ML111450861: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 13: Line 13:
| document type = E-Mail, Acceptance Review Letter
| document type = E-Mail, Acceptance Review Letter
| page count = 1
| page count = 1
| project = TAC:ME6251, TAC:ME6250
| project = TAC:ME6250, TAC:ME6251
| stage = Acceptance Review
| stage = Acceptance Review
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Pickett, Douglas Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 4:34 PM To: 'Furio, Patricia S' Cc: Lingam, Siva; Boyle, Patrick; Salgado, Nancy
 
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review for Calvert Cliffs TACs ME6250/ME6251
 
Ms. Furio:
By letter dated May 11, 2011 (TAC Nos. ME6250/ME6251), Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, LLC submitted a license amendment request for Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2. The proposed change to the Calvert Cliffs Technical Specifications would correct an administrative error that occurred during the Calvert Cliffs conversion to the improved Technical Specifications.
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Please contact me if you have any questions. A copy of this email will be made publicly available in ADAMS.
 
Douglas V. Pickett, Senior Project Manager Calvert Cliffs, R.E. Ginna U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-1364 Email:  douglas.pickett@nrc.gov}}

Revision as of 01:35, 8 August 2018

Acceptance Review for Calvert Cliffs TACs ME6250/ME6251
ML111450861
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 05/25/2011
From: Pickett D V
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Furio P S
Constellation Energy Group
Pickett , NRR/DLPM, 415-1364
References
TAC ME6251, TAC ME6250
Download: ML111450861 (1)
v • d • e


Text

From: Pickett, Douglas Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 4:34 PM To: 'Furio, Patricia S' Cc: Lingam, Siva; Boyle, Patrick; Salgado, Nancy

Subject:

Acceptance Review for Calvert Cliffs TACs ME6250/ME6251

Ms. Furio:

By letter dated May 11, 2011 (TAC Nos. ME6250/ME6251), Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, LLC submitted a license amendment request for Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2. The proposed change to the Calvert Cliffs Technical Specifications would correct an administrative error that occurred during the Calvert Cliffs conversion to the improved Technical Specifications.

The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

Please contact me if you have any questions. A copy of this email will be made publicly available in ADAMS.

Douglas V. Pickett, Senior Project Manager Calvert Cliffs, R.E. Ginna U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-1364 Email: douglas.pickett@nrc.gov

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML111450861&oldid=946969"