ML20073P115: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 31: Line 31:
On June 25, 1990 the NRC issued Generic Letter (G.f.) 90-06:                              Resolution of Generic Issue 70, "Pover-Operated Relief Valve and Block Valve Reliability," and Generic Issue 94, " Additional Low-Temperature Overpressure Protection for Light-Vater Reactors." In G.L. 90-06 the NRC delineated specific recommendations which address the concerns of Generic Issues 70 and 94. Vith regard to lov temperature overpressure protection, the NRC requested utilities to commit to modify the RCS low-temperature overpressure protection (LTOP) system technical specification to account for the increased likelihood of an overpressure event during operating l          Modes 5 and 6.
On June 25, 1990 the NRC issued Generic Letter (G.f.) 90-06:                              Resolution of Generic Issue 70, "Pover-Operated Relief Valve and Block Valve Reliability," and Generic Issue 94, " Additional Low-Temperature Overpressure Protection for Light-Vater Reactors." In G.L. 90-06 the NRC delineated specific recommendations which address the concerns of Generic Issues 70 and 94. Vith regard to lov temperature overpressure protection, the NRC requested utilities to commit to modify the RCS low-temperature overpressure protection (LTOP) system technical specification to account for the increased likelihood of an overpressure event during operating l          Modes 5 and 6.
l i
l i
Alabama Power Company provided an initial response to G.L. 90-06 by letter December 14, 1990.                            In the December 14, 1990 letter, Alabama Power Company committed to submit a proposed change to the LTOP technical specification or a justification for not changing the current technical specification by the end of the Unit 1 tenth refueling outage. By this letter Alabama Power Company requests a change to the LTOP technical specification in order to address the concerns of Generic Issue 94, and as such, fulfills the previous commitment.
Alabama Power Company provided an initial response to G.L. 90-06 by letter December 14, 1990.                            In the {{letter dated|date=December 14, 1990|text=December 14, 1990 letter}}, Alabama Power Company committed to submit a proposed change to the LTOP technical specification or a justification for not changing the current technical specification by the end of the Unit 1 tenth refueling outage. By this letter Alabama Power Company requests a change to the LTOP technical specification in order to address the concerns of Generic Issue 94, and as such, fulfills the previous commitment.
Alabama Power Company has reviewed the recommendations of G.L. 90-06 and the supporting analysis reported in NUREG-1326, " Regulatory Analysis for the Resolution of Generic Issue 94 Additional Low-Temperature Overpressure Protection for Light-Vater Reactors," and agrees with the NRC's conclusion that the greatest risk of an overpressure event occurs during vater-solid i          operation. At Farley Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 the residual heat removal (RilR) safety relief valves provide LTOP protection for the RCS.
Alabama Power Company has reviewed the recommendations of G.L. 90-06 and the supporting analysis reported in NUREG-1326, " Regulatory Analysis for the Resolution of Generic Issue 94 Additional Low-Temperature Overpressure Protection for Light-Vater Reactors," and agrees with the NRC's conclusion that the greatest risk of an overpressure event occurs during vater-solid i          operation. At Farley Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 the residual heat removal (RilR) safety relief valves provide LTOP protection for the RCS.
b*            ()f
b*            ()f

Latest revision as of 15:12, 27 September 2022

Application for Amend to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,changing Tech Specs Per Generic Ltr 90-06.Forwards Nonproprietary WCAP-12955 & Proprietary WCAP-12933, Allowable Outage Time Study for RHR Valves.... Rept Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)
ML20073P115
Person / Time
Site: Farley  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 05/13/1991
From: Woodard J
ALABAMA POWER CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML19298E517 List:
References
REF-GTECI-070, REF-GTECI-094, REF-GTECI-NI, TASK-070, TASK-094, TASK-70, TASK-94, TASK-OR GL-90-06, GL-90-6, NUDOCS 9105200346
Download: ML20073P115 (4)


Text

F *

' .c w ., o , ,

,.r, J.: , s, t 4 6y, ,

t4 4 , e, ,

, c .e , , .i

,f. Ia i m

J D. woodard /MillKilllillhWel~

o, ,

, i,s-bhy 13,1991 10 CFR 50.90 Docket Nos. 50-348 50-364 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Vashington, DC 20555 Joseph H. Farley Nuclear Plant Low-Temperature Overpressure Protection Technical Specification Change Per Generic Letter 90-06 Gentlemen:

On June 25, 1990 the NRC issued Generic Letter (G.f.) 90-06: Resolution of Generic Issue 70, "Pover-Operated Relief Valve and Block Valve Reliability," and Generic Issue 94, " Additional Low-Temperature Overpressure Protection for Light-Vater Reactors." In G.L. 90-06 the NRC delineated specific recommendations which address the concerns of Generic Issues 70 and 94. Vith regard to lov temperature overpressure protection, the NRC requested utilities to commit to modify the RCS low-temperature overpressure protection (LTOP) system technical specification to account for the increased likelihood of an overpressure event during operating l Modes 5 and 6.

l i

Alabama Power Company provided an initial response to G.L. 90-06 by letter December 14, 1990. In the December 14, 1990 letter, Alabama Power Company committed to submit a proposed change to the LTOP technical specification or a justification for not changing the current technical specification by the end of the Unit 1 tenth refueling outage. By this letter Alabama Power Company requests a change to the LTOP technical specification in order to address the concerns of Generic Issue 94, and as such, fulfills the previous commitment.

