ML13098A396: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML13098A396
| number = ML13098A396
| issue date = 04/08/2013
| issue date = 04/08/2013
| title = South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2 - Email Risk Informed GSI-191 Evaluation (TAC Nos. MF0613 and MF0614)
| title = Project, Units 1 and 2 - Email Risk Informed GSI-191 Evaluation (TAC Nos. MF0613 and MF0614)
| author name = Chappell C C
| author name = Chappell C C
| author affiliation = South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Co
| author affiliation = South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Co

Revision as of 20:20, 11 April 2019

Project, Units 1 and 2 - Email Risk Informed GSI-191 Evaluation (TAC Nos. MF0613 and MF0614)
ML13098A396
Person / Time
Site: South Texas  STP Nuclear Operating Company icon.png
Issue date: 04/08/2013
From: Chappell C C
South Texas
To: Singal B K
Plant Licensing Branch IV
Singal B K
Shared Package
ML13098A368 List:
References
TAC MF0613, TAC MF0614
Download: ML13098A396 (1)


Text

From:Chappell, Coley To:Singal, Balwant Cc:Paul, Jamie

Subject:

STP 1&2 CHLE 017 test protocol discussion Date:Monday, April 08, 2013 11:54:50 AM Attachments:Risk-Informed Chemical Effects Modules (Rev 0).pdfCHLE 017 - Tests to Assess Chemical Precipitate Formation Rev 5.pdf Balwant, STP requests a telecon with NRC staff to discuss a revision to the Corrosion/Head Loss Experiment(CHLE) Program based on the attached document no. CHLE-017, testing protocol to assess chemical precipitate formation.

Also attached is a discussion to provide background for how this testing fits intothe overall chemical effects testing scheme.

The CHLE-017 revision adds a set of confirmatory experiments that use both NEI-processed and blender-processed debris beds.

This is intended to address NRC staff concerns with the use of NEI-processed beds rather than blender-processed beds, which have exhibited a much greater sensitivity (and also much greater variability) to the presence of particulates.

The test results are expected toconfirm STP's previous conclusions based use of the NEI-processed beds, and also improveunderstanding of the margin provided by STP's use of a conservative factor to account for uncertainties due to (1) use of the NUREG-6224 correlation and (2) chemical effects.

STP seeks feedback regardingthe adequacy of the revised testing plan to address the staff's concerns.If there are any questions, please contact me or Jamie Paul.

Regards, Coley ChappellSTPNOC Licensing361-972-4745