4ER IEI YEAR LER NIJM4ER IEI SSQV IN>>AL" REVISION~4VM CR-VVV CA~AOE ISI R.E.Ginna Nuclear Power Plant TEXT 0Smcvc NMCC N CCtvnd.vcc ccRF4+w'HRC Ann PSA'cc lltl o s o o o 4 4 9 0 0 0 2-0 0 03 OF D.OTHER SYSTEMS OR SECONDARY FUNCTIONS AFFECTED: None E.'ETHOD OF DISCOVERY:
 
This event was discovered by the responsible Fire Watch during an afternoon turn-over meeting.F.OPERATOR ACTION: The control'oom operators were notified by the Safety Coordinator at which time they performed the following:
<<AC P>>>>   S00                                                                                                                                     VS, NUCLSAA 1IOULATOAYCOMMIHION
Initiated an A-25.1'Stat't e o t Notified Duty Engineer Notified Shift Technical Advisor (STA)Notified Plant Superintendent Notified Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident Inspector G.SAFETY SYSTEM RESPONSES:
>00II APPAOVIO OMS HO. SI00 0IOV LICENSEE EVENT REPORT {LER)                                                                SXPIASS ~ 0/Sll ~ S PACILITY HAMS     III                                                                                                                     OOCXIT NVMSS1 QI R. E. Ginna                   Nuclear Power Plant                                                                                       0     6   0   0     0   2 4           1OF 0 Fire Watch Patrol Performed Technical Specification Hourly Patrol in the IIIWron Area D e SYIHT OATS                           LS1 HVM001 IM r onnelIII ASPOAT OATS                                       OTHIA PACILITISS INYOLYIO NI IOVI<<TIAL       MVS~                                                      ACILITT<<AMLS                        OOCKIT HUMSSHISI
None III.CAUSE OF EVENT A.IMMEDIATE CAUSE: Technical Specifications fire detection system was not Fire Watch toured hourly.B.ROOT CAUSE: The root cause was determined to be unintentional human error.IV.ALYSIS OF EVENT Hourly Fire Watch tours of two (2)Technical Specifications areas with inoperable fire detection systems were not conducted so Technical Specifications 3.14.1 and 3.14.1.1 were not met.This event is reportable in accordance with 10CFR50.73, Licensee Event Report System, Item (a)(2)(i)(B), which requires reporting of,"Any Operation Or Condition Prohibited by the Plant's Technical Specifications".
                                                                <<valPPA Mo<< I<<
NRC FORM 544A l94SI HAC SM~444A i44)I LICENSEE E ENT'REPORT ILER)TEXT CONTINUA N V 4.HVC44*II IIIOVlATOIIY COMMI44IOH ATMOV40 OM4 HO 4I40&IOl 4XAH44.4QI44 SACIllTY HAM4 III COCK T 7 HVM44A ITI I,4A HVM44H I4I~44OVIHTtkl, 1 AIVISIO<1~AOI I4I R.E.Ginna Nuclear Power Plant TEXT W mOn HMTT H nouns YM~HAC~JNA'II I IT I oIs o o o 44 9 0-0 0 2-0 0 0 40F An assessment was performed considering the safety of this event with the following results and conclusions:
                                                                                                                        ~
There were no operational or, safety consequences or implica-tions attributed to the inoperable fire detection system because: Inoperable Fire Detection System>>A>>Battery Room: The fire area for the TTA>>Battery Room has a maximum permissible fire load of 160,000 BTU's/Sq.Ft.with an actual fire load of 44,021 BTU's/Sq.Ft.
UO<<T<<O*Y            YTAA    YTA1            ~
The actual fire load of 44,021 BTU's/Sq.Ft.
                                                    <<v<<PPA                              OAY    YSAA 0    6   0   0   0 0 2 2 6 9                   9 0                 0 0             p   pp       3 2 8 9 0                                                                     0   6   0   0   0 Tlllt ASPOAT      IS  IVAMITTSO WAPVA<<T T 0   Till AIOVIASMIHTT Ot      14 Ct 1 $ i IO>>>t >><<>>>>>>P            PP t>P Pttt<<>>ti Ill Ot I AATI <<0 MOOS    PPI                  SOAOlltl                               IO.MHIil                                  ~ 0, 1 S4)Q I   I<<I                           TLTIQI PONS A                          S0. A00 liII I II I                   ~ 0 004I III                              ~ 0.TSV IQIIPI                                TS.)I10I LSVSL                                                                                                                                                            OTHS1 ISttt<<P r A>>Y>>I II0 I                          S0.4CO 4 II I I I II                   lOMIMQl                                    00.TS4IQllwl
is considered low (<80,000 BTU's/Sq.Ft.).
                                                                                                                                                                    ~ >>P<<P<<0 M PttL N1C I>>><<
The wall separating the>>A>>Battery Room from the Turbine Building is a2 hour rated wall.The wall , separating the>>A>>Battery.Room from the>>B>>Battery Room is a 2 hour rated wall.The wall separating the>>A>>Battery Room from the Air.Handling Room is a 2 hour rated wall.Inoperable Fire Detection System>>B>>Battery Room: The fire area for the>>B>>Battery Room has a maximum permissible fire load of 160,000 BTU's/Sq.Ft.