Alabama Power Company has reviewed the recommendations of G.L. 90-06 and the supporting analysis reported in NUREG-1326, " Regulatory Analysis for the Resolution of Generic Issue 94 Additional Low-Temperature Overpressure Protection for Light-Vater Reactors," and agrees with the NRC's conclusion that the greatest risk of an overpressure event occurs during vater-solid i operation. At Farley Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 the residual heat removal (RilR) safety relief valves provide LTOP protection for the RCS.

b* ()f

ggse M88@ F# ' /4' '

P

/

],, o g

P U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 A plant-specific probabilistic risk assessment was performed for the case with one RHR relief valve out of service using assumptions and methods similar to those utilized in NUREG-1326. The assessment shows that a substantial reduction in risk from an overpressure event can be achieved by applying greater restrictions upon plant operation with one LTOP channel inoperable when in a vater-solid configuration than that currently requiced by the technical specification. An approximate 54 percent reduction in core damage frequency can be realized by reducing the allowed outage time for an RHB telief valve from the current seven days to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> for vater-solid operation. Therefore, Alabama Power Company provides as Attachment 1 a proposed change to the LTOP technical specification to reduce the allowed outage time for an inoperable RHR relief valve frnm the current seven days to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> when operating with the RCS in a vate -solid condition. The supporting significant hazards evaluation pursuant sa 10 CFR 50.92 is provided as Attachment 2. Based upon the analysis provided, Alabama Power Company has determined that the proposed change to the technical specifications does not involve a significant hazards consideration as defined by 10 CFR 50.92.

Alabama Power Company has evaluated the risk from an overpressure event during Modes 5 and 6 when the RCS is not vater-solid. Based upon the analysis performed, Alabama Power Company believes the reduction in risk realized from a more restrictive allowed outage time for an LTOP channel is insignificant for times other than when the RCS is vater-solid. The analysis concludes that only an additional 4.6 percent redaction in core damage frequency can be achieved by reducing the allowed outage time for an RHR relief valve for all times during Modes 5 and 6 including non-vater-solid conditions. Therefore, Alabama Power Company does not propose to modify the current seven-day LCC for an inoperable RHR relief valve for operation in non-vater-solid conditions. The results of the analysis to support this position are provided in the accompanying Vestinghouse report.

Provided as Attachment 3 are the results of the probabilistic risk assessment study as documented in Vestinghouse report VCAP-12933,

" Allowable Outage Time Study for Tesidual Heat Removal Valves for Farley Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2" (proprietary) and VCAP-12955, "Allovable Outage Time Study for Residual Heat Removal Valves for Farley Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2" (non-proprietary). Provided with Attachment 3 are a Vestinghouse authorization letter, CAV-91-159, accompanying affidavit, Proprietary Information Notice and a Copyright Notice. As VCAP-12933 contains information proprietary to Vestinghouse Electric Corporation, it is supported by an affidavit signed by Vestinghouse, the evner of the information. The affidavit sets forth the basis upon which the information may be withheld from public disclosure by the Commission and addresses with specificity the considerations listed in Paragraph (b)(4) of Section 2.790 of the Commission's regulations. Accordingly, it is respectively requested that the information which is proprietary to Vestinghouse be withheld from public disclosure in accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations. Correspondence with respect to the copyright or proprietary aspects of the items listed above or the supporting Vestinghouse affidavit should reference CAV-91-159 and should be addressed to Mr. R. P. DiPiazza, Manager, Operating Plant Licensing Support, Vestinghouse Electric Corporation, P.O. Box 355, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230-0355.

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 3 The Plant Operations Reviev Committee has reviewed and approved these ptoposed changes and the Nuclear Operations Reviev Board vill review these proposed changes at a future meeting.

A copy of these proposed changes is being sent to Dr. C. E. Fox, the Alabama State Designee, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.91 (b)(1).

Respectfully submitted, ALABAMA POVER COMPANY

, , ut o J7 . Voodard JDV/BilV: map 0128 SVORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME Attachments Tl!IS /b DAY OF j2 r / _ 1991 cc Mr. S. D. Ebneter m7, , -

y Mr. S. T. flof f man Mr. G. F. Maxwell

/ h tk N' Notary Public /

-/)q?4v N1_

Dr. C. E. Fox / v-My Commission Expires: '/-/9 /dY

bei Mr. R. P. Mcdonald Mr. D. N. Morey Mr. J. E. Garlington Mr. K. V. McCracken Mr. C. D. Nesbitt Mr. J. V. McGovan Mr. O. Batum Mr. V. R. Bayne Commitment Tracking System (2) l l

l l