ML062680226: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:TeamTrack Reports NMC > Sites > Point Beach -Action Request > Corrective Actn Program (CAP) AR Section I Page 20 of 36 1/14/2005 5:42:00 PM Activity Request Id: Activity Type: CAP061492 CAP Submit Date:#i One Line
 
== Description:==
 
Appearance of sleeping at work.Detailed
 
== Description:==
 
Initiator:
1/14/2005 5:42:00 PM -WEBER, DAN: On 01/13/04, an employee was noted as having the appearance of being a sleep in the operations field office.. The employee had taken an aspirin to relieve a bad headache and placed his head back to allow the aspirin to work. An employee entered the operations field office and noted the person with his head back and eyes closed and a second person in the office. The second person was in the office working on paperwork and did not peer prompt the other person that his actions could be seen as sleeping while at work. The Information about the employee was transmitted to the Shift Manager and Assistant Operations Manager WEBER, DAN L Initiator Department:
PO Operations PB Date/Time of Discovery:
1/14/2005 4:54:54 PM Date/Time of Occurrence:
Identified By: Equipment#
(1st): Equipment
# (2nd): Equipment#
(3rd): Site/Unit:
Why did this occur?: Site-identified (None) (None) (None)System:.
Equipment Name (1 st): Equipment Name (2nd): Equipment Name (3rd): 1/14/2005 4:54:54 PM (None) (None) (None) (None)Point Beach -None 1/14/2005 5:42:00 PM -WEBER, DAN: See Above.Immediate Action Taken: 1/14/2005 5:42:00 PM -WEBER, DAN: The SM and AOM discussed the event with the crew. The two people that were in the office immediately came forward when the discussion began and explained the situation.
The SM explained that the appearance of sleeping was inappropriate and that we need to work as a team to ensure that all team members are fully awake, fit for duty, and do not have the appearance of sleeping.
The SM went on to explain that we all can get tired and that we can all look out for each other and peer prompt each other to encourage taking a walk or other means of maintaining alertness.
Should any employee become unfit for duty, their watch can be turned over to another employee or an employee called in to take the watch if need. This discussion was well received by the team. The AOM talked to the training crew and put out an e-mail to the rest of the department's supervisors explaining the Issue to ensure timely"review of the need to maintain fit for duty, awake and not have the appearance of sleeping because of the possible negative perception of this act.Recommendations:
1/14/2005 5:42:00 PM -WEBER, DAN: Close to actions taken.'F SRO Review Required?:
N Section 2 Operability Status: Basis for Operability:
4 Unplanned TSAC Entry: NI ICompensatory Actions: 1/14/2005 6:52:24 PM -HANNA, JAMES: Work practices and fitness for duty question.
No operability concern.
N .,? External Notification:
N N ( GC http://enws02/tmtrackltmtrack.dll?ReportPage&Template=reports%2Frptexec&Reportld=55 1/17/2005}}

Revision as of 09:16, 11 November 2018

Action Request - Corrective Action Program (CAP) (CAP061492)
ML062680226
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/14/2005
From:
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
CAP061492, FOIA/PA-2006-0113
Download: ML062680226 (1)


Text

TeamTrack Reports NMC > Sites > Point Beach -Action Request > Corrective Actn Program (CAP) AR Section I Page 20 of 36 1/14/2005 5:42:00 PM Activity Request Id: Activity Type: CAP061492 CAP Submit Date:#i One Line

Description:

Appearance of sleeping at work.Detailed

Description:

Initiator:

1/14/2005 5:42:00 PM -WEBER, DAN: On 01/13/04, an employee was noted as having the appearance of being a sleep in the operations field office.. The employee had taken an aspirin to relieve a bad headache and placed his head back to allow the aspirin to work. An employee entered the operations field office and noted the person with his head back and eyes closed and a second person in the office. The second person was in the office working on paperwork and did not peer prompt the other person that his actions could be seen as sleeping while at work. The Information about the employee was transmitted to the Shift Manager and Assistant Operations Manager WEBER, DAN L Initiator Department:

PO Operations PB Date/Time of Discovery:

1/14/2005 4:54:54 PM Date/Time of Occurrence:

Identified By: Equipment#

(1st): Equipment

  1. (2nd): Equipment#

(3rd): Site/Unit:

Why did this occur?: Site-identified (None) (None) (None)System:.

Equipment Name (1 st): Equipment Name (2nd): Equipment Name (3rd): 1/14/2005 4:54:54 PM (None) (None) (None) (None)Point Beach -None 1/14/2005 5:42:00 PM -WEBER, DAN: See Above.Immediate Action Taken: 1/14/2005 5:42:00 PM -WEBER, DAN: The SM and AOM discussed the event with the crew. The two people that were in the office immediately came forward when the discussion began and explained the situation.

The SM explained that the appearance of sleeping was inappropriate and that we need to work as a team to ensure that all team members are fully awake, fit for duty, and do not have the appearance of sleeping.

The SM went on to explain that we all can get tired and that we can all look out for each other and peer prompt each other to encourage taking a walk or other means of maintaining alertness.

Should any employee become unfit for duty, their watch can be turned over to another employee or an employee called in to take the watch if need. This discussion was well received by the team. The AOM talked to the training crew and put out an e-mail to the rest of the department's supervisors explaining the Issue to ensure timely"review of the need to maintain fit for duty, awake and not have the appearance of sleeping because of the possible negative perception of this act.Recommendations:

1/14/2005 5:42:00 PM -WEBER, DAN: Close to actions taken.'F SRO Review Required?:

N Section 2 Operability Status: Basis for Operability:

4 Unplanned TSAC Entry: NI ICompensatory Actions: 1/14/2005 6:52:24 PM -HANNA, JAMES: Work practices and fitness for duty question.

No operability concern.

N .,? External Notification:

N N ( GC http://enws02/tmtrackltmtrack.dll?ReportPage&Template=reports%2Frptexec&Reportld=55 1/17/2005