SOA004III IIMI                    X   00.TS4IQIIU                               SOS S4 I QI I<<XIIAI                            BASSA/
with an actual fire load of 52,656 BTU's/Sq.Ft.
So A00 4 II I I l<<l                    SO.TS4IQII ~ I                             l0.PS  4 I IS II>WII~ I S0.400 4 I II I lil                    l0.7 S 4 I Q II M I                       ~ 0.T S41 Q     lltl LICSHSSI CONTACT      toll TIIQ LS1 IISI
The actual fire load of 52,656 BTU's/Sq.Ft.
"*"'ark E.                  Cavanaugh                                                                                                          ANSA COOS TILSPHOHI HVLQl1 Fire Protection Engineer                                                                                                                    1 5      5 2 4              4    4    4 COMPLSTS ONS LINT POA SAC>i COMPO<<THY PAll V1S OIPCAISSO IH THQ                    1IPO1T IISI IPONTASLS                                                                          MAHVP*O          SPOHTASL      SjKa$ ~4>,&gg>>+'<<I MAHUPAC                                                        SYSTIM      COMPO<<SHY CAUS S    SYSTIM      COMPOHINT              TVIIS1        To HP1OS                                                                              TU101          TO HPOOS            'pe~>SQ4(:
is considered low(<80,000 BTU's/Sq.Ft.).
Rgb)"T>>. -."
The wall separating the>>B>>Battery Room from the Turbine Building is a 2 hour rated wall.The wall separating the>>B>>Battery Room from the>>A>>Battery Room is a 2 hour rated wall.These two fire areas/zones (BR1A-1 and BR1B-1)have fire extinguishing equipment within the area and there are hose stations adjacent to them.The fire detection system for the area adjacent to the>>A>>and"B>>Battery Room in the Turbine Building basement,was operable.The fire suppression system for the area adjacent to the>>A>>Battery Room in the Air Handling Room was operable.
SVPPLIMLHTAL 1SPOAT SXPTCTlo        II4I                                                                            MONT<<CAY            YCA1 SXPICTSO LVSMISSIOH OATS II II YSS  IIIP>>. P>><<t<<N  CXPSCTSO SVPVISSION OATSI                                      <<0 ASSTAACT IIJ<<>H>>      lt00 MW>>, I ~ ., ttt>>i>>V>>it Nt>>t<< el~i~t Itre~<<>>A A~>>I ll~ I On      February 26, 1990, at approximately 1544 EST with the Reactor at approximately 98%,
V NRC fWm 99EA (949 I LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)TEXT CONTINUATION U.E.NUCLEAR RlOULATORY COMM)El)ON AttROVEO OM9 NO 5)50&)0e EXtlRES<9/5)/95 tACI(.I'TY NAME (1)OOCXET NUMEER CI)LER NUMEER (9)eeQI/ENTIAL M R.N.~REVISION Ie>>~AOE (9)R.E.Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 0 s 0 0 o 4 4 TExT///mme etece N nqvwaf.tee e)99(eN/HRC te/m~'I/(IT)9 0 0 0 2 0 0 05oF0 No work was performed in either of the<<A<<or<<B<<Battery Rooms.Based on the above, it can be c'oncluded that the public's health and safety was assured at all times.i V., CORRECTIVE ACTION A.ACTION TAKEN TO RETURN INOPERABLE FIRE DETECTION SYSTEM TO OPERABLE STATUS: Fire System reconnect was performed under plant procedure SC-3.16.2.4
Watch that was assigned to perform the hourly tours of the "A" it          was determined that the roving Fire and "B" Battery Rooms mistakenly performed the tours of the "A" and "B" Diesel Generator Rooms.                                                         The error was identified by the responsible Fire Watch during an afternoon pre-turnover meeting.
're S'S s e Co-o t isco ct'o-o e System declared operable on February 26, 1990 at 1744 EST.B.-ACTION TAKEN OR PLANNED TO PREVENT RECURRENCE:
Immediate action was to ensure an hourly patrol covered the "A" and "B" Battery Rooms.
As the root cause was determined to be a personnel error, the Fire Watch Supervisor has been instructed to follow-up the assignments given to fire watches to ensure they are going to the right area.Index cards have also been issued to the Fire Watch to ensure they have written instructions on where their patrols are to be conducted.
The cause                of the event was determined to be personnel                                                                              error            by the assigned Fire Watch.
VI.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A.B.FAILED COMPONENTS:
Corrective action has been taken by the Fire Protection section by issuing a card to each individual performing a Technical Specifi-cation Fire Watch commitment, which identifies the area of their responsibility.                                                                                                                                     N
None PREVIOUS LER'S ON SIMILAR EVENTS: A similar LER event historical search was conducted with the following results;No documentation of similar LER events with the same root cause at Ginna Station could be identified.
<<AC  Pv>>  S00 I}0SI
C.SPECIAL COMMENTS: During the five (5)hours in which the assigned Fire Watch inspected the incorrect area, Security entered the area of concern ten (10)times.NRC tORM 99EA)9451}}
 
