ML13101A170

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

MF0617 & MF0618 - Acceptance Review E-mail to Licensee - After Supplemental Information
ML13101A170
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 04/08/2013
From: Bhalchandra Vaidya
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Furio P
Constellation Energy Group
References
TAC MF0617, TAC MF0618
Download: ML13101A170 (1)


Text

Vaidy/a, Bhalchandra From: Vaidya, Bhalchandra Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 7:46 AM To: 'Patricia.Furio@cengllc.com' Cc: Bucholtz, Kristy; Elliott, Robert; Meighan, Sean

Subject:

Acceptance Review of Calvert Cliffs license amendment request MF0617 and MF0618

Pat, By letter dated January 28, 2013, Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, LLC., submitted a License Amendment Request (LAR) re: Eliminate Second Completion Times Limiting Time from Discovery of Failure to Meet an LCO, Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2. By letter dated April 1, 2013, in response to the NRC staff request for supplemental information required to compete the "Acceptance Review," the licensee provided the supplemental information required.

The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this LAR. The acceptance review was performed to determine ifthere is sufficient information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to compete the technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Bhalchandra K. Vaidya Licensing Project Manager NRC/NRR/DORL/LPL1 -1 (301)-415-3308 (0) bhalchandra.vaidya*,nrc..ov