ML20073B988: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 25: Line 25:
and FSAR Figure 7.3-1, Sheet 3, to determine if a bypass provision exists for the " differential pressure between steam lines - high" signal for safety injection actuation. The conclusion is that the FSAR is correct in showing no bypass provisions for this safety injection signal. The Technical Specification footnote indicating such a bypass is an administrative error.
and FSAR Figure 7.3-1, Sheet 3, to determine if a bypass provision exists for the " differential pressure between steam lines - high" signal for safety injection actuation. The conclusion is that the FSAR is correct in showing no bypass provisions for this safety injection signal. The Technical Specification footnote indicating such a bypass is an administrative error.
Alabama Power Company hereby requests an administrative change to delete the incorrect footnote reference shown on Item 1.e. of Table 3.3-3 in the Farley Nuclear Plant Technical Specifications. This proposed change has been reviewed by the Plant Operations Review Commi ttee . The proposed change to the Technical Specification pages is included as an attachment. The Nuclear Operation Review Committee will review this change at a future meeting.
Alabama Power Company hereby requests an administrative change to delete the incorrect footnote reference shown on Item 1.e. of Table 3.3-3 in the Farley Nuclear Plant Technical Specifications. This proposed change has been reviewed by the Plant Operations Review Commi ttee . The proposed change to the Technical Specification pages is included as an attachment. The Nuclear Operation Review Committee will review this change at a future meeting.
This letter is a supplement to the Alabama Power Company letter dated November 16, 1982. The class of this proposed change is designated as Class II for Unit 1 and Class I for Unit 2 in accordance with 10 CFR 170.22 requirements.            A check for $1,600.00 to cover the total amount of fees required was enclosed with the November 16, 1982 l ette r. NRC approval is requested by September 1,1983.
This letter is a supplement to the Alabama Power Company {{letter dated|date=November 16, 1982|text=letter dated November 16, 1982}}. The class of this proposed change is designated as Class II for Unit 1 and Class I for Unit 2 in accordance with 10 CFR 170.22 requirements.            A check for $1,600.00 to cover the total amount of fees required was enclosed with the November 16, 1982 l ette r. NRC approval is requested by September 1,1983.
Oh3PDRs                                                            !
Oh3PDRs                                                            !
l l
l l

Latest revision as of 17:29, 27 September 2022

Application for Amend to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,consisting of Administrative Tech Spec Change to Delete Incorrect Footnote Re ESF Actuation Sys Instrumentation
ML20073B988
Person / Time
Site: Farley  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 04/06/1983
From: Clayton F
ALABAMA POWER CO.
To: Varga S
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20073B993 List:
References
NUDOCS 8304120627
Download: ML20073B988 (2)
v • d • e


Text

Mailing Address

, Alibcma Power Company 600 North 18th street Post Offse Box aH1 Birmingham, Alabama 35291 c Telephone 205 783-6081 F. L Clayton, Jr.

Eggg,'"' AlabamaFbwer thesouthem electic system April 6, 1983 Docket Nos. 50-348 50-364 Director, Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Attention: Mr. S. A. Varga Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant - Units 1 and 2 Multi-Plant Action Item B-32, Administrative Technical Specification Change Gentlemen:

At the request of the NRC Staff, Alabama Power Company has reviewed a discrepancy between Technical Specification Table 3.3-3, Item 1.e.,

and FSAR Figure 7.3-1, Sheet 3, to determine if a bypass provision exists for the " differential pressure between steam lines - high" signal for safety injection actuation. The conclusion is that the FSAR is correct in showing no bypass provisions for this safety injection signal. The Technical Specification footnote indicating such a bypass is an administrative error.

Alabama Power Company hereby requests an administrative change to delete the incorrect footnote reference shown on Item 1.e. of Table 3.3-3 in the Farley Nuclear Plant Technical Specifications. This proposed change has been reviewed by the Plant Operations Review Commi ttee . The proposed change to the Technical Specification pages is included as an attachment. The Nuclear Operation Review Committee will review this change at a future meeting.

This letter is a supplement to the Alabama Power Company letter dated November 16, 1982. The class of this proposed change is designated as Class II for Unit 1 and Class I for Unit 2 in accordance with 10 CFR 170.22 requirements. A check for $1,600.00 to cover the total amount of fees required was enclosed with the November 16, 1982 l ette r. NRC approval is requested by September 1,1983.

Oh3PDRs  !

l l

l Mr. S. A. Varga April 6,1983 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 In accordance with 10 CFR 50.30 (c)(1)(i), three signed originals and forty (40) additional copies of this proposed change are enclosed.

You rs very t ruly, b L. Claytong Jr.

F LCJ r/GGY: 1 s h-D18 Attachment SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME cc: Mr. R. A. Thomas Mr. G. F. Trowbridge THIS @ b DAY OF M ,1983 Mr. J. P. O'Reilly '

Mr. E. A. Reeves -

Mr. W. H. Bradford Gs Le Not Ary Public My Commission Expi res: l-ID-Sl r

I l

i I -

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20073B988&oldid=3515481"