,
I NRC Rerm 344A                                                                                                V.E. NUCLEAR REOULATORY COMMIEEION I444I LICENSEE EVENT REPORT {LER) TEXT CONTINUATION                                ARAROVEO OM4 40  5I50&IOI EXlrIRES EflII45 RACILITY NAME III                                                      OOCKET NVMEE R ITI LER NUMEER IEI                  ~ AOE IEI SEOUE4TIAL  i  rlEYIEIO4 4@M ER        4IIM EA R. E. Ginna                    Nuclear Power Plant o so TEXT Ih'rrrr roect R rRRrrnd. rrer aamonel HlK'rxrrr444A'I I I IT) oo      244      0    0 2      0        0  02o~        0 5 I.             I      IA        PLA          0  T  ON The     plant            was at approximately 98% steady state                        full    power with      no    major activities in progress.
II.           DESCRIPTION 0                  EVENT A.        DATES AND APPROXIMATE TIMES FOR MAJOR OCCURRENCES:
February 26, 1990,             1544 EST:      Discovery date and time.
February 26, 1990, 1551 EST: Fire Watch correctly performed hourly patrol of "A" and "B" Battery Rooms,    in compliance'ith Technical Specif ications.
February 26, 1990, 1744 EST:                        Fire Detection System which was inoperable due to construction activities was restored to service, B.        EVENT:
On February 26, 1990, at approximately 1544 EST with the Reactor at approximately 98% full power, it was determined .by the Fire Watch Patrol that she was touring the "A" and "B" Diesel Generator Rooms instead of the "A" and "B" Battery Rooms, On February 26, 1990, at approximately 1551 EST, a Fire Watch was sent to the "A" and "B" Battery Rooms to perform the hourly tour.
C.         INOPERABLE STRUCTURES,.                       COMPONENTS      OR        SYSTEM            THAT CONTRIBUTED TO THE EVENT:
Inoperable Fire Detection System                - Pyrotronics VRC AORM 544A I443I
 
NRC So<~ 944A                                                                                              V.S. NUCLEAR REOULATORY COMMISSION I945I LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LERI TEXT CONTINUATION                                AFSROVEO OM4 NO 5150&IOC EXPIRES 4/SI/45 FACILITY NAME  I11                                              OOCKET NVM'4ER IEI                                              ~ AOE LER NIJM4ER IEI                        ISI YEAR  SSQV IN>>AL    "  REVISION
                                                                                                      ~ 4VM CR      - VVV CA R. E. Ginna                Nuclear Power Plant                o  s  o  o  o  4  4 9 0      0 0 2        0        0  03    OF TEXT 0Smcvc NMCC N CCtvnd. vcc ccRF4+w'HRC Ann PSA'cc lltl D.       OTHER SYSTEMS OR SECONDARY FUNCTIONS AFFECTED:
None E.     'ETHOD            OF DISCOVERY:
This event was discovered by the responsible Fire Watch during an afternoon turn-over meeting.
F.        OPERATOR ACTION:
The      control'oom operators were notified by the Safety Coordinator at which time they performed the following:
Initiated an A-25.1 '
Notified    Duty Engineer Stat'                    t      e o t Notified    Shift Technical Advisor                (STA)
Notified    Plant Superintendent Notified      Nuclear Regulatory            Commission                Resident Inspector G.         SAFETY SYSTEM RESPONSES:
None III. CAUSE              OF EVENT A.        IMMEDIATE CAUSE:
Technical Specifications                  fire detection            system was not Fire Watch toured hourly.
B.       ROOT CAUSE:
The      root cause      was    determined to be unintentional human error.
IV.              ALYSIS OF EVENT Hourly Fire Watch tours of two (2) Technical Specifications areas with inoperable fire detection systems were not conducted so Technical Specifications 3.14.1 and 3.14.1.1 were not met.                 This event is reportable in accordance with 10CFR50.73, Licensee Event Report System, Item (a)(2)(i)(B),
which requires reporting of, "Any Operation Or Condition Prohibited by the Plant's Technical Specifications".
NRC FORM 544A l94SI
 
HAC SM~ 444A                                                                                            V 4. HVC44*II IIIOVlATOIIYCOMMI44IOH i44) I LICENSEE    E    ENT'REPORT ILER) TEXT CONTINUA              N                  ATMOV40 OM4 HO 4I40&IOl 4XAH44. 4QI44 SACIllTY HAM4 III                                       COCK T 7 HVM44A ITI                I,4A HVM44H I4I                  ~ AOI I4I
                                                                                          ~    44OVIHTtkl,    AIVISIO<
1              1 R. E. Ginna TEXT W mOn HMTT H nouns YM ~
Nuclear Power Plant oIs HAC ~ JNA'II I IT I o  o  o    44  9 0  0      0  20          0 0    40F An assessment            was performed            considering the safety of this event with the following results and conclusions:
There were no operational or, safety consequences or implica-tions attributed to the inoperable fire detection system because:
Inoperable Fire Detection System >>A>> Battery Room:
The fire area for the TTA>> Battery Room has a maximum permissible fire load of 160,000 BTU's/Sq.
Ft. with an actual fire load of 44,021 BTU's/Sq.Ft.
The actual fire load of 44,021 BTU's/Sq.Ft. is considered low (<80,000 BTU's/Sq.Ft.).                                        The wall separating      the         >>A>>  Battery    Room        from      the        Turbine Building      is        a 2 hour    rated        wall.               The      wall separating the                >>A>>    Battery      .Room          from        the      >>B>>
is                                wall.
                                        ,
Battery    Room              a  2  hour  rated                          The    wall separating the >>A>> Battery Room from the Air
                                      . Handling Room is a 2 hour rated wall.
Inoperable Fire Detection System >>B>> Battery Room:
The fire area for the >>B>> Battery Room has a maximum        permissible              fire load of 160,000 BTU's/Sq.Ft. with an actual fire load of 52,656 BTU's/Sq.Ft.                The actual fire load of 52,656 BTU's/Sq.Ft.                 is        considered                  low(<80,000 BTU's/Sq.Ft.).                  The wall separating                          the >>B>>
Battery Room from the Turbine Building is a 2 hour rated wall. The wall separating the >>B>> Battery Room from the >>A>> Battery Room is a 2 hour rated wall.
These two fire areas/zones                          (BR1A-1 and BR1B-1) have fire extinguishing equipment within the area and there are hose stations adjacent to them.
The    fire  detection            system    for the        area adjacent to the    >>A>>   and        "B>>      Battery     Room         in the Turbine Building basement,was                  operable.
The    fire>>A>>suppression            system    for the            area adjacent to the            Battery         Room   in the Air Handling                        Room was    operable.
 
V NRC fWm 99EA                                                                                                U.E. NUCLEAR RlOULATORY COMM)El)ON (949 I LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION                                AttROVEO OM9 NO 5)50&)0e EXtlRES< 9/5) /95 tACI(.I'TY NAME (1)                                                  OOCXET NUMEER CI)            LER NUMEER (9)                    ~ AOE (9) eeQI/ENTIAL .N.~ REVISION M  R  Ie>>
R. E. Ginna                  Nuclear Power Plant                  0  s    0  0  o    4 4 9 0    0 0 2             0 0      05oF0 TExT /// mme etece N nqvwaf. tee e)99(eN/ HRC te/m ~'I/ (IT)
No      work was performed          in either of the               <<A<<      or    <<B<<
Battery Rooms.
Based on the above,                      it health and safety was assured at all times.
can be c'oncluded that the public's i
V.      ,  CORRECTIVE ACTION A.         ACTION TAKEN TO RETURN INOPERABLE FIRE DETECTION SYSTEM TO OPERABLE STATUS:
Fire System reconnect was performed                            under plant procedure SC-3.16.2.4                're S'                     S s e            Co-o    t isco          ct'o        o  e System declared operable on February 26, 1990 at 1744 EST.
B.       - ACTION TAKEN OR PLANNED TO PREVENT RECURRENCE:
As    the  root cause was determined to be a personnel error, the Fire Watch Supervisor has been instructed to follow-up the assignments given to fire watches to ensure they are going to the right area. Index cards have also been issued to the Fire Watch to ensure they have written instructions on where their patrols are to be conducted.
VI.        ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A.          FAILED COMPONENTS:
None B.         PREVIOUS LER'S ON SIMILAR EVENTS:
A    similar        LER  event        historical  search          was        conducted with the following results;                          No documentation                            of similar LER events with the same root cause at Ginna Station could be identified.
C.         SPECIAL COMMENTS:
During the five (5) hours in which the assigned Fire Watch          inspected the incorrect area, Security entered the area of concern ten (10) times.
NRC tORM 99EA
  )9451}}

Revision as of 17:50, 29 October 2019

LER 90-002-00:on 900226,fire Watch Patrol Hourly Patrol Performed in Wrong Areas.Caused by Personnel Error.Card Issued to Each Individual Performing Tech Spec Fire Watch commitment.W/900323 Ltr
ML17261B035
Person / Time
Site: Ginna Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/28/1990
From: Cavanaugh M, Mecredy R
ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
LER-90-002, LER-90-2, NUDOCS 9004130181
Download: ML17261B035 (7)


Text

ACCELERATE UTION DEMONSATION SYSIEM REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:9004130181 DOC DATE: 90/03/28 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50-244 Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Rochester G 05000244 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION CAVANAUGH,M.E. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.

MECREDY,R.C. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.

RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION

SUBJECT:

LER 90-002-00:on 900226,fire watch patrol hourly patrol performed in wrong areas due to'personnel error.

W/9 DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE22T COPIES RECEIVED LTR ENCL SIZE:

TITLE: 50.73/50.9 Licensee Event Report (LER), Incident Rpt, etc. /

NOTES:License Exp date in accordance with 10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72). 05000244 RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD1-3 LA 1 1 PD1-3 PD 1 1 D JOHNSON,A 1 1 INTERNAL: ACNW 2 2 AEOD/DOA 1 1 AEOD/DSP/TPAB 1 1 AEOD/ROAB/-DS P 2 2 DEDRO 1 1 NRR/DET/ECMB 9H 1 1 NRR/DET/EMEB9H3 1 1 NRR/DET/ESGB 8D 1 1 NRR/DLPQ/LHFB11 1 1 NRR/DLPQ/LPEB10 1 1 NRR/DOEA/OEAB11 1 1 NRR/DREP/PRPB11 2 2 NRR/DST/SELB 8D 1 1 NRR/DST/SICB 7E 1 1 D LB8D1 1 1 NRR/DST/SRXB 8E 1 1 EG 02 1 1 RES/DSIR/EIB 1 1 RGN1 FILE 01 1 1 EXTERNAL: EG&G STUART, V.A , 4 4 L ST LOBBY WARD 1 1 LPDR 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 R NSIC MAYS,G 1 1 NSIC MURPHY,G.A 1 1 NUDOCS FULL TXT 1 1 D

P>Vc Ps 72o >

D D

NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS'LEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTEl CONTACT ~ DOCUMENT CONSOL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 20079) 'IO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISHUBVIION FULL TEXT, CONVERSION REQUIRED TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 35 ENCL 35

loam C,

STATK ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION ~ 89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER, N.K 14649-0001 TEI.C>~ONf.

Aec* cooa vie 546 2700 March 23, 1990 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555

Subject:

LER 90-002, Fire Watch Patrol Performed Technical Specification Hourly Patrol in the Wrong Areas Due to Personnel Error.

R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Docket: No. 50-244 In accordance with 10CFR50.73, Licensee Event Report System, Item (a)(2)(i)(B), which requires reporting of Specifications",

<<Any Operation Or Condition Prohibited by the Plant's Technical the attached Licensee Event Report LER 90-002 is being submitted.

This LER is being submitted because an Hourly Fire Watch Patrol patrolled the wrong area and did not meet the Ginna Technical Specification 3.14 requirements for hourly patrol for two (2)

Technical Specifications systems.

This event in no way affected the public health and safety.

Very truly yours, Robert C. Mec dy Division Manager Nuclear Production xc: U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Ginna USNRC Senior Resident Inspector 9004l30i8i 90032

PDR S

ADOCK 05000244 PDC p4.0~

<<AC P>>>> S00 VS, NUCLSAA 1IOULATOAYCOMMIHION

>00II APPAOVIO OMS HO. SI00 0IOV LICENSEE EVENT REPORT {LER) SXPIASS ~ 0/Sll ~ S PACILITY HAMS III OOCXIT NVMSS1 QI R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 0 6 0 0 0 2 4 1OF 0 Fire Watch Patrol Performed Technical Specification Hourly Patrol in the IIIWron Area D e SYIHT OATS LS1 HVM001 IM r onnelIII ASPOAT OATS OTHIA PACILITISS INYOLYIO NI IOVI<<TIAL MVS~ ACILITT<<AMLS OOCKIT HUMSSHISI

<<valPPA Mo<< I<<

~

UO<<T<<O*Y YTAA YTA1 ~

<<v<<PPA OAY YSAA 0 6 0 0 0 0 2 2 6 9 9 0 0 0 p pp 3 2 8 9 0 0 6 0 0 0 Tlllt ASPOAT IS IVAMITTSO WAPVA<<T T 0 Till AIOVIASMIHTT Ot 14 Ct 1 $ i IO>>>t >><<>>>>>>P PP t>P Pttt<<>>ti Ill Ot I AATI <<0 MOOS PPI SOAOlltl IO.MHIil ~ 0, 1 S4)Q I I<<I TLTIQI PONS A S0. A00 liII I II I ~ 0 004I III ~ 0.TSV IQIIPI TS.)I10I LSVSL OTHS1 ISttt<

>Y>>I II0 I S0.4CO 4 II I I I II lOMIMQl 00.TS4IQllwl ~ >>P<<P<<0 M PttL N1C I>>><< SOA004III IIMI X 00.TS4IQIIU SOS S4 I QI I<<XIIAI BASSA/ So A00 4 II I I l<<l SO.TS4IQII ~ I l0.PS 4 I IS II>WII~ I S0.400 4 I II I lil l0.7 S 4 I Q II M I ~ 0.T S41 Q lltl LICSHSSI CONTACT toll TIIQ LS1 IISI "*"'ark E. Cavanaugh ANSA COOS TILSPHOHI HVLQl1 Fire Protection Engineer 1 5 5 2 4 4 4 4 COMPLSTS ONS LINT POA SAC>i COMPO<<THY PAll V1S OIPCAISSO IH THQ 1IPO1T IISI IPONTASLS MAHVP*O SPOHTASL SjKa$ ~4>,&gg>>+'<<I MAHUPAC SYSTIM COMPO<<SHY CAUS S SYSTIM COMPOHINT TVIIS1 To HP1OS TU101 TO HPOOS 'pe~>SQ4(: Rgb)"T>>. -." SVPPLIMLHTAL 1SPOAT SXPTCTlo II4I MONT<<CAY YCA1 SXPICTSO LVSMISSIOH OATS II II YSS IIIP>>. P>><<t<<N CXPSCTSO SVPVISSION OATSI <<0 ASSTAACT IIJ<<>H>> lt00 MW>>, I ~ ., ttt>>i>>V>>it Nt>>t<< el~i~t Itre~<<>>A A~>>I ll~ I On February 26, 1990, at approximately 1544 EST with the Reactor at approximately 98%, Watch that was assigned to perform the hourly tours of the "A" it was determined that the roving Fire and "B" Battery Rooms mistakenly performed the tours of the "A" and "B" Diesel Generator Rooms. The error was identified by the responsible Fire Watch during an afternoon pre-turnover meeting. Immediate action was to ensure an hourly patrol covered the "A" and "B" Battery Rooms. The cause of the event was determined to be personnel error by the assigned Fire Watch. Corrective action has been taken by the Fire Protection section by issuing a card to each individual performing a Technical Specifi-cation Fire Watch commitment, which identifies the area of their responsibility. N <<AC Pv>> S00 I}0SI , I NRC Rerm 344A V.E. NUCLEAR REOULATORY COMMIEEION I444I LICENSEE EVENT REPORT {LER) TEXT CONTINUATION ARAROVEO OM4 40 5I50&IOI EXlrIRES EflII45 RACILITY NAME III OOCKET NVMEE R ITI LER NUMEER IEI ~ AOE IEI SEOUE4TIAL i rlEYIEIO4 4@M ER 4IIM EA R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant o so TEXT Ih'rrrr roect R rRRrrnd. rrer aamonel HlK'rxrrr444A'I I I IT) oo 244 0 0 2 0 0 02o~ 0 5 I. I IA PLA 0 T ON The plant was at approximately 98% steady state full power with no major activities in progress. II. DESCRIPTION 0 EVENT A. DATES AND APPROXIMATE TIMES FOR MAJOR OCCURRENCES: February 26, 1990, 1544 EST: Discovery date and time. February 26, 1990, 1551 EST: Fire Watch correctly performed hourly patrol of "A" and "B" Battery Rooms, in compliance'ith Technical Specif ications. February 26, 1990, 1744 EST: Fire Detection System which was inoperable due to construction activities was restored to service, B. EVENT: On February 26, 1990, at approximately 1544 EST with the Reactor at approximately 98% full power, it was determined .by the Fire Watch Patrol that she was touring the "A" and "B" Diesel Generator Rooms instead of the "A" and "B" Battery Rooms, On February 26, 1990, at approximately 1551 EST, a Fire Watch was sent to the "A" and "B" Battery Rooms to perform the hourly tour. C. INOPERABLE STRUCTURES,. COMPONENTS OR SYSTEM THAT CONTRIBUTED TO THE EVENT: Inoperable Fire Detection System - Pyrotronics VRC AORM 544A I443I NRC So<~ 944A V.S. NUCLEAR REOULATORY COMMISSION I945I LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LERI TEXT CONTINUATION AFSROVEO OM4 NO 5150&IOC EXPIRES 4/SI/45 FACILITY NAME I11 OOCKET NVM'4ER IEI ~ AOE LER NIJM4ER IEI ISI YEAR SSQV IN>>AL " REVISION ~ 4VM CR - VVV CA R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant o s o o o 4 4 9 0 0 0 2 0 0 03 OF TEXT 0Smcvc NMCC N CCtvnd. vcc ccRF4+w'HRC Ann PSA'cc lltl D. OTHER SYSTEMS OR SECONDARY FUNCTIONS AFFECTED: None E. 'ETHOD OF DISCOVERY: This event was discovered by the responsible Fire Watch during an afternoon turn-over meeting. F. OPERATOR ACTION: The control'oom operators were notified by the Safety Coordinator at which time they performed the following: Initiated an A-25.1 ' Notified Duty Engineer Stat' t e o t Notified Shift Technical Advisor (STA) Notified Plant Superintendent Notified Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident Inspector G. SAFETY SYSTEM RESPONSES: None III. CAUSE OF EVENT A. IMMEDIATE CAUSE: Technical Specifications fire detection system was not Fire Watch toured hourly. B. ROOT CAUSE: The root cause was determined to be unintentional human error. IV. ALYSIS OF EVENT Hourly Fire Watch tours of two (2) Technical Specifications areas with inoperable fire detection systems were not conducted so Technical Specifications 3.14.1 and 3.14.1.1 were not met. This event is reportable in accordance with 10CFR50.73, Licensee Event Report System, Item (a)(2)(i)(B), which requires reporting of, "Any Operation Or Condition Prohibited by the Plant's Technical Specifications". NRC FORM 544A l94SI HAC SM~ 444A V 4. HVC44*II IIIOVlATOIIYCOMMI44IOH i44) I LICENSEE E ENT'REPORT ILER) TEXT CONTINUA N ATMOV40 OM4 HO 4I40&IOl 4XAH44. 4QI44 SACIllTY HAM4 III COCK T 7 HVM44A ITI I,4A HVM44H I4I ~ AOI I4I ~ 44OVIHTtkl, AIVISIO< 1 1 R. E. Ginna TEXT W mOn HMTT H nouns YM ~ Nuclear Power Plant oIs HAC ~ JNA'II I IT I o o o 44 9 0 0 0 20 0 0 40F An assessment was performed considering the safety of this event with the following results and conclusions: There were no operational or, safety consequences or implica-tions attributed to the inoperable fire detection system because: Inoperable Fire Detection System >>A>> Battery Room: The fire area for the TTA>> Battery Room has a maximum permissible fire load of 160,000 BTU's/Sq. Ft. with an actual fire load of 44,021 BTU's/Sq.Ft. The actual fire load of 44,021 BTU's/Sq.Ft. is considered low (<80,000 BTU's/Sq.Ft.). The wall separating the >>A>> Battery Room from the Turbine Building is a 2 hour2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> rated wall. The wall separating the >>A>> Battery .Room from the >>B>> is wall. , Battery Room a 2 hour rated The wall separating the >>A>> Battery Room from the Air . Handling Room is a 2 hour2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> rated wall. Inoperable Fire Detection System >>B>> Battery Room: The fire area for the >>B>> Battery Room has a maximum permissible fire load of 160,000 BTU's/Sq.Ft. with an actual fire load of 52,656 BTU's/Sq.Ft. The actual fire load of 52,656 BTU's/Sq.Ft. is considered low(<80,000 BTU's/Sq.Ft.). The wall separating the >>B>> Battery Room from the Turbine Building is a 2 hour2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> rated wall. The wall separating the >>B>> Battery Room from the >>A>> Battery Room is a 2 hour2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> rated wall. These two fire areas/zones (BR1A-1 and BR1B-1) have fire extinguishing equipment within the area and there are hose stations adjacent to them. The fire detection system for the area adjacent to the >>A>> and "B>> Battery Room in the Turbine Building basement,was operable. The fire>>A>>suppression system for the area adjacent to the Battery Room in the Air Handling Room was operable. V NRC fWm 99EA U.E. NUCLEAR RlOULATORY COMM)El)ON (949 I LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION AttROVEO OM9 NO 5)50&)0e EXtlRES< 9/5) /95 tACI(.I'TY NAME (1) OOCXET NUMEER CI) LER NUMEER (9) ~ AOE (9) eeQI/ENTIAL .N.~ REVISION M R Ie>> R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 0 s 0 0 o 4 4 9 0 0 0 2 0 0 05oF0 TExT /// mme etece N nqvwaf. tee e)99(eN/ HRC te/m ~'I/ (IT) No work was performed in either of the <<A<< or <<B<< Battery Rooms. Based on the above, it health and safety was assured at all times. can be c'oncluded that the public's i V. , CORRECTIVE ACTION A. ACTION TAKEN TO RETURN INOPERABLE FIRE DETECTION SYSTEM TO OPERABLE STATUS: Fire System reconnect was performed under plant procedure SC-3.16.2.4 're S' S s e Co-o t isco ct'o o e System declared operable on February 26, 1990 at 1744 EST. B. - ACTION TAKEN OR PLANNED TO PREVENT RECURRENCE: As the root cause was determined to be a personnel error, the Fire Watch Supervisor has been instructed to follow-up the assignments given to fire watches to ensure they are going to the right area. Index cards have also been issued to the Fire Watch to ensure they have written instructions on where their patrols are to be conducted. VI. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A. FAILED COMPONENTS: None B. PREVIOUS LER'S ON SIMILAR EVENTS: A similar LER event historical search was conducted with the following results; No documentation of similar LER events with the same root cause at Ginna Station could be identified. C. SPECIAL COMMENTS: During the five (5) hours in which the assigned Fire Watch inspected the incorrect area, Security entered the area of concern ten (10) times. NRC tORM 99EA )9451